<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ep-patent-document PUBLIC "-//EPO//EP PATENT DOCUMENT 1.5//EN" "ep-patent-document-v1-5.dtd">
<ep-patent-document id="EP12194492B1" file="EP12194492NWB1.xml" lang="en" country="EP" doc-number="2596929" kind="B1" date-publ="20170222" status="n" dtd-version="ep-patent-document-v1-5">
<SDOBI lang="en"><B000><eptags><B001EP>......DE....FRGB....................................................................................</B001EP><B005EP>J</B005EP><B007EP>BDM Ver 0.1.50 (10 Nov 2016) -  2100000/0</B007EP></eptags></B000><B100><B110>2596929</B110><B120><B121>EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION</B121></B120><B130>B1</B130><B140><date>20170222</date></B140><B190>EP</B190></B100><B200><B210>12194492.0</B210><B220><date>20121127</date></B220><B240><B241><date>20131118</date></B241><B242><date>20151112</date></B242></B240><B250>en</B250><B251EP>en</B251EP><B260>en</B260></B200><B300><B310>2011259157</B310><B320><date>20111128</date></B320><B330><ctry>JP</ctry></B330></B300><B400><B405><date>20170222</date><bnum>201708</bnum></B405><B430><date>20130529</date><bnum>201322</bnum></B430><B450><date>20170222</date><bnum>201708</bnum></B450><B452EP><date>20170112</date></B452EP></B400><B500><B510EP><classification-ipcr sequence="1"><text>B28D   5/02        20060101AFI20130228BHEP        </text></classification-ipcr><classification-ipcr sequence="2"><text>B24D   3/34        20060101ALI20130228BHEP        </text></classification-ipcr></B510EP><B540><B541>de</B541><B542>Sägeblatt und Verfahren zum mehrfachen Sägen eines Seltenerdmagneten</B542><B541>en</B541><B542>Saw blade and method for multiple sawing of rare earth magnet</B542><B541>fr</B541><B542>Lame de scie et procédé pour sciage multiple d'aimant à teneur en terre rare</B542></B540><B560><B561><text>EP-A2- 2 189 245</text></B561><B561><text>JP-A- 10 175 172</text></B561><B561><text>JP-A- 2004 050 331</text></B561><B561><text>US-A- 5 313 742</text></B561><B561><text>US-B1- 6 386 948</text></B561><B562><text>WISSLER ET AL: "Graphite and carbon powders for electrochemical applications", JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, ELSEVIER SA, CH, vol. 156, no. 2, 1 June 2006 (2006-06-01), pages 142-150, XP027937679, ISSN: 0378-7753 [retrieved on 2006-06-01]</text></B562></B560></B500><B700><B720><B721><snm>Sato, Koji</snm><adr><str>c/o Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.,
6-1, Ohtemachi 2-chome,</str><city>Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo</city><ctry>JP</ctry></adr></B721><B721><snm>Uraki, Yasunori</snm><adr><str>c/o Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
6-1, Ohtemachi 2-chome,</str><city>Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo</city><ctry>JP</ctry></adr></B721></B720><B730><B731><snm>Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.</snm><iid>101107079</iid><irf>GPS/FP6865091</irf><adr><str>6-1, Ohtemachi 2-chome 
Chiyoda-ku</str><city>Tokyo</city><ctry>JP</ctry></adr></B731></B730><B740><B741><snm>Stoner, Gerard Patrick</snm><sfx>et al</sfx><iid>100028835</iid><adr><str>Mewburn Ellis LLP</str><city>City Tower
40 Basinghall Street
London EC2V 5DE</city><ctry>GB</ctry></adr></B741></B740></B700><B800><B840><ctry>DE</ctry><ctry>FR</ctry><ctry>GB</ctry></B840><B880><date>20130529</date><bnum>201322</bnum></B880></B800></SDOBI>
<description id="desc" lang="en"><!-- EPO <DP n="1"> -->
<heading id="h0001"><u>TECHNICAL FIELD</u></heading>
<p id="p0001" num="0001">The invention relates to a saw blade for sawing a rare earth magnet block into multiple pieces according to the preamble of claim 1 and to a method of using it.</p>
<heading id="h0002"><u>BACKGROUND</u></heading>
<p id="p0002" num="0002">Such a saw blade is known from <patcit id="pcit0001" dnum="US6386948B1"><text>US6386948B1</text></patcit>. Systems for manufacturing commercial products of rare earth magnet include a single part system wherein a part of substantially the same shape as the product is produced at the stage of press molding, and a multiple part system wherein once a large block is molded, it is divided into a plurality of parts by machining. The single part system includes press molding, sintering or heat treating, and finishing steps. A molded part, a sintered or heat treated part, and a finished part (or product) are substantially identical in shape and size. Insofar as normal sintering is performed, a sintered part of near net shape is obtained, and the load of the finishing step is relatively low. However, when it is desired to manufacture parts of small size or parts having a reduced thickness in magnetization direction, the sequence of press molding and sintering is difficult to form sintered parts of normal shape, leading to a lowering of manufacturing yield, and at worst, such parts cannot be formed.<!-- EPO <DP n="2"> --></p>
<p id="p0003" num="0003">In contrast, the multiple part system eliminates the above-mentioned problems and allows press molding and sintering or heat treating steps to be performed with high productivity and versatility. It now becomes the mainstream of rare earth magnet manufacture. In the multiple part system, a molded block and a sintered or heat treated block are substantially identical in shape and size, but the subsequent finishing step requires cutting or sawing. It is the key for manufacture of finished parts how to saw the block in the most efficient and least wasteful manner.</p>
<p id="p0004" num="0004">Tools for cutting rare earth magnet blocks include two types, a diamond grinding wheel inner-diameter (ID) blade having diamond grits bonded to an inner periphery of a thin doughnut-shaped disk, and a diamond grinding wheel outer-diameter (OD) blade having diamond grits bonded to an outer periphery of a thin disk as a core. Nowadays the sawing technology using OD blades becomes the mainstream, especially from the aspect of productivity. The sawing technology using ID blades is low in productivity because of a single blade cutting mode. In the case of OD blade, multiple cutting is possible. <figref idref="f0001">FIG. 1</figref> illustrates an exemplary multiple blade assembly 1 comprising a plurality of saw blades 11 coaxially mounted on a rotating shaft (not shown) alternately with spacers 12, each blade 11 comprising a core 11b in the form of a thin doughnut disk and a cutting part or abrasive grain layer 11a on an outer peripheral rim of the core 11b. This multiple blade assembly 1 is capable of multiple sawing, that is, cutting a block into a multiplicity of parts at a time.</p>
<p id="p0005" num="0005">For the manufacture of OD abrasive blades, diamond grains are generally bonded by three typical binding systems including resin bonding with resin binders, metal bonding with metal binders, and electroplating. These abrasive blades are often used in sawing of rare earth magnet blocks.</p>
<p id="p0006" num="0006">When sawing abrasive blades are used to machine a rare earth magnet block of certain size into a multiplicity of parts, the relationship of the cutting part (axial) width of<!-- EPO <DP n="3"> --> the saw blade is crucially correlated to the material yield of the workpiece (magnet block). It is important to maximize a material yield and productivity by using a cutting part with a minimal width, machining at a high accuracy to minimize a machining allowance and reduce chips, and increasing the number of parts available.</p>
<p id="p0007" num="0007">In order to form a cutting part with a minimal width (or thinner cutting part) from the standpoint of material yield, the abrasive wheel core must be thin. In the case of OD blade 11 shown in <figref idref="f0001">FIG. 1</figref>, its core 11b is usually made of steel materials from the standpoints of material cost and mechanical strength. Of these steel materials, alloy tool steels classified as SK, SKS, SKD, SKT, and SKH according to the JIS standards are often used in commercial practice. However, in an attempt to saw a hard material such as rare earth magnet by a thin OD blade, the prior art core of alloy tool steel is short in mechanical strength and becomes deformed or bowed during sawing operation, losing dimensional accuracy.</p>
<p id="p0008" num="0008">One solution to this problem is a cutoff wheel for use with rare earth magnet alloys comprising a core of cemented carbide to which high hardness abrasive grains such as diamond and CBN are bonded with a binding system such as resin bonding, metal bonding or electroplating, as described in <patcit id="pcit0002" dnum="JPH10175172A"><text>JP-A H10-175172</text></patcit>. Use of cemented carbide as the core material mitigates buckling deformation by stresses during machining, ensuring that rare earth magnet is sawed at a high accuracy. However, if a high frictional resistance is exerted between the cutting part and the magnet during sawing of the magnet, high accuracy machining is not expected. In particular, if substantial friction occurs between the side surface of the cutting part (not directly contributing to grinding operation) and the magnet, the grinding resistance is enhanced. Then, even if the cemented carbide core is used, chipping and/or bowing can occur, adversely affecting the machined state.<!-- EPO <DP n="4"> --></p>
<p id="p0009" num="0009">One solution to the above problem is to add a lubricant such as fatty acid to grinding fluid or coolant. However, since the space between the saw blade and the workpiece or rare earth magnet is extremely narrow, it is difficult to effectively supply the coolant between the saw blade and the magnet.</p>
<p id="p0010" num="0010"><patcit id="pcit0003" dnum="JP2004050331A"><text>JP2004050331A</text></patcit> shows on paragraph [0006] and <figref idref="f0002">figure 2</figref> a single super abrasive wheel with hard particles of diamond or CBN for grinding metal, ceramics, glass, plastics, rubber or composite materials, said blade has in the composition of its cutting part lubricant fillers such as hexagonal crystal boron nitride. However, such a blade is not adapted to be stacked in a multiple blade assembly for cutting slices of rare earth magnet and the lubricant particles are of unknown sizes.</p>
<heading id="h0003"><u>Citation List</u></heading>
<p id="p0011" num="0011">Patent Document 1: <patcit id="pcit0004" dnum="JPH10175172A"><text>JP-A H10-175172</text></patcit></p>
<heading id="h0004"><u>THE INVENTION</u></heading>
<p id="p0012" num="0012">An object of the invention is to provide a saw blade according to claim 1 in the form of a resinoid wheel, which is used in multiple sawing of a rare earth magnet block into multiple pieces, which reduces the sawing resistance between the saw blade and the magnet block, and which ensures sawing at a high accuracy and high speed even if the saw blade is thinner than the conventional blades. Another object is to provide a method for sawing a rare earth magnet block into multiple pieces according to claim 14. Further preferred embodiments are defined by the dependent claims 1-13 and 15.</p>
<p id="p0013" num="0013">The invention pertains to a multiple blade assembly comprising a plurality of saw blades coaxially mounted on a rotating shaft at axially spaced apart positions. The multiple blade assembly is used for sawing a rare earth magnet block into multiple pieces by rotating the plurality of saw blades. The saw blade has a core in the form of a thin disk or thin doughnut disk and a peripheral cutting part on an outer peripheral rim of the core. The inventors have developed a saw blade in the form of a resinoid wheel having a cutting part made of a composition comprising a component or lubricant for reducing the friction between the cutting part and the magnet block during the sawing operation. When the magnet block is sawed by the saw blades, the sawing operation experiences a reduced cutting resistance, and achieves an equivalent yield and accuracy compared with the prior art even if thinner saw blades are used.<!-- EPO <DP n="5"> --></p>
<p id="p0014" num="0014">The invention generally pertains to a multiple blade assembly comprising a plurality of saw blades coaxially mounted on a rotating shaft at axially spaced apart positions,<!-- EPO <DP n="6"> --> which is used for sawing a rare earth magnet block into multiple pieces by rotating the plurality of saw blades. In one aspect, the invention provides the saw blade comprising a core in the form of a thin disk or thin doughnut disk and a peripheral cutting part on an outer peripheral rim of the core, the cutting part being made of a composition comprising an abrasive, a resin binder, and a lubricant for reducing the friction between the cutting part and the magnet block during the sawing operation.</p>
<p id="p0015" num="0015">The lubricant is boron nitride and is in particulate form having a particle size in the range of 1 to 200 µm.</p>
<p id="p0016" num="0016">Typically, the cutting part is made of a composition comprising 10 to 40% by weight of abrasive, e.g. diamond and/or CBN, 20 to 60% by weight of structural matrix material, preferably selected from SiC having a particle size of 1 to 100 µm, SiO<sub>2</sub> having a particle size of 1 to 100 µm, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> having a particle size of 1 to 100 µm, WC having a particle size of 0.1 to 50 µm, Fe, Ni and Cu having a particle size of 1 to 200 µm, and mixtures thereof; 10 to 50% by weight of a thermosetting resin as the binder; and 1 to 50% by weight of the lubricant material.</p>
<heading id="h0005"><u>ADVANTAGEOUS EFFECTS</u></heading>
<p id="p0017" num="0017">The saw blades in the form of a resinoid wheel are used in multiple sawing of a rare earth magnet block into multiple pieces. As compared with the prior art, the saw<br/>
<!-- EPO <DP n="7"> -->blade reduces the cutting resistance, improves the sawing accuracy, and ensures sawing at a high accuracy and high speed even if the saw blade is thinner than the conventional blades. The blade is of great worth in the industry.</p>
<heading id="h0006"><u>BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS</u></heading>
<p id="p0018" num="0018">
<ul id="ul0001" list-style="none" compact="compact">
<li><figref idref="f0001">FIG. 1</figref> illustrates a multiple blade assembly in one embodiment of the invention, <figref idref="f0001">FIG. 1a</figref> being a perspective view and <figref idref="f0001">FIG. 1b</figref> being a cross-sectional view.</li>
<li><figref idref="f0002">FIG. 2</figref> is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a peripheral portion of the saw blade.</li>
</ul></p>
<heading id="h0007"><u>FURTHER EXPLANATIONS; OPTIONS AND PREFERENCES</u></heading>
<p id="p0019" num="0019">The term "axial" refers to the axis of a rotating shaft and "radial" refers to a circular blade in an assembly. The width of the cutting part corresponds to an axial size in this sense.</p>
<p id="p0020" num="0020">A multiple blade assembly is constructed by coaxially mounting a plurality of saw blades on a rotating shaft at axially spaced apart positions (as shown in <figref idref="f0001">FIG. 1</figref>). The multiple blade assembly is operated by rotating the plurality of saw blades to saw a rare earth magnet block into multiple pieces at once. A saw blade 23 in the form of a resinoid wheel embodying the invention is shown in <figref idref="f0002">FIG. 2</figref> as comprising a core 21 in the form of a thin disk (which may be a "doughnut disk", i.e. with a central hole) and a peripheral cutting part 22 on an outer peripheral rim of core 21. The cutting part 22 is made of a composition comprising an abrasive 24, a resin binder, and solid lubricant to reduce friction between the cutting part and the workpiece (or magnet block) during the sawing operation.</p>
<p id="p0021" num="0021">According to the invention, the lubricant used herein includes boron nitride, and optionally carbon (including graphite and amorphous carbon), molybdenum disulfide, tungsten disulfide, graphite fluoride, and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), which may be used alone or in admixture of two or more. Although the conventional sawing operation is difficult to reduce the friction between<!-- EPO <DP n="8"> --> the cutting part side surface and the workpiece by providing a coolant supply for lubrication, the inclusion of the lubricant within the cutting part is effective for reducing the friction between the cutting part side surface and the workpiece, thereby preventing the cutting edge from axial runout during the sawing operation. This allows the cutting part to transmit its grinding force only in a radial direction and ensures high-accuracy sawing operation even with the saw blade using a thin core with a low deflective strength.</p>
<p id="p0022" num="0022">If a smaller amount of the lubricant is used, the effect of reducing friction on the side surface is reduced. A larger amount of the lubricant used has the problem that since the lubricant lacks the strength of a structural matrix, not only the strength of the cutting part of the blade is reduced, but also the frictional force of the grinding surface is reduced, resulting in a degraded grinding rate. The lubricant should preferably be used in an amount of 1 to 50% by weight of the composition of which the cutting part is made. As to the preferred amount of each species (% by weight based on the composition), boron nitride is 1 to 40% by weight, carbon (including graphite and amorphous carbon) is 1 to 40% by weight, molybdenum disulfide is 1 to 40% by weight, tungsten disulfide is 5 to 50% by weight, graphite fluoride is 5 to 40% by weight, and PTFE is 5 to 40% by weight. More preferably, boron nitride is 5 to 30% by weight, carbon (including graphite and amorphous carbon) is 5 to 30% by weight, molybdenum disulfide is 5 to 30% by weight, tungsten disulfide is 10 to 40% by weight, graphite fluoride is 10 to 30% by weight, and PTFE is 10 to 30% by weight. When a mixture of two or more lubricants is used, the total amount should preferably be in the range of 1 to 50% by weight, more preferably 5 to 40% by weight.</p>
<p id="p0023" num="0023">The solid lubricant material is in particulate form. Since the cutting part has a width of 0.2 to 2 mm, a particle size in excess of 0.2 mm (200 µm) is inadequate. Too fine particles have an increased volume, detracting from the<!-- EPO <DP n="9"> --> strength of the cutting part. According to the invention, the lubricant has a particle size of 1 to 200 µm, more preferably 10 to 150 µm.</p>
<p id="p0024" num="0024">In addition to the lubricant, the composition of which the cutting part is made contains abrasive grains, a resin binder, and a structural matrix. Preferred structural matrix materials include SiC e.g. of particle size 1 to 100 <i>µ</i>m, SiO<sub>2</sub> e.g. of particle size 1 to 100 <i>µ</i>m, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> e.g. of particle size 1 to 100 <i>µ</i>m, WC e.g. of particle size 0.1 to 50 <i>µ</i>m, also Fe, Ni and Cu e.g. of particle size 1 to 200 <i>µ</i>m. Matrix materials may be used alone or in admixture of two or more. The role of the structural matrix material is to increase the strength of the cutting part, prevent the cutting part from deforming in a direction perpendicular to the feed direction of the saw blade during the sawing operation, prevent the cutting edge from axial runout during the sawing operation, allows the saw blade to transmit its grinding force only in a radial direction, and ensures high-accuracy sawing operation even with the saw blade using a thin core with a low deflective strength. The matrix is available in particulate form. Too fine particles have an increased volume, failing to provide the cutting part with strength. If the particle size is large, only one particle is present per width of the cutting part, also leading to a reduced strength. Thus the matrix preferably has a particle size in the above range. More preferably, the particle size of SiC is 2 to 50 µm, SiO<sub>2</sub> is 2 to 50 µm, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> is 2 to 50 µm, WC is 1 to 30 µm, and Fe, Ni and Cu is 10 to 150 µm.</p>
<p id="p0025" num="0025">The matrix material is preferably used at from 20 to 60% by weight, more preferably 25 to 50% by weight of the composition. Outside the range, a smaller amount of the matrix may be less effective whereas a larger amount may detract from the strength of the cutting part.</p>
<p id="p0026" num="0026">The abrasive grains may be any well-known abrasives, preferably diamond and CBN. The abrasive grains preferably have a particle size of 10 to 200 µm, more preferably 50 to<!-- EPO <DP n="10"> --> 200 µm. A particle size in excess of 200 µm may exceed the width of the cutting part whereas a smaller particle size may interfere with grinding efficiency, sawing speed, and productivity. The abrasive should preferably be used in an amount of 20 to 60% by weight, more preferably 20 to 40% by weight of the composition. Outside the range, a smaller amount of the abrasive may lead to a lower grinding rate whereas a larger amount may detract from the strength of the cutting part.</p>
<p id="p0027" num="0027">The binder has a function of binding diamond or CBN, the lubricant and the matrix together to high strength so that a cutting part having a high stiffness despite thinness may be formed. Thermosetting resins are preferred as the binder. Inter alia, phenolic resins, formaldehyde resins and urea resins are more preferred. Phenol formaldehyde resins obtained by condensation of phenol and formaldehyde are most preferred since they have excellent heat resistance and water resistance and can tightly bind the abrasive and matrix. Melamine resins prepared from melamine and formaldehyde are also favorable. The binder should preferably be used in an amount of 10 to 50% by weight of the composition. Outside the range, a smaller amount of the binder may be weak in binding the other components whereas a larger amount of the binder indicates smaller amounts of the other components, leading to shortage of strength, grinding rate and lubrication.</p>
<p id="p0028" num="0028">The core supporting the cutting part is preferably made of cemented carbide. Any suitable cemented carbide e.g. as described in Patent Document 1 may be used.</p>
<p id="p0029" num="0029">The workpiece which is intended herein to saw is a rare earth magnet block. The rare earth magnet as the workpiece is not particularly limited. Suitable rare earth magnets include sintered rare earth magnets of R-Fe-B systems wherein R is at least one rare earth element inclusive of yttrium.</p>
<p id="p0030" num="0030">Suitable sintered rare earth magnets of R-Fe-B systems are those magnets containing, in weight percent, 5 to 40% of R, 50 to 90% of Fe, and 0.2 to 8% of B, and optionally one or<!-- EPO <DP n="11"> --> more additive elements selected from C, Al, Si, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Zr, Nb, Mo, Ag, Sn, Hf, Ta, and W, for the purpose of improving magnetic properties and corrosion resistance. The amounts of additive elements added are conventional, for example, up to 30 wt% of Co, and up to 8 wt% of the other elements. The additive elements, if added in extra amounts, rather adversely affect magnetic properties.</p>
<p id="p0031" num="0031">Suitable sintered rare earth magnets of R-Fe-B systems may be prepared, for example, by weighing source metal materials, melting, casting into an alloy ingot, finely dividing the alloy into particles with an average particle size of 1 to 20 µm, i.e., sintered R-Fe-B magnet powder, compacting the powder in a magnetic field, sintering the compact at 1,000 to 1,200°C for 0.5 to 5 hours, and heat treating at 400 to 1,000°C.</p>
<p id="p0032" num="0032">When the rare earth magnet block is sawed into a multiplicity of pieces by the multiple blade assembly of saw blades, any well-known procedures may be employed.</p>
<heading id="h0008"><u>EXAMPLE</u></heading>
<p id="p0033" num="0033">Examples and Comparative Examples are given below for further illustrating the invention although the invention is not limited thereto.</p>
<heading id="h0009"><u>Example 1</u></heading>
<p id="p0034" num="0034">OD blades were fabricated by providing a<br/>
doughnut-shaped disk core of cemented carbide (consisting of WC 90 wt%/Co 10 wt%) having an outer diameter 120 mm, inner diameter 40 mm, and thickness 0.3 mm, and heat pressing a composition to an outer peripheral rim of the core to form a resinoid grinding wheel section or cutting part. The composition contained 10 wt% of graphite having a particle size of 5 to 30 µm as the lubricant, 40 wt% of #800 SiC (GC powder) as the matrix, 25 wt% of a phenol formaldehyde resin as the binder, and 25 wt% of synthetic diamond grains having an average particle size of 150 µm. Subsequent finish work<!-- EPO <DP n="12"> --> completed OD blades (or sawing abrasive blades). The axial extension of the cutting part from the core was 0.05 mm on each side, that is, the cutting part had a width of 0.4 mm (in the thickness direction of the core). The radial extension or length of the cutting part is 2.5 mm, that is, the blade had an outer diameter of 125 mm.</p>
<p id="p0035" num="0035">Using the OD blades, a sawing test was carried out on a workpiece which was a sintered Nd-Fe-B magnet block. A multiple blade assembly was constructed as shown in <figref idref="f0001">FIG. 1</figref> by coaxially mounting 41 OD blades on a shaft at an axial spacing of 2.1 mm, with spacers interposed therebetween. The spacers each had an outer diameter 85 mm, inner diameter 40 mm, and thickness 2.1 mm. The multiple blade assembly was designed so that the magnet block was cut into magnet strips having a thickness of 2.0 mm.</p>
<p id="p0036" num="0036">Using the multiple blade assembly consisting of 41 OD blades and 40 spacers alternately mounted on the shaft, the sintered Nd-Fe-B magnet block was sawed. The sintered Nd-Fe-B magnet block had a length 101 mm, width 30 mm and height 17 mm and had been polished on all six surfaces at an accuracy of ±0.05 mm by a vertical double-disk polishing tool. By the multiple blade assembly, the magnet block was longitudinally divided into a multiplicity of magnet strips of 2.0 mm thick. Specifically, one magnet block was cut into 40 magnet strips.</p>
<p id="p0037" num="0037">The sawing operation was carried out while supplying 30 L/min of a grinding fluid or coolant from the feed nozzle, rotating the OD blades at 7,000 rpm (circumferential speed of 46 m/sec), and feeding the multiple blade assembly at a speed of 20 mm/min.</p>
<p id="p0038" num="0038">After magnet strips were cut using the OD blades constructed as above, they were measured for thickness between the machined surfaces at the center by a micrometer. The strips were rated "passed" if the measured thickness was within a cut size tolerance of 2.0±0.05 mm. If the measured thickness was outside the tolerance, the multiple blade assembly was tailored by adjusting the thickness of spacers,<!-- EPO <DP n="13"> --> so that the measured thickness might fall within the tolerance. If the spacer adjustment was repeated more than two times for the same OD blades, these OD blades were judged as having lost stability and replaced by new OD blades. Under these conditions, 1000 magnet blocks were sawed. The evaluation results of the sawed state are shown in Table 1.</p>
<heading id="h0010"><u>Comparative Example 1</u></heading>
<p id="p0039" num="0039">A sintered rare earth magnet block was sawed by the same procedure as in Example 1 except that the cutting part composition was changed. In this way, 1000 magnet blocks were sawed, and the sawed state was evaluated. The evaluation results are also shown in Table 1.</p>
<p id="p0040" num="0040">The composition of the cutting part in Comparative Example 1 contained 45 wt% of #800 SiC (GC powder) as the matrix, 30 wt% of the phenol formaldehyde resin as the binder, and 25 wt% of synthetic diamond grains having an average particle size of 150 µm.
<tables id="tabl0001" num="0001">
<table frame="all">
<title><u>Table 1</u></title>
<tgroup cols="12">
<colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="24mm"/>
<colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="17mm"/>
<colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" colwidth="13mm"/>
<thead>
<row>
<entry morerows="1" valign="middle"/>
<entry morerows="1" align="center" valign="middle">Number of strips</entry>
<entry namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center" valign="middle">After sawing of 200 blocks</entry>
<entry namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center" valign="middle">After sawing of 400 blocks</entry>
<entry namest="col7" nameend="col8" align="center" valign="middle">After sawing of 600 blocks</entry>
<entry namest="col9" nameend="col10" align="center" valign="middle">After sawing of 800 blocks</entry>
<entry namest="col11" nameend="col12" align="center" valign="middle">After sawing of 1000 blocks</entry></row>
<row>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">A</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">B</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">A</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">B</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">A</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">B</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">A</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">B</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">A</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">B</entry></row></thead>
<tbody>
<row>
<entry valign="middle">Example 1</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">40</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">0</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">0</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">0</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">0</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">0</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">0</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">0</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">0</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">0</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">0</entry></row>
<row>
<entry valign="middle">Comparative Example 1</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">40</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">10</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">0</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">16</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">2</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">25</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">7</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">39</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">18</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">69</entry>
<entry align="center" valign="middle">27</entry></row></tbody></tgroup>
<tgroup cols="12" rowsep="0">
<colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" colwidth="24mm"/>
<colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" colwidth="17mm"/>
<colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" colwidth="13mm"/>
<colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" colwidth="13mm"/>
<tbody>
<row>
<entry namest="col1" nameend="col12" align="justify">A: number of spacer adjustments<br/>
B: number of OD blade replacements</entry></row></tbody></tgroup>
</table>
</tables></p>
<p id="p0041" num="0041">As seen from Table 1, the sawing method embodying the invention maintained consistent dimensional accuracy for products over a long term despite the reduced blade thickness and is successful in reducing the number of spacer adjustments and the number of OD blade replacements. Then an increase in productivity is attained.<!-- EPO <DP n="14"> --></p>
<heading id="h0011"><u>Examples 2 to 10 and Comparative Example 2</u></heading>
<p id="p0042" num="0042">OD blades were fabricated by providing a doughnut-shaped disk core of cemented carbide (consisting of WC 90 wt%/Co 10 wt%) having an outer diameter 95 mm, inner diameter 40 mm, and thickness 0.3 mm, and heat pressing a composition shown in Table 2 to an outer peripheral rim of the core to form a cutting part. The axial extension of the cutting part from the core was 0.025 mm on each side, that is, the cutting part had a width of 0.35 mm (in the thickness direction of the core). The radial extension or length of the cutting part is 2.5 mm, that is, the blade had an outer diameter of 100 mm.</p>
<p id="p0043" num="0043">Using the OD blades, a sawing test was carried out on a workpiece which was a sintered Nd-Fe-B magnet block. A multiple blade assembly was constructed as shown in <figref idref="f0001">FIG. 1</figref> by coaxially mounting 38 OD blades on a shaft at an axial spacing of 1.05 mm, with spacers interposed therebetween. The spacers each had an outer diameter 70 mm, inner diameter 40 mm, and thickness 1.05 mm. The multiple blade assembly was designed so that the magnet block was cut into magnet strips having a thickness of 1.0 mm.</p>
<p id="p0044" num="0044">The multiple blade assembly consisting of 38 OD blades and 37 spacers alternately mounted on the shaft was set relative to the sintered Nd-Fe-B magnet block such that the lowermost end of the blades was 2 mm below the bottom surface of the magnet block. The sintered Nd-Fe-B magnet block had a length 50 mm, width 30 mm and height 12 mm and had been polished on all six surfaces at an accuracy of ±0.05 mm by a vertical double-disk polishing tool. By the multiple blade assembly, the magnet block was longitudinally divided into a multiplicity of magnet strips of 1.0 mm thick. Specifically, one magnet block was cut into 37 magnet strips.</p>
<p id="p0045" num="0045">The sawing operation was carried out while supplying 30 L/min of a grinding fluid or coolant from the feed nozzle, rotating the OD blades at 7,000 rpm (circumferential speed of 37 m/sec), and feeding the multiple blade assembly at a speed of 20 mm/min.<!-- EPO <DP n="15"> --></p>
<p id="p0046" num="0046">Using each of the OD blades of Examples 2 to 10 and Comparative Example 2, 1000 magnet blocks were sawed. The magnet strips were measured for thickness between the machined surfaces at the center by a micrometer. Provided that the cut size tolerance was 1.0±0.075 mm, a process capability index (Cpk) of measured thickness was computed. The results are shown in Table 2.
<tables id="tabl0002" num="0002"><img id="ib0001" file="imgb0001.tif" wi="160" he="181" img-content="table" img-format="tif"/>
</tables><!-- EPO <DP n="16"> --></p>
<p id="p0047" num="0047">As seen from Table 2, the saw blades comprising the lubricant ensures high-accuracy sawing operation even when they are as thin as 0.35 mm. The number of cut strips is increased.</p>
</description>
<claims id="claims01" lang="en"><!-- EPO <DP n="17"> -->
<claim id="c-en-01-0001" num="0001">
<claim-text>A saw blade, for use in a multiple blade assembly comprising a plurality of saw blades coaxially mounted on a rotating shaft at axially spaced apart positions, to be used for sawing a rare earth magnet block into multiple pieces by rotating the plurality of saw blades,<br/>
the saw blade comprising a core in the form of a thin disk and a peripheral cutting part on an outer peripheral rim of the core, the cutting part being made of a composition comprising an abrasive and a resin binder, <b>characterised in that</b> said composition further comprises boron nitride as a lubricant for reducing the friction between the cutting part and the magnet block during the sawing operation, and <b>in that</b> the boron nitride as the lubricant is in particulate form having a particle size in the range of 1 to 200 µm.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-en-01-0002" num="0002">
<claim-text>A saw blade of claim 1 wherein the amount of boron nitride as the lubricant in the cutting part composition is from 1 to 40% by weight.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-en-01-0003" num="0003">
<claim-text>A saw blade of claim 1 wherein the amount of boron nitride as the lubricant in the cutting part composition is 5 to 30% by weight.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-en-01-0004" num="0004">
<claim-text>A saw blade of claim 1 or 2 wherein the lubricant is in particulate form having a particle size in the range of 10 to 150 µm.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-en-01-0005" num="0005">
<claim-text>A saw blade of any one of the preceding claims in which the composition of the cutting part comprises a structural matrix material in addition to the lubricant, abrasive and resin binder.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-en-01-0006" num="0006">
<claim-text>A saw blade of claim 5 in which said matrix material is selected from SiC, SiO<sub>2</sub>, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, WC, Fe, Ni, Cu and mixtures thereof, in particulate form.<!-- EPO <DP n="18"> --></claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-en-01-0007" num="0007">
<claim-text>A saw blade of claim 5 or 6 in which the cutting part composition contains from 25 to 50% by weight of the structural matrix material.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-en-01-0008" num="0008">
<claim-text>A saw blade of claim 1 wherein said composition of the cutting part comprises
<claim-text>10 to 40% by weight of diamond and/or CBN as the abrasive,</claim-text>
<claim-text>20% to 60% by weight of matrix material selected from SiC having a particle size of 1 to 100 µm, SiO<sub>2</sub> having a particle size of 1 to 100 µm, WC having a particle size of 0.1 to 50 µm, Fe, Ni and Cu having a particle size of 1 to 200 µm, and mixtures thereof,</claim-text>
<claim-text>10 to 50% by weight of a thermosetting resin as the binder, and</claim-text>
<claim-text>1 to 50% by weight of the lubricant.</claim-text></claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-en-01-0009" num="0009">
<claim-text>A saw blade of claim 8 wherein the matrix material is said SiC having a particle size of 1 to 100 µm.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-en-01-0010" num="0010">
<claim-text>A saw blade of claim 8 or 9 in which the amount of lubricant is 1 to 40% by weight.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-en-01-0011" num="0011">
<claim-text>A saw blade of any one of the preceding claims in which the core is made of cemented carbide.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-en-01-0012" num="0012">
<claim-text>A saw blade of any one of the preceding claims in which the cutting part has a width of 0.2 to 2 mm.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-en-01-0013" num="0013">
<claim-text>A saw blade of any one of the preceding claims in which the resin binder is phenolic resin, formaldehyde resin or urea resin.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-en-01-0014" num="0014">
<claim-text>A method for sawing a rare earth magnet block into multiple pieces, comprising the steps of providing a multiple blade assembly comprising a plurality of saw blades<!-- EPO <DP n="19"> --> coaxially mounted on a rotating shaft at axially spaced apart positions, each saw blade being as set forth in any one of claims 1 to 11, and rotating the plurality of saw blades.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-en-01-0015" num="0015">
<claim-text>A multiple blade assembly for sawing rare earth magnet blocks into multiple pieces, comprising a plurality of saw blades as defined in any one of claims 1 to 13 coaxially mounted on a rotation shaft at axially spaced positions.</claim-text></claim>
</claims>
<claims id="claims02" lang="de"><!-- EPO <DP n="20"> -->
<claim id="c-de-01-0001" num="0001">
<claim-text>Sägeblatt zur Verwendung in einer Anordnung aus mehreren Sägeblättern, welche eine Vielzahl von Sägeblättern umfasst, die an axial voneinander beabstandeten Positionen koaxial auf einer Drehwelle montiert sind, um dazu verwendet zu werden, einen Seltene-Erden-Magnetblock in mehrere Stücke zu sägen, indem die Vielzahl von Sägeblättern gedreht wird,<br/>
wobei das Sägeblatt einen Kern in Form einer dünnen Scheibe sowie einen Umfangsschneideabschnitt auf einem Außenumfangsrand des Kerns umfasst, wobei der Schneideabschnitt aus einer Zusammensetzung besteht, welche ein Schleifmittel und ein Harzbindemittel umfasst, und <b>dadurch gekennzeichnet ist, dass</b> die Zusammensetzung ferner Bornitrid als Schmiermittel umfasst, um die Reibung zwischen dem Schneideabschnitt und dem Magnetblock während des Sägevorgangs zu reduzieren, und dadurch, dass das Bornitrid als Schmiermittel in einer Partikelform vorliegt, welche eine Partikelgröße im Bereich von 1 bis 200 µm aufweist.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-de-01-0002" num="0002">
<claim-text>Sägeblatt nach Anspruch 1, worin die Menge an Bornitrid als Schmiermittel in der Zusammensetzung des Schneideabschnitts von 1 bis 40 Gew.-% ist.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-de-01-0003" num="0003">
<claim-text>Sägeblatt nach Anspruch 1, worin die Menge an Bornitrid als Schmiermittel in der Zusammensetzung des Schneideabschnitts 5 bis 30 Gew.-% ist.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-de-01-0004" num="0004">
<claim-text>Sägeblatt nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, worin das Schmiermittel in Partikelform vorliegt, welche eine Partikelgröße im Bereich von 10 bis 150 µm aufweist.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-de-01-0005" num="0005">
<claim-text>Sägeblatt nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, bei welchem die Zusammensetzung des Schneideabschnittes zusätzlich zum Schmiermittel, Schleifmittel und Harzbindemittel ein Strukturmatrixmaterial umfasst.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-de-01-0006" num="0006">
<claim-text>Sägeblatt nach Anspruch 5, bei welchem das Matrixmaterial aus SiC, SiO<sub>2</sub>, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, WC, Fe, Ni, Cu und Gemischen daraus ausgewählt ist und in Partikelform vorliegt.<!-- EPO <DP n="21"> --></claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-de-01-0007" num="0007">
<claim-text>Sägeblatt nach Anspruch 5 oder 6, bei welchem die Zusammensetzung des Schneideabschnittes von 25 bis 50 Gew.-% des Strukturmatrixmaterials enthält.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-de-01-0008" num="0008">
<claim-text>Sägeblatt nach Anspruch 1, worin die Zusammensetzung des Schneideabschnittes Folgendes umfasst:
<claim-text>10 bis 40 Gew.-% Diamant und/oder CBN als Schleifmittel,</claim-text>
<claim-text>20 % bis 60 Gew.-% Matrixmaterial, welches aus SiC mit einer Partikelgröße von 1 bis 100 µm, SiO<sub>2</sub> mit einer Partikelgröße von 1 bis 100 µm, WC mit einer Partikelgröße von 0,1 bis 50 µm, Fe, Ni und Cu mit einer Partikelgröße von 1 bis 200 µm sowie Gemischen daraus ausgewählt ist,</claim-text>
<claim-text>10 bis 50 Gew.-% eines thermohärtenden Harzes als Bindemittel und</claim-text>
<claim-text>1 bis 50 Gew.-% des Schmiermittels.</claim-text></claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-de-01-0009" num="0009">
<claim-text>Sägeblatt nach Anspruch 8, worin das Matrixmaterial das SiC mit einer Partikelgröße von 1 bis 100 µm ist.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-de-01-0010" num="0010">
<claim-text>Sägeblatt nach Anspruch 8 oder 9, bei welchem der Schmiermittelanteil 1 bis 40 Gew.-% ist.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-de-01-0011" num="0011">
<claim-text>Sägeblatt nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, bei welchem der Kern aus einem Hartmetall besteht.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-de-01-0012" num="0012">
<claim-text>Sägeblatt nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, bei welchem der Schneideabschnitt eine Breite von 0,2 bis 2 mm aufweist.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-de-01-0013" num="0013">
<claim-text>Sägeblatt nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, bei welchem das Harzbindemittel ein Phenolharz, ein Formaldehydharz oder ein Harnstoffharz ist.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-de-01-0014" num="0014">
<claim-text>Verfahren zum Zersägen eines Seltene-Erden-Magnetblocks in mehrere Stücke, welches die Schritte des Bereitstellens einer Anordnung aus mehreren Sägeblättern, welche eine Vielzahl von Sägeblättern umfasst, die an axial voneinander<!-- EPO <DP n="22"> --> beabstandeten Positionen koaxial auf einer Drehwelle montiert sind, wobei jedes Sägeblatt wie in einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 11 dargelegt ist, sowie des Drehens der Vielzahl von Sägeblättern umfasst.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-de-01-0015" num="0015">
<claim-text>Anordnung aus mehreren Sägeblättern zum Zersägen von Seltene-Erden-Magnetblöcken in mehrere Stücke, welche eine Vielzahl von Sägeblättern umfasst, die wie in einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 13 definiert und an axial voneinander beabstandeten Positionen koaxial auf einer Drehwelle montiert sind.</claim-text></claim>
</claims>
<claims id="claims03" lang="fr"><!-- EPO <DP n="23"> -->
<claim id="c-fr-01-0001" num="0001">
<claim-text>Lame de scie destinée à être utilisée dans un ensemble à plusieurs lames comprenant une pluralité de lames de scie montées de manière coaxiale sur un arbre rotatif dans des positions axialement espacées, pour être utilisées pour scier un bloc d'aimant de terre rare en plusieurs morceaux en faisant tourner la pluralité de lames de scie,<br/>
la lame de scie comprenant un noyau se présentant sous la forme d'un disque fin et une partie de coupe périphérique sur un rebord périphérique externe du noyau, la partie de coupe étant réalisée avec une composition comprenant un abrasif, un liant résineux, <b>caractérisée en ce que</b> ladite composition comprend en outre du nitrure de bore en tant que lubrifiant pour réduire la friction entre la partie de coupe et le bloc d'aimant pendant l'opération de sciage, et <b>en ce que</b> :
<claim-text>le nitrure de bore en tant que lubrifiant est sous forme particulaire ayant une taille de particule dans la plage de 1 à 200 µm.</claim-text></claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-fr-01-0002" num="0002">
<claim-text>Lame de scie selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle la quantité de nitrure de bore en tant que lubrifiant dans la composition de la partie de coupe représente de 1 à 40% en poids.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-fr-01-0003" num="0003">
<claim-text>Lame de scie selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle la quantité de nitrure de bore en tant que lubrifiant dans la composition de la partie de coupe représente de 5 à 30% en poids.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-fr-01-0004" num="0004">
<claim-text>Lame de scie selon la revendication 1 ou 2, dans laquelle le lubrifiant se présente sous forme particulaire ayant une taille de particule dans la plage de 10 à 150 µm.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-fr-01-0005" num="0005">
<claim-text>Lame de scie selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle la composition de la partie de coupe comprend un matériau de matrice structurel en plus du lubrifiant, de l'abrasif et du liant résineux.<!-- EPO <DP n="24"> --></claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-fr-01-0006" num="0006">
<claim-text>Lame de scie selon la revendication 5, dans laquelle ledit matériau de matrice est choisi parmi SiC, SiO<sub>2</sub>, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, WC, Fe, Ni, Cu et leurs mélanges, sous forme particulaire.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-fr-01-0007" num="0007">
<claim-text>Lame de scie selon la revendication 5 ou 6, dans laquelle la composition de la partie de coupe contient de 25 à 50% en poids de matériau de matrice structurel.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-fr-01-0008" num="0008">
<claim-text>Lame de scie selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle ladite composition de la partie de coupe comprend :
<claim-text>de 10 à 40% en poids de diamant et/ou de CBN en tant qu'abrasif,</claim-text>
<claim-text>de 20% à 60% en poids de matériau de matrice choisi parmi SiC ayant une taille particulaire de 1 à 100 µm, SiO<sub>2</sub> ayant une taille particulaire de 1 à 100 µm, WC ayant une taille particulaire de 0,1 à 50 µm, Fe, Ni et Cu ayant une taille particulaire de 1 à 200 µm, et leurs mélanges,</claim-text>
<claim-text>de 10 à 50% en poids de résine thermodurcissable en tant que liant, et</claim-text>
<claim-text>de 1 à 50% en poids de lubrifiant.</claim-text></claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-fr-01-0009" num="0009">
<claim-text>Lame de scie selon la revendication 8, dans laquelle le matériau de matrice est ledit SiC ayant une taille particulaire de 1 à 100 µm.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-fr-01-0010" num="0010">
<claim-text>Lame de scie selon la revendication 8 ou 9, dans laquelle la quantité de lubrifiant représente de 1 à 40% en poids.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-fr-01-0011" num="0011">
<claim-text>Lame de scie selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle le noyau est réalisé avec un carbure fritté.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-fr-01-0012" num="0012">
<claim-text>Lame de scie selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle la partie de coupe a une largeur de 0,2 à 2 mm.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-fr-01-0013" num="0013">
<claim-text>Lame de scie selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans laquelle le liant résineux est de la résine phénolique, de la résine formaldéhyde ou une résine d'urée.<!-- EPO <DP n="25"> --></claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-fr-01-0014" num="0014">
<claim-text>Procédé pour scier un bloc d'aimant de terre rare en plusieurs morceaux, comprenant les étapes consistant à prévoir un ensemble à plusieurs lames comprenant une pluralité de lames de scie montées de manière coaxiale sur un arbre rotatif dans des positions axialement espacées, chaque lame de scie étant selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 11, et faire tourner la pluralité de lames de scie.</claim-text></claim>
<claim id="c-fr-01-0015" num="0015">
<claim-text>Ensemble à plusieurs lames pour scier des blocs d'aimant de terre rare en plusieurs morceaux, comprenant une pluralité de lames de scie selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 13 montées de manière coaxiale sur un arbre de rotation dans des positions axialement espacées.</claim-text></claim>
</claims>
<drawings id="draw" lang="en"><!-- EPO <DP n="26"> -->
<figure id="f0001" num="1A,1B"><img id="if0001" file="imgf0001.tif" wi="118" he="233" img-content="drawing" img-format="tif"/></figure><!-- EPO <DP n="27"> -->
<figure id="f0002" num="2"><img id="if0002" file="imgf0002.tif" wi="45" he="114" img-content="drawing" img-format="tif"/></figure>
</drawings>
<ep-reference-list id="ref-list">
<heading id="ref-h0001"><b>REFERENCES CITED IN THE DESCRIPTION</b></heading>
<p id="ref-p0001" num=""><i>This list of references cited by the applicant is for the reader's convenience only. It does not form part of the European patent document. Even though great care has been taken in compiling the references, errors or omissions cannot be excluded and the EPO disclaims all liability in this regard.</i></p>
<heading id="ref-h0002"><b>Patent documents cited in the description</b></heading>
<p id="ref-p0002" num="">
<ul id="ref-ul0001" list-style="bullet">
<li><patcit id="ref-pcit0001" dnum="US6386948B1"><document-id><country>US</country><doc-number>6386948</doc-number><kind>B1</kind></document-id></patcit><crossref idref="pcit0001">[0002]</crossref></li>
<li><patcit id="ref-pcit0002" dnum="JPH10175172A"><document-id><country>JP</country><doc-number>H10175172</doc-number><kind>A</kind></document-id></patcit><crossref idref="pcit0002">[0008]</crossref><crossref idref="pcit0004">[0011]</crossref></li>
<li><patcit id="ref-pcit0003" dnum="JP2004050331A"><document-id><country>JP</country><doc-number>2004050331</doc-number><kind>A</kind></document-id></patcit><crossref idref="pcit0003">[0010]</crossref></li>
</ul></p>
</ep-reference-list>
</ep-patent-document>
