| (19) |
 |
|
(11) |
EP 2 672 038 B1 |
| (12) |
EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION |
| (45) |
Mention of the grant of the patent: |
|
15.11.2017 Bulletin 2017/46 |
| (22) |
Date of filing: 27.05.2013 |
|
| (51) |
International Patent Classification (IPC):
|
|
| (54) |
A building seismic strengthening system
Seismisches Gebäudeverstärkungssystem
Système de renfort sismique de bâtiment
|
| (84) |
Designated Contracting States: |
|
AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL
NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
| (30) |
Priority: |
06.06.2012 SI 201200184 P
|
| (43) |
Date of publication of application: |
|
11.12.2013 Bulletin 2013/50 |
| (73) |
Proprietor: CBD d.o.o. |
|
3000 Celje (SI) |
|
| (72) |
Inventors: |
|
- Dujic, Bruno
3000 Celja (SI)
- Sustersic, Iztok
1000 Ljubljana (SI)
|
| (74) |
Representative: Knoop, Philipp |
|
VKK Patentanwälte
An der Alster 84 20099 Hamburg 20099 Hamburg (DE) |
| (56) |
References cited: :
WO-A1-93/14278 CN-B- 101 863 058 JP-A- 2006 125 069 US-A1- 2004 071 524
|
CN-A- 101 215 930 JP-A- 2005 126 955 US-A- 6 074 149
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European
patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to
the European patent
granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall
not be deemed to
have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent
Convention).
|
[0001] The subject of the invention is a seismic strengthened retrofit existing building,
according to the preamble of claim 1, or to be more specific, a system for seismic
strengthening of walls and connecting of floor planes of existing buildings with massive
cross laminated timber panels, which also includes an insulation effect.
[0002] CN 101215930 A discloses walls of a building which are strengthened by timber panels fixed at the
walls with anchoring bolts, the timber panels being glued to the walls. There is no
teaching how these walls can be used in connections with a building with more than
one storey. This document shows all the technical features of the preamble of claim
1.
WO 93/14278 A1 discloses a wall structure with an elongate track secured to a foundation structure
of a building having a plurality of posts secured thereto. Disposed between the posts
are a plurality of interlocking foam wall sections which encapsulate the posts of
the wall structure. This construction may be applied when constructing the building
from the very first. It can, however not be applied for retrofit of an existing building.
Current state of the art
[0003] There are quite some known systems for seismic strengthening of existing buildings.
According to document
KR 100989218 a method for seismic strengthening of partition walls of an existing masonry building
is known. Steel rods are drilled into the walls from one or both sides. They are sticking
out and are orientated perpendicularly to the wall plane. Just next to the wall, from
one or both sides, steel rods are placed diagonally over the whole wall area in both
directions. The steel rods are moulded in a layer of non-shrinkable mortar that connects
the new construction with the existing one. Weakness and deficiency of this solution
is above all in the fact that in order to provide the mortar layer(s), a framework
needs to be constructed and later removed. The proposed solution of clamping a wall
with steel rods does not significantly differ from the conventional solution of using
a steel mesh.
[0004] According to document
JP 9228658 a method for seismic strengthening of the walls of an existing building with laminated
timber plates made of glued laminated timber (parallel lamination) is known. The plates
are used as infill of existing frames and are attached to them with connecting construction
and steel mechanical fasteners. Weakness and deficiency of this solution is above
all in the fact that parallel glued laminated timber plates are used that are very
deformation sensitive to moisture changes, which negatively influences the existing
strengthening construction. In addition, the compression and tension strengths of
parallel-glued laminated timber elements perpendicularly to fibers are very low. Furthermore,
weakness and deficiency is in the fact that this solution is only usable for concrete
frame constructions and only from the inside but not the outside of an existing building.
Hence the outer walls of a building are not seismically strengthened. Such strengthening
structures are only used as partition walls. As the strengthening timber structure
can only be attached around its perimeter, it can only be connected at floor levels.
Therefore such a system is especially problematic for buildings that do not have RC
floor slabs.
[0005] According to document
JP 2009174148 a method for seismic strengthening of reinforced concretes buildings with strengthening
panels, additional concrete walls and light-weight infills is known. The walls of
an existing building are confined with strengthening panels, bolted together with
threaded rods, hence clamping the walls and transferring friction forces to themselves.
Weakness and deficiency of this solution is in the fact that it is only suitable for
reinforced concrete frame-type structures and that using a light material for filling
in the gap between the strengthening panels and existing walls is unreliable, making
the construction more demanding.
[0006] Furthermore, according to document
JP 2009097165 an outer strengthening structure of an existing building where the strengthening
frame is connected to the outer side of the structure at storey levels is known. A
separate strengthening frame is connected to each individual storey and the frames
are later connected together, as a rule, at mid-storey height. Weakness and deficiency
of this solution is in the fact that it is mostly suitable for frame-type structures,
that it is only attached to the existing structures at storey levels and that the
strengthening frames on the outer side significantly change the buildings' appearance.
[0007] The common characteristic of described known solutions is that the walls of buildings
are cladded with unsuitable strengthening panels or infills, whereby their construction
and connections do not enable sufficient seismic strengthening, they are not useful
for all types of walls and partition walls of a building, they do not improve the
thermal insulation of seismically retrofitted buildings and due to the high carbon
footprint of steel and concrete they do not meet contemporary ecology demands. As
these strengthening panels and infills do not provide a thermal insulation effect,
additional thermal insulation needs to be installed on building façades.
[0008] Due to the formerly mentioned weaknesses and deficiencies of known seismic retrofitting
solutions of existing buildings in seismic areas, there is a need for an effective
strengthening system for all types of walls that will allow a sufficient seismic mainly
horizontal load transfer and also a sufficient thermal insulation of buildings, all
in the scope of valid ecology standards.
The technical problem solution
[0009] According to the invention, the technical problem is resolved with a seismic strengthening
system with the features of claim 1. The invention will be more precisely described
in relation to the feasibility example and figures, which show as follows:
- Fig. 1
- the strengthening system according to the invention shown via a partial cross section
of the outer envelope of an existing building in an isometric projection
- Fig. 2
- a building's wall cladded with a massive monolithic panel in a dimetric projection
- Fig. 3
- same as in Fig. 2, however, the massive panel used for cladding and strengthening
a wall is assembled from smaller pieces
- Fig. 4
- a longitudinal cross section through a floor construction of a strengthened wall cladded
with a massive timber panel and partial cross sections of connection elements
- Fig. 5
- a detail of massive panel connections in the example of assembled panels, with a partial
cross-section of attachment
- Fig. 6
- a cladded and strengthened building's wall with a massive panel running uninterrupted
from the foundation to the roof of the building, embodiment that is not part of the
invention.
The building seismic strengthening system is made from massive cross laminated timber
panels 3 with which the walls 1 of an existing building are cladded from the outer
and/or inner side. The massive cross laminated timber panels 3 are attached to the
walls with a layer of glue 4 and additionally fixed with connections, namely anchor
bolts 5 in the presented feasibility example, and self-tapping wood screws 11. The
openings 7 for the existing windows and doors in walls 1 of an existing building are
cut out of the massive cross laminated timber panels 3 and/or encircled with them
so that they are left uncovered. In some other feasibility example, not shown here,
some doors and windows in the walls 1 of an existing building can also be covered
with massive cross laminated timber panels 3. According to the invention, for existing
buildings with two or more floors the massive cross laminated timber panels 3 are
interconnected with flat steel ties 6, typically at around each floor structure 2
area. In the seismic strengthening system according to the invention the massive cross
laminated timber plates 3 are placed onto the walls 1 of the masonry building. This
is shown in Fig. 1. In some other feasibility example, not shown here, the massive
cross laminated timber plates 3 can also be used to clad and strengthen walls 1 made
from concrete, timber or any other material, which can be used for this purpose, or
a combination of materials, with or without an insulation layer and/or a façade.
[0010] As shown in Fig. 2, the walls 1 in the appurtenant storeys of an existing building
is strengthened with a monolithic massive cross laminated timber plate 3 that completely
and in one piece covers the inner and/or outer side of an individual wall 1. In such
a case the openings 7 for existing doors and/or windows in wall 1 are cut out of the
massive cross laminated timber panel 3, which runs from the foundation 8 and partially
over the edge of the floor structure 2, in advance. As mentioned before the monolithic
massive cross laminated timber panels 3 are attached to the walls 1 and floor structures
2 with a layer of glue 4 and additionally connected with anchoring bolts 5 placed
over their surface at a certain spacing. A layer of glue 4 suitable for the task is
used.
[0011] As shown in Fig. 3, the walls 1 of the existing building can be cladded, conversely
strengthened, from one or both sides, with massive cross laminated timber panels 3
made from several smaller pieces 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 to 3.n of various
shapes and dimensions. Together they form connecting areas 9 that are additionally
connected on adjacent edges with self-tapping wood screws 11. Individual pieces 3.1
to 3.n of the massive cross laminated timber panel 3 are attached to wall 1 as in
the feasibility example in Fig. 2, namely with anchoring bolts 5. The advantage of
the multi-piece assembly of the massive cross laminated timber panels 3 over before
described monolithic one, is that cutting of openings 7 for the existing windows and
doors is not necessary as the openings are formed during the cladding and attaching
of pieces of massive cross laminated timber panels 3.1 to 3.n around window and door
openings in walls 1 of an existing building. Above all the multi-piece assembly is
easier if the massive cross laminated timber panels 3 are being attached to the inner
side of walls 1. Smaller pieces 3.1 to 3.n are lighter and allow for an easier manipulation
without the need for lifting equipment.
[0012] In some other feasibility example, not shown here, different walls 1 can be cladded
with massive cross laminated timber panels 3, both with monolithic and multi-piece
assemblies combined, as shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. Regardless of the type of the
aforementioned assemblies of massive cross laminated timber panels 3, monolithic or
multi-piece or combined, the connecting areas 9 in the floor structure 2 zones of
an existing building are made in the same way as prescribed below. The connecting
areas 9, where the massive cross laminated timber plates 3 attached to walls 1 in
two adjacent stories connect, are covered along the perimeter of the floor structure
2 with a flat steel tie 6 with holes 12 that is attached to the adjacent connecting
massive cross laminated timber panels 3 with self-tapping wood screws 11. Shear forces
and bending moments are transferred via the flat steel ties 6 from higher to lower
floors of an existing building. As described before, in all these examples, the massive
cross laminated timber panels 3 are attached to the walls 1 of an existing building
with a layer of glue 4 and additionally fastened with anchoring bolts 5 and washers
10. The described is presented in Fig. 4.
[0013] When assembling the massive cross laminated timber panels 3 at parallel or perpendicular
connecting areas 9 the so called seam-connections are made with self-tapping wood
screws 11, preferentially drilled under an angle 90° or 45° as shown in Fig. 5. It
applies that 45°drilling is used for parallel plate connecting areas 9 and 90°drilling
for overlapping connections.
[0014] In some feasibility examples not part of the present invention, the walls 1 of existing
buildings can be cladded and strengthened with massive cross laminated timber panels
3 that run from the foundation 8 to the roof of the building, or any other height,
in one piece. The massive cross laminated timber panels 3 are tailored to the geometry
of the existing building's envelope. Optimally, they are made from 3 to 7 or even
more layers of cross laminated timber lamellas of arbitrary thickness where every
layer runs perpendicularly to the two neighbouring ones. The necessary thickness of
the massive cross laminated timber panels 3 is prescribed according to the static
and seismic demands of the building. The panels need to be made with a hydraulic system
press.
[0015] The massive cross laminated timber panels 3 are attached to the walls 1 of an existing
building from the outer and/or inner side in the same formerly prescribed manner.
[0016] The layer of glue 4 is made of epoxide resin and added fillers with which we can
fill larger deviations between the existing walls 1 of an existing building and massive
cross laminated timber panels 3. An epoxy resin allowing for up to a few centimetre
glue layer 4 is chosen.
[0017] The anchoring bolts 5, with which massive cross laminated timber panels 3 are attached
to the walls 1 on an existing building, ensure a suitable bond forming between the
two. During an earthquake the anchoring bolts 5 ensure that delamination does not
occur between the massive cross laminated timber panels 3 and the cladded and strengthened
existing walls 1, namely allowing the layer of glue 4 to perform.
As described earlier, the openings 7 in massive cross laminated timber panels 3 can
be cut out before their attachment onto the walls 1 of an existing building or they
can be tailored to shape by assembling smaller pieces 3.1 to 3.n around the existing
windows and doors in the wall 1. If using monolithic massive cross laminated timber
panels 3, there is a possibility of a prior installation of builders' joinery into
the openings 7, which shortens and simplifies the work on terrain and ensures a higher
quality of individual part assembly.
[0018] The massive cross laminated panels 3 are glued and bolted onto walls 1 of an existing
building but not also into its foundation 8, hence leaving them undamaged and in their
original shape. As the massive cross laminated timber panels 3 attached to the walls
1 of an existing building have a relatively low mass the additional load on the foundation
is minimal and can hence be neglected in practice.
[0019] The building seismic strengthening system according to the invention is above all
useful for strengthening the walls 1 of existing buildings built in seismically active
areas but not designed to withstand seismic loads. In case of a catastrophic earthquake
the system allows minor damage to buildings but it prevents their collapse due to
the fairly flexible strengthening cage formed by massive cross laminated timber panels
3 attached to the walls 1.
1. Seismic strengthened retrofit existing building, in which the walls (1) of the existing
building are cladded with massive cross laminated timber panels (3) from the outer
and/or inner side with the use of a layer of epoxide glue (4) and additionally connected
with anchoring bolts (5) characterized in that, the heights of individual cross laminated timber panels (3) are equal to the distance
between the floor structures (2) the anchoring bolts are used with washers (10), the
massive cross laminated timber panels (3), attached to walls (1) between adjacent
storeys, are connected together in a connection area (9) at transitions from lower
to upper storey with at least one flat steel tie (6) so that the latter covers the
appurtenant connecting area (9) and is connected to the massive cross laminated timber
panels (3) with self-taping wood screws (11).
2. The retrofit according to claim 1 is characterized in that the massive cross laminated timber panels (3) are made either monolithic, covering
complete individual wall (1) of the existing building in one piece or in an multi-piece
assembly where more pieces (3.1) to (3.n) are put together to cover the individual
walls (1).
3. The retrofit according to claim 2 is characterized in that openings (7) for doors and windows in the walls (1) of an existing building are cut
out of the massive monolithic cross laminated timber panels (3).
4. The retrofit according to claim 3 is characterized in that the openings (7) for windows and doors in the walls (1) of the existing building
are encircled with separate pieces (3.1) to (3.n) of massive cross laminated timber
panels (3).
5. The retrofit according to claim 1 is characterized in that the massive cross laminated timber panels (3) are connected within an individual
storey at connecting areas (9) and are joined together with self-tapping wood screws
(11).
6. The retrofit according to claim 1 is characterized in that the massive cross laminated timber panels (3) are made from at least three to seven
or more layers of timber lamellas that run perpendicularly to each other and are glued
together.
7. The retrofit according to claim 1 is characterized in that the massive cross laminated timber panels (3) are glued and attached to the walls
(1) on the inner or outer side of the existing building.
1. Nachrüstung bestehender Gebäude gegen Erdbeben, bei der die Wände (1) des bestehenden
Gebäudes mit massiven, kreuzlaminierten Holzplatten (3) von außen und/oder innen verkleidet
sind, wobei diese durch eine Schicht aus Epoxidkleber (4) und zusätzlich durch Verankerungsbolzen
(5) verbunden sind, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Höhen einzelner kreuzlaminierter Holzplatten (3) gleich dem Abstand zwischen
den Bodenstrukturen (2) sind, wobei die massiven, kreuzlaminierten Holzplatten (3)
an den Wänden (1) zwischen benachbarten Geschossen durch die Verwendung von Verankerungsbolzen
mit Unterlegscheiben (10) befestigt und in einem Verbindungsbereich bei Übergängen
vom unteren zum oberem Geschoß mit mindestens einem flachen Stahlband (6) verbunden
sind, so dass dieses den zugehörigen Verbindungsbereich (9) abdeckt, wobei dieses
mit den massiven kreuzlaminierten Holzplatten (3) mit selbstklebenden Holzschrauben
(11) verbunden ist.
2. Nachrüstung nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die massiven kreuzlaminierten Holzplatten (3) entweder monolithisch ausgebildet sind
und die gesamte Einzelwand (1) des bestehenden Gebäudes in einem Stück abdecken oder
eine mehrteilige Baugruppe sind, wobei mehrere Stücke (3.1) bis (3.n) zusammengesetzt
sind, um die einzelnen Wände (1) zu bedecken.
3. Nachrüstung nach Anspruch 2, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Öffnungen (7) für bestehende Türen und Fenster in den Wänden (1) eines bestehenden
Gebäudes aus den massiven monolithischen kreuzlaminierten Holzplatten (3) ausgeschnitten
sind.
4. Nachrüstung nach Anspruch 3, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Öffnungen für Fenster und Türen in den Wänden (1) des bestehenden Gebäudes mit
separaten Teilen (3.1) bis (3.n) von massiven kreuzlaminierten Holzplatten (3) umrahmt
sind.
5. Nachrüstung nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die massiven kreuzlaminierten Holzplatten (3) innerhalb eines einzelnen Geschosses
an Verbindungsbereichen (9) verbunden und mit selbstschneidenden Holzschrauben (11)
gefügt sind.
6. Nachrüstung nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die kreuzlaminierten Holzplatten (3) aus mindestens drei bis sieben oder mehr Schichten
von Lamellen bestehen, die senkrecht zueinander verlaufen und zusammengeklebt sind.
7. Nachrüstung nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die massiven kreuzlaminierten Holzplatten (3) an den Wänden (1) an der Innen- oder
Außenseite der bestehenden Gebäude verklebt und befestigt sind.
1. Équipement de modification de bâtiment existant pour renfort sismique, dans lequel
les parois (1) du bâtiment existant sont revêtues de panneaux de bois massif lamellés
croisés (3) du côté extérieur et/ou intérieur avec l'utilisation d'une couche de colle
époxyde (4) et raccordées en outre avec des boulons d'ancrage (5), caractérisé en ce que les hauteurs de panneaux de bois lamellés croisés (3) individuels sont égales à la
distance entre les structures de sol (2), les boulons d'ancrage sont utilisés avec
des rondelles (10), les panneaux de bois massif lamellés croisés (3), attachés aux
parois (1) entre des étages adjacents, sont raccordés l'un à l'autre dans une zone
de raccordement (9) au niveau de transitions de l'étage inférieur à l'étage supérieur
avec au moins une attache plate en acier (6) de sorte que cette dernière couvre la
zone de raccordement (9) annexe et soit raccordée aux panneaux de bois massif lamellés
croisés (3) avec des vis à bois auto-taraudeuses (11).
2. Équipement de modification selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que les panneaux de bois massif lamellés croisés (3) sont réalisés soit de manière monolithique,
couvrant d'une seule pièce une paroi (1) individuelle complète du bâtiment existant,
soit dans un ensemble multi-pièces où plus de pièces (3.1) à (3.n) sont assemblées
pour couvrir les parois individuelles (1).
3. Équipement de modification selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que des ouvertures (7) pour portes et fenêtres dans les parois (1) d'un bâtiment existant
sont découpées dans les panneaux de bois massif lamellés croisés (3) monolithiques.
4. Équipement de modification selon la revendication 3, caractérisé en ce que les ouvertures (7) pour portes et fenêtres dans les parois (1) du bâtiment existant
sont encerclées avec des pièces séparées (3.1) à (3.n) de panneaux de bois massif
lamellés croisés (3).
5. Équipement de modification selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que les panneaux de bois massif lamellés croisés (3) sont raccordés à un étage individuel
au niveau de zones de raccordement (9) et sont joints l'un à l'autre avec des vis
à bois auto-taraudeuses (11).
6. Équipement de modification selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que les panneaux de bois massif lamellés croisés (3) sont réalisés à partir d'au moins
trois à sept ou plus couches de lamelles de bois qui s'étendent perpendiculairement
l'une à l'autre et sont collées l'une à l'autre.
7. Équipement de modification selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que les panneaux de bois massif lamellés croisés (3) sont collés et attachés aux parois
(1) sur le côté intérieur ou extérieur du bâtiment existant.
REFERENCES CITED IN THE DESCRIPTION
This list of references cited by the applicant is for the reader's convenience only.
It does not form part of the European patent document. Even though great care has
been taken in compiling the references, errors or omissions cannot be excluded and
the EPO disclaims all liability in this regard.
Patent documents cited in the description