Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to coke used in blast furnace ironmaking and a method
for producing the same and, in particular, relates to coke blended with ashless coal
obtained by extraction treatment of coal with a solvent.
Background Art
[0002] Coke used in blast furnace ironmaking is required to have various properties, e.g.,
a certain level of mechanical strength such that coke is not easily crushed in the
blast furnace, reactivity, an apparent density, and the size and distribution of lumps
necessary to ensure gas permeability in the blast furnace. As the raw material for
coke satisfying such requirements, usually, hard coking coal, which is referred to
as "coking coal", is used, which has high quality with a caking property, fluidity,
or degree of coalification in a certain range, and which is expensive coal compared
with coal generally used as fuel for boilers. Such hard coking coal softens and melts
at about 400°C to form a viscous liquid, fuse together, and swells by including gas.
Therefore, spaces between coal particles are effectively filled, and adhesion between
particles is facilitated, thus producing strong coke. However, in recent years, under
limited resources and rising costs, there has been an attempt to use inexpensive,
low-quality coal as the raw material for coke. For example, various technological
developments have been made for blending a larger amount of low-rank coal with hard
coking coal.
[0003] Low-rank coal, such as non-coking or slightly coking coal, has a lower fluidity than
hard coking coal and has a poor caking property, and therefore, inhibits adhesion
between coal particles, resulting in an increase in defect density, thus decreasing
the strength of coke. Accordingly, in order to compensate the caking property, techniques
have been disclosed for coking in which asphalt pitch (ASP), i.e., a caking additive
derived from petroleum, or ashless coal (Hyper-coal, HPC) composed of a soluble component
obtained by extraction of coal with an organic solvent, is added. In particular, regarding
ashless coal, various techniques have been developed for the effective utilization
of low-rank coal. For example, Patent Literature 1 discloses a technique for coking
in which ashless coal is added to coal including low-rank coal and describes that
when ashless coal is added in an amount of 5% to 10%, high-strength coke can be obtained.
Citation List
Patent Literature
[0004] PTL 1: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No.
2009-221361
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0005] Ashless coal has a higher fluidity than coking coal (unmodified coal). Therefore,
coke has a very strong structure when a large amount of ashless coal is added, even
if a large amount of low-rank coal is blended. However, in addition to strength, coke
used in a blast furnace is also required to be formed of large and uniform particles.
When a large amount of ashless coal is added, small particles tend to be mixed in
the resulting coke. For this reason, there is room for further improvement in Patent
Literature 1.
[0006] Furthermore, it is generally believed that variations occur in quality (strength,
particle size, porosity, and the like) due to the structure of a coke oven. In the
coke oven, since heat is transferred from the oven wall, the temperature is low at
the central portion of the oven, and the effective heating time in the carbonization
process is short. Furthermore, in the coke oven, since a pressure distribution occurs
in the height direction, a large load is applied in the lower part of the coke oven,
and coking coal or the like (coal charge) is unlikely to swell. Free swelling occurs
in the upper part of the coke oven. As a result, the quality of the resulting coke
varies depending on the position in the coke oven.
[0007] The present invention has been achieved in view of the problems described above.
It is an object of the present invention to provide coke with uniform quality, composed
of large particles and having sufficient strength, in which the blending amount of
hard coking coal is reduced, and a method for producing the same.
Solution to Problem
[0008] In order to solve the problems, the present inventors have found that the particle
size of coke is decreased by volume break. As a result of verification of the mechanism
of occurrence of volume break, it has been conceived that addition of a large amount
of ashless coal causes volume break. Accordingly, the present inventors have decided
to optimize the amount of ashless coal added so that overall fluidity can be secured
by coal.
[0009] That is, coke according to the present invention is obtained by carbonizing a coal
mixture including coal and 2% to 8% of ashless coal composed of a solvent-soluble
component of coal, characterized in that the coal mixture has a maximum fluidity MF
value (log (ddpm)) of 1.8 to 3.0.
[0010] In such a manner, by adding ashless coal having a higher fluidity than coal (coking
coal), the caking property required for coke formation is compensated to increase
the strength of coke; in the carbonization process, ashless coal flows at a temperature
lower than that of coal and bonds coal particles together uniformly in the coke oven;
and furthermore, since spaces between coal particles are filled owing to the high
swelling property, the quality of coke is made uniform. Moreover, by setting the amount
of ashless coal added and the average maximum fluidity of the entire coal mixture,
which serves as the coal charge, to appropriate ranges, the particle size of coke
can be increased.
[0011] Furthermore, a method for producing coke according to the present invention includes
a mixing step in which 2% to 8% of ashless coal is mixed with coal to obtain a coal
mixture having a maximum fluidity MF value (log (ddpm)) of 1.8 to 3.0, and a carbonization
step in which the coal mixture is carbonized.
[0012] By following such a procedure, in the method for producing coke, coking coal is selected
on the basis of the average maximum fluidity value that can be calculated in advance
and is blended and mixed with ashless coal in the mixing step, and the coal mixture
is carbonized in the carbonization step. Thereby, it is possible to produce coke composed
of uniform and large particles having sufficient strength.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0013] In the coke according to the present invention, sufficient strength and particle
size can be achieved while reducing raw material costs. Furthermore, in the method
for producing coke according to the present invention, ashless coal can be produced,
for example, from low-rank coal, and thus, raw material costs can be reduced. Furthermore,
it is possible to produce coke with sufficient strength and particle size uniformly,
regardless of the position inside the coke oven, by a simple production method.
Description of Embodiments
[0014] Coke and a method for producing the same according to the present invention will
be described in detail below.
[Coke]
[0015] The coke according to the present invention is fed into a blast furnace for producing
pig iron, and is obtained by carbonizing a coal mixture including coal and ashless
coal under the general conditions as described later. Coal and ashless coal, which
are raw materials for coke, will be described below.
(Coal)
[0016] As will be described later, one type or two or more types of coal having a quality
which makes it possible to set the average maximum fluidity MF value of the mixture
of coal and ashless coal to be within a specific range, are used. In particular, in
the case where low-rank coal classified as weakly coking coal or non-coking or slightly
coking coal, which is difficult to use alone as a raw material for coke, is used,
hard coking coal or semi-hard coking coal which is commonly used as a raw material
for coke is combined for use. In general, the low-rank coal refers to coal having
a maximum fluidity MF value (log (ddpm)) of 2.0 or less and an average maximum reflectance
Ro value of 1.1 or less. The maximum fluidity MF value represents thermal fluidity,
and the average maximum reflectance Ro value represents the degree of coalification.
In the coke according to the present invention, although depending on the characteristics
of coal, weakly coking coal and non-coking or slightly coking coal can be blended
at a blending ratio (including ashless coal) of about 50% at maximum, on the dry coal
basis. Although dried coal may be produced by air drying or the like, coal in the
state of containing moisture may be mixed with ashless coal and subjected to carbonization.
[0017] The coal is preferably in a pulverized form, and specifically, 80% or more of particles
of the coal have a diameter of 3 mm or less. In this description, the particle diameter
refers to the maximum length of the particle. The expression "80% or more of particles
have a diameter of 3 mm or less" means that "80% or more of the particles of coal
pass through a sieve with an opening of 3 mm". Note that, the coal with a particle
size of 3 mm or less means powder or particles which, when pulverized coal is screened
with a sieve (metal wire sieve, standard number JIS Z 8801-1(2006)) with an opening
of 3 mm or less, pass through the sieve. Such coal may be pulverized in advance or
pulverized while being mixed with ashless coal, which will be described in detail
when the production method is described.
(Ashless coal: 2% to 8%)
[0018] Ashless coal is a type of modified coal obtained by modifying coal for the effective
utilization of resources, and has been developed for efficient use as fuel. Ashless
coal is modified coal obtained by removing ash and insoluble coal components as much
as possible from coal, and is produced by a method in which, by subjecting coal to
extraction with a solvent having a high affinity for the coal, an extract from which
insoluble components, such as ash, are separated is obtained, and the solvent is removed
from the extract by distillation or evaporation. Such ashless coal can be produced
by a known method (for example, refer to Japanese Patent No.
4045229). Consequently, ashless coal does not substantially contain ash, and contains large
amounts of organic substances which are soluble in the solvent and which have softening
and melting properties. Structurally, ashless coal has a wide molecular weight distribution
ranging from a component with a relatively low molecular weight having two or three
fused aromatic rings to a component with a high molecular weight having about five
or six fused aromatic rings. Furthermore, ashless coal is dewatered in a state of
mixture (slurry) of coal and the solvent before extraction and separation. Therefore,
the moisture content is decreased to about 0.2% to 3% by mass, and ashless coal has
a sufficient calorific value. Accordingly, ashless coal has a high fluidity under
heating, and generally melts at 200°C to 300°C (has softening and melting properties)
regardless of the grade of coal used as a raw material. In the present invention,
regarding coal used as a raw material for ashless coal, quality does not matter. Furthermore,
in order to increase the strength of coke, ashless coal is preferably in a pulverized
form with a size as small as possible, and specifically, the diameter (maximum length)
is preferably 1 mm or less.
[0019] As described above, since ashless coal has a high volatile content, excellent thermal
fluidity, and a high caking property, it can compensate the caking property of low-rank
coal, such as weakly coking coal or non-coking coal. Furthermore, since ashless coal
starts to flow at a temperature lower than that of coking coal, by adding and dispersing
ashless coal into coal, ashless coal bonds coal particles together uniformly in the
coke oven, including at the central portion of the oven in which the temperature rise
is slow, in the carbonization process. Furthermore, since ashless coal has a higher
swelling property than coking coal, even in the lower part of the coke oven in which
a large load is applied, particles of ashless coal swell and spaces between coal particles
are filled. At the same time, ashless coal generates swelling pressure, thus bonding
other coal particles together. As a result, occurrence of defects, such as poor adhesion
between coal particles (macrocracks) and excessive swells (coarse pores), which may
act as starting points for breakage of coke, can be reduced, and it is possible to
suppress variations in quality in the width and height directions in the coke oven.
When the content (blending ratio) of ashless coal in the mixture of ashless coal and
coal (coal mixture, coal charge) is less than 2%, it is not possible to sufficiently
obtain a caking property required in the case where low-rank coal is blended or the
advantageous effects described above. Therefore, the content of ashless coal is set
at 2% or more, preferably, 3% or more.
[0020] On the other hand, ashless coal is produced by modifying inexpensive low-rank coal
in many cases. Therefore, it is believed that, in coke (carbon) formed using such
coking coal having a low degree of coalification, crystal growth is small (the breadth
or thickness of the carbon network structure is small) compared with carbon derived
from hard coking coal or the like having a high degree of coalification. Furthermore,
as the amount of ashless coal increases, the continuous phase of ashless coal in coke
increases, and when the continuous phase becomes excessive, the continuous phase itself
may act as a starting point for breakage. Furthermore, in addition to volume break,
breakage of coke also includes surface breakage. In the drum strength (DI) mainly
used as the index for strength of coke, volume break is unlikely to be indicated.
When a large amount of ashless coal is added, the particle size of coke is unlikely
to increase, and strength rather decreases. This tendency becomes noticeable when
the content exceeds 8%. Therefore, the content of ashless coal is set at 8% or less,
preferably 6% or less. In such a manner, in the coke according to the present invention,
the content of ashless coal is reduced to a certain level or less, and strength is
secured by the original caking property of coking coal (coal) to some extent.
(Maximum fluidity MF value (log (ddpm)): 1.8 to 3.0)
[0021] When the maximum fluidity MF value of the mixture of coal and ashless coal (coal
mixture) is less than 1.8, fluidity is insufficient, and the strength of the resulting
coke decreases. Specifically, when the maximum fluidity MF value is less than 1.8,
the blending amount of low-rank coal having a low fluidity and a low swelling property
is large, and particles of such coal are unlikely to bond with other coal particles
in the carbonization process. Therefore, the maximum fluidity MF value of the mixture
of coal and ashless coal is set at 1.8 or more, preferably 2.0 or more. Furthermore,
when the maximum fluidity MF value is 1.8 or more, the swelling property is likely
to be secured, and since coal particles swell by including gas in the carbonization
process, spaces between coal particles are effectively filled, and adhesion between
particles is facilitated, thus producing strong coke. On the other hand, when the
maximum fluidity MF value exceeds 3.0, there is a concern that fluidity may become
excessive and bubbles may occur in coke. Therefore, the maximum fluidity MF value
of the mixture of coal and ashless coal is set at 3.0 or less, preferably 2.6 or less.
The maximum fluidity MF value of the mixture of coal and ashless coal is defined as
the value measured on the mixture, and can be measured by the Gieseler plastometer
method in accordance with JIS M8801. However, in the case where the maximum fluidity
MF value for each of various types of coal and ashless coal is known, approximate
calculation may be performed by multiplying the blending ratio (mass%/(100%)) and
summing up.
[0022] Furthermore, when the average maximum reflectance Ro value of the mixture of coal
and ashless coal is small, because of the low degree of coalification, swelling and
fusing of particles of coal and ashless coal may become insufficient in the carbonization
process, and because of the low strength of the coke matrix, high-strength coke is
unlikely to be obtained. The average maximum reflectance Ro value of the mixture of
coal and ashless coal is preferably 0.95 or more, more preferably 1.0 or more. On
the other hand, even if the average maximum reflectance Ro value is large, the quality
of coke is not degraded by this alone. However, the maximum reflectance Ro value increases
as the amount of high-rank coal, such as hard coking coal, increases, and hard coking
coal has a high swelling property. Consequently, when an excessively large amount
of such coking coal is blended, in addition to an increase in raw material costs,
there is a concern that the swelling pressure may become excessive, resulting in a
severe damage of the coke oven. Specifically, the average maximum reflectance Ro value
of the mixture of coal and ashless coal is preferably 1.3 or less, more preferably
1.2 or less.
[Method for producing coke]
[0023] The method for producing coke according to the present invention includes a mixing
step in which ashless coal is mixed with coal, and a carbonization step in which the
coal and the like are carbonized. The individual steps will be described below.
(Mixing step)
[0024] In the mixing step, coal and ashless coal are mixed to obtain a coal mixture. The
blending ratio and the maximum fluidity MF value of the coal mixture are as described
above. In this step, preferably, these coals are simultaneously pulverized. Since
coal has lower pulverizability than ashless coal, as described above, when 80% or
more of particles of coal are pulverized to a diameter of 3 mm or less, ashless coal
is pulverized to particles with a diameter of 1 mm or less at the same time. For example,
coal and ashless coal are fed through a hopper into a known mixer, and stirring is
performed while pulverizing by an ordinary method. Thereby, secondary particles of
ashless coal are easily pulverized and coal is also pulverized. Note that the procedure
and method of mixing are not particularly specified, and for example, ashless coal
and coal which are pulverized in advance may be mixed.
(Carbonization step)
[0025] In the present invention, the conditions for carbonization are not particularly limited,
and usual carbonization conditions in the coke production using a coke oven can be
employed. For example, the coal mixture is charged into a chamber oven, in which about
30 tons can be charged through a charging hole, and carbonization is performed. At
the time of charging, by sufficiently increasing the bulk density of the coal mixture,
high-strength coke can be obtained. Preferably, the bulk density is set at 730 kg/m
3 or more. In particular, in the case of a coal mixture in which the fluidity of the
entire mixture is low, by increasing the bulk density, insufficient strength due to
the low fluidity can be compensated to some extent. Specifically, in a coal mixture
with a maximum fluidity MF of less than 2.0, the bulk density is preferably set at
750 kg/m
3 or more. The carbonization is performed under the conditions at a temperature of
preferably 950°C or higher, more preferably 1,000°C or higher, and preferably 1,200°C
or lower, more preferably 1,050°C or lower, for a time of preferably 8 hours or more,
more preferably 10 hours or more, and preferably 24 hours or less, more preferably
20 hours or less.
EXAMPLES
[0026] The coke and the method for producing the same according to the present invention
will be specifically described on the basis of examples and comparative examples.
[Coke making]
(Production of ashless coal)
[0027] First, ashless coal was produced in a Hyper-coal continuous production facility (Bench
Scale Unit) by the method described below.
[0028] Using bituminous coal produced in Australia as raw coal, 5 kg of the raw coal (in
terms of dried coal) and 1-methylnaphthalene (manufactured by Nippon Steel Chemical
Co., Ltd.), as a solvent, in four times (20 kg) the volume of the raw coal were mixed
to prepare a slurry The slurry was subjected to extraction treatment in a batch-type
autoclave with an inner volume of 30 L, at 370°C for one hour in a state in which
the pressure was increased to 1.2 MPa by introducing nitrogen. The slurry was separated
into a supernatant and a solid-content concentrated liquid in a gravity settling tank
maintaining the same temperature and the same pressure. By separating and recovering
the solvent from the supernatant by distillation, 2.7 kg of ashless coal was obtained.
The ash content of the resulting ashless coal was 0.9% by mass. The maximum fluidity
MF value (log (ddpm)) and the average maximum reflectance Ro value were as shown in
Table 1. The ashless coal was pulverized such that 100% (all) of the ashless coal
had a particle size (maximum length) of 3 mm or less.
(Mixing step)
[0029] The ashless coal and various types of coal shown in Table 1 were each adjusted to
a moisture content of 7.5% by mass, and mixed at the blending ratio shown in Table
2, on the dry coal basis. Note that the maximum fluidity MF values (log (ddpm)) of
coal and ashless coal shown in Table 1 were measured by the Gieseler plastometer method
in accordance with JIS M8801. The average maximum reflectance Ro value was measured
in accordance with JIS M8816. Furthermore, regarding mixtures, the maximum fluidity
MF values and the average maximum reflectance Ro values were calculated from the blending
ratios of various types of coal and ashless coal, which are shown in Table 2. Furthermore,
100% of coal was pulverized so as to have a particle size of 3 mm or less and the
pulverized coal was mixed.
(Carbonization step)
[0030] The mixture (coal charge) was placed inside a retort made of steel, and by applying
vibration to the retort, the bulk density was adjusted to the value shown in Table
2. Then, the retort was placed in an electric furnace of a both-side heating type,
and the mixture was subjected to carbonization under a nitrogen stream, thereby forming
a sample. The carbonization was performed under conditions in which the temperature
was raised at 3°C/min, heating was performed at 1,000°C for 20 minutes, and then,
the retort was taken out of the electric furnace and left to cool naturally. Furthermore,
as an evaluation reference, a sample (No. 20) was produced using coal having a high
maximum fluidity MF value in which non-coking coal was not blended and ashless coal
was not added.
[Evaluation]
(Strength)
[0031] As the strength of coke, the drum strength index DI
15015 is shown in Table 2. Specifically, in accordance with JISK2151, the sample was rotated
in a drum for 150 revolutions, then screened using a sieve with an opening of 15 mm,
and the weight ratio of the remaining portion was calculated. The acceptability criterion
for strength is set to DI
15015 of 84.8% or more. Note that the coke strength was measured using samples whose particle
size distribution had been measured by the method described later.
(Average particle size)
[0032] Coke was dropped twice using shatter equipment, and was subjected to impacts of 30
revolutions using a drum tester. Regarding the coke subjected to impacts, the particle
size distribution was measured using sieves with square openings of 100, 75, 50, 38,
25, and 15 mm. The average particle size was calculated from the formula (1) below.
Note that no samples remained over the sieve with a square opening of 100 mm. The
calculated average particle size is shown in Table 2. The acceptability criterion
is set at an average particle size of 45.0 mm or more.

M
75-100: weight of coke over 75 mm sieve
M
50-75: weight of coke under 75 mm sieve and over 50 mm sieve
M
38-50: weight of coke under 50 mm sieve and over 38 mm sieve
M
25-38: weight of coke under 38 mm sieve and over 25 mm sieve
M
15-25: weight of coke under 25 mm sieve and over 15 mm sieve
M
15<: weight of coke under 15 mm sieve
M
ALL: sum of weight of sieved coke (= M
75-100 + M
50-75 + M
38-50 + M
25-38 + M
15-25 + M
15<)
[Table 1]
| Raw material coal |
Maximum fluidity Log MF (logddpm) |
Average maximum reflectance Ro |
| Low-volatile-content hard coking coal group |
0.68 |
1.66 |
| Hard coking coal group |
2.20 |
1.35 |
| Semi-hard coking coal group |
3.10 |
0.78 |
| Weakly coking coal 1 |
0.99 |
1.05 |
| Weakly coking coal 2 |
2.58 |
0.75 |
| Non-coking coal 1 |
0.40 |
0.68 |
| Non-coking coal 2 |
0.02 |
1.22 |
| Ashless coal |
4.78 |
0.95 |
[Table 2]
| Sample |
Coke blending ratio (%) |
Mixture |
Bulk density |
Coke |
| Coal |
Ashless coal |
Average log MF |
Average Ro |
Average particle size |
DI15015 |
| Group |
No. |
Lowvolatile-content hard coking coal |
Hard coking coal |
Semi-hard coking coal |
Weakly coking coal 1 |
Weakly coking coal 2 |
Non-coking coal 1 |
Non-coking coal 2 |
| (logddp m) |
|
(kg/m3) |
(mm) |
(%) |
| Comparative Example |
1 |
5 |
25 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
1.92 |
1.070 |
730 |
42.6 |
84.2 |
| Comparative Example |
2 |
5 |
25 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
1.98 |
0.989 |
730 |
42.3 |
82.4 |
| Comparative Example |
3 |
5 |
24 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
1 |
1.95 |
1.066 |
730 |
42.8 |
84.2 |
| Comparative Example |
4 |
5 |
24 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
1 |
2.01 |
0.985 |
730 |
44.3 |
84.4 |
| Example |
5 |
5 |
23 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
2 |
1.98 |
1.062 |
730 |
45.1 |
84.8 |
| Example |
6 |
5 |
23 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
2 |
2.03 |
0.981 |
730 |
45.8 |
85.2 |
| Example |
7 |
5 |
22 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
3 |
2.00 |
1.058 |
730 |
45.9 |
85.1 |
| Example |
8 |
5 |
21 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
4 |
2.03 |
1.054 |
730 |
46.2 |
85.7 |
| Example |
9 |
5 |
21 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
4 |
2.08 |
0.973 |
730 |
49.0 |
86.0 |
| Example |
10 |
5 |
19 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
6 |
2.08 |
1.046 |
730 |
49.4 |
85.4 |
| Example |
11 |
5 |
19 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
6 |
2.14 |
0.965 |
730 |
47.2 |
85.3 |
| Example |
12 |
5 |
17 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
8 |
2.13 |
1.038 |
730 |
46.5 |
85.2 |
| Example |
13 |
5 |
17 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
8 |
2.19 |
0.957 |
730 |
45.6 |
85.1 |
| Comparative Example |
14 |
5 |
15 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
2.18 |
1.030 |
730 |
43.8 |
84.1 |
| Comparative Example |
15 |
5 |
15 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
2.24 |
0.949 |
730 |
44.5 |
84.6 |
| Comparative Example |
16 |
5 |
25 |
25 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
1.77 |
1.092 |
730 |
40.2 |
82.6 |
| Comparative Example |
17 |
5 |
25 |
25 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
1.77 |
1.092 |
780 |
42.3 |
84.3 |
| Example |
18 |
5 |
23 |
25 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
2 |
1.82 |
1.084 |
780 |
45.3 |
85.4 |
| Example |
19 |
5 |
21 |
25 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
4 |
1.87 |
1.076 |
780 |
49.9 |
86.8 |
| Reference Example |
20 |
5 |
30 |
40 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2.34 |
1.033 |
730 |
47.7 |
85.8 |
[0033] As shown in Table 2, in Sample Nos. 1, 2, 16, and 17 in which non-coking coal is
blended, without ashless coal being added, the strength is insufficient, coke is formed
of many small particles, and the average particle size is insufficient. Similarly,
in Sample Nos. 3 and 4 in which the content of ashless coal is insufficient, the strength
and average particle size are insufficient.
[0034] In contrast, in Sample Nos. 5 to 13, 18, and 19 in which the content of ashless coal
and the maximum fluidity MF value of the mixture are within the ranges of the present
invention, the resulting coke has sufficient strength and particle size although the
fluidity is lower than that of Sample No. 20. In particular, in Sample Nos. 8 to 11
and 19 in which the content of ashless coal is 4% to 6%, the resulting coke has a
particle size as large as that of Sample No. 20. Furthermore, in Sample Nos. 16 to
19, since the blending ratio of non-coking coal having a low fluidity is relatively
large, the fluidity of the mixture is also low. However, in Sample Nos. 18 and 19
in which ashless coal is added, the bulk density of the mixture is increased, and
then carbonization is performed, the resulting coke has sufficient strength and particle
size. On the other hand, in Sample Nos. 14 and 15 in which the content of ashless
coal is excessive, although the fluidity of the mixture is the same as or higher than
that of Sample Nos. 5 to 13, the strength and the particle size are insufficient.
[0035] While the present invention has been described in detail with reference to embodiments
and examples, the gist of the present invention is not limited to the above description,
and the scope of rights should be construed widely on the basis of the claims. In
the present invention, various modifications and changes are possible on the basis
of the above description.