TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to a stretch forming system and a stretch method for
performing stretch forming of a workpiece.
BACKGROUND ART
[0002] A stretch forming is conventionally performed for stretch forming of a workpiece
into a desired shape. For example, as depicted in Patent Document 1, the stretch forming
is performed by using a stretch forming apparatus including first and second jaws
clamping a plate-shaped workpiece at respective end edge portions opposite to each
other, a die disposed between the first and second jaws and coming into contact with
the workpiece, and multiple axes changing the relative positions and orientations
of the jaws with respect to the die. When an operator manually operates each of the
multiple control axes to change the relative positions and orientations of the jaws
with respect to the die, the workpiece is wrapped onto the die for stretch forming
into a desired shape.
PRIOR ART DOCUMENT
Patent Document
[0003] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication (Translation
of PCT Application) No.
2009-523613
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Problem to Be Solved by the Invention
[0004] To acquire a favorable formed product from stretch forming, a burden and skill of
an operator is required. Specifically, the stretch forming must be performed such
that a workpiece is prevented from wrinkling, that the thickness of the workpiece
is substantially uniformly changed across the entire part, and that no gap is generated
between the workpiece and the die. Therefore, the operator must devise paths of the
relative positions and orientations of the jaws with respect to the die necessary
for achieve this stretch forming as well as respective operation patterns of the multiple
control axes necessary for achieving the paths of the positions and orientations of
the jaws. This is time-consuming and therefore a burden for the operator, and is difficult
unless the worker is skilled.
[0005] it is therefore a problem of the present invention to calculate the paths of the
relative positions and orientations of the jaws with respect to the die, i.e., the
respective operation patterns of the multiple control axes, necessary for acquiring
a favorable formed product from the stretch forming on behalf of an operator in a
short period of time so as to reduce the burden of the operator. Means for Solving
the Problem
[0006] To achieve the object, the present invention is configured as follows.
[0007] According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a stretch
forming system comprising:
first and second jaws clamping a workpiece at respective end edge portions opposite
to each other;
a die disposed between the first and second jaws and coming into contact with the
workpiece; and
a plurality of control axes changing relative positions and orientations of the first
and second jaws with respect to the die;
a jaw path calculating unit calculating respective paths of the relative positions
and orientations of the first and second jaws with respect to the die when the workpiece
is wrapped onto the die by moving the die in a vertical direction under a restricting
condition that respective positions and orientations of the first and second jaws
are freely changeable except for movement in a vertical direction being regulated;
and
a control axis operation pattern calculating unit calculating respective operation
patterns of the plurality of the control axes achieving the respective paths of the
relative positions and orientations of the first and second jaws with respect to the
die calculated by the jaw path calculating unit.
[0008] According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a stretch
forming system comprising:
first and second jaws clamping a workpiece at respective end edge portions opposite
to each other;
a die disposed between the first and second jaws and coming into contact with the
workpiece; and
a plurality of control axes changing relative positions and orientations of the first
and second jaws with respect to the die;
a jaw path calculating unit calculating respective paths of the relative positions
and orientations of the first and second jaws with respect to the die when the workpiece
is wrapped onto the die by moving the die in a vertical direction under a restricting
condition that respective positions and orientations of the first and second jaws
are freely changeable except for movement in a vertical direction being regulated
and rotation around a rotation center line being regulated, the rotation center line
extending in a direction that is a horizontal direction orthogonal to a jaw facing
direction; and
a control axis operation pattern calculating unit calculating respective operation
patterns of the plurality of the control axes achieving the respective paths of the
relative positions and orientations of the first and second jaws with respect to the
die calculated by the jaw path calculating unit.
[0009] According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided the stretch
forming system according to the first or second aspect, wherein the jaw path calculating
unit calculates the respective paths of the relative positions and orientations of
the first and second jaws with respect to the die by using a workpiece having a thickness
thinner than the thickness of the actual workpiece.
[0010] According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, there is provided the stretch
forming system according to any one of the first to third aspect, further comprising
a die movement amount calculating unit calculating first and second intersections
between the respective paths of the relative positions of the first and second jaws
with respect to the die calculated by the jaw path calculating unit and respective
tangent lines at the both end edge portions of a forming surface of the die,
the die movement amount calculating unit calculating first and second vertical direction
distances from the calculated first and second respective intersections to an apex
of the die,
the die movement amount calculating unit comparing the calculated first and second
vertical direction distances with each other to determine the greater one as a relative
vertical-direction movement amount of the die with respect to the first and second
jaws.
[0011] According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a stretch
forming method of using first and second jaws clamping a workpiece at respective end
edge portions opposite to each other, a die disposed between the first and second
jaws and coming into contact with the workpiece, and a plurality of control axes changing
relative positions and orientations of the first and second jaws with respect to the
die to wrap the workpiece onto the die by the first and second jaws for forming, the
method including
calculating respective paths of the relative positions and orientations of the first
and second jaws with respect to the die when the workpiece is wrapped onto the die
by moving the die in a vertical direction under a restricting condition that the respective
positions and orientations of the first and second jaws are freely changeable except
for movement in a vertical direction being regulated, and
calculating respective operation patterns of the plurality of the control axes achieving
the calculated respective paths of the relative positions and orientations of the
first and second jaws with respect to the die.
[0012] According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a stretch
forming method of using first and second jaws clamping a workpiece at respective end
edge portions opposite to each other, a die disposed between the first and second
jaws and coming into contact with the workpiece, and a plurality of control axes changing
relative positions and orientations of the first and second jaws with respect to the
die to wrap the workpiece onto the die by the first and second jaws for forming, the
method including
calculating respective paths of the relative positions and orientations of the first
and second jaws with respect to the die when the workpiece is wrapped onto the die
by moving the die in a vertical direction under a restricting condition that the respective
positions and orientations of the first and second jaws are freely changeable except
for movement in a vertical direction being regulated and rotation around a rotation
center line being regulated, the rotation center line extending in a direction that
is a horizontal direction orthogonal to a jaw facing direction, and
calculating respective operation patterns of the plurality of the control axes achieving
the calculated respective paths of the relative positions and orientations of the
first and second jaws with respect to the die.
Effect of the Invention
[0013] The present invention enables the calculation of the paths of the relative positions
and orientations of the jaws with respect to the die, i.e., the respective operation
patterns of the multiple control axes, necessary for acquiring a favorable formed
product from the stretch forming on behalf of an operator in a short period of time.
As a result, the burden of the operator can be reduced.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0014] These aspects and features of the present invention will be apparent from the following
description related to preferable embodiments with regard to the accompanied drawings.
The drawings are as follows.
Fig. 1 is a model diagram of a configuration of control axes of a stretch forming
apparatus included in a stretch forming system according to an embodiment of the present
invention.
Fig. 2 is a schematic perspective view of jaws and a die of the stretch forming apparatus
depicted in Fig. 1.
Figs. 3A-3D are diagrams for explaining a flow of exemplary stretch forming.
Fig. 4 is a schematic configuration diagram of a control program creating apparatus
creating a control program for automatically controlling the operations of the control
axes.
Figs. 5A and 5B are diagrams for explaining the paths of the jaws calculated by a
jaw path calculating unit.
Fig. 6 is a diagram for explaining a die rise amount calculated by a die movement
amount calculating unit.
Figs. 7A and 7B are diagrams for explaining another stretch forming.
Fig. 8 is a diagram for explaining yet another stretch forming.
Fig. 9 is a diagram for explaining further stretch forming.
MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0015] Fig. 1 is a schematic of a configuration of a stretch forming apparatus included
in a stretch forming system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
[0016] As shown in Fig. 1, a stretch forming apparatus 10 has two jaws J
L, J
R opposite to each other and a die D. As shown in Fig. 2, which is a schematic perspective
view of the jaws J
L, J
R and the die D, the jaws J
L, J
R are configured to clamp a plate-shaped workpiece W in the thickness direction at
respective end edge portions opposite to each other. The die D is disposed between
the jaws J
L, J
R and is configured to come into contact with the workpiece W from below. The die D
includes a curved forming surface Ds coming into contact with the workpiece W.
[0017] The stretch forming apparatus 10 has a system coordinate system ΣS defined by an
X axis, a Y axis, and a Z axis orthogonal to each other. An X direction and a Y direction
are horizontal directions and a Z direction is a vertical direction.
[0018] The die D is has a die coordinate system ΣD defined by an X
D axis, a Y
D axis, and a Z
D axis orthogonal to each other as shown in Figs. 1 and 2.
[0019] The respective jaws J
L, J
R have jaw coordinate systems ΣJ
L, ΣJ
R defined as orthogonal coordinate systems as shown in Figs. 1 and 2. The origins of
the jaw coordinate systems ΣJ
L, ΣJR are located at reference points R
JL, R
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R positioned at the grip centers of the workpiece W of the jaws J
L, J
R. When the jaws J
L, J
R clamp the workpiece W in the thickness direction thereof, the reference points R
JL, R
JR are located at the centers of the portions of the workpiece W clamped by the jaws
J
L, J
R and the surfaces of the portions of the workpiece W clamped by the jaws J
L, J
R are orthogonal to a Z
JL axis and a Z
JR axis.
[0020] The stretch forming apparatus 10 also has control axes for the die for changing the
position and orientation of the die D, which are a die elevating/lowering axis J
D1 for elevating and lowering the die D in the vertical direction (Z direction) relative
to a base B of the stretch forming apparatus 10 and a die tilt axis J
D2 for rotating the die D around a rotation center line C
D1 extending in parallel with the X axis.
[0021] The stretch forming apparatus 10 also has control axes for the jaw J
L changing the position and orientation of the jaw J
L, which are, in the order from the base B of the stretch forming apparatus 10 to the
jaw J
L, a carriage axis J
L1 for stroking the jaw J
L in parallel with the X axis, an angulation axis J
L2 for rotating the jaw J
L around a rotation center line C
L1 extending in parallel with the Z axis, a slider axis J
L3 for stroking the jaw J
L in the horizontal direction (parallel with an X-Y plane), a swing axis J
L4 for rotating the jaw J
L around a rotation center line C
L2 extending in parallel with the stroke direction of the slider axis J
L3, a tension axis J
L5 for stroking the jaw J
L in the linear direction orthogonal to the rotation center line C
L2 of the swing axis J
L4, and a rotation axis J
L6 for rotating the jaw J
L around a rotation center line C
L3 extending in the stroke direction of the tension axis J
L5. The stroke direction of the tension axis J
L5 matches the X
JL direction of the jaw coordinate system ΣJ
L.
[0022] Similarly, the stretch forming apparatus 10 also has control axes for the jaw J
R for changing the position and orientation of the jaw J
R, which are, in the order from the base B of the stretch forming apparatus 10 to the
jaw J
R, a carriage axis J
R1 for stroking the jaw J
R in parallel with the X axis, an angulation axis J
R2 for rotating the jaw J
R around a rotation center line C
R1 extending in parallel with the Z axis, a slider axis J
R3 for stroking the jaw J
R in the horizontal direction (parallel with the X-Y plane), a swing axis J
R4 for rotating the jaw J
R around a rotation center line C
R2 extending in parallel with the stroke direction of the slider axis J
R3, a tension axis J
R5 for stroking the jaw J
R in the linear direction orthogonal to the rotation center line C
R2 of the swing axis J
R4, and a rotation axis J
R6 for rotating the jaw J
R around a rotation center line C
R3 extending in the stroke direction of the tension axis J
R5. The stroke direction of the tension axis J
R5 matches the X
JR direction of the jaw coordinate system ΣJ
R.
[0023] Because of the multiple control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 as described above, the jaws J
L, J
R can have six degrees of freedom in the die coordinate system ΣD. In other words,
the jaws J
L, J
R can move in parallel in the X
D, Y
D, and Z
D directions of the die coordinate system ΣD and can rotate around the X
D, Y
D, and Z
D axes.
[0024] Additionally, the stretch forming apparatus 10 has a control unit (not shown) controlling
the 14 control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6. Specifically, the stretch forming apparatus 10 has driving cylinders (not shown)
driving the control axes for the respective control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 and the control unit controls the driving cylinders.
[0025] The driving cylinders driving the control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 are fluid pressure cylinders (e.g., hydraulic cylinders) and an oil pressure is supplied
to each of a rod-side cylinder chamber and a head-side cylinder chamber adjacent across
a piston. The control unit controls hydraulic system constituent elements such as
an electromagnetic valve and a hydraulic pump (not depicted) to adjust the respective
oil pressures supplied to the rod-side cylinder chamber and the head-side cylinder
chamber, thereby controlling the respective driving cylinders of the control axes
J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6.
[0026] The control unit of the stretch forming apparatus 10 is configured to provide to
the driving cylinders the position control for controlling a piston position or the
pressure control for controlling a cylinder output. The stretch forming apparatus
10 is configured such that an operator can select whether the position control or
the pressure control of the driving cylinder is provided, for each of the control
axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6.
[0027] The rotation axes such as the die tilt axis J
D2, the angulation axes J
L2, J
R2, the swing axes J
L4, J
R4, and the rotation axes J
L6, J
R6 are used for rotating the die D and the jaws J
L, J
R within a predetermined angular range via crank mechanisms by advance and retreat
of rods of the driving cylinders. When the control unit provides the position control
of the driving cylinders, the angular positions of the die and the jaws are controlled
around the rotation center lines of the rotation axes. Alternatively, when the control
unit provides the pressure control of the driving cylinders, the torque of the rotation
axes is controlled.
[0028] The translation axes such as the die elevating/lowering axis J
D1, the carriage axes J
L1, J
R1, the slider axes J
L3, J
R3, and the tension axes J
L5, J
R5 are used for stroking the die D and the jaws J
L, J
R within a predetermined range by advance and retreat of the driving cylinders. When
the control unit provides the position control of the driving cylinders, the positions
of the die and the jaws are controlled within the stroke ranges of the translation
axes. Alternatively, when the control unit provides the pressure control of the driving
cylinders, the thrust force of the translation axes is controlled.
[0029] As a result of operation of each of the multiple control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 as described above, the relative positions and orientations of the jaws J
L, J
R are changed with respect to the die D and the workpiece W is consequently wrapped
onto the forming surface Ds of the die D and is stretch-formed (formed).
[0030] For example, first, as depicted in Fig. 3A, the jaws J
L, J
R hold the workpiece W in a horizontally extending orientation. The jaws J
L, J
R are in a horizontal orientation such that the stroke directions of the tension axes
C
L5, C
R5 of the jaws J
L, J
R (i.e., the X
JL and X
JR directions) match the horizontal direction.
[0031] In this case, the load control of the tension axes C
L5, C
R5 of the jaws J
L, J
R (the pressure control of the cylinders thereof) may be provided to stretch the workpiece
W by a predetermined amount, for example, about 1 % of a workpiece length (the length
of the workpiece W in the X direction shown in Fig. 2) (hereinafter, such a stretch
is referred to as "pre-stretch").
[0032] As shown in Fig. 3B, the die D then rises and the forming surface Ds comes into contact
with the workpiece W.
[0033] Subsequently, as shown in Fig. 3C, while the die D is rising, the positions and orientations
of the respective jaws J
L, J
R are changed to wrap the workpiece W onto the forming surface Ds of the die D. The
orientations of the jaws J
L, J
R are changed such that the stroke directions of the tension axes J
L5, J
R5 (i.e., the X
JL and X
JR directions) match the extending directions of the workpiece W (i.e., the directions
of the workpiece W extending from the die D toward the jaws J
L, J
R). Therefore, for example, respective angle sensors are disposed on the jaws J
L, J
R to detect angles between the main bodies of the jaws J
L, J
R and portions of the workpiece W extending from the jaws J
L, J
R. The orientations of the jaws J
L, J
R are changed such that the angle sensors continuously detect the angles at which the
stroke directions of the tension axes J
L5, J
R5 match the extending directions of the workpiece W.
[0034] In this case, the workpiece W may be wrapped onto the die D while the workpiece W
is stretched by the jaws J
L, J
R. For example, the load control of the tension axes J
L5, J
R5 of the jaws J
L, J
R (the pressure control of the cylinders thereof) is provided to stretch the workpiece
W by about 1 % of the workpiece length from the start to the end of wrapping (hereinafter,
such a stretch is referred to as "wrapping-time stretch").
[0035] As shown in Fig. 3D, when the jaws J
L, J
R arrive on tangent lines at the end edge portions of the forming surface Ds of the
workpiece W and the workpiece W comes into contact with the entire forming surface
Ds of the die D, the stretch forming is completed. After the workpiece W comes into
contact with the entire forming surface Ds of the die D, the load control of the tension
axes C
L5, C
R5 of the jaws J
L, J
R (the pressure control of the cylinders thereof) may be provided to stretch the workpiece
W by a predetermined amount, for example, about 1 % of the workpiece length (hereinafter,
such a stretch is referred to as "post-stretch").
[0036] The stretch forming system of this embodiment including the stretch forming apparatus
10 is configured such that the exemplary stretch forming shown in Figs. 3A-3D can
be performed by an operator manually operating the multiple control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 or by automatically controlling the operations of the multiple control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6. To automatically control the operations of the multiple control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6, the stretch forming system of this embodiment is configured such that a control
program can be created for automatically controlling the operations of the multiple
control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6. The creation of the control program for automatically controlling the operations
of the multiple control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 will hereinafter be described.
[0037] To acquire a favorable formed product after the end of the stretch forming, the operator
must devise paths (changes) of the relative positions and orientations of the jaws
J
L, J
R with respect to the die D (hereinafter referred to as "paths of the jaws J
L, J
R") such that the workpiece W is prevented from wrinkling, that the thickness of the
workpiece W is substantially uniformly changed across the entire part, and that no
gap is generated between the workpiece W and the die D. The operator must also devise
the respective operation patterns of the multiple control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 achieving the paths of the jaws J
L, J
R. However, this is time-consuming and therefore a burden for the operator, and is
difficult unless the operator is skilled.
[0038] Therefore, the stretch forming system of this embodiment is configured to calculate
the paths of the jaws J
L, J
R necessary for acquiring a favorable formed product. The stretch forming system is
also configured to calculate the respective operation patterns of the multiple control
axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 necessary for achieving the calculated paths of the jaws J
L, J
R. The stretch forming system is configured to create a control program for operating
the respective control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 in the calculated operation patterns.
[0039] Fig. 4 schematically shows configuration of a control program creating apparatus
included in the stretch forming system of this embodiment. The control program creating
apparatus is made up of a personal computer in which software for creating the control
program is installed, for example. A method of creating the control program will hereinafter
be described while describing the configuration of the control program creating apparatus.
[0040] As shown in Fig. 4, a control program creating apparatus 50 has a forming condition
acquiring unit 52, a jaw path calculating unit 54, a die movement amount calculating
unit 56, a control axis operation pattern calculating unit 58, an FEM analyzing unit
60, and a control program creating unit 62.
[0041] The forming condition acquiring unit 52 is configured to acquire from the operator
the forming conditions required for performing the stretch forming by wrapping the
workpiece W onto the die D. For example, if the control program creating apparatus
50 is made up of a personal computer, the forming conditions are acquired from the
operator via input devices such as a mouse and a keyboard and graphic user interfaces
such as a display.
[0042] The forming conditions acquired by the forming condition acquiring unit 52 from the
operator include, for example, a shape of the die D, a shape of the workpiece W, a
material (mechanical property) of the workpiece W, an initial position and an initial
orientation of the workpiece W, initial positions and initial orientations of the
respective jaws J
L and J
R, a pre-stretch amount (a stretch amount due to the pre-stretch), a wrapping-time
stretch amount (a stretch amount due to a stretch at the time of wrapping), and a
post-stretch amount (a stretch amount due to the post-stretch). The initial positions
and the initial orientations in this case refer to the start positions and the start
orientations at the start of wrapping of the workpiece W onto the die D.
[0043] The jaw path calculating unit 54 is configured to perform simulation using a model
of the stretch forming apparatus 10 based on the forming conditions acquired by the
forming condition acquiring unit 52 from the operator so as to calculated the paths
of the jaws J
L, J
R necessary for acquiring a favorable formed product, i.e., necessary for favorably
wrapping the workpiece W onto the forming surface Ds of the die D.
[0044] The jaw path calculating unit 54 will be described. First, as shown in Figs. 3A-3B,
the respective positions and orientations of the jaws J
L, J
R are changed during the stretch forming while raising the die D. This is performed
such that the workpiece W is prevented from wrinkling, that the thickness of the workpiece
W is substantially uniformly changed across the entire part, and that no gap is generated
between the workpiece W and the die D. The following method is conceivable as a method
of calculating the paths of the jaws J
L, J
R achieving this stretch forming.
[0045] For example, while variously changing parameters such as the initial position, the
initial orientation, and the rise speed of the die D and the initial positions, the
initial orientations, the change speeds of positions, and the change speeds of orientations
of the jaws J
L and J
R, the deformation behavior of the corresponding workpiece W is calculated by FEM (finite
element method) analysis each time the parameters are changed. This is performed until
the parameter values of the favorable deformation behavior of the workpiece W are
found out.
[0046] However, such a trial-and-error method requires a considerable time for calculating
the paths of the jaws J
L, J
R necessary for acquiring a favorable formed product.
[0047] Therefore, the inventors considered the following details.
[0048] First, the inventors thought that if the die D is in contact with the workpiece W
held by the jaws J
L, J
R as shown in Fig. 5A and is moved in the contact direction (the Z direction), the
workpiece W is favorably wrapped onto the forming surface Ds of the die D as shown
in Fig. 5B, given that the movement of the jaws J
L, J
R is regulated only in the movement direction of the die D (the Z direction). In particular,
the inventors thought that the workpiece W is naturally wrapped onto the forming surface
Ds of the die D without wrinkling, with the thickness of the workpiece W uniformly
changed across the entire part, and without a gap generated between the workpiece
W and the die D.
[0049] Specifically, the inventors thought that if the jaws J
L, J
R are in a free state except the movement in the Z direction, since the positions and
orientations of the jaws J
L, J
R are freely changed while the workpiece W is being wrapped onto the forming surface
Ds due to the movement of the die D in the Z direction, the workpiece W is not significantly
locally stretched (almost no local distortion is generated). Therefore, the inventors
thought that the workpiece W is favorably wrapped onto the forming surface Ds of the
die D such that a wrinkle is hardly generated, that the thickness of the workpiece
W is substantially uniformly changed across the entire part, and that almost no gap
is generated between the workpiece W and the die D.
[0050] Thus, the inventors thought that when the workpiece W is wrapped onto the die D by
moving the die D while the jaws J
L, J
R are in a free state except the movement in the Z direction, generated paths P
JL, P
JR (dashed-two dotted lines) of the jaws J
L, J
R correspond to the paths of the jaws J
L, J
R necessary for acquiring a favorable formed product.
[0051] Moreover, the inventors thought that the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R necessary for acquiring a favorable formed product can be calculated based on this
idea in a shorter time as compared to the trial-and-error method.
[0052] Based on such considerations by the inventors, the jaw path calculating unit 54 is
configured to perform the simulation (wrapping simulation) in which, under the restricting
condition that the positions and orientations of the jaws J
L, J
R can freely be changed except for the movement in the vertical direction (Z direction)
being regulated, the workpiece W is wrapped onto the forming surface Ds of the die
D by moving the die D in the vertical direction while the die D is in contact with
the workpiece W held by the jaws J
L, J
R. The jaw path calculating unit 54 is configured to calculate the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R based on a result of the wrapping simulation.
[0053] Specifically, the jaw path calculating unit 54 performs the wrapping simulation based
on the forming conditions acquired by the forming condition acquiring unit 52 under
the restricting condition regulating only the movement of the reference points R
JL, R
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R in the Z direction. For example, if the pre-stretch amount given as the forming condition
is 2 %, the wrapping simulation is performed by using a model of the workpiece W stretched
by 2 %.
[0054] The jaw path calculating unit 54 is configured to perform the wrapping simulation
by using the workpiece W (model) having a thickness thinner than the thickness of
the actual workpiece W. This is because when the thickness of the workpiece W is thinner,
since the resistance during bending is less generated (the bending rigidity of the
workpiece W is smaller), the workpiece W is more easily deformed with smaller distortion
and, therefore, the workpiece W more easily comes into contact with the forming surface
Ds of the die D (a gap is less generated) across the entire part. In other words,
when the thickness of the workpiece W is thinner, the ideal paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R can be calculated such that the workpiece W comes into close contact with the forming
surface Ds of the die D across the entire thereof.
[0055] The jaw path calculating unit 54 is configured to perform the wrapping simulation
in which the die D is moved in the Z direction by a maximum movable amount to wrap
the workpiece W onto the forming surface Ds of the die D. This is because the workpiece
W is certainly wrapped onto the forming surface Ds of the die D across the entire
thereof.
[0056] The jaw path calculating unit 54 may be configured to perform the wrapping simulation
under the restricting condition that the friction coefficient is maximized between
the workpiece W and the forming surface Ds of the die D. As a result, the workpiece
W is restrained from slipping on the forming surface Ds of the die D in the wrapping
simulation. Therefore, the wrapping simulation can be executed under the condition
close to the actual apparatus. As a result, the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R necessary for acquiring a favorable formed product can more accurately be calculated.
[0057] Additionally, the jaw path calculating unit 54 is configured to output a result of
the wrapping simulation to an operator. This allows the operator to determine whether
the result of the wrapping simulation is favorable.
[0058] For example, a display presents the positions and orientations of the jaws J
L, J
R, the position and orientation of the die D, the position, orientation, and shape
of the workpiece W after the wrapping simulation as a result of the wrapping simulation.
This enables the operator to confirm whether the favorable paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R are calculated by the control program creating apparatus 50 based on the result of
the wrapping simulation. If the wrapping simulation result is not favorable because
of, for example, an abnormality of the shape of the workpiece W or an absence of contact
between the workpiece W and the end edge portions of the forming surface Ds of the
die D, the operator can properly change the forming conditions such as the initial
positions and the initial orientations of the jaws J
L, J
R and the die D.
[0059] If the operator determines that the wrapping simulation result is favorable, i.e.,
if the operator performs a corresponding operation to, for example, the input device
such as a mouse and a keyboard, the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R calculated by the jaw path calculating unit 54 are fixed.
[0060] Returning to Fig. 4, the die movement amount calculating unit 56 of the control program
creating apparatus 50 is configured to calculate the Z-direction movement amount of
the die D based on the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R calculated by the jaw path calculating unit 54 (determined as being favorable by
the operator).
[0061] As described above, the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R calculated by the jaw path calculating unit 54 are the paths when the die D is moved
in the Z direction by the maximum movable amount. This is because the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R are obtained such that the workpiece W is certainly wrapped onto the entire forming
surface Ds of the die D.
[0062] However, if the relative positions and orientations of the jaws J
L, J
R are changed with respect to the die D in accordance with the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R as described above, the workpiece W may excessively be wound beyond the forming surface
Ds of the die D as shown in Fig. 5B. From another viewpoint, the die D may move more
than necessary in the Z direction. Actually, as depicted in Fig. 3(D), if the die
D is at least moved in the Z direction such that the jaws J
L, J
R arrive on the tangent lines at the end edge portions of the forming surface Ds of
the workpiece W, the workpiece W is wound onto the entire forming surface Ds. Therefore,
the die movement amount calculating unit 56 is configured to calculate the Z-direction
movement amount of the die D minimally required for winding the workpiece W onto the
entire forming surface Ds of the die D.
[0063] Fig. 6 is a diagram for explaining a method of calculating a Z-direction movement
amount of the die D. Fig. 6 shows a cross section of the die D parallel to the Z-X
plane. Points P
JL(S) and P
JR(S) indicate the starting points of the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R. Therefore, the starting points P
JL(S) and P
JR(S) indicate the positions of the reference points R
JL, R
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R before starting the stretch forming. On the other hand, points P
JL(F), P
JR(F) indicate the ending points of the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R. Therefore, the ending points P
JL(F), P
JR(F) indicate the positions of the reference points R
JL, R
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R after ending the stretch forming.
[0064] Dashed-dotted lines T
L, T
R indicate the tangent lines at the respective end edge portions of the forming surface
Ds of the die D on the Z-X plane. Points C
L, C
R indicate intersections between the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R and the tangent lines T
L, T
R (corresponding to "first and second intersections" of the claims).
[0065] A Z-direction distance (corresponding to a "first vertical direction distance" of
the claims) H
L between the intersection C
L and an apex (a point at the maximum height position of the forming surface Ds) D
T of the die D corresponds to the Z-direction movement amount of the die D minimally
required for a portion of the workpiece W closer to the jaw J
L to be wrapped onto the forming surface Ds of the die D. On the other hand, a Z-direction
distance (corresponding to a "second vertical direction distance" of the claims) H
R between the intersection C
R and the apex D
T of the die D corresponds to the Z-direction movement amount of the die D minimally
required for a portion of the workpiece W closer to the jaw J
R to be wrapped onto the forming surface Ds of the die D.
[0066] As shown in Fig. 6, the intersections C
L, C
R between the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R and the tangent lines T
L, T
R at the both respective end edge portions of the forming surface Ds of the die D are
not necessarily located at the same height position (Z-direction position). In other
words, the Z-direction distances H
L, H
R may be different.
[0067] If the Z-direction distances H
L, H
R are different, the die D must be moved in the Z direction by the same movement amount
as the larger Z-direction distance (H
R in Fig. 6) so as to wrap both the portion of the workpiece W closer to the jaw J
L and the portion of the workpiece W closer to the jaw J
R onto the forming surface Ds of the die D. If the die D is moved in the Z direction
by the same movement amount as the smaller vertical direction distance H
L, the portion of the workpiece W closer to the jaw J
R cannot brought into contact with the end edge portion of the forming surface Ds of
the die D.
[0068] Therefore, the die movement amount calculating unit 56 first calculates the intersections
C
L, C
R between the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R and the tangent lines T
L, T
R at the both respective end edge portions of the forming surface Ds of the die D based
on the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R calculated by the jaw path calculating unit 54 and the die shape acquired by the
forming condition acquiring unit 52. The die movement amount calculating unit 56 then
calculates the Z-direction distances H
L, H
R from the calculated intersections C
L, C
R to the apex D
T of the die D. The Z-direction distances H
L, H
R are compared to determine the greater one as the Z-direction movement amount of the
die D.
[0069] The Z-direction movement amount of the die D may be calculated by using a straight
line passing through two points on the end edge portions of the forming surface Ds
of the die D as the tangent lines.
[0070] In the case of the die shape having a cross-sectional shape parallel to the Z-X plane
differing depending on a Y-direction position, the Z-direction movement amount of
the die D may be calculated by the following method. First, the intersections C
L, C
R are calculated between the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R and the tangent lines T
L, T
R at the both respective end edge portions of the forming surface Ds of the die D in
each of multiple Z-X planes at different Y-direction positions. A Z-direction distance
is calculated between each of all the intersections C
L, C
R and the apex D
T of the die D. A maximum Z-direction distance is extracted from the multiple calculated
Z-direction distances, and the extracted maximum Z-direction distance is defined as
the Z-direction movement amount of the die D. As a result, even when the die shape
has a cross-sectional shape parallel to the Z-X plane differing depending on a Y-direction
position, the workpiece W can be wound onto the entire forming surface Ds of the die
D.
[0071] The control axis operation pattern calculating unit 58 of the control program creating
apparatus 50 is configured to calculate the respective operation patterns of the multiple
control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 based on the forming conditions acquired by the forming condition acquiring unit
52, the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R calculated by the jaw path calculating unit 54, and the Z-direction movement amount
of the die D calculated by the die movement amount calculating unit 58.
[0072] The control axis operation pattern calculating unit 58 calculates the respective
operation patterns of the multiple control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 for changing the respective positions and orientations of the jaws J
L, J
R and the die D, in accordance with the paths P
JL, P
JR of the jaws J
L, J
R from the respective initial positions and initial orientations of the jaws J
L, J
R and the die D acquired by the forming condition acquiring unit 52.
[0073] Specifically, the control axis operation pattern calculating unit 58 calculates the
respective operation patterns of the multiple control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 such that the Z-direction movement amount from the initial position of the die D
becomes equal to the movement amount calculated by the die movement amount calculating
unit 56 (e.g., the Z-direction distance H
R depicted in Fig. 6). Describing with reference to Fig. 6, the respective operation
patterns of the multiple control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 are calculated based on a portion of the path P
JL of the jaw J
L from the starting point P
JL(S) to a point C
L' and a portion of the path P
JR of the jaw J
R from the starting point P
JR(S) to the intersection C
R. The point C
L' is the point on the path P
JL at the same position as the Z-direction position of the intersection C
R as shown in Fig. 6.
[0074] If a post-stretch amount is given as the forming condition from the operator to the
forming condition acquiring unit 52, the operation patterns of the control axes necessary
for the post-stretch of the workpiece W by the post-stretch amount are added to the
operation patterns of the control axes calculated based on the calculation results
of the jaw path calculating unit 54 and the die movement amount calculating unit 56.
The operation patterns of the tension axes J
L5, J
R5 for stretching the workpiece W by the tension axes J
L5, J
R5 are added such that the workpiece W is stretched by the post-stretch amount given
from the operator after the workpiece W comes into contact with the entire forming
surface Ds of the die D as shown in Fig. 3D.
[0075] If a wrapping-time stretch amount is given as the forming condition to the forming
condition acquiring unit 52, the operation patterns of the control axes necessary
for stretching the workpiece W by the wrapping-time stretch amount are added to the
operation patterns of the control axes calculated based on the calculation results
of the jaw path calculating unit 54 and the die movement amount calculating unit 56.
The operation patterns of the tension axes J
L5, J
R5 for stretching the workpiece W by the tension axes J
L5, J
R5 are added such that the workpiece W is stretched by the wrapping-time stretch amount
from the start to the end of wrapping of the workpiece W onto the forming surface
Ds of the die D.
[0076] The FEM analyzing unit 60 of the control program creating apparatus 50 is configured
to execute the FEM analysis of the workpiece W by using the respective operation patterns
of the multiple control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 calculated by the control axis operation pattern calculating unit 58.
[0077] Specifically, the FEM analyzing unit 60 is configured to use the FEM analysis to
calculate the deformation behavior of the workpiece W generated by the stretch forming
apparatus 10 performing the stretch forming in accordance with the respective operation
patterns of the multiple control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 calculated by the control axis operation pattern calculating unit 58. The FEM analyzing
unit 60 is configured to output the result of the FEM analysis to an operator via
a display, for example. This allows the operator to determine whether the result of
the FEM analysis is favorable.
[0078] For example, the operator can know a partial thickness and a strain amount of the
workpiece W after the stretch forming (a formed product). This enables the operator
to confirm whether favorable operation patterns are calculated for the respective
control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6. If the result of the FEM analysis is not favorable because of, for example, a significant
local difference in the thickness or the strain amount, the operator can properly
change the forming conditions such as a pre-stretch amount.
[0079] If the operator determines that the result of the FEM analysis is favorable, i.e.,
if the operator performs a corresponding operation to, for example, the input device
such as a mouse and a keyboard, the respective operation patterns of the control axes
J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 calculated by the control axis operation pattern calculating unit 58 are fixed.
[0080] The control program creating unit 62 of the control program creating apparatus 50
is configured to create a control program for automatically controlling the respective
operations of the multiple control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 of the actual stretch forming apparatus 10 based on the respective operation patterns
of the control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 calculated by the control axis operation pattern calculating unit 58 (determined
as being favorable by the operator). The control program creating unit 62 is configured
to output the created control program as data.
[0081] When the respective operations of the multiple control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 are automatically controlled by the control program created as described above, the
stretch forming apparatus 10 favorably and automatically winds the workpiece W onto
the forming surface Ds of the die D. As a result, a favorable formed product is fabricated.
[0082] This embodiment enables the calculation of the paths of the relative positions and
orientations of the respective jaws J
L, J
R with respect to the die D necessary for acquiring a favorable formed product from
the stretch forming, i.e., the respective operation patterns of the multiple control
axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6, in a short time. As a result, a burden of the operator can be reduced.
[0083] Although the present invention has been described with reference to the embodiment
described above, the present invention is not limited thereto.
[0084] For example, in the case of the embodiment described above, as shown in Figs. 3A-3D,
the orientations of the jaws J
L, J
R are changed such that the stroke directions (X
JL and X
JR directions) of the tension axes J
L5, J
R5 match the extending directions of the workpiece W (the directions of the workpiece
W extending from the die D toward jaws J
L, J
R) while the stretch forming is performed. However, the present invention is not limited
thereto.
[0085] For example, as shown in Fig. 7A, the jaws J
L, J
R are in an orientation (horizontal orientation) with the stroke directions of the
tension axes J
L5, J
R5 (the X
JL and X
JR directions) matching the horizontal direction and hold the workpiece W in a horizontally
extending orientation. While the jaws J
L, J
R are maintained in the horizontal orientation, the die D is moved in the vertical
direction (Z direction) and the workpiece is wound onto the forming surface Ds of
the die D as shown in Fig. 7B.
[0086] In this case, the jaw path calculating unit 54 of the control program creating apparatus
50 regulates the movement of the jaws J
L, J
R in the Z direction and additionally regulates the rotation around rotation center
lines extending in the directions that are horizontal directions orthogonal to jaw
facing directions (i.e., Y
JL and Y
JR directions) to calculate the paths P
JL, P
JR of the relative positions and orientations of the jaws J
L, J
R with respect to the die D. As a result, even when the jaws J
L, J
R are maintained in the horizontal orientation during the stretch forming, the control
program can be created that automatically controls the respective operations of the
multiple control axes J
D1 to J
D2, J
L1 to J
L6, J
R1 to J
R6 necessary for achieving a favorable formed product.
[0087] In the case of the embodiment described above, as shown in Fig. 2, the forming surface
Ds of the die D is in a curved shape, the present invention is not limited thereto.
For example, a flat surface such as a forming surface Ds' of a die D' as depicted
in Fig. 8 may be available. The present invention is applicable to any dies including
a forming surface allowing a workpiece to wrap thereon.
[0088] In the case of the embodiment described above, the plate-shaped workpiece W wrapped
onto the die D is in a flat plate shape, the present invention is not limited thereto.
For example, as in the case of a workpiece W' shown in Fig. 9, the workpiece may be
in a curved shape curving in a direction A2 orthogonal to a jaw facing direction A1,
instead of a flat plate shape. In this case, the jaws are so-called curved jaws capable
of clamping the curved workpiece W' at the end edge portions opposite to each other.
[0089] Additionally, although the present invention has been described by taking as an example
the stretch forming in which the die D is moved in the Z direction by the movement
amount calculated by the die movement amount calculating unit 56 of the control program
creating apparatus 50 without moving the jaws J
L, J
R in the vertical direction (Z direction), the present invention is not limited thereto.
The Z-direction movement amount of the die D calculated by the die movement amount
calculating unit 56 is, in other words, a relative Z-direction movement amount of
the die D with respect to the jaws J
L, J
R, as depicted in Fig. 6. Therefore, it is only necessary that a total of the Z-direction
movement amount of the die D and the Z-direction movement amount of the jaws J
L, J
R is equal to the movement amount calculated by the die movement amount calculating
unit 56. Therefore, when the die D goes up in the Z direction while the jaws J
L, J
R go down in the Z direction, the workpiece W is wound onto the forming surface Ds
of the die D.
[0090] Although the present invention has sufficiently been described in terms of preferable
embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings, various modifications and
corrections are apparent for those skilled in the art. It should be understood that
such modifications and corrections are included in the scope of the present invention
unless the modifications and corrections depart from the scope of the present invention
according to the accompanying claims.
[0091] The disclosure of the description, the drawings, and the claims of Japanese Patent
Application No.
2012-229147 filed on October. 16, 2012 is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Industrial Availability
[0092] The present invention is applicable to any stretch forming apparatuses having two
jaws clamping a workpiece at respective end edge portions opposite to each other,
a die disposed between the two jaws and coming into contact with the workpiece, and
multiple control axes for changing the positions and orientations of the jaws and
the die.