Field of the invention
[0001] The invention relates in general to methods for fermentation of lignocellulosic and/or
starch biomass and to methods for processing lignocellulosic feed stocks.
Background
[0002] An intense interest has arisen in fermentation of carbohydrate-rich biomass to provide
alternatives to petrochemical sources for fuels and for organic chemical precursors.
"First generation" bioethanol production from starch sources such as corn or wheat
have proved marginally economically viable on a production scale. "Second generation"
bioethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstocks, including municipal and agricultural
wastes, faces steeper obstacles to economic viability. Improvements that reduce costs
or improve yields or efficiencies of either first or second generation bioethanol
fermentation processes are, accordingly, advantageous.
[0003] One problem typically encountered in "second generation" bioethanol fermentation
is the presence of degradation products arising from pretreatment of lignocellulosic
feedstocks. These degradation products often act as fermentation inhibitors. The character
and relative amounts of degradation products formed depend on the lignocellulosic
feedstock used and on pretreatment conditions. For review, see
ref. 1. In high temperature pretreatments, formation of degradation products is generally
dependent on a combined severity factor, which relates reaction temperature and duration
as well as pH. Sugar degradation products such as furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural
(HMF) are formed in high temperature processes, in general, and in especially high
concentrations during severe acid pretreatment. Acetic acid is ubiquitous in lignocellulose
pretreatments, since hemicellulose and, to some extent, lignin are acetylated. Formic
acid is, also, often formed as are a variety of monomeric phenolic compounds derived
from lignin.
[0004] Four general strategies have previously been pursued for ameliorating deleterious
impact of fermentation inhibitors. First, development of mild pretreatment conditions
that minimize formation of inhibitory degradation products. Second, development of
post-pretreatment processes that actively "detoxify" biomasses prior to fermentation.
Third, selection and engineering of inhibitor-tolerant fermentive organisms. Finally,
development of pretreatment processes that effectively detoxify inhibitors, such as
"wet oxidation" in the presence of oxygen. For examples, see
ref. 2,
3 and 4.
[0005] Another problem typically encountered in both "first" and "second generation" bioethanol
fermentation is bacterial contamination of fermentation mixtures. In both first and
second generation fermentation processes, bacterial contamination has proved difficult
to avoid under non-sterile conditions. Lactic acid bacteria, in particular
Lactobacillus species, are the primary bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol fermentations. Production
facilities routinely monitor lactic acid concentrations of fermentation mixtures as
a measure of degree of contamination. Bacterial contamination reduces ethanol yields
and, also, increases costs. Contamination has previously been controlled by addition
of anti-bacterial agents or other asceptics or by pasteurization procedures between
or during the course of fermentation runs. See e.g.
ref. 5.
[0006] Here we report the surprising discovery that a range of concentrations exists in
which fermentation inhibitors derived from pretreatments of lignocellulosic feed stocks
will not affect fermentive yeast but will inhibit growth of lactic acid bacteria.
By optimizing levels of fermentation inhibitors to fall within this range, yeast fermentations
of lignocellulosic biomass can be conducted under non-sterile conditions with ethanol
yields comparable to those achieved under sterile conditions. Fermentation inhibitors
derived from pretreated lignocellulosic feed stocks can also be added to first generation
starch fermentations, permitting normal ethanol yields under non-sterile conditions.
Summary
[0007] Methods of bioethanol fermentation from starch and/or lignocellulosic biomass and
methods of processing lignocellulosic biomass are provided. The concentration of fermentation
inhibitors derived from pretreatment of lignocellulosic feed stock is controlled in
a fermentation mixture to fall within ranges of concentrations that inhibit contaminating
bacterial growth and/or lactate production while having substantially no effect on
ethanol fermentive microorganisms. In preferred embodiments, this optimisation of
inhibitor levels is achieved by controlling the water/biomass ratio of a lignocellulosic
biomass during and after pretreatment. In some embodiments, the water/biomass ratio
is controlled by washing the fiber fraction of a previously pretreated lignocellulosic
biomass with a pre-defined amount of fresh water or recycled process solutions. Also
provided are anti-bacterial compositions comprising fermentation inhibitors derived
from pretreatment of lignocellulosic feedstocks.
Brief description of the drawings
[0008]
Figure 1 shows a schematic illustration of process steps in pretreatment of lignocellulosic
biomass.
Figure 2 shows non-sterile pre-hydrolysis and fermentation of pretreated wheat straw
having a water/biomass ratio of 5:1. Glucose, ethanol, lactate and glycerol concentrations
are shown over the course of pre-hydrolysis and SSF.
Figure 3 shows non-sterile pre-hydrolysis and fermentation of pretreated wheat straw
having a water/biomass ratio of 5:1 (dotted curves) compared with 11:1 (full line
curves). Lactate concentrations are shown over the course of pre-hydrolysis and SSF.
Figure 4 shows non-sterile pre-hydrolysis and fermentation of pretreated bagasse having
water/biomass ratio 5:1. Ethanol, glucose and lactate concentrations are shown over
the course of the pre-hydrolysis and SSF.
Figure 5 shows non-sterile pre-hydrolysis and fermentation of pretreated corn stover
having water/biomass ratio 5:1. Ethanol, glucose and lactate concentrations are shown
over the course of the pre-hydrolysis and SSF.
Figure 6 shows effects of varying concentrations of liquid fraction from pretreated
lignocellulosic biomass on yeast (A) and Lactobacillus (B) growth over the course of glucose fermentation.
Figure 7 shows effects of varying concentrations of liquid fraction from pretreated
lignocellulosic biomass on glucose fermentation by yeast and Lactobacillus. Ethanol (A) and lactate (B) concentrations are shown over the course of the process.
Figure 8 shows effects of varying concentrations of liquid fraction from pretreated
lignocellulosic biomass on glucose consumption by yeast and Lactobacillus during glucose fermentation.
Figure 9 shows effects of varying concentrations of liquid fraction on yeast (A) and
Lactobacillus (B) growth during SSF of pretreated wheat straw.
Figure 10 shows effects of varying concentrations of liquid fraction on fermentation
of pretreated wheat straw. Ethanol (A) and lactate (B) concentrations are shown over
the course of the SSF process.
Figure 11 shows effects of varying concentrations of liquid fraction on fermentation
of hydrolysed wheat flour. Ethanol and lactate concentrations are shown over the course
of the SSF process.
Figure 12 shows effects of inhibitor dilution on yeast (A) and Lactobacillus (B) growth during non-sterile fermentation of pretreated wheat straw.
Figure 13 shows non-sterile fermentation of pretreated wheat straw having water/biomass
ratio 5:1 and further diluted with water or supplemented with liquid fraction. Ethanol
(A) and lactate (B) concentrations are shown over the course of the SSF process.
Detailed description of preferred embodiments
[0009] As used herein, the following terms have the following meanings:
(i). Starch biomass
[0010] Starch biomass refers to material derived from plants or other organisms in which
carbohydrate content includes at most a small component of cellulose and hemicellulose
but includes a significant component of starch, amylose, amylopectin or similar substance.
The term as used includes seeds, fruits, grains, roots, tubers, processed materials,
such as waste foods, and starch rich components of fuel crops. Starch biomass will
typically comprise water content. A mixture of water and/or other agents and/or solvents
comprising starch biomass as the predominant solid component can also be referred
to as "a" starch biomass within the meaning of the term as used.
(ii). Lignocellulosic biomass
[0011] Lignocellulosic biomass refers to material derived from plants or other organisms
in which carbohydrate content includes a substantial component of cellulose and hemicellulose
and which comprises more than 5% lignin. The term as used includes material that is
predominantly cellulose and hemicellulose as well as material that includes starch
content, including agricultural wastes, whole crops, substantially whole crops, stems,
stalks, leaves, starch-rich components, and processed materials, such as papers. A
lignocellulosic biomass may comprise a starch biomass. Lignocellulosic biomass will
typically comprise water content. A mixture of water and/or other agents and/or solvents
comprising lignocellulosic biomass as the predominant solid component can also be
referred to as "a" lignocellulosic biomass within the meaning of the term as used.
The carbohydrate composition of a lignocellulosic biomass may be changed during pretreatment.
(iii). Initially pretreated, pretreatment and post pretreatment processing
[0012] Pretreatment refers to a manipulation of lignocellulosic biomass that renders its
cellulosic component more accessible to enzymes that convert carbohydrate polymers
into fermentable sugars. "Initially pretreated" refers to a lignocellulosic biomass
that has been subjected to at least one pretreatment. A lignocellulosic biomass may
be pretreated and then, subsequently, subject to post pretreatment processing that
enhances yield or efficiency of fermentation or otherwise facilitates production scale
operations. The fiber fraction of a pretreated lignocellulosic biomass may comprise
all or part of dry matter obtained from pretreated biomass.
(iv). Fermentation inhibitor
[0013] Fermentation inhibitor refers to lignocellulose degradation products that can inhibit
growth of fermentive microorganisms at concentrations that can be achieved in common
lignocellulosic feedstock mixtures after thermal or acid pretreatment. Fermentation
inhibitors as used herein may include any of furfural, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, acetic
acid, phenol, catechol, coniferyl alcohol, furfuryl alcohol, guaiacol, hydroquinone,
methylcatechol, vanillyl alcohol, eugenol, isoeugenol, syringol, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde,
4-hydroxybenzalcohol, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 3-hydroxybenzoic acid, 2-hydroxybenzoic
acid, 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 2,6-dimethoxy-hydroquinone, 2-methylphenol, ethylcatechol,
d-furoic acid, syringic acid, 4-hydroxycinnamic acid, ferulic acid, vanillin, iso-vannillin,
ortho-vanillin, syringaldehyde, vanillic acid, acetovanillone, acetosyringone, dihydroconiferyl
aclcohol, coniferly aldehyde, p-coumaric acid, formic acid, levulinic acid, caproic
acid, 2-furoic acid, gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, homovanillic acid, 4-hydroxy
acetophenone, trimethothy benzaldehyde, trimethoxyacetophenone, or other lignocellulosic
degradation products not currently known that may subsequently be identified. The
term "fermentation inhibitor" as used here is distinct from "anti-bacterial agents"
and "asceptics," which are not derived from lignocellulose degradation.
(v). Severity index
[0014] Severity index refers to an optimization parameter for pretreatment relating the
combined effect of treatment time and temperature which is typically written as:

where
tr is reaction time in minutes and
Tr is reaction temperature.
(vi). Amount of fermentation inhibitors initially present
[0015] The expression "amount of fermentation inhibitors initially present" in a pretreated
lignocellulosic biomass refers to the amount present after an initial pretreatment
to combined severity index at least 3.0 but before any subsequent pretreatments, washing
steps or post pretreatment processing.
(vii). Sterile conditions
[0016] Sterile conditions refers to fermentation conditions in which effective amounts of
asceptics or anti-bacterial agents other than fermentation inhibitors, as defined
herein, have been added, or in which procedures have been employed to sterilize the
fermentation vessel. Effective amounts of asceptics or anti-bacterial agents are amounts
that would be sufficient, in the absence of fermentation inhibitors, to suppress bacterial
growth and/or lactate production such that lactate yield in the fermentation mixture
after the desired part of fermentable sugars have been converted would be lower than
about 4 g/ kg.
(viii). Non-sterile conditions
[0017] Refers to fermentation conditions other than "sterile conditions" as defined herein.
(ix). Fermentation mixture
[0018] Refers to a mixture comprising starch and/or pretreated lignocellulosic biomass and
one or more ethanol fermentive microorganisms. A fermentation mixture may comprise
the fiber fraction of a pretreated lignocellulosic biomass that has been previously
subject to partial or complete enzymatic hydrolysis and/or used in a simultaneous
saccharification and fermentation process. A fermentation mixture may comprise a starch
biomass, a lignocellulosic biomass or a mixture of both. A fermentation mixture may
be a continuous or semi-continuous culture, batch or fed-batch fermentation mixture.
(x) Ethanol yield
[0019] Ethanol yield refers to the amount of ethanol produced from a certain amount of fermentable
sugars. An example is: In a fermentation mixture comprising 30g/kg of glucose, the
fermentive microorganism converts all the glucose and the result is a fermentation
mixture comprising 15g/kg of ethanol. The ethanol yield is 0.50 g ethanol/g glucose.
Another example is a fermentation mixture comprising 45 g/kg cellulose, from which
30g/kg glucose are released. The % conversion of cellulose is 67%. The ethanol yield
is 0.50 g ethanol/g glucose. The term "theoretical yield" refers to yeast efficiency
in fermentation of glucose. In both examples, theoretical yield is 98%.
(xi). Optimised levels of fermentation inhibitors
[0020] The expression "optimised levels" of fermentation inhibitors refers to levels of
fermentation inhibitors achieved by controlling the water/biomass ratio of a pretreated
biomass or by otherwise adjusting the amounts present in a pretreated lignocellulosic
biomass and/or in a fermentation mixture in such manner that when the pretreated lignocellulosic
biomass is fermented in a fermentation mixture or when the fermentation mixture containing
optimised levels is fermented, contaminating bacterial growth and/or lactate production
is substantially inhibited while ethanol fermentative yeast are substantially unaffected.
Bacterial growth and/or lactate production is substantially inhibited where the lactate
yield in the fermentation mixture after the desired part of fermentable sugars have
been converted is lower than about 4 g/ kg. Ethanol fermentative yeast are substantially
unaffected where the yeast strains produce ethanol yields higher than about 75% theoretical
yield. Adjustment to optimized levels of fermentation inhibitors may include increasing
levels by addition of fermentation inhibitors derived from a pretreated lignocellulosic
biomass, or decreasing levels.
(xii) Fiber fraction of a pretreated lignocellulosic biomass
[0021] Fiber fraction of a pretreated lignocellulosic biomass is obtained from pretreatment
and/or post-pretreatment processes in which pretreated biomass is separated into at
least two fractions, one comprising predominantly liquid, and one comprising predominantly
insoluble materials. The fiber fraction is that fraction comprising predominantly
insoluble materials. The liquid fraction and fiber fraction may be separated in multiple
steps. For example, a pretreated biomass may be pressed once, separating a liquid
and fiber fraction, then subsequently washed and pressed again, separating, again,
a liquid and fiber fraction. A fiber fraction may be subject to enzymatic or chemical
hydrolysis and liquefaction prior to use in a fermentation mixture.
(xiii). Water/biomass ratio
[0022] Water/biomass ratio refers to the ratio between the initial non-water content of
a lignocellulosic biomass prior to pretreatment and the total amount of water to which
this material is exposed during and after pretreatment, including water present in
the biomass as it is pretreated and water introduced during pretreatment and post
pretreatment processing, except for water that is added separately in dilution of
liquid fraction. Water may be added as fresh water, condensate, recycled process solutions
or any combination thereof. Processing may include wash steps, preparation of fermentation
mixtures, introduction to continuous fermentation mixtures, and other processes after
pretreatment but preceding final ethanol yields. An example calculation of water/biomass
ratio is the following: 50 kg wheat straw having non-water content 92.0% is subject
to pretreatment involving soaking in dilute acid, steam treatment, washing after steam
treatment and pressing to a pretreated fiber fraction weighing 100 kg and having water
content 64.8%. The total mass of wash effluent and solution pressed from the biomass
is 180 kg having water content 94.0% and dissolved solutes 6%. The fiber fraction
is directly subject to pre-hydrolysis and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation,
without further addition of water. The water/biomass ratio is, thus, 5:1 - [169.2
kg water ((180 kg x 94.0% water) + 64.8 kg water (100 kg x 64.8% water))= 234 kg water]
/ [46 kg initial non-water content (50 kg x 92.0%)].
[0023] We have discovered that, surprisingly, levels of fermentation inhibitors derived
from lignocellulose degradation can be optimised in bioethanol fermentation mixtures
such that ethanol fermentive microorganisms are substantially unaffected while contaminating
lactic acid bacteria are effectively inhibited.
[0024] Accordingly, in some embodiments, the invention provides a method of processing lignocellulosic
biomass comprising preparing a non-sterile fermentation mixture comprising the fiber
fraction of a pretreated lignocellulosic biomass and optimised levels of fermentation
inhibitors that inhibit contaminating bacterial growth and/or lactate production while
having substantially no effect on ethanol fermentive yeast.
[0025] In other embodiments, the invention provides a method of fermentation of lignocellulosic
biomass comprising the steps of
- preparing a non-sterile fermentation mixture comprising the fiber fraction of a pretreated
lignocellulosic biomass and optimised levels of fermentation inhibitors that inhibit
contaminating bacterial growth and/or lactate production while having substantially
no effect on ethanol fermentive yeast;
- fermenting said fermentation mixture.
[0026] In still other embodiments, fermentation inhibitors derived from pretreatment of
lignocellulosic biomass can be added to optimised levels in fermentation mixtures
comprising primarily starch biomass. This provides a cost-saving alternative to traditional
methods of contamination control in bioethanol production.
[0027] In still other embodiments, the invention provides anti-bacterial compositions comprising
a crude extract of liquid fraction from pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass.
[0028] Figure 1 provides a schematic illustration of process steps in pretreatment of lignocellulosic
biomass. As shown, in some pretreatment methods, lignocellulosic biomass is pretreated
in such manner as provides a slurry, having no separation of liquid and fiber fraction.
Lignocellulosic biomass pretreated by these methods is not suited for practice of
embodiments of the invention. Other pretreatment methods, as shown, provide a separation
of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass into at least two fractions, a liquid fraction
and a fiber fraction. In these pretreatment methods, lignocellulosic biomass can be
washed, soaked or wetted outside a pressurized reactor prior to pretreatment. After
pretreatment, water can be added in further soaking or washing steps, followed by
one or more pressing steps which separates a liquid fraction from a fiber fraction.
The "fiber" fraction comprises dry matter as well as some water and solute content.
The liquid fraction may contain a high percentage of dissolved sugars in addition
to fermentation inhibitors. Lignocellulosic biomass pretreated and processed so as
to provide a fiber fraction is suited for practice of embodiments of the invention.
[0029] In some pretreatment processes, water content may be introduced during pretreatment
by co-current, counter-current, or flow-through methods described in
ref. 6.
[0030] In preferred embodiments, the fiber fraction of a lignocellulosic biomass is suitable
for use on a large scale, having dry matter mass at least 40 kg, or greater than 100
kg, or greater than 1000 kg, or greater than 10,000 kg.
[0031] In the practice of some embodiments of the invention, any suitable lignocellulosic
biomass feedstock may be used including at least corn stover, wheat straw, rice straw,
bagasse, corn fiber, agricultural wastes, plant stalks, hardwood bulk, softwood bulk,
nut shells, empty fruit bunches, corn cobs, grasses, including coastal Bermuda grass
and switch grass, paper, including newspaper, waste papers and paper from chemical
pulps, sorted refuse, cotton seed hairs, and other materials well known in the art.
[0032] Lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks may be pretreated and processed by simple methods
that avoid excessive degradation of feedstocks and that provide separation of pretreated
biomass into at least a liquid and a fiber fraction. Suitable pretreatment methods
include at least steam explosion, high pressure steam, liquid hot water, and dilute
acid. Many variants of these pretreatment processes are suitable and well known in
the art. In preferred embodiments, feedstocks are pretreated to severity at least
3.0.
[0033] Different fermentation inhibitors are produced in different amounts, depending on
the properties of the lignocellulosic feedstock and on the method of pretreatment
used. See
ref. 1. At least three categories of fermentation inhibitors are typically formed during
pretreatment: (1) furans, primarily 2-furfural and 5-HMF (5 hydroxymethylfurfural)
which are degradation products from monosaccharides; (2) monomeric phenols, which
are degradation products of the lignin structure; and (3) small organic acids, primarily
acetic acid, which originate from acetyl groups in hemicelluloses and lignin.
[0034] The mixture of different inhibitors has been shown to act synergistically in bioethanol
fermentation using yeast strains (
ref. 7) and, also, using ethanolic
Escherichia coli (
ref. 8). During the course of fermentation, some inhibitors are consumed, the concentrations
of others remain constant, while still others are actively accumulated, including
acetic acid.
[0035] A suitable source for fermentation inhibitors that can provide optimised levels is
any lignocellulosic feedstock that gives rise to the following inhibitors when pretreated
with heat and/ or acid conditions: Furfural, hydroxymethylfurfural, acetic acid, and
monomeric phenols including any of syringaldehyde, vanillin, homovanillic acid, syringic
acid, p-coumaric acid, and ferulic acid. Preferred feedstocks when pretreated by heat
and/or acid conditions may also give rise to additional inhibitors, but at typically
lower levels, including acetosyringone, 4-OH benzaldehyde, phenol, guaiacol, syringol,
4-OH benzylalcohol, trimethoxybenzaldehyde, trimethoxyacetophenone, 4-OH acetophenone,
acetovanillone, vanillyl alcohol, 4 OH benzoic acid and vanillic acid. Preferred feedstocks
may also give rise to formic and levulinic acid.
[0036] The concentration of fermentation inhibitors generated during pretreatment which
is required to achieve optimised levels will vary depending on severity of pretreatment
and choice of lignocellulosic feedstock. However, an appropriate dilution suitable
to achieve optimised levels can be readily determined through routine experimentation.
[0037] Biochemical mechanisms are not currently known whereby fermentation inhibitors exhibit
a differential effect on lactic acid bacteria compared with ethanol fermentative yeast.
Many fermentation inhibitors commonly generated during pretreatment of lignocellulosic
biomass were previously reported to exhibit some anti-bacterial effect, although at
higher concentrations than those typically achieved in wash water from pretreated
biomass. For examples involving p-coumaric acid, vanillic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid,
syringic acid, and ferulic acid see
refs. 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13. Possibly, some previously unknown synergisms provide a cumulative anti-bacterial
effect, at much lower concentrations, involving a "cocktail" of inhibitors.
[0038] In some embodiments, such a "cocktail" of inhibitors generated during pretreatment
of lignocellulosic biomass may be up-concentrated and provided for use in contamination
control of starch or first generation bioethanol fermentation.
[0039] In preferred embodiments, a fermentation mixture comprising optimised levels of fermentation
inhibitors is prepared by controlling the water/biomass ratio, in particular, by washing
the fiber fraction of a pretreated lignocellulosic feedstock with a pre-defined quantity
of water or process solutions that provides a definite water/biomass ratio. For example,
with wheat straw, and other lignocellulosic feedstocks having compositions of hemicellulose,
cellulose and lignin similar to wheat straw, including bagasse, and corn stover pretreated
to combined severity index 3.5-4.0, optimised levels of fermentation inhibitors can
typically be achieved by washing the pretreated biomass with fresh water or recycled
process waters to achieve a water/biomass ratio of between 1:4 and 1:8. It will be
readily understood by one skilled in the art that aqueous solutions derived from liquid
fraction, washing/pressing steps, or other processes can be used in water recycling
schemes. In such cases, fermentation inhibitors may accumulate such that an overall
appropriate water/biomass ratio may be higher.
[0040] Using routine experimentation, one skilled in the art will readily arrive at an appropriate
water/biomass ratio for a given lignocellulosic feedstock subject to a given pretreatment.
It will be readily understood that, where a given lignocellulosic biomass is pretreated
to higher severity index, a higher water/biomass ratio may be required to achieve
optimised levels of fermentation inhibitors. Similarly, where a given lignocellulosic
biomass is pretreated to lower severity index, a lower water/biomass ratio may be
required to achieve optimised levels of fermentation inhibitors. For example, the
fiber fraction of a pretreated lignocellulosic feedstock is first tested directly
in a non-sterile fermentation mixture without any wash or effort to reduce or ameliorate
fermentation inhibitors. If both lactate and ethanol production appear to be relatively
un-inhibited, fermentation inhibitors can be added to optimised levels. In other circumstances,
washing steps can be conducted in increments of water/biomass ratio until an appropriate
range of wash conditions is identified that will provide optimised levels of fermentation
inhibitors in a fermentation mixture. In circumstances where fermentation inhibitors
must be added to achieve optimised levels of fermentation inhibitors, one skilled
in the art will readily determine, with routine experimentation, an appropriate amount
to add of wash water, liquid fraction or up-concentrated inhibitors from a given lignocellulosic
feedstock subject to a given pretreatment.
[0041] To achieve optimised levels of fermentation inhibitors in a fermentation mixture
comprising primarily starch biomass, liquid fraction or up-concentrated inhibitors
can be added that were derived from liquid fraction or wash waters from post-pretreatment
processing of lignocellulosic biomass. With routine experimentation, one skilled in
the art will readily arrive at an appropriate amount of inhibitors to add to a fermentation
mixture comprising primarily starch biomass so as to achieve optimised levels of fermentation
inhibitors.
[0042] Washing of pretreated lignocellulosic feedstocks can be achieved by a number of different
methods. In preferred embodiments, as shown in Figure 1, pretreated lignocellulosic
biomass is further subject to any number of washing/soaking and pressing steps. In
other embodiments, water content may be introduced during pretreatment to such levels
that optimised levels of fermentation inhibitors can be achieved using only pressing
steps or other methods for separating the fiber fraction. In still other embodiments,
an appropriate water/biomass ratio may be achieved that will provide optimised levels
of fermentation inhibitors by introducing water content prior to pretreatment and
subsequently separating a fiber fraction by pressing or other methods.
[0043] A fermentation mixture comprising a fiber fraction of a lignocellulosic biomass can
be prepared by a variety of different methods. In some embodiments, the fiber fraction
comprising dry matter and water content can be used in simultaneous saccharification
and fermentation by introducing fermentive microorganisms and hydrolytic enzymes essentially
simultaneously. In some embodiments, the fiber fraction comprising dry matter and
water content may be supplemented with additional water content and/or wash water
from a pretreated lignocellulosic biomass and/or other chemicals or additives including,
for example, surfactants and lignin-binding agents. In some embodiments, saccharification
and liquefaction of the fiber fraction may be acheived in one step, with fermentive
organisms added subsequently to provide a fermentation mixture. In some embodiments,
the fiber fraction with or without additives may be subject to an initial pre-hydrolysis
using hydrolytic enzymes, with subsequent simultaneous saccharification and fermentation.
In some embodiments, fermentation may be conducted in an essentially batch manner.
In some embodiments, a continuous or semi-continuous stream of fiber fraction of pretreated
lignocellulosic biomass may be introduced to a pre-hydrolysis reactor to which hydrolytic
enzymes are similary introduced in a continuous or semi-continuous stream. In these
embodiments, the water/biomass ratio may be adjusted to levels that achieve optimised
levels of fermentation inhibitors before the fiber fraction enters pre-hydrolysis.
Levels of fermentation inhibitors may also be optimised by subsequent additions in
pre-hydrolysis prior to introduction of ethanol fermentive microorganisms or in fermentation
mixtures. In some embodiments, fermentation may be conducted in a continuous culture,
to which pretreated and pre-hydrolysed lignocellulosic biomass can be introduced.
Other embodiments of the invention can also be imagined by one skilled in the art.
[0044] Fermentation inhibitors can also be isolated and/or concentrated to provide anti-bacterial
compositions. Crude extracts of liquid fraction or wash waters provide effective and
inexpensive anti-bacterial activity suitable for use in a variety of industrial or
other settings. Crude extracts of liquid fraction may be prepared by a variety of
methods known in the art and may be partially purified, in that particularly useful
components such as C5 sugars may be removed, or particularly hazardous or unwanted
materials removed. In preferred embodiments, a portion of liquid fraction remaining
after useful C5 sugars have been removed may simply be concentrated to a concentrated
liquid. Because many important inhibitors are volatile, precautions are advisable
to avoid evaporative losses. Accordingly, ultrafiltration techniques are generally
preferable for concentration of inhibitor solutes. The crude extract of liquid fraction
can be further partially purified. The concentrated, optionally partially purified,
crude extract can be used as a cheap alternative to hops or other anti-bacterial or
asceptic agents in first generation bioethanol fermentations of primarily starch biomass.
The material may further be used as an anti-bacterial composition in other, non-ethanol
yeast fermentations, in fermentations involving other inhibitor-tolerant microorganisms,
and in "training" inhibitor tolerance of fermentive microorganisms, for example, as
described in
ref. 14 and 15.
[0045] Preferred ethanol fermentive yeast that can be used to practice embodiments of the
invention include wild type strains of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other strains which have been adapted for use in ethanol fermentation. For example,
each of the following yeast strains obtained from Ethanol Technology were effective:
(a). THERMOSACC (Tm): This is a stress tolerant yeast, with good tolerance to high
temperatures, high organic acids and high osmotic pressure that occur in high-gravity
fermentations. This yeast works well at temperatures up to 37°C and alcohol concentrations
of more than 20% by volume (16% by weight). Glycerol production is lower. This yeast
can take short exposure to 40°C and still complete the fermentation. (b). SUPERSTART
(Tm): This is an older distilling yeast strain. This yeast is good for fermenting
maltose and maltotriose. This yeast has been used in high gravity fermentations reaching
23% alcohol by volume on a wheat substrate. SUPERSTART (Tm) is long-lived and resilient
in continuous fermentation conditions. (c). CAT 1 (Tm): This is a very robust yeast
most often used in continuous or recycling operations. It is resistant to mutations
and is able to dominate fermentations. It has good resistance to low pH.
[0046] Suitable "untrained" ethanol fermentive yeast include any strains that have tolerance
comparable or greater than wild type
Saccharomyces cerevisiae to a mixture of 5 hydroxymethyl furfural, furfural, acetic acid, vanillin, syringaldehyde,
vanillic acid, homovanillic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, and ferulic acid.
[0047] Optimised levels of fermentation inhibitors are effective against a variety of lactic
acid bacteria, including but not limited to species of the genera
Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Aerococcus, Carnobacterium,
Enterococcus, Oenococcus, Teragenococcus, Vagococcus, and
Weisella.
Example 1: Achieving optimised levels of fermentation inhibitors for non-sterile fermentation of steam pretreated wheat straw by controlling the water/biomass ratio in the pretreatment and post-pretreatment processing.
[0048] Experiments were conducted at the Inbicon pilot plant in Fredericia, Denmark. Cut
wheat straw (average particle size of approximately 40 mm), 50 kg/hour having 92.0%
initial non-water content, was continuously pretreated by steam at 185-200°C for 10-15
minutes. The pretreatment must be sufficient to ensure that the structure of the lignocellulosic
content is rendered accessible to hydrolytic enzymes. In order to achieve appropriate
levels of fermentation inhibitors, the pretreated wheat straw was subject to post-pretreatment
processing consisting of a washing and pressing step. The pretreated wheat straw was
washed by water in such manner as to achieve a water/biomass ratio of 5:1, in one
experiment, and 11:1 in an otherwise identical experiment.
[0049] After washing and pressing, the liquid fraction comprised fermentation inhibitors,
hemicellulose and other soluble components. The fiber fraction comprised insoluble
fibers and had a dry matter content of approximately 26%. The fiber fraction was pre-hydrolysed
by means of addition of NOVOZYM 188 (Tm) and CELLUCLAST 1.5 FG (Tm) (Novozymes, A/S)
at 50°C. The pre-hydrolysed fiber fraction was subsequently used to prepare a fermentation
mixture by adding common bakers yeast (Baker's yeast,
Saccharomyces cerevisiae obtained from De Danske Spritfabrikker) without further addition of water or other
agents. The fermentation mixture was simultaneously saccharified and fermented (SSF)
at 30-33°C. The SSF was conducted in a non-sterile free fall mixer according to the
process described by
WO2006/056838, which is hereby incorporated by reference in entirety. The fermentation mixture
was not sterilised before the experiment and was opened daily during the fermentation
time of up to 400 hours to take out samples.
[0050] Results are presented in figures 2 and 3. Figure 2 shows glucose, ethanol, lactate
and glycerol concentrations over the course of pre-hydrolysis and SSF of pretreated
wheat straw having water/biomass ratio 5:1. As shown, less than 2 g/kg of glucose
was detected after 30 hours. This indicates that the yeast was capable of utilising
all glucose produced during pre-hydrolysis and later all glucose produced during SSF
as the ethanol concentration in the fermentation mixture was still increasing after
170 hours of fermentation. Less than 1 g/kg of lactate was detected after 170 hours
of fermentation showing that lactate-producing bacterial growth and/or lactate production
were substantially inhibited in the non-sterile fermentation conditions.
[0051] Figure 3 shows lactate concentrations over the course of fermentation in fermentation
mixtures prepared from the fiber fraction of pretreated and washed wheat straw having
water/biomass ratio 11:1 or 5:1. As shown, in fermentation mixtures prepared from
the fiber fraction having water/biomass ratio 11:1, lactate concentrations increased
from below 1 g/kg after 48 hours to approximately 8 g/kg after 150 hours. In contrast,
in fermentation mixtures prepared from the fiber fraction having water/biomass ratio
5:1, lactate concentrations remained beneath 1 g/kg throughout the course of the fermentation
process.
Example 2: Non-sterile fermentation of steam pretreated bagasse using levels of fermentation
inhibitors optimised by controlling the water/biomass ratio.
[0052] Experiments were conducted at the Inbicon pilot plant in Fredericia, Denmark. Cut
bagasse from US (average particle size of approximately 40 mm), 50 kg/h having 92.0%
initial non-water content, was continuously pretreated by steam at 185-200°C for 10-15
minutes. Conditions were not optimized for maximum ethanol yield. In order to achieve
appropriate levels of fermentation inhibitors, the pretreated bagasse was subject
to post- pretreatment processing consisting of a washing and pressing step. The pretreated
bagasse was washed by water in such manner as to achieve a water/biomass ratio of
5:1.
[0053] After washing and pressing, the liquid fraction comprised fermentation inhibitors,
hemicellulose and other soluble components. The fiber fraction comprised insoluble
fibres and had a dry matter content of approximately 26%. The fiber fraction was pre-hydrolysed
by means of addition of NOVOZYM 188 (Tm) and CELLUCLAST 1.5 FG (Tm) at 50°C. The pre-hydrolysed
fiber fraction was subsequently used to prepare a fermentation mixture by adding THERMOSACC
(Tm) (obtained from Ethanol Technology) without further addition of water or other
agents. The fermentation mixture was simultaneously saccharified and fermented (SSF)
at 30-33°C. The SSF was conducted in a non-sterile free fall mixer, according to the
process described by
WO2006/056838 The fermentation mixture was not sterilised before the experiment and was opened
daily during the fermentation time of up to 200 hours to take out samples.
[0054] Results are presented in figure 4, which shows ethanol, glucose and lactate concentration
over the course of the SSF process. As shown, less than 2 g/kg of glucose was detected
after 30 hours. This indicates that the yeast was capable of utilising all glucose
produced during pre-hydrolysis and, later, all glucose produced during SSF, as the
ethanol concentration in the fermentation mixture was still increasing after 150 hours
of fermentation. Less than 1 g/kg of lactate was detected after 170 hours of fermentation
showing that lactate-producing bacterial growth and/or lactate production were substantially
inhibited in the non-sterile fermentation conditions.
Example 3: Non-sterile fermentation of steam pretreated corn stover using levels of
fermentation inhibitors optimised by controlling the water/biomass ratio.
[0055] Experiments were conducted at the Inbicon pilot plant in Fredericia, Denmark. Cut
corn stover from Hungary (average particle size of approximately 40 mm), 50 kg/h having
92.0% initial non-water content, was continuously pretreated by steam at 185-200°C
for 10-15 minutes. Conditions were not optimized for maximum ethanol yield. In order
to achieve appropriate levels of fermentation inhibitors, the pretreated corn stover
was subject to post-pretreatment processing consisting of a washing and pressing step.
The pretreated corn stover was washed by water in such manner as to achieve a water/biomass
ratio of 5:1.
[0056] After washing and pressing, the liquid fraction comprised fermentation inhibitors,
hemicellulose and other soluble components. The fiber fraction comprised insoluble
fibres and had a dry matter content of approximately 26%. The fiber fraction was pre-hydrolysed
by means of addition of NOVOZYM 188 (Tm) and CELLUCLAST 1.5 FG (Tm) (Novozymes A/S)
at 50°C. The pre-hydrolysed fiber fraction was subsequently used to prepare a fermentation
mixture by adding THERMOSACC (Tm) (obtained from Ethanol Technology) without further
addition of water or other agents. The fermentation mixture was simultaneously saccharified
and fermented (SSF) at 30-33°C. The SSF was conducted in a non-sterile free fall mixer
according to the process described by
WO2006/056838. The fermentation mixture was not sterilised before the experiment and was opened
daily during the fermentation time of up to 200 hours to take out samples.
[0057] Results are presented in figure 5, which shows ethanol, glucose and lactate concentrations
over the course of the SSF process. As shown, less than 3 g/kg of glucose was detected
after 43 hours. This indicates that the yeast was capable of utilising all glucose
produced during pre-hydrolysis and later all glucose produced during SSF. Less than
1 g/kg of lactate was detected after 163 hours of fermentation showing that lactate-producing
bacterial growth and/or lactate production were substantially inhibited in the non-sterile
fermentation conditions.
Example 4: Concentration of selected fermentation inhibitors during hydrolysis and
fermentation of pretreated wheat straw having a water/biomass ratio of 5:1.
[0058] Levels of selected fermentation inhibitors during hydrolysis and fermentation achieved
in the experiments described in Example 1 were measured by HPLC and are shown in Table
1. Individual measurements are means of duplicate experiments. Values are expressed
as parts per million for all inhibitors except furfural and 5 hydroxymethylfurfural,
which are expressed in g/l. Parts per million as used here refers to g/1,000,000 g.
The mash used for inhibitor measurements during fermentation contained approximately
26% dry matter (insoluble material) and had a density of about 1,2 kg/L.
Table 1. Levels of inhibitors during hydrolysis (first 6 hours, at 50 °C) and fermentation
at 33 °C (yeast added after 6 hours), at 26% dry matter. Numbers represent the mean
of measurements in two batch fermentations.
|
Hours |
|
0 |
5,75 |
18,75 |
40 |
65,5 |
93,5 |
117,5 |
135,5 |
158,25 |
180,75 |
207,5 |
5 HMF |
0,100 |
0,124 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Furfural |
0,133 |
0,141 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0,013 |
0,024 |
2-furoic acid |
24 |
30 |
28,5 |
24,5 |
23 |
24 |
24 |
23 |
21,5 |
24 |
21,5 |
Phenol |
1 |
1,5 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1,5 |
2 |
2 |
1,5 |
1 |
Guaiacol |
1 |
1 |
4,5 |
8,5 |
10,5 |
13 |
13 |
14 |
13 |
14,5 |
15 |
Syringol |
4,5 |
4,5 |
3,5 |
3,5 |
3,5 |
3,5 |
4,5 |
4,5 |
4,5 |
4 |
3,5 |
4-OH benzaldehyd |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Vanillin |
6,5 |
6,5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Syringaldehyd |
5 |
5,5 |
14 |
9.5 |
6,5 |
5 |
3,5 |
3 |
3 |
3,5 |
2,5 |
4-OH benzylalcohol |
0,5 |
0,5 |
2 |
2,5 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Trimethoxybenzaldehyd |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Trimethoxyacetophenon |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4-OH acetophenone |
3,5 |
3,5 |
2,5 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3,5 |
3 |
3 |
2,5 |
2 |
Acetovanillone |
0 |
|
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Acetosyringone |
3,5 |
3,5 |
2,5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2,5 |
2 |
2 |
1,5 |
2 |
Vanillyl alcohol |
0 |
0 |
13,5 |
13 |
13 |
12 |
12 |
10,5 |
10,5 |
13 |
10 |
4-OH benzoic acid |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Vanillic acid |
4,5 |
5 |
5,5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
5,5 |
5,5 |
5,5 |
Homovanillic acid |
3 |
4 |
19 |
21 |
21,5 |
22,5 |
22,5 |
22,5 |
21 |
21 |
20,5 |
Syringic acid |
7 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4,5 |
5 |
4,5 |
4 |
5 |
4,5 |
Coumaric acid |
9,5 |
7 |
6,5 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
3.5 |
4 |
Ferulic acid |
10,5 |
|
8 5 |
4,5 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
5 HMF and furfural: g/l, others: ppm |
Example 5: Identifying a range of concentrations of liquid fraction from pretreated
lignocellulosic biomass that inhibit Lactobacillus contaminants but do not substantially
affect yeast growth in glucose fermentation.
[0059] Fermentation inhibitors are primarily found in the liquid fraction of pretreated
lignocellulosic biomass. Accordingly, the following experiments were conducted with
dilutions of liquid fraction from wheat straw pretreated under the conditions described
in Example 1.
[0060] Liquid fraction (pH regulated with acetate and Na
2CO
3) was used undiluted (100%), or diluted to 75% full strength, 50%, 25% or 10% using
0,1 M acetate buffer. Initial concentrations of inhibitors corresponding to each of
these dilutions were measured by HPLC and are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Initial concentrations of inhibitors corresponding to the dilutions of liquid
fraction used in example 5,6 and 7.
|
100 % |
50 % |
25 % |
10 % |
5 HMF [g/l] |
0,19 |
0,13-0,16 |
0,07-0,11 |
0,09 |
Furfural [g/l] |
0,74 |
0,34-0,38 |
0,19-0,21 |
0,14 |
2-furoic acid |
46 |
26-36 |
15-25 |
11 |
Vanillin |
22 |
10-16 |
8 |
7 |
Ferulic acid |
35 |
24-41 |
11-22 |
3 |
Coumaric acid |
16 |
9-17 |
4-8 |
2 |
Syringic acid |
11 |
8-12 |
4 |
3 |
Syringaldehyd |
9 |
6-7 |
5-6 |
5 |
Homovanillic acid |
n.d |
4-5 |
3-4 |
3 |
4-OH benzaldehyd |
5 |
0-4 |
0-2 |
1 |
Acetosyringone |
2 |
4-7 |
1-4 |
0 |
Total phenol cal. |
167 |
101-167 |
60-86 |
42 |
Acetate [g/l]* |
4,87 |
5,15-4,59 |
4,60-4,62 |
4,63 |
Concentrations are in ppm if nothing else is stated. n.d: not determined
*Acetate was used as buffer - concentration accordingly does not varying much between
dilutions |
[0061] Other compounds that might have contributed to the inhibition effects, as for example
formic acid and levulinic acid, were not determined. The compounds phenol, guaiacol,
syringol, 4-OH benzylalcohol, trimethoxybenzaldehyde, trimethoxyacetophenone, 4-OH
acetophenone, acetovanillone, vanillyl alcohol, 4 OH benzoic acid and vanillic acid
were found in quite low start concentrations (below 7 ppm in 100 % liquid fraction).
[0062] Lactobacillus were inoculated to different levels in fermentations reported in Examples 5, 6 and
7. These levels are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Inoculation levels of Lactobacillus used in examples 5, 6 and 7.
CFU/ml |
Inoculation level |
Used in example |
7*108 to 109 |
high |
5 |
107 |
Low |
6,7 |
[0063] Different inoculation levels were used to demonstrate the inhibition effect in different
situations and to further evaluate the effects of inhibitors on
Lactobacillus growth and lactate production. The "high" inoculation level is not regarded as a
realistic contamination level in second generation bioethanol production. Hydrolysis
and fermentation in second generation production follow immediately after a lignocellulosic
pretreatment step which in all known cases kills bacteria. Reatistic conditions are
expected to fall closer to the "low" inoculation levels. In first generation bioethanol
processes, considered to be much more vulnerable to contamination, contamination levels
varied from 10
4 CFU/ml to 5*10
6 in wet mill facilities, and from 10
4 CFU/ml to 5*10
8 CFU/ml in dry mill facilities. See e.g.
ref. 16.
[0064] The experiment was conducted at Inbicon laboratories, Fredericia, Denmark. The effects
of liquid fraction on glucose fermentation were examined using 6% glucose and different
dilutions of liquid fraction. Fermentations were conducted with either yeast or
Lactobacillus, to identify differences in tolerance to liquid fraction.
[0065] Fermentation was conducted using 250 ml blue cap bottles with a membrane cap, equipped
with a 1,2 mm sterile needle with a 0,2 µm filter to allow CO
2 to escape. The membrane cap further allowed small subsamples to be retrieved with
a 2 mm needle without disturbing the anaerobic environment, to determine yeast and
Lactobacillus CFU, and to conduct HPLC analysis of ethanol and glucose over time. Each treatment
was conducted using two replicates (separate flasks). Measurements are means of two
replicates. There was no adjustment of pH. The total volume added to each bottle was
80 ml.
[0066] Fermentation was conducted at 35 °C. Yeast (THERMOSACC (Tm) from Ethanol Technology,
4*10
6 CFU/ml), and
Lactobacillus (7*10
8 CFU/ml of a mixture of equal amounts of
L. paracasei P4126
and L. plantarum P5868, see
ref. 17) was added. Newly harvested
Lactobacillus from an approximately 36-hour-old culture in MRS bouillon was used as inoculum.
[0067] Results are presented in figures 6, 7 and 8. Measurements are means of two replicates.
Standard deviation bars are also shown. The different lines labelled 100%, 50% and
25% refer to the different concentrations of liquid fraction. Figure 6 shows yeast
(A) and
Lactobacillus (B) CFU over the course of fermentation in the presence of different dilutions of
liquid fraction. Figure 7 shows ethanol (A) and lactate (B) concentrations over the
course of fermentation in the presence of different dilutions of liquid fraction.
Figure 8 shows glucose concentrations for both yeast and
Lactobacillus incubations over the course of fermentation in presence of different dilutions of
liquid fraction.
[0068] As shown in Figure 6A, yeast grows at the 50% dilution of liquid fraction, but not
at 100%. Yeast also did not grow at 75% dilution of liquid fraction (not shown).
[0069] As shown in Figure 7A, yeast ferments ethanol at the 50% dilution of liquid fraction,
but not at 100%. Yeast also did not ferment ethanol at 75% dilution of liquid fraction
(not shown).
[0070] As shown in Figure 6B, in contrast, even diluted liquid fraction was clearly toxic
to
Lactobacillus. At these very high
Lactobacillus inoculation levels, cells died rapidly at 100% liquid fraction and at the 50% and
25% dilution.
[0071] As shown in Figure 7B, liquid fraction also inhibited lactate production. At these
very high
Lactobacillus inoculation levels, liquid fraction exhibits a clear concentration-dependent inhibitory
effect on lactate production.
[0072] As shown in Figure 8, glucose consumption by
Lactobacillus was very low at 100% liquid fraction and at the 50% and 25% dilution. This indicates
that
Lactobacillus did not thrive under any of these conditions. In contrast, as also shown in Figure
8, glucose consumption by yeast was robust, indicating that yeast thrived, at both
the 50% and 25% dilution of liquid fraction.
Example 6: Dependence of Lactobacillus growth and lactate production on concentration
of liquid fraction in a second generation bioethanol SSF process.
[0073] Experiments were conducted at Inbicon laboratories, Fredericia, Denmark. The effects
of liquid fraction on a second generation SSF bioethanol process were examined using
different dilutions of liquid fraction. SSF of wheat straw pretreated according to
the conditions of Example 1 was conducted at dry matter content 9.6% in the presence
of different dilutions of liquid fraction. Liquid fraction of steam pretreated wheat
straw was prepared as described in Example 5. Three different concentrations of liquid
fraction were tested at the "low" level of
Lactobacillus inoculation.
[0074] SSF was conducted using 250 ml blue cap bottles with a membrane cap, equipped with
a 1,2 mm sterile needle with a 0,2 µm filter to allow CO
2 to escape. The membrane cap further allowed small subsamples to be retrieved without
disturbing the anaerobic environment, to determine yeast and
Lactobacillus CFU, and to conduct HPLC analysis of ethanol and glucose over time. Each treatment
was conducted using two replicates (separate flasks). Measurements are means of two
replicates. Initial pH was adjusted to 5,0 and maintained between 4.9-5.1 using daily
additions of appropriate quantities of 2 M NaOH every day during the experiment. The
total volume added to each bottle was 180 ml, which contained pretreated wheat straw
sufficient to provide 9.6% dry matter and liquid fraction (pH regulated with acetate
and Na
2CO
3) diluted with 0,1 M acetate buffer to 50%, 25% or 10%. NOVOZYM 188 (Tm) and CELLUCLAST
1.5 FG (Tm) were mixed together in the ratio 1:5 and added at, collectively, 7 FPU/g
dry matter for a 6 hours prehydrolysis at 50 °C. After 6 hours, the temperature was
lowered to 37 °C, and yeast (THERMOSACC (Tm) from Ethanol Technology, 3 g/kg dry matter),
and
Lactobacillus were added.
Lactobacillus was added at a low inoculation level of 10
7 CFU/ml, which is a more realistic representation of conditions in second generation
bioethanol fermentation than the high inoculation level used in Example 5. Newly harvested
Lactobacillus from an approximately 36-hour-old culture in MRS bouillon was used as inoculum, having
a mixture of equal amounts of
L. paracasei P4126
and L. plantarum P5868, see
ref. 17.
[0075] Results are presented in figures 9 and 10. Measurements are means of two replicates.
Standard deviation bars are also shown. The different lines labelled 50%, 25% and
10% refer to the different concentrations of liquid fraction. Figure 9 shows yeast
and
Lactobacillus CFU during the course of fermentation at different dilutions of liquid fraction.
Figure 10 shows ethanol and lactate concentrations during the course of fermentation
at different dilutions of liquid fraction. The time point t=0 represents the start
of fermentation.
[0076] As shown in Figure 9, at these low levels of
Lactobacillus inoculation, the 50% dilution of liquid fraction effectively completely inhibited
Lactobacillus growth. The 25% dilution of liquid fraction also provided substantial inhibition
of
Lactobacillus growth. In contrast, as shown, neither the 50% nor the 25% dilution of liquid fractions
affected final yield.
[0077] As shown in Figure 10, at these low levels of
Lactobacillus inoculation, under the conditions of fermentation at 9.6% dry matter, bacterial lactate
production remained beneath 2 g/kg, even at the 10% dilution of liquid fraction. It
should be noted that in industrial fermentation processes, much higher dry matter
content would likely be used, which would be expected to result in higher levels of
lactate production. The 25% and 50% dilutions of liquid fraction clearly substantially
inhibited bacterial lactate production. In contrast, in all of the dilutions of liquid
fraction tested, 50%, 25% and 10%, final ethanol yields were not affected.
Example 7: Dependence of Lactobacillus lactate production on concentration of liquid
fraction in a first generation bioethanol fermentation.
[0078] Experiments were conducted at Inbicon laboratories, Fredericia, Denmark. The effects
of liquid fraction on a first generation SSF bioethanol process were examined using
different dilutions of liquid fraction. SSF of hydrolysed wheat flour was conducted
at dry matter content 10% in the presence of different dilutions of liquid fraction.
Liquid fraction of steam pretreated wheat straw was prepared as described in Example
5. Three different concentrations of liquid fraction were tested at the "low" level
of
Lactobacillus inoculation.
[0079] SSF was conducted using 250 ml blue cap bottles with a membrane cap, as described
in Examples 5 and 6. Each treatment was conducted using two replicates (separate flasks).
Measurements are means of two replicates. Initial pH was adjusted to 5,0 and maintained
between 4.9-5.1 using daily additions of appropriate quantities of 2 M NaOH every
day during the experiment. Hydrolysis was first conducted at 18% dry matter content
by mixing flour and 0.1 M acetate buffer with NS50033 (Novozymes,14 g/kg flour). Flasks
were incubated at 50 °C for 22 hours. After 22 hours, liquid fraction (pH regulated
with acetate and Na
2CO
3) and 0,1 M acetate buffer was added in various amounts. The total volume added to
each bottle was 180 ml, which contained hydrolysed wheat flour and liquid fraction
diluted to 50%, 25% or 10% of full strength or a buffer control, 0%. The temperature
was lowered to 37 °C. Yeast (THERMOSACC (Tm) from Ethanol Technology, 3 g/kg dry matter),
and
Lactobacillus were added.
Lactobacillus was added at a low inoculation level of 10
7 CFU/ml, as described in Example 6.
[0080] Results are shown in Figure 11, which shows ethanol and lactate concentrations during
the course of fermenation at different dilutions of liquid fraction. The time point
t=0 is start of fermentation. Measurements are means of two replicates. Standard deviation
bars are also shown. The different lines labelled 50%, 25% and 0% refer to the different
concentrations of liquid fraction.
[0081] As shown in Figure 11, the first generation process is fast compared to the second
generation process described in example 6. The first generation process is generally
more vulnerable towards
Lactobacillus contamination. This is indicated by the high lactate concentrations obtained with
low
Lactobacillus inoculation (10
7 CFU/ml), resulting in up to 15 g/l in the first generation process, compared to a
maximum of about 2 g/l in the second generation process, using a roughly comparable
quantity of theoretically fermentable sugars.
[0082] As shown, the 50% dilution of liquid fraction proved totally effective in suppressing
Lactobacillus lactate production. In contrast, as shown, the 50% dilution did not affect yeast
ethanol production.
Example 8. Non-sterile fermentation of pretreated wheat straw having water/biomass ratio 5:1 and further diluted with water or supplemented with liquid fraction.
[0083] Experiments were conducted at the IBUS pilot plant of Inbicon in Fredericia, Denmark.
Cut wheat straw (average particle size of approximately 40 mm), 50 kg/hour having
92.0% initial non-water content, was continuously pretreated by steam at 185-200°C
for 10-15 minutes. The pretreated wheat straw was subject to a secondary pretreatment
consisting of a washing and pressing step. The pretreated wheat straw was washed by
water in such manner as to achieve a water/biomass ratio of 5:1 in pretreatment and
post-pretreatment processing.
[0084] After washing and pressing, the fiber fraction comprised insoluble fibres and had
a dry matter content of approximately 35%. Inhibitor concentrations were measured
by HPLC (not shown). Alternatively water or liquid fraction was added to the fiber
fraction in various amounts, to obtain a dry matter content of 26%, and to achieve
inhibitor concentrations roughly approximating those observed with the 50% and 25%
dilution of liquid fraction described in examples 5, 6 and 7.
[0085] Other compounds that might have contributed to the inhibition effects, as for example
formic acid and levulinic acid, were not determined. The compounds phenol, guaiacol,
syringol, 4-OH benzylalcohol, trimethoxybenzaldehyd, trimethoxyacetophenone, acetovanillone,
vanillyl alcohol, and 4 OH benzoic acid were found in quite low start concentrations
(below 3 ppm).
[0086] Fibers were pre-hydrolysed by means of addition of NOVOZYME 188 (Tm) and CELLUCLAST
1.5 FG (Tm) at 50°C. To the pre-hydrolysed fiber fraction, yeast was added (THERMOSACC
(Tm), 3g/kg DM, obtained from Ethanol Technology), and
Lactobacillus at the low level, as described in Examples 5 and 6. The fermentation mixture was
simultaneously saccharified and fermented (SSF) at 37°C. The SSF was conducted in
a non-sterile free fall mixer, according to the process described by
WO2006/056838.
[0087] Results are shown in figures 12 and 13. The different lines labelled 50% and 25%
refer to the different levels of inhibitor dilution. Figure 12 shows
Lactobacillus CFU over the course of the SSF process at different levels of inhibitor dilution.
Figure 13 shows ethanol (A) and lactate (B) concentrations over the course of the
SSF process at different levels of inhibitor dilution.
[0088] As shown, even where
Lactobacillus has been actively added to the fermentation mixture, contaminating bacterial growth
and lactate production were suppressed while ethanol production was substantially
unaffected.
[0089] The examples and descriptions provide representative examples of particular embodiments
and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention as defined by the claims.
[0090] The invention is further explained with reference to the Items 1-17 set out below:
Item 1: A method of processing lignocellulosic biomass comprising the steps of
- preparing a non-sterile fermentation mixture comprising the fiber fraction of a pretreated
lignocellulosic biomass and optimised levels of fermentation inhibitors that inhibit
contaminating bacterial growth and/or lactate production while having substantially
no effect on ethanol fermentive organisms.
Item 2: A method of fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass comprising the steps of
- preparing a non-sterile fermentation mixture comprising the fiber fraction of a pretreated
lignocellulosic biomass and optimised levels of fermentation inhibitors that inhibit
contaminating bacterial growth and/or lactate production while having substantially
no effect on ethanol fermentive organisms;
- fermenting said fermentation mixture.
Item 3: The method of item 1 or 2 wherein optimised levels of fermentation inhibitors
are achieved by controlling the water/biomass ratio in the pretreatment and in any
post pretreatment processing of the pretreated lignocellulosic biomass.
Item 4: The method of item 3 wherein the pretreated lignocellulosic biomass is subject
to washing and pressing steps.
Item 5: The method of item 4 wherein the pretreated lignocellulosic biomass is washed
with water to achieve a water/biomass ratio in the pretreatment and in any post pretreatment
processing to about 5:1.
Item 6: The method of item 4 wherein the pretreated lignocellulosic biomass is washed
with water to achieve a water/biomass ratio of between about 4:1 and about 8:1.
Item 7: The method of item 4 wherein the lignocellulosic biomass is pretreated to
severity index at least about 3.5.
Item 8: The method of item 4 wherein the lignocellulosic biomass comprises wheat straw,
bagasse, or corn stover.
Item 9: The method of item 4 wherein the lignocellulosic biomass comprises rice straw,
bagasse, corn fiber, hardwood bulk, softwood bulk, nut shells, corn cobs, grass, paper,
or cotton seed hairs.
Item 10: The method of item 1 or 2 wherein the fiber fraction of the pretreated lignocellulosic
biomass comprises dry matter mass of at least 40 kg.
Item 11: The method of item 1 or 2 wherein the fermentation mixture is a continuous
culture.
Item 12: The method of item 1 or 2 wherein the fermentation mixture is a batch or
fed-batch culture.
Item 13: The method of item 1 or 2 wherein the fermentation mixture is prepared from
a pre-hydrolysed fiber fraction of a pretreated lignocellulosic biomass.
Item 14: An anti-bacterial composition comprising a crude extract of liquid fraction
from pretreated lignocellulosic biomass.
Item 15: A method of fermentation to produce ethanol or other yeast fermentation product
comprising addition of the anti-bacterial composition of item 14 to the fermentation
mixture.
Item 16: A method of fermentation of starch biomass comprising the steps of
- preparing a non-sterile fermentation mixture comprising a starch biomass and optimised
levels of fermentation inhibitors that inhibit contaminating bacterial growth and/or
lactate production while having substantially no affect on ethanol fermentive organisms;
- fermenting said fermentation mixture.
Item 17: The method of Item 16 wherein optimised levels of fermentation inhibitors
are achieved by addition of the anti-bacterial composition of item 14.
References:
[0091]
- 1 H. Klinke et al., "Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation
products produced during pretreatment of biomass," Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. (2004)
66:10.
- 2 C. Martin et al., "A study of three strategies for improving the fermentability of
sugarcane bagasse hydrolysates for fuel ethanol production," International Sugar Journal
(2007) 109(1297):33
- 3 S. Shinsuke et al., "Effect of lignocellulose-derived inhibitors on growth of and
ethanol production by growth-arrested Corynebacterium glutamicum R," Applied and Environmental
Microbiology (2007) 73(7):2349
- 4 WO2006/032282
- 5 D. Schell et al., "Contaminant occurrence, identification and control in a pilot-scale
corn fiber to ethanol conversion process," Bioresource Technology (2007) 98: 2942
- 6 N. Mosier et al., "Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic
biomass," Bioresource Technology (2005) 96:673
- 7 Palmquist E, H Grage, NQ Meinander and B Hahn-Higerdal (1999). Main and interaction
effects of acetic acid, furfural, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid on growth and ethanol
productivity of yeasts. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 63: 46-55
- 8 Zaldivar J, A Martinez and LO Ingram (1999). Effects of selected aldehydes on the
growth and fermentation of ethanologenic Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 65.
24-33
- 9 N. Ariz, et al., "Comparative antibacterial and antifungal effects of some phenolic
compounds," Microbios (1998) 374:43
- 10 R. Capasso et al., "Antibacterial polyphenols from olive oil mill waste waters," Journal
of Applied Bacteriology (1995) 79:393
- 11 S. Naz et al., "Antibacterial activity directed isolation of compounds from Onosma
hispidum," Microbiological Research (2006) 161:43
- 12 M. Fernandez et al., "Antibacterial activity of the phenolic acids fractions of Scrophularia
frutescens and Scrophularia sambucifolia," Journal of Ethnopharmacology (1996) 53:11
- 13 M. Mokbel and T. Suganuma, "Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the methanol
extracts from pummelo (Citrus grandis Osbeck) fruit albedo tissues," Eur. Food Res.
Technol (2006), 224:39
- 14 Almeida JRM, T Modig, A. Petersson, B. Hähn-Hägerdal, G. Lidén and MF Gorwa-Grauslund
(2007). Increased tolerance and conversion.... Journal of chemical technology and
biotechnology 82: 340-349
- 15 Liu ZL.(2006) Genomic adaptation of ethanologenic yeast to biomass conversion inhibitors.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 73: 27-36
- 16 Skinner K.A. & T.D. Leathers (2004). Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production.
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol, vol 31, pp 401-408
- 17 Thomsen MH, Kiel P (2008) Selection of lactic Acid Bacteria for Acidification of Brown
juice (grass juice) with the aim of making a durable substrate for L-lysine fermentation.
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 88: 976-983.