Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet which
has an excellent strength-ductility balance and excellent delayed fracture resistance
and which is a material suitable for use principally in ultra-high-strength automobile
structural parts such as center pillars and door impact beams for automobiles and
also relates to a method for manufacturing the same.
Background Art
[0002] In recent years, in Europe, regulations on CO
2 emissions from automobiles, which are mobile CO
2 emission sources, have been tightened because of concerns about global warming due
to increasing CO
2 emissions and therefore the improvement of automobile fuel efficiency has been strongly
required. The lightening of car bodies is effective in improving fuel efficiency;
however, since the safety of occupants needs to be ensured, the crash safety of lightweight
car bodies needs to be more ensured than ever. In order to cope with two requirements,
that is, the lightening of car bodies and the ensuring of crash safety, the gauge
reduction of steel sheets used is being attempted using materials with high specific
strength. In recent years, high-strength steel sheets with a tensile strength of 980
to 1180 MPa have been actively used for automobile structural parts such as center
pillars and door impact beams. However, there are increasing demands for lightweight
car bodies and therefore attempts are being made to manufacture more lightweight car
bodies using steel sheets stronger than 1180 MPa class steel sheets.
[0003] Since automobile structural parts are usually manufactured by press molding, the
ductility of materials significantly affects the press formability thereof. In view
of automobile crash safety, residual ductility after press molding is important. Since
the ductility of steel sheets usually decreases with an increase in strength, press
formability and residual ductility after press molding decrease with an increase in
strength. In high-strength materials with a tensile strength of greater than 980 MPa,
there are concerns about delayed fracture due to residual ductility after press molding
and hydrogen coming from surroundings. Therefore, in order to use high-strength cold-rolled
steel sheets for the above automobile structural parts, the high-strength cold-rolled
steel sheets need to have high press formability, high ductility, and excellent delayed
fracture resistance.
[0004] In order to cope with these requirements, various proposals have been made.
[0005] For example, Patent Literature 1 discloses an example in which a steel sheet assumed
to have a tensile strength of 1350 MPa and a tempered martensite single-phase microstructure
is obtained by quench and tempering although the percentages of phases are not described
therein. However, the total elongation of the steel sheet is small, 7%. Therefore,
it is extremely difficult to manufacture automobile safety parts from the steel sheet
by pressing. The martensite single-phase microstructure is probably obtained by quenching
and therefore the steel sheet probably has a seriously bad shape. This case needs
a step of correcting the shape thereof after annealing and therefore is not preferable
in terms of manufacture.
[0006] Patent Literature 2 discloses a TRIP (Transformation-Induced Plasticity) steel sheet
which has high strength and ductility and which is obtained by making use of strain-induced
transformation, that is, the transformation of retained austenite into martensite
by strain during deformation. In order to ensure the amount of retained austenite
necessary to develop a TRIP effect, this steel sheet contains 0.3% to 2% Al on a mass
basis. A large amount of Al causes a problem that casting defects are likely to be
caused. In order to allow retained austenite to remain in a microstructure, isothermal
holding needs to be performed at a temperature not lower than the Ms transformation
temperature in the course of cooling from the annealing temperature, which results
in an increased number of manufacturing steps. Since the change in rate of cooling
to the temperature of isothermal holding during operation causes a significant change
in material quality, operating conditions needs to be strictly controlled in order
to stably manufacture steel sheets with a certain level of quality, which is not preferable
in terms of manufacture.
[0007] Non-Patent Literatures 1 and 2 will be described in Examples.
Citation List
Patent Literature
[0008]
PTL 1: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2005-163055
PTL 2: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2006-307325
Non Patent Literature
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0010] The present invention has been made in view of the foregoing circumstances and has
an object to provide an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet which has excellent
delayed fracture resistance and a tensile strength of 1320 MPa or more and which does
not excessively contain a transition metal element, such as V or Mo, causing a significant
increase in alloying cost or Al, which may possibly cause casting defects, and to
provide a method for manufacturing the ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet.
Solution to Problem
[0011] In order to obtain a conventional ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet with
a tensile strength of 1320 MPa or more, a microstructure needs to be transformed into
a martensite single-phase microstructure by quenching. In the case where a microstructure
is a martensite single-phase, sufficient ductility cannot be achieved. Even if an
attempt is made to increase the ductility by tempering subsequent to quenching, the
strength is reduced and the ductility is apt not to be increased so much because of
the recovery of a dislocation microstructure in a martensite phase and the coarsening
of a carbide, such as Fe
3C, precipitated in the martensite phase.
[0012] On the other hand, in order to develop high ductility, TRIP steels have by ma use
of the many TRIP steels have been invented by making use of the strain-induced transformation
of a retained austenite. However, in order to develop a TRIP effect, a large amount
of an alloying element needs to be used to increase the stability of austenite and
isothermal holding needs to be precisely performed at a temperature not lower than
the Ms transformation temperature in the course of cooling from the annealing temperature,
which is not preferable in terms of manufacturing stability and manufacturing costs.
[0013] In view of delayed fracture resistance, hydrogen-trapping sites, which cause delayed
fracture, are preferably diminished as much as possible. Martensite phases are preferably
diminished as much as possible because a large number of dislocations serving as hydrogen-trapping
sites are introduced into the martensite phases during crystallographic transformation
from austenitic phases. Retained austenite, which contributes to an increase in ductility,
is known to serve as a hydrogen-trapping site like a dislocation and is present on
a grain boundary in the form of a film. Therefore, the penetration of hydrogen into
retained austenite may possibly cause grain boundary fracture to reduce delayed fracture
resistance. Thus, it is not preferred that a metal microstructure contains retained
austenite.
[0014] The inventors have made intensive studies to solve the above problems. As a result,
the inventors have elucidated that the balance between tensile strength and ductility
can be controlled in such a manner that a microstructure is converted into a microstructure
containing a tempered martensite phase and a ferrite phase and the volume fraction
of the tempered martensite phase is varied. The inventors have discovered a technique
in which a steel sheet with ultra-high strength is obtained in such a manner that
the hardness of the tempered martensite phase and that of the ferrite phase are increased
by the addition of C and Si the volume fraction of an untempered martensite phase
is reduced. The inventors have found that an ultra-high-strength steel sheet with
high ductility can be obtained.
[0015] In addition, the inventors have elucidated that the density of dislocations in a
microstructure can be significantly reduced as compared with a martensite single-phase
microstructure by precipitating a ferrite phase containing substantially no dislocation
in the microstructure and the amount of hydrogen permeating through steel can be significantly
reduced by diminishing hydrogen-trapping sites. The inventors have found that delayed
fracture resistance can be increased.
[0016] Furthermore, the inventors have found that in view of manufacturing steps, it is
effective the annealing temperature and the course of cooling are appropriately controlled
during annealing and cooling subsequent to cold rolling and tempering heat treatment
is performed at a temperature of 100°C to 300°C.
[0017] The present invention is based on the above findings. The scope of the present invention
is as described below.
[0018]
- (1) An ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet with excellent ductility and delayed
fracture resistance contains 0.15% to 0.25% C, 1.0% to 3.0% Si, 1.5% to 2.5% Mn, 0.05%
or less P, 0.02% or less S, 0.01% to 0.05% Al, and less than 0.005% N on a mass ratio,
the remainder being Fe and unavoidable impurities, and has a metal microstructure
containing 40% to 85% of a tempered martensite phase and 15% to 60% of a ferritic
phase on a volume fraction basis and a tensile strength of 1320 MPa or more.
[0019]
(2) The ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet with excellent ductility and delayed
fracture resistance specified in Item (1) further contains one or more of 0.1% or
less, 0.1% or less Ti, and 5 ppm to 30 ppm B on a mass ratio.
[0020]
(3) The ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet with excellent ductility and delayed
fracture resistance specified in Item (1) or (2) has a total elongation of 12% or
more.
[0021]
(4) A method for manufacturing an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet having
excellent ductility and delayed fracture resistance includes heating a steel slab
having the chemical composition specified in Item (1) or (2) to 1200°C or higher;
hot-rolling the steel slab at a finish rolling end temperature of 800°C or higher;
pickling the steel; cold-rolling the steel; continuously annealing the steel in such
a manner that the steel is held at a temperature ranging from the Ac1 transformation temperature to Ac3 transformation temperature thereof for 30 s to 1200 s, is cooled to a temperature
of 600°C to 800°C at an average cooling rate of 100 °C/s or less, and is then cooled
to 100°C or lower at an average cooling rate of 100 °C/s to 1000 °C/s; and tempering
the steel in such a manner that the steel is reheated and is held at a temperature
of 100°C to 300°C for 120 s to 1800 s.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0022] A cold-rolled steel sheet according to the present invention has extremely high tensile
strength, high ductility, and therefore excellent workability. Parts formed from the
cold-rolled steel sheet have resistance to delayed fracture due to hydrogen coming
from surroundings, that is, excellent delayed fracture resistance. For example, a
tensile strength of 1320 MPa or more, a total elongation of 12% or more, and such
delayed fracture resistance that fracture does not occur for 100 hours in a 25°C hydrochloric
acid environment with a pH of 3 can be readily achieved. Furthermore, a cold-rolled
steel sheet having such excellent properties as described above can be stably manufactured
by a method according to the present invention.
[0023] According to the present invention, the following sheet can be stably manufactured:
an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet which has a tensile strength of 1320
MPa or more and which exhibits excellent workability during forming. Parts formed
from the cold-rolled steel sheet by press molding have resistance to delayed fracture
due to hydrogen coming from surroundings, that is, excellent delayed fracture resistance.
Ultra-high-strength parts, such as automobile safety parts including center pillars
and impact beams, resistant to delayed fracture can be provided. Brief Description
of Drawing
[0024]
[Fig. 1] Fig. 1 is a schematic view of a 180-degree bent specimen subjected to stress
by bolting. Description of Embodiments
[0025] An ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet according to the present invention
has a specific chemical composition and a microstructure as described below. The chemical
composition of the cold-rolled steel sheet is first described.
(C: 0.15% to 0.25% by mass)
[0026] C is an element which stabilizes austenite and which is necessary to ensure the strength
of the steel sheet. When the content of C is less than 0.15% by mass, it is difficult
for a microstructure having a tempered martensite phase and a ferrite phase to stably
obtain a tensile strength of 1320 MPa or more. However, when the content of C is more
than 0.25% by mass, welded portions and heat-affected zones affected by welding are
significantly hardened and therefore weldability is reduced. Therefore, the content
of C is preferably 0.15% to 0.25% by mass and more preferably 0.18% to 0.22% by mass.
(Si: 1.0% to 3.0% by mass)
[0027] Si is a substitutional solid solution hardening element effective in hardening the
steel sheet. In order to develop this effect, the content of Si needs to be 1.0% by
mass or more. When the content of Si is more than 3.0% by mass, scales are significantly
formed during hot rolling and the failure rate of final products is increased, which
is not economically preferred. Therefore, the content of Si is 1.0% to 3.0% by mass.
(Mn: 1.5% to 2.5% by mass)
[0028] Mn is an element which stabilizes austenite and which is effective in hardening steel.
When the content of Mn is less than 1.5% by mass, it is difficult to stably manufacture
the steel sheet having a target strength because the hardenability of steel is insufficient,
the production of a ferrite phase during cooling from the annealing temperature and
the formation of pearlite and bainite begin early, and the strength is significantly
reduced. However, when the content thereof is more than 2.5% by mass, segregation
is serious, workability is deteriorated in some cases, and delayed fracture resistance
is reduced. Therefore, the content of Mn is preferably 1.5% to 2.5% by mass and more
preferably 1.5% to 2.0% by mass.
(P: 0.05% by mass or less)
[0029] P is an element conductive to grain boundary fracture due to grain boundary segregation
and therefore is preferably low. The upper limit thereof is 0.05% by mass and is preferably
0.010% by mass. In view of an increase in weldability, the upper limit thereof is
more preferably 0.008% by mass or less.
(S: 0.02% by mass or less)
[0030] S forms an inclusion, such as MnS, causing a reduction in impact resistance and/or
delayed fracture resistance and is preferably minimized. The upper limit thereof is
0.02% by mass and preferably 0.002% by mass.
(Al: 0.01% to 0.05% by mass)
[0031] A1 is an element effective in deoxidization. In order to achieve an effective deoxidizing
effect, the content thereof needs to be 0.01% by mass or more. However, when the content
thereof is excessive, more than 0.05% by mass, the steel sheet contains increased
amounts of inclusions and has reduced ductility. Therefore, the content of Al is 0.01%
to 0.05% by mass.
(N: less than 0.005% by mass)
[0032] When the content of N is 0.005% by mass or more, the formation of nitrides causes
a reduction in ductility at high temperature and low temperature. Therefore, the content
of N is less than 0.005% by mass.
[0033] The steel sheet may further contain one or more of Nb, Ti, and B as required. The
effect of the addition of these three elements and the preferred content thereof are
described below.
(Nb and Ti: 0.1% by mass or less)
[0034] Nb and Ti are elements which have a grain-refining effect and which are effective
in increasing the strength of the steel sheet; hence, the content of is preferably
0.015% by mass or more. However, when the content of each of Nb and Ti is more than
0.1% by mass, the effect thereof is saturated, which is not economically preferred.
Therefore, the content of each of Nb and Ti is 0.1% by mass or less.
(B: 5 ppm to 30 ppm by mass)
[0035] B is an element effective in increasing the strength of the steel sheet. When the
content of B is less than 5 ppm by mass, the strength-increasing effect of B cannot
be expected. However, when the content of B is more than 30 ppm by mass, hot workability
is reduced, which is not preferable in terms of manufacture. Therefore, the content
of B is 5 ppm to 30 ppm by mass.
[0036] The remainders other than the above components are Fe and unavoidable impuritzes.
[0037] The microstructure of the cold-rolled steel sheet is described below.
[0038] The inventors have made investigations to increase ductility affecting press moldability
and investigations to obtain a steel sheet exhibiting excellent delayed fracture resistance
after press molding. The inventors have found that the appropriate control of a microstructure
is important in exhibiting high ductility. In particular, it is important that the
microstructure contains 40% or more of a tempered martensite phase on a volume fraction
basis after continuous annealing, the remainder being a ferrite phase. The microstructure
is obtained by quenching from the annealing temperature and tempering subsequent to
quenching. According to this method, an ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet
with high ductility can be obtained without excessively using a transition metal element,
such as V or Mo, causing an increase in cost or an alloying element, such as Al, possibly
causing casting defects.
[0039] The less the amount of hydrogen permeating through steel is, the more excellent the
delayed fracture resistance is. An extremely large number of dislocations are introduced
into the tempered martensite phase by the crystallographic transformation from an
austenite phase to a martensite phase during quenching. When the microstructure contains
an appropriate amount of the ferrite phase, the number of the dislocations, which
serve as hydrogen-trapping sites causing delayed fracture, can be more significantly
reduced as compared with a tempered martensite single-phase microstructure and therefore
the amount of hydrogen permeating through can be reduced.
[0040] The tensile strength of steel with a microstructure containing a tempered martensite
phase and a ferrite phase increases with an increase in volume fraction of the tempered
martensite phase. This is because the hardness of the tempered martensite phase is
higher than the hardness of the ferrite phase, the tempered martensite phase, which
is a hard phase, exhibits resistance to deformation during tensile deformation, and
the larger the volume fraction of the tempered martensite phase is, the more the tensile
strength of the steel is close to the tensile strength of the tempered martensite
single-phase microstructure. In the range of each steel component specified herein,
a tensile strength of 1320 MPa or more is not achieved when the volume fraction of
the tempered martensite phase is less than 40%. Since ductility decreases with an
increase in volume fraction of the tempered martensite phase, a microstructure containing
more than 85% of the tempered martensite phase on a volume fraction basis cannot ensure
the volume fraction of the ferrite phase that is necessary to achieve a high ductility
of 12% or more in terms of total elongation and necessary to increase the delayed
fracture resistance. When the volume fraction of the ferrite phase is less than 15%,
a high ductility of 12% or more in terms of total elongation is not achieved or an
increase in delayed fracture resistance not sufficient. However, when the volume fraction
thereof is more than 60%, the volume fraction of the tempered martensite phase that
is necessary to achieve a predetermined strength cannot be ensured.
[0041] From the above reasons, in the microstructure of the cold-rolled steel sheet according
to the present invention, the volume fraction of the tempered martensite phase and
that of the ferrite phase are 40% to 85% and 15% to 60%, respectively, and more preferably
60% to 85% and 15% to 40%, respectively. The microstructure of the cold-rolled steel
sheet according to the present invention may be a two-phase microstructure containing
a tempered martensite phase and ferrite phase each having a desired volume fraction
and may contain a constituent phase, such as a retained austenite phase, a bainite
phase, or a pearlite phase, other than these two phases. However, large amounts of
the bainite and Pearlite phases are present, the bainite phase and the pearlite phase
cause a reduction in ductility and a reduction in strength, respectively. Therefore,
it is not preferable that the microstructure contains large amounts of the bainite
and pearlite phases. The retained austenite phase is principally present at a grain
boundary in the form of a film, serves as a hydrogen-trapping site, and therefore
may possibly act as an origin of fracture due to hydrogen embrittlement; hence, the
content thereof is preferably minimized. Therefore, in the present invention, the
volume fraction of the constituent phase (the retained austenite phase, the bainite
phase, or the pearlite phase) other than the tempered martensite phase and the ferrite
phase is preferably 1% or less in total.
[0042] The tensile strength and ductility (total elongation as determined by a tensile test
using a JIS No. 5 tensile specimen) intended by the present invention are 1320 MPa
or more and 12% or more, respectively. The total elongation corresponds to the minimum
elongation capable of pressing automobile structural parts such as impact beams. In
the present invention, such a strength level and elongation level can be readily achieved.
The delayed fracture resistance intended by the present invention is such a performance
that fracture does not occur for 100 hours in a 25°C hydrochloric acid environment
with a pH of 3. In the present invention, such a performance can be readily achieved.
[0043] Applications of the cold-rolled steel sheet according to the present invention are
not particularly limited. Since the cold-rolled steel sheet has the above properties,
the cold-rolled steel sheet is particularly suitable for ultra-high-strength automobile
safety parts such as automobile door impact beams and center pillars. Steel sheets
intended by the present invention include steel strips. The cold-rolled steel sheet
according to the present invention may be subjected to surface treatment such as plating
(electroplating or the like) or chemical conversion so as to be used as a surface-treated
steel sheet.
[0044] A method for manufacturing the ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet according
to the present invention will now be described.
[0045] In the present invention, steel with the above composition is produced and is then
continuously cast into a cast slab (slab). After being heated to 1200°C or higher,
the slab is hot-rolled at a finish rolling end temperature of 800°C or higher. Reasons
for limiting hot rolling are described below.
(Slab-heating temperature of 1200°C or higher)
[0046] When the heating temperature of the slab is lower than 1200°C, an increase in rolling
load increases the risk of causing troubles during hot rolling. Thus, the heating
temperature of the slab is 1200°C or higher. When the heating temperature thereof
is excessively high, an increase in oxidation causes an increase in scale loss. Thus,
the heating temperature of the slab is preferably 1300°C or lower.
(Finish rolling end temperature of 800°C or higher)
[0047] When the finish rolling end temperature is 800°C or higher, a uniform hot-rolled
microstructure can be obtained. When the finish rolling end temperature is lower than
800°C, the microstructure of the steel sheet is nonuniform, the ductility thereof
is, and the risk of causing various failures during molding is increased. Thus, the
finish rolling end temperature is 800°C or higher. The upper limit of the finish rolling
end temperature is not particularly limited and is preferably 1000°C or lower because
rolling at excessively high temperature causes scale defects.
[0048] The hot-rolled steel sheet is coiled. The coiling temperature thereof is not particularly
limited. When the coiling temperature thereof is excessively high, the microstructure
of the steel sheet is nonuniform and the ductility thereof is low, due to formation
of coarse grains. When the coiling temperature thereof is excessively low, a deformed
microstructure caused by hot rolling remains to increase the rolling load in cold
rolling subsequent to hot rolling. Therefore, the coiling temperature thereof is preferably
600°C to 700°C. In particular, the coiling temperature thereof is preferably 600°C
to 650°C.
[0049] The hot-rolled steel sheet is pickled, is cold-rolled, is continuously annealed,
and is then tempered. Pickling and cold rolling conditions are not particularly limited.
The steel sheet is continuously annealed in such a manner that the steel sheet is
held at a temperature ranging from the Ac
1 transformation temperature to Ac
3 transformation temperature thereof for 30 s to 1200 s, is cooled to a temperature
of 600°C to 800°C at an average cooling rate of 100 °C/s or less, and is then cooled
to 100°C or lower at an average cooling rate of 100 °C/s to 1000 °C/s. The steel sheet
is subsequently tempered in such a manner that the steel sheet is reheated and is
held at a temperature of 100°C to 300°C for 120 s to 1800 s. Reasons for limiting
continuous annealing and tempering conditions are described below.
(Annealing temperature: holding at temperature ranging from Ac1 transformation temperature to Ac3 transformation temperature for 30 s to 1200 s)
[0050] When the annealing temperature is lower than the Ac
1 transformation temperature, an austenite phase (transformed into a martensite phase
after quenching) necessary to ensure a predetermined strength is not produced during
annealing and therefore such a predetermined strength cannot be achieved even if quenching
is performed subsequently to annealing. Even if the annealing temperature is higher
than the Ac
3 transformation temperature, 40% or more of the martensite phase can be obtained on
a volume fraction basis by controlling a ferrite phase precipitated during cooling
from the annealing temperature. In the case of performing annealing at a temperature
higher than the Ac
3 transformation temperature, a desired microstructure is unlikely to be obtained.
Therefore, the annealing temperature ranges from the Ac
1 transformation temperature to the Ac
3 transformation temperature. In view of stably ensuring the equilibrium volume fraction
of the austenite phase to be 40% or more within this temperature range, 760°C or higher
is preferred and 780°C or higher is more preferred. When the holding time (annealing
time) at the annealing temperature is excessively short, a microstructure is not sufficiently
annealed, a nonuniform microstructure in which a deformed microstructure caused by
hot rolling is present is caused, and the ductility is reduced. However, when the
holding time is excessively long, an increase in manufacturing time is caused, which
is not preferable in terms of manufacturing costs. Therefore, the holding time is
30 seconds to 1200 seconds. In particular, the holding time is preferably 250 seconds
to 600 seconds.
(Cooling (annealing) to temperature of 600°C to 800°C at average cooling rate of 100
°C/s or less)
[0051] The steel sheet is cooled (the term "cool" is hereinafter referred to as "anneal"
in some cases) to a temperature (annealing end temperature) of 600°C to 800°C from
the annealing temperature at an average cooling rate of 100 °C/s or less. The ferrite
phase is precipitated during annealing from the annealing temperature and the strength-ductility
balance can be thereby controlled. When the annealing end temperature is lower than
600°C, a large amount of pearlite is formed in the microstructure to cause a significant
reduction in strength and therefore a tensile strength of 1320 MPa cannot be achieved.
When the annealing end temperature is higher than 800°C, a sufficient amount of the
ferrite phase cannot be precipitated during annealing from the annealing temperature
and therefore sufficient ductility cannot be achieved. Therefore, the annealing end
temperature is 600°C to 800°C. In view of suppressing a change in material quality
due to an operational change in annealing end temperature, the annealing end temperature
is preferably 700°C to 750°C.
[0052] When the average annealing rate during annealing is more than 100 °C/s, a sufficient
amount of the ferrite phase is not precipitated and therefore predetermined ductility
cannot be achieved. The ductility of the microstructure, which contains the tempered
martensite phase and the ferrite phase as intended by the present invention, results
from high work hardenability developed by the coexistence of the tempered martensite
phase, which is hard, and the ferrite phase, which is soft. When the average annealing
rate is more than 100 °C/s, the concentration of carbon in the austenite phase during
annealing is insufficient and therefore a hard martensite phase cannot be obtained
during quenching. As a result, the work hardenability of a final microstructure is
reduced and therefore sufficient ductility is not achieved. Therefore, the average
annealing rate during annealing is 100 °C/s or less. In order to sufficiently concentrate
carbon in the austenitic phase, the average annealing rate is preferably 5 °C/s or
less.
(Cooling (quenching) to 100°C or lower at average cooling rate of 100 °C/s to 1000
°C/s)
[0053] Subsequently to annealing, the steel sheet is cooled (the term "cool" is hereinafter
referred to as "quench" in some cases) to a temperature (cooling end temperature)
of 100°C or lower at an average cooling rate of 100 °C/s to 1000 °C/s. Quenching subsequent
to annealing is performed for the purpose of transforming the austenite phase into
the martensite phase. When the average cooling rate is less than 100 °C/s, the austenite
phase is transformed into the ferrite phase, a bainite phase, or a pearlite phase
during cooling and therefore a predetermined strength cannot be achieved. However,
when the average cooling rate is more than 1000 °C/s, shrinkage cracks may possibly
be induced in the steel sheet by cooling. Therefore, the average cooling rate during
quenching is 100 °C/s to 1000 °C/s. The steel sheet is preferably cooled by water
quenching.
[0054] The cooling end temperature is preferably 100°C or lower. When the cooling end temperature
is higher than 100°C, the volume fraction of the martensite phase is reduced because
of the insufficient transformation of austenite phase into martensite phase during
quenching and a reduction in material strength is caused by the self-tempering of
the martensite phase produced by quenching, which is not preferable in terms of manufacture.
(Tempering: holding at temperature of 100°C to 300°C for 120 seconds to 1800 seconds)
[0055] Subsequently to quenching, the steel sheet is tempered for the purpose of tempering
the martensite phase in such a manner that the steel sheet is reheated and is then
held at a temperature of 100°C to 300°C for 120 seconds to 1800 seconds. The tempering
thereof softens the martensite phase to increase the workability. In the case of performing
tempering at lower than 100°C, the softening of martensite is insufficient and therefore
the effect of increasing the workability cannot be expected. Performing tempering
at higher than 300°C increases manufacturing costs for reheating, causes a significant
reduction in strength, and is incapable of achieving a useful effect.
[0056] When the holding time is less than 120 s, martensite phase is not sufficiently softened
at a holding temperature and therefore the effect of increasing the workability cannot
be expected. When the holding time is more than 1800 s, the strength is significantly
reduced because of the excessive softening of martensite phase and manufacturing costs
are increased because of an increase in reheating time, which is not preferable.
[0057] The ultra-high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet according to the present invention
can be manufactured through the above manufacturing steps. Since the ultra-high-strength
cold-rolled steel sheet according to the present invention has excellent shapeability
(flatness) after annealing, a step of correcting the shape of the steel sheet by rolling,
leveling, or the like is not necessarily needed. In view of adjusting the quality
and/or surface roughness thereof, the annealed steel sheet may be rolled with an elongation
of several percent.
Examples
[0058] Test Steels A to M with compositions shown in Table 1 were produced in a vacuum and
were then formed into slabs, which were hot-rolled under conditions shown in Table
2, whereby hot-rolled steel sheets with a thickness of 3.4 mm were prepared. The hot-rolled
steel sheets were surface-descaled by pickling and were then cold-rolled to a thickness
of 1.4 mm. The cold-rolled steel sheets were continuously annealed and tempered under
conditions shown in Table 2. The Ac
1 transformation temperature and Ac
3 transformation temperature of each steels is determined from relational equations
(the following two equations) described in Non-Patent Literatures 1 and 2, the equations
being involved in the dependence of transformation temperature on alloying components:

[0059]
[Table 1]
Steel symbol |
Composition (% by mass) |
AC1 transformation temperature (°C) |
AC3 transformation temperature (°C) |
Remarks |
C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
Al |
N |
Ti |
Nb |
B |
|
|
A |
0.15 |
1.48 |
1.8 |
0.007 |
0.0011 |
0.028 |
0.0031 |
- |
- |
- |
747 |
837 |
Inventive steel |
B |
0.18 |
1.48 |
1.8 |
0.007 |
0.0008 |
0.031 |
0.0036 |
- |
- |
- |
747 |
830 |
Inventive steel |
C |
0.25 |
1.49 |
1.8 |
0.010 |
0.0014 |
0.027 |
0.0024 |
- |
- |
- |
747 |
816 |
Inventive steel |
D |
0.20 |
1.03 |
1.8 |
0.011 |
0.0008 |
0.027 |
0.0027 |
- |
- |
- |
734 |
814 |
Inventive steel |
E |
0.18 |
2.97 |
1.8 |
0.010 |
0.0009 |
0.025 |
0.0028 |
- |
- |
- |
790 |
873 |
Inventive steel |
F |
0.20 |
1.52 |
1.5 |
0.011 |
0.0007 |
0.033 |
0.0028 |
- |
- |
- |
751 |
839 |
Inventive steel |
G |
0.19 |
1.54 |
2.4 |
0.009 |
0.0018 |
0.024 |
0.0033 |
- |
- |
- |
742 |
810 |
Inventive steel |
H |
0.18 |
1.51 |
1.8 |
0.010 |
0.0009 |
0.026 |
0.0036 |
0.04 |
- |
- |
748 |
847 |
Inventive steel |
I |
0.18 |
1.50 |
1.8 |
0.010 |
0.0010 |
0.038 |
0.0035 |
- |
0.04 |
- |
747 |
836 |
Inventive steel |
J |
0.19 |
1.49 |
1.8 |
0.009 |
0.0010 |
0.033 |
0.0029 |
- |
- |
0.002 |
747 |
830 |
Inventive steel |
K |
0.19 |
1.48 |
1.8 |
0.007 |
0.0012 |
0.035 |
0.0037 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.002 |
747 |
845 |
Inventive steel |
L |
0.12 |
1.46 |
2.0 |
0.011 |
0.0011 |
0.029 |
0.0041 |
- |
- |
- |
744 |
841 |
Comparative steel |
M |
0.15 |
0.44 |
1.6 |
0.009 |
0.0010 |
0.022 |
0.0038 |
- |
- |
- |
719 |
811 |
Comparative steel |
[0060]
[Table 2]
No. |
Steel symbol |
Hot rolling step |
Annealing step |
Tempering step |
Remarks |
Slab-heating temperature (°C) |
Finish rolling temperature (°C) |
Coiling temperature (°C) |
Annealing temperature (°C) |
Holding time (s) |
Annealing average cooling rate (°C/s) |
Annealing end temperature (°C) |
Quenching average cooling rate (°C/s) |
Cooling end temperature (°C) |
Tempering temperature (°C) |
Holding time (s) |
1 |
A |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
830 |
600 |
5 |
750 |
904 |
25 |
150 |
1200 |
Example |
2 |
B |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
14 |
690 |
751 |
24 |
150 |
1200 |
Example |
3 |
B |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
14 |
710 |
814 |
22 |
200 |
1200 |
Example |
4 |
B |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
5 |
750 |
973 |
31 |
300 |
1200 |
Example |
5 |
B |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
830 |
600 |
19 |
700 |
883 |
28 |
300 |
1200 |
Example |
6 |
C |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
22 |
650 |
885 |
25 |
200 |
1200 |
Example |
7 |
C |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
4 |
680 |
833 |
20 |
200 |
1200 |
Example |
8 |
D |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
5 |
700 |
910 |
22 |
200 |
1200 |
Example |
9 |
E |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
15 |
750 |
837 |
21 |
150 |
1200 |
Example |
10 |
E |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
13 |
750 |
767 |
21 |
200 |
1200 |
Example |
11 |
F |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
5 |
750 |
681 |
22 |
150 |
1200 |
Example |
12 |
G |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
780 |
600 |
4 |
620 |
753 |
24 |
200 |
1200 |
Example |
13 |
H |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
5 |
700 |
625 |
19 |
150 |
1200 |
Example |
14 |
H |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
12 |
730 |
869 |
19 |
200 |
1200 |
Example |
15 |
I |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
4 |
680 |
867 |
23 |
150 |
1200 |
Example |
16 |
I |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
5 |
710 |
855 |
22 |
200 |
1200 |
Example |
17 |
J |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
3 |
720 |
774 |
22 |
200 |
1200 |
Example |
18 |
K |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
5 |
720 |
864 |
23 |
150 |
1200 |
Example |
19 |
K |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
19 |
740 |
995 |
23 |
200 |
1200 |
Example |
20 |
B |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
30 |
12 |
700 |
887 |
21 |
200 |
1200 |
Example |
21 |
B |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
1200 |
5 |
700 |
646 |
20 |
200 |
1200 |
Example |
22 |
F |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
4 |
750 |
964 |
25 |
150 |
150 |
Example |
23 |
F |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
4 |
750 |
738 |
24 |
150 |
1800 |
Example |
24 |
E |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
10 |
14 |
700 |
846 |
23 |
300 |
1200 |
Comparative Example |
25 |
K |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
900 |
600 |
24 |
800 |
967 |
22 |
300 |
1200 |
Comparative Example |
26 |
L |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
830 |
600 |
19 |
650 |
941 |
19 |
300 |
1200 |
Comparative Example |
27 |
M |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
800 |
600 |
11 |
700 |
910 |
25 |
200 |
1200 |
Comparative Example |
28 |
M |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
780 |
600 |
10 |
700 |
809 |
25 |
200 |
1200 |
Comparative Example |
29 |
M |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
780 |
600 |
12 |
750 |
811 |
26 |
200 |
1200 |
Comparative Example |
30 |
A |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
830 |
600 |
16 |
500 |
786 |
20 |
200 |
1200 |
Comparative Example |
31 |
A |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
780 |
600 |
20 |
750 |
20 |
19 |
200 |
1200 |
Comparative Example |
32 |
B |
1250 |
900 |
650 |
830 |
600 |
19 |
700 |
889 |
20 |
400 |
120 |
Comparative Example |
[0061] Specimens were taken from the steel sheets obtained through the above manufacturing
steps, were observed (measured) for microstructure, and were subjected to a tensile
test. Furthermore, some of the steels were subjected to a delayed fracture test. The
results are shown in Table 3.
[0062] The observation (measurement) of microstructure and performance tests were conducted
as described below.
(1) Observation of microstructure
[0063] Specimens were taken from the obtained cold-rolled steel sheets. A surface of each
specimen that was parallel to the rolling direction was mirror-polished and was etched
with nital. The microstructure thereof was observed and photographed with an optical
microscope or a scanning electron microscope, whereby the type of a constituent phase
such as a tempered martensite phase or a ferrite phase was identify. A photograph
of the microstructure was binarized, whereby the volume fraction of each of the tempered
martensite phase and the ferrite phase was determined. Since there was a possibility
that a retained austenite phase was present in the obtained cold-rolled steel sheets,
attempts were made to measure examples of the present invention for retained austenite
phase by X-ray (Mo-Kα) determination. However, the amount of the retained austenite
phase present therein was substantially zero and therefore was not included in the
remainder shown in Table 3.
(2) Tensile test
[0064] JIS No. 5 tensile specimens were taken from the obtained cold-rolled steel sheets
in a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction and were subjected to a tensile
test according to JIS Z 2241, whereby the specimens were determined for tensile property
(0.2% proof stress (YS)), tensile strength (TS), and total elongation (EL).
(3) Delayed fracture characterization test
[0065] A specimen with a size of 30 mm × 100 mm was cut out of each of the obtained cold-rolled
steel sheets such that the longitudinal direction of the specimen corresponded to
the rolling direction of the cold-rolled steel sheets. An end surface of the specimen
was ground. The specimen was bent to 180 degrees using a punch having a tip with a
radius of curvature of 10 mm. As shown in Fig. 1, the springback caused in the bent
specimen was retained with a bolt 2 such that the distance between inner portions
of the specimen 1 was 20 mm. After the specimen 1 was stressed, the specimen 1 was
immersed in hydrochloric acid with a pH of 3 at 25°C and was measured for up to 100
hours until the specimen 1 was broken. A specimen that was not broken within 100 hours
was judged to be acceptable.
[0066]
[Table 3]
No. |
Steel symbol |
Volume fraction of tempered martensite (%) |
Volume fraction of ferrite (%) |
Other constituent phase |
YS (MPa) |
TS (MPa) |
EL (%) |
Results of delayed fracture characterization test |
Remarks |
1 |
A |
85 |
15 |
- |
972 |
1349 |
14 |
Acceptable |
Example |
2 |
B |
64 |
36 |
- |
878 |
1338 |
14 |
Acceptable |
Example |
3 |
B |
74 |
26 |
- |
1024 |
1363 |
15 |
Acceptable |
Example |
4 |
B |
81 |
19 |
- |
1135 |
1326 |
14 |
Acceptable |
Example |
5 |
B |
85 |
15 |
- |
1166 |
1359 |
12 |
Acceptable |
Example |
6 |
C |
60 |
40 |
- |
819 |
1378 |
16 |
Acceptable |
Example |
7 |
C |
63 |
37 |
- |
798 |
1336 |
17 |
Acceptable |
Example |
8 |
D |
81 |
19 |
- |
1037 |
1347 |
13 |
Acceptable |
Example |
9 |
E |
45 |
55 |
- |
789 |
1361 |
19 |
Acceptable |
Example |
10 |
E |
45 |
55 |
- |
863 |
1332 |
19 |
Acceptable |
Example |
11 |
F |
68 |
32 |
- |
911 |
1341 |
14 |
Acceptable |
Example |
12 |
G |
60 |
40 |
- |
953 |
1401 |
13 |
Acceptable |
Example |
13 |
H |
61 |
39 |
- |
819 |
1327 |
15 |
Acceptable |
Example |
14 |
H |
72 |
28 |
- |
1092 |
1394 |
14 |
Acceptable |
Example |
15 |
I |
65 |
35 |
- |
789 |
1325 |
13 |
Acceptable |
Example |
16 |
I |
74 |
26 |
- |
1005 |
1368 |
15 |
Acceptable |
Example |
17 |
J |
80 |
20 |
- |
1080 |
1384 |
13 |
Acceptable |
Example |
18 |
K |
60 |
40 |
- |
796 |
1323 |
16 |
Acceptable |
Example |
19 |
K |
69 |
31 |
- |
1008 |
1328 |
15 |
Acceptable |
Example |
20 |
B |
71 |
29 |
- |
997 |
1349 |
14 |
Acceptable |
Example |
21 |
B |
75 |
25 |
- |
976 |
1354 |
14 |
Acceptable |
Example |
22 |
F |
69 |
31 |
- |
941 |
1364 |
14 |
Acceptable |
Example |
23 |
F |
70 |
30 |
- |
1012 |
1322 |
13 |
Acceptable |
Example |
24 |
E |
32 |
58 |
Pearlite |
951 |
1068 |
9 |
- |
Comparative Example |
25 |
K |
100 |
0 |
- |
1348 |
1498 |
7 |
Unacceptable |
Comparative Example |
26 |
L |
52 |
48 |
- |
889 |
1075 |
19 |
- |
Comparative Example |
27 |
M |
42 |
58 |
- |
632 |
993 |
13 |
- |
Comparative Example |
28 |
M |
48 |
52 |
- |
668 |
991 |
14 |
- |
Comparative Example |
29 |
M |
100 |
0 |
- |
1136 |
1352 |
6 |
Unacceptable |
Comparative Example |
30 |
A |
24 |
66 |
Pearlite |
437 |
658 |
30 |
- |
Comparative Example |
31 |
A |
0 |
72 |
Pearlite |
462 |
578 |
32 |
- |
Comparative Example |
32 |
B |
72 |
28 |
- |
983 |
1166 |
14 |
- |
Comparative Example |
[0067] Tables 1 to 3 confirm that examples of the present invention meet requirements specified
herein and have a tensile strength of 1320 MPa or more, a total elongation of 12%
or more, a high strength-ductility balance, and excellent delayed fracture resistance
because the examples were not broken for 100 hours in the delayed fracture characterization
test.
[0068] No. 24, of which the annealing time is 10 seconds and therefore is outside the scope
of present invention, has no predetermined strength or ductility because a Pearlite
phase produced after hot rolling remains after annealing and the influence of strain
due to cold rolling is not sufficiently removed. Nos. 25 and 29, each of which the
annealing temperature is not lower than the Ac
3 temperature, cannot precipitate any ferrite phase during annealing, have a martensite
single-phase microstructure, and exhibit predetermined strength and no predetermined
ductility. Nos. 26 and 27, of which steel components are outside the scope of present
invention, have no predetermined strength although continuous annealing and tempering
were performed as specified herein. No. 30, of which the annealing end temperature
is 500°C, contains a large amount of a ferrite phase precipitated therein and a pearlite
phase and therefore has no predetermined strength. No. 31, of which the average cooling
rate in a quenching step is 20 °C/s and therefore is outside the scope of present
invention, cannot obtain a predetermined amount of a martensite phase and has no predetermined
strength. No. 32, of which the tempering temperature is 400°C, has no predetermined
strength because a martensite phase was excessively softened by tempering.
[0069] Example Nos. 1 to 23, which meet the requirements specified herein, were not broken
for 100 hours in the delayed fracture characterization test. This confirms that a
cold-rolled steel sheet obtained in accordance with the present invention has sufficient
delayed fracture resistance. However, Comparative Example Nos. 25 and 29, each of
which the microstructure is a tempered martensite single-phase which is outside the
scope of the present invention, were broken within 100 hours and therefore failed
in the delayed fracture characterization test.
Industrial Applicability
[0070] The present invention provides a thin steel sheet for quenching or tempering, the
thin steel sheet being suitable for use principally in ultra-high-strength automobile
structural parts such as door impact beams and center pillars for automobiles. In
advance of manufacturing automobile parts from the steel sheet, the composition, rolling
conditions, and annealing conditions are appropriately controlled. This allows the
steel sheet to have a microstructure containing 40% to 85% of a tempered martensite
phase and 15% to 60% of a ferrite phase on a volume fraction basis, a tensile strength
of 1320 MPa or more, a total elongation of 12% or more, an excellent strength-ductility
balance, and excellent delayed fracture resistance. The use of an ultra-high-strength
cold-rolled steel sheet according to the present invention enables the pressing of
automobile safety parts such as impact beams. The automobile safety parts exhibit
excellent delayed fracture resistance.
Reference Signs List