FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to a hard capsule composite formulation comprising
multi-unit spheroidal tablets (MUSTs) and method for preparing same.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The advancement in the field of medicine has improved the quality of life and increased
the life expectancy of humans. However, there is a limit to the efficacy of a single
pharmaceutically active ingredient in treating patients with medical disorders. Thus,
it is common to administer multiple medications having different mechanisms (modes)
of action simultaneously or sequentially for synergistic effects.
[0003] However, co-administration of two or more separate drug units may reduce patents'
compliance to taking medicine, thereby causing great inconvenience to the patients
who are subjected to continuous drug treatments. Further, the patients have to take
such multiple drug units at once, and carry them all the time. It will also give the
patients great inconvenience in their daily lives.
[0004] In order to redress such problems, there has been suggested a method of packaging
a number of medications in a single package. For instance, Torrent Pharmaceuticals
Ltd. (India) has released a composite formulation "CVpill," a single kit containing
a capsule and a tablet for treating a cardiovascular disease. CVpill consists of a
capsule containing 10 mg of Atorvastatin in powder form, Ramipril in powder form and
75 mg of an enteric-coated aspirin tablet, and a sustained-release tablet containing
50 mg of Metoprolol. The capsule and the tablet must be administered once a day simultaneously.
But such co-packaged products consisting of a simple kit can hardly improve patients'
compliance to taking medicine, which, however, may be expected in a composite formulation.
Therefore, there is a growing demand for a research on development of a "combination
drug or composite formulation" of specific active ingredients.
[0005] WO 2012/124973 discloses a combined formulation for oral administration for treatment of cardiovascular
disease, comprising (a) cholesterol lowering agent mini-tablets having a diameter
of 7.5 mm or less, which contain cholesterol lowering agent, a stabilizer thereof
and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient and have a coating layer on a surface
thereof, and (b) antithrombic agent mini-tablets or mini-pellets having a diameter
of 7.5 mm or less, which contain an antithrombotic agent a pharmaceutically acceptable
excipient thereof and include an enteric coating film on a surface thereof.
[0006] EP 1 462 098 is related to a solid pharmaceutical composition comprising two separate regions,
a first region comprising at least one non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)
and an adequate pharmaceutical carrier containing a retardant material for an extended
release delivery of said non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and a second
region comprising a stabilized gastroprotective prostaglandin and an adequate pharmaceutical
carrier containing a retardant material for an immediate release of said stabilized
gastroprotective prostaglandin.
[0007] The IP.com Jounral, IPCOM000170324D, 2008 relates to a pharmaceutical composition comprising montelukast sodium and levocetririzine
dihydrochloride in a single dosage form, designed to minimize interaction between
the two drugs.
[0008] The term "composite formulation" as used herein, refers to a combination of two or
more different active ingredients or drugs in a single unit dose such as tablet or
capsule. However, development of a composite formulation for specific active ingredients
is sometimes very difficult for the following reasons.
[0009] First, the combination of specific active ingredients to be used for a composite
formulation should readily be made. Further, the composition comprising active ingredients
and a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient should be in appropriate size and weight
for administration thereof. However, it is not always easy to develop a composite
formulation which meets such requirements. If the amount of drugs to be employed is
excessive or insufficient, it would be difficult to adjust the weight of the composition
to an appropriate level. Also, unexpected problems may be encountered in the course
of dealing with the various conditions resulting from the pharmacokinetical and pharmaceutical
properties of drugs.
[0010] Second, the chemical interaction between the active ingredients in the preparation
of a composite formulation may reduce the stability of drugs. Especially, it is even
more difficult to develop a fixed combination dosage form with sufficient physicochemical
stability for a combination of drugs if the stability thereof may be reduced due to
their chemical interaction when combined.
[0011] When a composite formulation of tablet is prepared, a double- or triple-layer tableting
machine can be used to separate the active ingredients. Moreover, not only does such
method require special equipments, but it is also mechanically impossible to completely
separate the main ingredients in each layer since an undesirable reaction may take
place at the interface of the layers.
[0012] For a capsule, a conventional hard capsule is charged with drugs in the form of powder,
granule or pellet. Also, only a single active ingredient is charged in a hard capsule
by a single charging step. Also, a drug in the form of powder, granule or pellet has
a density lower than that of a tablet since the former is not subjected to a high
pressure compressing step. Thus, there exists a limit in the amount of drugs in the
form of powder, granule or pellet to be charged in a capsule. In order to charge a
high dose of an active ingredient or more than one active ingredient in a single hard
capsule, the size of capsule must be increased to accommodate such large amount of
drugs. However, if the size of the capsule becomes too big for accommodating a large
amount of drugs, it may cause swallowing difficulties, dysphagia. Particularly, capsules
having large sizes of No. 00 (8.5 mm in capsule cap diameter and 23.3 mm in capsule
length) and No. 0 (7.6 mm in capsule cap diameter and 21.7 mm in capsule length) may
cause difficulties for elderly people or children to swallow them. It may also be
inconvenient to carry them due to their large size.
[0013] Accordingly, the present inventors have endeavored to resolve the disadvantages of
a composite formulation and have developed a hard capsule comprising a small number
of, e.g., 1 to 3, tablets per main ingredient. However, the initial dissolution rate
(within 15 min) of the hard capsule slowed down due to a delay in the disintegration
time of the hard capsule, and an increase in the deviation between individual dissolution
test results was observed. Thus, it may be difficult to expect the same bioequivalence
of a single dosage form from a composite formulation if it comprises a drug which
requires fast absorption rate, e.g., maximum drug concentration time (T
max) of 1 to 2 hrs. Therefore, there still remains a need for developing a composite
formulation with good productivity and stability which does not have a delay in initial
dissolution rate.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0014] Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a composite formulation
having no delay in initial dissolution rate within 15 min, and exhibiting good
in vivo absorption rate owing to a small change in each dissolution rate, as well as good
productivity and stability.
[0015] It is another object of the present invention to provide a method for preparing the
composite formulation.
[0016] In accordance with one object of the present invention, there is provided a hard
capsule composite formulation according to claim 1.
[0017] In accordance with another object of the present invention, there is provided a method
for preparing the hard capsule composite formulation according to claim 10.
[0018] The hard capsule composite formulation according to the present invention comprising
multi-unit spheroidal tablets (MUSTs) can effectively charge the MUSTs in the limited
space of the capsule, which allows charging a high dose of different pharmaceutically
active ingredients in a capsule with a relatively small size, to thereby increase
the productivity and render it readily administered to patients. The capsule has a
good dissolution rate because the pharmaceutically active ingredients contained in
the capsule are separated from one another; therefore, the dissolution rates of the
ingredients are less affected by one another. It may also be possible to maximize
the therapeutic effects of the pharmaceutically active ingredients since the composite
formulation has good stability.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0019]
Fig. 1 shows a schematic view of a hard capsule composite formulation in accordance
with one embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 2 shows a schematic view of a multi-unit spheroidal tablet (MUST), which is charged
in the hard capsule composite formulation.
Figs. 3 and 4 are graphs showing the dissolution rates of montelukast and levocetirizine,
respectively, in accordance with Test Example 1.
Fig. 5 is a graph showing the dissolution rate of ambroxol in accordance with Test
Example 2.
Figs. 6 and 7 are graphs showing the plasma levels of montelukast and levocetirizine,
respectively, in accordance with Test Example 3.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0020] Embodiments of the present invention are explained in detail hereinafter.
[0021] The present invention provides a hard capsule composite formulation comprising multi-unit
spheroidal tablets (MUSTs). The schematic view of the hard capsule composite formulation
in accordance with the present invention is shown in Fig. 1.
[0022] The term "composite formulation," as used herein, refers to a combination of two
or more different active ingredients or drugs in a single unit dose. The composite
formulation of the present invention comprises a capsule, and a plurality of multi-unit
mini tablets, which contains any one of the pharmaceutically active ingredients, having
a sphere-like shape that is encapsulated in the capsule.
[0023] In the inventive composite formulation, the capsule may be any conventional capsule
used in the pharmaceutical industry, preferably a hard capsule. A hard capsule is
composed of a capsule body and a cap, so that contents are charged in the internal
space of the capsule body and the capsule cap is used to close the capsule body for
use. The final capsule product, with its cap closed, that is actually administered
to patients has the shape of cylindrical body with hemispherical ends, and the contents
are charged in the internal space of the capsule body. In general, the internal space
of conventional capsules is often charged with powder, granule or pellet in general,
however, the internal space of the inventive composite formulation is characterized
in being charged with mini tablets instead. The size of the mini tablets are small,
and thus a plurality of mini tablets, e.g., 4 or more, may be charged in the internal
space of the inventive composite formulation.
[0024] Capsules with various size numbers are used depending on the capsule size, but capsules
having large size such as No. 00 (8.5 mm in capsule cap diameter and 23.3 mm in capsule
length) may cause difficulties for elderly people or children to swallow them. It
may also not portable due to their large size.
[0025] Therefore, the capsule size of the inventive composite formulation is preferably
hard capsule No. 0 or smaller, e.g., hard capsule No. 0 (7.6 mm in capsule cap diameter
and 21.7 mm in capsule length), hard capsule No. 1 (6.9 mm in capsule cap diameter
and 19.1 mm in capsule length), hard capsule No. 2 (6.4 mm in capsule cap diameter
and 17.6 mm in capsule length), hard capsule No. 3 (5.8 mm in capsule cap diameter
and 15.7 mm in capsule length) or hard capsule No. 4 (5.3 mm in capsule cap diameter
and 14.2 mm in capsule length), and more preferably the capsule size of hard capsule
No. 1 or smaller.
[0026] In the inventive composite formulation, the MUST may comprise pharmaceutically active
ingredients and pharmaceutically acceptable additives.
[0027] The MUST can be prepared by subjecting a mixture or granules of pharmaceutically
active ingredients and pharmaceutically acceptable additives to a compression step
with a tableting machine. In such case, the hardness of the tablet is determined by
the magnitude of the compression pressure.
[0028] The tablet can be prepared in the form of a circle, rectangle or oval, however, a
circular form is preferred because it allows easier packing in the internal space
of the hard capsule. Particularly, when the diameter of the circular tablet is similar
to the thickness of the circular tablet, it has a spheroidal shape, which improves
the flowability of the tablet, and also minimizes the void to be formed in the capsule
by forming a desirable packing arrangement.
[0029] Therefore, the tablet to be charged in the capsule is preferably in the form of a
circle, more preferably a mini spheroidal tablet (MUST). The multi-unit spheroidal
tablet which is comprised in the inventive composite formulation is shown in Fig.
2.
[0030] In order to prepare the circular tablet in the form of a spheroid, the ratio of the
diameter of the circular tablet to the thickness thereof of each MUST needs to be
in a range of 1 : 0.7 to 1 : 1.3, preferably 1 : 0.8 to 1 : 1.2. The MUST having the
ratio of the diameter of the circular tablet to the thickness thereof in a range of
1 : 0.7 to 1 : 1.3 in accordance with the present invention can completely fill the
internal space of the hard capsule without forming any void, and thus, a larger amount
of a pharmaceutical composition can be charged even in a smaller capsule.
[0031] In addition, when the ratio of the cylinder height to the total thickness of the
MUST is in a specific range, the tableting characteristics of the MUST improve, and
hence can improve the speed of the tableting process.
[0032] Specifically, the cylinder height is equal to the total length of the tablet minus
the length of both hemispherical ends (top and bottom) combined, as shown in Fig.
2. If the ratio of the cylinder height in the total thickness is too high, the tablet
would form a rectangular shape which can deteriorate the flowability of the tablet,
and thereby causing a trouble during the packing process. If the ratio of the cylinder
height in the total thickness is too low, the tablet would be prone to shatter during
the tableting process. Therefore, the ratio of the thickness to the cylinder height
of the MUST in accordance with the present invention is in a range of 1 : 0.3 to 1
: 0.9, preferably 1 : 0.5 to 1 : 0.8.
[0033] Further, the MUST is a mini tablet having a small size, and thus the internal space
of the capsule comprises at least 4 or more of mini tablets, preferably 4 to 40 MUSTs
per each pharmaceutically active ingredient.
[0034] Accordingly, the diameter of the MUST in the composite formulation according to the
present invention is less than the internal diameter of the hard capsule body, and
preferably less than or equal to 1/2 of the internal diameter of the hard capsule.
[0035] If the diameter of the MUST is too large (e.g., greater than 1/2 of the internal
diameter of the hard capsule body), it becomes difficult to charge the tablets in
the internal space of the capsule, and also the total number of tablets to be charged
in the internal space of the capsule decreases, thereby inhibiting an improvement
in dissolution rate or a reduction in standard deviation of dissolution rates. Even
after the tablets were charged, it does not allow the formation of desired packing
arrangement, and thus cause voids to form within the capsule. On the other hand, when
the diameter of the MUST is too small (e.g., less than 1 mm), the amount charged in
a single tablet is limited, and also the physical properties of the tablet may be
largely affected by the environmental variables during the tableting process.
[0036] Therefore, the MUST in accordance with the present invention has a diameter in a
range of 1 mm to 4 mm, preferably in a range of 1.5 mm to 3 mm. If the diameter of
the tablet is in the said range, the desirable packing arrangement can be achieved,
which allows the maximization of the contents to be charged in a capsule, and it also
yields an improvement in dissolution rate due to having a plurality of tablets.
[0037] The composite formulation of the present invention has a good charge rate as compared
to conventional hard capsules which are charged with granule or pellets.
[0038] The charge rate of a capsule can be calculated by the weight of material charged
in the capsule over the volume of the capsule body. For example, when 150 mg of a
composition is charged in a No. 2 capsule (vol.: 0.37 mL), the charge rate is approximately
0.41 g/mL. Generally, it is difficult to achieve a charge rate of 0.6 g/mL or greater
if granule or pellet material is charged due to the low density of the material charged
or the voids existing in the pellet. In contrast, the composite formulation according
to the present invention has a charge rate of 0.6 g/mL to 1.0 g/mL, and thus having
a charge rate of 0.6 g/mL or greater, which make it possible to reduce the size of
a hard capsule, rendering it readily administered to patients.
[0039] Further, the composite formulation in accordance with the present invention has a
significantly less porosity (the rate of empty space) as compared to a conventional
capsule which is charged with typical tablets having a diameter of 5 mm or greater.
Since there is an inverse relationship between the charge rate and the porosity value,
the MUST of the present invention can be charged in the internal space of the capsule
at an optimum level.
[0040] In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a hard
capsule composite formulation comprising a plurality of MUSTs whose diameter is less
than or equal to 1/2 of the internal diameter of the hard capsule body, and is in
a range of 1 mm to 4 mm. In such formulations, the diameter of the MUST may be in
a range of 1.5 mm to 3 mm.
[0041] According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a hard capsule
composite formulation comprising a plurality of MUST whose ratio of its thickness
to the cylinder height is in a range of 1 : 0.7 to 1 : 1.3, and the diameter thereof
is in a range of 1 mm to 4 mm. In such formulations, the ratio of the thickness to
the cylinder height of the MUST may be in a range of 1 : 0.8 to 1 : 1.2, and the diameter
thereof may be in the range 1.5 mm to 3 mm.
[0042] According to still another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a hard
capsule composite formulation comprising a plurality of MUST whose diameter is less
than or equal to 1/2 of the internal diameter of the hard capsule body, and the ratio
of the thickness of MUST to the cylinder height thereof may be in a range of 1 : 0.8
to 1 : 1.2.
[0043] Any two or more drugs known in the art can be employed as active ingredient for the
MUSTs of the present invention. The drug used in the present invention may be selected
from the same or different drug groups. Examples of the drug employable include antipyretics
agents, analgesics, anti-inflammatory agents and muscle relaxants such as tramadol,
naproxen, ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, aspirin, acetaminophen, indomethacin, diclofenac
sodium, aceclofenac, ketoprofen, isopropyl antipyrine, phenacetin, flubiprofen, phenylbutazone,
etodolac, celecoxib, etoricoxib, eperisone, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts
thereof; antiulcer agents such as omeprazole, esomeprazole, pantoprazole, cimetidine,
famotidine, ranitidine, nizatidine, roxatidine, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts
thereof; cardiovascular agent or vasodilators such as losartan, ibesartan, candesartan,
telmisartan, valsartan, nifedipine, amlodipine, verapamil, captopril, diltiazem hydrochloride,
propranolol, oxprenolol, nitroglycerin, enalapril, and pharmaceutically acceptable
salts thereof; antidiabetic agents such as metformin, glimepiride, sitagliptin, rosiglitazone,
pioglitazone, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof; anti-hyperlipidemic agents
such as simvastatin, rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts
thereof; antibiotics such as ampicillin, amoxicillin, cephalexin, cefuroxime, cefdinir,
cefadroxil, cefprozil, cefpodoxime, cefditoren, cefaclor, cefixime, cefradine, loracarbef,
ceftibuten, cefatrizine, cefcapene, erythromycins, tetracyclines, quinolones, and
pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof; antitussives or anti-asthmatic agents such
as montelukast, theophylline, aminophylline, codeine phosphate, methylephedrine hydrochloride,
dextromethorpan, noscapine, salbutamol, ambroxol, levodropropizine, clenbuterol, tebutalin,
and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof; antiemetic agents or GIT regulators
such as ondansetron, metoclopramide, domperidone, trimebutine maleate, cisapride,
levosulpiride, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof; anti-impotence agents
such as sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil, udenafil, and pharmaceutically acceptable
salts thereof; and anti-dementia agents such as donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine,
acetyl carnitine, memantine, xaliproden, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.
[0044] Besides, anti-BPH agents such as tamsulosin; antimigraine agents such as zolmitriptan
and rizatriptan; psychostimulants; antimicrobials; antihistamines such as cetirizine,
levocetirizine, and loratadine; antidiabetic agents; antiallergic agents; contraceptives;
vitamin supplements; anticoagulants such as clopidogrel; muscle relaxants; brain metabolism
enhancers; diuretics such as torsemide, and furosemide; antiepileptic agents such
as gabapentin, pregabalin, valproate, topiramate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine;
and antiparkinson drugs such as selegiline; antipsychotics such as risperidone, ziprasidone,
quetiapine, olanzapine, clozapine, and paliperidone, and pharmaceutically acceptable
salts thereof may be employed in the present invention. Also, biological agents such
as oral vaccines may be employed in the present invention.
[0045] Preferably, the active ingredient may be selected from the group consisting of levocetirizine,
montelukast, ambroxol, levodropropizine, losartan, ibersartan, amlodipine, rosuvastatin,
atorvastatin, aspirin, clopidogrel, aceclofenac, eperison, esomeprazole, naproxen,
and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.
[0046] In the inventive composite formulation, the MUST may further comprise pharmaceutically
acceptable additives selected from the group consisting of a pharmaceutically acceptable
diluent, disintegrating agent, binder, stabilizer, lubricant, coloring agent, and
a mixture thereof.
[0047] The diluent may be selected from the group consisting of microcrystalline cellulose,
lactose, Ludipress®, mannitol, monocalcium phosphate, starch, low-substituted hydroxypropyl
cellulose, and a mixture thereof. The amount of diluent employed may be about 1 to
99 wt%, preferably about 5 to 90 wt%, based on the total weight of the tablet.
[0048] The disintegrating agent may be any material that safely swells in a liquid environment,
which is selected from the group consisting of crospovidone, sodium starch glycolate,
croscarmellose sodium, low-substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose, starch, alginate,
or its sodium salt, or a mixture thereof. In a preferred embodiment of the present
invention, the disintegrating agent is selected from the group consisting of low-substituted
hydroxypropyl cellulose, crospovidone, sodium starch glycolate, croscarmellose sodium,
and a mixture thereof. The amount of disintegrating agent employed may be about 1
to 30 wt%, preferably about 2 to 15 wt%, based on the total weight of the tablet.
[0049] The binder may be selected from the group consisting of hydroxypropyl cellulose,
hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, copovidone, macrogol, light
anhydrous silicic acid, synthetic aluminum silicate, silicate derivatives such as
calcium silicate or magnesium metasilicate aluminate, phosphates such as calcium hydrogen
phosphate, carbonates such as calcium carbonate, and a mixture thereof, and the amount
of binder employable may be about 1 to 30 wt%, preferably about 2 to 15 wt%, based
on the total weight of the tablet.
[0050] The stabilizer may be an antioxidant, acidifying agent, or basifying agent.
[0051] Specific examples of the antioxidant include butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), butylated
hydroxyanisole (BHA), ascorbic acid, ascorbyl palmitate, ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid (EDTA), sodium pyrosulfite, and a mixture thereof; particularly butylated hydroxytoluene
is preferred. Specific examples of the acidifying agent include organic acids such
as fumaric acid, citric acid, tartaric acid, succinic acid, lactic acid, malic acid,
tosylic acid, oxalic acid, ascorbic acid, glutamic acid, alginic acid, maleic acid
and adipic acid; inorganic acids such as hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitric
acid, phosphoric acid, acetic acid and boric acid, and a mixture thereof, preferably
fumaric acid, citric acid, tartaric acid, and phosphoric acid. Examples of the basifying
agent include arginine, lysine, histidine, meglumine, aluminum magnesium silicate,
aluminum magnesium metasilicate, or basic minerals such as NaHCO
3, CaCO
3, MgCO
3, KH
2PO
4, K
2HPO
3, and tribasic calcium phosphate, preferably NaHCO
3, CaCO
3, MgCO
3 or a mixture thereof.
[0052] The stabilizer can be selected depending on the nature of the pharmaceutically active
ingredients, and the amount of stabilizing agent employed may be 0.01 to 10 wt%, based
on the total amount of the selected pharmaceutically active ingredients.
[0053] The lubricant may be selected from the group consisting of stearic acid, metal stearates
such as calcium stearate and magnesium stearate, talc, colloidal silica, sucrose esters
of fatty acids, hydrogenated vegetable oil, high melting point wax, glyceryl fatty
acid esters, glycerol dibehenate and a mixture thereof, and the amount of lubricant
employed may be in a range of about 0.02 to 5 wt%, preferably about 0.3 to 3 wt%,
based on the total weight of the tablet.
[0054] The coloring agent may be selected from the group consisting of red iron oxide pigments,
yellow iron oxide pigments, titanium dioxide, Blue No. 1, Blue No. 2, and a mixture
thereof, and the amount of coloring agent employed may be in a range of about 0.001
to 2 wt%, preferably about 0.01 to 1.5 wt%, based on the total weight of the tablet.
[0055] The inventive composite formulation comprising a plurality of MUSTs, and thus have
a very fast dissolution rate without experiencing a reduction in initial dissolution.
Generally, a conventional hard capsule formulation requires the disintegration time
for the capsule, hence there is a drawback of an increase in the deviation of dissolution
test results due to the slowdown of the initial dissolution rate (within 15 min).
Thus, it may be difficult to expect the same bioequivalence of a single dosage form
from a composite formulation if it comprises a drug which requires fast absorption
rate, e.g., maximum drug concentration time (T
max) of 1 to 2 hrs. However, the inventive composite formulation comprising a plurality
of tablets having a small size which can quickly disintegrate simultaneously, and
thus there is no delay in initial dissolution rate.
[0056] Accordingly, one or more active ingredients of the inventive composite formulation
are immediate release drugs, one or more active ingredients having
in vitro initial dissolution rate of 30% or more within 5 min of administration, and
in vitro initial dissolution rate of 80% or more within 10 min of administration (
see Figs. 3 to 5).
[0057] Further, the inventive composite formulation completely separates each active ingredient,
securing improved dissolution rate and a good stability upon long-term storage. This
advantageous effect can be enhanced further by coating the MUST. Accordingly, the
MUST of the present invention may be coated with a polymer film coating layer so as
to physically prevent any possible interaction between two or more active ingredients.
[0058] Any conventional polymer that can form a film coating may be used in the film coating
layer of the present invention. Specific examples include water soluble polymers such
as polyvinyl alcohol, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hypromellose, polyvinylpyrrolidone,
and a mixture thereof; water insoluble polymers such as hypromellose phthalate (HPMCP),
polyvinyl acetate (e.g., Kollicoat® SR 30D), water insoluble polymethacrylate copolymer
[such as, poly(ethyl acrylate-methyl methacrylate) copolymer (e.g., Eudragit® NE30D),
poly(ethyl acrylate-methyl methacrylate-trimethylaminoethyl methacrylate chloride)
copolymer (e.g., Eudragit® RSPO], ethyl cellulose, cellulose ester, cellulose ether,
cellulose acylate, cellulose diacylate, cellulose triacylate, cellulose acetate, cellulose
diacetate, cellulose triacetate, and a mixture thereof.
[0059] The employment of such polymer not only serves to separate active ingredients from
one another, but also serves to allow forming MUST with different dissolution rates
(e.g., immediate/sustained or immediate/enteric) in the same capsule. In this case,
the MUST is coated with said polymer, and then can be charged in a desirable ratio
as the drug designer had intended so as to regulate the dissolution rates between
the same drug groups or between different drug groups. This advantageous effect was
made possible by employing a plurality of mini tablets as MUST of the in the present
invention.
[0060] The amount of polymer may be adjusted in order to provide a tablet having an appropriate
size and dissolution rate in an efficient manner, which is preferably about 1 to 50
wt%, more preferably about 1 to 20 wt %, based on the total weight of the tablet.
Each tablet is completely separated and forms an independent dosage form, preventing
any interaction between the tablets. Also, in the analysis of the stability of active
ingredients prepared in accordance with the present invention, it would be sufficient
to analyze the stability of each tablet contained in a capsule by a conventional method
for analyzing a single medicine, instead of any special method therefor.
[0061] Also, the present invention provides a method for preparing the hard capsule composite
formulation, which comprises the steps of: (1) preparing a MUST comprising a pharmaceutically
active ingredient; and (2) encapsulating a plurality of the MUSTs in the hard capsule
such that the hard capsule composite formulation comprises two or more pharmaceutically
active ingredients. The method may further comprise an additional step of coating
the MUST with a polymer film during the step (1) of the method above.
[0062] Hereinafter, the present invention is described more specifically by the following
examples.
Example 1: Preparation of Composite Formulation I
[0063]
- Levocetirizine layer -
| Levocetirizine dihydrochloride |
5.0 mg |
| Ludipress® |
60.5 mg |
| Microcrystalline cellulose |
8.1 mg |
| Citric acid |
3.0 mg |
| Croscarmellose sodium |
5.0 mg |
| Light anhydrous silicic acid |
0.5 mg |
| Magnesium stearate |
0.9 mg |
| Opadry® Y-1-7000 |
2.0 mg |
| Distilled water |
(10.0 mg) |
- Montelukast layer -
| Montelukast sodium |
10.4 mg (montelukast, 10 mg) |
| D-mannitol |
45.4 mg |
| Microcrystalline cellulose |
92.0 mg |
| Light anhydrous silicic acid |
2.4 mg |
| Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
4.0 mg |
| Sodium starch glycolate |
8.4 mg |
| Magnesium Stearate |
3.4 mg |
| Hypromellose |
1.5 mg |
| Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
1.5 mg |
| Titanium dioxide |
0.96 mg |
| Red iron oxide |
0.004 mg |
| Yellow iron oxide |
0.036 mg |
| Distilled water |
(40.0 mg) |
[0064] The levocetirizine-containing tablet layer was prepared as described below. Levocetirizine
dihydrochloride, Ludipress® (BASF), microcrystalline cellulose, citric acid, croscarmellose
sodium, light anhydrous silicic acid, and magnesium stearate were sieved and admixed,
and then the resulting mixture was pressed into a tablet using a tablet press machine
with the die diameter of 2.0 mm, to yield 10 MUSTs, wherein each tablet has the weight
of 8.3 mg, the thickness of about 2.0 mm, and the cylinder height of 1.3 mm.
[0065] Separately, a coating solution was prepared by dissolving Opadry® Y-1-7000 in distilled
water, and the coating solution was applied on the levocetirizine-containing MUSTs
prepared above. The total weight of 10 MUSTs thus obtained was 85 mg, and the total
weight of levocetirizine therein was 5 mg.
[0066] Meanwhile, the montelukast-containing tablet layer was prepared as described below.
Montelukast sodium, D-mannitol, microcrystalline cellulose, light anhydrous silicic
acid, hydroxypropyl cellulose, sodium starch glycolate, and magnesium stearate were
sieved and admixed, and then the resulting mixture was pressed into a tablet using
a tablet press machine with the die diameter of 2.0 mm, to yield 20 MUSTs, wherein
each tablet has the weight of 8.3 mg, the thickness of about 2.0 mm, and the cylinder
height of 1.3 mm.
[0067] Separately, a coating solution was prepared by dissolving hypromellose, hydroxypropyl
cellulose, titanium dioxide, red iron oxide, and yellow iron oxide in distilled water,
and the coating solution was applied on the montelukast-containing MUSTs prepared
above. The total weight of 20 MUSTs thus obtained was 170 mg, and the total weight
of montelukast therein was 10 mg.
[0068] The two different MUSTs prepared above, 10 levocetirizine-containing MUSTs and 20
montelukast-containing MUSTs, were charged in the capsule body of a No. 1 hard capsule
primarily made up with gelatin to produce a hard capsule formulation comprising 10
mg of montelukast and 5 mg of levocetirizine.
Example 2: Preparation of Composite Formulation II
[0069]
- Ambroxol layer -
| Ambroxol hydrochloride |
30.0 mg |
| Lactose hydrate |
22.7 mg |
| Pregelatinized starch |
22.7 mg |
| Povidone K-30 |
1.4 mg |
| Distilled water |
(20.0 mg) |
| Light anhydrous silicic acid |
0.4 mg |
| Magnesium stearate |
0.8 mg |
- Levodropropizine layer -
| Levodropropizine |
60.0 mg |
| Lactose hydrate |
46.6 mg |
| Microcrystalline cellulose |
47.0 mg |
| Sodium starch glycolate |
5.6 mg |
| Magnesium stearate |
0.8 mg |
[0070] The ambroxol-containing tablet layer was prepared as described below. Ambroxol hydrochloride,
lactose hydrate, and pregelatinized starch were admixed, added with a binding solution
prepared by dissolving povidone K-30 in distilled water, and the mixture was wet granulated.
Light anhydrous silicic acid and magnesium stearate were added thereto, and the mixture
was pressed into a tablet using a tablet press machine with the die diameter of 2.0
mm, to yield 10 MUSTs, wherein each tablet has the weight of 7.8 mg and the thickness
of about 2.0 mm, and the cylinder height of 1.3 mm. The total weight of 10 MUSTs thus
obtained was 78 mg, and the total weight of ambroxol hydrochloride therein was 30
mg.
[0071] Meanwhile, the levodropropizine-containing tablet layer was prepared as described
below. Levodropropizine, lactose hydrate, microcrystalline cellulose, sodium starch
glycolate, and magnesium stearate were sieved and admixed, and then the resulting
mixture was pressed into a tablet using a tablet press machine with the die diameter
of 2.0 mm, to yield 20 MUSTs, wherein each tablet has the weight of 8.0 mg, the thickness
of about 2.0 mm, and the cylinder height of 1.4 mm. The total weight of 20 MUSTs thus
obtained was 160 mg, and the total weight of levodropropizine therein was 60 mg.
[0072] The two different MUSTs prepared above, 10 ambroxol hydrochloride-containing MUSTs
and 20 levodropropizine-containing MUSTs, were charged in the capsule body of a No.
1 hard capsule primarily made up with gelatin to produce a hard capsule formulation
comprising 30 mg of ambroxol hydrochloride and 60 mg of levodropropizine.
Example 3: Preparation of Composite Formulation III
[0073]
- Losartan layer -
| Losartan potassium |
50.0 mg |
| Ludipress® |
41.5 mg |
| Copovidone |
3.7 mg |
| Light anhydrous silicic acid |
1.0 mg |
| Croscarmellose sodium |
3.0 mg |
| Magnesium stearate |
0.8 mg |
| Opadry® Y-1-7000 |
2.0 mg |
| Distilled water |
(10.0 mg) |
- Amlodipine layer -
| Amlodipine camsylate |
15.68 mg (amlodipine 10 mg) |
| Mannitol |
40.0 mg |
| Microcrystalline cellulose |
36.92 mg |
| Sodium starch glycolate |
2.4 mg |
| Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
3.0 mg |
| Magnesium stearate |
2.0 mg |
| Opadry® Y-1-7000 |
2.0 mg |
| Distilled water |
(10.0 mg) |
[0074] The losartan-containing tablet layer was prepared as described below. Losartan potassium,
Ludipress® (BASF), copovidone, croscarmellose sodium, light anhydrous silicic acid,
and magnesium stearate were sieved and admixed, and then the mixture was pressed into
a tablet using a tablet press machine with the die diameter of 2.0 mm, to yield 12
MUSTs, wherein each tablet has the weight of about 8.3 mg and the thickness of about
2.0 mm, and the cylinder height of 1.2 mm.
[0075] Separately, a coating solution was prepared by dissolving Opadry® Y-1-7000 in distilled
water, and the coating solution was applied on the losartan-containing MUSTs prepared
above. The total weight of 12 MUSTs thus obtained was 102 mg, and the total weight
of losartan therein 50 mg.
[0076] Meanwhile, the amlodipine-containing tablet layer was prepared as described below.
Amlodipine camsylate, mannitol, microcrystalline cellulose, sodium starch glycolate,
hydroxypropyl cellulose, and magnesium stearate were sieved and admixed, and then
the resulting mixture was pressed into a tablet using a tablet press machine with
the die diameter of 2.0 mm, to yield 12 MUSTs, wherein each tablet has the weight
of about 8.3 mg and the thickness of about 2.0 mm, and the cylinder height of 1.3
mm.
[0077] Separately, a coating solution was prepared by dissolving Opadry® Y-1-7000 in distilled
water, and the coating solution was applied on the amlodipine-containing MUSTs prepared
above. The total weight of 12 MUSTs thus obtained was 102 mg, and the total weight
of amlodipine therein was 10 mg.
[0078] The two different MUSTs prepared above, 12 losartan-containing MUSTs and 12 amlodipine-containing
MUSTs, were charged in the capsule body of a No. 2 hard capsule primarily made up
with gelatin to produce a hard capsule formulation comprising 50 mg of losartan and
10 mg of amlodipine.
Example 4: Preparation of Composite Formulation IV
[0079]
- Rosuvastatin layer -
| Rosuvastatin calcium |
10.4 mg (rosuvastatin 10 mg) |
| Lactose hydrate |
44.7 mg |
| Microcrystalline cellulose |
22.8 mg |
| Crospovidone |
4.3 mg |
| Magnesium stearate |
0.8 mg |
| Opadry® Y-1-7000 |
3.0 mg |
| Red iron oxide |
0.1 mg |
| Distilled water |
(15.0 mg) |
- Aspirin layer -
| Aspirin |
100.0 mg |
| Microcrystalline cellulose |
26.0 mg |
| Pregelatinized starch |
13.0 mg |
| Light anhydrous silicic acid |
1.5 mg |
| Stearic acid |
0.5 mg |
| Hypromellose phthalate |
17.0 mg |
| Titanium dioxide |
1.7 mg |
| Acetylated monoglyceride |
0.3 mg |
| Ethanol |
(90.0 mg) |
| Distilled water |
(180.0 mg) |
[0080] The rosuvastatin-containing tablet layer was prepared as described below. Rosuvastatin
calcium, lactose hydrate, microcrystalline cellulose, crospovidone, and magnesium
stearate were sieved and admixed, and then the mixture was pressed into a tablet using
a tablet press machine with the die diameter of 2.0 mm, to yield 10 MUSTs, wherein
each tablet has the weight of about 8.3 mg, the thickness of about 2.0 mm, and the
cylinder height of 1.3 mm.
[0081] Separately, a coating solution was prepared by dissolving Opadry® Y-1-7000 in distilled
water, and the coating solution was applied on the rosuvastatin-containing MUSTs prepared
above. The total weight of 10 MUSTs thus obtained was 86 mg, and the total weight
of rosuvastatin therein was 10 mg.
[0082] Meanwhile, the aspirin-containing tablet layer was prepared as described below. Aspirin,
microcrystalline cellulose, pregelatinized starch, and light anhydrous silicic acid
were admixed. Stearic acid was added as a lubricant to the resulting mixture, and
then the mixture was pressed into a tablet using a tablet press machine with the die
diameter of 2.0 mm, to yield 20 MUSTs, wherein each tablet has the weight of about
7.05 mg, the thickness of about 2.0 mm, and the cylinder height of 1.2 mm.
[0083] Separately, a coating solution was prepared by dissolving hypromellose phthalate,
titanium dioxide, and acetylated monoglyceride in a mixed solvent of ethanol and acetone,
and the coating solution was applied on the aspirin-containing MUSTs prepared above
(enteric coating). The total weight of 20 MUSTs thus obtained was 160 mg, and the
total weight of aspirin therein was 100 mg.
[0084] The two different MUSTs prepared above, 10 rosuvastatin-containing MUSTs and 20 aspirin-containing
MUSTs, were charged in the capsule body of a No. 1 hard capsule primarily made up
with gelatin to produce a hard capsule formulation comprising 10 mg of rosuvastatin
and 100 mg of aspirin.
Example 5: Preparation of Composite Formulation V
[0085]
- Clopidogrel layer -
| Clopidogrel hydrogen sulfate |
97.9 mg (clopidogrel 75 mg) |
| D-mannitol |
40.0 mg |
| Low-substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose |
17.1 mg |
| Sucrose esters of fatty acids |
5.0 mg |
| Opadry® 32K-14834 |
4.0 mg |
| Distilled water |
(15.0 mg) |
- Aspirin layer -
| Aspirin |
100.0 mg |
| Microcrystalline cellulose |
26.0 mg |
| Pregelatinized starch |
13.0 mg |
| Light anhydrous silicic acid |
1.5 mg |
| Stearic acid |
0.5 mg |
| Hypromellose phthalate |
17.0 mg |
| Titanium dioxide |
1.7 mg |
| Acetylated monoglyceride |
0.3 mg |
| Ethanol |
(90.0 mg) |
| Distilled water |
(180.0 mg) |
[0086] The clopidogrel-containing tablet layer was prepared as described below. Clopidogrel
hydrogen sulfate, D-mannitol, low-substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose, and sucrose
esters of fatty acids were sieved and admixed, and then the mixture was pressed into
a tablet using a tablet press machine with the die diameter of 2.0 mm, to yield 20
MUSTs, wherein each tablet has the weight of about 8.0 mg, the thickness of about
2.0 mm, and the cylinder height of 1.3 mm.
[0087] Separately, a coating solution was prepared by dissolving Opadry® 32K-14834 in distilled
water, and the coating solution was applied on the clopidogrel-containing MUSTs prepared
above. The total weight of 20 MUSTs thus obtained was 164 mg, and the total weight
of clopidogrel therein was 75 mg.
[0088] Meanwhile, the aspirin-containing layer was prepared as described below. Aspirin,
microcrystalline cellulose, pregelatinized starch, and light anhydrous silicic acid
were admixed. Stearic acid was added as a lubricant to the resulting mixture, and
then the mixture was pressed into a tablet using a tablet press machine with the die
diameter of 2.0 mm, to yield 20 MUSTs, wherein each tablet has the weight of about
7.05 mg, the thickness of about 2.0 mm, and the cylinder height of 1.2 mm.
[0089] Separately, a coating solution was prepared by dissolving hypromellose phthalate,
titanium dioxide, and acetylated monoglyceride in a mixed solvent of ethanol and acetone,
and the coating solution was applied on the aspirin-containing MUSTs prepared above
(enteric coating). The total weight of 20 MUSTs thus obtained was 160 mg, and the
total weight of aspirin therein was 100 mg.
[0090] The two different MUSTs prepared above, 20 clopidogrel-containing MUSTs and 20 aspirin-containing
MUSTs, were charged in the capsule body of an elongated No. 1 hard capsule primarily
made up with gelatin to produce a hard capsule formulation comprising 75 mg of clopidogrel
and 100 mg of aspirin.
Comparative Example 1: Preparation of Composite Formulation VI
[0091]
- Levocetirizine layer -
| Levocetirizine dihydrochloride |
5.0 mg |
| Ludipress® |
60.5 mg |
| Microcrystalline cellulose |
8.1 mg |
| Citric acid |
3.0 mg |
| Croscarmellose sodium |
5.0 mg |
| Light anhydrous silicic acid |
0.5 mg |
| Magnesium stearate |
0.9 mg |
| Opadry® Y-1-7000 |
2.0 mg |
| Distilled water |
(10.0 mg) |
- Montelukast layer -
| Montelukast sodium |
10.4 mg (montelukast 10 mg) |
| D-mannitol |
45.4 mg |
| Microcrystalline cellulose |
92.0 mg |
| Light anhydrous silicic acid |
2.4 mg |
| Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
4.0 mg |
| Sodium starch glycolate |
8.4 mg |
| Magnesium Stearate |
3.4 mg |
| Hypromellose |
1.5 mg |
| Hydroxypropyl cellulose |
1.5 mg |
| Titanium dioxide |
0.96 mg |
| Red iron oxide |
0.004 mg |
| Yellow iron oxide |
0.036 mg |
| Distilled water |
(40.0 mg) |
[0092] The levocetirizine-containing tablet layer was prepared as described below. Levocetirizine
dihydrochloride, Ludipress®, microcrystalline cellulose, citric acid, croscarmellose
sodium, light anhydrous silicic acid, and magnesium stearate were sieved and admixed,
and then the mixture was pressed into a tablet using a tablet press machine with the
die diameter of 5.0 mm, to yield a tablet. Then, a coating solution prepared by dissolving
Opadry® Y-1-7000 in distilled water was applied on the tablet to produce the levocetirizine
tablet. The total weight of the tablet thus obtained was 85 mg, and the total weight
of levocetirizine therein was 5 mg.
[0093] Meanwhile, the montelukast-containing tablet layer was prepared as described below.
Montelukast sodium, D-mannitol, microcrystalline cellulose, light anhydrous silicic
acid, hydroxypropyl cellulose, sodium starch glycolate, and magnesium stearate were
sieved and admixed, and then the resulting mixture was pressed into a tablet using
a tablet press machine with the dye diameter of 5.0 mm, to yield two tablets. Separately,
a coating solution was prepared by dissolving hypromellose, hydroxypropyl cellulose,
titanium dioxide, red iron oxide, yellow iron oxide in distilled water, and the coating
solution was applied on the tablet to produce the montelukast tablet. The total weight
of the tablet thus obtained was 170 mg, and the total weight of montelukast therein
was 10 mg.
[0094] The two different tablets prepared above, 1 levocetirizine tablet and 2 montelukast
tablets, were charged in the capsule body of a No. 1 hard capsule primarily made up
with gelatin to produce a hard capsule formulation comprising 5 mg of levocetirizine
and 10 mg of montelukast.
Comparative Example 2: Preparation of Composite Formulation VII
[0095]
- Ambroxol layer -
| Ambroxol hydrochloride |
30.0 mg |
| Lactose hydrate |
22.7 mg |
| Pregelatinized starch |
22.7 mg |
| Povidone K-30 |
1.4 mg |
| Distilled water |
(20.0 mg) |
| Light anhydrous silicic acid |
0.4 mg |
| Magnesium stearate |
0.8 mg |
- Levodropropizine layer -
| Levodropropizine |
60.0 mg |
| Lactose hydrate |
46.6 mg |
| Microcrystalline cellulose |
47.0 mg |
| Sodium starch glycolate |
5.6 mg |
| Magnesium stearate |
0.8 mg |
[0096] The ambroxol-containing tablet layer was prepared as described below. Ambroxol hydrochloride,
lactose hydrate, and pregelatinized starch were admixed, added with a binding solution
prepared by dissolving povidone K-30 in distilled water, and then the mixture was
wet granulated. Light anhydrous silicic acid and magnesium stearate were added thereto,
and the mixture was pressed into a tablet using a tablet press machine with the die
diameter of 5.0 mm, to yield a tablet. The total weight of the tablet thus obtained
was 78 mg, and the total weight of ambroxol hydrochloride therein was 30 mg.
[0097] Meanwhile, the levodropropizine-containing tablet layer was prepared as described
below. Levodropropizine, lactose hydrate, microcrystalline cellulose, sodium starch
glycolate, and magnesium stearate were sieved and admixed, and then the resulting
mixture was pressed into a tablet using a tablet press machine with the die diameter
of 5.0 mm, to yield two tablets. The total weight of the tablets thus obtained was
160 mg, and the total weight of levodropropizine therein was 60 mg.
[0098] The two different tablets prepared above, 1 ambroxol tablet and 2 levodropropizine
tablets, were charged in the capsule body of a No. 1 hard capsule primarily made up
with gelatin to produce a hard capsule formulation comprising 30 mg of ambroxol hydrochloride
and 60 mg of levodropropizine.
Test Example 1: Dissolution Test of Montelukast and Levocetirizine
[0099] The composite formulations comprising montelukast and levocetirizine prepared in
Example 1 and Comparative Example 1, and Singulair® tablet (MSD, 10 mg) and Xyzal®
tablet (Korea UCB Co., 5 mg) as reference drugs for montelukast and levocetirizine,
respectively, were subjected to drug dissolution test using six test vessels for each
drug under the following conditions. The results are shown in Table 1, and Figs. 3
and 4.
<Test Conditions>
[0100]
- Dissolution medium:
for montelukast = 0.5% sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) solution, 900 mL
for levocetirizine = distilled water, 900 mL
- Dissolution-test system: paddle, 75 rpm
- Temperature: 37°C
<Analytical Conditions- Simultaneous determination of montelukast and levocetirizine
>
[0101]
- Column: stainless steel column filled with 5 µm octadecylsilyl silica gel for liquid
chromatography (Inertsil C8, 4.6 x 150 mm, 5 µm)
- Mobile phase: 0.025 M potassium dihydrogen phosphate (pH 6.6), acetonitrile (40 :
60, v/v)
- Detector : ultraviolet spectrophotometer (225 nm)
- Flow rate: 1.0 mL/min
- Injection volume: 10 µL
- Column temperature: 45 °C
[Table 1]
| Component |
Time |
Example 1 |
Comp. Ex. 1 |
Singulair® tab. |
Xyzal® tab. |
| Montelukast |
5 min |
86.3 ± 2.4% |
13.2 ± 12.6% |
79.5 ± 3.4% |
- |
| 10 min |
90.9 ± 1.3% |
77.7 ± 9.8% |
95.4 ± 2.4% |
- |
| 15 min |
92.3 ± 1.1% |
95.2 ± 2.4% |
97.6 ± 1.7% |
- |
| Levocetirizine |
5 min |
74.2 ± 3.4% |
0.2 ± 0.0% |
- |
95.3 ± 1.5% |
| 10 min |
94.1 ± 2.9% |
48.9 ± 17.4% |
- |
98.0 ± 2.1 % |
| 15 min |
94.0 ± 1.3% |
92.6 ± 5.6% |
- |
97.8 ± 0.9% |
[0102] As shown in Table 1 and Figs. 3 and 4, the composite formulation prepared in Example
1 comprising MUST exhibited much higher initial dissolution rates (within 10 min)
than that of Comparative Example 1 comprising conventional tablets, which was even
similar to that of reference drugs, Singulair® tablet (montelukast) and Xyzal® tablet
(levocetirizine).
[0103] In addition, the dissolution test results of montelukast and levocetirizine of Example
1 demonstrated significantly less standard deviation values than the result of dissolution
test of Comparative Example 1, and thus smaller changes in body absorption rates can
be expected from the inventive composite formulation. Therefore, it can also be expected
that it would be easier for the inventive hard capsule composite formulation comprising
MUST to be bioequivalent with their reference drugs Singulair® and Xyzal®.
Test Example 2: Dissolution Test of Ambroxol
[0104] The composite formulations comprising ambroxol and levodropropizine prepared in Example
2 and Comparative Example 2, and Mucopect® tablet (Boehringer Ingelheim, 30 mg) as
a reference drug for ambroxol were subjected to drug dissolution test using six test
vessels for each drug under the following conditions. The results are shown in Table
2, and Fig 5.
<Test Condition>
[0105]
- Dissolution medium: pH 1.2 artificial gastric juice, 900 mL
- Dissolution-test system: paddle, 50 rpm
- Temperature: 37 °C
<Analytical Conditions- ambroxol>
[0106]
- Column: stainless steel column filled with octadecylsilanized silica gel for 5 µm
liquid chromatography (Waters ODS-2, 4.6 mm x 50 mm, 5 µm)
- Mobile phase: 0.05 M potassium dihydrogen phosphate (adjusted to pH 3.0 using phosphoric
acid), methanol (88 : 12, v/v)
- Detector: ultraviolet spectrophotometer (254 nm)
- Flow rate: 1.0 mL/min
- Injection amount: 10 µL
- Column temperature: 30 °C
[Table 2]
| Component |
Time |
Example 2 |
Comp. Ex. 2 |
Mucopect® tab. |
| Ambroxol |
5 min |
88.4 ± 2.3% |
1.2 ± 0.1% |
85.3 ± 2.6% |
| 10 min |
90.6 ± 1.9% |
21.4 ± 18.4% |
92.4 ± 2.1% |
| 15 min |
93.4 ± 0.8% |
75.4 ± 8.3% |
95.4 ± 1.8% |
[0107] As shown in Table 2 and Fig. 5, the composite formulation prepared in Example 2 comprising
MUST exhibited much higher initial dissolution rates (within 10 min) and much smaller
changes in the standard deviation values than that of Comparative Example 2 which
is charged with a conventional tablet.
[0108] Therefore, it can be expected that if ambroxol, whose initial dissolution rate is
considered critical to its given T
max of 0.25 to 1 hr, is prepared in the form of the inventive hard capsule composite
formulation comprising MUSTs, then it would be easier for the inventive composite
formulation to be bioequivalent with its reference drug, Mucopect® tablet, and smaller
changes in body absorption rates is also expected.
Test Example 3: Absorption Test for Montelukast and Levocetirizine
[0109] The composite formulations comprising montelukast and levocetirizine prepared in
Example 1, and Singulair® tablet 10 mg and Xyzal® tablet 5 mg as reference drugs for
montelukast and levocetirizine, respectively, were orally administered to test animals
for bioavailability test under the following conditions.
[0110] The test animals were healthy, male, 20-month-old Beagle dogs with a body weight
of 12 ± 2 kg and 5 dogs were alloted per test group. The dogs were placed in a cage,
allowed to have free access to commercial dog feed (400 g per day), and then fasted
over a period of 14 hrs prior to the experiment. The dogs were divided into two groups:
Group 1 (Example 1) and Group 2 (Singulair® tab.+ Xyzal® tab.). Each dogs were orally
administered with the corresponding formulation, and forcefully administered with
40 mg of water. Blood samples (2 mL) were taken from cephalic vein using a tube with
an anticoagulant (1,000 IU/mL, heparin 5µl) at 0 (initial), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4,
8, 10, 24 and 48 hrs after the oral administration. All blood samples were centrifuged
(12,000 rpm, 2 min, Eppendorf) to plasma, and contained in a freezer at -20 °C for
later analysis of each sample by LC-MS under the following conditions:
Column: Halo C18 (2.1 × 50 mm, 2.7 µm)
Mobile phase: methanol, 10 mM ammonium formate (85 : 15, v/v)
Injection amount: 10 µL
Detection: Turbo Ion spray Ionization mode (positive)
[0111] C
max and T
max were obtained from the plasma concentration versus time curve, and AUC from 0 to
24 hrs after the administration was calculated according to trapezoidal rule using
the curve. The results are shown in Table 3, and Figs. 6 and 7.
[Table 3]
| |
|
AUC*1 |
Cmax *2 |
Tmax*3 |
| Montelukast |
Example 1 |
231319 ± 35054 |
24833 ± 4366 |
3.3 ± 0.6 |
| Singulair® + Xyzal® |
228783 ± 80531 |
25200 ± 13612 |
3.5 ± 0.6 |
| Lev ocetirizine |
Example 1 |
17106 ± 6340 |
2452 ± 259 |
0.5 ± 0.1 |
| Singulair® + Xyzal® |
16200 ± 2582 |
2290 ± 472 |
0.8 ± 0.3 |
| *1 : Area under the curve (initial to 24 hr) |
| *2 : Peak plasma concentration |
| *3 : Time to peak plasma concentration |
[0112] As shown in Table 3, and Figs. 6 and 7, the composite formulation of Example 1 had
an equivalent or superior bioavailability than taking the two single formulation reference
tablets simultaneously.
[0113] The composite formulation in accordance with Example 1 resulted similar AUC and C
max values of montelukast and levocetirizine to its reference drugs, Singulair® tablet
and Xyzal® tablet, and showed no delay in T
max values, but rather, slightly T
max value.