Field of Invention
[0001] The invention belongs to the field of climbing walls for all disciplines of sport
climbing on artificial walls. The invention refers to a new system for erecting climbing
walls. More specifically, the invention refers to a climbing wall that can be fabricated,
transported, assembled and changed in a simple way with a limited number of elements.
The elements that make up the system are fabricated serially in a reproducible and
controllable quality. The system of the invention provides unlimited freedom in functional
design of climbing surfaces and climbing walls, in fact it provides for a custom-made
climbing wall fabrication.
[0002] The invention also covers a small-scale system designed for making climbing wall
maquettes where a user erects a small-size maquette and orders a climbing wall based
on this maquette, and for training of spatial perception as a brain game.
Background of Invention
[0003] Sport climbing has become a popular sport. We are facing an abundance of climbing
walls and user's requirements have become more demanding and versatile. It is often
difficult to make a good compromise between appearance and applicability, It often
happens that the users quite rapidly find out that the wall fails to meet their expectations
that the appearance seemed to promise. A wish for a change follows soon thereafter.
A few changes can be made in certain cases by adding large climbing holds - volumes;
however an integral change in the wall configuration is an expensive and demanding
procedure.
[0004] Long years of commitment to providing conditions for training of sport climbers from
children to world cup contestants have brought much experience. The first important
fact is that something that looks good is not necessarily applicable. The second fact
is that the users get relatively rapidly bored with any installed configuration of
a wall. Flat surfaces can be made more interesting if large-size climbing holds called
volumes are added. One problem is herewith solved yet another arises. Generally, the
volumes are not fixed to a wall at dedicated fitting sites but where the holes in
the volumes allow this. Such a solution may be questionable from the point of view
of compatibility with the standard and clearly defined safety. A still bigger problem
is very variegated wall configurations. More demanding users get bored with them even
more rapidly and adjustment by means of volumes is more difficult or even impossible.
A wall configuration needs therefore be changed several times a year and for the needs
of contestants especially as a function of a training process.
[0005] Climbing walls are usually made of wood and composite boards that are used as climbing
surfaces and are joined with each other in various known ways such as screw connections
and from fabricated simply drawn, rolled or sprayed profiles from wood, metals or
composites. When erecting a wall a fixed support structure is usually installed, on
which elements made of wood or composite materials of a climbing surface are screwed.
Additional mutual joining of elements of a climbing surface has no point in this case.
This fixed structure can be standalone or fastened to another standalone structure.
Sometimes conventional construction parts such as pipes and collars are used for the
erection of a support structure. Such construction clearly shows real advantages of
the use of conventional standardized elements - low price, simple assembly as well
as simple and reliable calculation, however it occupies much space and does not allow
any special creativity, in fact any change to the shape of a climbing wall or of a
climbing surface is difficult or rather impossible.
[0006] A need was therefore felt for a system that will provide the users with a cost effective
and reliable adjustment of climbing walls to current needs.
Scope of Invention
[0007] The mentioned technical problem is solved by a system for erecting climbing walls
according to the invention. With the system according to the invention, standard elements
in the shape of flat surfaces and fabricated by standardized procedures are joined
with each other by various connecting elements. A plurality of various bodies can
be assembled from triangles, rectangles, pentagons, hexagons and other polygons, i.e.
standard elements having equally long sides. According to the system of the invention
any number of standard elements, i.e. polygons, can be joined with each other in order
to design a climbing wall or a climbing surface tailored to user's wishes. Each standard
element in the assembly that makes up a climbing wall is joined with another standard
element by way of a connecting element. All standard elements are subject to a condition
that they are equally machined on their circumference. In order to provide for a precise
matching of standard elements, from which a climbing wall is made up, regardless of
their mutual combinations and position, the circumferences, i.e. the edges, with which
the standard elements are joined with each other, must match in length and a joint
between them must provide for adequate stability with a possibility of simple assembly
and disassembly regardless of the angle, at which the standard elements are joined
with each other.
[0008] A theoretical distance between the two opposite vertices of mutually joined standard
elements must be equal to the theoretical length of the edges, with which two standard
elements are joined with each other. The terms theoretical distance and theoretical
length refer to a distance and a length that would exist if the circumferences of
the standard elements were not additionally machined. If the theoretical length of
both edges, with which two standard elements are joined with each other, is not equal,
of course within the allowed tolerances, to the theoretical distance between both
vertices of the corresponding joint, an error occurs. Summing up of errors exceeding
the tolerances in huge assemblies-in huge climbing walls or climbing surfaces - inevitably
means that the assembly cannot be completed.
[0009] Connecting elements can be of various types: angular elements, hinge joint or flexible
joint. The standard elements can thus be combined in an unlimited number of ways and
a set of the standard elements can constantly be optimized.
[0010] The invention will be explained in more detail by way of embodiments and drawings.
Figure 1 shows a cross-section of a joint of two standard panel elements by means
of an angular connecting element.
Figure 2 shows a cross-section of a joint of two standard panel elements with a focus
being on the machining of the circumference of the elements in order to ensure the
tolerances.
Figure 3 shows parameters that are important for the calculation of positions of holes
on an angular connecting element.
Figure 4 shows a cross-section of a hinge joint.
Figure 5 shows a cross-section of a flexible joint.
[0011] Let us presume, for the ease of understanding, that the standard panel elements have
a zero thickness. Such element with a zero thickness is defined in the present application
as a project standard element. In this case, each project standard element has the
number of edges that equals the number of angles. Project standard elements can be
joined with each other only when the lengths of the abutting edges of both elements
precisely match. This means that both vertices on the abutting edge precisely overlap
as well.
[0012] In reality, standard panel elements that are joined with each other have a certain
thickness. If standard panel elements are to be joined at various angles, they must
have a property of a project standard element at contacts - the zero thickness. To
make a standard panel element having properties of a project standard element at contacts,
a standard panel element needs to be chamfered along their entire circumference at
an angle preferably of 30 to 40 degrees relative to the project standard element.
As the standard panel elements are chamfered they cannot be joined at any angle like
project standard elements; the angle of chamfering determines possible angles of joining.
[0013] Project standard elements 2 that are only visible as lines in the cross-section shown
in Figure 1 due to the zero thickness abutting to each other in a point that actually
represents an edge 1, in which two equally long edges of two project standard elements
2 abutting each other. As elements with the zero thickness do not exist in reality
a solution needs to be found for standard panel elements 5, 6 having a certain thickness.
The standard panel elements 5, 6 and their circumferences 3 are in cross-section shown
as flat surfaces. In order to reach the functionality of a project standard element
the circumference 3 of the standard panel element 5, 6 need to be machined. The standard
panel elements 5, 6 are therefore chamfered along their circumference 3 at an angle
in order to obtain the sharpest possible edge at the edge 1 of the project standard
element 2. The circumference 3 is thus defined with two chamfered flat surfaces 3a
abutting to each other in the edge 1. These two flat surfaces 3a are inclined towards
the project standard element 2 at an angle α preferably in the range from 30 to 40
degrees. The smaller this angle, the larger the range of angles, at which the standard
panel elements 5, 6 can be joined with each other. The circumference 3 of both standard
panel elements 5, 6 can be chamfered symmetrically or asymmetrically, wherein the
chamfering is preferably made in a way that a distance of a connecting element 4 from
the project standard element 2 is as small as possible, preferably between 1 mm and
5 mm. A huge distance between the connecting element 4 and the project standard element
2 causes problems in arranging holes for fastening on the connecting element 4. A
too small distance means a too sensitive edge 1 of the standard panel element 5, 6.
[0014] If the circumference 3 of the standard panel element 5, 6 is chamfered along the
entire circumference 3 at an angle of 35 degrees, wherein the chamfering is preferably
equal at both sides, the minimum possible joining angle is 70 degrees and the maximum
is 290 degrees.
[0015] A tendency is to have as small angle as possible. A limitation is the stability of
the so formed edge 1 which is too thin and therefore too sensitive. The obtained edge
1 is therefore additionally chamfered, preferably for 1 mm, as shown in Figure 2.
If both chamfered flat surfaces 3a abutting to each other in the edge 1, the circumference
3 of the standard panel element 5, 6 is very sensitive and also dangerously sharp.
Another problem arises due to the needed tolerances during the assembly. In order
to avoid said problems the standard panel element 5, 6 is additionally chamfered or
reduced such that the edge 1 is additionally chamfered or ground off and an additional
flat surface 3b is formed on the circumference 3 between the flat surfaces 3a. The
circumference 3 is thus defined by two flat surfaces 3a and the flat surface 3b. In
the joint between both standard panel elements 5, 6 a narrow slot is thus formed between
the flat surface 3b of the element 5 and the flat surface 3b of the element 6 and
represents a tolerance range for assembly. A tolerance range is a prerequisite when
assembling a climbing wall or when joining standard elements with each other.
[0016] The standard panel element is therefore preferably by 1 mm smaller along the entire
circumference than the project standard element. If a project standard element is
a square with a side of 100 mm, than a standard panel element is a square with a side
or preferably 98 mm.
[0017] All flat surfaces on the circumference of all standard elements are machined equally.
[0018] The connecting elements are angular connecting profiles adapted to the actual angle
between the two standard panel elements and the position of fastening holes. Various
angles require various angular connecting profiles; this increases the number of connecting
elements but this mode of connection brings about obvious advantages in safety matters.
These angular connecting profiles are so strong that each carries a maximum test load
of 20 kN. They simultaneously serve as an aid in self-support of small climbing walls
or sections of climbing walls without protection points. A climbing wall is fastened
to a building or another support structure with these angular connecting profiles.
Protection points are also fastened to these angular connecting profiles. In one protection
line all protection points are connected with each other via these angular connecting
profiles and in the event that one protection point fails the load is taken over by
the neighbouring points.
[0019] Fastening of angular connecting profiles 4 and standard panel elements 5, 6 is carried
out through the holes formed both in the angular connecting profile 4 and the standard
panel element 5, 6. Fastening is carried out in various ways that are known to the
persons skilled in the art, preferably via a screw connection.
[0020] Figure 3 shows parameters that are important in the calculation of positions of the
holes on an angular connecting profile 4. Holes 9 for fastening a climbing wall or
for joining the standard panel elements 5, 6 to the angular connecting profile 4 are
equidistant from the edge 1 on the standard panel elements 5, 6, said edge 1 actually
representing a line segment or an edge, in which two equally long edges of the two
project standard elements 2 abutting to each other. The position of the holes 9 changes
on the angular connecting profiles 4; the position of the holes 9 depends on an angle
10, at which two standard panel elements 5, 6 join with each other, and on the distance
of the angular connecting profile 4 from the project standard element 2.
[0021] The distance of the centre of the hole 9 from a top 8 of the angular connecting profile
4 changes according to the following formula

wherein:
LR - real distance of the centre of the hole 9 from the top 8 of the angular connecting
profile 4
L - distance of the centre of the hole 9 from the edge 1
RAZ - distance of the angular connecting profile 4 from the project standard element
2
ANGLE - angle 10 between both flat surfaces in arc degrees
[0022] Other ways of joining standard panel elements with each other are also possible.
One possible type of a connecting element is a hinge joint with a pivotal point in
the common connecting edge of two neighbouring standard panel elements of a climbing
surface as shown in Figure 4. A hinge joint is made of two parts 14, 15, wherein each
part is fastened to the standard panel element 5, 6 in a way known to a person skilled
in the art, for instance in an L-shape as shown in the figure. The project standard
elements 2 intersect in a line 16 that represents an axis 17 of the hinge joint, with
which the standard panel elements 5, 6 are joined. In this case, the project standard
element 2 is preferably virtually arranged in the centre of the standard panel element
5, 6.
[0023] A variant of a hinge joint is a flexible joint made from an adequate metallic, polymeric
or composite material with a deforming area in the common connecting edge of two neighbouring
standard panel elements of a climbing surface as shown in Figure 5. A rapid development
of materials provides a huge potential to this solution especially at the contacts
which cannot carry huge loads.
[0024] A joint between the standard panel elements 5, 6 and a flexible joint 12 is carried
out in various ways known to a person skilled in the art, for instance in an L-shape
as shown in Figure 5. The project standard elements 2 intersect in a point or a line
that represents a common connecting edge 13. A thickness d1 of the flexible joint
12 that equals the thickness of the standard panel elements 5, 6 to be joined, linearly
reduces from both sides towards the common connecting edge 13 up to a thickness d2.
A ratio between the thicknesses d2:d1 is within a range from 1:2 to 1:4 in order to
still provide for the necessary stability of the joint.
[0025] As the cross-section, i.e. the thickness of the flexible joint 12 in the connecting
edge 13 is reduced, the flexible joint 12 can undergo an elastic or plastic deformation,
wherewith an optional angle can be obtained, at which both standard panel elements
5, 6 are joined. In this case, the project standard element 2 is preferably virtually
arranged in the centre of the standard panel element 5, 6.
[0026] From the stability point of view, the hinge joint and the flexible joint are considerably
poorer than the joint with an angular connecting element. They can only be used to
join a limited number of elements in the assembly.
[0027] Other ways of joining may be used in practice, which, however, do not limit the scope
of the invention.
1. A system for erecting climbing walls by means of standardized elements
characterized in that it comprises:
- standard panel elements (5, 6) which are polygons in the shape of flat surfaces
and having equally long sides, wherein all standard panel elements (5, 6) have equally
machined circumferences (3), such that the circumferences (3) or the edges, with which
the standard panel elements (5, 6) are joined with each other, match in length, and
- connecting elements that provide for the stability of the joint and simple assembly
and disassembly regardless of the angle, at which the standard panel elements (5,
6) are joined with each other.
2. The system according to claim 1 characterized in that the connecting element is an angular connecting profile (4).
3. The system according to claim 1 and 2 characterized in that the circumference (3) of the standard panel element (5, 6) is defined with two chamfered
flat surfaces (3a) that are inclined towards a project standard element (2) at an
angle (α) and with an additional chamfered flat surface (3b) and a narrow slot is
formed between both standard panel elements (5, 6) in the joint, said slot being arranged
between the flat surface (3b) of the element (5) and the flat surface (3b) of the
element (6) and the angular connecting profile (4) and the position of fastening holes
(9) on the angular connecting profile (4) is adapted to an actual angle (10) of joining
of the standard panel elements (5, 6) with each other.
4. The system according to claims 1 to 3 characterized in that the angle (α) is preferably between 30 and 40 degrees and the circumference (3) of
both standard panel elements (5, 6) is chamfered symmetrically or asymmetrically,
wherein the chamfering is preferably carried out in a way that the distance of the
connecting element (4) from the project standard element (2) is as small as possible,
preferably between 1 mm and 5 mm.
5. The system according to claims 1 to 4 characterized in that the position of the fastening holes (9) on the angular connecting profile (4) depends
on the angle (10), at which two standard panel elements (5, 6) joint or connect with
each other and on the distance of the angular connecting profile (4) from the project
standard element (2).
6. The system according to claim 1 characterized in that the connecting element is a hinge joint.
7. The system according to claims 1 and 6 characterized in that the hinge joint is made up of two parts (14, 15), wherein each part is fastened to
the standard panel element (5, 6) and an axis (17) of the hinge joint is represented
by a line (16), in which two project standard elements (2) intersect, and the project
standard element (2) is virtually arranged in the centre of the standard panel element
(5, 6).
8. The system according to claim 1 characterized in that the connecting element is a flexible joint (12).
9. The system according to claims 1 and 8 characterized in that in the flexible joint (12) a common connecting edge (13) represents a line, in which
two project standard elements (2) intersect, and a thickness (d1) of the flexible
joint (12) that equals the thickness of the two standard panel elements (5, 6) to
be joined, is linearly reduced from both sides towards the common connecting edge
(13) up to a thickness (d2) and the ratio between the thicknesses d2:d1 is within
the range from 1:2 to 1:4, and the project standard element (2) is virtually arranged
in the centre of the standard panel element (5, 6).
10. A use of the system according to claims 1 to 9 for fabricating climbing walls, for
fabricating climbing wall maquettes, where a user erects a small size maquette and
orders a climbing wall on this basis, and for training spatial perception.