FIELD
[0001] The present disclosure relates generally to multi-port amplifiers. More particularly,
the present disclosure relates to a method and apparatus for improving the leakage
performance of a multi-port amplifier.
BACKGROUND
[0002] Communications systems oftentimes generate signals that require amplification to
high levels of power. As one illustrative example, a geostationary communications
satellite that receives multiple signals in various uplink beams over multiple channels
may retransmit those signals in various downlink beams amplified to high power. In
some cases, these signals may be amplified by assigning one amplifier set at a fixed
maximum power level to each signal that is received.
[0003] However, in some cases, it is desirable to dynamically allocate a total available
pool of power among the various signals. Multi-port amplifiers (MPAs) allow this type
of dynamic distribution of power.
[0004] A multi-port amplifier receives n component signals as n input signals at an input
hybrid network. The input hybrid network rearranges the input signals such that the
outputs of the network form an orthogonal transformation of the inputs. Each output
of the input hybrid network may be referred to as a composite signal, which is the
sum of a phase-shifted version of each and every input signal. For n input signals,
the input hybrid network may output n composite signals.
[0005] The multi-port amplifier may also include n individual high-power amplifiers, each
of which is used to amplify a corresponding composite signal. An output hybrid network
is used to perform a generalized inverse transformation of the input hybrid network
to separate the various composite signals back into n composite signals, each of which
is amplified.
[0006] In this manner, each input signal fed into the multi-port amplifier may be amplified
using any amount of the total available pool of power. The amount of power distributed
to each amplified component signal output from the multi-port amplifier may be proportional
to the relative power of the input signals.
[0007] For a multi-port amplifier to function properly, the input hybrid network, the output
hybrid network, the high-power amplifiers, and all transmission lines connecting these
components may need to be aligned in amplitude and phase within selected tolerances.
Misalignment of any of the components in the multi-port amplifier may result in incomplete
separation of the component signals at the output of the multi-port amplifier. In
other words, the misalignment may result in leakage of the various signals across
two or more of the output ports of the multi-port amplifier. This leakage may create
interference with respect to the intended signals. This interference may deter the
use of such multi-port amplifiers.
[0008] Some currently available multi-port amplifiers use equalizers to provide amplitude
and/or phase adjustments to the composite signals prior to the composite signals being
amplified by the high-power amplifiers. However, these equalizers may require special
test signals and/or multiple iterations in order to reduce leakage to within selected
tolerances. Further, in some cases these equalizers may be unable to reduce leakage
to within selected tolerances. Therefore, it would be desirable to have a method and
apparatus that take into account at least some of the issues discussed above, as well
as other possible issues.
SUMMARY
[0009] In one illustrative embodiment, an apparatus comprises a multi-port amplifier and
a controller. The multi-port amplifier is configured to amplify a plurality of signals
to form a plurality of amplified signals. The controller is configured to send a plurality
of control adjustments to a plurality of equalizers in the multi-port amplifier to
improve leakage performance of the multi-port amplifier.
[0010] In another illustrative embodiment, an amplifier system may comprise an input network,
a plurality of equalizers, a plurality of amplifiers, an output network, and a controller.
The input network is configured to receive a plurality of signals and combine the
plurality of signals to form a plurality of composite signals. The plurality of equalizers
is configured to apply an adjustment to each of the plurality of composite signals
to form a plurality of adjusted composite signals. The plurality of amplifiers is
configured to amplify the plurality of adjusted composite signals to form a plurality
of amplified composite signals. The output network is configured to deconstruct the
plurality of amplified composite signals into a plurality of amplified signals. The
controller is configured to send a plurality of adjustments to the plurality of equalizers
to improve leakage performance of a multi-port amplifier. The controller comprises
an output control network and a comparator system. The output control network is configured
to receive the plurality of amplified signals. The output control network is further
configured to form a plurality of first control signals using the plurality of amplified
signals. The comparator system is configured to compare the plurality of first control
signals to a plurality of second control signals to form a plurality of control adjustments
for the plurality of equalizers that will improve the leakage performance of the multi-port
amplifier.
[0011] In still yet another illustrative embodiment, a method for managing a multi-port
amplifier is provided. A plurality of signals is amplified using the multi-port amplifier
to form a plurality of amplified signals. A plurality of control adjustments, which
is to be sent to a plurality of equalizers in the multi-port amplifier to improve
leakage performance of the multi-port amplifier, is identified.
[0012] The features and functions can be achieved independently in various embodiments of
the present disclosure or may be combined in yet other embodiments in which further
details can be seen with reference to the following description and drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0013] The novel features believed characteristic of the illustrative embodiments are set
forth in the appended claims. The illustrative embodiments, however, as well as a
preferred mode of use, further objectives and features thereof, will best be understood
by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment of
the present disclosure when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 is an illustration of an amplifier system in the form of a block diagram in accordance
with an illustrative embodiment;
Figure 2 is an illustration of a controller in accordance with an illustrative embodiment;
Figures 3A and 3B are an illustration of an amplifier system in accordance with an illustrative embodiment;
Figures 4A and 4B are an illustration of another configuration for an amplifier system in accordance
with an illustrative embodiment;
Figures 5A and 5B are an illustration of yet another configuration for an amplifier system in accordance
with an illustrative embodiment;
Figures 6A and 6B are an illustration of still another configuration for an amplifier system in accordance
with an illustrative embodiment;
Figures 7A and 7B are an illustration of another configuration for an amplifier system in accordance
with an illustrative embodiment;
Figure 8 is an illustration of a process for managing a multi-port amplifier in the form of
a flowchart in accordance with an illustrative embodiment;
Figure 9 is an illustration of a process for managing a multi-port amplifier in the form of
a flowchart in accordance with an illustrative embodiment; and
Figure 10 is an illustration of a data processing system in the form of a block diagram in
accordance with an illustrative embodiment.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0014] The illustrative embodiments recognize and take into account different considerations.
For example, the illustrative embodiments recognize and take into account that it
may be desirable to have the capability to improve the leakage performance of a multi-port
amplifier. In particular, the illustrative embodiments recognize and take into account
that it may be desirable to have the capability to improve the leakage performance
of existing multi-port amplifiers without significantly altering the current configurations
for these multi-port amplifiers.
[0015] Thus, the illustrative embodiments provide a method and apparatus for managing a
multi-port amplifier. In one illustrative example, a plurality of signals is amplified
using the multi-port amplifier to form a plurality of amplified signals. A plurality
of control adjustments, which is to be sent to a plurality of equalizers in the multi-port
amplifier to improve leakage performance of the multi-port amplifier, is identified
using a controller.
[0016] Referring now to the figures and, in particular, with reference to
Figure 1, an illustration of an amplifier system is depicted in the form of a block diagram
in accordance with an illustrative embodiment. In this illustrative example, amplifier
system
100 may include multi-port amplifier
102 and controller
104. Multi-port amplifier
102 may be configured to receive a plurality of signals
106 and amplify signals
106 to form a plurality of amplified signals
108.
[0017] In this illustrative example, signals
106 and amplified signals
108 may be analog signals. Signals
106 may be received at multi-port amplifier
102 from, for example, without limitation, one or more satellite systems, one or more
communications systems, one or more antenna systems, and/or one or more other types
of systems and devices.
[0018] As depicted, multi-port amplifier
102 may include input network
110, a plurality of equalizers
112, a plurality of amplifiers
114, and output network
116. Input network
110 may be configured to receive signals
106. In particular, input network
110 may receive signals
106 at a plurality of input ports
117.
[0019] Input network
110 may be configured to use signals
106 to form a plurality of composite signals
118. In particular, input network
110 may rearrange signals
106 such that composite signals
118 form an orthogonal transformation of signals
106. For example, without limitation, each of composite signals
118 may be a composite sum of a phase-shifted version of each and every one of signals
106. In one illustrative example, the operation performed by input network
110 may be similar to a fast Fourier transform (FFT).
[0020] Equalizers
112 may receive composite signals
118 and may make an adjustment to each of composite signals
118 to form a plurality of adjusted composite signals
120. In particular, equalizers
112 may make a plurality of adjustments
121 to composite signals
118. Each adjustment in adjustments
121 may adjust the amplitude and/or phase of a corresponding composite signal.
[0021] In this illustrative example, amplifiers
114 may receive adjusted composite signals
120. Amplifiers
114 may take the form of a plurality of high-power amplifiers (HPAs) in this example.
Amplifiers
114 may amplify adjusted composite signals
120 to form a plurality of amplified composite signals
122.
[0022] Output network
116 receives amplified composite signals
122 and uses amplified composite signals
122 to form amplified signals
108. In particular, output network
116 outputs amplified signals
108 from a plurality of output ports
123.
[0023] Output network
116 may deconstruct amplified composite signals
122 back into separate component signals to form amplified signals
108. The operation performed by output network
116 may be a generalized inverse of the operation performed by input network
110. Amplified signals
108 may be sent to, for example, without limitation, target system
125. Target system
125 may comprise any number of transmission lines along which and/or target devices to
which amplified signals
108 is to be sent.
[0024] In this illustrative example, controller
104 may be configured to improve leakage performance
126 of multi-port amplifier
102. Controller
104 may be implemented using hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof.
[0025] Controller
104 may be configured to generate a plurality of control adjustments
124 to be used by equalizers
112. Equalizers
112 may, for example, without limitation, adjust adjustments
121 made to composite signals
118 based on control adjustments
124. Each of control adjustments
124 may be, for example, an adjustment in amplitude and/or phase.
[0026] Control adjustments
124 may compensate for number of errors
128 in multi-port amplifier
102 that contribute to leakage across the signals output from output ports
123. As used herein, a "number of" items may include one or more items. In this manner,
number of errors
128 may be one or more errors.
[0027] Number of errors
128 may include, for example, without limitation, any misalignment of the components
within multi-port amplifier
102, including any transmission lines that may connect these components, with respect
to amplitude and/or phase. Number of errors
128 may result in leakage across output ports
123. In other words, number of errors
128 may result in amplified composite signals
122 not being completely separated back out into individual component signals. By compensating
for number of errors
128, controller
104 may improve leakage performance
126 of multi-port amplifier
102.
[0028] With reference now to
Figure 2, an illustration of controller
104 from
Figure 1 is depicted in accordance with an illustrative embodiment. In this illustrative example,
controller
104 may include output control network
200 and comparator system
202.
[0029] Output control network
200 may receive amplified signals
108 output from output network
116 in
Figure 1. For example, without limitation, a plurality of output couplers
204 in controller
104 may be configured to couple amplified signals
108 to both target system
125 in
Figure 1 and output control network
200.
[0030] Output control network
200 may use amplified signals
108 to form plurality of first control signals
206. The operation performed by output control network
200 may be an inverse of an ideal version of the operation performed by output network
116 in
Figure 1.
[0031] Comparator system
202 may be configured to receive first control signals
206 and second control signals
208. Second control signals
208 may be received in a number of different ways.
[0032] In one illustrative example, controller
104 may include input control network
210. Input control network
210 may be configured to receive signals
106 and form second control signals
208 using signals
106. The operation performed by input control network
210 may be an ideal version of the operation performed by input network
110 in
Figure 1.
[0033] In the above described example, a plurality of input couplers
212 may be used to couple signals
106 to both input network
110 in
Figure 1 and input control network
210. However, in another illustrative example, input couplers
212 may be configured to couple signals
106 to input network
110 in
Figure 1 and comparator system
202 directly. In this manner, comparator system
202 may receive signals
106 as second control signals
208.
[0034] Comparator system
202 may be configured to compare first control signals
206 and second control signals
208 to form control adjustments
124. In particular, for each corresponding pair of signals from first control signals
206 and second control signals
208, comparator system
202 may determine the control adjustment needed to minimize the difference between the
pair of signals.
[0035] In one illustrative example, comparator system
202 may be comprised of a plurality of comparators
214. Comparators
214 may receive first control signals
206 and second control signals
208. A comparator in comparators
214 may compare the control signal in first control signals
206 received at the comparator and the control signal in second control signals
208 received at the comparator. The comparator may then identify the amplitude and/or
phase adjustment needed in order to minimize the difference between these two control
signals. The amplitude and/or phase adjustment identified may be used to form a control
adjustment that is then sent to a corresponding equalizer in equalizers
112 in
Figure 1.
[0036] For example, a signal input into multi-port amplifier
102 in
Figure 1 may enter as u and exit as
y. Mathematically, the ideal multi-port amplifier may be represented by the complex
matrix equation:

where E is a diagonal matrix representing equalizers
112 in
Figure 1, α represents the ideal operation performed by input network
110 in
Figure 1, and
β represents the ideal operation performed by output network
116 in
Figure 1.
[0037] Equation (1) may be rewritten as follows:

where
E represents the equalizer adjustments that make
β-1y =
αu.
[0038] However, number of errors
128 in
Figure 1 may result in the ideal operations not being performed. The actual operation performed
by input network
110 may be represented by, for example, A, and the actual operation performed by output
network
116 may be represented by, for example,
B.
[0039] Input control network
210 may be configured such that the operation performed by input control network
210 is substantially equivalent to
α. Output control network
200 may be configured such that the operation performed by output control network
200 is substantially equivalent to
β-1. By passing amplified signals
108 through
β-1, the net effect of number of errors
128 in multi-port amplifier
102 may be arranged such that these errors may be compared against the ideal
αu. For a particular u and y, each of comparators
214 may be configured to identify the adjustment needed in order for
β-1y to be equal to
αu.
[0040] In some illustrative examples, controller
104 may include logic module
216. Control adjustments
124 may be sent into logic module
216 prior to being sent to equalizers
112 in this example. Logic module
216 may be configured to modify control adjustments
124 to form a plurality of modified control adjustments
217, which may then be sent to equalizers
112 in
Figure 2.
[0041] Logic module
216 may be used in a number of different ways. Logic module
216 may be used to decrease the tuning of all of equalizers
112 to avoid equalizers
112 being driven beyond their capable ranges. In some cases, logic module
216 may be used to change the routing of a signal when an equalizer and/or amplifier
need to be switched out of multi-port amplifier
102. In this manner, logic module
216 may be used to tune equalizers
112 in a number of different ways to achieve a desired result.
[0042] In other illustrative examples, controller
104 may include a plurality of non-linear distortion elements
218. Non-linear distortion elements
218 may be used to apply distortion to second control signals
208 prior to second control signals
208 being sent to comparator system
202.
[0043] For example, in some cases, the outputs of amplifiers
114 may be distorted versions of the inputs to amplifiers
114 in
Figure 1. Comparator system
202 may be unable to distinguish between misalignment errors within multi-port amplifier
102 and distortion errors caused by amplifiers
114. To improve the compensation for number of errors
128, non-linear distortion elements
218 may be used to produce distortion similar to the distortion that may be produced
by amplifiers
114. In this manner, comparator system
202 may be able to cancel out the effects of this distortion. An example of one implementation
for a non-linear distortion element in non-linear distortion elements
218 may be an envelope limiter that clips a signal in a manner that mimics the saturation
of a high-power amplifier.
[0044] Although comparator system
202 has been described as having comparators
214, comparator system
202 may comprise first switching network
220, second switching network
222, and comparator
224 in another illustrative example. First switching network
220 and second switching network
222 may switch together.
[0045] First switching network
220 may be configured to receive first control signals
206 and send first control signals
206 to comparator
224 one at a time. Similarly, second switching network
222 may be configured to receive second control signals
208 and send second control signals
208 to comparator
224 one at a time.
[0046] For example, first switching network
220 may send selected first control signal
226 to comparator
224 at the same time that second switching network
222 sends selected second control signal
228 to comparator
224. Comparator
224 may compare these two selected control signals to identify control adjustment
230. Control adjustment
230 may then be sent to a corresponding equalizer in equalizers
112 in
Figure 1.
[0047] The illustrations of amplifier system
100 in
Figure 1 and controller
104 in
Figure 2 are not meant to imply physical or architectural limitations to the manner in which
an illustrative embodiment may be implemented. Other components in addition to or
in place of the ones illustrated may be used. Some components may be optional. Also,
the blocks are presented to illustrate some functional components. One or more of
these blocks may be combined, divided, or combined and divided into different blocks
when implemented in an illustrative embodiment.
[0048] With reference now to
Figures 3A and
3B, an illustration of an amplifier system is depicted in accordance with an illustrative
embodiment. In this illustrative example, amplifier system
300 may be an example of one implementation for amplifier system
100 in
Figure 1. As depicted, amplifier system
300 may include multi-port amplifier
302 and controller
304, which may be examples of implementations for multi-port amplifier
102 and controller
104, respectively, in
Figure 1.
[0049] In this illustrative example, multi-port amplifier
302 may include input network
306, equalizers
308, amplifiers
310, and output network
312. Input network
306, equalizers
308, amplifiers
310, and output network
312 may be examples of implementations for input network
110, equalizers
112, amplifiers
114, and output network
116, respectively, in
Figure 1.
[0050] Further, controller
304 may include input couplers
314, input control network
316, output couplers
318, output control network
320, and comparators
322. Input couplers
314, input control network
316, output couplers
318, output control network
320, and comparators
322 may be examples of implementations for input couplers
212, input control network
210, output couplers
204, output control network
200, and comparators
214, respectively, in
Figure 2.
[0051] Input couplers
314 may be configured to couple signals
324 to both input network
306 and input control network
316. Input network
306 may process signals
324 to form composite signals. These composite signals may then be adjusted by equalizers
308 to form adjusted composite signals. These adjusted composite signals may be amplified
by amplifiers
310 to form amplified composite signals. The amplified composite signals may then be
processed by output network
312 to form amplified signals
326.
[0052] Output couplers
318 may couple amplified signals
326 to output control network
320. Output control network
320 may form first control signals using amplified signals
326 that may then be sent to comparators
322.
[0053] Signals
324 sent to input control network
316 from input couplers
314 may be sent through delay lines
328 in this illustrative example. Input control network
316 may form second control signals using signals
324 and send these control signals to comparators
322. Delay lines
328 may be fixed delay lines used to compensate for the time path difference between
the first control signals arriving at comparators
322 from output control network
320 and the second control signals arriving at comparators
322 from input control network
316.
[0054] Comparators
322 may compare the different control signals to form control adjustments
330 that are then sent to equalizers
308. Equalizers
308 may use these control adjustments to compensate for errors within multi-port amplifier
302 to improve the leakage performance of multi-port amplifier
302.
[0055] With reference now to
Figures 4A and
4B, an illustration of another configuration for amplifier system
300 from
Figures 3A and
3B is depicted in accordance with an illustrative embodiment. In this illustrative example,
input couplers
314 may now be configured to couple the composite signals formed by input network
306 to equalizers
308 and comparators
322. Input control network
316 from
Figure 3A may not be included in this configuration for controller
304.
[0056] In some cases, input network
306 may not be subject to the extreme power fluctuations and thermal fluctuations that
induce errors. Consequently, input control network
316 may not be needed. The operation performed by input network
306 may be sufficiently close to the desired ideal operation. In this illustrative example,
the composite signals formed by input network
306 are sent through delay lines
328 from input couplers
314 to comparators
322.
[0057] With reference now to
Figures 5A and
5B, an illustration of yet another configuration for amplifier system
300 from
Figures 3A and
3B is depicted in accordance with an illustrative embodiment. In this illustrative example,
logic module
500 has been added to amplifier system
300 from
Figures 3A and
3B. Logic module
500 may be an example of one implementation for logic module
216 in
Figure 2. Logic module
500 may modify the control adjustments made by comparators
322 prior to these adjustments being sent to equalizers
308.
[0058] With reference now to
Figures 6A and
6B, an illustration of still another configuration for amplifier system
300 from
Figures 3A and
3B is depicted in accordance with an illustrative embodiment. In this illustrative example,
non-linear distortion elements
600 has been added to amplifier system
300 from
Figures 3A and
3B. Non-linear distortion elements
600 may be an example of one implementation for non-linear distortion elements
218 in
Figure 2.
[0059] Non-linear distortion elements
600 may apply distortion to the control signals formed by input control network
316. This distortion may mimic the distortion created by amplifiers
310 in
Figure 3B.
[0060] With reference now to
Figures 7A and
7B, an illustration of another configuration for amplifier system
300 from
Figures 3A and
3B is depicted in accordance with an illustrative embodiment. In this illustrative example,
comparators
322 from
Figure 3A have been replaced by first switching network
700, second switching network
702, and comparator
704. Further, delay lines
328 from
Figure 3A are not included. Instead, delay line
706 has been added between second switching network
702 and comparator
704.
[0061] In this illustrative example, first switching network
700, second switching network
702, and comparator
704 may be examples of implementations for first switching network
220, second switching network
222, and comparator
224, respectively, in
Figure 2. First switching network
700 and second switching network
702 may switch at the same time and may be configured to send a control signal formed
by input control network
316 to comparator
704 at the same time as a corresponding control signal formed by output control network
320. Delay line
706 may be used to account for any time differences such that both control signals arrive
at comparator
704 at the same time.
[0062] Comparator
704 may then compare the two control signals and form a control adjustment that is then
sent to a corresponding equalizer in equalizers
308. In this illustrative example, logic module
500 from
Figure 5A is also included in controller
304. However, in other illustrative examples, logic module
500 may be replaced by a switching network.
[0063] With reference now to
Figure 8, an illustration of a process for managing a multi-port amplifier is depicted in the
form of a flowchart in accordance with an illustrative embodiment. The process illustrated
in
Figure 8 may be implemented to manage multi-port amplifier
102 in
Figure 1.
[0064] The process may begin by amplifying a plurality of signals using a multi-port amplifier
to form a plurality of amplified signals (operation
800). A plurality of control adjustments to be sent to a plurality of equalizers in the
multi-port amplifier to improve leakage performance of the multi-port amplifier may
be identified (operation
802). The plurality of control adjustments may be sent to the plurality of equalizers in
the multi-port amplifier (operation
804), with the process terminating thereafter.
[0065] With reference now to
Figure 9, an illustration of a process for managing a multi-port amplifier is depicted in the
form of a flowchart in accordance with an illustrative embodiment. The process illustrated
in
Figure 9 may be implemented to manage multi-port amplifier
102 in
Figure 1.
[0066] The process may begin by receiving and combining the plurality of signals by an input
network in the multi-port amplifier to form a plurality of composite signals (operation
900). An adjustment may be applied to each of the plurality of composite signals by the
plurality of equalizers in the multi-port amplifier to form a plurality of adjusted
composite signals (operation
902).
[0067] The plurality of adjusted composite signals may be amplified by a plurality of amplifiers
in the multi-port amplifier to form a plurality of amplified composite signals (operation
904). Thereafter, the plurality of amplified composite signals may be deconstructed into
the plurality of amplified signals by an output network in the multi-port amplifier
(operation
906).
[0068] A plurality of first control signals may be formed using an output control network
that represents an inverse of an ideal version of the output network based on the
plurality of amplified signals output from the output network (operation
908). Further, a plurality of second control signals may be formed based on the plurality
of signals input to the multi-port amplifier (operation
910).
[0069] Thereafter, the plurality of first control signals may be compared to the plurality
of second control signals using a comparator system to form a plurality of control
adjustments for the plurality of equalizers in the multi-port amplifier (operation
912). The plurality of equalizers may use the plurality of control adjustments to compensate
for a number of errors in the multi-port amplifier and thereby improve the leakage
performance of the multi-port amplifier (operation
914), with the process terminating thereafter.
[0070] Turning now to
Figure 10, an illustration of a data processing system in the form of a block diagram is depicted
in accordance with an illustrative embodiment. Data processing system
1000 may be used to implement at least a portion of controller
104 in
Figure 1 in some illustrative examples. As depicted, data processing system
1000 includes communications framework
1002, which provides communications between processor unit
1004, storage devices
1006, communications unit
1008, input/output unit
1010, and display
1012. In some cases, communications framework
1002 may be implemented as a bus system.
[0071] Processor unit
1004 is configured to execute instructions for software to perform a number of operations.
Processor unit
1004 may comprise a number of processors, a multi-processor core, and/or some other type
of processor, depending on the implementation. In some cases, processor unit
1004 may take the form of a hardware unit, such as a circuit system, an application specific
integrated circuit (ASIC), a programmable logic device, or some other suitable type
of hardware unit.
[0072] Instructions for the operating system, applications, and/or programs run by processor
unit
1004 may be located in storage devices
1006. Storage devices
1006 may be in communication with processor unit
1004 through communications framework
1002. As used herein, a storage device, also referred to as a computer readable storage
device, is any piece of hardware capable of storing information on a temporary and/or
permanent basis. This information may include, but is not limited to, data, program
code, and/or other information.
[0073] Memory
1014 and persistent storage
1016 are examples of storage devices
1006. Memory
1014 may take the form of, for example, a random access memory or some type of volatile
or non-volatile storage device. Persistent storage
1016 may comprise any number of components or devices. For example, persistent storage
1016 may comprise a hard drive, a flash memory, a rewritable optical disk, a rewritable
magnetic tape, or some combination of the above. The media used by persistent storage
1016 may or may not be removable.
[0074] Communications unit
1008 allows data processing system
1000 to communicate with other data processing systems and/or devices. Communications
unit
1008 may provide communications using physical and/or wireless communications links.
[0075] Input/output unit
1010 allows input to be received from and output to be sent to other devices connected
to data processing system
1000. For example, input/output unit
1010 may allow user input to be received through a keyboard, a mouse, and/or some other
type of input device. As another example, input/output unit
1010 may allow output to be sent to a printer connected to data processing system
1000.
[0076] Display
1012 is configured to display information to a user. Display
1012 may comprise, for example, without limitation, a monitor, a touch screen, a laser
display, a holographic display, a virtual display device, and/or some other type of
display device.
[0077] In this illustrative example, the processes of the different illustrative embodiments
may be performed by processor unit
1004 using computer-implemented instructions. These instructions may be referred to as
program code, computer usable program code, or computer readable program code and
may be read and executed by one or more processors in processor unit
1004.
[0078] In these examples, program code
1018 is located in a functional form on computer readable media
1020, which is selectively removable, and may be loaded onto or transferred to data processing
system
1000 for execution by processor unit
1004. Program code
1018 and computer readable media
1020 together form computer program product
1022. In this illustrative example, computer readable media
1020 may be computer readable storage media
1024 or computer readable signal media
1026.
[0079] Computer readable storage media
1024 is a physical or tangible storage device used to store program code
1018 rather than a medium that propagates or transmits program code
1018. Computer readable storage media
1024 may be, for example, without limitation, an optical or magnetic disk or a persistent
storage device that is connected to data processing system
1000.
[0080] Alternatively, program code
1018 may be transferred to data processing system
1000 using computer readable signal media
1026. Computer readable signal media
1026 may be, for example, a propagated data signal containing program code
1018. This data signal may be an electromagnetic signal, an optical signal, and/or some
other type of signal that can be transmitted over physical and/or wireless communications
links.
[0081] The illustration of data processing system
1000 in
Figure 10 is not meant to provide architectural limitations to the manner in which the illustrative
embodiments may be implemented. The different illustrative embodiments may be implemented
in a data processing system that includes components in addition to or in place of
those illustrated for data processing system
1000. Further, components shown in
Figure 10 may be varied from the illustrative examples shown.
[0082] In one alternative implementation the controller comprises a logic module configured
to receive and process the plurality of control adjustments to form a plurality of
modified control adjustments and to send the plurality of modified control adjustments
to the plurality of equalizers.
[0083] Yet another implementation the amplifier system comprising an input network configured
to receive a plurality of signals and combine the plurality of signals to form a plurality
of composite signals a plurality of equalizers configured to apply an adjustment to
each of the plurality of composite signals to form a plurality of adjusted composite
signals; a plurality of amplifiers configured to amplify the plurality of adjusted
composite signals to form a plurality of amplified composite signals; an output network
configured to deconstruct the plurality of amplified composite signals into a plurality
of amplified signals; and a controller configured to send a plurality of adjustments
to the plurality of equalizers to improve leakage performance of a multi-port amplifier,
wherein the controller comprises: an output control network configured to receive
the plurality of amplified signals and form a plurality of first control signals using
the plurality of amplified signals; and a comparator system configured to compare
the plurality of first control signals to a plurality of second control signals to
form a plurality of control adjustments for the plurality of equalizers that will
improve the leakage performance of the multi-port amplifier.
[0084] Another possible alternative implementation involves amplifying the plurality of
signals using the multi-port amplifier to form the plurality of amplified signals
comprises: receiving and combining the plurality of signals by an input network in
the multi-port amplifier to form a plurality of composite signals; applying an adjustment
to each of the plurality of composite signals by the plurality of equalizers in the
multi-port amplifier to form a plurality of adjusted composite signals; amplifying
the plurality of adjusted composite signals by a plurality of amplifiers in the multi-port
amplifier to form a plurality of amplified composite signals; and deconstructing the
plurality of amplified composite signals into the plurality of amplified signals by
an output network in the multi-port amplifier.
[0085] In another embodiment the plurality of control adjustments to be sent to the plurality
of equalizers comprises generating a plurality of first control signals using an output
control network that represents an inverse of an ideal version of the output network
based on the plurality of amplified signals output from the output network; comparing
the plurality of first control signals to a plurality of second control signals using
a comparator system to form the plurality of control adjustments for the plurality
of equalizers; and
sending the plurality of signals to the comparator system as the plurality of second
control signals.
[0086] Yet another embodiment identifies the plurality of control adjustments to be sent
to the plurality of equalizers further comprises: receiving the plurality of signals
at an input control network that represents an ideal version of the input network
in the multi-port amplifier; and generating the plurality of second control signals
based on the plurality of signals.
[0087] The flowcharts and block diagrams in the different depicted embodiments illustrate
the architecture, functionality, and operation of some possible implementations of
apparatuses and methods in an illustrative embodiment. In this regard, each block
in the flowcharts or block diagrams may represent a module, a segment, a function,
and/or a portion of an operation or step.
[0088] In some alternative implementations of an illustrative embodiment, the function or
functions noted in the blocks may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For
example, in some cases, two blocks shown in succession may be executed substantially
concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be performed in the reverse order, depending
upon the functionality involved. Also, other blocks may be added in addition to the
illustrated blocks in a flowchart or block diagram.
[0089] The description of the different illustrative embodiments has been presented for
purposes of illustration and description, and is not intended to be exhaustive or
limited to the embodiments in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations
will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Further, different illustrative
embodiments may provide different features as compared to other desirable embodiments.
The embodiment or embodiments selected are chosen and described in order to best explain
the principles of the embodiments, the practical application, and to enable others
of ordinary skill in the art to understand the disclosure for various embodiments
with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.