[0001] The invention relates to a decommissioning system for decommissioning a track section.
[0002] The invention also relates to interface means for connecting a decommissioning system
to a train safety system of the railway track.
[0003] Not only the Dutch railway network but also railway networks in other countries comprise
a good deal of multi-track sections and railway yards. These sections and yards may
comprise one track, but generally they comprise several tracks. If more tracks are
used, also referred to as multitracks, trains travelling in opposite directions have
their own track, for example when a double track is available, this in contrast to
a single track, where trains must use one and the same track for both directions.
[0004] Besides single track and double track sections and railway yards there are also sections
and railway yards where three, or in some cases even four, tracks run parallel to
each other and at least in the Netherlands there are a few instances of six-track
railway sections.
[0005] As indicated, railway sections and railway yards may comprise several tracks, each
track consisting of two parallel rails. The sections and yards are divided lengthwise
into a number of so-called zones. Each zone comprises one or more signals for providing
information and giving the engine driver of a train some form of permission. The zones
can differ in length and can be made up of one or more sections. These railway sections
are usually electrically separated from each other.
[0006] Within the sections, trains are detected by a train detection system. A system that
is frequently used, at least in the Netherlands, is the track circuit system, wherein
each section comprises a power source on one side, by which an electrical potential
is applied between the rails, whilst a relay is connected between the rails on the
other side. This relay is energized by the power source and maintained in this active
status during the time the circuit is not interrupted and the relay continues to be
energized. In this quiescent condition the light of the signal for trains is green,
indicating that a train is allowed to enter the zone.
[0007] When a train enters the track section, it causes a short circuit between the two
rails via its axles and wheels. As a result of this short circuit, the relay is no
longer energized, causing it to drop out. As a result of said dropping out of the
track relay, the track signal will be put in the stop position, indicating that this
zone of the railway track selection ahead of them is in use, a so-called "occupancy
indication", or "track in use" or "track possession". As long as the signal is in
the stop position for the zone in question, indicating it to be in use, other trains
will not be allowed to enter the zone.
[0008] In addition to the aforesaid track circuit train detection, also other train detection
systems are known wherein the axles of a train are counted using a sensor so as to
thus determine whether a train is entering the zone, on the basis of which determination
an occupancy indication is provided and the signals are put in the stop position.
[0009] The railway network is being used increasingly intensively and must meet increasingly
stringent requirements. Regular maintenance is required, therefore. In order to be
able to carry out this maintenance in a safe manner, parts of a section are shut down,
i.e. decommissioned. Train detection systems, such as the aforesaid track circuit
system, for example, can be used not only for detecting trains and providing an occupancy
indication for a zone and putting the signal in the stop position on the basis thereof,
but they can also be used for simulating a train so as to thus provide an occupancy
indication for the zone, so that maintenance can be carried out in the zone that has
been shut down.
[0010] It is known to use a shunt bar, or short-circuit bar/bridge, for creating a short
circuit between two rails of the zone that is to be shut down for maintenance, i.e.
decommissioned. Thus a self-signalling shunt bar (ZKL 3000) as described in
NL 1033077 and available via the present applicant, by means of which shunt bar a short circuit
can be realised and monitored in a simple and reliable manner at the time of carrying
out maintenance work. The shunt bar simulates the presence of a train in the section
of the track circuit in that the rails are shortcircuited in the same manner as would
take place by the wheels and axles of a train present in the section in question.
The relay of the track circuit system thus drops out and the signal will be put in
the stop position, thereby signalling the zone to be in use, or in other words, shut
down or decommissioned.
[0011] From
NL 1033581, likewise in the name of the present applicant, there is known a shunt bar which
is configured to be activated by remote control (similar to the ZKL 3000 RC that is
available via the present applicant) so as to thus remotely provide a zone occupancy
indication.
[0012] With such a shunt bar it is possible to activate and de-activate the shunt by remote
control. The bar can thus remain in the section; when work is to be carried out the
decommissioning of a section can be realised by remote control. The advantage of this
is not only that central control thus becomes possible; the time that is otherwise
needed for installing the shunt bar and realising the decommissioning on site is thus
no longer lost.
[0013] Such a shunt bar ensures that the zone of the railway track is decommissioned. In
this way it is safe for the maintenance workers to carry out work in that zone of
the railway track for as long as the shunt bar realises a short circuit, thus creating
a safe zone for the rail workers.
[0014] A drawback of such an approach is that a shunt bar must already be present in the
zone or section of the railway track for every zone of the railway track that is to
be decommissioned, or that it must be installed yet in said zone or section. This
is a costly investment in the case of shunt bars that are already present and a labour-intensive
approach in the case of shunt bars that are to be provided yet.
[0015] Another drawback is that the known solutions only suffice for realising an occupancy
indication if a track circuit system is used. In the future and in other countries
work will be carried out in zones that are protected by other systems. An example
of this is the increasingly important European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS).
The installation of a shunt bar between the rails of an ERTMS-protected railway track
does not guarantee that an occupancy indication will be generated and maintenance
work can be carried out in a safe manner. In many cases it concerns the control of
switches and signals to close off a track section to trains so as to thus create a
safe place to work.
[0016] Yet another drawback is that the known solutions are only capable of locally realising
an occupancy indication by installing one or more shunt bars. Current systems are
inadequate for realising an occupancy indication over a multitude of local, different
train management systems in a simple manner and realising a large zone comprising
several sections.
[0017] An object of the invention is to provide a solution to the aforesaid drawbacks and
to provide, in a first aspect of the invention, a decommissioning system for decommissioning
a section of a railway track, comprising:
- decommissioning means configured to decommission the at least one section of the railway
track and close it off to trains by generating an occupancy indication;
- communication means configured to receive a command to decommission the section of
the railway track and to deliver status information regarding a section of the railway
track that has or has not been decommissioned;
- control means configured to control the decommissioning means to decommission the
section of the railway track on the basis of said command;
- interface means which can be physically connected to a train safety system of the
railway track on the one hand and to the decommissioning means on the other hand and
which are configured to activate the decommissioning of the track section within the
train safety level by generating an occupancy indication to the train safety system.
[0018] When work is to be carried out on the railway track, the part of the railway track
in question, one or more sections which together form a zone, need to be blocked such
that there is a guarantee that trains cannot enter said zone. This can be realised
by locally installing a shunt bar in a section of the zone, by means of which the
presence of a train in said zone is simulated.
[0019] The inventor has recognised that simulation of the presence of a train in the zone
is eventually received at the train safety (supervision) level and processed into
an eventually controlled occupancy indication of the zone in question. The simulation
of the presence of a train directly on the train safety system on the one hand has
the advantage that this prevents the need either to locally install a shunt bar in
the track before the work is carried out or to ensure that shunt bars are already
present in all zones, which leads to a significant saving in costs. On the other hand
it is an advantage that the decommission for maintenance is thus no longer system
dependent (track circuit), but that it can also be used within other train safety
and management systems.
[0020] The train safety supervision level is not the same as the train management level.
The main difference between a train safety system and a train management system is
that the train safety system is to guarantee the safety of the rail traffic and that
the train management system provides the control. The timetable is therefore (centrally)
controlled at a high level in the train management level. The (electrical and mechanical)
protection, as realised by means of switches and/or signals, therefore (locally) takes
place at a low level, being the train safety supervision level. These differences
between train management and train safety can therefore not only be indicated in abstract
levels, but they are usually also present at physically different locations in the
railway system. Consequently, the train safety system, to which the interface means
according to the invention can be physically connected, is generally present in signal
equipment buildings/relay cabinets (whether or not provided with actual relays or
more modern PLCs or computer controlled circuits or so-called Radio Block Centres
(RBCs).
[0021] The term "train safety system" can also be understood to mean (part of) the Automatic
Train Control (ATC), automatic train protection system, or Automatische Treinbeïnvloeding
(ATB) system. This system makes it possible to prevent accidents, for example resulting
from the engine driver's missing a red signal. The system roughly consists of two
elements, i.e. the track equipment and the train equipment. The track equipment also
includes the track circuit, by means of which the presence of a train in the track
section in question can be simulated, for example by means of a shunt bar as available
from the present applicant. Short-circuiting the rails by means of a shunt bar will
result in the track relay dropping out and the track section getting an occupancy
status. According to the invention, the train safety system, to which the interface
means according to the invention can be physically connected, can therefore concern
this part of the track equipment of the ATC, connected in a signal equipment building,
RBC or Junction Box (JB) beside the track.
[0022] As described, the invention provides a decommissioning system which comprises interface
means that can be directly connected to the train safety system. The location may
be in a signal equipment building, RBC or JB. Traditionally, the signal equipment
buildings comprise so-called B relays. These are relays having a safety function which
are used in a rail safety installation (such as an NX-type installation). The B relays
are very reliable and are guaranteed to drop out when the coil is powered off (i.e.
when an axle of a train in the track section causes a short-circuit within the track
circuit). Another feature of the B relays is that the break contacts open before the
make contacts are closed. According to the invention the interface means can therefore
simulate the operation of the B relay in a similar manner. Currently, many of the
conventional B relays have been exchanged for electrical (computer and/or PLC) rail
safety systems; examples of this include Siemens' SIMIS system, Alstom's VPI's Smartlock
and Bombardier's EBILOCK. The interface means according to the invention can also
be connected to these electrical rail safety systems, however.
[0023] In a first aspect, a decommissioning system according to the invention comprises
decommissioning means for decommissioning a section of the railway track by simulating
the presence of a train in the track section. The system further comprises communication
means for receiving a command to decommission the section of the railway track and
to deliver status information regarding a track section that may or may not have been
decommissioned. The communication means enable the system to remotely transmit a command
to decommission a track section via an internet and/or (mobile) telephone network.
The communication means are further capable of remotely reading the status (e.g. "track
in use" or "track clear") of the track section or zone. In addition to that, the system
comprises control means for controlling the decommissioning means to decommission
the at least one section of the railway track on the basis of the command. The term
" decommissioning" is understood to mean the decommissioning of the at least one section
of the railway track in the broadest sense of the word. Thus the rail traffic can
be controlled by controlling signals and/or switches. In this way a route can be set
for a train. A route is a section of railway infrastructure that is reserved, also
referred to as "scheduled", for a train. Thus a train can be prevented from moving
into a section by activating the appropriate signals and/or switches. On the other
hand it is also possible to simulate the presence of a train by means of a train detection
system. Simulating the presence of a train achieves the same object of shutting down
or decommissioning the at least one section to rail traffic.
[0024] Rails are present in all situations. Consequently, it is always possible to install
a shunt bar between rails, and if the rails are operative in that zone within a track
circuit system, the installation of a shunt bar is a simple and reliable manner of
indicating zone to be in use.
[0025] In order to be able to interfere directly in the train safety system, a decommissioning
system according to the invention further comprises interface means for making the
decommissioning system compatible with the train safety system and enabling it to
operate within said system.
[0026] Whereas in the prior art a short-circuit is generated, thereby simulating the presence
of a train, by installing a shunt bar, in the present invention the presence of a
train is simulated by activating a signal at, for example, a train detection input
of the train safety system.
[0027] In the present application the short-circuiting of the rails of a section is described
purely by way of example. Eventually this will result, via the train detection system
(in particular the track circuit system) in a section that is indicated to be "in
use".
[0028] The invention also provides different manners of realising an occupancy indication,
however. This is for example done by controlling one or more signals and/or switches.
When a signal is activated and put in the stop position, the train safety system will
detect this, and based on this detection it will not indicate the section in question
to be clear. A train is not allowed to enter this section. In this way the same is
realised, likewise via the train safety system, but in a different manner. The present
invention also provides an embodiment in which a train is blocked from entering a
section by inputting a command into the train safety system by which the section (or
sections) in question is/are "scheduled". Rail traffic control supervises the controlling
and adjusting of the timetable. In accordance with a particular plan, the timetable,
a planning is made as to which train is present in the network at which point in time.
In accordance with this planning, those parts of the railway (section, sections or
route) are reserved for that strain. This is referred to as "scheduling". If a part
of the track is reserved for a train, that part is blocked to other trains. These
trains cannot enter the section or sections. The present invention also relates to
a decommissioning system wherein the decommissioning means are configured to deliver
a command for the (simulated) scheduling of a train in one or more sections. This
is done by communicating the scheduling of a train in that section or sections to
the train safety system.
[0029] In another embodiment, at least the interface means and the decommissioning means
are accommodated in a housing of a train safety system of the railway track.
[0030] By accommodating at least the interface means and the decommissioning means in a
housing of a train safety system in such a practical embodiment, the decommissioning
system becomes an integral part of the existing train safety system. The interface
means are directly connected to the control unit, being relays, PLCs or computer controlled
circuits so as to make direct interference in the train safety supervision level possible.
In another embodiment, the aforesaid means may also be accommodated in a signal equipment
building of the train safety system, as the signal equipment building accommodates
the train safety equipment for the respective part of the track which comprises the
sections or zones that are to be decommissioned. The term "signal equipment building"
is understood to mean a building on a railway yard in which the relay safety equipment
of that railway yard is accommodated. According to one embodiment of the invention,
however, at least the interface means and the decommissioning means may also be accommodated
in a so-called Radio Block Centre (RBC). Whereas signal equipment buildings generally
comprise conventional relays, an RBC is configured for digital processing and digitally
controlling the train safety system. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention
is not limited to implementation in a signal equipment building, but it also includes
implementation in an RBC and equivalents thereof.
[0031] In another embodiment, the system comprises a cluster of a multitude of interface
means and decommissioning means accommodated in various housings of train safety systems,
wherein the system is configured to decommission a multitude of sections on the basis
of one decommissioning command.
[0032] In yet another embodiment, the system comprises a cluster of a multitude of interface
means and decommissioning means accommodated in various signal equipment buildings,
wherein the system is configured to decommission a multitude of sections on the basis
of one decommissioning command.
[0033] At least the interface means and the decommissioning means may be directly accommodated
in a housing of the train safety system, or be directly accommodated in a signal equipment
building of a train safety system. Various sections together form a zone. Various
(local) zones from the nearby track converge in a single signal equipment building,
where the train safety of the various sections within the zones is controlled. Thus,
various sections together form one zone, and various zones converge in one train safety
system that is accommodated in one signal equipment building. A national railway system
therefore comprises a multitude of said signal equipment buildings comprising train
safety systems which control the safety of a multitude of local zones and of the sections
that form part of said zones.
[0034] By providing several local signal equipment buildings with interface means and the
associated decommissioning means, and in particular with associated control means
and communication means, it becomes possible to place these systems in the signal
equipment buildings in communication with each other via the communication means.
As a result, a multitude of local zones or sections can be controlled simultaneously
at the highest control level by means of one and the same decommissioning command.
Using said one command, a site safety (controller) is able to decommission a complete
route comprising sections that are associated with several local signal equipment
buildings. The activation of the command causes all the sections to be decommissioned
simultaneously. This can for example take place on the basis of the activation of
one or more signals and/or the controlling of one or more switches. This in contrast
to the prior art, in which only sections associated with that specific signal equipment
building can be controlled within a command.
[0035] In another embodiment, the interface means are configured for being connected to
one or more relays of the train safety system.
[0036] The interface means may be configured to decommission a specific zone. To do so,
an occupancy indication is delivered to the respective input of the relay, the PLC
or other (digital) switching unit. In a preferred embodiment, the interface means
may be connected to several relays, PLCs etc at the same time so as to thus control
several (groups of) zones and provide an occupancy indication at the inputs in question.
[0037] In an alternative embodiment, the interface means are configured for being connected
to one or more PLCs of the train safety system.
[0038] As indicated, various train safety systems are being used nationally but certainly
internationally. In a standard, conventional embodiment these systems may comprise
relays which drop out and deliver an occupancy indication in the dropout position,
but in more current train safety system they comprise PLCs or other (digital) switching
units. The PLCs are provided with a multitude of inputs and outputs, wherein at least
some of these inputs are intended for releasing a specific zone of the track or indicating
it to be in use, as the case may be. These relays or PLCs are usually of a so-called
failsafe type, which means that the standard, neutral position is a position in which
the track can be safely used. In practice this means that, in the case of a relay,
this relay will not release the zone of the track until the relay is energized. If
the relay drops out, as a result of a train entering the zone, an occupancy indication
being generated for carrying out maintenance, or a power failure, the zone will be
blocked and no trains may enter the zone. PLCs are usually programmed accordingly.
[0039] In another embodiment, the interface means are configured to generate an occupancy
indication to the train safety system and read back the status of an occupancy indication
from the train safety system.
[0040] In one embodiment, the interface means may be configured as bidirectional interface
means. This means that they not only deliver a control signal for an occupancy indication
of a zone to the train safety system but that they also read the status thereof again.
Consequently, not only control but also feedback takes place in that it is checked
(by reading the status at the output) whether the train safety system has correctly
carried out the command. This has a positive effect as regards the safety and reliability
of the control.
[0041] In a specific embodiment, the communication means are configured to communicate the
status of the occupancy indication as read to signalling means, which signalling means
are configured to produce light signals at the section of the railway track that has
been decommissioned.
[0042] In such an embodiment, the communication means communicate this status to one or
more users, for example within a graphic user interface on a server or, workstation
or by means of a website on a computer, hand-held device, telephone or other communication
means.
[0043] In another embodiment, the decommissioning system is connected to at least one power
source of the train safety system.
[0044] To provide a system with power, this system may be provided with its own power source,
but it may also be connected to existing power sources of the train safety system.
More in particular, the system may comprise an additional auxiliary power source or
emergency power source, which functions as a backup for the power source of the train
safety system. This auxiliary power source may furthermore comprise a battery to act
as an uninterruptible power supply, which battery is charged by the power source of
the train safety system.
[0045] In another embodiment, the interface means are configured to form an interface cluster
together with one or more further interface means, which interface cluster can be
controlled by one of a multitude of control means.
[0046] A major advantage of the use of interface means over single relays or PLCS configured
to switch single zones or sections of a track is the fact that, using the interface
means, it is possible to form a cluster of interface means which are connected by
the control means. If extensive work is to be carried out on a long section or a large
railway yard, for example, it will be efficient if the entire area and all the sections
therein can be regarded as a large, virtual zone. This zone must be given a track
in use status upon commencement of the work. Without this system according to the
invention, this cannot be realised within the current train safety system, and all
the zones or sections must be separately controlled. This can for example be done
by installing a shunt bar in every zone. In the case of a train safety system which
is provided with PLCs, the software of the PLCs could be adapted so as to combine
them in a virtual zone. The PLCs need to be reprogrammed, however, in order to realise
this. The system according to the invention does provide a possibility of composing
virtual zones or clusters in a simple manner, remotely controlled via the communication
means, in that use is made of the interface means. Upon commencement of the work a
single command will in that case suffice for putting the signal in the stop position
for a large area comprising all the selected zones configured in the command, thereby
preventing trains from entering the area. Similar to the previously described embodiment,
the system can provide a cluster or virtual zone which bypasses local train safety
systems, i.e. which converge in various signal equipment buildings. A cluster or virtual
zone may thus comprise preselected sections of, for example, zone 1 from the train
safety system in the signal equipment building 1 and zones 1, 2, 3 and 4 from the
train safety system in the signal equipment building 2, etc. They can be decommissioned
in one go by activating one command.
[0047] In another embodiment, the interface means comprise one or more failsafe switches,
in particular bidirectional failsafe switches, and even more in particular a double
normally closed and a double normally open switch.
[0048] In a practical embodiment, the control of the train safety system by the interface
means can take place, as already indicated before, by means of failsafe switches,
more specifically bidirectional failsafe switches, which detect/read whether the command/control
has actually been carried out. These failsafe switches are intended for situations
where the interface means are connected to a (B)-relay. The invention also provides
a system, however, which comprises interface means which are not configured with physical
mechanical failsafe switches but with digital components, which are connected to the
train safety system by means of a UTP cable. Preferably, such a digital variant, which
is quite suitable for train safety systems comprising PLCs or an RBC, is more reliable
if use is made of a safety protocol.
[0049] In another embodiment, the control means are configured to receive a release signal
via the communication means and to control the decommissioning means to decommission
part of the track only upon receipt of said signal.
[0050] The releasing of the decommissioning falls within the "give and take" principle.
The term "give and take" is understood to mean that not only a process-oriented possibility
but also a system-oriented possibility is provided in which a person responsible,
such as a so-called rail traffic controller manning the post, on the one hand and
a person responsible at the location of the track on the other hand, for example a
contractor who is going to carry out work, can together effect a decommissioning via
the system. Currently this process takes place by telephone, in one embodiment of
the invention, however, the system is configured for preparing a decommission (give).
The rail traffic controller can thus prepare a section that is to be decommissioned
for maintenance. The rail worker (contractor or person locally responsible) can then
take, i.e. activate in the system the decommissioning that has been put ready by the
rail traffic controller, so that the decommissioning will actually take place. In
a second aspect, interface means are provided for a decommissioning system according
to one of the above descriptions.
[0051] The invention will now be explained in more detail with reference to a number of
figures, in which:
Figures 1 a and 1b show plans of a track section protected by a rail safety system;
Figure 2 shows a prior art decommissioning unit for use in a track circuit train safety
system;
Figure 3 is a schematic view of a decommissioning system according to an exemplary
embodiment of the invention;
Figure 4 is a perspective view of the decommissioning system according to an exemplary
embodiment of the invention which is to be accommodated in a signal equipment building
or a housing of a train safety system;
Figure 5 is an illustrative view of the various parts of the decommissioning system
according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention;
Figure 6 is an illustrative view of a failsafe circuit according to an exemplary embodiment
of the invention.
[0052] For a better understanding of the invention, like parts will be indicated by identical
numerals in the description of the figures below.
[0053] Figure 1a shows a track which is built up of successive track sections 1
-1 - 1 - 1
+1 - etc. Each zone of the track may comprise one (usually several) track section 1
-1 - 1 - 1
+1 - etc. The track comprising the various sections is made up of rails 2a-2b, which
are fixed to sleepers 3. The successive track sections are separated from each other
by means of insulating connecting bridges 4, which are installed in one of the rails
2a-2b, or in both (as shown here).
[0054] If a track circuit system is used, a voltage potential may be applied to each track
section 1
-1 - 1 - 1
+1 - etc, making it possible to check whether a train is present in the section in question.
The track circuit of each track section is for that purpose built up of a power source
5, which is connected to each rail 2a, 2b via connections 5a, 5b, respectively. On
the other side of the track section in question, a dropout or rail relay 6 is provided,
which is likewise electrically connected to the two rails 2a, 2b of the section in
question via connections 6a, 6b, respectively.
[0055] In the situation shown in figure 1a, no train is present in the track section 10,
which means that the voltage (from the power source 5) applied between the two rails
2a-2b causes the (magnetic) relay 6 to be energised. As a result of this situation,
the track signals associated with the zone in question that comprises the track section
are green and the rail safety system allows trains to enter this zone comprising the
track section 10.
[0056] Figure 1b shows the situation in which a train 7 enters the track section 10 from
the left, seen in the figure. The axles 7a of the train cause a short-circuit between
the two rails 2a-2b, as a result of which current flows from the power source 5 via
the connection 5a, the rail 2a, the axles 7a and back to the power source 5 via the
other rail 2b and the connection 5b. As a result, less current or hardly any current
will flow to the relay 6, causing it to drop out. This situation is shown in figure
1 b.
[0057] As a result of the relay 6 dropping out due to the short-circuit created between
the two rails 2a-2b, the track signals of the section comprising the track section
10 in question will be put in the stop position. Putting the signals in the stop position
means that the zone in question is protected and
[0058] In the case of work being carried out in the track section 10, such short-circuiting
of the track section in question by a passing train 7 can also be simulated by a "simulation
train" using a decommissioning unit, or in other words, a shunt bar.
[0059] Figure 2 shows a prior art shunt bar, which is provided with means 24 for activating
and de-activating the shunt bar by remote control. The short-circuit 20 consists of
two arm members which are hinged together by means of a hinge 22. The hinge makes
it possible to install the bar between two rails 2a-2b, for example by exerting some
pressure on the upper side of the bar using a foot. Following this, the bar will be
securely clamped between the rails.
[0060] In the illustrated embodiment, the bar 20 comprises two contact parts 23a-23b, by
means of which the bar is brought into electrical contact with the respective rails
2a-2b. The two arms of the bar are not continuously in electrical contact with each
other, however, but they can be connected and disconnected by means of a control element
present on the bar or by remote control from a communication module.
[0061] Upon being connected, the shunt bar will bring the first rail 2a into electrical
contact with the second rail 2b. As a result, the track zone in question will be decommissioned
by indicating it to be in use and putting the signal in the stop position. In a specific
embodiment, the bar further comprises a monitoring module 25 for monitoring the short-circuit
resistance between the two rails.
[0062] The shunt bar shown in figure 2 is configured as a portable shunt bar. This means
that it can be removed and be reused elsewhere for decommissioning a track zone at
that location. In another embodiment, it may also form an integral part of a sleeper
of the track and thus be permanently incorporated in the section. In yet another embodiment,
it may also be accommodated near the track, for example in a junction box that is
already present beside the track.
[0063] The shunt bar 20 can communicate with a central processing unit using a communication
module 24, and for example transmit the short-circuiting status to a control centre.
Via the central processing unit, the communication module can also receive a command
to activate and de-activate the shunt bar by remote control.
[0064] The above description relates to a train detection system that is based on a track
circuit system. Not all the tracks in the Netherlands, and certainly outside the Netherlands,
make use of this system, however. The detection of trains in such other systems for
example takes place by counting the number of axles, using an axle counter, at the
beginning of a section or zone. If the number of detected axles at the beginning of
the section equals the number of axles at the end of the section, it can be concluded
that the train has left the section. In that case it can be determined that no train
is present in the section and that the occupancy indication for that section no longer
applies. Other trains can then enter the section again. Besides these axle counters
also other detection systems are used, such as detection loops, pedals that are depressed
when the train passes thereover, etc. The skilled person will appreciate what other
systems are known and can be used.
[0065] Within the European system ETCS, which will be increasingly used in the future, trains
can also be detected on the basis of a GSM connection, for example by means of a GSM-R(rail)
connection specially specified for trains. In the (near) future they can also be replaced
by newer mobile network standards, such as 3G, 4G or specific train standards such
as Future Railway Mobile Radio System, FRMRS.
[0066] To make maintenance on such a variety of train detection system possible, the use
of known shunt bars does not suffice.
[0067] Figure 3 shows an embodiment of the invention of a decommissioning system that does
not exhibit the above drawbacks.
[0068] Figure 3 is a general view of several decommissioning systems 10, 10', 10" according
to an embodiment of the invention. Two side-by-side track sections 1, 1', each comprising
rails 2a, 2b (2a', 2b' and 2a", 2b") and a train signal 20 (20', 20"), for each local
signal equipment building 101, 101', 101" are shown by way of illustration. The track
section 1 (1', 1 ") is monitored for the presence of a train by means of a track circuit
system (not shown), axle counter, GSM-R detection or other form of train detection.
This detection can be transmitted, via cables 15a, 15b (15a', 15b' and 15a", 15b",
respectively), to a train safety building such as a signal equipment building 101
(101', 101"). According to the invention, interface means 15 (15', 15") are provided
in this building, thus forming part of the train safety system, and by way of practical
example in the signal equipment building, which interface means are directly physically
connected to the train detection part of the train safety system. In comparison with
the prior art decommissioning systems for realising an occupancy indication, such
as a shunt bar, a decommissioning system according to the invention directly interferes
with the train safety means (in the signal equipment buildings) rather than with the
physical track, i.e. the rails.
[0069] Because the interface means 15 (15', 15") are centrally provided directly near the
train safety means in the signal equipment building 101 (101', 101 "), the risk of
damage is reduced, among other things. After all, in comparison with a shunt bar installed
in the track, a system that is installed in a signal equipment building is not exposed
to extreme weather conditions (extreme cold, snow, ice, frost, rain, hail, extreme
heat, etc) and is better protected against theft and vandalism. This has a positive
respect as on the reliability and the safety of the system.
[0070] Prior to the work, a project is configured, that is, a design is made for the decommissioning
of a number of sections (for example only the sections associated with rails 2a, 2b
and 2a", 2b"). A project for work on the track, also called a working zone, may comprise
one or more zones. Each zone comprises one or more clusters and each cluster comprises
one or more sections. Sections are thus the smallest in size, followed by clusters
and finally zones. The invention relates to the generation of an occupancy indication
for at least one section, using the interface means. Within the scope of the present
invention, at least one section is concerned, therefore. Several sections forming
part of one zone or even several zones and preferably several clusters may be involved,
of course, which are preferably distributed over various signal equipment buildings,
PLC connections or RBC, so that the decommissioning of the entire working zone can
be realised in a very simple and reliable manner using one command.
[0071] This project is also called a site safety instruction (SSI) of a clear track, zone
or single section. The design is made, verified and validated (for example at the
office 100 via central server 150), and subsequently one SSP (site safety person)
or a group of SSPs 150 can release the project via a local computer, tablet computer
etc that is connected to the central server 150. The released project is then displayed
to the COSS (controller of site safety) employee 150c, who may be on site. After the
COSS has gone through the process of taking over the track from the rail traffic controller,
he or she can activate the project using a tablet computer, PDA, computer or other
communication medium. The COSS to that end logs in via a personal authentication.
In the preliminary stage the SSP determines what, when, where, using what means, and
how switching will take place by the COSS 150c. When the whole has been activated
by the COSS 150c, a green LED on the interface means 15 (15', 15") will blink. The
decommissioning is cancelled by deactivating the project, which can be done by the
COSS. At a later stage, the product can be given back and taken back so as to prevent
the project still being displayed to a COSS 150c on duty. In this example a product
could thus be conceived at the office 100 and be verified and validated at said office,
and a command to activate an occupancy indication on the train safety systems of only
the signal equipment buildings 101 and 101" could be generated, so that the signals
20 and 20" for the sections associated with the rails 2a, 2b and 2a", 2b" will be
put in the stop position and an occupancy indication will be activated. This command
is made available to the COSS 150c via the central server. The COSS 150c is the person
who is locally responsible for safety and who activates the decommissioning prior
to the commencement of the work by logging into the server 150 (by personal authentication).
At the server, the command is ready and is communicated to the decommissioning means
and the interface means 15, 15" in the signal equipment buildings 101 and 101" via
the communication means. The local decommissioning means interfere with the train
safety system via the interface means 15, 15" for decommissioning the sections of
the rails 2a, 2b and 2a", 2b".
[0072] The interface means 15 are shown in more detail in figure 4. The control means 15
are preferably accommodated in an explosion-proof housing 151 and built up around
a PCB 152, on which the necessary components are mounted. The housing with the interface
means that is shown in figure 4 is to be interpreted solely as an example, however.
Other variants thereto are also conceivable, which variants fall within the inventive
concept and the scope of the appended claims. As it is, the variant shown in figure
4 is configured to be connected to a (B)-relay and concerns a single circuit. In the
case of an electronic (not relay-based) train safety system, the interface means 15
can be many times more compact. Another advantage of electronic, not relay-based interface
means is that multiple switching is possible therewith. In this way multiple, simultaneous
decommissioning several sections (or one entire cluster, several clusters, one entire
zone or even several zones) becomes possible. The generation of an occupancy indication
for all the sections of one product or working zone is thus possible by the electronic
simultaneous switching of all the sections associated with that product or working
zone. It stands to reason that it may also concern a combination wherein one or several
interface means are configured for use with and are connected to one or more relays
of an older generation train safety system, and one or more interface means are configured
for use with and are connected to one or more PLCs or computers of a newer generation
electronic train safety system. In that case all the sections (old and newer generation)
of the working zone can be decommissioned with a single command by generating an occupancy
indication for that zone.
[0073] The control means 15 are preferably supplied with power from a power source that
forms part of the infrastructure 100-101 of the train safety system. In this way a
reliable operation of the system is ensured, so that the safety of the rail workers
in the case of a decommissioning is guaranteed.
[0074] In view of the possibility of a malfunction, an auxiliary power source 153 is mounted
on the PCB 152, so that the system need not be decommissioned but will continue to
be operational in case of a malfunction in the train safety system and an undesirable
failure of the main power source. This further contributes to safer working conditions
for rail workers in and beside the track section 2-2' in question.
[0075] The auxiliary power source 153 in particular comprises one or more batteries, which
can be recharged by the main power source that forms part of the infrastructure 101-101
of the train safety system. In this way the functionality of the system according
to the invention is at all times ensured, even in case of unexpected malfunctions.
[0076] The decommissioning system 15 comprises decommissioning means, which generate an
occupancy indication. The system further comprises communication means via which the
system communicates with an interface or other form of communication over a network.
This communication is shown in figure 3 and takes place between the central (web)
server 150 and all the persons and apparatuses that can be connected thereto, such
as the user 150c or a remote user 150a who can log into the server and read the status
of the occupancy indication but also input an occupancy indication command. The user
150c can for example locally activate the occupancy indication command. The server
150 is further connected to the interface means 15, 15', 15" in the local signal equipment
buildings 101, 101', 101" via the communication channels 17, 17', 17".
[0077] The system further comprises control means which are configured to control the decommissioning
means and to convert instructions received via the communication means into commands,
so that the decommissioning means can be controlled on the basis thereof.
[0078] The system 15 is configured to decommission a section or an entire zone of a track
in a controlled manner by generating an occupancy indication. Whereas in a prior art
system a shunt bar is placed between the rails, in a system according to the invention
the decommissioning means are placed inside a signal equipment building and consequently
outside the risk area of the track. Via the interface means the system is hardwired
to the train safety system in the signal equipment building and the switch, i.e. the
decommissioning means, is remotely controlled by the control means, i.e. via the communication
means, to effect the decommissioning and read whether it meets the requirements made
thereof. The result is made available again, for example to the person responsible
for the safety, via the communication means. All these means are locally housed in
the signal equipment building 101, 101', 101", and linked together via the web server
150.
[0079] Using such a decommissioning system according to the invention, the physical limitation
of control within a single signal equipment building is removed and it becomes possible
to centrally control one or usually several track sections associated with different
signal equipment buildings.
[0080] Figure 5 is a block diagram showing the principle of operation of the system 15 according
to one embodiment of the invention, which is specifically configured for being connected
to a train safety system which comprises relays and which is switched (off) on the
basis of said relays. According to another embodiment, the invention also provides
a digital/electronic variant which is configured for being connected to a train safety
system which does not comprise relays but which comprises PLCs or other computer-controlled/switched
protection circuits, as is the case in an RBC. In such an electronic or digital variant,
the interface means do not comprise conventional switches 211 and (failsafe) relays
213, but they are configured as digital means and control one or more sections simultaneously,
for example via a computer interface over a UTP cable or the like. In particular,
and preferably, this communication is reliable as a result of the use of a secure
and safe communication protocol. The invention also provides interface means that
can be connected to a train safety system that comprises both PLCs and relays, however,
for example a system in which the PLCs (digital/electronic) are controlled by the
interface means and the PLCs subsequently control the relays. One or more components
210, 212, 214 may be configured as redundant components with a view to increasing
the reliability and availability. Various components can be distinguished in the block
diagram. Centrally arranged is the MCU, being a central processor (or several processors)
201, also called the control means, which controls and checks the entire system. The
control means and the rest of the system are supplied with energy by the PSU 202.
Said PSU is in turn supplied with power from a 12 V rail of the signal box or signal
equipment building, for example, which is already present in the safety system.
[0081] Watchdog 203 monitors the systems and checks whether the system still reacts. If
it does not, the supply of power is briefly stopped, causing the system to restart.
Logging 204 takes place internally for writing all events to an SD card, for example,
or to another form of local storage. Indication 205 provides an indication whether
the site is safe. It may to that end comprise an LED, which can blink green if the
site is safe. A condition is that this includes not only detection whether the site
is safe but also whether the system is functioning properly. Only in that case will
a status report in the form of a blinking green LED be provided. As the skilled person
will appreciate, these status reports may also be provided using different LEDs, colours
or other signalling forms.
[0082] If desired, switching to an occupancy indication can also take place manually by
the manual 206 element. It may be provided with a key (see figure 4, numeral 154),
so that local switching of the occupancy indication can only take place if the correct
key is used. The MCU 201 communicates with external means via a communication channel
or via communication means 207 on the basis of a reliable protocol, such as the CP3000
protocol. Other apparatuses available via the present applicant, such as an MTinfo,
can co-operate with this system on the basis of such a protocol.
[0083] Detection 208 detects whether the system is in the correct position, and control
209 controls the switch and it also checks whether the switch is indeed able to switch,
which is done prior to the actual switching thereof. Drive 210 is used for driving
the switch to switch individual segments to the correct position, and measure 212
is used for measuring whether the individual switching segments of the switch have
been switched to the correct position. The result of this is transmitted to control
block 209. Switch 211 carries out the actual activation. These can be remotely operated
via the communication means, CP3000 and MCU, and in particular comprise a double redundant,
bi-directional failsafe switch.
[0084] The interface module is indicated at 213, it forms the interface between the rest
of the system and in particular the decommissioning means in the form of the switch
211 on the one side and the interface with the train protection system in the signal
equipment building on the other side.
[0085] Feedback 214 combines the feedback from the signal equipment building with the internal
feedback from the system and translates this into a detection status. The detection
status may either be "safe" or "unsafe" (for the rail worker). The interface 214 to
the signal box consists of a 2x normally open and 2x normally closed connection and
the feedback connection.
[0086] Up to the communication means, all elements are directly connected using a local
hardwired connection. The communication means 207 make a connection with the web server
150 of figure 3 via a GPRS or Ethernet module 16 and make the information available
to the users in question via said channel. GPRS and Ethernet are mentioned purely
by way of illustration. The skilled person will appreciate that these terms refer
to a wireless and a hardwired connection, respectively. Within that framework, the
term GPRS is understood to include current standards but also new/future standards
such as 3G and 4G. The term Ethernet is understood to mean a fixed connection that
may already be present in the signal equipment building.
[0087] The system may furthermore be provided with a GPS module 217, by means of which the
system can be located and which is also suitable for synchronising the internal clock
of the system.
[0088] The communication means communicate (wirelessly or via a fixed connection) with the
coordinating web-based management system 219, which is available as the MTinfo system
from the present applicant. Via this system users can control the system via a web
interface 220, and all the data in the system is safely written to a database 219.
Using a remote control device, the system can be used at any location via remote 221
for decommissioning one (or several) zone(s) or section(s).
[0089] Typical of the switch 211 that is used is that it may be configured as a so-called
bi-directional failsafe switch. The switch is provided with a memory module, in which
the actual operating status of the train simulation unit can be stored. In the case
of the "functional operation" status, the failsafe status of the bidirectional switch
is that status which maintains safety in the track section in question. In other words:
if the train simulation unit is in functional operation and consequently simulates
the presence of a train in a track section allocated to the system (and thus provides
an occupancy indication to further trains) and the system gets out of operation due
to a malfunction, the bi-directional failsafe switch will maintain the "occupancy
indication" rather than switch off automatically. In this way the safety of the rail
workers in the track section in question is guaranteed, so that the last status will
be maintained also in the case of a malfunction in the train simulation unit.
[0090] The "non-functional operation" status is the failsafe status of the bidirectional
switch, in which status the availability of the train protection system is maintained.
When the track is in use, this means that in the case of a disturbance occurring during
the functional operation status of the system, the decommissioning (occupancy indications)
and/or a de-energization of the overhead current rail of a track section or a cluster
of track will be maintained. This means that in the case of a non-functional operation
status the train traffic can continue at all times during a malfunction in the train
simulation unit. In this way undesirable and unnecessary suspension of train traffic
(with the resulting damage and delays) is prevented.
[0091] This switching principle is shown in detail in figure 6. The bidirectional switch
is provided with two switch contacts 300a-300b. Contact 300a is a contact which is
closed when the system, in particular the decommissioning means thereof, is not "on".
The switch contact 300b is open in that situation. When the decommissioning means
are activated, the switch contact 300a will be open and the switch contact 300b will
be closed. The system continuously monitors the status of the protection means (made
up of the two switch contacts 300a-300b) and the system will not provide a "safe"
indication until a closed contact has been detected.
[0092] The communication interface is configured so that a situation in which both contacts
are closed upon switching of the switch contacts 300a-300b cannot occur.
[0093] Another feature is that the bi-directional switch is made up of a circuit with 2
Normally Closed and 2 Normally Open terminals. This provides an effective interface
connection with all kinds of different types of train protection systems as indicated
before and used in various countries.
[0094] The status of the bi-directional switch is remotely monitored via the communication
means, whilst also the status of the train protection system is continuously monitored.
Periodically (for example every 0.5 seconds locally and every 3 seconds remotely via
the communication means/network) the status of the switch is translated into a status
for the user, which status may be "functional operation" or "non-functional operation".
1. A decommissioning system for decommissioning at least on section of a railway track,
comprising:
- decommissioning means configured to decommission the at least one section of the
railway track and close it off to trains by generating an occupancy indication;
- communication means configured to receive a command to decommission the at least
one section of the railway track and to deliver status information regarding a section
of the railway track that has or has not been decommissioned;
- control means configured to control the decommissioning means to decommission the
at least one track section on the basis of said command;
- interface mean which can be physically connected to a train safety system of the
railway track on the one side and to the decommissioning means on the other side and
which are configured to activate the decommissioning of the section of the railway
track within the train safety supervision level on the basis of said command by generating
an occupancy indication to the train safety system.
2. The decommissioning system according to claim 1, wherein at least the interface means
and the decommissioning means are accommodated in a housing of a train safety system
of the railway track.
3. The decommissioning system according to claim 2, wherein the system comprises a cluster
of a multitude of interface means and decommissioning means accommodated in various
housings of train safety systems, and wherein the system is configured to decommission
a multitude of sections on the basis of one decommissioning command.
4. The decommissioning system according to claim 1, wherein at least the interface means
and the decommissioning means are accommodated in a signal equipment building of the
train safety system of the railway track.
5. The decommissioning system according to claim 4, wherein the system comprises a cluster
of a multitude of interface means and decommissioning means accommodated in various
signal equipment buildings of train safety systems, and wherein the system is configured
to decommission a multitude of sections on the basis of one decommissioning command.
6. The decommissioning system according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the
interface means are configured for being connected to one or more relays and/or PLCs
and/or RBCs and/or ASKs of the train safety system.
7. The decommissioning system according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the
interface means are configured to generate an occupancy indication to the train safety
system and, in particular, read back the status of an occupancy indication from the
train safety system and/or to generate a switch control command to the train safety
system and, in particular, read back the status of a switch control command from the
train safety system and/or to generate a signal control command to the train safety
system and, in particular, read the status of a signal control command back from the
train safety system.
8. The decommissioning system according to claim 7, wherein the communication means are
configured to communicate the status of the occupancy indication as read to signalling
means, which signalling means are configured to produce light signals at the section
of the railway track that has been decommissioned.
9. The decommissioning system according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the
decommissioning system is connected to at least one power source of the train safety
system and in particular also to an additional auxiliary power source.
10. The decommissioning system according to claim 9, wherein the auxiliary power supply
comprises a battery, and wherein the battery act can in particular be charged by the
power source of the train safety system.
11. The decommissioning system according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the
interface means are configured to form an interface cluster together with one or more
further interface means, which interface cluster can be controlled by one of a multitude
of control means.
12. The decommissioning system according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the
interface means comprise one or more failsafe switches, in particular bidirectional
failsafe switches, and even more in particular a double normally closed and a double
normally open switch.
13. The decommissioning system according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the
control means are configured to receive a release signal from the communication means
and to control the decommissioning means to decommission the at least one section
of the railway track on the basis of the decommissioning command only upon receipt
of said signal.
14. The decommissioning system according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the
decommissioning means are configured to decommission the at least one section of the
railway track on the basis of one or more of the group comprising: scheduling one
or more trains, putting one or more signals in the stop position, blocking one or
more switches and simulating the presence of a train in the at least one section of
the railway track.
15. Interface means for a decommissioning system according to any one of the preceding
claims.