Field of the invention
[0001] The invention relates to a method of and a device for estimating a reflection profile
of an optical channel.
Background
[0002] These days, access networks, also called passive optical networks (PON), are used
for connecting a plurality of customers to a core network of data transportation.
[0003] In such an access network, the interconnection between the core network and the access
network is given at a so-called central office, which contains an optical line terminal
(OLT).
[0004] The OLT is connected via at least one optical fiber, preferably called optical feeder
fiber, to a so-called remote node. At this remote node, an optical downlink signal
transmitted by the OLT is split onto different optical branches, to which one or more
customers are connected by means of optical network units (ONU).
[0005] The customers send via the optical branches optical uplink signals towards the remote
node, which combines these optical uplink signals to a combined uplink signal and
transmits the combined signal via the optical feeder fiber to the central office,
which contains the OLT.
[0006] In order to determine the transmission properties of the transmission channel into
which a device transmits an optical signal, a measurement technique of optical time
domain reflectometry (OTDR) can be applied. In such an OTDR measurement, a reflection
profile of the transmission channel is estimated. Preferably, the technique of OTDR
is carried out at the OLT.
[0007] For the purpose of OTDR, an optical measurement signal in the form of an optical
pulse may be transmitted into the optical channel, which comprises one or more optical
fibers. Such Optical fibers are usually made of inhomogeneous material, which causes
backscattering of the optical measurement signal. The backscattered optical signal,
preferably called received response signal, may then be recorded over time as the
reflection profile. Knowing the propagation speed of the optical signals within the
optical fibers, the received response signal can be converted from the time domain
to a distance.
[0008] Different imperfections of the optical channel, such as e.g. an open connector or
a dirty fiber-connector, may cause characteristic increased or decreased backscattering
of the measurement signal, which in turn may be observed as reflection peaks within
the reflection profile. By examining the reflection profile and the reflection peaks
contained in the profile, one may derive, at which distance an imperfection is present
within the optical channel.
[0009] Instead of using a single optical pulse as the measurement signal, a more advanced
technique of OTDR may be employed. This advanced technique makes use of an optical
signal that is modulated in its amplitude in dependence on a correlation sequence.
The received response signal is first recorded and then used for determining the reflection
profile. This is achieved, by correlating a time-discrete version of the received
response signal with the initial correlation sequence itself. In the case, that the
auto-correlation function of the correlation sequence is equal to or approximated
by the dirac delta function, the result of the correlation yields an estimate of the
impulse response of the optical channel in the time domain, which is an approximation
of the reflection profile.
[0010] When transmitting an optical transmission signal carrying transmission data into
the optical channel using a transmission device, it is one possibility to carry out
the technique of OTDR, by using a further, separate device. The transmission device
and the separate OTDR device are in this case both coupled to the same optical channel,
preferably via an optical coupler.
[0011] A more advanced technique is that of embedded OTDR (eOTDR), in which the transmission
device itself contains the hardware for generating the optical transmission signal
as well as the hardware that is necessary for carrying out an OTDR measurement. Preferably,
the optical transmission signal is directly modulated in dependence on a correlation
sequence, wherein the frequency of this direct modulation is chosen, such that it
does not disturb data reception at a receiving side. After transmitting into the optical
channel the optical transmission signal, which carries the directly modulated measurement
signal, the received response signal of the optical channel can be obtained, by filtering
out that frequency, at which the optical transmission signal was modulated. This received
response signal can then be used for determining a reflection profile via the technique
of signal correlation as it has been described previously above.
Summary
[0012] Proposed is a method of estimating a reflection profile of an optical channel. The
method comprises different steps.
[0013] A measured reflection profile of the optical channel is provided. One or more reflection
peaks are estimated within the measured reflection profile.
[0014] A residual reflection profile is determined, by removing the estimated reflection
peaks from the measured reflection profile. Furthermore, a modified residual reflection
profile is determined, by modifying one or more estimated crosstalk frequency components
within the residual reflection profile.
[0015] Finally, the estimated reflection profile is determined, by superposing the estimated
reflection peaks and the modified residual reflection profile.
[0016] In order to grasp the advantages of the proposed method, the following aspects may
be taken into consideration.
[0017] When carrying out a method of embedded OTDR, the hardware components carrying out
the measurement of the reflection profile may experience an impact of crosstalk noise
caused by other hardware components present within one same device. Such crosstalk
noise may degrade the measured response signal and thus also the measured reflection
profile. Crosstalk noise may be present especially, in the case that the integration
of the OTDR devices into the transmission device is given as a Small Form-Factor Pluggable
(SFP).
[0018] For obtaining a reliable estimated reflection profile, the impact of crosstalk noise
needs to be reduced. One countermeasure may be, to shield the hardware devices, in
order to reduce the amount crosstalk noise caused by electromagnetic fields generated
by the hardware devices. Such a countermeasure is on the one hand cumbersome and on
the other hand may also be expensive, due to space restrictions given for a device
carrying out eOTDR.
[0019] In order to remove the crosstalk noise from the measured reflection profile, filtering
techniques may be applied. Such filtering techniques may not only have an impact on
the crosstalk noise, but also on reflection peaks present within the measured reflection
profile. As it has been previously described, such reflection peaks should remain
present within a filtered reflection profile, in order to detect imperfections of
the optical channel.
[0020] The proposed method first estimates the reflection peaks and then removes these peaks,
in order to yield a residual reflection profile. Next, the residual reflection profile
is filtered, such that estimated crosstalk frequency components are modified. Due
to the fact, that crosstalk usually causes one or more spectral peaks within the spectrum
of a reflection profile, the crosstalk noise may be reduced, by modifying the estimated
crosstalk frequency components. After modifying the crosstalk frequency components,
the yielded modified residual reflection profile is superposed with the previously
estimated reflection peaks.
[0021] Thus, the proposed method of estimating a reflection applies a filtering technique,
in which estimated reflection peaks are first separated from the measured reflection
profile, before separately filtering the crosstalk noise in the frequency domain,
and then finally superposing the filtering result with the preserved reflection peaks
again. Thus, this filtering technique for reducing crosstalk impact avoids a severe
degradation of the reflection peaks present within the finally estimated reflection
profile. Therefore, the estimated reflection profile contains well preserved reflection
peaks. Thus, the estimated reflection profile may be used for detecting imperfections
of the optical channel via the reflection peaks, as well as reliably estimating the
attenuation profile of the optical channel due to reduced crosstalk noise.
Brief description of the Figures
[0022]
Figure 1 shows a flowchart of the proposed method according to an embodiment.
Figures 2a and 2b show a measured reflection profile in the linear and the logarithmic
domain.
Figure 3 shows a second derivative of the measured reflection profile in the linear
domain.
Figure 4a shows estimated reflection peaks.
Figure 4b shows a residual reflection profile.
Figure 5 shows a magnitude of a spectrum of the residual reflection profile.
Figure 6 shows a first derivative of the magnitude.
Figure 7 shows a modified residual reflection profile.
Figures 8a and 8b show an estimated reflection profile in the linear and the logarithmic
domain, respectively, plotted over a time scale on the abcissa.
Figures 9a and 9b show the estimated reflection profile in the linear and the logarithmic
domain, respectively, plotted over a distance scale on the abcissa.
Figure 10 shows a proposed device according to an embodiment.
Description of embodiments
[0023] Figure 1 shows a flowchart of the proposed method according to a preferred embodiment.
In the step Sl, an OTDR trace as a measured reflection profile of an optical channel
is provided. This OTDR trace may be measured by a device carrying out also the proposed
method. According to an alternative solution, the OTDR trace may be provided by a
first device to a second device via a data interface of the second device, which receives
the data of the OTDR trace, and which then provides the OTDR trace to further sub-devices
of the second device carrying out the further steps of the proposed method.
[0024] The OTDR trace is preferably a measured reflection profile in the form of a time
discrete sampled signal. Preferably, the sampling frequency of the sampled measured
reflection profile lies within the range of several megahertz, preferably 40 MHz.
Such a sampling frequency of 40 MHz corresponds to a sampling interval of 25 ns. Taking
into consideration typical propagation speeds of optical signals within optical fibers,
the sampling interval of 25 ns corresponds to a resolution in distance of 2.5 m.
[0025] The measured reflection profile RP is provided to a next step S2 of the proposed
method.
[0026] Figure 2a shows an example of a measured reflection profile RP in the linear domain,
wherein a timescale corresponding to a time resolution in microseconds is shown along
the abcissa. The reflection profile RP contains in this example at least three reflection
peaks P1, P2, P3, as well as crosstalk noise, which is clearly visible as a noise
signal overlaying the reflection profile RP.
[0027] The reflection profile RP of Figure 2a is once more shown in Figure 2b as a reflection
profile RPL in the logarithmic domain. Both refection profiles RP and RPL of the Figures
2a and 2b are plotted here as time continuous signals over a time scale of microseconds,
wherein a person skilled in the art will acknowledge, that such time continuous plots
may represent time discrete and sampled reflection profiles. Thus, the plotted values
of the reflection profiles RP and RPL can be considered as time discrete values plotted
over discrete indices corresponding to the timescales shown in the Figures 2a and
2b.
[0028] Coming back to Figure 1, reflection peaks EP present within the reflection profile
RP are estimated within the step S2. These estimated reflection peaks EP may then
be stored in a separate step S21. The measured reflection profile RP is provided in
the time domain, while the estimated reflection peaks EP are preferably also estimated
in the time domain. For estimating the reflection peaks, a second derivative of the
measured reflection profile is determined. This may be obtained, by determining for
the time discrete measured reflection profile the signal of second differential order
in the time domain. Having yielded this second derivative, a reflection peak is estimated
to be present for those time discrete indices, for which the second derivative exceeds
a defined threshold.
[0029] Figure 3 shows the second derivative SD together with the threshold T1. The threshold
T1 may be determined, by determining the median absolute value of the second derivative
SD. Preferably, the threshold T1 is chosen to this median absolute value multiplied
by a fixed factor. The fixed factor is preferably chosen within the range between
the values 1 and 10. In a preferred embodiment, the fixed factor is chosen to the
value 6.
[0030] As it was previously outlined, for estimating the presence of one or more reflection
peaks, those time-discrete indices of the second derivative are determined, for which
the second derivative exceeds the threshold. The estimated reflection peaks are then
determined as those values of the measured reflection profile RP, whose time-discrete
indices correspond to or are equal to the determined time-discrete indices.
[0031] Preferably, not only these determined values of the measured reflection profile RP
are used as the estimated the reflection peaks and then removed, but also further
values of the measured reflection profile RP are determined used as the estimated
reflection peaks. These further values are those, whose corresponding further time-discrete
indices lie within predefined time windows, which are centered around the previously
determined time-discrete indices. Thus, preferably, a combined set of values corresponding
to a combined set of time-discrete indices is used for estimating the reflection peaks,
wherein the combined set of time-discrete indices is a combination of the previously
determined set of time-discrete indices and the further time-discrete indices.
[0032] For a sampling frequency of 40 MHz for the measured reflection profile RP, a time
window has preferably a width of 8 time discrete indices, which corresponds to 200
ns or a distance resolution of 20 m. Furthermore, the timely width of the time window
corresponds to a full-width-at-half-maximum of an optical pulse, when using only a
single optical pulse for OTDR measurement instead of a correlation sequence. Even
furthermore, the timely width of the time window corresponds to a timely width of
a dirac-delta function resulting from OTDR measurement using a correlation sequence.
[0033] The time window is preferably a weighting window, which defines weighting factors
for the values of the measured reflection profiles falling within the time window.
According to a first solution, the weighting window is a simple boxcar window applying
a constant factor of 1 to those value of the measured reflection profile, which fall
within the time window. According to another solution, the weighting window is a raised
cosine window, which applies different values within the range 0 to 1 to those values
of the measured reflection profile, which fall within the time window. By using such
a raised cosine window, a more smooth transition of values representing a reflection
peak and values representing no reflection peak is achieved.
[0034] Figure 4a shows a number of estimated reflection peaks EP in the linear domain.
[0035] Coming back to Figure 1, the estimated reflection peaks are removed from the measured
reflection profile RP within a step S3. This yields a residual reflection profile
RRP. Figure 4b shows the residual reflection profile RRP in the linear domain. The
reflection peaks are removed from the residual reflection profile RRP, by replacing
the initial values of the measured reflection profile at those indices, at which reflection
peaks were detected, by the mean value of the reflection profile of those indices,
which are adjacent to the indices at which reflection peaks were detected.
[0036] Coming back to Figure 1, the obtained residual reflection profile RRP is then used
for filtering out the crosstalk noise.
[0037] Figure 5 shows a magnitude S of a spectrum of a residual reflection profile. Frequency
components CT of the crosstalk noise are also indicated in Figure 5. A modified residual
reflection profile is determined, by modifying estimated crosstalk frequency components
within the residual reflection profile's spectrum.
[0038] Such modification is carried out in the step S4 of the Figure 1. The crosstalk frequency
components CT shown in Figure 5 are estimated in the frequency domain and also modified
in the frequency domain. Such crosstalk frequency components CT can be expected as
spectral peaks within the lower frequency domain, while normally no discontinuities
are expected for higher frequencies within the residual reflection profile's spectrum.
[0039] For estimating the crosstalk frequency components CT, the spectrum of the reflection
profile is determined, by transforming the residual reflection profile from the time
domain to the frequency domain. This is preferably carried out by a frequency transformation,
which is discrete in the time domain and discrete in the frequency domain. Preferably,
the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is used. This yields a complex discrete frequency
spectrum. The magnitude S of such a discrete frequency spectrum is the one shown in
Figure 5, wherein the frequency scale as a continuous scale is plotted along the abscissa.
In this example, the number of discrete values plotted is 4096.
[0040] For finally detecting the crosstalk frequency components CT, the complex discrete
frequency spectrum is differentiated once, preferably by determining the first order
differential signal. This yields a complex first derivative. Then, the magnitude of
this first derivative is determined, which yields real values.
[0041] Figure 6 shows the magnitude FD of the first derivative of the residual reflection
profile's spectrum. Those spectral indices of the first derivative's magnitude FD
are determined, for which the first derivative's magnitude FD exceeds a spectral threshold
T2. The complex spectrum is then modified in its complex values at those indices,
which correspond to the determined spectral indices.
[0042] The threshold T2 may be determined, by determining a median value of the first derivative's
magnitude FD. Preferably, the threshold T2 is chosen to this median value multiplied
by a fixed factor. The fixed factor is preferably chosen within the range between
the values 1 and 10. In a preferred embodiment, the fixed factor is chosen to the
value 6.
[0043] Preferably, the threshold T2 is determined, by determining a median value of the
first derivative's magnitude FD within a predefined spectral range FR. This spectral
range FR has a lower frequency limit LL and an upper frequency limit UL. This median
value may then be multiplied by a fixed factor. The fixed factor is preferably chosen
within the range between the values 1 and 10. In a preferred embodiment, the fixed
factor is chosen to the value 6.
[0044] Preferably, the modification of the complex spectral values of the spectrum is carried
out not only for the spectral values at those spectral indices, for which the first
derivative's magnitude FD exceeds the spectral threshold T2, but also for further
values of the spectrum, whose further spectral indices lie within one or more predefined
spectral windows, which are centered around the previously determined spectral indices.
[0045] Thus, preferably, a combined set of values corresponding to a combined set of discrete
spectral indices is used for estimating the crosstalk frequency components and then
modifying these components, wherein the combined set of discrete spectral indices
is a combination of the previously determined set of discrete spectral indices and
the further discrete spectral indices.
[0046] Preferably, the spectral window has a predefined width, which is preferably of a
width of eight spectral indices. Preferably, this spectral window is a weighting window,
which may in one alternative solution be a boxcar window applying weighting factors
of 1 or 0. According to an alternative solution, the spectral window is a raised cosine
window applying varying weighting factors within the range between 0 and 1.
[0047] The corresponding complex spectral values, which correspond to the spectral indices
used for estimating the crosstalk frequency components, are modified to a respective
mean value. For one of these corresponding complex spectral values, the respective
complex mean value is determined as the mean of the adjacent spectral values, which
are adjacent to the corresponding values to be modified.
[0048] Preferably, the estimation of the crosstalk frequency components and the modification
of these components is limited to the predefined frequency range FR.
[0049] The modified complex spectrum is then transformed back from the frequency domain
to the time domain, using preferably a time discrete and discrete frequency transform
as an inverse transform. This inverse transform is preferably the inversed Fast Fourier
Transform (IFFT).
[0050] An obtained modified residual reflection profile is then provided from the step S4
to the step S5, as shown in Figure 1. Such an example of a modified residual reflection
profile MRRP is shown in Figure 7 in the linear domain. As shown in Figure 1, the
yielded modified residual reflection profile MRRP is then superposed with the previously
estimated reflection peaks EP within a step S5. This yields an estimated reflection
profile ERP.
[0051] Figures 8a and 8b show an estimated reflection profile in the linear domain ERP as
well as in the logarithmic domain ERPL, wherein these profiles are plotted over a
time scale on the abcissa. By comparing the initially measured reflection profile
RP of Figure 2a with the estimated reflection profile ERP of Figure 8a in the linear
domain, it has to be noted, that the amount of crosstalk noise is reduced, while the
impact of the step of reducing the crosstalk noise onto the reflection peaks is kept
to a minimised amount. Looking at Figure 8a, one can clearly see that not only the
initially visible reflection peaks P1, P2 and P3 can be observed, but also the reflection
peak P4, which was previously not easily visible within the reflection profile RP
of Figure 2a.
[0052] The proposed method is of advantage, since it first separates the estimated reflection
peaks from the measured reflection profile, before then filtering the residual reflection
profile, for reducing the amount of crosstalk noise. Furthermore, by later on superposing
the estimated reflection peaks with the modified residual reflection profile, an estimated
reflection profile is obtained, in which both aims, reducing crosstalk noise and preserving
reflection peaks, is achieved.
[0053] Figures 9a and 9b show an estimated reflection profile in the linear domain ERPD
and in the logarithmic domain ERPDL, respectively, wherein these profiles are plotted
over a distance scale on the abcissa.
[0054] Figure 10 shows the proposed device for estimating a reflection profile of an optical
channel according to a preferred embodiment.
[0055] The device D contains a data interface DI, over which data representing a measured
reflection profile can be received.
[0056] Preferably, the data interface DI is connected via a data bus DB to a processing
device P as well as a memory device M.
[0057] The memory device M and the processing device P are operable, such that they jointly
carry out the different steps of the proposed method described in detail above.
[0058] Thus, the memory device M and the processing device P are operable, to jointly estimate
reflection peaks within a measured reflection profile, and furthermore to determine
a residual reflection profile, by removing the estimated reflection peaks from the
measured reflection profile.
[0059] Furthermore, the devices P and M are operable to jointly modify estimated crosstalk
frequency components within the residual reflection profile, for determining a modified
residual reflection profile. Finally, the devices P and M are operable, to jointly
superpose the estimated reflection peaks and the modified residual reflection profile,
for determining the estimated reflection profile.
[0060] The functions of the various elements shown in Figure 10, including any functional
block labelled as 'processor', may be provided through the use of dedicated hardware
as well as hardware capable of executing software in association with appropriate
software. When provided by a processor, the functions may be provided by a single
dedicated processor, by a single shared processor, or by a plurality of individual
processors, some of which may be shared. Moreover, explicit use of the term 'processor'
or should not be construed to refer exclusively to hardware capable of executing software,
and may implicitly include, without limitation, digital signal processor (DSP) hardware,
network processor, application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), field programmable
gate array (FPGA), read only memory (ROM) for storing software, random access memory
(RAM), and non volatile storage. Other hardware, conventional and/or custom, may also
be included.
[0061] It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that any block diagrams herein
represent conceptual views of illustrative circuitry embodying the principles of the
invention. Similarly, it will be appreciated that any flow charts may be substantially
represented in computer readable medium and so executed by a computer or processor,
whether or not such computer or processor is explicitly shown.
1. Method of estimating a reflection profile of an optical channel,
comprising
- providing a measured reflection profile (RP) of said optical channel,
- estimating one or more estimated reflection peaks (P1, P2, P3) within said measured
reflection profile (RP),
- determining a residual reflection profile (RRP), by removing the estimated reflection
peaks (P1, P2, P3) from said measured reflection profile (RP),
- determining a modified residual reflection profile (MRRP), by modifying one or more
estimated crosstalk frequency components (CT) within said residual reflection profile
(RRP),
- determining the estimated reflection profile (ERP), by superposing said estimated
reflection peaks (P1, P2, P3) and said modified residual reflection profile (MRRP).
2. Method according to claim 1,
wherein said measured reflection profile (RP) is provided in the time domain,
comprising furthermore
- estimating said reflection peaks (P1, P2, P3) in the time domain,
- removing said estimated reflection peaks (P1, P2, P3) in the time domain.
3. Method according to claim 2,
wherein the step of estimating said reflection peaks (P1, P2, P3) in the time domain
includes
- determining a second derivative (SD) of said measured reflection profile (RP),
- determining those indices of said second derivative (SD), for which said second
derivative (SD) exceeds a threshold (T1).
4. Method according to claim 3,
wherein said step of estimating said reflection peaks (P1, P2, P3) in the time domain
includes
- using those values of said measured reflection profile (RP), whose indices correspond
to the determined indices.
5. Method according to claim 4,
wherein said step of estimating said reflection peaks (P1, P2, P3) in the time domain
includes
- using furthermore those values of said measured reflection profile (RP), whose indices
lie within one or more predefined time-windows centered around said determined indices.
6. Method according to claim 3,
wherein said threshold (T1) is determined, using a median absolute value of said second
derivative.
7. Method according to claim 1,
wherein said measured reflection profile (RP) is provided in the time domain, comprising
furthermore
- estimating said crosstalk frequency components (CT) in the frequency domain,
- modifying said crosstalk frequency components (CT) in the frequency domain.
8. Method according to claim 7,
wherein the step of estimating said crosstalk frequency components (CT) in the frequency
domain includes furthermore
- determining a spectrum (S) of said residual reflection profile (RRP), by transforming
said residual reflection profile (RRP) from the time domain to the frequency domain,
- determining a first derivative (FD) of a magnitude of said spectrum (S),
- determining those spectral indices of said first derivative (FD), for which said
first derivative (FD) exceeds a spectral threshold (T2).
9. Method according to claim 8,
wherein the step of modifying said crosstalk frequency components (CT) in the frequency
domain includes furthermore
- modifying those values of said spectrum (S), whose spectral indices correspond to
the determined spectral indices.
10. Method according to claim 9,
wherein the step of modifying said crosstalk frequency components (CT) in the frequency
domain includes furthermore
- modifying also those values of said spectrum (S), whose spectral indices lie within
a one or more predefined spectral-windows centered around said determined spectral
indices.
11. Method according to claim 10,
wherein the step of modifying said crosstalk frequency components (CT) in the frequency
domain includes furthermore
- setting spectral values within a respective spectral window to a respective mean
value, wherein said mean value is determined as the mean of those spectral values,
whose indices are adjacent to said respective spectral window.
12. Method according to claim 8,
wherein the step of determining said modified residual reflection profile (MRRP) includes
furthermore
- determining said modified residual reflection profile (MRRP), by transforming the
modified spectrum back to the time domain.
13. Device for estimating a reflection profile of an optical channel,
comprising
- at least one data interface (DI),
- at least one memory device (M),
- at least one processing device (P),
wherein said data interface (DI) is operable to receive a measured reflection profile
(RP) of said optical channel,
and wherein said memory device (M) and said processing device (P) are operable, to
jointly
- estimate one or more estimated reflection peaks (P1, P2, P3) within said measured
reflection profile (RP),
- determine a residual reflection profile (RRP), by removing the estimated reflection
peaks (P1, P2, P3) from said measured reflection profile (RP),
- determine a modified residual reflection profile (MRRP), by modifying one or more
estimated crosstalk frequency components (CT) within said residual reflection profile
(RRP), and
- determine the estimated reflection profile (ERP), by superposing said estimated
reflection peaks (P1, P2, P3) and said modified residual reflection profile (MRRP).