TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to a catalyst composition for purifying exhaust gas
and an exhaust gas purifying catalyst which can be used to purify the exhaust gas
discharged from an internal combustion engine. Among them, a catalyst composition
for purifying exhaust gas and an exhaust gas purifying catalyst which contain a manganese-based
composite oxide such as yttrium manganite composite oxide (also referred to as "YMO"
in the present specification).
BACKGROUND ART
[0002] The exhaust gas from motor vehicles which use gasoline as the fuel contains harmful
components such as hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen oxides (NOx).
It is required to purify each of the harmful components by using a catalyst so that
the hydrocarbons (HC) are converted into water and carbon dioxide by oxidation, the
carbon monoxide (CO) is converted into carbon dioxide by oxidation, and the nitrogen
oxides (NOx) are converted into nitrogen by reduction.
[0003] As a catalyst (hereinafter referred to as the "exhaust gas purifying catalyst") for
treating such an exhaust gas, a three way catalyst (TWC) capable of redoxing CO, HC,
and NOx is used.
[0004] As such a three way catalyst, those that are obtained by supporting a precious metal
such as platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd), or rhodium (Rh) on a refractory oxide porous
material having a high specific surface area, for example, an alumina porous material
having a high specific surface area and supporting this on a substrate, for example,
a monolithic substrate which is made of a refractory ceramic or a metal and has a
honeycomb structure or those that are obtained by supporting this on refractory particles
are known.
[0005] In recent years, an invention has been disclosed which is intended to use yttrium
manganite composite oxide (YMO) as an oxidation catalyst for purifying exhaust gas
although it is used as an oxidation catalyst for diesel engine.
[0006] For example, an oxidation catalyst for purifying exhaust gas that is composed of
a composite metal oxide represented by a general formula Y
1-xAg
xMnO
3 (0.01 ≤ x ≤ 0.15) or a general formula Y
1-xAg
xMn
1-yA
yO
3 (A is one kind of metal selected from the group consisting of Ti, Nb, Ta, and Ru.
0.005 ≤ y ≤ 0.2) is disclosed in Patent Document 1 (
JP 2008-100184 A).
[0007] An oxidation catalyst composed of a mixture of any one kind of composite metal oxide
among the composite metal oxides that are represented by a general formula Y
1-xAg
xMn
1-yA
yO
3, in which A is one kind of metal selected from the group consisting of Ti, Ce, and
Ru, 0.01 ≤ x ≤ 0.30, and 0.005 ≤ y ≤ 0.30 and zirconium oxide is disclosed in Patent
Document 2 (
JP 2009-279579 A).
[0008] An oxidation catalyst composed of any one kind of composite metal oxide represented
by a chemical formula YMnO
3, Y
1-xAg
xMnO
3 (0.01 ≤ x ≤ 0.30), Y
1-xAg
xMn
1-yA
yO
3 0.01 ≤ x ≤ 0.30 and 0.005 ≤ y ≤ 0.30, and A is any one kind of metal of Ti, Nb, Ta,
Ru, Ce, or Fe) is disclosed in Patent Document 3 (
JP 2010-284583 A).
[0009] An oxidation catalyst for purifying exhaust gas which contains a composite metal
oxide represented by a general formula Y
1-xAg
xMn
1-yFe
yO
3 0.01 ≤ x ≤ 0.30 and 0.01 ≤ y ≤ 0.50) is disclosed in Patent Document 4 (
JP 2010-284584 A).
[0010] A catalyst for purifying exhaust gas which contains a double oxide in which the site
A contains Y, the site B contains Mn, and the composition ratio B/A of the site B
to the site A is greater than 2 and which is composed of a crystal taking a structure
D
yMn
2O
5 is disclosed in Patent Document 5 (
JP 2013-233541 A).
[0011] A catalyst for purifying exhaust gas which contains a catalyst support composed of
a ceramic or a metallic material, a double oxide Y
1-xA
xMn
2-zB
zO
5 (in the formula, A is La, Sr, Ce, Ba, Ca, Sc, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, or Bi, B is Co,
Fe, Ni, Cr, Mg, Ti, Nb, Ta, Cu, or Ru, 0.5 ≥ x ≥ 0, and 1 ≥ z ≥ 0) that is supported
on the catalyst support, and at least one kind of atom that is selected from the group
consisting of Ag, Pt, Au, Pd, Rh, Cu, and Mn and supported on the double oxide Y
1-xA
xMn
2-zB
zO
5 is disclosed in Patent Document 6 (
WO 2012/093599 A) as a catalyst for exhaust gas which exhibits excellent oxygen occluding properties
and is used to purify the exhaust gas discharged from an internal combustion engine
of a motor vehicle or the like.
[0012] In addition, a catalyst for purifying exhaust gas that is composed of a tetragonal
composite oxide represented by a general formula A
2BO
4 (in the general formula, A represents at least one kind selected from the group consisting
of Ca, Sr, and Ba, and B represents at least one kind selected from the group consisting
of Mn, Fe, Ti, Sn, and V), a refractory inorganic oxide in which at least the surface
layer is composed of MgAl
2O
4, and a precious metal component that is present in the tetragonal composite oxide
in the form of a solid solution or supported on the tetragonal composite oxide or
the refractory inorganic oxide is disclosed in Patent Document 7 (
JP 2006-26554 A) as a catalyst composition for purifying exhaust gas which contains particles containing
a manganese-containing composite oxide.
[0013] An exhaust gas purifying catalyst having a support formed of an oxide, a great number
of palladium oxide (PdO) particles which are supported on the support and have an
average particle size of 1 nm or more and 50 nm or less, two or more kinds of composite
oxides selected from Mn, Fe, Co, or Ni as the promotor particles, a great number of
rare earth oxide (LnOx) particles which are in contact with the palladium oxide (PdO)
particles and supported on the support and have an average particle size of from 11
nm to 50 nm is disclosed in Patent Document 8 (
JP 2007-105633 A).
CITATION LIST
PATENT DOCUMENT
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED BY THE INVENTION
[0015] The price of the catalyst is greatly dependent on the amount of the precious metal
contained as the catalytically active component, and the development of a catalyst
to decrease the amount of the precious metal has been actively carried out for the
purpose of suppressing the price of catalyst as low as possible.
[0016] The invention relates to a catalyst composition for purifying exhaust gas and an
exhaust gas purifying catalyst which contain a manganese-containing composite oxide,
and an object thereof is to provide a novel catalyst composition for purifying exhaust
gas and a novel exhaust gas purifying catalyst which can sufficiently function as
an exhaust gas purifying catalyst even without supporting a precious metal as a catalytically
active component.
MEANS FOR SOLVING PROBLEM
[0017] The invention proposes a catalyst composition for purifying exhaust gas in which
particles containing a manganese-containing composite oxide (also referred to as the
"Mn-based oxide") (also referred to as the "Mn-based oxide particles") and particles
containing a metal of Group 5 to Group 11 having an electron in the d orbital (however,
Mn, Pt, Rh, and Pd are excluded) or an oxide of the metal (also referred to as the
"mixed metal-oxide") (also referred to as the "mixed metal-oxide particles") are present
in a mixed state.
EFFECT OF THE INVENTION
[0018] The catalyst composition for purifying exhaust gas proposed by the invention can
sufficiently function as an exhaust gas purifying catalyst even without supporting
a precious metal as a catalytically active component. Hence, according to the invention,
it is possible to provide an exhaust gas purifying catalyst excellent in purification
performance at low cost.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0019]
Fig. 1 is a view illustrating the XRD patterns of the catalyst compositions obtained
in Example 1 and Comparative Example 1 side by side;
Fig. 2(A) is an image of the catalytic composition obtained in Example 1 as a base
for EDXS Mapping taken by a SEM, Fig. 2(B) is a view illustrating the distribution
state of Y thereof, Fig. 2(C) is a view illustrating the distribution state of Mn
thereof, and Fig. 2(D) is a view illustrating the distribution state of Cu thereof;
and
Fig. 3(A) is an image of the catalyst composition obtained in Comparative Example
1 as a base for EDX Mapping taken by a SEM, Fig. 3(B) is a view illustrating the distribution
state of Y thereof, Fig. 3(C) is a view illustrating the distribution state of Mn
thereof, and Fig. 3(D) is a view illustrating the distribution state of Cu thereof.
MODE(S) FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0020] Next, embodiments of the invention will be described. However, the invention is not
limited to the embodiments to be described below.
<Present catalyst composition>
[0021] The catalyst composition for purifying exhaust gas according to an example of the
embodiments of the invention (referred to as the "present catalyst composition") is
a catalyst composition for purifying exhaust gas in which the Mn-based oxide particles
and the mixed metal-oxide particles are present in a mixed state.
[0022] A catalyst composition for purifying exhaust gas in which the Mn-based oxide particles
and the mixed metal-oxide particles are present in a mixed state can sufficiently
function as an exhaust gas purifying catalyst even without supporting a precious metal
as a catalytically active component.
[0023] The present catalyst composition is suitable for the purification of exhaust gas
from an internal combustion engine, and it can be applied as a catalyst for either
of a gasoline motor vehicle or a diesel motor vehicle.
[0024] Especially, it is suitable as a three way catalyst for a gasoline motor vehicle.
<Mn-based oxide particles>
[0025] The Mn-based oxide particles may be any particles which contain a manganese-containing
composite oxide.
[0026] The particles containing a manganese-containing composite oxide are even more preferable
from the viewpoint of increased heat resistance as compared to the case of containing
manganese oxide and decreased concern that CuO or the like is embedded in the Mn-containing
particles by the reaction of the manganese-containing particles with CuO or the like.
[0027] In the Mn-based oxide particles, it is preferable that the manganese-containing composite
oxide accounts for 95% by mass or more of the entire particles from the viewpoint
of securing the purification performance thereof, and among them, it is preferable
that it accounts for 99% by mass or more (including 100% by mass). At this time, the
fact that the manganese-containing composite oxide accounts for 100% by mass means
that the components other than inevitable impurities are all the manganese-containing
composite oxide.
[0028] Examples of the manganese-containing composite oxide may include yttrium manganite,
lanthanum manganite, praseodymium manganite, neodymium manganite, calcium manganate,
strontium manganate, and barium manganate. Among them, a manganese rare earth composite
oxide, and manganese alkaline earth metal composite oxide are preferable, and among
them, yttrium manganite composite oxide is even more preferable.
[0029] The yttrium manganite composite oxide may be a composite oxide containing manganese
and yttrium. Examples thereof may include one kind or a mixture of two or more kinds
selected from the group consisting of YMn
2O
5, Y
1-xA
xMn
2-zB
zO
5 (in the formula, A is La, Sr, Ce, Ba, Ca, Sc, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, or Bi, B is Co,
Fe, Ni, Cr, Mg, Ti, Nb, Ta, Cu, or Ru, 0.5 ≥ x ≥ 0, and 1 ≥ z ≥ 0), YMnO
3, Y
1-xA
xMn
1-zB
zO
3 (in the formula, A is La, Sr, Ce, Ba, Ca, Sc, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, or Bi, B is Co,
Fe, Ni, Cr, Mg, Ti, Nb, Ta, Cu, or Ru, 0.5 ≥ x ≥ 0, and 1 ≥ z ≥ 0), and Y
2M
n2O
7. Among them, one kind or a mixture of two or more kinds selected from the group consisting
of YMn
2O
5 and Y
1-xA
xMn
2-zB
zO
5 (in the formula, A is La, Sr, Ce, Ba, Ca, Sc, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, or Bi, B is Co,
Fe, Ni, Cr, Mg, Ti, Nb, Ta, Cu, or Ru, 0.5 ≥ x ≥ 0, and 1 ≥ z ≥ 0) are preferable
from the viewpoint of exhaust gas purification performance when being mixed with the
mixed metal-oxide particles, and among them, YMn
2O
5 is preferable.
[0030] It is preferable that D50 of the Mn-based oxide particles, namely, the volume cumulative
particle size D50 measured by a laser diffraction scattering particle size distribution
measuring apparatus is from 1 µm to 30 µm. It is easy to secure the purification performance
and it is also possible to improve the production stability when D50 of the Mn-based
oxide particles is in such a range.
<Mixed metal-oxide particles>
[0031] The mixed metal-oxide particles described above may be particles which contain a
metal of Group 5 to Group 11 having an electron in the d orbital or an oxide of the
metal.
[0032] However, manganese (Mn) that is the main component of the Mn-based oxide particles,
platinum (Pt) as the platinum group, rhodium (Rh), and palladium (Pd) are excluded
from the "metal of Group 5 to Group 11 having an electron in the d orbital". Hereinafter,
the same applies.
[0033] In a case in which the particles which contain a metal of Group 5 to Group 11 having
an electron in the d orbital or an oxide of the metal and the Mn-based oxide particles
are present in a mixed state, the Mn-based oxide of which the valence is easily changed
donates or receives an electron to or from the metal of Group 5 to Group 11 having
an electron in the d orbital or an oxide of the metal in the mixed metal-oxide particles
that are present in the vicinity of the Mn-based oxide in association with a change
in atmosphere of redox. In other words, as the Mn-based oxide donates or receives
an electron to or from the mixed metal-oxide, the adsorption and dissociation of the
gas to or from the metal of Group 5 to Group 11 having an electron in the d orbital
or an oxide of the metal is promoted and the catalytic activity is enhanced.
[0034] On the other hand, when the mixed metal-oxide particles are supported on the Mn-based
oxide, sintering of the Mn-based oxide is promoted and it is concerned that the catalyst
is deactivated.
[0035] Hence, it is considered that both of them are preferably present in a mixed state.
[0036] In the mixed metal-oxide particles, from the viewpoint of enhancing the NOx purification
performance, it is preferable that the metal of Group 5 to Group 11 having an electron
in the d orbital or an oxide of the metal accounts for 85% by mass or more, and it
is preferable that it accounts for 95% by mass or more among them and it accounts
for 99% by mass or more (including 100% by mass) among them. At this time, the fact
that the metal of Group 5 to Group 11 having an electron in the d orbital or an oxide
of the metal accounts for 100% by mass means that the components other than inevitable
impurities are all the metal of Group 5 to Group 11 having an electron in the d orbital
or an oxide of the metal.
[0037] The electron affinity is stronger, the exchange of the electron to the exhaust gas
component easily takes place, and the catalytic activity is enhanced when the "d orbital"
of the metal of Group 5 to Group 11 having an electron in the d orbital or an oxide
of the metal is filled with more electrons. Hence, it is desirable to employ a metal
or an oxide thereof which has 3 or more d electrons in the state of a metal. For example,
the d electrons are eliminated when being ionized in the case of Zr of Group 4, and
thus it is preferable to contain an element of Group 5 or higher.
[0038] In addition, the exchange of electron more easily takes place when there is a vacancy
in the orbital, and thus the electron occupying the S orbital is desirably one when
the d orbital is filled (10). From this point of view, a metal to Group 11 having
an electron in the d orbital is favorable, and thus it is preferable to contain an
element of Group 5 to Group 11.
[0039] From this point of view, in a case in which there are 3 or more d electrons and the
d orbital is filled in the state of a metal, an element which has one electron in
the S orbital, for example, those composed of one kind or a combination of two or
more kinds selected from the group consisting of V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Nb, Mo,
Ag, Ta, and W are preferable. Among them, those composed of one kind or a combination
of two or more kinds selected from the group consisting of Fe, Co, Ni, Ag, and Cu
are even more preferable from the viewpoint of suppressing the production cost, and
copper or silver is even more preferable among them.
[0040] In a case in which the mixed metal-oxide particles are copper or an oxide thereof,
the copper-copper oxide particles may be particles which contain those composed of
one kind or a combination of two or more kinds selected from the group consisting
of copper (Cu), copper oxide(I) (Cu
20), and copper oxide (II) (CuO). In a case in which the mixed metal-oxide particles
are silver or an oxide thereof, the silver-silver oxide particles may be particles
which contain those composed of one kind or a combination of two or more kinds selected
from the group consisting of silver (Ag) and silver oxide (Ag
2O). In addition, it may be a mixture of particles containing any one or more kinds
of copper, copper oxide, silver, or silver oxide.
[0041] It is preferable that D50 of the mixed metal-oxide particles, namely, the volume
cumulative particle size D50 measured by a laser diffraction scattering particle size
distribution measuring apparatus is from 0.2 µm to 10 µm in order to secure the purification
performance and the production stability, and among them, it is even more preferably
1 µm or more or 7 µm or less.
[0042] Incidentally, the metal and the oxide thereof contained in the present catalyst are
reversibly switched by the redox reaction in association with a change in A/F ratio
of the gas discharged from the engine when the catalyst is actually used, and thus
it is presumed that the same effect is exerted when the metal source to be first added
is a metal powder or a metal oxide.
[0043] However, it is even more preferable to use a metal oxide in which oxygen is reliably
contained to the inside of the particles.
[0044] Incidentally, The "A/F ratio" stands for the Air/Fuel and is a numerical value indicating
the ratio of air to fuel.
(Mixed state)
[0045] In the present catalyst composition, it is required that the Mn-based oxide particles
and the mixed metal-oxide particles are present in a mixed state.
[0046] The present catalyst composition can sufficiently function as a catalyst even without
supporting a precious metal when the Mn-based oxide particles and the mixed metal-oxide
particles are present in a mixed state. In addition, superior catalytic activity is
exerted as compared to a case in which the mixed metal-oxide particles are present
in a state of being supported on the Mn-based oxide particles, and remarkably excellent
catalytic activity is exerted particularly for the NO purification performance.
[0047] Here, the term "they are present in a mixed state" refers to a state in which each
of these two kinds of particles can be confirmed as particles, and more specifically,
it refers to a state in which one is not supported on the other. In addition, whether
"they are present in a mixed state" or not can be confirmed by the magnitude of the
average particle size of the two kinds of particles or the intensity ratio of the
diffraction peaks in the XRD patterns as to be described below.
(Size of particles)
[0048] In the present catalyst composition, it is preferable that the average particle size
of the mixed metal-oxide particles is from 3 to 300% of the average particle size
of the Mn-based oxide particles. It can be said that the Mn-based oxide particles
and the mixed metal-oxide particles are present in a mixed state when they are in
such a relation. In addition, it is possible to favorably maintain the contact of
the mixed metal-oxide particles with the Mn-based oxide particles when the average
particle size of the mixed metal-oxide particles is 3% or more of the average particle
size of the Mn-based oxide particles, and it is possible to secure the active site
of Cu when it is 300% or less.
[0049] Consequently, from this point of view, the average particle size of the mixed metal-oxide
particles is preferably from 3 to 300% of the average particle size of the Mn-based
oxide particles, it is even more preferably 10% or more or 200% or less among them,
and it is even more preferably 20% or more or 150% or less among them.
[0050] Here, the "average particle size of the mixed metal-oxide particles" and the "average
particle size of the Mn-based oxide particles" are the average value of the particle
size obtained by measuring the size of the respective particles from a photograph
taken by a SEM.
(Peak intensity)
[0051] In addition, in the present catalyst composition, it is preferable that the intensity
of the main peak among the diffraction peaks attributed to the mixed metal-oxide is
5% or more of the intensity of the main peak among the diffraction peaks attributed
to the Mn-based oxide in the XRD pattern determined by the XRD measurement (Cu/Kα).
It can be said that the Mn-based oxide particles and the mixed metal-oxide particles
are present in a mixed state when they are in such a relation.
[0052] The "main peak among the diffraction peaks attributed to the mixed metal-oxide" means
a diffraction peak which has the highest peak intensity among the diffraction peaks
in a case in which there are a plurality of diffraction peaks attributed to the mixed
metal-oxide.
[0053] In addition, the "main peak among the diffraction peaks attributed to the Mn-based
oxide" means a diffraction peak which has the highest peak intensity among the diffraction
peaks in a case in which there are a plurality of diffraction peaks attributed to
the Mn-based oxide.
[0054] Incidentally, in a case in which the "main peak among the diffraction peaks attributed
to the mixed metal-oxide" and the "main peak among the diffraction peaks attributed
to the Mn-based oxide" overlap each other, namely, in a case in which 2θ (deg) of
the respective main peaks approximates to each other so that the peak intensity of
the respective main peaks cannot be accurately determined, the peak having secondly
highest intensity is adopted as the main peak for each of the diffraction peaks attributed
to the mixed metal-oxide and the Mn-based oxide.
[0055] It has been confirmed in Examples and Comparative Examples to be described later
that excellent catalytic activity is exerted and remarkably excellent catalytic activity
is exerted particularly for NOx when the intensity of the main peak among the diffraction
peaks attributed to the mixed metal-oxide is 5% or more of the intensity of the main
peak among the diffraction peaks attributed to the Mn-based oxide in the present catalyst
composition. This intensity ratio does not have the upper limit, but it is empirically
about 500% at the maximum.
[0056] Consequently, from this point of view, in the present catalyst composition, it is
preferable that the intensity of the main peak among the diffraction peaks attributed
to the mixed metal-oxide is 5% or more of the intensity of the main peak among the
diffraction peaks attributed to the Mn-based oxide, and it is even more preferable
that it is from 10 to 500% among them and it is 20% or more or 200% or less among
them.
[0057] For example, when a case in which the Mn-based oxide particles are a composite oxide
which contains manganese and yttrium (referred to as the "YMO particles") and the
mixed metal-oxide particles are particles which contain copper or copper oxide is
taken as an example, it is preferable that the intensity of the main peak appearing
at 2θ (deg) = 48 to 50° as the diffraction peak of copper or copper oxide is from
5 to 70% of the intensity of the main peak appearing at 2θ (deg) = 30 to 32° as the
diffraction peak of the yttrium manganite composite oxide in the XRD pattern obtained
by the XRD measurement (Cu/Kα).
[0058] It has been confirmed in Examples and Comparative Examples to be described later
that excellent catalytic activity is exerted and remarkably excellent catalytic activity
is exerted particularly for NOx when the intensity of the main peak appearing at 2θ
(deg) = 48 to 50° is from 5 to 70% of the intensity of the main peak appearing at
2θ (deg) = 30 to 32° as the diffraction peak in the present catalyst composition.
[0059] Consequently, from this point of view, in the present catalyst composition, it is
preferable that the intensity of the main peak appearing at 2θ (deg) = 48 to 50° is
from 5 to 70% of the intensity of the main peak appearing at 2θ (deg) = 30 to 32°
as the diffraction peak, it is even more preferably 10% or more or 60% or less among
them, and it is even more preferably 20% or more or 50% or less among them.
[0060] Incidentally, the "main peak appearing at 2θ (deg) = 48 to 50°" means the peak having
the highest intensity among the peaks in a case in which a plurality of peaks can
be confirmed in a range of 2θ (deg) = 48 to 50°.
[0061] The "main peak appearing at 2θ (deg) = 30 to 32°" means the peak having the highest
intensity among the peaks in a case in which a plurality of peaks can be confirmed
in a range of 2θ (deg) = 30 to 32°.
(Mixing ratio)
[0062] In the present catalyst composition, it is preferable that the content of the mixed
metal-oxide particles (however, the amount in terms of metal excluding the amount
of oxygen (O) in the case of an oxide) is from 1 to 60 parts by mass with respect
to 100 parts by mass of the sum of the content of the mixed metal-oxide particles
and the content of the Mn-based oxide particles.
[0063] It is possible to exert excellent catalytic activity when the content of the mixed
metal-oxide particles is in the range described above in the present catalyst composition.
[0064] Consequently, from this point of view, in the present catalyst composition, it is
preferable that the content of the mixed metal-oxide particles is from 1 to 60 parts
by mass with respect to 100 parts by mass of the sum of the content of the mixed metal-oxide
particles and the content of the Mn-based oxide particles, and it is even more preferably
4 parts by mass or more or 35 parts by mass or less among them.
[0065] At this time, it is possible to further enhance the CO purification performance while
maintaining the HC and NOx purification performance when the content of the mixed
metal-oxide particles is from 4 to 35 parts by mass with respect to 100 parts by mass
of the sum of the content of the mixed metal-oxide particles and the content of the
Mn-based oxide particles. From this point of view, the content of the mixed metal-oxide
particles is even more preferably 6 parts by mass or more or 13 parts by mass or less.
(Precious metal)
[0066] The present catalyst composition has a feature to be able to sufficiently function
as a catalyst even without supporting a precious metal such as Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, Os,
Ir, Pt, or Au, for example. Consequently, the present catalyst composition may not
support a precious metal. It is advantageous from the viewpoint of production cost
that the present catalyst composition does not support such a precious metal, particularly
Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, Os, Ir, Pt, or Au.
[0067] However, it is also possible to support a precious metal if necessary.
[0068] At this time, examples of the preferred precious metal to be supported as a catalytically
active component may include palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), and rhodium (Rh), and
it is possible to use one kind or two or more kinds among these in combination.
(Other components)
[0069] The present catalyst composition may contain other components other than the Mn-based
oxide particles and the mixed metal-oxide particles (these are referred to as the
"present catalyst particles").
[0070] For example, the present catalyst composition may contain other catalyst particles
formed by supporting a catalytically active component such as a precious metal on
inorganic porous particles, OSC material particles, a stabilizer, a binder, and other
additive components.
[0071] As the binder component, it is possible to use an inorganic binder, for example,
an aqueous solution such as alumina sol, silica sol, or zirconia sol. These can take
the form of an inorganic oxide when being calcined.
[0072] However, in the present catalyst composition, it is preferable that the present catalyst
particles account for at least 50% by mass or more of the total amount of the present
catalyst particles and the other catalyst particles, they account for 70% by mass
or more among them, and they account for 90% by mass or more among them.
[0073] Examples of the inorganic porous particles constituting the other catalyst particles
may include a porous material composed of a compound selected from the group consisting
of silica, ceria, ceria-zirconia, alumina, and titania, more specifically, examples
thereof may include a porous material of a compound selected from the group consisting
of alumina, silica, silica-alumina, an alumino-silicate, alumina-zirconia, alumina-chromia,
and alumina-ceria.
[0074] Examples of the precious metal constituting the catalyst particles may include a
metal such as platinum, rhodium, or palladium.
[0075] The OSC material particles may be particles composed of a material having the oxygen
storage capacity (OSC). Examples thereof may include cerium compound particles, zirconium
compound particles, and ceria-zirconia particles.
[0076] The present catalyst composition may contain a stabilizer. Examples of this kind
of stabilizer may include an alkaline earth metal and an alkali metal. Among them,
it is possible to select one kind or two or more kinds among the metals selected from
the group consisting of magnesium, barium, calcium, and strontium, and suitably strontium
and barium.
(Method for producing present catalyst composition)
[0077] It is possible to obtain the slurry-like present catalyst composition, for example,
by mixing and stirring a particle powder containing Mn-based oxide particles, a particle
powder containing mixed metal-oxide particles, water, and other raw materials if necessary.
In addition, it is also possible to obtain the powdery present catalyst composition
by drying the slurry-like present catalyst composition if necessary.
<Present catalyst>
[0078] Next, an exhaust gas purifying catalyst (hereinafter, referred to as the "present
catalyst") can be produced by using the present catalyst composition will be described.
[0079] The present catalyst can be fabricated by supporting the present catalyst composition
on a substrate.
[0080] In addition, the present catalyst can be fabricated by molding the present catalyst
composition into a pellet shape.
[0081] Examples of a specific configuration example of the present catalyst may include
a catalyst having a configuration that is formed by fabricating a slurry by mixing
the present catalyst composition with water and other components and stirring the
mixture by a ball mill, and coating, drying, and calcining this slurry on a substrate
so as to form a catalyst layer.
[0082] In addition, examples thereof may include a catalyst that is formed by fabricating
a slurry by mixing the present catalyst composition with water and other components
and stirring the mixture by a ball mill, then immersing a substrate in this slurry,
and pulling up and calcining this so as to form a catalyst layer on the substrate
surface.
[0083] However, it is possible to employ any known method as the method for producing the
present catalyst, and the method is not limited to the above examples.
(Substrate)
[0084] Examples of the material for the substrate used in the present catalyst may include
a refractory material such as ceramics or a metal material.
[0085] Examples of the material for the ceramic substrate may include a refractory ceramic
material, for example, cordierite, cordierite-alpha alumina, silicon nitride, zircon
mullite, spodumene, alumina-silica magnesia, zircon silicate, sillimanite, magnesium
silicate, zircon, petalite, alpha alumina, and an aluminosilicate.
[0086] Examples of the material for the metal substrate may include a refractory metal,
for example, other suitable corrosion resistant alloys containing stainless steel
or iron as the base.
[0087] Examples of the shape of the substrate may include a honeycomb shape, a pellet shape,
and a spherical shape.
[0088] In the case of using a substrate having a honeycomb shape, for example, it is possible
to use a monolithic substrate having a great number of parallel and fine gas flow
passages, namely, channels in the inside of the substrate so that the gas flows through
the inside of the substrate. At this time, a catalyst layer can be formed by coating
the catalyst composition on the respective channel inner wall surface of the monolithic
substrate by wash coating or the like.
[0089] As the substrate having a honeycomb shape, it is preferable to use a substrate which
has an inner flow passage area to demarcate the inner radius region and an outer flow
passage area to demarcate the outer radius region and is configured so that more exhaust
gas passes through the inner flow passage area as compared to the outer flow passage
area. By using such a substrate, more convective heat is concentrated in the central
region, and thus it is possible to accelerate the rate of temperature increase and
to enhance the exhaust gas purification performance at the initial stage of engine
start.
(Catalyst layer)
[0090] The catalyst layer may be laminated on a substrate in one layer or two or more layers,
and different catalyst layers may be formed on the upstream side and the downstream
side when the exhaust gas flows through.
<Description of phrase>
[0091] In the present specification, in a case in which it is expressed by "X to Y" (X and
Y are an arbitrary number), it includes the meaning of "preferably greater than X"
or "preferably less than Y" as well as the meaning of "X or more and Y or less" unless
otherwise stated.
[0092] In addition, in a case in which it is expressed by "X or more" (X is an arbitrary
number) or "Y or less" (Y is an arbitrary number), it also includes the intention
that "it is preferable to be greater than X" of "it is preferable to be less than
Y".
[0093] In addition, the "Group 5 to Group 11" refers to an element of Group 5 to Group 11
referred to in the long periodic table.
Examples
[0094] Hereinafter, the invention will be described in more detail based on the following
Examples and Comparative Examples.
(Example 1)
[0095] The catalyst composition A was obtained by crushing, mixing, drying, and calcining
90 parts by mass of a YMn
2O
5 powder (D50: 60 µm) as the Mn-based oxide particles and 10 parts by mass of a copper
oxide particle powder (purity of CuO: 90%, D50: 4 µm) in terms of copper metal as
the mixed metal-oxide particles, and water.
[0096] Incidentally, the term "90 parts by mass of a YMn
2O
5 powder" means that the content proportion (YMn
2O
5/Cu + YMn
2O
5) of the YMn
2O
5 powder with respect to 100 parts by mass of the total content of copper (Cu) in CuO
in terms of copper metal excluding O and YMn
2O
5 is 90 parts by mass (the same applies in Examples and Comparative Examples to be
described below).
[0097] Furthermore, the term "10 parts by mass of copper oxide particle powder in terms
of copper metal" means that the content proportion (Cu/ Cu + YMn
2O
5) of copper in CuO in terms of copper metal excluding O with respect to 100 parts
by mass of the total content of copper (Cu) in CuO in terms of copper metal excluding
O and YMn
2O
5 is 10 parts by mass (the same applies in Examples and Comparative Examples to be
described below).
(Comparative Example 1)
[0098] In conformity to Example 21 in
WO 2012/093599 A, YMn
2O
5 supporting copper was fabricated. In other words, 10 parts by mass of copper sulfate
trihydrate in terms of copper metal was introduced into ion exchanged water and stirred
to be dissolved. After the copper sulfate was completely dissolved, 90 parts by mass
of a YMn
2O
5 powder (D50: 60 µm) in terms of oxide was introduced thereinto and stirred to be
dispersed. Subsequently, the resultant was subjected to vacuum deaeration at 60°C,
evaporated to dryness, and calcined, thereby obtaining a YMn
2O
5 powder supporting copper. This YMn
2O
5 powder, a binder, and water were crushed, mixed, dried, and calcined, thereby obtaining
the catalyst composition B.
<Exhaust gas purification performance test 1>
[0099] The exhaust gas purifying catalyst was subjected to the endurance test at 900°C for
8 hours in the air, and the performance was then compared with each other. The catalyst
compositions A and B were respectively filled in a separate evaluation apparatus,
and the purification performance thereof for the simulated exhaust gas was measured
by using a fixed bed flow type reactor. Specifically, the catalyst powder was set
in the reaction tube by 0.3 g, CO, C
3H
6, NO, O
2, CO
2, H
2O, H
2, and N
2 were mixed together at 10°C/min and the air to fuel ratio (A/F) of 14.3 as the simulated
exhaust gas, the catalyst powder was introduced into the simulated exhaust gas at
a total flow rate of 1000 cc/min, the measurement was conducted.
[0100] The temperature (°C) at which CO is purified by 50% (CO-T50), the temperature (°C)
at which HC is purified by 20% (HC-T20), the temperature (°C) at which NO is purified
by 50% (NO-T50), and the purification rate (CO-η400 (%), HC-η400 (%), NO-η400 (%))
of each of CO, HC, and NO at 400°C were as presented in Table 1.
[Table 1]
|
Catalyst component |
Three way purification performance |
Mixed metal-oxide particles |
Mn-based oxide particles |
State |
CO-T50 (°C) |
HC-T20 (°C) |
NOT50 (°C) |
co-η400 (%) |
HC-η400 (%) |
NO-η400 (%) |
Comparative Example 1 (catalyst composition B) |
CuO |
YMn205 |
Supported |
330 |
366 |
376 |
80.3 |
23.1 |
74.5 |
Example 1 (catalyst composition A) |
CuO |
YMn2O5 |
Physically mixed |
297 |
322 |
351 |
87.8 |
27.6 |
90.5 |
(Discussion)
[0101] The catalyst compositions A and B obtained in Example 1 and Comparative Example 1
were subjected to the component observation using EDX as well as the observation by
FE-SEM, and as a result, it was possible to observe the YMO particles and the copper
oxide particles, respectively, so as to confirm that both of the particles were present
in a mixed state in the catalyst composition A obtained in Example 1.
[0102] The average particle size of the YMO particles and the copper oxide particles was
measured from a photograph taken by a SEM, and as a result, the average particle size
of the YMO particles was 5 µm and the average particle size of the copper oxide particles
was 2 µm.
[0103] On the other hand, it was not possible to confirm the copper-copper oxide particles
having a particle size of 2 µm or more in the catalyst composition B obtained in Comparative
Example 1.
[0104] In addition, the catalyst compositions A and B obtained in Example 1 and Comparative
Example 1 were analyzed by the XRD measurement (Cu/Kα), and as a result, the intensity
of the main peak appearing at 2θ (deg) = 48 to 50° was 35% of the intensity of the
main peak appearing at 2θ (deg) = 30 to 32° for the catalyst composition A obtained
in Example 1.
[0105] On the other hand, the peak appearing at 2θ (deg) = 48 to 50° was not present for
the catalyst composition B obtained in Comparative Example 1.
[0106] It has been found that the catalyst composition can sufficiently function as a three
way catalyst even without supporting a precious metal when the YMO particles and the
copper-copper oxide particles are present in a mixed state from Example and Comparative
Example described above and the results of the tests which the inventors have conducted.
In addition, it has been confirmed that the catalyst composition exerts excellent
three way catalytic activity and exerts remarkably excellent effect particularly in
the NOx purification performance as compared to a case in which the copper-copper
oxide particles are present in a state of being supported on the YMO particles.
[0107] In addition, it has been presumed that it is even more preferable that the average
particle size of the copper-copper oxide particles is from 3 to 70% of the average
particle size of the YMO particles, it is 10% or more or 60% or less among them, and
it is 20% or more or 50% or less among them from Example and Comparative Example described
above and the results of the tests which the inventors have conducted.
[0108] Furthermore, it has been found that it is even more preferable that the intensity
of the main peak appearing at 2θ (deg) = 48 to 50° as the diffraction peak of the
copper or copper oxide is from 10 to 70% of the intensity of the main peak appearing
at 2θ (deg) = 30 to 32° as the diffraction peak of the yttrium manganite composite
oxide and it is 20% or more or 50% or less among them in the XRD pattern obtained
by the XRD measurement (Cu/Kα).
[0109] Incidentally, the effect has been confirmed by using YMn
2O
5 particles as the YMO particles in Example described above, but for example, it is
possible to understand that the YMO particles have the same nature as long as they
are yttrium manganite composite oxide containing Y and Mn such as YMn
2O
5 and Y
1-xA
xMn
2-zB
zO
5 (in the formula, A is La, Sr, Ce, Ba, Ca, Sc, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, or Bi, B is Co,
Fe, Ni, Cr, Mg, Ti, Nb, Ta, Cu, or Ru, 0.5 ≥ x ≥ 0, and 1 ≥ z ≥ 0), for example, from
the description in [0017] to [0080] of
WO 2012/093599 A as well.
[0110] Hence, it is possible to understand that the YMO particles other than YMn
2O
5, namely, yttrium manganite composite oxide containing Y and Mn also exert the same
performance as the YMn
2O
5 particles.
[0111] Furthermore, it is considered that the effect of the YMO particles is greatly affected
by a change in valence of manganese, and thus the same effect as that of the YMO particles
can be expected as long as the particles are particles composed of a manganese-containing
composite oxide even though they are particles other than the YMO particles.
[0112] From this point of view, it is possible to expect the same effect, for example, even
when manganese-based oxide particles such as manganese oxide, yttrium manganite, lanthanum
manganite, praseodymium manganite, neodymium manganite, calcium manganate, strontium
manganate, and barium manganate instead of the YMO particles.
(Example 2)
[0113] The slurry-like catalyst composition C was obtained in the same manner as in Example
1 except that the mass proportion of the YMn
2O
5 powder was set to 95 parts by mass and the mass proportion of the copper oxide particle
powder was set to 5 parts by mass.
<Exhaust gas purification performance test 2>
[0114] A honeycomb substrate made of φ 25.4 mm x L 30 mm-400 cell cordierite was immersed
in the slurry-like catalyst composition A or C obtained in Example 1 and Example 2,
and pulled up, the excess slurry was blown off therefrom, and the honeycomb substrate
was dried and calcined for 1 hour at 500°C to form a coating layer, thereby obtaining
an exhaust gas purifying catalyst (sample). The amount of this coat layer was 110
g per 1 L of the honeycomb substrate.
[0115] The honeycomb catalyst was subjected to the endurance test at 900°C for 8 hours in
the air, and the performance was then compared with each other. With regard to the
three way characteristics of the honeycomb catalyst, the simulated exhaust gas composed
of CO, CO
2, C
3H
6, O
2, NO, H
2O, and N
2 of the balance was scanned until A/F = 14.1 to 14.8 (variation in concentration of
CO and O
2), and allowed to flow through the ceramic honeycomb catalyst so as to have SV = 10,000
h
-1, the outlet gas components at 400°C were measured by using a CO/HC/NO analyzer (MOTOR
EXHAUST GAS ANALYZER MEXA9100 manufactured by HORIBA, Ltd.), and the performance of
the catalysts was compared with each other.
[0116] With regard to the light-off performance of the honeycomb catalyst, the temperature
of the simulated exhaust gas composed of CO, CO
2, C
3H
6, O
2, NO, H
2O, and N
2 of the balance was raised at A/F = 16 and 10°C/min, the simulated exhaust gas was
allowed to flow through the ceramic honeycomb catalyst so as to have SV = 10,000 h
-1, the outlet gas components at 400°C were measured by using a CO/HC/NO analyzer (MOTOR
EXHAUST GAS ANALYZER MEXA9100 manufactured by HORIBA, Ltd.), and the performance of
the catalysts was compared with each other. With regard to the light-off performance
of the honeycomb catalyst, the temperature of the simulated exhaust gas composed of
CO, CO
2, C
3H
6, O
2, NO, H
2O, and N
2 of the balance was raised at A/F = 16 and 10°C/min, the simulated exhaust gas was
allowed to flow through the ceramic honeycomb catalyst so as to have SV = 10,000 h
-1, the outlet gas components at 400°C were measured by using a CO/HC/NO analyzer (MOTOR
EXHAUST GAS ANALYZER MEXA9100 manufactured by HORIBA, Ltd.), and the performance of
the catalysts was compared with each other.
[0117] With regard to the light-off performance, the temperature (°C) at which CO is purified
by 50% (CO-T50) and the temperature (°C) at which HC is purified by 50% (HC-T50) were
as presented in Table 2.
[Table 2]
|
Catalyst component |
Purification performance |
Mixed metal-oxide particles |
Mn-based oxide particles |
Three way characteristics |
Light-off |
A/F |
CO purification rate (%) |
THC purification rate (%) |
NOx purification rate (%) |
CO-T50 (°C) |
HC-T50 (°C) |
Example 1 (catalyst composition A) |
10 parts by mass of CuO |
90 parts by mass of YMn2O5 |
14.1 |
66.6 |
10.4 |
97.1 |
|
|
14.3 |
81.4 |
23.6 |
96.5 |
|
|
14.4 |
88.7 |
47.4 |
91.1 |
|
|
14.5 |
93.6 |
69.9 |
22.2 |
278 |
328 |
14.6 |
94.5 |
71.5 |
12.6 |
|
|
14.7 |
96.2 |
75.3 |
3.9 |
|
|
14.8 |
96.5 |
75.8 |
1.3 |
|
|
Example 2 catalyst composition C) |
5 parts by mass of CuO |
95 parts by mass of YMn2O5 |
14.1 |
68.8 |
9.8 |
96.6 |
|
|
14.3 |
86.7 |
18.0 |
96.0 |
|
|
14.4 |
95.0 |
35.8 |
88.9 |
|
|
14.5 |
97.2 |
61.1 |
15.3 |
279 |
351 |
14.6 |
97.6 |
63.9 |
6.2 |
|
|
14.7 |
97.8 |
72.6 |
2.3 |
|
|
14.8 |
97.9 |
80.5 |
0.3 |
|
|
(Examples 3 to 5)
[0118] The slurry-like catalyst compositions D to F were obtained in the same manner as
in Example 1 except that the mass proportion of the YMn
2O
5 powder and the copper oxide particle powder were changed as presented in Table 3.
<Exhaust gas purification performance test 3>
[0119] A honeycomb substrate made of φ 25.4 mm × L 30 mm-400 cell cordierite was immersed
in the slurry-like catalyst compositions A and D to F obtained in Example 1 and Example
2, and pulled up, the excess slurry was blown off therefrom, and the honeycomb substrate
was dried and calcined for 1 hour at 500°C to form a coating layer, thereby obtaining
an exhaust gas purifying catalyst (sample). The amount of this coat layer was 110
g per 1 L of the honeycomb substrate.
[0120] The catalyst was set in an electric furnace kept at 850°C, the simulated exhaust
gas was allowed to flow through the electric furnace while circulating a mixed gas
(70s) of C
3H
6 or CO and O
2 (complete combustion ratio) and the air (30s), and treated for 25 hours, and the
evaluation was conducted. With regard to the light-off performance of the honeycomb
catalyst, the temperature of the simulated exhaust gas composed of CO, CO
2, C
3H
6, O
2, NO, H
2O, and N
2 of the balance was raised at A/F = 16 and 10°C/min, the simulated exhaust gas was
allowed to flow through the ceramic honeycomb catalyst so as to have SV = 10,000 h
-1, the outlet gas components at 400°C were measured by using a CO/HC/NO analyzer (MOTOR
EXHAUST GAS ANALYZER MEXA9100 manufactured by HORIBA, Ltd.), and the performance of
the catalysts was compared with one another.
[0121] The temperature (°C) at which CO is purified by 50% (CO-T50), the temperature (°C)
at which HC is purified by 10% (HC-T10), and the temperature (°C) at which NO is purified
by 10% (NO-T10) were as presented in Table 1.
[Table 3]
|
Catalyst component |
Purification performance |
Mixed metal-oxide particles |
Content: in terms of Cu metal (parts by mass) |
Method of addition |
Mn-based oxide particles |
Content in terms of oxide (parts by mass) |
CO-T50 (°C) |
HC-T10 (°C) |
NO-T10 (°C) |
Example 1 (catalyst composition A) |
CuO |
10 |
Physical mixing |
YMn2O5 |
90 |
312 |
329 |
407 |
Example 3 (catalyst composition D) |
CuO |
15 |
Physical mixing |
YMn205 |
85 |
322 |
331 |
414 |
Example 4 (catalyst composition E) |
CuO |
30 |
Physical mixing |
YMn2O5 |
70 |
326 |
323 |
406 |
Example 5 (catalyst composition F) |
CuO |
40 |
Physical mixing |
YMn2O5 |
60 |
348 |
324 |
413 |
[0122] It has been possible to consider that the content of the copper-copper oxide particles
(however, Cu amount in CuO in terms of copper metal excluding O in the case of CuO)
is preferably from 1 to 60 parts by mass with respect to 100 parts by mass of the
sum of the content of the copper-copper oxide particles and the content of the YMO
particles, and it is even more preferably 4 parts by mass or more or 35 parts by mass
or less among them and it is even more preferably 5 parts by mass or more or 13 parts
by mass or less among them in the present catalyst composition from the Examples 1
to 5 described above and the results of the tests which the inventors have conducted.
(Examples 6 to 9 and 12)
[0123] The slurry-like catalyst compositions G to J or O were obtained in the same manner
as in Example 1 except that the oxide particle powder presented in Table 4 was mixed
instead of the copper oxide particle powder.
<Exhaust gas purification performance test 4>
[0124] A honeycomb substrate made of φ 25.4 mm × L 30 mm-400 cell cordierite was immersed
in the slurry-like catalyst compositions G to J obtained in Comparative Examples 2
to 4, and pulled up, the excess slurry was blown off therefrom, and the honeycomb
substrate was dried and calcined for 1 hour at 500°C to form a coating layer, thereby
obtaining an exhaust gas purifying catalyst (sample). The amount of this coat layer
was 110 g per 1 L of the honeycomb substrate.
[0125] The honeycomb catalyst was subjected to the endurance test at 900°C for 8 hours in
the air, and the performance was then compared with one another. With regard to the
three way characteristics of the honeycomb catalyst, the simulated exhaust gas composed
of CO, CO
2, C
3H
6, O
2, NO, H
2O, and N
2 of the balance was scanned until A/F = 14.1 to 14.8 (variation in concentration of
CO and O
2), and allowed to flow through the ceramic honeycomb catalyst so as to have SV = 10,000
h
-1, the outlet gas components at 400°C were measured by using a CO/HC/NO analyzer (MOTOR
EXHAUST GAS ANALYZER MEXA9100 manufactured by HORIBA, Ltd.), and the performance of
the catalysts was compared with one another.
[Table 4]
|
Catalyst component |
Purification performance |
Mixed metal-oxide particles |
Mn-based oxide particles |
Three way characteristics (400°C) |
A/F |
CO purification rate (%) |
THC purification rate (%) |
NOx purification rate (%) |
Example 6 (catalyst composition G) |
10 parts by mass of NiO |
90 parts by mass of YMn2O5 |
14.1 |
38.1 |
2.3 |
11.1 |
14.3 |
58.7 |
6.9 |
4.8 |
14.4 |
81.3 |
17.7 |
2.5 |
14.5 |
98.0 |
57.9 |
0.7 |
14.6 |
98.3 |
64.9 |
0.4 |
14.7 |
98.6 |
82.0 |
0.2 |
14.8 |
98.7 |
90.7 |
0.0 |
Example 7 (catalyst composition H) |
10 parts by mass of Co3O4 |
90 parts by mass of YMn2O5 |
14.1 |
36.5 |
0.3 |
1.0 |
14.3 |
58.8 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
14.4 |
84.9 |
2.5 |
0.0 |
14.5 |
94.9 |
11.5 |
0.8 |
14.6 |
94.6 |
11.1 |
1.0 |
14.7 |
94.7 |
11.8 |
1.5 |
14.8 |
94.7 |
12.6 |
1.8 |
Example 8 (cataly st composition I) |
10 parts by mass of Fe2O3 |
90 parts by mass of YMn2O5 |
14.1 |
38.0 |
3.5 |
21.9 |
14.3 |
58.3 |
8.3 |
9.4 |
14.4 |
80.6 |
18.6 |
5.6 |
14.5 |
97.8 |
56.6 |
1.2 |
14.6 |
98.1 |
62.7 |
0.9 |
14.7 |
98.4 |
78.2 |
1.2 |
14.8 |
98.6 |
85.5 |
2.4 |
Example 9 (catalyst composition J) |
10 parts by mass of MnO2 |
90 parts by mass of YMn2O5 |
14.1 |
36.1 |
0.6 |
5.2 |
14.3 |
57.6 |
2.6 |
2.9 |
14.4 |
81.9 |
8.9 |
1.6 |
14.5 |
95.7 |
37.7 |
2.1 |
14.6 |
95.8 |
39.5 |
2.0 |
14.7 |
95.9 |
44.1 |
2.4 |
14.8 |
96.1 |
47.6 |
2.2 |
Example 12 (catalyst composition O) |
10 parts by mass of Ag2O |
90 parts by mass of YMn2Os |
14.1 |
38.2 |
3.4 |
25.8 |
14.3 |
57.2 |
9.4 |
12.1 |
14.4 |
77.3 |
19.3 |
5.8 |
14.5 |
96.6 |
53.6 |
0.5 |
14.6 |
97.2 |
58.8 |
0.0 |
14.7 |
98.8 |
75.9 |
0.0 |
14.8 |
99.1 |
90.9 |
0.0 |
[0126] From the results of Examples 6 to 9 and 12 described above, it has been possible
to confirm that the catalyst composition exerts the three way catalytic activity even
in a mixed state consisting of a combination of the YMO particles with the NiO particles,
the YMO particles with the Co
3O
4 particles, the YMO particles with the Fe
2O
3 particles, the YMO particles with the MnO
2 particles, or the YMO particles with the Ag
2O particles.
[0127] However, when it is compared to Example 1, it has been found that the catalyst composition
exerts superior three way catalytic activity and exerts remarkably excellent purification
performance particularly in the NOx purification performance in a mixed state consisting
of a combination of the YMO particles with the CuO particles as compared to the mixed
state consisting of a combination of the YMO particles with the NiO particles, the
YMO particles with the Co
3O
4 particles, the YMO particles with the Fe
2O
3 particles, or the YMO particles with the MnO
2 particles.
[0128] It can be presumed that it is possible to obtain the same effect as that in at least
Examples 1 to 9 and 12 when the particles containing a manganese-containing composite
oxide and the particles containing a metal of Group 5 to Group 11 having an electron
in the d orbital or an oxide of the metal are in a mixed state from Examples described
above, the results of the tests which the inventors have conducted, and the technical
reasons described above.
(Examples 10 and 11)
[0129] The slurry-like catalyst compositions K and L were obtained in the same manner as
in Example 1 except that the manganese oxide particle powder presented in Table 5
was mixed instead of the YMn
2O
5 powder as the Mn-based oxide particles.
(Comparative Examples 2 and 3)
[0130] The slurry-like catalyst compositions M and N were obtained in the same manner as
in Examples 10 and 11, respectively, except that the manganese oxide particle powder
presented in Table 5 was crushed and mixed with water without mixing the copper oxide
particles.
<Exhaust gas purification performance test 5>
[0131] A honeycomb substrate made of φ 25.4 mm × L 30 mm-400 cell cordierite was immersed
in the slurry-like catalyst compositions K to N obtained in Examples 10 and 11 and
Comparative Examples 2 and 3, and pulled up, the excess slurry was blown off therefrom,
and the honeycomb substrate was dried and calcined for 1 hour at 500°C to form a coating
layer, thereby obtaining an exhaust gas purifying catalyst (sample). The amount of
this coat layer was 110 g per 1 L of the honeycomb substrate.
[0132] The honeycomb catalyst was subjected to the endurance test at 900°C for 8 hours in
the air, and the performance was then compared with one another. With regard to the
three way characteristics of the honeycomb catalyst, the simulated exhaust gas composed
of CO, CO
2, C
3H
6, O
2, NO, H
2O, and N
2 of the balance was scanned until A/F = 14.1 to 14.8 (variation in concentration of
CO and O
2), and allowed to flow through the ceramic honeycomb catalyst so as to have SV = 10,000
h
-1, the outlet gas components at 400°C were measured by using a CO/HC/NO analyzer (MOTOR
EXHAUST GAS ANALYZER MEXA9100 manufactured by HORIBA, Ltd.), and the performance of
the catalysts was compared with one another.
[0133] The three way characteristics were as presented in Table 5.
[Table 5]
|
Catalyst component |
Purification performance |
Mixed metal-oxide particles |
Mn-based oxide particles |
Three way characteristics (400°C) |
A/F |
CO purification rate (%) |
THC purification rate (%) |
NOx purification rate (%) |
Example 10 (catalyst composition K) |
10 parts by mass of CuO |
90 parts by mass of LaMnO3 |
14.1 |
58.5 |
2.1 |
98.9 |
14.3 |
85.3 |
17.1 |
97.4 |
14.4 |
93.4 |
39.0 |
82.9 |
14.5 |
97.3 |
66.6 |
17.2 |
14.6 |
97.6 |
72.5 |
10.7 |
14.7 |
98.8 |
84.3 |
2.3 |
14.8 |
99.2 |
78.9 |
0.4 |
Example 11 (catalyst composition L) |
10 parts by mass of CuO |
90 parts by mass YMnO3 |
14.1 |
53.9 |
1.8 |
98.6 |
14.3 |
83.7 |
13.1 |
95.8 |
14.4 |
92.9 |
29.2 |
72.9 |
14.5 |
97.7 |
61.2 |
6.4 |
114.6 |
98.2 |
67.5 |
4.4 |
14.7 |
99.0 |
74.5 |
1.5 |
14.8 |
99.3 |
63.1 |
0.6 |
Comparative Example 2 (catalyst composition M) |
|
100 parts by mass of LaMnO3 |
14.1 |
34.1 |
2.2 |
0.0 |
14.3 |
51.4 |
4.9 |
0.0 |
14.4 |
63.9 |
11.0 |
0.0 |
14.5 |
63.2 |
13.8 |
0.0 |
14.6 |
62.4 |
14.2 |
0.0 |
14.7 |
62.2 |
15.0 |
0.0 |
14.8 |
62.3 |
16.0 |
0.0 |
Comparat ive Example 3 (catalyst composition N) |
|
100 parts by mass of YMnO3 |
14.1 |
35.3 |
1.4 |
2.1 |
14.3 |
55.9 |
5.1 |
0.6 |
14.4 |
70.1 |
8.8 |
0.0 |
14.5 |
75.3 |
14.9 |
0.0 |
14.6 |
75.3 |
15.3 |
0.0 |
14.7 |
76.3 |
16.9 |
0.0 |
14.8 |
77.2 |
18.5 |
0.0 |
[0134] From the results of Examples 10 and 11 described above, it has been found that the
catalyst composition exerts three way catalytic activity and exerts remarkably excellent
purification performance particularly in the NOx purification performance even in
a mixed state consisting of a combination of the LaMnO
3 particles with the CuO particles or the YMnO
3 particles with the CuO particles.
[0135] Hence, it has been found that the same effect as that in the case of mixing the YMO
particles is obtained even in the manganese oxide particle powder other than the YMO
particles.
[0136] It can be presumed that it is possible to obtain the same effect as that in at least
Examples 1 to 11 when the particles containing a manganese-containing composite oxide
and the particles containing a metal of Group 5 to Group 11 having an electron in
the d orbital or an oxide of the metal are in a mixed state from the results of Examples
10 and 11 described above as well.