Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a rolled material for high strength spring, and
a wire for high strength spring using the same. More particularly, the present invention
relates to a rolled material and a wire, which are useful as raw materials of high
strength springs that are used in a state of being subjected to heat treatment, namely,
quenching and tempering, particularly a rolled material having excellent wire drawability,
and a wire for high strength spring, which are excellent in corrosion fatigue properties
even though a tensile strength is a high strength in a range of 1,900 MPa or more
after wire drawing.
Background Art
[0002] Coil springs used in automobiles, for example, a valve spring and a suspension spring
used in the engine, suspension, and the like are required to reduce the weight and
to increase the strength so as to achieve exhaust gas reduction and improvement in
fuel efficeincy. In the manufacture of a high strength wire, wire drawing is applied
for the purpose of achieving improvement in dimensional accuracy of a wire diameter
and uniformization of a structure due to plastic working before a heat treatment of
quenching and tempering. Particularly, a wire drawing reduction rate is sometimes
increased so as to further uniformize the structure in the high strength wire, and
a rolled material is required to have satisfactory wire drawability. The spring imparted
with high strength is likely to cause hydrogen brittleness because of its poor toughness
and ductility, leading to degradation of corrosion fatigue properties. Therefore,
the steel wire (wire) for high strength spring used in the manufacture of a spring
is required to have excellent corrosion fatigue properties. Hydrogen generated by
corrosion enters into a steel and may lead to embrittlement of a steel material, thus
causing corrosion fatigue fracture, so that there is a need to improve corrosion resistance
and hydrogen embrittlement resistance of the steel material so as to improve corrosion
fatigue properties.
[0003] There has been known, as a method for enhancing wire drawability of a rolled material
for high strength spring and corrosion fatigue properties of a wire for high strength
spring, a method for controlling by the chemical composition. However, such a method
is not necessarily desirable from a viewpoint of an increase in manufacturing costs
and resource saving because of use of a large amount of an alloying element.
[0004] Meanwhile, there have been known, as a method for manufacturing a spring, a method
in which a steel wire is heating to a quenching temperature and hot-formed into a
spring shape, followed by oil cooling and further tempering, and a method in which
a steel wire is subjected to quenching and tempering, and then cold-formed into a
spring shape. In the cold forming method of the latter, it is also known that quenching
and tempering before forming is performed by high frequency induction heating. For
example, Patent Document 1 discloses technology in which a wire rod is cold-drawn
and then the structure is adjusted by quenching and tempering through high frequency
induction heating. According to this technology, a structural fraction of pearlite
is set at 30% or less and a structural fraction composed of martensite and bainite
is set at 70% or more and then cold drawing is performed at a predetermined area reduction
rate, followed by quenching and tempering to thereby reduce the unsolveded carbides,
leading to an improvement in delayed fracture properties.
[0005] In Examples of Patent Document 2, a rolled wire rod is subjected to wire drawing,
followed by a quenching and tempering treatment through high frequency induction heating.
This technology focuses primarily on achievement of the reconciliation of high strength
and formability (coiling properties), and gives no consideration to hydrogen embrittlement
resistance..
[0006] While paying attention to the amount of hydrogen in a steel that is evaluated by
the total amount of hydrogen released when the temperature is raised from room temperature
to 350°C, Patent Document 3 proposes a hot rolled wire rod having excellent wire drawability
under severe wire drawing conditions. However, Patent Document 3 focuses only on wire
drawability during special processing such as sehere wire drawing, and also gives
no consideration to hydrogen embrittlement resistance after quenching and tempering,
which becomes most important in a suspension spring.
Patent Document 1: JP 2004-143482 A
Patent Document 2: JP 2006-183137 A
Patent Document 3: JP 2007-231347 A
Summary of Invention
Problems to be Solved by the Invention
[0007] In light of aforementioned circumstances, the present invention has been made, and
it is an object thereof is to provide a rolled material for high strength spring,
which is a material for high strength spring including both materials for hot coiling
and cold coiling, and which has excellent wire drawability even when suppressing the
addition amount of an alloying element, and also can exhibit corrosion fatigue properties
after quenching and tempering.
Means for Solving the Problems
[0008] The present invention that can solve the foregoing problems provides a rolled material
for high strength spring, including, in % by mass:
C: 0.39 to 0.65%,
Si: 1.5 to 2.5%,
Mn: 0.15 to 1.2%,
P: exceeding 0% and 0.015% or less,
S: exceeding 0% and 0.015% or less,
Al: 0.001 to 0.1%,
Cu: 0.1 to 0.80%, and
Ni: 0.1 to 0.80%, with the balance being iron and inevitable impurities, wherein
an amount of nondiffusible hydrogen is 0.40 ppm by mass or less, and
an area ratio of ferrite expressed as a percentage satisfies an inequality expression
(1) below, and a total area ratio of bainite and martensite is 2% or less:

where [name of element] in the above inequality expression (1) means a content expressed
in % by mass of each element.
[0009] The rolled material for high strength spring of the present invention preferably
includes, in % by mass, at least one belonging to any one of the following (a), (b),
(c) and (d):
- (a) Cr: exceeding 0% and 1.2% or less,
- (b) Ti: exceeding 0% and 0.13% or less,
- (c) B: exceeding 0% and 0.01% or less, and
- (d) at least one selected from the group consisting of Nb: exceeding 0% and 0.1% or
less, Mo: exceeding 0% and 0.5% or less, and V: exceeding 0% and 0.4% or less.
[0010] In the rolled material for high strength spring of the present invention, an ideal
critical diameter D
i is preferably in a range of 65 to 140 mm, and is calculated using an equation (2)
below when B is not included or using an equation (3) below when B is included. If
some elements are not included in the rolled material of the present invention among
elements mentioned in the equations, calculation is made under the condition that
the content of the elements is 0%.

where [name of element] in the above equations (2) and (3) means a content expressed
in % by mass of each element.
[0011] The present invention also includes a wire for high strength spring, having a tensile
strength of 1,900 MPa or more, obtained by wire-drawing any one of the rolled materials
for high strength spring mentioned above, followed by a quenching and tempering treatment.
Effects of the Invention
[0012] According to the present invention, since the amount of nondiffusible hydrogen in
a rolled material is suppressed and formation of supercooled structures such as bainite
and martensite is suppressed, the rolled material exhibits excellent wire drawability
without adding a large amount of an alloying element. In the rolled material of the
present invention, an area ratio of ferrite is appropriately adjusted according to
the concentration of C, specifically, the area ratio of ferrite decreases as the concentration
of C increases, so that a wire obtained by wire-drawing this rolled material, followed
by quenching and tempering is excellent in corrosion fatigue properties even though
the strength is a high strength in a range of 1,900 MPa or more. In such a rolled
material, it is possible to improve wire drawability of the rolled material and corrosion
fatigue properties of the wire even when suppressing the cost of steel materials,
thus making it possible to supply a high strength spring which is excellent in manufacturability
and is very unlikely to cause corrosion fatigue fracture, for example, a coil spring
such as a suspension spring that is one of automobile components, at a cheap price.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0013] Fig. 1 is a graph showing an influence of an amount of C and a ferrite area ratio
on hydrogen embrittlement resistance.
Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
[0014] Wire drawability of a rolled material is usually influenced by ductility of the rolled
material. Poor ductility of a basis material or degradation of ductility due to the
presence of a supercooled structure may lead to fracture during wire drawing, resulting
in drastic degradation of manufacturability. Therefore, wire drawability can be improved
by enhancing ductility of the rolled material.
[0015] Meanwhile, if corrosion occurs, pits are generated on a surface of a steel material,
and wall thinning due to corrosion may lead to a decrease in wire diameter of the
steel material. Hydrogen generated by corrosion enters into a steel and may lead to
embrittlement of the steel material. Corrosion fatigue fracture occurs with these
corrosion pits, wall thickness reduction sections, and embrittled sections of the
steel material as starting points. Therefore, corrosion fatigue fracture can be improved
by improving hydrogen embrittlement resistance and corrosion resistance of the steel
material.
[0016] The inventors of the present invention have made a study of factors that exert an
influence on ductility, hydrogen embrittlement resistance and corrosion resistance
of a steel material from various viewpoints. As a result, they have found that proper
control of both a ferrite area ratio of a rolled material and the amount of hydrogen
in a steel expressed particularly by the amount of nondiffusible hydrogen enables
an improvement in ductility of the rolled material and significant improvement in
hydrogen embrittlement resistance when the rolled material is subjected to wire drawing,
followed by quenching and tempering. They have also found that corrosion resistance
can also be improved by appropriately adjusting the chemical composition, leading
to significant improvement in corrosion fatigue properties, thus completing the present
invention. The structure, the amount of hydrogen in steel, and the chemical composition
of the rolled material of the present invention will be sequentially described below.
[0017] The ferrite structure is likely to form a carbide depleted region after quenching
and tempering, and formation of the carbide depleted region serves as a fracture starting
point, as a strength lowering section. While carbides are capable of detoxicating
hydrogen by trapping hydrogen, the carbide depleted region becomes an area lacking
such a capability, so that hydrogen embrittlement is likely to occur, leading to fracture.
In order to suppress formation of the carbide depleted region after a quenching and
tempering treatment to thereby uniformly disperse carbides, there is a need to form
a structure in which carbides are uniformly dispersed in a stage of a rolled material
before quenching and tempering. Namely, there is a need that a ratio of a pearlite
structure, which is a structure that ferrite and carbides form layers, is increased
to thereby decrease a ratio of a ferrite structure. The inventors of the present invention
have found that it is important to make an area ratio of the ferrite structure smaller
than that of the ferrite structure obtained by allowing to cool after rolling, so
as to improve hydrogen embrittlement resistance, and that the ferrite structure obtained
by allowing to cool after rolling has a close relation with the amount of C.
[0018] As a result of examination of the ratio of the ferrite structure obtained by allowing
to cool after rolling with respect to a steel material in which the amount of C is
variously changed, it became clear that the ratio of the ferrite structure obtained
by allowing to cool after rolling is represented by the right side of an inequality
expression (1) below. The rolled material of the present invention is characterized
by controlling the ratio of the ferrite structure so as to satisfy the inequality
expression (1) below. The [name of element] in the inequality expression (1) below
means a content expressed in % by mass of each element. As used herein, the ferrite
area ratio means a ratio expressed as a percentage.

[0019] Fig. 1 is a graph showing an influence of an amount of C and a ferrite area ratio
on hydrogen embrittlement resistance on the basis of Example data mentioned later.
As shown by a straight line in Fig. 1, the ratio of the ferrite structure obtained
by allowing to cool after rolling tends to decrease as the amount of C increases.
The rolled material of the present invention is significantly characterized by decreasing
an area ratio of ferrite as the amount of C increases. The steel material including
a large amount of C is required to reduce the ratio of the ferrite structure from
a viewpoint that a martensite structure is likely to embrittle, particularly. The
less an area ratio of ferrite, the better, and the area ratio of ferrite may be 0%.
[0020] Regarding the rolled material of the present invention, the ratio of the ferrite
structure is preferably reduced by at least 10% lower than that of the ferrite structure
obtained by allowing to cool after rolling, namely, the ratio of the ferrite structure
preferably satisfies an inequality expression (1-2) below.

[0021] In the rolled material of the present invention, when the content of supercooled
structures such as bainite and martensite increases, wire drawability is drastically
degraded. Therefore, even if supercooled structures are included, the area percentage
is 2 percentage or less, preferably 1 percentage or less, most preferably 0 percentage
or less.
[0022] In the rolled material of the present invention, formation of ferrite, bainite and
martensite is suppressed, and the structure except for them is pearlite.
[0023] The amount of hydrogen in the rolled material of the present invention will be described
below. In the rolled material of the present invention, an amount of nondiffusible
hydrogen is set at 0.40 ppm by mass or less. If a large amount of nondiffusible hydrogen
exists, hydrogen is accumulated around inclusions and segregating zones in the rolled
material to thereby generate microcracks, resulting in degraded wire drawability of
the rolled material. If a large amount of nondiffusible hydrogen exists, a permissible
amount of hydrogen, which further enters until the steel material embrittles, decreases.
Therefore, even though a small amount of hydrogen entered during use as a spring,
embrittlement of the steel material occurs and early fracture is likely to occur,
resulting in degraded hydrogen embrittlement resistance. The amount of nondiffusible
hydrogen is preferably 0.35 ppm by mass or less, and more preferably 0.30 ppm by mass
or less. The less the amount of nondiffusible hydrogen, the better. However, it is
difficult to set at 0 ppm by mass and the lower limit is about 0.01 ppm by mass.
[0024] The amount of nondiffusible hydrogen is an amount of hydrogen measured by the method
mentioned in Examples below, and specifically means the total amount of hydrogen released
at 300 to 600°C when the temperature of a steel material is raised at 100°C/hour.
[0025] The rolled material for high strength spring according to the present invention is
a low alloy steel in which the content of an alloying element is suppressed, and the
chemical composition is as follows. The present invention also includes a wire obtained
by wire-drawing the above-mentioned rolled material, followed by quenching and tempering,
and the chemical composition is the same as that of the rolled material.
C: 0.39 to 0.65%
[0026] Carbon is an element that is required to ensure the strength of a wire for spring,
and is also required to generate fine carbides that serve as hydrogen trapping sites.
From such a viewpoint, the amount of C is determined in a range of 0.39% or more.
The lower limit of the amount of C is preferably 0.45% or more, and more preferably
0.50% or more. Excessive C amount, however, might generate coarse residual austenite
and ussolved carbides after quenching and tempering, which further degrades hydrogen
embrittlement resistance. C is an element that degrades corrosion resistance, so that
there is a need to suppress the amount of C so as to enhance corrosion fatigue properties
of a spring product such as a suspension spring which is a final product. From such
a viewpoint, the amount of C is determined in a range of 0.65% or less. The upper
limit of the amount of C is preferably 0.62% or less, and more preferably 0.60% or
less.
Si: 1.5 to 2.5%
[0027] Si is an element that is required to ensure the strength, and also exhibits the effect
of refining carbides. To effectively exhibit these effects, the amount of Si is determined
in a range of 1.5% or more. The lower limit of the amount of Si is preferably 1.7%
or more, and more preferably 1.9% or more. Meanwhile, since Si is also an element
that accelerates decarburization, excessive Si amount accelerates formation of a decarburized
layer on a surface of a steel material, thus requiring the peeling step for removal
of the decarburized layer, resulting in increased manufacturing costs. Unsolved carbides
also increase, thus degrading hydrogen embrittlement resistance. From such a viewpoint,
the amount of Si is determined in a range of 2.5% or less. The upper limit of the
amount of Si is preferably 2.3% or less, more preferably 2.2% or less, and still more
preferably 2.1% or less.
Mn: 0.15 to 1.2%
[0028] Mn is an element that is employed as a deoxidizing element and reacts with S, which
is a harmful element in a steel, to form MnS, and is useful for detoxication of S.
Mn is also an element that contributes to an improvement in strength. To effectively
exhibit these effects, the amount of Mn is determined in a range of 0.15% or more.
The lower limit of the amount of Mn is preferably 0.2% or more, and more preferably
0.3% or more. Excessive Mn amount, however, degrades toughness, thus causing embrittlement
of a steel material. From such a viewpoint, the amount of Mn is determined in a range
of 1.2% or less. The upper limit of the amount of Mn is preferably 1.0% or less, more
preferably 0.85% or less, and still more preferably 0.70% or less.
P: exceeding 0% and 0.015% or less
[0029] P is a harmful element that degrades ductility such as coiling properties of a rolled
material, namely, a wire rod, and the amount thereof is preferably as small as possible.
P is likely to segregate in grain boundaries to cause grain boundary embrittlement,
and hydrogen is likely to cause fracture of grain boundaries, thus exerting an adverse
influence on hydrogen embrittlement resistance. From such a viewpoint, the amount
of P is determined in a range of 0.015% or less. The upper limit of the amount of
P is preferably 0.010% or less, and more preferably 0.008% or less. The amount of
P is preferably as small as possible, and is usually about 0.001%.
S: exceeding 0% and 0.015% or less
[0030] Like P mentioned above, S is a harmful element that degrades ductility such as coiling
properties of a rolled material, and the amount thereof is preferably as small as
possible. S is likely to segregate in grain boundaries to cause grain boundary embrittlement,
and hydrogen is likely to cause fracture of grain boundaries, thus exerting an adverse
influence on hydrogen embrittlement resistance. From such a viewpoint, the amount
of S is determined in a range of 0.015% or less. The upper limit of the amount of
S is preferably 0. 010% or less, and more preferably 0.008% or less. The amount of
S is preferably as small as possible, and is usually about 0.001%.
Al: 0.001 to 0.1%
[0031] Al is mainly added as a deoxidizing element. This element reacts with N to form AlN
to thereby detoxicate solid-soluted N, and also contributes to refining of the structure.
To adequately exhibit these effects, the amount of Al is determined in a range of
0.001% or more. The lower limit of the amount of Al is preferably 0.002% or more,
and more preferably 0.005% or more. However, since Al is an element that accelerates
decarburization, like Si, there is a need to suppress the amount of Al in a steel
for spring, which includes a large amount of Si. Therefore, in the present invention,
the amount of Al isdetermined in a range of 0.1% or less. The upper limit of the amount
of Al is preferably 0.07% or less, more preferably 0.030% or less, and particularly
preferably 0.020% or less.
Cu: 0.1 to 0.80%
[0032] Cu is an element that is effective in suppressing surface decarburization and improving
corrosion resistance. Therefore, the amount of Cu is determined in a range of 0.1%
or more. The lower limit of the amount of Cu is preferably 0.15% or more, more preferably
0.20% or more, and still more preferably 0.25% or more. Excessive Cu amount, however,
causes cracks during hot working and increases costs. Therefore, the amount of Cu
is determined in a range of 0.80% or less. The upper limit of the amount of Cu is
preferably 0.70% or less, more preferably 0.60% or less, still more preferably 0.48%
or less, particularly preferably 0.35% or less, and most preferably 0.30% or less.
Ni: 0.1 to 0.80%
[0033] Like Cu, Ni is an element that is effective in suppressing surface decarburization
and improving corrosion resistance. Therefore, the amount of Ni is determined in a
range of 0.1% or more. The lower limit of the amount of Ni is preferably 0.15% or
more, more preferably 0.20% or more, and still more preferably 0.35% or more, and
most preferably 0.45% or more. Excessive Ni amount, however, increases costs. Therefore,
the amount of Ni is determined in a range of 0.80% or less. The upper limit of the
amount of Ni is preferably 0.70% or less, more preferably 0.60% or less, still more
preferably 0.55% or less, and yet preferably 0.48% or less, 0.35% or less, and 0.30%
or less.
[0034] Basic components of the rolled material of the present invention are as mentioned
above, the balance being substantially iron. As a matter of course, inclding of inevitable
impurities introduced by the state of raw material, material, manufacturing facility,
and the like is permitted. The rolled material for spring of the present invention
has the chemical composition mentioned above even when suppressing an alloying element
such as Cu, and can achieve excellent coiling properties and hydrogen embrittlement
resistance while having high strength. Elements mentioned below may be further included
for the purpose of improving corrosion resistance according to application.
Cr: exceeding 0% and 1.2% or less
[0035] Cr is an element that is effective in improving corrosion resistance. To effectively
exhibit these effects, the amount of Cr is preferably 0.01% or more, more preferably
0.05% or more, and still more preferably 0.10% or more. However, Cr is an element
that has a strong tendency to form carbides, and forms peculiar carbides in a steel
material and is likely to be dissolved in cementite in a high concentration. It is
effective to include a small amount of Cr, however, the heating time of the quenching
step decreases in high frequency induction heating, leading to insufficient austenitizing
of dissolving carbide, cementite, and the like into a base material. Therefore, when
including a large amount of Cr, dissolving residue of cementite, in which Cr-based
carbide and metallic Cr in high concentration are solid-soluted, is generated as a
stress concentration source, so that fracture likely to occur, thus degrading hydrogen
embrittlement resistance. Therefore, the amount of Cr is preferably 1.2% or less,
more preferably 0.8% or less, and still more preferably 0.6% or less.
Ti: exceeding 0% and 0.13% or less
[0036] Ti is an element that is useful to react with S to form sulfide to thereby detoxicate
S. Ti also has the effect of refining the structure by forming carbonitride. To effectively
exhibit these effects, the amount of Ti is preferably 0.02% or more, more preferably
0.05% or more, and still more preferably 0.06% or more. Excessive Ti amount, however,
may form coarse Ti sulfide, thus degrading ductility. Therefore, the amount of Ti
is preferably 0.13% or less. From a viewpoint of cost reduction, the amount of Ti
is preferably 0.10% or less, and more preferably 0.09% or less.
B: exceeding 0% and 0.01% or less
[0037] B is an element that improve hardenability and strengthens prior austenite crystal
grain boundaries, and also contributes to suppression of fracture. To effectively
exhibit these effects, the amount of B is preferably 0.0005% or more, and more preferably
0.0010% or more. Excessive B amount, however, causes saturation of the above effects,
so that the amount of B is preferably 0.01% or less, more preferably 0.0050% or less,
and still more preferably 0.0040% or less.
Nb: exceeding 0% and 0.1% or less
[0038] Nb is an element that forms carbonitride together with C and N, and mainly contributes
to refining of the structure. To effectively exhibit these effects, the amount of
Nb is preferably 0.003% or more, more preferably 0.005% or more, and still more preferably
0.01% or more. Excessive Nb amount, however, form coarse carbonitride, thus degrading
ductility of a steel material. Therefore, the amount of Nb is preferably 0.1% or less.
From a viewpoint of cost reduction, the amount is preferably set at 0.07% or less.
Mo: exceeding 0% and 0.5% or less
[0039] Like Nb, Mo is also an element that forms carbonitride together with C and N, and
contributes to refining of the structure Mo is an element that is also effective in
ensuring the strength after tempering. To effectively exhibit these effects, the amount
of Mo is preferably 0.15% or more, more preferably 0.20% or more, and still more preferably
0.25% or more. Excessive Mo amount, however, form coarse carbonitride, thus degrading
ductility such as coiling properties of a steel material. Therefore, the amount of
Mo is preferably 0.5% or less, and more preferably 0.4% or less.
V: exceeding 0% and 0.4% or less
[0040] V is an element that contributes to an improvement in strength and refining of crystal
grains. To effectively exhibit these effects, the amount of V is preferably 0.1% or
more, more preferably 0.15% or more, and still more preferably 0.20% or more. Excessive
V amount, however, increases costs. Therefore, the amount of V is preferably 0.4%
or less, and more preferably 0.3% or less.
[0041] Nb, Mo and V may be included individually, or two or more kinds of them may be included
in combination.
[0042] The rolled material of the present invention includes O and N as inevitable impurities,
and the amount of them is preferably adjusted in a range mentioned below.
O: exceeding 0% and 0.002% or less
[0043] Excess amount of O forms oxide inclusions such as coarse Al
2O
3 and exerts an adverse influence on fatigue properties. Therefore, the upper limit
of the amount of O is preferably 0.002% or less, more preferably 0.0015% or less,
and still more preferably 0.0013% or less. Meanwhile, the lower limit of the amount
of O is generally 0.0002% or more (preferably 0.0004% or more) from an industrial
viewpoint.
N: exceeding 0% and 0.007% or less
[0044] As the amount of N increases, it forms coarse nitride together with Ti and Al, thus
exerting an adverse influence on fatigue properties. Therefore, the amount of N is
preferably as small as possible, for example, 0.007% or less, and more preferably
0.005% or less. Meanwhile, if the amount of N is too reduced, productivity is drastically
degraded. N forms nitride together with Al to thereby contribute to refining of crystal
grains. From such a viewpoint, the amount of N is preferably 0.001% or more, more
preferably 0.002% or more, and still more preferably 0.003% or more.
[0045] In the rolled material and the wire of the present invention, an ideal critical diameter
D
i represented by the equation (2) or (3) below is preferably in a range from 65 to
140 mm. To use the rolled material as a raw material for spring after wire drawing
without being subjected to soft annealing, there is a need to reduce supercooled structures
to a predetermined content or less so as not to cause wire breakage during wire drawing.
If the ideal critical diameter D
i is large, hardenability is enhanced and supercooled structures are likely to be generated,
so that the upper limit of the ideal critical diameter D
i is preferably 140 mm or less. The upper limit of the ideal critical diameter D
i is more preferably 135 mm or less, still more preferably 130 mm or less, and particularly
preferably 120 mm or less. To perform quenching to the inside as a spring, it is important
to ensure given hardenability. Therefore, the lower limit of the ideal critical diameter
D
i is preferably 65 mm or more, more preferably 70 mm or more, and still more preferably
80 mm or more.
[0046] When including no B, the following equation (2) defined in ASTM A255 is used as the
ideal critical diameter D
i. When including B, there is a need to add a boron factor B.F. defined in ASTM A255-02
by multiplying right side of the equation (2) by the boron factor, and the ideal critical
diameter D
i is calculated by the following equation (3).

where [name of element] in the above equations (2) and (3) means a content expressed
in % by mass of each element.
[0047] A method for producing a rolled material of the present invention will be described
below. In a series of steps of melting a steel having the above chemical composition,
followed by continuous casting, blooming, and hot rolling, it is possible to control
the amount of nondiffusible hydrogen of the rolled material by adjusting at least
one of (A) the amount of hydrogen in a molten steel stage, (B) the homogenizing treatment
temperature and time before blooming, and (C) the average cooling rate in a range
of 400 to 100°C after hot rolling. It is also possible to adjust the structure of
the rolled material, namely, ferrite, martensite and bainite in the range mentioned
above by adjusting all of (i) the coiling temperature (TL) after rolling, (ii) the
average cooling rate in a range of TL to 650°C, and (iii) the average cooling rate
in a range of 650 to 400°C.
[0048] There is a need to remove hydrogen in a steel by diffusion so as to reduce hydrogen
in the steel after solidification, and heating at a high temperature for a long time
is effective to increase a diffusion rate of hydrogen so as to release hydrogen from
a surface of a steel material. Specific examples of the method of reducing the amount
of hydrogen in the steel include a method of adjusting in a molten steel stage, a
method of adjusting in a stage of a continuously cast material at 1,000°C or higher
after solidification, a method of adjusting in a heating stage before hot rolling,
a method of adjusting in a heating stage during rolling, and a method of adjusting
in a cooling stage after rolling. It is particularly preferred to perform at least
one of treatments for reducing nondiffusible hydrogen (A) to (C) mentioned below.
[0049]
- (A) A degassing treatment is performed by a molten steel treatment to thereby adjust
the amount of hydrogen in a molten steel at 2. 5 ppm by mass or less.
For example, it is effective that a vacuum tank equipped with two immersion tubes
is mounted in a ladle in a secondary refining step and then an Ar gas is blown from
the side of one immersion tube, followed by vacuum degassing that enables circulation
of a molten steel to the vacuum tank utilizing the buoyancy. This method is excellent
in hydrogen removing capability and reduction in inclusion. The amount of hydrogen
in the molten steel is preferably 2.0 ppm by mass or less, more preferably 1. 8 ppm
by mass or less, still more preferably 1. 5 ppm by mass or less, and particularly
preferably 1.0 ppm by mass or less.
- (B) A homogenizing treatment before blooming is performed at 1,100°C or higher, and
preferably 1,200°C or higher for 10 hours or more.
- (C) An average cooling rate in a range of 400 to 100°C after rolling is set at 0.5°C/second
or less, and preferably 0.3°C/second or less.
[0050] When a steel material has a large cross-sectional area, particularly, it becomes
necessary to perform heating for a long time. If the steel material is heated for
a long time, decarburization is accelerated, so that the amount of hydrogen in the
steel is preferably reduced by performing the treatment (A) mentioned above.
[0051] To adjust an area ratio of the structure in the rolled material, namely, ferrite,
bainite and martensite in the range mentioned above, it is preferred to adjust rolling
conditions as follows, and to adjust to rolling conditions that satisfy all conditions
(i) to (iii).
(i) Coiling temperature TL before initiation of cooling: 900°C or higher
[0052] To reduce the ratio of ferrite, there is a need that the coiling temperature TL before
initiation of cooling is adjusted at a temperature in an austenitic single phase.
Therefore, TL is more preferably 910°C or higher, and still more preferably 930°C
or higher. The upper limit of TL is not particularly limited and is about 1,000°C,
although it depends on a finish rolling temperature.
(ii) Average cooling rate in a range of TL to 650°C: 2 to 5°C/second
[0053] To allow pearlite transformation to take place, there is a need to suppress formation
of ferrite by increasing a cooling rate in a temperature range of TL to 650°C. Therefore,
an average cooling rate in a range of TL to 650°C is preferably 2°C/second or more,
more preferably 2.3°C/second or more, and still more preferably 2.5°C/second or more.
If the cooling rate in a range of TL to 650°C is excessively increased, supercooled
structures such as martensite and bainite are likely to be formed. Therefore, the
cooling rate at TL to 650°C is preferably 5°C/second or less, more preferably 4.5°C/second
or less, and still more preferably 4°C/second or less.
(iii) Average cooling rate in a range of 650 to 400°C: 2°C/second or less
[0054] Further, a cooling rate in a range of 650 to 400°C, at which formation of supercooled
structures is initiated, is preferably decreased. An average cooling rate in a range
of 650 to 400°C is preferably 2°C/second or less, more preferably 1.5°C/second or
less, and still more preferably 1°C/second or less. The lower limit of the average
cooling rate is not particularly limited and is, for example, about 0.3°C/second.
[0055] To manufacture a coil spring used in automobiles, there is a need that a wire is
manufactured by wire processing of the rolled material mentioned above, namely, wire
drawing. For example, in a cold coiled spring, quenching and tempering such as high
frequency induction heating are performed after wire drawing, and such a wire is also
included in the present invention. For example, the rolled material is subjected to
wire drawing at an area reduction rate of about 5 to 35%, followed by quenching at
about 900 to 1,000°C and further tempering at about 300 to 520°C. The quenching temperature
is preferably 900°C or higher so as to sufficiently perform austenitizing, and preferably
1,000°C or lower so as to prevent grain coarsening. The heating temperature for tempering
may be set at an appropriate temperature in a range of 300 to 520°C according to a
target value of a wire strength. When quenching and tempering are performed by high
frequency induction heating, quenching and tempering times are respectively in a range
of about 10 to 60 seconds.
[0056] The thus obtained wire of the present invention can realize a high tensile strength
in a range of 1,900 MPa or more. The tensile strength is preferably 1,950 MPa or more,
and more preferably 2,000 MPa or more. The upper limit of the tensile strength is
not particularly limited and is about 2, 500 MPa. The wire of the present invention
can exhibit corrosion fatigue properties even at a high strength in a range of 1,
900 MPa or more because of use of the rolled material of the present invention.
[0057] This application claims priority based on Japanese Patent Application No.
2013-272569 filed on December 27, 2013 in Japan, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Examples
[0058] The present invention will be described in more detail below by way of Examples.
It should be noted that, however, these examples are never construed to limit the
scope of the invention; various modifications and changes may be made without departing
from the scope and spirit of the invention and should be considered to be within the
scope of the invention.
[0059] Each of steel materials having chemical compositions shown in Tables 1 to 3 was melted
by melting in converter and then subjecting to continuous casting and a homogenizing
treatment at 1,100°C or higher. After the homogenizing treatment, blooming was performed,
followed by heating at 1,100 to 1,280°C and further hot rolling to obtain a wire rod
having a diameter of 14.3 mm, namely, a rolled material. Whether or not a degassing
treatment of a molten steel is implemented, coiling temperature TL after hot rolling,
and cooling conditions after cooling are as shown in Tables 4 to 6. In test examples
in which "Implementation" is written in the column of the homogenizing treatment,
the homogenizing treatment is performed at 1,100°C for 10 hours or more. In test examples
in which the mark "-" is written, the time of the homogenizing treatment at 1,100°C
is less than 10 hours.
[0060] With respect to the thus obtained wire rods, namely, rolled materials, the structure
was identified by the procedure below, and the amount of nondiffusible hydrogen was
measured and also wire drawability was measured.
(1) Identification of Structure
[0061] A cross section of each rolled material was subjected to buffing and etched with
an etching solution, and then a microstructure was observed by an optical microscope
and each area ratio of a ferrite structure, and bainite and martensite structures
(hereinafter, bainite and martensite structures are collectively referred to as supercooled
structures) was measured. The measurement was performed at the position of 1 mm deep
from a surface. The observation field has a size of 400 µm × 300 µm and the measurement
was performed with respect to five visual fields, and the average was regarded as
a ratio of each structure. The ratio of the pearlite structure was determined by subtracting
the ratios of ferrite and supercooled structures from 100%.
(2) Amount of Nondiffusible Hydrogen
[0062] A specimen measuring 20 mm in width × 40 mm in length was cut out from the rolled
material. After raising the temperature of the specimen at a temperature rise rate
of 100°C/hour, a hydrogen release amount at 300 to 600°C was measured using a gas
chromatogram, and the hydrogen release amount was regarded as the amount of nondiffusible
hydrogen.
(3) Wire Drawability
[0063] Wire drawability was evaluated by reduction of area of a tensile test. A JIS No.
14 specimen was cut out from the rolled material and a tensile test was performed
under the conditions of a crosshead speed of 10 mm/minute in accordance with JIS Z2241
(2011) using a universal tester, and then reduction of area RA was measured
[0064] Next, the rolled material was subjected to wire drawing, namely, cold drawing to
obtain a wire having a diameter of 12.5 mm, followed by quenching and tempering. An
area reduction rate of the drawn wire mentioned above is about 23.6% and the conditions
of quenching and tempering are as follows.
Quenching and Tempering Conditions
[0065]
- High frequency induction heating
- Heating rate: 200°C/second
- Quenching: 950°C, 20 seconds, water cooling
- Tempering: each temperature in a range of 300 to 520°C, 20 seconds, water cooling
[0066] With respect to the wire after wire drawing, and quenching and tempering, the tensile
strength, hydrogen embrittlement resistance and corrosion resistance were evaluated.
(4) Measurement of Tensile Strength
[0067] After quenching and tempering, a wire was cut into a predetermined length and a tensile
test was performed at a distance between chucks of 200 mm and a tensile speed 5 mm/minute
in accordance with JIS Z2241 (2011).
(5) Evaluation of Hydrogen Embrittlement Resistance
[0068] A specimen measuring 10 mm in width × 1.5 mm in thickness × 65 mm in length was cut
out from the wire after quenching and tempering. In a state where stress of 1,400
MPa is applied to the specimen by four-point bending, the specimen was immersed in
a mixed solution of 0.5 mol/L of sulfuric acid and 0.01 mol/L of potassium thiocyanate.
Using a potentiostat, a voltage of -700 mV, which is less nobler than that of a saturated
calomel electrode (SCE), was applied and the fracture time required for the occurrence
of cracking was measured.
(6) Evaluation of Corrosion Resistance
[0069] A specimen measuring 10 mm in diameter × 100 mm in length was cut out from the wire
after quenching and tempering by cutting. The specimen was subjected to a salt spray
test with an aqueous 5%NaCl solution for 8 hours and then held in a wet atmosphere
at 35°C and a relative humidity of 60% for 16 hours. After repeating this cycle seven
times in total, a difference.in weight before and after the test was measured and
the thus obtained difference was regarded as a corrosion weight loss.
[0070] The results (1) to (6) mentioned above are shown in Tables 4 to 6.
[Table 1]
| |
Chemical composition (% by mass) The balance being iron and inevitable impurities |
Di value |
| Steel |
C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
Al |
Cu |
Ni |
Cr |
Ti |
B |
Nb |
Mo |
V |
O |
N |
B is not added |
B is added |
| A1 |
0.42 |
2.1 |
0.86 |
0.008 |
0.006 |
0.027 |
0.22 |
0.23 |
0.35 |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0042 |
109 |
|
| A2 |
0.41 |
1.8 |
0.86 |
0.006 |
0.007 |
0.028 |
0.21 |
0.21 |
0.35 |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
0.0013 |
0.0054 |
97 |
|
| A3 |
0.42 |
2.1 |
0.91 |
0.007 |
0.007 |
0.025 |
0.26 |
0.26 |
0.36 |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
0.0009 |
0.0043 |
117 |
|
| A4 |
0.43 |
2.2 |
0.89 |
0.010 |
0.006 |
0.029 |
0.23 |
0.24 |
0.35 |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
0.0010 |
0.0038 |
117 |
|
| A5 |
0.42 |
2.1 |
0.85 |
0.005 |
0.003 |
0.027 |
0.26 |
0.24 |
0.33 |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
0.0014 |
0.0044 |
107 |
|
| A6 |
0.41 |
2.1 |
0.89 |
0.006 |
0.002 |
0.029 |
0.20 |
0.23 |
0.34 |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
0.0013 |
0.0042 |
108 |
|
| A7 |
0.42 |
2.1 |
0.89 |
0.010 |
0.011 |
0.025 |
0.26 |
0.23 |
0.35 |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0052 |
113 |
|
| A8 |
0.60 |
2.0 |
0.80 |
0.004 |
0.006 |
0.030 |
0.35 |
0.30 |
0.08 |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
0.0009 |
0.0055 |
87 |
|
| A9 |
0.59 |
2.0 |
0.71 |
0.008 |
0.003 |
0.025 |
0.36 |
0.37 |
0.06 |
0.10 |
0.0032 |
|
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0039 |
|
80 |
| A10 |
0.62 |
2.1 |
0.80 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
0.031 |
0.34 |
0.33 |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0014 |
0.0039 |
93 |
|
| A11 |
0.60 |
2.0 |
0.71 |
0.008 |
0.005 |
0.027 |
0.34 |
0.30 |
|
|
0.0030 |
|
|
|
0.0014 |
0.0040 |
|
68 |
| A12 |
0.61 |
1.9 |
0.80 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.030 |
0.30 |
0.37 |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0013 |
0.0045 |
83 |
|
| A13 |
0.61 |
2.0 |
0.69 |
0.008 |
0.009 |
0.031 |
0.35 |
0.35 |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0049 |
81 |
|
| A14 |
0.60 |
2.0 |
0.68 |
0.005 |
0.006 |
0.028 |
0.33 |
0.30 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
0.0011 |
0.0039 |
79 |
|
| A15 |
0.59 |
2.0 |
0.72 |
0.008 |
0.009 |
0.031 |
0.37 |
0.36 |
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0010 |
0.0040 |
161 |
|
| A16 |
0.62 |
2.0 |
0.65 |
0.006 |
0.005 |
0.025 |
0.37 |
0.36 |
0.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0039 |
185 |
|
| A17 |
0.60 |
2.0 |
0.66 |
0.003 |
0.003 |
0.031 |
0.31 |
0.32 |
0.55 |
|
0.003% |
|
|
|
0.0008 |
0.0054 |
|
141 |
| A18 |
0.35 |
2.1 |
0.79 |
0.010 |
0.012 |
0.032 |
0.28 |
0.30 |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0015 |
0.0056 |
118 |
|
| A19 |
0.40 |
2.0 |
0.77 |
0.010 |
0.005 |
0.025 |
0.25 |
0.27 |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0013 |
0.0055 |
104 |
|
| A20 |
0.64 |
1.9 |
0.80 |
0.009 |
0.004 |
0.032 |
0.25 |
0.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0013 |
0.0054 |
73 |
|
| A21 |
0.68 |
2.0 |
0.79 |
0.008 |
0.004 |
0.026 |
0.30 |
0.26 |
|
|
0.0030 |
|
|
|
0.0015 |
0.0047 |
|
43 |
| A22 |
0.50 |
1.3 |
0.80 |
0.005 |
0.001 |
0.030 |
0.29 |
0.27 |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0014 |
0.0043 |
75 |
|
| A23 |
0.52 |
1.6 |
0.80 |
0.005 |
0.006 |
0.030 |
0.31 |
0.27 |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0046 |
112 |
|
| A24 |
0.49 |
2.0 |
0.20 |
0.008 |
0.009 |
0.025 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0014 |
0.0053 |
86 |
|
| A25 |
0.50 |
2.0 |
0.80 |
0.005 |
0.004 |
0.032 |
0.28 |
0.28 |
0.50 |
0.09 |
0.0035 |
|
|
|
0.0008 |
0.0053 |
|
163 |
| A26 |
0.53 |
2.0 |
0.80 |
0.003 |
0.006 |
0.027 |
0.27 |
0.27 |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0014 |
0.0045 |
95 |
|
[Table 2]
| |
Chemical composition (% by mass) The balance being iron and inevitable impurities |
Di value |
| Steel |
C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
Al |
Cu |
Ni |
Cr |
Ti |
B |
Nb |
Mo |
V |
O |
N |
B is not added |
B is added |
| A27 |
0.50 |
2.1 |
1.50 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.032 |
0.31 |
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0015 |
0.0047 |
111 |
|
| A28 |
0.55 |
2.1 |
0.76 |
0.032 |
0.027 |
0.029 |
0.28 |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0010 |
0.0051 |
67 |
|
| A29 |
0.50 |
2.0 |
0.77 |
0.005 |
0.030 |
0.025 |
0.29 |
0.31 |
0.20 |
|
0.0030 |
|
|
|
0.0014 |
0.0041 |
|
111 |
| A30 |
0.55 |
1.9 |
0.75 |
0.006 |
0.004 |
0.029 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0011 |
0.0054 |
88 |
|
| A31 |
0.50 |
2.0 |
0.82 |
0.009 |
0.008 |
0.032 |
0.13 |
0.27 |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0011 |
0.0049 |
82 |
|
| A32 |
0.50 |
2.1 |
0.78 |
0.010 |
0.011 |
0.027 |
0.32 |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0045 |
65 |
|
| A33 |
0.45 |
2.0 |
0.77 |
0.004 |
0.002 |
0.030 |
0.45 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.08 |
0.0035 |
|
|
|
0.0010 |
0.0049 |
|
138 |
| A34 |
0.5% |
1.9 |
0.81 |
0.007 |
0.008 |
0.025 |
0.29 |
0.00 |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0011 |
0.0051 |
95 |
|
| A35 |
0.52 |
2.0 |
0.82 |
0.004 |
0.005 |
0.028 |
0.30 |
0.12 |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0009 |
0.0041 |
85 |
|
| A36 |
0.50 |
2.0 |
0.76 |
0.008 |
0.003 |
0.029 |
0.31 |
0.029 |
0.22 |
0.08 |
0.0030 |
|
|
|
0.0014 |
0.0040 |
|
113 |
| A37 |
0.49 |
2.0 |
0.82 |
0.009 |
0.008 |
0.030 |
0.29 |
0.45 |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0011 |
0.0043 |
115 |
|
| A38 |
0.50 |
2.1 |
0.76 |
0.008 |
0.005 |
0.026 |
0.30 |
0.25 |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0015 |
0.0054 |
133 |
|
| A39 |
0.45 |
1.8 |
0.40 |
0.005 |
0.004 |
0.031 |
0.28 |
0.28 |
1.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0013 |
0.0051 |
124 |
|
| A40 |
0.55 |
1.9 |
0.75 |
0.008 |
0.009 |
0.029 |
0.29 |
0.26 |
1.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0010 |
0.0040 |
268 |
|
| A41 |
0.50 |
2.1 |
0.95 |
0.010 |
0.008 |
0.028 |
0.31 |
0.32 |
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
0.0009 |
0.0045 |
77 |
|
| A42 |
0.50 |
2.0 |
0.95 |
0.008 |
0.007 |
0.029 |
0.31 |
0.27 |
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
0.0010 |
0.0052 |
74 |
|
| A43 |
0.47 |
1.9 |
0.95 |
0.005 |
0.004 |
0.031 |
0.26 |
0.27 |
|
|
0.0030 |
|
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0050 |
68 |
|
| A44 |
0.48 |
2.0 |
0.98 |
0.008 |
0.002 |
0.030 |
0.32 |
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0038 |
75 |
|
| A45 |
0.50 |
2.0 |
0.76 |
0.007 |
0.004 |
0.032 |
0.25 |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
0.0014 |
0.0056 |
134 |
|
| A46 |
0.50 |
2.0 |
0.78 |
0.007 |
0.004 |
0.025 |
0.30 |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.30 |
0.0014 |
0.0045 |
96 |
|
| A47 |
0.40 |
2.0 |
0.77 |
0.010 |
0.005 |
0.025 |
0.25 |
0.27 |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0013 |
0.0055 |
104 |
|
| A48 |
0.49 |
2.0 |
0.20 |
0.008 |
0.009 |
0.025 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0014 |
0.0053 |
86 |
|
| A49 |
0.50 |
2.0 |
0.80 |
0.005 |
0.004 |
0.032 |
0.28 |
0.28 |
0.50 |
0.09 |
0.0035 |
|
|
|
0.0008 |
0.0053 |
|
163 |
| A50 |
0.53 |
2.0 |
0.80 |
0.003 |
0.006 |
0.027 |
0.27 |
0.27 |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0014 |
0.0045 |
95 |
|
[Table 3]
| |
Chemical composition (% by mass) The balance being iron and inevitable impurities |
Di value |
| Steel |
C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
Al |
Cu |
Ni |
Cr |
Ti |
B |
Nb |
Mo |
V |
O |
N |
B is not added |
B is added |
| A51 |
0.59 |
2.1 |
0.35 |
0.006 |
0.008 |
0.027 |
0.29 |
0.47 |
0.31 |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0040 |
77 |
|
| A52 |
0.61 |
2.2 |
0.55 |
0.007 |
0.008 |
0.027 |
0.31 |
0.52 |
0.29 |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
0.0009 |
0.0040 |
106 |
|
| A53 |
0.58 |
2.2 |
0.41 |
0.006 |
0.008 |
0.025 |
0.32 |
0.60 |
0.35 |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
0.0014 |
0.0051 |
95 |
|
| A54 |
0.61 |
2.1 |
0.55 |
0.010 |
0.010 |
0.032 |
0.28 |
0.80 |
0.25 |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
0.0009 |
0.0041 |
105 |
|
| A55 |
0.58 |
2.2 |
0.40 |
0.008 |
0.009 |
0.029 |
0.12 |
0.53 |
0.28 |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0043 |
78 |
|
| A56 |
0.60 |
2.2 |
0.70 |
0.007 |
0.006 |
0.030 |
0.20 |
0.58 |
0.28 |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
0.0010 |
0.0043 |
120 |
|
| A57 |
0.61 |
2.1 |
0.62 |
0.008 |
0.010 |
0.027 |
0.58 |
0.62 |
0.27 |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
0.0011 |
0.0054 |
122 |
|
| A58 |
0.62 |
2.2 |
0.48 |
0.008 |
0.008 |
0.025 |
0.29 |
0.56 |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0041 |
102 |
|
| A59 |
0.59 |
2.2 |
0.59 |
0.010 |
0.007 |
0.030 |
0.32 |
0.47 |
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0009 |
0.0040 |
97 |
|
| A60 |
0.49 |
2.2 |
0.58 |
0.007 |
0.009 |
0.032 |
0.32 |
0.56 |
0.21 |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0043 |
87 |
|
| A61 |
0.55 |
2.1 |
0.52 |
0.009 |
0.006 |
0.025 |
0.29 |
0.51 |
0.19 |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0041 |
80 |
|
| A62 |
0.60 |
2.2 |
0.65 |
0.010 |
0.007 |
0.029 |
0.31 |
0.56 |
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
0.0009 |
0.0053 |
73 |
|
| A63 |
0.61 |
2.2 |
0.75 |
0.008 |
0.008 |
0.030 |
0.28 |
0.49 |
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
0.0011 |
0.0053 |
79 |
|
| A64 |
0.61 |
2.3 |
0.60 |
0.007 |
0.007 |
0.032 |
0.35 |
0.56 |
0.35 |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0051 |
128 |
|
| A65 |
0.58 |
2.4 |
0.54 |
0.008 |
0.009 |
0.029 |
0.28 |
0.62 |
0.32 |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
0.0012 |
0.0041 |
113 |
|
| A66 |
0.61 |
2.1 |
0.50 |
0.009 |
0.008 |
0.025 |
0.28 |
0.58 |
0.19 |
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
0.0009 |
0.0054 |
104 |
|
| A67 |
0.63 |
2.1 |
0.42 |
0.008 |
0.006 |
0.029 |
0.45 |
0.55 |
0.27 |
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
0.0009 |
0.0043 |
121 |
|
[Table 5]
| Test No, |
Steel No. |
Whether or not treatment for reduction of hydrogen in steel is implemented |
Roiling/cooling conditions |
Amount of nondiffusible hydrogen (ppm by mass) |
Ferrite area ratio (%) |
Value of right side of inequality expression (1) |
(Value of right side of inequality expression (1)) -(Ferrite area ratio) |
Reduction rate (%) |
Area ratio of supercooled structure (%) |
Area ratio of structure (%) |
Wire tensile strength (MPa) |
Reduction rolled of rolled material (%) |
Hydrogen Corrosion embrittlement weight resistance loss (sec) (g) |
| Molten steel treatment |
Homogenizing treatment |
Cooling (iii) in a range of 400 to 100°C after rolling |
TL temperature (°C) |
Average cooling rate in a range of TL to 650°C (°C/sec) Cooling (i) |
average cooling rate in a range of 650 to 400°C (°C/sec) Cooling (ii) |
| 33 |
A19 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
950 |
4 |
1 |
0.12 |
35.9 |
42.7 |
6.8 |
16 |
≤1% |
64.1 |
1913 |
50.0 |
1,100 |
4.2 |
| 34 |
A20 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
900 |
4 |
I |
0.08 |
0.3 |
3.5 |
3.2 |
92 |
≤1% |
99.7 |
2188 |
44.1 |
1068 |
4.4 |
| 35 |
A21 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
900 |
4 |
1 |
0.18 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
≤1% |
- |
2254 |
39.6 |
756 |
4.2 |
| 36 |
A22 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.12 |
20.9 |
26.4 |
5.5 |
21 |
≤1% |
79.1 |
1855 |
53.1 |
|
|
| 37 |
A23 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.10 |
16.3 |
23.1 |
6.8 |
30 |
≤1% |
83.7 |
2043 |
50.1 |
1090 |
4.2 |
| 38 |
A24 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.12 |
21.0 |
28.0 |
7.0 |
25 |
<1% |
79.0 |
2006 |
52.4 |
1116 |
3.8 |
| 39 |
A25 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.22 |
18.8 |
26.4 |
7.6 |
29 |
≤1% |
81.2 |
2026 |
42.8 |
1073 |
4.1 |
| 40 |
A26 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.09 |
14.2 |
21.5 |
7.3 |
34 |
≤1% |
85.8 |
2068 |
46.4 |
1092 |
4.1 |
| 41 |
A27 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.25 |
18.3 |
26.4 |
8.1 |
31 |
≤1% |
81.7 |
2022 |
33.9 |
756 |
3.8 |
| 42 |
A28 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
I |
0.10 |
11.6 |
18.2 |
6.6 |
36 |
≤1% |
88.4 |
2089 |
44.9 |
369 |
4.2 |
| 43 |
A29 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.11 |
19.5 |
26.4 |
6.9 |
26 |
≤1% |
80.5 |
2019 |
47.3 |
258 |
3.9 |
| 44 |
A30 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.14 |
11.6 |
18.2 |
6.6 |
36 |
≤ 1% |
88.4 |
2089 |
45.5 |
1080 |
5.3 |
| 45 |
A31 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.30 |
19.3 |
26.4 |
7.1 |
27 |
≤1% |
80.7 |
2033 |
40.2 |
1058 |
4.4 |
| 46 |
A32 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.13 |
20.2 |
26.4 |
6.2 |
23 |
≤1% |
79.8 |
2029 |
45.0 |
1081 |
4 |
| 47 |
A33. |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.20 |
28.2 |
34.6 |
6.4 |
18 |
≤1% |
71.8 |
1965 |
45.5 |
1084 |
3.7 |
| 48 |
A34 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.25 |
19.2 |
26.4 |
7.2 |
27 |
≤1% |
80.8 |
2031 |
43.4 |
1075 |
5.4 |
| 49 |
A35 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.16 |
16.6 |
23.1 |
6.5 |
28 |
≤1% |
83.4 |
2056 |
44.7 |
1074 |
4.7 |
| 50 |
A36 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.19 |
20.3 |
26.4 |
6.1 |
23 |
≤1% |
79.7 |
2041 |
44.1 |
1073 |
4 |
| 51 |
A37 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.08 |
21.1 |
28.0 |
6.9 |
25 |
≤1% |
78.9 |
2020 |
48.0 |
1090 |
3.5 |
| 52 |
A38 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.15 |
19.7 |
26.4 |
6.7 |
25 |
≤1% |
80.3 |
2030 |
44.9 |
1081 |
4.2 |
| 53 |
A39 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.08 |
27.3 |
34.6 |
7.3 |
21 |
≤1% |
72.7 |
1977 |
55.1 |
1127 |
4.1 |
| 54 |
A40 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.18 |
9.0 |
18.2 |
9.2 |
51 |
≤1% |
91.0 |
2087 |
44.0 |
885 |
4 |
| 55 |
A41 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.22 |
19.7 |
26.4 |
6.7 |
25 |
≤1% |
80.3 |
2024 |
40.9 |
1057 |
3.9 |
| 56 |
A42 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1. |
0.25 |
19.6 |
26.4 |
6.8 |
26 |
< 1% |
80.4 |
2031 |
40.7 |
1057 |
4 |
| 57 |
A43 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.25 |
25.0 |
31.3 |
6.3 |
20 |
≤1% |
75.0 |
1989 |
42.6 |
1064 |
4.2 |
| 58 |
A44 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.22 |
22.9 |
29.7 |
6.8 |
23 |
≤1% |
77.1 |
1998 |
41.9 |
1071 |
4 |
| 59 |
A45 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.09 |
20.5 |
26.4 |
5.9 |
22 |
≤1% |
79.5 |
2023 |
47.7 |
1088 |
4 |
| 60 |
A46 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.15 |
19.6 |
26.4 |
6.8 |
26 |
≤1% |
80.4 |
2022 |
46.0 |
1082 |
4.1 |
| 61 |
A47 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
950 |
1 |
1 |
0.12 |
50.2 |
42.7 |
-7.5 |
-18 |
≤1% |
49.8 |
1905 |
51.2 |
905 |
4.3 |
| 62 |
A48 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
1 |
1 |
0.12 |
32.2 |
28.0 |
-4.2 |
-15 |
≤1% |
67.8 |
2000 |
53.0 |
920 |
3.8 |
| 63 |
A49 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
1 |
1 |
0.22 |
30.2 |
26.4 |
3.8 |
-14 |
≤1% |
69.8 |
2025 |
42.5 |
775 |
4 |
| 64 |
A50 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
1 |
1 |
0.09 |
23.5 |
21.5 |
-2.0 |
-9 |
≤1% |
76.5 |
2060 |
46.0 |
799 |
4 |
[Table 6]
| Test No. |
Steel No, |
Whether or not treatment for reduction of hydrogen in steel is implemented |
Roiling/cooling conditions |
Amount of nondiffusible hydrogen (ppm by mass) |
Ferrite area ratio (%) |
Value of right side of inequality expression (1) |
(Value of right side of inequality expression (1)) -(Ferrite area ratio) |
Reduction rate (%) |
Area ratio of supercooled structure (%) |
Area ratio of pearlite structure (%) |
Wire tensile strength (MPa) |
Reduction rolled material (%) |
Hydrogen embrittlement resistance (sec) |
Corrosion weight loss (g) |
| Molten steel treatment |
Homogenizing treatment |
Cooling (iii) in a range of 400 to 100°C after rolling |
TL temperature (°C) |
Average cooling rate in a range of TL to 650°C (°C/sec) Cooling (i) |
Average cooling rate in a range of 650 to 400°C (°C/sec) Cooling (ii) |
| 65 |
A51 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.18 |
5.0 |
11.7 |
6.7 |
57 |
≤1% |
95.0 |
1992 |
46.8 |
1079 |
2.5 |
| 66 |
A52 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.25 |
1.0 |
8.4 |
7.5 |
89 |
≤1% |
99.0 |
2030 |
37.2 |
1069 |
2.2 |
| 67 |
A53 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.22 |
6.2 |
13.3 |
7.1 |
53 |
<1% |
93.8 |
2010 |
40.3 |
1068 |
1.7 |
| 68 |
A54 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.16 |
1.2 |
8.4 |
7.2 |
86 |
≤1% |
98.8 |
2004 |
47.7 |
1094 |
1.0 |
| 69 |
A55 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
I |
0.22 |
6.2 |
13.3 |
7.2 |
54 |
≤1% |
93.8 |
2018 |
32.6 |
1030 |
2.1 |
| 70 |
A56 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.16 |
2.5 |
10.1 |
7.6 |
75 |
≤1% |
97.5 |
2018 |
35.1 |
1015 |
1.7 |
| 71 |
A57 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.20 |
1.0 |
8.4 |
7.4 |
88 |
≤1% |
99.0 |
1994 |
43.6 |
1094 |
1.4 |
| 72 |
A58 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.24 |
0.5 |
6.8 |
6.3 |
93 |
≤1% |
99.5 |
1995 |
44.9 |
1080 |
2.2 |
| 73 |
A59 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.23 |
4.6 |
11.7 |
7.1 |
61 |
≤1% |
95.4 |
2010 |
44.4 |
1064 |
2.4 |
| 74 |
A60 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.24 |
21.4 |
28.0 |
6.6 |
24 |
≤1% |
78.6 |
1981 |
50.8 |
1122 |
2.1 |
| 75 |
A61 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.17 |
11.6 |
18.2 |
6.6 |
36 |
≤1% |
88.4 |
2004 |
45.7 |
1085 |
2.3 |
| 76 |
A62 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.19 |
3.2 |
10.1 |
6.8 |
68 |
<1% |
96.8 |
2021 |
42.1 |
1060 |
1.8 |
| 77 |
A63 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.22 |
1.1 |
8.4 |
7.3 |
87 |
≤1% |
98.9 |
2011 |
42.0 |
1158 |
2.0 |
| 78 |
A64 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
I |
0.24 |
0.6 |
8.4 |
7.9 |
93 |
≤1% |
99.4 |
2028 |
45.2 |
1178 |
1.7 |
| 79 |
A65 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.24 |
5.6 |
13.3 |
7.8 |
58 |
≤1% |
94.4 |
1988 |
42.4 |
1076 |
1.5 |
| 80 |
A66 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.18 |
1.3 |
8.4 |
7.2 |
85 |
≤1% |
98.7 |
1981 |
40.2 |
1024 |
1.8 |
| 81 |
A67 |
Implementation |
- |
- |
930 |
4 |
1 |
0.19 |
0.5 |
5.2 |
4.7 |
90 |
≤1% |
99.5 |
2014 |
39.4 |
1069 |
1.9 |
[0071] Samples of test Nos. 1 to 4, 7 to 11, 15 to 18, 21 to 25, 33, 34, 37 to 40, 45 to
47, 49 to 53, 55 to 60, and 65 to 81 are manufactured from a steel having appropriately
adjusted chemical composition under preferred manufacturing conditions mentioned above,
so that the amount of nondiffusible hydrogen, and the area ratio of ferrite and supercooled
structures satisfy the requirements of the present invention. Therefore, the rolled
material exhibits a reduction of area RA of 30% or more in the tensile test and is
excellent in wire drawability, and the wire obtained by wire drawing of the rolled
material, followed by quenching and tempering has an excellent tensile strength in
a range of 1,900 MPa or more. Further, the wire obtained after quenching and tempering
exhibits a fracture time of 1,000 seconds or more in an evaluation test of hydrogen
embrittlement resistance and a corrosion weight loss of 5.0 g or less in an evaluation
test of corrosion resistance, so that the wire is excellent in both hydrogen embrittlement
resistance and corrosion resistance. Further, "reduction rate" in Tables 4 to 6 is
a value in which a ratio of a difference between a value of right side of the inequality
expression (1) and an actual value of a ferrite area ratio to a value of right side
of the inequality expression (1) is expressed as percentage.
[0072] In contrast, in examples other than the above-mentioned ones, at least any one of
the requirements, including the chemical composition of a steel, the amount of nondiffusible
hydrogen, the ferrite area ratio, and the supercooled structure area ratio does not
satisfy the requirements of the present invention, leading to the result that at least
any one property of wire drawability of a rolled material, tensile strength, hydrogen
embrittlement resistance, and corrosion resistance of a wire is inferior.
[0073] All of samples of test Nos. 5, 6, 19 and 20 are not subjected to the above-mentioned
treatment for reduction of nondiffusible hydrogen, so that the amount of nondiffusible
hydrogen in the rolled material increased, thus degrading wire drawability.
[0074] In samples of tests Nos. 12 and 26, because of low average cooling rate in a range
of a coiling temperature TL to 650°C, the ferrite area ratio increased, thus degrading
hydrogen embrittlement resistance. In samples of tests Nos. 13 and 27, because of
high average cooling rate in a range of a coiling temperature TL to 650°C, the supercooled
structures increased, thus degrading wire drawability. In samples of tests Nos. 14
and 28, because of high average cooling rate in a range of 650 to 400°C, the supercooled
structure increased, thus degrading wire drawability.
[0075] In samples of tests Nos. 29 to 31, the supercooled structure increased, thus degrading
wire drawability. In sample of test No. 32, because of a small amount of C, the wire
exhibited poor tensile strength. In sample of test No. 35, because of a large amount
of C, residual austenite was generated, thus degrading hydrogen embrittlement resistance.
In sample of test No. 36, because of a small amount of Si, the wire exhibited poor
tensile strength.
[0076] In sample of test No. 41, because of a large amount of Mn, toughness was degraded,
thus degrading hydrogen embrittlement resistance. In sample of test No. 42, because
of a large amount of P and a large amount of S, grain boundary embrittlement occurred,
thus degrading hydrogen embrittlement resistance. In sample of test No. 43, because
of a large amount of S, grain boundary embrittlement occurred, thus degrading hydrogen
embrittlement resistance. In sample of test No. 44, neither Cu nor Ni is not added,
thus degrading corrosion resistance.
[0077] In sample of test No. 48, Ni is not added, occurred, thus degrading corrosion resistance.
In sample of test No. 54 , because of a large amount of Cr, dissolving residue of
cementite, is which chromium-based carbide and metallic Cr in high concentration are
solid-soluted, was generated as a stress concentration source, thus degrading hydrogen
embrittlement resistance.
[0078] In samples of tests Nos. 61 to 64, because of low average cooling rate in a range
of a coiling temperature TL to 650°C, the ferrite area ratio increased, thus degrading
hydrogen embrittlement resistance.
Industrial Applicability
[0079] The rolled material and the wire of the present invention are industrially useful
since they can be suitably used for coil springs that are used in automobiles, for
example, a valve spring, a suspension spring and the like that are used in the engine,
suspension, and the like.