Technical field
[0001] The present invention relates to items of footwear with improved comfort to the wearer,
such as reduction of uptake of liquid into the fabric material of which the footwear
is made, leading to reduction of weight gain during use and quick drying effect, and
such as keeping the wearer's feet dry. Quick drying effect has clear benefits for
running and water sports. When used in colder or wet environments, such as hiking,
skiing, mountain climbing and the like, a dry fabric material will also prevent the
feet from cooling down and becoming damp. The present invention also relates to innovative
methods to produce such an item of footwear.
Background of the invention
[0002] The footwear industry is a large industry. Footwear for many applications is produced
and sold on a world wide scale. For each application, the construction and design
of the footwear may be different. Also the materials used to manufacture the item
of footwear may be different.
[0003] For example, sports shoes need to be light and breathable and have quick drying properties
for optimal sweat and moisture regulation, and are often made of synthetic materials
and porous structures. Upon use of the sports footwear, weight gain due to water take
up is highly unwanted. Also breathability is needed to avoid damp and wet feet, since
this increases friction of the skin with the sock and shoe, leading to pain and blisters
at the friction points of the foot.
[0004] Sports shoes for water sports need to have a quick drying effect after use and reduced
weight gain during use for optimal comfort for the wearer since the feet stay dry
and the footwear doesn't become heavy due to saturation with water. Reduced weight
gain in terms of reduced absorption of water, and quick drying effect are especially
beneficial in water sports at sea, since the salty water tends to leave stains on
the items of footwear upon drying. When less or no water is absorbed, drying stains
will not occur.
[0005] Footwear for personal protective equipment need to be liquid repellent and resistant
to avoid penetration of hazardous liquids, and have often reinforcements to protect
the feet against injuries.
[0006] Footwear for hiking, skiing and mountain climbing need to be as waterproof as possible
to reduce the water ingress into the fabric material of which the footwear is made,
since humid footwear may lead to wet or damp feet, and in cold conditions cold feet
as well.
[0007] Fashion footwear is all about design and wearer comfort. This type of footwear may
be made of a wide range of materials. Wearer comfort is evaluated by end customers
in function of support when worn, breathability, dry and warm but yet not damp or
wet feet, light weight, and protection against stains. For example, when walking in
snow, rain or on the beach, absorbed water may leave stains after drying.
[0008] Several documents describe a way to keep the feet dry from moisture, rain and humidity
in the atmosphere. Other documents describe ways to reduce the weight gain of footwear
during use, for example running, hiking and the like.
[0009] EP0263665 describes a waterproof, water-vapour permeable fabric construction, where a porous
PTFE membrane, which is waterproof and water vapour permeable, is laminated to a non-waterproof
fabric construction, made of polyester (PES), polyamide (PA, nylon) or the like. The
structure may be used for hats and shoes. When used in shoes, the non-waterproof fabric
construction is the outer structure and the membrane is on the inside and invisible
to the end user. Footwear comprising this structure, will keep the feet dry. But on
the other hand, the outer fabric is non-waterproof, and may take up liquids, water,
rain and the like, and gain weight. Further, when this outer fabric is humid, it may
cause cooling down of the feet during use, especially in colder environments.
[0010] JPH0670804 (A) describes the use of a waterproof, water vapour permeable bag-like
or sock-like structure that is placed inside the item of footwear to protect the feet
from getting wet. The bag-like structure is a laminate of a polyurethane resin film
or membrane and a protective fabric. The bag-like structure has a fixed position within
the item of footwear. JPH0759604 (A) describe a similar bag-like structure, but which
may be removed from the footwear for washing, drying, etc. The outer fabric may be
non-waterproof, and may take up liquids and humidity, and gain weight. Further, liquids
that penetrated the outer structure may accumulate in the space between the bag-like
structure and the outer fabric, which may cause cooling down of the feet during use,
especially in colder environments. Breathability of such membranes is limited in order
to guarantee sufficient waterproofness. Limited breathability will reduce the release
of heat and humidity from the feet to the outside.
[0011] US6065227 describes an item of footwear that comprises a waterproof membrane lining on the
inside of the upper portion of the footwear. Lower portion, upper portion and inner
lining are joined together by seams, which penetrate the waterproof lining. The seams
are sealed with a waterproof tape. Footwear according to
US6065227 will keep the feet dry. On the other hand, the outer material may take up liquids,
water, etc. and may gain weight. Further, when this outer material is humid, it may
cause cooling down of the feet during use, especially in colder environments and especially
with leather as outer material, since wet leather has a cold touch. The combination
of membrane lining and seams will limit the breathability of the footwear, which will
reduce the release of heat and humidity from the feet to the outside.
[0012] WO2007/007369 describes footwear which comprises a waterproof membrane lining that is positioned
at the inside of the item of footwear, and is glued to the outer fabric of the footwear.
The manufacture process is rather complex, and a suitable adhesive that is waterproof
is needed. Footwear comprising this structure, will keep the feet dry. But on the
other hand, the outer fabric is non-waterproof, and may take up liquids, water, rain
and the like, and gain weight. Further, when this outer fabric is humid, it may cause
cooling down of the feet during use, especially in colder environments and especially
when the outer material is leather, for wet leather has a cold touch. The combination
of membrane lining and seams will limit the breathability of the footwear, which will
reduce the release of heat and humidity from the feet to the outside.
[0013] WO2007083124 describes a method to deposit a coating onto the surface of a piece of fashion clothing,
clothing accessory (e.g. a shoe), and the like, by low pressure plasma polymerization.
The technical problem solved here is protection against contamination from liquids,
and odour resistance and colour fastness. The coating is deposited at the surface
of the material to reduce the ingress of liquids in most normal circumstances. The
document is silent on keeping the feet dry, and prevent them from cooling down.
[0014] WO2009056809 describes a method to reduce the water penetration over time during use. A protective
coating is deposited on the surface of the footwear or constructed upper by means
of low pressure plasma polymerization. The coating is said to be durable and waterproof,
as to reduce the penetration of water over time during use, while breathability of
the footwear is maintained. Although the water penetration is reduced, the document
is silent on keeping the feet dry, and prevent them from cooling down.
[0015] WO2009010741 describes a method to provide an item of footwear with a liquid repellent coating
by means of low pressure plasma polymerization. The coating is deposited on the complete
item including fasteners, laces, zips, etc., in order to reduce the uptake of liquid
during use, hereby reducing the weight gain of the footwear during use. The document
is silent on breathability of the coated item of footwear, and on keeping the feet
dry and on preventing cooling down of the feet.
[0016] WO2009010738 describes a method to produce an item of footwear with a liquid repellent coating
and a liquid absorbing foot supporting footbed. A liquid repellent coating is deposited
on at least part of the surface of the item of footwear by means of low pressure plasma
deposition. A liquid absorbing footbed or insole is placed inside the footwear after
coating deposition to absorb the sweat which is then removed through outer fabric
of the footwear. The document suggests that a hydrophilic inside and a hydrophobic
outside is recommended for optimal wearer comfort. The technical problem solved here
is how the feet can be kept dry from the inside out. However, the document is silent
on reduction of weight gain, on keeping the feet dry from liquids from the outside,
and on preventing them from cooling down due to humid outer fabric. More in particular,
the method disclosed in this document does not prevent the fabric of the footwear
itself to take up sweat from the wearer's foot, i.e. sweat from the foot can be absorbed
by the fabric of the upper of the footwear item from the inside as the method of
WO2009010738 does not seem to guarantee an essentially water- and/or oil-repellent coating on
the inner surface of the item of footwear up until the tip of the item. Sweat is also
absorbed by the liquid absorbing footbed or insole. The method of
WO2009010738 also does not lead to coating of internal surfaces.
[0017] This uptake of sweat has a number of disadvantages, including the following:
- The foot can be in contact with the wet fabric and wet insole during use. As the moisture
is absorbed throughout the fabric, it is in close proximity to the outer surface and
can cool down rapidly, giving rise to a wet and cold feeling for the wearer, which
remains present for a long time due to the high thermal capacity of sweat. As a further
result, excess sweat cannot be evaporated but is cooled down and remains as a cold
liquid layer on the foot of the wearer.
- The sweat vapour that penetrates the fabric from the inside towards the outside, may
condensate and getting absorbed by the internal surfaces of the fabric. As the exterior
of the fabric is coated, this coating will prevent the condensated sweat vapour from
leaving the item of footwear. Consequently, the fabric may cool down rapidly, giving
rise to a wet and cold feeling for the wearer.
- Undesired odours remain longer present in the item of footwear, as the sweat in the
fabric and especially in the insole is not easily vaporised;
- The increase of weight by moisture is merely slowed down, but remains: whether the
footwear gains weight from the uptake of water from the outside or from sweat uptake
from the inside, the upper's fabric anyhow gets saturated with liquid at the internal
surfaces, which can evaporate only very slowly.
[0018] Furthermore, a coating applied to an outer surface of the item of footwear is more
prone to wear and tear.
[0019] Although the above prior art documents offer a solution to a single problem - namely
or keeping the feet dry from liquids, water and moisture in the atmosphere, or reducing
the weight gain of the shoe from the outside - all prior art documents fail to solve
multiple technical problems in one solution. However, the end customer is looking
for footwear which, during use, do not gain weight, keep the feet dry, and have an
outer fabric which stays dry to prevent cooling down of the feet.
[0020] The present application improves on the foregoing prior art documents by providing
a method which, surprisingly, solves these technical problems all together in a single
method. This is not obvious over the prior art, since the prior art solutions for
keeping the feet dry are limiting the breathability of the item of footwear, and the
prior art solution for reduction of the weight gain do not offer a solution for keeping
the feet dry since only the outer surface of the upper material of the item of footwear
receives the coating. Combination of these two prior art solutions would lead to an
item of footwear with limited breathability, which would not offer a solution for
sweat generated on the inside. Further, since only the outer surface of the upper
material of the item of footwear would be coated, water ingress is not maximally reduced,
since the inside of the upper material is not protected against liquids.
[0021] The technical problems solved with the method according to the present invention
are:
- Keeping the feet dry from outer liquids, such as rain and snow and the like;
- Maintaining the breathability of the item of footwear, and keeping the feet dry from
sweat generated inside upon use;
- Reduction of weight gain of the upper material due to uptake of liquid throughout
the thickness of upper material of the footwear during use with resulting quick dry
effect;
- Preventing the feet from cooling down;
- Ensuring that evaporated sweat does not condense on internal surfaces of the item
of footwear, e.g. internal surfaces of a fabric, mesh or foam of the item of footwear,
thereby preventing absorption of liquid sweat by the item of footwear and thus reducing
weight gain.
Summary of the invention
[0022] The present application solves the abovementioned technical problems by providing
a method to selectively coat the footwear from the outside to the inside wherein the
coating is deposited not only on the surface of the outer material - fabric, mesh,
open foam, but also velour, leather and the like - but penetrates the structure of
the outer material completely so that the coating is deposited on the internal surfaces
of the material - e.g. the fabric material which is below the decorations and reinforcing
plastic structures - and on the inside of the footwear as well. As a result, the coating
obtained with methods of the present invention lasts longer than coatings obtained
with prior art techniques.
Brief description of the figures
[0023]
Figure 1 shows the front view of an example of a low pressure plasma equipment according
to the present invention. This low pressure plasma system has a volume of 1836 litres
and is designed to contain up to 40-60 pairs of footwear.
Figure 2 illustrates the water contact angle in function of number of rubbing cycles.
Figure 3 illustrates a weight comparison after submersion test.
Figure 4 illustrates the drying time of foam structure after submersion.
Figure 5 illustrates the drying time of faux fur (A4-sheet)
Figure 6 shows water vapour permeability results
Figure 7 shows air permeability results.
Figure 8 shows, from left to right: untreated, plasma coated, conventionally coated.
Detailed description of the invention
[0024] As used herein, the following terms have the following meanings:
"A", "an", and "the" as used herein refers to both singular and plural referents unless
the context clearly dictates otherwise. By way of example, "a compartment" refers
to one or more than one compartment.
"About" as used herein referring to a measurable value such as a parameter, an amount,
a temporal duration, and the like, is meant to encompass variations of +/-20% or less,
preferably +/-10% or less, more preferably +/-5% or less, even more preferably +/-1%
or less, and still more preferably +/-0.1% or less of and from the specified value,
in so far such variations are appropriate to perform in the disclosed invention. However,
it is to be understood that the value to which the modifier "about" refers is itself
also specifically disclosed.
"Comprise," "comprising," and "comprises" and "comprised of" as used herein are synonymous
with "include", "including", "includes" or "contain", "containing", "contains" and
are inclusive or open-ended terms that specifies the presence of what follows e.g.
component and do not exclude or preclude the presence of additional, non-recited components,
features, elements, members or steps, known in the art or disclosed therein.
[0025] The recitation of numerical ranges by endpoints includes all numbers and fractions
subsumed within that range, as well as the recited endpoints.
[0026] The expression "% by weight" (weight percent), here and throughout the description
unless otherwise defined, refers to the relative weight of the respective component
based on the overall weight of the formulation.
[0027] "Footwear" or "item of footwear", such as a "shoe", as used herein describe a product
which is to be worn at the feet. An item of footwear may comprise parts which are
readily identified, such as a sole, an outsole, an insole, an upper, a fastener such
as a loop-and-hook type fastener like Velcro® or a lace, decorations, stitches, reinforcements,
etc. The parts are assembled in an item of footwear by different methods, including
methods for permanent or semi-permanent assembly such as overmouling, gluing and stitching,
or methods for releasable assembly, e.g. "lacing". In the context of the present invention,
an item of footwear may refer to the complete item of footwear - including fasteners,
laces, outsole, insole, decorations, stiches, reinforcements, and the like - or, in
case one or more areas are excluded from coating to parts or a subassembly of the
complete item where this is clearly mentioned. In preferred embodiments of the present
invention, the item of footwear comprises a component which is at least partly breathable,
i.e. permeable to at least water vapour and/or evaporated sweat and preferably also
to air, such as a fabric, mesh and/or foam, and/or the item of footwear comprises
a component which is capable of absorbing liquid, in particular water or sweat, and/or
which is permeable to liquid, in particular water or sweat. Non-limiting examples
of such items of footwear are: sports shoes, sports shoes for water sports such as
wet-suit footwear or wet suits comprising footwear, footwear for personal protective
equipment, footwear for hiking, footwear for skiing and mountain climbing, fashion
footwear, shoes, boots, sandals, closed shoes, open shoes, etc.
[0028] The term "inner surface", as used herein, refers to the surface of the item of footwear
on the inside, which is, can be or is intended to be in contact with a wearer's foot.
The term "outer surface", as used herein, refers to the surface of the item of footwear
which is in direct contact with the outer environment. The term "internal surface"
refers to surfaces which are not directly exposed to the wearer's foot or the outer
environment. Examples of internal surfaces are surfaces in between fabric of the upper
and decorations or reinforcements attached to the inner or outer surface of the upper,
surfaces present within the fabric such as side surfaces of pores of the fabric or
surfaces defined by open cells within the upper or sole, e.g. open cells of foam material
which is processed in the construction of the item of footwear, for example to be
used for the tongue of the item of footwear.
[0029] The terms "outgassing" and "degassing", as used herein, are used interchangeably
and refer to a process of removing gasses and liquids, more in particular within the
context of this document, removing contaminants, gasses and liquids from items of
footwear or parts thereof, in order to ensure a good adhesion between coating and
at least part and preferably all, of the internal surface of the item. The present
invention solves the abovementioned technical problems by providing a method to selectively
coat the footwear with a water- and/or oil-repellent coating from the outside to the
inside wherein the coating is deposited not only on the surface of the outer material
- fabric, mesh, open foam, but also velour, leather and the like - but penetrates
the structure of the outer material so that the coating is deposited on the internal
surfaces of the material and on the inside of the footwear as well. The water- and/or
oil repellent coating is deposited by means of low pressure plasma polymerization.
[0030] Contrary to prior art which seem to guide towards a hydrophilic inside of the footwear
for moisture regulation, e.g. by using a hydrophilic liquid absorbing insole, the
present invention ensures sufficient breathability of the coated footwear material
to exclude the need for a hydrophilic inside.
[0031] The advantage of selectively coating certain areas is that this allows to protect
the footwear in an optimal way. The applicant discovered surprisingly that in some
cases it is not needed, and sometimes even disadvantageous, to coat certain areas
or components of the footwear.
[0032] The applicants have discovered that with a method according to the present invention
it is possible to deposit a water and/or oil repellent coating throughout the complete
upper material of the footwear, from the outside to the internal surfaces. The applicants
have discovered surprisingly that this allows to deposit a coating on the upper material
which is covered with decorative and/or functional plastic tapes and parts, for example
for reinforcement of the ankles and the heel of the wearer, or for the logo or brand
name of the footwear seller. This is an unexpected result of the present invention
and method, since the decorative and/or functional plastic tapes cover some surface
of the outer surface of the upper material of which the item of footwear is made so
that this covered surface is not directly exposed to the plasma.
[0033] Consequently, the advantage of the method according to the present invention is that
not only the surface of the upper fabric which is directly exposed to the plasma is
coated, but that also the upper material which is shielded from direct exposure to
the plasma will be coated. This is a clear improvement over the prior art, and contributes
highly to a reduction of the water ingress and thus weight gain over time during use
and quick drying effect, since in case the coating on the outer surface would get
damaged, the internal and inner surfaces are still coated and preventing the uptake
of liquids through capillary effects. Further, coated internal and inner surfaces
also exclude the use of the prior art liquid repellent membranes, so that by the method
of the present invention the breathability of the item of footwear is maintained as
well.
[0034] It is a first aspect of the present invention to provide a method to obtain a water
and/or oil repellent coating on footwear to keep the feet dry while at the same time
reducing the weight gain of the material of which the item of footwear is made, reducing
the drying time (so-called "quick dry effect"), and maintaining the breathability
of the material, whereby the coating is selectively deposited by means of low pressure
plasma polymerization.
[0035] It is a second aspect of the present invention to provide a method to obtain a water
and/or oil repellent coating on footwear to keep the feet dry while at the same time
reducing the weight gain of the material of which the item of footwear is made, reducing
the drying time (so-called "quick dry effect"), and maintaining the breathability
of the material, whereby the coating is deposited throughout the material from the
outside of the material to the internal surfaces of the material by means of low pressure
plasma polymerization so that also the upper material of the footwear covered by decorative
and/or functional plastic tapes receives the low pressure plasma coating for improved
protection against the ingress of liquids.
[0036] It is a third aspect of the present invention to provide an item of footwear with
a water and/or oil repellent coating which keeps the feet dry while at the same time
reducing the weight gain of the material of which the item of footwear is made, reducing
the drying time (so-called "quick dry effect"), and maintaining the breathability
of the material, whereby the coating is deposited selectively and throughout the material
from the outside to the internal surfaces of the material by means of low pressure
plasma polymerization so that also the upper material of the footwear covered by decorative
and/or functional plastic tapes receives the low pressure plasma coating for improved
protection against the ingress of liquids.
[0037] It is a fourth aspect of the present invention to provide a water and/or oil repellent
coating which is deposited selectively and throughout the material from the outside
to the internal surfaces of the material by means of low pressure plasma polymerization
so that also the upper material of the footwear covered by decorative and/or functional
plastic tapes receives the low pressure plasma coating for improved protection against
the ingress of liquids, whereby the coating reduces the weight gain of the material
of which the item of footwear is made, reduces the drying time (so-called "quick dry
effect") of the footwear, and maintains the breathability of the material and keeps
the feet dry.
[0038] The applicants have discovered that in order to obtain optimal protection in terms
of keeping the feet dry, reducing the water uptake of the footwear material for reduced
weight gain, reduced drying time, and no cooling down of the feet due to humid material,
it is advantageous that the coating is deposited selectively. Selective coating may
be done by preventing deposition of the coating on one or more areas or components,
or by removing one or more components from the item of footwear prior to coating.
The removed components may receive a coating in a separate process for optimal results,
or may not be coated when there is no benefit or even a negative influence on the
performance when said components are coated.
[0039] The applicants have further developed a method whereby the coating is deposited throughout
the material of which the footwear is made, from the outside towards the inside, instead
of coating the outer surface - like it is done in prior art documents. The applicants
have discovered surprisingly that by coating not only the outer surface of the footwear
material, but the inner surfaces as well, the breathability of the material is not
influenced, while at the same time the weight gain during use and the drying time
after use is further reduced (so-called "quick dry effect") and the footwear material
is protected against becoming wet, which keeps the feet dry and warm - a wet or humid
footwear material may lead to cold feet. Further, the coating method according to
the present invention allows to deposit a coating also on the upper material of the
footwear covered by covering elements, such as decorative and/or functional plastic
tapes, stitches, prints, printing of the brand name, receives the low pressure plasma
coating for improved protection against the ingress of liquids.
[0040] In a first embodiment according to the present invention, the selective coating is
done by coating the items of footwear without laces or other type of fasteners so
that not the entire item of footwear receives the coating in the same processing step.
In manufacturing, this may be done either by performing the coating step on the subassembly
of the item of footwear without fasteners or laces prior to the processing step whereby
the fasteners and laces are placed on the footwear. Alternatively, this may be realized
by removing the fasteners or laces prior to performing the low pressure plasma polymerization
process.
[0041] Preferably, when using laces, the laces are coated in a separate process, e.g. in
a different processing chamber design to contain many laces for a high throughput.
The applicants have discovered surprisingly that the optimal process to coat the laces
and to coat the item of footwear (without laces) may be different, since the materials
used have a different structure. Laces tend to be strong and circular in cross-section.
Further, the applicants have surprisingly discovered that when the laces are coated
separately, the openings in the shoe where the laces are placed into, and the surrounding
material, such as the tongue, may be accessed more easily by the plasma and will thus
be coated in a better, more uniform way.
[0042] Whether fasteners other than laces are coated in a separate process or not, depend
on the type of fasteners.
[0043] The applicants have surprisingly discovered that for fasteners of the hook-and-loop
type, there is no advantage in applying a coating. When fasteners of the hook-and-loop
type are exposed to the plasma and have a liquid repellent coating, the sticking effect
of the fasteners is reduced, which leads to items of footwear which are more difficult
to be closed and are less comfortable to wear.
[0044] Preferably, a selective coating method according to the present invention may prevent
deposition of a water- and/or oil repellent nanocoating on fasteners of the hook-and-loop
type by deposition of the coating on the subassembly of the item of footwear, before
the hook-and-loop fasteners are stitched onto the upper material of the footwear.
[0045] Alternatively, a selective coating method according to the present invention may
prevent deposition of a water- and/or oil repellent nanocoating on fasteners of the
hook-and-loop type by deposition of the coating on the item of footwear whereby the
hook-and-loop fasteners are shielded from the plasma.
[0046] Preferably, the shielding of the hook-and-loop fasteners is done with a non-textile
material that allows perfect shielding from exposure to the plasma. Preferably, a
flexible plastic tape, or another type of adhesive tape, or paper may be used to prevent
the fasteners from receiving a water and/or oil repellent nanocoating.
[0047] In a second embodiment of the present invention, the selective coating is done by
coating the items of footwear whereby the outsole of the item of footwear is shielded
to prevent it from receiving the coating.
[0048] Preferably, this may be done in the manufacturing process by coating the upper textile
material of the item of footwear before the outsole is connected or moulded to the
upper textile material.
[0049] Alternatively, this may be done by covering the outsole of the footwear prior to
coating polymerization, for example by putting the shoe in a specially designed tray
to contain the shoes in the plasma chamber, whereby the tray is designed as to prevent
exposure of the outsole to the plasma. Alternatively, this may be done by placing
a shielding material, e.g. a tape or plastic structure, onto the outsole to prevent
exposure to the plasma.
[0050] The applicants have surprisingly discovered that it is advantageous not to coat the
outsole of an item of footwear, since the coatings used in the present invention tend
to be low friction coatings. In case the outsole of the item of footwear would be
coated, the low friction coating may lead to slippery shoes, which may be dangerous
in some situations, e.g. on smooth floors.
[0051] In a third embodiment according to the present invention, the coating is deposited
throughout the material of which the upper of the footwear is made, from the outside
to the inside, so that the coating is present not only at the outer surface of the
material, but also at the internal surfaces and the inside of the item of footwear.
[0052] The applicants have surprisingly discovered that in this way a nanocoating is deposited
also on the upper material of the footwear which is covered by the decorative and/or
functional plastic tape, e.g. at areas where reinforcement is needed for improved
wearer comfort, such as the ankles.
[0053] Preferably, the upper fabric or material of which the item of footwear is made, has
a nanocoating not only at the outer surface of said fabric or material, but also throughout
the complete upper material.
[0054] Consequently, this contributes highly to a reduction of the water ingress, thus weight
gain over time during use and drying time of the footwear after use (so-called "quick
dry effect"), since in case the coating on the outer surface would get damaged, the
internal and inner surfaces are still coated and preventing the uptake of liquids
through capillary effects. Further, coated internal and inner surfaces also exclude
the use of the prior art liquid repellent membranes, so that by the method of the
present invention the breathability of the item of footwear is maintained as well.
Consequently, this keeps the feet dry as well, and since the material of the footwear
won't become humid or wet, this will not lead to cold feet, hence increased wearer
comfort.
[0055] Further, the applicants have surprisingly discovered that coating the material of
which the item of footwear is made, throughout its structure, so that a coating is
deposited into the core, onto the internal surfaces, has no negative impact on the
breathability of the item of footwear, contrary to membranes which keep the feet dry
but have limited breathability.
[0056] The thickness of the nanocoating is in the range of nanometres, typically from 10
to 1000 nm, which is less than the average size of openings in a woven, knitted or
even non-woven fabric, mesh or 3D-foam structure used to produce the item of footwear.
The deposited coating covers the individual fibres and yarns without blocking the
openings in the fabric, mesh or foam.
[0057] The water and/or oil repellent protective nanocoating is deposited selectively and
into the core of the material of which the item of footwear is made, by means of a
low pressure plasma polymerization process.
[0058] The present invention concerns a low-pressure plasma polymerization coating apparatus
for high-load coating of items of footwear. Such a low-pressure plasma polymerization
coating apparatus comprises a vacuum chamber in which the plasma polymerization coating
process can take place.
[0059] More in particular, the present invention concerns a low-pressure plasma polymerization
coating apparatus for high-load coating of items of footwear which comprises at least
two pairs of electrodes, each pair comprising a ground electrode and a radiofrequency
(RF) electrode for inducing a plasma and for applying a plasma polymerized coating
onto items of footwear which can be placed in between the ground electrode and the
RF electrode of each pair, whereby the distance between the ground electrode of the
first electrode pair and the RF electrode of the second pair is larger than 1 mm and
smaller than 50 mm. The distance between the two electrodes of the same pair is preferably
larger than 50 mm, more preferably larger than 100 mm, and preferably smaller than
500 mm, more preferably smaller than 250 mm.
[0060] The present invention also concerns a low-pressure plasma polymerization coating
apparatus for high-load coating of items of footwear, said apparatus being configured
to perform a method as disclosed in this document, preferably an apparatus comprising
at least two pairs of electrodes as discussed here above or further in this document.
[0061] Figure 1 shows an embodiment of a low pressure plasma equipment according to the
present invention, wherein a method according to the present invention can be carried
out. The plasma chamber has a volume of 1836 I, and has radiofrequency electrodes
10 and ground electrodes 11 which are positioned in a vertical way that generates
a favourable plasma in the wider spaces, so-called "slots" 12 between the electrodes.
[0062] Preferably, at least one radiofrequency electrode 10 and one ground electrode 11
of an adjacent pair of electrodes, are positioned close to each other, having a distance
of from 1 mm to 50 mm, such as 2 mm to 40 mm, such as 5 mm to 30 mm, for example 30,
29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9,
8, 7, 6 or 5 mm.
[0063] Preferably, the distance between the ground electrode and the RF electrode of a pair
of electrodes, marks a wider space or so-called "slot", and is from 50 mm to 500 mm,
such as 100 mm to 450 mm, such as 120 mm to 400 mm, for example 400, 390, 380, 375,
370, 360, 350, 340, 330, 325, 320, 310, 300, 290, 280, 275, 270, 260, 250, 240, 230,
225, 220, 210, 200, 190, 180, 175, 170, 160, 150, 140, 130, 125 or 120 mm.
[0064] The applicants discovered that by placing pairs of electrodes, each consisting of
one radiofrequency electrode 10 and one ground electrode 11 inside the plasma chamber,
a favourable, stable and uniform plasma is generated in the slots.
[0065] By using this electrode configuration according to the present invention, the applicants
have discovered that the deposited coating on the items of footwear, preferably without
the laces and with the outsole covered not to receive the plasma coating - for reasons
of the aforementioned advantages and benefits - is more uniform than when a prior
art set-up of single electrodes on each side of a slot is used.
[0066] Preferably, the apparatus comprises slots in between the electrodes of each pair,
said slots preferably comprising means for placing one or more sample holders at variable
or different positions, e.g. at variable or different heights. As such, the apparatus
can be configured to coat a great variety of types of items of footwear, such as high
boots or low sandals. More preferably, said apparatus comprises one or more sample
holders inserted in said slots for holding the items of footwear or parts of the item
of footwear, which are to be coated.
[0067] In the slots 12, it is possible to place sample holders 13 horizontally, such as
perforated trays or containers, which may contain the items of footwear, preferably
without the laces and with the outsole covered not to receive the plasma coating -
for reasons of the aforementioned advantages and benefits - to be coated. Preferably,
perforated trays are used.
[0068] The plasma chamber in Figure 1 has 4 slots 12, and each slot may contain up to 8
trays 13, and each tray may contain up to 4 items of footwear (2 pairs), preferably
without the laces and with the outsole covered not to receive the plasma coating -
for reasons of the aforementioned advantages and benefits -, giving a capacity of
64 pairs of said items of footwear.
[0069] Preferably, a frame or another construction to keep the trays 13 in place is placed
into the plasma chamber to allow easy loading and unloading of the plasma chamber
before and after each processing run.
[0070] Preferably, the numbers of trays 13 within each slot 12 may be varied according to
the type of footwear to be coated. For example, summer shoes tend to have limited
height, and up to 8 trays may be used. When the height of the footwear, preferably
without the laces and with the outsole covered not to receive the plasma coating -
for reasons of the aforementioned advantages and benefits - exceeds the distance between
two trays 13, the plasma chamber according to the present invention allows to leave
out one or more trays per slot 12. Consequently, number of said footwear that may
be coated in a single batch, will decrease. For example, when 6 instead of 8 trays
are used per slot, the capacity is (placing 2 pairs of said footwear per tray) 48
pairs of said footwear. In most production environments, this is still enough to implement
the plasma chamber in the manufacturing line.
[0071] Since footwear may contain considerably amounts of fabric, plastics and/or adhesives
such as glue, footwear may contain considerable amounts of moisture and humidity when
placed inside the plasma chamber. This may have a negative impact on the coating performance
after coating, but also on the cycle time. Therefore, the applicants have discovered
that an outgassing may be advantageous, especially in case large volumes of footwear,
preferably without the laces and with the outsole covered not to receive the plasma
coating - for reasons of the aforementioned advantages and benefits - are to be treated,
e.g. in mass production.
[0072] Further, the applicants have surprisingly discovered that an outgassing allows better
penetration of the plasma polymerization coating into the core of the material of
which the items of footwear is made. This is because the outgassing removes not only
contaminants and moisture from the surface, but also from the internal surfaces, which
is not the case without outgassing. When the moisture from the internal surfaces is
removed properly, these internal surfaces become accessible by the coating process
of the present invention. Consequently, the performance of the deposited coatings
- in terms of water and/or oil repellency, dry feet, reduced weight gain during use,
quick dry effect and breathability - will be enhanced when using a degassing prior
to coating deposition.
[0073] Therefore, the present invention relates to a method for coating outer, internal
and inner surfaces of an item of footwear by a low-pressure plasma polymerization
coating process, said item comprising an upper with covering elements which are applied
to an outer surface of the upper, by degassing the item of footwear prior to said
coating process.
[0074] In an embodiment, said item of footwear is degassed to a degassing level of at most
50 mTorr, more preferably at most 20 mTorr, even more preferably at most 10 mTorr.
Additionally or alternatively, said item of footwear is degassed in a vacuum chamber
until said vacuum chamber comprises a degassing level of at most 100 mTorr, more preferably
at most 50 mTorr, such as 40 mTorr or less. Note that the degassing level of the vacuum
chamber may depend on the load, i.c. on the number and nature of the items of footwear
placed inside the chamber.
[0075] In order to determine the degassing level of an item of footwear, the pressure increase
in a vacuum chamber due to gasses released from the item of footwear needs to be determined.
Thereto, the item is positioned in a vacuum chamber, e.g. a plasma chamber, which
is pumped down to a degassing pressure P
degassing, which is less than 500 mTorr, preferably less than 250 mTorr, such as less than
100 mTorr, and next the inlets and outlets of the vacuum chamber are closed off. After
a preset time of 60 seconds, the pressure increase, ΔP, inside the chamber is measured.
The degassing level of the item is then given by the pressure increase, ΔP, minus
the whistling leak pressure of the vacuum chamber at the degassing pressure P
degassing. Optionally, if more than one item of footwear is positioned inside the vacuum chamber,
the degassing level of an item of footwear is given by the pressure increase, ΔP,
minus the whistling leak pressure of the vacuum chamber at the degassing pressure
P
degassing, divided by the number of items of footwear in the vacuum chamber. Hereby, the whistling
leak pressure of the vacuum chamber at the degassing pressure P
degassing is determined by repeating the same procedure for an empty chamber with all items
of footwear removed from the vacuum chamber - pumping down to the same degassing pressure
P
degassing, closing off all inlets and outlets of the vacuum chamber and measuring the pressure
increase after the same preset time as for the loaded chamber, i.e. 60 seconds.
[0076] In order to determine the degassing level of a vacuum chamber which is loaded with
a number of items of footwear, the pressure increase in the vacuum chamber due to
gasses released from the items of footwear needs to be determined. Thereto, the items
of footwear are positioned in a vacuum chamber, e.g. a plasma chamber, which is pumped
down to a degassing pressure P
degassing, which is less than 500 mTorr, preferably less than 250 mTorr, such as less than
100 mTorr, and next the inlets and outlets of the vacuum chamber are closed off. After
a preset time of 60 seconds, the pressure increase, ΔP, inside the chamber is measured.
The degassing level of the chamber is then given by the pressure increase, ΔP, minus
the whistling leak pressure of the vacuum chamber at the degassing pressure P
degassing. Hereby, the whistling leak pressure of the vacuum chamber at the degassing pressure
P
degassing is determined by repeating the same procedure for an empty chamber with all items
of footwear removed from the vacuum chamber - pumping down to the same degassing pressure
P
degassing, closing off all inlets and outlets of the vacuum chamber and measuring the pressure
increase after the same preset time as for the loaded chamber, i.e. 60 seconds.
[0077] In a preferred embodiment, the low pressure plasma polymerization is preceded by
a low pressure plasma pre-treatment step, preferably the degassing and the pre-treatment
being combined in a single processing step.
[0078] In an embodiment, said method comprises shielding parts of the item prior to said
coating process, removing of parts of the item prior to said coating process, and/or
separately coating parts of the item by said coating process prior to assembly of
the parts into said item.
[0079] In an embodiment, the low pressure plasma polymerization uses a monomer which is
C
uF
2u+1C
wX
2wCR
13Y-OCO-C(R
14) = CH
2,
wherein u is 2 to 6, w is 0 to 9, X and Y are H, F, Cl, Br or I, R
13 is H or alkyl or a substituted alkyl, e.g. an at least partially halo-substituted
alkyl, and R
14 is H or alkyl or a substituted alkyl, e.g. an at least partially halo-substituted
alkyl.
[0080] In another embodiment, the low pressure plasma polymerization uses a monomer which
is an organosilane, wherein the organosilane is:
- Y1-X-Y2 wherein X is O or NH, Y1 is -Si(Y3)(Y4)Y5 and Y2 is Si(Y3')(Y4')Y5' wherein
Y3, Y4, Y5, Y3', Y4', and Y5' are each independently H or an alkyl group of up to
10 carbon atoms; wherein at most one of Y3, Y4 and Y5 is hydrogen, at most one of
Y3', Y4' and Y5' is hydrogen; and the total number of carbon atoms is not more than
20;
- cyclic according to -[Si(CH3)q(H)2-q-X-]n- where n is 2 to 10, wherein q is 0 to 2
and wherein the total number of carbon atoms is not more than 20;
- CH2 = C(R1)-Si(R2)(R3)-R4 wherein R1 is H or an alkyl group, e.g. -CH3, and wherein
R1, R2 and R3 are each independently H, an alkyl group of up to 10 carbon atoms or
an alkoxy group -O-Z, wherein Z is preferably -CtH2t+1, wherein t is 1 to 10;
- R5-Si(R6)(R7)-R8 wherein R5 is H or an alkyl group, e.g. -CH3, and wherein R6, R7
and R8 are each independently H, an alkyl group of up to 10 carbon atoms or an alkoxy
group -O-Z, wherein Z is preferably -CtH2t+1, wherein t is 1 to 10; or
- CH2=C(R9)C(O)-O-(CH2)p-Si(R10)(R11)-R12 wherein R9 is H or an alkyl group, e.g. -CH3,
wherein p is from 0 to 10, and wherein R10, R11 and R12 are each independently H,
an alkyl group of up to 10 carbon atoms or an alkoxy group -O-Z, wherein Z is preferably
-CtH2t+1, wherein t is 1 to 10.
[0081] In a further aspect, the present invention concerns the use of a method for coating,
preferably selectively coating, an item of footwear as disclosed herein, to increase
security and/or comfort of the wearer of an item of footwear obtained by said method.
[0082] In yet a further aspect, the present invention concerns the use of a method as disclosed
in this document, to reduce the weight gain of an item of footwear during use, to
prevent the item of footwear from absorbing liquid so as to lead to a warm and dry
feeling of the wearer's feet, and to shorten the drying time of the item of footwear.
Preferably, the drying time - the time needed to have a weight increase of maximum
5 % compared to the initial weight of the item of footwear before wearing it - is
reduced to an absolute minimum.
[0083] In yet a further aspect, the present invention concerns a degassed item of footwear.
In an embodiment, said item comprises an upper with covering elements which are applied
to an outer surface of the upper.
[0084] Preferably, said degassed item of footwear comprises a degassing level of less than
50 mTorr, more preferably less than 20 mTorr, even more preferably less than 10 mTorr,
and/or said item of footwear is located in a vacuum chamber, loaded with a number
of items of footwear, said vacuum chamber comprising a degassing level of at most
100 mTorr, preferably at most 50 mTorr, more preferably at most 40 mTorr. For a fully
loaded chamber, e.g. 50 pairs of footwear, the chamber with the full load is preferably
degassed to a degassing level of less than 100 mTorr, more preferably less than 50
mTorr, such as less than 40 mTorr.
[0085] In an embodiment, said degassing is performed in a degassing apparatus or degassing
chamber which is different from a plasma chamber in which the low-pressure plasma
polymerization coating process is performed. Such a degassing apparatus or degassing
chamber may comprise a heating element and may be an oven.
[0086] The present invention also concerns an item of footwear comprising a water-and/or
oil-repellent coating on the outer surface of an upper of the item of footwear, as
well as on internal surfaces and inner surfaces of the item of footwear, preferably
said coating applied by a method according to the present invention.
[0087] In order to determine whether internal surfaces of the treated item of footwear are
coated with a water- and/or oil-repellent coating, the item of footwear can be cut
open, after which the internal surfaces along the cut are exposed and can be tested
for their oil- and/or water-repellency. In preferred embodiments, the coating on the
internal surface comprises an oil-repellency level which is at least level 1 according
to oil repellency test ISO 14419, and preferably which is maximally one level below
the water- and/or oil-repellency level of the inner and/or outer surface coating,
e.g. if the inner and outer surface coating have an oil or water repellency level
of 5, the internal surface coating preferably has an oil or water repellency level
of at least 4, such as 4, 5, 6, etc.
[0088] The present invention also concerns an item of footwear comprising a water-and/or
oil-repellent coating applied by a low-pressure plasma polymerization coating process,
said item of footwear comprising a Drying Time which is at most 50%, preferably at
most 40%, more preferably at most 30%, still more preferably at most 20%, yet most
preferably at most 10%, such as 9%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1% and most preferably
0%, of a Drying Time of the item of footwear when uncoated, preferably said coating
applied by a method according to the present invention. The Drying Time is defined
as the time needed for an used/tested item of footwear to reach a weight gain of 5
% or lower, wherein the weight gain is the increase of weight of the item of footwear
compared to the dry weight of the same item of footwear before using/testing.
[0089] The present invention also concerns an item of footwear comprising a water-and/or
oil-repellent coating applied by a low-pressure plasma polymerization coating method
applied according to the present invention, said item of footwear comprising a Direct
Weight Gain which is at most 50%, preferably at most 40%, more preferably at most
30%, still more preferably at most 20%, yet most preferably at most 10%, such as 9%,
8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4% or less, of a Direct Weight Gain of the item of footwear when uncoated.
The Direct Weight Gain is the weight increase of an item of footwear right after using/testing,
compared to the dry weight of the same item of footwear before using/testing.
[0090] The Direct Weight Gain and the Drying Time are determined after a test that simulates
the daily use of the item of footwear. This test is carried out as following:
- Weigh the item of footwear prior to submersion (dry weight);
- Put the item of footwear at the foot to simulate actual use of the item of footwear;
- Soak the foot with the item of footwear for 60 seconds horizontally in a vessel filled
with water at room temperature (23 ± 2 °C) up to the height where the foot and leg
come out of the item of footwear;
- Take the foot with the item of footwear out of the vessel, and take the footwear off
from the foot;
- Shake out the item of footwear by hand 20 times (up - down movement);
- Weight again the item of footwear (tested item of footwear).
[0091] The different in weight between the tested item of footwear and the dry item of footwear
(weight before simulation of use test), is the Direct Weight Gain, expressed in grams.
The Direct Weight Gain expressed in % is the Direct Weight Gain in grams divided by
the dry weight of the item of footwear multiplied by 100.
[0092] Now, the item of footwear is hung semi-horizontally with opening for the feet oriented
downwards to allow drying. Every 5 minutes, the item of footwear is weighted again,
until the weight increase (actual weight minus the dry weight before submersion) is
5% or less of the dry weight of the item of footwear. When this is reached, the required
time to reach this is referred to as the Drying Time.
[0093] The size of the effect of outgassing may depend on the amount of said footwear in
the plasma chamber, as well as the design of said footwear and the materials of which
said footwear is constructed.
[0094] Preferably, an outgassing is performed prior to starting the first process step.
[0095] Optionally, but preferably, a low pressure plasma pre-treatment is carried out before
the coating polymerization step, and after the outgassing step when an outgassing
step is performed. A pre-treatment step in the form of an activation and/or cleaning
and/or etching step might be advantageous for improving the adhesion and cross-linking
of the polymer coating and for obtaining better penetration into the core of the footwear
materials to coat not only the outer surface of the materials, but the internal surfaces
as well.
[0096] Further, the applicants have surprisingly discovered that a pre-treatment allows
better penetration of the plasma polymerization coating into the core of the material
of which the items of footwear is made, so that also the upper material which is covered
by decorative and/or functional plastic parts and tapes become coated. This is because
the pre-treatment removes not only contaminants from the surface, but also from the
internal surfaces, which is not the case without pre-treatment. The resulting low
pressure plasma coating is more uniform, and thanks to a selective coating process
and coating into the core of the footwear materials, an optimal performance in terms
of dry outer fabric, reduced weight gain and drying time (so-called "quick dry effect"),
and dry feet is obtained. This is not possible without the outgassing and/or the plasma
pre-treatment of the present invention.
[0097] Preferably, the outgassing prior to the first processing step - the coating step
or a pre-treatment step - is performed by pumping the plasma chamber down to a set
low pressure, which may be equal to or higher than the set base pressure of the first
processing step. Next, the pumping down is continued for a set time, after which the
pumping is stopped and all chamber inlets and outlets are closed for a set outgassing
time, and the pressure increase over that outgassing time is measured. When the pressure
increase is below a set value - a maximum pressure increase -, the outgassing is considered
considerable low to continue the process. When the pressure increase is higher than
the set value, there is still outgassing, and the same outgassing sequence is repeated,
until the pressure increase is below the set value.
[0098] The set parameters of the outgassing, such as set low pressure, set pumping down
time, set outgassing time and set maximum pressure increase, depend on the plasma
equipment used and the volume of the plasma chamber, the type of pump used, the number
of items of footwear, preferably without the laces and with the outsole covered not
to receive the plasma coating - for reasons of the aforementioned advantages and benefits
- and the design and material of said footwear.
[0099] Preferably, the set low pressure is from 5 mTorr to 200 mTorr, more preferably from
10 mTorr to 150 mTorr, such as 15 mTorr to 125 mTorr, for example 125, 120, 110, 100,
90, 80, 75, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 25, 20, or 15 mTorr.
[0100] Preferably, the set pumping down time is from 10 s to 900 s, more preferably from
30 s to 840 s, even more preferably from 45 s to 780 s, such as 60 s to 720 s, for
example 720, 690, 660, 630, 600, 570, 540, 510, 480, 450, 420, 390, 360, 330, 300,
270, 240, 210, 180, 150, 120, 90, or 60 s.
[0101] Preferably, the outgassing time is from 1 s to 120 s, more preferably 5 s to 90 s,
such as 90, 80, 75, 70, 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, 15, 10, or 5 s.
[0102] Preferably, the maximum pressure increase is from 10 mTorr to 500 mTorr, more preferably
from 15 mTorr to 250 mTorr, such as 20 mTorr to 100 mTorr, for example 100, 90, 80,
75, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 25 or 20 mTorr.
[0103] When a pre-treatment is carried out, it is preferably carried out using inert gases,
such as Ar, N
2 or He, additionally or alternatively combined with reactive gases, such as H
2, or O
2, or with etching reagents such as CF
4. Mixtures of the foregoing gases can also be used.
[0104] More preferably the pre-treatment is done Ar or He.
[0105] Preferably, the pre-treatment is performed from 30 seconds to 30 minutes, for example
from 45 seconds to 15 minutes, preferably 1 minute to 10 minutes, e.g. 9, 8, 7, 6,
5, 4, 3, 2, or 1 minutes. The duration of the pre-treatment depends on the precursor
monomer used and on the design and materials used to produce the items of footwear
to be treated, preferably without the laces and with the outsole covered not to receive
the plasma coating - for reasons of the aforementioned advantages and benefits.
[0106] The power used in the pre-treatment can be applied in continuous wave mode or in
pulsed wave mode.
[0107] Preferably, when applied in continuous wave mode in a 1836 litre plasma chamber,
the pre-treatment takes place at powers of 5 to 5000 W, more preferably 25 to 4000
W, even more preferably at 50 to 3000 W, say 75 to 2500 W, such as 100 to 2000 W,
e.g. 2000, 1900, 1800, 1750, 1700, 1600, 1500, 1400, 1300, 1250, 1200, 1100, 1000,
950, 900, 850, 800, 750, 700, 650, 600, 550, 500, 450, 400, 350, 300, 250, 200, 175,
150, 125, or 100 W.
[0108] Preferably, when applied in pulsed wave mode in a 1836 litre plasma chamber, the
pre-treatment takes place at a power of 5 to 5000 W, more preferably 25 to 4000 W,
even more preferably at 50 to 3000 W, say 75 to 2500 W, such as 100 to 2000 W, e.g.
2000, 1900, 1800, 1750, 1700, 1600, 1500, 1400, 1300, 1250, 1200, 1100, 1000, 950,
900, 850, 800, 750, 700, 650, 600, 550, 500, 450, 400, 350, 300, 250, 200, 175, 150,
125, or 100 W.
[0109] When applied in pulsed power mode, the pulse frequency may be from 100 Hz to 10 kHz
having a duty cycle from approximately 0.05 to 50 %, with the optimum parameters being
dependent on the gas or gas mixture used.
[0110] Preferably, in a 1836 litre plasma chamber, the operating pressure for the pre-treatment
is 10 to 500 mTorr, more preferably 15 to 250 mTorr, even more preferably 20 to 200
mTorr, say 25 to 175 mTorr, such as 30 to 150 mTorr, e.g. 150, 140, 130, 125, 120,
110, 100, 95, 90, 85, 80, 75, 70, 65, 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, or 30 mTorr.
[0111] For systems of other dimensions, with another volume and/or electrode set-up, the
power value, the operating pressure and the pre-treatment time are varied in a way
that the best process parameters for the pre-treatment are used.
[0112] Preferably, when the items of footwear, preferably without the laces and with the
outsole covered not to receive the plasma coating - for reasons of the aforementioned
advantages and benefits - as placed in the plasma chamber, contain low amounts of
moisture and humidity, the outgassing step and the pre-treatment may be combined in
a single processing step, whereby the outgassing takes place during the pre-treatment.
This may be done for example when said footwear has been dried prior to being placed
in the plasma chamber.
[0113] After the outgassing and/or the pre-treatment step, a plasma polymerization step
is performed, during which the nanocoating is deposited selectively on the footwear,
and further into the core of the material of which the item of footwear is made.
[0114] In an embodiment according to the present invention, the low pressure plasma polymerization
as described above - selective and into the core of the material of which the item
of footwear is made - is a low pressure plasma polymerization of an acrylate or methacrylate
precursor monomer, said (meth)acrylate being of the formula (I):
C
uF
2u+1C
w X
2wCR
13Y-OCO-C(R
14) = CH
2 (I)
wherein u is 2 to 6, w is 0 to 9, X and Y are H, F, Cl, Br or I, R
13 is H or alkyl or a substituted alkyl, e.g. an at least partially halo-substituted
alkyl, and R
14 is H or alkyl or a substituted alkyl, e.g. an at least partially halo-substituted
alkyl.
[0115] Preferably, the acrylate or methacrylate is introduced into the plasma chamber without
the use of a carrier gas, and the acrylate or methacrylate monomer is able to strike
the plasma.
[0116] In another embodiment according to the present invention, the low pressure plasma
polymerization as described above - selective and into the core of the material of
which the item of footwear is made - is a low pressure plasma polymerization of an
organosilane precursor monomer which is introduced into the plasma chamber by means
of a carrier gas, said organosilane being of the formula (II), (III), (IV), (V) or
(VI).
Y
1-X-Y
2 (II)
or
-[Si(CH
3)
q(H)
2-q-X-]
n- (III)
or
CH
2 = C(R
1)-Si(R
2)(R
3)-R
4 (IV)
or
R
5-Si(R
6)(R
7)-R
8 (V)
or
CH
2=C(R
9)C(O)-O-(CH
2)
p-Si(R
10)(R
11)-R
12 (VI)
- wherein for Formula (II) X is O or NH, Y1 is -Si(Y3)(Y4)Y5 and Y2 is Si(Y3')(Y4')Y5' wherein Y3, Y4, Y5, Y3', Y4', and Y5' are each independently H or an alkyl group of up to 10 carbon atoms; wherein at most
one of Y3, Y4 and Y5 is hydrogen, at most one of Y3', Y4' and Y5' is hydrogen; and the total number of carbon atoms is not more than 20.
- wherein Formula (III) is cyclic where n is 2 to 10, wherein q is 0 to 2 and wherein
the total number of carbon atoms is not more than 20.
- wherein for Formula (IV) R1 is H or an alkyl group, e.g. -CH3, and wherein R1, R2 and R3 are each independently H, an alkyl group of up to 10 carbon atoms or an alkoxy group
-O-Z, wherein Z is preferably -CtH2t+1, wherein t is 1 to 10.
- wherein for Formula (V) R5 is H or an alkyl group, e.g. -CH3, and wherein R6, R7 and R8 are each independently H, an alkyl group of up to 10 carbon atoms or an alkoxy group
-O-Z, wherein Z is preferably -CtH2t+1, wherein t is 1 to 10.
- wherein for Formula (VI) R9 is H or an alkyl group, e.g. -CH3, wherein p is from 0 to 10, and wherein R10, R11 and R12 are each independently H, an alkyl group of up to 10 carbon atoms or an alkoxy group
-O-Z, wherein Z is preferably -CtH2t+1, wherein t is 1 to 10.
[0117] The alkyl groups may be straight or branched-chain but straight groups are preferred.
Such alkyl groups are aptly methyl or ethyl groups of which methyl is preferred. Aptly
all of Y
3, Y
4, Y
5, Y
3', Y
4' or Y
5' are alkyl groups.
[0118] The alkoxy groups may be straight, branched-chain or cyclic but straight groups are
preferred. Such alkoxy groups are aptly methoxy or ethoxy groups.
[0119] The monomer of Formula II may be one containing six methyl groups. Aptly the monomer
of Formula II is hexamethyldisiloxane. Aptly the monomer of Formula II is hexamethyldisilazane.
[0120] The monomer of Formula III may be one wherein n is 3, or n is 4, or n is 5, or n
is 6. Aptly the monomer of Formula III is octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane. Aptly the
monomer of Formula III is hexamethylcyclotrisilazane.
[0121] Preferably the monomer employed in this invention is hexamethyldisiloxane or hexamethyldisilazane.
[0122] The organosilane precursor monomer may be introduced to a plasma chamber by means
of a carrier gas. Preferably, the carrier gas is selected from H
2, N
2, O
2, N
2O, CH
4, He or Ar, and/or any mixture of these gases. In one preferred process, a single
carrier gas is used. This is most preferably O
2 or Ar.
[0123] Preferably the amount of carrier gas used together with the organosilane is about
1 % to about 50 % carrier gas/gases based on the flow of monomer. Preferably, about
5 % to about 30 % carrier gas is used, e.g. about 10 % carrier gas.
[0124] The present invention also concerns in an aspect a method for coating an item of
footwear by low-pressure plasma polymerization coating wherein the low pressure plasma
polymerization uses a monomer as described here above, in particular according to
formulas (I) to (VI), and further in this document.
[0125] Preferably, the plasma chamber comprises one or more electrode layers, which may
be radiofrequency electrode layers or ground electrode layers, to generate an electromagnetic
field.
[0126] Preferably, the or each radiofrequency electrode generates a high frequency electric
field at frequencies of from 20 kHz to 2.45 GHz, more preferably of from 40 kHz to
13.56 MHz, with 13.56 MHz being preferred.
[0127] In order to perform the low pressure plasma polymerization step, the plasma chamber
is evacuated to a set low base pressure. Next, one or more monomer inlets are opened
to allow a constant flow of monomer, optionally together with a carrier gas, to enter
the plasma chamber.
[0128] Preferably, an outgassing and/or a pre-treatment step are performed before the low
pressure plasma polymerization process.
[0129] When the monomer is an acrylate or a methacrylate according to formula (I), the monomer
is able to strike the plasma. Consequently a carrier gas is not needed to strike the
plasma.
[0130] When the monomer is an organosilane monomer according to any of formulae (II) to
(VI), a carrier gas may be used to strike the plasma. Whether a carrier gas is used
or not depends on the monomer used.
[0131] Upon stabilization of the monomer, optionally combined with a carrier gas, to a set
work pressure in the plasma chamber, a power is applied to the radiofrequency electrode
or electrodes to generate an electromagnetic field. A plasma is struck, and the monomer
molecules become activated. The substrates or products in the plasma chamber act as
an initiation promoter or facilitator for the initiation of the plasma polymerization
reaction, which will start upon contact of the activated monomer molecules, and will
continue as long as there are activated monomer molecules present in the plasma chamber.
During the plasma polymerization process, there is a constant flow of fresh monomer,
optionally combined with a carrier gas, into the plasma chamber to keep the polymerization
going.
[0132] Once a set plasma polymerization duration has been reached, the power applied to
the radiofrequency electrode or electrodes is turned off, and the chamber is brought
back to atmospheric pressure to allow removal of the treated products from the chamber.
[0133] The plasma polymerization time is determined in function of the design and materials
of which the item of footwear is made, in order to obtain polymerization not only
at the surface of the footwear material, but also into the core such as upper fabric
covered by decorative and/or functional plastic tapes or prints, to obtain substantial
better protection against water penetration and ingress, leading to dryer feet, no
cooling down of the feed, reduced weight gain and drying time, and no wet outer fabric.
[0134] Preferably, the plasma polymerization time, expressed in the time that a power is
applied to the electrodes, is from about 30 seconds to about 45 minutes, more preferably
from about 45 seconds to about 30 minutes, such as from 1 minute to 25 minutes, such
as 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5,
4, 3, 2, or 1 minute.
[0135] The plasma polymerization may be continuous plasma polymerization. The plasma polymerization
may be pulsed wave polymerization. Whether a continuous plasma or a pulsed plasma
is used for the polymerization, depends on the chemistry used and on the volume and
design of the plasma chamber.
[0136] Preferably, in a 1836 litre plasma chamber, the applied power for the coating process,
when applied in continuous wave mode, is approximately 5 to 5000 W, more preferably
approximately 10 to 2500 W, even more preferably approximately, say 15 to 2000W, for
example 20 to 1500 W, say 25 to 1000 W, say 30 to 750 W, say 35 to 500 W, say 500,
475, 450, 425, 400, 375, 350, 325, 300, 275, 250, 225, 200, 190, 180, 175, 170, 160,
150, 140, 130, 125, 120, 110, 100, 95, 90, 85, 80, 75, 70, 65, 60, 55, 50, 45, 40,
or 35 W.
[0137] Preferably, in a 1836 litre plasma chamber, the applied power for the coating process,
when applied in pulsed wave mode, is approximately 5 to 5000 W, more preferably approximately
10 to 2500 W, even more preferably approximately, say 20 to 1500W, for example 30
to 1000 W, say 50 to 900 W, say 75 to 800 W, say 100 to 750 W, say 750, 725, 700,
675, 650, 625, 600, 575, 550, 525, 500, 475, 450, 425, 400, 375, 350, 325, 300, 275,
250, 225, 200, 190, 180, 175, 170, 160, 150, 140, 130, 125, 120, 110, or 100 W.
[0138] Preferably, when in pulsed power mode, the pulse repetition frequency may be from
100 Hz to 10 kHz having a duty cycle from approximately 0.05 to 50 %, with the optimum
parameters being dependent on the monomer used.
[0139] In a 1836 litre plasma chamber, used to apply a coating on 48 pairs of footwear in
one single batch, the operating pressure for the coating step is approximately 10
to 500 mTorr, preferably approximately 15 to 200 mTorr, more preferably approximately
20 to 150 mTorr, say 30 to 100 mTorr, say less than 100, 90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30
mTorr.
[0140] Preferably, the method includes the step of applying a polymer coating having a thickness
of from 10 to 1000 nm on the outer surfaces as well as on the internal surfaces, more
preferably of from 20 to 750 nm, even more preferably of from 50 to 500 nm, e.g. 500,
450, 400, 350, 300, 250, 200, 150, 100, 75 or 50 nm.
[0141] In the current invention, when using acrylate monomers or methacrylate monomers according
to formula (II), super-hydrophobic surfaces can be created with contact angles for
water of more than 100°, say 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111,
112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119 or 120° according to ASTM D5946-04.
[0142] The same coatings, deposited from methacrylate and acrylate monomers according to
formula (I) are super-oleophobic with oil repellency levels above or above and including
1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7, 7.5 or 8 for example up to 6 according
to ISO14419, say up to or up to and including 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, 7 7.5, or 8.
[0143] In the current invention, when using organosilane monomers according to any of formula
(II) to formula (VI), hydrophobic surfaces can be created with contact angles for
water of more than 90°, say 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103,
104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109 or 110° according to ASTM D5946-04.
[0144] The water contact angle and/or oil repellency level obtained depend on the monomer
used, any carrier gases that may be used optionally, on the process conditions used,
but also on the substrate onto which the nanocoating is deposited, e.g. polymer used,
weight and thickness of the material, degree of openness, material construction (woven
fabric, non-woven fabric, mesh, foam), etc.
[0145] Preferably, the method includes applying a polymer coating having a uniformity variation
of the contact angles for water of less than 10° according to ASTM D5946-04 and, for
nanocoatings deposited from methacrylate or acrylate monomers according to formula
(I), a uniformity variation of the oil repellency of less than 0.5 according to ISO14419.
[0146] By using the method described above, a low pressure plasma coating is deposited on
the outer and internal surfaces of an item of footwear, by applying the coating selectively
and with penetration into the core of the footwear materials.
[0147] The applicants have surprisingly discovered that with a method according to the present
invention, a water and/or oil repellent nanocoating is deposited not only on the outer
surface of the upper material of the item of footwear, but also on the internal surfaces
and even the surfaces which are shielded from direct exposure to the plasma by decorative
and/or functional plastic tape or printing.
[0148] By using this inventive process according to the invention, the technical problem
that is solved is not a single problem, but a combination of problems. Prior art documents
fail to solve all these technical problems with a single method or solution.
[0149] The present application improves on the foregoing prior art documents by providing
a method which, surprisingly, solves these technical problems all together in a single
method. This is not obvious over the prior art, since the prior art solutions for
keeping the feet dry are limiting the breathability of the item of footwear, and the
prior art solution for reduction of the weight gain do not offer a solution for keeping
the feet dry since only the outer surface of the upper material of the item of footwear
receives the coating. Combination of these two prior art solutions would lead to an
item of footwear with limited breathability, which would not offer a solution for
sweat generated on the inside. Further, since only the outer surface of the upper
material of the item of footwear would be coated, water ingress is not maximally reduced,
since the inside of the upper material is not protected against liquids.
[0150] The technical problems solved by the invention described above include, but are not
limited to:
- Keeping the feet dry from outer liquids, such as rain and snow and the like;
- Keeping the feet dry from sweat generated inside upon use;
- Reduction of the weight gain of the footwear during use with resulting reduction in
drying time (so-called "quick dry effect");
- Preventing the feet from cooling down.
[0151] The following non-limiting examples make these properties clear and show the benefit
in using the method and nanocoatings of the present invention on footwear in general.
EXAMPLES
[0152] In order that the invention may be more readily understood, it will now be described
by way of the following non-limiting examples.
Example 1: Benefit of degassing prior to coating
[0153] A 680 litre chamber, designed to contain up to 40 pairs of footwear, was in its empty
state pumped down to a pre-set degassing pressure of 20 mTorr, after which all inlets
and outlets were closed off. The pressure increase over 60 seconds was measured and
was 10 mTorr.
[0154] The same chamber was now fully loaded with sports shoes from which the laces had
been removed. In a first process, the degassing level of said footwear was determined
by pumping down the chamber to the same pre-set degassing pressure of 20 mTorr. Next,
all inlets and outlets were closed off, and the pressure increase over 60 seconds
was measured. The total pressure increase was 100 - 120 mTorr, which is at least 10
times higher than for an empty vacuum chamber. Next, a coating process according to
Table 1 was performed, including a pre-treatment step. The oil level of the coated
items of footwear was measured afterwards according to ISO14419 and was level 1.
[0155] The same experiment has been repeated, where after pumping down to the preset degassing
pressure of 20 mTorr the pumping down was continued for 10 more minutes. Then, all
inlets and outlets were closed off, and the pressure increase was found to be 35 -
40 mTorr. Next, a coating process according to Table 1 was performed, including a
pre-treatment step. The oil level of the coated items of footwear was measured afterwards
according to ISO14419 and was level 4.
[0156] In both experiments, the laces were coated separately by a method according to Table
2 and were afterwards placed back in the coated item of footwear.
[0157] An uncoated shoe of the same type, e.g. the left shoe of a pair including uncoated
laces, was used for testing the Direct Weight Gain and the Drying Time. Also one item
of footwear including laces coated according to the process with insufficient degassing
and one item of footwear coated according to the process with sufficient degassing,
were used for testing the Direct Weight Gain and the Drying Time.
[0158] The Direct Weight Gain and the Drying Time are determined after a test that simulates
the daily use of the item of footwear. This test is carried out as following:
- Weigh the item of footwear prior to submersion (dry weight);
- Put the item of footwear at the foot to simulate actual use of the item of footwear;
- Soak the foot with the item of footwear for 60 seconds horizontally in a vessel filled
with water at room temperature (23 ± 2 °C) up to the height where the foot and leg
come out of the item of footwear;
- Take the foot with the item of footwear out of the vessel, and take the footwear off
from the foot;
- Shake out the item of footwear by hand 20 times (up - down movement);
- Weight again the item of footwear (tested item of footwear).
[0159] The different in weight between the tested item of footwear and the dry item of footwear
(weight before simulation of use test), is the Direct Weight Gain, expressed in grams.
The Direct Weight Gain expressed in % is the Direct Weight Gain in grams divided by
the dry weight of the item of footwear multiplied by 100.
[0160] Now, the item of footwear is hung semi-horizontally with opening for the feet oriented
downwards to allow drying. Every 5 minutes, the item of footwear is weighted again,
until the weight increase (actual weight minus the dry weight before submersion) is
5% or less of the dry weight of the item of footwear. When this is reached, the required
time to reach this is referred to as the Drying Time. For example, for a dry weight
of 100 grams, the item is considered dry when the weight increase is 5 grams or less
(item of footwear has weight of 105 grams or less).
Table 1: Process parameters for coating items of footwear in a 680 litre chamber
| Parameter |
Value |
| Pre-treatment |
|
| Gas |
Argon |
| Flow |
500 - 1500 sccm |
| Treatment time |
1 - 10 min |
| Power |
100 - 1000 W |
| Frequency |
13.56 MHz |
| Frequency mode |
Cw |
| Plasma Zone |
|
| Coating time |
10 - 20 min |
| Temperature walls |
40 - 50 °C |
| Monomer |
1H,1H,2H,2H-Perfluorooctyl acrylate |
| Flow |
30 - 100 sccm |
| Electrodes & Generator |
|
| Power during coating |
50 - 500 W |
| Frequency |
13.56 MHz |
| Frequency mode |
cw |
| Temperature RF electrode |
30 - 50 °C |
| Pressure |
|
| Base pressure |
10 - 50 mTorr |
| Work pressure |
20 - 150 mTorr |
| Oleophobicity Level (ISO 14419-2010) |
5 |
Table 2: Process parameters for laces in a 490 litre chamber
| Parameter |
Value |
| Pre-treatment |
|
| Gas |
Argon |
| Flow |
100 - 1000 sccm |
| Treatment time |
1 - 10 min |
| Power |
100 - 1000 W |
| Frequency |
13.56 MHz |
| Frequency mode |
Cw |
| Plasma Zone |
|
| Coating time |
10 - 20 min |
| Temperature walls |
40 - 50 °C |
| Monomer |
1H,1H,2H,2H-Perfluorooctyl acrylate |
| Flow |
20 - 50 sccm |
| Electrodes & Generator |
|
| Power during coating |
50 - 500 W |
| Frequency |
13.56 MHz |
| Frequency mode |
cw |
| Temperature RF electrode |
30 - 50 °C |
| Pressure |
|
| Base pressure |
10 - 50 mTorr |
| Work pressure |
20 - 150 mTorr |
| Oleophobicity Level (ISO 14419-2010) |
5 |
[0161] Table 3 gives the summary of the test results in terms of oil repellency, Direct
Weight Gain and Drying Time. It is clear that there is a huge, significant improvement
when the item of footwear is coated, and that the results are further increased by
a thorough degassing of the items of footwear.
[0162] The thoroughly degassed item of footwear has a Direct Weight Gain of only 3.4 %,
which is below 5 %, so that the Drying Time is considered to be 0 minutes. For the
uncoated item of footwear, the Direct Weight Gain of 18.6 % clearly exceeds the 5
%. For the coated item of footwear with less thorough degassing, the Direct Weight
Gain of 12.7 %, which is less than the Direct Weight Gain of the uncoated item, but
which clearly exceeds the 5 %.
[0163] The
Drying Time for a thoroughly degassed item of footwear (sports shoe in this example) is
reduced by 100 % compared to an uncoated item of footwear and even to a coated item with less thorough
degassing. The Drying Time for a thoroughly degassed item of footwear is thus 0 %
(ZERO) of the Drying Time of an uncoated item of footwear and 0 % of the Drying Time
of a coated item of footwear with less thorough degassing.
[0164] The
Direct Weight Gain for a thoroughly degassed item of footwear (sports shoe in this example) is
reduced by 81.6 % compared to an uncoated item of footwear and by 72.9 % compared
to a coated item of footwear with less thorough degassing. The Direct Weight Gain for a thoroughly degassed item of footwear is thus only 18.4
% of the Direct Weight Gain of an uncoated item of footwear and only 27.1 % of the
Direct Weight Gain of a coated item of footwear without thorough degassing.
Table 3: Test results in function of outgassing level
| Coated? |
Pressure increase |
Outgassing level |
Oil repellency level |
Direct weight gain (%) |
Drying time (5 %)(min) |
| Uncoated |
/ |
/ |
Level 0 |
18.6 % |
102 min |
| Coated |
100 - 120 mTorr |
90 - 110 mTorr |
Level 1 |
12.7 % |
61 min |
| Coated |
35 - 40 mTorr |
25 - 30 mTorr |
Level 4 |
3.4 % |
0 min |
Example 2: Penetration into core of material
2.1 Penetration into core of material
[0165] An item of footwear for running was coated according to the parameters in Table 4.
The fasteners - laces - were removed prior to coating and were coated separately in
a 490 l chamber, which can contain up to 250 or more laces in one batch, according
to Table 2.
[0166] Before placing this item of footwear into the plasma chamber, the complete inside,
including the tongue and the insole, were covered with several layers of paper tape,
to shield the inside of the footwear from direct exposure to the plasma. Even the
opening where the foot enters the footwear was closed by several layers of tape.
[0167] After coating, the tape was removed, and the coated item of footwear was compared
to the same footwear, but uncoated. The upper fabric of the running shoe is a porous
mesh which is highly hydrophilic for the untreated shoe. The upper fabric for the
coated shoe was after coating super-hydrophobic, with water contact angles of 110°
and more. Also the inside of the footwear, which was covered by the tape during coating,
and which is hydrophilic before coating, was after coating surprisingly super-hydrophobic.
[0168] This clearly shows that according to the method of the present invention, a coating
is deposited not only at the outer surface of the upper material of the footwear,
but also at the internal and inner surfaces.
Table 4: Process parameters for selective coating throughout the structure of footwear
in a 1836 litre chamber
| Parameter |
Value |
| Outgassing |
|
| Pumpdown time |
10 min |
| Wait time |
30 - 120 sec |
| Maximum allowed pressure |
5 - 50 mTorr |
| increase inside chamber |
|
| Pre-treatment |
|
| Gas |
Argon |
| Flow |
500 - 1500 sccm |
| Treatment time |
1 - 10 min |
| Power |
100 - 1000 W |
| Frequency |
13.56 MHz |
| Frequency mode |
Cw |
| Plasma Zone |
|
| Coating time |
10 - 20 min |
| Temperature walls |
40 - 50 °C |
| Monomer |
1H,1H,2H,2H-Perfluorooctyl acrylate |
| Flow |
30 - 100 sccm |
| Electrodes & Generator |
|
| Power during coating |
50 - 500 W |
| Frequency |
13.56 MHz |
| Frequency mode |
cw |
| Temperature RF electrode |
30 - 50 °C |
| Pressure |
|
| Base pressure |
10 - 50 mTorr |
| Work pressure |
20 - 150 mTorr |
| Oleophobicity Level (ISO 14419-2010) |
5 |
2.2 Abrasion resistance - simulated use
[0169] In order to get insight in the daily use of footwear, and especially the abrasion
upon use, a coated item of footwear for sports applications is rubbed manually with
a tissue in a back-and-forth movement. The item of footwear was coated according to
the process parameters in Table 4 wherein the laces had been removed prior to coating,
and the outsole was masked with a masking tape to prevent coating deposition onto
the outsole.
[0170] This test is testing how good the coating adhesion to the material is, as well as
how good the coating was deposited into the core of the material, since the possible
damage of the coating at the surface would lead to a reduction in contact angle for
water.
[0171] The contact angle for water of the rubbed mesh surface is measured in function of
the number of abrasion cycles. It is clear from Figure 2 that even after 1000 abrasion
cycles the water contact angle of the coated mesh fabric is still in the range of
the footwear as coated, before starting the abrasion simulation.
Example 3: Reduced weight gain and improved drying time
2.1 Reduction in weight gain during use
[0172] A sports shoe was coated in a batch process in a machine with a chamber volume of
1836 litres, according to the process parameters of Table 4. This plasma chamber can
contain up to 40 - 60 pairs of footwear. Upon coating, the fasteners were removed
from the item of footwear and were coated in a separate process according to Table
2 (selective coating of items of footwear). The equipment used to coat the fasteners
was a 490 litre chamber, in which 150 to 250 fasteners (laces) can be coated in a
single batch.
[0173] The coating process of the footwear comprises an outgassing step, a pre-treatment
step and a plasma polymerization coating step. The outgassing step is performed to
remove moisture, air and other gases from the chamber and the items of footwear prior
to starting the pre-treatment process. The pre-treatment process removes contamination
on the material, in order to obtain a better coating throughout the material structure.
The applicants have discovered that this selective coating throughout the footwear
materials leads to an enhanced performance of the coated items of footwear.
[0174] Afterwards, the laces were placed back into the sports shoe. The sports shoe was
submersed during 1 minute in a 10-litre bucket of water, and then the shoe was shaken
out 20 times and weighted afterwards. The same test was done for an identical but
uncoated shoe.
[0175] Figure 3 presents the test results. It is clear that after only one minute submersion,
the untreated sports shoe takes up 40 grams of water, while the plasma coated sports
shoe has a weight increase of only 9 grams, meaning a weight gain reduction of 31
grams, which is 9% of the dry weight of the sports shoe.
2.2 Quick drying effect
2.2.1 Foam structure
[0176] An open cell structure used as foam or mesh in footwear was coated with two different
plasma processes, P1 and P2, according to Table 4. The only difference between P1
and P2 is the coating time (P2 longer than P1).
[0177] They were submersed in a vessel with a weight of 5 kg put on top to force water ingress
to a large extent (worst case scenario), for 5 minutes. Then they were taken out of
the vessel and they were dried at the ambient air. The drying time was measured and
is defined as the time needed to reach a weight within 5% weight gain compared to
their dry weight. The same test was done on uncoated foam.
[0178] It is clear from Figure 4 that the drying time is highly reduced by the deposition
of a plasma coating according to the present invention.
2.2.2 Faux fur
[0179] Faux fur as a pile weave, used to decorate items of footwear for leisure shoes, and
used to insulate the inside (inner lining) of footwear for winter times and cold environments,
is coated on roll using a process according to Table 5. Two processes have been done,
P1 and P2, wherein the coating step speed of P2 is higher than that of P1 (shorter
residence time in the plasma zone).
[0180] A4-sized sheets of untreated and plasma coated faux fur have been tested in a submersion
test. They were placed in a basket under 10 cm of water at room temperature for 5
minutes, with a 2 kg weight placed on top of the basket to prevent the samples from
rising and floating in the water. Afterwards, they were taken out of the basket and
were allowed to drip out and dry in a vertical position. The weight gain compared
to the dry weight was calculated after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 minutes drying time.
Table 5
| Parameter |
Value |
| Pre-treatment |
|
| Gas |
Argon |
| Flow |
500 - 1500 sccm |
| Treatment speed |
6 m/min |
| Power |
1000 - 5000 W |
| Frequency |
13.56 MHz |
| Frequency mode |
cw |
| Plasma Zone |
|
| Length of plasma zone |
6 m |
| Coating step speed |
2 m/min |
| Tension |
1.5 kg (15 N) |
| Temperature walls |
40 - 50 °C |
| Electrodes & Generator |
|
| Electrode configuration |
M/RF/M/RF/RF/M/RF/M |
| Plasma type |
Primary |
| Power during coating |
100 - 500 W |
| Frequency |
13.56 MHz |
| Frequency mode |
cw |
| Temperature RF electrode |
30 - 35 °C |
| Monomer |
1H,1H,2H,2H-Perfluorooctyl acrylate |
| Flow |
50 - 150 sccm |
| Pressure |
|
| Base pressure |
10 - 50 mTorr |
| Work pressure |
20 - 80 mTorr |
| Residence time in plasma zone during coating |
3 minutes |
| Oleophobicity Level (ISO 14419-2010) |
5 |
[0181] It is clear from Figure 5 that untreated faux fur tends to take up a lot of moisture,
specially the backing layer of the pile weave material. Once coated, the weight gain
is decreased largely and the drying time is much shorter. When defining the drying
time as the time needed to reach a weight gain of 5% or less, then P2 has a drying
time of only 4 minutes, while the uncoated material still has a weight gain of 207%
after 5 minutes drying.
Example 4: Breathability
[0182] A polyester (PES) fabric has been coated on roll of 1.6m width with a method according
to the present invention, comprising a pre-treatment step and a plasma polymerization
coating step, with the process parameters of Table 5. The same fabric was coated with
a traditional pad-dry-cure coating process.
[0183] The breathability was tested on all fabrics and evaluated in terms of water vapour
permeability and air permeability.
4.1 Water vapour permeability
[0184] Water vapour permeability is a degree for the transport of humidity inside the item
of footwear, coming from the feet. Upon use, the temperature of the feet rises and
sweat is produced. Release of water vapour and thus evaporated sweat, and of the heat,
is essential for a good comfort for the end user of the footwear.
[0185] Water vapour permeability is tested according to ASTM E96 (1995), and measures the
weight gain in g/m
2.day of silica pellets. The weight gain is coming from absorption of water vapour
that passed the fabric, while the fabric is placed in a closed environment at 20°C
and 65% relative humidity.
[0186] Every fabric has an water vapour permeability specific for the fabric, since the
fabric structure, weave pattern, openness, polymer type, etc. may all influence the
inherent water vapour permeability.
[0187] Figure 6 presents the results of the water vapour permeability of the fabrics (untreated,
conventionally coated and plasma coated).
[0188] It is clear that the water vapour permeability of plasma coated fabric is higher
than that of fabric coated with a conventional pad-dry-cure process. More, the plasma
coating enhances the water vapour permeability of the fabric as such, because the
water vapour doesn't get absorbed by the textile fibres, where for the untreated fabric
the fibres tend to absorb moisture to some degree. From Figure 7 it is also clear
that a conventional coating reduces the water vapour permeability of the tested fabric,
since this coating tends to block the openings in the fabric, or at least reduces
the dimensions of the openings in the fabric.
4.2 Air permeability
[0189] The air permeability is a degree for heat release and openness of the fabric. It
is measured according to ISO9237 (1995), measuring the amount of air passing through
a fabric (in l/(s.m
2)) when a constant pressure difference of 100-200 Pa is maintained at both sides of
the fabric.
[0190] Figure 7 presents the results of the air permeability of the fabrics (untreated,
conventionally coated and plasma coated). The plasma coated samples are obtained using
a process according to Table 5. It is clear that the air permeability of plasma coated
fabric is higher than that of fabric coated with a conventional pad-dry-cure process,
and is in the same range as the air permeability of the untreated fabric.
[0191] SEM-examination (Figure 8) of PES fabric, uncoated, conventionally coated, and plasma
coated according to Table 5 shows clearly that the plasma coating covers the individual
yarns, but that the conventional coating covers multiple yarns, gluing these together
and limiting the breathability.