Field of the Invention
[0001] The present invention relates to the use of aluminosilicates, particularly SAB-15,
as an additive for reducing the toxic and carcinogenic compounds present in tobacco
smoke.
State of the Art
[0002] The habit of smoking tobacco has been and is a global problem with very negative
consequences on human health. Its impact on the departments or ministries of public
health is of great importance. More than 4000 different compounds have been identified
in tobacco and in the smoke generated when burning same [
R.R. Baker, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 32 (2006), 373], among which at least 60 are recognized as toxic and carcinogenic. These compounds
include tars, carbon monoxide and dioxide, acetaldehyde, phenols, acetone, formaldehyde,
benzene, toluene and nicotine. Nicotine is the main addictive component present in
tobacco, and in the human body it is converted into a metabolite called cotinine and
is used as a reference index for measuring the degree of exposure to tobacco smoke.
[0003] The process of smoking a cigarette generates the occurrence of two types of smoke
streams, the so-called mainstream and sidestream. The mainstream corresponds to smoke
which is generated when burning the tobacco and goes through the cigarette from the
lit end to leave through the filter end.
[0004] Patent document
EP2092838 describes the use of certain zeolites and other aluminosilicates and mesoporous solids,
in different forms and with various compositions, adding them and mixing them directly
with tobacco in the form of powder, without having to use any type of special technology
or adhesive, as tobacco additives for drastically reducing the amount of toxic and/or
carcinogenic compounds that are generated when smoking and are found in the mainstream
and sidestream of tobacco smoke.
[0005] Patent application
US2005133052 describes the use of mesoporous aluminosilicate molecular sieves modified with aminoalkylsilyl
groups in filters for retaining specific compounds.
[0006] Patent application
US20050133051 proposes the use of filters containing materials formed by a porous alumina or aluminosilicate
matrix containing adsorbent activated carbon and zeolite particles for selectively
removing specific compounds from tobacco smoke.
[0007] Patent application
WO 2004110183 A2 describes filters containing a catalyst dispersed in a porous aluminosilicate matrix,
for the purpose of converting the CO in cigarette smoke into CO
2.
[0008] Patent application
WO 2004086888 describes a filter including at least 2 porous monolithic adsorbent segments that
are capable of selectively removing components from the smoke stream, and a mixing
segment between both.
[0009] Patent application
CN 102242527 proposes the use of a cigarette paper containing a microencapsulated adsorbent which
allows reducing the content of toxic substances in tobacco smoke. The different adsorbent
materials used include, among others, one or more oxides of Cu, Mn, Zn, Fe, Al, Ti,
etc., as well as composite materials where the oxides are supported by zeolites, MCM-48,
or SBA-15.
[0010] Zhu
et al. [
Zhou, F.N. Gu, L. Gao, J.Y. Yang, W.G. Lin, J., Yang, Y.,Wang, J. H. Zhu, Catalysis
Today, 166(1), (2011), 39 and
Zhou, Gao, Gu, Yang, Yang, Wei, Wang and Zhu, Weinheiman der Bergstrasse, Germany,
15(27), (2009), 6748] have described the use of SBA-15 for selectively reducing the concentration of tobacco-specific
nitrosamines (TSNA) in tobacco smoke; however, this article focuses on the synthesis,
characterization, adsorption and catalytic activity of SBA-15 and examines a new pathway
which allows increasing the efficiency thereof as adsorbents/catalysts with environmental
applications through morphology control.
[0011] Patent application
WO 2011015861 proposes the use of a filter containing an adsorbent material which is capable of
removing phenol from tobacco smoke. The material is formed by a porous solid (with
micro- or mesopores) containing an adsorption promoter which is a hydrophilic organic
proton donor or acceptor substance.
[0012] Patent application
CN 101433818 claims the use of a mesoporous material consisting of SBA-15 for adsorbing particulate
matter, tar, phenol and nitrosamines in mainstream tobacco smoke.
[0014] The results described in patent document
EP0740907 for generating tars or nicotine when using the acidic and sodium forms of zeolite
BETA clearly show the minimum differences with respect to the reference cigarette
smoked without an additive.
[0015] Different types of equipment that facilitate and can even improve incorporating the
additive to fine-cut tobacco, such as for example, speed mixers or orbital mixers,
fluidized beds and entrained beds, among others, as well as sieves for separating
and recirculating the additive that did not attach onto tobacco fibers, can be used
for preparing cigarettes.
Brief Description of the Invention
[0016] Therefore in a first aspect, the present invention relates to aluminosilicate SAB-15
or the acidic or sodium forms thereof, interchanged with Fe, Na, K, Ca, Ce, Zr, the
oxides of Fe, Na, K, Ca, Ce, Zr and mixtures thereof as an additive for reducing the
toxic and carcinogenic substances present in tobacco smoke, both in mainstream and
sidestream tobacco smoke, particularly, toxic substances such as tars, carbon monoxide
and nicotine, as well as the components of the liquids and gases generated when burning
tobacco in the smoking process.
[0017] In a more particular aspect of the present invention, the aluminosilicate SAB-15
has a spherical morphological shape, tubular morphological shape or rod shape, or
any other shape obtained by various synthesis processes and different degrees of acidity
obtained by incorporating aluminum in its structure, in a pressurized autoclave that
is under stirring or standing still and under reflux at different temperatures, and
where it has been interchanged with the cations of metals: Fe, Na, K, Ca, Ce, Zr.
[0018] In a more particular aspect of the present invention, the aluminosilicate SAB-15
has a pore size comprised between 4-10 nm and a mesopore volume preferably greater
than 2.2 cm
3/g, although the mesopore volume can be less.
[0019] In a second aspect, the present invention relates to a mixture comprising dry tobacco
and aluminosilicate SAB-15, or the acidic or sodium forms thereof, interchanged with
Fe, Na, K, Ca, Ce, Zr, the oxides of Fe, Na, K, Ca, Ce, Zr and mixtures thereof as
an additive and not comprising adhesive agents. Dry tobacco refers to a bright tobacco,
dark tobacco, fine-cut tobacco, roll-your-own tobacco, pipe tobacco and any other
type of tobacco that can be smoked.
[0020] In the present invention, agent adhesive refers to compounds with the capacity to
bind or adhere to tobacco or substances incorporated therein, for example, guar gum,
alginates or other compounds having similar characteristics.
[0021] In a more particular aspect of the present invention, the additive is at a concentration
comprised between 0.5-10% by weight with respect to the dry tobacco, in another more
particular aspect, the additive is at a concentration comprised between 2-7% by weight
with respect to the dry tobacco.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0022]
Figure 1 shows the SEM image of a fibrous SBA-15 (A) and a spherical SBA-15 (B).
Figure 2 shows the N2 adsorption isotherms obtained for SBA-15 materials synthesized in different ways.
Detailed Description of Embodiments and Example
Example 1: Method for synthesizing the different materials
[0023] The SBA-15 was synthesized according to the following method: a pluronic P 123 solution
in acidic medium was first prepared to which an amount of tetraethyl orthosilicate
(TEOS) was added. The resulting solution was aged under stirring at 38°C for 20 hours.
It was then transferred to an autoclave with a Teflon liner and kept at 100°C for
24 hours. The resulting suspension was washed with water, dried overnight at 100°C
and finally burned at 550°C for 5 hours (
F. Zhang, Y. Yan, H. Yang, Y. Meng, C. Yu, B. Tu, D. Zhao, Journal of Physical Chemistry
B.109 (18), (2005), 8723).
[0024] The SBA-15
spherical was obtained under the following conditions. An amount of pluronic P 123 was dissolved
in HCl. A second suspension with CTABr and water was prepared and added to the first
suspension. A small amount of ethanol was then added, followed by addition of TEOS.
The resulting solution was aged at 35°C for 45 minutes. It was then transferred to
an autoclave with a Teflon liner at 75°C for several hours and finally treated at
105°C. The resulting suspension was washed with water, dried overnight at 100°C and
finally burned at 550°C, (
A. Katiyar, S. Yadav, PG. Smirniotis, NG. Pinto, Journal of Chromatography A, 1122
(1-2), (2006), 13).
[0025] The SBA-15
reflux material was obtained under conditions similar to SBA-15, but a flask containing
the obtained suspension connected to a reflux condenser at 100°C was used in the final
step. The resulting solid was washed with water, dried overnight at 100°C and finally
burned at 550°C.
[0026] The SBA-15 material at 125°C was prepared similarly to SBA-15 but modifying the temperature
at which it is kept throughout the final temperature of the process, 125°C instead
of 100°C.
[0028] The Na-AlSBA-15 material was prepared by means of ion exchange from the AISBA-15
material, in which 1 gram of material is stirred for 24 hours with a 1 M NaCl solution.
The resulting material is filtered, washed with water and dried in an oven at 100°C.
[0029] The FeNa-AlSBA-15 material was prepared by means of ion exchange from the Na-AISBA-15
material, in which in 1 liter of distilled water with 1.26 g of Fe(NO
3)9H
2O and 4.5 g of Na-AISBA-15 is added. The resulting solution is stirred for 24 hours
and then filtered, washed with water and dried in an oven at 100°C.
[0030] Table 1 shows the chemical and structural characteristics of some of the additives
that are studied in this application as representative examples of such materials,
corresponding to SBA-15 samples prepared under different synthesis conditions or subjected
to post-synthesis modifications. Figure 2 shows the corresponding N
2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K.
Table 1. Textural properties of some of the additives (
aBJH;
bBET method, N
2 adsorption isotherms;
ct method, N
2 adsorption isotherms;
dmeasured at P/P
0=0.995, N
2 adsorption isotherms;
eXRF). The nomenclature refers to SBA-15 materials prepared with different synthesis
conditions or subjected to post-synthesis modifications.
| PROPERTY |
SBA |
SBAspherical |
SBAreflux |
Na-Al-SBA (autoclave) |
| Pore size (nm)a |
6.12 |
6.07 |
6.39 |
6.14 |
| BET area (m2/g)b |
680.5 |
847.8 |
1066 |
915.9 |
| Outer surface area (m2/g)c |
536.3 |
847.8 |
668.2 |
915.9 |
| Pore volume (cm3/g)d |
0.91 |
1.06 |
1.24 |
0.84 |
[0031] For the purpose of demonstrating the role of the additives proposed in this invention,
the following cigarettes were smoked:
- a) reference commercial cigarettes 3R4F from the University of Kentucky and
- b) cigarettes to which the additives were incorporated, using a smoking machine that
worked according to the following operation variables:
The cigarette smoking conditions and the analysis of the generated products are provided
in detail below:
- Fifteen cigarettes were smoked following the specifications of the ISO 3308 standard
(2-second drags, 35 mL inhaled volume, 60-second drag frequency and a drag pressure
loss of less than 300 Pa).
- The cigarettes were conditioned at room temperature and 60% relative humidity, keeping
them in a dryer provided with a saturated sodium nitrite solution at least for 48
hours before being smoked.
- During the smoking process, the smoke, including CO, CO2 and other non-condensable products went through the cigarette filter as well as a
trap (glass fiber filter) located before the gas collection bag. The non-condensable
products were collected in a Tedlar gas bag which was kept for subsequent analysis
by gas chromatography (GC) and the condensable products were collected in the cigarette
filter and in the trap that follows, in which the condensable products directly inhaled
by smokers were retained.
- The condensable products retained in the trap located before the filter were extracted
with 2-propanol, assuring that all the compounds retained in the trap are recovered.
The extract is then dried with sodium sulfate and kept for subsequent analysis by
GC.
- The CO and CO2 content in the non-condensable fraction was determined by GC using a thermal conductivity
detector (GC-TCD) and a CTRI concentric column, which was also used for analyzing
O2, N2 and CH4, in SHIMADZU GC-14A equipment, using calibration by means of external standards.
Quantification was performed by calculating the response factor (grams of compound/peak
area) of these compounds by means of injecting different volumes (between 0.5 and
2.5 mL) of the corresponding standard (carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen,
methane and oxygen).
- The analysis conditions were:
Carrier gas: He
Injector temperature: 28°C
Detector temperature: 110°C
Injected volume: 2.5 mL
Constant column flow: 40 mL/min
Oven temperature program: isotherm at 110°C
Analysis time 20 minutes
- The rest of the non-condensable components were analyzed by GC with a flame ionization
detector (GC-FID), using a GAS-PRO column and the following conditions:
Injector temperature: 150°C
Detector temperature: 210°C
Carrier gas: Helium
Injected sample volume: 150 µL
Constant column flow: 2 mL/min
Oven temperature program:
Initial column temperature 35°C for 10 min
Heating to 100°C with a ramp of 5°C/min
Heating to 200°C with a ramp of 15°C/min
Final time: 10 minutes
- The condensable compounds (extracted with 2-propanol from the cigarette filters and
the smoke traps) were analyzed by GC with a detector using mass spectrometry (GC-MS),
using an HP-5MS column and the following conditions:
Injector temperature: 250°C
Carrier gas: Helium
Injected sample volume: 1 µL
Constant column flow: 2 mL/min
Oven temperature program:
Initial column temperature 40°C for 5 min
Heating to 320°C with a ramp of 12°C/min
Final Time: 25 minutes
[0032] Nicotine standards of different concentrations (between 5 and 300 ppm) were prepared
for quantifying the compounds present in the condensed phase of tobacco smoke. They
were injected in the equipment and the value of the corresponding response factor
was obtained from the slope of the straight line obtained from the graphs representing
the amount of injected compound vs. peak area. The response factor obtained for nicotine
was used for the rest of the analyzed compounds since nicotine was the main compound.
Quantification was carried out in a similar manner for the gases, in which a mean
response factor was used in the cases in which the corresponding response factor was
not available.
Cigarette preparation conditions
[0033] To carry out all the tests, cigarettes in which tobacco fibers were mixed by hand
with the catalyst were prepared, aided by a few drops of ethanol. This operation was
performed on a sieve which allowed separating the catalyst that did not adhere to
the tobacco, such that a percentage of catalyst was obtained in the nominal mixtures,
corresponding to the amount of initially weighed catalyst, and another real percentage,
which was that retained by the sample. Agents other than ethanol which can be used
to aid in the process of mixing the tobacco and catalysts are water, glycerin and
other similar compounds, commonly present in tobacco preparations and evaporate with
relative ease. Nevertheless, mixing can also be satisfactorily performed without having
to use any of these substances.
[0034] The characteristics corresponding to some examples which allow illustrating the results
that can be achieved with the use of the proposed additives are shown below. The nominal
percentage of each type of additive is indicated. The tobacco used, both in the reference
cigarettes and in the different mixtures with the additives, was always the reference
tobacco 3R4F obtained from the University of Kentucky.
Tobacco-additive mixtures for the conducted tests
[0035] A nominal percentage of 4-6% by weight of additive is used in all the cases. The
cigarettes were prepared using the method described in "cigarette preparation conditions"
and using the additives indicated below. Table 2 shows the mixtures made in the different
tests conducted.
Table 2: tobacco mixtures
| Mixtures |
| 3R4F+SBA-15 (4%) |
| 3R4F+SBA-15 (6%) |
| 3R4F+SBA-15 (8%) |
| 3R4F+SBA-15spherical |
| 3R4F+Na-SBA-15 |
| 3R4F+FeNa-SBA |
| 3R4F+AlSBA-15 (autoclave) |
| 3R4F+Na-AISBA-15 (autoclave) |
| 3R4F+SBA-15spherical (125°C) |
| 3R4F+SBA-15 (reflux) |
[0036] Tables 3, 4, 5 and 6 show the results obtained when smoking the cigarettes using
the cigarette preparation conditions, the smoking conditions and the conditions for
analyzing the generated products and the examples corresponding to different tobacco-additive
mixtures. The values obtained for the following are shown:
- CO and CO2, in mg of compound/cigarette
- the amount of some toxic products, in mg of compound/cigarette
- total particulate matter (TPM) in mg/cigarette, calculated as:

where mo is the mass of the trap located before the filter, in mg, before smoking
m1 is the mass of the trap located before the filter, in mg, after smoking a number
q of cigarettes.
Table 3. CO and CO
2 content in tobacco smoke generated under controlled conditions
| Sample |
CO2 (mg/cigarette) |
CO (mg/cigarette) |
| 3R4F |
40.63 |
11.22 |
| 3R4F+SBA-15 |
29.85 |
10.89 |
| 3R4F+SBA-15spherical |
31.95 |
9.02 |
| 3R4F+FeNa-SBA-15 |
37.00 |
11.45 |
| 3R4F+AISBA-15 (autoclave) |
39.69 |
10.11 |
| 3R4F+SBA-15spherical (125°C) |
36.97 |
9.55 |
Table 4. Number of drags and TPM obtained when smoking tobacco under controlled conditions
| Sample |
% zeolite |
Drags |
mg/cigarette |
TPM (mg/cigarette) |
| 3R4F |
0.0 |
9 |
0.76 |
6.79 |
| 3R4F+SBA-15 |
3.8 |
9 |
0.76 |
2.34 |
| 3R4F+SBA-15spherical |
6.3 |
8.5 |
0.68 |
3.07 |
| 3R4F+FeNa-SBA-15 |
3.9 |
9 |
0.78 |
2.91 |
| 3R4F+AlSBA-15 (autoclave) |
5.9 |
10 |
0.80 |
3.21 |
| 3R4F+SBA-15sphehcal (125°C) |
5.8 |
8.5 |
0.77 |
2.44 |
Table 5. Generation (mg compound/cigarette) of different toxic compounds present in
the gases collected in the Tedlar bag after smoking tobacco under controlled conditions
| Sample |
Propionaldehyde |
Toluene |
Benzene |
Acetaldehyde |
| 3R4F |
0.0208 |
0.0178 |
0.0849 |
0.4214 |
| 3R4F+SBA-15 |
0.0152 |
0.0135 |
0.0655 |
0.2908 |
| 3R4F+SBA-15spherical |
0.0118 |
0.0148 |
0.1944 |
1.2061 |
| 3R4F+FeNa-SBA-15 |
0.0203 |
0.0183 |
0.0836 |
0.5511 |
| 3R4F+AlSBA-15 (autoclave) |
0.0135 |
0.0101 |
0.0772 |
0.6541 |
| 3R4F+SBA-15spherical (125°C) |
0.0128 |
0.0099 |
0.0874 |
0.4350 |

[0037] Tables 3 to 6 clearly show that, generally, the proposed additives, mixed with tobacco
in the described proportions, provided a significant reduction in the amount of most
of the toxic compounds in tobacco smoke. This reduction in turn entailed a decrease
of the potential negative effects caused by tobacco smoke in smokers and in passive
smokers, without causing significant changes in the organoleptic properties, taste
and consistency of the tobacco, and without the apparent generation of other undesired
compounds. On the other hand, not only were the toxic compounds reduced, but also
the total amount of gases and liquids that are formed when smoking the cigarette (total
particulate matter, TPM, plus the liquids retained in the filter) also generally decreased
in a significant manner, whereas solid residue together with ash increased. When the
process of smoking the cigarette ended, the additives were retained in the ash or
in the tobacco that has not been smoked.
[0038] Table 3 shows the yields obtained for CO and CO
2 when smoking cigarettes prepared with the described mixtures. As can be seen, reductions
are generally obtained in the amount of CO present in the mainstream tobacco smoke
as a result of the presence of almost all the studied materials. As will be seen below,
these reductions are particularly interesting for the additive referred to as SBA-15
when it is used in nominal proportions of 6 and 8%. The SBA-15
spherical, SBA-15
spherical and SBA-15 at 125°C materials also provide significant reductions in CO. That is
particularly interesting since CO is one of the substances regulated by laws applicable
to commercial cigarettes. The rest of the additives also provide a reduction, although
less, in CO, with the only exception of FeNa-SBA-15, which causes a slight increase.
It is also seen that reductions in CO
2 are obtained in all the studied cases. It must be pointed out that the results shown
in Table 4 depict a significant decrease in the total particulate matter (TPM) as
a result of using the proposed additives. These reductions range between a maximum
value of 66%, in the case of SBA-15, and a minimum reduction of 52% in the worst case,
which corresponds to AISBA-15 (autoclave). This is also an important feature of these
materials since the TPM is closely related to tars that are generated when smoking
cigarettes, tars being another regulated substance. In fact, the amount of tars is
considered to provide a good measurement of the amount of toxic and harmful substances
generated when smoking, all of them considered as a whole. It can therefore be concluded
that the capacity of these additives for reducing the formation of said toxic substances
is very significant.
[0039] Table 5 shows, by way of example, the results obtained for the production of some
toxic and carcinogenic compounds in tobacco smoke. As can be seen, all the additives
provided a reduction in the formation of propionaldehyde with respect to the reference
cigarette. Interesting reductions were also observed in the case of toluene, with
the only exception of the NaFe-SBA-15 material, which caused a slight increase. Similar
considerations can be made for benzene and acetaldehyde: reductions are observed for
benzene in all cases, except for SBA-15
spherical and SBA-15
spherical at 125°C, causing a slight increase. In the case of acetaldehyde, the only additive
which causes reductions with respect to the reference cigarette is SBA-15. It can
therefore be concluded that the sample of the SBA-15 material has an excellent behavior
from the viewpoint of applying same as an additive for reducing the toxicity of the
mainstream tobacco smoke since, in addition to reducing the generation of CO and TPM,
it separately reduces all the analyzed toxic compounds.
[0040] Table 6 shows the results obtained for other compounds present in tobacco smoke in
the case of the reference tobacco and with 4 of the studied additives. The excellent
behavior shown by the SBA-15 sample can again be confirmed, with reductions ranging
between 95% for phenol and 39% for nicotine. The SBA-15
spherical material also caused reductions in 7 studied compounds, whereas FeNa-SBA-15 caused
an increase in all of said compounds, except benzaldehyde.
[0041] All the described mixtures can also be prepared by means of using speed mixers, fluidized
beds or entrained beds and any other type of equipment which favors mixing the tobacco
fiber and additive. Sieves can also be used for separating and recirculating the additive
that did not attach onto the tobacco fibers. On the other hand, for other different
conventional cigarette preparations, in which the tobacco-additive mixtures must be
prepared manually by smokers themselves, a dispenser providing the suitable amount
of catalyst can be used for preparing bright tobacco, dark tobacco, fine-cut tobacco,
roll-your-own tobacco, pipe tobacco and any other product that can be smoked. This
dispenser can consist of a blister, in which each cavity contains the selected amount
(between 5 and 70 mg, such that between 0.5 and 7% is obtained with respect to the
tobacco which will usually be consumed in portions of about 1 g of tobacco), individual
capsules containing said amounts, a container including a calibrated or graduated
spoon or any another calibrated dispenser. To prepare a ready-to-smoke product (MYO,
RYO, pipe or other forms), the content of the calibrated dispenser is poured onto
the tobacco fiber and carefully mixed by hand. This method assures excellent results
which are as good as those shown in Tables 3 to 6.
Tobacco-additive mixtures with different additive concentration
[0042] The additive used in all the cases was SBA-15. The percentages by weight of catalyst
are indicated. The cigarettes were prepared using the method described in "cigarette
preparation conditions" and using nominal concentrations (percentage by weight) of
4.6 and 8%.
Results obtained corresponding to tobacco-additive mixtures with different additive
concentration
[0043] The influence of additive concentration on additive-tobacco mixtures was also studied.
To that end, mixtures were prepared with a nominal percentage of catalyst comprised
between 4 and 8% using the method described above. By way of example, Tables 7 and
8 show the results obtained when using SBA-15 as an additive. As can be seen, the
best results were achieved when using the maximum additive concentration, although
excellent results, which can be adjusted according to the desired reduction in toxic
compounds, were also obtained in mixtures with intermediate concentrations.

[0044] From this point of view, it must be pointed out as being particularly interesting
the use of SBA-15 with a nominal concentration of 8% which caused the following reductions:
42% of CO, 90% of TPM, 51% of propionaldehyde, 62% of toluene, 58% of benzene, 53%
of acetaldehyde, 83% of nicotine, 66% of benzaldehyde, and practical disappearance
of other compounds.
1. Use of aluminosilicate SAB-15, or the acidic or sodium forms thereof, interchanged
with Fe, Na, K, Ca, Ce, Zr, the oxides of Fe, Na, K, Ca, Ce, Zr and mixtures thereof
as an additive for reducing the toxic and carcinogenic substances present in tobacco
smoke.
2. Use according to claim 1, where the aluminosilicate SAB-15 has a spherical morphological
shape, tubular morphological shape or rod shape.
3. Use according to any of the preceding claims, where the aluminosilicate SAB-15 has
a pore size comprised between 4-10 nm and a mesopore volume preferably greater than
2.2 cm3/g.
4. Mixture comprising dry tobacco and aluminosilicate SAB-15, or the acidic or sodium
forms thereof, interchanged with Fe, Na, K, Ca, Ce, Zr, the oxides of Fe, Na, K, Ca,
Ce, Zr and mixtures thereof as an additive and not containing adhesive agents.
5. Mixture according to claim 4, characterized in that the additive is at a concentration comprised between 0.5-10% by weight with respect
to the dry tobacco.
6. Mixture according to claim 5, characterized in that the additive is at a concentration comprised between 2-7% by weight with respect
to the dry tobacco.