Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a high strength hot formed steel sheet member, more
particularly relates to a high strength hot formed steel sheet member excellent in
delayed fracture resistance.
Background Art
[0002] In the field of steel sheets for automobile use, to achieve both lighter weight for
improved fuel efficiency and improvement of the impact resistance, there has been
growing use of high strength steel sheet having a high tensile strength. However,
along with higher strength, the press formability of steel sheet falls, so production
of complicated shapes of products has become difficult.
[0003] As a result, for example, along with the higher strength of steel sheet, the problem
of the ductility falling and fracture occurring at portions with a high working degree
and the problem of the springback and wall camber becoming greater and therefore the
dimensional precision deteriorating arise. Therefore, it has not been easy to press-form
steel sheet having a high strength, in particular 780 MPa or more tensile strength,
into a product having a complicated shape.
[0004] Therefore, in recent years, as disclosed in PLT 1, as art for press-forming high
strength steel sheet and other such hard-to-shape materials, hot stamping has been
employed. "Hot stamping" is a hot forming technique which heats a material used for
forming and then forms it. With this technique, the sheet is hardened simultaneously
with the forming process, so at the time of the forming process, the steel sheet is
soft and has good shapeability while after the forming process, the shaped member
can be given a strength higher than steel sheet for cold forming use.
[0005] PLT 2 discloses a steel member having a 980 MPa tensile strength.
[0006] PLT 3 discloses to lower the cleanliness and segregation ratios of P and S to obtain
a hot pressed steel sheet member excellent in strength and toughness.
Citation List
Patent Literature
[0008] More examples of high strength hot formed steel sheet are disclosed in prior art
documents
JP 2012 237048 and
EP 2581465.
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0009] The metal material of PLT 1 is insufficient in hardenability at the time of hot pressing,
so there is the problem of inferior stability of hardness as a result. PLTs 2 and
3 disclose steel sheets excellent in tensile strength and toughness, so room remains
for improvement in terms of the delayed fracture resistance.
[0010] The present invention was made for solving the above problem and has as its object
the provision of high strength hot formed steel sheet member realizing both hardness
stability and delayed fracture resistance. Note that, a hot formed steel sheet member
is in many cases not a flat sheet, but a shaped member. In the present invention,
this will be referred to as a "hot formed steel sheet member" including also the case
of a shaped member.
Solution to Problem
[0011] The inventors engaged in intensive studies on the relationship of the chemical composition
and metal structure for satisfying both hardness stability and delayed fracture resistance.
As a result, they obtained the following discoveries.
- (a) By refining the prior γ-grains, it is possible to improve the fracture resistance
and suppress delayed fracture. To refine the prior γ-grains, it is necessary to include
a prescribed amount of Nb.
- (b) If the steel contains a large amount of inclusions, hydrogen is trapped at the
interfaces of the inclusions. This easily becomes the starting points of delayed fracture.
For this reason, in particular in the case of such a hot formed steel sheet member
having a 1.7 GPa or more tensile strength, it is necessary to lower the value of the
cleanliness of the steel prescribed in JIS G 0555 (2003).
- (c) By being able to reduce the center segregation of Mn, it becomes possible to suppress
the concentration of MnS acting as the starting points of delayed fracture and suppress
the formation of hard structures at the center part of sheet thickness. To reduce
the center segregation of Mn, it is necessary to limit the Mn content to a certain
value or less and to lower the segregation ratio of Mn.
- (d) If limiting the Mn content, the hardenability falls and the hardness stability
deteriorates, so it is necessary to supplement the hardenability by including mainly
Cr and B.
- (e) If the number density of the residual carbides is high, they become hydrogen trapping
sites in the same way as inclusions and become starting points for delayed fracture.
For this reason, it is necessary to lower the number density.
- (f) By hot forming steel sheet adjusted in chemical composition, reduced in inclusions,
and reduced in center segregation of Mn in the above way while reducing the residual
carbide density, it is possible to obtain a steel sheet member excellent in hardness
stability and delayed fracture resistance.
[0012] The present invention was made based on the above discoveries and it is set according
to claims 1-3.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0013] According to the present invention, it is possible to obtain a high strength hot
formed steel sheet member having a 1.7 GPa or more tensile strength and able to realize
both hardness stability and delayed fracture resistance. The high strength hot formed
steel sheet member of the present invention is particularly suitable for use as an
impact resistant part of an automobile. Brief Description of Drawings
[0014] FIG. 1 is a schematic view showing the shape of a die set in forming a hat shape
in an example. FIG. 2 is a schematic view showing the shape of a shaped article obtained
by hot forming in an example. Description of Embodiment
[0015] Below, the requirements of the present invention will be explained in detail.
(A) Chemical Composition
[0016] The reasons for limitation of the elements are as follows. Note that in the following
explanation, the "%" in the content means "mass%".
C: 0.25 to 0.40%
[0017] C is an important element for raising the hardenability of steel and securing the
strength after hardening. Further, C is an austenite-forming element, so has the action
of suppressing the strain-induced ferrite transformation at the time of high strain
formation. For this reason, obtaining a stable hardness distribution in the hot formed
steel sheet member is facilitated. If the C content is less than 0.25%, it becomes
difficult to secure a 1100 MPa or more tensile strength after hardening and to obtain
the above effect. Therefore, the C content is made 0.25% or more. On the other hand,
if the C content exceeds 0.40%, the strength after hardening excessively rises and
the toughness deteriorates. Therefore, the C content is made 0.40% or less. The C
content is preferably 0.37% or less, more preferably 0.35% or less.
Si: 0.005 to 0.14%
[0018] Si is an element having the action of suppressing the formation of scale at the time
of high temperature heating at the time of hot forming. If the Si content is less
than 0.005%, the above effect can no longer be sufficiently obtained. Therefore, the
Si content is made 0.005% or more. On the other hand, if the Si content is over 0.14%,
the heating temperature required for austenite transformation at the time of hot forming
becomes remarkably high. For this reason, a rise in the cost required for heat treatment
is invited and insufficient heating causes the hardening to become insufficient.
[0019] Further, Si is a ferrite-forming element, so if the Si content is too high, strain-induced
ferrite transformation easily occurs at the time of high strain formation, so at the
hot formed steel sheet member, a local drop in hardness is caused and a stable hardness
distribution can no longer be obtained. Furthermore, if including a large amount of
Si, sometimes the wettability drops when performing hot dip coating and gives rise
to nonplating defects. Therefore, the Si content is made 0.14% or less. An Si content
of 0.01% or more is preferable, while 0.03% or more is more preferable. Further, the
Si content is preferably 0.12% or less.
Mn: 1.50% or less
[0020] Mn is an element useful for raising the hardenability of steel sheet and stably securing
the strength after hot forming. However, in the present invention, to reduce the center
segregation of Mn, the content has to be limited. If the Mn content is over 1.50%,
the segregation of Mn causes the toughness to deteriorate. Therefore, the Mn content
is made 1.50% or less. An Mn content of 0.5% or more is preferable, and 1.3% or less
is preferable.
P: 0.02% or less
[0021] P is an element contained as an impurity, but has the action of raising the hardenability
of the steel and furthermore stably securing the strength of the steel after hardening,
so may be proactively included. However, if the P content exceeds 0.02%, the toughness
remarkably deteriorates. Therefore, the P content is made 0.02% or less. A P content
of 0.01% or less is preferable. A lower limit of the P content does not have to be
particularly set. However, excessive reduction of the P content causes the cost to
remarkably rise, so the P content is preferably 0.0002% or more.
S: 0.005% or less
[0022] S is an element contained as an impurity, but forms MnS and degrades the delayed
fracture property. If the S content exceeds 0.005%, the toughness and delayed fracture
property remarkably deteriorate. Therefore, the S content is made 0.005% or less.
A lower limit of the S content does not have to be particularly set. However, excessive
reduction of the S content causes the cost to remarkably rise, so the S content is
preferably 0.0002% or more.
Sol. Al: 0.0002 to 1.0%
[0023] Al is an element having the action of deoxidizing the molten steel and making the
steel sounder. If the sol. Al content is less than 0.0002%, the deoxidation is not
sufficient. Furthermore, Al is also an element which has the action of raising the
hardenability of the steel sheet and stably securing the strength after hardening,
so may be proactively included. Therefore, the sol. Al content is made 0.0002% or
more. However, even if over 1.0% is included, the effect obtained by that action is
small and the cost increases. For this reason, the Al content is made 1.0% or less.
An Al content of 0.01% or more is preferable, an 0.2% or less is preferable.
N: 0.01% or less
[0024] N is an element contained as an impurity and degrades the toughness. If the N content
exceeds 0.01%, coarse nitrides are formed in the steel and the local deformation ability
and toughness are remarkably degraded. Therefore, the N content is made 0.01% or less.
An N content of 0.008% or less is preferable. A lower limit of the N content does
not have to be particularly set. However, excessive reduction of the N content causes
the cost to remarkably rise, so the N content is preferably 0.0002% or more. 0.0008%
or more is more preferable.
Cr: 0.25 to 3.00%
[0025] Cr is an element having the action of raising the hardenability of the steel. For
this reason, in the present invention, which limits the Mn content to 1.5% or less,
it is a particularly important element. Further, Cr is an austenite-forming element
and has the action of suppressing the strain-induced ferrite transformation at the
time of high strain formation. For this reason, by including Cr, it becomes easy to
obtain a stable hardness distribution in the hot formed steel sheet member.
[0026] If the Cr content is less than 0.25%, the above effect cannot be sufficiently obtained.
Therefore, the Cr content is made 0.25% or more. On the other hand, if the Cr content
exceeds 3.00%, the Cr concentrates at the carbides in the steel to thereby delay the
dissolution of carbides in the heating process when supplied for hot forming and to
lower the hardenability. Therefore, the Cr content is made 3.00% or less. A Cr content
of 0.3% or more is preferable, while 0.4% or more is more preferable. Further, a Cr
content of 2.5% or less is preferable.
Ti: 0.01 to 0.05%
[0027] Ti is an element having the action of suppressing the recrystallization of the austenite
grains when heating a hot-forming use steel sheet to the Ac
3 point or more and supplying it for hot forming. Furthermore, it has the action of
forming fine carbides and suppressing the growth of austenite grains to thereby obtain
fine grains. For this reason, it has the action of greatly improving the toughness
of the hot formed steel sheet member. Further, Ti preferentially bonds with the N
in the steel, so suppresses the consumption of B due to the precipitation of BN and
as a result has the action of raising the hardenability due to B.
[0028] Therefore, the Ti content is made 0.01% or more. However, if over 0.05% is included,
the amount of precipitation of TiC increases, C is consumed, and the strength after
hardening falls. For this reason, the Ti content is made 0.05% or less. A Ti content
of 0.015% or more is preferable, and 0.04% or less is preferable.
Nb: 0.01 to 0.50%
[0029] Nb, like Ti, is an element having the action of suppressing the recrystallization
when heating the hot-forming use steel sheet to the Ac
3 point or more for hot forming and, furthermore, forming fine carbides to suppress
grain growth and make the austenite grains finer. For this reason, it has the action
of greatly improving the toughness of the hot formed steel sheet member.
[0030] Therefore, the Nb content is made 0.01% or more. However, if over 0.50% is included,
the amount of precipitation of NbC increases, C is consumed, and the strength after
hardening falls. For this reason, the Nb Content is made 0.5% or less. A Nb content
of 0.015% or more is preferable, and 0.45% or less is preferable.
B: 0.001 to 0.01%
[0031] B is an element having the action of enabling raising of the hardenability of steel
and stable securing of the strength after hardening. For this reason, in the present
invention, which limits the Mn content to 1.5% or less, it is a particularly important
element. If the B content is less than 0.001%, it is not possible to sufficiently
obtain the above effect. Therefore, the B content is made 0.001% or more. On the other
hand, if the B content exceeds 0.01%, the above effect becomes saturated and furthermore
deterioration of the toughness of the hardened part is invited. Therefore, the B content
is made 0.01% or less. A B content of 0.005% or less is preferable.
Mn+Cr: 1.5 to 3.5%
[0032] As explained above, Mn and Cr are elements which raise the hardenability of the steel
sheet and stably secure the strength after hardening, so are extremely effective.
However, if the total content of Mn and Cr is less than 1.5%, the effect is not sufficient,
while if over 3.5%, the effect becomes saturated and conversely securing stable strength
becomes difficult. Therefore, the total content of Mn and Cr is made 1.5 to 3.5%.
A total content of Mn and Cr of 2.0% or more is preferable, and 3.0% or less is preferable.
[0033] The high strength hot formed steel sheet member of the present invention has a chemical
composition comprised of the elements from the above C to B and of a balance of Fe
and impurities.
[0034] Here, "impurities" mean components mixed in at the time of industrial production
of steel sheet due to the ore, scraps, and other raw materials and various factors
in the production process and allowed in a range not detrimentally affecting the present
invention.
[0035] The high strength hot formed steel sheet member of the present invention may contain,
in addition to the above elements, one or more elements selected from the amounts
of Ni, Cu, Mo, V, and Ca shown below.
Ni: 0 to 3.0%
[0036] Ni is an element effective for increasing the hardenability of steel sheet and stably
securing strength after hardening, so may be included in accordance with need. However,
even if over 3.0% of Ni is included, the effect is small and the cost increases. For
this reason, if including Ni, the content is made 3.0% or less. An Ni content of 1.5%
or less is preferable. If desiring to obtain the above effect, an Ni content of 0.01%
or more is preferable, while 0.05% or more is more preferable.
Cu: 0 to 1.0%
[0037] Cu is an element effective for increasing the hardenability of steel sheet and stably
securing strength after hardening, so may be included in accordance with need. However,
if over 1.0% of Cu is included, the effect is small and the cost increases. For this
reason, if including Cu, the content is made 1.0% or less. A Cu content of 0.5% or
less is preferable. If desiring to obtain the above effect, a Cu content of 0.01%
or more is preferable, while 0.03% or more is more preferable.
Mo: 0 to 2.0%
[0038] Mo is an element having the action of forming fine carbides and suppressing the growth
of grains when heating the hot forming-use steel sheet to the Ac
3 point or more for hot forming. For this reason, it has the action of greatly improving
the toughness of the hot formed steel sheet member. For this reason, Mo may be included
in accordance with need.
[0039] However, if the Mo content is over 2.0%, the effect becomes saturated and the cost
increases. Therefore, when including Mo, the content is made 2.0% or less. An Mo content
of 1.5% or less is preferable, while 1.0% or less is more preferable. To obtain the
above effect, an Mo content of 0.01% or more is preferable, while 0.04% or more is
more preferable.
V: 0 to 0.1%
[0040] V is an element effective for increasing the hardenability of steel sheet and stably
securing strength after hardening, so may be included in accordance with need.
[0041] However, if over 1.0% of V is included, the effect is small and the cost increases.
For this reason, if including V, the content is made 0.1% or less. A V content of
0.05% or less is preferable. If desiring to obtain the above effect, a V content of
0.001% or more is preferable, while 0.005% or more is more preferable.
Ca: 0 to 0.01%
[0042] Ca is an element having the effect of refining the inclusions in the steel and improving
the toughness after hardening, so may be included in accordance with need. However,
if the Ca content exceeds 0.01%, the effect becomes saturated and the cost increases.
Therefore, if including Ca, the content is made 0.01% or less. A Ca content of 0.005%
or less is preferable. If desiring to obtain the above effect, a Ca content of 0.001%
or more is preferable, while 0.002% or more is more preferable.
(B) Microstructure
[0043] Mn segregation ratio α: 1.6 or less

[0044] At the center part of the cross-section of sheet thickness of the steel sheet, the
occurrence of center segregation would cause Mn to concentrate. Therefore, MnS would
concentrate at the center as inclusions, hard martensite would easily form, a difference
would arise in hardness with the surroundings, and the toughness would deteriorate.
[0045] In particular, if the value of the segregation ratio α of Mn represented by the above
formula (i) exceeds 1.6, the toughness would remarkably deteriorate. Therefore, to
improve the toughness, the value of α of the hot-forming use steel sheet has to be
made 1.6 or less. To further improve the toughness, the value of α is preferably made
1.2 or less.
[0046] Note that, the value of α does not greatly change due to hot forming, so if making
the value of α of the hot forming-use steel sheet the above range, it is possible
to make the value of α of the hot formed steel sheet member 1.6 or less.
[0047] The maximum Mn concentration at the center part of sheet thickness is found by the
following method. An electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA) was used for line analysis
at the center part of sheet thickness of the steel sheet. From the results of analysis,
three measurement values were selected in the order of the highest down and the average
value was calculated. Further, the average Mn concentration at a position of 1/4 sheet
thickness depth from the surface was found by the following method. Using the same
EPMA, 10 locations at positions of 1/4 steel sheet depth were analyzed. The average
value was calculated.
[0048] The segregation of Mn in the steel sheet is mainly controlled by the composition
of the steel sheet, in particular the contents of impurities, and the conditions of
the continuous casting. It does not substantially change before and after hot rolling
and hot forming. Therefore, if the state of segregation of the hot forming-use steel
sheet satisfies the requirements of the present invention, the inclusions and segregated
state of the hot formed steel sheet member produced by hot forming after that similarly
satisfy the requirements of the present invention.
Cleanliness: 0.08% or less
[0049] If the steel sheet member has large amounts of the A-based, B-based, and C-based
inclusions described in JIS G 0555 (2003), the inclusions will easily become starting
points for delayed fracture. If the inclusions increase, fracture propagation will
easily occur, so the delayed fracture resistance will deteriorate and the toughness
will deteriorate. In particular, in the case of a hot formed steel sheet member having
a 1.7GPa or more tensile strength, it is necessary to keep the proportion of the inclusions
low.
[0050] If the value of the cleanliness of the steel prescribed in JIS G 0555 (2003) exceeds
0.08%, since the amount of the inclusions is large, it becomes difficult to secure
a practically sufficient toughness. For this reason, the value of the cleanliness
of the hot-forming use steel sheet is made 0.08% or less. To much further improve
the toughness, the value of cleanliness is preferably made 0.04% or less. Note that,
the value of the cleanliness of the steel was calculated by the percent area occupied
by the above A-based, B-based, and C-based inclusions.
[0051] Note that, the hot forming does not cause the value of the cleanliness to greatly
change, so by making the value of cleanliness of the hot-forming use steel sheet the
above range enables the value of the cleanliness of the hot formed steel sheet member
to also be made 0.08% or less.
[0052] In the present invention, the value of cleanliness of the hot formed steel sheet
member is found by the following method. Test samples were cut out from five locations
of the hot formed steel sheet member. At the positions of thickness 1/8t, 1/4t, 1/2t,
3/4t, and 7/8t of each test sample, the point count method was used to investigate
the cleanliness. Further, the numerical value of the largest value of cleanliness
at the sheet thicknesses (the lowest cleanliness) was made the value of cleanliness
of that test sample.
Average Grain Size of Prior γ-Grains: 10 µm or less
[0053] As explained above, if making the grain size of the prior γ-grains in the hot formed
steel sheet member smaller, the delayed fracture resistance is improved. In steel
sheet mainly comprised of martensite, if delayed fracture occurs, sometimes the sheet
breaks at the prior γ-grain boundaries. However, by making the prior γ-grains finer,
it is possible to keep the prior γ-grain boundaries from becoming starting points
of cracking and delayed fracture from occurring and the delayed fracture resistance
can be improved. If the average grain size of the prior γ-grains exceeds 10 µm, this
effect cannot be exhibited. Therefore, the average grain size of the prior γ-grains
in the hot formed steel sheet member is made 10 µm or less.
[0054] The average grain size of the prior γ-grains can be measured using the method prescribed
in ISO643. That is, the number of crystal grains in a measurement field are counted.
The area of the measurement field is divided by the number of crystal grains to find
the average area of the crystal grains, then the crystal grain size is calculated
by the circle equivalent diameter. At that time, a grain at the boundary of the field
is counted as 1/2. The magnification is preferably adjusted to cover 200 or more crystal
grains. Further, to improve the precision, measurement of a plurality of fields is
preferable.
Residual Carbides: 4×103/mm2 or less
[0055] In the case of hot forming, the redissolution of the carbides generally present in
the steel enables sufficient hardenability to be secured. However, sometimes part
of the carbides will not re-dissolve, but will remain. Residual carbides have the
effect of suppressing γ-grain growth due to pinning when heating and holding the steel
during hot forming. Therefore, during heating and holding, the presence of residual
carbides is desirable. At the time of hot forming, the smaller the amount of these
residual carbides, the more improved the hardenability and the more a high strength
can be secured. Therefore, when finishing the heating and holding operation, it is
preferable that the number density of residual carbides can be reduced.
[0056] If a large amount of residual carbides are present, not only is the hardenability
after hot forming liable to fall, but also the residual carbides will sometimes deposit
at the prior γ-grain boundaries and cause the grain boundaries to become brittle.
In particular, if the number density of residual carbides exceeds 4×10/mm
2, the hardenability after hot forming is liable to deteriorate. Therefore, the number
density of residual carbides in the hot formed steel sheet member is preferably made
4×10
3/mm
2 or less.
[0057] If a large amount of residual carbides are present, hydrogen is trapped at the carbide
interfaces, so easily becomes starting points for hydrogen embrittlement cracking
and the delayed fracture resistance also becomes poor.
(C) Plated/Coated Layer
[0058] The high strength hot formed steel sheet member of the present invention may have
a plated or coated layer on its surface for the purpose of improving the corrosion
resistance etc. The plated/coated layer may be an electroplated layer or a hot dip
coated layer. For the electroplated layer, electrogalvanization, electro Zn-Ni alloy
plating, electro Zn-Fe alloy plating, etc. may be mentioned. Further, as the hot dip
coated layer, hot dip galvanization, hot dip galvannealing, hot dip aluminum coating,
hot dip Zn-Al alloy coating, hot dip Zn-Al-Mg alloy coating, hot dip Zn-Al-Mg-Si alloy
coating, etc. may be mentioned. The amount of plating/coating deposition is not particularly
limited and may be adjusted within general ranges.
(D) Method of Production of Hot Forming-Use Steel Sheet
[0059] The hot forming-use steel sheet used for the high strength hot formed steel sheet
member of the present invention can be produced by the method of production shown
below.
[0060] Steel having each above chemical composition is smelted in a furnace, then is cast
to prepare a slab. To make the cleanliness of the steel sheet 0.08% or less, when
continuously casting the molten steel, preferably the heating temperature of the molten
steel is made a temperature 5°C or more higher than the liquidus temperature of the
steel and the amount of casting of molten steel per unit time is kept to 6t/min or
less.
[0061] If the amount of casting per unit time of the molten steel at the time of continuous
casting exceeds 6t/min, the fluid motion of the molten steel in the mold is fast,
so inclusions are easily trapped in the solidified shell and the inclusions in the
slab increase. Further, if the molten steel heating temperature is less than a temperature
5°C higher than the liquidus temperature, the viscosity of the molten steel becomes
higher and it becomes difficult for inclusions to float up inside the continuous casting
machine resulting in an increase in inclusions in the slab and easy deterioration
of the cleanliness.
[0062] By casting while making the molten steel heating temperature from the liquidus temperature
of the molten steel 5°C or more and making the amount of casting of molten steel per
unit time 6t/min or less, it becomes difficult for inclusions to be brought into the
slab. As a result, the amount of inclusions at the stage of preparing a slab can be
effectively reduced and a steel sheet cleanliness of 0.08% or less can be easily achieved.
[0063] When continuously casting molten steel, the molten steel heating temperature is preferably
made a temperature of 8°C or more higher than the liquidus temperature, Further, the
amount of casting of molten steel per unit time is preferably made 5t/min or less.
By making the molten steel heating temperature a temperature 8°C or more higher than
the liquidus temperature and making the amount of casting of molten steel per unit
time 5t/min or less, the cleanliness can be easily made 0.04% or less, so this is
preferable.
[0064] Further, to suppress the concentration of MnS forming starting points of delayed
fracture, it is preferable to reduce the center segregation of Mn by center segregation
reduction treatment. As center segregation reduction treatment, the method of discharging
the molten steel at which Mn has concentrated at the unsolidified layer before the
slab becomes completely solidified can be mentioned.
[0065] Specifically, by electromagnetic stirring, reduction of the unsolidified layer, or
other treatment, the molten steel at which Mn has concentrated before complete solidification
can be discharged. Note that the electromagnetic stirring treatment can be performed
by giving fluid motion to the unsolidified steel by 250 to 1000 Gauss, while the unsolidified
layer rolling treatment can be performed by rolling the finally solidified part by
a gradient of about 1 mm/m.
[0066] A slab obtained by the above method may if necessary be treated by soaking. By performing
the soaking treatment, it is possible to make the precipitated Mn disperse and lower
the segregation ratio. The preferable soaking temperature when performing soaking
treatment is 1200 to 1300°C, while the soaking time is 20 to 50h.
[0067] After that, the slab is hot rolled. The hot rolling conditions, from the viewpoint
of enabling carbides to be more uniformly formed, are preferably made a hot rolling
starting temperature of 1000 to 1300°C in temperature range and a hot rolling end
temperature of 850°C or more. The coiling temperature is preferably high from the
viewpoint of the processability, but if too high, scale formation will cause the yield
to fall, so 500 to 650°C is preferable. The hot rolled steel sheet obtained by the
hot rolling may be treated to remove the scale by pickling etc.
[0068] In the present invention, to refine the prior γ-grain size after hot forming and
lower the number density of the residual carbides, it is important to anneal the descaled
hot rolled steel sheet to obtain hot rolled annealed steel sheet.
[0069] To refine the prior γ-grain size after hot forming, it is necessary to suppress the
growth of the γ-grains by the carbides in the solution. However, to improve the hardenability
and secure high strength in a hot formed steel sheet member, it is necessary to reduce
the number density of the residual carbides.
[0070] To refine the prior γ-grain size in the hot formed steel sheet member and lower the
number density of the residual carbides, the form of the carbides present in the steel
sheet before hot forming and the degree of concentration of elements in the carbides
become important. It is desirable that the carbides be finely dispersed, but in that
case, the carbides dissolve more quickly, so the effect of grain growth cannot be
expected. If making the Mn, Cr, and other elements concentrate in the carbides, it
becomes harder for the carbides to form solid solutions. Therefore, the degree of
concentration of elements in the carbides is preferably high.
[0071] The form of the carbides can be controlled by adjusting the annealing conditions
after the hot rolling. Specifically, the annealing is performed at an annealing temperature
of the Ac1 to the Ac1 point-100°C for 5h or less.
[0072] If making the coiling temperature after the hot rolling 550°C or less, the carbides
easily finely disperse. However, the degree of concentration of the elements in the
carbides also falls, so annealing is performed to make the elements concentrate more.
[0073] If the coiling temperature is 550°C or more, pearlite forms and elements increasingly
concentrate in the carbides in the pearlite. In this case, annealing is performed
to break up the pearlite and disperse the carbides.
[0074] As the steel sheet for high strength hot formed steel sheet member use in the present
invention, it is possible to use hot rolled annealed steel sheet, cold rolled steel
sheet, or cold rolled annealed steel sheet. The treatment process may be suitably
selected in accordance with the demanded level of sheet thickness precision of the
product. Note that, carbides are hard, so even if performing cold rolling, they are
not changed in form. Their form before the cold rolling is maintained even after the
cold rolling.
[0075] The cold rolling may be performed using an ordinary method. From the viewpoint of
securing excellent flatness, the reduction rate at the cold rolling is preferably
made 30% or more. On the other hand, to avoid the load from becoming excessive, the
reduction rate at the cold rolling is preferably 80% or less.
[0076] When annealing the cold rolled steel sheet, it is preferable to degrease and otherwise
treat it in advance. The annealing is performed for removing strain relief by cold
rolling and is preferably performed by annealing at the Ac1 point or less for 5h or
less, preferably 3h or less.
(E) Method of Forming Plated/Coated Layer
[0077] The high strength hot formed steel sheet member of the present invention may have
a plated/coate3d layer at its surface for the purpose of improving the corrosion resistance
etc. The plated/coated layer is preferably formed at the steel sheet before hot forming.
[0078] When galvanizing the surface of the steel sheet, from the viewpoint of the productivity,
hot dip galvanization is preferably performed on a continuous hot dip galvanization
line. In that case, the steel sheet may be annealed before the plating treatment on
the continuous hot dip galvanization line or the heating and holding temperature may
be lowered and just coating treatment and not annealing performed.
[0079] Further, it is also possible to perform hot dip galvanization, then alloying heat
treatment to obtain a hot dip galvannealed steel sheet. The galvanization may also
be performed by electroplating. Note that galvanization need only be performed on
part of the surface of a steel material, but in the case of steel sheet, it is generally
performed on the entire surfaces of one or both surfaces.
(F) Method of Production of High Strength Hot Formed Steel Sheet Member
[0080] By hot forming the above hot-forming use steel sheet, it is possible to obtain a
high strength hot formed steel sheet member.
[0081] The heating speed of the steel sheet at the time of hot forming is preferably 20°C/s
or more from the viewpoint of suppressing grain growth. More preferable is 50°C/s
or more. The heating temperature of the steel sheet is preferably over the Ac
3 point and not more than the Ac
3 point+150°C. If the heating temperature is the Ac
3 point or less, the structure will not become an austenite single phase before the
hot forming and ferrite, pearlite, or bainite will remain in the steel sheet. As a
result, after hot forming, sometimes the structure will not become a martensite single-phase
structure and the desired hardness cannot be obtained. Further, the hardness of the
hot formed steel sheet member will greatly vary. Furthermore, the delayed fracture
characteristic deteriorates. If the heating temperature exceeds the Ac
3 point+150°C, the austenite coarsens and the steel sheet member will sometimes deteriorate
in toughness.
[0082] The heating time of the steel sheet at the time of hot forming is preferably 1 to
10 min. If the heating time is less than 1 min, even if heating, sometimes conversion
to a single phase of austenite is insufficient. Further, the carbides are insufficiently
dissolved, so even if the γ-grain size becomes fine, the number density of the residual
carbides will become greater. If the heating time exceeds 10 min, the austenite will
coarsen and the hot formed steel sheet member will deteriorate in hydrogen embrittlement
resistance.
[0083] The hot forming start temperature is preferably made the Ar
3 point or more. If the hot formed start temperature is a temperature of less than
the Ar
3 point, ferrite transformation starts, so even with forced cooling after that, the
structure will not become a martensite single-phase structure in some cases. After
hot forming, rapid cooling by a 10°C/s or more cooling speed is preferable, while
rapid cooling by a 20°C/s or more speed is more preferable. The upper limit of the
cooling speed is not particularly prescribed.
[0084] To obtain a high strength hot formed steel sheet member with a single-phase martensite
structure with little variation in hardness, it is preferable to cause rapid cooling
after hot forming until the surface temperature of the steel sheet becomes 350°C or
less. The cooling end temperature is preferably made 100°C or less, more preferably
is made room temperature.
Examples
[0085] Below, examples will be used to more specifically explain the present invention,
but the present invention is not limited to these examples.
[0086] Steel having each of the chemical compositions shown in Table 1 was smelted in a
test converter and continuously cast by a continuous casting test machine to obtain
a width 1000 mm, thickness 250 mm slab. Here, at the conditions shown in Table 2,
the heating temperature of the molten steel and amount of casting of molten steel
per unit time were adjusted.
[0087] The cooling speed of the slab was controlled by changing the amount of water at the
secondary cooling spray zone. Further, the center segregation reduction treatment
was performed at the end part of solidification using a roll mill to softly reduce
the thickness by a gradient of 1 mm/m and discharge the concentrated molten steel
of the final solidified part. In some slabs, after that, a soaking treatment was performed
under conditions of 1250°C and 24 h.
Table 1
| Steel type |
Chemical composition (mass%, balance: Fe and unavoidable impurities) |
| C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
sol. Al |
N |
Cr |
Ti |
Nb |
B |
Cu |
N i |
Mo |
V |
Ca |
Mn+Cr |
| A |
0.31 |
0.10 |
1.30 |
0.005 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.002 |
0.50 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.0030 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.8 |
| B |
0.28 |
0.05 |
1.10 |
0.005 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.002 |
1.00 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.0015 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2.1 |
| C |
0.35 |
0.05 |
1.30 |
0.005 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.002 |
0.50 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.0015 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.8 |
| D |
0.32 |
0.05 |
1.40 |
0.005 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.002 |
0.40 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.0015 |
0.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.8 |
| E |
0.34 |
0.05 |
1.20 |
0.005 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.002 |
0.60 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.0015 |
- |
0.5 |
- |
- |
- |
1.8 |
| F |
0.31 |
0.05 |
1.30 |
0.005 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.002 |
0.70 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.0015 |
- |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
2.0 |
| G |
0.30 |
0.05 |
1.30 |
0.005 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.002 |
0.60 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.0015 |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
1.9 |
| H |
0.29 |
0.05 |
1.30 |
0.005 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.002 |
1.00 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.0015 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.005 |
2.3 |
| I |
0.31 |
0.13 |
2.40* |
0.005 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.002 |
0.20* |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.0020 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2.6 |
| J |
0.21* |
0.10 |
1.30 |
0.005 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.0 02 |
0.10* |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.0018 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.4* |
| K |
0.35 |
0.10 |
0.40 |
0.005 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.002 |
0.30 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.0015 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.7* |
| L |
0.32 |
0.10 |
1.30 |
0.005 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.002 |
0.40 |
0.02 |
- * |
0.0020 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.7 |
| M |
0.30 |
0.10 |
1.30 |
0.005 |
0.003 |
0.04 |
0.002 |
0.30 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.0003* |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.6 |
| N |
0.31 |
0.10 |
1.40 |
0.005 |
0.008* |
0.04 |
0.002 |
0.40 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.0015 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.8 |
| O |
0.32 |
0.50* |
1.00 |
0.005 0.002 |
0.04 |
0.002 |
0.60 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
0.0015 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.6 |
| * Outside range of present invention |
[0088] The obtained slab was hot rolled by a hot rolling mill to obtain a thickness 3.0
hot rolled steel sheet. This was coiled up, then the hot rolled steel sheet was pickled
and further annealed.
[0089] After that, part of the steel sheet was cold rolled by a cold rolling machine to
obtain thickness 1.5 mm cold rolled steel sheet. Furthermore, part of the cold rolled
steel sheet was annealed at 600°C for 2h to obtain steel sheet for hot-forming use.
[0090] After that, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, a hot press apparatus was used to hot press
the above hot-forming use steel sheet 1 by die set (punch 11 and die 12) (forming
hat shape) to obtain a hot formed steel sheet member 2. More specifically, the steel
sheet was heated inside a heating furnace by 50°C/s until reaching the target temperature,
was held at that temperature for various times, then was taken out from the heating
furnace and immediately hot pressed by a die set with a cooling system attached so
as to form and anneal it simultaneously. The hot formed steel sheet member was evaluated
as follows:
Evaluation of Mechanical Characteristics of Hot Formed Steel Sheet Member
[0091] The hot formed steel sheet member was measured for tensile strength (TS) by taking
a JIS No. 5 tensile test piece from a direction perpendicular to the rolling and performing
a tensile test based on JIS Z 2241 (2011).
Evaluation of Cleanliness
[0092] Test samples were cut out from five locations of the hot formed steel sheet member.
At the positions of thickness 1/8t, 1/4t, 1/2t, 3/4t, and 7/8t of each test sample,
the point count method was used to investigate the cleanliness. Further, the numerical
value of the largest value of cleanliness at the sheet thicknesses (the lowest cleanliness)
was made the value of cleanliness of that test sample.
Measurement of Mn Segregation Ratio α
[0093] At the center part of sheet thickness of the hot formed steel sheet member, an EPMA
was used for line analysis. Three measurement values were selected from the results
of analysis in order from the highest one down, then the average value was calculated
to find the maximum Mn concentration at the center part of sheet thickness. Further,
at a position of 1/4 sheet thickness depth from the surface of the hot formed steel
sheet member, an EPMA was used to analyze 10 locations. The average value was calculated
to find the average Mn concentration at a position of 1/4 sheet thickness depth from
the surface. Further, the maximum Mn concentration at the center part of sheet thickness
was divided by the average Mn concentration at the position of 1/4 sheet thickness
depth from the surface to find the Mn segregation ratio α.
Measurement of Average Grain Size of Prior γ-Grains
[0094] The average grain size of the prior γ-grains in the hot formed steel sheet member
was found by counting the number of crystal grains in the measurement field, dividing
the area of the measurement field by the number of crystal grains to find the average
area of the crystal grains, and calculating the crystal grain size by the circle equivalent
diameter. At that time, a grain at the boundary of the field was counted as 1/2 and
the magnification was suitably adjusted to cover 200 or more crystal grains.
Number Density of Residual Carbides
[0095] The surface of the hot formed steel sheet member was corroded using a picral solution.
A scanning electron microscope was used to examine this enlarged to 2000X. Several
fields were examined. At that time, the number of fields in which carbides were present
were count and the number of 1 mm
2 was calculated.
Evaluation of Delayed Fracture Resistance
[0096] The delayed fracture resistance was evaluated by cutting out a test piece of a length
68 mm and width 6 mm having the rolling direction as the longitudinal direction, applying
strain to the test piece by four point bending, dipping it into 30°C, pH 1 hydrochloric
acid in that state, observing any cracks after the elapse of 100 hours, and converting
the lower limit strain at which cracking occurs to a stress value from a stress-strain
curve of the test piece.
Variation in Hardness
[0097] The following test was performed to evaluate the hardness stability. Hot forming-use
steel sheets were heated by a heat treatment simulator by 50°C/s until the target
temperatures, then were held in various ways. After that, the sheets were cooled by
cooling speeds of about 80°C/s and 10°C/s until room temperature. These samples were
tested for Vicker's hardness at positions of 1/4 thickness of the cross-section. The
hardness was measured based on JIS Z 2244 (2009). The test force was made 9.8N, the
hardnesses at five points were measured, the average values of the hardnesses at the
five points when the cooling speed was about 80°C/s and 10°C/s were made HS
80 and HS
10, and the difference ΔHv was used as an indicator of the hardness stability.
Table 2
| Test. no. |
Steel type |
Molten steel liquidus temp. (°C) |
Molten steel heating temp. (°C) |
Amount of casting of molten steel (t/min) |
Slab center segregation reduction treatment |
Soaking treatment |
Coiling temp. (°C) |
Annealing after hot rolling |
Cold rolling |
Annealing after cold rolling |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Hot forming |
| Temp. (°C) |
Time (h) |
Heating target temp. (°C) |
Heating and holding time (s) |
| 1 |
A |
1506 |
1536 |
6.0 |
Yes |
No |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
1925 |
880 |
90 |
| 2 |
A |
1506 |
1531 |
7.0 |
No |
1250°C×24h |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
1912 |
880 |
90 |
| 3 |
B |
1508 |
1543 |
5 |
Yes |
1250°C×24h |
510 |
650 |
1 |
No |
No |
1762 |
880 |
90 |
| 4 |
B |
1508 |
1506 |
4.5 |
No |
No |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
1993 |
880 |
10 |
| 5 |
C |
1503 |
1540 |
3.2 |
Yes |
1250°C×24h |
620 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
No |
2118 |
880 |
90 |
| 6 |
C |
1503 |
1540 |
3.2 |
No |
No |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
2095 |
880 |
90 |
| 7 |
C |
1503 |
1540 |
3.2 |
Yes |
No |
650 |
- |
- |
Yes |
No |
2083 |
880 |
70 |
| 8 |
D |
1505 |
1530 |
3.3 |
Yes |
1250°C×24h |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
1976 |
880 |
90 |
| 9 |
D |
1505 |
1530 |
3.3 |
Yes |
1250°C×24h |
510 |
620 |
10 |
Yes |
Yes |
1905 |
880 |
90 |
| 10 |
D |
1505 |
1530 |
3.3 |
Yes |
1250°C×24h |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
1872 |
1000 |
120 |
| 11 |
D |
1505 |
1530 |
3.3 |
Yes |
1250°C×24h |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
1965 |
880 |
70 |
| 12 |
E |
1504 |
1521 |
2.8 |
Yes |
No |
620 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
2049 |
880 |
90 |
| 13 |
F |
1506 |
1532 |
3.4 |
Yes |
No |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
1915 |
880 |
90 |
| 14 |
G |
1507 |
1537 |
2.5 |
Yes |
No |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
1879 |
880 |
90 |
| 15 |
H |
1506 |
1546 |
3.0 |
Yes |
1250°C×24h |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
1823 |
880 |
90 |
| 16 |
I* |
1500 |
1532 |
3.5 |
Yes |
No |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
2070 |
880 |
90 |
| 17 |
J* |
1514 |
1567 |
4.3 |
Yes |
No |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
1462 |
880 |
90 |
| 18 |
K* |
1508 |
1525 |
5.5 |
Yes |
No |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
1969 |
880 |
90 |
| 19 |
L* |
1505 |
1547 |
3.5 |
Yes |
No |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
1971 |
880 |
90 |
| 20 |
M* |
1507 |
1538 |
4.1 |
Yes |
No |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
1884 |
880 |
90 |
| 21 |
N* |
1505 |
1517 |
2.5 |
Yes |
No |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
1950 |
880 |
90 |
| 22 |
O* |
1501 |
1517 |
3.5 |
Yes |
No |
510 |
650 |
1 |
Yes |
Yes |
1945 |
880 |
90 |
Table 3
| Test no. |
Variation in hardness |
Prior γ-grain size (µm) |
Segregation ratio α |
Cleanliness (%) |
Density of residual carbides (/mm2) |
Delayed fracture breaking stress (MPa) |
|
| HS80 |
HS10 |
ΔHv |
| 1 |
553 |
482 |
71 |
6 |
1.1 |
0.02 |
1.25× 103 |
1460 |
Inv. ex. |
| 2 |
542 |
456 |
86 |
7 |
1.2 |
0.09* |
1.752× 103 |
1210 |
Comp. ex. |
| 3 |
502 |
458 |
44 |
6 |
0.8 |
0.02 |
2.253× 103 |
1620 |
Inv. ex. |
| 4 |
562 |
482 |
80 |
3 |
1.9* |
0.09* |
7.12× 103* |
1195 |
Comp. ex. |
| 5 |
583 |
507 |
76 |
7 |
1.1 |
0.02 |
2.789× 103 |
1310 |
Inv. ex. |
| 6 |
581 |
503 |
78 |
7 |
1.8* |
0.02 |
3.2× 103 |
1180 |
Comp. ex. |
| 7 |
578 |
496 |
82 |
6 |
1.2 |
0.02 |
4.7x 103* |
1190 |
Comp. ex. |
| 8 |
551 |
472 |
79 |
6 |
1.1 |
0.02 |
3.437× 103 |
1490 |
Inv. ex. |
| 9 |
535 |
432 |
103 |
4 |
1.1 |
0.02 |
5.12× 103* |
1100 |
Comp. ex. |
| 10 |
545 |
470 |
75 |
20* |
1.2 |
0.02 |
0.05× 103 |
1160 |
Comp. ex. |
| 11 |
548 |
462 |
86 |
5 |
1.1 |
0.02 |
3.78× 103 |
1340 |
Inv. ex. |
| 1 2 |
567 |
563 |
5 |
6 |
1.1 |
0.02 |
2.019× 103 |
1300 |
Inv. ex. |
| 13 |
537 |
500 |
37 |
6 |
1.1 |
0.02 |
2.293× 103 |
1460 |
Inv. ex. |
| 14 |
529 |
523 |
5 |
6 |
1.1 |
0.02 |
2.058× 103 |
1520 |
Inv. ex. |
| 15 |
516 |
511 |
5 |
6 |
0.7 |
0.02 |
2.251× 103 |
1550 |
Inv. ex. |
| 16 |
552 |
515 |
37 |
6 |
1.8* |
0.02 |
3.015× 103 |
1050 |
Comp. ex. |
| 17 |
441 |
340 |
101 |
6 |
1.1 |
0.02 |
3.248× 103 |
2260 |
Comp. ex. |
| 18 |
557 |
146 |
411 |
6 |
1.1 |
0.02 |
3.75× 103 |
1750 |
Comp. ex. |
| 19 |
549 |
461 |
88 |
13* |
1.1 |
0.02 |
3.015× 103 |
1150 |
Comp. ex. |
| 20 |
530 |
229 |
301 |
6 |
1.1 |
0.02 |
2.75× 103 |
1230 |
Comp. ex. |
| 21 |
545 |
474 |
71 |
6 |
1.1 |
0.09* |
2.514× 103 |
1050 |
Comp. ex. |
| 22 |
544 |
439 |
105 |
6 |
1.1 |
0.02 |
2.3× 103 |
1070 |
Comp. ex. |
| * Outside range of present invention |
[0098] Samples with a delayed fracture resistance and hardness stability of respectively
a delayed fracture cracking stress of 1250MPa or more and a ΔHv of 100 or less were
judged as good.
[0099] Table 3 shows the results.
Test No. 2 had a composition of the steel satisfying the requirements of the present
invention, but had a large amount of casting of molten steel per unit time, so the
result was the value of the cleanliness exceeded 0.08% and the delayed fracture strength
was inferior.
Test No. 4 had a composition of steel satisfying the requirements of the present invention,
but had a low molten steel heating temperature, so the value of the cleanliness exceeded
0.08%. Further, no center segregation treatment and soaking treatment were performed,
so the Mn segregation ratio exceeded 1.6. Furthermore, the heating and holding time
at the time of hot forming was short, so the residual carbide density became high.
As a result, the result was the delayed fracture strength was inferior.
Test No. 6 did not include center segregation treatment and soaking treatment, so
the result was that the Mn segregation ratio exceeded 1.6 and the delayed fracture
strength was inferior.
Test No. 7 did not include annealing after hot rolling, so the result was that the
dissolution of the carbides was delayed and the delayed fracture strength was inferior.
Test No. 9 had a long annealing time after hot rolling, so the result was that the
dissolution of the carbides was insufficient and the number density of the residual
carbides became high, so the delayed fracture strength was inferior.
Test No. 10 had a high heating temperature at the time of hot forming, so the result
was the austenite grains coarsened and the fracture strength was inferior.
Test No. 16 had an Mn content exceeding the prescribed upper limit value, so the result
was that the Mn segregation ratio exceeded 1.6 and the delayed fracture strength was
inferior.
Test Nos. 17 and 18 were low in total contents of Mn and Cr, so the result was that
the hardness stability was inferior.
Test No. 19 did not contain Nb, so the result was that the prior γ-grain size become
larger and the delayed fracture strength was inferior.
Test No. 20 was low in B content, so the result was that the hardness stability was
inferior.
Test No. 21 had an S content exceeding the prescribed upper limit value, so the result
was that the value of the cleanliness exceeded 0.08% and the delayed fracture strength
was inferior.
Test No. 22 had an Si content exceeding the prescribed upper limit value, so the result
was that the A3 point rose, the structure did not become a martensite single-phase structure after
hot forming, and the hardness stability and delayed fracture strength were inferior.
Test Nos. 1, 3, 5, 8, and 11 to 15 satisfying the requirements of the present invention
were excellent in both hardness stability and delayed fracture resistance in the results.
Industrial Applicability
[0100] According to the present invention, it is possible to obtain a high strength hot
formed steel sheet member having a 1.7GPa or more tensile strength and realizing both
hardness stability and delayed fracture resistance. The high strength hot formed steel
sheet member of the present invention is particularly suitable for use as impact resistant
parts of an automobile.
Reference Signs List
[0101]
- 1.
- hot forming-use steel sheet
- 2.
- hot formed steel sheet member
- 11.
- punch
- 12.
- die