Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a composition for inducing the direct transdifferentiation
of somatic cells into induced oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (iOPCs), including,
as an active ingredient, at least one protein selected from the group consisting of
direct transdifferentiation factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, or a vector having the nucleic acid
molecule introduced thereto, and to a method for direct transdifferentiation of somatic
cells into oligodendrocyte progenitor cells using the above composition. In addition,
the present invention relates to a pharmaceutical composition, a cell therapy agent,
a drug screening composition, or a 3D printing biomaterial composition for manufacturing
artificial tissue, each of which includes oligodendrocyte progenitor cells induced
by the above method for direct transdifferentiation of somatic cells into oligodendrocyte
progenitor cells, thereby being suitable for use in the prevention or treatment of
spinal cord injury or demyelination disease.
Background Art
[0002] Oligodendrocytes originate from the neuroepithelium during the differentiation of
glial-restricted precursors, known as oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. Oligodendrocyte
progenitor cells are a type of neuroglial cell that is essential for the production
of the myelin sheath in the central nervous system (CNS). Myelination enables neurons
to maintain the action potential of electrical impulses through severed axons.
[0003] The dysfunction of oligodendrocytes is a disorder created by the loss of myelin sheath,
and causes many neurodegenerative diseases, including multiple sclerosis, cerebral
palsy, leukodystrophy, neuropathy, central pontine myelinolysis, and hypomyelination.
In order to treat damaged oligodendrocytes, transplantation of oligodendrocyte progenitor
cells, functioning to restore endogenous cells or to produce myelin sheath, into the
central nervous system, is the fundamental method for treating myelin injury.
[0004] In this regard, transplantation of oligodendrocytes has been used to treat myelin
injury, but is problematic because effective methods of differentiating oligodendrocytes
are not readily available and because it is very difficult to obtain large amounts
of oligodendrocytes.
[0005] Furthermore, although methods for differentiation of embryonic stem cells (ESCs)
and induced pluripotent stem cells into oligodendrocytes have been devised, they suffer
from low induction efficiency into cells of interest and the risk of forming tumors
from the embryonic stem cells or pluripotent stem cells upon differentiation into
specific cells.
[0006] In order to eliminate the risk of forming tumors, research is ongoing into the direct
transdifferentiation of somatic cells into other types of somatic cells or multipotent
stem cells, rather than via pluripotent stem cells. However, such a cell reprogramming
mechanism is difficult to specifically prove, attributable to the excessively large
number of genes involved in the induction procedure, and thus the technical level
thereof that has been exhibited to date is negligible. Despite the establishment of
a de-differentiation strategy, the development of technically simple and highly efficient
methods must continue in order to real-world therapeutic applications thereof Moreover,
when the techniques developed thus are evaluated in terms of efficiency and safety,
they are dissatisfactory. Furthermore, methods of preparing oligodendrocyte progenitor
cells by expressing only a single gene from somatic cells have not yet been known.
[0007] To respond to such circumstances, the present inventors have ascertained that oligodendrocyte
progenitor cells may be prepared from somatic cells through direct transdifferentiation
using at least one gene selected from among direct transdifferentiation factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, without the risk of forming tumors, thus culminating in the present invention.
Disclosure
Technical Problem
[0008] Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a composition for inducing
the direct transdifferentiation of somatic cells into oligodendrocyte progenitor cells,
including, as an active ingredient, at least one protein selected from the group consisting
of direct transdifferentiation factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, or a vector having the nucleic acid
molecule introduced thereto.
[0009] Another object of the present invention is to provide a pharmaceutical composition
for the prevention or treatment of spinal cord injury or demyelination disease, a
cell therapy agent for the prevention or treatment of spinal cord injury or demyelination
disease, a drug screening composition for the treatment of spinal cord injury or demyelination
disease, or a 3D printing biomaterial composition for manufacturing artificial tissue
for the treatment of spinal cord injury or demyelination disease, each of which includes,
as an active ingredient, at least one protein selected from the group consisting of
direct transdifferentiation factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, a vector having the nucleic acid molecule
introduced thereto, or an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell induced through direct transdifferentiation.
[0010] Still another object of the present invention is to provide a method for the direct
transdifferentiation of somatic cells into oligodendrocyte progenitor cells.
Technical Solution
[0011] In order to accomplish the above objects, the present invention provides a composition
for inducing the direct transdifferentiation of a somatic cell into an oligodendrocyte
progenitor cell, including, as an active ingredient, at least one protein selected
from the group consisting of direct transdifferentiation factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, or a vector comprising the nucleic
acid molecule.
[0012] In addition, the present invention provides an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell induced
through direct transdifferentiation by introducing at least one protein selected from
the group consisting of direct transdifferentiation factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, or a vector comprising the nucleic
acid molecule, to a somatic cell.
[0013] In addition, the present invention provides a pharmaceutical composition for the
prevention or treatment of spinal cord injury or demyelination disease, including,
as an active ingredient, at least one protein selected from the group consisting of
direct transdifferentiation factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, a vector comprising the nucleic acid
molecule, or an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell induced through direct transdifferentiation.
[0014] In addition, the present invention provides a cell therapy agent for the prevention
or treatment of spinal cord injury or demyelination disease, including, as an active
ingredient, at least one protein selected from the group consisting of direct transdifferentiation
factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, a vector comprising the nucleic acid
molecule, or an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell induced through direct transdifferentiation.
[0015] In addition, the present invention provides a composition for screening a drug for
the treatment of spinal cord injury or demyelination disease, including, as an active
ingredient, at least one protein selected from the group consisting of direct transdifferentiation
factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, a vector comprising the nucleic acid
molecule, or an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell induced through direct transdifferentiation.
[0016] In addition, the present invention provides a 3D printing biomaterial composition
(a biomaterial composition for 3D printing) for manufacturing artificial tissue for
the treatment of spinal cord injury or demyelination disease, including, as an active
ingredient, at least one protein selected from the group consisting of direct transdifferentiation
factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, a vector comprising the nucleic acid
molecule, or an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell induced through direct transdifferentiation.
[0017] In addition, the present invention provides a method for direct transdifferentiation
of a somatic cell into an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell, including introducing at
least one protein selected from the group consisting of direct transdifferentiation
factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, or a vector comprising the nucleic
acid molecule, to the somatic cell.
Advantageous Effects
[0018] According to the present invention, a composition for inducing the direct transdifferentiation
of somatic cells into oligodendrocyte progenitor cells using at least one gene selected
from among direct transdifferentiation factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2 can be provided. In addition, the above composition can be effectively utilized to
prepare oligodendrocyte progenitor cells from somatic cells, thereby treating spinal
cord injury and demyelination disease.
Description of Drawings
[0019] Throughout the drawings, "iOPC-C1" and "iOPC-C2" respectively designate Clone 1 and
Clone 2 of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells prepared according to the present invention.
FIG. 1a is schematic illustration of the process of generating OCT4-induced iOPCs from fibroblasts;
FIG. 1b is of phase-contrast microscope images illustrating changes during the gradual
differentiation of fibroblasts into iOPCs, in which "B" shows uninfected fibroblasts,
"C" shows a control, "D" shows fibroblast-OCT4 on the 25th day, 'E" shows an OCT4-induced fibroblast aggregate, "F" shows an iOPC-like colonies, and "G" shows the
bipolar morphology of iOPCs, and scale bars of E and F are 500 µm, scale bars of B
to D are 200 µm, and scale bars of G are 100 µm;
FIG. 1c illustrates the results of immunocytochemistry assay of OCT4-induced iOPC clones double-stained with iOPC-specific markers such as PDGFR-α, NG2,
A2B5, and Olig2, in which scale bars are 125 µm;
FIG. 1d illustrates phase-contrast microscope images of self-renewing iOPCs, in which
scale bars are 100 µm;
FIG. 1e illustrates the proliferation rates of iOPCs over time in initial passage
(P3) and late passage (P31), in which data is represented by average ± standard error;
FIG. 2a illustrates immunocytochemistry images of undifferentiated iOPCs, in which
"A" shows an image stained with PDGFR-α and GFAP, "B" shows an image stained with
NG2 and Tuj1, and "C" shows an image stained with A2B5 and RIP, and scale bars are
250 µm;
FIG. 2b is of phase-contrast microscope images illustrating changes in morphology
during the in vitro differentiation of iOPCs, in which "D" shows the results on the 1st day, "E" shows the results on the 5th day, "F" shows the results on the 16th day, the green arrow designates the oligodendrocyte, the red arrow designates the
astrocyte, and scale bars are 100 µm;
FIG. 2c illustrates the coexistence of O4+ oligodendrocyte (green) and GFAP+ astrocyte
(red) showing the multipotency of iOPCs after differentiation, in which scale bars
are 125 µm;
FIG. 2d illustrates the immunocytochemistry images of oligodendrocytes, which express
mature oligodendrocyte markers, 30 days after differentiation, in which "M" and "P"
show RIP expression, "N" and "Q" show GalC expression, "O" and "R" show MBP expression,
and scale bars are 125 µm;
FIG. 3a illustrates the heatmap results of microarray analysis for the total gene
expression of OCT4-induced iOPCs, in which "Fibroblasts" show fibroblasts, "Fib-OCT4 D3" shows fibroblasts
on the 3rd day during the differentiation induction by OCT4, "Fib-OCT4 D10" shows fibroblasts on the 10th day during the differentiation induction by OCT4, "Mock" shows a control, and "wtOPC" shows OPCs derived from pluripotent stem cells;
FIG. 3b illustrates scatter plots that compare total gene expression, showing correlations
between fibroblasts and OPCs, fibroblasts and iOPC-C1, fibroblasts and iOPC-C2, iOPC-C1
and OPCs, iOPC-C2 and OPCs, and iOPC-C1 and iOPC-C2, in which the black line designates
a boundary having two-fold gene expression changes between the coupled samples, and
the gene expression level is represented by a log2 value;
FIG. 3c illustrates the results of quantitative RT-PCR of OCT4-induced OPCs for gene expression of OPC-based markers and oligodendrocyte markers,
in which the graph is shown in log2 fold change normalized to GAPDH;
FIG. 3d illustrates the 3D analytical results of principal components, in which the
first principal component (PC1) constitutes 64% of gene expression variability, the
second principal component (PC2) constitutes 14% of the variability, and the third
principal component (PC3) constitutes 8.3% ofthe variability;
FIG. 3e illustrates the hierarchical clustering results of total gene expression,
in which changes in gene expression are checked after OCT4 induction based on the results of microarray analysis, and the development of oligodendrocytes
and neurons is related with genes that are highly expressed in iOPCs, compared to
the fibroblasts;
FIG. 4a illustrates images of the spinal cord of a rat stained by H&E, 12 weeks after
transplantation into an injured portion, in which scale bars are 200 µm;
FIG. 4b illustrates the results of immunohistochemistry analysis of the injured spinal
cord, in which "C" and "F" are stained with 04, 'D" and "G" are stained with MBP,
and 'E and H" are stained with GFAP;
FIG. 4c illustrates the results of differentiation of iOPCs transplanted into the
spinal cord of a rat into 04, MBP and GFAP positive cells, and A2B5 immature marker
expression of undifferentiated iOPCs (I and I'), in which the white arrows in J' indicate
04 positive and MBP positive cells, and scale bars are 100 µm and 50 µm;
FIG. 5 illustrates the cleavage map of a pMX retroviral vector; and
FIG. 6 illustrates the results of quantitative RT-PCR of iOPCs induced by SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, or NKX6.2 for gene expression of OPC-based markers and oligodendrocyte markers, in which the
graph is shown in log2 fold change normalized to GAPDH.
Best Mode
[0020] In a specific embodiment of the present invention, in order to determine whether
induced oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (iOPCs) may be generated using at least one
gene selected from among direct transdifferentiation factors
OCT4, SOX1,
SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, somatic cells were separated and infected with retrovirus encoding a gene transcription
factor for a direct transdifferentiation factor, thereby generating iOPCs (Test Result
1).
[0021] In another embodiment, the immature state of prepared iOPCs, as the precursor, was
verified through immunocytochemistry and double staining. Consequently, the self-renewing
capacity of the precursor and the growth rate of 31 passages or more were verified
(Test Result 2).
[0022] Also, differentiation was induced to evaluate the differentiation capacity of generated
iOPCs. Consequently, they were able to differentiate into mature oligodendrocytes
or astrocytes (Test Result 3).
[0023] In still another embodiment of the present invention, total gene expression profiles
of generated iOPCs and OPCs were compared. Consequently, the total gene expression
profiles of iOPCs and OPCs were found to be similar, indicating that generated iOPCs
were responsible for the functions of OPCs (Test Result 4).
[0024] Furthermore, in the present invention, iOPCs were transplanted into rats, the spinal
cord of which was
injured in vivo in order to evaluate the effects thereof on such spinal cord injury. Consequently,
the injured spinal cord tissue was significantly alleviated, and myelination was restored
without the generation of tumors.
[0025] Hereinafter, a detailed description will be given ofthe present invention.
[0026] The present invention addresses a composition for inducing the direct transdifferentiation
of somatic cells into oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, including, as an active ingredient,
at least one protein selected from the group consisting of direct transdifferentiation
factors such as
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, or a vector having the nucleic acid
molecule introduced thereto.
[0027] The
OCT4 (octamer-binding transcription factor 4) protein is known to be a POU5F1 protein,
and is encoded by a POU5F1 gene.
OCT4 is a homeodomain transcription factor in the POU family. Although the
OCT4 protein is known to be associated with the self-renewal of undifferentiated embryonic
stem cells, contents concerning the direct transdifferentiation of somatic cells into
oligodendrocyte progenitor cells are not known at all. The gene sequence of
OCT4 is registered with NCBI Registration Nos. NM_014209 and NM_013633.3.
[0028] SOL1 is a transcription factor in the SOX protein family, and is registered with NCBI
Registration Nos. NM_005986.2 and NM_009233.3.
[0029] SOX2 is a transcription factor in the SOX protein family, and is registered with NCBI
Registration Nos. NM_003106.3 and NM_011443.3.
[0030] SOX10 is a transcription factor in the SOX protein family, and is registered with NCBI
Registration Nos. NM_006941.3 and NM_011437.1.
[0031] OLIG2 is a transcription factor in the OLIG protein family, and is registered with NCBI
Registration Nos. NM_005806.3 and NM_016967.2.
[0032] NKX2.2 is a homeodomain transcription factor in the NK2 family, and is registered with NCBI
Registration Nos. NM_002509.3 and NM_001077632.1.
[0033] NKX6.2 is a homeodomain transcription factor in the NK2 family, and is registered with NCBI
Registration Nos. NM_177400.2 and NM_183248.3.
[0034] In the present invention,
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2 genes may be provided in the form of a protein or a nucleic acid encoding the protein,
and the protein may include any protein derived from humans or animals, such as mice,
horses, sheep, pigs, goats, camels, antelopes, and dogs. Also,
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2 proteins used in the present invention include not only proteins having wild-type
amino acid sequences but also protein variants of individual genes.
[0035] The term "protein variant" refers to a protein, at least one amino acid residue of
which differs from the native amino acid sequence, resulting from deletion, insertion,
non-conservative or conservative substitution, or combinations thereof. The variant
may be a functional equivalent that shows the same biological activity as a native
protein, may be a variant in which physical and chemical properties of a protein are
modified as necessary, or may be a variant the structural stability of which is increased
under certain physical or chemical conditions, or the physiological activity ofwhich
is increased.
[0036] Also, a nucleic acid encoding the protein may have a base sequence encoding the wild-type
protein or the variant-type protein, and may be mutated by subjecting at least one
base to substitution, deletion, insertion, or combinations thereof. Also, it may be
prepared via extraction from nature or using a chemical synthesis method. The nucleic
acid having the base sequence encoding the protein may be a single chain or a double
chain, and may be a DNA molecule (genomic DNA, cDNA) or an RNA molecule.
[0037] In an embodiment of the present invention, the nucleic acid molecule encoding the
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, or
NKX6.2 protein may be a vector that expresses proteins by including the nucleic acids that
encode each protein.
[0038] As used herein, the term "vector" refers to an expression vector that is able to
express a protein of interest in a host cell, and may indicate a gene construct including
an essential regulatory element that is operably linked to express a gene insert.
[0039] In the present invention, the vector may include a signal sequence or a reader sequence
for membrane targeting or secretion, in addition to the expression regulatory element,
such as a promoter, an operator, an initiation codon, a termination codon, a polyadenylation
signal, or an enhancer, and may be variously manufactured so as to be adapted for
some purpose. The promoter of the vector may be constructive or inductive. Furthermore,
the expression vector includes a selective marker for selecting a host cell containing
the vector, and a replicable expression vector includes a replication origin. The
vector may be self-replicating, or may be integrated into the host DNA.
[0040] The vector may include a plasmid vector, a cosmid vector, a viral vector, and an
episomal vector. Preferably useful is a viral vector. Examples of the viral vector
may include, but are not limited to, a lentiviral vector, and a vector derived from
Retrovirus, for example, HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), MLV (Murine Leukemia
Virus), ASLV (Avian Sarcoma/Leukosis), SNV (Spleen Necrosis Virus), RSV (Rous Sarcoma
Virus), MMTV (Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus), Adenovirus, Adeno-associated virus, Herpes
simplex virus, etc. Such a vector system is used to induce direct transdifferentiation
through the over-expression of genes associated with specific cells in the vector
delivered to somatic cells. Regardless of the vector system that is used, the effects
of the present invention may be manifested. In a specific embodiment of the present
invention, a pMX-based retroviral vector for expressing
OCT4 may be used (FIG. 5).
[0041] Also, the nucleic acid encoding the protein may be transferred or introduced into
the cells using any process known in the art, for example, using a vector-type naked
DNA, or using a liposome, a cationic polymer, etc. The liposome is a phospholipid
membrane obtained through mixing with cationic phospholipids such as DOTMA or DOTAP
for gene delivery. When a cationic liposome and an anionic nucleic acid are mixed
at a predetermined ratio, a nucleic acid-liposome complex may be formed, and may thereby
be introduced into the cells.
[0042] Specifically in the present invention, the nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein
is contained in the vector and virus manufactured so as to express each gene by transforming
and infecting the viral vector, which includes the nucleic acid encoding the protein,
into packaging cells, and may be thereby introduced into somatic cells. Examples of
the virus may include, but are not limited to, Retrovirus, Adenovirus, Adeno-associated
virus, Herpes simplex virus, etc.
[0043] As used herein, the term "somatic cell" refers to any cell other than a germ cell.
Examples of somatic cells may one selected from the group consisting of fibroblasts,
muscle cells, nerve cells, gastric mucosal cells, goblet cells, G cells, pericytes,
astrocytes, B cells, blood cells, epithelial cells, neural stem cells, hematopoietic
stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, cord blood stem cells, and the like. However,
direct transdifferentiation may be applied regardless of the specific kind of tissue
cell, so long as it starts from somatic cells, and the present invention is not limited
to the above examples of somatic cells. In a specific embodiment of the present invention,
skin fibroblasts are used.
[0044] As used herein, the term "oligodendrocyte progenitor cell" refers to a subtype of
glial cell in the central nervous system. Such cells are a precursor of oligodendrocytes
and are able to differentiate into neurons and astrocytes. Also, in the present invention,
"iOPCs" designate induced oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, for example, induced oligodendrocyte
progenitor cells prepared from somatic cells through direct differentiation according
to the method of the present invention.
[0045] In addition, the present invention addresses oligodendrocyte progenitor cells induced
through direct transdifferentiation by introducing somatic cells with at least one
protein selected from the group consisting of direct transdifferentiation factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, or a vector having the nucleic acid
molecule introduced thereto.
[0046] In addition, the present invention addresses a pharmaceutical composition for the
prevention or treatment of spinal cord injury or demyelination disease, including,
as an active ingredient, at least one protein selected from the group consisting of
direct transdifferentiation factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, a vector having the nucleic acid molecule
introduced thereto, or an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell induced through direct transdifferentiation.
[0047] In addition, the present invention addresses a cell therapy agent for the prevention
or treatment of spinal cord injury or demyelination disease, including, as an active
ingredient, at least one protein selected from the group consisting of direct transdifferentiation
factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, a vector having the nucleic acid molecule
introduced thereto, or an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell induced through direct transdifferentiation.
[0048] In addition, the present invention addresses a drug screening composition for the
treatment of spinal cord injury or demyelination disease, including, as an active
ingredient, at least one protein selected from the group consisting of direct transdifferentiation
factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, a vector having the nucleic acid molecule
introduced thereto, or an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell induced through direct transdifferentiation.
[0049] Spinal cord injury includes any case where the spinal cord, which is a portion of
the central nervous system, is injured due to external or internal causes and thus
does not perform its function, and may be caused by, for example, external injury,
such as commotion, compression, or contusion, but the present invention is not limited
thereto. Moreover, when the spinal cord, which is a portion of the central nervous
system, does not perform its function, a variety of symptoms, such as thermoregulatory
dysfunction, diaphragmatic paralysis, intercostal paralysis, perspiration, motor paralysis,
sensory paralysis, dysuria, pressure sores, heterotopic ossification, fasciculation,
etc., may appear.
[0050] Also, demyelination disease means any disease associated with the myelin sheath of
the nerves, and examples thereof include, but are not limited to, multiple sclerosis,
cerebral palsy, leukodystrophy, neuropathy, central pontine myelinolysis, and hypomyelination.
[0051] As used herein, the term "cell therapy agent" refers to a medicine (US FDA-regulated)
used for the purpose of treatment, diagnosis or prevention of diseases with cells
and tissues manufactured through culturing and specialized tasks after separation
from human beings, especially a medicine used for the purpose of treatment, diagnosis
or prevention of diseases by proliferating or screening autologous, allogeneic or
xenogeneic living cells
in vitro or otherwise changing the biological characteristics of cells in order to restore
the functions of cells or tissues.
[0052] The method of determining the reactivity of the induced oligodendrocyte progenitor
cells according to the present invention in the presence and absence of a therapeutic
candidate material for treating spinal cord injury or demyelination disease may be
usefully employed in screening a therapeutic agent for treating spinal cord injury
or demyelination disease. For example, the induced oligodendrocyte progenitor cells
according to the present invention are nerve cells, which are regarded as important
in the treatment of and recovery from demyelination disease, and may be used to evaluate
the toxicity or efficacy of the candidate material.
[0053] The toxicity may be evaluated based on methods of determining toxicity typically
used in the art, such as methods of measuring IC
50 of induced oligodendrocyte progenitor cells according to the present invention, or
depending on whether the differentiation of induced oligodendrocyte progenitor cells
according to the present invention into oligodendrocytes in the presence and absence
of a therapeutic candidate material of the invention is inhibited. Also, the efficacy
may be evaluated based on methods of determining treatment effects on demyelination
disease in the art, such as methods of promoting myelination, or depending on whether
the differentiation of induced oligodendrocyte progenitor cells according to the present
invention into oligodendrocytes in the presence and absence of a therapeutic candidate
material of the invention is promoted.
[0054] In addition, the present invention addresses a 3D printing biomaterial composition
for manufacturing artificial tissue for the treatment of spinal cord injury or demyelination
disease, including, as an active ingredient, at least one protein selected from the
group consisting of direct transdifferentiation factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, a vector having the nucleic acid molecule
introduced thereto, or an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell induced through direct transdifferentiation.
[0055] In addition, the present invention addresses a method for the direct transdifferentiation
of somatic cells into oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, including introducing somatic
cells with at least one protein selected from the group consisting of direct transdifferentiation
factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, or a vector having the nucleic acid
molecule introduced thereto.
[0056] More specifically, the method includes: culturing somatic cells in a culture medium,
transfecting the cultured somatic cells with a gene-inserted vector, and culturing
the infected somatic cells under culture conditions for inducing direct transdifferentiation.
[0057] The culture medium used for culturing the somatic cells includes any medium typically
useful in the culture of somatic cells in the art. The culture medium usually contains
a carbon source, a nitrogen source, and small amounts of elements. In a specific embodiment
of the present invention, a culture medium containing protamine sulphate is used.
[0058] Also, the culture conditions for inducing the direct transdifferentiation of somatic
cells may include any culture medium typically used to induce direct transdifferentiation
of somatic cells in the art. In a specific embodiment ofthe present invention, a culture
medium containing N2-supplemented DMEM/F12, penicillin/streptomycin, 20 ng/ml PDGF-α,
and 10 ng/ml FGF-2 is used.
[0059] Through the introduction of somatic cells with the composition for inducing direct
transdifferentiation according to the present invention, ectopic expression of the
direct transdifferentiation factor may be induced. Here, ectopic expression is the
expression of a gene in a tissue or cell where it is not normally expressed, or is
the expression of a gene at a point in time at which it is not normally expressed.
In a specific embodiment of the present invention, the composition for inducing direct
transdifferentiation is introduced into the somatic cells, thereby inducing expression
of the direct transdifferentiation factor in the somatic cells. Accordingly, oligodendrocyte
progenitor cells may be prepared from the somatic cells.
[0060] The oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, prepared according to the present invention,
play an essential role in myelination in the central nervous system, and are able
to differentiate into oligodendrocytes, neurons or astrocytes, and thus may be applied
to the prevention or treatment of disease caused by the loss ofmyelin sheath.
Mode for Invention
[0061] A better understanding of the present invention may be obtained through the following
examples, which are set forth to illustrate, but are not to be construed as limiting
the scope of the present invention. The examples of the present invention are provided
to fully describe the present invention to those having ordinary knowledge in the
art to which the present invention pertains.
Test Example 1. Generation of iOPCs
[0062] Skin fibroblasts were aliquoted in an amount of 3x10
4 cells on a gelatin-coated 6-well plate with 10% FBS culture medium. After one day,
the fibroblasts were infected with a pMX retroviral vector for expressing
OCT4 in a 6 µg/ml protamine sulfate-containing medium. 24 hr after infection, the viral
supernatant was removed, and the medium was replaced with a new medium. On the 3
rd day after infection, the cells were transferred into a chemically modified OPC medium
(N2-supplemented DMEM/F12, penicillin/streptomycin, 20 ng/ml PDGF-α (Peprotech), 10
ng/ml FGF-2 (Peprotech)). 12 days after additional culture in the OPC medium, OPC-like
aggregates were mechanically separated, and mature iOPCs were picked or were subcultured
by trypsinization in the gelatin-coated plate.
Test Example 2. Differentiation of iOPCs (in vitro)
[0063] In order to prepare mature oligodendrocytes, iOPCs were plated onto a PDL/laminin-coated
4-well plate with an OPC medium. On the next day, the medium was replaced with an
oligodendrocyte differentiation medium 1 (N2-supplemented DMEM/F12, penicillin/streptomycin,
10 ng/ml FGF-2 (Peprotech), 10 mM forskolin (Sigma)), and then maintained for four
to five days. After the first differentiation stage, the cells were treated with an
oligodendrocyte differentiation medium 2 (30 ng/ml 3,3,5-tri-iodothyronine (T3; Sigma),
20 ng/ml ascorbic acid (AA; Sigma)).
Test Example 3. Retroviral production
[0064] A pMX-based retroviral vector for expressing
OCT4 was transfected into 293T cells (ATCC, CAT #. CRL-3216) using an X-tremeGENE9 DNA
transfection reagent (Roche) as a VSV-G-like virus package. 48 hr after transfection,
the virus-containing supernatant was collected and filtered with a 0.45 µm syringe
filter, thus acquiring a virus.
Test Example 4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR
[0065] DNA-free total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen). A total of 500
ng of RNA per reaction was used to synthesize cDNA with SuperScript® III reverse transcriptase
(Invitrogen). The synthesized cDNA had a total volume of 20 µL and was used as a template
by LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Mastermix (Roche). The OPC marker genes, pluripotent
stem cells and neural markers were tested three times and normalized to housekeeping
gene
Gapdh. Gene expression was measured through Ct value calculation. All tests were performed
according to the manufacturer's description.
Test Example 5. Immunocytochemistry
[0066] The cells were immobilized for 10 min in 4% para-formaldehyde and treated with 0.1
% Triton X-100 for 10 min so as to be permeable. The cells were incubated in a 4%
FBS blocking solution for 30 min and then further incubated in a primary antibody
diluted with the blocking solution at room temperature for 1 hr: Oligo2 (Santacruz,
1:200), PDGF-α (Abcam, 1:500), A2B5 (Millipore, 1:500), NG2 (Millipore, 1:200), 04
(Millipore, 1:400), RIP (DSHB, 1:200), GalC (Chemicon, 1:200), GFAP (Sigma, 1:500).
After the primary antibody treatment, the cells were washed three times with PBST
(0.05% tween20). A secondary antibody was diluted with PBS and incubated for 1 hr
together with the cells (Alexa Fluor 488/568 anti-mouse IgG1, IgG3, IgM, anti-goat
IgG (Invitrogen, 1:1000)). The nuclei were stained for 10 sec using Hoechst 33342
(Thermo). The primary antibodies used in the test are summarized in Table 1 below.
Table 1
Antibody |
Source |
Isotype |
Dilution |
Localization |
Oligo2 |
Santacruz |
Goat IgG |
1:200 |
Nucleus |
PDGFR-α |
Abeam |
Mouse IgG |
1:200 |
Receptor |
A2B5 |
Millipore |
Mouse IgM |
1:500 |
Cell surface |
NG2 |
Millipore |
Mouse IgG |
1:100 |
Cell surface |
O4 |
Millipore |
Mouse IgM |
1:200 |
Cell surface |
RIP |
DSHB |
Mouse IgG1 |
1:200 |
Cell surface |
MBP |
Millipore |
Mosue IgG2a |
1:100 |
Myelin membrane |
GalC |
Millipore |
Mosue IgG3 |
1:200 |
Cytoplasm |
GFAP |
SIGMA |
Mouse IgG1 |
1:500 |
Cytoplasm |
Test Example 6. Preparation of Skin Fibroblasts
[0067] The skin fibroblasts were separated and cultured in an MEF medium (Dullbecco's modified
Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% FBS, nonessential amino acids, L-glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin,
mercaptoethanol) at 37°C in a 5% CO
2 incubator.
Test Example 7. Characteristics of Fibroblasts through RT-PCR and Immunocytochemistry
[0068] 35 cycles of RT-PCR were performed using a Taq DNA polymerase recombinant (Invitrogen).
For immunocytochemistry, the cells were immobilized for 10 min in para-formaldehyde
in a 4% PBS (pH 7.4) and treated with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min so as to be permeable.
The cells were incubated in a 4% FBS blocking solution for 30 min and then further
incubated in a primary antibody diluted with the blocking solution at room temperature
for 1 hr: Oct4 (Santacruz, 1:200), Sox2 (Santacruz, 1:400), Olig2 (Santacruz, 1:200),
Pax6 (DSHB, 1:200), 04 (Millipore, 1:400), RIP (DSHB, 1:200), GFAP (Sigma, 1:500).
After the primary antibody treatment, the cells were washed and incubated in a secondary
antibody for 1 hr (Alexa Fluor 488/568 anti-mouse IgG1, IgG3, IgM, anti-goat IgG (Invitrogen,
1:1000)). The nuclei were stained for 10 sec using Hoechst 33342 (Thermo).
Test Example 8. Silencing of OCT4 Transgene through Quantitative Real-Time PCR
[0069] Total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen). A total of 500 ng of RNA
per reaction was synthesized into cDNA with SuperScript® III reverse transcriptase
(Invitrogen). The synthesized cDNA had a total volume of 20 µL and was analyzed through
real-time PCR using LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Mastermix (Roche). The testing was
repeated three times and normalization to the housekeeping gene
GAPDH was carried out. Gene expression was measured through Ct value calculation.
Test Example 9. Microarray Analysis Technique
[0070] Through a microarray analysis technique, the total gene expression of fibroblasts,
fibroblasts on the 3
rd day after
OCT4 infection (fibroblasts-day3), fibroblasts on the 10
th day after
OCT4 infection (fibroblasts-day10), a control (fibroblasts cultured in OPC medium without
infection), iOPC-C1, and iOPC-C2 was profiled and compared with bona fide OPC samples
of previously published data. Total RNA was separated using an RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. The sample was hybridized with Affymetrix
array and normalized through calculation using an RMA (Robust Multi-array Analysis)
algorithm. Data processing and graphics were executed using an internally developed
MATLAB application. Hierarchical clustering of genes and samples was carried out through
one minus correlation metric and the unweighted average distance (UPGMA) linkage method.
Test Example 10. Spinal Cord Injury and Transplantation
[0071] As a spinal cord injury model, a 6-week-old male rat was used, and the chest spine
level 9(T9) of the spinal cord thereof was injured using an air punching device. One
week after injury, the obtained iOPCs were labeled with DiI and injected at a concentration
of 1x10
5 iOPCs/rat into the chest spine level 8(T8) and the chest spine level 10(T10) of the
spinal cord through a stereotaxic method. Water and food were regularly fed to the
rat and the bladder of the rat was massaged for urination. The animal testing was
approved by the Animal Facility and the IBR Committee of the Ulsan National Institute
of Science and Technology. The animal experimental procedure was based on the guidelines
of the National Institute of Health for animal studies.
Test Example 11. Histolosical Process and Immunohistochemical Analysis
[0072] 12 weeks after transplantation, the rat was anesthetized and perfused with PBS. The
spinal cord was immobilized overnight with 4% para-formaldehyde and dehydrated in
alcohol and xylene at stepwise concentrations. The tissue was placed in a paraffin
block and consecutively sliced to a thickness of 4 µm in sagittal and coronal directions.
The sliced portions were made permeable with 0.25% Triton X-100, and non-specific
binding sites were blocked with a 10% blocking solution. For immunohistochemical analysis,
the sliced portions were incubated with a primary antibody: PDGF-α (Abcam, 1:100),
04 (Millipore, 1:100), RIP (DSHB, 1:100), GFAP (Sigma, 1:100), MBP (Millipore, 1:100).
Thereafter, the spinal cord was stained with a secondary antibody. The fluorescent
images were visualized using an Olympus microscope, model IX81-ZDC.
Test Results
1. Preparation of iOPCs from Adult Fibroblasts using OCT4 alone
[0073] In order to induce cell fate conversion into OPCs in the course of inducing the differentiation
of FIG. 1a, skin fibroblasts were infected with a retrovirus encoding an
OCT4 transcription factor. As illustrated in FIG. 1b, uninfected fibroblasts had typical
fibroblast morphology before induction. The separated fibroblasts did not express
pluripotent cell genes or nervous system genes, and pluripotent stem cell or nerve
cell clustering could not be confirmed even through immunostaining. The fibroblasts
were reduced in size and changed to a nerve cell-like shape from the 25
th day after the introduction of
OCT4 to a glial cell induction medium, but the control cells having no
OCT4 did not change (D and C of FIG. 1b). In order to increase the generation of cells
such as iOPCs, they were cultured in a specific medium, which was supplemented with
PDGF-AA, a growth factor essential for OPCs. 30 days after the introduction, cells
having a nerve cell-like shape were mechanically separated and glial cells were continuously
induced in a specific OPC medium. As a result, iOPC aggregates (iOPC-Ag) were observed
20 days after culture in the OPC medium (E of FIG. 1b). Next, when iOPC-Ag was transferred
to a gelatin-coated plate, iOPC-like clusters were formed (F of FIG. 1b), and iOPC-like
cells departed from the above clusters after attachment (G of FIG. 1b). It was confirmed
using PCR that
OCT4 genes were transferred to and integrated with the host DNA of iOPC. In order to verify
silencing of the transferred genes, the mRNA level of
OCT4 was measured using real-time PCR. Furthermore, iOPCs were subjected to cell fate
conversion through viral induction, after which karyotypes of chromosomes thereof
were maintained. Thereby,
OCT4 was proven to be suitable for the initial fate conversion from the fibroblasts into
iOPCs.
2. Self-renewal of iOPCs induced by OCT4 and Characteristics of OPCs
[0074] In order to evaluate the lineages of iOPCs induced by
OCT4 and the immature state thereof as a precursor, immunocytochemistry assay was performed
using OPC markers such as PDGFR-α, NG2, A2B5 and Olig2. These markers were expressed
in all iOPCs, and common expression of the markers was confirmed through double-immunostaining.
[0075] Two iOPC clones that were stably uniformly proliferated were obtained. Both of the
clones could be extended up to 31 passages or more, without changes in the characteristics
or morphologies thereof (FIG. 1d). The growth characteristics were evaluated by measuring
the average doubling time of iOPCs (FIG. 1e). The growth curve showed the self-renewal
capacity of iOPCs. The growth rate was maintained up to a late passage number such
as 31 passages or more.
3. Differentiation of Multipotent iOPCs as Glial-Restricted Stem Cells into Mature
Oligodendrocytes and Astrocytes
[0076] In order to evaluate the iOPC clone, which is a glial-restricted uniform precursor,
the expression of GFAP (astrocyte), Tuj1 (immature neuron), and RIP (mature oligodendrocyte)
markers in iOPCs was checked. GFAP positive astrocytes were not detected, or were
seldom present, in undifferentiated iOPCs (A of FIG. 2a). In order to evaluate whether
iOPCs were restricted to glial lineages, the cells were stained with a neuronal marker
Tuj1, which is not expressed in undifferentiated iOPCs (B of FIG. 2a). Furthermore,
RIP, serving as the late-stage oligodendrocyte marker, was not detected in undifferentiated
iOPCs. Thereby, iOPCs were determined to be a homogeneous population (C of FIG. 2a).
[0077] Also, iOPCs are multipotent stem cells able to differentiate into glial lineage cells.
In order to evaluate the multipotency of iOPCs, the differentiation of iOPCs was induced,
and whether iOPCs were able to differentiate into mature oligodendrocytes or other
glial lineage cells was checked. The undifferentiated iOPCs were plated onto a PDL/Laminin-coated
plate with a differentiation medium supplemented with forskolin, ascorbic acid and
T3, suitable for promoting the maturation of oligodendrocytes, and were then immediately
changed (D of FIG. 2b). For five days after differentiation, the shape ofthe cells
was converted into a gradually flat shape with small branches (E of FIG. 2b). The
mature shape of oligodendrocytes was further observed until 16 days, and they were
observed to be present together with differentiated astrocytes (F of FIG. 2b). After
differentiation, the cells were stained with the oligodendrocyte marker 04 and the
astrocyte marker GFAP, whereby the oligodendrocytes were observed to be present together
with astrocytes (G to L of FIG. 2c). However, the likelihood of differentiation of
iNSCs into oligodendrocytes may vary depending on the kind of transcription factor
that is used, and the efficiency thereof is relatively low. To evaluate the differentiation
efficiency of
OCT4-iOPCs, they were stained with O4, GFAP, Tuj1, and A2B5, and proportion of iOPCs was assayed
after differentiation, and the extent of differentiation was evaluated during the
maturation. Moreover, iOPCs appeared to be restricted to glial cells when induced
under conditions appropriate for inducing astrocytes and neurons. Although iOPCs efficiently
differentiated into astrocytes, they did not differentiate into Tuj1 positive neurons.
Based on these results, glial-restricted iOPCs were proven to exhibit multipotency
for differentiation not only into astrocytes but also into oligodendrocytes.
[0078] When iOPCs completely differentiated into late-stage mature oligodendrocytes, undifferentiated
iOPCs did not express RIP (C of FIG. 2a), but expressed protein markers such as RIP,
GalC, and MBP (M to R of FIG. 2d). Moreover, homogenous
OCT4-iOPCs were proven to have multipotency for differentiation into oligodendrocytes.
4. Total Gene Profile Expression of iOPCs and OPCs
[0079] In order to evaluate the extent of total gene expression of fibroblasts and iOPCs,
a microarray analysis process was performed. The gene expression patterns of two established
iOPC clones were very similar to OPCs induced from pluripotent stem cells (FIG. 3a).
In contrast, the total gene expression had an opposite pattern in fibroblasts and
control (Mock) (fibroblasts cultured in the OPC medium without
OCT4 induction). Furthermore, there were no special changes in fibroblasts cultured only
in the OPC medium without
OCT4 induction. Thereby,
OCT4 was essential for cell fate conversion into iOPCs. Through Pairwise scatter plot
of the microarray data, the similarity between fibroblasts and iOPCs and the similarity
between OPCs (bona fide) and iOPCs were verified (FIG. 3b). Through 3D PCA analysis
and hierarchical clustering, iOPCs and OPCs (bona fide) were proven to be closely
related to each other (FIGS. 3d and 3e), compared to the fibroblasts. Next, OPC-specific
gene expression was confirmed using real-time PCR (FIG. 3c). In accordance with the
microarray data, iOPCs expressed a high level of mRNA of OPC-specific genes such as
PTPRZ1,
SIAT8A,
OLIG2, OLIG1, SOX10, NKX2.2, MAG, MYRF and
CNP. In order to detect genes that were highly expressed after conversion, 68 genes associated
with the development of oligodendrocytes and nervous system cells, the expression
of which was increased in iOPCs compared to the fibroblasts, were identified.
5. Enhancement of Restoration of Spinal Cord Injured Rat by iOPCs (in vivo)
[0080] In order to evaluate functional characteristics of iOPCs
in vivo, cells were transplanted into spinal cord injured adult rats. To this end, iOPCs
were injected into the injured spinal cord until one week after spinal cord injury,
and the results were observed until 12 weeks. To observe the restoration of the injured
portion, the spinal cord was stained by H&E. The extent of the tissue injury in the
injured portion was decreased further in the iOPC-injected group than in the control
(FIG. 4a). Immunohistochemical staining was performed, whereby engraftment of the
transplanted cells was confirmed. In the transplanted bone marrow, O4, MBP and GFAP
positive cells were observed in large amounts, but were seldom observed in the fibroblast-transplanted
rat (C to H of FIG. 4b). In the restored spinal cord cells, the injured portion was
stained with the oligodendrocyte markers A2B5, O4, MBP and GFAP (I to K' of FIG. 4c).
The A2B5 and 04 positive cells expressed MBP in common, but the GFAP positive cells
did not express MBP. Thereby, the transplanted iOPCs were proven to differentiate
into either myelination oligodendrocytes or GFAP positive astrocytes. To exclude the
concern of tumor genes, iOPCs were injected into a mouse, and whether tumors were
formed was checked until 8 months after injection. Consequently, the transplanted
iOPCs were proven to restore the myelination in the spinal cord without the generation
of tumors, and to restore the injured portion of the spinal cord injured rat.
6. Gene Expression of iOPCs manufactured using only Single Gene among Direct Transdifferentiation
Factors SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and NKX6.2
[0081] Using only a single gene, among
SOX1,
SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and
NKX6.2 genes, important for the development of the nervous system, iPSCs were induced. Based
on the results of mRNA expression of OPC-specific genes of iOPCs manufactured from
individual genes,
PTPRZ1, NKX2.2, OLIG2, OLIG1 and
SOX10 manifested high expression (FIG. 6).
1. A composition for inducing a direct transdifferentiation of a somatic cell into an
oligodendrocyte progenitor cell, comprising, as an active ingredient, at least one
protein selected from the group consisting of direct transdifferentiation factors
OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, or a vector comprising the nucleic
acid molecule.
2. The composition for inducing a direct transdifferentiation of a somatic cell into
an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell according to claim 1, wherein the vector is at
least one selected from the group consisting of a plasmid vector, a cosmid vector,
a viral vector, a lentiviral vector, a retrovirus vector, a HIV (Human Immunodeficiency
Virus) vector, a MLV (Murine Leukemia Virus) vector, an ASLV (Avian Sarcoma/Leukosis)
vector, a SNV (Spleen Necrosis Virus) vector, a RSV (Rous Sarcoma Virus) vector, a
MMTV (Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus) vector, an adenovirus vector, an adeno-associated
virus vector, a Herpes simplex virus vector, and an episomal vector.
3. The composition for inducing a direct transdifferentiation of a somatic cell into
an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell according to claim 1, wherein the somatic cell
is a cell selected from the group consisting of a fibroblast, an epithelial cell,
a muscle cell, a nerve cells, a gastric mucosal cell, a goblet cells, a G cells, a
B cell, a pericyte, an astrocyte, a blood cell, a neural stem cell, a hematopoietic
stem cell, a cord blood stem cell, and a mesenchymal stem cell.
4. An oligodendrocyte progenitor cell induced through a direct transdifferentiation by
introducing at least one protein selected from the group consisting of direct transdifferentiation
factors OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, or a vector comprising the nucleic
acid molecule, to a somatic cell.
5. A pharmaceutical composition for prevention or treatment of spinal cord injury or
demyelination disease, comprising, as an active ingredient, at least one protein selected
from the group consisting of direct transdifferentiation factors OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, a vector comprising the nucleic acid
molecule, or the oligodendrocyte progenitor cell induced through direct transdifferentiation
of claim 4.
6. The pharmaceutical composition for prevention or treatment of spinal cord injury or
demyelination disease according to claim 5, wherein the demyelination disease is multiple
sclerosis, cerebral palsy, leukodystrophy, neuropathy, central pontine myelinolysis,
or hypomyelination.
7. A cell therapy agent for prevention or treatment of spinal cord injury or demyelination
disease, comprising, as an active ingredient, at least one protein selected from the
group consisting of direct transdifferentiation factors OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, a vector comprising the nucleic acid
molecule, or the oligodendrocyte progenitor cell induced through direct transdifferentiation
of claim 4.
8. A composition for screening a drug for the treatment of spinal cord injury or demyelination
disease, comprising, as an active ingredient, at least one protein selected from the
group consisting of direct transdifferentiation factors OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, a vector comprising the nucleic acid
molecule, or the oligodendrocyte progenitor cell induced through direct transdifferentiation
of claim 4.
9. A 3D printing biomaterial composition for manufacturing artificial tissue for treatment
of spinal cord injury or demyelination disease, comprising, as an active ingredient,
at least one protein selected from the group consisting of direct transdifferentiation
factors OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, a vector comprising the nucleic acid
molecule, or the oligodendrocyte progenitor cell induced through direct transdifferentiation
of claim 4.
10. A method of direct transdifferentiation of a somatic cell into an oligodendrocyte
progenitor cell, comprising introducing at least one protein selected from the group
consisting of direct transdifferentiation factors OCT4, SOX1, SOX2, SOX10, OLIG2, NKX2.2, and NKX6.2, a nucleic acid molecule encoding the protein, or a vector comprising the nucleic
acid molecule, to the somatic cell.