CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims priority to
U.S. Utility Application No. 14/840,473 filed August 31, 2015, which is a continuation-in-part application of, and claims priority to, non-provisional
patent Application No.
14/012,089 filed August 28, 2013 which is a continuation-part-part application of, and claims priority to non-provisional
patent Application No.
13/788,068, filed March 7, 2013.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] An apparatus and method for providing a time delay in injection of pressured fluid
into a geologic formation. More specifically, it is a toe valve apparatus activated
by fluid pressure that opens ports after a predetermined time interval to allow fluid
to pass from a well casing to a formation.
PRIOR ART AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Prior Art Background
[0003] It has become a common practice to install a pressure responsive opening device at
the bottom or toe of a casing string within horizontal well bores and in some vertical
bores. These devices make up and run as an integral part of the casing string. After
the casing has been cemented and allowed to solidify, the applied surface pressure
is combined with the hydrostatic pressure and a pressure responsive valve is opened.
The combination of hydrostatic and applied pressure is customarily used to overcome
a number of shear pins or to overcome a precision rupture disc. Once communication
with the well bore [i.e., area outside of the casing] is achieved, the well can be
hydraulically fractured or the valve can be used as an injection port to pump down
additional wire line perforating guns, plugs or other conveyance means such as well
tractors. Other known methods of establishing communication with the cemented and
cased well include tubing conveyed or coil tubing conveyed perforators. These are
all common methods to achieve an injection point but require increased time and money.
[0004] The present invention provides an improved apparatus and method that provides a time
delay in fluid injection through the casing.
[0005] Current time delay tools that open instantly do such in an uncontrolled manner wherein
a piston slams in an uncontrolled manner. Therefore, there is a need for a time delay
tool that may be opened instantly in a controlled manner. Current time delay tools
are not capable of opening multiple downhole tools. For example, when there are two
tools that need to open to a formation, one tool may be opened to the formation due
to the variation in actuation pressure of the rupture disks, however the pump pressure
cannot reach the second tool to actuate due to the first tool that is already connected
to a formation. Therefore, there is a need for opening multiple tools within a short
period of time without the need for deploying each tool separately.
[0006] Prior art tools also do not provide for a repeatable and reproducible time delays
due to the uncontrolled manner of the tool opening. Therefore there is a need for
a reliable, repeatable and reproducible time delay tool for opening connection to
a formation in a controlled manner.
[0007] US 6,763,892 patent entitled, "Sliding sleeve valve and method for assembly," discloses the following:
[0008] "A sliding sleeve valve and method for assembly is disclosed. The valve comprises
a segmented main body that is assembled from a top, middle and bottom segments. The
middle segment has flow apertures. A closing sleeve is co-axially mounted in the assembled
main body. The closing sleeve has flow apertures that are intended to communicate
with the flow apertures of the middle section when the valve is open. The closing
sleeve is sealed by seal means within the main body to prevent undesired fluid flow
across the valve. The seal means comprise primary, secondary and tertiary seals acting
in cooperative combinations. The seals comprise O-Ring and Vee-stack seals located
within the body of the valve. The sliding sleeve valve has a fluid pressure equalization
means to permit equalization of fluid pressure across the valve before it is fully
opened or fully closed in order to reduce wear on the seals. The equalization means
comprises a plurality of pressure equalization ports in the sliding sleeve that are
intended to communicate with the main body apertures prior to the sliding sleeve apertures
when opening and subsequent to the sliding sleeve apertures when closing."
[0009] Prior art assembly and manufacturing of the valve as aforementioned comprises a number
of individual components threadedly connected together with suitable seals. The components
of the tubular body may include top, middle and bottom segments, end couplings and
coupling adapters that are connected together and integrated into a well casing. However,
due to the number of connections the valve cannot withstand the torque specifications
of a typical wellbore casing. In addition, more number of segments and connections
increases the propensity of leaks through the valve and therefore rendering the valve
unreliable. Therefore, there is a need for a single piece mandrel or tubular body
to withstand the torsional and torque specifications of the wellbore casing when the
valve is threaded into the wellbore casing. There is a need for a valve manufactured
from a single piece mandrel provides for more reliability and reduces the propensity
of leaks.
Deficiencies in the Prior Art
[0010] The prior art as detailed above suffers from the following deficiencies:
[0011] Prior art systems do not provide for economical time delay tools with simple construction
and less expensive time delay elements.
[0012] Prior art systems do not provide for reliable time delay tools that open at high
pressure for connection to a geologic formation.
[0013] Prior art systems do not provide for opening time delay tools with reverse acting
rupture disks that resist plugging from wellbore debris and fluids.
[0014] Prior art systems do not provide for opening multiple time delay tools in a staged
manner.
[0015] Prior art systems do not provide for a short-delay controlled tool that appears to
open immediately to an operator.
[0016] Prior art systems do not provide a time delay tool with a larger inner diameter.
[0017] Prior art systems do not provide for a short time delay tool that is controlled within
a range of 0.5 seconds to 3 minutes.
[0018] Prior art systems do not provide for a long time delay tool that is controlled within
a range of 60 minutes to 2 weeks.
[0019] Prior art systems do not provide for a long time delay tool that is controlled with
a large pressure reservoir.
[0020] Prior art systems do not provide for a long time delay tool that is controlled with
an extremely high viscosity fluid.
[0021] Prior art systems do not provide for a long time delay tool that is controlled with
plugging agent.
[0022] Prior art systems do not provide for a long time delay tool that is controlled stacked
delay agents connected in series or parallel.
[0023] Prior art systems do not provide for a dual actuated controlled time delay valves.
[0024] Prior art systems do not provide for a single-actuated controlled time delay valves.
[0025] Prior art systems do not provide for a dual actuated controlled time delay valves
manufacture from a single mandrel.
[0026] Prior art systems do not provide for a single actuated controlled time delay valves
manufacture from a single mandrel.
[0027] Prior art systems do not provide for fracturing through a controlled time delay valves.
[0028] Prior art systems do not provide for detecting a wet shoe with a toe valve.
[0029] Prior art systems do not provide for removing debris from well with a multi injection
apparatus.
[0030] Prior art systems do not provide for manufacturing a controlled time delay apparatus
from a single mandrel that can carry all of the tensile, compressional and torsional
loads of the well casing.
[0031] Prior art systems do not provide for a valve manufactured from a single piece mandrel
for more reliability and reduces the propensity of leaks.
[0032] While some of the prior art may teach some solutions to several of these problems,
the core issue of a controlled time delay apparatus for establishing injection into
a subterranean formation has not been addressed by prior art.
OBJECTIVES OF THE INVENTION
[0033] Accordingly, the objectives of the present invention are (among others) to circumvent
the deficiencies in the prior art and affect the following objectives:
[0034] Provide for economical time delay tools with simple construction and less expensive
time delay elements.
[0035] Provide for reliable time delay tools that open at high pressure for connection to
a geologic formation.
[0036] Provide for opening time delay tools with reverse acting rupture disks that resist
plugging from wellbore debris and fluids.
[0037] Provide for opening multiple time delay tools in a staged manner.
[0038] Provide for a short delay controlled tool that appears to open immediately to an
operator.
[0039] Provide a time delay tool with a larger inner diameter.
[0040] Provide for a short time delay tool that is controlled within a range of 0.5 seconds
to 3 minutes.
[0041] Provide for a long time delay tool that is controlled within a range of 60 minutes
to 2 weeks.
[0042] Provide for a long time delay tool that is controlled with a large pressure reservoir.
[0043] Provide for a long time delay tool that is controlled with an extremely high viscosity
fluid.
[0044] Provide for a long time delay tool that is controlled with plugging agent.
[0045] Provide for a long time delay tool that is controlled stacked delay agents connected
in series or parallel.
[0046] Prior art systems do not provide for a dual actuated controlled time delay valves.
[0047] Prior art systems do not provide for a single-actuated controlled time delay valves.
[0048] Provide for a dual actuated controlled time delay valves manufacture from a single
mandrel.
[0049] Provide for a single actuated controlled time delay valves manufacture from a single
mandrel.
[0050] Provide for fracturing through a controlled time delay valves.
[0051] Provide for detecting a wet shoe with a toe valve.
[0052] Provide for removing debris from well with a multi injection apparatus.
[0053] Provide for manufacturing a controlled time delay apparatus from a single mandrel
that can carry all of the tensile, compressional and torsional loads of the well casing.
[0054] Provide for a valve manufactured from a single piece mandrel for more reliability
and reduces the propensity of leaks.
[0055] While these objectives should not be understood to limit the teachings of the present
invention, in general these objectives are achieved in part or in whole by the disclosed
invention that is discussed in the following sections. One skilled in the art will
no doubt be able to select aspects of the present invention as disclosed to affect
any combination of the objectives described above.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
System Overview
[0056] The present invention in various embodiments addresses one or more of the above objectives
in the following manner. The present invention includes an apparatus integrated into
a well casing for injection of pressurized fluid into a subterranean formation. The
apparatus comprises a housing with openings, a piston, a stacked delay restrictor,
an actuating device and a high pressure chamber with a hydraulic fluid. The stacked
delay restrictor is configured to be in pressure communication with the high pressure
chamber and a rate of travel of the piston is restrained by a passage of the hydraulic
fluid from the high pressure chamber into a low pressure chamber through the stacked
delay restrictor. Upon actuation by the actuating device, the piston travels for an
actuation time period, after elapse of the actuation time period, the piston travel
allows opening of the openings so that the pressurized fluid flows through the openings
for a port opening time interval.
Method Overview
[0057] The present invention system may be utilized in the context of a controlled time
delay method, wherein the system as described previously is controlled by a method
having the following steps:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with the apparatus;
- (2) injecting the fluid into the wellbore casing so as to increase pressure to a maximum;
- (3) actuating the actuating device when the maximum pressure exceeds a rated pressure
of the actuating device;
- (4) allowing the piston to travel for the actuation time period;
- (5) enabling the piston to travel to open said openings for the port opening time
interval so that the pressurized fluid flows into the subterranean formation.
[0058] Integration of this and other preferred exemplary embodiment methods in conjunction
with a variety of preferred exemplary embodiment systems described herein in anticipation
by the overall scope of the present invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0059] For a fuller understanding of the advantages provided by the invention, reference
should be made to the following detailed description together with the accompanying
drawings wherein:
FIG. 1a is a plan view of an apparatus of an embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 1b is a plan view of a cross section of an apparatus of an embodiment of the
invention.
FIG. 2 is an exploded section view of the apparatus displayed in Figure 1a and 1b
in which the ports are closed.
FIG. 3 is an exploded section view of the apparatus displayed in Figure 1a and 1b
in which the ports are open.
FIG. 4 is a plan view of an apparatus of an embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 5 is an exploded section view AE of a section of the apparatus of an embodiment
of the invention displayed in Figure 4.
FIG. 6 is an exploded section view AC of a section of displayed in Figure 4.
FIG. 7 is an exploded section view AD of a section of an embodiment of the invention
the apparatus displayed in Figure 4.
FIG. 8 is a graphic representation of results of a test of the operation of an apparatus
of an embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 9a and FIG. 9b illustrate an exemplary controlled time delay apparatus with stacked
delay elements arranged in series in a restrictor according to a preferred embodiment
of the present invention.
FIG. 9c and FIG. 9d illustrate an exemplary controlled time delay apparatus with stacked
delay elements arranged in series and parallel combination in a restrictor according
to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 10a, FIG. 10b, FIG. 10c are exemplary cross sections of a controlled time delay
apparatus illustrating closed time, actuation time and port open time according to
a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 11a is an exemplary chart for a casing pressure test with a controlled toe valve
apparatus illustrating delayed actuation time and port open time according to a preferred
embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 11b is an exemplary chart for a casing pressure test with a controlled toe valve
apparatus illustrating instant actuation time and port open time according to a preferred
embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 12a illustrates a prior art system cross section of a rupture disk.
FIG. 12b illustrates an exemplary system cross section of a reverse acting rupture
disk for use in a controlled time delay apparatus according to a preferred embodiment
of the present invention.
FIG. 13 illustrates an exemplary system cross section of a circular shaped housing
opening and a circular shaped mandrel port in a toe valve to produce a jetting action
according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 14 illustrates an exemplary system cross section of an oval shaped housing opening
and an oval shaped mandrel port in a toe valve to produce a jetting action according
to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 15a illustrates an exemplary system cross section of an oval shaped housing opening
and a circular shaped mandrel port in a toe valve to produce a jetting action according
to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 15b illustrates an exemplary system cross section of a circular shaped housing
opening and an oval shaped mandrel port in a toe valve to produce a jetting action
according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 16 is an exemplary flow chart that illustrates a controlled time delay method
with a time delay toe valve apparatus according to a preferred embodiment of the present
invention.
FIG. 16a is an exemplary flow chart that illustrates a casing integrity test method
with a controlled time delay with a time delay toe valve apparatus according to a
preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 17a illustrate an exemplary dual actuating controlled time delay apparatus comprising
dual controlled toe valves according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 17b illustrates an exemplary cross section of a dual actuating controlled time
delay apparatus comprising dual controlled toe valves according to a preferred embodiment
of the present invention.
FIG. 18 illustrates an exemplary perspective view of a dual actuating controlled time
delay apparatus according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 19 illustrates an exemplary dual actuating controlled time delay apparatus integrated
into a wellbore casing according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 20 is an exemplary chart that illustrates a controlled time delay method with
a dual time delay toe valve apparatus according to a preferred embodiment of the present
invention.
FIG. 21a, 21b, 21c illustrate an exemplary cross section of a single actuating controlled
time delay apparatus according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 22 illustrates an exemplary perspective view of a single actuating controlled
time delay apparatus according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 23 is an exemplary flow chart illustrating a controlled time delay method with
a single actuating dual time delay toe valve apparatus according to a preferred embodiment
of the present invention.
FIG. 24 is an exemplary flow chart illustrating a fracturing and perforating method
through a time delay toe valve apparatus according to a preferred embodiment of the
present invention.
FIG. 25 illustrates an exemplary cross section of a toe valve apparatus with a ball
seat according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 26 illustrates an exemplary perspective view of a toe valve apparatus with a
ball seat according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 27 is an exemplary flow chart illustrating a wet shoe detection with a time delay
toe valve apparatus and a restriction plug element according to a preferred embodiment
of the present invention.
FIG. 28a, 28b, 28c are an exemplary dual injection apparatus illustrating a first
injection point, debris collection and a second injection point according to a preferred
embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 29 is an exemplary flow chart illustrating debris removal with a controlled dual
injection apparatus according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 30 is an exemplary flow chart illustrating debris removal with a controlled dual
time delay apparatus according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 31 is an exemplary flow chart illustrating debris removal with a controlled time
delay apparatus and a perforating gun according to a preferred embodiment of the present
invention.
FIG. 32 is an exemplary flow chart illustrating debris removal with a controlled time
delay apparatus comprising a first tool, a second tool and a third tool according
to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 33 is an exemplary sliding sleeve apparatus with a one piece mandrel according
to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 34 is an exemplary flow chart illustrating assembly of a sliding sleeve apparatus
with a one piece mandrel according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENTLY PREFERRED EXEMPLARY
EMBODIMENTS
[0060] While this invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there
is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detailed preferred embodiment
of the invention with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered
as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit
the broad aspect of the invention to the embodiment illustrated.
[0061] The numerous innovative teachings of the present application will be described with
particular reference to the presently preferred embodiment, wherein these innovative
teachings are advantageously applied to the particular problems of a establishing
injection to a hydrocarbon formation system and method. However, it should be understood
that this embodiment is only one example of the many advantageous uses of the innovative
teachings herein. In general, statements made in the specification of the present
application do not necessarily limit any of the various claimed inventions. Moreover,
some statements may apply to some inventive features but not to others.
[0062] The present invention is an improved "toe valve" apparatus and method to allow fluid
to be injected through ports in an oil or gas well casing wall section (and casing
cement) into a geologic formation in a time delayed manner.
[0063] The apparatus, in broad aspect, provides time-delayed injection of pressurized fluid
through openings in a well casing section to a geological formation comprising:
a housing with openings that can communicate through ports in the walls of the apparatus
housing to a formation;
a movable piston or pistons capable of moving into position to provide covering and
sealing the port(s) and to a position where the ports are uncovered;
means for moving the piston to a final position leaving the port(s) uncovered; and
means for activation the movement of the piston.
[0064] The present invention represents several improvements over conventional pressure
responsive devices improvements that will be appreciated by those of ordinary skills
in the art of well completions. The greatest limitation of current devices is that
the sleeve or power piston of the device that allows fluid to flow from the casing
to a formation (through openings or ports in the apparatus wall) opens immediately
after the actuation pressure is reached. This limits the test time at pressure and
in many situations precludes the operator from ever reaching the desired casing test
pressure. The present invention overcomes that limitation by providing a hydraulic
delay to afford adequate time to test the casing at the required pressure and duration
before allowing fluid communication with the well bore and geologic formation. This
is accomplished by slowly releasing a trapped volume of fluid through a hydraulic
metering chamber that allows a piston covering the openings to move to a position
where the openings are uncovered. This feature will become even more advantageous
as federal and state regulators mandate the duration or dwell time of the casing test
pressure. The metering time can be increased or tailored to a specific test requirement
through manipulation of the fluid type, fluid volume, by altering the flow rate of
the hydraulic liquid flow restrictor and by appropriate placement and setting of pressure
valves on either or both sides of the flow restrictor.
[0065] A second advantage of this invention is that two or more valves can be installed
(run) as part of the same casing installation. This optional configuration of running
two or more valves is made possible by the delay time that allows all of the valves
to start metering before any of the valves are opened. The feature and option to run
two or more valves in a single casing string increases the likelihood that the first
stage of the well can be fracture stimulated without any well intervention whatsoever.
Other known devices do not allow more than a single valve to operate in the same well
since no further actuation pressure can be applied or increased after the first valve
is opened.
[0066] A third significant advantage is that in the operation of the valve, the ports are
opened slowly so that as the ports are opened (uncovered) the liquid is injected to
the cement on the outside of the casing in a high pressure jet (resulting from the
initial small opening of the ports), thus establishing better connection to the formation.
As the ports are uncovered the fluid first jets as a highly effective pinpoint cutting
jet and enlarges as the ports are opened to produce an effect of a guide-hole that
is then enlarged.
[0067] Referring to the Figures, Figure 1A represents a controlled time delay tool comprising
an inner mandrel,
29, that is inserted directly into the casing string and shows an overall external view
of an embodiment of the apparatus of the invention. Slotted ports
28 through which fluid will be transported into the geologic formation surrounding the
casing. Figure 1B shows a cross section view of the apparatus of Figure 1A. The integral
one-piece design of the mandrel carries all of the tensile, compressional and torsional
loads encountered by the apparatus. The entire toe valve apparatus is piped into the
casing string as an integral part of the string and positioned where perforation of
the formation and fluid injection into a formation is desired. The apparatus may be
installed in either direction with no change in its function.
[0068] Figure 2 (a section of Figure 1B) shows details of the apparatus of an embodiment
of the invention. A pressure activated opening device
23 preferably a Reverse Acting Disc but conventional rupture discs may be used for initiating
a piston. Since the rupture disc is in place in the casing string during cementing
it is very advantageous to have a reverse acting rupture disc that will not be easily
clogged and not require extra cleaning effort. The valve mandrel is machined to accept
the opening device
23 (such as rupture discs) that ultimately controls actuation of the piston,
5. The opening piston,
5, is sealed by elastomeric seals
(16, 18 and
20 in Figure 2 and
45, 47 and
49 in Figure 6) to cover the inner and outer ports,
25-27 and
28, in the apparatus.
[0069] The openings
25-27 (and a fourth port not shown) shown in Figures 2 and 3 are open ports. In one embodiment
the ports
25-27 (and other inside ports) will have means to restrict the rate of flow such as baffles
(
50 in Figure 7) as, for example, with a baffle plate consisting of restrictive ports
or a threaded and tortuous pathway,
50. This will impede rapid influx of well bore fluids through the rupture discs,
23 in Figure 2 and
52 in Figure 7 into the piston chamber
32. In Figure 5, the mandrel housing
54 is similar to mandrel housing
5 in Figure 2 and
52 is the rupture disc that corresponds to
23 in Figure 2. The mandrel housing
51 which is same as mandrel housing
6.
[0070] In one embodiment, the piston,
5, has dual diameters (Figure 6 shows the piston,
5 (
46 and
48), with one section,
46, having a smaller diameter at one end than at the other end,
48. This stepped diameter piston design will reduce the internal pressure required to
balance out the pressure across the piston when the piston is subjected to casing
pressure. This pressure reduction will increase the total delay time afforded by a
specific restrictor. The resistance to flow of a particular restrictor is affected
by the differential pressure across the component. By reducing the differential across
the component, the rate of flow can be skillfully and predictably manipulated. This
design provides increased delay and pressure test intervals without adding a larger
fluid chamber to the apparatus. The dual diameter piston allows the pressure in the
fluid chamber to be lowered. This has several advantages; in particular the delay
time will be increased by virtue of the fact that the differential pressure across
a given restrictor or metering device will be reduced. With a balanced piston area,
the pressure in the fluid chamber will be at or near the well bore pressure. With
the lower end of the piston
46 smaller and the piston area adjacent to the fluid chamber,
48, larger the forces will balance with a lower pressure in the fluid chamber. In this
way it will be easy to reduce the fluid chamber pressure by 25% or more.
[0071] A series of outer sections
4, 6, and
8 illustrated in Figures 1A, 1B and 2 are threadedly connected to form the fluid and
pressure chambers for the apparatus. The tandem,
3, not only couples outer section
4 and piston
5 but also houses a hydraulic restrictor
22. The area,
32, to the left of the piston,
5, is a fluid chamber and the area to the left of tandem
3 is the low pressure chamber that accommodates the fluid volume as it traverses across
the hydraulic restrictor. The chambers are both capped by the upper cap
8.
[0072] The rupture disc
23 or
52 is the activation device that sets the valve opening operation into play. When ready
to operate (i.e., open the piston), the casing pressure is increased to a test pressure
condition. This increased pressure ruptures the rupture disc
23 or
52 and fluid at casing pressure (hydrostatic, applied or any combination) enters the
chamber immediately below and adjacent to the piston
5 (in Figure 2 this is shown at the right end of piston
5 and to the left of valve
14). This entry of fluid causes the piston
5 to begin moving (to the left in the drawings). This fluid movement allows the piston
to move inexorably closer to an open position. In actual lab and field tests a piston
movement of about 4.5 inches begins to uncover the inner openings
25-27 and the outer openings
28. These openings are initially closed or sealed off from the casing fluid by the piston
5. As piston
5 moves toward the open and final position, the slots,
28, are uncovered allowing fluid to flow through openings
25, 26 and
27 through slots
28. Thus, the restrained movement of the piston allows a time delay from the time the
disc,
23 is ruptured until the slots uncovered for fluid to pass. This movement continues
until the piston has moved to a position where the ports are fully opened. Piston
5 surrounds the inter wall of the apparatus
29. As fluid pressure increases through port
14 it moves piston
5 into the fluid chamber
32. Hydraulic fluid in the fluid chamber restrains the movement of the piston. There
is a hydraulic flow restrictor
22 that allows fluid to pass from chamber
32 to lower pressure chamber
34. This flow restrictor controls the rate of flow of fluid from chamber
32 to chamber
34 and thereby controls the speed of the movement of the piston as it moves to the full
open position. Slots
28 in the apparatus mandrel that will be the passageway for fluid from the casing to
the formation. Figure 3 shows the position of piston
5 when "opened" (moved into chamber
32)
. Initially, this movement increases pressure in the fluid chamber to a value that
closely reflects the hydrostatic plus applied casing pressure. There is considerable
predetermined control over the delay time by learned manipulation of the fluid type,
fluid volume, initial charging pressure of the low pressure chamber and the variable
flow rate through the hydraulic restrictor. The time delay can be set as desired but
generally will be about 5 to 60 minutes. Any hydraulic fluid will be suitable if capable
of withstanding the pressure and temperature conditions that exist in the well bore.
Those skilled in the art will easily be able to select suitable fluids such as Skydrol
500B-4™.
[0073] In another embodiment there are added controls on the flow of fluid from the piston
chamber
32 to the low pressure piston chamber
34 to more precisely regulate the speed at which the piston moves to open the ports.
As illustrated in Figure 5 (a sectional enlarged view of the section of the tool housing
the flow restrictor that allows fluid to flow from the piston chamber
32 to the lower pressure chamber
34) there is a Back Pressure Valve or Pressure Relief Valve
42 placed downstream of the Flow Metering Section
22 to maintain a predetermined pressure in the Fluid Chamber. This improves tool reliability
by reducing the differential pressure that exists between the Fluid Chamber
34 and the well bore pressure in the piston chamber
32. This Back Pressure Valve or Pressure Relief Valve
42 may be selected based on the anticipated hydrostatic pressure. Back pressure valve(s)
may also be placed in series to increase the trapped pressure. Another Back Pressure
Valve or Pressure Relief Valve
44 may be placed downstream of the Fluid Metering Section
22 to ensure that only a minimum fluid volume can migrate from the Fluid Metering Section
22 to the Low Pressure Chamber
34 during transport, when deployed in a horizontal well bore or when inverted for an
extended period of time. By selecting the appropriate pressure setting of these back
pressure valves "slamming" (forceful opening by sudden onrush of pressurized fluid)
of the flow control valve is reduced.
[0074] In operation an apparatus of the invention will be piped into a casing string at
a location that will allow fluid injection into the formation where desired. The apparatus
may be inserted into the string an either direction. An advantage of the present invention
is that two or more of the valves of the invention may be used in the string. They
will, as explained above, open to allow injection of fluid at multiple locations in
the formation. It can also be appreciated by those skilled in the art how two or more
of valves of the invention may be used and programmed at different time delays to
open during different stages of well operations as desired (e.g. one or more at 5
minute delay and one or more at 20 minutes delay). For example, the apparatus may
be configured so that an operator may open one or more valves (activating the sliding
closure) after a five minute delay, fracture the zone at the point of the open valves,
then have one or more valves and continue to fractures the zone.
[0075] In general the apparatus will be constructed of steel having properties similar to
the well casing.
[0076] A prototype apparatus had the general dimensions of about 60 inches in length, with
a nominal outside diameter of 6.5 inches and an inside diameter of 3.75 inches. Other
dimensions as appropriate for the well and operation in which the apparatus is intended
to be used are intended to be included in the invention and may easily be determined
by those of ordinary skill in the art.
[0077] Figure 8 represents the results of a test of a prototype of the apparatus. As shown,
a 5-minute test shows constant pressure for 5 minutes while the piston movement uncovered
openings in the apparatus.
[0078] In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to
specific embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications
and changes can be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope
of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. The specification is, accordingly,
to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. Therefore, the
scope of the invention should be limited only by the appended claims.
Preferred Exemplary Controlled Time Delay Apparatus with Stacked Delay Restrictor (0900 - 0940)
[0079] The present invention is generally illustrated in more detail in FIG. 9a
(0910) wherein a controlled time delay apparatus with a stacked delay restrictor is integrated
and conveyed with a wellbore casing. An expanded view of the stacked delay restrictor
is further illustrated in FIG. 9b
(0920). The apparatus may comprise a piston that moves from a high pressure chamber to a
low pressure chamber, when actuated. The stacked delay restrictor
(0902) is in communication with a high pressure chamber
(0903), may comprise multiple stacked delay elements connected in a series, parallel or combination
thereof. The delay element may be a conventional hydraulic restrictor such as a ViscoJet™.
The stacked delay restrictor allows fluid to pass from a high pressure chamber
(0903) to lower pressure chamber
(0901). This flow restrictor controls the rate of flow of fluid from the high pressure chamber
(0903) to the low chamber
(0901) and thereby controls the speed of the movement of the piston
(0904) as it moves to the full open position. The number of delay elements may be customized
to achieve a desired time delay for the piston to travel from a closed position to
open an opening in housing of the apparatus. According to another preferred exemplary
embodiment, the delay elements are connected in a parallel fashion as illustrated
in FIG. 9c
(0930). An expanded view of the stacked delay restrictor with parallel delay elements
(0902, 0912) is further illustrated in FIG. 9d
(0940). According to yet another preferred exemplary embodiment, the delay elements are connected
in a series and parallel combination. According to a preferred exemplary embodiment,
a time delay is greater than 60 minutes and less than 2 weeks. The time delay may
be controlled by manipulating the fluid type fluid volume in the delay elements, initial
charging pressure of the low pressure chamber and the variable flow rate through the
hydraulic restrictor. According to yet another exemplary embodiment, the hydraulic
fluid is solid at the surface that changes phase to liquid when in operation as a
toe valve in the wellbore casing. Any hydraulic fluid will be suitable if capable
of withstanding the pressure and temperature conditions that exist in the well bore.
The viscosity of the hydraulic fluid may range from 3 centistokes to 10,000 centistokes.
According to a further exemplary embodiment, the time delay in the restrictor may
be increased by addition of plugging agents. The size and shape of the plugging agents
may be designed to effect a longer or shorter time delay. For example, larger particle
size plugging agents may delay the rate of travel of a piston as compared to smaller
size plugging agents.
[0080] According to yet another preferred exemplary embodiment, the delay elements may be
designed as a cartridge that may be slide in and out of the restrictor. The cartridge
may have a form factor that is compatible with the restrictor. According to a preferred
exemplary embodiment, the cartridge may be positioned and customized to achieve a
desired time delay.
Preferred Exemplary ID/OD Controlled Time Delay Ratio
[0081] Table 1.0 illustrates an exemplary ratio of inner diameter (ID) to outer diameter
(OD) in an exemplary controlled time delay apparatus. According to a preferred exemplary
embodiment the ratio of ID/OD ranges from 0.4 to 0.99. According to a preferred exemplary
embodiment, a full bore version wherein the inner diameter of the apparatus is almost
equal to the inner diameter of the wellbore casing enables substantially more fluid
flow during production. Table 2.0 illustrate the inner casing ID and outer casing
ID corresponding to the Name column of Table 1.0. For example, a name of 4 ½ refers
to a casing OD of 4.5 in table 2.0.
Table 1.0
Name |
Outer Diameter (in) |
Inner Diameter (in) |
4 1/2 |
5.65 |
3.34 |
5 |
5. 65 |
3.34 |
5 1/2 |
6.88 |
3.75 |
4 ½ Full Bore |
x |
x |
5 ½ Full Bore |
7.38 |
4.6 |
Table 2.0
Casing OD |
Casing Weight |
Casing ID |
(in) |
(lb/ft) |
(in) |
4.5 |
13.50 |
3.03 |
4.5 |
11.60 |
3.11 |
5.5 |
23.00 |
3.78 |
5.5 |
20.00 |
3.90 |
5.5 |
17.00 |
4.03 |
[0082] According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, an inner tool diameter and an inner
casing diameter ratio ranges from 0.4 to 1.1.
Preferred Exemplary Section of a Controlled Toe Valve Apparatus illustrating Port
Closed time, Actuation Time Period and Port Open Time Interval (1000 - 1030)
Port Closed Time (1010):
[0083] As generally illustrated in FIG. 10a
(1010), when ready to operate, the casing pressure is increased to a test pressure condition.
The piston
(1001) is held in its place while the piston covers the openings
(1002) in the housing of the controlled time delay apparatus. The piston
(1001) remains in place until an actuation event takes place. The time the piston remains
in a static position between a pressure ramp-up event to just before an actuation
event may be considered a port closed time.
Port Actuation Time Period (1020):
[0084] As generally illustrated in FIG. 10b
(1020), when ready to operate, the casing pressure is increased to a test pressure condition
which is generally the maximum pressure that a well casing is designed to operate.
When the casing pressure increases beyond an actuation pressure of a pressure actuation
device, the increased pressure ruptures a pressure actuation device such as a rupture
disc and fluid at casing pressure enters the chamber immediately below and adjacent
to the piston
(1001) into a high pressure chamber. This fluid movement allows the piston to move inexorably
closer to an open position. The piston moves toward the openings in the housing of
the apparatus. The time the piston travels after an actuation event to just before
uncovering a port may be considered actuation time period. The restrained movement
of the piston
(1001) allows a time delay from the time the pressure actuation device is ruptured until
the openings ("slots")
(1002) uncovered for fluid to pass. This movement continues until the piston has moved to
a position where the ports are almost open to fully open. Hydraulic fluid in the fluid
chamber restrains the movement of the piston. A stacked delay restrictor or a restriction
element such as a ViscoJet™ may control the rate of flow of fluid from a high pressure
chamber to a low pressure chamber and thereby control the speed of the movement of
the piston as it moves to a full open position.
Port Open Time Interval 11030):
[0085] As generally illustrated in FIG. 10c
(1030), as the piston
(1001) moves toward the fully open and final position, the openings
(1002) in the housing are uncovered allowing fluid to flow through the ports in the mandrel.
This movement continues until the piston has moved to a position where the openings
are fully uncovered. The time the piston travels from a position
(1001) just before uncovering the openings
(1002) to fully uncovering the openings
(1002) may be considered port opening time interval.
Preferred Exemplary Chart of a Pressure Casing Test with a Controlled Time Delay Toe
Valve Apparatus (1100 - 1190)
[0086] Figure 11a
(1140) illustrates an exemplary pressure test with a controlled time delay toe valve apparatus.
The chart shows the pressure in the casing on the Y-axis plotted against time on the
X-axis. The pressure in the casing may be increased from an initial pressure
(1101) to 80% of the maximum test pressure
(1102). A pressure actuating device such as a reverse acting rupture disk may rupture at
80-90% of the test pressure
(1103) at time
(1107). The piston may be actuated then and begin to move as the pressure is further increased
to max casing pressure
(1104). The actuation time period may be defined as the time taken by the piston to travel
when the piston is actuated to the time the piston starts uncovering the housing openings.
For example, as illustrated in FIG. 11a
(1140), the time of travel of the piston from time
(1107) to time
(1108) is the actuation time
(1105). When the piston starts to uncover the openings of the housing, the ports in the mandrel
align with the openings as the piston moves slowly in a controlled manner. The port
opening time interval may be defined as the time taken by the piston to start opening
the openings to completely open the openings. For example, as illustrated in FIG.
11a
(1140), the time of travel of the piston from time
(1108) to time
(1109) is the port opening time
(1106). During the port opening time, the pressure in the casing may drop to the hydrocarbon
formation pressure as the connection to the formation is complete. According to a
preferred exemplary embodiment, the piston moves past the housing openings slowly
in a controlled manner resulting in a jetting action for connection of the pressurized
fluid to the formation. The port opening time and the actuation time may be controlled
by various factors including size of the high pressure chamber, hydraulic restrictor
fluid, length of the hydraulic restrictor, plugging agents and design of the hydraulic
restrictor. The diameter of the plugging agent may range from 1 micron to 50 microns.
[0087] According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, the port opening time interval may
range from 1 second to 1 hour. According to a more preferred exemplary embodiment
the port opening time interval may range from 0.5 second to 20 minutes. According
to another preferred exemplary embodiment, the port opening time interval is almost
0 seconds.
[0088] Similar to the chart in FIG. 11a
(1140), a chart illustrating an instant open is generally illustrated in FIG. 11b
(1160) wherein the piston make a connection to the formation instantaneously in a controlled
manner. The port actuation time period
(1115) is relatively short and controlled as compared to the port actuation time period
(1105) in FIG. 11a
(1140). According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, the port actuation time period ranges
from 0.5 seconds to less than 5 minutes. According to a more preferred exemplary embodiment,
the port actuation time period is almost zero or instantaneous. According to another
preferred exemplary embodiment, the port actuation time period ranges from 60 minutes
to less than 2 weeks. The time delay or the actuation time period may be controlled
by factors such as shorter hydraulic restrictor length, lower viscosity hydraulic
restrictor fluid, and shorter high pressure chamber. To an operator controlling the
fluid pressure from the surface, it would appear that the connection to the formation
occurred instantaneously as the pressure response is too quick to detect. In this
case, the connection to the subterranean formation occurs instantaneously in a controlled
manner as compared to prior art methods wherein the piston is slammed to open the
ports to the formation. According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, the apparatus
makes connection to the formation instantaneously in a controlled manner.
Preferred Exemplary Reverse Acting Rupture Disk (1200 - 1220)
[0089] As generally illustrated in FIG. 12a
(1210) a prior art rupture disk is prone to plugging with cement and other debris
(1201). The plugging of the rupture disk
(1210) may fluctuate the actuation pressure at which the rupture disk ruptures and may prevent
actuation of the device. Therefore, there is a need for a rupture disk that functions
as rated without plugging. As generally illustrated in FIG. 12b
(1220) an exemplary reverse acting rupture disk may be used in a controlled time delay apparatus
as a pressure actuating device. The reverse acting rupture disk
(1202) has the unique advantage of not getting plugged during cementing and other wellbore
operations. This advantage results in the rupture disk to function as it is rated
when compared to a conventional forward acting rupture disk which is susceptible to
plugging.
Preferred Exemplary Controlled Time Delay Apparatus with Mandrel Ports and Housing
Opening Shapes (1300 - 1500)
[0090] FIG. 13
(1300), FIG. 14
(1400), FIG. 15a (
1510), and FIG. 15b
(1520) generally illustrate a jetting action of pressurized fluid from the wellbore casing
to the hydrocarbon formation. As the piston moves slowly across the openings in the
housing of the toe valve uncovering the openings in the housing, the ports in the
mandrel align with the openings to produce a guided hole jet effect of the pressurized
fluid through the openings. The shape of the guided hole jet depends on the shape
of the port in the piston and shape of the opening in the housing. The valve may open
at maximum pressure and an initial restricted flow area, which increases to maximum
design flow area over time as the piston moves slowly across. According to a preferred
exemplary embodiment, the shape of the port in the mandrel may be selected from a
group comprising a circle, oval and a square. According to another preferred exemplary
embodiment, the shape of the opening in the housing may be selected from a group comprising
a circle, oval and a square.
[0091] FIG. 13
(1300) illustrates a jet that may be formed with a circle shaped opening
(1303) in the housing and a circle shaped port
(1304) in the mandrel
(1302) when a piston uncovers the openings in the housing
(1301). Similarly, FIG. 14
(1400) illustrates a jet that may be formed with an oval shaped opening
(1403) in the housing and an oval shaped port
(1404) in the mandrel
(1402) when a piston uncovers the openings in the housing
(1401). Likewise, FIG. 15a
(1510) illustrates a jet that may be formed with an oval shaped opening
(1503) in the housing and a circle shaped port
(1504) in the mandrel
(1502) when a piston uncovers the openings in the housing
(1501). Also, FIG. 15b
(1520) illustrates a jet that may be formed with a circle shaped opening
(1513) in the housing and an oval shaped port
(1514) in the mandrel
(1512) when a piston uncovers the openings in the housing
(1511).
[0092] A constant width slot or variable width slot such as a tear drop may also be used
as an opening in the housing or a port in the mandrel. Any shape that is constant
width as the piston travels may be used as an opening in the housing or a port in
the mandrel. Similarly, a shape such as a tear drop that may become wider or narrower
as the piston moves past the openings and the ports may be used as an opening in the
housing or a port in the mandrel. The flow area of the inner mandrel may be designed
for limited entry applications so that flow is diverted to multiple injection points
at high enough flow rate.
Preferred Exemplary Flowchart of a Controlled Time Delay Apparatus (1600)
[0093] As generally seen in the flow chart of FIG. 16
(1600), a preferred exemplary controlled time delay method with a controlled time delay apparatus
may be generally described in terms of the following steps:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with the toe valve apparatus
(1601);
- (2) injecting the fluid to increase well pressure to 80 to 100% of the maximum pressure
(1602);
- (3) actuating the actuating device when a pressure of said fluid exceeds a rated pressure
of the actuating device (1603);
- (4) allowing a piston in the toe valve to travel for an actuation time period (1604); and
- (5) enabling the piston to travel to open openings for the port opening time interval
so that the pressurized fluid flows into the subterranean formation (1605).
Preferred Exemplary Flowchart of a Controlled Time Delay Apparatus (1610)
[0094] As generally seen in the flow chart of FIG. 16a
(1610), a preferred exemplary controlled time delay method with a controlled time delay apparatus
may be generally described in terms of the following steps:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with said apparatus (1611);
- (2) injecting the fluid to increase well pressure to 80 to 100% of the maximum pressure
(1612);
- (3) testing for casing integrity (1613);
- (4) increasing pressure of said pressurized fluid so that said pressure exceeds a
rated pressure of said actuating device (1614);
- (5) increasing pressure of said pressurized fluid to about 100% of said maximum casing
pressure allowing a piston to travel for said actuation time period (1615);
- (6) testing casing integrity for said actuation time period (1616); and
- (7) enabling said piston to travel to open said openings for said port opening time
interval so that said pressurized fluid flows into said subterranean formation (1617).
Preferred Exemplary Dual Actuating Controlled Time Delay Apparatus (1700 - 1900)
[0095] As generally illustrated in FIG. 17a
(1710) and FIG. 17b
(1720) a dual actuating controlled time delay apparatus comprises dual controlled toe valves
(1701, 1702) for use in a wellbore casing. Each of the dual toe valves
(1701, 1702) is similar to the aforementioned toe valve apparatus in FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B. Toe
valve (first delay tool)
(1701) may comprise a first piston
(1704) that moves when actuated by a first pressure actuating device
(1703), first openings
(1705) in the housing and first ports
(1707) in the mandrel. Similarly, toe valve (second delay tool)
(1702) may comprise a second piston
(1714) that moves when actuated by a second pressure actuating device
(1713), second openings
(1715) in the housing and second ports
(1717) in the mandrel. The first delay tool
(1701) may be integrated into the well casing at a first location and the second delay tool
(1702) may be integrated into the well casing at a second location. The first location and
the second locations may be determined by an open-hole log before casing is placed
in a wellbore, seismic data that may include 3 dimensional formation of interest to
stay in a zone, and a mud log. According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, the
dual actuating controlled time delay apparatus may further comprise a third delay
tool integrated into the wellbore casing at a third location. The third tool may comprise
a third housing with third openings, a third piston, and a third actuating device.
It should be noted that the number of delay tools aforementioned may not be construed
as a limitation. One ordinarily skilled in the art may use three or more delay tools
that may be integrated into the wellbore casing to achieve staggered delay openings
at various times. Other operations including pumping down tools, injecting fluid or
plugging may be performed at any time while the delay tools are opening. Rate of travel
of each of the pistons
(1704, 1714) in the toe valves
(1701, 1702) is controlled independently of each other. According to a preferred exemplary embodiment,
the dual actuating controlled time delay apparatus may be manufactured from an integral
one-piece design of the mandrel that carries all of the tensile, compressional and
torsional loads encountered by the apparatus. The entire dual actuating controlled
time delay apparatus may be piped into the casing string as an integral part of the
string and positioned where perforation of the formation and fluid injection into
a formation is desired. The dual actuating controlled time delay apparatus may be
installed in either direction with no change in its function.
[0096] Prior art systems do not provide for two or more toe valves in a single system due
to the fact that the first connection to the formation releases all the pressure in
the well casing, therefore making a potential second toe valve ineffective. This is
caused by the tolerance in actuation pressure inherent in the actuation devices. According
to a preferred exemplary embodiment, the time delays of individual toe valves are
controlled independently so that multiple connection points to the formation are created.
The effect of multiple connection points to the formation may result in increased
connection efficiency and increased flow area to the formation. According to a preferred
exemplary embodiment, the flow area may be increased by 50% to more than 1000%. According
to a preferred exemplary embodiment, the time delays of the individual toe valves
are the same. According to another preferred exemplary embodiment, the time delays
of the individual toe valves are not equal. According to yet another preferred exemplary
embodiment, a ratio of the first actuation time period and the second actuation time
period ranges from 0.01 to 100. According to a further preferred exemplary embodiment,
a ratio of the first port open time interval and the second port open time interval
ranges from 0.01 to 100. According to yet another preferred exemplary embodiment,
one valve provides a fail-safe mechanism for connection to the formation. The difference
in rated pressures of the first actuating device
(1713) and the second actuating device
(1703) may be within 500 PSI. This is particularly important as the rated pressure of actuating
devices such as rupture disks are rated within +- 500 PSI. In order to account for
the differences in rated pressure, two delay tools with a rated pressure difference
of +-500 PSI may be used to minimize the uncertainty in the actuation pressure. In
the event that one valve fails to open or function the other valve may act as a replacement
or fail-safe to provide connection to the formation. FIG.18
(1800) illustrates a perspective view of a controlled dual time delay controlled apparatus.
The controlled dual time delay controlled apparatus may be integrated into a wellbore
casing
(1901) as illustrated in FIG. 19
(1900). The casing with the integrated dual control apparatus may be cemented with a cement
(1902). The apparatus may comprise two individually controlled time delay apparatus, a first
delay tool
(1903) and a second delay tool
(1904). According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, the controlled dual time delay controlled
apparatus may be integrated at a toe end of the casing. According to another preferred
exemplary embodiment, the controlled dual time delay controlled apparatus may be integrated
at a heal end of the casing.
Preferred Exemplary Flowchart of a Controlled Time Delay with a Dual Actuating Toe
Valve (2000)
[0097] As generally seen in the flow chart of FIG. 20
(2000), a preferred exemplary controlled time delay method with a dual actuating controlled
apparatus aforementioned in FIG. 17a
(1710) may be generally described in terms of the following steps:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with the dual actuating controlled
apparatus (2001);
- (2) injecting the fluid to increase well pressure to 80 to 100% of the maximum pressure
(2002);
- (3) activating a first actuating device when the maximum pressure exceeds a rated
pressure of the first actuating device and activating the second actuating device
when the maximum pressure exceeds a rated pressure of the second actuating device
(2003);
- (4) allowing a first piston to travel for a first actuation time period and allowing
a second piston to travel for a second actuation time period (2004); and
- (5) enabling the first piston to travel to open the first openings for a first port
opening time interval and enabling the second piston to travel to open the second
openings for a second port opening time interval, so that the pressurized fluid flows
into the subterranean formation (2005).
Preferred Exemplary Single Actuating Controlled Dual Time Delay Apparatus (2100 -
2200)
[0098] As generally illustrated in FIG. 21a
(2110), FIG. 21b
(2120), and FIG. 21c
(2130) a single-actuating controlled dual time delay apparatus comprising dual time delay
valves with pistons
(2103, 2113), a mandrel
(2105), openings
(2101, 2111) and ports
(2102, 2112) for use in a wellbore casing. The single-actuating controlled dual time delay apparatus
may comprise a first piston
(2103) and a second piston that move in opposite directions when actuated by a pressure
actuating device
(2104). The first delay valve may be integrated into the well casing at a first location
and the second delay valve may be integrated into the well casing at a second location.
The first location and the second locations may be determined by an open-hole log
before casing is placed in a wellbore, seismic data that may include 3 dimensional
formation of interest to stay in a zone, and a mud log. According to a preferred exemplary
embodiment, the single actuating controlled time delay apparatus may further comprise
a third delay tool integrated into the wellbore casing at a third location. The third
tool may comprise a third housing with third openings, a third piston, and an actuating
device. It should be noted that the number of delay tools aforementioned may not be
construed as a limitation. One ordinarily skilled in the art may use three or more
delay tools that may be integrated into the wellbore casing to achieve staggered delay
openings at various times. According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, two or more
time delay valves may be actuated by a single actuating device. The rate of travel
of each of the pistons
(2103, 2113) in the apparatus may be controlled independently of each other. According to a preferred
exemplary embodiment, the single-actuating controlled time delay apparatus may be
manufactured from an integral one-piece design of the mandrel that carries all of
the tensile, compressional and torsional loads encountered by the apparatus. The entire
single-actuating controlled time delay apparatus may be piped into the casing string
as an integral part of the string and positioned where perforation of the formation
and fluid injection into a formation is desired. The single-actuating controlled time
delay apparatus may be installed in either direction with no change in its function.
Prior art systems do not provide for two or more toe valves in a single system due
to the fact that the first connection to the formation releases all the pressure in
the well casing, therefore making a potential second toe valve ineffective. According
to a preferred exemplary embodiment, the time delays of individual toe valves are
controlled independently so that multiple connection points to the formation are created.
The effect of multiple connection points to the formation may result in increased
connection efficiency and increased flow area to the formation. According to a preferred
exemplary embodiment, the flow area may be increased by 50% to more than 1000%. According
to a preferred exemplary embodiment, the time delays of the individual toe valves
are the same. According to another preferred exemplary embodiment, the time delays
of the individual toe valves are not equal. According to yet another preferred exemplary
embodiment, one valve provides a fail-safe mechanism for connection to the formation.
In the event that one valve fails to open or function the other valve may act as a
replacement or fail-safe to provide connection to the formation. FIG.22
(2200) illustrates a perspective view of a controlled single-actuating dual time delay controlled
apparatus. The controlled single-actuating dual time delay controlled apparatus may
be integrated into a wellbore casing. The single-actuating may comprise two individually
controlled time delay apparatus, a first delay tool and a second delay tool. According
to a preferred exemplary embodiment, the controlled dual time delay controlled apparatus
may be integrated at a toe end of the casing. According to another preferred exemplary
embodiment, the controlled dual time delay controlled apparatus may be integrated
at a heal end of the casing.
Preferred Exemplary Flowchart of a Controlled Time Delay with a Single Actuating Toe
Valve (2300)
[0099] As generally seen in the flow chart of FIG. 23
(2300), a preferred exemplary controlled time delay method with a single-actuating controlled
dual time delay apparatus may be generally described in terms of the following steps:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with the dual toe valve apparatus
(2301);
- (2) injecting the fluid to increase well pressure to 80 to 100% of the maximum pressure
(2302);
- (3) activating an actuating device when the maximum pressure exceeds a rated pressure
of the actuating device (2303);
- (4) allowing a first piston to travel for a first actuation time period and allowing
a second piston to travel for a second actuation time period (2304); and
- (5) enabling the first piston to travel to open the first openings for a first port
opening time interval and enabling the second piston to travel to open the second
openings for a second port opening time interval, so that the pressurized fluid flows
into the subterranean formation (2305).
Preferred Exemplary Flowchart of Perforating and Fracturing through a Controlled Time
Delay Toe Valve (2400)
[0100] As generally seen in the flow chart of FIG. 24
(2400), a preferred exemplary fracturing method through a controlled time delay apparatus
may be generally described in terms of the following steps:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with the time delay apparatus
(2401);
the time delay apparatus may be configured with a seating surface so that a restriction
plug element may be seated in the seating surface.
- (2) pumping up wellbore pressure to a maximum pressure (2402);
- (3) activating an actuating device when a maximum pressure exceeds a rated pressure
of the actuating device (2403);
- (4) performing a casing integrity test for an actuation time period at the maximum
pressure (2404);
- (5) enabling a piston to travel to open openings so that a connection is established
to a subterranean formation (2405);
- (6) pumping fracturing fluid through the time delay apparatus (2406);
acid stimulation with HCL may be performed prior to or during pumping fracturing fluid
so that an improved connection is created to the formation and further fracturing
operations are effective in creating fractures.
- (7) pumping a perforating gun into the wellbore casing (2407); and
The perforating gun may be pumped along with a frac plug so that the frac plug isolates
the next stage. A restriction plug element may be deployed to seat in the seating
surface of the apparatus.
- (8) perforating through the perforating gun (2408).
Preferred Exemplary Apparatus Ball Seat in a Controlled Time Delay Injection Valve (2500 - 2600)
[0101] The wiper plug designs used in today's horizontal well bores were initially developed
for use in vertical well bores. The horizontal well bores present a more challenging
trajectory for the equipment due to the extended casing length and concentrated friction
on only one side of the wiper plug. As a consequence, the elastomeric fins of a wiper
plug can become worn on one side and render incapable of sealing properly in the dimensions
of the conventional shoe joint. This causes a phenomena called "wet shoe." The downfalls
of having a wet shoe in a cemented wellbore casing include possible leak paths, lack
of isolation, and no pressure integrity of the casing. Therefore, when a pressure
casing integrity test fails, the cause of the failure is either a wet shoe or leak
in the casing. According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, time delay injection
valve or a toe valve with a ball seat enables detection of wet shoe when a ball or
a restriction plug element dropped into the wellbore casing seats in the ball seat
and seals the toe end to remediate the wet shoe. On the other hand, if the ball seated
in the time delay injection valve still causes a casing integrity test to fail, then
the cause of the failure is not the wet shoe which further indicates that the cause
of failure is related to the casing integrity. In some instances, the casing integrity
failure may be due to weaker joints or a hole in the casing. According to a preferred
exemplary embodiment, the time delay injection valve is a hydraulic controlled time
delay valve. For example the time delay injection valve may be a hydraulic controlled
time delay valve as illustrated in FIG. 1A. An additional seat may be located below
the valve, providing a means to test the toe, the valve and the well. According to
another preferred exemplary embodiment, the time delay injection valve is a hydraulic
controlled dual actuated time delay valve. For example the time delay injection valve
may be a hydraulic controlled dual actuated time delay valve as illustrated in FIG.
17a. According to yet another preferred exemplary embodiment, the time delay injection
valve is a hydraulic controlled single actuated time delay valve. For example the
time delay injection valve may be a hydraulic controlled single actuated time delay
valve as illustrated in FIG. 21a.
[0102] FIG. 25
(2500) generally illustrates a restriction plug element
(2503) seated in a seating surface
(2502) of a controlled time delay apparatus
(2501). The controlled time delay apparatus
(2501) may be installed at a toe end of a wellbore casing. The restriction plug element
(2503) may be a ball that may be dropped to seat in the valve
(2501). The seated restriction plug element
(2503) may seal any leaks past the restriction plug element
(2503) in a toe ward direction, thereby enabling detection of a wet shoe in a wellbore casing.
According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, a toe valve with a ball seat is used
to isolate wet shoe failures from casing integrity failures. According to a preferred
exemplary embodiment, a restriction plug element seated in a controlled time delay
apparatus may be used to create the first stage in a perforation and fracturing operation.
FIG. 26
(2600) generally illustrates a perspective view of a restriction plug element seated in
a seating surface of a controlled time delay apparatus. According to a preferred exemplary
embodiment, the restriction plug element is degradable in wellbore fluids.
[0103] According to another preferred exemplary embodiment, the restriction plug element
is non-degradable in wellbore fluids. According to a preferred exemplary embodiment,
the restriction plug element has a shape that may be selected from a group comprising
a sphere, dart, oval, or cylinder.
Preferred Exemplary Flowchart of Wet Shoe Detection with a Controlled Time Delay Toe
Valve (2700)
[0104] As generally seen in the flow chart of FIG. 27
(2700), a preferred exemplary wet shoe detection method through a controlled time delay apparatus
with a ball seat may be generally described in terms of the following steps:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with the apparatus (2701);
- (2) performing a casing integrity test at 80 to 100 % of maximum pressure (2702);
the casing integrity test may be performed at 80% or 100% of the maximum pressure.
Fluid may be injecting to increase well pressure to 80 to 100% of the maximum pressure.
- (3) checking if the casing integrity test passes, if so, proceeding to step (9) (2703);
- (4) deploying a restriction plug element into the wellbore casing (2704);
- (5) seating the restriction plug element in a conforming seating surface of the apparatus
(2705);
- (6) performing a casing integrity test at maximum pressure (2706);
the casing integrity test may be performed at 80% or 100% of the maximum pressure.
- (7) checking if the casing integrity test passes, if so, proceeding to step (9) (2707);
- (8) fixing a source of the leak (2708); and
- (9) performing injection, perforation, or fracturing operations (2709).
Preferred Exemplary System of Debris Removal in a Wellbore Casing (2800)
[0105] In a fracture treatment application, the well can contain residual cement or other
"debris" which can block or restrict the function of perforations or casing conveyed
completion valves. This blockage may occur during initial injection at low rates to
pump down a tool string, or when the pumping rate increases during a fracture stimulation
treatment, or after some time at the increased pumping rate. FIG. 28a
(2810), FIG. 28b
(2820), FIG. 28c
(2830) illustrate a dual injection system with a time delay mechanism that may be used in
a staged or sequential delay fashion with multiple injection points. As illustrated
in FIG. 28a, a first tool
(2801) and a second tool
(2802) may be conveyed with a wellbore casing or deployed into a wellbore casing
(2805). The wellbore casing may be lined with cement
(2803) or open hole. For instance, injection point one is open as illustrated in FIG 28b.
(2820), and flow rate ramps up, carrying debris preferentially to clog injection point one.
Injection point two then opens as illustrated in FIG. 28c
(2830), allowing unobstructed flow to the wellbore. Staggered sequential time delayed tools
(used in conjunction with already open connections or in sets by themselves) such
that debris from cementing, perforation or other sources is preferentially drawn toward
the tool that connects to the reservoir first, whether uphole or downhole from second
tool, that opens leaving second tool to be free of debris with an improved connection
to the reservoir. In the interval between the opening of the first injection point
in the first tool
(2801) and opening of the second injection point in the second tool
(2802), fluid may be pumped into the well casing to move debris
(2804) to the first injection point. According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, the
second injection point may open after the first injection point plugs. For example,
if the first tool is a controlled time delay valve with a 5 minute time delay and
the second tool is a controlled time delay valve with a 30 minute time delay, after
the first tool opens at 5 minutes after actuation, fluid may be pumped for 25 minutes
to collect debris in the first tool before the second tool is opened. According to
a preferred exemplary embodiment, the dual injection apparatus may be manufactured
from an integral one-piece design of the mandrel that carries all of the tensile,
compressional and torsional loads encountered by the apparatus. The entire dual injection
apparatus may be piped into the casing string as an integral part of the string and
positioned where perforation of the formation and fluid injection into a formation
is desired. The dual injection apparatus may be installed in either direction with
no change in its function. According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, the first
tool and the second tools are controlled time delay tools. According to another preferred
exemplary embodiment, the first tool is a controlled time delay tool and the second
tool is a perforating gun. According to yet another preferred exemplary embodiment,
the first tool is a valve that may be actuated by a ball and the second tool is a
controlled time delay tool. According to a further preferred exemplary embodiment,
the first tool and the second tools are valves that may be actuated by a ball. It
should be noted that any combination of a controlled time delay tool, perforating
gun, valve actuated by a ball may be used as the first tool and the second tool to
create the first injection point and the second injection point.
[0106] In a cemented liner application, it is common practice to over displace the cement
by 20-40% of cement volume to achieve a good liner lap (good cement job across the
liner top for pressure integrity). When the running tool is disconnected from the
liner hanger system, the over displaced cement then falls back into the liner top,
which leaves behind cement stringers, and other debris. These stringers, and debris
then gravitate to the heel of the well, and later will be pumped from the heel to
the toe when opening the toe valves. These stringers and debris have been known to
plug or lock up toe valves.
[0107] According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, two or more injections points may
be used in a staggered fashion in order to collect debris before creating an obstruction
free connection to the formation. This is particularly important for a liner hanger
job wherein a liner hangs of the inside surface of the casing. If the casing is not
substantially clean, the liner may not hang on to the inside surface.
Preferred Exemplary Flowchart of Debris Removal with a Controlled Dual Injection Apparatus
(2900)
[0108] As generally seen in the flow chart of FIG. 29
(2900), a preferred exemplary debris removal method with a controlled dual injection apparatus
comprising a first tool and a second tool may be generally described in terms of the
following steps:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with the controlled dual injection
apparatus (2901);
- (2) injecting fluid so as to increase pressure to about 80 to 100% of the maximum
pressure (2902);
- (3) opening a first injection point in the first tool (2903);
- (4) collecting debris in the first tool (2904);
- (5) opening a second injection point in the second tool (2905); and
- (6) performing a downhole operation through the second injection point (2906).
Preferred Exemplary Flowchart of Debris Removal with a Controlled Dual Time Delay
Apparatus (3000)
[0109] As generally seen in the flow chart of FIG. 30
(3000), a preferred exemplary debris removal method with a controlled dual injection apparatus
comprising a first delay tool and a second delay tool may be generally described in
terms of the following steps:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with the controlled dual time
delay apparatus (3001);
- (2) injecting fluid so as to increase wellbore pressure to about 80 to 100% of the
maximum pressure (3002);
- (3) allowing a first piston in first delay tool to travel for a first actuation time
period and allowing a second piston in second delay tool to travel for a second actuation
time period (3003);
- (4) opening a first injection point in the first delay tool after elapse of the first
actuation period (3004);
- (5) collecting debris in the first tool (3005);
- (6) opening a second injection point in the second tool after elapse of the second
actuation period (3006); and
- (7) performing a downhole operation through the second injection point (3007).
Preferred Exemplary Flowchart of Debris Removal with a Controlled Time Delay Apparatus
and a Perforating Gun (3100)
[0110] As generally seen in the flow chart of FIG. 31
(3100), a preferred exemplary debris removal method with a controlled apparatus comprising
a first delay tool and a perforating gun may be generally described in terms of the
following steps:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with the controlled apparatus
(3101);
- (2) injecting fluid so as to increase pressure to 80 to 100% of the maximum pressure
(3102);
- (3) allowing a piston in the delay tool to travel for a actuation time period (3103);
- (4) opening a first injection point in the delay tool after elapse of the first actuation
period (3104);
- (5) collecting debris in the first tool (3105);
- (6) opening a second injection point in the second tool after elapse a predetermined
time (3106); and
- (7) performing a downhole operation through the second injection point (3107).
Preferred Exemplary Flowchart of Debris Removal with a Controlled Dual Injection Apparatus
(3200)
[0111] As generally seen in the flow chart of FIG. 32
(3200), a preferred exemplary debris removal method with a staged time delay system comprising
a first tool, a second tool and a third tool may be generally described in terms of
the following steps:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore (3201);
- (2) injecting fluid into the wellbore casing so as to increase pressure to a maximum
pressure (3202);
- (3) opening a first injection point in the first tool (3203);
- (4) collecting debris present in the wellbore casing at first injection point in the
first tool for a predetermined time (3204);
- (5) opening a second injection point in the second tool and a third injection point
in the third tool (3205); and
- (6) performing a downhole operation through the second injection point and the third
injection point (3206).
[0112] According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, the first tool is plugged with debris
during the predetermined time.
[0113] According to another preferred exemplary embodiment, the second tool and the third
tool are controlled time delay valves.
[0114] According to a yet another preferred exemplary embodiment, the second tool and the
third tool are actuated by a pressure of the pressurized fluid.
[0115] According to a further preferred exemplary embodiment, the first tool and the second
tool are actuated by a first actuating device and the third tool actuated by a second
actuating device.
[0116] According to a more preferred exemplary embodiment, the first tool and second tool
are actuated by pressure and the third tool is actuated by a ball. The ball is deployed
into the wellbore casing after the first tool collects debris from the wellbore casing.
[0117] According to a more preferred exemplary embodiment, the system may further comprises
a fourth controlled time delay tool which is configured to be collects debris through
a fourth injection point along with the first injection point.
Preferred Exemplary Sliding Sleeve Apparatus manufactured from a One Piece Mandrel
[0118] As generally illustrated in FIG. 33, the sliding sleeve valve may be manufactured
by installing a pressure actuating disk
(23) such as a rupture disk or a reverse acting rupture disk onto the one piece mandrel
(29). A piston
(5) may be installed onto the mandrel
(29) to cover openings
(25) in the mandrel
(29). The piston
(5) may be installed from the first threaded end
(41) towards the second threaded end
(51) and hydraulically locking in place. A first outer housing
(6) may be slid over the piston
(5) from the first threaded end
(41) and stopping on a first shoulder
(40). A first outer housing
(6) may be slid or glided over the piston
(5) from the first threaded end
(41) and stop on a first shoulder
(50). A high pressure chamber
(32) may be installed with a hydraulic fluid from the first threaded end
(41) and stop adjacent to said piston
(5). A restriction assembly
(44) may be installed from the first threaded end
(41) and stop adjacent to the high pressure chamber
(32). A second outer housing
(4) may be slid or glided over the mandrel adjacent to the restriction assembly
(44). An end cap (43) is attached to the mandrel
(29) and creating a low pressure chamber
(34) adjacent to the restriction assembly
(44). The wellbore casing
(60) may be threaded to the mandrel
(29) with the threads
(62). It should be noted that even though there is one threaded end
(41) illustrated in the FIG.33 with threads
(62), a second thread is made on the second threaded end
(51) of the mandrel to customize the kind of thread used to thread into a wellbore casing.
According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, the threads may be designed to casing
torque specification.
[0119] According to a preferred exemplary embodiment, a sliding sleeve valve for use in
a wellbore casing comprises a mandrel with a first threaded end and a second threaded
end. The sliding sleeve valve may be conveyed with said wellbore casing. The sliding
sleeve valve may be installed on a toe end of said wellbore casing. The mandrel may
be a tubular annular single piece member. The mandrel may be made from materials selected
from a group comprising of steel, cast iron, ceramics or, composites. The one piece
integral piece enables the mandrel to carry the full torsional load 10,000 ft-lbs
to 30,000 ft-lbs of a wellbore casing when the first threaded end and the second threaded
end are threaded to ends of the wellbore casing. The first threaded end and the second
threaded end may be designed to carry the wellbore casing
(60) specification. According to a further preferred exemplary embodiment the first threaded
end and the threaded end are configured with threads that are configured to conform
to the wellbore casing torque specification.
[0120] According to a further preferred exemplary embodiment the sliding sleeve valve is
assembled with components from one end only. For example, the rupture disk
(23), the piston
(5), the first outer housing
(6), the high pressure chamber
(32), the restriction assembly
(44), the second outer housing
(4) and the end cap
(43) are all slid/glided or installed from the first threaded end
(41) towards the direction of the second threaded end
(51). According to another preferred exemplary embodiment a plurality of components are
installed longitudinally from either end of the mandrel. The components may be installed
from
[0121] According to a preferred exemplary embodiment a plurality of components are installed
on an outer surface of the mandrel. For example, the rupture disk
(23), the piston
(5), the first outer housing
(6), the high pressure chamber
(32), the restriction assembly
(44), the second outer housing
(4) and the end cap
(43) are all slid/glided or installed on the outer surface of the mandrel
(29). According to another preferred exemplary embodiment the plurality of components are
installed on an inner surface of the mandrel. According to yet another preferred exemplary
embodiment the plurality of components are installed on an inner surface of the mandrel
and an outer surface of the mandrel.
[0122] According to a preferred exemplary embodiment said sliding sleeve valve is a controlled
hydraulic time delay valve. According to a further preferred exemplary embodiment
the controlled hydraulic time delay valve comprises dual time delay valves which are
each actuated by dual actuating devices. According to a further preferred exemplary
embodiment the controlled hydraulic time delay valve comprises dual time delay valves
which are both actuated by a single actuating device.
Preferred Exemplary Flowchart of Assembling a Sliding Sleeve Valve with a One Piece
Mandrel (3400)
[0123] As generally seen in the flow chart of FIG. 34 (3400), a preferred exemplary method
of assembly of a sliding sleeve valve with a one piece mandrel is described in terms
of the following steps:
- (1) installing a pressure actuating disk onto said mandrel (3401);
- (2) installing a piston onto said mandrel to cover a plurality of openings in said
mandrel from said first threaded end towards said second threaded end and hydraulically
locking in place (3402);
- (3) sliding a first outer housing over said piston from said first threaded end and
stopping on a first shoulder (3403);
- (4) installing a high pressure chamber with the fluid from said first threaded end
and stopping adjacent to said piston (3404);
- (5) installing a restriction assembly from said first end and stopping adjacent to
said high pressure chamber (3405);
- (6) sliding a second outer housing over said mandrel adjacent to said restriction
assembly (3406);
- (7) installing an end cap in said mandrel and creating a low pressure chamber adjacent
to said restriction assembly (3407); and
- (8) threading said wellbore casing to said sliding sleeve valve with said mandrel
(3408).
System Summary
[0124] The present invention system anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic
theme of time delay valves, but can be generalized a controlled time delay apparatus
integrated into a well casing for injection of pressurized fluid into a subterranean
formation, the apparatus comprising: a housing with openings, a piston, a delay restrictor,
an actuating device and a high pressure chamber with a hydraulic fluid; the delay
restrictor is configured to be in pressure communication with the high pressure chamber;
a rate of travel of the piston is restrained by a passage of the hydraulic fluid from
the high pressure chamber into a low pressure chamber through the delay restrictor;
wherein
upon actuation by the actuating device, the piston travels for an actuation time period,
after elapse of the actuation time period, the piston travel allows opening of the
openings so that the pressurized fluid flows through the openings for a port opening
time interval.
[0125] This general system summary may be augmented by the various elements described herein
to produce a wide variety of invention embodiments consistent with this overall design
description.
Method Summary
[0126] The present invention method anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic
theme of implementation, but can be generalized as a controlled time delay method
wherein the method is performed on a controlled time delay apparatus integrated into
a well casing for injection of pressurized fluid into a subterranean formation, the
apparatus comprising: a housing with openings, a piston, a delay restrictor, an actuating
device and a high pressure chamber with a hydraulic fluid; the delay restrictor is
configured to be in pressure communication with the high pressure chamber; a rate
of travel of the piston is restrained by a passage of the hydraulic fluid from the
high pressure chamber into a low pressure chamber through the delay restrictor;
wherein
upon actuation by the actuating device, the piston travels for an actuation time period,
after elapse of the actuation time period, the piston travel allows opening of the
openings so that the pressurized fluid flows through the openings for a port opening
time interval;
wherein the method comprises the steps of:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with the apparatus;
- (2) injecting the pressurized fluid into the wellbore casing;
- (3) actuating the actuating device when the maximum pressure exceeds a rated pressure
of the actuating device;
- (4) allowing the piston to travel for the actuation time period; and
- (5) enabling the piston to travel to open the openings for the port opening time interval
so that the pressurized fluid flows into the subterranean formation.
[0127] This general method summary may be augmented by the various elements described herein
to produce a wide variety of invention embodiments consistent with this overall design
description.
Casing Integrity Test Method Summary
[0128] The present invention method anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic
theme of implementation, but can be generalized as a casing integrity test method
wherein the method is performed with a controlled time delay apparatus the time delay
apparatus comprising: a housing with openings, a piston, a restrictor, an actuating
device and a high pressure chamber with a hydraulic fluid; the restrictor is configured
to be in pressure communication with the high pressure chamber; a rate of travel of
the piston is restrained by a passage of the hydraulic fluid from the high pressure
chamber into a low pressure chamber through the restrictor;
wherein upon actuation by the actuating device, the piston travels for an actuation
time period, after elapse of the actuation time period, the piston travel allows opening
of the openings so that the pressurized fluid flows through the openings for a port
opening time interval;
wherein the method comprises the steps of:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with the apparatus;
- (2) injecting the fluid to about 80% of a maximum casing pressure;
- (3) testing for casing integrity;
- (4) increasing pressure of the pressurized fluid so that the pressure exceeds a rated
pressure of the actuating device;
- (5) increasing pressure of the pressurized fluid to about 100% of the maximum casing
pressure allowing the piston to travel for the actuation time period;
- (6) testing casing integrity for the actuation time period; and
- (7) enabling the piston to travel to open the openings for the port opening time interval
so that the pressurized fluid flows into the subterranean formation.
[0129] This general method summary may be augmented by the various elements described herein
to produce a wide variety of invention embodiments consistent with this overall design
description.
System/Method Variations
[0130] The present invention anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic theme
of oil and gas extraction. The examples presented previously do not represent the
entire scope of possible usages. They are meant to cite a few of the almost limitless
possibilities.
[0131] This basic system and method may be augmented with a variety of ancillary embodiments,
including but not limited to:
[0132] An embodiment wherein the delay restrictor is a cartridge comprising a plurality
of delay elements connected as a series chain.
[0133] An embodiment wherein the delay restrictor is a cartridge comprising a plurality
of delay elements connected in a combination of series chain and a parallel chain.
[0134] An embodiment wherein the hydraulic fluid has a viscosity ranging from 3 to 10000
centistokes.
[0135] An embodiment wherein the hydraulic fluid further has plugging agents that are configured
to further retard the rate of travel of the piston.
[0136] An embodiment wherein the hydraulic fluid is configured to change phase from a solid
to a liquid.
[0137] An embodiment wherein the actuation time period ranges from greater than 60 minutes
to less than 2 weeks.
[0138] An embodiment wherein the actuation time period is almost 0 seconds so that the openings
open instantaneously.
[0139] An embodiment wherein the actuation time period ranges from 0.5 seconds to 60 minutes.
[0140] An embodiment wherein the actuation time period is ranges from 2 minutes to 3 minutes.
[0141] An embodiment wherein the port opening time interval ranges from 0.5 seconds to 20
minutes.
[0142] An embodiment wherein the port opening time interval is almost 0 seconds.
[0143] An embodiment wherein the apparatus is associated with an inner diameter and an outer
diameter; the ratio of inner diameter to outer diameter ranges from 0.4 to 0.9.
[0144] An embodiment wherein the apparatus is associated with an inner tool diameter and
the well bore casing is associated with an inner casing diameter ratio; the ratio
of inner tool diameter to outer casing diameter ranges from 0.4 to 1.1.
[0145] An embodiment wherein the actuating device has a rating pressure that is substantially
equal to a pressure of the wellbore casing.
[0146] An embodiment wherein the actuating device is a reverse acting rupture disk.
[0147] An embodiment wherein the actuating device is a rupture disk.
[0148] An embodiment wherein the mandrel further comprises ports; the ports are configured
to align to the openings in the housing during the port opening time interval.
[0149] An embodiment wherein a shape of the openings in the housing is selected from a group
consisting of: a circle, an oval, a triangle, and a rectangle.
[0150] An embodiment wherein a shape of the ports in the mandrel is selected from a group
consisting of: a circle, an oval, a triangle or a rectangle.
[0151] An embodiment wherein a jet of the pressurized fluid is produced when the pressurized
fluid injects into the subterranean formation as the ports in the mandrel travel slowly
across the openings in the housing.
[0152] An embodiment wherein a shape of the jet is determined by a shape of the ports and
a shape of the openings.
[0153] One skilled in the art will recognize that other embodiments are possible based on
combinations of elements taught within the above invention description.
Controlled Dual Time Delay System Summary
[0154] The present invention system anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic
theme of time delay valves, but can be generalized a controlled dual time delay system
for injection of pressurized fluid through a wellbore casing at a plurality of locations
into a subterranean formation, the system comprising:
a first delay tool integrated into the wellbore casing at a first location; the first
tool comprises a first housing with first openings, a first piston, and a first actuating
device;
a second delay tool integrated into the wellbore casing at a second location; the
second tool comprises a second housing with second openings, a second piston, and
a second actuating device;
wherein
upon actuation by the first actuating device, the first piston travels for a first
actuation time period, after elapse of the first actuation time period, the first
piston travel allows opening of the first openings so that the pressurized fluid flows
through the first openings for a first port opening time interval; and
upon actuation by the second actuating device, the second piston travels for a second
actuation time period, after elapse of the second actuation time period, the second
piston travel allows opening of the second openings so that the pressurized fluid
flows through the second openings for a second port opening time interval.
Controlled Dual Time Delay Method Summary
[0155] The present invention method anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic
theme of implementation, but can be generalized as a controlled dual time delay method
for controlled injection of pressurized fluid into a subterranean formation at a plurality
of locations, the method operating in conjunction with a controlled dual time delay
system, the controlled dual time delay system comprising: a first delay tool integrated
into the wellbore casing at a first location; the first delay tool comprises a first
housing with first openings, a first piston, and a first actuating device; a second
delay tool integrated into the wellbore casing at a second location; the second delay
tool comprises a second housing with second openings, a second piston, and a second
actuating device;
wherein
the controlled dual time delay method comprises the steps of:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with the dual time delay system;
- (2) injecting the pressurized fluid at about maximum pressure;
- (3) activating the first actuating device when the maximum pressure exceeds a rated
pressure of the first actuating device and activating the second actuating device
when the maximum pressure exceeds a rated pressure of the second actuating device;
- (4) allowing the first piston to travel for a first actuation time period and allowing
the second piston to travel for a second actuation time period;
- (5) enabling the first piston to travel to open the first openings for a first port
opening time interval and enabling the second piston to travel to open said second
openings for a second port opening time interval, so that the pressurized fluid flows
into the subterranean formation.
[0156] This general method summary may be augmented by the various elements described herein
to produce a wide variety of invention embodiments consistent with this overall design
description.
Single-Actuating Controlled Time Delay System Summary
[0157] The present invention system anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic
theme of time delay valves, but can be generalized a single-actuating controlled time
delay system integrated into a wellbore casing for injecting pressurized fluid through
the wellbore casing into a subterranean formation, the dual toe valve comprising:
a housing with first openings and second openings, a first piston, a second piston,
and an actuating device;
wherein
upon actuation by the actuating device, the first piston travels for a first actuation
time period, after elapse of the first actuation time period, the first piston travel
allows opening of the first openings so that the pressurized fluid flows through the
first openings for a first port opening time interval;
upon actuation by the actuating device, the second piston travels for a second actuation
time period, after elapse of the second actuation time period, the second piston travel
allows opening of the second openings so that the pressurized fluid flows through
the second openings for a second port opening time interval; and
upon actuation by the actuating device, the first piston and the second piston travel
in opposite directions.
Single-Actuating Controlled Time Delay Method Summary
[0158] The present invention method anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic
theme of implementation, but can be generalized as a single-actuating controlled time
delay method for controlled injection of pressurized fluid into a subterranean formation
at a plurality of locations, the method operating in conjunction with a controlled
single-actuating time delay toe valve integrated into a wellbore casing for injecting
pressurized fluid through the wellbore casing into a subterranean formation, the single-actuating
time delay toe valve comprising: a housing with first openings and second openings,
a first piston, a second piston, and an actuating device;
wherein
the single-actuating time delay method comprises the steps of:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with the single actuating dual
toe valve;
- (2) injecting the pressurized fluid at about maximum pressure;
- (3) activating the actuating device when the maximum pressure exceeds a rated pressure
of the actuating device;
- (4) allowing the first piston to travel for a first actuation time period and allowing
the second piston to travel for a second actuation time period;
- (5) enabling the first piston to travel to open the first openings for a first port
opening time interval and enabling the second piston to travel to open the second
openings for a second port opening time interval, so that the pressurized fluid flows
into the subterranean formation.
[0159] This general method summary may be augmented by the various elements described herein
to produce a wide variety of invention embodiments consistent with this overall design
description.
Wet Shoe Detection System Summary
[0160] The present invention system anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic
theme of time delay valves, but can be generalized an apparatus integrated into a
well casing, a time delay injection valve with a seating surface built into the valve;
the seating surface is configured to seat a restriction plug element; whereby, when
a leak is detected in the well casing during a casing integrity test, a restriction
plug element is dropped to seat in the conforming seating surface to determine if
the leak is due to the wet shoe.
Wet Shoe Detection Method Summary
[0161] The present invention method anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic
theme of implementation, but can be generalized as a method for detecting a wet shoe
in a wellbore casing, the method operating in conjunction with an apparatus integrated
into a toe end of the well casing, the apparatus a time delay injection valve with
a seating surface built into the valve; the seating surface is configured to seat
a restriction plug element; whereby, when a leak is detected in the well casing during
a casing integrity test, a restriction plug element is dropped to seat in the conforming
seating surface to determine if the leak is due to the wet shoe;
wherein said method comprises the steps of:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with the apparatus;
- (2) performing a casing integrity test at maximum pressure;
- (3) checking if the casing integrity test passes, if so, proceeding to step (9);
- (4) deploying the restriction plug element into the wellbore casing;
- (5) seating the restriction plug element in the conforming seating surface of the
apparatus;
- (6) performing a casing integrity test at maximum pressure;
- (7) checking if the casing integrity test passes, if so, proceeding to step (9);
- (8) fixing the source of the leak; and
- (9) performing perforation and fracturing operations.
[0162] This general method summary may be augmented by the various elements described herein
to produce a wide variety of invention embodiments consistent with this overall design
description.
Fracturing Method Summary
[0163] The present invention method anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic
theme of implementation, but can be generalized as a fracturing method for pumping
fracturing fluid into a subterranean formation through a controlled time delay apparatus,
the controlled time delay apparatus comprising: a housing with openings, a piston,
a restrictor, an actuating device and a high pressure chamber with a hydraulic fluid;
the stacked delay restrictor is configured to be in pressure communication with the
high pressure chamber; a rate of travel of the piston is restrained by a passage of
the hydraulic fluid from the high pressure chamber into a low pressure chamber through
the stacked delay restrictor;
wherein the fracturing method comprises the steps of:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore along with the time delay apparatus;
- (2) pumping up wellbore pressure to a maximum pressure;
- (3) activating the actuating device when the maximum pressure exceeds a rated pressure
of the actuating device;
- (4) performing a casing integrity test for an actuation time period at the maximum
pressure;
- (5) enabling the piston to travel to open the openings so that a connection is established
to the subterranean formation; and
- (6) pumping fracturing fluid through the time delay apparatus.
[0164] This general method summary may be augmented by the various elements described herein
to produce a wide variety of invention embodiments consistent with this overall design
description.
Staged Time Delay System Summary
[0165] The present invention system anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic
theme of time delay valves, but can be generalized a staged time delay system for
removal of debris in a wellbore casing, the staged time delay system comprising a
first tool and a second tool; the first tool is conveyed with the wellbore casing;
wherein when pressurized fluid is injected into the wellbore casing at a maximum pressure,
a first injection point in the first tool is opened; the first injection point collects
debris from the wellbore casing for a predetermined time; and a second injection point
in the second tool is opened after the predetermined time; the second injection point
is configured to enable downhole operations after the debris is collected in the first
tool leaving the second injection point free of the debris.
Staged Injection Method Summary
[0166] The present invention method anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic
theme of implementation, but can be generalized as a staged injection method for removal
of debris in a wellbore casing, the method operating in conjunction with a staged
time delay system, the staged time delay system comprising a first tool and a second
tool;
wherein the staged injection method comprises the steps of:
- (1) installing a wellbore casing in a wellbore;
- (2) injecting pressurized fluid into the wellbore casing at a maximum pressure;
- (3) opening a first injection point in the first tool;
- (4) collecting debris present in the wellbore casing at first injection point in the
first tool for a predetermined time;
- (5) opening a second injection point in the second tool; and
- (6) performing a downhole operation through the second injection point.
[0167] This general method summary may be augmented by the various elements described herein
to produce a wide variety of invention embodiments consistent with this overall design
description.
Sliding Sleeve Valve System Summary
[0168] The present invention system anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic
theme of time delay valves, but can be generalized a sliding sleeve valve for use
in a wellbore casing comprising a mandrel with a first threaded end and a second threaded
end; the mandrel manufactured from one integral piece such that the mandrel carries
a torque rating of the wellbore casing when the mandrel is threaded to ends of the
wellbore casing.
Sliding Sleeve Valve Method Summary
[0169] The present invention method anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic
theme of implementation, but can be generalized as a method of manufacturing a sliding
sleeve valve for use in a wellbore casing; the sliding sleeve valve comprising a mandrel
with a first threaded end and a second threaded end; the mandrel manufactured from
one integral piece such that the mandrel carries a torque rating of the wellbore casing
when mandrel is threaded to the wellbore casing;
wherein the method comprises the steps of:
- (1) installing a pressure actuating disk onto the mandrel;
- (2) installing a piston onto the mandrel to cover a plurality of openings in the mandrel
from the first threaded end towards the second threaded end and hydraulically locking
in place;
- (3) sliding a first outer housing over the piston from the first threaded end and
stopping on a first shoulder;
- (4) installing a high pressure chamber with the fluid from the first threaded end
and stopping adjacent to the piston;
- (5) installing a restriction assembly from the first end and stopping adjacent to
the high pressure chamber;
- (6) sliding a second outer housing over the mandrel adjacent to the restriction assembly;
- (7) installing an end cap in the mandrel and creating a low pressure chamber adjacent
to the restriction assembly; and
- (8) threading the wellbore casing to the sliding sleeve valve with the mandrel.
[0170] This general method summary may be augmented by the various elements described herein
to produce a wide variety of invention embodiments consistent with this overall design
description.
CONCLUSION
[0171] An apparatus and method for providing a time delay in injection of pressured fluid
into a geologic formation has been disclosed. In one aspect the invention is a toe
valve activated by fluid pressure that opens ports after a predetermined time interval
to allow fluid to pass from a well casing to a formation. The controlled time delay
enables casing integrity testing before fluid is passed through the ports. This time
delay also allows multiple valves to be used in the same well casing and provide a
focused jetting action to better penetrate a concrete casing lining.
AMENDED CLAIMS FOR FILING IN EUROPE
[0172] Although a preferred embodiment of the present invention has been illustrated in
the accompanying drawings and described in the foregoing Detailed Description, it
will be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed,
but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications, and substitutions without
departing from the spirit of the invention as set forth and defined by the following
claims.