Background
[0001] Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a group of disorders that cause an overproduction
of blood cells (platelets, white blood cells and red blood cells) in the bone marrow.
MPNs include polycythemia vera (PV), primary or essential thrombocythemia (ET), primary
or idiopathic myelofibrosis, chronic myelogenous (myelocytic) leukemia (CML), chronic
neutrophilic leukemia (CNL), juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JML) and chronic eosinophilic
leukemia (CEL)/hyper eosinophilic syndrome (HES). These disorders are grouped together
because they share some or all of the following features: involvement of a multipotent
hematopoietic progenitor cell, dominance of the transformed clone over the non-transformed
hematopoietic progenitor cells, overproduction of one or more hematopoietic lineages
in the absence of a definable stimulus, growth factor-independent colony formation
in vitro, marrow hypercellularity, megakaryocyte hyperplasia and dysplasia, abnormalities
predominantly involving chromosomes 1, 8, 9,13, and 20, thrombotic and hemorrhagic
diatheses, exuberant extramedullary hematopoiesis, and spontaneous transformation
to acute leukemia or development of marrow fibrosis but at a low rate, as compared
to the rate in CML. The incidence of MPNs varies widely, ranging from approximately
3 per 100,000 individuals older than 60 years annually for CML to 0.13 per 100,000
children from birth to 14 years annually for JML (
Vardiman JW et al., Blood 100 (7): 2292-302, 2002).
[0002] US20080312259 and
MESA RUBEN A ET AL: "Emerging drugs for the therapy of primary and post essential
thrombocythemia, post polycythemia vera myelofibrosis", EXPERT OPINION ON EMERGING
DRUGS ENGLAND, vol. 14, no. 3,1 September 2009 (2009-09-01), pages 471-479, disclose (3R)-3-cyclopentyl-3-[4-(7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]propanenitrile
(compound I, ruxolitinib, or INCB018424) for use in the treatment of myeloproliferative
disorders (MPDs) such as polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), myeloid
metaplasia with myelofibrosis (MMM), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), chronic myelomonocytic
leukemia (CMML),hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), systemic mast cell disease (SMCD),
primary and post essential thrombocythemia, post polycythemia vera myelofibrosis.
[0003] VANNUCCHI ALESSANDRO M ET AL: "RAD001, An Inhibitor of mTOR, Shows Clinical Activity
in a Phase I/II Study in Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) and Post Polycythemia
Vera/Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (PPV/PET MF)",BLOOD, vol. 114, no. 22,
November 2009 (2009-11),
VANNUCCHI ALESSANDRO M ET AL: "The mTOR Inhibitor, RAD001, Inhibits the Growth of
Cells From Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms", BLOOD; 51 ST ANNUAL MEETING
OF THE AMERICAN-SOCIETY-OF-HEMATOLOGY, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY, US; NEW ORLEANS,
US, vol. 114, no. 22, 20 November 2009 (2009-11-20), page 1139,
JANES MATTHEW R ET AL: "Effective and selective targeting of leukemia cells using
a TORC1/2 kinase inhibitor.", NATURE MEDICINE FEB 2010 LNKD- PUBMED:20072130, vol.
16, no. 2, February 2010 (2010-02), pages 205-213, and
MANCINI MANUELA ET AL: "RAD 001 (everolimus) prevents mTOR and Akt late re-activation
in response to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia.", JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
1 FEB 2010 LNKD- PUBMED:20014066, vol. 109, no. 2, February 2010 (2010-02-01), pages
320-328, discloses mTOR inhibitors everolimus (RAD001) and 2-(4-Amino-1-isopropyl-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-3-yl)-1H-indol-5-ol
(PP242) for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms, such as primary myelofibrosis
and post polycytemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, chronic myeloid
leukemia.
[0004] Accordingly, there remains a need for new treatments of MPNs, as well as other cancers.
Summary of the Invention
[0005] The present invention is defined in the appended claims. Subject matters which are
not encompassed by the scope of the claims do not form part of the present claimed
invention.
[0006] Provided herein is a combination therapy comprising an mTOR inhibitor and a JAK inhibiton
as defined in the appended claims. The combination therapy is useful for the treatment
of a variety of cancers, including MPNs. The combination therapy is also useful for
the treatment of any number of JAK-associated diseases.
[0007] Accordingly, in one aspect, provided herein is a combination therapy comprising an
mTOR inhibitor and a JAK inhibitory as defined in the appended claims. In one embodiment,
the JAK inhibitor has the general formula set forth in formula I:

or stereoisomers, tautomers, racemates, solvates, or pharmaceutically acceptable salts
thereof. In another aspect, provided herein is a composition comprising an mTOR inhibitor
and a JAK inhibitor. In a particular embodiment, the compound of formula I is (3R)-3-cyclopentyl-3-[4-(7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]propanenitrile
(Compound A), or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
[0008] In another embodiment, the JAK inhibitor is 5-Chloro-N
2-[(1S)-1-(5-fluoropyrimidin-2-yl)ethyl]-N
4-(5-methyl-1H-pyrazol-3-yl)-pyrimidine-2,4-diamine (AZD1480), or a pharmaceutically
acceptable salt thereof.
[0009] In another embodiment the mTOR inhibitor is Everolimus (RAD001) or 2-(4-amino-1-isopropyl-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-3-yl)-1H-indol-5-ol
(PP242).
[0010] In one particular embodiment, the combination therapy comprises Everolimus and Compound
A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In another particular embodiment,
the combination therapy comprises PP242 and Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable
salt thereof.
[0011] In one embodiment of the combination therapy provided herein, the mTOR inhibitor
and the JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a compound of formula I (
e.g., Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof)) as defined in the appended
claims are in a single formulation or unit dosage form. The single formulation or
unit dosage form can further comprise a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. In another
embodiment, the mTOR inhibitor and the JAK inhibitor are administered separately.
[0012] The combination therapy provided herein is useful for the treatment of a JAK-associated
disease in a subject. Accordingly, in one aspect, provided herein is a method of treating
cancer in a subject in need thereof comprising administering to the subject an effective
amount of an mTOR inhibitor and a JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a compound of formula I (
e.g., Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof)). In one embodiment,
the cancer is a myeloproliferative neoplasm. Non-limiting examples of myeloproliferative
neoplasms that can be treated using the combination therapy of the invention include,
but are not limited to, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), polycythemia vera (PV), essential
thrombocythemia (ET), primary or idiopathic myelofibrosis (PMF), chronic neutrophilic
leukemia, chronic eosinophilic leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, juvenile
myelomonocytic leukemia, hypereosinophilic syndrome, systemic mastocytosis, and atypical
chronic myelogenous leukemia. In another embodiment, the combination therapy can be
used for treatment of intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis, including primary myelofibrosis,
post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.
[0013] In one embodiment of these treatment methods, the subject is human. In another embodiment,
the treatment comprises co-administering an mTOR inhibitor and a JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a compound of formula I (
e.g.. Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof)) as defined in the appended
claims. In another embodiment, the mTOR inhibitor and the JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a compound of formula I (
e.g., Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof)) are in a single formulation
or unit dosage form. The mTOR inhibitor and the JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a compound of formula I (
e.g., Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof)) can be in separate formulations
or unit dosage forms. In still another embodiment, the treatment comprises administering
the mTOR inhibitor and the JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a compound of formula I (
e.g., Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof)) at substantially the
same time, or different times. In another embodiment, the mTOR inhibitor is administered
to the subject, followed by administration of the JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a compound of formula I (
e.g., Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof)). In still another embodiment,
the JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a compound of formula I (
e.g., Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof)) is administered to the
subject, followed by administration of the mTOR inhibitor. In another embodiment of
the method, the mTOR inhibitor and/or the JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a compound of formula I (
e.g., Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof)) is administered at amounts
that would not be effective when one or both of the mTOR inhibitor and the JAK inhibitor
(
e.g., a compound of formula I (
e.g., Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof) is administered alone,
but which amounts are effective in combination.
[0014] The combination therapy provided herein is also useful for inhibiting STAT5 phosphorylation.
The STAT5 phosphorylation can be inhibited in a subject in need thereof. In one embodiment,
the inhibition of STAT5 phosphorylation in a subject treats a myeloproliferative neoplasm
in the subject. The myeloproliferative neoplasm can be selected from the group consisting
of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia
(ET), primary or idiopathic myelofibrosis (PMF), chronic neutrophilic leukemia, chronic
eosinophilic leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia,
hypereosinophilic syndrome, systemic mastocytosis, and atypical chronic myelogenous
leukemia.
[0015] In another aspect, provided herein is a method of treating a myeloproliferative neoplasm
comprising administering to a subject in need thereof Everolimus and Compound A, or
a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In another aspect, provided herein is
a method of treating a myeloproliferative neoplasm comprising administering to a subject
in need thereof PP242 and Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
In one embodiment of these aspects, the myeloproliferative neoplasm is primary myelofibrosis,
post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0016]
Figures 1A - 1E show the effect of selected mTOR inhibitors, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, histone deacethylase
inhibitors and hydroxyurea on cell apoptosis and cell cycle in SET2 or HEL cells.
Figure 2 shows the effect of selected mTOR inhibitors, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, histone deacethylase
inhibitors and hydroxyurea on mTOR and JAK/STAT signaling in SET2 cells.
Detailed Description
[0017] It has been discovered that administering a combination of an mTOR inhibitor and
a JAK kinase inhibitor (
e.g., a JAK kinase inhibitor of the formula I (
e.g., Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof)) as defined in the appended
claims provides surprising, synergistic effects for treating cancer,
e.g., myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), in a subject. Such an approach - combination
or co-administration of the two types of agents - can be useful for treating individuals
suffering from cancer who do not respond to or are resistant to currently-available
therapies. The combination therapy provided herein is also useful for improving the
efficacy and/or reducing the side effects of currently-available Cancer therapies
for individuals who do respond to such therapies.
[0018] Certain terms used herein are described below. Compounds of the present invention
are described using standard nomenclature. Unless defined otherwise, all technical
and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as is commonly understood by
one of skill in the art to which this invention belongs.
mTOR Inhibitor /JAK Inhibitor Combination
[0019] Provided herein is a combination of therapeutic agents and administration methods
for the combination of agents to treat cancer,
e.g., MPNs. As used herein, a "combination of agents" and similar terms refer to a combination
of two types of agents: (1) an mTOR inhibitor and (2) a JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a JAK kinase inhibitor of the formula I (
e.g., Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof)).
[0020] The mammalian target of rapamycin, commonly known as mTOR, is a serine/threonine
protein kinase that regulates cell growth, cell proliferation, cell motility, cell
survival, protein synthesis, and transcription. mTOR is a key intermediary in multiple
mitogenic signaling pathways and plays a central role in modulating proliferation
and angiogenesis in normal tissues and neoplastic processes. Hyperactivation of mTOR
signaling has been implicated in tumorigenesis, and studies in several tumor types
suggest that the anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic properties of mTOR inhibitors
are useful in cancer therapy. mTOR exists within two complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2.
mTORC1 is sensitive to rapamycin analogs (such as temsirolimus or everolimus) and
mTORC2 is largely rapamycin-insensitive. Several mTOR inhibitors have been or are
being evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of cancer.
[0021] As used herein, the term "mTOR inhibitor" refers to a compound or a ligand that inhibits
at least one activity of an mTOR, such as the serine/threonine protein kinase activity
on at least one of its substrates (
e.g., p70S6 kinase 1, 4E-BP1, AKT/PKB and eEF2). A person skilled in the art can readily
determine whether a compound, such as rapamycin or an analogue or derivative thereof,
is an mTOR inhibitor. Methods of identifying such compounds or ligands are known in
the art. Examples of mTOR inhibitors include, without limitation, rapamycin (sirolimus),
rapamycin derivatives, CI-779, everolimus (Certican
™), ABT-578, tacrolimus (FK 506), ABT-578, AP-23675, BEZ-235, OSI-027, QLT-0447, ABI-009,
BC-210, salirasib, TAFA-93, deforolimus (AP-23573), temsirolimus (Torisel
™), 2-(4-Amino-1-isopropyl-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-3-yl)-1H-indol-5-ol (PP242)
and AP-23841.
[0022] As used herein, the term "selective mTOR inhibitor" refers to a compound or a ligand
that inhibits mTOR activity but does not inhibit PI3K activity. Suitable selective
mTOR inhibitors include RAD001. Accordingly, in one aspect, provided herein is a combination
therapy comprising a selective mTOR inhibitor and a JAK inhibitor.
[0023] Rapamycin is a known macrolide antibiotic produced by
Streptomyces hygroscopicus. Suitable derivatives of rapamycin include
e.g., compounds of formula II:

wherein
R1aa is CH3 or C3-6alkynyl,
R2aa is H or -CH2-CH2-OH, 3-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methyl-propanoyl or tetrazolyl, and
Xaa is =O, (H,H) or (H,OH)
or a prodrug thereof when R2aa is -CH2-CH2-OH, e.g., a physiologically hydrolysable ether thereof.
[0025] Representative rapamycin derivatives of formula II are,
e.g., 32-deoxorapamycin, 16-pent-2-ynyloxy-32-deoxorapamycin,16-pent-2-ynyloxy-32(S or
R)-dihydro-rapamycin,16-pent-2-ynyloxy-32(S or R)-dihydro-40-O-(2-hydroxyethyl)-rapamycin,
40-[3-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methylpropanoate]-rapamycin (also called CCI779)
or 40-epi-(tetrazolyl)-rapamycin (also called ABT578). Rapamycin derivatives may also
include the so-called rapalogs, e.g as disclosed in
WO 98/02441 and
WO 01/14387, e.g. AP23573, AP23464, AP23675 or AP23841. Further examples of a rapamycin derivative
are those disclosed under the name TAFA-93 (a rapamycin prodrug), biolimus-7 or biolimus-9.
[0026] In a preferred embodiment, the mTOR inhibitor used in the combination therapy provided
herein is Everolimus (RAD001) or 2-(4-amino-1-isopropyl-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-3-yl)-1H-indol-5-ol
(PP242) (see,
e.g.,
Apsel et al., Nature Chemical Biology 4, 691-699 (2008)).
[0027] The JAK family plays a role in the cytokine-dependent regulation of proliferation
and function of cells involved in immune response. Currently, there are four known
mammalian JAK family members: JAK1 (also known as Janus kinase-1), JAK2 (also known
as Janus kinase-2), JAK3 (also known as Janus kinase, leucocyte; JAKL; L-JAK and Janus
kinase-3) and TYK2 (also known as protein-tyrosine kinase 2). The JAK proteins range
in size from 120 to 140 kDa and comprise seven conserved JAK homology (JH) domains;
one of these is a functional catalytic kinase domain, and another is a pseudokinase
domain potentially serving a regulatory function and/or serving as a docking site
for STATs (
Scott, M. J., C. J. Godshall, et al. (2002) Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9(6): 1153-9).
[0028] As used herein, a "JAK inhibitor" refers to a compound or a ligand that inhibits
at least one activity of a JAK kinase. A "JAK inhibitor" can also be a "JAK1/JAK2
inhibitor." In certain embodiments, the JAK inhibitor induces a JAK-inhibited state.
Examples of JAK inhibitors include compounds of formula I and AZD1480.
[0029] The compound of formula I is defined as follows:

or stereoisomers, tautomers, racemates, solvates or pharmaceutically acceptable salts
thereof,
wherein.
R1, R2 and R3 are independently selected from H, halo, and C1-4 alkyl; and
Z is C3-6 cycloalkyl (e.g., cyclopentyl).
[0031] In a particular embodiment, the compound of formula I is 3-cyclopentyl-3-[4-(7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]propanenitrile
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In another embodiment, the compound
of formula I is (3R)-3-cyclopentyl-3-[4-(7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-pyrazolo-1-yl]propanenitrile
(Compound A) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In still another embodiment,
the compound of formula I is (3S)-3-cyclopentyl-3-[4-(7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]propananitrile
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. The synthesis of these compounds are
described in, for example,
U.S. Patent No. 7,598,257 and
PCT Publication WO/2010/083283 (
PCT/US2010/021003).
[0032] In another embodiment, the compound of formula I is (3R)-3-cyclopentyl-3-[4-(7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]propanenitrile
maleic acid salt. In still another embodiment, the compound of formula I is (3R)-3-cyclopentyl-3-[4-(7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]propanenitrile
sulfuric acid salt. In yet another embodiment, the compound is of formula I is (3R)-3-cyclopentyl-3-[4-(7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]propanenitrile
phosphoric acid salt ("phosphoric acid salt of Compound A"). The synthesis of these
compounds are described in, for example,
U.S. Patent Application No. 12/137,892.
[0033] In an embodiment, provided herein is a combination therapy comprising the phosphoric
acid salt of Compound A and an mTOR inhibitor,
e.g., Everolimus or PP242.
[0034] As used herein, the expression "C
x-C
y-alkyl", wherein x is 1-5 and y is 2-10 indicates a particular alkyl group (straight-
or branched-chain) of a particular range of carbons. For example, the expression C
1-C
4-alkyl includes, but is not limited to, methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, isopropyl, tert-butyl
and isobutyl.
[0035] As used herein, the term "C
3-6 cycloalkyl" refers to saturated or unsaturated monocyclic or bicyclic hydrocarbon
groups of 3-6 carbon atoms, preferably 5 carbon atoms. Exemplary monocyclic hydrocarbon
groups include, but are not limited to, cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, and cyclopentyl.
[0036] The term "halogen" or "halo" refers to chloro, bromo, fluoro, and iodo groups.
[0037] Agents may contain one or more asymmetric elements such as stereogenic centers or
stereogenic axes,
e.g., asymmetric carbon atoms, so that the compounds can exist in different stereoisomeric
forms. These compounds can be, for example, racemates or optically active forms. For
compounds with two or more asymmetric elements, these compounds can additionally be
mixtures of diastereomers. For compounds having asymmetric centers, it should be understood
that all of the optical isomers and mixtures thereof are encompassed. In addition,
compounds with carbon-carbon double bonds may occur in Z- and E-forms; all isomeric
forms of the compounds are included in the present invention. In these situations,
the single enantiomers (optically active forms) can be obtained by asymmetric synthesis,
synthesis from optically pure precursors, or by resolution of the racemates. Resolution
of the racemates can also be accomplished, for example, by conventional methods such
as crystallization in the presence of a resolving agent, or chromatography, using,
for example a chiral HPLC column.
[0038] Unless otherwise specified, or clearly indicated by the text, reference to compounds
useful in the combination therapy of the invention includes both the free base of
the compounds, and all pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the compounds.
[0039] As used herein, the term "pharmaceutically acceptable salts" refers to the nontoxic
acid or alkaline earth metal salts of the pyrimidine compounds of the invention. These
salts can be prepared
in situ during the final isolation and purification of the pyrimidine compounds, or by separately
reacting the base or acid functions with a suitable organic or inorganic acid or base,
respectively. Representative salts include, but are not limited to, the following:
acetate, adipate, alginate, citrate, aspartate, benzoate, benzenesulfonate, bisulfate,
butyrate, camphorate, camphorsulfonate, digluconate, cyclopentanepropionate, dodecylsulfate,
ethanesulfonate, glucoheptanoate, glycerophosphate, hemi-sulfate, heptanoate, hexanoate,
fumarate, hydrochloride, hydrobromide, hydroiodide, 2-hydroxyethanesulfonate, lactate,
maleate, methanesulfonate, nicotinate, 2-naphth-alenesulfonate, oxalate, pamoate,
pectinate, persulfate, 3-phenylproionate, picrate, pivalate, propionate, succinate,
sulfate, tartrate, thiocyanate, p-toluenesulfonate, and undecanoate. Also, the basic
nitrogen-containing groups can be quaternized with such agents as alkyl halides, such
as methyl, ethyl, propyl, and butyl chloride, bromides, and iodides; dialkyl sulfates
like dimethyl, diethyl, dibutyl, and diamyl sulfates, long chain halides such as decyl,
lauryl myristyl, and stearyl chlorides, bromides and iodides, aralkyl halides like
benzyl and phenethyl bromides, and others. Water or oil-soluble or dispersible products
are thereby obtained.
[0040] Examples of acids that may be employed to form pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition
salts include such inorganic acids as hydrochloric acid, hydroboric acid, nitric acid,
sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid and such organic acids as formic acid, acetic acid,
trifluoroacetic acid, fumaric acid, tartaric acid, oxalic acid, maleic acid, methanesulfonic
acid, succinic acid, malic acid, methanesulfonic acid, benzenesulfonic acid, and p-toluenesulfonic
acid, citric acid, and acidic amino acids such as aspartic acid and glutamic acid.
[0041] Provided herein is a combination therapy comprising-an mTOR inhibitor and a JAK inhibitor
(
e.g., the JAK inhibitor of formula I (
e.g., Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof). Administration of the
combination (
i.e., a combination of an mTOR inhibitor and a JAK inhibitor (
e.g., the JAK inhibitor of formula I (
e.g., Compound A, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof) includes administration
of the combination in a single formulation or unit dosage form, administration of
the individual agents of the combination concurrently but separately, or administration
of the individual agents of the combination sequentially by any suitable route. The
dosage of the individual agents of the combination may require more frequent administration
of one of the agent(s) as compared to the other agent(s) in the combination. Therefore,
to permit appropriate dosing, packaged pharmaceutical products may contain one or
more dosage forms that contain the combination of agents, and one or more dosage forms
that contain one of the combination of agents, but not the other agent(s) of the combination.
[0042] The term "single formulation" as used herein refers to a single carrier or vehicle
formulated to deliver effective amounts of both therapeutic agents to a patient. The
single vehicle is designed to deliver an effective amount of each of the agents, along
with any pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or excipients. In some embodiments,
the vehicle is a tablet, capsule, pill, or a patch. In other embodiments, the vehicle
is a solution or a suspension.
[0043] The term "unit dose" is used herein to mean simultaneous administration of both agents
together, in one dosage form, to the patient being treated. In some embodiments, the
unit dose is a single formulation. In certain embodiments, the unit dose includes
one or more vehicles such that each vehicle includes an effective amount of at least
one of the agents along with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers and excipients.
In some embodiments, the unit dose is one or more tablets, capsules, pills, or patches
administered to the patient at the same time.
[0044] The term "treat" is used herein to mean to relieve, reduce or alleviate, at least
one symptom of a disease in a subject. Within the meaning of the present invention,
the term "treat" also denotes, to arrest, delay the onset (
i.e., the period prior to clinical manifestation of a disease or symptom of a disease)
and/or reduce the risk of developing or worsening a symptom of a disease.
[0045] The term "subject" is intended to include animals. Examples of subjects include mammals,
e.g., humans, dogs, cows, horses, pigs, sheep, goats, cats, mice, rabbits, rats, and transgenic
non-human animals. In certain embodiments, the subject is a human,
e.g., a human suffering from, at risk of suffering from, or potentially capable of suffering
from cancer,
e.g., myeloproliferative neoplasms.
[0046] The term "about" or "approximately" usually means within 20%, more preferably within
10%, and most preferably still within 5% of a given value or range. Alternatively,
especially in biological systems, the term "about" means within about a log (
i.e., an order of magnitude) preferably within a factor of two of a given value.
[0047] The term "combination therapy" refers to the administration of two or more therapeutic
agents to treat a therapeutic condition or disorder described in the present disclosure.
Such administration encompasses co-administration of these therapeutic agents in a
substantially simultaneous manner, such as in a single capsule having a fixed ratio
of active ingredients or in multiple, or in separate containers (
e.g., capsules) for each active ingredient. In addition, such administration also encompasses
use of each type of therapeutic agent in a sequential manner, either at approximately
the same time or at different times. In either case, the treatment regimen will provide
beneficial effects of the drug combination in treating the conditions or disorders
described herein.
[0048] The combination of agents described herein display a synergistic effect. The term
"synergistic effect" as used herein, refers to action of two agents such as, for example,
an mTOR inhibitor and a JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a JAK inhibitor of formula, I), producing an effect, for example, slowing the symptomatic
progression of cancer or symptoms thereof, which is greater than the simple addition
of the effects of each drug administered by themselves. A synergistic effect can be
calculated, for example, using suitable methods such as the Sigmoid-Emax equation
(
Holford, N. H. G. and Scheiner, L. B., Clin. Pharmscokinet. 6: 429-453 (1981)), the equation of Loewe additivity (
Loewe, S. and Muischnek, H., Arch. Exp. Pathol Pharmacol. 114: 313-326 (1926)) and the median-effect equation (
Chou, T. C. and Talalay, P., Adv. Enzyme Regul. 22: 27-55 (1984)). Each equation referred to above can be applied to experimental data to generate
a corresponding graph to aid in assessing the effects of the drug combination. The
corresponding graphs associated with the equations referred to above are the concentration-effect
curve, isobologram curve and combination index curve, respectively.
[0049] In an embodiment, provided herein is a combination therapy comprising an effective
amount of a JAK inhibitor and an mTOR inhibitor. An "effective amount" of a combination
of agents (
i.e., an mTOR inhibitor and a JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a JAK inhibitor of formula I)) is an amount sufficient to provide an observable
improvement over the baseline clinically observable signs and symptoms of the disorders
treated with the combination.
[0050] An "oral dosage form" includes a unit dosage form prescribed or intended for oral
administration.
Methods of Treatment Using an mTOR Inhibitor / JAK Inhibitor Combination
[0051] The invention provides a method of treating JAK-associated diseases,
e.g., cancer,
e.g., myeloproliferative neoplasms, in an individual by administering to the individual
a combination of an mTOR inhibitor and a JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a JAK inhibitor of formula I).
[0052] In one embodiment, provided herein are methods of treating a JAK-associated disease
or disorder in a subject (
e.g., patient) by administering to the individual in need of such treatment a therapeutically
effective amount or dose of a combination of the present invention or a pharmaceutical
composition thereof. A JAK-associated disease can include any disease, disorder or
condition that is directly or indirectly linked to expression or activity of the JAK,
including over-expression and/or abnormal activity levels. A JAK-associated disease
can also include any disease, disorder or condition that can be prevented, ameliorated,
or cured by modulating JAK activity.
[0053] Examples of JAK-associated diseases include diseases involving the immune system
including, for example, organ transplant rejection (
e.g., allograft rejection and graft versus host disease).
[0054] Further examples of JAK-associated diseases include autoimmune diseases such as multiple
sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile arthritis, type I diabetes, lupus, psoriasis,
inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, myasthenia gravis,
immunoglobulin nephropathies, autoimmune thyroid disorders, and the like. In some
embodiments, the autoimmune disease is an autoimmune bullous skin disorder such as
pemphigus vulgaris (PV) or bullous pemphigoid (BP).
[0055] Further examples of JAK-associated diseases include allergic conditions such as asthma,
food allergies, atopic dermatitis and rhinitis. Further examples of JAK-associated
diseases include viral diseases such as Epstein Barr Virus (EBV), Hepatitis B, Hepatitis
C, HIV, HTLV 1, Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV) and Human Papilloma Virus (HPV).
[0056] Further examples of JAK-associated diseases or conditions include skin disorders
such as psoriasis (for example, psoriasis vulgaris), atopic dermatitis, skin rash,
skin irritation, skin sensitization (
e.g., contact dermatitis or allergic contact dermatitis). For example, certain substances
including some pharmaceuticals when topically applied can cause skin sensitization.
In some embodiments, the skin disorder is treated by topical administration of the
combination therapy.
[0057] In further embodiments, the JAK-associated disease is cancer including those characterized
by solid tumors (
e.g., prostate cancer, renal cancer, hepatic cancer, pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer,
breast cancer, lung cancer, cancers of the head and neck, thyroid cancer, glioblastoma,
Kaposi's sarcoma, Castleman's disease, melanoma
etc.), hematological cancers (
e.g., lymphoma, leukemia such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or multiple myeloma), and
skin cancer such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and cutaneous B-cell lymphoma.
Example cutaneous T-cell lymphomas include Sezary syndrome and mycosis fungoides.
[0058] JAK-associated diseases can further include those characterized by expression of
a mutant JAK2 such as those having at least one mutation in the pseudo-kinase domain
(
e.g., JAK2V617F).
[0059] JAK-associated diseases can further include myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs) such
as polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), myeloid metaplasia with
myelofibrosis (MMM), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
(CMML), hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), systemic mast cell disease (SMCD), and the
like.
[0060] Further JAK-associated diseases include inflammation and inflammatory diseases. Example
inflammatory diseases include inflammatory diseases of the eye (
e.g., iritis, uveitis, scleritis, conjunctivitis, or related disease), inflammatory diseases
of the respiratory tract (
e.g., the upper respiratory tract including the nose and sinuses such as rhinitis or sinusitis
or the lower respiratory tract including bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease, and the like), inflammatory myopathy such as myocarditis, and other inflammatory
diseases.
[0061] The combination therapy described herein can further be used to treat ischemia reperfusion
injuries or a disease or condition related to an inflammatory ischemic event such
as stroke or cardiac arrest. The combination therapy described herein can further
be used to treat anorexia, cachexia, or fatigue such as that resulting from or associated
with cancer. The combination therapy described herein can further be used to treat
restenosis, sclerodermitis, or fibrosis. The combination therapy described herein
can further be used to treat conditions associated with hypoxia or astrogliosis such
as, for example, diabetic retinopathy, cancer, or neurodegeneration. See,
e.g.,
Dudley, A. C. et al. Biochem. J. 2005, 390(Pt 2):427-36 and
Sriram, K. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279(19):19936-47. Epub 2004 Mar 2.
[0062] The chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), which include polycythemia vera (PV),
essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF), are characterized
by a V617F point mutation in exon 14 of Janus Kinase 2 (
JAK2) occurring in greater than 95% of PV and 60% of ET or PMF patients. Other
JAK2 exon 12 mutations are detected in rare patients with PV while mutations in
MPL have been reported in 5-10% of ET or PMF patients (
Vannucchi AM, Guglielmelli, P, Tefferi, A. Advances in understanding and management
of myeloproliferative neoplasms. AC- A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2009;59:171-191). These molecular abnormalities are all associated with constitutive activation of
the JAK/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway
and contribute to cytokine hypersensitivity and cytokine independent growth of the
mutant cells, as exemplified by the erythropoietin-independent erythroid colonies
(EEC). Transplantation of
JAK2V617F-overexpressing hematopoietic cells in mice is sufficient to recapitulate a PV
phenotype, that in some models evolved to myelofibrosis. A MPN disorder with the phenotype
of PV or ET has been obtained also in conditional knock-in mice. Dysregulation of
the JAK/STAT pathway is associated with development of solid and hematological cancers
and constitutively activated STAT5A or STAT5B mutants (caSTAT5) display oncogenic
properties
in vitro and
in vivo. In aggregate, JAK2 represents a potentially valuable therapeutic target in MPN patients
(
Id.), as supported by effects in murine models of MPN and current evidence in clinical
trials.
[0063] Activation of other downstream pathways through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
(PI3K) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) has been documented in
JAK2V617F mutated cells. The serine/threonine protein kinase B/Akt is downstream of PI3K;
it is a key regulator of many cellular processes including cell survival, proliferation
and differentiation, and is commonly dysregulated in cancer cells. Although Akt resulted
constitutively activated in
JAK2V617F mutated cells
in vitro and in V617F transgenic or knock-in mice (
Akada H, Yan D, Zou H, Fiering. S, Hutchison RE, Mohi MG. Conditional expression of
heterozygous or homozygous Jak2V617F from its endogenous promoter induces a polycythemia
vera-like disease. Blood. 2010;115:3589-3597), the contribution of PI3K/Akt signaling to the pathogenesis of MPN is still poorly
characterized. Akt is phosphorylated and activated via PI3K in response to ligand-engagement
of the erythropoietin (EPO) receptor and has a role in normal erythroid differentiation.
In particular, Akt is able to support erythroid differentiation in JAK2-deficient
fetal liver progenitor cells through a mechanism downstream of EpoR and at least in
part related to GATA-1 phosphorylation. Akt resulted activated in erythroblasts from
the bone marrow or the spleen of mice with conditional
JAK2V617F knock-in allele, especially in V617F homozygous animals. Comparably increased
phosphorylation of STAT5 and Akt was demonstrated by immunocytochemistry in the bone
marrow of MPN patients, particularly in megakaryocytes. The preferential activation
of Akt in megakaryocytes may be reconciled with the strong inhibition of human megakaryocyte
progenitors' proliferation after blockade of mTOR signaling by rapamycin. Furthermore,
small molecule inhibitors of the JAK/STAT or PI3K/Akt pathway caused comparable inhibition
of spontaneous and EPO-induced erythroid differentiation in cultured PV progenitor
cells.
[0064] Accordingly, in a certain embodiment, the cancer that can be treated using the combination
provided herein is a myeloproliferative disorder. Myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs),
now commonly referred to as meyloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), are in the class
of haematological malignancies that are clonal disorders of hematopoietic progenitors.
Tefferi, A. and Vardiman, J. W., Classification and diagnosis of myeloproliferative
neoplasms: The 2008 World Health Organization criteria and point-of-care diagnostic
algorithms, Leukemia, September 2007, 22: 4-22; is hereby incorporated by reference. They are characterized by enhanced proliferation
and survival of one or more mature myeloid lineage cell types. This category includes
but is not limited to, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), polycythemia vera (PV), essential
thrombocythemia (ET), primary or idiopathic myelofibrosis (PMF), chronic neutrophilic
leukemia, chronic eosinophilic leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, juvenile
myelomonocytic leukemia, hypereosinophilic syndrome, systemic mastocytosis, and atypical
chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Tefferi, A. and Gilliland, D. G., Oncogenes in myeloproliferative disorders, Cell
Cycle. March 2007, 6(5): 550-566 is hereby fully incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
[0065] In another embodiment, the combination therapy provided herein is useful for the
treatment of primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis, post-essential
thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, and secondary acute myelogenous leukemia.
[0066] In another embodiment, the combination therapy provided herein can be used to treat
patients with intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis, including primary myelofibrosis,
post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.
[0067] In some embodiments, the subject to be treated (
e.g., a human) is determined to be non-responsive or resistant to one or more therapies
for myeloproliferative disorders.
[0068] In a particular embodiment, provided herein is a method of treating a myeloproliferative
neoplasm in a subject in need thereof, comprising administering to the subject an
effective amount of a composition comprising Everolimus and Compound A, or a pharmaceutically
acceptable salt thereof.
[0069] In an embodiment, provided herein is the use of an mTor inhibitor and a JAK inhibitor
in the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of cancer,
e.g., a myeloproliferative disorder,
e.g., intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis, including primary myelofibrosis, post-polycythemia
vera myelofibrosis and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.
[0070] In another embodiment, provided herein is a method of treating a myeloproliferative
neoplasm in a subject in need thereof, comprising administering to the subject an
effective amount of a composition comprising PP242 and Compound A, or a pharmaceutically
acceptable salt thereof.
[0071] Provided herein are methods of treating disease,
e.g., a myeloproliferative disorder, by administering an effective amount of a compound
of an mTOR inhibitor and a JAK inhibitor to an individual suffering from a disease.
The amount of the combination of agents is effective to treat the disease. It is important
to note the synergistic effects of the combination of agents: even though one or more
of the agents administered alone at a particular dosage may not be effective, when
administered in combination, at the same dosage of each agent, the treatment is effective.
The doses of the one or more of the agents in the combination therefore can be less
than the FDA approved doses of each agent
Dosages
[0072] The optimal dose of the combination of agents for treatment of disease can be determined
empirically for each individual using known methods and will depend upon a variety
of factors, including, though not limited to, the degree of advancement of the disease;
the age, body weight, general health, gender and diet of the individual; the time
and route of administration; and other medications the individual is taking. Optimal
dosages may be established using routine testing and procedures that are well known
in the art.
[0073] The amount of combination of agents that may be combined with the carrier materials
to produce a single dosage form will vary depending upon the individual treated and
the particular mode of administration. In some embodiments the unit dosage forms containing
the combination of agents as described herein will contain the amounts of each agent
of the combination that are typically administered when the agents are administered
alone.
[0074] Frequency of dosage may vary depending on the compound used and the particular condition
to be treated or prevented. In general, the use of the minimum dosage that is sufficient
to provide effective therapy is preferred. Patients may generally be monitored for
therapeutic effectiveness using assays suitable for the condition being treated or
prevented, which will be familiar to those of ordinary skill in the art.
[0075] The dosage form can be prepared by various conventional mixing, comminution and fabrication
techniques readily apparent to those skilled in the chemistry of drug formulations.
[0076] The oral dosage form containing the combination of agents or individual agents of
the combination of agents may be in the form of micro-tablets enclosed inside a capsule,
e.g. a gelatin capsule. For this, a gelatin capsule as is employed in pharmaceutical formulations
can be used, such as the hard gelatin capsule known as CAPSUGEL, available from Pfizer.
[0077] Many of the oral dosage forms useful herein contain the combination of agents or
individual agents of the combination of agents in the form of particles. Such particles
may be compressed into a tablet, present in a core element of a coated dosage form,
such as a taste-masked dosage form, a press coated dosage form, or an enteric coated
dosage form, or may be contained in a capsule, osmotic pump dosage form, or other
dosage form.
[0078] The drug compounds of the present invention (for example, an mTOR inhibitor and a
JAK inhibitor) are present in the combinations, dosage forms, pharmaceutical compositions
and pharmaceutical formulations disclosed herein in a ratio in the range of 100:1
to 1:100. For example, the ratio of a compound of formula I : an mTOR inhibitor can
be in the range of 1:100 to 1:1, for example, 1:100, 1:90, 1:80, 1:70, 1:60, 1:50,
1:40, 1:30,1:20,1:10,1:5,1:2, or 1:1 of formula I: an mTOR inhibitor. In another example,
the ratio of an mTOR inhibitor: a compound of formula I can be in the range of 1:100
to 1:1, for example, 1:100, 1:90, 1:80, 1:70, 1:60, 1:50, 1:40, 1:30, 1:20, 1:10,
1:5, 1:2, or 1:1 of an mTOR inhibitor: a compound of formula I.
[0079] The optimum ratios, individual and combined dosages, and concentrations of the drug
compounds that yield efficacy without toxicity are based on the kinetics of the active
ingredients' availability to target sites, and are determined using methods known
to those of skill in the art.
[0080] The pharmaceutical compositions or combinations provided herein (
i.e., an mTOR inhibitor and a JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a JAK inhibitor of formula I)) can be tested in clinical studies. Suitable clinical
studies may be, for example, open label, dose escalation studies in patients with
proliferative diseases. Such studies prove in particular the synergism of the active
ingredients of the combination of the invention. The beneficial effects on proliferative
diseases may be determined directly through the results of these studies which are
known as such to a person skilled in the art. Such studies may be, in particular,
suitable to compare the effects of a monotherapy using the active ingredients and
a combination of the invention. In one embodiment, the dose of a compound of an mTOR
inhibitor,
e.g., Everolimus (RAD001) or PP242, is escalated until the Maximum Tolerated Dosage is
reached, and a JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a JAK inhibitor of formula I) is administered with a fixed dose. Alternatively,
a JAK inhibitor (
e.g., a JAK inhibitor of formula I), may be administered in a fixed dose and the dose
of the mTOR inhibitor may be escalated. Each patient may receive doses of the compounds
either daily or intermittently. The efficacy of the treatment may be determined in
such studies,
e.g., after 12,18 or 24 weeks by evaluation of symptom scores every 6 weeks.
[0081] The administration of a combination therapy of the invention may result not only
in a beneficial effect,
e.g. a synergistic therapeutic effect,
e.g. with regard to alleviating, delaying progression of or inhibiting the symptoms, but
also in further surprising beneficial effects,
e.g. fewer side-effects, an improved quality of life or a decreased morbidity, compared
with a monotherapy applying only one of the pharmaceutically active ingredients used
in the combination of the invention.
[0082] A further benefit may be that lower doses of the active ingredients of the combination
of the invention may be used, for example, that the dosages need not only often be
smaller but may also be applied less frequently, which may diminish the incidence
or severity of side-effects. This is in accordance with the desires and requirements
of the patients to be treated.
[0083] It is one objective of this invention to provide a pharmaceutical composition comprising
a quantity, which may be jointly therapeutically effective at targeting or preventing
cancer,
e.g., a myeloproliferative disorder. In this composition, an mTOR inhibitor and a JAK
inhibitor (
e.g., a JAK inhibitor of formula I) may be administered together, one after the other
or separately in one combined unit dosage form or in two separate unit dosage forms.
The unit dosage form may also be a fixed combination.
[0084] The pharmaceutical compositions for separate administration of both compounds, or
for the administration in a fixed combination,
i.e. a single galenical composition comprising both compounds according to the invention
may be prepared in a manner known
per se and are those suitable for enteral, such as oral or rectal, and parenteral administration
to mammals (warm-blooded animals), including humans, comprising a therapeutically
effective amount of at least one pharmacologically active combination partner alone,
e.g. as indicated above, or in combination with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable
carriers or diluents, especially suitable for enteral or parenteral application.
Formulations
[0085] The drug combinations provided herein may be formulated by a variety of methods apparent
to those of skill in the art of pharmaceutical formulation. The various release properties
described above may be achieved in a variety of different ways. Suitable formulations
include, for example, tablets, capsules, press coat formulations, and other easily
administered formulations.
[0086] Suitable pharmaceutical formulations may contain, for example, from about 0.1 % to
about 99.9%, preferably from about 1 %, to about 60 %, of the active ingredient(s).
Pharmaceutical formulations for the combination therapy for enteral or parenteral
administration are, for example, those in unit dosage forms, such as sugar-coated
tablets, tablets, capsules or suppositories, or ampoules. If not indicated otherwise,
these are prepared in a manner known
per se, for example by means of conventional mixing, granulating, sugar-coating, dissolving
or lyophilizing processes. It will be appreciated that the unit content of a combination
partner contained in an individual dose of each dosage form need not in itself constitute
an effective amount since the necessary effective amount may be reached by administration
of a plurality of dosage units.
[0087] In particular, a therapeutically effective amount of each of the combination partner
of the combination of the invention may be administered simultaneously or sequentially
and in any order, and the components may be administered separately or as a fixed
combination. For example, the method of treating a disease according to the invention
may comprise (i) administration of the first agent in free or pharmaceutically acceptable
salt form and (ii) administration of the second agent in free or pharmaceutically
acceptable salt form, simultaneously or sequentially in any order, in jointly therapeutically
effective amounts, preferably in synergistically effective amounts,
e.g. in daily or intermittently dosages corresponding to the amounts described herein.
The individual combination partners of the combination of the invention may be administered
separately at different times during the course of therapy or concurrently in divided
or single combination forms. Furthermore, the term administering also encompasses
the use of a pro-drug of a combination partner that convert
in vivo to the combination partner as such. The instant invention is therefore to be understood
as embracing all such regimens of simultaneous or alternating treatment and the term
"administering" is to be interpreted accordingly.
[0088] The effective dosage of each of the combination partners employed in the combination
of the invention may vary depending on the particular compound or pharmaceutical composition
employed, the mode of administration, the condition being treated, the severity of
the condition being treated. Thus, the dosage regimen of the combination of the invention
is selected in accordance with a variety of factors including the route of administration
and the renal and hepatic function of the patient. A clinician or physician of ordinary
skill can readily determine and prescribe the effective amount of the single active
ingredients required to alleviate, counter or arrest the progress of the condition.
[0089] Preferred suitable dosages for the compounds used in the treatment described herein
are on the order of about 1 mg to about 600 mg, preferably about 3, 5, 10, 15, 20,
25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 90, 95, 100, 120, 140, 160, 180, 200,
220, 240, 260, 280, 300, 320, 340, 360, 380, 400, 420, 440, 460, 480, 500, 520, 540,
560, 580 to about 600 mgs total. In an embodiment, the JAK inhibitor is administered
in a 5mg, 10mg, 15mg, 20mg, or a 25mg dose.
[0090] Accordingly, in an embodiment, provided herein is a composition comprising an mTOR
inhibitor and a compound of formula I. In an embodiment, the compound of formula I
is (3R)-3-cyclopentyl-3-[4-(7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]propanenitrile,
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In another embodiment, the mTOR inhibitor
is Everolimus (RAD001) or 2-(4-Amino-1-isopropyl-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-3-yl)-1H-indol-5-ol
(PP242). In still another embodiment, the composition further comprises a pharmaceutically
acceptable carrier.
Examples
[0091] The invention is further illustrated by the following examples.
[0092] Presented below is evidence that drugs targeting mTOR signaling prevented cytokine-induced
and cytokine-independent cell proliferation in various cellular models of MPN and
that simultaneous treatment with a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor or interferon-α resulted in
synergistic activity. These findings provide a rationale for exploring the effectiveness
of targeting Akt/mTOR in the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms.
METHODS and MATERIALS
Reagents
[0093] RAD001 (an mTOR specific allosteric inhibitor), PP242 (an ATP domain inhibitor of
mTOR) and hydroxyurea were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Germany). Interferon-α
was obtained from Pegasys. Antibodies against phospho(p)-STAT5 (Tyr694), STAT5, p-4EBP1
(Thr70), 4EBP1, mTOR, p-JAK2 (Tyr1007/1008) and JAK2, were from Cell Signaling Technology
(Danvers, MA, US). Anti-human tubulin antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa
Cruz, CA, US). Recombinant human IL-3, GM-CSF, SCF, and EPO were purchased from Miltenyi
Biotec (Gladbach, Germany). siRNAs against mTOR were from Dharmacon siGENOME Smart
pool (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, US); the siGENOME Non-Targeting siRNA Pool#1
(Thermo Scientific) was used as a negative control.
Cell lines and cell culture
[0094] The HEL, SET2 and K562 human cell lines were purchased from the German Collection
of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). Murine BaF/3 and
BaF/3-EPOR cells expressing
JAK2 wild-type (wt) or
JAK2V617F were donated by R. Skoda (Basel, Switzerland). Cell lines were cultured in
RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Lonza, Belgium) (20% for
SET2 cells), antibiotics and L-glutamine. mIL-3 and EPO were added to the culture
medium of
JAK2 WT BaF/3 and BaF/3-EPOR cells, respectively.
Human cells
[0095] Samples of peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) were obtained from patients
diagnosed with PV or PMF (2008 WHO criteria) under a protocol approved by Institutional
Review Board of Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Careggi and after obtaining an informed
consent. Healthy donors of hematopoietic stem cells provided informed consent to donate
excess CD34
+ cells. Research was carried out according to the principles of Declaration of Helsinki.
CD34
+ cells were immunomagnetically selected as described. The
JAK2V617F mutational status was determined by a quantitative real-time PCR assay in granulocytes.
Inhibition of proliferation assay, clonogenic assay, and apoptosis or cell cycle analysis
[0096] Cells (2x10
4) were plated in 96-well culture tissue plates with increasing concentrations of the
drug(s), in triplicate; viable cells were assessed using the WST-1 assay (Roche, USA)
and normalized to wells containing an equivalent volume of vehicle (DMSO) only. The
concentration at which 50% inhibition of proliferation occurred (IC
50) was calculated using the Origin software (V 7.5, OriginLab Northampton, MA). In
some experiments, clonogenic tests were also employed. Cells (5x10
3) were plated in 0.5% agar in medium supplemented with FBS, and variable amount of
the drug(s) (or an equivalent volume of vehicle in control plates) was added once
at the beginning of culture. Colonies were enumerated by inverted microscopy after
7 day incubation. Quantification of apoptotic cells was accomplished by flow cytometry
using the Annexin-V-FLUOS Staining kit (Roche); at least 20,000 events were acquired.
For cell cycle distribution analysis by flow cytometry, 1x10
6 cells were treated with ethanol 95%, RNase 10 µg/mL and propidium iodide 50 mg/mL.
Colony assays for human hematopoietic progenitors and colony genotyping
[0097] BM mononuclear cells from MPN patients or control subjects were plated at 1x10
5/mL in methylcellulose (MethoCult; StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) supplemented
with SCF 50ng/mL, IL-3 10ng/mL, IL-6 10ng/mL, GM-CSF 10ng/mL, G-CSF 10ng/mL and EPO
3U/mL for the growth of BFU-E and CFU-GM. EEC assay was performed by plating 2.5x10
5/mL PB mononuclear cells from PV patients in methylcellulose containing leukocyte-conditioned
medium without EPO (StemCell Technol., cat. No.#04531). For the growth of CFU-Mk,
5x10
4/mL CD34
+ cells were plated in a 24-well plate in Megacult Collagen and medium with lipids
(StemCell TechnoL) supplemented with Thrombopoietin 50ng/mL, IL-3 10ng/mL, IL-6 10ng/mL.
Colonies were enumerated on day 14 according to standard criteria.
[0098] For
JAK2V617F single-colony genotyping an allele-specific PCR assay was used. Well-separated
colonies (at least 40 colonies per point) were individually plucked off the semisolid
medium in 5 µL DNase/RNase-free water, lysed at 95°C for 5 minutes, and subjected
to PCR amplification and gel electrophoresis.
Cell lysis and SDS-PAGE Western blotting
[0099] Cells were resuspended in RIPA lysis buffer (50mM pH 7.4 Tris-HCl, 150mM NaCl, 1%
NP-40, 1mMEDTA) containing a proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Halt Protease Inhibitor
Cocktail Kit, PIERCE, Rockford, IL, US) and subjected to sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis separation and western blotting onto Immunoblot PVDF membrane
(BioRad, Hercules, CA, US), according to standard protocols. Membranes were probed
with primary antibodies followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-Ig antibody
produced in rabbits (Sigma-Aldrich); immunoreactive proteins were revealed with ECL
using the Image Quant 350 apparatus (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK).
RNA isolation and Real-Time quantitative PCR (RTQ-PCR)
[0100] Total RNA was purified using Trizol (Invitrogen-Life Technologies, Paisley, UK),
and the RNA concentration and purity/integrity was determined with NanoDrop ND-1000
spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Techn., Wilmington, DE, USA). One microgram of RNA was
reverse transcribed using High Capacity cDNA Archive Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster
City, CA). RT-QPCR reactions were performed with the TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix
using ABI PRISM 7300 HT and TaqMan® Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems), in
triplicate. Gene expression profiling was achieved using the Comparative cycle threshold
(C
T) method of relative quantitation using VIC-labeled
RNaseP probe as the housekeeping gene (ΔC
T).
Cell transfection
[0101] Exponentially growing HEL cells were electroporated with siRNAs in the Amaxa Nucleofector
(Amaxa Biosystems, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) using Amaxa kit R. Briefly, 2-5x10
6 cells in 0.1 mL volume were transfected with 1 µM siRNA and immediately transferred
to 24-well plates containing prewarmed culture medium. Transfection efficiency and
cell viability were assessed by flow cytometry with pmaxGFP® (Amaxa Biosystems), and
resulted always greater than 85%.
Statistical methods
[0102] Comparison between groups was performed by the Mann-Whitney U or Fisher test as appropriate,
using the SPSS (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK) or Origin software. The level of significance
from two-sided tests was P<0.05. The combination index (CI), that is a measure of
the interaction between two drugs, was calculated according to the median-effect principle
of the Chou and Talalay method using the CalcuSyn software. According to this formula,
when CI<1 the interaction of two drugs is considered synergistic, when CI=1 the interaction
is additive, and when CI>1 the interaction is antagonistic.
RESULTS
mTOR inhibitors abrogate proliferation of JAK2V617F mutant cell lines
[0103] To ascertain whether
JAK2V617F mutant human leukemia cell lines were sensitive to mTOR inhibition, the selective
allosteric mTOR inhibitor RAD001 and the ATP competitive inhibitor of the active site
of mTOR, PP242, were empolyed. It was discovered that
JAK2V617F mutant HEL and SET2 cells were at least as sensitive to mTOR inhibition as the
BCR/ABL positive K562 cells used as control.IC
50 values are shown in Table 1. The effects of mTOR inhibitors in
JAK2 wild-type murine IL-3-dependent (Ba/F3) or EPO-dependent (Ba/F3-EPOR) cells or the
cytokine-independent
JAK2V617F counterpart were investigated. It was found that V617F Ba/F3 cells were more
sensitive to RAD001 than the
JAK2 wt counterpart either in the absence or the presence of IL-3 in the culture medium.
Similarly, in Ba/F3-EPOR cells, the IC
50 of V617F mutant cells was 651nM and 1,213nM in the absence and presence of EPO, respectively,
compared to an IC
50 >10,000 nM in
JAK2 wt cells. PP242 was similarly effective: in V617F Ba/F3 cells IC
50 was 800nM and 1,600nM, respectively, in the absence or presence of IL-3 versus 3,400nM
in wt cells; in wt Ba/F3-EPOR cells, IC
50 was 5,931nM versus 500nM and 750nM in V617F cells supplemented or not with EPO, respectively
(Table 1). At their IC
50 concentration, RAD001 and PP242 (not shown) caused cell cycle arrest of SET2 and
HEL cells in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle (Figure 1A). On the other hand, treatment
with RAD001 was largely ineffective in inducing cell death, while PP242 promoted a
modest, yet dose-dependent, cell apoptosis at highest concentrations in SET2 (Figure
1B) or HEL (not shown) cells. In addition to inhibition of cell proliferation it was
found that RAD001 also impaired the clonogenic potential of
JAK2V617F mutant HEL, SET2 and UKE-1 cells more efficiently than K562. Also, colony formation
by V617F Ba/F3 cells was inhibited at significantly lower RAD001 concentrations, irrespective
of cytokine in the medium, than the wt counterpart (data not shown). Overall, these
data indicate that
JAK2V617F mutant cells are uniformly sensitive to mTOR inhibition and suggest that abrogation
of cell proliferation reflects mainly a cytostatic rather than an apoptotic effect.
[0104] Next, the mechanisms of inhibition of cell proliferation induced by mTOR inhibitors
with those of the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor Compound A and the histone deacethylase (HDAC)
inhibitor Panobinostat were compared. Those molecules were all growth inhibitory in
HEL and SET2 cells at IC
50 concentrations significantly lower than those measured in K562 cell line (Table 1).
However, unlike mTOR inhibitors, they were dose-dependently potent inducers of cell
apoptosis (Figure 1C,D). HEL (IC
50=410µM) and SET2 (IC
50=330µM) cells resulted more sensitive to the ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase
inhibitor hydroxyurea than K562 cells (IC
50=4,910µM (Table 1); hydroxyurea induced dose-dependent cell apoptosis (Figure 1E).
[0105] The effect of the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor was also evaluated in Ba/F3 cells to exploit
the role of cytokine exposure to drug sensitivity. It was found that V617F Ba/F3 and
Ba/F3-EPOR cells were more sensitive to Compound A (IC
50=34nM and 220nM, respectively) that their wt counterpart (1,600nM or 457nM for Compound
A, respectively). However, addition of the appropriate cytokine to culture medium
abrogated the preferential growth inhibitory effect of the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor on
V617F mutant cells (IC
50=1600nM for Compound A, in Ba/F3 cells; IC
50=521nM for Compound A, in Ba/F3-EPOR cells) (Table 1).
[0106] Overall, these data indicate that the growth inhibitory activity of JAK1/JAK2 and
HDAC inhibitors in
JAK2V617F leukemia cell lines is prevalently mediated by cell apoptosis. Furthermore,
it was confirmed that cytokines markedly reduced the cell sensitivity to JAK1/JAK2
inhibitors.
[0107] Figure 1 shows the effect of selected mTOR inhibitors, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, histone deacethylase
inhibitors and hydroxyurea on cell apoptosis and cell cycle in SET2 or HEL cells.
In panels (B) to (E), the percentage of Annexin V-positive apoptotic cells was measured
by flow cytometry in SET2 cells that had been exposed for 48h to varying amount of
the mTOR inhibitors RAD001 or PP242 (B), JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor Compound A (C), HDAC
inhibitor Panobinostat (D) or hydroxyurea (E). Results are expressed ad percent viable
cells compared to control wells containing vehicle (DMSO) only. The fraction of necrotic
cells was identified as the double-positive Annexin V/propidium iodide cells. One
representative of three similar experiments. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01.
[0108] Table 4 shows inhibition of clonogenic growth of
JAK2V617F mutant cell lines by mTOR inhibitors, RAD001 or PP242 and JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor
Compound A.
JAK2V617F mutant human-origin cell lines, either heterozygous (SET-2) or homozygous (HEL),
and the BCR/ABL mutant K562 cell line (used as a control), were exposed to increasing
concentrations of RAD001, PP242 or Compound A. 10
3 cells were plated in agar in the presence of variable amount of the drug; colonies
were counted on day 7 and expressed as a percentage of colony number grown in control
plates containing vehicle. Murine BaF/3 cells over-expressing
JAK2V617F were similarly exposed to RAD001, PP242 or Compound A, and compared to wild-type
cells (wt). Interleukin-3 (10 ng/mL) was added or not to the culture medium. IC
50 values shown are the Mean±SD of at least three independent experiments.
mTOR inhibitors attenuate downstream signalling of mTOR pathway and reduce STATS phosphorylation
in JAK2V617F mutated cell lines
[0109] The effect of mTOR inhibition on signal transduction in
JAK2V617F mutant cells using SET2 cells as a model was investigated next (Figure 2). It
was observed that treatment with RAD001 and PP242 dose-dependently reduced phosphorylation
of the mTOR target 4E-BP1 and, unexpectedly, of STAT5, while both phosphorylated and
total JAK2 resulted unaffected. In comparison, the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor Compound A
markedly and dose-dependently reduced phosphorylation of JAK2 and STAT5 leaving unaffected
4EBP1. The HDAC inhibitor panobinostat dose-dependently reduced phosphorylated and
total JAK2, phosphorylated STAT5 and showed a modest effect on phosphorylated 4E-BP1.
Conversely, hydroxyurea did not affect the level or the phosphorylation status of
4EBP1 or STAT5.
[0110] To better characterize the correlation between
JAK2V617F mutation and mTOR activation, as well as the consequences of mTOR inhibition
on STATS phosphorylation, BA/F3 and Ba/F3-EPOR cells were used. First, it was observed
that 4E-BP1 was minimally phosphorylated in
JAK2 wt Ba/F3 and Ba/P3-EPOR cells deprived of cytokines, while it was hyper-phosphorylated
in V617F cells, supporting previous data on Akt constitutive activation in
JAK2V617F-mutated cells. The addition of cytokines resulted in increased 4E-BP1 phosphorylation
in
JAK2 wt and V617F mutated Ba/F3 and Ba/F3-EPOR cells (data not shown). In cells incubated
with RAD001, a marked inhibition of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation occurred (data not shown)
and persisted up to at least 24 h (data not shown). STAT5 phosphorylation was greater
in V617F cells compared to IL-3- or EPO-deprived
JAK2 wt Ba/F3 or Ba/F3-EPOR cells, and it did increase substantially after cytokine exposure.
STATS phosphorylation was significantly downregulated mirroring the effects on 4EBP1;
inhibition was already evident at 60 min was maintained up to 24 h (not shown).
[0111] To confirm that attenuation of STAT5 phosphorylation was actually mediated by mTOR
inhibition rather than resulting from a direct effect of RAD001 on STATS phopshorylation,
mTOR was silenced with specific siRNA in HEL cells. Although siRNAs treatment decreased
mTOR levels by only 50-60% at 24 h, the level of phosphorylated 4E-BP1 decreased dramatically
compared to cells that had been treated with irrelevant control siRNA; total 4E-BP1
protein content did not change at all (data not shown). At 48 h, both mTOR and phosphorylated
4E-BP1 were barely detectable. At the same time, the level of phosphorylated STAT5
appeared markedly reduced at 24-48 h in cells that had been-nucleofected with mTOR
specific siRNA compared to control; total STAT5 concent did not change.
[0112] Figure 2 shows the effect of selected mTOR inhibitors, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, histone deacethylase
inhibitors and hydroxyurea on mTOR and JAK/STAT signaling in SET2 cells. SET2 cells
were incubated for 24 h with increasing concentrations of the drugs, and the level
of total and phosphorylated JAK2, STAT5, and 4EBP1 was analyzed by western blot. Tubulin
was used for loading normalization. The results shown are representative of two to
four similar experiments for the different drugs.
Combination of RAD001 or PP242 with Compound A results in synergistic inhibition of
JAK2V617F leukemic cell line proliferation and colony formation
[0113] The effects of concurrent inhibition of mTOR and JAK1/JAK2 in SET2 and V617F Ba/F3-EPOR
cells were evaluated by measuring the proliferation inhibitory effects. Cells were
incubated with different concentrations of RAD001 or PP242 and; by using these drug
combinations a combination index (CI) ranging from 0.12 to 0.44 was measured suggesting
strong synergistic activity of the two drugs (Table 3).
[0114] Further experiments using SET2 and Ba/F3 epoR V617F cells were performed in a clonogenic
agar assay (Table 5); a CI ranging from 0.22 to 0.81 was measured in these cultures,
again pointing to drug synergisms.
Combination of RAD001 or PP242 with Compound A results in synergistic inhibition of
hematopoietic progenitor cells from patients with MPN in EEC colony formation assay.
[0115] To determine whether the proliferation of leukemic cells from MPN patients could
be affected by simultaneous targeting of the mTOR and JAK pathway, PBMC from patients
with PV were incubated with increasing concentration of RAD001, PP242, Compound A
or a combination of RAD001 or PP242 and Compound A in an EEC assay. Peripheral-blood
derived mononuclear cells from PV patients were cultured in EPO-free methylcellulose
medium for EEC growth, in the absence or the presence of a fixed amount of RAD001,
PP242, and/or Compound A. The EEC were scored at 12 day and expressed as percent of
the number of colonies measured in control plates containing vehicle only. *, P<0.05,
**, P<0.01. The results set forth in Table 6 show CIs of 0.2 and 0.26 in these cultures,
further demonstrating synergism between mTOR and JAK inhibitors in the inhibition
of
JAK2V617F cell growth.
DISCUSSION
[0116] The MPN-associated
JAK2V617F mutation determines a constitutive activation of the JAK2/STAT pathway; JAK2
inhibitors reduce the proliferation of
JAK2V617F mutant cells
in vitro, mitigate myeloproliferation in
JAK2V617F transgenic animals (Liu PC,
Caulder E, Li J, et al. Combined inhibition of Janus kinase 1/2 for the treatment
of JAK2V617F-driven neoplasms: selective effects on mutant cells and improvements
in measures of disease severity. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:6891-6900) and produce measurable clinical improvement in patients with myelofibrosis (
Verstovsek S, Kantaijian H, Mesa RA, et al. Safety and efficacy of INCB018424, a JAK1
and JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1117-1127) or hydroxyurea-resistant PV or ET. However, variations in
JAK2V617F burden were modest and no molecular remission has been reported yet. Furthermore,
the disease-initiating cell population in
JAK2V617F knock-in mice was not affected by treatment with the JAK2 inhibitor TG101348.
Overall, these observations present the possibility that effective targeting of MPN
clone may not be achievable with available JAK2 inhibitors. Therefore, a more detailed
knowledge of cellular signals involved in the dysregulated proliferation of mutant
cells is desirable in order to design more effective therapeutic strategies. At this
regard, it has been shown that co-treatment of the HDACi panobinostat and the JAK2
inhibitor TG101209 determined greater attenuation of JAK/STAT signaling in human and
murine
JAK2V617F-mutated cells and increased cytotoxicity against MPN CD34
+ cells compared to individual drugs.
[0117] This study focused on the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a key downstream
target of the PI3k/Akt pathway. The serine/threonine kinase mTOR functions as a central
regulator of cell metabolism, survival, growth, proliferation and autophagy. mTOR
is inhibited by a family of molecules, named rapalogs following its founding member
rapamycin, that have been recently employed in clinical trials in cancers. mTOR exists
in two complexes, TORC1 and TORC2. TORC1, formed with raptor, controls the level of
cap-dependent mRNA translation and phosphorylates effectors such as the eukaryotic
initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) and S6 kinase 1 (S6K1). On turn, phosphorylated
4E-BP1 leads to inhibited binding to eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and prevents
translation activation of several genes, including cyclin D1, Bcl-2, Bcl-X
L, and vascular endothelial growth factor. On the other hand, S6K1 regulates cell growth
by phosphorylating key targets such as eIFe4, mTOR, eukaryotic initiation factor 4B
and elongation-2 kinase. Both eIF4E and SKI have been involved in cellular transformation
and are overexpressed in some poor-prognosis cancers. Additional components of TORC1
include mammalian LST8/G-protein β-subunit like protein (mLST8/GβL) and the recently
identified partners PRAS40 and DEPTOR. mTOR also combines with Rictor in mTORC2, that
is largely rapamicin insensitive, and is composed of GβL and mammalian stress-activated
protein kinase interacting protein 1 (mSIN1); TORC 2 is involved in the phosphorylation
of Akt at Ser473. This negative feedback loop from mTORC2 to Akt may, in some instances,
result in exacerbated tumor progression, although RAD001 was reported to potently
inhibited Akt activity in leukemic cells via suppression of both mTORC1 and mTORC2.
To overcome possible limitations and drawbacks of allosteric mTOR inhibitors, such
as RAD001, novel molecules that act as competitive inhibitors of the mTOR ATP active
site have been developed; one of these, PP242 strongly suppresses both TORC1 and TORC2-mediated
activities and exerted potent cytotoxicity against leukemia cells. RAD001 and PP242
were used to explore
in vitro the putative role mTOR as target for therapy in MPN.
[0118] It was first demonstrated that mTOR inhibitors prompted an arrest of cell proliferation
of
JAK2V617F mutated human and murine leukemia cell lines at drug concentrations significantly
lower than control cells (Table 1). Conversely, RAD001 did not induce cell death while
PP242 cause some cell apoptosis as highest concentrations; thus, in these experimental
settings, mTOR inhibitors are mainly cytostatic. This mode of action differed from
the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor Compound A and HDAC inhibitor panobinostat that all potently
induced cell apoptosis (Figure 1). On the other hand, it was demonstrated that cell
proliferation inhibition caused by mTOR inhibitors was not affected by maximized activation
of the JAK/STAT pathway that followed cytokine exposure of the Ba/FE and Ba/F3-EPOR
cells, unlike the case for the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor. The latter observation was on
line with the demonstration that sensitivity to JAK2 inhibitors of erythroid progenitors
from PV patients resulted suppressed by the addition of EPO to the culture medium,
and indirectly suggests that mechanisms underlying cell proliferation inhibition by
RAD001 are at least in part independent of cytokine-induced JAK/STAT activation. It
was demonstrated that RAD001 was more selective against
JAK2V617F mutated than wild-type progenitors in patients with PV since the number of V617F
colonies decreased of a mean of 39% in favor of wild-type ones (Table 2).
[0119] A prevalent antiproliferative rather than pro-apoptotic effect of RAD001 has been
demonstrated in several other cancer cells, and represents the rationale for combination
therapy with agents that preferentially induce apoptosis. Bearing this in mind, the
effects of combining mTOR and a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor
in vitro was explored and evidence of a significant synergism concerning the inhibition of
proliferation (Table 3) clonogenic potential (Table5) of leukemia cell lines was demonstrated.
In addition, the formation of hematopoietic colonies by progenitor cells from MPN
patients was synergistically inhibited by combining RAD001 or PP242 with the JAK1/JAK2
inhibitor Compound A (Table 6).
[0120] Analysis of key signalling molecules showed that RAD001 and PP242 inhibited the phosphorylation
of the downstream target 4EBP1, while JAK1/JAK2 inhibitors and HDAC inhibitors reduced
phosphorylation of both JAK2 and STAT; of note, HDAC inhibitors also reduced the expression
of total JAK2 (Figure 2). An intriguing observation was that mTOR inhibition due to
RAD001 and PP242 was associated with an appreciable decrease of STATS phosphorylation,
which was not accounted for by reduced total STAT5 protein content. This positive
feedback between mTOR and STAT5 was substantiated by demonstrating a concurrent attenuation
of 4B-BP1 and STATS phosphorylation with the use of specific inhibitory RNA (siRNA)
against mTOR (data not shown). The degree of inhibition of STAT5 phosphorylation mediated
by RAD001 was far less than with JAK1/JAK2 inhibitorsthat did not affect 4E-BP1 phosphorylation,
suggesting that mTOR activation in MPN cells may be largely JAK2-independent. On the
other hand, an HDAC inhibitor demonstrated a modest inhibition of phoshorylation of
4EBP1, although current data do not allow us to conclude whether this effect was direct
or not As a whole, these observations indicate that STAT5 phosphorylation can be affected
by targeting JAK2- and mTOR-initiated signaling. In this regard, rapamycin-sensitive
activation of STAT3 via receptor tyrosine kinase/PI3K/Akt signalling has been demonstrated
in several cancer cells and mouse of human tumors.
Table 1. Determination of IC
50 of mTOR inhibitors, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, HDAC inhibitors and hydroxyurea using
proliferation inhibition assay in human and murine
JAK2V617F mutated and
JAK2 wild-type control cell lines. *, P<0.05; ** P<0.00. N.D., notdone
| |
|
|
|
|
|
BaF/3 -IL3 |
| DRUG |
K562 |
HEL |
SET2 |
WT |
V617F |
V617F +IL3 |
| RAD001 (nM) |
16,000 ± 2,500 |
14,000 ± 2,800 |
17,000 ± 3,000** |
2,600 ± 1,200 |
10 ± 4** |
10 ± 5** |
| PP242 (nM) |
8,300 ± 1000 |
1,500 ± 113** |
285 ± 11** |
3.400 ± 300 |
800 ± 200** |
1,600 ± 200** |
| Compound A (nM) |
>20,000 |
790 ± 150** |
160 ± 24** |
1,600 ± 500 |
34 ± 2** |
1,700 ± 300 |
| Panobinostat (nM) |
31±8 |
8 ± 3* |
7 ±2* |
N.D. |
N.D. |
N.D. |
| NuOH (µM) |
4,910 ± 15 |
410 ± 20* |
330 ± 11* |
N.D. |
N.D. |
N.D. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BaF/3 -EPOR |
| DRUG |
WT |
V617F |
V617F+EPO |
| RAD001 (nM) |
>10,000 |
651 ± 50** |
1,231 ± 100** |
| PP242 (nM) |
5,931 ± 1,000 |
500 ± 100** |
750 ± 100** |
| Compound A (nM) |
457 ± 15 |
220 ± 20** |
521 ± 45 |
| Panobinostat (nM) |
N.D. |
N.D. |
N.D. |
| HuOH (µM) |
N.D. |
N.D. |
N.D. |
Table 2. Effects of RAD001 on the proportion of
JAK2 wild-type and V617F colonies in clonogenic assays of CD34
+ cells from MPN patients.
| JAK2 genotype |
| Pat.# |
RAD001 (50 nM) |
Wild-type (%) |
V617F (%) |
% decrease V617F |
| 1 |
- |
80 |
20 |
70 |
| + |
94 |
6 |
| 2 |
- |
53 |
47 |
15 |
| + |
60 |
40 |
| 3 |
- |
28 |
72 |
21 |
| + |
43 |
57 |
| 4 |
- |
52 |
48 |
17 |
| + |
58 |
40 |
| 5 |
- |
68 |
32 |
72 |
| + |
91 |
9 |
| |
Mean ± SD |
39 ± 29 |

[0121] The IC
50 value was calculated in proliferation inhibition assay in the presence of different
drug combinations. Reported is the median IC
50value from at least 3 experiments of the drugs used in combination. The Combination
Index (CI) was calculated according to Chou and Talaly as described in Materials and
Methods. A CI<1 indicates that the interaction of the two drugs is synergistic. The
first two columns (in gray) report, for convenience, the IC
50 value of the individual drugs as calculated from data in Table 1.

[0122] The IC
50 value (i.e., the concentration of drug that reduced colony number to 50% that measured
in control dishes with vehicle only) was calculated in agar clonogenic assay by enumerating
the colonies on day 7 in the presence of different drug concentrations. In case of
human cell lines, the control cell line was K562, while in case of murine cells the
reference were Ba/F3 wild-type cells maintained in the presence of IL-3. **, P< 0.01.

[0123] The IC
50 value was calculated in clonogenic assay in agar by enumerating the colonies grown
on day 7 of culture established in the presence of different drug combinations. Reported
is the median value from at least 3 experiments of IC
50 of the two drugs used in combination. The Combination Index (CI) was calculated as
described in Materials and Methods. A a CI<1 indicates that the interaction of the
two drugs is synergistic. The first two columns (in gray) indicate the IC
50 value calculated for the individual drugs and are reported here from Table 4 for
convenience.

[0124] The IC
50 value was calculated in clonogenic assay in agar by enumerating the colonies grown
on day 7 of culture established in the presence of different drug combinations. The
Combination Index (CI) was calculated as described in Materials and Methods. A a CI<1
indicates that the interaction of the two drugs is synergistic.