BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
[0001] This present invention generally relates to high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy products
and methods for making such products.
2. Background
[0002] High strength 7xxx (Al-Zn) aluminum alloy products are extensively used in aerospace
structure application, in which the material strength, fracture toughness, fatigue
resistance, and corrosion resistance are required simultaneously. In order to aggressively
reduce aircraft weight for fuel efficiency, thick plate, high strength 7xxx aluminum
alloys are being pursued assertively by airframe manufacturers and aluminum material
manufacturers. This is especially critical for large size commercial aircraft in which
a significant amount of large parts are fabricated through monolithic fabrication
processing for cost reduction. A thick plate is required for such large monolithic
components. However, the combination of high strength and high thickness imposes an
extreme metallurgical challenge to produce such thick plate, high strength, aluminum
products for the aluminum manufacturing industry. Due to such extreme metallurgical
challenges, only very limited commercial products are currently available for this
key aerospace application based on the most recent "Aluminum Association: 2011 Yellow/Tan
Sheets" and "Addendum to 2011 Edition of Yellow/Tan Sheets" for aluminum and aluminum
alloy products registered in Aluminum Association.
[0003] The chemical composition of an aluminum alloy product has a phenomenal influence
on the final production properties. In 7xxx series aluminum alloys, the high levels
of Zn, Mg and Cu are usually added in order to achieve high strength and corrosion
resistance. However, compositions with too high Zn and Mg content generally negatively
affect stress corrosion cracking (SCC) resistance and fracture toughness performance.
Additionally, concentrations of Cu that are too high also significantly increase the
risk of high level of undesirable coarse Al
2MgCu particles and macro-segregation from plate surface to center. During casting,
large Al
2CuMg particles can form during solidification. Such large particles normally can be
dissolved during subsequent homogenization and solution heat treatment. If the Cu
content is too high, however, this could promote extreme high levels of Al
2CuMg particles, which cannot be dissolved during subsequent thermal treatments. Those
undissolved Al
2CuMg particles significantly reduce the strength and damage tolerance performance.
[0004] In order to achieve aging precipitation hardening, Cu, Mg and Zn alloying element
have to be in solid solution before aging. This is generally achieved through the
processing steps of Solution Heat Treatment, followed by cold water quench. With the
higher Mg, Zn and Cu levels, it is extremely difficult to dissolve all constituent
particles, which consume a significant amount of added alloying elements, into solid
solution. More importantly, the higher levels of alloying element increase the potential
coarse particles precipitation during quenching. This is especially critical for thick
plate with slow cooling rate during quench. It is easier to achieve better strength
and other properties for a thin cross section product than for a thick cross section
product of high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy. As cross section increases the quench
related cooling rate in the plate significantly decreases, resulting in not only lowering
overall strength but also the fracture toughness. This phenomenon is also referred
to as high strength 7xxx thick plate quench sensitivity, which is of great concern
in high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy.
[0005] In summary, the combination of the complicated age hardening behavior, specific quenching
condition for thick plate, strict damage tolerance and corrosion requirements necessitates
a very fine, optimized, and probably very narrow chemistry range that needs to be
discovered. There is a strong need of such new alloys in aerospace application, especially
for large size commercial aircraft.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] Thick plate high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy products comprise Zn from 8.0 to 8.4
wt.%, Mg from 1.5 to 2.0 wt.% and Cu from 1.1 to 1.5 wt.%, 4.0 to 5.3 of Zn/Mg weight
percentage ratio, 0.14 to 0.19 of Cu/Zn weight percentage ratio, and 10.7 to 11.6
wt.% of Cu+Mg+Zn, one or more elements selected from the group consisting of up to
0.2% Zr, up to 0.2% Sc, up to 0.2% Hf, and the balance A1, and impurities.
[0007] In one embodiment of the present invention, the thick plate high strength 7xxx aluminum
alloy product is produced using precisely controlled thermal mechanical processes.
[0008] Preferably, the alloy can be fabricated to a thickness of 3-10 inch, more preferably
4-10 inch, even more preferably 4-8 inches thickness plates, extrusions, and forging
products. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy product also provides necessary short-transverse
ductility, damage tolerance performance as well as corrosion resistance performance
required for aerospace applications. Such plates, forgings and extrusions are suitable
for use in making aerospace structural components like large commercial airplane wing
components,
[0009] It has been surprisingly discovered that an aluminum alloy having a high Zn chemistry,
associated with precise Mg and Cu content, Zn/Mg and Cu/Zn weight percentage ratios
along with deliberately controlled thermal mechanical processing, is capable of producing
3 to 10" gauge thick products with high strength, better damage tolerance, and corrosion
properties never achieved before.
[0010] In one embodiment, the high strength 7xxx thick plate aluminum product offers a promising
opportunity for significant fuel efficiency and cost reduction advantage for commercial
airplanes, especially large size commercial aircraft. An example of such application
of the present invention is the integral design wing box, which requires thick cross
section 7xxx aluminum alloy products. Material strength is a key design factor for
weight reduction. Also, important are Short Transverse (ST) tensile ductility, damage
tolerance, corrosion resistance performance, such as exfoliation and stress corrosion
resistance, and fatigue crack growth resistance.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] The features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the
following detailed description of a preferred embodiment thereof, taken in conjunction
with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a graph showing a comparison of the Cu and Zn levels between 32 chemistries
in US patent 6,972,110 and present invention range;
FIG. 2 is a graph showing the strength and fracture toughness of 4" invention and
non-invention alloy plates;
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the strength and fracture toughness of 6" invention and
non-invention alloy plates;
FIG. 4 is a graph showing the strength and fracture toughness of 7.5" invention and
non-invention alloy plates;
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the effect of Cu+Mg+Zn on fracture toughness of 7.5" thick
plate showing that too low or too high Cu+Mg+Zn gives worse fracture toughness;
FIG. 6 is a graph showing the effect of Cu/Zn ratio on fracture toughness of 7.5"
thick plate; and
FIG. 7 is a graph showing the effect of Zn/Mg ratio on fracture toughness of 6" thick
plate.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0012] The thick plate high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy product comprises 8.0 to 8.4 wt.%
Zn, 1.5 to 2.0 wt.% Mg, 1.1 to 1.5 wt.% Cu, 4.0 to 5.3 of Zn/Mg weight percentage
ratio, 0.14 to 0.19 of Cu/Zn weight percentage ratio, and 10.7 to 11.6 wt.% of Cu+Mg+Zn,
one or more elements selected from the group consisting of up to 0.2 wt.% Zr, up to
0.2 wt.% Sc, and up to 0.2 wt.% Hf, and the balance A1, and impurities.
[0013] The upper or lower limits for the ranges provided above are understood to include
all of the numbers provided within the range. It is understood that within the range
of 8.0 to 8.4 wt.% Zn, the upper or lower limit for the amount ofZn may be selected
from 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3 and 8.4 wt.% Zn. It is understood that within the range of
1.5 to 2.0 wt.% Mg, the upper or lower limit for the amount of Mg may be selected
from 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9 and 2.0 wt.% Mg. It is understood that within the range
of 1.1 to 1.5 wt.% Cu, the upper or lower limit for the amount of Cu may be selected
from 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5 wt.% Cu. It is understood that within the range of
4.0 to 5.3 Zn/Mg weight percentage ratio, the upper or lower limit for the Zn/Mg weight
percentage ratio may be selected from 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8,
4.9, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 Zn/Mg weight percentage ratio. It is understood that within
the range of 0.14 and 0.19 Cu/Zn weight percentage ratio, the upper or lower limit
for the Cu/Zn weight percentage ratio may be selected from 0.14, 0.15, 0.16, 0.17,
0.18 and 0.19 Cu/Zn weight percentage ratio. It is understood that within the range
of 10.7 to 11.6 wt.% Cu+Mg+Zn, the upper or lower limit for the amount of Cu+Mg+Zn
may be selected from 10.7, 10.8, 10.9, 11.0, 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5 and 11.6
wt.% Cu+Mg+Zn.
[0014] The unique chemistry range along with the ratios of Zn/Mg and Cu/Zn in accordance
with the present invention gives the distinctive thermodynamic and kinetic behaviors
of precipitations during quenching and aging heat treatment.
[0015] Zn and Mg are generally added to produce metastable and/or stable MgZn
2 (η' and/or η Phase) and its variant phases, which are the predominant precipitation
hardening phases. However, the actual chemical compositions of age hardening phases
are far more complicated than 1:2 atomic ratio of Mg/Zn. The Zn/Mg weight percentage
ratio in the range of 4.0 to 5.3 surprisingly gives the optimized physical metallurgy
suitable for thick plate high strength and fracture toughness properties.
[0016] Copper is generally added in order to improve SCC resistance performance. Cu can
significantly increase the breakdown potentials, resulting in better corrosion resistance
performance. During quenching and aging process, Cu can substitute with Zn in MgZn
2 type phase to form Mg(ZnCuAl)
2 phases in grain boundary and/or matrix. Therefore, the level of Cu should be carefully
considered for different Zn and Mg levels as well as the plate thickness which affects
the precipitation during quenching. The Cu/Zn ratio in the range of 0.14 to 0.19 surprisingly
gives the optimized physical metallurgy suitable for thick plate high strength and
fracture toughness properties.
[0017] In one embodiment, the thick plate high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy product includes
≤0.12 wt.% Si, preferably ≤0.05 wt.% Si. In one embodiment, the thick plate high strength
7xxx aluminum alloy product includes ≤0.15 wt.% Fe, preferably ≤0.08 wt.% Fe. In one
embodiment, the thick plate high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy product includes ≤ 0.2
wt.% Mn. In one embodiment, the thick plate high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy product
includes ≤0.04 wt.% Cr, preferably no Cr is added to the alloy other than that provided
as an impurity. In one embodiment, the thick plate high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy
product includes ≤0.06 wt.% Ti.
[0018] The thick plate high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy product of the present invention
may also include low level of "impurities" that are not included intentionally. The
"impurities" means any other elements except above described Al, Zn, Mg, Cu, Zr, Sc,
Hf, Si, Fe, Mn, Cr and Ti.
[0019] Preferably, the thick plate high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy products, such as plates,
forgings and extrusions, are suitable for use in making aerospace structural components
like large commercial airplane wing components. Preferably, the alloy has a thickness
of 3 - 10 inch, preferably 4 - 10 inch, more preferably 4 - 8 inch for producing plates,
extrusion, and forging products. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy product also
provides necessary damage tolerance performance as well as corrosion resistance performance
required for aerospace application.
[0020] The present invention has various advantageous mechanical and physical properties.
In one embodiment of the present invention the term "high strength" means the minimum
Long-Transverse (LT) yield strength at quarter-thickness (th/4) is (74 - 0.56 * plate
thickness in inch) ksi, and the minimum LT ultimate strength at th/4 is (78 - 0.36
* plate thickness in inch) ksi. In one embodiment of the present invention, the thick
plate high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy product has fracture toughness values of a
minimum 27 ksi-in
1/2 at th/4. In one embodiment of the present invention, the ST tensile ductility is
at least (7 - 0.5 * plate thickness in inch)%. In one embodiment of the present invention
improved exfoliation, such as better than or equal to EA EXCO rating per ASTM G34
at th/10 and th/2, may be observed. In one embodiment of the present invention, improved
stress corrosion resistance, such as at least 20 days at 25 ksi and preferably at
least 20 days at 30 ksi per ASTM G47 in a T7651 temper, may be observed.
[0021] In one embodiment of the present invention, the thick plate high strength 7xxx aluminum
alloy product is produced using a precise chemistry range along with precisely controlled
thermal mechanical processes. In one embodiment, this thick plate high strength 7xxx
aluminum alloy product is used in aerospace applications.
[0022] As indicated, the thick plate high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy product may be used
to produce plates, extrusions, and forging products. In one embodiment, the thick
plate high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy product is used to produce a wrought product
that is a rolled thick plate including any of the chemistries provided in the above-mentioned
embodiments. The rolled thick plate may be manufactured using known process conditions
such as homogenization, hot-rolling, solution heat treatments and ageing treatments.
[0023] In one embodiment, ingots of the thick plate high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy product
may be cast, homogenized, hot rolled, solution heat treated, cold water quenched,
optionally stretched, and aged to desired temper. In one embodiment, the thick plate
high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy is a plate subjected to a final T7651 and T7451
tempers in the thickness range from 3 inch to 10 inch. The ingots may be homogenized
at temperatures from 454 to 491 °C (849 to 916°F). The hot rolling start temperature
may be from 385 to 450 °C (725 to 842°F). The exit temperature may be in a similar
range as the start temperature. The plates may be solution heat treated at temperature
range from 454 to 491 °C (849 to 916°F). The plates are cold water quenched to room
temperature and may be stretched at about 1.5 to 3%. The quenched plate may be subjecting
to any known aging practices known by those of skill in the art including, but not
limited to, two-step aging practices that produce a final T7651 or T7451 temper. When
using a T7651 temper, the first stage temperature may be in the range of 100 to 140
°C (212 to 284 °F) for 4 to 24 hours and the second stage temperature may be in the
range of 135 to 200 °C (275 to 392 °F) for 5 to 20 hours.
[0024] Table 1 compares the present invention alloy chemistry with other aluminum alloy
products currently available based on the most recent "Aluminum Association: 2014
Yellow/Tan Sheets" and "Aluminum Standard and Data 2013" for more than 4" thick plates
with T7651 temper. It should be mentioned that although there are more commercial
alloys available for lower than 4" thickness plates and T7451 temper, only very few
alloys are available for thicker than 4" plates with high strength T7651 temper.
[0025] As shown in Table 1, the invention alloy has distinguished chemistry with other alloys.
AA7140 and AA7081 have much lower Zn than present invention alloy, and AA7085 has
lower Zn than invention alloy. The Zn is very critical for high strength property.
In addition, the Cu/Zn weight percentage ratios of AA7065 and AA7140 alloy are much
higher than that of current invention alloy. The high Cu/Zn weight percentage ratio
can significantly reduce the strength potential since the Cu may consume more Mg during
solidification to form undesirable Al
2CuMg particles.
Table 1
| Alloy |
Gage Range |
Cu, Min. |
Cu, Max. |
Mg, Min. |
Mg, Max. |
Zn, Min. |
Zn, Max. |
Zn/Mg, min. |
Zn/Mg, max. |
Cu/Zn, min. |
Cu/Zn, max. |
Mg+Cu+Zn, min. |
Mg+Cu+Zn, max. |
| 7140 |
4" to 10" |
1.30 |
2.30 |
1.50 |
2.40 |
6.20 |
7.00 |
2.58 |
4.67 |
0.19 |
0.37 |
9.0 |
11.7 |
| 7081 |
1" to 6" |
1.20 |
1.80 |
1.80 |
2.20 |
6.90 |
7.50 |
3.14 |
4.17 |
0.16 |
0.26 |
9.9 |
11.5 |
| 7085 |
4" to 7 |
1.30 |
2.00 |
1.20 |
1.80 |
7.00 |
8.00 |
3.89 |
6.67 |
0.16 |
0.29 |
9.5 |
11.8 |
| 7065 |
1" to 6" |
1.90 |
2.30 |
1.50 |
1.80 |
7.10 |
8.30 |
3.94 |
5.53 |
0.23 |
0.32 |
10.5 |
12.4 |
| Invention |
3" to 10" |
1.1 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
2.0 |
8.0 |
8.4 |
4.00 |
5.30 |
0.14 |
0.19 |
10.7 |
11.6 |
[0026] As shown in the Table 1, the closest product is AA7085-T7651, in which Zn is lower
than the present invention. AA7085 was registered by Alcoa and described in United
States Patent
US 6,972,110. In this patent, 28 different chemistries were studied in lab scale samples and 4
commercial scale products. FIG. 1 shows a graph comparing the Cu and Zn levels between
those 32 chemistries and present invention range. It clearly demonstrates the uniqueness
of the current invention alloy. Although a very broad chemistry range was explored
in
US Patent 6,972,110, the chemistry range of the present invention alloy was not studied in
US Patent 6,972,110.
[0027] 7xxx high strength aluminum alloys with high Zn were also explored in
US Patent 6,790,407. It should be noticed that the alloys described in
US Patent 6,790,407 intentionally require the addition of Cr, Ni, and hydrogen in certain levels for
better grain structures, precipitations, and uniform non-metallic inclusions. In contrast,
the present invention alloy requires none of these elements due to the potential negative
impacts on fracture toughness. In
US Patent 6,790,407, seven (7) alloys were specifically disclosed. All alloys except Alloy 2 in
US Patent 6,790,407 have higher than 1.5 wt.% Cu. For Alloy 2 in
US Patent 6,790,407, the Mg and Zn are much higher than those presently provided in the invention alloy
which includes ranges of Cu and Mg are 1.1 to 1.5 wt.% and 1.5 to 2.0 wt.% respectively.
[0028] Although the following examples demonstrate various embodiments of the present invention,
one of skill in the art should understand how additional thick plate high strength
7xxx aluminum alloy products can be fabricated in accordance with the present invention.
The examples should not be construed to limit the scope of protection provided for
the present invention.
Examples (Plant Trial)
[0029] Sixteen (16) industrial scale ingots were cast by commercial DC (Direct Chill) casting
process and processed to different thickness plates. Table 2 gives the typical chemical
compositions of selected plates with different gauges.
Table 2: Chemical compositions of industrial scale ingots
| Sample ID |
Patent Alloy |
Si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mg |
Zn |
Mn |
Zr |
Zn/Mg |
Cu/Zn |
Cu+Mg+Zn |
Plate Thickness in |
| Alloy A |
Yes |
0.022 |
0.038 |
1.3 |
1.8 |
8.0 |
0.001 |
0.11 |
4.5 |
0.16 |
11.1 |
4 |
| Alloy B |
Yes |
0.039 |
0.078 |
1.2 |
1.7 |
8.1 |
0.004 |
0.09 |
4.7 |
0.15 |
11.0 |
4 |
| Alloy C |
No |
0.04 |
0.063 |
1.2 |
2.1 |
8.1 |
0.005 |
0.10 |
3.9 |
0.15 |
11.4 |
4 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Alloy D |
Yes |
0.04 |
0.065 |
1.4 |
1.6 |
8.2 |
0.003 |
0.10 |
5.2 |
0.17 |
11.2 |
6 |
| Alloy E |
yes |
0.039 |
0.054 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
8.2 |
0.133 |
0.04 |
5.0 |
0.18 |
11.3 |
6 |
| Alloy F |
Yes |
0.032 |
0.055 |
1.2 |
1.7 |
8.2 |
0.001 |
0.10 |
4.9 |
0.15 |
11.1 |
6 |
| Alloy G |
No |
0.04 |
0.059 |
1.6 |
1.9 |
6.8 |
0.003 |
0.10 |
3.6 |
0.24 |
10.3 |
6 |
| Alloy H |
No |
0.04 |
0.06 |
1.3 |
2.1 |
8.1 |
0.005 |
0.10 |
3.9 |
0.16 |
11.5 |
6 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Alloy I |
Yes |
0.035 |
0.06 |
1.4 |
1.6 |
8.2 |
0.003 |
0.11 |
5.1 |
0.18 |
11.2 |
7.5 |
| Alloy J |
Yes |
0.039 |
0.062 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
8.2 |
0.003 |
0.11 |
5.1 |
0.18 |
11.2 |
7.5 |
| Alloy K |
Yes |
0.033 |
0.054 |
1.3 |
1.9 |
8.0 |
0.002 |
0.11 |
4.1 |
0.16 |
11.2 |
7.5 |
| Alloy L |
Yes |
0.039 |
0.056 |
1.4 |
1.7 |
8.1 |
0.129 |
0.04 |
4.8 |
0.17 |
11.2 |
7.5 |
| Alloy M |
No |
0.04 |
0.059 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
6.8 |
0.002 |
0.10 |
3.5 |
0.23 |
10.4 |
7.5 |
| Alloy N |
No |
0.03 |
0.051 |
1.3 |
1.6 |
8.6 |
0.002 |
0.11 |
5.3 |
0.14 |
11.5 |
7.5 |
| Alloy O |
No |
0.04 |
0.059 |
1.8 |
1.7 |
8.5 |
0.002 |
0.11 |
4.9 |
0.22 |
12.0 |
7.5 |
| Alloy P |
No |
0.04 |
0.059 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
9.0 |
0.002 |
0.11 |
5.5 |
0.17 |
12.1 |
7.5 |
[0030] Alloy A, B, D to F, and I to L are invention alloys. Alloy C is not an invention
alloy since the Mg is too high and Zn/Mg weight percentage ratio is too low compared
with the invention alloy. Alloy G is not an invention alloy since the Cu is too high,
Zn is too low, Zn/Mg weight percentage ratio is too low, Cu/Zn weight percentage ratio
is too high, and Cu+Mg+Zn is too low. Alloy H is not an invention alloy since the
Mg is too high and Zn/Mg weight percentage ratio is too low. Alloy M is not an invention
alloy since the Cu is too high, Zn is too low, Zn/Mg weight percentage ratio is too
low, Cu/Zn weight percentage ratio is too high, and Cu+Mg+Zn is too low. Alloy N is
not an invention alloy since the Zn is too high. Alloy O is not an invention alloy
since the Cu is too high, Zn is too high, and Cu+Zn+Mg is too high. Alloy P is not
an invention alloy since the Zn is too high, Zn/Mg weight percentage ratio is too
high, and Cu+Mg+Zn is too high.
[0031] Ingots were homogenized, hot rolled, solution heat treated, quenched, stretched and
aged to final T7651 temper plates in the thickness range from 4 inch to 7.5 inch.
The ingots were homogenized at a temperature from 465 to 485 °C (869 to 905°F). The
hot rolling start temperature is from 400 to 440 °C (752 to 824°F). The exit rolling
temperature is in the similar range as start temperature. The rolling reduction of
each pass was deliberately controlled to achieve target temperature during hot rolling
process.
[0032] The plates were solution heat treated at temperature range from 470 to 485 °C (878
to 905°F), cold water quenched to room temperature and stretched at about 1.5 to 3%.
A two-step aging practice was used to produce final T7651 temper. The first stage
temperature is in the range of 110 to 130 °C (230 to 266 °F) for 4 to 12 hours and
the second stage temperature is in the range of 145 to 160 °C (293 to 320 °F) for
8 to 20 hours.
[0033] Tables 3 give tensile and fracture toughness properties. The 0.2% offset yield strength
(TYS) along transverse direction (LT) was measured at quarter thickness (T/4) under
ASTM B557 specification. The plane strain fracture toughness (K
1c) in T-L orientations at quarter thickness (T/4) was measured under ASTM E399 using
CT specimens.
Table 3: Tensile and fracture toughness properties of final T7651 temper plates
| Sample ID |
Patent Alloy |
Plate Thickness in |
LT TYS @T/4 ksi |
LT UTS @T/4 ksi |
LT Elongation @T/4 % |
K1c T-L @T/4 ksi-in1/2 |
| Alloy A |
Yes |
4 |
72.2 |
77.8 |
10.4 |
28.65 |
| Alloy B |
Yes |
4 |
73.2 |
77.6 |
11.0 |
27.2 |
| Alloy C |
No |
4 |
70.7 |
78.0 |
11.0 |
27.1 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Alloy D |
Yes |
6 |
73.0 |
78.0 |
6.9 |
27.9 |
| Alloy E |
yes |
6 |
71.5 |
77.1 |
7.1 |
30.4 |
| Alloy F |
Yes |
6 |
71.0 |
76.3 |
7.5 |
28.7 |
| Alloy G |
No |
6 |
69.1 |
76.2 |
8.3 |
26.1 |
| Alloy H |
No |
6 |
69.9 |
77.7 |
7.9 |
24.8 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Alloy I |
Yes |
7.5 |
69.8 |
75.4 |
5.8 |
31.8 |
| Alloy J |
Yes |
7.5 |
70.5 |
76.1 |
5.8 |
30.5 |
| Alloy K |
Yes |
7.5 |
72.2 |
78.0 |
4.1 |
28.9 |
| Alloy L |
Yes |
7.5 |
70.6 |
76.4 |
5.0 |
28.9 |
| Alloy M |
No |
7.5 |
70.1 |
77.1 |
5.0 |
26.7 |
| Alloy N |
No |
7.5 |
68.2 |
74.3 |
5.2 |
30.1 |
| Alloy O |
No |
7.5 |
72.3 |
77.9 |
4.6 |
24.9 |
| Alloy P |
No |
7.5 |
68.3 |
75.2 |
6.4 |
27.9 |
[0034] FIG. 2 is a graph showing a comparison of the strength and fracture toughness of
invention alloys (Alloy A and B) and non-invention alloy (Alloy C) 4" thickness plates.
With same industrial processing route and final plate thickness, the invention Alloy
A and Alloy B have much better performance of strength and fracture toughness than
Alloy C, which has too high Mg and too low Zn/Mg ratio than invention alloys. The
results demonstrate that the invention alloys has surprisingly much better performance
than non-invention alloy. It also demonstrates that the small chemistry deviation
from invention alloy can severely decreases final production properties.
[0035] FIG. 3 is a graph showing the strength and fracture toughness of invention alloys
(D, E, and F) and non-invention alloys (G and H) 6" thickness plates. Both Alloy G
and H have lower fracture toughness with similar or lower strength than Alloy D to
F invention alloys. Alloy G is not an invention alloy since the Cu is too high, Zn
is too low, and Zn/Mg weight percentage ratio is too low, Cu/Zn weight percentage
ratio is too high, and Cu+Mg+Zn is too low. Alloy H is not an invention alloy since
the Mg is too high and Zn/Mg weight percentage ratio is too low. The results demonstrate
that the invention alloys surprisingly have much better performance than non-invention
alloy. It also confirms that even small chemistry deviation from invention alloy can
severely decreases final production properties.
[0036] FIG. 4 is a graph showing the strength and fracture toughness of invention alloys
(I to L) and non-invention alloys (M to P) 7.5" thickness plates. All non-invention
alloys have lower combination of strength and fracture toughness compared with invention
alloys. As shown in Table 2, Alloy M is not an invention alloy since the Cu is too
high, Zn is too low, Zn/Mg weight percentage ratio is too low, Cu/Zn weight percentage
ratio is too high, and Cu+Mg+Zn is too low. Alloy N is not an invention alloy since
the Zn is too high. Alloy O is not an invention alloy since the Cu is too high, Zn
is too high, and Cu+Zn+Mg is too high. Alloy P is not an invention alloy since the
Zn is too high, Zn/Mg weight percentage ratio is too high, and Cu+Mg+Zn is too high.
The results confirm that the invention alloys surprisingly has much better performance
than non-invention alloys. It once again demonstrates that even small chemistry deviation
from invention alloy can severely decreases final production properties.
[0037] FIG. 5 is a graph showing the fracture toughness as function of total Cu+Mg+Zn amount.
It can been seen that the invention alloy range of 10.7 to 11.6% of total Cu+Mg+Zn
gives the best performance. It is very critical to control total Cu+Mg+Zn in an optimized
range in order to achieve both higher strength and better fracture toughness especially
for thick plate product.
[0038] FIG. 6 is a graph showing the fracture toughness as function of total Cu/Zn weight
percentage ratio. It can be seen that the range provided by the invention alloy Cu/Zn
weight percentage ratio range of 0.14 to 0.19 gives better performance than other
range. The beneficial impact of Cu on corrosion resistance performance is also strongly
affected by Zn level. In addition, Cu contents that are too high also significantly
increase the risk of undesirable coarse Al
2MgCu particles and macro-segregation from plate surface to center. Therefore, the
ratio of Cu/Zn is very critical for high strength, high damage tolerance, and corrosion
resistance performance required by aerospace application.
[0039] Figure 7 gives the fracture toughness as function of Zn/Mg weight percentage ratio.
It can be seen that the invention alloy Zn/Mg weight percentage ratio range of 4.0
to 5.3 gives the better performance than other range. The Zn/Mg ratio strongly affects
the metastable and/or stable MgZn
2 (η' and/or η Phase) and its variant phases at different aging stages.
[0040] The more comprehensive strength and fracture toughness at different through layers
and orientations were evaluated for invention alloys A, E, and K with 4", 6" and 7.5"
plate thickness respectively. Table 4 gives the comprehensive strength and fracture
toughness testing results. T/2 represents half thickness of plate, L, LT and ST indicates
rolling direction, long transverse direction, and short transverse direction respectively.
Table 4: The comprehensive strength and fracture toughness testing results
| |
Alloy A
Invention Alloy |
Alloy E
Invention Alloy |
Alloy K
Invention Alloy |
| Plate Thickness (in.) |
4.0 |
6.0 |
7.5 |
| LT TYS @T/4 (ksi) |
72.2 |
71.5 |
72.2 |
| LT UTS @T/4 (ksi) |
77.8 |
77.1 |
78.0 |
| LT El. @ T/4 (%) |
10.4 |
7.1 |
4.1 |
| LT TYS @T/2 (ksi) |
|
69.4 |
68.9 |
| LT UTS @T/2 (ksi) |
|
75.0 |
75.4 |
| LT El. @T/2 (%) |
|
6.0 |
5.9 |
| L TYS @ T/4 (ksi) |
73.4 |
72.5 |
73.3 |
| L UTS @ T/4 (ksi) |
77.1 |
75.7 |
76.7 |
| L E1.@ T/4 (%) |
15.3 |
9.5 |
10.6 |
| L TYS @ T/2 (ksi) |
|
73.7 |
74.6 |
| L UTS @ T/2 (ksi) |
|
78.1 |
79.6 |
| LE1. @ T/2 (%) |
|
9.2 |
8.8 |
| ST TYS @ T/2 (ksi) |
65.5 |
68.4 |
68.5 |
| ST UTS @ T/2 (ksi) |
75.4 |
75.4 |
75.7 |
| ST El. @ T/2 (%) |
8.3 |
5.2 |
3.7 |
| K1c L-T @ T/4 (ksi-in1/2) |
36.6 |
34.0 |
34.1 |
| K1c T-L @ T/4 (ksi-in1/2) |
28.7 |
30.4 |
28.9 |
| Klc S-L @ T/2 (ksi-in1/2) |
32.1 |
27.4 |
26.1 |
[0041] Stress corrosion resistance is critical for aerospace application. The standard stress
corrosion cracking resistance testing was performed in accordance with the requirements
of ASTM G47 which is alternate immersion in a 3.5% NaCl solution under constant deflection.
Three specimens were tested per sample. All specimens survived 30 days testing without
failing under 30 ksi stress level in ST direction. Meanwhile, the exfoliation corrosion
resistance was tested according to ASTM G34. The specimen size was 51 mm (2") in the
LT direction and 102 mm (4") in the L direction. Testing was performed at thickness
positions of surface (T/10) and plate center (T/2). All samples were rated as pitting
based on ASTM G34.
[0042] Although the present invention has been disclosed in terms of a preferred embodiment,
it will be understood that numerous additional modifications and variations could
be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the
following claims:
1. A thick plate high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy product comprising
8.0 to 8.4 wt. % Zn,
1.5 to 2.0 wt. % Mg,
1.1 to 1.5 wt. % Cu, and
one or more elements selected from the group consisting of up to 0.2 wt.% Zr, up to
0.2% wt. Sc, and up to 0.2 wt.% Hf,
with the balance A1, and impurities
wherein said alloy product has a Zn/Mg weight percentage ratio between 4.0 to 5.3,
a Cu/Zn weight percentage ratio between 0.14 to 0.19, and an amount of Cu+Mg+Zn between
10.7 to 11.6 wt.%.
2. The aluminum alloy product of claim 1 comprising ≤0.12 wt.% Si; optionally comprising
≤0.05 wt.% Si.
3. The aluminum alloy product of claim 1 or 2 comprising ≤0.15 wt.% Fe; optionally comprising
≤0.08 wt.% Fe.
4. The aluminum alloy product of any one of claims 1 to 3 comprising ≤0.20 wt.% Mn.
5. The aluminum alloy product of any one of claims 1 to 4 comprising ≤0.04 wt.% Cr; and
/ or
comprising ≤ 0.06 wt.% Ti.
6. The aluminum alloy product of any one of claims 1 to 5 consisting essentially of
8.0 to 8.4 wt. % Zn,
1.5 to 2.0 wt. % Mg,
1.1 to 1.5 wt. % Cu,
one or more elements selected from the group consisting of up to 0.2 wt.% Zr, up to
0.2 wt.% Sc, and up to 0.2 wt.% Hf,
≤0.12 wt.% Si,
≤0.15 wt.% Fe,
≤0.20 wt.% Mn,
≤0.04 wt.% Cr,
and ≤0.06 wt.% Ti
with the balance Al, and impurities
wherein said alloy product has a Zn/Mg weight percentage ratio between 4.0 to 5.3,
a Cu/Zn weight percentage ratio between 0.14 to 0.19, and an amount ofCu+Mg+Zn between
10.7 to 11.6 wt.%..
7. The aluminum alloy product of any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein said aluminum alloy
product is a 7.92 - 25.4 cm (3-10 inches) thick plate, extrusion, or forging product;
or
wherein said aluminum alloy product is a 10.16 - 25.4 cm (4-10 inches) thick plate,
extrusion, or forging product; or
wherein said aluminum alloy product is a 10.16 - 20.32 cm (4-8 inches) thick plate,
extrusion, or forging product.
8. The aluminum alloy product of any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the aluminum alloy
product has a minimum Long-Transverse (LT) yield strength at quarter-thickness (th/4)
of (510,2 - 0,152*th in mm) MPa ((74 - 0.56 * plate thickness in inch) ksi) and a
minimum LT ultimate strength at th/4 of (537,8 - 0,098*th in mm) Mpa ((78 - 0.36 *
plate thickness in inch) ksi).
9. A method of manufacturing a thick plate high strength 7xxx aluminum alloy product
comprising the steps of:
a. casting stock of an ingot of a 7xxx aluminum alloy comprising the aluminum alloy
product of any one of claims 1 to 8;
b. homogenizing the cast stock;
c. hot working the stock by one or more methods selected from the group consisting
of rolling, extrusion, and forging;
d. solution heat treating (SHT) of the hot worked stock;
e. cold water quenching said SHT stock;
f. optionally stretching the SHT stock; and
h. ageing of the SHT, cold water quenched and optionally stretched stock to a desired
temper.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein said step of homogenizing includes homogenizing at
temperatures from 454 to 491 °C (849 to 916°F).
11. The method of claim 9 or 10, wherein said step of hot working includes hot rolling
at a temperature of 385 to 450 °C (725 to 842°F).
12. The method of any one of claims 9 to 11, wherein said step of solution heat treating
includes solution heat treating at temperature range from 454 to 491 °C (849 to 916°F).
13. The method of any one of claims 9 to 12, wherein said step of optionally stretching
includes stretching at about 1.5 to 3%.
14. The method of any one of claims 9 to 13, wherein said step of ageing includes a two-step
T7651 ageing process wherein a first stage temperature ranges from 100 to 140 °C (212
to 284 °F) for 4 to 24 hours and a second stage temperature ranges from 135 to 200
°C (275 to 392 °F) for 5 to 20 hours.
15. The method of any one of claims 9 to 14, wherein
b. said step of homogenizing includes homogenizing at temperatures from 454 to 491
°C (849 to 916°F);
c. said step of hot working includes hot rolling at a temperature of 385 to 450 °C
(725 to 842°F);
d. said step of solution heat treating includes solution heat treating at temperature
range from 454 to 491 °C (849 to 916°F);
e. said step of cold water quenching includes cold water quenching to room temperature;
f. said step of optionally stretching includes stretching at about 1.5 to 3%;
g. said step of ageing includes a two-step T7651 ageing process wherein a first stage
temperature ranges from 100 to 140 °C (212 to 284 °F) for 4 to 24 hours and a second
stage temperature ranges from 135 to 200 °C (275 to 392 °F) for 5 to 20 hours.