TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present technology is generally directed to devices and methods for modifying
fluid flow within a duct. More specifically, some embodiments are directed to flow
modifiers and transition portions for improving the exhaust flow from a coke oven
through a duct intersection.
BACKGROUND
[0002] Coke is a solid carbonaceous fuel that is derived from coal. Because of its relatively
few impurities, coke is a favored energy source in a variety of useful applications.
For example, coke is often used to smelt iron ores during the steelmaking process.
As a further example, coke may also be used to heat commercial buildings or power
industrial boilers.
[0003] In a typical coke making process, an amount of coal is baked in a coke oven at temperatures
that typically exceed 2000 degrees Fahrenheit (1093.3 degrees Celsius). The baking
process transforms the relatively impure coal into coke, which contains relatively
few impurities. At the end of the baking process, the coke typically emerges from
the coke oven as a substantially intact piece. The coke typically is removed from
the coke oven, loaded into one or more train cars (e.g., a hot car, a quench car,
or a combined hot car/quench car), and transported to a quench tower in order to cool
or "quench" the coke before it is made available for distribution for use as a fuel
source.
[0004] The hot exhaust (i.e. flue gas) is extracted from the coke ovens through a network
of ducts, intersections, and transitions. The intersections in the flue gas flow path
of a coke plant can lead to significant pressure drop losses, poor flow zones (e.g.
dead, stagnant, recirculation, separation, etc.), and poor mixing of air and volatile
matter. The high pressure drop losses lead to higher required draft which can lead
to leaks and a more difficult to control system. In addition, poor mixing and resulting
localized hot spots can lead to earlier structural degradation due to accelerated
localized erosion and thermal wear. Erosion includes deterioration due to high velocity
flow eating away at material. Hot spots can lead to thermal degradation of material,
which can eventually cause thermal/structural failure. This localized erosion and/or
hot spots can, in turn, lead to failures at duct intersections. For example, the intersection
of a coke plant's vent stack and crossover duct is susceptible to poor mixing/flow
distribution that can lead to hot spots resulting in tunnel failures.
[0005] Traditional duct intersection designs also result in significant pressure drop losses
which may limit the number of coke ovens connected together in a single battery. There
are limitations on how much draft a coke plant draft fan can pull. Pressure drops
in duct intersections take away from the amount of draft available to exhaust flue
gases from the coke oven battery.
[0006] These and other related problems with traditional duct intersection design result
in additional capital expenses. Therefore, a need exists to provide improved duct
intersection/transitions that can improve mixing, flow distribution, minimize poor
flow zones (e.g. dead, stagnant, recirculation, separation, etc.), and reduce pressure
drop losses at the intersection thereby leading to improved coke plant operation as
well as potentially lower costs to design, build, and operate a coke plant.
US 2011/168482 A1 discloses a silencer for a gas turbine.
DE 10 2009 003461 A1 discloses an exhaust stack with a transition tube and a gas vent.
CN 2 521 473 Y discloses a flow guiding straight tee.
US 4 720 262 A discloses apparatus for the heat treatment of fine material.
US 4 342 195 A discloses an exhaust system for a motorcycle.
EP 0 126 399 A1 discloses a flow channel of short overall length.
US 5 213 138 A discloses downstream extending convolutions disposed on the inside corner of an angled
conduit.
SUMMARY
[0007] Provided herein are contoured duct liners, turning vanes, transition portions, duct
intersections, and methods of improving gas flow in an exhaust system.
A duct intersection according to the present invention is provided according to claim
1.
A method of improving gas flow in an exhaust system including at least one duct intersection
according to the present invention is provided according to claim 5.
In an exemplary embodiment, a duct intersection comprises a first duct portion and
a second duct portion extending laterally from a side of the first duct portion. The
second duct portion may tee into the first duct portion. The second duct portion may
extend laterally from the side of the first duct portion at an angle of less than
90 degrees.
[0008] At least one flow modifier is mounted inside one of the first and second duct portions.
In one aspect of the technology described herein, the flow modifier is a contoured
duct liner. In another aspect of the present technology, the flow modifier includes
at least one turning vane.
[0009] In an embodiment, the contoured duct liner comprises a first contoured wall mated
to an inside surface of the duct and a second contoured wall mated to the first contoured
wall. In one aspect of the present technology, the contoured duct liner may be mounted
inside the first duct portion. In another aspect of the present technology, the contoured
duct liner is mounted inside the second duct portion. The second contoured wall may
comprise a refractory material.
[0010] In another embodiment, the contoured duct liner comprises a first wall contoured
to mate with an inside surface of a duct intersection and a second wall attached to
the first wall. The second wall is contoured to modify the direction of gas flow within
the duct intersection. In one aspect of the present technology, the second wall includes
at least one convex surface.
[0011] In yet another embodiment, the duct intersection comprises a first duct portion and
a second duct portion extending laterally from a side of the first duct portion. A
transition portion extends between the first and second duct portions, wherein the
transition portion has a length extending along a side of the first duct portion and
a depth extending away from the side of the first duct portion. In an embodiment,
the length is a function of the diameter of the second duct portion. In another embodiment,
the length is greater than a diameter of the second duct portion. In a still further
embodiment, the length is twice the depth.
[0012] Also provided herein is a coking facility exhaust system. In an embodiment the exhaust
system comprises an emergency stack and a crossover duct extending laterally from
a side of the emergency stack. The system also includes a contoured duct liner including
a first wall mated to an inside surface of the emergency stack and a second wall attached
to the first wall. The second wall is contoured to modify the direction of gas flow
proximate an intersection of the emergency stack and crossover duct. The exhaust system
may further comprise a second contoured duct liner mated to an inside surface of the
crossover duct.
[0013] Also contemplated herein are methods for improving gas flow in an exhaust system.
In one embodiment the method may include determining a location of a poor flow zone
(e.g. dead, stagnant, recirculation, separation, etc.) within the duct intersection
and mounting a flow modifier in the duct intersection at the determined location.
In one aspect of the disclosed technology, the location is determined with a computer
aided design system, such as a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) system. In other
aspects of the disclosed technology, the location is determined by measuring conditions
at the duct intersection, such as temperature, pressure, and/or velocity.
[0014] In another embodiment, a method of improving gas flow in an exhaust system including
at least one duct intersection comprises determining a location of a poor flow zone
within the duct intersection and injecting a fluid into the duct intersection at the
determined location.
[0015] These and other aspects of the disclosed technology will be apparent after consideration
of the Detailed Description and Figures herein. It is to be understood, however, that
the scope of the invention shall be determined by the claims as issued and not by
whether given subject matter addresses any or all issues noted in the background or
includes any features or aspects recited in this summary.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0016] Non-limiting and non-exhaustive embodiments of the devices, systems, and methods,
including the preferred embodiment, are described with reference to the following
figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the various
view unless otherwise specified.
FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a coke plant;
FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a representative coke oven and associated
exhaust system;
FIG. 3 is a side view in cross-section of an emergency stack and crossover duct intersection
indicating various flow anomalies near the intersection;
FIG. 4 is a side view in cross-section of a duct intersection according to an exemplary
embodiment;
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a fan manifold that extends between the duct fan and
main stack of a coke plant;
FIG. 6 is a side view in cross-section of a traditional fan manifold indicating the
velocity of gases traveling through the manifold and main stack;
FIG. 7 is a side view in cross-section of a modified fan manifold indicating the velocity
of gases traveling through the manifold and main stack;
FIG. 8 is a side view in cross-section of a turning vane assembly according to an
exemplary embodiment;
FIG. 9 is a perspective view of the turning vane assembly shown in FIG. 8;
FIG. 10 is a side view in cross-section of a fan manifold according to an exemplary
embodiment indicating the velocity of gases traveling through the manifold and main
stack;
FIG. 11A is a front view schematic representation of a duct intersection according
to an exemplary embodiment;
FIG. 11B is a side view schematic representation of the duct intersection shown in
FIG. 11A;
FIG. 12A is a front view schematic representation of a duct intersection according
to an exemplary embodiment;
FIG. 12B is a side view schematic representation of the duct intersection shown in
FIG. 12A;
FIG. 13 is a side view of a duct intersection according to another exemplary embodiment;
FIG. 14 is a schematic representation of a fluid injection system for use at a duct
intersection;
FIG. 15A is a perspective view of an intermediate HRSG tie in with transition pieces
at the tie-in joints;
FIG. 15B is a side view of an intermediate HRSG tie in with transition pieces at the
tie-in joints;
FIG. 15C is a perspective view of an intermediate HRSG tie in with transition pieces
at the tie-in joints; and
FIG. 15D is a top view of an intermediate HRSG tie in with transition pieces at the
tie-in joints.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0017] Provided herein is a contoured duct liner, a duct intersection, and methods of improving
gas flow in an exhaust system. The described embodiments may be implemented as original
designs or as retrofits to existing facilities. The disclosed designs have been found
to improve flow, thermal conditions, and structural integrity at intersections or
tie-ins in a coke oven or similar system. By optimizing the external and/or internal
shape of intersections, the mixing can be improved, areas of relatively undesirable
conditions can be minimized, and pressure drop losses at the intersection can be minimized.
Reducing pressure losses at the intersections can help lower draft set point(s), which
can lead to improved operation as well as potentially lower cost designs and maintenance.
Furthermore, it can be advantageous to minimize the draft set point of the overall
system to minimize infiltration of any unwanted outside air into the system.
[0018] Specific details of several embodiments of the technology are described below with
reference to FIGS. 1-14. Other details describing well-known structures and systems
often associated with coke making and/or duct design have not been set forth in the
following disclosure to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description of the various
embodiments of the technology. Many of the details, dimensions, angles, and other
features shown in the figures are merely illustrative of particular embodiments of
the technology. Accordingly, other embodiments can have other details, dimensions,
angles, and features without departing from the scope of the claims. A person of ordinary
skill in the art, therefore, will accordingly understand that the technology may have
other embodiments with additional elements, or the technology may have other embodiments
without several of the features shown and described below with reference to FIGS.
1-14.
[0019] FIG. 1 illustrates a representative coke plant 5 where coal 1 is fed into a battery
of coke ovens 10 where the coal is heated to form coke. Exhaust gases (i.e. flue gases)
from the coke ovens are collected in a common tunnel 12 which intersects emergency
stack 14. Cross-over duct 16 is also connected to common tunnel 12 via the emergency
stack 14. Hot flue gases flow through the cross-over duct 16 into a co-generation
plant 18 which includes a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) 20 which in turn feeds
steam turbine 22. The flue gases continue on to a sulfur treatment facility 24 and
finally the treated exhaust gases are expelled through main stack 28 via duct fans
26, which provide negative pressure on the entire system in addition to the draft
created by gases rising through the main stack 28.
[0020] With further reference to FIG. 2, it can be appreciated that coke ovens 10 are connected
to the common tunnel 12 via uptakes 15. Common tunnel 12 extends horizontally along
the top of the coke ovens 10. An emergency stack 14 extends vertically from common
tunnel 12 as shown. Cross-over duct 16 intersects emergency stack 14 at a duct intersection
30. In normal operation, the emergency stack 14 is closed whereby exhaust gases travel
through the cross-over duct 16 to the co-generation plant 18 (see FIG. 1). In the
event of a problem with the co-generation plant 18, or other downstream equipment,
the emergency stack 14 may be opened to allow exhaust gases to exit the system directly.
While the figures show the common tunnel 12 and cross-over duct 16 intersecting the
emergency stack 14 at different elevations, the common tunnel 12 and cross-over duct
16 may intersect the emergency stack 14 at the same elevation. Furthermore, the technology
disclosed herein may be applied to the intersections whether they are at the same
elevation or different elevations.
[0021] FIG. 3 illustrates various flow anomalies present in traditional duct intersections,
such as duct intersection 30. Flow anomaly 32 is a point of localized combustion that
is due to poor flow/distribution. An additional area of poor flow/mixing distribution
36 is located in the emergency stack 14 across from the cross-over duct 16. A poor
flow zone 34 (e.g. dead, stagnant, recirculation, separation, etc.) is located in
cross-over duct 16. These poor flow zone areas contain separated flows which can dissipate
useful flow energy. These potential poor flow spaces can also contain unwanted, unsteady
vortical flow, sometimes enhanced by buoyancy or chemical reactions, which can contribute
to unwanted, poor acoustics, forced harmonics, potential flow instabilities, and incorrect
instrument readings. Incorrect instrument readings may occur if measurements are made
in a poor flow zone that has conditions not representative of flow in the duct. Because
of the nature of the poor flow zones, these areas can also cause particle drop out
and promote particle accumulation.
[0022] FIG. 4 illustrates an improved duct intersection 130 according to an exemplary embodiment.
Duct intersection 130 includes a first duct portion in the form of emergency stack
114 and a second duct portion in the form of cross-over duct 116 that extends laterally
from a side of the emergency stack 114. In this embodiment, duct intersection 130
includes a plurality of flow modifiers (40, 42, 44) to improve exhaust flow. For example,
flow modifier 40 is in the form of a contoured duct liner that is positioned at the
intersection 130 of emergency stack 114 and cross-over duct 116. Flow modifier 40
occupies the area where traditional designs have poor flow and mixing such as flow
anomaly 32 in FIG. 3. Flow modifier 42 is disposed in cross-over duct 116 to occupy
the poor flow zone 34 shown in FIG. 3. Flow modifier 44 is disposed in the emergency
stack 114 opposite the cross-over duct 116 and, in this case, occupies the poor mixing
distribution region 36 shown in FIG. 3. With the addition of flow modifiers 40, 42,
and 44 the flow F within intersection 130 is improved (see FIG. 4).
[0023] The duct liners reshape the internal contours of the duct, inherently changing the
nature and direction of the flow path among other effects. The duct liners can be
used to smooth or improve flow entrance or provide better transition from one path
to another especially when there are limitations to do so with the duct shape. The
contoured duct liners can be used to alleviate wall shear stress/erosion stemming
from high velocities and particle accumulation from settling and/or particle impaction,
which could result in slow or poor flow zones. The contoured duct liners also provide
better duct transitions, or paths, for better flow transition and movement, mitigation
of stress and thermal concentrations, and mitigation of flow separation, etc.
[0024] With continued reference to FIG. 4 it can be appreciated that, in this embodiment,
the contoured duct liners 40, 42, and 44 are each comprised of a first contoured wall
mated to an inside surface of the duct intersection and a second contoured wall mated
to the first contoured wall. For example, contoured duct liner 40 includes a first
contoured wall 50 which is mated to the inside surface 17 of emergency stack 114 and
inside surface 19 of cross-over duct 116. Duct liner 40 also includes a second contoured
wall 52 that is mated to the first contoured wall 50. In this case, the second contoured
wall 52 is convex and extends into the flow F of the flue gases traveling through
the duct intersection 130. Contoured duct liner 42 includes a first contoured wall
54 which is mated to an inside surface 19 of the cross-over duct 116. A second contoured
wall 56 is mated to the first contoured wall 54 and is also convex. Similarly, contoured
duct liner 44 includes a first contoured wall 58 mated to inside surface 17 of the
emergency stack 114 and includes a second contoured wall 60 mated to the first contoured
wall 58.
[0025] The first contoured walls of the contoured duct liners may be attached to the inside
surfaces 17 and 19 by welding, fasteners, or the like. Similarly, the second contoured
walls may be attached to their respective first contoured walls by appropriate fasteners
or by welding. As one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize, the contoured duct
liners may be comprised of various materials which are suitable for corrosive, high
heat applications. For example, first contoured walls 50, 54, and 58 may be comprised
of steel or other suitable material. The second contoured walls 52, 56, and 60 may
comprise a refractory material such as ceramic that is capable of resisting the heat
associated with the flue gases and local combustion. The selection of materials can
be dependent on the thermal, flow, and chemical properties of the flue gases. Because
the flue gases can be of varied temperatures, velocities, chemical composition, in
which all can depend on many factors such as the time in the coking cycle, flow control
settings, ambient conditions, at the locations in the coking oven system, etc., the
material selection can vary as well. The internal lining layers for the hot duct tie-ins
could have more significant refractory layers than for cold ducts. Selection of appropriate
materials may take into account min/max temperatures, thermal cycling, chemical reactions,
flow erosion, acoustics, harmonics, resonance, condensation of corrosive chemicals,
and accumulation of particles, for example.
[0026] In an embodiment, the flow modifiers may comprise a multilayer lining that is built
up with a relatively inexpensive material and covered with a skin. In yet another
embodiment, refractory or similar material can be shaped via gunning (i.e. spraying).
Better control of shaping via gunning may be accomplished by gunning in small increments
or layers. In addition, a template or mold may be used to aid the shaping via gunning.
A template, mold, or advanced cutting techniques may be used to shape the refractory
(e.g. even in the absence of gunning for the main shape of an internal insert) for
insertion into the duct and then attached via gunning to the inner lining of the duct.
In yet another embodiment, the flow modifier may be integrally formed along the duct.
In other words, the duct wall may be formed or "dented" to provide a convex surface
along the interior surface of the duct. As used herein, the term convex does not require
a continuous smooth surface, although a smooth surface may be desirable. For example,
the flow modifiers may be in the form of a multi-faceted protrusion extending into
the flow path. Such a protrusion may be comprised of multiple discontinuous panels
and/or surfaces. Furthermore, the flow modifiers are not limited to convex surfaces.
The contours of the flow modifiers may have other complex surfaces that may be determined
by CFD analysis and testing, and can be determined by design considerations such as
cost, space, operating conditions, etc.
[0027] FIG. 5 illustrates a traditional fan manifold 70 that extends between the duct fans
26 and main stack 28 (see FIG. 1). Fan manifold 70 comprises a plurality of branches
72, 74, and 76 which all intersect into plenum 80. As shown in the figure, branches
74 and 76 include flow diverters 78 while plenum 80 includes flow straightener 79.
With reference to FIG. 6, which indicates velocity magnitude in the fan manifold 70,
traditional fan manifold designs result in a high velocity flow 82 which can damage
the duct as a result of high shear stress. In contrast, FIG. 7 illustrates a fan plenum
180 intersection which includes a turning vane assembly 90. In this case, the magnitude
of the velocity flowing next to the surface of main stack 128 is much lower than in
the conventional duct configuration shown in FIG. 6. The higher flow velocity 184
is displaced inward away from the inside wall of the main stack 128, thereby reducing
shear stress on the wall and helping to prevent erosion and corrosion of the stack.
Turning vanes inside the duct help direct the flow path for a more efficient process.
Turning vanes can be used to better mix flow, better directing of flow, and mitigation
of total pressure losses, for example.
[0028] With reference to FIGS. 8 and 9, the turning vane assembly 90 includes an inner vane
92 and an outer vane 94. In this embodiment, both the inner and outer vanes are disposed
in the main stack 128. FIG. 8 provides exemplary dimensions by which a turning vane
assembly could be constructed. However, these dimensions are exemplary and other dimensions
and angles may be used. As perhaps best shown in FIG. 9 the inner vane 92 includes
a leading portion 902 that connects to an angled portion 904, which, in turn, connects
to trailing portion 906. As shown in the figure, the angled portion 904 tapers from
a 100 inch width (2.54 metres) to an 80 inch width (2.03 metres). Similarly, the trailing
portion 906 tapers from an 80 inch width (2.03 metres) to a 50 inch width (1.27 metres).
Here again, the dimensions are only representative and may vary. In this embodiment,
the angled portion 904 is angled at approximately 45 degrees; however, other angles
may be used depending on the particular application. Outer vane 94 includes a leading
portion 908 connected to an angled portion 910 which in turn is connected to a trailing
portion 912. Outer turning vane 94 also includes side walls 914 and 916 as shown.
Side walls 914 and 916 are canted inward towards the angled and trailing portions
910 and 912 at an angle A. In this embodiment angle A is approximately 10 degrees.
Turning vane assembly 90 may be mounted or assembled into the main stack 128 with
suitable fasteners or may be welded in place, for example.
[0029] In an exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 10, a fan manifold plenum 280 intersects
main stack 228 with a ramped transition. In this case, it can be appreciated that
the fan manifold plenum 280 has an upper wall 281 which transitions into the main
stack 228 at an angle. As shown by the velocity magnitude 282, this results in a lower
flow velocity magnitude than with traditional fan manifold designs shown in FIGS.
5 and 6. It has been found that improving the intersection/transition from the duct
fan to the main stack can reduce wear and erosion as well as ash buildup in the main
stack. In addition to the ramped transition, contoured duct liners and/or turning
vanes may be used together in combination. For example, contoured duct liners may
be located in the slower velocity regions 202, 204, and 206 as shown in FIG. 10.
[0030] FIGS. 11A and 11B illustrate a duct intersection 230 according to another exemplary
embodiment. In this embodiment, the duct intersection 230 includes an emergency stack
214 and a cross-over duct 216 with a transition portion 240 extending therebetween.
Changing the size of the duct cross sectional areas near or at intersections can help
improve flow performance. In general, increasing the size of the flow cross sectional
area as in transition portion 240 can help reduce flow losses. The transition portion
can help better transition flow from a duct to a joining duct at tie-ins or intersections.
The transitions can be flared, swaged, swept, or the like to provide the desired flow
behavior at the intersections. In addition, the transitions may converge or diverge
with respect to the direction of flow. Converging and diverging portions may be used
in combination, e.g. the duct may first converge and then diverge or vice versa. Furthermore,
it should be understood that the embodiments may be implemented in various combinations.
For example, a turning vane assembly, such as described above with respect to FIGS.
7-9, may be used in conjunction with the duct liners, whether fabricated or gunned
in place, as well as transition portions.
[0031] The transition portion 240 has a length L extending along a side of the exhaust duct
and a depth D extending away from the side of the exhaust duct. In this embodiment,
the length is greater than a diameter d of the cross-over duct 216. The length L may
be a function of the duct diameter d or the depth D. For example, the length L may
be twice the depth D. FIG. 12A and 12B illustrate a duct intersection 330 including
a transition portion 340 that is similar to that shown in FIGS. 11A and 11B, except
in this case the exhaust stack 314 includes an enlarged annular region 315 that is
adjacent to the intersection 330. FIG. 13 illustrates yet another embodiment of a
duct intersection 430 with an asymmetric transition portion 440. Depending on the
desired design performance, external fins could be added to help enhance heat transfer
with the surrounding ambient air. For example, external fins from the surfaces could
be used to help cool localized hot spots.
[0032] Duct intersections can be designed, retrofitted, or modified to introduce fluids
such as oxidizers (for better combustion or to remove PIC's, products of incomplete
combustion), liquids such as water, fuels, inert gases, etc. to help better distribute
combustion and mitigate hot spots or allow cooling of the hot stream. For example,
fluid could be introduced to provide a boundary layer of cold inert fluid to mitigate
hot spots at affected wall surfaces. The fluids, which could include liquids such
as water, inert or other gases, could be used for cooling or mitigating certain chemical
reactions. The ducts can be modified to accommodate ports or additional pathways for
introducing fluids. Fluid introduction, if introduced from a pressurized source, could
also create entrainment, thereby improving mixing or flow energy.
[0033] FIG. 14 illustrates a duct intersection 530 including a fluid injection system 540.
Fluid injection system 540 is operative to inject fluid at particular regions in the
intersection 530 to energize or direct flow, as well as insulate the surface of the
ducts from exhaust gases. Fluid injection system 540 includes a controller 542 which
is connected to a plurality of valves, or fluid injectors 544, via wiring 548. Each
injector 544 is connected by tubing 546 to a fluid reservoir 550. It should be understood
that the term fluid encompasses liquids as well as gases. Thus, the injection system
540 may inject liquids or gases into the exhaust flow. The injectors may be spaced
optimally depending on design conditions. The injectors can inject fluid transversely
into the duct, as shown in FIG. 14. Alternatively, the injectors could inject external
fluid axially or along the exhaust flow direction at various locations. The injectors
could also inject fluid at different injection angles. The direction and method of
injection depends on the conditions that exist at the tie-ins and intersections. The
injected fluid may come from an external pressurized source. In another embodiment,
the fluid may be entrained through a port or valve by the draft of the exhaust flow.
[0034] The fluid injection system 540 may also include various sensors, such as temperature
sensor 552 connected to controller 542 via cable 554. Various sensors, such as sensor
552, may provide feedback to controller 542 such that fluid may be injected at appropriate
times. While the embodiment is illustrated as having a single temperature sensor,
other additional sensors of different types of sensors may be employed in providing
control feedback to controller 542. For example, other sensor may include pressure,
velocity, and emissions sensors, such as an oxygen sensor.
[0035] The fluid injection system 540 may be used in conjunction with the contoured duct
liners, turning vanes, and transition portions disclosed above. The contoured duct
liners in conjunction with the fluid injection system may extend the use of the duct
intersection as a true mixing zone and potentially a combustion chamber. Air and other
additives (e.g. oxygen) may be injected into the intersection to allow better combustion
and use of the tunnels as extended combustion zones. Also, a well-mixed duct intersection
may be configured to act as a second combustion chamber. The addition of extra air
into the duct intersection mixing zone can burn any excess flue gas and even cool
off the intersection with excess air or other gases, such as nitrogen. For example,
if the common tunnel is too hot and fully combusted, air may be injected to cool the
process. In contrast, if the flue gas is not completely combusted before entering
the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG), it could reduce the HRSG tubes, which are
typically made of metal, leading to accelerated corrosion and failure. In this case,
an oxidizer is added, such as air, to burn all the combustibles before entering the
HRSG.
[0036] Although the embodiments have been described with respect to a duct intersection
between an emergency stack and cross-over duct, the disclosed technology may be applicable
to hot duct tie-ins, cold duct tie-ins, stack junctions, and HRSGs. For example, as
shown in FIGS. 15A-15D, an intermediate HRSG tie in may include transition pieces
(632, 634, 652) at the tie-in joints. Transitions 632 and 634 connect duct 622 to
duct 630. Duct 630 connects to a rectangular tube 650 via transition piece 652.
[0037] Also contemplated herein are methods of improving gas flow in an exhaust system that
includes at least one duct intersection. The methods may include any procedural step
inherent in the structures described herein. In an embodiment, the method comprises
determining a location of a low or poor flow zone, an area of poor combustion, or
an area of poor mixing (Le. areas of relatively undesirable conditions) within the
duct intersection and providing a flow modifier at the determined location. Providing
a flow modifier may include, for example and without limitation, mounting a duct liner
within the duct, gunning a refractory material to the inside of the duct, mounting
turning vanes within the duct, forming a convex surface along the duct, and combinations
of the above. The location may be determined with a computer aided design system,
such as a CFD system. The location may also be determined by measuring conditions
at the duct intersection, such as temperature, pressure, and velocity. In another
embodiment the method comprises determining a location of a poor flow zone within
the duct intersection and injecting a fluid into the duct intersection at the determined
location.
[0038] From the foregoing it will be appreciated that, although specific embodiments of
the technology have been described herein for purposes of illustration, various modifications
may be made without deviating from the claimed invention. Further, certain aspects
of the new technology described in the context of particular embodiments may be combined
or eliminated in other embodiments. Moreover, while advantages associated with certain
embodiments of the technology have been described in the context of those embodiments,
other embodiments may also exhibit such advantages, and not all embodiments need necessarily
exhibit such advantages to fall within the scope of the claimed invention. Accordingly,
the claimed invention can encompass other embodiments not expressly shown or described
herein. Thus, the disclosure is not limited except as by the appended claims.
1. Kanalkreuzung, umfassend:
einen ersten Kanalabschnitt:
einen zweiten sich seitlich von einer Seite des ersten Kanalabschnitts erstreckenden
Kanalabschnitt; und
mindestens einen innerhalb von einem des ersten und des zweiten Kanalabschnitts angeordneten
Flussmodifikator,
wobei der Flussmodifikator eine entsprechend konturangepasste Kanalauskleidung ist,
umfassend:
eine erste konturangepasste Wand, die an eine Innenfläche des Kanals angepasst ist;
und
eine zweite konturangepasste Wand zum Modifizieren der Richtung des Gasflusses innerhalb
der Kanalkreuzung, die an die erste konturangepasste Wand angepasst, wobei die zweite
Wand mindestens eine konvexe Oberfläche einschließt
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass der Flussmodifikator ein geschichteter Flussmodifikator ist, der durch schichtweises
Spritzen von feuerfestem Material auf eine Innenfläche der Kanalkreuzung an der bestimmten
Stelle gebildet wird und dadurch die konvexe Oberfläche bereitstellt.
2. Kanalkreuzung nach Anspruch 1, wobei die zweite konturangepasste Wand ein feuerfestes
Material umfasst.
3. Kanalkreuzung nach Anspruch 1, wobei der zweite Rohrabschnitt in den ersten Rohrabschnitt
abzweigt.
4. Kanalkreuzung nach Anspruch 3, wobei die konturangepasste Kanalauskleidung innerhalb
des ersten Kanalabschnitts oder innerhalb des zweiten Kanalabschnitts angebracht ist.
5. Verfahren zum Verbessern des Gasflusses in einem Abgassystem, das mindestens eine
Kanalkreuzung einschließt, wobei das Verfahren umfasst:
Bestimmen einer Stelle mit unerwünschten Flusseigenschaften in der Kanalkreuzung;
und
Bereitstellen eines Flussmodifikators in der Kanalkreuzung an der festgelegten Stelle,
wobei der Flussmodifikator eine konturangepasste Kanalauskleidung ist, umfassend:
eine erste konturangepasste Wand, die an eine Innenfläche des Kanals passt; und
eine zweite konturangepasste Wand zur Änderung der Richtung des Gasflusses innerhalb
der Kanalkreuzung, die an die erste konturangepasste Wand passt, wobei die zweite
Wand mindestens eine konvexe Oberfläche einschließt,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass das Verfahren ferner das Spritzen von feuerfestem Material auf eine Innenfläche der
Kanalkreuzung an der bestimmten Stelle umfasst und dadurch die konvexe Oberfläche
bereitstellt.
6. Verfahren nach Anspruch 5, wobei die Stelle durch Messen der Bedingungen an der Kanalkreuzung
bestimmt wird.
7. Verfahren nach Anspruch 6, wobei die Bedingungen aus der Gruppe ausgewählt werden
bestehend aus Temperatur, Druck und Geschwindigkeit.