Technical field
[0001] The present invention relates to a method for controlling an electric motor, in particular
a single-phase permanent magnet (brushless) motor.
[0002] In particular, the invention relates to a method for controlling the movement of
the electric motor which allows to disable the generation of the movement power signal
supplied to the motor following the detection of operation anomalies in the motor
itself.
Prior art
[0003] As known, a permanent magnet electric motor or brushless motor, e.g. of the direct
current (DC) type, comprises a rotor, consisting of a permanent magnet and a stator,
provided with conductor windings supplied by alternating current AC voltages. In such
motors, the rotor operates as induction element and is rotating, while the induced
element, i.e. the stator, is supplied by the alternating current voltages generated
by an inverter device starting from the direct power voltage.
[0004] The safety of a single-phase electric motor of brushless type, for example a motor
configured to move a fan heater in a gas boiler, is governed by international standard
EN 60335-1. In particular, such a standard requires such electric motors to be robust
during use, i.e. to remain safe also in case of operation anomalies. Among the operation
anomalies of the electric motor, for example, the overload conditions and blocked
rotor conditions are the most significant.
[0005] Such operation anomalies may determine an increase of the operating currents flowing
in the motor windings to reach values which are much higher than nominal values, with
the consequent risk of overheating the entire motor apparatus and, in the worst cases,
of even generating flames.
[0006] In order to avoid winding overheating problems, the motor apparatus of the electric
motors of known type is equipped with air vents or appropriate cooling fans which
have the function of cooling the windings by convection.
[0007] In order to ensure the safety levels required by the CEI EN 60335-1 standard it is
known to provide the motor apparatus with thermal-protection devices. Such devices
comprise, for example, normally closed electric switches which are mounted in series
to the windings of the motor and adapted to be thermally coupled to the motor itself.
During operation of the motor, when a predetermined temperature caused by the aforesaid
anomalies is reached in the motor windings, such switches open preventing direct current
from flowing in the windings of motor itself.
[0008] The use of such thermal-protection devices has some drawbacks. Indeed, the addition
of one or more of such thermal-protections to the motor apparatus is a complex activity,
in particular with reference to the creation of a thermal contact between the two
parts, and is costly to the extent of affecting the total cost of the motor apparatus.
[0009] In motors which are digitally controlled, for example, by means of microprocessor,
it is known to use a detection device of the current flowing in the windings operatively
associated with a digital Analog-to-Digital Converter, or ADC, instead of the thermal-protection
devices. Indeed, since the overheating of the motor in overload and blocked rotor
conditions is due, as mentioned above, to an anomalous increase of the current on
the motor windings, detecting such a current and quantifying it by the microprocessor
may provide indications on the operation anomalies of the motor.
[0010] This method also has some drawbacks. Indeed, detecting such a current often requires
the use of complex electronic devices (e.g. an ADC shunt resistor on the microprocessor),
the cost of which significantly affects the total cost of the motor apparatus. Furthermore,
the detected current signal is an analog type signal, the value of which may be altered
by electromagnetic interference produced by the motor itself.
[0011] It is the object of the present invention to devise and provide a method for controlling
an electric motor, in particular a single-phase permanent magnet (brushless) motor,
which allows to disable the generation of the movement power signal supplied to the
motor following the detection of operation anomalies in the motor itself, stopping
it in safe manner and having features which allow to overcome, at least partially,
the limits and drawbacks of the known control methods..
[0012] Such an object is reached by means of a method for controlling a permanent magnet
electric motor according to claim 1. Alternative embodiments of the aforesaid method
are defined in the dependent claims.
Brief description of the drawings
[0013] Further features and advantages of the control method of the invention will result
from the following description of a preferred embodiment given by way of non-limiting
example, with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:
- figure 1 shows a block chart of an electronic control apparatus of an electric motor according
to a first operative example of the control;
- figure 2 shows a block chart of an electronic control apparatus of an electric motor according
to a second operative example of the control;
- figure 3 shows a block chart of an electronic control apparatus of an electric motor according
to a third operative example of the control;
- figure 4 shows a functional block chart of a protection block included in the electronic control
apparatus in figures 1-3;
- figure 5 shows examples of signal patterns managed by the protection block in figure 4, as
a function of the duty-cycle;
- figure 6 shows examples of signal duty-cycle patterns managed by the protection block in figure
4, as a function of duty-cycle of a reference signal.
Detailed description
[0014] Similar or equivalent elements in the aforesaid figures are indicated by means of
the same reference numerals.
[0015] With reference to figures 1-3, a functional block chart of an electronic apparatus
used in the industrial sector to output power for controlling the movement of an electric
motor M according to the invention is indicated by reference numerals 100, 200, 300
as a whole. Hereinafter, such an electronic control apparatus 100, 200, 300 will be
simply indicated as control apparatus.
[0016] It is worth noting that the aforementioned electric motor M is preferably a single-phase
permanent magnet electric motor or brushless motor, which can be used, for example,
for moving a fan heater V in a gas boiler or the like. In general, such a brushless
motor M comprises a moveable rotor, consisting of a permanent magnet, and a stator
provided with conductor windings supplied by alternating current AC voltages.
[0017] With reference to the examples in figures 1-3, the control apparatus 100, 200, 300
comprises a voltage generation stage 10 configured to generate a reference signal,
in particular a PWM (Pulse Width Modulation) digital voltage signal, indicated by
S
PWM as a whole. Such a reference signal S
PWM is adapted to start the movement of the motor and is preferably a signal with fixed
frequency, e.g. 1kHz, and variable duty-cycle. Hereinafter, a signal representing
the duty-cycle values associated with the reference signal S
PWM will be indicated by reference d.
[0018] The control apparatus 100, 200, 300 further comprises a power stage 20 (power drive).
Such a power stage 20 comprises, for example, a bridge circuit structure (not shown),
in particular single-phase, including electronic power transistors, e.g. IGBT Insulated
Gate Bipolar Transistors, of type known to a person skilled in the art. Such a power
stage 20 is configured to generate a power signal SC, e.g. an alternating current
voltage, to be supplied to the electric motor M to ensure the desired speed (or torque)
to the motor M itself, i.e. to move it.
[0019] Furthermore, the control apparatus 100, 200, 300 comprises an electronic control
and protection stage of the motor M against operation anomalies, indicated as a whole
by reference numeral 30 and enclosed by the dashed line in figures 1-3. In particular,
such a control and protection stage 30 is interposed between the voltage generation
stage 10 and the power stage 20 to receive the aforementioned reference signal S
PWM.
[0020] In particular, it is worth noting that such an electronic control and protection
stage 30 is indicative of a control unit of the operation of the motor M. In one embodiment,
such a control unit 30 is implemented by a microcontroller provided with a respective
program (firmware) integrated directly in such an electronic component. In another
embodiment, some components of the control unit 30 may be realized by means of dedicated
hardware blocks. It will be assumed that the control unit 30 is implemented by a microcontroller
hereinafter in the description.
[0021] Furthermore, the control apparatus 100, 200, 300 comprises a sensor unit SEN associated
with the motor M adapted to detect the rotation speed of the rotor of the motor M.
[0022] In an exemplary embodiment, such a sensor unit SEN is a Hall sensor. As known, a
Hall sensor is configured to detect flux variations of a magnetic field, by discriminating
the presence of a "NORTH" magnetic field and of a "SOUTH" magnetic field or the transition
from a "NORTH" magnetic field to a "SOUTH" magnetic field and vice versa.
[0023] In the example of the invention, the Hall sensor SEN is associated with the stator
of the motor M, e.g. is mounted in position integral with the stator, to detect the
rotation speed of the rotor by outputting a signal S
A which is representative of such a speed. In particular, the rotation speed of the
rotor is as a function of the frequency of the signal S
A supplied to the output of the sensor SEN.
[0024] Such a digital signal S
A is, for example, a square wave signal adapted to assume a high value following a
transition from the "NORTH" magnetic field to the "SOUTH" magnetic field and a low
value following a transition from the "SOUTH" magnetic field to the "NORTH" one.
[0025] It is worth noting that the digital signal S
A supplied by the sensor SEN is advantageously much more robust and immune from interference
than a signal associated with the current reading in the motor M.
[0026] In particular, the electronic control and protection stage 30 of the apparatus 100,
200, 300 comprises a first block 40 configured to receive the signal S
A from the Hall sensor SEN to generate a first signal S2, in particular of digital
type, sequence of high/low signals, indicative of the angular rotation speed of the
motor M. It is worth noting that the first block 40 is configured to digitalize the
signal S
A generated by the Hall sensor SEN, cleaning it from noise effects, and to make the
first signal S2 assume the voltage levels of the microcontroller.
[0027] In an alternative embodiment, the sensor unit SEN may be implemented by appropriate
evaluation algorithms included in a software program which equips the microprocessor
adapted to reconstruct the position of the rotor with respect to the stator using
"state observers" to generate the aforesaid digital signal S2. As known to a person
skilled in art, "state observers" are numerical modules or dynamic systems processed
to estimate the evolution of the state of a system to be observed. In the specific
case of the present invention, the state observer would be a numerical model of the
motor capable of making appreciable the magnetic field of the rotor with respect to
the stator if using a magnetic field sensor is not possible.
[0028] With reference to figures 1-3, the control and protection stage 30 further comprises
a functional protection block 500 of the motor M against operation anomalies, or protection
block in short.
[0029] Such a protection block 500 is configured to receive at a first input 1 the signal
representative of the duty-cycle values d of the reference signal S
PWM, hereinafter indicated as second signal d, generated by a second functional block
70 of the electronic control and protection stage 30.
[0030] Furthermore, the protection block 500 is configured to receive, at a second input
2, the aforementioned first digital signal S2 indicative of the speed of the motor.
[0031] A third input 3 of the protection block 500 is configured to receive a fifth signal
S1, in particular an activating and control signal of the power stage 20, e.g. a digital
signal, to generate the aforementioned power signal SC.
[0032] It is worth noting that in the electronic apparatuses 100, 200, 300, the reference
signal S
PWM is indicative of the power supplied to the motor M and the first signal S2 contains
the information regarding the supply method of the branches of the single-phase bridge
circuit structure of the power stage 20.
[0033] With reference to the electronic apparatus 100 in figure 1, the fifth signal S1 is
analogous to the reference signal S
PWM.
[0034] With reference to the electronic apparatus 200 in figure 2, the fifth signal S1 is
generated starting from a nominal current error E on the motor M.
[0035] With reference to the example of electronic apparatus 300 in figure 3, the fifth
signal S1 is generated starting from a speed error E' of the rotor from a nominal
reference value. In other words, such a fifth signal S1 is representative of a deviation
of the angular speed of the rotor from a nominal reference value.
[0036] The protection block 500 of the motor M is configured to generate a third C1 or a
fourth C2 signal following the detection of a first or a second anomalous operation
condition of the motor, respectively. For example, the first anomaly condition is
representative of a malfunction condition of the motor M caused by the blocked rotor.
The second anomaly condition represents a malfunction condition for overload of the
motor.
[0037] Advantageously, the protection block 500 is configured to send the aforementioned
third C1 or fourth C2 signal to the power stage 20 to disable the generation of the
power signal SC provided to the motor M by such a power stage 20 and stop the motor
M as a consequence.
[0038] It is worth noting that the electronic control apparatus 100 in figure 1 implements,
by way of example, a logic control diagram of the motor having variable duty-cycle
in an open loop. The electronic apparatus 200 in figure 2 implements, by way of example,
a logic control diagram of the motor with current adjustment in a closed loop. The
electronic apparatus 300 of figure 3 implements, by way of example, a speed adjustment
control logic diagram in a closed loop.
[0039] With reference to the example of control apparatus 100 in figure 1, the electronic
control and protection stage 30 comprises a functional control block 60 adapted to
receive the reference signal S
PWM at a respective first input 4 and the first digital signal S2, at a respective second
input 5, generated by the first block 40 to generate the aforesaid fifth digital signal
S1 on a respective output 6.
[0040] With reference to the example of control apparatus 200 in figure 2, the electronic
control and protection stage 30 comprises the functional control block 60 adapted
to receive the current error signal E at the respective first input 4 and the first
digital signal S2 generated by the first block 40 at the respective second input 5.
The fifth digital signal S1 is provided on the respective output 6.
[0041] In greater detail, the current error signal E is obtained at the output of a subtractor
block 50' starting from the reference signal S
PWM, filtered by a filtering block 50, e.g. a low pass filter (LPF), and from a further
signal S3 generated by a current sensor block 700 and indicative of the current flowing
in the windings of the motor M.
[0042] In an embodiment, the current sensor 700 comprises a shunt resistor and possibly
also an operational amplifier, which receives in input a current, and the aforementioned
further signal S3 is a voltage signal comprising voltage levels proportional to the
current which crosses the windings of the electric motor M and ranging, for example,
between 0V and 5V.
[0043] With reference to the example of control apparatus 300 in figure 3, the electronic
control and protection stage 30 comprises the functional control block 60 adapted
to receive the speed error signal E' at the respective first input 4 and the first
digital signal S2 generated by the first block 40 at the respective second input 5.
The fifth digital signal S1 is provided on the respective output 6.
[0044] In greater detail, such a speed error signal E' is obtained by means of the subtractor
block 50' starting from the reference signal S
PWM, filtered by a filtering block 50, and from a further first signal S2', in particular
digital, indicative of the current speed of the motor. In particular, such a further
first signal S2' is obtained by means of a third block 80 starting from the first
digital signal S2 representative of the speed of the motor M. It is worth noting that
the operation performed by the third block 80 on the first digital signal S2 is such
to provide such a further first signal S2', which is comparable to the first signal
in terms of physical quantity and scale.
[0045] In the case of the control apparatuses 200 and 300 in figures 2 and 3, an increase
of the module of fifth signal S1 corresponds to an increase of the module of error
signal E, E' to ensure an increase of the current, and thus of the power, supplied
to the motor M by means of the power signal SC. Conversely, a decrease of the module
of the fifth signal S1 corresponds to a decrease of the module of error signal E,
E' to reduce the current supplied to the motor M.
[0046] The method for controlling the electric motor M of the present invention will be
described in greater detail with reference to figure 4, which illustrates a functional
block chart of a protection block 500 included in each electronic control apparatus
100, 200, 300 in figures 1-3.
[0047] As the first digital signal S2 indicative of the rotation speed of the motor M is
a periodical signal, the step of generating the third C1 or the fourth C2 signal of
the method of the invention comprises a common step of calculating 502 a period PER
H of the first signal S2 obtained starting from the Hall sensor SEN. By way of example,
being the first digital signal S2 representative of a square wave, such a period PER
H represents the time elapsing between two consecutive up-edges of such a first signal
S2.
[0048] Furthermore, the step of generating the third signal C1 comprises a step 501 of detecting,
by the protection block 500, that the aforesaid period PER
H of the first signal S2 is higher than a maximum predetermined constant value PER
H_max, i.e. that the following expression applies:

[0049] In such a manner, the protection block 500 detects the blocked rotor condition, i.e.
the rotor fixed in a given position, which corresponds to the condition in which the
Hall sensor SEN provides a first digital signal S2 always fixed to either the high
value or the low value.
[0050] When the condition (1) occurs, the generation of the third signal C1 disables the
generation of the power signal SC provided to the motor M by the power stage 20 and
consequently stops the motor M.
[0051] It is worth noting that the protection expressed by the condition (1) applies to
all control modes of the motor M that are guaranteed by the control apparatuses 100,
200 and 300.
[0052] Furthermore, with reference to the step of generating the fourth signal C2, the control
method of the invention firstly comprises a step 503 of calculating a speed SP
RPM of the motor M starting from the aforementioned period PER
H for the first digital signal S2 based on the equation:

wherein p is a parameter representing the number of polar pairs of the motor M, PER
H is the period of the first signal S2, and the speed SP
RPM of the motor M is expressed in revolutions per minute (rpm).
[0053] In relation to the application, it is possible to define a minimum rotation speed
SP
RPM_min and a maximum rotation speed SP
RPM_max of the motor M, from which it is possible to obtain minimum and maximum values of
the Hall period PER
H:

[0054] In greater detail, such a step of generating the fourth signal C2 comprises the following
steps, indicated as a whole by reference numeral 504.
[0055] A first step of providing a nominal speed characteristic SP
RPM(d) of the motor M starting from a discreet number of values of the second signal
d representative of the duty-cycle associated with the reference signal S
PWM.
[0056] A second step of defining a "limit characteristic" SP
LIMIT(d) of the speed of the motor M such that the equation applies:

wherein ΔSPis representative of a decrease in the allowed maximum speed due to an
abnormal load of the motor, SP
RPM(d) represents the nominal speed characteristic of the motor, SP
LIMIT(d) represents the speed limit characteristic of the motor.
[0057] Figure 5 shows examples of patterns of the nominal speed characteristic SP
RPM(d) of the motor and of the speed limit characteristic SP
LIMIT(d) of the motor as a function of the duty-cycle d (in percentage value).
[0058] It is worth noting that in the entire operating range, the limit characteristic SP
LIMIT(d) of the motor speed is such that if the motor M moves at a slower speed than the
limit speed the windings thereof could undergo an excessive heating and reach a higher
temperature that the maximum temperature set by the standard.
[0059] Furthermore, the maximum period PER
H_max of the first digital signal S2 and the limit characteristic SP
LIMIT(d) of the motor speed are characteristic parameters of the electric motor M and/or
of the particular application, are thus known beforehand. Such parameters are an integral
part of the control firmware.
[0060] Indeed, as mentioned above, the maximum period PER
H_max is a constant. Instead, the representation of the limit characteristic parameter
SP
LIMIT(d) of the motor speed is more articulated.
[0061] In a first embodiment, such a limit characteristic parameter SP
LIMIT(d) may be assimilated to a memory buffer including, for example, 100 memory positions
and thus one hundred values. In particular, the buffer is adapted to store the value
of SP
LIMIT(1) in a first position, the value of SP
LIMIT(2) in a second position and so on to the last position, in which the buffer is adapted
to store the value of SP
LIMIT(100). In such a case, the limit characteristic SP
LIMIT(d) of the motor speed is represented by means of such one hundred parameters.
[0062] In another example, the speed limit characteristic of the motor SP
LIMIT(d) is of linear type and can be expressed by the equation:.

wherein:

and

with d
1 and d
100 which represent a first and a second duty-cycle parameter, SP
LIMIT(1) and SP
LIMIT(100), which represent a first and a second speed limit characteristic parameter of
the motor. In this case, there are only four data to be considered as parameters representative
of the motor speed limit characteristic SP
LIMIT(d): d
1, d
100, SP
LIMIT(1) and SP
LIMIT(100).
[0063] In a yet other example, the speed limit characteristic of the motor SP
LIMIT(d) is of linear type in parts and can be expressed by the equation:

wherein the values of the parameters m
1, m
2, m
3 and q
1, q
2, q
3 can be expressed in manner similar to that of equations (7) and (8).
[0064] In a third step of the method the aforesaid fourth signal C2 is generated when the
motor speed SP
RPM calculated with the expression (2) is lower than the motor speed limit characteristic
SP
LIMIT(d), i.e. when the following condition occurs:

[0065] In such a manner, the protection block 500 is adapted to detect the overload condition.
When the condition (10) occurs, the generation of the fourth signal C2 disables the
generation of the power signal SC provided to the motor M by the power stage 20 and
consequently stops the motor M.
[0066] It is worth noting that the protection expressed by the condition (10) applies to
all control modes associated with the control apparatuses 100, 200 and 300 described
above.
[0067] With reference to the control with closed loop speed adjustment only, i.e. with reference
to the apparatus 300 in figure 3, the method provides the following control steps,
indicated by reference numeral 505 as a whole.
[0068] In a first step of the method a maximum duty-cycle value d
motorMAX(d) is fixed for each duty-cycle value of the second signal d associated with the
reference signal S
PWM.
[0069] In a subsequent step a further duty-cycle signal d
motor representative of the duty-cycle associated with the fifth signal S1 is provided.
Such a duty-cycle signal d
motor is representative of a measure of the power transferred to the electric motor M.
[0070] Figure 6 shows by way of example a pattern of the duty-cycle signals (in percentage)
of the fifth digital signal S1 and of a sixth digital signal S1' generated by the
protection block 500 as a function of the reference signal duty-cycle S
PWM (in percentage value).
[0071] In particular, the protection block 500 is configured to generate the sixth signal
S1', substantially coinciding with the fifth signal S1, when such a duty-cycle value
d
motor associated with the fifth signal S1 is lower than the maximum duty-cycle value d
motorMAX(d), i.e. the following condition occurs:

[0072] Alternatively, the protection block 500 is adapted to generate such a sixth signal
S1' substantially coinciding with the maximum duty-cycle value d
motorMAX(d) when such a value of the further duty-cycle signal d
motor associated with the fifth signal S1 is greater than d
motorMAx(d), i.e. the following occurs:

[0073] In the embodiment shown in figure 6, the maximum duty-cycle value d
motorMAX(d) is expressed by means of a linear characteristic by means of the equation:

wherein

and

[0074] The control method of a permanent magnet electric motor M according to the invention
has many advantages.
[0075] Firstly, such a method allows to control the motor to guarantee the safety levels
required by the CEI EN 60335-1 standard without necessarily needing to use thermal-protection
devices, thus ensuring a non-negligible saving in terms of overall cost of the motor
apparatus.
[0076] Furthermore, the method of the invention exclusively based on detecting the speed
by the motor M with Hall sensor SEN avoids, particularly in relation to the apparatuses
100 and 300, the need to detect the current of the motor M. This makes the use of
complex and costly additional electronic devices unnecessary.
[0077] Furthermore, the detection of the motor speed on which the present invention is based
is more reliable because it is immune from electromagnetic interference produced by
the motor itself.
[0078] A person skilled in art may make changes and adaptations to the embodiments of the
aforesaid method for controlling an electric motor or can replace elements with others
which are functionally equivalent to satisfy contingent needs without departing from
the scope of protection of the appended claims. All the features described above as
belonging to one possible embodiment may be implemented independently from the other
described embodiments.
LEGEND OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 6
[0079] "duty-cycle [%] di S1, S2" = duty-cycle [%] of S1, S2 "d[%] duty-cycle di S
PWM" = d[%] duty-cycle of S
PWM
1. A method for controlling a single-phase permanent magnet electric motor (M) movable
through a power signal (SC) generated by an electronic control apparatus (100, 200,
300) of the motor based on a reference signal (S
PWM),
said method comprising the steps of:
- generating, by a sensor unit (SEN, 40) associated with the motor (M), a first signal
(S2) representative of the rotation speed of the motor (M);
- providing a protection block (500) of the motor against operation anomalies, which
is included in said electronic control apparatus (100, 200, 300);
- providing a second signal (d) at a first input (1) of said protection block (500)
of the motor, said second signal (d) being representative of duty-cycle values associated
with said reference signal (SPWM);
- providing said first signal (S2) at a second input (2) of said protection block
(500) of the motor;
- generating, by the protection block (500) of the motor, based on said first signal
(S2) and second signal (d), a third (C1) or a fourth (C2) signal following the detection
of a first or a second operating conditions of anomalous operation of the motor (M),
respectively;
- disabling the generation of the power signal (SC) provided to the motor (M) by said
electronic control apparatus (100, 200, 300) based on said third (C1) or fourth (C2)
signals to stop the motor.
2. The method for controlling an electric motor (M) according to claim 1, wherein said
first signal (S2) indicative of the rotation speed of the motor (M) is a periodic
signal, and said step of generating said third (C1) or said fourth (C2) signals comprises
a step (502) of calculating a period (PERH) of said first signal (S2).
3. The method for controlling an electric motor (M) according to claim 2, wherein said
step of generating said third signal (C1) comprises a step (501) of detecting that
said period (PERH) of the first signal (S2) is larger than a preset constant maximum value (PERH_max).
4. The method for controlling an electric motor (M) according to claim 2, wherein said
step of generating said fourth signal (C2) comprises a step (503) of calculating a
speed (SP
RPM) of the motor (M) starting from said period (PER
H) of the first signal (S2) based on the equation:

wherein p is representative of the number of polar pairs of the motor (M), PER
H is the period of the first signal (S2), said speed (SP
RPM) of the motor (M) being expressed in revolutions per minute.
5. The method for controlling an electric motor (M) according to claim 4, wherein said
step of generating said fourth signal (C2) comprises the steps (504) of:
- providing a nominal speed characteristic (SPRPM(d)) of the motor (M) starting from a discrete number of values of said second signal
(d) associated with said reference signal (SPWM);
- defining a speed limit characteristic (SPLIMIT(d)) of the motor (M) such that:

wherein ΔSP is representative of a decrease in the allowed maximum speed due to an
abnormal load of the motor, SPRPM(d) represents the nominal speed characteristic of the motor, SPLIMIT(d) represents the speed limit characteristic of the motor;
- generating said fourth signal (C2) following the detection that said speed of the
motor (SPRPM) is less than said speed limit characteristic of the motor (SPLIMIT(d)).
6. The method for controlling an electric motor (M) according to claim 1, further comprising
the step of providing a fifth signal (S1) to a third input (3) of said protection
block (500) of the motor for actuating said power signal (SC), and the further steps
(505) of:
- setting a maximum duty-cycle signal value (dmotorMAX(d)) per each value of said second duty-cycle signal (d) associated with the reference
signal (SPWM);
- providing a further duty-cycle signal (dmotor) representative of the duty-cycle value associated with said fifth signal (S1).
7. The method for controlling an electric motor (M) according to claim 6, further comprising
the step of generating a sixth signal (S1') substantially coincident with said fifth
signal (S1) when said duty-cycle value (dmotor) associated with said fifth signal (S1) is less than said maximum duty-cycle value
(dmotorMAX(d)).
8. The method for controlling an electric motor (M) according to claim 6, further comprising
the step of generating a sixth signal (S1') substantially coincident with said maximum
duty-cycle signal value (dmotorMAX(d)) when said duty-cycle value (dmotor) associated with said fifth signal (S1) is larger than or equal to said maximum duty-cycle
value (dmotorMAX(d)).
9. The method for controlling an electric motor (M) according to any of the preceding
claims, wherein said sensor unit (SEN) comprises a Hall effect sensor.
10. The method for controlling an electric motor (M) according to claim 5, wherein the
speed limit characteristic of the motor (SPLIMIT(d)) is a characteristic of the linear type.
11. The method for controlling an electric motor (M) according to claim 5, wherein the
speed limit characteristic of the motor (SPLIMIT(d)) is a characteristic of the piecewise linear type.
12. The method for controlling an electric motor (M) according to claim 1, wherein said
first and second operating conditions of anomalous operation of the motor (M) are
a condition of locked rotor and a motor overload condition, respectively.