Field of the invention
[0001] The present invention relates to a process for forming a polymer coating on at least
a portion of a substrate surface.
Background of the invention
[0002] In many applications it is important to differentiate between the bulk properties
of a material or device and the surface properties of that material or device. The
bulk or substrate material provides a set of bulk properties suitable for the intended
application, such as mechanical properties or refractive properties. However, in many
applications the surface properties of the substrate material are not suitable or
ideal for the intended application. Accordingly, for these substrate materials surface
modification is required to modify the surface properties of the substrate.
[0003] Surface modification techniques include methods such as adsorption, self-assembled
monolayer (SAM) formation, functionalised silanes, Langmuir-Blodgett deposition, layer-by-layer
(LbL) assembly, and covalent attachment of genetically-engineered surface-binding
peptides. These techniques have limitations for widespread practical use. For instance,
adsorbed coatings may desorb under certain conditions, which limits the appropriateness
of adsorption as a surface modification technique in a variety of applications. Furthermore,
simple adsorption is not readily applicable to a large variety of substrate materials,
as the properties of the substrate are not suitable for attracting and retaining the
coating polymers. Whether the properties of a substrate are appropriate will also
depend on the type of polymer that is to be applied. Although covalent surface modification
techniques improve adhesion, chemical specificity between interfacial modifiers and
substrates (eg alkanethiols on noble metals and silanes on oxides) is typically required.
The substrates and polymers available for surface modification chemistry is the primary
limitation.
[0004] LbL derived coatings (
Decher G. "Fuzzy Nanoassemblies: Toward Layered Polymeric Multicomposites", Science,
277, 1232 - 1237 (1997)) can be reliably and evenly deposited from aqueous solutions, provide good adhesion
and control over the coating thickness while providing functional groups that can
be used for subsequent surface immobilisation reactions and can be used for coating
various substrate geometries such as porous materials and internal surfaces in a device.
However, LbL assembly requires a multi-step procedure for implementation.
[0005] It would be helpful to have a simpler one-step process that provides a multi-purpose,
polymeric coating that may be used in chemical, biological and material sciences,
as well as in applied sciences, engineering and technology. It is desirable that the
process not be limited by the substrate material or geometry and that the process
has the capability to be carried out (i) under either oxidative or non-oxidative conditions,
(ii) in aqueous or non-aqueous solutions, and (iii) in the gaseous phase.
[0007] The present invention seeks to ameliorate the deficiencies of the prior art in providing
coatings of widespread applicability and practicality of use. Reference to any prior
art in the specification is not, and should not be taken as, an acknowledgment or
any form of suggestion that this prior art forms part of the common general knowledge
in Australia or any other jurisdiction or that this prior art could reasonably be
expected to be ascertained, understood and regarded as relevant by a person skilled
in the art.
Summary of the invention
[0008] The present invention relates to an alternative, broadly applicable method of forming
a polymeric coating on the surface of a substrate. In particular, the present invention
provides, by controlling the reaction conditions, a hydrogen cyanide (or hydrogen
cyanic acid) (HCN) derived coating on a surface. Such a coating is useful for example
in the development of biocompatible coatings of medical devices, surface modifications
of drug delivery carriers and tissue engineering scaffolds, biosensors, biofouling-resistant,
industrial and consumer coatings, semiconductors, metal removal, surface catalysts,
electronic properties of metals (such as deposition of coatings for work function
modification) and next generation electronic displays.
[0009] In one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a polymer of hydrogen cyanide
monomeric units (or 'HCMUs') that forms a coating on a substrate. The coating is in
one embodiment readily and stably attached to a wide range of substrates and is adaptable
to different uses, including by functionalisation or addition of co-monomers. Typically
and advantageously, the coatings according to the invention are adherent to the substrate
surface. The invention includes such a coating attached to a substrate. The HCMUs
are reacted as building blocks for polymer film deposition on any bulk material surface
(ie substrate) with a variety of surface geometries. In addition to HCN itself, HCMUs
are broadly defined as compounds containing at least one nitrile functionality and
at least one nucleophilic functionality, such as NH or SH, such that the compound
will undergo a self-reaction or polymerisation. The NH functionality may be in the
form of an amine (HN-) or imine (HN=). Preferred HCMUs for the invention are those
that are practically useful, namely HCN itself, and multimers of HCN including (HCN)
2, (HCN)
3, and (HCN)
4. Preferred isomeric forms of HCN multimers include the hydrogen cyanide dimer iminoacetonitrile
HN=CH-CN (IAN), the hydrogen cyanide trimer aminomalononitrile H
2N-CH-(CN)
2 (AMN) and the hydrogen cyanide tetramer diaminomaleonitrile H
2NC(CN)=C(CN)-NH
2 (DAMN), as well as the compound aminoacetonitrile H
2N-CH
2-CN (AAN). In a particular embodiment, the HCMUs consist essentially of one or more
of the monomers selected from the group consisting of HCN, IAN, AMN, DAMN, AAN, azidoacetontirile
and isomers of any one of these, and typically from AMN, DAMN, AAN and isomers of
any one of these. In one embodiment, the HCMUs consist essentially of one or more
monomers selected from the group consisting of HCN, IAN, AMN, AAN, azidoacetonitrile
and multimers of HCN. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the HCMUs consist essentially
of HCN or AMN.
[0010] In one embodiment, the present invention provides a process of coating at least a
portion of a substrate surface, the method comprising contacting the surface with
HCMUs in a liquid solution, adding base to permit polymerisation of the HCMUs to form
a polymer that coats at least a portion of the substrate surface. This process thus
provides modifying the substrate surface. Typically, the HCMUs are provided in a solution
which is contacted with the surface.
[0011] The conditions permitting polymerisation depend on the reactivities of the HCMUs
used. The different reactivities and nature of the HCMUs can be illustrated with the
following series. The HCN dimer imminoacetonitrile generated in the gas phase is stable
only below ca. -40 degrees Celsius. Above this temperature it spontaneously polymerises.
The HCN trimer aminomalononitrile is stable as a sulphonic acid salt but polymerises
when neutralised. Base may be used to neutralise aminomalononitrile salt. However,
base is not necessarily required to initiate polymerisation. Neutralised aminomalononitrile
that has been extracted from basic solution will spontaneously polymerise as it is
no longer in the protonated form. The HCN tetramer diaminomaleonitrile is a stable
solid compound but will generate polymer when boiled in water.
[0012] In one preferred embodiment, polymerisation of the HCMUs is controlled by regulating
the pH. This is more readily achieved using HCMUs stabilised at room temperature.
In one form, the solution is acidic and the pH is increased to provide conditions
permitting polymerisation. Generally, the HCMUs will not polymerise to any significant
extent in acidic conditions. Increasing the pH to form a more alkaline solution triggers
polymerisation of the HCMUs and binding onto the substrate surface. The role of the
base is to get the HCMUs into a form that permits polymerisation. Neutralisation of
protonated stable HCMUs is required. The base is not primarily an initiator although
it may incidentally undergo reaction with either the neutralised HCMUs or resultant
polymer. In a preferred embodiment, the pH value of the solution upon contacting the
surface is above 7. It is preferred that the pH is below 12. A preferred pH range
for polymerisation is from 8 to 9. For example, one form of the invention is a process
that provides the HCMUs in an acidic solution, to which base is added to raise the
pH to form the alkaline solution. Preferably, the acid is a strong acid. Suitable
acids include but are not limited to acids such as p-toluenesulfonic acid, methane
sulfonic acid, trifluoroacetic acid, sulphuric acid, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid,
triflic acid, and trifluoroacetic acid. Other suitable acids include, without limitation,
acetic acid, phosphoric acid, and perchloric acid. Preferably the acid is one which
forms a solution of HCMUs whether aqueous or non-aqueous. A suitable acid is p-toluenesulfonic
acid which is a readily commercially available suitable organic acid. Suitable bases
include sodium hydroxide (NaOH), potassium hydroxide (KOH), ammonium hydroxide (NH
4OH), calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)
2), magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)
2), barium hydroxide (Ba(OH)
2), aluminium hydroxide (Al(OH)
3), ferrous hydroxide (Fe(OH)
2), ferric hydroxide (Fe(OH)
3), zinc hydroxide (Zn(OH)
2), lithium hydroxide (LiOH), 2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-propane-1,3-diol (Tris), and
ammonium di-methyl amine. Preferably, the base is NaOH or Tris, also readily commercially
available suitable bases.
[0013] "Contacting" in this specification means exposing at least a portion of the substrate
to the HCMUs under conditions permitting the polymer to form and attach to the substrate.
A typical period of time of contacting ranges from 1 minute to 7 days; preferably
1 minute, more preferably 5 minutes to 50 hours; even more preferably 30 minutes to
24 hours. The reaction is usually conducted at about room temperature, although this
will vary with the HCMUs used - the highly reactive dimer will start to polymerise
at temperatures of about -40 degrees Celsius. However the more stable tetramer may
require temperatures of up to about 100 degrees Celsius. In a preferred embodiment,
the entire substrate is immersed or dipped in the HCMU solution. The examples below
illustrate preferred contacting methods. However, a variety of techniques are employed
to contact the substrate surface with the HCMU solution including, without limitation,
swabbing, dip coating, spin coating, die coating, ink jet coating, spraying, screen
printing (eg rotary screen printing), gravure printing, photolithographic printing
and flexographic printing, micro-contact printing, and nanolithography.
[0014] "Solution" includes vapours and liquids. Liquid includes both aqueous and non-aqueous
solvents, including miscible solutions of water and organic solvents such as acetone,
methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, dimethylformamide and dimethylsulfoxide. Preferably,
the solution is made just prior to contacting the substrate, although the solution
may be stored for at least brief periods of time before use. In one embodiment, the
solution is aqueous, and a base soluble in the aqueous solvent is added to raise the
pH to form the alkaline solution. In an alternative embodiment, the solution is non-aqueous,
and a base soluble in the non-aqueous solvent is added to raise the pH to form the
alkaline solution. For example, toluenesulfonic acid may carry the HCMUs as a non-aqueous
solvent, but is also miscible with water. A suitable concentration is 100 mg HCMU
/ mL solvent for forming a coating on a substrate.
[0015] The steps of the polymerisation process can be varied in order to suit the desired
purpose. In one embodiment, the solvent (water or organic solvent or mixtures thereof),
base and HCMUs may be combined and then the substrate to be coated added. In another
embodiment, the solvent and base may be added together with the substrate to be coated
and then the HCMUs added. Alternatively the HCMUs, solvent and substrate may be combined
and then the base added to start the polymerisation and resultant coating. In another
embodiment, the HCMUs and base may be added together in an aqueous solvent. An organic
solvent may be added to extract neutralised HCMUs as they are formed. The neutralised
HCMUs may be subsequently transferred to a substrate for coating. In this embodiment
the HCMUs, which are neutralised first, are then dissolved (ie solubilised) in a suitable
solvent (eg an organic solvent) and cast, sprayed or otherwise deposited on a material
surface to form a coating. For example, in one embodiment, aminomalononitrile toluene
sulfonic acid salt is added to an aqueous solvent, such as water, and neutralised
to liberate the free base of aminomalononitrile. The free base of aminomalononitrile
is extracted into an organic solvent, such as diethylether, and cast on a substrate.
The organic solvent is then evaporated leaving a film of aminomalononitrile which,
in the free base form, spontaneously polymerises to form a polymer that coats the
surface. Separation of the neutralisation and coating steps can allow easy removal
of any particulate polymer prior to film formation. It can also allow accurate concentration
of neutralised HCMU in solution and make coating more precise.
[0016] In one embodiment, the substrate or surface to be coated is separate from a reaction
vessel in which the polymerisation occurs so that it is removable from the vessel
once coated and/or its surface is modified by the process of the invention. It is
also envisaged that the substrate could include the inner surface of a vessel which
also functions as the reaction vessel itself. In this latter embodiment, the vessel
is preferably not comprised of glass or borosilicate glassware.
[0017] The HCMUs may also be selected from the group consisting of the HCN dimer iminoacetonitrile,
aminomalononitrile derivatives, diaminomaleonitrile derivatives, aminoacetonitrile
derivatives and mixtures thereof. When provided as stabilised salts with p-toluenesulfonic
acid, hydrochloric acid, sulphuric acid or other acids, the HCMUs may be selected
from the group consisting of aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate, aminoacetonitrile
hydrogen sulphate and mixtures thereof.
[0018] The HCMUs form a polymeric coating on the substrate surface. The polymer does not
necessarily have a regular structure. The polymer on the substrate surface modifies
the surface so as to provide a substrate surface functionalised with amino or imino
groups derived from the HCMUs. Under aqueous conditions the imine groups are hydrolysed
to amine groups whereas under non-aqueous conditions a greater proportion of the imine
functional groups, which are more reactive after polymerisation, are retained. In
addition, alternative co-monomers to the HCMUs may also provide additional functionalisation
of the coating of the substrate.
[0019] In another embodiment, the present invention provides a solvent-free vapour deposition
process of modifying a substrate surface, the method comprising contacting at least
a portion of the substrate with a vapour comprising HCMUs, under conditions permitting
polymerisation of the HCMUs such that the substrate surface is modified. Preferably,
the vapour comprises the HCN dimer iminoacetonitrile. Preferably, polymerisation is
spontaneous and no catalyst is required because the dimer is highly unstable and will
thermally polymerise above -40 degrees Celsius (
Evans, RA et al, JACS 113, 7261 (1991)). "Thermally polymerise" in this specification means that the compound spontaneously
polymerises on warming to room temperature. The HCN dimer iminoacetonitrile polymerises
above about -40 degrees Celsius. Preferably, polymerisation using IAN is carried out
at a temperature ranging from -30 degrees Celsius to 50 degrees Celsius, more preferably
from -20 degrees Celsius to 40 degrees Celsius, even more preferably at about room
temperature. Thus the dimer is a source of solvent free HCN polymer formed without
catalyst. Preferably, the substrate surface modified by the solvent-free vapour deposition
process is not glass. In a preferred embodiment, the substrate surface modified by
the solvent-free vapour deposition process is removable from the reaction vessel in
which the reaction is carried out.
[0020] Suitable organic substrates include organic substrates formed from or being thermoplastics
including polyesters (eg polyethylene terephthalate (PET), fluorinated ethylene propylene
(FEP) or polyethylene naphthalates), polyacrylates (eg polymethyl methacrylate or
PMMA), poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAC), poly(vinylbutyral) (PVB), poly(ethyl acrylate)
(PEA), poly(diphenoxyphosphazene) (PDPP), polycarbonate (PC), polypropylene (PP),
high density polyethylene (HDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE), polysulfone (PS),
polyether sulfone (PES), polyurethane (PUR), polyamide (PA), poly(dimethylsiloxane)
(PDMS), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyvinylidene fluoride
(PVDF), polystyrene (PSy), including tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS), polyethylene
sulphide, and combinations thereof; and thermoset plastics such as cellulose derivatives,
polyimide, polyimide benzoxazole, polybenzoxazole, and combinations thereof. Other
suitable organic substrates include, without limitation, graphite, carbon nanotubes,
fullerenes, graphene, poly(glycolic acid), poly(lactic acid), and poly(lactic-co-glycolic
acid) Teflon®, and combinations thereof. Further suitable organic substrates include
biological and biologically derived substrates such as tissues, collagens, keratins,
bone derived materials, and combinations thereof.
[0021] Suitable inorganic substrates include inorganic substrates formed from or being quartz,
glass, silica and other oxides or ceramics such as alumina, indium tin oxide (ITO),
lithium tantalate (LiTaO
3), lithium niobate (LiNbO
3), gallium arsenide (GaAs), silicon carbide (SiC), langasite (LGS), zinc oxide (ZnO),
aluminium nitride (AlN), aluminium oxide (Al
2O
3), silicon (Si), silicon nitride (Si
3N
4), and lead zirconium titanate (PZT), titanium oxide (TiO
2), niobium oxide (Nb
2O
5); and metals or alloys such as aluminium, copper, gold, platinum, silver, iron, copper,
mercury, zinc and steel. Other suitable inorganic substrates include mica, diamond
and nickel titanium (NiTi).
[0022] In one embodiment, the process is carried out in the presence of oxygen. Typically,
the oxygen is derived from atmospheric oxygen and is naturally dissolved in the solution.
In an alternative embodiment, the process is carried out in conditions substantially
free from oxygen. Preferably, the solution is substantially free from oxygen by purging
or degassing under reduced pressure with an inert gas. Preferably, the inert gas is
nitrogen or argon.
[0023] In another embodiment, the invention relates to a process for further functionalising
the surface modified substrate, wherein the process has a further step of contacting
the surface modified substrate with one or more reactive moieties, wherein the reactive
moiety reacts with and is bound to the modified surface. Preferably, the reactive
moiety comprises nucleophiles, electrophiles or metals. Preferably, the reactive moiety
is selected from the group consisting of amines, thiols, nitriles, aldehydes, imidazoles,
azides, polyhexamethylene dithiocarbonate, hydrogen, hydroxyls, carboxylic acids,
carboxylic esters, carboxamides, alkyl halides, benzylic halides, epoxides, thioepoxides,
isocyanates (organic non-protic solvents) and combinations thereof. In this way the
surface modified substrate may be functionalised with, for example, further polymers
such as poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and biopolymers. Suitable biopolymers include
oligonucleotides, DNA, RNA, peptides, and proteins, such as extracellular matrix proteins.
Further polymers may be incorporated in the polymer coating by co-deposition before,
during or after coating formation. In one embodiment, the further polymer includes
one or more reactive moieties, for example an amine reactive PEG, an imine reactive
PEG or an amine functionalised PEG, that reacts with and binds the surface modified
substrate. In another embodiment, the surface modified substrate is first functionalised
with one or more reactive moieties and then functionalised with a further polymer
that reacts with and binds the reactive moiety(ies). For example, the surface modified
substrate may be functionalised with a compound that includes two or more amine moieties
(eg polyallylamine or an amine-terminated dendrimer) such that at least one of the
amine moieties reacts with and binds the surface modified substrate, and at least
one of the amine moieties is free to bind the further polymer. Suitable further polymers
include monomethoxy-PEG-aldehyde, PEG-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester, carboxyl-modified
PEG, other amine-reactive PEGs and mixtures thereof. In this way, the properties of
the surface modified substrate may be further modified. In one embodiment, the surface
modified substrate is non-cell adherent. In this embodiment, the substrate may be
coated with a polymer formed from HCMUs and functionalised with a further polymer,
such as PEG, according to any one of the processes described above. In an alternative
embodiment, the surface modified substrate is cell adherent. In this embodiment, the
substrate is coated with a polymer formed from HCMUs.
[0024] Nanoparticles may also be incorporated in the polymer coating by co-deposition before,
during or after coating formation. The nanoparticles may be either or both of nanoparticles
independently produced and nanoparticles formed in addition to the coating by the
HCMUs. Suitable nanoparticles include crosslinked polystyrene, other organic polymers,
silica, quantum dots, and metal particles.
[0025] Substrates treated with a solution of HCMUs are reactive with organic heteroatoms
such as amine and thiol groups (originating from an appropriate sulphur-containing
co-monomer) and also strongly bind to various metals such as Au, Ag, Pt, Fe, Cu, Hg
and Zn. Metals may be incorporated in the polymer coating by co-deposition before,
during or after coating formation. Metals may be deposited on or in the surface modified
substrate in various oxidation states. For example, in one embodiment, the process
involves contacting at least a portion of the surface modified substrate with a solution
of AgNO
3 to incorporate silver onto the surface modified substrate. In this embodiment silver
is deposited on the surface modified substrate in Ag
(0) and Ag
(+) oxidation states. In this way, the properties of the surface modified substrate may
be further modified. In this particular embodiment, the coating including silver has
enhanced antimicrobial properties.
[0026] The solution of HCMUs of the present invention can also include one or more fillers,
pigments, wetting agents, viscosity modifiers, stabilizers and anti-oxidants. The
solution of HCMUs may also include one or more of nanoparticles, biopolymers, and
metals. Moreover, as explained in more detail below, the HCMU solution may also contain
additional components which may act as ligands (eg as a reactive group binding to
a functional group within the polymer coating such as exemplified in example 4 below),
cross-linking agents (eg that crosslink to the polymer network in addition to the
HCMUs) and also co-monomers that polymerise with the HCMUs. The HCMUs can also be
cross-linked with co-monomers if desired. The co-monomers may be present in the HCMU
solution. Alternatively, the co-monomers may be present on the substrate surface such
that the HCMUs form a co-polymeric coating on the substrate surface incorporating
co-monomers present on or in the substrate surface. Co-monomers that are suitable
are generally those that may react with amines, active methylene compounds or activated
nitriles. Examples of such co-monomers without limiting the scope of the invention
are compounds containing amines (primary or secondary), thiols, acrylates, methacrylates,
epoxides, thioepoxides, isothiocyanates alkyl halides and arylmethyl halides.
[0027] The invention extends to a substrate coated by a polymer according to any one of
the processes described above. In a preferred embodiment, the polymer provides a smooth,
continuous polymeric coating on the substrate surface, the polymeric coating having
a substantially constant thickness (ie ±20%). A suitable means for measuring the coating
thickness is atomic force microscopy (AFM). As a general guide, the polymeric coating
exists on the substrate surface in an average thickness ranging from 1 to 1000 nm,
preferably ranging from 2 to 400 nm, more preferably ranging from 5 to 200 nm, more
preferably from 20 to 200 nm, in one embodiment 10 to 100 nm. A suitable average thickness
is about 45 nm, 50 nm or 175 nm with a root mean squared (rms) roughness value of
10 nm or less. A coating is of substantially constant thickness if its rms value is
less than about ±20% the average thickness.
[0028] In one embodiment, the invention relates to a method of coating a substantially planar
substrate, including microscope slides, cell culture plates and flasks. In another
embodiment, the invention relates to a method of coating particles. In this case the
polymer coats particles that may be derived from inorganic or organic materials. Examples
of particles, without limiting the invention, include crosslinked polystyrene, other
organic polymers, silica, quantum dots, and metal particles. The diameter of the particles
may range from a few nanometres to several millimetres. The particles may also act
as a sacrificial scaffold such that the coating will become a hollow capsule upon
dissolution of the particle. For example, a silica particle that is coated with the
polymer of the invention may be dissolved using hydrofluoric acid.
[0029] In another embodiment, the invention relates to a method of coating porous materials.
In this case the polymer evenly coats the material throughout the porous structure
as well as on the outer surface as a result of the HCMU solution contacting the surface
by moving into the porous structure where polymerisation occurs. The porosity may
range from the nanometer scale to the centimeter scale. Suitable materials of larger
scale porosity include bone, porous metals or metal alloys, zeolites and porous polymers
with interconnected porosity.
[0030] The ability to coat porous materials is useful in a variety of fields. For example,
the zeolites allows their use in the selective removal of metal ions from solution
or selective removal of components in a gas mixture. Carbon dioxide capture and release
in framework materials for sequestration applications is particularly important. Larger
scale porosity materials such as bone, porous metals, metal alloys and porous polymers
can be coated advantageously to provide an improved tissue response for example in
implantable medical devices, in particular in bone related applications.
[0031] In another embodiment, the invention relates to a method of forming a hydrocyanic
acid-based hydrogel, the method comprising co-polymerisation in a solution, the solution
comprising HCMUs and co-monomers. In this way, a polymer of HCMUs is formed without
the need for a substrate. Preferably, the co-monomers are selected from a compound
that comprises one or more functional groups that react with an amine, nitrile, any
intermediate formed in the polymerisation of HCN, or a combination thereof. These
co-monomers may impart additional functionality on the resulting hydrogel. In a particularly
preferred embodiment, the co-monomers are selected from compounds that comprise one
or more amine functional groups selected from the group consisting of polyallylamines,
polyethyleneimines and combinations thereof. This leads to the formation of crosslinked
polymer networks to produce materials such as hydrogels. The solution of HCMUs and
co-monomers can also include one or more fillers, pigments, wetting agents, viscosity
modifiers, stabilizers and anti-oxidants. The solution of HCMUs and co-monomers may
also include one or more of nanoparticles, biopolymers, and metals. Preferably, the
biopolymers are selected from the group consisting of one or more of proteins, peptides,
oligonucleotides, DNA, RNA, and combinations thereof. For example, one process is
to provide the HCMUs and co-monomers in an acidic solution, to which base is added
to raise the pH to form the alkaline solution. Nanoparticles may also be incorporated
in the hydrogel by co-polymerisation during hydrogel formation or deposition on the
hydrogel after hydrogel formation. The nanoparticles may be either or both of nanoparticles
independently produced and nanoparticles formed in addition to the coating by the
HCMUs.
[0032] The invention extends to a hydrocyanic acid-based hydrogel formed by the method described
above. Such a hydrogel may have additional components as described in this specification
to impart various functionalities to it. The invention also extends to a process of
coating at least a portion of a substrate surface, the method comprising contacting
the surface with a hydrocyanic acid-based hydrogel, to coat the portion of the surface.
[0033] In another embodiment, the invention relates to a kit for modifying a substrate surface,
the kit comprising a solution comprising HCMUs and instructions for use. Preferably,
the kit also comprises a base or a base and an accelerant. Suitable accelerants include
but are not limited to (i) aldehyde/ketones such as formaldehyde, - acetaldehyde and
acetone (ii) cyanohydrins derived from the above carbonyl compounds such as glycolonitrile,
acetalaldehyde cyanohydrin, acetone cyanohydrin and (iii) metal salts such as metavanadates.
A kit according to the invention may further comprise a reactive moiety selected from
the group consisting of thiols, amines, nitriles, aldehydes, imidazoles, azides, halides,
polyhexamethylene dithiocarbonate, hydrogen, hydroxyls, carboxylic acids, carboxylic
esters, carboxamides or a combination thereof.
[0034] As used herein, except where the context requires otherwise, the term "comprise"
and variations of the term, such as "comprising", "comprises" and "comprised", are
not intended to exclude further additives, components, integers or steps.
[0035] It will be understood that the invention disclosed and defined in this specification
extends to all alternative combinations of two or more of the individual features
mentioned or evident from the text or drawings. All of these different combinations
constitute various alternative aspects of the invention.
[0036] Further aspects of the present invention and further embodiments of the aspects described
in the preceding paragraphs will become apparent from the following description, given
by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Brief description of the figures
[0037]
Figure 1: Reaction schematic for HCN polymer formation using various HCMUs. Exemplary isomeric
forms of various HCN multimers are shown (HCN; AAN; IAN as an example of (HCN)2; AMN as an example of (HCN)3; DAMN as an example of (HCN)4). X- is a counter anion, preferably derived from an acid. Suitable acids include but are
not limited to acids such as sulphuric acid, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, triflic
acid, trifluoroacetic acid, p-toluenesulfonic acid, methane sulfonic acid, acetic
acid, phosphoric acid, and perchloric acid. M+ is a cation. Suitable cations include but are not limited to cations such as Li+, Na+ K+ as well as multivalent cations.
Figure 2: The average coating thickness obtained on Mica substrates as a function of the deposition
time as measured by AFM (n=3). The line has been drawn to guide the eye.
Figure 3: AFM section analysis of an AMN coating deposited on Mica for 48 h. The section analysis
was performed in an area where a mask was present during the coating process which
was later removed to expose the untreated Mica surface.
Figure 4: Average water contact angle measurements obtained on fluorinated ethylene propylene
(FEP) polymer, polypropylene (PP), polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), polytetrafluoroethylene
(PTFE), polystyrene (PSy), polycarbonate (PC), polyethersulfone (PES), poly(ethylene
terephthalate) (PET), steel, gold, glass and Mica before and after coating with AMN
polymer (n=10).
Figure 5: SEM images obtained on AMN based coatings in air (A) and in a nitrogen atmosphere
(B).
Figure 6: Cell attachment results obtained from colourimetric tests performed on 96 well plates
relative to TCPS in % (n = 8).
Figure 7: The deposition of Ag in two different states of oxidation on the AMN coating is revealed
by XPS.
Figure 8: The formation of crosslinked gels without the need for a substrate is observed after
incubating solutions containing different ratios of AMN and polyallylamine (PAA) at
pH 8.5.
Figure 9: L929 mouse fibroblast attachment after 24 hours obtained from MTS tests relative
to TCPS in % (n = 8).
Figure 10: Crystal violet based quantification of biofilm formation on AMN coatings incorporating
silver for S. epidermidis and P. aeruginosa depending on the solution concentration of AgNO3 used for deposition of silver.
Figure 11: L929 cell viability determined relative to serum free medium (SFM) in %. Results
were recorded using an MTS assay after 20 hours of incubation with a serial dilution
(100%-0.39%) of SFM-based extraction solutions that had been in contact with AMN coated
surfaces for 66 hours. SFM containing 5% PBS and 5% DMSO served as non-toxic and toxic
controls, respectively.
Figure 12: L929 cell response to a patterned surface chemistry representing cell adhesive AMN
coated areas on a non-cell adhesive Ultra-low attachment (ULA) coating (Corning, USA)
after 24 hours.
Figure 13: L929 mouse fibroblast attachment after 24 hours obtained from MTS tests relative
to TCPS in % (n = 8).
Detailed description of the embodiments
[0038] It is known that some HCMUs spontaneously polymerise in an alkaline environment to
yield polymeric products. Aqueous polymerisation of HCMUs yields two fractions; (i)
a coloured aqueous solution, and (ii) a precipitate. The solution is believed to comprise
water soluble HCN oligomers. One form of the precipitate is insoluble particles of
HCN polymers. The structures of the soluble and precipitate fractions that form from
the aqueous polymerisation of hydrocyanic acid have not been definitively established.
The insoluble particles have been described as dark in
US patent no 2,894,916 and
US patent no 2,579,061. HCN adsorption to a substrate surface has been studied in
Kozirovski, Y. et al "Infrared Spectrum and Surface Poklymerization of Adsorbed HCN"
Transactions of the Faraday Society (1964) Vol 60, p 1532 - 1538; and
Low, M. et al "Infrared Spectrum, Surface Reaction, and Polymerization of Adbsorbed
Hydrogen Cyanide on Porous Glass" J. Phys. Chem. (1968) Vol 72, p 2371 - 2378. Further, HCN adsorption to a silicon substrate surface to passivate Si dangling
bonds has also been studied in
Takahashi, M. et al "Passivation of defect states in surface and edge regions on pn-junction
Si solar cells by use of hydrogen cyanide solutions" Cent. Eur. J. Phys. (2009).
[0039] Low, M.J.D. et al ("Infrared study of HCN polymer on alumina" Journal of the Research
Institute for Catalysis, Hokkaido University 1968, vol. 16, pages 535-542), discloses absorption of HCN from the gas phase onto alumina at high temperatures,
and the consequent formation of polymer.
McDonald, R.N. et al ("Polymers from Intermediates Obtained from Hydrogen Cyanide"
Journal of Polymer Science, Interscience Publishers 1974, vol. 12, pages 663-678) discloses a condensation polymerisation reaction between diaminomaleonitrile (DAMN;
the HCN tetramer) as diamine, and isophthaloyl chloride as di-acid chloride, to form
polyamide coatings.
[0040] In this invention, a substrate is contacted with an alkaline solution comprising
HCMUs to form an adherent polymeric HCN derived film coated on the substrate. One
process is to provide the HCMUs in an acidic solution, to which base is added to raise
the pH to form the alkaline solution. For example, the pH of an AMN toluenesulfonate
solution may be raised to eg pH 8 - 9 using aqueous NaOH. Neutralisation of the acid
initiates the polymerisation reaction. Similarly, this can be achieved using a solution
containing potassium cyanide and ammonium chloride. Preferably, the solution contains
similar molar amounts of potassium cyanide and ammonium chloride.
[0041] In another process, the HCMUs are in the gaseous phase and polymerisation spontaneously
occurs above a certain temperature. This method does not require a catalyst, ie a
base.
[0042] In order to form a homogeneous polymeric coating, it is desirable to minimise the
formation of particulates on the substrate surface, which may be achieved by one or
more of:
- keeping the polymerisation and coating process short. Here, the formation of a coating
proceeds to the point before the formation of particulates in solution;
- repeatedly starting the polymerisation and coating process, followed by washing. In
each cycle, the formation of the coating proceeds before the formation of particulates
in solution; and
- utilising the different density and mobility of the dark particulate material to separate
particulates from the coating, for example by placing the substrate in the solution,
facing down (precipitating particles fall down) or a similar system (eg involving
centrifugal force on the particulates).
[0043] However, in some embodiments, the roughness afforded by having particles is easily
obtained by having the substrate surface facing up in the polymerisation solution
to allow particulates to fall onto the surface and to be incorporated into the surface
coating.
[0044] Surface roughness can also be controlled by the nature of the deposition conditions.
For example, depositions performed under an inert atmosphere (oxygen free) will result
in an increased roughness of the coating. An increase in surface roughness provides
substrate materials with an increased surface area which is beneficial in some material
science applications. Control over surface roughness also affects biological response
and may be modulated to control that response. For example, cellular responses can
be influenced by surface roughness.
[0045] Additional compounds can be added to speed the rate of polymerisation. These include
(i) aldehyde/ketones such as formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acetone (ii) cyanohydrins
derived from the above carbonyl compounds such as glycolonitrile, acetalaldehyde cyanohydrin,
acetone cyanohydrin and (iii) metal salts such as metavanadates.
[0046] As outlined above, different HCMUs may be used and mixtures of them are also suitable.
HCN, IAN, AMN, DAMN, AAN, azidoacetonitrile and isomers of any one of these may be
used. DAMN breaks down to form AMN. The larger monomeric units are more stable physically
and chemically. To illustrate the different but related pathways, Figure 1 is a reaction
schematic of different possible HCMUs.
[0047] The structure of the polymer coating may be controlled by varying:
- the amount of oxygen present in solution - in the presence of oxygen a more uniform
coating forms, in the absence of oxygen (ie oxygen concentration <0.1%, purged with
an inert gas such as N2 or Ar) a coating with increased surface roughness forms and particles deposit on
the surface;
- the time for polymerisation / deposition time;
- the solution concentration of HCMUs;
- the type of buffer or solvent used.
[0048] The polymer coating can be characterised by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
analysis. Here, the distinctive N/C ratios can be used to validate the presence of
the coating. O/C ratios can also be measured but the N/C ratio is useful given the
relatively high nitrogen content of the polymer coating. For AMN, N/C ratios of the
coating range between 0.4 and 0.7, preferably between 0.550 and 0.650. For DAMN, N/C
ratios of the coating are typically around 0.508.
[0049] The polymer coating can also be characterised by water contact angle measurement
analysis. Here, the distinctive contact angles can be used to validate the presence
of the coating. Water contact angles of the coating range between 50 and 60 degrees,
preferably between 52 and 58 degrees, more preferably between 53.1 and 57.8 degrees.
[0050] The thickness of the coating may be controlled by varying eg the deposition time
or solution concentration.
[0051] As outlined above, the solution of HCMUs may include ligands comprising functional
groups. Thus, additional functional groups may be incorporated by either or both of
(i) incorporating the additional functional group as a co-monomer with the HCMU and
(ii) contacting the surface with the additional group under conditions permitting
it to react with the surface coating. In this way, the substrate surface may be further
functionalised with ligands comprising functional groups. Preferably, the functional
groups comprise nucleophiles, electrophiles or metals. Preferably, the functional
groups are selected from the group consisting of amines, thiols, nitriles, aldehydes,
imidazoles, azides, polyhexamethylene dithiocarbonate, hydrogen, hydroxyls, carboxylic
acids, carboxylic esters, carboxamides, alkyl halides, benzylic halides, epoxides,
thioepoxides, isocyanates (organic non-protic solvents) and combinations thereof.
These reactions can occur spontaneously or a catalyst (ie base) may be required depending
on the reaction carried out.
Hydrogels
[0052] HCMUs may alternatively be co-polymerised with ligands comprising multiple (more
than one) functional groups to form hydrogels. Co-monomers may be selected from compounds
that comprise one or more functional groups that react with an amine, nitrile, any
intermediate formed in the polymerisation of HCN, or a combination thereof. Preferably,
the functional groups are selected from the group consisting of thiols, aldehydes,
ketones, epoxides, acrylates, methacrylates, isocyanates, alkyl halides, amines, cyanohydrins
and combinations thereof. More preferably, the functional groups are amines. Preferably,
the amine functional groups are selected from the group consisting of polyallylamines,
polyethyleneimines and combinations thereof.
[0053] Hydrogels can be formed without the need for a substrate and could be subsequently
attached to a substrate or a portion thereof to form a coating.
Example 1: Deposition of AMN coatings in a PBS buffer solution
[0054] Aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate (AMN) (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) with a pH of 7.4 at a concentration of 100 mg/mL. To coat glass
cover slip samples, the glass cover slip samples were incubated in this solution for
24 h after polymerisation was induced by adjusting the pH of the solution to 8.5 using
0.1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Subsequently, samples were washed five times with MilliQ™
water and then incubated overnight in MilliQ™ water before being air dried in a laminar
flow cabinet. The presence of the coating was indicated by a light brown colour change.
In cases where surface coatings with a low roughness were desired, samples were facing
downwards during the coating process to avoid the precipitation of polymer, which
was also formed in solution.
[0055] Coatings were successfully deposited on a variety of substrate materials. These coatings
were adherent to the surface after several washing cycles. Table 1 shows X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS) data collected on different substrate materials before and after
coating with AMN. In each case, the XPS results clearly demonstrate the deposition
of a coating, with a significant change in the elemental composition. The similar
elemental ratios obtained after deposition of the AMN coating on different substrate
materials also suggests that the coating composition is independent of the substrate
material. In addition, the complete attenuation of signals originating from the substrate
material observed on some substrate materials demonstrates that a consistent, pinhole-free
coating was obtained.
Table 1: XPS results obtained on poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), polyethersulfone (PES),
Mica and glass substrate materials before and after coating with AMN. The average
atomic ratios are presented (n=3).
| Substrate |
O/C |
N/C |
Other |
| PET |
0.344±0.003 |
- |
- |
| PET-AMN |
0.244±0.005 |
0.637±0.003 |
- |
| PES |
0.220±0.011 |
- |
0.066±0.003 (S/C) |
| PES-AMN |
0.234±0.006 |
0.627±0.006 |
- |
| Mica |
5.739±0.242 |
- |
1.348±0.051 (Si/C) |
| Mica-AMN |
0.248±0.002 |
0.618±0.012 |
- |
| Glass |
2.857±0.048 |
0.036±0.005 |
1.203±0.007 (Si/C) |
| Glass-AMN |
0.234±0.002 |
0.600±0.006 |
- |
[0056] This example demonstrates that the polymerisation of aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate
(AMN) under basic conditions can be exploited to produce adherent coatings on a variety
of substrate materials, including polymers and inorganic substrate materials.
Example 2: Control over the coating thickness
[0057] Mica samples were freshly cleaved to provide a flat substrate for thickness measurements.
Subsequently, one drop of a 10% (w/v) solution of poly(D,L-lactide) in acetone was
placed on the mica samples and the solvent was allowed to evaporate in a laminar flow
cabinet. Aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate (AMN) (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved
in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with a pH of 7.4 at a concentration of 100 mg/mL.
To coat the mica samples, the samples were incubated in this solution for different
periods of time after polymerisation was induced by adjusting the pH of the solution
to 8.5 using 0.1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Subsequently, samples were washed five
times with MilliQ™ water and then incubated overnight in MilliQ™ water before being
air dried in a laminar flow cabinet. The presence of the coating was indicated by
a light brown colour change. During the coating process samples were facing downwards
to avoid the precipitation of polymer from solution.
[0058] After removing the poly(D,L-lactide) masks to expose the underlying Mica surface
again, atomic force microscopy (AFM) experiments (Asylum Research MFP-3D, Santa Barbara,
USA) were used to determine the coating thickness using the section analysis function.
The thickness measurements obtained (Figure 2) clearly demonstrate that the coating
thickness is a function of the deposition time.
[0059] Furthermore, AFM section analysis experiments revealed a consistent, pinhole-free
coating for all of the deposition time points investigated (12 h, 24 h, 48 h). This
is demonstrated in Figure 3, which shows the section analysis of a coating deposited
for 48 h.
[0060] Coating thickness measurements obtained by atomic force microscopy (AFM) experiments
on freshly cleaved Mica substrates (Figure 2) clearly demonstrated that the coating
thickness is a function of the deposition time. Therefore, the coating thickness can
be easily controlled by choosing a suitable deposition time. Importantly, AFM section
analysis experiments also demonstrated that consistent, pinhole-free coatings were
obtained. The section analysis in Figure 3 was obtained after a deposition time of
48 h in an area where a mask was present during the coating process and later removed
to expose the untreated Mica surface again.
Example 3: Consistent coatings can be achieved on a variety of different substrate
materials
[0061] Aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate (AMN) (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) with a pH of 7.4 at a concentration of 100 mg/mL. To coat various
substrate materials including polymers, inorganic materials and metals, the different
substrate materials were incubated in this solution for 24 hours after polymerisation
was induced by adjusting the pH of the solution to 8.5 using 0.1 M sodium hydroxide
(NaOH). Subsequently, samples were washed five times with MilliQ™ water and then incubated
overnight in MilliQ™ water before being air dried in a laminar flow cabinet. The presence
of the coating was indicated by a light brown colour change. During the coating process
samples were facing downwards to avoid the precipitation of polymer from solution.
[0062] Static contact angles were measured across different points on samples before and
after coating using an automated contact angle goniometer (KSV Instruments LTD). A
droplet with a volume of approximately 5 µL of ultrapure MilliQ™ water was used for
the experiments. Average contact angles were calculated from 10 measurements, with
each measurement recording the contact angles on both sides of the droplet. Table
2 and Figure 4 show the average water contact angle measurements obtained on different
substrate materials before and after coating with the AMN polymer. Even though the
water contact angle varied considerably on uncoated samples, no significant difference
was observed between water contact angles measured after the coating was applied,
indicating that the coating method is transferable between a variety of different
substrate materials.
Table 2: Average water contact angle measurements obtained on fluorinated ethylene
propylene (FEP) polymer, polypropylene (PP), polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), polytetrafluoroethylene
(PTFE), polystyrene (PSy), polycarbonate (PC), polyethersulfone (PES), poly(ethylene
terephthalate) (PET), steel, gold, glass and Mica before and after coating with AMN
polymer (n=10).
| Substrate material |
Contact angle before coating (°) |
Contact angle after coating (°) |
| FEP |
114.3 |
55.6 |
| PP |
100.8 |
56.3 |
| PDMS |
96.6 |
56.1 |
| PTFE |
93.1 |
56.9 |
| PSy |
92.9 |
55.5 |
| PC |
85.6 |
55.6 |
| PES |
81.2 |
54.3 |
| PET |
67.0 |
53.1 |
| Steel |
51.2 |
53.7 |
| Gold |
17.1 |
57.8 |
| Glass |
15.6 |
55.5 |
| Mica |
3.9 |
56.3 |
[0063] Water contact angle measurements obtained on a variety of different substrate materials
including polymers, metals and inorganic substrates before and after AMN coating revealed
large differences in the contact angles of the untreated substrate materials. However,
no significant difference was observed between water contact angles measured after
the AMN coating was applied. This clearly demonstrates that the coating method is
transferable between a variety of different substrate materials.
Example 4: Incorporation of amine functionalised compounds into AMN coatings
[0064] Aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate (AMN) (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) with a pH of 7.4 at a concentration of 80 mg/mL. 2,2,2-trifluoroethylamine
(TFEA) (Aldrich) was added to this solution at a concentration of 20 mg/mL. Polystyrene
(PSy) discs were used as the substrate material. To coat the polystyrene (PSy) discs,
the discs were incubated in this solution for 24 h after polymerisation was then induced
by adjusting the pH of the solution to 8.5 using 0.1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Subsequently,
samples were washed five times with MilliQ™ water and then incubated overnight in
MilliQ™ water before being air dried in a laminar flow cabinet. The presence of the
coating was indicated by a light brown colour change. During the coating process samples
were facing downwards to avoid precipitation of polymer from solution onto the surfaces.
[0065] The presence of the TFEA in the coating was demonstrated by XPS (Table 3). The presence
of fluorine in the coating demonstrates that compounds containing amine functional
groups can be incorporated into the coating during the deposition process.
Table 3: XPS results obtained on polystyrene (PSy) substrates after deposition of
an AMN coating and deposition of an AMN coating that was deposited in the presence
of TFEA. The average atomic ratios are presented (n=3).
| Substrate |
O/C |
N/C |
F/C |
| PSy-AMN |
0.206±0.003 |
0.577±0.039 |
- |
| PSy-(AMN-co-TFEA) |
0.211±0.005 |
0.526±0.006 |
0.007±0.001 |
[0066] This example demonstrates that amine containing compounds can be incorporated into
AMN coatings simply by being present in the coating solution during the coating deposition
process.
Example 5: Different coating morphology depending on coating conditions
[0067] Aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate (AMN) (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) with a pH of 7.4 at a concentration of 100 mg/mL. A part of
this solution was transferred into a glove box which provided an inert nitrogen atmosphere
(< 0.1 %O
2). The remaining oxygen was removed from this solution by bubbling the solution with
nitrogen gas for 1 hour. To coat glass cover slip samples, the samples were incubated
in either (i) the solution stored in an inert atmosphere or (ii) the solution in air,
for 24 h after polymerisation was induced by adjusting the pH to 8.5 using 0.1 M sodium
hydroxide (NaOH). Subsequently, samples were washed five times with MilliQ™ water
and then incubated overnight in MilliQ™ water before being air dried in a laminar
flow cabinet. The presence of the coating was indicated by a light brown colour change
in the case of the oxygen containing atmosphere and a darker, black colour change
in the case of the nitrogen containing atmosphere.
[0068] The samples were then mounted on an aluminium stub with double-sided conductive carbon
tape. Samples were then iridium coated using a Polaron SC5750 sputter coater. The
thickness of the iridium coating was approximately 10 nm. Once coated, the samples
were placed into a Philips XL30 Field Emission Scanning Electron microscope (FESEM)
for imaging. An accelerating voltage of 2kV was used to obtain images.
[0069] FESEM experiments (Figure 5) revealed a smooth surface coating in the case of the
oxygen containing atmosphere and a rough surface coating with a substantially higher
surface area in the case of the nitrogen containing atmosphere.
[0070] This example demonstrates that different coating morphologies can be obtained depending
on the environmental conditions during the deposition of coatings. Control over the
surface morphology is important in a broad range of coating applications, including
applications where control over the surface area is required.
Example 6: AMN coatings for enhanced cell attachment
[0071] Aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate (AMN) (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) with a pH of 7.4 at a concentration of 100 mg/mL. To coat 96
well plates having an Ultra-low attachment (ULA) coating (Corning, USA), the plates
were incubated in this solution for 24 h after polymerisation was induced by adjusting
the pH of the solution to 8.5 using 0.1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Subsequently, samples
were washed five times with MilliQ™ water and then incubated overnight in MilliQ™
water before being air dried in a laminar flow cabinet. The presence of the coating
was indicated by a light brown colour change. During the coating process samples were
facing downwards to avoid the precipitation of polymer from solution.
[0072] L929 mouse fibroblasts (cell line ATCC-CCL-1, Rockville, USA) were used to investigate
the cellular response to modified surfaces. Cells were cultured in minimum essential
medium (MEM) containing 10% foetal bovine serum and 1% non-essential amino acids (Invitrogen,
USA). After cell seeding on tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) 96 well plates (Nunclon
Δ, Nunc), Ultra-low attachment (ULA) coated 96 well plates (Corning, USA) and AMN
coated ULA 96 well plates (ULA-AMN) at a density of 2.5 x 10
4 cells/cm
2, samples were incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C in humidified air containing 5% CO
2.
[0073] Subsequently substrates were washed once with minimum essential medium (MEM) before
a solution consisting of 100 µL phenazine methosulfate (PMS) solution (0.92 mg/mL
in DPBS), 2 mL 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTS)
solution (2 mg/mL in DPBS), and 10 mL MEM was added. The substrates were incubated
for 3 hours at 37 °C in humidified air containing 5% CO
2 before a colorimetric readout was performed at 490 nm and 655 nm.
[0074] Table 4 and Figure 6 show the colourimetric assay results obtained on the different
coatings. Cell attachment was reduced to 2.6% on the ULA coating relative to the tissue
culture polystyrene (TCPS) surface. On the other hand, cell attachment increased to
130.0% on the AMN coated ULA coating relative to TCPS. No cytotoxic effect originating
from the coating was observed during cell culture experiments. The data demonstrate
that AMN coatings can be used for applications where high cell attachment is required.
Table 4: Cell attachment results obtained from colourimetric test performed on 96
well plates relative to TCPS in % (n = 8).
| Sample |
Cell attachment relative to TCPS (%) |
| TCPS |
100.0 ± 12.9 |
| ULA |
2.6 ± 2.2 |
| ULA-AMN |
130.0 ± 5.2 |
[0075] The cell culture results clearly demonstrate that AMN coatings lead to high cell
attachment and are suitable for the culture of cells in serum containing media. This
high cell attachment is thought to be related to the adsorption of proteins from the
cell culture medium. The cell culture results obtained on the ULA and the ULA-AMN
surface also demonstrate that the AMN coating is able to mask the properties of the
underlying substrate material very effectively.
[0076] As outlined above, surface roughness of the polymer coating can be controlled by
the nature of the deposition conditions. For example, depositions performed under
an inert atmosphere (oxygen free) results in an increased roughness of the coating,
which may be of benefit in the control of biological response, for example, cellular
responses.
Example 7: Metallisation of AMN substrates
[0077] Aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate (AMN) (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) with a pH of 7.4 at a concentration of 100 mg/mL. To coat glass
cover slip samples, the samples were incubated in this solution for 24 h after polymerisation
was induced by adjusting the pH of the solution to 8.5 using 0.1 M sodium hydroxide
(NaOH). Subsequently, samples were washed five times with MilliQ™ water and then incubated
overnight in MilliQ™ water before being air dried in a laminar flow cabinet. The presence
of the coating was indicated by a light brown colour change.
[0078] Cover glass slips coated with the coating were incubated in a 50 mM aqueous solution
of silver nitrate (AgNO
3) (Chem Supply) over 16 h at room temperature, followed by extensive repeated washing
over 4 h in MilliQ™ water and drying in a laminar flow cabinet.
[0079] Coated samples showed a visible grey colour change, suggesting the deposition of
metallic silver. This observation was confirmed by XPS experiments which revealed
an average Ag/C ratio of 0.183 (Table 5). Furthermore, XPS experiments also revealed
the deposition of Ag in two different states of oxidation, Ag
(0) and Ag
(+), as indicated from distinct peaks in the Ag MW Auger spectrum (Figure 7). The figure
shows the association of different states of oxidation with the different peaks observed
in the high resolution spectrum.
Table 5: XPS results obtained on AMN coated glass substrates before and after incubation
with AgNO
3. The average atomic ratios are presented (n=3).
| Substrate |
Ag/C |
| Glass-AMN |
- |
| Glass-AMN-Ag |
0.205±0.004 |
[0080] The metal containing coatings are useful in a broad range of applications, including
electroactive applications. In biomedical applications, the deposition of elemental
silver (Ag and/or Ag
(+)) is useful due to its broad antimicrobial properties.
Example 8: Gel formation
[0081] Aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate (AMN) (Aldrich, 98%) and polyallylamine (PAA)
(MW 70,000, Aldrich) were diluted in 10 mM tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris)
solution at an overall concentration of 100 mg/mL with ratios of (1) 1:1, (2) 1:2,
(3) 1:3, (4) 1:4, (5) 1:5, (6) 5:1, (7) 4:1, (8) 3:1 and (9) 2:1 %(w/w). Numbered
glass vials each filled with 1 mL of one of these solutions were incubated for 72
h after polymerisation was induced by adjusting the pH to 8.5 using 0.1 M NaOH. In
samples 6-9 this resulted in the formation of a gel as seen in Figure 8. The gel formation
demonstrates that a reaction involving both the AMN and the PAA has occurred during
the polymerisation reaction, with the PAA effectively acting as a crosslinker.
[0082] The formation of gels during AMN polymerisation in the presence of polyallylamine
(PAA) demonstrates that a reaction involving both the AMN and the PAA has occurred
during the polymerisation reaction, with the PAA effectively acting as a crosslinker.
Hydrogels so formed are suitable for subsequent attachment to a substrate to thereby
form a coating on at least a portion of the substrate. They may also be used as biological
scaffolds, eg for wound healing.
Example 9: Reactivity of AMN coatings
[0083] Aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate (AMN) (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) with a pH of 7.4 at a concentration of 100 mg/mL. To coat glass
cover slip samples, the samples were incubated in this solution for 24 h after polymerisation
was induced by adjusting the pH of the solution to 8.5 using 0.1 M sodium hydroxide
(NaOH).
[0084] Subsequently, samples were washed five times with MilliQ™ water and then incubated
overnight in MilliQ™ water before being air dried in a laminar flow cabinet. The presence
of the coating was indicated by a light brown colour change. During the coating process
samples were facing downwards to avoid the precipitation of polymer from solution.
[0085] Subsequently the freshly prepared samples were incubated in a solution of 100 mg
4-bromobenzyl bromide (BBB) (Aldrich) in 5 mL acetonitrile and 200 µL 0.1 M triethylamine
(TEA) overnight at 37 °C, followed by extensive washing in acetonitrile and MilliQ™
water and drying in a laminar flow cabinet. Control samples were analogously prepared
under identical conditions using 100 mg 1,4-dibromobenzene (DBB).
[0086] The detection of bromine by XPS (Table 6) after reaction with 4-bromobenzyl bromide
(BBB) demonstrates the reactivity of the AMN surface with this compound. Furthermore,
the fact that no bromine is detected after reaction with 1,4-dibromobenzene (DBB)
demonstrates that bromobenzene functional groups do not react with the AMN surface.
In addition, the control experiment demonstrates that the washing procedures are sufficient
for the complete removal of non-covalently bound BBB or DBB.
Table 6: XPS results obtained on AMN coated glass substrate materials before and after
reaction with 4-bromobenzyl bromide (BBB) and 1,4-dibromobenzene (DBB). The average
atomic ratios are presented (n=3).
| Substrate |
Br/C |
| Glass-AMN |
- |
| Glass-AMN-BBB |
0.007±0.001 |
| Glass-AMN-DBB |
- |
[0087] The detection of bromine by XPS after reaction with 4-bromobenzyl bromide (BBB) demonstrates
the reactivity of the AMN surface with this compound and its covalent immobilisation.
Furthermore, the fact that no bromine is detected after reaction with 1,4-dibromobenzene
(DBB) demonstrates that bromobenzene functional groups do not react with the AMN surface.
In addition, the control experiment demonstrates that the washing procedures are sufficient
for the complete removal of non-covalently bound BBB or DBB.
Example 10: Deposition of coatings using potassium cyanide
[0088] Equimolar amounts of potassium cyanide (65.1 mg, KCN, Sigma) and ammonium chloride
(53.5 mg, Sigma) were dissolved in 2 mL of MilliQ™ water. To coat glass samples, the
samples were incubated in this solution at room temperature for 7 days. Subsequently,
samples were washed five times with MilliQ™ water and then incubated overnight in
MilliQ™ water before being air dried in a laminar flow cabinet. The presence of the
coating was indicated by a light brown colour change.
[0089] Coatings were successfully deposited on glass substrates. Table 7 shows X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS) data collected before and after coating with the solution containing
equimolar amounts of potassium cyanide and ammonium chloride. The XPS results clearly
demonstrate the deposition of a coating, with a significant change in the elemental
ratios. The most significant changes observed were an increase in the N/C ratio from
0.000 to 0.645 and a decrease in the Si/C ratio from 1.538 to 0.072. The latter reflects
the almost complete attenuation of the Si signal from the underlying substrate material
and a coating thickness close to the information depth of the XPS method.
Table 7: XPS results obtained on glass substrate materials before and after coating
with a solution containing equimolar amounts of potassium cyanide (KCN) and ammonium
chloride. The average atomic ratios observed are presented (n=3).
| Substrate |
O/C |
N/C |
Si/C |
| Glass |
2.961±0.072 |
- |
1.538±0.047 |
| Glass-KCN |
0.231±0.007 |
0.645±0.003 |
0.072±0.004 |
Example 11: AMN modified coatings for low cell attachment
[0090] Aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate (AMN) (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) with a pH of 7.4 at a concentration of 50 mg/mL. Polymerisation
was induced by adjusting the pH of the solution to 8.5 using 0.1 M sodium hydroxide
(NaOH). 96 well plates (Nunclon Δ treated, Nunc, Denmark) were incubated for 24 h
in the coating solution. During the coating process samples were facing downwards
to avoid the precipitation of polymer from solution onto the surface of the wells.
Subsequently, samples were washed five times with MilliQ™ water and then incubated
overnight in MilliQ™ water before being air dried in a laminar flow cabinet. The presence
of the coating was indicated by a light brown colour change.
[0091] The grafting of monomethoxy poly(ethylene glycol) aldehyde (PEG-ALD) (molecular weight
5,000, Shearwater Polymers, USA) was carried out in individual wells on AMN coated
96 well plates using 100 µL per well of a phosphate buffer solution (pH 6.2) containing
0.25% (w/v) PEG-ALD, 11% (w/v) potassium sulfate and 0.3% (w/v) sodium cyanoborohydride.
The grafting reaction was carried out at 60 °C over 24 hours. Subsequently, samples
were washed five times with MilliQ™ water and then incubated overnight in MilliQ™
water before being air dried in a laminar flow cabinet.
[0092] Table 8 shows XPS data collected on TCPS before and after coating with (i) AMN and
(ii) AMN further modified with PEG-ALD. The significant increase in the O/C and N/C
ratio in comparison to the TCPS substrate surface after deposition of the AMN coating
demonstrates the successful deposition of this coating. Furthermore, the increase
in the O/C ratio and the significant decrease in the N/C ratio after subsequent reaction
with PEG-ALD demonstrates the successful grafting of PEG molecules on the AMN surface.
Table 8: XPS results obtained on TCPS substrate materials before and after coating
with AMN and further modification with PEG-ALD. The average atomic ratios are presented
(n=3).
| Substrate |
O/C |
N/C |
| TCPS |
0.179 ± 0.020 |
0.014 ± 0.007 |
| AMN |
0.249 ± 0.007 |
0.559 ± 0.018 |
| AMN-PEG-ALD |
0.292 ± 0.007 |
0.428 ± 0.004 |
[0093] Prior to cell culture experiments, the plates were subjected to γ-sterilisation at
a dose of 15 kGy (Steritech, Australia). L929 mouse fibroblasts (cell line ATCC-CCL-1,
Rockville, USA) were used to investigate the cellular response to modified surfaces.
Cells were cultured in minimum essential medium (MEM) containing 10% foetal bovine
serum and 1% non-essential amino acids (Invitrogen, USA). After cell seeding in wells
representing tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) (Nunclon Δ treated, Nunc, USA), the
AMN coating and the PEG-ALD modified AMN coating at a density of 2.5 x 10
4 cells/cm
2, samples were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C in humidified air containing 5% CO
2.
[0094] Subsequently substrates were washed once with minimum essential medium (MEM) before
a solution consisting of 100 µL phenazine methosulfate (PMS) solution (0.92 mg/mL
in DPBS), 2 mL 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTS)
solution (2 mg/mL in DPBS), and 10 mL MEM was added. The substrates were incubated
for 3 hours at 37 °C in humidified air containing 5% CO
2 before a colorimetric readout was performed at 490 nm and 655 nm.
[0095] Figure 9 shows the MTS assay results obtained on the different surfaces. Cell attachment
was enhanced on AMN coated surfaces relative to TCPS. Most importantly, cell attachment
was reduced significantly on PEG-ALD modified AMN coated surfaces relative to the
TCPS and the AMN surfaces.
[0096] The data clearly demonstrate that PEG-ALD molecules can be surface immobilised on
AMN coatings using a reductive amination reaction. Furthermore, the PEG grafting reaction
can be used to modulate the cellular response. Importantly, the PEG grafting density
achieved in the grafting reaction was demonstrated to be sufficient to significantly
reduce cell attachment. Overall the data demonstrate that PEG-ALD modified AMN coatings
can be used for applications where substantially reduced cell attachment is required.
Example 12: Coatings having antimicrobial properties
[0097] Aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate (AMN) (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) with a pH of 7.4 at a concentration of 100 mg/mL. Polymerisation
was induced by adjusting the pH of the solution to 8.5 using 0.1 M sodium hydroxide
(NaOH). 96 well plates having an Ultra-low attachment (ULA) coating (Corning, USA)
were incubated for 24 h in the coating solution. Subsequently, samples were washed
five times with MilliQ™ water and then incubated overnight in MilliQ™ water before
being air dried in a laminar flow cabinet. The presence of the coating was indicated
by a light brown colour change. During the coating process samples were facing downwards
to avoid the precipitation of polymer from solution.
[0098] Subsequently, an aqueous solution containing silver nitrate (AgNO
3) was added to individual wells with concentrations ranging from 10
-9 M to 10
-2 M and incubated over 24 hours. The wells were then washed at least three times using
MilliQ™ water and a pipette and finally filled with 360 µL MilliQ™ water before soaking
for 24 hours and drying in air in a laminar flow cabinet. XPS experiments confirmed
the deposition of silver. The average Ag/C ratio observed were 0 for less than 10
-5 M, 0.002 for 10
-5 M, 0.025 for 10
-4 M, 0.065 for 10
-3 M, and 0.096 for 10
-2 M AgNO
3 in solution. Prior to biofilm testing, the plates were subjected to γ-sterilisation
at a dose of 15 kGy (Steritech, Australia).
[0099] A static biofilm assay was performed using a clinically relevant gram-positive (
Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62a) and gram-negative (
Pseudomonas aeruginosa) strain. Broth cultures were grown from single colonies overnight at 37 °C using
Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB-medium) for S.
epidermidis and Luria Broth (LB-medium) for
P. aeruginosa. The bacterial cultures were then diluted to 10
7 Cell forming units (CFU)/mL using the respective media for dilution. 100 µL of the
diluted broth cultures were then used to inoculate each well (four repetitions for
each silver concentration). Identical experiments representing negative controls were
also performed using the two different types of media without bacteria (four repetitions
for each silver concentration). The plates were incubated for 18 hours at 37 °C. Subsequently,
planktonic bacteria were removed and the wells washed three times with 200 µL PBS
buffer followed by drying in air. Biofilms were then stained by incubating each well
with 100 µL 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet solution. The staining solution was removed
after 15 minutes and the plates were repeatedly (3 times) submerged in water to wash
off excess dye followed by drying in air. For the purpose of quantification by UV
spectroscopy, the dye incorporated in the biofilm was dissolved by adding 200 µL of
5% (v/v) acetic acid in ethanol and occasional shaking for 15 minutes. 100 µL of this
solution were then transferred to a fresh 96-well plate and the absorption measured
at 600 nm. Absorptions were averaged and background corrected using the averaged readouts
from negative controls. Figure 10 shows the biofilm quantification data obtained in
this assay. The results demonstrate that biofilm formation for both strains is prevented
effectively at an AgNO
3 concentration of 0.1 mM and above.
Example 13: Coatings produced by solvent casting of neutralised AMN
[0100] 1g of Aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate (AMN) (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in
6 mL of MilliQ™ water. 6 mL of a saturated sodium bicarbonate solution was then added
to reach a pH of 9.0. This aqueous solution was then extracted with diethylether.
The organic phase, which showed a pale yellow colour was then separated from the aqueous
phase. Subsequently the amount of solvent was reduced under vacuum using a rotary
evaporator and the remaining solution was cast onto glass substrates, resulting in
a brown coating after incubation over 16 hours at room temperature or after incubation
for 5 minutes at 110 °C, respectively. Samples were then washed five times with MilliQ™
water before being air dried in a laminar flow cabinet.
[0101] This coating process is based on isolating the free base of the aminomalononitrile
in an organic solvent followed by its spontaneous polymerisation. Coatings produced
in this way were characterised by XPS. Table 9 shows XPS data collected on glass substrates
before and after coating with the solvent cast neutralised AMN coating at different
temperatures. In each case, the XPS results clearly demonstrate the deposition of
a coating, with a significant change in the elemental composition in comparison to
an untreated glass substrate. However, the fact that a relatively high Si/C ratio
was observed suggests that the coating thickness was below the XPS information depth
of approximately 10 nm.
Table 9: XPS results obtained on glass substrates before and after solvent casting
of neutralised AMN and incubation at different temperatures. The average atomic ratios
are presented (n=3).
| Substrate |
O/C |
N/C |
Other |
| Glass |
2.857±0.048 |
0.036±0.005 |
1.203±0.007 (Si/C) |
| Glass-AMN (solvent cast) Room temperature |
0.611±0.023 |
0.472±0.020 |
0.302±0.009 |
| Glass-AMN (solvent cast) 110 °C |
0.832±0.090 |
0.427±0.059 |
0.492±0.085 |
[0102] These results demonstrate that coatings can be obtained in a simple solvent casting
process from an organic solvent containing neutralised AMN.
Example 14: Coatings formed using diaminomaleonitrile (DAMN)
[0103] 0.5 g of Diaminomaleonitrile (DAMN) was refluxed in 50 mL of MilliQ™ water for 24
hours in a flask containing a glass sample. Subsequently, the glass sample was washed
five times with MilliQ™ water and then incubated overnight in MilliQ™ water before
being air dried in a laminar flow cabinet. The presence of a coating on the glass
substrate was indicated by a light brown colour change. Table 10 shows the XPS results
obtained on the DAMN coated glass sample in comparison to results obtained on an untreated
glass sample. The XPS results clearly demonstrate the deposition of a coating, with
a significant change in the elemental ratios after coating composition. The fact that
only a small Si/C ratio was observed on the DAMN coated surface also points to a consistent
coating with a thickness on the order of or exceeding the XPS information depth of
approximately 10 nm.
Table 10: XPS results obtained on glass substrates before and after deposition of
a DAMN coating. The average atomic ratios are presented (n=3).
| Substrate |
O/C |
N/C |
Other |
| Glass |
2.857±0.048 |
0.036±0.005 |
1.203±0.007 (Si/C) |
| Glass-DAMN |
0.317±0.007 |
0.508±0.011 |
0.021±0.011 |
[0104] These results demonstrate that coatings can be obtained in a simple process from
Diaminomaleonitrile (DAMN).
Example 15: Cytotoxicity of AMN coatings
[0105] Aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate (AMN) (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) with a pH of 7.4 at a concentration of 100 mg/mL. Polymerisation
was induced by adjusting the pH of the solution to 8.5 using 0.1 M sodium hydroxide
(NaOH). 24 well plates (Nunclon Δ treated, Nunc, Denmark) were incubated for 24 h
in the coating solution. During the coating process samples were facing downwards
to avoid the precipitation of polymer from solution onto the surface of the wells.
Subsequently, samples were washed five times with MilliQ™ water and then incubated
overnight in MilliQ™ water before being air dried in a laminar flow cabinet. The presence
of the coating was indicated by a light brown colour change.
[0106] Cytotoxicity testing was performed according to the international standard ISO10993-5
(Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 5: Tests for
in vitro cytotoxicity and Part 12: Sample preparation and reference materials). The volume
of the extraction solution was determined by the surface area of the base and side
wall of the well (0.8 mL per well), giving a depth of 6 mm for the extraction fluid.
The extraction solution was serum free medium (SFM). The extraction solvent was incubated
on the samples for 66 hours at 37 °C with agitation on a rocking platform set to 20
rpm.
[0107] Subsequently the extraction solutions from each well were brought to room temperature
and the extraction fluid from each well separately serially diluted 1 in 2 using SFM
as the diluent to give a range of test solutions from 100%, 50% etc. to 0.39%. of
the original extraction solution. Standard control solutions included SFM alone, SFM
containing 5% PBS, and SFM containing 5% DMSO. All solutions were prepared in sterile
96 well plates (Nunclon Δ treated, Nunc, Denmark) in quadruplicate.
[0108] In parallel, L929 mouse fibroblast cells were seeded at a density of 2x10
4 cells/well into 96 well plates (Nunclon Δ treated, Nunc, USA) in 100 µL of freshly
prepared serum containing medium. The cells were incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C in
humidified air containing 5% CO
2.
[0109] Following removal of the serum containing medium from all of the wells, these were
washed twice with 150 µL of SFM after which 100 µL of test solution (100%, 50% etc.
to 0.39%. of the original extraction solution) or control solution (SFM, SFM containing
5% PBS or SFM containing 5% DMSO) was added to individual wells. The plates were then
incubated for a further 20 hours at 37 °C.
[0110] To quantify the number of metabolically active cells, a colorimetric MTS assay was
performed using 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5(3-carboxymethoxphenyl)-2-(4-sulphophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium
(Promega). At 20 hours, a fresh working solution of MTS reagent was prepared as per
the manufacturer's instructions. The test and control solutions were removed from
the plates and 100 µL of MTS solution added. The plates were then incubated for 3
hours at 37 °C. Subsequently the plates were read using an ELISA plate reader (BioTek,
USA). Figure 11 shows the quantitative evaluation of cytotoxicity using the MTS assay
with serial dilutions (100% - 0.39%) of SFM-based extraction solutions originating
from 4 different samples, each of which were investigated in multiple replicates.
The MTS assay was also carried out on the same overall number of replicates using
SFM, SFM containing 5% PBS and SFM containing 5% DMSO. None of the extraction solutions
showed a cytotoxic response at any dilution, while the control samples gave the expected
responses. Therefore the AMN coatings are not considered cytotoxic.
[0111] Qualitative evaluation of the plates by visual inspection showed that none of the
wells containing SFM and 5% PBS showed any reactivity to the solution with all cells
having an attached, flattened healthy appearance. Also none of the test solutions
showed any reactivity at any dilution with all cells having an attached, flattened
healthy appearance (Grade 0). In comparison, wells containing 5% DMSO showed a mild
reaction with approximately 25% of cells having a rounded appearance (Grade 2).
[0112] The lack of cytotoxicity underlines the suitability of AMN coatings in a broad range
of biomedical applications.
Example 16: Spatial control over the biological response using AMN coatings
[0113] Substrate samples with a size of approximately 4 cm
2 were cut out of 6 well plates having an Ultra-low attachment (ULA) coating (Corning,
USA).
[0114] Aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate (AMN) (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) with a pH of 7.4 at a concentration of 100 mg/mL. Polymerisation
was induced by adjusting the pH of the solution to 8.5 using 0.1 M sodium hydroxide
(NaOH). After 30 minutes incubation, 100 µL of this solution was transferred to individual
wells of a 96 well plate, which was used as a source plate in a microarray printer
(NanoPrint LM60 microarrayer, ArrayIt, USA). After contact printing of the solution
onto the ULA coated samples in an array pattern using pins with a diameter of 375
µm, samples were air dried in a laminar flow cabinet over 48 hours. Subsequently,
samples were washed three times with MilliQ™ water before again being air dried in
a laminar flow cabinet. Prior to cell seeding, samples were subjected to γ-sterilisation
at a dose of 15 kGy (Steritech, Australia).
[0115] L929 mouse fibroblasts (cell line ATCC-CCL-1, Rockville, USA) were used to investigate
the cellular response to the patterned surface chemistry. Cells were cultured in minimum
essential medium (MEM) containing 10% foetal bovine serum and 1% non-essential amino
acids (Invitrogen, USA). After cell seeding at a density of 2.5 x 10
4 cells/cm
2, samples were incubated for 16 hours at 37 °C in humidified air containing 5% CO
2.
[0116] After washing samples with medium, a Molecular Probes live/dead assay was performed,
which resulted in live, attached cells being stained green and dead, attached cells
being stained red. Samples were then imaged using a Nikon TE 2000 Fluorescent Microscope.
The cell attachment pattern observed in Figure 12 demonstrates that cells were only
able to attach to the substrate in areas where the AMN coating is present, while cell
attachment was prevented on the ULA background coating. Cell attachment exactly followed
the pattern provided by the microarray printing process. Furthermore, all cells attached
to the AMN coated areas showed green fluorescence, indicating live cells and therefore
negligible cytotoxicity.
[0117] These results demonstrate that spatial control over biological responses such as
cell attachment can be achieved using AMN coating deposition.
Example 17: Grafting of polymers onto AMN coatings
[0118] Aminomalononitrile p-toluenesulfonate (AMN) (Aldrich, 98%) was dissolved in phosphate
buffered saline (PBS) with a pH of 7.4 at a concentration of 50 mg/mL. Polymerisation
was induced by adjusting the pH of the solution to 8.5 using 0.1 M sodium hydroxide
(NaOH). 96 well plates (Nunclon Δ treated, Nunc, Denmark) were incubated for 24 h
in the coating solution. During the coating process samples were facing downwards
to avoid the precipitation of polymer from solution onto the surface of the wells.
Subsequently, samples were washed five times with MilliQ™ water and then incubated
overnight in MilliQ™ water before being air dried in a laminar flow cabinet. The presence
of the coating was indicated by a light brown colour change.
[0119] Freshly AMN-coated multiwell substrates were then incubated with solutions containing
either an amine-terminated dendrimer (DMR, Generation 4, Sigma-Aldrich) or polyallylamine
(ALA, molecular weight 70,000, Sigma-Aldrich) to increase the number of amine functional
groups available at the surface. AMN coated 96-well plate surfaces were incubated
for 24 hours with a volume of 100 µL per well containing 0.30% (w/v) of DMR or 0.25%
(w/v) of ALA, respectively in PBS at pH 6. Subsequently, samples were washed five
times with MilliQ™ water and then incubated overnight in MilliQ™ water before being
air dried in a laminar flow cabinet.
[0120] The grafting of monomethoxy poly(ethylene glycol) aldehyde (PEG-ALD) (molecular weight
5,000, Shearwater Polymers, USA) was carried out in individual wells on AMN-DMR and
AMN-ALA coated 96 well plates using 100 µL per well of a phosphate buffer solution
(pH 6.2) containing 0.25% (w/v) PEG-ALD, 11% (w/v) potassium sulfate and 0.3% (w/v)
sodium cyanoborohydride. The grafting reaction was carried out at 60 °C over 24 hours.
Subsequently, samples were washed five times with MilliQ™ water and then incubated
overnight in MilliQ™ water before being air dried in a laminar flow cabinet.
[0121] The significant increase in the O/C and N/C ratio in comparison to the TCPS substrate
surface after deposition of the AMN coating demonstrates the successful deposition
of this coating (Table 11). The successful deposition of DMR and ALA on the AMN surface
is also reflected by significant changes in particular in the N/C ratio compared to
the AMN coated substrate. Furthermore, the significant changes in the O/C and N/C
ratios following the grafting of PEG-ALD on both AMN-DMR and AMN-ALA coated surfaces
demonstrates the successful grafting of PEG molecules on these amine-rich surfaces
(Table 11).
Table 11: XPS results obtained on TCPS substrate materials before and after coating
with AMN, immobilisation of DMR or ALA and further modification with PEG-ALD. The
average atomic ratios are presented (n=3).
| Substrate |
O/C |
N/C |
| TCPS |
0.179 ± 0.020 |
0.014 ± 0.007 |
| AMN |
0.249 ± 0.007 |
0.559 ± 0.018 |
| AMN-DMR |
0.221 ± 0.009 |
0.454 ± 0.031 |
| AMN-DMR-PEG-ALD |
0.356 ± 0.013 |
0.321 ± 0.019 |
| AMN-ALA |
0.225 ± 0.010 |
0.462 ± 0.033 |
| AMN-ALA-PEG-ALD |
0.408 ± 0.056 |
0.127 ± 0.030 |
[0122] Prior to cell culture experiments, the plates were subjected to γ-sterilisation at
a dose of 15 kGy (Steritech, Australia). L929 mouse fibroblasts (cell line ATCC-CCL-1,
Rockville, USA) were used to investigate the cellular response to modified surfaces.
Cells were cultured in minimum essential medium (MEM) containing 10% foetal bovine
serum and 1% non-essential amino acids (Invitrogen, USA). After cell seeding in wells
representing tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) (Nunclon Δ treated, Nunc, USA), the
AMN coating and the PEG-ALD modified AMN coating at a density of 2.5 x 10
4 cells/cm
2, samples were incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C in humidified air containing 5% CO
2.
[0123] Subsequently substrates were washed once with minimum essential medium (MEM) before
a solution consisting of 100 µL phenazine methosulfate (PMS) solution (0.92 mg/mL
in DPBS), 2 mL 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTS)
solution (2 mg/mL in DPBS), and 10 mL MEM was added. The substrates were incubated
for 3 hours at 37 °C in humidified air containing 5% CO
2 before a colorimetric readout was performed at 490 nm and 655 nm.
[0124] Figure 13 shows the MTS assay results obtained on the different surfaces. Cell attachment
was enhanced on AMN coated surfaces relative to TCPS. High cell attachment was also
observed on AMN-DMR and AMN-ALA coated surfaces. In comparison, a significant reduction
of cell attachment was observed on AMN-DMR and AMN-ALA coated surfaces that had been
grafted with PEG-ALD polymer.
[0125] The data clearly demonstrate that polyamines such as DMR and ALA can be immobilised
on AMN coated surfaces. In addition, the results demonstrate that polyamines such
as DMR and ALA can be used as an interlayer for the subsequent grafting of polymers
such as PEG-ALD, which in turn may be used to modulate the cellular response. Importantly,
the PEG grafting density achieved in the grafting reactions was demonstrated to be
sufficient to significantly reduce cell attachment.