ATBECHDEDKESFRGBGRITLILUNLSEMCPTIESILTLVFIROMKCYALTRBGCZEEHUPLSK..HRIS..MTNORS..SM..................
*
J
BDM Ver 1.7.2 (20 November 2019) - 2999001/0
2852414
CORRECTED EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION
B9
B1
20201209
W1
de
Beschreibung
en
Description
fr
Description
EP
13724265.7
20130522
20141222
20180205
en
en
en
201261650025 P
20120522
US
201261698677 P
20120909
US
201361799528 P
20130315
US
20201209
202050
20150401
201514
20200708
202028
20200203
20201209
202050
G01N 30/88 20060101AFI20200109BHEP
A61K 39/095 20060101ALI20200109BHEP
A61K 39/00 20060101ALI20200109BHEP
A61K 47/64 20170101ALI20200109BHEP
de
MENINGOKOKKEN-SEROGRUPPE-X-KONJUGAT
en
MENINGOCOCCUS SEROGROUP X CONJUGATE
fr
CONJUGUÉ DE SÉROGROUPE X DE MÉNINGOCOQUE
WO-A1-2008/102173
WO-A1-2011/023764
WO-A2-2012/061400
WO-A2-2013/038375
Wei Zou and Harolds Jennings: "Preparation of Glycoconjugate Vaccines" In: "Carbohydrate-Based Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Eds Zhongwu Guo and Geert-Jan Boons", 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, XP002705361, pages 55-88, section 2.2.3 "Neisseria meningitidis"
COSTANTINO P ET AL: "The design of semi-synthetic and synthetic glycoconjugate vaccines", EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY 2011 INFORMA HEALTHCARE GBR, vol. 6, no. 10, October 2011 (2011-10), pages 1045-1066, XP008163752, ISSN: 1746-0441
KIANG J ET AL: "Simultaneous determination of glucosamine and glucosamine 4-phosphate in Lipid A with high-performance anion-exchange chromatography (HPAEC)", CARBOHYDRATE RESEARCH, PERGAMON, GB, vol. 312, no. 1-2, 1 November 1998 (1998-11-01), pages 73-76, XP004204821, ISSN: 0008-6215, DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6215(98)00226-2
XIE O ET AL: "Characterization of size, structure and purity of serogroup X Neisseria meningitidis polysaccharide, and development of an assay for quantification of human antibodies", VACCINE 20120831 ELSEVIER LTD GBR, vol. 30, no. 40, 31 August 2012 (2012-08-31), pages 5812-5823, XP002705005, ISSN: 0264-410X cited in the application
ROMANO, Maria Rosaria
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics SrL Via Fiorentina 1
53100 Siena
IT
MICOLI, Francesca
Novartis Vaccines Institute for Global Health Via Fiorentina 1
53100 Siena
IT
BERTI, Francesco
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics SrL Via Fiorentina 1
53100 Siena
IT
ADAMO, Roberto
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics SrL Via Fiorentina 1
53100 Siena
IT
COSTANTINO, Paolo
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics SrL Via Fiorentina 1
53100 Siena
IT
GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA
100750201
VN54744
Rue de l'Institut 89
1330 Rixensart
BE
Dalton, Marcus Jonathan William
et al
101447594
GlaxoSmithKline Global Patents (CN925.1) 980 Great West Road
Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS
GB
AL
AT
BE
BG
CH
CY
CZ
DE
DK
EE
ES
FI
FR
GB
GR
HR
HU
IE
IS
IT
LI
LT
LU
LV
MC
MK
MT
NL
NO
PL
PT
RO
RS
SE
SI
SK
SM
TR
EP2013060447
20130522
en
WO2013174832
20131128
201348

TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention is in the field of bacterial capsular saccharides, particularly Neisseria meningitidis serogroup X capsular polysaccharides. The polysaccharides may be conjugated to carriers in order to form conjugates. The polysaccharides and conjugates are useful for immunisation, particularly in aqueous formulations.

BACKGROUND ART
The capsular saccharides of bacteria have been used for many years in vaccines against capsulated bacteria. As saccharides are T-independent antigens, however, they are poorly immunogenic. Conjugation to a carrier can convert T-independent antigens into T-dependent antigens, thereby enhancing memory responses and allowing protective immunity to develop. The most effective saccharide vaccines are therefore based on glycoconjugates, and the prototype conjugate vaccine was against Haemophilus influenzae type b ('Hib') [e.g. see chapter 14 of ref. 86].
Based on the organism's capsular polysaccharide, twelve serogroups of N.meningitidis have been identified (A, B, C, H, I, K, L, 29E, W135, X, Y and Z). Group A is the pathogen most often implicated in epidemic disease in sub-Saharan Africa. Serogroups B and C are responsible for the vast majority of cases in USA and in most developed countries. Serogroups W135 and Y are responsible for the remaining cases in USA and developed countries. A tetravalent vaccine of capsular polysaccharides from serogroups A, C, Y and W135 has been known for many years [1,2]. Although effective in adolescents and adults, it induces a poor immune response and short duration of protection and cannot be used in infants [e.g. ref. 3] because polysaccharides are T cell-independent antigens that induce a weak immune response which cannot be boosted. The polysaccharides in this vaccine are not conjugated [4]. Conjugate vaccines against serogroup C have been approved for human use, and include Menjugate™ [5], Meningitec™ and NeisVac-C™. Mixtures of conjugates from serogroups A+C are known [6-8] and mixtures of conjugates from serogroups A+C+W135+Y have been reported [9-13].
The structure of the group X capsular polysaccharide has been known since the 1970s [14] and this serogroup has been associated with a number of outbreaks of meningococcal disease, e.g. in sub-Saharan Africa and China [15,16]. Serogroup X is known to have a significantly higher attack rate than serogroup A among children below 5 years of age. Although the need for a vaccine against this serogroup has been recognised for many years [17], no effective vaccine has been developed. Conjugate vaccines against serogroup X have been proposed [17,18], but it remains unknown whether such conjugates would be immunogenic or protective against this serogroup.
Accordingly, there remains a need for conjugates of serogroup X capsular polysaccharides. Moreover, there remains a need for conjugates that can be used for vaccination against diseases caused by this serogroup.
The structure of the group X capsular polysaccharide consists of N-acetylglucosamine-4-phosphate residues held together by α1-4 phosphodiester bonds without O-acetyl groups [19]: {→4)-D-GlcpNAc-α-(1→OPO3→} (Figure 1). Based on the similarity between their structures, a biosynthetic relationship between MenA and MenX capsular polysaccharides has been postulated [14]. MenA capsular polysaccharide tends to hydrolyse significantly in aqueous solution [20]. This instability is thought to be caused by the presence of a phosphodiester linkage involving the anomeric position and of the N-Acetyl group in position 2 of mannosamine, which can assist departure of a phosphomonoester group [21]. Another possibility is that the hydroxyl groups at position 4 of the N-acetylmannosamine subunits interact with the phosphodiester groups facilitating hydrolysis via an internal participation mechanism, as seen in the capsular polysaccharide of type 6A pneumococcus [22] and Haemophilus influenzae type b [23]. The similarity in the structures of the MenX and MenA capsular polysaccharides, particularly their common anomeric phosphodiester linkage, means that the MenX polysaccharide may suffer from similar stability problems when in aqueous solution. The intrinsic instability of the MenA capsular polysaccharide in aqueous solution means that it is often presented in a lyophilized form when contained in vaccines (e.g. in the polysaccharide vaccine Mencevax™ and the conjugate vaccines MenAfriVac™, Menveo™ and Nimenrix™). Although the MenX capsular polysaccharide could similarly be presented in a lyophilised form to improve its stability, an aqueous formulation would be more convenient. The only vaccine containing a MenA capsular polysaccharide conjugate in an aqueous formulation is Menactra™, but this vaccine requires storage at low temperatures. Such cold storage is expensive and presents practical difficulties in many of the countries where MenA and MenX outbreaks are common (e.g. sub-Saharan Africa).
Accordingly, there is a need for aqueous formulations of serogroup X capsular polysaccharides and conjugates thereof, particularly aqueous formulations that do not require refrigeration.
The development of a vaccine against MenX requires a method for polysaccharide quantification that can be used as an in-process assay and/or for the characterization of the final vaccine. The presence of phosphate groups in the MenX capsular polysaccharide means that the polysaccharide can be quantified by a colorimetric method that measures total phosphorus content [24]. However, this method lacks selectivity and therefore would not be suitable for certain in-process applications, e.g. for the analysis of polysaccharide in phosphate buffers or in the presence of phosphate-containing impurities. A more selective method would be NMR, which has been proposed already for MenX polysaccharide quantification [25]. However, this approach requires pure samples and a large amount of material. Reference 26 demonstrates an alternative approach, where the MenX polysaccharide is quantified by HPAEC-PAD, which is more sensitive than NMR and more selective than measuring phosphate content. The authors of ref. 26 quantified the MenX polysaccharide by hydrolysing the sample to make glucosamine, and comparing the amount of glucosamine released against a calibration curve derived from an N-acetyl-glucosamine-6-phosphate quantitative standard. However, glucosamine may be present because of contamination, leading to inaccurate results.
Accordingly, there is a need for alternative or improved methods for assaying the MenX polysaccharide, and in particular for methods that are more selective for MenX.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
The invention is based in part on methods for conjugating a serogroup X capsular polysaccharide to a carrier molecule. The inventors have found that the resulting conjugates are immunogenic and capable of inducing a bactericidal antibody response. Serogroup X conjugates are therefore useful in immunogenic compositions, and in particular in vaccines. The inventors have also discovered that it is possible to combine serogroup X capsular polysaccharide antigens, e.g. serogroup X conjugates, with other antigens without losing the immune response to serogroup X. In particular, serogroup X conjugates may be combined with other conjugates, e.g. conjugates comprising other bacterial capsular saccharide antigens. Serogroup X conjugates are particularly suitable for combination with conjugates comprising capsular saccharide antigens from other N.meningitidis serogroups, e.g. serogroups A, C, W135 and Y. In these combinations, not only does the serogroup X conjugate retain its immunogenicity, but the serogroup A, C, W135 and/or Y conjugates also retain their immunogenicity. Furthermore, the inventors have also found that despite its structural similarity to the serogroup A capsular polysaccharide, the capsular polysaccharide from serogroup X is surprisingly stable in solution. Serogroup X capsular polysaccharides and conjugates thereof may therefore be particularly suitable for use in aqueous formulations.
The invention provides an immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of a Neisseria meningitidis serogroup X capsular polysaccharide and a carrier molecule, wherein coupling of the capsular polysaccharide to the carrier protein is direct. The inventors have found that particularly stable conjugates of a serogroup X capsular polysaccharide and a carrier molecule may be made using the process of the first process described below. For example, the conjugates may contain less than 50% free saccharide after 28 days at 37 °C. The % free saccharide may be determined as described in Stability study (2) below. Accordingly, the invention provides an immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of a serogroup X capsular polysaccharide and a carrier molecule which comprises less than 50% free saccharide after 28 days at 37 °C. The immunogenic composition may in particular comprise less than 25% free saccharide, particularly less than 20% free saccharide and more particularly less than 15% free saccharide, e.g. about 10% free saccharide.
The conjugate is typically obtained or obtainable by one of the four processes described below. However, the conjugate may alternatively be made by any suitable method.
A first process for preparing a conjugate of a serogroup X capsular polysaccharide and a carrier molecule, comprises the steps of: (a) oxidising a primary hydroxyl group in the capsular polysaccharide, to give an oxidised polysaccharide with an aldehyde group; and (b) coupling the oxidised polysaccharide to a carrier molecule via the aldehyde group, thereby giving the conjugate. This process is thought to be particularly suitable (e.g. in terms of yield) for relatively long polysaccharides, e.g. those with a degree of polymerisation (DP) of between 20 and 200, particularly between 60 and 100 (e.g. between 70 and 90, particularly around 80). This process also contains relatively few steps, making it easier to scale-up to an industrial setting. The resulting conjugates may also be more stable, particularly compared to conjugates in which the polysaccharide is linked to the carrier via its reducing terminus. The coupling in step (b) is e.g. by reductive amination between the aldehyde group and a primary amine group on the carrier molecule.
A second process for preparing a conjugate of a serogroup X capsular polysaccharide and a carrier molecule, comprises the steps of: (a) reductive amination of the reducing terminus of the capsular polysaccharide, to give a modified polysaccharide with a primary amine group bonded to the C-1 atom of the terminal subunit by a covalent bond; and (b) coupling the modified polysaccharide to a carrier molecule via the primary amine group, thereby giving the conjugate. This process is particularly suitable for relatively short polysaccharides e.g. polysaccharides with a DP between 5 and 50, particularly between 10 and 20, e.g. about 15.
A third process for preparing a conjugate of a serogroup X capsular polysaccharide and a carrier molecule, comprises the steps of: (a) reduction of the reducing terminus of the capsular polysaccharide, to give a modified polysaccharide with two vicinal hydroxyl groups at that terminus; (b) oxidative cleavage of the vicinal hydroxyl groups, to give a further modified polysaccharide with an aldehyde group at the terminus; (c) reductive amination of the aldehyde group, to give a further modified polysaccharide with a primary amine group at the terminus and (d) coupling the further modified polysaccharide to a carrier molecule via the primary amine group, thereby giving the conjugate. This process may provide a better yield than the first and second processes, particularly for relatively short polysaccharides e.g. polysaccharides with a DP between 5 and 50, particularly between 10 and 20, e.g. about 15.
A fourth process for preparing a conjugate of a serogroup X capsular polysaccharide and a carrier molecule, comprises the steps of: (a) reduction of the reducing terminus of the capsular polysaccharide, to give a modified polysaccharide with two vicinal hydroxyl groups at that terminus; (b) oxidative cleavage of the vicinal hydroxyl groups, to give a further modified polysaccharide with an aldehyde group at the terminus; (c) direct coupling of the further modified polysaccharide to the carrier molecule by reductive amination of the aldehyde group with a primary amine group on the carrier molecule, thereby giving the conjugate.

The capsular polysaccharide
The invention involves the capsular polysaccharide of N.meningitidis serogroup X. The structure of the group X capsular polysaccharide consists of N-acetylglucosamine-4-phosphate residues held together by α1-4 phosphodiester bonds without O-acetyl groups [19]: {→4)-D-GlcpNAc-α-(1→OPO3→} (Figure 1).
The capsular polysaccharide can be purified by known techniques, for example by the method described in ref. 19. In general, meningococcal capsular polysaccharides are prepared by a process comprising the steps of polysaccharide precipitation (e.g. using a cationic detergent), ethanol fractionation, cold phenol extraction (to remove protein) and ultracentrifugation (to remove LPS) [e.g. ref. 27]. However, a preferred process for the serogroup X capsular polysaccharide is described in ref. 10. This process involves polysaccharide precipitation followed by solubilisation of the precipitated polysaccharide using a lower alcohol. Precipitation can be achieved using a cationic detergent such as tetrabutylammonium and cetyltrimethylammonium salts (e.g. the bromide salts), or hexadimethrine bromide and myristyltrimethylammonium salts. Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide ('CTAB') is typically used [28]. Solubilisation of the precipitated material can be achieved using a lower alcohol such as methanol, propan-1-ol, propan-2-ol, butan-1-ol, butan-2-ol, 2-methyl-propan-1-ol, 2-methyl-propan-2-ol, diols, etc., but ethanol is particularly suitable for solubilising CTAB-polysaccharide complexes. Ethanol is preferably added to the precipitated polysaccharide to give a final ethanol concentration (based on total content of ethanol and water) of between 50% and 95%.
After re-solubilisation, the polysaccharide may be further treated to remove contaminants. This is particularly important in situations where even minor contamination is not acceptable (e.g. for human vaccine production). This will typically involve one or more steps of filtration e.g. depth filtration, filtration through activated carbon may be used, size filtration and/or ultrafiltration.
Once filtered to remove contaminants, the polysaccharide may be precipitated for further treatment and/or processing. This can be conveniently achieved by exchanging cations (e.g. by the addition of calcium or sodium salts).
The invention is not limited to polysaccharides purified from natural sources, however, and the polysaccharides may be obtained by other methods, such as total or partial synthesis, e.g. by the enzymatic synthesis described in ref. 29.
The polysaccharide may be chemically modified relative to the capsular polysaccharide as found in nature. For example, the polysaccharide may be de-N-acetylated (partially or fully), N-propionated (partially or fully), etc. De-acetylation may occur before, during or after conjugation, but typically occurs before conjugation. The degree of N-acetylation of the serogroup X capsular polysaccharide used in the invention may be 0-100%, 50-100%, 75-100%, 80-100%, 90-100%, or 95-100%. Typically, the degree of N-acetylation is 100%. The degree of N-acetylation of the polysaccharide can be determined by any method known in the art, for example, by proton NMR (e.g. as described in references 30 and 31.
Capsular polysaccharides will generally be used in the form of oligosaccharides. These are conveniently formed by fragmentation of purified capsular polysaccharide (e.g. by hydrolysis), which will usually be followed by purification of the fragments of the desired size.
Fragmentation of polysaccharides is preferably performed to give a final average degree of polymerisation (DP) in the oligosaccharide of between 20 and 200, particularly between 60 and 100 (e.g. between 70 and 90, particularly around 80). The inventors have found that polysaccharides of this length are particularly suitable for use in the first process described above. However, the inventors have found that shorter polysaccharides may also be used, e.g. polysaccharides with a DP between 5 and 50, particularly between 10 and 20, e.g. about 15. The inventors have found that polysaccharides of this length are particularly suitable for use in the second and third processes described above. DP can conveniently be measured by ion exchange chromatography, NMR or by colorimetric assays [32].
The polysaccharide may be sized in order to obtain a desired range of polysaccharide sizes [33]. This can be achieved in various ways, such as ultrafiltration followed by ion-exchange chromatography.

The carrier molecule
The invention involves the use of carrier proteins. In general, covalent conjugation of saccharides to carriers enhances the immunogenicity of saccharides as it converts them from T-independent antigens to T-dependent antigens, thus allowing priming for immunological memory. Conjugation is particularly useful for paediatric vaccines [e.g. ref. 34] and is a well known technique [e.g. reviewed in refs. 35 to 43].
Preferred carrier proteins are bacterial toxins, such as diphtheria or tetanus toxins, or toxoids or mutants thereof, particularly diphtheria toxoid or tetanus toxoid. The inventors have found that the CRM197 diphtheria toxin mutant [44] is particularly suitable. Protein D from H.influenzae [45-47] may also be used.
Other suitable carrier proteins include the N.meningitidis outer membrane protein complex [48], synthetic peptides [49,50], heat shock proteins [51,52], pertussis proteins [53,54], cytokines [55], lymphokines [55], hormones [55], growth factors [55], human serum albumin (typically recombinant), artificial proteins comprising multiple human CD4+ T cell epitopes from various pathogen-derived antigens [56] such as N19 [57], pneumococcal surface protein PspA [58], pneumolysin [59] or its non-toxic derivatives [60], iron-uptake proteins [61], toxin A or B from C.difficile [62], a GBS protein [63], a GAS protein [64] etc.
Other suitable carrier proteins are described in ref. 65, in particular the carrier protein of SEQ ID NO: 9 in that document. These carrier proteins are also described in ref. 66, and further details are provided in the section "Exemplary carrier proteins" below.

Oxidation
In step (a) of the first process described above, a primary hydroxyl group in the capsular polysaccharide is oxidised to give an aldehyde group. The primary hydroxyl group is bonded to the C-6 atom of a MenX capsular polysaccharide subunit by a covalent bond, such that the step proceeds as follows:
This step may involve oxidation of more than one such primary hydroxyl group, resulting in the introduction of more than one aldehyde group along the polysaccharide chain. For example, the inventors have found that suitable conjugates can be prepared by oxidising the primary hydroxyl group on between 1-50%, particularly 1-20% and more particularly 1-10%, e.g. about 4-8%, of residues within the serogroup X polysaccharide. Hydroxyl groups may be converted to aldehydes by various oxidation reactions (e.g. Swern oxidation, Dess-Martin oxidation, Cr^{VI} oxidations, etc.). However the inventors have found that the TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyloxy radical)-mediated oxidation is particularly suitable. TEMPO-mediated oxidation is described in of ref. 67. To prevent oxidation of the aldehyde group to a carboxyl group, TEMPO-mediated oxidation is preferably carried out in non-aqueous conditions, e.g. using a DMF solvent as described in ref. 68. The skilled person would be capable of identifying suitable conditions for oxidation. For example, the inventors have found that treatment of polysaccharide with TEMPO (0.06eq relative to the MenX repeating subunit), NaHCO_3 (9eq relative to the MenX repeating subunit) and TCC (trichloroisocyanuric acid, 2eq relative to the MenX repeating subunit) at 0°C overnight is suitable.

Oxidative cleavage
In step (b) of the the third and fourth processes described above, two vicinal hydroxyl groups in the capsular polysaccharide undergo oxidative cleavage to give an aldehyde group:
Oxidative cleavage (e.g. using NaIO_4, Pb(OAc)_4, etc.) is well known in the art. The inventors have found that reacting the polysaccharide at 6-8 mg/ml in 10mM NaPi buffer at pH 7.2 with NaIO_4 (10eq relative to the molecular weight of MenX, solid) for 1.5 hours at room temperature is suitable.

Reduction
In step (a) of the third and fourth processes described above, the reducing terminus of the capsular polysaccharide is reduced to give a modified polysaccharide with two vicinal hydroxyl groups at the terminus:
Reduction of polysaccharides (e.g. using NaBH_4, etc.) is well known in the art. The inventors have found that reacting the polysaccharide at 15 mg/ml in 10mM NaPi buffer at pH 8 with NaBH_4 (12eq relative to the molecular weight of MenX, solid) for 1.5 hours at room temperature is suitable.

Reductive amination
In step (a) of the second process described above, the reducing terminus of the capsular polysaccharide is subjected to reductive amination to give a modified polysaccharide with a primary amine group bonded to the C-1 atom of the terminal subunit by a covalent bond:
Reductive amination is a standard technique in organic chemistry. For example, the aldehyde group at the reducing terminus may be converted into a primary amine group using ammonia. This can conveniently be achieved using an ammonium salt (e.g. ammonium chloride or ammonium acetate) in combination with an appropriate reducing agent (e.g. cyanoborohydrides, such as sodium cyanoborohydride NaBH_3CN; borane-pyridine; sodium triacetoxyborohydride; borohydride exchange resin). The skilled person would be capable of identifying suitable conditions for reductive amination.
Reductive amination is also carried out in step (c) of the third process described above, to give a modified polysaccharide with a primary amine group at the terminus. For example, the aldehyde group may be converted into a primary amine group as described above. The reductive amination may therefore result in a modified polysaccharide with a primary amine group bonded to the C-5 atom of the terminal subunit by a covalent bond:
Reductive amination is also carried out in step (c) of the fourth process described above, to give the conjugate. The reductive amination is between the aldehyde group of the further modified polysaccharide and a primary amine group on the carrier molecule.

Coupling to a carrier molecule
The coupling of the oxidised polysaccharide to the carrier molecule via the aldehyde group in step (b) of the first process described above is direct. The coupling of the modified polysaccharide to the carrier molecule via the primary amine group in step (b) of the second process above is also direct. The coupling of the modified polysaccharide to the carrier molecule via the primary amine group in step (d) of the third process described above is also direct. For all three steps, any suitable conjugation reaction can be used.
Attachment of the polysaccharide to the carrier is typically via a primary amine (-NH_2) group e.g. in the side chain of a lysine or residue in a carrier protein, or of an arginine residue. Attachment to the carrier may also be via a sulphydryl (-SH) group e.g. in the side chain of a cysteine residue.
For the first process described above, the inventors have found that direct coupling may be conveniently achieved by reacting the aldehyde group in the oxidised polysaccharide with an amine group in the carrier by reductive amination. Direct coupling of this nature is therefore preferred. As discussed above, reductive amination is a standard technique, and has been used extensively in the production of conjugates of capsular polysaccharides for vaccine use. In one approach, an aldehyde group in the oxidised polysaccharide reacts with an amine group in the carrier. This can conveniently be achieved by combining the polysaccharide with the carrier in the presence of an appropriate reducing agent (e.g. cyanoborohydrides, such as sodium cyanoborohydride NaBH_3CN; borane-pyridine; sodium triacetoxyborohydride; borohydride exchange resin; etc.). The skilled person would be capable of identifying suitable conditions for reductive amination. For example, the inventors have found that treatment of oxidised polysaccharide with 10mg/ml CRM197 at a 4:1 w/w ratio and NaBH_3CN at a 1:1 w/w ratio in a NaPi 10mM pH 7.2 buffer is suitable. This mixture may be left for 72 hours with slow stirring at 37°C to effect the reductive amination.
Conjugates with a polysaccharide:protein ratio (w/w) of between 1:20 (i.e. excess protein) and 20:1 (i.e. excess polysaccharide) are of interest. Ratios of 1:10 to 1:1 are preferred, particularly ratios between 1:2 and 1:1 and, most preferably, about 1:1.5. For conjugates made by the first process, a typical ratio is between 0.1 and 1.0, more particularly between 0.2 and 0.4, e.g. about 0.35. For conjugates made by the second process, a typical ratio is between 0.1 and 1.0, more particularly between 0.1 and 0.3, e.g. about 0.22. For conjugates made by third process, a typical ratio is between is between 0.1 and 1.0, more particularly between 0.1 and 0.3, e.g. about 0.21.
Compositions may include a small amount of free carrier [72]. When a given carrier protein is present in both free and conjugated form in a composition of the invention, the unconjugated form is preferably no more than 5% of the total amount of the carrier protein in the composition as a whole, and more preferably present at less than 2% by weight.
After conjugation, free and conjugated polysaccharides can be separated. There are many suitable methods, including hydrophobic chromatography, tangential ultrafiltration, diafiltration etc. [see also refs. 73 & 74, etc.].

Combinations of conjugates and other antigens
As well as providing individual conjugates as described above, an immunogenic composition may comprise one or more further antigens.
The further antigen(s) may comprise further conjugates. In these embodiments, it is possible to use more than one carrier for the different conjugates in the composition, e.g. to reduce the risk of carrier suppression. Typically, the same carrier is used for all conjugates. However, the inventors have found that the use of a different carrier for the N.meningitidis serogroup X conjugate may reduce immune interference when the N.meningitidis serogroup X conjugate is combined with further conjugate(s). Accordingly, in some embodiments, the N.meningitidis serogroup X conjugate uses one carrier (particularly tetanus toxoid or SEQ ID NO: 9 of ref. 65 and ref. 66), while the further conjugate(s) use a different carrier (particularly CRM197).
A single carrier protein might carry more than one polysaccharide antigen [75,76]. To achieve this goal, different polysaccharides can be mixed prior to the conjugation process. Typically, however, there are separate conjugates for each polysaccharide, with the different polysaccharides being mixed after conjugation. The separate conjugates are typically based on the same carrier, as discussed above.
The further antigen(s) may in particular be selected from the group consisting of serogroup A capsular polysaccharide, serogroup C capsular polysaccharide, serogroup Y capsular polysaccharide and serogroup W135 capsular polysaccharide. Typically, the further antigen(s) selected from this group are each separately conjugated to a carrier protein. Preferred carrier proteins are bacterial toxins, such as diphtheria or tetanus toxins, or toxoids or mutants thereof, particularly diphtheria toxoid or tetanus toxoid. The inventors have found that the CRM197 diphtheria toxin mutant is particularly suitable. Protein D from H.influenzae may also be used. Typically, the same carrier protein is used for all of the conjugates, optionally including the N.meningitidis serogroup X conjugate. The inventors have found that the CRM197 diphtheria toxin mutant is particularly suitable, although diphtheria toxoid and tetanus toxoid may also be used. As noted above, the inventors have found that the use of a different carrier for the N.meningitidis serogroup X conjugate may reduce immune interference when the conjugate is combined with further conjugate(s). Accordingly, in some embodiments, the N.meningitidis serogroup X conjugate uses one carrier (particularly tetanus toxoid or SEQ ID NO: 9 of ref. 65 and ref. 66), while the further conjugate(s) uses a different carrier (particularly CRM197).
The following combinations are specifically envisaged for use in the invention:
1. 1) a N.meningitidis serogroup X conjugate and a conjugate of a serogroup A capsular polysaccharide and a carrier protein;
2. 2) a N.meningitidis serogroup X conjugate and a conjugate of a serogroup W135 capsular polysaccharide and a carrier protein;
3. 3) a N.meningitidis serogroup X conjugate, a conjugate of a serogroup A capsular polysaccharide and a carrier protein, and a conjugate of a serogroup W135 capsular polysaccharide and a carrier protein; and
4. 4) a N.meningitidis serogroup X conjugate, a conjugate of a serogroup A capsular polysaccharide and a carrier protein, a conjugate of a serogroup C capsular polysaccharide and a carrier protein, a conjugate of a serogroup W135 capsular polysaccharide and a carrier protein, and a conjugate of a serogroup Y capsular polysaccharide and a carrier protein.
By including antigens from serogroup X and serogroup A and/or serogroup W135, compositions comprising combinations 1)-3) can provide protection against the serogroups that cause the majority of N.meningitidis disease in Africa. Such combinations are therefore particularly preferred. Although the addition of further antigens, e.g. the antigens from serogroups C and Y included in combination 4), may provide additional protection, the benefit of this additional protection may not outweigh the additional costs involved. Accordingly, in some embodiments of the invention, the composition does not contain an antigen from serogroup C, particularly a conjugate of a serogroup C capsular polysaccharide and a carrier protein. Similarly, in the same or other embodiments of the invention, the composition does not contain an antigen from serogroup Y, particularly a conjugate of a serogroup Y capsular polysaccharide and a carrier protein.
The further antigen(s) may comprise additional bacterial, viral or parasitic antigens. These may be selected from the following:
- a saccharide antigen from Streptococcus pneumoniae [e.g. refs. 77-79; chapters 22 & 23 of ref. 86].
- an antigen from hepatitis A virus, such as inactivated virus [e.g. 80, 81; chapter 15 of ref. 86].
- an antigen from hepatitis B virus, such as the surface and/or core antigens [e.g. 81,82; chpater 16 of ref. 86].
- an antigen from hepatitis C virus [e.g. 83].
- an antigen from Bordetella pertussis, such as pertussis holotoxin (PT) and filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) from B.pertussis, optionally also in combination with pertactin and/or agglutinogens 2 and 3 [e.g. refs. 84 & 85; chapter 21 of ref. 86].
- a diphtheria antigen, such as a diphtheria toxoid [e.g. chapter 13 of ref. 86].
- a tetanus antigen, such as a tetanus toxoid [e.g. chapter 27 of ref. 86].
- a saccharide antigen from Haemophilus influenzae B [e.g. chapter 14 of ref. 86]
- an antigen from Chlamydia pneumoniae [e.g. 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93].
- an antigen from Chlamydia trachomatis [e.g. 94].
- an antigen from Porphyromonas gingivalis [e.g. 95].
- polio antigen(s) [e.g. 96, 97; chapter 24 of ref. 86] such as IPV.
- rabies antigen(s) [e.g. 98] such as lyophilised inactivated virus [e.g. 99, RabAvert™].
- measles, mumps and/or rubella antigens [e.g. chapters 19, 20 and 26 of ref. 86].
- influenza antigen(s) [e.g. chapters 17 & 18 of ref. 86], such as the haemagglutinin and/or neuraminidase surface proteins.
- an antigen from Moraxella catarrhalis [e.g. 100].
- an antigen from Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococcus) [e.g. 101, 102, 103].
- an antigen from Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococcus) [e.g. 64, 104-106].
- an antigen from S.epidermidis [e.g. type I, II and/or III capsular polysaccharide obtainable from strains ATCC-31432, SE-360 and SE-10 as described in refs. 107, 108 and 109.
Where a saccharide or carbohydrate antigen is used, it is typically conjugated to a carrier in order to enhance immunogenicity. Conjugation of H.influenzae B, meningococcal and pneumococcal saccharide antigens is well known.
Toxic protein antigens may be detoxified where necessary (e.g. detoxification of pertussis toxin by chemical and/or genetic means [85]).
Where a diphtheria antigen is included in the composition it is typical also to include tetanus antigen and pertussis antigens. Similarly, where a tetanus antigen is included it is typical also to include diphtheria and pertussis antigens. Similarly, where a pertussis antigen is included it is typical also to include diphtheria and tetanus antigens.
Antigens may be adsorbed to an aluminium salt.
Antigens in the composition will typically be present at a concentration of at least 1µg/ml each. In general, the concentration of any given antigen will be sufficient to elicit an immune response against that antigen.
As an alternative to using proteins antigens in the composition of the invention, nucleic acid encoding the antigen may be used [e.g. refs. 110 to 118]. Protein components of the compositions of the invention may thus be replaced by nucleic acid (usually DNA e.g. in the form of a plasmid) that encodes the protein.
In practical terms, there may be an upper limit to the number of antigens included in compositions of the invention. The number of antigens in a composition of the invention may be less than 20, less than 19, less than 18, less than 17, less than 16, less than 15, less than 14, less than 13, less than 12, less than 11, less than 10, less than 9, less than 8, less than 7, less than 6, less than 5, less than 4, or less than 3.

Pharmaceutical compositions and methods
Pharmaceutical composition comprise (a) a N.meningitidis serogroup X conjugate, and (b) a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. Typical 'pharmaceutically acceptable carriers' include any carrier that does not itself induce the production of antibodies harmful to the individual receiving the composition. Suitable carriers are typically large, slowly metabolised macromolecules such as proteins, polysaccharides, polylactic acids, polyglycolic acids, polymeric amino acids, amino acid copolymers, sucrose [119], trehalose [120], lactose, and lipid aggregates (such as oil droplets or liposomes). Such carriers are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. The vaccines may also contain diluents, such as water, saline, glycerol, etc. Additionally, auxiliary substances, such as wetting or emulsifying agents, pH buffering substances, and the like, may be present. Sterile pyrogen-free, phosphate-buffered physiologic saline is a typical carrier. A thorough discussion of pharmaceutically acceptable excipients is available in reference 121.
Compositions of the invention may be in an aqueous formulation (i.e. solutions or suspensions) or in a dried form (e.g. lyophilised). Aqueous formulations are preferred because the inventors have found that the serogroup X capsular polysaccharide is surprisingly stable in an aqueous environment. If a dried vaccine is used then it will be reconstituted into an aqueous formulation prior to injection. Lyophilisation of conjugate vaccines is known in the art e.g. the Menjugate™ product is presented in lyophilised form, whereas NeisVac-C™ and Meningitec™ are presented in aqueous form. To stabilise conjugates during lyophilisation, it may be typical to include a sugar alcohol (e.g. mannitol) or a disaccharide (e.g. sucrose or trehalose) e.g. at between 1mg/ml and 30mg/ml (e.g. about 25 mg/ml) in the composition. After reconstitution, these stabilisers may be present in the aqueous formulation.
Compositions may be presented in vials, or they may be presented in ready-filled syringes. The syringes may be supplied with or without needles. A syringe will include a single dose of the composition, whereas a vial may include a single dose or multiple doses.
Aqueous formulations of the invention are also suitable for reconstituting other vaccines from a lyophilised form. Where a composition of the invention is to be used for such extemporaneous reconstitution, the invention provides a kit, which may comprise two vials, or may comprise one ready-filled syringe and one vial, with the contents of the syringe being used to reactivate the contents of the vial prior to injection.
Compositions of the invention may be packaged in unit dose form or in multiple dose form. For multiple dose forms, vials are preferred to pre-filled syringes. Effective dosage volumes can be routinely established, but a typical human dose of the composition has a volume of 0.5ml e.g. for intramuscular injection.
The pH of the composition is typically between 6 and 8, e.g. about 7. Stable pH may be maintained by the use of a buffer. Typical buffers, e.g. for use in the aqueous formulations of the invention, are phosphate salts. For example, a mixture of anhydrous dibasic sodium phosphate and monobasic sodium phosphate is typical. A suitable concentration is 10 mM anhydrous dibasic sodium phosphate and 10 mM monobasic sodium phosphate. If a composition comprises an aluminium hydroxide salt, it is typical to use a histidine buffer [122]. The composition may be sterile and/or pyrogen-free. Compositions of the invention may be isotonic with respect to humans.
Compositions of the invention are immunogenic, and are more preferably vaccine compositions. Vaccines according to the invention may either be prophylactic (i.e. to prevent infection) or therapeutic (i.e. to treat infection), but will typically be prophylactic. Immunogenic compositions used as vaccines comprise an immunologically effective amount of antigen(s), as well as any other components, as needed. By 'immunologically effective amount', it is meant that the administration of that amount to an individual, either in a single dose or as part of a series, is effective for treatment or prevention. This amount varies depending upon the health and physical condition of the individual to be treated, age, the taxonomic group of individual to be treated (e.g. non-human primate, primate, etc.), the capacity of the individual's immune system to synthesise antibodies, the degree of protection desired, the formulation of the vaccine, the treating doctor's assessment of the medical situation, and other relevant factors. It is expected that the amount will fall in a relatively broad range that can be determined through routine trials.
Within each dose, the quantity of an individual saccharide antigen will generally be between 1-50 µg (measured as mass of saccharide) e.g. about 1µg, about 2.5µg, about 4µg, about 5µg, or about 10µg.
N.meningitidis affects various areas of the body and so the compositions of the invention may be prepared in various forms. For example, the compositions may be prepared as injectables, either as aqueous solutions or suspensions. The composition may be prepared for pulmonary administration e.g. as an inhaler, using a fine powder or a spray. The composition may be prepared as a suppository or pessary. The composition may be prepared for nasal, aural or ocular administration e.g. as spray, drops, gel or powder [e.g. refs 123 & 124]. Success with nasal administration of pneumococcal saccharides [125,126],Hib saccharides [127], MenC saccharides [128], and mixtures of Hib and MenC saccharide conjugates [129] has been reported.
Compositions of the invention may include an antimicrobial, particularly when packaged in multiple dose format.
Compositions of the invention may comprise detergent e.g. a Tween (polysorbate), such as Tween 80. Detergents are generally present at low levels e.g. <0.01%.
Compositions of the invention may include sodium salts (e.g. sodium chloride) to give tonicity. A concentration of 2-20mg/ml, e.g. about 10+2mg/ml or about 5±1mg/ml (particularly about 4.25mg) NaCl is typical.
Compositions of the invention will generally include a buffer. A phosphate buffer is typical.
Compositions of the invention will generally be administered in conjunction with other immunoregulatory agents. In particular, compositions will usually include one or more adjuvants. Such adjuvants include, but are not limited to:

A. Mineral-containing compositions
Mineral containing compositions suitable for use as adjuvants in the invention include mineral salts, such as aluminium salts and calcium salts. The invention includes mineral salts such as hydroxides (e.g. oxyhydroxides), phosphates (e.g. hydroxyphosphates, orthophosphates), sulphates, etc. [e.g. see chapters 8 & 9 of ref. 130], or mixtures of different mineral compounds (e.g. a mixture of a phosphate and a hydroxide adjuvant, optionally with an excess of the phosphate), with the compounds taking any suitable form (e.g. gel, crystalline, amorphous, etc.), and with adsorption to the salt(s) being typical. The mineral containing compositions may also be formulated as a particle of metal salt [131].
Aluminum salts may be included in vaccines of the invention such that the dose of Al^{3+} is between 0.2 and 1.0 mg per dose.
A typical aluminium phosphate adjuvant is amorphous aluminium hydroxyphosphate with PO_4/Al molar ratio between 0.84 and 0.92, included at 0.6mg Al^{3+}/ml. Adsorption with a low dose of aluminium phosphate may be used e.g. between 50 and 100µg Al^{3+} per conjugate per dose. Where an aluminium phosphate it used and it is desired not to adsorb an antigen to the adjuvant, this is favoured by including free phosphate ions in solution (e.g. by the use of a phosphate buffer).

B. Oil Emulsions
Oil emulsion compositions suitable for use as adjuvants in the invention include squalene-water emulsions, such as MF59 (5% Squalene, 0.5% Tween 80, and 0.5% Span 85, formulated into submicron particles using a microfluidizer) [Chapter 10 of ref. 130; see also refs. 132-134]. MF59 is used as the adjuvant in the FLUAD™ influenza virus trivalent subunit vaccine.
Particularly useful adjuvants for use in the compositions are submicron oil-in-water emulsions. Preferred submicron oil-in-water emulsions for use herein are squalene/water emulsions optionally containing varying amounts of MTP-PE, such as a submicron oil-in-water emulsion containing 4-5% w/v squalene, 0.25-1.0% w/v Tween 80 (polyoxyelthylenesorbitan monooleate), and/or 0.25-1.0% Span 85 (sorbitan trioleate), and, optionally, N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isogluatminyl-L-alanine-2-(1'-2'-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-hydroxyphosphophoryloxy)-ethylamine (MTP-PE). Submicron oil-in-water emulsions, methods of making the same and immunostimulating agents, such as muramyl peptides, for use in the compositions, are described in detail in references 132 & 135-136.
Complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) and incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA) may also be used as adjuvants in the invention.

C. Saponin formulations [chapter 22 of ref. 130]
Saponin formulations may also be used as adjuvants in the invention. Saponins are a heterologous group of sterol glycosides and triterpenoid glycosides that are found in the bark, leaves, stems, roots and even flowers of a wide range of plant species. Saponins isolated from the bark of the Quillaia saponaria Molina tree have been widely studied as adjuvants. Saponin can also be commercially obtained from Smilax ornata (sarsaprilla), Gypsophilla paniculata (brides veil), and Saponaria officianalis (soap root). Saponin adjuvant formulations include purified formulations, such as QS21, as well as lipid formulations, such as ISCOMs.
Saponin compositions have been purified using HPLC and RP-HPLC. Specific purified fractions using these techniques have been identified, including QS7, QS17, QS18, QS21, QH-A, QH-B and QH-C. Preferably, the saponin is QS21. A method of production of QS21 is disclosed in ref. 137. Saponin formulations may also comprise a sterol, such as cholesterol [138].
Combinations of saponins and cholesterols can be used to form unique particles called immunostimulating complexes (ISCOMs) [chapter 23 of ref. 130]. ISCOMs typically also include a phospholipid such as phosphatidylethanolamine or phosphatidylcholine. Any known saponin can be used in ISCOMs. Preferably, the ISCOM includes one or more of QuilA, QHA and QHC. ISCOMs are further described in refs. 138-140. Optionally, the ISCOMS may be devoid of additional detergent(s) [141].
A review of the development of saponin based adjuvants can be found in refs. 142 & 143.

D. Virosomes and virus-like particles
Virosomes and virus-like particles (VLPs) can also be used as adjuvants in the invention. These structures generally contain one or more proteins from a virus optionally combined or formulated with a phospholipid. They are generally non-pathogenic, non-replicating and generally do not contain any of the native viral genome. The viral proteins may be recombinantly produced or isolated from whole viruses. These viral proteins suitable for use in virosomes or VLPs include proteins derived from influenza virus (such as HA or NA), Hepatitis B virus (such as core or capsid proteins), Hepatitis E virus, measles virus, Sindbis virus, Rotavirus, Foot-and-Mouth Disease virus, Retrovirus, Norwalk virus, human Papilloma virus, HIV, RNA-phages, Qβ-phage (such as coat proteins), GA-phage, fr-phage, AP205 phage, and Ty (such as retrotransposon Ty protein p1). VLPs are discussed further in refs. 144-149. Virosomes are discussed further in, for example, ref. 150

E. Bacterial or microbial derivatives
Adjuvants suitable for use in the invention include bacterial or microbial derivatives such as non-toxic derivatives of enterobacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), Lipid A derivatives, immunostimulatory oligonucleotides and ADP-ribosylating toxins and detoxified derivatives thereof.
Non-toxic derivatives of LPS include monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) and 3-O-deacylated MPL (3dMPL). 3dMPL is a mixture of 3 de-O-acylated monophosphoryl lipid A with 4, 5 or 6 acylated chains. A preferred "small particle" form of 3 De-O-acylated monophosphoryl lipid A is disclosed in ref. 151. Such "small particles" of 3dMPL are small enough to be sterile filtered through a 0.22µm membrane [151]. Other non-toxic LPS derivatives include monophosphoryl lipid A mimics, such as aminoalkyl glucosaminide phosphate derivatives e.g. RC-529 [152,153].
Lipid A derivatives include derivatives of lipid A from Escherichia coli such as OM-174. OM-174 is described for example in refs. 154 & 155.
Immunostimulatory oligonucleotides suitable for use as adjuvants in the invention include nucleotide sequences containing a CpG motif (a dinucleotide sequence containing an unmethylated cytosine linked by a phosphate bond to a guanosine). Double-stranded RNAs and oligonucleotides containing palindromic or poly(dG) sequences have also been shown to be immunostimulatory.
The CpG's can include nucleotide modifications/analogs such as phosphorothioate modifications and can be double-stranded or single-stranded. References 156, 157 and 158 disclose possible analog substitutions e.g. replacement of guanosine with 2'-deoxy-7-deazaguanosine. The adjuvant effect of CpG oligonucleotides is further discussed in refs. 159-164.
The CpG sequence may be directed to TLR9, such as the motif GTCGTT or TTCGTT [165]. The CpG sequence may be specific for inducing a Th1 immune response, such as a CpG-A ODN, or it may be more specific for inducing a B cell response, such a CpG-B ODN. CpG-A and CpG-B ODNs are discussed in refs. 166-168. Preferably, the CpG is a CpG-A ODN.
Preferably, the CpG oligonucleotide is constructed so that the 5' end is accessible for receptor recognition. Optionally, two CpG oligonucleotide sequences may be attached at their 3' ends to form "immunomers". See, for example, refs. 165 & 169-171.
Bacterial ADP-ribosylating toxins and detoxified derivatives thereof may be used as adjuvants in the invention. Preferably, the protein is derived from E. coli (E. coli heat labile enterotoxin "LT"), cholera ("CT"), or pertussis ("PT"). The use of detoxified ADP-ribosylating toxins as mucosal adjuvants is described in ref. 172 and as parenteral adjuvants in ref. 173. The toxin or toxoid is preferably in the form of a holotoxin, comprising both A and B subunits. Preferably, the A subunit contains a detoxifying mutation; preferably the B subunit is not mutated. Preferably, the adjuvant is a detoxified LT mutant such as LT-K63, LT-R72, and LT-G192. The use of ADP-ribosylating toxins and detoxified derivaties thereof, particularly LT-K63 and LT-R72, as adjuvants can be found in refs. 174-181. Numerical reference for amino acid substitutions is preferably based on the alignments of the A and B subunits of ADP-ribosylating toxins set forth in ref. 182, specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

F. Human immunomodulators
Human immunomodulators suitable for use as adjuvants in the invention include cytokines, such as interleukins (e.g. IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-12 [183], etc.) [184], interferons (e.g. interferon-y), macrophage colony stimulating factor, and tumor necrosis factor.

G. Bioadhesives and Mucoadhesives
Bioadhesives and mucoadhesives may also be used as adjuvants in the invention. Suitable bioadhesives include esterified hyaluronic acid microspheres [185] or mucoadhesives such as cross-linked derivatives of poly(acrylic acid), polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl pyrollidone, polysaccharides and carboxymethylcellulose. Chitosan and derivatives thereof may also be used as adjuvants in the invention [186].

H. Microparticles
Microparticles may also be used as adjuvants in the invention. Microparticles (i.e. a particle of ∼100nm to ∼150µm in diameter, more preferably ∼200nm to ∼30µm in diameter, and most preferably ∼500nm to ∼10µm in diameter) formed from materials that are biodegradable and non-toxic (e.g. a poly(α-hydroxy acid), a polyhydroxybutyric acid, a polyorthoester, a polyanhydride, a polycaprolactone, etc.), with poly(lactide-co-glycolide) are preferred, optionally treated to have a negatively-charged surface (e.g. with SDS) or a positively-charged surface (e.g. with a cationic detergent, such as CTAB).

I. Liposomes (Chapters 13 & 14 of ref. 130)
Examples of liposome formulations suitable for use as adjuvants are described in refs. 187-189.

J. Polyoxyethylene ether and polyoxyethylene ester formulations
Adjuvants suitable for use in the invention include polyoxyethylene ethers and polyoxyethylene esters [190]. Such formulations further include polyoxyethylene sorbitan ester surfactants in combination with an octoxynol [191] as well as polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers or ester surfactants in combination with at least one additional non-ionic surfactant such as an octoxynol [192]. Preferred polyoxyethylene ethers are selected from the following group: polyoxyethylene-9-lauryl ether (laureth 9), polyoxyethylene-9-steoryl ether, polyoxytheylene-8-steoryl ether, polyoxyethylene-4-lauryl ether, polyoxyethylene-35-lauryl ether, and polyoxyethylene-23-lauryl ether.

K. Polyphosphazene (PCPP)
PCPP formulations are described, for example, in refs. 193 and 194.

L. Muramyl peptides
Examples of muramyl peptides suitable for use as adjuvants in the invention include N-acetyl-muramyl-L-threonyl-D-isoglutamine (thr-MDP), N-acetyl-normuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutamine (nor-MDP), and N-acetylmuramyl-L-alanyl-D-isoglutaminyl-L-alanine-2-(1'-2'-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-hydroxyphosphoryloxy)-ethylamine MTP-PE).

M. Imidazoquinolone Compounds.
Examples of imidazoquinolone compounds suitable for use adjuvants in the invention include Imiquamod and its homologues (e,g. "Resiquimod 3M"), described further in refs. 195 and 196.

N. Thiosemicarbazone Compounds.
Examples of thiosemicarbazone compounds, as well as methods of formulating, manufacturing, and screening for compounds all suitable for use as adjuvants in the invention include those described in ref. 197. The thiosemicarbazones are particularly effective in the stimulation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells for the production of cytokines, such as TNF-α.
O
.
Tryptanthrin Compounds.
Examples of tryptanthrin compounds, as well as methods of formulating, manufacturing, and screening for compounds all suitable for use as adjuvants in the invention include those described in ref. 198. The tryptanthrin compounds are particularly effective in the stimulation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells for the production of cytokines, such as TNF-α.
The immunogenic compositions may also comprise combinations of one or more of the adjuvants identified above. For example, the following combinations may be used as adjuvant compositions in the invention: (1) a saponin and an oil-in-water emulsion [199]; (2) a saponin (e.g. QS21) + a non-toxic LPS derivative (e.g. 3dMPL) [200]; (3) a saponin (e.g. QS21) + a non-toxic LPS derivative (e.g. 3dMPL) + a cholesterol; (4) a saponin (e.g. QS21) + 3dMPL + IL-12 (optionally + a sterol) [201]; (5) combinations of 3dMPL with, for example, QS21 and/or oil-in-water emulsions [202]; (6) SAF, containing 10% squalane, 0.4% Tween 80™, 5% pluronic-block polymer L121, and thr-MDP, either microfluidized into a submicron emulsion or vortexed to generate a larger particle size emulsion. (7) Ribi™ adjuvant system (RAS), (Ribi Immunochem) containing 2% squalene, 0.2% Tween 80, and one or more bacterial cell wall components from the group consisting of monophosphorylipid A (MPL), trehalose dimycolate (TDM), and cell wall skeleton (CWS), preferably MPL + CWS (Detox™); and (8) one or more mineral salts (such as an aluminium salt) + a non-toxic derivative of LPS (such as 3dMPL).
Other substances that act as immunostimulating agents are disclosed in chapter 7 of ref. 130.
The use of aluminium salt adjuvants is particularly useful, and antigens are generally adsorbed to such salts. The Menjugate™ and NeisVac™ conjugates use a hydroxide adjuvant, whereas Meningitec™ uses a phosphate adjuvant. It is possible in compositions of the invention to adsorb some antigens to an aluminium hydroxide but to have other antigens in association with an aluminium phosphate. Typically, however, only a single salt is used, e.g. a hydroxide or a phosphate, but not both. Not all conjugates need to be adsorbed i.e. some or all can be free in solution.

Methods of treatment
The invention discloses a method for raising an immune response in a mammal, comprising administering a pharmaceutical composition of the invention to the mammal. The immune response is preferably protective and preferably involves antibodies. The method may raise a booster response.
The mammal is preferably a human. Where the vaccine is for prophylactic use, the human is preferably a child (e.g. a toddler or infant) or a teenager; where the vaccine is for therapeutic use, the human is preferably an adult. A vaccine intended for children may also be administered to adults e.g. to assess safety, dosage, immunogenicity, etc.
The invention also provides an immunogenic composition of the invention for use as a medicament. The medicament is preferably able to raise an immune response in a mammal (i.e. it is an immunogenic composition) and is more preferably a vaccine.
Preferred compositions of the invention can confer an antibody titre in a patient that is superior to the criterion for seroprotection for each antigenic component for an acceptable percentage of human subjects. Antigens with an associated antibody titre above which a host is considered to be seroconverted against the antigen are well known, and such titres are published by organisations such as WHO. Preferably more than 80% of a statistically significant sample of subjects is seroconverted, more preferably more than 90%, still more preferably more than 93% and most preferably 96-100%.
Compositions of the invention will generally be administered directly to a patient. Direct delivery may be accomplished by parenteral injection (e.g. subcutaneously, intraperitoneally, intravenously, intramuscularly, or to the interstitial space of a tissue), or by rectal, oral, vaginal, topical, transdermal, intranasal, ocular, aural, pulmonary or other mucosal administration. Intramuscular administration to the thigh or the upper arm is preferred. Injection may be via a needle (e.g. a hypodermic needle), but needle-free injection may alternatively be used. A typical intramuscular dose is 0.5 ml.
The invention may be used to elicit systemic and/or mucosal immunity.
Dosage treatment can be a single dose schedule or a multiple dose schedule. Multiple doses may be used in a primary immunisation schedule and/or in a booster immunisation schedule. A primary dose schedule may be followed by a booster dose schedule. Suitable timing between priming doses (e.g. between 4-16 weeks), and between priming and boosting, can be routinely determined.

Exemplary carrier proteins
As discussed above, the inventors have found that the carrier proteins described in ref. 65 and ref. 66 are particularly suitable for use as a carrier molecule in the invention, especially the protein of SEQ ID NO: 9 in those documents (which is also SEQ ID NO: 9 herein).
These carrier molecules comprise a spr0096 antigen and a spr2021 antigen. Typically, the carrier molecule comprises the spr0096 antigen and the spr2021 antigen as a single polypeptide chain (a "hybrid" polypeptide). The spr0096 antigen, spr2021 antigen and the nature of the hybrid polypeptide are described in more detail below.

spr0096 antigen
The original 'spr0096' polypeptide sequence was annotated in reference 203 as 'hypothetical protein' (see GI: 15902140). For reference purposes, the amino acid sequence of full length spr0096 as found in the R6 strain is given as SEQ ID NO: 1 herein.
The spr0096 antigen of the invention comprises at least one CD4+ T cell epitope. CD4+ T cells help B lymphocytes to produce antibodies against antigens [204]. T-cell epitopes can be identified empirically (e.g. using PEPSCAN [205,206] or similar methods), or they can be predicted (e.g. using the Jameson-Wolf antigenic index [207], matrix-based approaches [208], TEPITOPE [209], neural networks [210], OptiMer & EpiMer [211,212], ADEPT [213], Tsites [214], hydrophilicity [215], antigenic index [216] or the methods disclosed in reference 217, etc.).
Preferred spr0096 antigens for use with the invention comprise an amino acid sequence: (a) having 50% or more identity (e.g. 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5% or more) to SEQ ID NO: 1; and/or (b) comprising a fragment of at least 'n' consecutive amino acids of SEQ ID NO: 1, wherein 'n' is 7 or more (e.g. 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 150, 200, 250 or more). These spr0096 polypeptides include variants of SEQ ID NO: 1 (e.g. SEQ ID NO: 2; see below). Preferred fragments of (b) comprise at least one CD4+ T cell epitope from SEQ ID NO: 1. Other preferred fragments lack one or more amino acids (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25 or more) from the C-terminus and/or one or more amino acids (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25 or more) from the N-terminus of SEQ ID NO: 1 while retaining at least one CD4+ T cell epitope of SEQ ID NO: 1. Other fragments omit one or more protein domains. One suitable fragment is SEQ ID NO: 14, which omits the natural leader peptide sequence. The spr0096 antigen may consist of a single CD4+ T cell epitope from SEQ ID NO: 1.
A variant form of spr0096, with an insert near its C-terminus relative to SEQ ID NO: 1, is SEQ ID NO: 2 herein. The use of this variant for immunisation is reported in reference 218 (SEQ ID NO: 150 therein), where it is annotated as a LysM domain protein. Thus a spr0096 antigen for use with the invention may comprise an amino acid sequence: (a) having 50% or more identity (e.g. 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5% or more) to SEQ ID NO: 2; and/or (b) comprising a fragment of at least 'n' consecutive amino acids of SEQ ID NO: 2, wherein 'n' is 7 or more (e.g. 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 150, 200, 250 or more). These polypeptides include variants of SEQ ID NO: 2. Preferred fragments of (b) comprise at least one CD4+ T cell epitope from SEQ ID NO: 2. Other preferred fragments lack one or more amino acids (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25 or more) from the C-terminus and/or one or more amino acids (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25 or more) from the N-terminus of SEQ ID NO: 2 while retaining at least one CD4+ T cell epitope of SEQ ID NO: 2. Other fragments omit one or more protein domains. One suitable fragment is SEQ ID NO: 15, which omits the natural leader peptide sequence. Immunogenic fragments of SEQ ID NO: 2 are identified in table 1 of reference 218. The spr0096 antigen may consist of a single CD4+ T cell epitope from SEQ ID NO: 2.
A spr0096 antigen may be used in the form of a dimer e.g. a homodimer.

spr2021 antigen
The original 'spr2021' polypeptide sequence was annotated in reference 203 as 'General stress protein GSP-781' (see GI: 15904062). For reference purposes, the amino acid sequence of full length spr2021 as found in the R6 strain is given as SEQ ID NO: 3 herein.
The spr2021 antigen of the invention comprises at least one CD4+ T cell epitope.
Preferred spr2021 antigens for use with the invention comprise an amino acid sequence: (a) having 50% or more identity (e.g. 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5% or more) to SEQ ID NO: 3; and/or (b) comprising a fragment of at least 'n' consecutive amino acids of SEQ ID NO: 3, wherein 'n' is 7 or more (e.g. 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 150, 200, 250 or more). These spr2021 polypeptides include variants of SEQ ID NO: 3. Preferred fragments of (b) comprise at least one CD4+ T cell epitope from SEQ ID NO: 3. Other preferred fragments lack one or more amino acids (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25 or more) from the C-terminus and/or one or more amino acids (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25 or more) from the N-terminus of SEQ ID NO: 3 while retaining at least one CD4+ T cell epitope of SEQ ID NO: 3. Other fragments omit one or more protein domains. One suitable fragment is SEQ ID NO: 4, which omits the natural leader peptide sequence. The spr0096 antigen may consist of a single CD4+ T cell epitope from SEQ ID NO: 3.
Reference 218 annotates spr2021 as a secreted 45kDa protein with homology to GbpB and discloses its use as an immunogen (SEQ ID NO: 243 therein; SP2216). Immunogenic fragments of spr2021 are identified in table 1 of reference 218 (page 73). Another useful fragment of spr2021 is disclosed as SEQ ID NO: 1 of reference 219 (amino acids 28-278 of SEQ ID NO: 3 herein).

Hybrid polypeptide
Typically, the spr0096 antigen and spr2021 antigen are expressed as a single polypeptide chain (a 'hybrid' polypeptide). Hybrid polypeptides can be represented by the formula NH_2-A-{-X-L-}_n-B-COOH, wherein: A is an optional N-terminal amino acid sequence; B is an optional C-terminal amino acid sequence; n is an integer of 2 or more (e.g. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, etc.); each X is an amino acid sequence of an spr0096 antigen or an spr2021 antigen (as described above), wherein at least one X is an spr0096 antigen and at least one X is an spr2021 antigen; and L is an optional linker amino acid sequence. Usually n is 2. When n is 2, X_1 is usually an spr0096 antigen and X_2 is usually an spr2021 antigen. When n is more than 2, each spr0096 antigen (when more than one is present) may be the same or different and each spr2021 antigen (when more than one is present) may be the same or different.
The spr0096 antigen or spr2021 antigen that is the amino acid sequence of each X is as defined above. Where these antigens are defined in terms of (a) having 50% or more identity (e.g. 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5% or more) to a given sequence; and/or (b) comprising a fragment of at least 'n' consecutive amino acids of a given sequence, wherein 'n' is 7 or more (e.g. 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 150, 200, 250 or more), the level of identity in (a) and the value of 'n' in (b) may be the same for each X.
The leader peptide sequence in the wild-type form of each -X- moiety may be included or omitted in the hybrid protein. In some embodiments, the leader peptides will be deleted except for that of the -X- moiety located at the N-terminus of the hybrid protein i.e. the leader peptide of X_1 will be retained, but the leader peptides of X_2 ... X_n will be omitted. This is equivalent to deleting all leader peptides and using the leader peptide of X_1 as moiety -A-.
For each n instances of {-X-L-}, linker amino acid sequence -L- may be present or absent. For instance, when n=2 the hybrid may be NH_2-X_1-L_1-X_2-L_2-COOH, NH_2-X_1-X_2-COOH, NH_2-X_1-L_1-X_2-COOH, NH_2-X_1-X_2-L_2-COOH, etc. Linker amino acid sequence(s) -L- will typically be short (e.g. 20 or fewer amino acids i.e. 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1). Examples comprise short peptide sequences which facilitate cloning, poly-glycine linkers (i.e. comprising Gly_n where n = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more), and histidine tags (i.e. His_n where n = 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more). Other suitable linker amino acid sequences will be apparent to those skilled in the art. A useful linker is GSGGGG (SEQ ID NO:5) or GSGSGGGG (SEQ ID NO:6), with the Gly-Ser dipeptide being formed from a BamHI restriction site, thus aiding cloning and manipulation, and the (Gly)_4 tetrapeptide being a typical poly-glycine linker. Other suitable linkers, particularly for use as the final L_n are a Leu-Glu dipeptide or SEQ ID NO: 7.
-A- is an optional N-terminal amino acid sequence. This will typically be short (e.g. 40 or fewer amino acids i.e. 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1). Examples include leader sequences to direct protein trafficking, or short peptide sequences which facilitate cloning or purification (e.g. histidine tags i.e. His_n where n = 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more). Other suitable N-terminal amino acid sequences will be apparent to those skilled in the art. If X_1 lacks its own N-terminus methionine, -A-is preferably an oligopeptide (e.g. with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 amino acids) which provides a N-terminus methionine e.g. Met-Ala-Ser, or a single Met residue.
-B- is an optional C-terminal amino acid sequence. This will typically be short (e.g. 40 or fewer amino acids i.e. 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1). Examples include sequences to direct protein trafficking, short peptide sequences which facilitate cloning or purification (e.g. comprising histidine tags i.e. His_n where n = 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 or more, such as SEQ ID NO: 8), or sequences which enhance protein stability. Other suitable C-terminal amino acid sequences will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
Examples of hybrids include polypeptides that comprise an amino acid sequence of spr0096-spr2021 (e.g. SEQ ID NO: 9) or spr2021-spr0096 (e.g. SEQ ID NO: 10). The hybrid may also comprise an amino acid sequence having 50% or more identity (e.g. 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5% or more) to SEQ ID NO: 9 or 10. Typically, the hybrid comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 9. The hybrid may also comprise an amino acid sequence having 50% or more identity (e.g. 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5% or more) to SEQ ID NO: 9.
In particular embodiments, the carrier molecule comprises (a) one or more (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc.) CD4+ T cell epitopes from SEQ ID NO: 2; and (b) one or more (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc.) CD4+ T cell epitopes from SEQ ID NO: 3.

Method for assaying a sample
A method for assaying a sample suspected to contain serogroup X capsular polysaccharide is disclosed, comprising the steps of: (i) hydrolysing any serogroup X capsular polysaccharide in the sample, to give a hydrolysate; (ii) subjecting the hydrolysate to liquid chromatography; and (iii) detecting any glucosamine-4-phosphate separated in step (ii).
The method can be used for quantifying serogroup X capsular polysaccharide in the sample. In this way, it is possible to determine the concentration of the polysaccharide in the sample. Typically, the quantification involves comparison with a N-acetylglucosamine-4-phosphate standard. However, other standards may be used, including glucosamine-6-phosphate.
Although the method has been developed for serogroup X capsular polysaccharide, it is suitable for any substance with glucosamine-4-phosphate in its structure, e.g. bacterial lipid A. Accordingly, also disclosed is a method for assaying a sample suspected to contain a substance with glucosamine-4-phosphate in its structure, comprising the steps of: (i) hydrolysing any substance with glucosamine-4-phosphate in its structure in the sample, to give a hydrolysate; (ii) subjecting the hydrolysate to liquid chromatography; and (iii) detecting any glucosamine-4-phosphate separated in step (ii).

Sample
The sample is typically a vaccine, e.g. when the method is used for polysaccharide quantification in the characterization of a vaccine product. However, the method can also be used as an in-process assay during vaccine manufacture. In these embodiments, the sample will be a process intermediate from the manufacturing process. The method is capable of quantifying very low concentrations of serogroup X capsular polysaccharide (≥0.5 µg/ml) and is therefore suitable for assaying serogroup X capsular polysaccharide in small samples, e.g. taken in-process during a manufacturing process. The method is also specific for serogroup X capsular polysaccharide, even when impurities are present. The sample may therefore be a fermentation broth, or a supernatant taken from a fermentation broth.
The sample may contain free (unconjugated) serogroup X capsular polysaccharide and/or conjugated serogroup X capsular polysaccharide. Thus the method may be used to assay polysaccharide prepared from a bacterium, polysaccharide after purification, polysaccharide prior to conjugation, and/or polysaccharide after conjugation.
In a sample containing conjugated serogroup X capsular polysaccharide, a comparison of levels of free polysaccharide to the total polysaccharide in a sample (i.e. the ratio of unconjugated polysaccharide : (unconjugated + conjugated) polysaccharide) can be used to determine stability. High levels of unconjugated polysaccharide are undesirable. A time-series of such assays can reveal if a conjugate is stable e.g. during storage. The level of free polysaccharide can also be used to check if a conjugation reaction has gone to completion.
The sample will typically be aqueous, but may have been reconstituted into aqueous form from a dried form e.g. from a lyophilisate. Thus the sample may contain lyophilisation stabilizers. These stabilizers include substances such as sugar alcohols (e.g. mannitol, etc.), disaccharides (e.g. sucrose, trehalose, etc.), and other simple saccharides. An advantage of the methods is that they can assay serogroup X capsular polysaccharide against a background of impurities, without requiring any pre-separation of the polysaccharide and the impurities.
The sample may be diluted prior to analysis. After analysis, the level of polysaccharide in the sample can then be related to the level in the original undiluted material. Dilution is useful, for example, to ensure that analysis of a sample gives a result within a desired portion of a calibration curve.
In addition to serogroup X capsular polysaccharide, the sample may contain other bacterial capsular saccharides e.g. from Haemophilus influenzae type B, from other meningococcal serogroups (e.g. A, C, W135 and/or Y), from Streptococcus pneumoniae, etc.
Samples may also include other components, such as non-antigen components often found in vaccines. For example, these may include carriers, adjuvants, excipients, buffers, etc., as described above.
In some situations, it is useful to spike the sample with a known amount of the analyte in question e.g. to add a known quantity of serogroup X capsular polysaccharide, either in conjugated or unconjugated form. Spiking studies can be useful for calibration, and for studying sensitivity, variability, recovery, etc.

Hydrolysis
The method involves hydrolysis of the serogroup X capsular polysaccharide. Typical hydrolysis methods involve acid hydrolysis e.g. using trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). The inventors have found that particularly effective conditions are treatment with 2M TFA for between 2 and 3 (e.g. 2.5) hours at 100°C. These conditions allow good release of the polysaccharide's monomer subunits, without their degradation. However, shorter or longer treatments, e.g. for between 1 and 6 hours, are also possible.
Total serogroup X capsular polysaccharide can be prepared from a sample including conjugated polysaccharide by subjecting the whole sample to hydrolysis, as described above. If measurement of only conjugated or unconjugated serogroup X capsular polysaccharide is desired, however, then conjugated and unconjugated polysaccharide should be separated from each other prior to hydrolysis. Suitable separation techniques include selective precipitation, size-based methods, solid-phase extraction [220], etc.

Liquid chromatography
The results of serogroup X capsular polysaccharide hydrolysis are analysed by liquid chromatography. Thus the methods will typically utilize a liquid chromatography column, and will involve analysing the output of such a column.
Various liquid chromatography columns can be used, but the method will typically be used with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The method is particularly useful for analysing the results of separation by high performance anion exchange chromatography (HPAEC) or by high performance cation exchange chromatography (HPCEC). HPAEC is a common technique used for saccharide characterisation, often in combination with pulsed amperometric detection (PAD) [221,222] to detect and quantify the polysaccharide. Suitable HPAEC-PAD systems are provided by Dionex™ Corporation (Sunnyvale, CA) e.g. the BioLC™ system. In these systems, the eluate from a HPAEC column is analysed using PAD i.e. based on electrical current. At suitable (high) pH, carbohydrates can be electrocatalytically oxidised at the surface of electrodes by applying a positive potential. The current generated is this way is proportional to the carbohydrate concentration, allowing detection and quantification of the carbohydrate by amperometry. Compared with simple amperometric detection, PAD intersperses short pulses of a cleaning and regeneration potential with the standard detecting potential, thereby avoiding difficulties that arise when oxidation products of analytes foul the electrodes.
Non-amperometric methods can be combined with PAD for analyzing eluates e.g. see ref. 223.
Thus the hydrolysed serogroup X capsular polysaccharide can be subjected to HPAEC for separation and the separated materials can be detected and, optionally, quantified by PAD. As shown in the examples below, HPAEC-PAD can separate hydrolysed glucosamine-4-phosphate residues from other background materials in a sample.
Preferred columns are those that spontaneously retain saccharides such that they have to be eluted from the column. Elution from the chromatography column can be an isocratic elution or a gradient elution. Eluents including hydroxide and/or acetate salts are typical eluents used during HPAEC-PAD analysis of saccharides. It is also possible, however, to use anions such as nitrate, chloride, etc. Sodium salts are typically used. For eluting analytes from AEC columns then the eluent will generally be basic e.g. the pH will be >8, >9, >10, >11, >12, >13, etc. Hydroxide salts (e.g. NaOH) can be used to achieve the desired pH.
Eluates may be subjected to chemical suppression of hydroxide ions, particularly where the ions interfere with an analytical detection technique that is being used. A micromembrane suppressor can conveniently be used, such as the MMS products from Dionex™. The 'MMS III' product uses continuous chemical suppression to enhance analyte conductivities while decreasing eluent conductivity, and enables direct conductivity detection with ion-exchange applications using isocratic or gradient elution over wide concentration ranges.
Suitable HPAEC columns for use with the methods are the "CarboPac" columns marketed by Dionex, such as the PA1 [10 µm diameter polystyrene substrate 2% crosslinked with divinylbenzene, agglomerated with 500 nm MicroBead quaternary ammonium functionalized latex (5% crosslinked)], PA100, PA20, PA10 [10 µm diameter ethylvinylbenzene substrate 55% crosslinked with divinylbenzene, agglomerated with 460 nm MicroBead difunctional quaternary ammonium ion (5% crosslinked)], PA200 or MA1 columns.
Analytical HPAEC columns can be used in conjunction with pre-columns and/or trap columns. For instance, a PA10 analytical column can be used in conjunction with an inline PA10 guard column, and/or an inline trap (pre-treatment) column. Such columns can remove materials that would otherwise interfere with analyses e.g. an "AminoTrap" column can remove amino acids prior to saccharide analysis. Borate traps can also be used. TYPICAL "AminoTrap" resin has a 10µm diameter substrate (ethylvinylbenzene 55% crosslinked with divinylbenzene) grafted with difunctional quaternary ammonium anion exchange sites, whereas a typical "BorateTrap "has a 20µm diameter high capacity resin with very high selectivity for borate.
The PA1 and PA10 columns are both anion-exchange columns designed to be used with PAD to deliver high resolution separations of mono- and disaccharides, and the resins in both are 10µm diameter nonporous beads covered with a fine latex of functionalized MicroBeads. Their pellicular resin structure permits excellent mass transfer, resulting in high resolution chromatography and rapid re-equilibration. Whereas PA1 is an all-purpose column suitable for determining monosaccharides and disaccharides in a variety of matrices, and is the column of choice for high resolution separations of linear polysaccharides, PA10 is optimized to determine the amino, neutral, and acidic monosaccharides that are found in the carbohydrate moieties of mammalian glycoproteins. The main difference between the PA1 and PA10 columns is that the resin in PA1 is polystyrene 2% crosslinked with divinylbenzene, but in PA10 it is ethylvinylbenzene 55% crosslinked with divinylbenzene.
To date, the most preferred HPAEC separation method for serogroup X capsular polysaccharide involves a CarboPac PA1 column (4x250mm) combined with a Guard PA1 pre-column (4x50mm).
After elution and detection, the method may include the further step of determining a characteristic of any serogroup X capsular polysaccharide that was identified in the sample e.g. its DP (typically an average DP), its molecular weight, its purity, etc.

Preparation of N-acetylglucosamine-4-phosphate
Processes and reagents useful for preparing N-acetylglucosamine-4-phosphate are disclosed. As discussed above, this compound can be used as an analytical standard in the method for assaying serogroup X capsular polysaccharide.
The process may comprise N-deprotecting a compound of formula A and N-acylating the deprotected compound to give a compound of formula B; wherein PG is an oxygen protecting group; PG_N is a nitrogen protecting group and all the PG groups are the same. PG and PG_N may be any suitable protecting group, for example as described in reference 224.
The process may comprise introducing an organophosphate group into a compound of formula B to give a compound of formula C: wherein both R_P groups are the same and R_P is either H or an arylmethyl phosphate protecting group, for example as described in reference 224; or the R_P groups are joined together to form a single arylmethyl protecting group, for example o-xylenyl. PG is as defined above and all the PG groups are the same. Where R_P is H, the compound of formula B is typically reacted with a phosphorylating reagent and an oxidising agent. The phosphorylating agent may be salicyl chlorophosphite, typically in the presence of pyridine and pivaloyl chloride. The phosphorylating agent may also be PCl_3 followed by water or aqueous NaHCO_3. The oxidising agent may be I_2 or mCPBA, typically I_2. Where the R_P groups are joined together to form a single protecting group, the compound of formula B is typically reacted with an o-xylene containing organophosphorus reagent and then an oxidising agent. The o-xylene containing organophosphorus reagent is typically a phosphoramidite such as N-diethyl-1,5-dihydro-3H-2,3,4-benzodioaxaphosphine-3-amine. The oxidising agent may be I_2 or mCPBA, typically mCPBA. Where the R_P groups are not joined together to form a single protecting group, the compound of formula B is typically reacted with a pyrophosphate reagent containing the R_P groups. A suitable pyrophosphate reagent is tetrabenzylpyrophospate, in which case R_P is a benzyl group.
The process may comprise deprotecting a compound of formula C to give N-acetylglucosamine-4-phosphate:
PG and R_P are as defined above and all PG groups are the same. Typically, when R_p is a phosphate protecting group, all the PG groups and the R_P group are removed in the same step, for example by hydrogenolysis.
A process for making a compound of formula A above, may comprise reducing a compound of formula Z to give a compound of formula A': wherein Ri is phenyl or phenyl substituted with one or more groups selected from alkyl, such as methyl or ethyl; O-alkyl, such as O-methyl; and nitro, such that the R_1CH_2- moiety in formula A' is a substituted or unsubstituted benzyl ether oxygen protecting group. The protecting group may for example be any suitable protecting group described in reference 224. In particular, the protecting group may be benzyl, p-methoxybenzyl, 3,4-dimethoxybenzyl, 2,6-dimethoxybenzyl, o-nitrobenzyl, p-nitrobenzyl, and is typically benzyl. PG_N is a nitrogen protecting group as defined above. Typical PG_N groups are phthalimide; carbamates such as Boc and Fmoc; nosyl, tosyl and mesyl. Particularly, PG_N is phthalimide. Typically, the reaction comprises reacting a compound of formula Z, wherein Ri is phenyl and PG_N is a pthalimide group, with a boron containing compound and a Lewis acid in an organic solvent to give a compound of formula A'. The boron containing compound may be a borohydirde reagent such as trialkylaminoborane, particularly triethylaminoborane or trimethylaminoborane, and is typically trimethylaminoborane. The Lewis acid may be AlCl_3 or a boron containing Lewis acid, such as a boron trifluoride complex, and is typically BF_3•Et_2O. The organic solvent may be a chlorinated organic solvent, for example CHCl_3 or CH_2Cl_2 or a non-chlorinated solvent, and is typically acetonitrile. The reaction may be carried out in a temperature range of from about -10 to about 10°C, from about -5 to about 5°C, typically at about 0°C.
An example of the process comprises step i) N-deprotecting a compound of formula A' and step ii) N-acylating the deprotected compound to give a compound of formula B': wherein Ri and PG_N are as defined above. Typically, the reaction comprises reacting a compound of formula A' wherein PG_N is phthalimide in step i) with 1,2-diaminoethane in an alcoholic solvent such as MeOH or EtOH, typically EtOH. Step i) is usually carried out between room temperature and the reflux point of the solvent, for example at a temperature of about 25°C or more, from about 25 to about 80°C, from about 35 to about 80°C, from about 45 to about 80°C, from about 55 to about 80°C, from about 65 to about 80°C, from about 75 to about 80°C typically about 80°C or about the refluxing point of the solvent. Step ii) includes adding an acylating agent. The acylating agent may be any suitable acylating agent, typically Ac_2O with an amine base such as pyridine or triethylamine or imidazole. Alternatively the acylating agent may be about a 4:1 mixture of EtOH:Ac_2O. Step ii) may be carried out at about room temperature, for example at about 25°C. Typically there is no purification step between steps i) and ii), for example only solvent from step i) is removed before step ii) performed.
An example of the process comprises introducing an organophosphate group into a compound of formula B' to give a compound of formula C': wherein Ri is as defined above. Typically, the compound of formula B' is first reacted with an o-xylene containing organophosphorus reagent, e.g. a phosphoramidite such as N-diethyl-1,5-dihydro-3H-2,3,4-benzodloaxaphosphine-3-amine, in the presence of an amine base, typically 1H-tetrazole, in an organic solvent such as THF or CH_2Cl_2, typically CH_2Cl_2. An oxidising agent, such as I_2 in pyridine and water or mCPBA, is then added. The mCPBA is usually used at a temperature of from about -20°C to about 20°C, from about -15°C to about 15°C, from about -10°C to about 10°C, from about -5°C to about 5°C, and typically about 0°C. The mCPBA is usually added to the same reaction solvent as was used in the first step. The completion of the first step may be detected, for example by TLC analysis, before the mCPBA is added.
A further example of the process comprises introducing an organophosphate group into a compound of formula B' to give a compound of formula C": wherein Ri is as defined above. Typically, the compound of formula B' is reacted with a pyrophosphate reagent, e.g. tetrabenzylpyrophosphate. The reaction is carried out in the presence of a base, suitable bases are lithium amides such as LDA or LiHMDS. The reaction is carried out in an organic solvent, for example a chlorinated solvent such as CH_2Cl_2 or an ether solvent, typically diethyl ether or THF. Typically, the reaction is carried out below about 0°C, for example about -10°C, about -20°C, about -30°C, about -40°C, about -50°C, about -60°C, about -70°C, suitably about -80°C then about -30°C.
A further example of the process comprises introducing an organophosphate group into a compound of formula B' to give a compound of formula C''': wherein Ri is as defined above. Typically, the compound of formula B' is phosphorylated with a suitable phosphorylating reagent and oxidising agent. Typical phosphorylating reagents are salicyl chlorophosphite or PCl_3 and water or aqueous NaHCO_3. When the phosphorylating agent is salicyl chlorophosphite, the reaction is typically carried out in a pyridine solvent and pivaloyl chloride is typically present. The reaction is usually carried out at room temperature, for example about 25°C. An oxidising agent such as I_2 in pyridine and water, or mCPBA is then added, typically I_2. The reaction is typically cooled to below about 0°C before addition of the oxidant, for example to about -10°C, about -20°C, about -30°C, about -40°C, about -50°C, typically about -40°C. Oxidation is typically completed at a temperature of about 0°C. The I_2 is typically added as a solution in pyridine/water. The concentration of the solution is typically about 0.1 to 1 M, about 0.2 to 0.9 M, about 0.3 to 0.8 M, about 0.4 to 0.7 M, suitably about 0.5M. The ratio of pyridine to water is typically about 10:1 to 30:1, about 12:1 to about 28:1, about 14:1 to about 26:1 about 16:1 to about 24:1, about 18:1 to about 22:1, suitably about 19:1. The oxidant is usually added to the same reaction solvent as was used in the first step. The completion of the first step may be detected, for example by TLC analysis, before the oxidant is added. The compound of formula C''' is usually isolated as a salt, typically the di-triethylammonium salt.
When the phosphorylating agent is PCl_3 and water or aqueous NaHCO_3, the reaction is typically carried out in an organic solvent such as MeCN. Water or aqueous NaHCO_3 is added after PCl_3, suitably at room temperature. An oxidising agent such as I_2 or mCPBA is then added, typically I_2. Usually, the solvents are removed before the addition of the oxidant and a new solvent is added. The new solvent is typically a mixture of pyridine and triethylamine. The pyridine to triethylamine ratio is typically about 2:1 to about 8:1, suitably about 4:1. I_2 is typically added as a solution in pyridine water. The concentration of the solution is typically about 0.1 to 1 M, about 0.2 to 0.9M, about 0.3 to 0.8 M, suitably about 0.4M. The compound of formula C''' is usually isolated as a salt, typically the di-triethylammonium salt.
An example of the process comprises deprotecting, typically by hydrogenolysis, a compound of formula C' to give N-acetylglucosamine-4-phosphate: wherein Ri is as defined above. Typically, the compound of formula C' is reacted with H_2 in the presence of a palladium catalyst such as 10% Pd/C or Pearlman's catalyst PdOH_2/C, in an alcoholic solvent, for example MeOH or EtOH, and typically MeOH. The reaction is usually carried out at a pressure of from about 1 to about 5 atm, from about 1 to about 4 atm, from about 1 to about 3 atm, from about to about 2 atm, typically about 1 atm.
A further example of the process comprises deprotecting, typically by hydrogenolysis, a compound of formula C" to give N-acetylglucosamine-4-phosphate: wherein Ri is as defined above. Typically, the compound of formula C" is reacted with H_2 in the presence of a palladium catalyst such as 10% Pd/C or Pearlman's catalyst Pd(OH)_2/C, in an alcoholic solvent, for example MeOH or EtOH, and typically MeOH. The reaction is usually carried out at a pressure of from about 1 to about 5 atm, from about 1 to about 4 atm, from about 1 to about 3 atm, from about to about 2 atm, typically about 1 atm.
A further example of the process comprises deprotecting, typically by hydrogenolysis, a compound of formula C''', or the di-triethylammonium salt thereof, to give N-acetylglucosamine-4-phosphate: wherein Ri is as defined above. Typically, the compound of formula C''' is reacted with H_2 in the presence of a palladium catalyst such as 10% Pd/C or Pearlman's catalyst Pd(OH)_2/C, in an alcoholic solvent, for example MeOH or EtOH, and typically MeOH. The reaction is usually carried out at a pressure of from about 1 to about 5 atm, from about 1 to about 4 atm, from about 1 to about 3 atm, from about to about 2 atm, typically about 1 atm.
The N-acetylglucosamine-4-phosphate may be purified, for example by crystallisation, or more typically chromatography, particularly chromotography using a hydrophobically modified silica stationary phase.
The process may be as follows:
Suitable reaction conditions for this process are provided in the section "Modes for Carrying out the Invention" below (e.g. in Scheme 1).

General
The practice of the present invention will employ, unless otherwise indicated, conventional methods of chemistry, biochemistry, molecular biology, immunology and pharmacology, within the skill of the art. Such techniques are explained fully in the literature. See, e.g., references 225-232, etc.
"GI" numbering is used above. A GI number, or "GenInfo Identifier", is a series of digits assigned consecutively to each sequence record processed by NCBI when sequences are added to its databases. The GI number bears no resemblance to the accession number of the sequence record. When a sequence is updated (e.g. for correction, or to add more annotation or information) then it receives a new GI number. Thus the sequence associated with a given GI number is never changed.
Where an antigen "domain" is omitted, this may involve omission of a signal peptide, of a cytoplasmic domain, of a transmembrane domain, of an extracellular domain, etc.
The term "comprising" encompasses "including" as well as "consisting" e.g. a composition "comprising" X may consist exclusively of X or may include something additional e.g. X + Y.
The term "about" in relation to a numerical value x means, for example, x±10%.
The word "substantially" does not exclude "completely" e.g. a composition which is "substantially free" from Y may be completely free from Y. Where necessary, the word "substantially" may be omitted from the definition of the invention.
It will be appreciated that sugar rings can exist in open and closed form and that, whilst closed forms are shown in structural formulae herein, open forms are also encompassed by the invention. Similarly, it will be appreciated that sugars can exist in pyranose and furanose forms and that, whilst pyranose forms are shown in structural formulae herein, furanose forms are also encompassed. Different anomeric forms of sugars are also encompassed.
References to a percentage sequence identity between two amino acid sequences means that, when aligned, that percentage of amino acids are the same in comparing the two sequences. This alignment and the percent homology or sequence identity can be determined using software programs known in the art, for example those described in section 7.7.18 of ref. 233. A preferred alignment is determined by the Smith-Waterman homology search algorithm using an affine gap search with a gap open penalty of 12 and a gap extension penalty of 2, BLOSUM matrix of 62. The Smith-Waterman homology search algorithm is disclosed in ref. 234.
Particular embodiments of the invention include:
1. 1. An immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of a Neisseria meningitidis serogroup X capsular polysaccharide and a carrier molecule, wherein the coupling of the capsular polysaccharide is direct.
2. 2. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of embodiment 1, wherein the conjugate is obtainable by a process comprising the steps of: (a) oxidising a primary hydroxyl group in the capsular polysaccharide, to give an oxidised polysaccharide with an aldehyde group; and (b) coupling the oxidised polysaccharide to a carrier molecule via the aldehyde group, thereby giving the conjugate.
3. 3. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of embodiment 2, where the oxidation in step (a) is of the primary hydroxyl group on between 1-10% of the residues in the capsular polysaccharide.
4. 4. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of embodiment 3, where the oxidation is of the primary hydroxyl group on between 4-8% of the residues in the capsular polysaccharide.
5. 5. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of any of embodiments 2-4, where the oxidation in step (a) is TEMPO-mediated oxidation.
6. 6. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of any of embodiments 2-5, wherein the coupling in step (b) is by reductive amination between the aldehyde group and a primary amine group on the carrier molecule.
7. 7. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of embodiment 1, wherein the conjugate is obtainable by a process comprising the steps of: (a) reductive amination of the reducing terminus of the capsular polysaccharide, to give a modified polysaccharide with a primary amine group bonded to the C-1 atom of the terminal subunit by a covalent bond; and (b) coupling the modified polysaccharide to a carrier molecule via the primary amine group, thereby giving the conjugate.
8. 8. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of embodiment 1, wherein the conjugate is obtainable by a process comprising the steps of: (a) reduction of the reducing terminus of the capsular polysaccharide, to give a modified polysaccharide with two vicinal hydroxyl groups at that terminus; (b) oxidative cleavage of the vicinal hydroxyl groups, to give a further modified polysaccharide with an aldehyde group at the terminus; (c) reductive amination of the aldehyde group, to give a further modified polysaccharide with a primary amine group at the terminus and (d) coupling the further modified polysaccharide to a carrier molecule via the primary amine group, thereby giving the conjugate.
9. 9. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of embodiment 8, wherein the primary amine group is bonded to the C-5 atom of the terminal subunit by a covalent bond.
10. 10. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of any of embodiments 2-9, wherein the capsular polysaccharide is an oligosaccharide.
11. 11. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of embodiment 10, wherein the oligosaccharide has a degree of polymerisation between 60 and 100 or between 10 and 20.
12. 12. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of any of embodiments 1-11, wherein the carrier molecule is a diphtheria or tetanus toxoid, CRM197 or protein D.
13. 13. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of any of embodiments 1-11, wherein the carrier molecule comprises a spr0096 antigen and a spr2021 antigen.
14. 14. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of embodiment 13, wherein the spr0096 antigen comprises an amino acid sequence having 50% or more identity to SEQ ID NO: 1 or SEQ ID NO: 2.
15. 15. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate according to embodiment 13 or embodiment 24, wherein the spr2021 antigen comprises an amino acid sequence having 50% or more identity to SEQ ID NO: 3.
16. 16. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate according to any of embodiments 13-15, wherein the carrier molecule comprises the spr0096 antigen and the spr2021 antigen as a single polypeptide chain.
17. 17. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate according to embodiment 16, wherein the polypeptide chain is of the formula NH_2-A-{-X-L-}_n-B-COOH, wherein: A is an optional N terminal amino acid sequence; B is an optional C terminal amino acid sequence; n is an integer of 2 or more; each X is an amino acid sequence of an spr0096 antigen or an spr2021 antigen, wherein at least one X is an spr0096 antigen and at least one X is an spr2021 antigen; and L is an optional linker amino acid sequence.
18. 18. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate according to embodiment 17, wherein n is 2.
19. 19. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate according to embodiment 18, wherein X_1 is an spr0096 antigen and X_2 is an spr2021 antigen.
20. 20. The immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate according to embodiment 19, wherein the polypeptide chain comprises an amino acid sequence having 50% or more identity to SEQ ID NO: 9, particularly an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 9.
21. 21. The immunogenic composition of any of embodiments 1-20, further comprising one or more further antigens.
22. 22. The immunogenic composition of embodiment 21, further comprising a serogroup A capsular polysaccharide.
23. 23. The immunogenic composition of embodiment 22, wherein the serogroup A capsular polysaccharide is conjugated to a carrier molecule.
24. 24. The immunogenic composition of any of embodiments 21-23, further comprising a serogroup W135 capsular polysaccharide.
25. 25. The immunogenic composition of embodiment 24, wherein the composition comprises a serogroup A capsular polysaccharide conjugated to a carrier molecule.
26. 26. The immunogenic composition of embodiment 24 or embodiment 25, wherein the serogroup W135 capsular polysaccharide is conjugated to a carrier molecule.
27. 27. The immunogenic composition of embodiment 23, 25 or 26, wherein the carrier molecule is as defined in embodiment 12.
28. 28. The immunogenic composition of any of embodiments 21-27, further comprising a serogroup C capsular polysaccharide.
29. 29. The immunogenic composition of any of embodiments 21-28, further comprising a serogroup Y capsular polysaccharide.
30. 30. The immunogenic composition of embodiment 28 or embodiment 29, wherein the capsular polysaccharide is conjugated to a carrier molecule.
31. 31. The composition of embodiment 30, wherein the carrier molecule is as defined in embodiment 12.
32. 32. The immunogenic composition of any of embodiments 1-31, wherein the composition is in an aqueous formulation.
33. 33. A vaccine comprising the immunogenic composition of any of embodiments 1-32.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
- Figure 1 shows the repeat unit of the serogroup X capsular polysaccharide.
- Figure 2 shows an ultra performance liquid chromatogram for native and hydrolysed serogroup X capsular polysaccharide.
- Figure 3 shows a scheme for the conjugation of a serogroup X capsular polysaccharide to CRM197 by TEMPO oxidation followed by reductive amination, and an SDS PAGE analysis of the resultant conjugate.
- Figure 4 shows a chromatogram of conjugation mixture run on a Sephacryl S300 column with phosphate buffered saline.
- Figure 5 shows a scheme for the conjugation of a serogroup X capsular polysaccharide to CRM197 via SIDEA linker, and an SDS PAGE analysis of the resultant conjugate.
- Figure 6 shows a scheme for the conjugation of a serogroup X capsular polysaccharide to CRM197 via SIDEA linker using a different method, and an SDS PAGE analysis of the resultant conjugate.
- Figure 7 shows an SDS PAGE analysis of a serogroup X capsular polysaccharide-CRM197 conjugate made using a different linker.
- Figure 8 shows IgG antibody titres against serogroup X capsular polysaccharide and serum bactericidal antibody titres against serogroup X following immunisation with a variety of N.meningitidis conjugates.
- Figure 9 shows IgG antibody titres against serogroup A capsular polysaccharide and serum bactericidal antibody titres against serogroup A from the same experiment.
- Figure 10 shows IgG antibody titres against serogroup C capsular polysaccharide and serum bactericidal antibody titres against serogroup C from the same experiment.
- Figure 11 shows IgG antibody titres against serogroup W135 capsular polysaccharide and serum bactericidal antibody titres against serogroup W135 from the same experiment.
- Figure 12 shows IgG antibody titres against serogroup Y capsular polysaccharide and serum bactericidal antibody titres against serogroup Y from the same experiment.
- Figure 13 shows 2D 1H-31P HMBC NMR spectrum recorded at 400 MHz and 25 ± 0.1°C on MenA (a) and MenX (b) oligosaccharide generated by acidic hydrolysis. Peaks assignments are labelled.
- Figure 14 shows a) avDP and b) pH as a function of time collected for MenA and MenX capsular polysaccharides and C) O-acetyl status for MenA capsular polysaccharide only at 37°C and 45°C.
- Figure 15 shows profiles of avDP as a function of time, collected for the stability study at 37°C and 45°C for a) MenA and b) MenX capsular polysaccharide at time points (a) 0, (b) 7, (c) 10, (d) 14, (e) 21 days at 45°C and at (f) 7, (g) 14, (h) 21, (i) 28 days at 37°C. In addition a profile of experimentally degraded MenX capsular polysaccharide, obtained by acidic treatment (sodium acetate pH 4.0, at 80°C for ∼4 hrs), is shown in b) (l).
- Figure 16 shows IgG antibody titres against serogroup X capsular polysaccharide and serum bactericidal antibody titres against serogroup X following immunisation with a variety of N.meningitidis conjugates.
- Figure 17 shows a scheme for the conjugation of a serogroup X capsular polysaccharide to CRM197 using a further method, and an SDS PAGE analysis of the resultant conjugate.
- Figure 18 shows IgG antibody titres against serogroup A capsular polysaccharide and serum bactericidal antibody titres against serogroup A following immunisation with a variety of N.meningitidis conjugates.
- Figure 19 shows IgG antibody titres against serogroup C capsular polysaccharide and serum bactericidal antibody titres against serogroup C following immunisation with a variety of N.meningitidis conjugates.
- Figure 20 shows IgG antibody titres against serogroup W135 capsular polysaccharide and serum bactericidal antibody titres against serogroup W135 following immunisation with a variety of N.meningitidis conjugates.
- Figure 21 shows IgG antibody titres against serogroup Y capsular polysaccharide following immunisation with a variety of N. meningitidis conjugates.
- Figure 22 shows high affinity IgG antibody titres against serogroup X capsular polysaccharide following immunisation with a variety of N.meningitidis conjugates.

MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Bacterial growth for serogroup X capsular polysaccharide production
In order to identify optimal bacterial growth conditions for production and release of serogroup X capsular polysaccharide in the supernatant, three different media were tested using the MenX 5967 (ST 750) strain. Different growths were performed in flasks and monitored by Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectroscopy (1H NMR). Culture supernatants were analyzed by NMR sequence with a diffusion filter to cut off signals deriving from lower molecular weight (MW) species and highlight the signals of higher MW serogroup X capsular polysaccharide. Further analysis of the corresponding pellets by 1H High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning NMR (HR-MAS NMR) in solid state did not show serogroup X capsular polysaccharide signals, indicating that the majority of the polysaccharide was released in the supernatant (considering the limit of detection of this assay, the maximum amount of polysaccharide remaining on the bacteria should be 1/8 of the starting amount). Similar results were obtained with the three media.
In addition to the NMR methodology, a more accurate method for serogroup X capsular polysaccharide quantification in the clarified culture broth was developed (see below) using High-Performance Anion-Exchange Chromatography with Pulsed Amperometric Detection (HPAEC-PAD). As shown in the table below, medium #3 resulted in the highest amount of polysaccharide. It was therefore selected for a higher scale (18 L) fermentation which yielded 356 µg/mL of serogroup X capsular polysaccharide in the supernatant.

MenX 5967 (ST 750) strain growth in different media and relative polysaccharide production
Growth medium* | OD(600nm) | Saccharide (µg/mL) | µg saccharide/OD
#1 | 2 | 22.55 | 13.3
#2 | 6 | 42.73 | 7.1
#3 | 2.8 | 62.6 | 22.4
*1. modified Catlin v.6: casaminoacids 10 g/L, NaCl 5.8 g/L, glucose 10 g/L, K_2HPO_4 4 g/L, NH_4Cl 1 g/L, K_2SO_4 1 g/L, MgCl_2·6 H_2O 0.4 g/L, CaCl_2·2 H_2O 0.03 g/L, Fe(III) citrate 0.5 mg/L, pH 7.2; 2. MCDM1: glucose 10 g/L, soy peptone 15 g/L, NaCl 5.80 g/L, K_2SO_4 1 g/L, K_2HPO_4 4 g/L, L-glutamic acid 5 g/L, L-arginine 0.3 g/L, L-serine 0.5 g/L, L-cysteine 0.23 g/L, MgCl_2 0.19 g/L, CaCl_2 0.021 g/L, FeSO_4 0.002 g/L; 3. modified Frantz: L-Glutamic acid 1.6 g/L, Na_2HPO_4·2H_2O 15.5 g/L, KCl 0.09 g/L, NH_4Cl 1.25 g/L, pH 7.6, supplemented with: glucose 50 g/L, MgSO_4 ·7H_2O 30 g/L, 25 g/L ultrafiltered yeast extract, L-cysteine 1.5 g/L.

Purification of serogroup X capsular polysaccharide
The process for purifying serogroup X capsular polysaccharide was purified by a method adapted from reference 235.

Conjugate production and characterisation
Conjugates were made using polysaccharides of different chain lengths and different conjugation chemistries.

Conjugation by oxidation and reductive amination (method A):
Purified serogroup X capsular polysaccharide was hydrolysed in 50 mM sodium acetate at pH 4.7, 100 °C for 1 hour (Figure 2). The average degree of polymerisation of the resulting oligosaccharide was determined to be 80, corresponding to a molecular weight of 25-30kDa, by NMR The polysaccharide depolymerization was monitored in process by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Size Exclusion Chromatography (UPLC-SEC) and phosphorus (_{31}P) NMR spectroscopy, and it was quenched by neutralization when the desired avDP was reached. The buffer was exchanged with tetrabutyl ammonium bromide to allow dissolution of the saccharide in dimethylformamide solvent. The saccharide was then oxidized with TEMPO (0.06eq relative to the MenX repeating subunit), NaHCO_3 (9eq relative to the MenX repeating subunit), TCC (2eq relative to the MenX repeating subunit) at 0°C overnight. This oxidation generates an aldehyde group at the C-6 position of individual subunits (Figure 3). The oxidised saccharide was purified by precipitation with acetone/NaCl and gel filtration using a Sephadex G15 column. The saccharide was quantified using HPAEC-PAD and its structural identity confirmed using NMR. There were approximately 4.5 oxidized groups per chain, corresponding to a degree of oxidation of approximately 6 % along the circa 80 residue chain. The molecular weight distribution of the oxidized saccharide was measured by UPLC-SEC.
The aldehyde group was used for conjugation to carrier protein CRM197 by reductive amination (Figure 3). Briefly, the saccharide was mixed with 10mg/ml CRM197 at a 4:1 w/w ratio and NaBH_3CN at a 1:1 w/w ratio in a NaPi 10mM pH 7.2 buffer. The mixture was left for 72 hours with slow stirring at 37°C. Conjugates were purified on a Sephacryl S300 column with phosphate buffered saline and fractions collected into pools (Figure 4). Conjugation was verified by SDS PAGE (Figure 3). The properties of the purified conjugates (pool 1) are given below:
MenX (µg/mL) | CRM197 (µg/mL) | Total mass MenX (mg) | Total mass CRM197 (mg) | MenX/CRM197 (w/w) | MenX yield (%) | CRM197 yield (%) | MenX/CRM197 (mol/mol) | Kd (SEC) | EU/µg (LAL)
104.8 | 151.3 | 1.26 | 1.82 | 0.69 | 12.6 | 72.6 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 1.6
Conjugates were also made by this method in which the polysaccharides were not hydrolysed with sodium acetate and therefore had a native average degree of polymerisation. Further conjugates were made containing polysaccharides with an average degree of polymerisation of 130.
Conjugates were also made by this method in which the carrier protein was tetanus toxoid (TT) or SEQ ID NO: 9 (SEQ9). The polysaccharides in these conjugates had an average degree of polymerisation of 130. Other characteristics of these conjugates are given below:
Carrier | MenX (µg/mL) | Carrier (µg/mL) | MenX/carrier (w/w) | MenX/carrier (mol/mol) | EU/µg (LAL)
TT | 197.6 | 660.80 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 18.81
SEQ9 | 159.7 | 757.70 | 0.21 | 0.3 | 6.57

Conjugation by reductive amination followed by reaction with SIDEA linker (method B):
Purified serogroup X capsular polysaccharide was hydrolysed in 50 mM sodium acetate at pH 4.7, 100 °C for 2 hours (Figure 2). The average degree of polymerisation of the resulting oligosaccharide was determined to be 15, corresponding to a molecular weight of 5kDa, by NMR The saccharide was then solubilised at 5 mg/ml in 5mM sodium acetate buffer at pH 6.5 with 300 mg/ml NH_4OAc and 49 mg/ml NaBH_3CN for 5 days at 37°C. This step resulted in reductive amination of the terminal aldehyde group to generate a primary amine group (Figure 5). The reaction mixture was then purified by tangential flow filtration with a 200 cm^2 Hydrosart (cellulose) 2kDa-cut off membrane against 1M NaCl and water. The primary amine group was then used for activation with SIDEA and subsequent conjugation to carrier protein CRM197 (Figure 5). Briefly, the modified saccharide was dissolved in DMSO/water at 9:1 (v/v) with NEt_3 (at a molar ratio of NEt_3:total NH2 groups of 5:1) at a mol SIDEA:total mol NH_2 groups of 12:1 for 3 hours at room temperature. The reaction mixture was then purified by precipitation with 90% dioxane (v/v). The SIDEA-modified saccharide was then reacted with 25 mg/ml CRM197 at a ratio of 13:1 (molar ratio active ester groups:CRM197) in a 25mM NaPi buffer at pH 7.2. The mixture was left for 5 hours with slow stirring at room temperature. The conjugates were purified by precipitation with (NH_4)_2SO_4. Conjugation was verified by SDS PAGE (Figure 5). The properties of one lot of these conjugates are given below:
MenX (µg/mL) | CRM197 (µg/mL) | Total mass MenX (mg) | Total mass CRM197 (mg) | MenX/CRM197 (w/w) | MenX/CRM197 (mol/mol) | MenX yield (%) | Kd (SEC) | EU/µg (LAL)
167.3 | 514.4 | 0.17 | 0.51 | 0.33 | 4.22 | 12.6 | 0.32 | 0.8

Conjugation by reduction, oxidation and reductive amination followed by reaction with SIDEA linker (method C):
Purified serogroup X capsular saccharide was reacted at 15 mg/ml in 10mM NaPi buffer at pH 8 with NaBH_4 (12eq relative to the molecular weight of MenX, solid) for 1.5 hours at room temperature. This step resulted in reduction of the saccharide. The reduced saccharide was then reacted at 6-8 mg/ml in 10mM NaPi buffer at pH 7.2 with NaIO_4 (10eq relative to the molecular weight of MenX, solid) for 1.5 hours at room temperature. The combined effect of these two steps is the generation of an aldehyde group at the reducing terminus of the saccharide (Figure 6). The modified saccharide is then subjected to reductive amination to provide a primary amine group that can be used for activation with SIDEA and subsequent conjugation to carrier protein CRM197 (Figure 6). Briefly, the modified saccharide solubilised at 4-5 mg/ml in 10mM NaPi buffer at pH 7 with 300 mg/ml NH_4OAc and 49 mg/ml NaBH_3CN for 5 days at 37°C. The modified saccharide was then dissolved in DMSO/water at 9:1 (v/v) with NEt_3 (at a molar ratio of NEt_3:total NH2 groups of 5:1) at a mol SIDEA:total mol NH2 groups of 12:1 for 3 hours at room temperature. The reaction mixture was then purified by precipitation with 80% acetone (v/v). The resulting SIDEA-modified saccharide was then reacted with 25 mg/ml CRM197 at a ratio of 13:1 (molar ratio active ester groups:CRM197) in a 100mM NaPi buffer at pH 7.2. The mixture was left overnight with slow stirring at room temperature. The conjugates were purified by precipitation with (NH_4)_2SO_4. Conjugation was verified by SDS PAGE (Figure 6). The properties of one lot of these conjugates are given below:
MenX (µg/mL) | CRM197 (µg/mL) | MenX/CRM197 (w/w) | MenX/CRM197 (mol/mol) | Free saccharide (%) | EU/µg (LAL)
129.60 | 628.70 | 0.21 | 2.1 | <6 | 0.01

Conjugation via alternative linker (method D):
The purified serogroup X capsular polysaccharide with an average degree of polymerisation of 15, as described above, was also conjugated to CRM197 using a different linker according to the method of Figure 7 in US 61/534,751. Conjugation was verified by SDS PAGE (Figure 7 herein).

Conjugation by reduction, oxidation and reductive amination with the carrier (method E):
Purified serogroup X capsular saccharide was reacted at 15 mg/ml in 10mM NaPi buffer at pH 8 with NaBH_4 (12eq relative to the molecular weight of MenX, solid) for 2 hours at room temperature. This step resulted in reduction of the saccharide. The reduced saccharide was then reacted at 6-8 mg/ml in 10mM NaPi buffer at pH 7.2 with NaIO_4 (10eq relative to the molecular weight of MenX, solid) for 1.5 hours at room temperature. The combined effect of these two steps is the generation of an aldehyde group at the reducing terminus of the saccharide (Figure 17). The modified saccharide is then subjected to reductive amination with carrier protein CRM197. Briefly, the modified saccharide at 2mg/ml was dissolved in 300mM NaPi buffer at pH 8 (at a weight ratio of saccharide:CRM197 of 8:1) and NaBH_3CN (at a weight ratio of saccharide: NaBH_3CN of 4:1) for 4 days at 37°C. Conjugation was verified by SDS PAGE (Figure 17).

Immunisation study (1)
General assay protocol: Balb/c mice were immunized by subcutaneous injection according to the schedule described below. The injection volume was 200 µl and the injection contained alum phosphate adjuvant (120 µg per dose). Injections were carried out on days 1, 14 and 28, with bleeds taken at day 0 (for preimmune sera), 28 (post second immunisation sera) and 42 (post third sera).
Grp | Mice per group | Immunogen | Antigen dose
1 | 8 | PBS | -
2 | 16 | MenX-CRM197 (method A) | 1µg
3 | 16 | MenX-CRM197 (method D) | 1µg
4 | 16 | MenX-CRM197 (method B) | 1µg
5 | 16 | MenX-CRM197 (method A) + MenACWY | 1µg + 2,1,1, 1µg
6 | 16 | MenX-CRM197 (method D)+ MenACWY | 1µg + 2,1,1, 1µg
7 | 16 | MenX-CRM197 (method B)+ MenACWY | 1µg + 2,1,1, 1µg
8 | 16 | MenACWY | 2,1,1, 1ug
9 | 16 | MenX-CRM197 (method D) | 0.1µg
MenACWY = mixture of MenA-CRM197, MenC-CRM197, MenW135-CRM197 and MenY-CRM197 prepared according to ref. 10.
The post third immunisation IgG antibody titre against serogroup X capsular polysaccharide and serum bactericidal antibody titre against serogroup X strain Z9615 are shown in Figure 8. The serogroup X conjugates were immunogenic and induced bactericidal antibodies. The response was not diminished when the dose was reduced ten-fold (to 0.1µg). Responses were slightly reduced when the conjugates were combined with conjugates derived from serogroups A, C, W135 and Y, but still well above controls. Accordingly, immune interference between these conjugates and the serogroup X conjugates appears to be relatively small.
The post third immunisation IgG antibody titres against serogroups A, C, W135 and Y capsular polysaccharides and serum bactericidal antibody titres against these serogroups (using strains F8238, 11, 240070 and 860800 respectively) were also measured for groups 5, 6, 7 and 8. Results are shown in Figures 9-12. The responses to the serogroup A, C, W135 and Y conjugates were generally not diminished when combined with the serogroup X conjugates. Once again, these results suggest that there is little immune interference between these conjugates and the serogroup X conjugates.
Anti-serogroup X capsular polysaccharide IgM ELISA units were found to be low for all the conjugates, as expected for conjugate vaccines due to effective isotype switching from IgM to IgG.
A modified ELISA was used to measure higher avidity IgG antibodies only (Figure 22). The modified ELISA uses a chaotropic salt to select and detect higher avidity IgG antibodies only. Anti-serogroup X capsular polysaccharide IgG ELISA units were low for all the conjugates both after the second and the third dose compared to the units by standard ELISA, but a statistically significant booster effect was observed after the third dose for all the conjugates (P from 0.0006 to <0.0001).
The following table summarises the rabbit complement serum bactericidal antibody titres against the various strains from the pooled post third immunisation sera.
Antigen Name | Antigen Dose (µg) | MenX Z9615 | MenA F8238 | MenC 11 | MenW 240070 | MenY 860800
PBS + AlumPhosphate | - | <4 | <16 | <16 | <16 | 32
MenX-CRM197 (A) | 1 | 4096 | <16 | <16 | <16 | 32
MenX-CRM197 (D) | 1 | 4096 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a
MenX-CRM197 (B) | 1 | 4096 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a
MenX-CRM197 (A) + MenACWY | 1 + 2,1,1,1 | 256 | 4096 | 4096 | 512 | 1024
MenX-CRM197 (D) + MenACWY | 1 + 2,1,1,1 | 1024 | 2048 | 4096 | 1024 | 1024
MenX-CRM197 (B) + MenACWY | 1 + 2,1,1,1 | 1024 | 2048 | 4096 | 1024 | 1024
MenACWY | 2,1,1,1 | <4 | 2048 | 8192 | 1024 | 2048
MenX-CRM197 (D) | 0.1 | 4096 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a

Immunisation study (2)
General assay protocol: Balb/c mice were immunized by subcutaneous injection according to the schedule described below. The injection volume was 200 µl and the injection contained alum phosphate adjuvant.
Group | Mice per group | Immunogen | Antigen dose
1 | 1-8 | PBS | 1µg
2 | 9-16 | MenX-CRM197 (method A, native avDP) | 1µg
3 | 17-24 | MenX-CRM197 (method A, 80 avDP) | 1µg
4 | 25-32 | MenX-CRM197 (method A, 130 avDP) | 1µg
5 | 33-40 | MenX-TT (method A, 130 avDP) | 1µg
6 | 41-48 | MenX-SEQ9 (method A, 130 avDP) | 1µg
7 | 49-56 | MenX-CRM197 (method A, native avDP) + MenACWY | 1µg + 2,1,1, 1µg
8 | 57-64 | MenX-CRM197 (method A, 80 avDP) + MenACWY | 1µg + 2,1,1, 1µg
9 | 65-72 | MenX-CRM197 (method A, 130 avDP) + MenACWY | 1µg + 2,1,1, 1µg
10 | 73-80 | MenX-TT (method A, 130 avDP) + MenACWY | 1µg + 2,1,1, 1µg
11 | 81-88 | MenX-SEQ9 (method A, 130 avDP) + MenACWY | 1µg + 2,1,1, 1µg
MenACWY = mixture of MenA-CRM197, MenC-CRM197, MenW135-CRM197 and MenY-CRM197 prepared according to ref. 10.
The post third immunisation IgG antibody titre against serogroup X capsular polysaccharide and serum bactericidal antibody titre against serogroup X strain Z9615 are shown in Figure 16. The serogroup X conjugates were immunogenic and induced bactericidal antibodies. Responses were slightly reduced when the MenX-CRM197 conjugates were combined with conjugates derived from serogroups A, C, W135 and Y, but still well above controls. In contrast, little or no reduction was seen when MenX-TT or MenX-SEQ9 conjugates were combined with these conjugates. Accordingly, the use of a different carrier protein for the MenX polysaccharide may help to reduce any immune interference between the serogroup X conjugate and these conjugates.
The post third immunisation IgG antibody titre against serogroup A capsular polysaccharide and serum bactericidal antibody titre against serogroup A strain F8238 when the MenX conjugates were combined with conjugates derived from serogroups A, C, W135 and Y are shown in Figure 18. Corresponding data for serogroups C, W135 and Y are shown in Figures 19-21.

Stability study (1)
Materials: Purified MenA and MenX polysaccharides were obtained according to the method of ref. 10. The purity of the polysaccharide preparation was assessed by estimation of residual protein and nucleic acids contents, which were lower than 1% w/w of saccharide.
NMR analyses: 1H, 13C and 31P NMR experiments were recorded on Bruker Avance III 400 MHz spectrometer, equipped with a high precision temperature controller, and using 5-mm broadband probe (Bruker). For data acquisition and processing, TopSpin version 2.6 software (Bruker) was used. 1H NMR spectra were collected at 25 ± 0.1 °C with 32k data points over a 10 ppm spectral width, accumulating 128 scans. The spectra were weighted with 0.2 Hz line broadening and Fourier-transformed. The transmitter was set at the water frequency which was used as the reference signal (4.79 ppm). 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 100.6 MHz and 37 ± 0.1°C, with 32k data points over a 200 ppm spectral width, accumulating 4k scans. The spectra were weighted with 0.2 Hz line broadening and Fourier-transformed. The transmitter was set at the acetone frequency which was used as the reference signal (30.89 ppm). 31P NMR spectra were recorded at 161.9 MHz at 25 ± 0.1°C, with 32k data points over a 20 ppm spectral width, accumulating approximately 1k of scans. The spectra were weighted with 3.0 Hz line broadening and Fourier-transformed. 85% phosphoric acid in deuterium oxide was used as an external standard (0 ppm). All the 1H and 31P NMR spectra were obtained in quantitative manner using a total recycle time to ensure a full recovery of each signal (5 x Longitudinal Relaxation Time T1). To confirm the degradation mechanism of MenA and MenX capsular polysaccharides and consequently to assign the 31P NMR peaks, bidimensional 1H-31P Heteronuclear Multiple-Bond Correlation (HMBC) experiments were acquired on MenA and MenX oligosaccaride samples, previously generated by acidic hydrolysis in 50 mM sodium acetate pH 4.8 (saccharide concentration of ∼10 mg/mL) at 73°C for ∼2.5 hrs and pH 4.0 at 80°C for ∼5.5 hrs (saccharide concentration of ∼2.5 mg/mL) respectively. The average degree of polymerization (avDP) of MenA and MenX oligosaccharides was ∼12 and ∼10 respectively, as estimated by 31P NMR analysis (see paragraph Stability experiments below). These NMR analytical samples were prepared by solubilizing approximately 10 mg of dried saccharide in 0.75 mL of deuterium oxide (99.9% atom D - Aldrich), with a standard pulse-program. 4096 and 512 data points were collected in F2 and F1 dimension respectively. 64 scans were accumulated prior to Fourier transformation to yield a digital resolution of 0.2 Hz and 5.0 Hz per point in F2 and F1 respectively.
HPLC analyses: HPLC analyses were conducted using CarboPac PA200 column (4 mm x 250 mm; Dionex) with guard column (4 mm x 50 mm; Dionex) connected to an ICS 3000 Dionex system equipped with a Pulsed Amperometric Detector. 100 mM NaOH + 10 mM sodium nitrate buffer was used for column equilibration and a three-step gradient with increasing amount of sodium nitrate (100 mM NaOH + 10 mM, 250 mM, 500 mM sodium nitrate for 80, 15 and 3 min respectively) was used for elution. A flow rate of 0.4 mL/min was used for the entire run of 120 min. 20 µL samples were injected at a concentration of approximately 1 mg/mL. The effluent was monitored using an electrochemical detector in the pulse amperometric mode with a gold working electrode and an Ag/AgCl reference electrode. A quadruple-potential waveform for carbohydrates was applied. The resulting chromatographic data were processed using Chromeleon software 6.8 (Dionex).
Stability experiments: MenA and MenX polysaccharide solutions at a concentration of approximately 1 mg/mL in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.0 prepared with deuterated water were incubated at 37°C and 45°C respectively. At different time points, samples were withdrawn and analysed by NMR and HPLC. pH was also monitored at each time point. The avDP of MenA and MenX was monitored for polysaccharide stability. avDP values were calculated by the integration of 31P NMR spectra and expressed as [(Pde/Pme) +1], where Pde is molar concentration of the phosphodiester in chain groups and Pme the molar concentration of phosphomonoester end groups. The HPLC profiles were also evaluated semi-quantitatively in order to confirm the more accurate stability evaluation collected by 31P NMR assay
Degradation mechanism of MenA and MenX polysaccharides The NMR ^1H-^{31}P HMBC data on the MenA oligosaccharide, generated by mild acidic hydrolysis, are reported in Figure 13(a). Due to the presence of O-acetyl groups at C_3 and C_4 of mannosamine residues, several spin systems were detected and assigned: (i) proton at C1 of 3- or 4-O-acetylated residues (H_1-P_{de})^{3/4OAc}; (ii) proton at C_1 of de-O-acetylated residues (H_1-P_{de})^{deOAc}; (iii) proton at C_3 and C_4 geminal of O-acetyl groups (H_3/H_4-P_{de})^{3/4OAc}; (iv) proton at C_2 of 3-O-acetylated residues (H_2-P_{de})^{3OAc}; (v) proton at C_2 of 4-O-acetylated residues (H_2-P_{de})^{4OAc}; (vi) proton at C_2 of de-O-acetylated residues (H_2-P_{de})^{deOAc}; (vii) protons at C_5 and C_6 of 3- or 4-O-acetylated residues (H_{5/6}-P_{de})^{3/4OAc}; (viii) protons at C_3, C_4, C_5 and C_6 of de-O-acetylated residues (H_{3/4/5/6}-P_{de})^{deOAc}. The attachment of phosphate at C_6, confirmed by the cross peaks of phosphomonoester to proton at C_6 of 3- or 4-O-acetylated residues (H_6-P_{me})^{3/4OAc} and to proton at C_6 of de-O-acetylated residues (H_6-P_{me})^{deOAc}, indicated that during hydrolysis the phosphodiester bond is cleaved leaving a phosphate group attached to the non-reducing terminus, which is consistent with the lower stability of the phosphate-Ci linkage. Because no other ^1H-^{31}P scalar correlation was detected, no phosphate migration involving free hydroxyl groups at C4 or C3 occurred during hydrolysis. ^1H-^{31}P HMBC on the MenX oligosaccharides (Figure 13(b)) also indicated that the phosphate-Ci linkage is less stable and in this case the non-reducing terminus has a phosphate group attached at C_4: the monoester phosphate shows cross-correlation only with proton at C_4. Also for MenX, no phosphate migration involving free hydroxyl groups at C3 or C6 occurred during hydrolysis. All the ^{31}P spin systems were assigned, the phosphodiester and phosphomonoester signals at -1.40 and 4.65 ppm respectively. The proton NMR profile was assigned also by collecting the ^{31}P-decoupled spectrum which reduces the peaks structure due to this scalar coupling. All the spectra assignments were in agreement with the published results mainly based on ^{13}C NMR analysis (ref. 30). 13C NMR chemical shifts of MenX capsular polysaccharide were in agreement with published data (ref. 14), as shown in Table 1 below:

Table 1: 13C NMR chemical shifts of MenX capsular polysaccharide.
| C_1 | C_2 | C_3 | C_4 | C_5 | C_6 | CH_3^{NAc} | CO^{NAc}
Chemical shift (ppm) | 95.2 | 54.8 | 71.1 | 75.1 | 73.2 | 61.3 | 23.2 | 175.6
Thermal stability of MenA and MenX polysaccharides. Degradation of MenA and MenX capsular polysaccharides, as the consequence of hydrolysis at phosphodiester bonds, results in fragments of lower avDP which expose newly-formed phosphomonoester end groups. In NMR experiments, these phosphomonester groups generate a ^{31}P resonance signal at higher fields than that originated by the internal phosphodiester groups thus allowing the avDP calculation as described in Stability experiments above. The variation of avDP during storage is an indicator of the polysaccharide stability and so the avDP of samples of MenA and MenX capsular polysaccharides, taken at different time points during exposure at 37°C and 45°C, was measured by ^{31}P NMR (Table 2 and Figure 14(a)):

Table 2: avDP estimated by 31P NMR analysis and pH values detected on MenA and MenX samples at different time points and temperatures of 37°C and 45°C. O-acetylation status of MenA capsular polysaccharide, expressed as mol O-Acetyl groups per mol of repeating unit, is also reported.
Temperature (°C) | Time (days) | MenA PS | MenX PS
pH | avDP | OAc (mol/mol) | pH | avDP
37 | 0 | 6.97 | >100 | 0.932 | 6.96 | >100
7 | 6.91 | 88.1 | 0.916 | 6.91 | >100
14 | 6.91 | 68.2 | 0.916 | 6.89 | >100
21 | 7.00 | 46.1 | 0.897 | 6.93 | >100
28 | 6.96 | 22.9 | 0.883 | 6.91 | >100
45 | 0 | 6.97 | >100 | 0.932 | 6.96 | >100
7 | 6.95 | 22.4 | 0.891 | 6.94 | >100
10 | 6.93 | 15.1 | 0.886 | 6.86 | >100
14 | 6.91 | 10.5 | 0.851 | 6.85 | >100
21 | 6.90 | 5.1 | 0.826 | 6.87 | >100
At the sample concentration used, the sensitivity of the technique did not allow measurement of the avDP at time zero for both polysaccharides, when the avDP is higher than 100. For each time point sample the pH was maintained in the range of 7.0 ± 0.1 (Figure 14(b)).
At 37°C MenA capsular polysaccharide degraded to an avDP of 22.9 after 28 days of incubation, while at 45°C degradation was accelerated with an avDP of 5.1 after 21 days. Under the same conditions, MenX capsular polysaccharide did not show degradation (avDP>100 for all time points at both incubation temperatures; based on the assay sensitivity, 100 is the maximum avDP value detectable). HPLC profiles of MenA capsular polysaccharide incubated at 37°C and 45°C (Figure 15) progressively showed increased intensity peaks of shorter oligosaccharides indicating depolymerisation of chains. In comparison, HPLC profiles collected on all MenX samples remain practically unmodified with a broad peak due to long chain polysaccharides at approximately 87 min which additionally demonstrates the higher stability of this carbohydrate. ^1H NMR analysis confirmed that the incubation of MenA and MenX capsular polysaccharides at 37°C and 45°C did not alter the structure of the polysaccharide repeating units. Only a limited decreasing of O-acetylation level (O-acetyl groups are present in MenA capsular polysaccharide only), from 0.932 to 0.883 and 0.826 mol/mol repeating unit at 37°C and 45°C was respectively observed (Table 2 and Figure 14(c)). Taken together, these NMR and HPLC data confirm the higher stability of MenX as compared to MenA capsular polysaccharide in aqueous solution.

Stability study (2)
Materials: MenX-CRM197 conjugates were prepared according to methods A, B and C above.
The conjugates prepared according to method A contained polysaccharides with an average degree of polymerisation of 100. Other characteristics of this conjugate lot are given below:
MenX (µg/mL) | CRM197 (µg/mL) | MenX/CRM197 (w/w) | MenX/CRM197 (mol/mol) | Free saccharide (%)
477.3 | 1378 | 0.35 | 0.7 | <2.3
The conjugates prepared according to method B had the following characteristics:
MenX (µg) | CRM197 (mg) | MenX/CRM197 (w/w) | Free saccharide (%)
383 | 1.71 | 0.22 | 5.8
The conjugates prepared according to method C contained polysaccharides with an average degree of polymerisation of 19. Other characteristics of this conjugate lot are given below:
MenX (µg/mL) | CRM197 (µg/mL) | MenX/CRM197 (w/w) | MenX/CRM197 (mol/mol) | Free saccharide (%)
129.6 | 628.7 | 0.21 | 2.1 | <6
Accelerated stability studies were performed to provide preliminary information on the stability of these conjugates. Stability studies of were performed at 37°C for 28 days, the time points for measurement were every 7 days (0, 7, 14, 21, 28 days). Samples were monitored by measuring the free saccharide released from the conjugates. The separation of free saccharide was performed by SPE-C4 cartridge using as elution buffer ACN 10-20% + TFA 0,05%. The total and free saccharide was quantified by HPAEC-PAD analysis, allowing a % free saccharide to be calculated. Values for the three lots of conjugate are given below:
Time (days) | % free saccharide
Method A conjugates | Method B conjugates | Method C conjugates
0 | <2.3 | 5.8 | <2.1
7 | 4.2 | 29.9 | 24.9
14 | 6.2 | 51.2 | 31.5
21 | 8.7 | 48.7 | 34.8
28 | 10.0 | 56.1 | 42.8
The conjugates made using method A were more stable than the conjugates made by methods B and C.

Analytical study
Materials: MenX polysaccharide was produced by bacterial growth of the Neisseria meningitidis X5967 strain (ST 750) and purified by a method adapted from reference 235. The purity of the polysaccharide preparation was assessed by estimation of residual protein and nucleic acid content using colorimetric assays (both were present at <1% w/w of saccharide), and endotoxin content using the LAL assay (<10 EU/µg of saccharide). Sodium acetate salt (Thermo Scientific Dionex), Sodium hydroxide 50% solution (J.T. Baker), Trifluoroacetic acid (Sigma), Water MilliQ grade (Millipore) were of pro analysis quality.
General methods: Total phosphorus content was measured according to the method of reference 24.
Reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on Silica Gel 60 F254 (Sigma Aldrich); after exam under UV light, compounds were visualized by heating with 10% (v/v) ethanolic H_2SO_4. Column chromatography was performed using pre-packed silica cartridges RediSep (Teledyne-Isco, 0.040-0.063 nm). Unless otherwise specified, a gradient 0 → 100% of the elution mixture was applied in a Combiflash Rf (Teledyne-Isco) instrument.
^1H, ^{13}C and ^{31}P NMR experiments were recorded on Bruker Avance III 400 MHz spectrometer, equipped with a high precision temperature controller, and using 5-mm broadband probe (Bruker). For data acquisition and processing, TopSpin version 2.6 software (Bruker) was used.
_1H NMR spectra were collected at 25±0.1 °C with 32k data points over a 10 ppm spectral width. The spectra were weighted with 0.2 Hz line broadening and Fouriertransformed. Chemical shift values were reported in ppm, relative to internal Me_4Si (0.00 ppm, CDCl_3) or the solvent signal (4.79 ppm, D2O). ^{13}C NMR spectra were recorded at 100.6 MHz and 37±0.1 °C, with 32k data points over a 200 ppm spectral width. The spectra were weighted with 0.2 Hz line broadening and Fourier-transformed. Chemical shift values were reported in ppm relative to the signal of CDCl_3 (77.0 ppm, CDCl_3).
^{31}P NMR spectra were recorded at 161.9 MHz at 25±0.1 °C, with 32k data points over a 20 ppm spectral width. The spectra were weighted with 3.0 Hz line broadening and Fourier-transformed. 85% phosphoric acid in deuterium oxide was used as an external standard (0 ppm).
Exact masses were measured by electron spray ionization cut-off spectroscopy, using a Q-Tof micro Macromass (Waters) instrument. Optical rotation was measured with a P-2000 Jasco polarimeter.Benzyl 3,6-di-O-benzyl-2-deoxy-2-phthalimido-β-D-glucopyranoside 3. The starting material 2 (ref. 236) (1.8 g, 3.1 mmol) was dissolved in acetonitrile (200 ml) under nitrogen, and treated with trimethylamineborane (1.4 g, 18.4 mmol) and BF_3·Et_2O (2.6 ml, 18.4 mmol) at 0°C. After stirring for 1 h at 0°C, the mixture was allowed to reach ambient temperature, at which time the reaction was complete (TLC, 7:3 cyclohexane-EtOAc). MeOH (3 ml) and triethylamine (3 ml) were added, and the mixture was concentrated. The residue was partitioned with aq NaHCO_3, and combined organic layers were concentrated and purified on silica gel (cyclohexane-EtOAc) to afford 1.5 g of product 3 (83%). [α]_D^{24}= +1.9 (c 0.5, CHCl_3). ^1H NMR (CDCl_3, 400 MHz): δ = 7.80-6.95 (m, 19 H, Ph), 5.15 (d, 1 H, J_{1,2} 8.0 Hz, H-1), 4.78, 4.47 (2 d, 2 H, ^2J 12.2 Hz, CH_2Ph), 4.72, 4.51 (2 d, 2 H, ^2J 12.0 Hz, CH_2Ph), 4.67, 4.59 (2 d, 2 H, ^2J 12.0 Hz, CH_2Ph), 4.26-4.18 (m, 2 H, H-2,3), 3.87-3.88 (m, 3 H, H-4,6), 3.66-3.62 (m, 1 H, H-5), 2.89 (d, 1 H, J_{2,OH} 2.3 Hz, OH-4). ^{13}C NMR (CDCl_3, 100 MHz): δ = 167.81 (CO), 138.15, 137.59, 137.10, 133.67, 131.61, 128.12, 127.91, 127.86, 127.81, 127.58, 127.40 (Ar), 97.35 (C-1), 78.49 (C-3), 74.37, 74.24(CH_2Ph), 73.78 (C-5), 73.45 (C-4), 70.80 (CH_2Ph), 70.69 (C-6), 55.37 (C-2). ESI HR-MS (C_{35}H_{33}NO_7): m/z = ([M+Na]+ found 597.2547; calc 597.2601); ([M+Na]+ found 618.1895; calc 618.1894).
Benzyl 2-acetamido-3,6-di-O-benzyl-2-deoxy-β-D-glucopyranoside 4. A mixture of N-phthalimido compound 3 (1 g, 1.7 mmol) in EtOH (20 ml), containing 1.2 ml of ethylenediamine, was refluxed overnight. After TLC (toluene-EtOAc 4:1) showed the reaction was complete, the mixture was concentrated and re-dissolved in 4:1 EtOH-Ac_2O (25 ml). The mixture was stirred for 3 h, then concentrated. Chromatography of the residue (cyclohexane-EtOAc) gave 740 mg of monosaccharide 4, whose NMR data were identical with those recently reported in literature [237].
Benzyl 2-acetamido-3,6-di-O-benzyl-4-(1,5-dihydro-3-oxo-3λ^5-3H-2,4,3-benzodioxaphosphepin-3-yl)-β-D-glucopyranoside 5. N,N-diethyl-1,5-dihydro-3H-2,3,4-benzodioxaphosphepin-3-amine (717 mg, 3 mmol) was added to a solution of the monosaccharide (500 mg, 1 mmol) in CH_2Cl_2 (9 ml) and 0.45 M 1H-tetrazole in acetonitrile (9 ml) at 0°C. After 10 min the iced bath was removed and stirring was continued. After stirring further 3 h the reaction went to completion (TLC, 1:1 toluene-EtOAc). The mixture was cooled to -20°C and m-CPBA was added. After 20 min some aq NaHCO_3 was added to quench it. The mixture was diluted with CH_2Cl_2 and extracted in a separatory funnel with aq NaHCO_3. Combined organic layers were concentrated and the residue was purified on silica gel (cyclohexane-EtOAc) to furnish 630 mg of product (92%). White crystals from EtOAc, m.p. 159-160°C. = [α]_D^{24}= +34.7 (c 0.1, CHCl_3). ^1H NMR (CDCl_3, 400 MHz): δ = 7.41-7.12 (m, 18 H, Ph), 5.90 (d, 1 H, J_{1,2} 7.6 Hz, H-1), 5.17-5.12 (m, 2 H, 2 CHPh), 5.00-4.78 (m, 4 H, 4 CHPh), 4.65-4.58 (m, 5 H, 4 CHPh, H-4), 4.32 (t, 1 H, J 9.0 Hz, H-3), 3.89 (d, 1 H, J_{6a,5} 9.0 Hz, H-6a), 3.76-3.69 (m, 2 H, H-5,6b), 3.46-3.42 (m, 1 H, H-2), 1.80 (s, 3 H, CH_3CO). ^{13}C NMR (CDCl_3, 100 MHz): δ = 170.61 (CO), 138.26, 137.36, 134.98, 128.94, 128.35, 127.95, 127.98, 127.80, 127.71, 127.57, 127.50 (Ar), 98.85 (C-1), 78.71 (C-3), 76.72 (C-4), 73.97 (C-5), 73.76, 73.42, 70.09 (CH_2Ph), 69.04 (C-6), 68.30, 60.25 (CH_2Ph), 56.95 (C-2), 23.40 (CH_3CO). ^{31}P NMR (CDCl_3, 162 MHz): δ = 0.32. ESI HR-MS (C_{37}H_{40}NO_9P): m/z = ([M+H]+ found 674.2476; calc 674.2519) .
2-Acetamido-2-deoxy-β-D-glucopyranosyl phosphate 6. The protected monosaccharide 5 (100 mg, 0.15 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (10 ml) and hydrogenated over 10% Pd/C (30 mg). The mixture was stirred for 1 d, then it was filtered through a celite pad. The solvent was evaporated and the recovered crude material was purified on a C-18 Isolute SPE cartridge. Fractions containing the sugar were freeze-dried to give 42 mg of foamy product 6 (95%), whose NMR data were in agreement with those reported in literature [238].
High-Performance Anion-Exchange Chromatography with Pulsed Amperometric Detection (HPAEC-PAD) for MenX quantification: MenX samples were treated with TFA at a final concentration of 2 M diluted to a total volume of 600 µL in the range 0.5-8 µg/mL. Samples were heated at 100°C for 2.5 hours in a closed screw-cap test tube, then chilled at 2-8°C for about 30 minutes, added of 700 µL NaOH 2 M and filtered with 0.45 µm Acrodisc (PALL) filters before analysis. A pure preparation of MenX PS or the synthetic monomer 4-GlcNAc-4P, titered through the colorimetric method for total phosphorus content, were used for building the calibration curve, set up with standards in the range of 0.5-8 µg/mL. HPAEC-PAD was performed with a Dionex ICS3000 equipped with a CarboPac PA1 column (4 x 250 mm; Dionex) coupled with PA1 guard column (4 x 50 mm; Dionex). Samples were run with a flow rate of 1 mL/min, using a gradient in 10 minutes from 100 mM to 500 mM AcONa in 100 mM NaOH. The effluent was monitored using an electrochemical detector in the pulse amperometric mode with a gold working electrode and an Ag/AgCl reference electrode. A quadruple-potential waveform for carbohydrates was applied. The resulting chromatographic data were processed using Chromeleon software 6.8.
Acid hydrolysis of MenX polysaccharide and GlcNAc-4P and NMR characterization: A large scale acid hydrolysis was conducted on MenX polysaccharide and on the synthetic monomer (10 mg). Both the samples were dissolved in 2 mL 2 M TFA and hydrolysed at 100°C for 2.5 hours. The samples were dried and exchanged with D_2O for three times before analysis.
Selection of hydrolysis conditions: To identify the optimal conditions for MenX hydrolysis able to completely release the monomer subunits and minimize their degradation, different reaction times for the hydrolysis of MenX polysaccharide (from 1 to 6 hours) performing the hydrolysis in 2 M TFA at 100°C were explored. A pure preparation of MenX polysaccharide, titered through the colorimetric method for total phosphorus content, was used at two different concentrations (0.5 and 2 µg/mL). One prevalent peak was detected by HPAEC-PAD analysis. The area of the peak increased over time, with a maximum among two and three hours, before decreasing for longer times. Eventually 2.5 hours was selected as optimal time of hydrolysis
The linearity of the method was verified in the range 0.5-8 µg/mL (R^2 = 99.807). The method was successfully applied to purification process intermediates, including fermentation broths, and in order to determine the accuracy of the method a recovery study was conducted. Known amounts of polysaccharide were added to standard samples that were subjected to the analysis. The recovery was calculated based on the difference between the total concentration determined for the spiked samples and the concentration found in the un-spiked samples. The mean recovery ranged from 98 to 102%, indicating a high grade of accuracy. Repeatability inter-analysis was performed by analyzing the same sample four times with a CV of 1% and a corresponding average CV of 0.5%.
Synthesis of 4P-GlcNAc: As shown in Scheme 1, the synthesis of target compound 6 commenced from the regioselective ring opening of protected GlcN 2 (92% yield), which was prepared from galactosamine hydrochloride as described in reference 236. Removal of the N-phthalimido protection by means of ethylenediamine, followed by selective N-acetylation provided known compound 4 in 87% yield [237]. Reaction of 4 with N,N-diethyl-1,5-dihydro-3H-2,3,4-benzodioxaphosphepin-3 amine and 1H-tetrazole and subsequent oxidation with m-chloroperbenzoic acid (m-CPBA) enabled the phosphate group introduction in significantly higher yield than previously reported with other methods [238] and furnished crystalline shelf stable compound 5 (m. p. 159-160°C). A phosphomonoester peak at 0.32 ppm in the ^{31}P NMR spectrum, which correlated with the H-4 signal at 4.58 ppm and two couples of CH systems (5.13, 4.98 and 5.14, 4.99 ppm respectively) in the ^1H-^{31}P HMBC NMR spectrum allowed to assess the structure of 5. Finally hydrogenolysis over 10% Pd-C provided the target 4P-GlcNAc 6 in excellent yield (95%) respect to 50% yield attained when unprotected phosphate was present. NMR data of the final product were in good agreement with those reported in literature [239].

Scheme 1. a. Ref. 236; b. trimethylamineborane, BF_3·Et_2O, CH_3CN, 0°C, 83%; c. H_2NCH_2CH_2NH_2, EtOH, reflux; Ac_2O, pyridine, 87% (over 2 steps); d. N,N-diethyl-1,5-dihydro-3H-2,3,4-benzodioxaphosphepin-3-amine, 1H-tetrazole, CH_2Cl_2; m-CPBA, CH_2Cl_2, H_2O, 92%; e. H_2, 10% Pd-C, 95%.
NMR characterization of the products formed by acid hydrolysis of MenX polysaccharide or 4P-GlcNAc: MenX polysaccharide and the synthetic monomer 6 were hydrolyzed at larger scale according to the procedure optimized for the HPAEC-PAD analysis in order to confirm the structure of the resulting species by NMR analysis. In both cases 4P-GlcNH was assessed as the prevalent species.
^1H NMR spectrum of 4P-GlcNAc 6 showed the α/β anomeric peaks at5.19 and 4.72 ppm respectively, and the proton signals in the range 4.00-3.69 ppm. H-2α and H-2β were assigned at 3.91 ppm and 3.72 ppm signals by homo-nuclear COSY NMR correlation. One single peak for phosphate monoester at 0.58 ppm was detected at the ^{31}P NMR
After hydrolysis of both the standard 6 and the native MenX PS, ^1H NMR analysis of the attained 4P-GlcN showed two major anomeric signals corresponding at α/β mixtures in the ratio of 5.5:4.5 and 6.7:3.3 at 5.40 and 4.92 ppm, respectively. Remaining ring proton signals fell between 4.08 and 3.44 ppm, while H-2α (dd, J 3.7 and 10.3 Hz, at 3.91 ppm) and H-2β (dd, J 8.5 and 10.5 Hz, at 3.06 ppm) were shifted up-field due to the loss of the acetyl group. Furthermore, no N-acetyl CH_3 signals were detected indicating that hydrolysis resulted in total de-N-acetylation.
Bidimensional ^1H-^{31}P HMBC NMR evidenced two overlapping cross peaks, assigned to the phosphate monoester signals at 0.68 and 0.14 ppm of the ^{31}P NMR spectrum, correlating with H-4α and H-4β at 3.94 and 3.96 ppm, respectively, in the ^1H NMR
Use of 4P-GlcNAc as standard for MenX quantification by HPAEC-PAD: The synthetic monomer 6 was quantified by the colorimetric method for total phosphorus content and then used for building a calibration curve (in the range 0.5-8 µg/mL) in comparison to the native MenX polysaccharide. After subjecting the synthetic monomer and the native polysaccharide to the same hydrolysis conditions optimized for MenX polysaccharide samples, the same peak was detected by HPAEC-PAD and the curves obtained perfectly overlapped. The concentration of unknown samples and intermediates of the polysaccharide purification process was consistent independently from the curve used for the quantification (the difference in saccharide concentration values was < 2% for all the tested samples). Mixtures of hydrolyzed MenX polysaccharide and synthetic monomer were also analyzed by HPAEC-PAD on a CarboPac PA1 column, eluting with 10 mM sodium hydroxide, to verify the eventual formation of GlcN in the hydrolysis conditions used [26]. Formation of GlcN was less than 5% in moles both for native MenX and synthetic monomer samples.
We also verified the possibility to use the commercially available glucosamine-6-phosphate (6P-GlcN) as standard for the analysis, using the same hydrolysis conditions optimized for MenX. The resulting calibration curve overlapped those obtained with native MenX and its synthetic monomer, but the elution time of the resulting peak detected by HPAEC-PAD was different (8.97 min against 9.88 min for MenX), demonstrating that utilization of 4P-GlcNAc is more straightforward.
This method for MenX polysaccharide quantification is a crucial analytical tool for monitoring the saccharide content of purification process intermediates and a final conjugate vaccine. In addition to allowing the process yield to be calculated, the quantification allows calculation of the saccharide/protein ratio of the conjugate and the % of free saccharide, both of which are important parameters for verifying the quality and consistency of a final vaccine formulation.
The use of a synthetic monomer means that there is no need for the standardization of a batch of polysaccharide for the analysis. The overall method is rapid, permits detection of very low concentrations of sugar (≥ 0.5 µg/mL of polysaccharide), with minimal sample clean-up and has been verified to work well for the characterization of purification process intermediates, including fermentation broths. The method may be suitable for the quantification of intermediates of conjugation processes and for the characterization of the final vaccine formulations.

REFERENCES
- [1] Armand et al. (1982) J. Biol. Stand. 10:335-339.
- [2] Cadoz et al. (1985) Vaccine 3:340-342.
- [3] MMWR (1997) 46(RR-5) 1-10.
- [4] Baklaic et al. (1983) Infect. Immun. 42:599-604.
- [5] Jones (2001) Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2:47-49.
- [6] Costantino et al. (1992) Vaccine 10:691-8.
- [7] Lieberman et al. (1996) JAMA 275:1499-503.
- [8] WO2005/000345.
- [9] WO02/058737.
- [10] WO03/007985.
- [11] Rennels et al. (2002) Pediatr Infect Dis J 21:978-979.
- [12] WO2004/013400.
- [13] Campbell et al. (2002) J Infect Dis 186:1848-1851.
- [14] Bundle et al. (1974) J Biol Chem. 249(15):4797-801.
- [15] Delrieu et al. (2011) PLoS One. 6(5):e19513. Epub 2011 May 20.
- [16] Chen et al. (2008) Chin Med J (Engl). 121(7):664-6.
- [17] Gagneux et al. (2002) Emerg Infect Dis. 8(5):462-6.
- [18] WO 2008/102173
- [19] Bundle et al. (1974) J Biol Chem 249:2275-81.
- [20] Tiesjema et al. (1977) Bull World Health Organ 55:3578-48.
- [21] Teodorović P. Synthesis of oligosaccharides related to the capsular polysaccharide of Neisseria meningitidis serotype A. Doctoral Thesis - Stockholm University 2005.
- [22] Zon et al. (1982) Infect Immun 1982;37:89-103.
- [23] Egan et al. (1982) J Am Chem Soc 104:2898-910.
- [24] Chen et al. (1956) Anal. Chem. 28:1756-1758.
- [25] Garrido et al. (2012) J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 70:295-300.
- [26] Xie et al. (2012) Vaccine 2012 (30) 5812- 5582.
- [27] Frash (1990) p. 123-145 of Advances in Biotechnological Processes vol. 13 (eds. Mizrahi & Van Wezel)
- [28] Inzana (1987) Infect. Immun. 55:1573-1579.
- [29] WO 2011/023764.
- [30] Lemercinier and Jones (1996) Carbohydrate Res. 296:83-96.
- [31] Jones and Lemercinier (2002) J Pharm Biomed Anal. 30(4):1233-47.
- [32] Ravenscroft et al. (1999) Vaccine 17:2802-2816.
- [33] Costantino et al. (1999) Vaccine 17:1251-1263.
- [34] Ramsay et al. (2001) Lancet 357(9251):195-196.
- [35] Lindberg (1999) Vaccine 17 Suppl 2:S28-36.
- [36] Buttery & Moxon (2000) J R Coll Physicians Lond 34:163-168.
- [37] Ahmad & Chapnick (1999) Infect Dis Clin North Am 13:113-33, vii.
- [38] Goldblatt (1998) J. Med. Microbiol. 47:563-567.
- [39] European patent 0477508.
- [40] US patent 5,306,492.
- [41] WO98/42721.
- [42] Dick et al. in Conjugate Vaccines (eds. Cruse et al.) Karger, Basel, 1989, 10:48-114.
- [43] Hermanson Bioconjugate Techniques, Academic Press, San Diego (1996) ISBN: 0123423368.
- [44]
Research Disclosure, 453077 (Jan 2002
)
- [45] EP-A-0594610.
- [46] Ruan et al. (1990) J Immunol 145:3379-3384.
- [47] WO00/56360.
- [48] EP-A-0372501.
- [49] EP-A-0378881.
- [50] EP-A-0427347.
- [51] WO93/17712
- [52] WO94/03208.
- [53] WO98/58668.
- [54] EP-A-0471177.
- [55] WO91/01146
- [56] Falugi et al. (2001) Eur J Immunol 31:3816-3824.
- [57] Baraldo et al. (2004) Infect Immun 72(8):4884-7.
- [58] WO02/091998.
- [59] Kuo et al. (1995) Infect Immun 63:2706-13.
- [60] Michon et al. (1998) Vaccine. 16:1732-41.
- [61] WO01/72337
- [62] WO00/61761.
- [63] WO2004/041157.
- [64] WO02/34771.
- [65] US patent application no. 61/556,456.
- [66] International patent application no. PCT/IB2012/056240.
- [67] Kato et al. (2003) Carbohydr. Polym. 51:69-75.
- [68] Angelin et al. (2006) Eur. J. Org. Chem., 4323-4326.
- [72] WO96/40242.
- [73] Lei et al. (2000) Dev Biol (Basel) 103:259-264.
- [74] WO00/38711; US patent 6,146,902.
- [75] WO99/42130.
- [76] WO2004/011027.
- [77] Watson (2000) Pediatr Infect Dis J 19:331-332.
- [78] Rubin (2000) Pediatr Clin North Am 47:269-285, v.
- [79] Jedrzejas (2001) Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 65: 187-207.
- [80] Bell (2000) Pediatr Infect Dis J 19:1187-1188.
- [81] Iwarson (1995) APMIS 103:321-326.
- [82] Gerlich et al. (1990) Vaccine 8 Suppl:S63-68 & 79-80.
- [83] Hsu et al. (1999) Clin Liver Dis 3:901-915.
- [84] Gustafsson et al. (1996) N. Engl. J. Med. 334:349-355.
- [85] Rappuoli etal. (1991) TIBTECH 9:232-238.
- [86] Vaccines (2004) eds. Plotkin & Orenstein. ISBN 0-7216-9688-0.
- [87] WO02/02606.
- [88] Kalman et al. (1999) Nature Genetics 21:385-389.
- [89] Read et al. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res 28:1397-406.
- [90] Shirai et al. (2000) J. Infect. Dis. 181(Suppl 3):S524-S527.
- [91] WO99/27105.
- [92] WO00/27994.
- [93] WO00/37494.
- [94] WO99/28475.
- [95] Ross et al. (2001) Vaccine 19:4135-4142.
- [96] Sutter et al. (2000) Pediatr Clin North Am 47:287-308.
- [97] Zimmerman & Spann (1999) Am Fam Physician 59:113-118, 125-126.
- [98] Dreesen (1997) Vaccine 15 Suppl:S2-6.
- [99] MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1998 Jan 16;47(1):12, 19.
- [100] McMichael (2000) Vaccine 19 Suppl 1:S101-107.
- [101] WO02/34771.
- [102] Dale (1999) Infect Dis Clin North Am 13:227-43, viii.
- [103] Ferretti et al. (2001) PNAS USA 98: 4658-4663.
- [104] WO03/093306.
- [105] WO2004/018646.
- [106] WO2004/041157.
- [107] lchiman and Yoshida (1981) J. Appl. Bacteriol. 51:229.
- [108] US4197290
- [109] lchiman et al. (1991) J. Appl. Bacteriol. 71:176.
- [110] Robinson & Torres (1997) Seminars in Immunology 9:271-283.
- [111] Donnelly et al. (1997) Annu Rev Immunol 15:617-648.
- [112] Scott-Taylor & Dalgleish (2000) Expert Opin Investig Drugs 9:471-480.
- [113] Apostolopoulos & Plebanski (2000) Curr Opin Mol Ther 2:441-447.
- [114] Ilan (1999) Curr Opin Mol Ther 1:116-120.
- [115] Dubensky et al. (2000) Mol Med 6:723-732.
- [116] Robinson & Pertmer (2000) Adv Virus Res 55:1-74.
- [117] Donnelly et al. (2000) Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162(4 Pt 2): S190-193.
- [118] Davis (1999) Mt. Sinai J. Med. 66:84-90.
- [119] Paoletti etal. (2001) Vaccine 19:2118-2126.
- [120] WO00/56365.
- [121] Gennaro (2000) Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy. 20th edition, ISBN: 0683306472.
- [122] WO03/009869.
- [123] Almeida & Alpar (1996) J. Drug Targeting 3:455-467.
- [124] Agarwal & Mishra (1999) Indian J Exp Biol 37:6-16.
- [125] WO00/53221.
- [126] Jakobsen et al. (2002) Infect Immun 70:1443-1452.
- [127] Bergquist et al. (1998) APMIS 106:800-806.
- [128] Baudner et al. (2002) Infect Immun 70:4785-4790.
- [129] Ugozzoli et al. (2002) J Infect Dis 186:1358-1361.
- [130] Vaccine Design... (1995) eds. Powell & Newman. ISBN: 030644867X. Plenum.
- [131] WO00/23105.
- [132] WO90/14837.
- [133] Podda (2001) Vaccine 19:2673-80.
- [134] Frey et al. (2003) Vaccine 21:4234-7.
- [135] US Patent 6,299,884.
- [136] US Patent 6,451,325.
- [137] US patent 5,057,540.
- [138] WO96/33739.
- [139] EP-A-0109942.
- [140] WO96/11711.
- [141] WO00/07621.
- [142] Barr et al. (1998) Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 32:247-271.
- [143] Sjolanderet et al. (1998) Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 32:321-338.
- [144] Niikura et al. (2002) Virology 293:273-280.
- [145] Lenz et al. (2001) J Immunol 166:5346-5355.
- [146] Pinto et al. (2003) J Infect Dis 188:327-338.
- [147] Gerber et al. (2001) Virol 75:4752-4760.
- [148] WO03/024480
- [149] WO03/024481
- [150] Gluck et al. (2002) Vaccine 20:B10-B16.
- [151] EP-A-0689454.
- [152] Johnson et al. (1999) Bioorg Med Chem Lett 9:2273-2278.
- [153] Evans et al. (2003) ExpertRev Vaccines 2:219-229.
- [154] Meraldi et al. (2003) Vaccine 21:2485-2491.
- [155] Pajak et al. (2003) Vaccine 21:836-842.
- [156] Kandimalla et al. (2003) Nucleic Acids Research 31:2393-2400.
- [157] WO02/26757.
- [158] WO99/62923.
- [159] Krieg (2003) Nature Medicine 9:831-835.
- [160] McCluskie et al. (2002) FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 32:179-185.
- [161] WO98/40100.
- [162] US patent 6,207,646.
- [163] US patent 6,239,116.
- [164] US patent 6,429,199.
- [165] Kandimalla et al. (2003) Biochemical Society Transactions 31 (part 3):654-658.
- [166] Blackwell et al. (2003) J Immunol 170:4061-4068.
- [167] Krieg (2002) Trends Immunol 23:64-65.
- [168] WO01/95935.
- [169] Kandimalla et al. (2003) BBRC 306:948-953.
- [170] Bhagat et al. (2003) BBRC 300:853-861.
- [171] WO03/035836.
- [172] WO95/17211.
- [173] WO98/42375.
- [174] Beignon et al. (2002) Infect Immun 70:3012-3019.
- [175] Pizza et al. (2001) Vaccine 19:2534-2541.
- [176] Pizza et al. (2000) Int J Med Microbiol 290:455-461.
- [177] Scharton-Kersten et al. (2000) Infect Immun 68:5306-5313.
- [178] Ryan et al. (1999) InfectImmun 67:6270-6280.
- [179] Partidos et al. (1999) Immunol Lett 67:209-216.
- [180] Peppoloni et al. (2003) Expert Rev Vaccines 2:285-293.
- [181] Pine et al. (2002) J Control Release 85:263-270.
- [182] Domenighini et al. (1995) Mol Microbiol 15:1165-1167.
- [183] WO99/40936.
- [184] WO99/44636.
- [185] Singh et al] (2001) JContRelease 70:267-276.
- [186] WO99/27960.
- [187] US patent 6,090,406
- [188] US patent 5,916,588
- [189] EP-A-0626169.
- [190] WO99/52549.
- [191] WO01/21207.
- [192] WO01/21152.
- [193] Andrianov et al. (1998) Biomaterials 19:109-115.
- [194] Payne et al. (1998) Adv Drug Delivery Review 31:185-196.
- [195] Stanley (2002) Clin Exp Dermatol 27:571-577.
- [196] Jones (2003) Curr Opin Investig Drugs 4:214-218.
- [197] WO04/60308
- [198] WO04/64759.
- [199] WO99/11241.
- [200] WO94/00153.
- [201] WO98/57659.
- [202] European patent applications 0835318, 0735898 and 0761231.
- [203] Hoskins et al. (2001) J.Bacteriol. 183:5709-5717.
- [204] Falugi et al. (2001) Eur J Immunol. 31(12):3816-24.
- [205] Geysen et al. (1984) PNAS USA 81:3998-4002.
- [206] Carter (1994) Methods Mol Biol 36:207-23.
- [207] Jameson, BA et al. 1988, CABIOS 4(1):181-186.
- [208] Raddrizzani & Hammer (2000) Brief Bioinform 1(2):179-89.
- [209] De Lalla et al. (1999) J. Immunol. 163:1725-29.
- [210] Brusic et al. (1998) Bioinformatics 14(2):121-30
- [211] Meister et al. (1995) Vaccine 13(6):581-91.
- [212] Roberts et al. (1996) AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 12(7):593-610.
- [213] Maksyutov & Zagrebelnaya (1993) Comput Appl Biosci 9(3):291-7.
- [214] Feller & de la Cruz (1991) Nature 349(6311):720-1.
- [215] Hopp (1993) Peptide Research 6:183-190.
- [216] Welling et al. (1985) FEBSLett. 188:215-218.
- [217] Davenport et al. (1995) Immunogenetics 42:392-297.
- [218] WO2004/092209.
- [219] WO2008/061953.
- [220] WO2005/090985
- [221] Hardy et al. (1988) Anal Biochem 170:54-62.
- [222] Wang et al. (1990) Anal Biochem 190:182-187.
- [223] WO2005/114171.
- [224] T. W. Greene and P. G. M. Wuts in "Protective groups in organic chemistry" John Wiley and Sons, 4th Edition, 2006.
- [225] Gennaro (2000) Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy. 20th edition, ISBN: 0683306472.
- [226] Methods In Enzymology (S. Colowick and N. Kaplan, eds., Academic Press, Inc.)
- [227] Handbook of Experimental Immunology, Vols. I-IV (D.M. Weir and C.C. Blackwell, eds, 1986, Blackwell Scientific Publications)
- [228] Sambrook et al. (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd edition (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).
- [229]
Handbook of Surface and Colloidal Chemistry (Birdi, K.S. ed., CRC Press, 1997
)
- [230] Ausubel et al. (eds) (2002) Short protocols in molecular biology, 5th edition (Current Protocols).
- [231] Molecular Biology Techniques: An Intensive Laboratory Course, (Ream et al., eds., 1998, Academic Press)
- [232] PCR (Introduction to Biotechniques Series), 2nd ed. (Newton & Graham eds., 1997, Springer Verlag)
- [233] Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (F.M. Ausubel et al., eds., 1987) Supplement 30
- [234] Smith & Waterman (1981) Adv. Appl. Math. 2: 482-489.
- [235] Micoli et al. (2012) Vaccine 30: 853-861.
- [236] Debenham et al. (1997) J. Org. Chem. 62:4591-4600.
- [237] Bera et al. (2011) J. Org. Chem. 76:3181-3193.
- [238] Bundle et al. (1974) Can. J. Biochem. 52(9):723-725.
- [239] Berti et al. (2012) Vaccine 30: 6409- 6415.

SEQUENCE LISTING
- <110> Novartis AG
- <120> MENINGOCOCCUS SEROGROUP X CONJUGATE
- <130> PAT054744-WO-PCT
- <140> PCT/EP2013/______
<141> 2013-05-22
- <150> USSN 61/799,528
<151> 2013-03-15
- <150> USSN 61/698,677
<151> 2012-09-09
- <150> USSN 61/650,025
<151> 2012-05-22
- <160> 10
- <170> SeqWin2010, version 1.0
- <210> 1
<211> 167
<212> PRT
<213> Streptococcus pneumoniae
- <400> 1
- <210> 2
<211> 195
<212> PRT
<213> Streptococcus pneumoniae
- <400> 2
- <210> 3
<211> 392
<212> PRT
<213> Streptococcus pneumoniae
- <400> 3
- <210> 4
<211> 366
<212> PRT
<213> Streptococcus pneumoniae
- <400> 4
- <210> 5
<211> 6
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
- <220>
<223> synthetic linker
- <400> 5
- <210> 6
<211> 8
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
- <220>
<223> synthetic linker
- <400> 6
- <210> 7
<211> 5
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
- <220>
<223> synthetic linker
- <400> 7
- <210> 8
<211> 6
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence
- <220>
<223> synthetic histidine tag
- <400> 8
- <210> 9
<211> 555
<212> PRT
<213> Streptococcus pneumoniae
- <400> 9
- <210> 10
<211> 552
<212> PRT
<213> Streptococcus pneumoniae
- <400> 10
1. An immunogenic composition comprising a conjugate of a Neisseria meningitidis serogroup X capsular polysaccharide and a carrier protein, wherein coupling of the capsular polysaccharide to the carrier protein is direct.
2. The immunogenic composition of claim 1, wherein the capsular polysaccharide is an oligosaccharide and wherein the final average degree of polymerization (DP) in the oligosaccharide is between 20 and 200.
3. The immunogenic composition of claim 1 or 2, wherein the carrier protein is a diphtheria or tetanus toxoid, CRM197 or protein D.
4. The immunogenic composition of claim 1 or 2, wherein the carrier protein comprises a spr0096 antigen and a spr2021 antigen.
5. The immunogenic composition of any preceding claim, further comprising one or more further antigens.
6. The immunogenic composition of claim 5, further comprising a Neisseria meningitidis serogroup A capsular polysaccharide optionally conjugated to a carrier molecule.
7. The immunogenic composition of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the composition is in an aqueous formulation.
8. The immunogenic composition any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the conjugate is obtainable by a process comprising the steps of: (a) oxidising a primary hydroxyl group in the capsular polysaccharide, to give an oxidised polysaccharide with an aldehyde group; and (b) coupling the oxidised polysaccharide to the carrier protein via the aldehyde group, thereby giving the conjugate.
9. The immunogenic composition of claim 8, where the oxidation in step (a) is of the primary hydroxyl group on between 1-10% of the residues in the capsular polysaccharide.
10. The immunogenic composition of any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the conjugate is obtainable by a process comprising the steps of: (a) reductive amination of the reducing terminus of the capsular polysaccharide, to give a modified polysaccharide with a primary amine group bonded to the C-1 atom of the terminal subunit by a covalent bond; and (b) coupling the modified polysaccharide to the carrier protein via the primary amine group, thereby giving the conjugate.
11. The immunogenic composition of any one of claim 1 to 7, wherein the conjugate is obtainable by a process comprising the steps of: (a) reduction of the reducing terminus of the capsular polysaccharide, to give a modified polysaccharide with two vicinal hydroxyl groups at that terminus; (b) oxidative cleavage of the vicinal hydroxyl groups, to give a further modified polysaccharide with an aldehyde group at the terminus; (c) reductive amination of the aldehyde group, to give a further modified polysaccharide with a primary amine group at the terminus and (d) coupling the further modified polysaccharide to the carrier protein via the primary amine group, thereby giving the conjugate.
12. A vaccine comprising the immunogenic composition of any preceding claim.
13. The immunogenic composition of any one of claims 1 to 11 or the vaccine of claim 12 for use in a method of raising an immune response in a mammal comprising administering to the mammal the immunogenic composition.
1. Immunogene Zusammensetzung, umfassend ein Konjugat eines Neisseria meningitidis-Serogruppe X-Kapselpolysaccharids und eines Trägerproteins, wobei das Koppeln des Kapselpolysaccharids an das Trägerprotein direkt erfolgt.
2. Immunogene Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 1, wobei das Kapselpolysaccharid ein Oligosaccharid ist und wobei der durchschnittliche Endgrad der Polymerisation (degree of polymerization; DP) in dem Oligosaccharid zwischen 20 und 200 beträgt.
3. Immunogene Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, wobei das Trägerprotein ein Diphtherie- oder Tetanustoxoid, CRM197 oder Protein D ist.
4. Immunogene Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, wobei das Trägerprotein ein spr0096-Antigen und ein spr2021-Antigen umfasst.
5. Immunogene Zusammensetzung nach irgendeinem vorangegangenen Anspruch, welche weiterhin ein oder mehrere weitere Antigene umfasst.
6. Immunogene Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 5, weiterhin umfassend ein Neisseria meningitidis-Serogruppe A-Kapselpolysaccharid, welches optional an ein Trägermolekül konjugiert ist.
7. Immunogene Zusammensetzung nach irgendeinem der Ansprüche 1 bis 6, wobei die Zusammensetzung in einer wässrigen Formulierung vorliegt.
8. Immunogene Zusammensetzung nach irgendeinem der Ansprüche 1 bis 7, wobei das Konjugat durch ein Verfahren erhalten wird, welches die Schritte umfasst: (a) Oxidieren einer primären Hydroxylgruppe in dem Kapselpolysaccharid unter Erhalt eines oxidierten Polysaccharids mit einer Aldehydgruppe; und (b) Koppeln des oxidierten Polysaccharids an das Trägerprotein über die Aldehydgruppe, wodurch sich das Konjugat ergibt.
9. Immunogene Zusammensetzung nach Anspruch 8, wobei die Oxidation in Schritt (a) an der primären Hydroxylgruppe an zwischen 1-10% der Reste in dem Kapselpolysaccharid erfolgt.
10. Immunogene Zusammensetzung nach irgendeinem der Ansprüche 1 bis 7, wobei das Konjugat durch ein Verfahren erhältlich ist, welches die Schritte umfasst: (a) reduktive Aminierung des reduzierenden Terminus des Kapselpolysaccharids unter Erhalt eines modifizierten Polysaccharids mit einer primären Aminogruppe, die mit dem C-1-Atom der terminalen Untereinheit durch eine kovalente Bindung verbunden ist; und (b) Koppeln des modifizierten Polysaccharids an das Trägerprotein über die primäre Amingruppe, wodurch sich das Konjugat ergibt.
11. Immunogene Zusammensetzung nach irgendeinem der Ansprüche 1 bis 7, wobei das Konjugat durch ein Verfahren erhältlich ist, welches die Schritte umfasst: (a) Reduzieren des reduzierenden Terminus des Kapselpolysaccharids unter Erhalt eines modifizierten Polysaccharids mit zwei vicinalen Hydroxylgruppen an diesem Terminus; (b) oxidative Spaltung der vicinalen Hydroxylgruppen unter Erhalt eines weiteren modifizierten Polysaccharids mit einer Aldehydgruppe am Terminus; (c) reduktive Aminierung der Aldehydgruppe unter Erhalt eines weiteren modifizierten Polysaccharids mit einer primären Amingruppe am Terminus und (d) Koppeln des weiteren modifizierten Polysaccharids an das Trägerprotein über die primäre Amingruppe, wodurch sich das Konjugat ergibt.
12. Impfstoff, welcher die immunogene Zusammensetzung nach irgendeinem vorangegangenen Anspruch umfasst.
13. Immunogene Zusammensetzung nach irgendeinem der Ansprüche 1 bis 11 oder Impfstoff nach Anspruch 12 zur Verwendung in einem Verfahren zum Hervorrufen einer Immunantwort in einem Säugetier, umfassend das Verabreichen der immunogenen Zusammensetzung an das Säugetier.
1. Composition immunogène comprenant un conjugué d'un polysaccharide capsulaire de sérogroupe X Neisseria meningitidis et une protéine porteuse, dans laquelle le couplage du polysaccharide capsulaire avec la protéine porteuse est direct.
2. Composition immunogène selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle le polysaccharide capsulaire est un oligosaccharide et dans laquelle le degré moyen final de polymérisation (DP) dans l'oligosaccharide se situe entre 20 et 200.
3. Composition immunogène selon la revendication 1 ou 2, dans laquelle la protéine porteuse est une anatoxine diphtérique ou tétanique, du CRM197 ou une protéine D.
4. Composition immunogène selon la revendication 1 ou 2, dans laquelle la protéine porteuse comprend un antigène spr0096 et un antigène spr2021.
5. Composition immunogène selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comprenant en outre un ou plusieurs autres antigènes.
6. Composition immunogène selon la revendication 5, comprenant en outre un polysaccharide capsulaire de sérogroupe A Neisseria meningitidis éventuellement conjugué avec une molécule porteuse.
7. Composition immunogène selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 6, dans laquelle la composition se trouve dans une formulation aqueuse.
8. Composition immunogène selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 7, dans laquelle le conjugué peut être obtenu par un processus comprenant les étapes consistant : (a) à oxyder un groupement hydroxyle primaire dans le polysaccharide capsulaire pour donner un polysaccharide oxydé avec un groupement aldéhyde ; et (b) à coupler le polysaccharide oxydé avec la protéine porteuse via le groupement aldéhyde, en donnant ainsi le conjugué.
9. Composition immunogène selon la revendication 8, dans laquelle l'oxydation à l'étape (a) est celle du groupement hydroxyle primaire sur une portion comprise entre 1 et 10 % des résidus dans le polysaccharide capsulaire.
10. Composition immunogène selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 7, dans laquelle le conjugué peut être obtenu par un processus comprenant les étapes : (a) d'amination réductrice du terminal réducteur du polysaccharide capsulaire pour donner un polysaccharide modifié avec un groupement amine primaire lié à l'atome C-1 de la sous-unité terminale par une liaison covalente ; et (b) de couplage du polysaccharide modifié avec la protéine porteuse via le groupement amine primaire, en donnant ainsi le conjugué.
11. Composition immunogène selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 7, dans laquelle le conjugué peut être obtenu par un processus comprenant les étapes : (a) de réduction du terminal réducteur du polysaccharide capsulaire pour donner un polysaccharide modifié avec deux groupements hydroxyle vicinaux sur ce terminal ; (b) de clivage oxydant des groupements hydroxyle vicinaux pour donner un autre polysaccharide modifié avec un groupement aldéhyde au terminal ; (c) d'amination réductrice du groupement aldéhyde pour donner un autre polysaccharide modifié avec un groupement amine primaire au terminal et (d) de couplage de l'autre polysaccharide modifié avec la protéine porteuse via le groupement amine primaire, en donnant ainsi le conjugué.
12. Vaccin comprenant la composition immunogène selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes.
13. Composition immunogène selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 11 ou vaccin selon la revendication 12 pour utilisation dans un procédé permettant d'obtenir une réponse immunitaire chez un mammifère, comprenant l'administration au mammifère de la composition immunogène.

REFERENCES CITED IN THE DESCRIPTION
This list of references cited by the applicant is for the reader's convenience only. It does not form part of the European patent document. Even though great care has been taken in compiling the references, errors or omissions cannot be excluded and the EPO disclaims all liability in this regard.

Patent documents cited in the description
- US
61534751
B
[0194]
- WO
2005000345
A
[0238]
- WO
02058737
A
[0238]
- WO
03007985
A
[0238]
- WO
2004013400
A
[0238]
- WO
2008102173
A
[0238]
- WO
2011023764
A
[0238]
- EP
0477508
A
[0238]
- US
5306492
A
[0238]
- WO
9842721
A
[0238]
- EP
0594610
A
[0238]
- WO
0056360
A
[0238]
- EP
0372501
A
[0238]
- EP
0378881
A
[0238]
- EP
0427347
A
[0238]
- WO
9317712
A
[0238]
- WO
9403208
A
[0238]
- WO
9858668
A
[0238]
- EP
0471177
A
[0238]
- WO
9101146
A
[0238]
- WO
02091998
A
[0238]
- WO
0172337
A
[0238]
- WO
0061761
A
[0238]
- WO
2004041157
A
[0238]
[0238]
- WO
0234771
A
[0238]
[0238]
- US
61556456
[0238]
- WO
2012056240
W
[0238]
- WO
9640242
A
[0238]
- WO
0038711
A
[0238]
- US
6146902
A
[0238]
- WO
9942130
A
[0238]
- WO
2004011027
A
[0238]
- WO
0202606
A
[0238]
- WO
9927105
A
[0238]
- WO
0027994
A
[0238]
- WO
0037494
A
[0238]
- WO
9928475
A
[0238]
- WO
03093306
A
[0238]
- WO
2004018646
A
[0238]
- US
4197290
A
[0238]
- WO
0056365
A
[0238]
- WO
03009869
A
[0238]
- WO
0053221
A
[0238]
- WO
0023105
A
[0238]
- WO
9014837
A
[0238]
- US
6299884
B
[0238]
- US
6451325
B
[0238]
- US
5057540
A
[0238]
- WO
9633739
A
[0238]
- EP
0109942
A
[0238]
- WO
9611711
A
[0238]
- WO
0007621
A
[0238]
- WO
03024480
A
[0238]
- WO
03024481
A
[0238]
- EP
0689454
A
[0238]
- WO
0226757
A
[0238]
- WO
9962923
A
[0238]
- WO
9840100
A
[0238]
- US
6207646
B
[0238]
- US
6239116
B
[0238]
- US
6429199
B
[0238]
- WO
0195935
A
[0238]
- WO
03035836
A
[0238]
- WO
9517211
A
[0238]
- WO
9842375
A
[0238]
- WO
9940936
A
[0238]
- WO
9944636
A
[0238]
- WO
9927960
A
[0238]
- US
6090406
A
[0238]
- US
5916588
A
[0238]
- EP
0626169
A
[0238]
- WO
9952549
A
[0238]
- WO
0121207
A
[0238]
- WO
0121152
A
[0238]
- WO
0460308
A
[0238]
- WO
0464759
A
[0238]
- WO
9911241
A
[0238]
- WO
9400153
A
[0238]
- WO
9857659
A
[0238]
- EP
0835318
A
[0238]
- EP
0735898
A
[0238]
- EP
0761231
A
[0238]
- WO
2004092209
A
[0238]
- WO
2008061953
A
[0238]
- WO
2005090985
A
[0238]
- WO
2005114171
A
[0238]
- EP
2013
W
20130522
[0239]
- US
61799528
20130315
[0239]
- US
61698677
20120909
[0239]
- US
61650025
20120522
[0239]

Non-patent literature cited in the description
- ARMAND et al.
J. Biol. Stand.
19820000
10
335
339
[0238]
- CADOZ et al.
Vaccine
19850000
3
340
342
[0238]
- MMWR
19970000
46
RR-5
1
10
[0238]
- BAKLAIC et al.
Infect. Immun.
19830000
42
599
604
[0238]
- JONES
Curr Opin Investig Drugs
20010000
2
47
49
[0238]
- COSTANTINO et al.
Vaccine
19920000
10
691
8
[0238]
- LIEBERMAN et al.
JAMA
19960000
275
1499
503
[0238]
- RENNELS et al.
Pediatr Infect Dis J
20020000
21
978
979
[0238]
- CAMPBELL et al.
J Infect Dis
20020000
186
1848
1851
[0238]
- BUNDLE et al.
J Biol Chem.
19740000
249
15
4797
801
[0238]
- DELRIEU et al.
PLoS One
20110000
6
5
e19513
[0238]
- CHEN et al.
Chin Med J (Engl).
20080000
121
7
664
6
[0238]
- GAGNEUX et al.
Emerg Infect Dis.
20020000
8
5
462
6
[0238]
- BUNDLE et al.
J Biol Chem
19740000
249
2275
81
[0238]
- TIESJEMA et al.
Bull World Health Organ
19770000
55
3578
48
[0238]
- TEODOROVIĆ P
Synthesis of oligosaccharides related to the capsular polysaccharide of Neisseria meningitidis serotype A
Doctoral Thesis - Stockholm University
20050000
[0238]
- ZON et al.
Infect Immun
19820000
37
89
103
[0238]
- EGAN et al.
J Am Chem Soc
19820000
104
2898
910
[0238]
- CHEN et al.
Anal. Chem.
19560000
28
1756
1758
[0238]
- GARRIDO et al.
J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.
20120000
70
295
300
[0238]
- XIE et al.
Vaccine 2012
20120000
30
5812
5582
[0238]
- FRASH
Advances in Biotechnological Processes
19900000
13
123
145
[0238]
- INZANA
Infect. Immun.
19870000
55
1573
1579
[0238]
- LEMERCINIER
JONES
Carbohydrate Res.
19960000
296
83
96
[0238]
- JONES
LEMERCINIER
J Pharm Biomed Anal.
20020000
30
4
1233
47
[0238]
- RAVENSCROFT et al.
Vaccine
19990000
17
2802
2816
[0238]
- COSTANTINO et al.
Vaccine
19990000
17
1251
1263
[0238]
- RAMSAY et al.
Lancet
20010000
357
9251
195
196
[0238]
- LINDBERG
Vaccine
19990000
17
2
28
36
[0238]
- BUTTERY
MOXON
J R Coll Physicians Lond
20000000
34
163
168
[0238]
- AHMAD
CHAPNICK
Infect Dis Clin North Am
19990000
13
113
33
[0238]
- GOLDBLATT
J. Med. Microbiol.
19980000
47
563
567
[0238]
- DICK et al.
Conjugate Vaccines
Karger
19890000
10
48
114
[0238]
- HERMANSON
Bioconjugate Techniques
Academic Press
19960000
[0238]
- Research Disclosure
20020100
453077
[0238]
- RUAN et al.
J Immunol
19900000
145
3379
3384
[0238]
- FALUGI et al.
Eur J Immunol
20010000
31
3816
3824
[0238]
- BARALDO et al.
Infect Immun
20040000
72
8
4884
7
[0238]
- KUO et al.
Infect Immun
19950000
63
2706
13
[0238]
- MICHON et al.
Vaccine
19980000
16
1732
41
[0238]
- KATO et al.
Carbohydr. Polym.
20030000
51
69
75
[0238]
- ANGELIN et al.
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
20060000
4323
4326
[0238]
- LEI et al.
Dev Biol
20000000
103
259
264
[0238]
- WATSON
Pediatr Infect Dis J
20000000
19
331
332
[0238]
- RUBIN
Pediatr Clin North Am
20000000
47
269
285
[0238]
- JEDRZEJAS
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev
20010000
65
187
207
[0238]
- BELL
Pediatr Infect Dis J
20000000
19
1187
1188
[0238]
- IWARSON
APMIS
19950000
103
321
326
[0238]
- GERLICH et al.
Vaccine
19900000
8
63
68
79
80
[0238]
- HSU et al.
Clin Liver Dis
19990000
3
901
915
[0238]
- GUSTAFSSON et al.
N. Engl. J. Med.
19960000
334
349
355
[0238]
- RAPPUOLI et al.
TIBTECH
19910000
9
232
238
[0238]
- Vaccines
20040000
[0238]
- KALMAN et al.
Nature Genetics
19990000
21
385
389
[0238]
- READ et al.
Nucleic Acids Res
20000000
28
1397
406
[0238]
- SHIRAI et al.
J. Infect. Dis.
20000000
181
3
S524
S527
[0238]
- ROSS et al.
Vaccine
20010000
19
4135
4142
[0238]
- SUTTER et al.
Pediatr Clin North Am
20000000
47
287
308
[0238]
- ZIMMERMAN
SPANN
Am Fam Physician
19990000
59
113
118
125
126
[0238]
- DREESEN
Vaccine
19970000
15
S2-6
[0238]
- MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
19980116
47
1
12
19
[0238]
- MCMICHAEL
Vaccine
20000000
19
1
101
107
[0238]
- DALE
Infect Dis Clin North Am
19990000
13
227
43
[0238]
- FERRETTI et al.
PNAS USA
20010000
98
4658
4663
[0238]
- LCHIMAN
YOSHIDA
J. Appl. Bacteriol
19810000
51
229
[0238]
- LCHIMAN et al.
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
19910000
71
176
[0238]
- ROBINSON
TORRES
Seminars in Immunology
19970000
9
271
283
[0238]
- DONNELLY et al.
Annu Rev Immunol
19970000
15
617
648
[0238]
- SCOTT-TAYLOR
DALGLEISH
Expert Opin Investig Drugs
20000000
9
471
480
[0238]
- APOSTOLOPOULOS
PLEBANSKI
Curr Opin Mol Ther
20000000
2
441
447
[0238]
- ILAN
Curr Opin Mol Ther
19990000
1
116
120
[0238]
- DUBENSKY et al.
Mol Med
20000000
6
723
732
[0238]
- ROBINSON
PERTMER
Adv Virus Res
20000000
55
1
74
[0238]
- DONNELLY et al.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
20000000
162
4
190
193
[0238]
- DAVIS
Mt. Sinai J. Med.
19990000
66
84
90
[0238]
- PAOLETTI et al.
Vaccine
20010000
19
2118
2126
[0238]
- GENNARO
Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy
20000000
[0238]
[0238]
- ALMEIDA
ALPAR
J. Drug Targeting
19960000
3
455
467
[0238]
- AGARWAL
MISHRA
Indian J Exp Biol
19990000
37
6
16
[0238]
- JAKOBSEN et al.
Infect Immun
20020000
70
1443
1452
[0238]
- BERGQUIST et al.
APMIS
19980000
106
800
806
[0238]
- BAUDNER et al.
Infect Immun
20020000
70
4785
4790
[0238]
- UGOZZOLI et al.
J Infect Dis
20020000
186
1358
1361
[0238]
- Vaccine Design
Plenum
19950000
[0238]
- PODDA
Vaccine
20010000
19
2673
80
[0238]
- FREY et al.
Vaccine
20030000
21
4234
7
[0238]
- BARR et al.
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
19980000
32
247
271
[0238]
- SJOLANDERET et al.
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
19980000
32
321
338
[0238]
- NIIKURA et al.
Virology
20020000
293
273
280
[0238]
- LENZ et al.
J Immunol
20010000
166
5346
5355
[0238]
- PINTO et al.
J Infect Dis
20030000
188
327
338
[0238]
- GERBER et al.
Virol
20010000
75
4752
4760
[0238]
- GLUCK et al.
Vaccine
20020000
20
B10
B16
[0238]
- JOHNSON et al.
Bioorg Med Chem Lett
19990000
9
2273
2278
[0238]
- EVANS et al.
ExpertRev Vaccines
20030000
2
219
229
[0238]
- MERALDI et al.
Vaccine
20030000
21
2485
2491
[0238]
- PAJAK et al.
Vaccine
20030000
21
836
842
[0238]
- KANDIMALLA et al.
Nucleic Acids Research
20030000
31
2393
2400
[0238]
- KRIEG
Nature Medicine
20030000
9
831
835
[0238]
- MCCLUSKIE et al.
FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology
20020000
32
179
185
[0238]
- KANDIMALLA et al.
Biochemical Society Transactions
20030000
31
654
658
[0238]
- BLACKWELL et al.
J Immunol
20030000
170
4061
4068
[0238]
- KRIEG
Trends Immunol
20020000
23
64
65
[0238]
- KANDIMALLA et al.
BBRC
20030000
306
948
953
[0238]
- BHAGAT et al.
BBRC
20030000
300
853
861
[0238]
- BEIGNON et al.
Infect Immun
20020000
70
3012
3019
[0238]
- PIZZA et al.
Vaccine
20010000
19
2534
2541
[0238]
- PIZZA et al.
Int J Med Microbiol
20000000
290
455
461
[0238]
- SCHARTON-KERSTEN et al.
Infect Immun
20000000
68
5306
5313
[0238]
- RYAN et al.
InfectImmun
19990000
67
6270
6280
[0238]
- PARTIDOS et al.
Immunol Lett
19990000
67
209
216
[0238]
- PEPPOLONI et al.
Expert Rev Vaccines
20030000
2
285
293
[0238]
- PINE et al.
J Control Release
20020000
85
263
270
[0238]
- DOMENIGHINI et al.
Mol Microbiol
19950000
15
1165
1167
[0238]
- SINGH et al.
JContRelease
20010000
70
267
276
[0238]
- ANDRIANOV et al.
Biomaterials
19980000
19
109
115
[0238]
- PAYNE et al.
Adv Drug Delivery Review
19980000
31
185
196
[0238]
- STANLEY
Clin Exp Dermatol
20020000
27
571
577
[0238]
- JONES
Curr Opin Investig Drugs
20030000
4
214
218
[0238]
- HOSKINS et al.
J.Bacteriol
20010000
183
5709
5717
[0238]
- FALUGI et al.
Eur J Immunol.
20010000
31
12
3816
24
[0238]
- GEYSEN et al.
PNAS USA
19840000
81
3998
4002
[0238]
- CARTER
Methods Mol Biol
19940000
36
207
23
[0238]
- JAMESON, BA et al.
CABIOS
19880000
4
1
181
186
[0238]
- RADDRIZZANI
HAMMER
Brief Bioinform
20000000
1
2
179
89
[0238]
- DE LALLA et al.
J. Immunol.
19990000
163
1725
29
[0238]
- BRUSIC et al.
Bioinformatics
19980000
14
2
121
30
[0238]
- MEISTER et al.
Vaccine
19950000
13
6
581
91
[0238]
- ROBERTS et al.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses
19960000
12
7
593
610
[0238]
- MAKSYUTOV
ZAGREBELNAYA
Comput Appl Biosci
19930000
9
3
291
7
[0238]
- FELLER
DE LA CRUZ
Nature
19910000
349
6311
720
1
[0238]
- HOPP
Peptide Research
19930000
6
183
190
[0238]
- WELLING et al.
FEBSLett.
19850000
188
215
218
[0238]
- DAVENPORT et al.
Immunogenetics
19950000
42
392
297
[0238]
- HARDY et al.
Anal Biochem
19880000
170
54
62
[0238]
- WANG et al.
Anal Biochem
19900000
190
182
187
[0238]
- T. W. GREENE
P. G. M. WUTS
Protective groups in organic chemistry
John Wiley and Sons
20060000
[0238]
- Methods In Enzymology
Academic Press, Inc
[0238]
- Handbook of Experimental Immunology
Blackwell Scientific Publications
19860000
I-IV
[0238]
- SAMBROOK et al.
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
20010000
[0238]
- Handbook of Surface and Colloidal Chemistry
CRC Press
19970000
[0238]
- Short protocols in molecular biology
Current Protocols
20020000
[0238]
- Molecular Biology Techniques: An Intensive Laboratory Course
Academic Press
19980000
[0238]
- PCR (Introduction to Biotechniques Series)
Springer Verlag
19970000
[0238]
- Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
19870000
[0238]
- SMITH
WATERMAN
Adv. Appl. Math.
19810000
2
482
489
[0238]
- MICOLI et al.
Vaccine
20120000
30
853
861
[0238]
- DEBENHAM et al.
J. Org. Chem.
19970000
62
4591
4600
[0238]
- BERA et al.
J. Org. Chem.
20110000
76
3181
3193
[0238]
- BUNDLE et al.
Can. J. Biochem.
19740000
52
9
723
725
[0238]
- BERTI et al.
Vaccine
20120000
30
6409
6415
[0238]