BACKGROUND
[0001] The present disclosure generally relates to polymer compositions and methods of making
and using same. More specifically the present disclosure relates to polymer compositions
having improved processability and melt fracture characteristics.
FIELD
[0002] Polyolefins are plastic materials useful for making a wide variety of valued products
due to their combination of features such as stiffness, ductility, barrier properties,
temperature resistance, optical properties, availability, and low cost. In particular,
polyethylene (PE) is one of the largest volume polymers consumed in the world. It
is a versatile polymer that offers high performance relative to other polymers and
alternative materials such as glass or metal.
[0003] There exists an ongoing need for improved polymer compositions displaying desired
processing characteristics.
BRIEF SUMMARY
[0004] Disclosed herein is a metallocene-catalyzed polymer comprising (i) a higher molecular
weight component and (ii) a lower molecular weight component wherein the polymer has
a polydispersity index of from 10 to 26; a zero shear viscosity of from 5×10
-5 Pa.s to 2×10
14 Pa.s and a smooth-to-matte transition critical stress of from 20 kPa to about 85
kPa at a shear rate of from 1.5 s
-1 to 17 s
-1.
[0005] Also disclosed herein is a dual metaliocene-catalyzed polyethylene comprising (i)
a higher molecular weight component and (ii) a lower molecular weight component wherein
the polymer has a polydispersity index of from 10 to 26; a zero shear viscosity of
from 5×10
5 Pa.s to 2 × 10
14 Pa.s and a smooth-to-matte transition stress of from 20 kPa to 85 kPa at a shear
rate of from 1.5 s
-1 to 17 s
-1.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0006]
Figure 1 depicts structures of compounds used in the preparation of the samples from
example 1.
Figure 2 is the molecular weight distribution profile of the samples from example
1.
Figure 3 is a plot of the viscosity as a. function of frequency for the samples from
example 1.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0007] Disclosed herein are novel polymers and methods of making and using same. Herein,
the polymer refers both to a material collected as the product of a polymerization
reaction (e.g., a reactor or virgin resin) and a polymeric composition comprising
a polymer and one or more additives. In an embodiment, a monomer (e.g., ethylene)
may be polymerized using the methodologies disclosed herein to produce a polymer of
the type disclosed herein.
[0008] In an embodiment polymers of the type disclosed herein are characterized as metallocene-catalyzed
polymers having improved processability and designated as POL-IPs. Additional features
of POL-IPs are disclosed herein.
[0009] In an embodiment, a POL-IP of the type described herein may be prepared by any suitable
methodology, for example by employing one or more catalyst systems, in one or more
reactors, in solution, in slurry, or in the gas phase, and/or by varying the monomer
concentration in the polymerization reaction, and/or by changing any/all of the materials
or parameters involved in the production of the POL-IPs, as will be described in more
detail later herein.
[0010] The POL-IP of the present disclosure can be produced using various types of polymerization
reactors. As used herein, "polymerization reactor" includes any reactor capable of
polymerizing olefin monomers to produce homopolymers and/or copolymers. Homopolymers
and/or copolymers produced in the reactor may be referred to as resin and/or polymers.
The various types of reactors include, but are not limited to those that may be referred
to as batch, slurry, gas-phase, solution, high pressure, tubular, autoclave, or other
reactor a.nd/or reactors. Gas phase reactors may comprise fluidized bed reactors or
staged horizontal reactors. Slurry reactors may comprise vertical and/or horizontal
loops. High pressure reactors may comprise autoclave and/or tubular reactors. Reactor
types may include batch and/or continuous processes. Continuous processes may use
intermittent and/or continuous product discharge or transfer. Processes may also include
partial or full direct recycle of un-reacted monomer, un-reacted comonomer, catalyst
and/or co-catalysts, diluents, and/or other materials of the polymerization process.
[0011] Polymerization reactor systems of the present disclosure may comprise one type of
reactor in a system or multiple reactors of the same or different type, operated in
any suitable configuration. Production of polymers in multiple reactors may include
several stages in at least two separate polymerization reactors interconnected by
a transfer system making it possible to transfer the polymers resulting from the first
polymerization reactor into the second reactor. Alternatively, polymerization in multiple
reactors may include the transfer, either manual or automatic, of polymer from one
reactor to subsequent reactor or reactors for additional polymerization. Alternatively,
multi-stage or multi-step polymerization may take place in a single reactor, wherein
the conditions are changed such that a different polymerization reaction takes place.
[0012] The desired polymerization conditions in one of the reactors may be the same as or
different from the operating conditions of any other reactors involved in the overall
process of producing the polymer of the present disclosure. Multiple reactor systems
may include any combination including, but not limited to multiple loop reactors,
multiple gas phase reactors, a combination of loop and gas phase reactors, multiple
high pressure reactors or a combination of high pressure with loop and/or gas reactors.
The multiple reactors may be operated in series or in parallel. In an embodiment,
any arrangement and/or any combination of reactors may be employed to produce the
polymer of the present disclosure.
[0013] According to one embodiment, the polymerization reactor system may comprise at least
one loop slurry reactor. Such reactors may comprise vertical or horizontal loops.
Monomer, diluent, catalyst system, and optionally any comonomer may be continuously
fed to a loop slurry reactor, where polymerization occurs. Generally, continuous processes
may comprise the continuous introduction of a monomer, a catalyst, and/or a diluent
into a polymerization reactor and the continuous removal from this reactor of a suspension
comprising polymer particles and the diluent. Reactor affluent may be flashed to remove
the liquids that comprise the diluent from the solid polymer, monomer and/or comonomer.
Various technologies may be used for this separation step including but not limited
to, flashing that may include any combination of heat addition and pressure reduction;
separation by cyclonic action in either a cyclone or hydrocyclone; separation by centrifugation;
or other appropriate method of separation.
[0014] Typical slurry polymerization processes (also known as particle-form processes) are
disclosed in
U.S. Patent Nos. 3,248,179,
4,501,885,
5,565,175,
5,575,979,
6,239,235,
6,262,191 and
6,833,415.
[0015] Suitable diluents used in slurry polymerization include, but are not limited to,
the monomer being polymerized and hydrocarbons that are liquids under reaction conditions.
Examples of suitable diluents include, but are not limited to, hydrocarbons such as
propane, cyclohexane, isobutane, n-butane, n-pentane, isopentane, neopentane, and
n-hexane. Some loop polymerization reactions can occur under bulk conditions where
no diluent is used. An example is polymerization of propylene monomer as disclosed
in
U.S. Patent Nos. 5,455,314.
[0016] According to yet another embodiment, the polymerization reactor may comprise at least
one gas phase reactor. Such systems may employ a continuous recycle stream containing
one or more monomers continuously cycled through a fluidized bed in the presence of
the catalyst under polymerization conditions. A recycle stream may be withdrawn from
the fluidized bed and recycled back into the reactor. Simultaneously, polymer product
may be withdrawn from the reactor and new or fresh monomer may be added to replace
the polymerized monomer. Such gas phase reactors may comprise a process for multi-step
gas-phase polymerization of olefins, in which olefins are polymerized in the gaseous
phase in at least two independent gas-phase polymerization zones while feeding a catalyst-containing
polymer formed in a first polymerization zone to a second polymerization zone. One
type of gas phase reactor is disclosed in
U.S. Patent Nos. 4,588,790,
5,352,749, and
5,436,304.
[0017] According to still another embodiment, a high pressure polymerization reactor may
comprise a tubular reactor or an autoclave reactor. Tubular reactors may have several
zones where fresh monomer, initiators, or catalysts are added. Monomer may be entrained
in an inert gaseous stream and introduced at one zone of the reactor. Initiators,
catalysts, and/or catalyst components may be entrained in a gaseous stream and introduced
at another zone of the reactor. The gas streams may be intermixed for polymerization.
Heat and pressure may be employed appropriately to obtain optimal polymerization reaction
conditions.
[0018] According to yet another embodiment, the polymerization reactor may comprise a solution
polymerization reactor wherein the monomer is contacted with the catalyst composition
by suitable stirring or other means. A carrier comprising an organic diluent or excess
monomer may be employed. If desired, the monomer may be brought in the vapor phase
into contact with the catalytic reaction product, in the presence or absence of liquid
material. The polymerization zone is maintained at temperatures and pressures that
will result in the formation of a solution of the polymer in a reaction medium. Agitation
may be employed to obtain better temperature control and to maintain uniform polymerization
mixtures throughout the polymerization zone. Adequate means are utilized for dissipating
the exothermic heat of polymerization.
[0019] Polymerization reactors suitable for the present disclosure may further comprise
any combination of at least one raw material feed system, at least one feed system
for catalyst or catalyst components, and/or at least one polymer recovery system.
Suitable reactor systems for the present invention may further comprise systems for
feedstock purification, catalyst storage and preparation, extrusion, reactor cooling,
polymer recovery, fractionation, recycle, storage, loadout, laboratory analysis, and
process control.
[0020] Conditions that are controlled for polymerization efficiency and to provide polymer
properties include, but are not limited to temperature, pressure, type and quantity
of catalyst or co-catalyst, and the concentrations of various reactants. Polymerization
temperature can affect catalyst productivity, polymer molecular weight and molecular
weight distribution. Suitable polymerization temperatures may be any temperature below
the de-polymerization temperature, according to the Gibbs Free Energy Equation. Typically,
this includes from 60°C to 280°C, for example, and/or from 70°C to 110°C, depending
upon the type of polymerization reactor and/or polymerization process.
[0021] Suitable pressures will also vary according to the reactor and polymerization process.
The pressure for liquid phase polymerization in a loop reactor is typically less than
1000 psig. Pressure for gas phase polymerization is usually at 200 - 500 psig. High
pressure polymerization in tubular or autoclave reactors is generally run at 20,000
to 75,000 psig. Polymerization reactors can also be operated in a supercritical region
occurring at generally higher temperatures and pressures. Operation above the critical
point of a pressure/temperature diagram (supercritical phase) may offer advantages.
[0022] The concentration of various reactants can be controlled to produce polymers with
certain physical and mechanical properties. The proposed end-use product that will
be formed by the polymer and the method of forming that product may be varied to determine
the desired final product properties. Mechanical properties include, but are not limited
to tensile strength, flexural modulus, impact resistance, creep, stress relaxation
and hardness tests. Physical properties include, but are not limited to density, molecular
weight, molecular weight distribution, melting temperature, glass transition temperature,
temperature melt of crystallization, density, stereoregularity, crack growth, short
chain branching, long chain branching and rheological measurements.
[0023] The concentrations of monomer, co-monomer, hydrogen, co-catalyst, modifiers, and
electron donors are generally important in producing specific polymer properties.
Comonomer may be used to control product density. Hydrogen may be used to control
product molecular weight. Co-catalysts may be used to alkylate, scavenge poisons and/or
control molecular weight. The concentration of poisons may be minimized, as poisons
may impact the reactions and/or otherwise affect polymer product properties. Modifiers
may be used to control product properties and electron donors may affect stereoregularity.
[0024] In an embodiment, a method of preparing a POL-IP comprises contacting an olefin (e.g.,
ethylene) monomer with a catalyst system under conditions suitable for the formation
of a polymer of the type described herein. In an embodiment, the catalyst system comprises
a transition-metal complex. The terms "catalyst composition," "catalyst mixtures,"
"catalyst system," do not depend upon the actual product resulting from the contact
or reaction of the components of the mixtures, the nature of the active catalytic
site, or the fate of the co-catalyst, the catalyst, any olefin monomer used to prepare
a precontacted mixture, or the activator-support, after combining these components.
Therefore, the terms "catalyst composition," "catalyst mixtures," "catalyst system,"
can include both heterogeneous compositions and homogenous compositions.
[0025] In an embodiment, a catalyst system suitable for the preparation of a POL-IP comprises
at least one metallocene-containing compound. Herein, the term "metallocene" describes
a compound comprising at least one η
3 to η
5-cycloalkadienyl-type moiety, wherein η
3 to η
5-cycloalkadienyl moieties include cyclopentadienyl ligands, indenyl ligands, fluorenyl
ligands, including partially saturated or substituted derivatives or analogs of any
of these. Possible substituents on these ligands include hydrogen, therefore the description
"substituted derivatives thereof" in this disclosure comprises partially saturated
ligands such as tetrahydroindenyl, tetrahydrofluorenyl, octahydrofluorenyl, partially
saturated indenyl, partially saturated fluorenyl, substituted partially saturated
indenyl, substituted partially saturated fluorenyl.
[0026] In an embodiment, a catalyst system suitable for the preparation of a POL-IP comprises
at least two metallocene-containing compounds. Nonlimiting examples of metallocene-cantaining
compounds suitable for use in this disclosure are described in more detail in
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,939,217;
5,191,132;
5,210,352;
5,347,026;
5,399,636;
5,401,817;
5,420,320;
5,436,305;
5,451,649;
5,496,781;
5,498,581;
5,541.272;
5,554,795;
5,563,284;
5,565,592;
5,571,880;
5,594,078;
5,631,203;
5,631,335;
5,654,454;
5,668,230;
5,705,478;
5,705,579;
6,187,880;
6,509,427;
7,026,494, and
U.S. Patent App. Nos. 20100190926 A1 and
20120059134. Other processes to prepare metallocene compounds suitable for use in this disclosure
have been reported in references such as:
Koppl, A. Alt, H. G. J. Mol. Catal. A. 2001, 165, 23;
Kajigaeshi, S.; Kadowaki, T.; Nishida, A.; Fujisaki, S. The Chemical Society of Japan,
1986, 59, 97;
Alt, H. G.; Jung, M.; Kehr, G. J. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 562, 153-181; and
Alt, H. G.; Jung, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 568, 87-112. The following treatises also describe such methods:
Wailes, P. C.; Coutts, R. S. P.; Weigold, H. in Organometallic Chemistry of Titanium,
Zirconium, and Hafnium, Academic; New York, 1974.;
Cardin, D. J.; Lappert, M. F.; and Raston, C. L.; Chemistry of Organo-Zirconium and
-Hafnium Compounds; Halstead Press; New York, 1986. In an embodiment, the POL-IP is prepared using a catalyst system comprising two
metallocene-containing compounds and may be characterized as a dual metallocen polymer
or a dual metallocene resin. In an embodiment such dual-metallocene catalysts may
be used to prepare bimodal or bimodal-like resins of the type disclosed herein.
[0027] In an embodiment, the dual metallocene catalyst used for preparation of the POL-IP
comprises an unabridged metallocene, designated MTE-A. In an embodiment, MTE-A is
a compound that may be characterized by one of general formulas 1 or 2:

where each X is independently F, Cl, Br, I, methyl, benzyl, phenyl, H, BH
4, a hydrocarbyloxide group having up to 20 carbon atoms, a hydrocarbylamino group
having up to 20 carbon atoms, a trihydrocarbylsilyl group having up to 20 carbon atoms,
OBR'
2 wherein R' may be an alkyl group having up to 12 carbon atoms or an aryl group having
up to 12 carbon atoms, and SO
3R", wherein R" may be an alkyl group having up to 12 carbon atoms or an aryl group
having up to 12 carbon atoms; Y is a CR
2 or SiR
2 group where R is hydrogen or a hydrocarbyl group; Cp
A, Cp
B, Cp
C, and Cp
D are each independently a substituted or unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl group, indenyl,
group, or flourenyl group and where any substituent on Cp
A, Cp
B, Cp
C, and Cp
D can be H, a hydrocarbyl group having up to 18 carbon atoms or a hydrocarbylsilyl
group having up to 18 carbon atoms. In an embodiment, MTE-A is a dinuclear compound
wherein each metal moiety has the same structural characteristic described previously
herein.
[0028] In an embodiment, the dual metallocene catalyst used for preparation of the POL-IP
further comprises a bridged metallocene compound hereinafter designated MTE-B. In
an embodiment, MTE-B can be characterized by one of general formulas 3 or 4:

where M is Ti, Zr or Hf; each X is independently F, Cl, Br, I, methyl, phenyl, benzyl,
H, BH
4, a hydrocarbyloxide group having up to 20 carbon atoms, a hydrocarbylamino group
having up to 20 carbon atoms, a trihydrocarbylsilyl group having up to 20 carbon atoms,
OBR'
2 wherein R' may be an alkyl group having up to 12 carbon atoms or an aryl group having
up to 12 carbon atoms, or SO
3R" wherein R" may be an alkyl group having up to 12 carbon atoms or an aryl group
having up to 12 carbon atoms; Y is a CR
2, SiR
2, or R
2CCR
2 group which may be linear or cyclic and where R is hydrogen or a hydrocarbyl group;
Cp
A, Cp
B, Cp
C, and Cp
D are each independently a substituted or unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl group, indenyl
group, or flourenyl group and were any substituent on Cp
A, Cp
B, Cp
C, and Cp
D can be H, a hydrocarbyl group having up to 18 carbon atoms or a hydrocarbylsilyl
group having up to 18 carbon atoms. E represents a bridging group which may comprise
(i) a cyclic or heterocyclic moiety having up to 18 carbon atoms, (ii) a group represented
by the general formula E
AR
3AR
4A, wherein E
A is C, Si, Ge, or B, and R
3A and R
4A are independently H or a hydrocarbyl group having up to 18 carbon atoms, (iii) a
group represented by the general formula -R
3BR
4B-CR
3CR
4C-, wherein R
3B, R
4B, R
3C, and R
4C independently H or a hydrocarbyl group having up to 10 carbon atoms, or (iv) a group
represented by the general formula SiR
2-CR
2 where X is Si or C and R is a hydrogen or hydrocarbyl group; or -SiR
3DR
4D-SiR
3ER
4E-, wherein R
3D, R
4D R
3E, and R
4E are independently H or a hydrocarbyl group having up to 10 carbon atoms, and wherein
at least one of R
3A, R
3B, R
4A, R
4B, R
3C, R
4C, R
3D, R
4D, R
3E, R
4E, or the substituent on Cp, Cp
1, or Cp
2, is (1) a terminal alkenyl group having up to 12 carbon atoms or (2) a dinuclear
compound wherein each metal moiety has the same structural characteristic as MTE-B.
[0029] The POL-IP may comprise additives. Examples of additives include, but are not limited
to, antistatic agents, colorants, stabilizers, nucleators, surface modifiers, pigments,
slip agents, antiblocks, tackifiers, polymer processing aids, and combinations thereof.
Such additives may be used singularly or in combination and may be contacted with
the polymer before, during, or after preparation of the POL-IP as described herein.
Such additives may be added via any suitable technique, for example during an extrusion
or compounding step such as during pelletization or subsequent processing into an
end use article.
[0030] In an embodiment, the POL-IP comprises polyethylene. For example the POL-IP may comprise
a polyethylene homopolymer. It is to be understood that an inconsequential amount
of comonomer may be present in the polymers disclosed herein and the polymer still
be considered a homopolymer. Herein an inconsequential amount of a comonomer refers
to an amount that does not substantively affect the properties of the polymer disclosed
herein. For example a comonomer can be present in an amount of less than 0.5 wit.%,
0.1 wit.%, or 0.01 wt.% based on the total weight of polymer.
[0031] In an alternative embodiment, the POL-IP comprises a polyethylene copolymer. Examples
of suitable comonomers include without limitation unsaturated hydrocarbons having
from 3 to 20 carbon atoms such as propylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, 3-methyl-1-butene,
4-methyl-1-pentene, 1-heptene, 1-octene, 1-nonene, 1-decene, and mixtures thereof.
In some embodiments the POL-IP is copolymer of ethylene and 1-hexene. The applicability
of the aspects and features disclosed herein to linear olefin polymers other than
ethylene (e.g., propylene and 1-butylene) and olefin copolymers are also contemplated.
[0032] A POL-IP of the type described herein may be a multimodal resin. Herein, the "modality"
of a polymer resin refers to the form of its molecular weight distribution curve,
i.e., the appearance of the graph of the polymer weight fraction as a function of
its molecular weight, as may be displayed by, for example, gel permeation chromatography
(GPC). The polymer weight fraction refers to the weight fraction of molecules of a
given size. A polymer having a molecular weight distribution curve showing a single
peak may be referred to as a unimodal polymer, a polymer having a curve showing two
distinct peaks may be referred to as bimodal or a bimodal-like polymer, a polymer
having a curve showing three distinct peaks may be referred to as trimodal polymer.
Polymers having molecular weight distribution curves showing more than one peak may
be collectively referred to as multimodal polymers or resins. It is acknowledged that,
in some instances, a multimodal polymer may appear to have a single peak via, for
example, GPC analysis, when in fact the polymer itself is multimodal. In such instances,
overlap of peaks may obscure the presence of other peaks and may imply unimodality,
when in fact multimodality is a more accurate representation of the nature of the
polymer or polymers.
[0033] In an embodiment, the POL-IP is characterized as a bimodal-like resin. Such a bimodal-like
resin may show two peaks in a GPC profile, but is different from the conventional
bimodal resins. A GPC of a POL-IP of the type described herein may display the following
identifiable features (i) a peak attributable to a higher molecular weight (HMW) component
and (ii) a peak attributable to a lower molecular weight (LMW) component where the
peak attributable to the HMW component and LMW component are not base line separated.
[0034] In an embodiment, the LMW component is present in the POL-IP in an amount ranging
from 70 weight percent (wt.%) to 97 wt.%, alternatively from 75 wt.% to 95 wt.%, or
alternatively from 80 wt.% to 90 wt.%. In an embodiment, the HMW component is present
in the POL-IP in an amount ranging from 3 wt.% to 30 wt.%, alternatively from 5 wt.%
to 25 wt.%, or alternatively from 5 wt.% to 20 wt.%. The individual components of
the polymer composition can be obtained by deconvoluting a GPC of the polymer (i.e.
POL-IP) as described in
U.S. Patent Publication No. 20070298508.
[0035] In an embodiment, the POL-IP has a weight average molecular weight (M
w) of from 260 kg/mol to 360 kg/mol, alternatively from 280 kg/mol to 350 kg/mol, or
alternatively from 290 kg/mol to 340 kg/mol. In an embodiment, the POL-IP has a number
average molecular weight (M
n) of from 12 kg/mol to 26 kg/mol, alternatively from 13 kg/mol to 25 kg/mol, or alternatively
from 14 kg/mol to 24 kg/mol. In an embodiment, the POL-IP has a z-average molecular
weight (M
z) of from 1500 kg/mol to 2500 kg/mol, alternatively from 1550 kg/mol to 2400 kg/mol,
or alternatively from 1600 kg/mol to 2350 kg/mol. The weight average molecular weight
describes the molecular weight distribution of a polymer composition and is calculated
according to equation 1:

where N
i is the number of molecules of molecular weight M
i. The molecular weight averages may be expressed in kilogram per mole (g/mol) or kiloDaltons
and are determined by gel permeation chromatography. The number average molecular
weight is the common average of the molecular weights of the individual polymers calculated
by measuring the molecular weight of
n polymer molecules, summing the weight, and dividing by
n. 
The z-average molecular weight, is a higher order molecular weight average which
is calculated according to equation (3)

where n
i is the amount of substance of species i and M
i is the molar mass of species.
[0036] The POL-IP may further be characterized by a molecular weight distribution (MWD)
for the entire polymer of from 10 to 26, alternatively from 11 to 25, or alternatively
from 12 to 24. The POL-IP may further be characterized by a MWD for the HMW component
of from 1.3 to 2, alternatively from 1.4 to 1.9, or alternatively from 1.5 to 1.9.
The POL-IP may further be characterized by a MWD for the LMW component of from 4 to
9, alternatively from 4.5 to 9, or alternatively from 5 to 8. The MWD refers to the
ratio of the weight average M
w to M
n, which is also referred to as the polydispersity index (PDI) or more simply as polydispersity.
[0037] The POL-IP may further be characterized as having an M
z/M
w of from 5 to 9, alternatively from 5.5 to 8.5, or alternatively from 5.7 to 8.
[0038] The POL-IP may be characterized by the degree of branching present in the individual
components and/or in the composition as a whole. Short chain branching (SCB) is known
for its effects on polymer properties such as stiffness, tensile properties, heat
resistance, hardness, permeation resistance, shrinkage, creep resistance, transparency,
stress crack resistance, flexibility, impact strength, and the solid state properties
of semi-crystalline polymers such as polyethylene. In an embodiment, a polymer of
the type disclosed herein (i.e., POL-IP) is further characterized by a reverse comonomer
branching distribution or reverse short-chain branching distribution (SCBD) resulting
in SCB that occurs primarily in the HMW component of the polymer. For example from
50 percent (%) to 85% of the SCB may be located within the HMW component of the POL-IP,
alternatively from 60% to 80% or alternatively from 65% to 80%. Herein, the SCBD refers
to the number of SCB per 1000 carbon atoms at each molecular weight across the MWD
profile of a polymer.
[0039] In an embodiment, a polymer of the type disclosed herein (i.e. POL-IP) is characterized
by a short-chain branching content of from 0.5 to 3.5 short chain branches per 1000
total carbon atoms, alternatively from 0.5 to 3, alternatively from 1 to 3, or alternatively
from 1 to 2.5.
[0040] Long chain branching (LCB) exerts its effects on polymer rheology. A POL-IP may contain
from 0.002 to 0.2 long chain branches (LCB) per 1,000 total carbon atoms, alternatively
from 0.001 to 0.1 LCB per 1,000 total carbon atoms, or alternatively from 0.003 to
0.3 LCB per 1,000 total carbon atoms; wherein the LCB content is determined by Janzen-Colby
Model found in
J. Janzen and R.H. Colby, J. of Molecular Structure, 485, 569 (1999).
[0041] The POL-IP may be characterized as having a density of from 0.945 g/cc to 0.955 g/cc,
alternatively from 0.948 g/cc to 0.955 g/cc, or alternatively from 0.950 g/cc to 0.955
g/cc as determined in accordance with ASTM D 1505.
[0042] The POL-IP may be characterized as having a high-load melt index (HLMI) of from 5
g/10 min. to 12 g/10 min., alternatively from 5 g/10 min. to 10 g/10 min., alternatively
from 6 g/10 min. to 10 g/10 min., or alternatively from 6 g/10 min. to 9 g/10 min.
The HLMI refers to the amount of a polymer which can be forced through an extrusion
rheometer orifice of 0.0825 inch diameter when subjected to a force of 21.6 kilograms
in ten minutes at 190C, as determined in accordance with ASTM D 1238.
[0043] In an embodiment, a POL-IP of the type described herein has a zero shear viscosity
(E
0), in the range of from 5×10
5 Pa-s to 2×10
14 Pa-s, alternatively from 5×10
5 Pa-s to 1.5×10
14 Pa-s, alternatively from 6×10
5 Pa-s to 1.5×10
14 Pa-s, or alternatively of from 6×10
5 Pa-s to 1.3×10
14 Pa-s as determined in accordance with Carreau-Yasuda (CY) model which is represented
by equation (4) when n=0.1818:

where
E = viscosity (Pa·s)
γ̇ = shear rate (l/s)
a = rheological breadth parameter
Tξ = relaxation time (s) [describes the location in time of the transition region]
E0 = zero shear viscosity (Pa·s) [defines the Newtonian plateau]
n = power law constant [defines the final slope of the high shear rate region].
[0044] To facilitate model fitting, the power law constant
n is held at a constant value. Details of the significance and interpretation of the
CY model and derived parameters may be found in:
C. A. Hieber and H. H. Chiang, Rheol. Acta, 28, 321 (1989);
C.A. Hieber and H.H. Chiang, Polym. Eng. Sci., 32, 931 (1992); and
R. B. Bird, R. C. Armstrong and O. Hasseger, Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, Volume
1, Fluid Mechanics, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons (1987).
[0045] The zero shear viscosity refers to the viscosity of the polymeric composition at
a zero shear rate and is indicative of the materials molecular structure. Further,
for polymer melts, the zero shear viscosity is often a useful indicator of processing
attributes such as the melt strength of polymer melts in polymer processes. For example,
the higher the zero shear viscosity, the better the melt strength.
[0046] In an embodiment, the POL-IP has an "a" value of from 0.03 to 0.4, alternatively
from 0.033 to 0.39, alternatively from 0.033 to 0.385, or alternatively from 0.035
to 0.38 wherein the dynamic complex viscosity versus frequency scan are fitted to
the Carreau-Yasuda equation with an n=0.1818 value.
[0047] In an embodiment, the POL-IP has an "tau eta" (T
ξ) value of from 7 seconds (s) to 2×10
5 s, alternatively from 8 s to 1.8 × 10
5 s, alternatively from 8 s to 1.5×10
5 s, or alternatively from 9 s to 1×10
5 s wherein the dynamic complex viscosity versus frequency scan are fitted to the Carreau-Yasuda
equation with an n=0.1818 value.
[0048] In an embodiment, a POL-IP prepared as described herein may display reduced melt
fracture during polymer melt formation and processing when compared to a typical dual-metallocene
catalyzed polymer. The type, extent, and conditions under which the polymer melt experiences
melt fracture may vary depending on the polymer microstructure. In an embodiment,
a POL-IP of the type disclosed herein displays a reduced tendency to melt fracture
as determined by measuring the shear stress as a function of shear rate using Capillary
rheometry.
[0049] Capillary rheometry is a technique whereby a sample undergoes extrusion through a
die of defined dimensions and the shear pressure drop across the die is recorded at
set volumetric flow rates. In an embodiment, a POL-IP is the subject of a capillary
extrusion experiment to characterize the melt fracture behavior of the polymer. The
capillary extrusion experiment may be carried out using any suitable methodology.
For example, the capillary extrusion experiments may be carried out at 190 °C, using
a dual-bore capillary rheometer (Rosand RH-7, Malvem) operated in constant speed mode.
A capillary die with 1 mm diameter and of 16 mm length and an orifice die with 1 mm
diameter may be used. The entrance angle for the dies can be 180°, and the contraction
ratio from the reservoir barrel to the die may be 15. A step shear rate test can be
performed for a given sample to obtain the apparent wall shear rate (
γ̇A) and apparent wall shear stress (
σA) according to equation 5:

where R is the capillary radius, Δ
P is the measured pressure drop across the capillary, L is the capillary length, and
Q is the imposed flow rate. Bagley and Rabinowitsch corrections are applied to obtain
more realistic shear stress value at the wall (
σW) and shear rate (
γ̇W) respectively according to equation 6:

where
P0 is measured pressure for the orifice die and
b=d(log
γ̇A)/
d(log
σW). Extrudates can be collected at different shear rates and imaged using an optical
microscope to identify onset critical stresses and shear rates of the melt fractures.
[0050] In an embodiment, POL-IPs display a smooth to matte transition that occurs at a critical
stress of from 20 kPa to 85 kPa, alternatively from 30 kPa to 80 kPa or alternatively
from 35 kPa to 70 kPa. The critical stress refers to the wall shear stresses that
serves as the trigger for the onset of a particular extrudate distortion or melt fracture.
The smooth to matte transition may also be referred to as surface melt fracture (SMF)
or the sharkskin melt fracture (SSMF). The onset of the smooth to matte transition
is a polymer instability that originates at the exit of a die during extrusion of
melted polymer (i.e., melt) through the die. The smooth to matte transition may be
attributable to the acceleration (high stretching rate) of the melt as it exits the
die. Without wishing to be limited by theory, it is hypothesized that melt leaving
the die in the neighborhood of the wall experiences a large, rapid, tensile deformation
as the velocity field adjusts from the no-slip boundary condition to the free-surface
condition. The large stresses on the free surface cause periodic cracks that result
into small amplitude periodic distortions termed sharkskin, which is a visible surface
defect present in the product being produced from the die (e.g., pipe). The critical
stress is related to the onset of the smooth to matte transition. In an embodiment,
a POL-IP may display a smooth-to-matte transition that occurs at a critical shear
rate of from 1.5 s
-1 to 17 s
-1, alternatively from 1.2 s
-1 to 16.5 s
-1, alternatively from 1.8 s
-1 to 16.5 s
-1, alternatively from 1.4 s
-1 to 16 s
-1, or alternatively from 1.6 s
-1 to 18 s
-1. Herein, the shear rate refers to the extrusion speed that serves as the trigger
for the onset of a particular extrudate distortion or melt fracture.
[0051] The POL-IPs may display a magnitude of slip-stick fracture (SSF) at from 200 psi
to 1200 psi, alternatively from 217 psi to 1100 psi, alternatively from 210 psi to
1100 psi, or alternatively from 220 psi to 1000 psi. SSF is believed to occur when
the shear stress at the die wall exceeds the critical stress. When this occurs, the
melt jerks forward as a plug, relieving the pressure behind it and allowing the oriented
chain segments to recoil somewhat. Once the pressure is relieved, the rate of movement
of the polymer slows and it re-establishes the non-slip boundary condition. During
SSF the pressure within the die fluctuates and the polymer output is unsteady. The
magnitude of SSF pressure oscillation is recorded and correlated with the onset of
melt fractures.
[0052] A POL-IP may display improved processability as indicated by the N_100 value which
is the slope viscosity curve at 100 rad/s frequency. The N_100 is often a useful indicator
of output in polymer processes. For example, a POL-IP may have a N_100 value of from
0.2 to 0.5, alternatively from 0.23 to 0.49, or alternatively from 0.25 to 0.47.
[0053] Additional improvements in processing may include a decrease in the head pressure.
The viscosity at 100 rad/s is a useful indicator that correlates with the extrusion
pressure in polymer processes. For example, a POL-IP may have a viscosity at 100 rad/s
value of from 2×10
3 Pa.s to 2.4×10
3 Pa.s, alternatively from 1.9×10
3 Pa.s to 2.3×10
3 Pa.s, alternatively from 1.8×10
3 Pa.s to 2.2×10
3 Pa.s.
[0054] In an embodiment, the POL-IP is contacted with one or polymer processing aids (PPAs)
to form a POL-IP composition or POL-IPC. A PPA functions to improve the processing
characteristics of the polymer and to eliminate surface related imperfections that
occur during processing. Any suitable PPA may be contacted with the POL-IP to form
a composition suitable for use in this disclosure. Examples of PPAs suitable for use
with POL-IPs include without limitation fluoroelastomers, polyethylene glycol, low
molecular weight polyethylene waxes and combinations thereof. In an aspect, the PPA
is a fluoroelastomer. POL-IPCs may display processing and/or melt fracture characteristics
that are similar to those previously described herein for the POL-IP. In some embodiments,
the processing and/or melt fracture characteristics of the POL-IPCs are improved with
respect to that of the POL-IP. In an embodiment a POL-IP of the type disclosed herein
is characterized by the ability to form a composition with a PPA (e.g., fluoroelastomer)
(i.e., to form a POL-IPC) that has improved processing and/or melt fracture characteristics.
[0055] POL-IPs as described herein may be formed into various articles, including but not
limited to, household containers, utensils, film products, drums, fuel tanks, pipes,
geomembranes, and liners. In an aspect, the POL-IP of this disclosure is fabricated
into a pipe by a plastics shaping process such as extrusion.
[0056] Pipe extrusion in the simplest terms is performed by melting, conveying polyethylene
pellets into a particular shape (generally an annular shape), and solidifying that
shape during a cooling process. There are numerous steps to pipe extrusion as provided
below. The polymer feedstock can either be a pre-pigmented polyethylene resin or it
can be a mixture of natural polyethylene and color concentrate (referred to as "Salt
and Pepper blends"). In North America, the most common feedstock for pipe extrusion
is "Salt and Pepper blends." In Europe and other areas of the world, the most common
feedstock for pipe extrusion is pre-pigmented polyethylene resin. Feedstock is rigidly
controlled to obtain the proper finished product (pipe) and ultimate consumer specifications.
[0057] The feedstock is then fed into an extruder. The most common extruder system for pipe
production is a single-screw extruder. The purpose of the extruder is to melt, convey,
and homogenize the polyethylene pellets. Extrusion temperatures typically range from
178°C to 250°C depending upon the extruder scree design and flow properties of the
polyethylene.
[0058] The molten polymer is then passed through a die. The die distributes the homogenous
polyethylene polymer melt around a solid mandrel, which forms it into an annular shape.
Adjustments can be made at the die exit to try to compensate for polymer sag through
the rest of the process. In order for the pipe to meet the proper dimensional parameters,
the pipe is then sized. There are two methods for sizing: vacuum or pressure. Both
employ different techniques and different equipment.
[0059] Next, the pipe is cooled and solidified in the desired dimensions. Cooling is accomplished
by the use of several water tanks where the outside pipe is either submerged or water
is sprayed on the pipe exterior. The pipe is cooled from the outside surface to the
inside surface. The interior wall and inside surfaces of the pipe can stay very hot
for a long period of time, as polyethylene is a poor conductor of heat. Finally, the
pipe is printed and either coiled or cut to length.
EXAMPLES
[0060] Molecular weight and molecular weight distributions were obtained using a PL-GPC
220 (Polymer Labs, an Agilent Company) system equipped with a IR4 detector (Polymer
Char, Spain) and three Styragel HMW-6E GPC columns (Waters, MA) running at 145 °C.
The flow rate of the mobile phase 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (TCB) that contains 0.5 g/L
2,6-di-t-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) was set at 1 mL/min and the concentration of polymer
solutions was generally kept in the range of 1.0-1.5 mg/mL, depending on the molecular
weight. Sample preparation was conducted at 150 °C for nominally 4 h with occasional
and gentle agitation before the solutions being transferred to sample vials for injection.
The integral calibration method was used to deduce molecular weights and molecular
weight distributions using a Chevron Phillips Chemical Company's HDPE polyethylene
resin, MARLEX BHB5003, as the broad standard. The integral table of the broad standard
was pre-determined in a separate experiment with SEC-MALS.
[0061] For the dynamic frequency sweep measurement, the PRE pellet samples (i.e. POL-IPs)
were compression molded at 182 °C for a total of 3 minutes. The samples were allowed
to melt at a relatively low pressure for 1 minute and then subjected to a high molding
pressure for additional 2 minutes. The molded samples were then quenched in a cold
(room temperature) press, and then 25.4 mm diameter disks were stamped out of the
molded slabs for the measurement in a rotational rheometer. The measurements were
performed in parallel plates of 25 mm in diameter at 190 °C using a controlled-stress
rheometer equipped with an air bearing system (Physica MCR-500, Anton Paar). The test
chamber of the rheometer was purged with nitrogen to minimize oxidative degradation.
After thermal equilibration, the specimens were squeezed between the plates to a 1.6
mm thickness, and the excess was trimmed. The dynamic frequency sweep test was performed
with 1∼10% strain in the LVE regime at angular frequencies from 0.0316 to 316 rad/s.
Smaller strain values were used for high viscosity samples to avoid overloading the
torque transducer and to keep within the linear viscoelastic limits of the sample.
The instrument automatically reduces the strain at high frequencies if necessary to
keep from overloading the torque transducer. These data were fit to the Carreau-Yasuda
equation to determine zero shear viscosity (η
0), relaxation time (τ), and a measure of the breadth of the relaxation time distribution
(CY-a).
[0062] Melt fracture behavior was determined by capillary rheometry. Capillary extrusion
experiments were carried out at 190 °C, using a dual-bore capillary rheometer (Rosand
RH-7, Malvern) operated in constant speed mode. A capillary die with 1 mm diameter
and of 16 mm length and an orifice die with 1 mm diameter were used throughout this
study. The entrance angle for the dies was 180°, and the contraction ratio from the
reservoir barrel to the die was about 15. Bagley and Rabinowitsch corrections were
applied to obtain steady shear stresses as a function of shear rate. The stresses
obtained from the capillary experiments were compared with the magnitude of complex
moduli measured from the dynamic frequency sweep tests. The extrudate were collected
at different shear rates and imaged using an optical microscope to identify onset
and evolution of the melt fractures.
Example 1
[0063] Four POL-IPs of the type disclosed herein were prepared as follows and designated
Samples 1-4: Samples 1-3 were produced using the following polymerization procedure.
All polymerization runs were conducted in a one-gallon stainless steel reactor with
1.8 L of isobutane. Both metallocene solutions of MTE-A and MTE-B were prepared at
about 1 mg/mL in toluene. The Structures of MTE-A and MTE-B utilized in preparing
the samples is shown in Figure 1. Alkyl aluminum (triisobutylaluminum, Tiba), fluorided
alumina, premixed MTE-A and MTE-B at the given ratio were added in that order through
a charge port while slowly venting isobutane vapor. The charge port was closed and
isobutane was added. The contents of the reactor were stirred and heated to the desired
run temperature of about 92 °C, and ethylene was then introduced into the reactor
with 1-hexene and hydrogen. Ethylene and hydrogen were fed on demand at the specified
weight ratio to maintain the target reactor pressure of 390 psig pressure for 45 min.
The reactor was maintained at the desired temperature throughout the run by an automated
heating-cooling system. Polymerization conditions and polymer information for Samples
1-3 are summarized in Table 1.
[0064] Sample 4 was produced using the following polymerization procedure. All polymerization
runs were conducted in a one-gallon stainless steel reactor with 1.8 L of isobutane.
Both metallocene solutions of MET-A and MTE-B were prepared at about 1 mg/mL in toluene.
Alkyl aluminum (triisobutylaluminum, Tiba), sulfated alumina, premixed MTE-A and MTE-B
at the given ratio were added in that order through a charge port while slowly venting
isobutane vapor. The charge port was closed and isobutane was added. The contents
of the reactor were stirred and heated to the desired run temperature of about 92
°C, and ethylene was then introduced into the reactor with 1-hexene and hydrogen.
Ethylene and hydrogen were fed on demand at the specified weight ratio to maintain
the target reactor pressure of 390 psig pressure for 40 min. The reactor was maintained
at the desired temperature throughout the run by an automated heating-cooling system.
Polymerization conditions and polymer information are summarized in Table 2. Two batches
of the polymer were produced and combined.
Table 1
| Sample No |
Metallocene (I) |
Metallocene (II) |
MTE-A/MTE-B (mg/mg) |
H2/Ethylene (ppm, wt) |
Solid PE (g) |
HLMI |
Density (g/cc) |
Mn/1000 |
Mw/1000 |
Mz/1000 |
| 1 |
MTE-A |
MTE-B |
1.2mg/.7mg |
100 |
369 |
9.7 |
0.9507 |
31.9 |
245.0 |
1597.5 |
| 2 |
MTE-A |
MTE-B |
1.2mg/ 1.3mg |
150 |
447 |
7.1 |
0.9497 |
14.1 |
322.1 |
1854.7 |
| 3 |
MTE-A |
MTE-B |
1.2mn/1.4mg |
175 |
374 |
7.8 |
0.9517 |
17.5 |
291.5 |
1364.4 |
| Polymerization condition: 92C/390psi, 45min, 5g 1-hexene, 300 mg flourided alumina,
0.8 mmol Tiba |
Table 2
| Sample No. |
Metallocene (I) |
Metallocene (II) |
MTE-A/MTE-B (mg/mg) |
H2/Ethylene (ppm, wt) |
Solid PE |
HLMI |
Density |
Man/1000 |
Mw/1000 |
Mz/1000 |
| 4 |
MTE-A |
MTE-B |
1.2 mg/ 1.1 mg |
200 |
147 |
8.4 |
0.9482 |
22.0 |
294.1 |
1648.0 |
| Polymerization condition: 92C/390psi, 40min, 6g 1-hexene, 200 mg sulfated alumina,
0.8 mmol Tiba |
[0065] The MWD profiles of Samples 1-4 are presented in Figure 2. Also shown in Figure 2
is the MWD profile for comparative Sample A which is MARLEX H525 high density polyethylene
which is a chromium-based resin (Cr-based resin) commercially available from Chevron
Phillips Chemical Company LP.
[0066] The zero-shear viscosity, relaxation time and rheological breadth of the samples
was determined and this data is presented in Table 3.
Table 3
| Sample |
Zero Shear Viscosity (Pa s) |
Relaxation Time (s) |
Rheological Breadth (CY-a) |
| 1 |
5.56E+05 |
7.95E+00 |
0.3806 |
| 2 |
4.31E+13 |
5.83E+04 |
0.0341 |
| 3 |
1.66E+06 |
2.32E+01 |
0.2902 |
| 4 |
6.14E+06 |
6.42E+01 |
0.1866 |
| A |
9.14E+06 |
9.95E+01 |
0.1728 |
[0067] Samples 1-4 displayed broad rheological distributions and high zero-shear viscosities
suggesting the samples melt strength and procesability is similar to that of Cr-based
resins. Additionally, Figure 3 which is a graph of the viscosity as a function of
frequency demonstrates that Samples 1-4 displayed viscosity curves similar to that
of Cr-based resins.
Example 2
[0068] The melt fracture behavior of the POL-IPs was investigated. Specifically the melt
fracture behavior of Samples 1-4 were assessed by capillary rheometry and this data
is presented in Table 4. Samples 1B and Sample 2B were compositions prepared using
the polymer of samples 1 and 2 respectively and a polymer processing aid (PPA) comprising
fluoro-polymer or fluoro-elastomer processing aids.
Table 4
| Sample No. |
Smooth to Matte |
Slip-Stick transition |
| Stress (kPa) |
Shear Rate (s-1) |
Stress (kPa) |
Shear Rate(s-1) |
Magnitude (psi) |
| 1 |
36.5 |
2.12 |
201.7 |
357 |
217.2 |
| 1B |
47.7 |
4.89 |
- |
- |
- |
| 2 |
77.7 |
16.6 |
271.8 |
323 |
1103.1 |
| 2B |
- |
- |
349.1 |
1450 |
423.7 |
| 3 |
38.3 |
1.86 |
202.9 |
295 |
409.1 |
| 4 |
< 30.2 |
< 1.21 |
242.5 |
350 |
735.9 |
| A |
35.7 |
1.89 |
193 |
353 |
84 |
[0069] The results demonstrate that the magnitude of slip-stick oscillation of Samples 1-4
(i.e., POL-LPs) is larger than that of the Cr-based resin (i.e., Sample A) indicating
that Samples 1-4 have good melt fracture potential. Samples 1-4 displayed a relatively
low onset of stresses of smooth-to-matte transition which is similar to that of Sample
A and may be attributable to the presence of the HMW tails in these samples. Overall
the melt fracture behavior of Samples 1-4 is expected to be similar to that of the
Cr-based resin.
[0070] Further the Samples 1B and 2B containing a PPA had melt fracture behavior that was
characterized by a delay in or the disappearance of the smooth-to-matte transition
and a reduction in or disappearance of the slip-stick transition.