[0001] The present application relates to a way for protecting dye-containing liquid compositions,
such as textile or hard surface treatment compositions, from discoloration.
[0002] Liquid detergents have traditionally been sold in opaque bottles. However, use of
clear (for the present purpose used synonymously with the terms transparent and translucent)
bottles can be aesthetically appealing to consumers as they can see the color of the
product, its consistency, and suspended particles if they are present.
[0003] However, the use of clear bottles can lead to destruction of colorant by UV light.
By UV light is meant light having wavelength of about 250 to about 460 nanometers
(nm). Specifically, UVA generally is in range 320-400 nm, UVB about 290 to 320 nm
and UVC below 290 nm, down to about 250 nm.
[0004] It has been known in the art that UV absorbers or UV blockers can be added to the
bottle material during manufacture of clear bottles to protect them from becoming
brittle and to protect the ingredients inside the bottle. Another approach is the
addition of UV absorbers or UV blockers to the formulation.
[0005] WO 2000/36074 A1 discloses a translucent or transparent aqueous heavy duty liquid in a clear bottle
comprising colorant dye and fluorescent dye and/or UV absorber to protect said colorant
dye.
[0006] Since all solutions add to the production costs of the product, there is a need for
improving the color stability of liquid compositions, especially liquid detergent
compositions, in a cost effective way.
[0007] Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a cheap way for
stabilizing dye-containing liquid compositions, especially dye-containing liquid textile
or hard surface treatment compositions.
[0008] This object is achieved by a method of reducing destruction of blue colorant dye
in a liquid textile or hard surface treatment composition in a bottle that is permeable
for UV light by adding ethanol to said composition, in an amount of at least 0.01
% by wt. of the liquid composition.
[0009] It has now surprisingly been found that the addition of ethanol effectively protects
a colored liquid composition against destruction of the blue colorant dye. Since ethanol
is a cheap chemical that is often and widely used, the color stability of dyed liquid
compositions can be improved in a simple and cost effective way.
[0010] The liquid composition is a liquid textile or hard surface treatment composition.
Liquid textile or hard surface treatment compositions are often intensively dyed and,
in addition, are packaged in clear bottles.
[0011] The ethanol is added in amount of at least 0.01 % by wt. of the liquid composition.
It has surprisingly been shown that already very little amounts of ethanol are sufficient
to effectively reduce the destruction of a colorant dye in a liquid composition.
[0012] In another preferred embodiment the liquid composition comprises an anionic surfactant.
[0013] Anionic surfactants are important ingredients of many liquid compositions, especially
of liquid textile or hard surface treatment compositions. It has been shown that anionic
surfactants sometimes promote the destruction of colorant dyes. By adding ethanol
to a colored liquid composition the colorant dye is stabilized against the UV light
destruction even in the presence of anionic surfactants.
[0014] The colorant dye is a blue dye. It is even more preferred that the colorant dye is
selected from the group consisting of Acid Blue 145, Acid Blue 9, Acid Blue 80, blue
anthraquinone dyes, blue xanthene dyes and mixtures thereof. Ethanol is very effective
in reducing the destruction of blue dyes being present in a liquid composition
[0015] In a preferred embodiment the liquid composition is a transparent or translucent
liquid composition since stabilization against discoloration/color change is especially
necessary in this case.
[0016] The invention is described in greater detail below on the basis of examples, among
other things.
[0017] The invention relates to method of reducing destruction of colorant dye in a liquid
textile or hard surface treatment composition in a bottle that is permeable for UV
light by adding ethanol to said composition.
[0018] Surprisingly, relatively small amounts of ethanol are sufficient to protect the colored
liquid composition against destruction of the colorant dye. Accordingly, ethanol is
added in amount of at least 0.01 % by wt. of the composition. In a preferred embodiment
the ethanol is added in amount of at least 0.05 % by wt. of the composition and in
an even more preferred embodiment ethanol is added in amount of at least 0.1 % by
wt. of the composition. In general, there is no upper limit for the amount of ethanol
added to the liquid composition. But it may be preferred that the ethanol is added
in amount of up to 5 % by wt. of the composition, more preferably up to 1 % by wt.
of the liquid composition and most preferred up to 0.5 % by wt. of the composition.
[0019] The invention is applicable to any type of blue colorant dye which may be destroyed
by UV light. Non limiting examples of such include, but are not limited to the following:
Acid Blue 145, Acid Blue 9, Acid Blue 80, anthraquinone dyes, and blue xanthene dyes.
The colorant dyes may be present in an amount of from 0.0001% to 1% by wt. of the
liquid composition and preferably in an amount of from 0.001 to 0.4% by wt. of the
composition. The colorant dye is a blue colorant dye since these dyes showed to be
most affected by UV light.
[0020] Preferably, the liquid composition is an aqueous liquid composition and contains
water as main solvent. In a preferred embodiment the liquid composition is an aqueous
liquid textile or hard surface treatment composition.
[0021] In addition to the ethanol and the blue colorant dye, a liquid composition may contain
further ingredients that further improve the applications-engineering or aesthetic
properties of the liquid composition.
[0022] In the context of the present invention, a liquid textile or hard surface treatment
composition by preference additionally contains one or more substances from the group
of surfactants, builder, enzymes, non-aqueous solvents, perfume, thickeners, pH adjusting
agents, fluorescing agents, hydrotopes, silicone oils, anti-redeposition agents, anti-gray
agents, shrinkage preventers, wrinkle protection agents, dye transfer inhibitors,
corrosion inhibitors, antistatic agents, bittering agents, ironing adjuvants, electrolytes,
proofing and impregnation agents, swelling and anti-slip agents, softening compounds,
biocidal compounds and UV absorbers.
[0023] From the above mentioned further ingredients surfactants, enzymes, non-aqueous solvents,
perfume, pH adjusting agents, fluorescing agents, silicone oils, soil-release polymers,
anti-gray agents, dye transfer inhibitors, electrolytes and bittering agents are most
preferred included into a liquid textile or hard surface treatment composition.
[0024] The compositions of the method of the invention may contain one or more surfactants
selected from the group consisting of anionic, nonionic, cationic, ampholytic and
zwitterionic surfactants and mixtures thereof. The preferred surfactants for use in
the liquid textile or hard surface treatment composition are mixtures of anionic surfactants,
mixtures of anionic surfactants and nonionic surfactants or mixtures of anionic and
ampholytic surfactants although it is to be understood that any surfactant may be
used alone or in combination with any other surfactant or surfactants. The surfactant
should comprise at least 2.5 % by wt. of the composition.
[0025] It is preferred that the liquid textile or hard surface treatment composition comprises
an anionic surfactant.
[0026] Anionic surfactants are important ingredients of liquid textile or hard surface treatment
compositions because of their cleansing and emulsifying properties. Anionic surfactants
are particularly good at keeping the dirt away from textile and hard surfaces, and
removing oily soil residues from textile and hard surfaces.
[0027] For example, liquid textile or hard surface treatment compositions may contain a
surfactant of the following general formula I:
R
1-O-(AO)
n-SO
3-X
+ (I),
wherein
- R1
- is linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or un-substituted hydrocarbon
wherein the total number of carbon atoms is from 1 to 24;
- AO
- is an ethylene oxide- (EO) or propylene oxide- (PO) group;
- n
- is an integer from 1 to 50;
- X
- is a monovalent metal cation, the n-th part of an n-valent metal cation, an ammonium
cation or a substituted ammonium cation.
[0028] In formula (I) R
1 is a linear or branched, substituted or unsubstituted alkyl-, aryl- or alkylaryl
group, preferably a linear, unsubstituted alkyl group, more preferably a fatty alcohol
residue. Preferred residues R
1 are chosen from decyl-, undecyl-, dodecyl-, tridecyl-, tetradecyl, pentadecyl-, hexadecyl-,
heptadecyl-, octadecyl-, nonadecyl-, eicosyl residues und their mixtures, wherein
the residues with an even number of carbon atoms are preferred. Particularly preferred
residues R
1 are derived from C
12-C
18-fatty alcohols, for example from coconut fatty alcohol, tallow fatty alcohol, lauryl-,
myristyl-, cetyl- or stearyl alcohol or from C
10-C
20-oxo alcohols.
[0029] AO is an ethylene oxide (EO) or propylene oxide (PO) group, preferably an ethylene
oxide group. The index n is an integral number from 1 to 50, preferably from 1 to
20 und most preferably from 2 to 10. Particularly preferred, n is 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
or 8. X is a monovalent cation or the n-th part of an n-valent cation, preferred cations
are alkali metal ions, especially Na
+ or K
+, wherein Na
+ is particularly preferred. Further cations X+ can be chosen from NH
4+, ½ Zn
2+,½ Mg
2+,½ Ca
2+,½ Mn
2+, and their mixtures.
[0030] Particularly preferred surfactants of formula (I) are chosen from fatty alcohol ether
sulphates of formula I-A

with k = 11 to 19, n = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8. Most preferred representatives of this
formula are Na-C
12-14 fatty alcohol ether sulphates with 2 EO (k = 11-13, n = 3 in formula I-A).
[0031] Other suitable anionic surfactants can be preferably chosen from fatty alcohol sulphates
and/or alkyl benzene sulfonates. Accordingly, liquid textile or hard surface treatment
compositions may contain a surfactant of the following general formula II:
R
3-A-SO
3-Y
+ (II),
wherein
- R3
- is linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated, substituted or un-substituted hydrocarbon
wherein the total number of carbon atoms is from 1 to 24;
- A
- is -O- or a chemical bond;
- Y
- is a monovalent metal cation, the n-th part of an n-valent metal cation, an ammonium
cation or a substituted ammonium cation.
[0032] In formula (II) R
3 is a linear or branched, substituted or unsubstituted alkyl-, aryl- or alkylaryl
group, preferably a linear, unsubstituted alkyl group, more preferably a fatty alcohol
residue. Preferred residues R
1 are chosen from decyl-, undecyl-, dodecyl-, tridecyl-, tetradecyl, pentadecyl-, hexadecyl-,
heptadecyl-, octadecyl-, nonadecyl-, eicosyl residues und their mixtures, wherein
the residues with an even number of carbon atoms are preferred. Particularly preferred
residues R
1 are derived from C
12-C
18-fatty alcohols, for example from coconut fatty alcohol, tallow fatty alcohol, lauryl-,
myristyl-, cetyl- or stearyl alcohol or from C
10-C
20-oxo alcohols.
[0033] A is -O- or a chemical bond. X is a monovalent cation or the n-th part of an n-valent
cation, preferred cations are alkali metal ions, especially Na
+ or K
+, wherein Na
+ is particularly preferred. Further cations X
+ can be chosen from NH
4+, ½ Zn
2+, ½Mg
2+, ½Ca
2+, ½Mn
2+, and their mixtures.
[0034] Depending on whether A is a bridging oxygen or a chemical bond, formula (II) describes
sulphate surfactants or sulfonate surfactants.
[0035] Particularly preferred surfactants of formula (II) are chosen from fatty alcohol
sulphates of formula (II-A)

with k = 11 to 19. Most preferred representatives of this formula are Na-C
12-14 fatty alcohol sulphates (k = 11-13 in formula II-A).
[0036] Even more preferred surfactants of formula (II) are sulfonate surfactants (A = chemical
bond). Here, R
3 preferably is a linear or branched unsubstituted alkylaryl residue.
[0037] X is a monovalent cation or the n-th part of an n-valent cation, preferred cations
are alkali metal ions, especially Na
+ or K
+, wherein Na
+ is particularly preferred. Further cations X+ can be chosen from NH
4+, ½Zn
2+,½ Mg
2+,½ Ca
2+,½ Mn
2+, and their mixtures.
[0038] Such most preferred surfactants are chosen from linear or branched alkyl benzene
sulfonates of formula C-2

in which R' and R" together have 9 to 19, preferably 11 to 15 and most preferably
11 to 13 C-atoms. A particularly preferred representative of this formula can be described
by formula II-Ba:

[0039] It is preferred that the anionic surfactant is present at a level of from 1 % up
to 20 % by weight of said composition and, preferably, at a level of from 2 % up to
15 % by weight of said composition.
[0040] The liquid textile or hard surface treatment composition may also contain a non-ionic
surfactant as additional ingredient at a level up to 5 % by weight of the liquid textile
or hard surface treatment composition.
[0041] The nonionic surfactant that can be used are by preference alkoxylated, advantageously
ethoxylated, in particular primary alcohols having by preference 8 to 18 carbon atoms
and an average of 1 to 12 mol ethylene oxide (EO) per mol of alcohol, in which the
alcohol residue can be linear or preferably methyl-branched in the 2-position, or
can contain mixed linear and methyl-branched residues, such as those that are usually
present in oxo alcohol residues. Particularly preferred, however, are alcohol ethoxylates
having linear residues made up of alcohols of natural origin having 12 to 18 carbon
atoms, e.g. from coconut, palm, tallow, or oleyl alcohol, and an average of 2 to 8
EO per mol of alcohol. The preferred ethoxylated alcohols include, for example, C
12-14 alcohols with 3 EO, 4 EO, 5 EO, or 7 EO, C
9-11 alcohols with 7 EO, C
13-15 alcohols with 3 EO, 5 EO, 7 EO, or 8 EO, C
12-18 alcohols with 3 EO, 5 EO, or 7 EO, and mixtures thereof, such as mixtures of C
12-14 alcohol with 3 EO and C
12-18 alcohol with 7 EO. The degrees of ethoxylation indicated represent statistical averages,
which can correspond to an integral or a fractional number for a specific product.
Preferred alcohol ethoxylates exhibit a restricted distribution of homologs (narrow
range ethoxylates, NRE). In addition to these non-ionic active detergent species,
fatty alcohols with more than 12 EO can also be used. Examples of these are tallow
fatty alcohol with 14 EO, 25 EO, 30 EO, or 40 EO. Nonionic active detergent species
that contain EO and PO groups together in the molecule are also usable according to
the present invention. Block copolymers having EO-PO block units or PO-EO block units,
but also EO-PO-EO copolymers or PO-EO-PO copolymers, can be used in this context.
Also usable, of course, are mixed alkoxylated nonionic active detergent species in
which EO and PO units are distributed statistically rather than in block fashion.
Such products are obtainable by the simultaneous action of ethylene oxide and propylene
oxide on fatty alcohols. These non-ionic surfactants are obtainable, for example,
under the commercial name Dehydol® (from Cognis).
[0042] Ampholytic surfactants can be broadly described as derivatives of aliphatic or aliphatic
derivatives of heterocyclic secondary and tertiary amines in which the aliphatic radical
may be a straight chain or a branched and wherein one of the aliphatic substituents
contains from 8 to 18 carbon atoms and at least one contains an anionic water-solubilizing
group, e.g. carboxy, sulfonate, sulfate. A preferred ampholytic surfactant is cocamidopropyl
betaine.
[0043] Preferably, the textile or hard surface treatment composition additionally contains
a perfume composition in order to impart a pleasant scent to the laundry treated therewith
and to the textile or hard surface treatment composition itself.
[0044] In a preferred embodiment, the liquid textile or hard surface treatment composition
contains a perfume composition in a quantity of usually up to 3 wt.%, preferably 0.05
to 2 wt.%, particularly 0.1 to 1.5 wt.% and particularly preferably 0.2 to 1 wt.%,
in each case based on the total liquid textile or hard surface treatment composition.
[0045] The perfume composition can contain individual fragrance compounds, for example the
synthetic products of the type of the esters, ethers, aldehydes, ketones, alcohols
and hydrocarbons. Preferably, however, mixtures of various fragrances are used which
together produce an attractive scent. The perfume composition can also contain natural
fragrance compounds as may be obtained from plant sources. The perfume composition
of the textile or hard surface treatment composition can also contain at least one
aromatherapy component such as an essential oil. In another preferred embodiment,
the fabric washing liquid composition comprises an encapsulated perfume and a free
perfume. The use of pro-fragrances in the perfume composition may be also advantageous.
[0046] The treatment compositions can be used to clean hard surfaces or textile fabrics.
For the purposes of the present invention, hard surfaces for example comprise surfaces
of stone or ceramic materials, rigid plastics materials, glass, porcelain or metal.
Hard surfaces may be, for example, tableware, walls, tiles, work surfaces, painted
surfaces, flooring or sanitary articles.
[0047] The textile or hard surface treatment composition is manufactured using usual and
known methods and processes. For example, the constituents of the textile or hard
surface treatment composition can be simply mixed in agitator vessels, the water,
non-aqueous solvent, ethanol and surfactants usefully being prepared first. After
cooling under stirring, if necessary at all, the further constituents are then added
in portions.
[0048] Table 1 below shows the composition of three liquid hard surface treatment compositions
E1 to E3. Quantities are indicated in wt% of active matter.
Table 1:
| |
E1 |
E2 |
E3 |
| Alkyl benzene sulfonic acid, sodium salt |
13 |
2 |
2 |
| Cocamidopropyl betaine |
1.5 |
-- |
-- |
| Sodium lauryl ether sulfate (2 EO) |
4 |
4 |
4 |
| Perfume |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.33 |
| Acid Blue 9 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
-- |
| Acid Yellow 23 |
0.0014 |
-- |
-- |
| Blue anthraquinone dye |
-- |
-- |
0.008 |
| NaCl |
0.2 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
| Na2CO3 |
-- |
0.2 |
0.2 |
| Bitrex® |
0.001 |
-- |
-- |
| Ethanol |
0.1 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
| Water |
to make 100 wt.% |
[0049] When subjected to UV light (the lamp spectrum corresponded to natural sunlight) for
72 hours all three liquid hard surface treatment compositions E1 to E3 showed no or
only little change in color. In contrast, identical liquid compositions but without
ethanol showed after 72 hours exposure to UV light a substantial color fading and/or
discoloration. All three liquid hard surface treatment compositions E1 to E3 were
transparent.
[0050] For liquid hard surface treatment compositions E1 and a comparative composition that
is identical to composition E1 except that it contains no ethanol the color change
was quantitatively measured using the European Pharmacopoeia (EP) color scale. The
measurements were carried out with a Hach Lange LICO 500 Colorimeter. The measured
values before and after 72 hours UV light exposure are given in table 2.
Table 2: EP color values
| Product |
L* |
a* |
b* |
| Initial |
|
|
|
| E1 |
57.7 |
-86.3 |
-2.9 |
| E1 without ethanol |
57.7 |
-86.3 |
-2.9 |
| After UV exposure |
|
|
|
| E1 |
60.2 |
-84.9 |
-3.6 |
| E1 without ethanol |
89.1 |
-5.3 |
0.3 |
[0051] The data in table 2 clearly show that the addition of ethanol has no impact on the
EP color values and, thus, no impact on the color of a dyed liquid composition since
both compositions exhibit exactly the same values for L*, a* and b*.
[0052] The data also clearly show that the composition without ethanol undergoes a dramatic
change in color and that little amounts of ethanol significantly reduce the destruction
of colorant dye.