FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] Embodiments of the invention relate to a method for channel estimation in a wireless
communication system comprising a communication unit and one or more terminals. Embodiments
of the invention further relate to a communication unit for communication with one
or more terminals in a communication system. Embodiments of the invention further
relate to a terminal for communication with a communication unit provided with a plurality
of antennas in a communication system. Finally, an embodiment of the invention relates
to a communication system comprising a communication unit and one or more terminals.
BACKGROUND
[0002] This section introduces aspects that may be helpful in facilitating a better understanding
of the invention. Accordingly, the statements of this section are to be read in this
light and are not to be understood as admissions about what is known in the art.
[0003] In a massive Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) communication system a massive
MIMO central node, sometimes also referred to as massive MIMO base station, is provided
with an antenna array comprising multiple, e.g. M, antennas for serving a plurality
of, e.g. K, terminals over the same time/frequency resources using spatial multiplexing.
A key factor for successful operation of the multiplexing operation in the massive
MIMO communication system relates to the acquisition of sufficiently accurate channel
state information (CSI). In particular the massive MIMO base station needs to obtain
sufficiently accurate estimates of the frequency responses of the propagation channels
between each of its M antennas and each of the K terminals.
[0004] Obtaining such CSI is relatively easy for a massive MIMO communication system employing
time division duplex (TDD), where the same frequency band is utilized for both uplink
and downlink data transmission. CSI may be acquired by simultaneous transmission of
orthogonal pilot sequences by the K terminals to the M base station antennas, from
which the uplink propagation channel state between each of the M base station antennas
and the K terminals is estimated. By virtue of reciprocity, the uplink channels are
equal to the downlink channels. The sample duration is independent of the number of
base station antennas, and execution of a training scheme to obtain the required propagation
channel state estimates is relatively fast as the entire process for K terminals requires
K resource samples, and in a typical MIMO system the number of terminals is relatively
low as compared to the number of base station antennas.
[0005] However, in Europe and North America most wireless communication systems operate
using frequency-division duplex (FDD), where uplink and downlink channels are typically
located in different frequency bands. Under FDD, the transmission of uplink orthogonal
pilot sequences still suffices for the MIMO base station to estimate the state of
the uplink propagation channels. However, a further approach is needed for the MIMO
base station to obtain sufficiently accurate estimates of the state of the downlink
propagation channels, which is generally time-consuming.
[0006] Considering a system with M base station antennas and K single-antenna terminals,
a known way to acquire the downlink CSI is for the K terminals to send pilot signals
towards the M base station antennas, which enable the MIMO base station to obtain
the CSI of the uplink channels. Additionally, to obtain the downlink CSI, the M base
station antennas simultaneously transmit orthogonal pilot sequences on the downlink,
and each of the K terminals receive the combination of pilots through the propagation
channels. Each terminal then, in real time, simultaneously transmits its analog composite
received pilot signal back towards the base station on the uplink. Through signal
processing, and its knowledge of the uplink channels the base station may then reliably
estimate the downlink channel states. The entire process requires a minimum of 2M+K
resource samples. As the number of base station antennas M is typically much higher
than the number of terminals K in a massive MIMO system obtaining reliable CSI for
the uplink and downlink propagation channels in a MIMO-system employing FDD is much
more cumbersome than obtaining such CSI in a MIMO-system employing TDD.
[0008] US-patent application publication 2014/0219377 describes channel estimation for a very large-scale MIMO system in which a transmitter
includes a multiplicity of antennas spaced such that spacing between adjacent antennas
provides a spatial correlation coefficient greater than a threshold level. The transmitter
selects a subset of the transmit antennas for transmitting pilot reference signals
to a receiver. The pilot reference signals are transmitted only from the selected
subset. The receiver includes a channel estimator configured to derive a channel estimation
for all of the transmit antennas using the received pilot reference signals and known
or estimated spatial correlation among the transmit antennas.
[0009] It is desirable to reduce the time for obtaining the CSI in a FDD system, in particular
for MIMO-systems with a relatively large number of terminals.
SUMMARY
[0010] An objective of embodiments of the present invention is to reduce the time for obtaining
channel state information, in particular for MIMO-systems with a relatively large
number of terminals and employing FDD. For this purpose, an embodiment of the invention
relates to a method for channel estimation in a wireless communication system comprising
a communication unit and one or more terminals, wherein the communication unit comprises
a plurality of antennas, the method comprising: transmitting pilot signals from each
antenna of the plurality of antennas towards the one or more terminals; performing
correlative coding with respect to the transmitted pilot signals at the one or more
terminals to form correlatively coded pilot signals, the correlatively coded pilot
signals being provided with a terminal-specific correlation signature or an antenna-specific
correlation signature if the one or more terminals comprise more than one antenna;
retransmitting the correlatively coded pilot signals from the one or more terminals
to the plurality of antennas; estimating uplink channels
between the one or more terminals and the plurality of antennas based on the correlatively
coded pilot signals; and obtaining estimates of the downlink channels between the
plurality of antennas and the one or more terminals based on the estimated uplink
channels. In a communication system comprising
M antennas and
K terminals, this estimation method requires a minimum of 2
M resource samples. Consequently, the method is independent of
K, and therefore highly attractive for communication systems comprising a relatively
large number of terminals configured to be served by the communication unit.
[0011] Abovementioned method results in the estimation of uplink channels and estimates
obtained for downlink channels that are sufficiently known up to an unknown permutation
of the terminal indices (or if terminals have more than one antenna with respect to
the antenna indices). Although sufficient for scenarios such as broadcast transmission
in the downlink with conjugate beam forming for individual terminals, this ambiguity
may cause issues in some other scenarios. For this purpose, in some embodiments, the
method further comprises transmitting data signals from the one or more terminals
to the plurality of antennas, each data signal comprising information related to an
identity of the transmission source from which the data signal originates; and linking
uplink and downlink channels to corresponding terminals using the transmission source
identity information. The transmission source identity information may be terminal-specific
information if the one or more terminals are provided with a single antenna or antenna-specific
information if the one or more terminals are provided with more than one antenna.
[0012] In some embodiments, correlative coding comprises filtering received pilot signals
by an auto-regressive model, preferably an auto-regressive model of order 1. Such
auto-regressive model, in particular an auto-regressive model of order 1, is easy
to implement. It is relatively simple and efficient in creating spectral diversity.
[0013] In some other embodiments, correlative coding comprises executing a circular convolution
operation onto the pilot signals. Executing a circular convolution operation onto
the pilot signals may enable improvement of covariance matrix estimation accuracy,
and may therefore lead to an improved performance.
[0014] In some embodiments, estimating uplink channels between the one or more user terminals
and the plurality of antennas utilizes a second-order blind identification algorithm.
The second-order blind identification algorithm is known in the art, and therefore
relatively easy to implement.
[0015] Additionally, an embodiment of the invention is related to a communication unit for
communication with one or more terminals in a communication system, the communication
unit comprising: a plurality of antennas; and at least one channel estimation module;
wherein the communication unit is configured to: transmit pilot signals from each
antenna of the plurality of antennas towards the one or more terminals in the communication
system; receive correlatively coded pilot signals from the one or more terminals at
the plurality of antennas, the correlatively coded pilot signals being provided with
a terminal-specific correlation signature or an antenna-specific correlation signature
if the one or more terminals comprise more than one antenna; estimate uplink channels
between the one or more terminals and the plurality of antennas by the at least one
channel estimation module based on the coded pilot signals; and obtain estimates of
the downlink channels between the plurality of antennas and the one or more user terminals
by the at least one channel estimation module based on the estimated uplink channels.
[0016] In some embodiments, for reasons set out above, the communication unit further comprises
a decoding module and is further configured to: receive data signals from the one
or more terminals via the plurality of antennas, the data signals comprising information
related to an identity of the transmission source from which the data signal originates;
and linking uplink and downlink channels to corresponding terminals by the at least
one decoding module using the transmission source identity information as received.
[0017] In some embodiments, the at least one channel estimation module is configured to
estimate the uplink channels by utilizing a second-order blind identification algorithm.
[0018] Additionally, an embodiment of the invention is related to a terminal for communication
with a communication unit provided with a plurality of antennas in a communication
system, the terminal comprising: a transceiver for respectively receiving signals
from and transmitting signals to the plurality of antennas of the communication unit;
and a coding unit; wherein the terminal is configured to: receive pilot signals transmitted
from each antenna of the plurality of antennas; perform correlative coding with respect
to the received pilot signals using the coding unit to form correlatively coded pilot
signals, the correlatively coded pilot signals being provided with a terminal-specific
correlation signature or an antenna-specific correlation signature if the terminal
comprises more than one antenna; and retransmit the correlatively coded pilot signals
to the plurality of antennas thereby enabling the communication unit to estimate uplink
channels based on the coded pilot signals and to obtain estimate of downlink channels
based on the estimated uplink channels.
[0019] In some embodiments, for reasons set out earlier, the terminal may further be configured
to transmit a data signal to the plurality of antennas, the data signal including
information related to an identity of the transmission source from which the data
signal originates.
[0020] In some embodiments, correlative coding as performed by the coding unit comprises
filtering received pilot signals by an autoregressive model.
[0021] In some embodiments, the terminal is a user terminal. Alternatively, the terminal
may be a relay station.
[0022] Finally, an embodiment of the invention relates to a communication system comprising
an embodiment of abovementioned communication unit and an embodiment of one or more
of abovementioned terminals.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0023] Embodiments of the present invention will now be described further, with reference
to the accompanying drawings, in which
FIG. 1 schematically shows an example of a communication network in which embodiments
of the invention may be implemented;
FIG. 2 schematically shows another example of a communication network in which embodiments
of the invention may be implemented;
FIG. 3 schematically shows a flow chart of a method for channel estimation in a wireless
communication system according to embodiments of the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
[0024] The description and figures merely illustrate the principles of the invention. It
will be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise various arrangements
that, although not explicitly described or shown herein, embody the principles of
the invention. Furthermore, all examples recited herein are principally intended expressly
to aid the reader in understanding the principles of the invention and are to be constructed
as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions.
Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects and embodiments of the
invention, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass equivalents
thereof.
[0025] In the following description, illustrative embodiments will be described with reference
to acts and symbolic representations of operations (e.g., in the form of flowcharts)
that may be implemented as program modules or functional processes that include routines,
programs, objects, components, data structures, etc., that when executed perform particular
tasks or implement particular abstract data types and may be implemented using existing
hardware at existing network elements. Such existing hardware may include one or more
Central Processing Units (CPUs), digital signal processors (DSPs), system-on-chip
(SOC) devices, application-specific-integrated-circuits (ASICs), field programmable
gate arrays (FPGAs) computers or the like machines that once programmed become particular
machines. In at least some cases, CPUs, SOCs, DSPs, ASICs and FPGAs may generally
be referred to as processing circuits, processors and/or microprocessors.
[0026] The various modules described herein may thus be implemented or performed with a
general-purpose processor, a DSP, an ASIC, an FPGA or other programmable logic device,
discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components or any combination
thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. Further the functionalities
of various modules may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed
by a processor, or in a combination of the two.
[0027] As will be understood, the "terminals" and "base stations" as described herein may
further include memory. The memories may include any non-transitory computer-readable
medium known in the art including, for example, volatile memory such as static random
access memory (SRAM), and dynamic random access memory (DRAM), and/or non-volatile
memory, such as read only memory (ROM), erasable programmable ROM, flash memories,
hard disks, optical disks and magnetic tapes.
[0028] As used herein, the term "terminal" may be considered synonymous to, and may hereafter
be occasionally referred to, as a client, mobile unit, mobile station, mobile user,
user equipment (UE), subscriber, user, remote station, access terminal, receiver,
relay station, small cell, relay cell etc., and may describe a remote user of wireless
resources in a wireless communication network. In the MIMO system, a terminal may
have one or more antennas.
[0029] Similarly, as used herein, the term "base station" may be considered synonymous to,
and may hereafter be occasionally referred to, as a eNode B, (base) transceiver station
(BTS), central node etc., and may describe a transceiver in communication with and
providing wireless resources to mobiles in a wireless communication network. As discussed
herein, base stations may have all functionally associated with conventional, well-known
base stations in addition to the capability to perform the methods discussed herein.
[0030] FIG. 1 schematically shows an example of a communication network according to the
standard 3GPP LTE, also known as "4G", in which embodiments of the invention may be
implemented. The communication network comprises a radio access node
10, e.g. a base station, user terminals UE1, UE2, UE3, UE4, a serving gateway SGW, a
packet data network gateway PDNGW, and a mobility management entity MME. Hereinafter,
the radio access node
10 may also be referred to as (massive) Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) base station
10. The MIMO base station
10 comprises at least one channel estimation module
20, at least one decoding module
25, and is provided with a plurality of antennas
30-1,...,30-m. The user terminals UE1-UE4 are connected via radio connections to the MIMO base station
10. Although for clarity reasons merely shown for UE1, all user terminals UE1-UE4 comprise
a coding unit
40. The MIMO base station
10 is communicatively connected to the serving gateway SGW and to the mobility management
entity MME, i.e. to the evolved packet core (EPC), via a so-called S1-interface. The
serving gateway SGW is communicatively connected to the packet data network gateway
PDNGW, which in its turn is communicatively connected to an external IP network IPN.
[0031] The S1 interface is a standardized interface between a base station, i.e. an eNodeB
in this example, and the evolved packet core (EPC) and has two flavors. First, S1-MME
is the interface for exchange of signaling messages between the MIMO base station
10 and the mobility management entity MME. Secondly, S1-U is the interface for transport
of user datagrams between the MIMO base station
10 and the serving gateway SGW.
[0032] The serving gateway SGW is configured to perform routing of IP user data between
the MIMO base station
10, as well as other base stations (not shown) in the communication network, and the
packet data network gateway PDNGW. Additionally, the serving gateway SGW serves as
a mobile anchor point during handover either between different base stations, or between
different access networks.
[0033] The packet data network gateway PDNGW represents the interface to the external IP
network IPN and terminates the so-called Evolved Packet System (EPS) bearer, which
is established between a user terminal and its serving base station.
[0034] The mobility management entity MME is configured to perform tasks related to subscriber
management and session management, and also executes mobility management during handover
between different access networks.
[0035] In downlink, IP data received from the external IP network IPN are transmitted from
the packet data network gateway PDNGW via the serving gateway SGW to the MIMO base
station
10 on an EPS bearer. The MIMO base station
10 then processes the IP data and transmits the IP data via the plurality of antennas
30-1,...,30-m to the respective user terminal over an air interface. In uplink, data transmission
is performed in an analogous way as described above with respect to downlink, but
in the reverse direction from the user terminal to the external IP network IPN. Hereinafter,
uplink and downlink will be discussed with respect to the air interface between MIMO
base station
10 and user terminals UE1-UE4. That is, downlink refers to signal transmission from
MIMO base station
10 to user terminals UE1-UE4, and uplink refers to signal transmission from user terminals
UE1-UE4 to MIMO base station
10.
[0036] FIG. 2 schematically shows an example of a communication network with a backhaul
system architecture having a massive MIMO wireless backhaul link, in which embodiments
of the invention may be implemented. The communication network includes a (massive)
MIMO central node
50, also referred to as a (massive) MIMO base station, a radio access network (RAN) server
80, and a plurality of relay cells SC1, SC2, SC3, and SC4 for serving user terminals.
The relay cells SC1-SC4 may also be referred to as (repeater) small cells SC1-SC4
or terminals SC1-SC4. The MIMO base station
50 comprises at least one channel estimation module
60, at least one decoding module
65, and is provided with a plurality of antennas
70-1,...,70-m. The terminals SC1-SC4 are connected via radio connections to the MIMO base station
50. Although for clarity reasons merely depicted for terminal SC1, which serves user
equipments UE5 and UE6, it will be understood that each terminal SC1, SC2, SC3, and
SC4 is configured to serve one or more user terminals. Furthermore, although for clarity
reasons merely shown for SC1, all terminals SC1-SC4 comprise a coding unit
90.The MIMO base station
50 is further communicatively connected to the RAN server
80.
[0037] A key factor for successful operation of the multiplexing operation that takes place
in a massive MIMO base station, such as MIMO base station
10 in FIG. 1 and MIMO base station
50 in FIG. 2, relates to the acquisition of sufficiently accurate channel state information
(CSI). In particular the massive MIMO base station needs to obtain sufficiently accurate
estimates of the frequency responses of the propagation channels between each of its
M antennas, i.e. antennas
30-1,...,30-m in FIG. 1 and antennas
70-1,...,70m in FIG. 2 and each of the K terminals it is serving, i.e. UE1-UE4 in FIG. 1 and SC1-SC4
in FIG. 2, in both examples K being equal to 4.
[0038] Obtaining such CSI is relatively easy for a massive MIMO communication system employing
time division duplex (TDD), where the same frequency band is utilized for both uplink
and downlink data transmission. CSI may be acquired by simultaneous transmission of
orthogonal pilot sequences by the K terminals to the M base station antennas, from
which the uplink propagation channel state between each of the M base station antennas
and the K terminals is estimated. By virtue of reciprocity, the uplink channels are
equal to the downlink channels. The sample duration is independent of the number of
base station antennas, and execution of a training scheme to obtain the required propagation
channel state estimates is relatively fast as the entire process for K terminals requires
K resource samples, and in a typical MIMO system the number of terminals is relatively
low as compared to the number of base station antennas.
[0039] However, in Europe and North America most wireless communication systems operate
using frequency-division duplex (FDD), where uplink and downlink channels are typically
located in different frequency bands. Under FDD, the transmission of uplink orthogonal
pilot sequences still suffices for the MIMO base station to estimate the state of
the uplink propagation channels. However, a further approach is needed for the MIMO
base station to obtain sufficiently accurate estimates of the state of the downlink
propagation channels, which is generally time-consuming. Considering a system with
M base station antennas and K single-antenna terminals, a known way to obtain channel
state estimates for both the uplink and the downlink propagation systems in an FDD
massive MIMO-system uses direct uplink pilots and downlink pilots plus (analog) feedback.
In the following process description, it is assumed that the frequency dependence
of the uplink and downlink channels is suppressed. Furthermore, it should be understood
that the subsequently described training and corresponding signal processing occurs
within each frequency interval (referred to as subband) over which the propagation
channels are considered to be substantially constant.
[0040] In the first phase of this two-phase process, considering a system with M base station
antennas and K single antenna terminals, the K terminals collectively transmit on
the uplink channel orthogonal pilot sequences with a sample duration
τu, represented by a
τu ×
K unitary matrix
Ψu. The antenna array of the MIMO base station receives a
M ×
τu signal, i.e.

where the superscript "H" denotes the Hermitian transpose, the matrix
Gu denotes the
M ×
K uplink propagation matrix,
Vu denotes additive receiver noise, and
ρu is a measure of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the uplink channel. Each of the
M antennas then correlates its received signal with each of the K pilot sequences
to obtain a noisy version of the uplink matrix-valued channel, i.e.

[0041] An appropriately scaled version of the uplink matrix-valued channel resulting from
equation (2) then constitutes the minimum mean-square estimate for the uplink channels.
[0042] During the second phase the M base station antennas transmit orthogonal pilot sequences
of sample duration
τd on the downlink channel, represented by a
τd ×
M unitary matrix
Ψd. The K terminals collectively receive a
K ×
τd signal, i.e.

where the matrix
Gd denotes the
M ×
K downlink propagation matrix,
Vd denotes additive receiver noise, and
ρd is a measure of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the downlink channel. The received
signal is then re-transmitted on the uplink, optionally using a scaling factor
α to conform to power constraints. The base station then receives a
M ×
τd signal, i.e.

[0043] Now, each of the M base station antennas may correlate its received signal with each
of the M pilot sequences, resulting in a
M ×
M signal, i.e.

[0044] Since the uplink pilots of the first phase already provided an estimate for the uplink
channel, the base station may now estimate the downlink channel, e.g. by means of
techniques including, but not limited to, zero-forcing and minimum mean-square error
estimation
[0045] The entire process described above requires a minimum of 2M+K resource samples. As
the number of base station antennas M is typically much higher than the number of
terminals K in a massive MIMO system obtaining reliable CSI for the uplink and downlink
propagation channels in a MIMO-system employing FDD is much more cumbersome than obtaining
such CSI in a MIMO-system employing TDD.
[0046] FIG. 3 schematically shows a flow chart of a method for channel estimation in a wireless
communication system comprising a massive MIMO system according to embodiments of
the invention. In this method for channel estimation of propagation channels between
a communication unit and one or more terminals in a communication system, the communication
system comprising a plurality of antennas, first, pilot signals are transmitted from
each antenna of the plurality of antennas towards the one or more terminals (action
101). Typically, such pilot signals are linearly independent, preferably orthogonal,
to ensure a sufficiently accurate downlink estimation an embodiment of which will
be described later.
[0047] Upon receipt by the one or more terminals, correlative coding is performed with respect
to the received pilot signal at the one or more terminals to form correlatively coded
pilot signals (action
103). Correlative coding here refers to the insertion of a known amount of correlation
into the pilot signals. For this purpose, as depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2, the terminals
are provided with a coding unit. The coding unit may be configured to apply correlative
coding to a signal in time domain or in frequency domain, depending on the number
of subbands. A time domain coding unit is applicable if the communication system employs
only one subband. For that case, the coding unit is configured to provide a received
pilot signal with a terminal-specific correlative signature to form the correlatively
coded pilot signals, e.g. by applying a Finite Impulse Response (FIR) or Infinite
Impulse Response (IIR) filter that introduces a known autocorrelation to the received
pilot signal, preferably a normalized version thereof, also referred to as auto-covariance.
If a terminal is provided with more than one antenna, the coding unit may be configured
to provide a received pilot signal with an antenna-specific and/or terminal-specific
correlative signature. For the case of multiple subbands, a frequency domain coding
unit is employed, which operates subband-wise by applying a FIR or IIR filter to the
subband-specific received pilot signal. This filter introduces a known terminal-specific,
and/or antenna-specific, autocorrelation to the received pilot signal. Hereinafter,
the term terminal-specific will be used for simplicity. But it will be understood
that in embodiments using terminals with more than one antenna this term may be replaced
by the term antenna-specific. The correlative coding may include filtering received
pilot signals by a terminal-specific auto-regressive model, preferably a terminal-specific
auto-regressive model of order 1 ("AR1-model"). The AR1-model is easy to implement
because it is simple and efficient in creating spectral diversity.
[0048] Note that in order to enable estimation of the uplink channels the applied filters
(i.e., correlative coding units) employed by corresponding terminals for the correlative
coding have to be known by the base station.
[0049] The correlatively coded pilot signals are then retransmitted from the one or more
terminals to the plurality antennas of the communication unit (action
105).
[0050] The communication unit is provided with at least one channel estimation module for
estimating uplink channels between the one or more terminals and the plurality of
antennas based on the correlatively coded pilot signals (action
107). A suitable algorithm to accomplish this would be a second-order blind identification
(SOBI) algorithm, which is known to a person skilled in the art. The SOBI algorithm
estimates spatial covariance matrices, the corresponding estimation error of which
reduces to zero as
M grows large. In other words, a larger number of MIMO base station antennas results
in improved estimation of the uplink channels if the SOBI algorithm is employed.
[0051] Finally, estimates of the downlink channels between the plurality of antennas and
the one or more terminals may be obtained based on the estimated uplink channels (action
109).
[0052] The method for estimation of propagation channels between the communication unit,
in particular a MIMO base station, and one or more terminals requires a minimum of
2
M resource samples. Consequently, as this estimation scheme, which may also be referred
to as training scheme, is independent of
K, the method is highly attractive for communication systems comprising a relatively
large number of terminals configured to be served by the communication unit.
[0053] Note that instead of an AR1-model other types of filters may be used, as long as
the filter introduces sufficient spectral diversity and is invertible. For example,
instead of an AR1-model which uses a linear convolution, a filter using a circular
convolution operation onto the received pilot signals may be used. Estimation of uplink
channels (action
107) by blind separation of received (superimposed) signals relies on the estimation
of (spatial) covariance matrices for different time lags. However, due to the finite
length of the pilot signals such estimation may suffer from a finite sample support.
By employing a circular convolution it is possible to introduce correlation between
the first samples of a pilot signal, where a linear correlation filter would merely
exhibit some transient behavior. As a result, the covariance matrix estimation accuracy
may be improved for finite sample support.
[0054] A quantitative example of the embodiment described above with reference to FIG. 3
for a MIMO communication system comprising M base station antennas and K terminals
may be described as follows. Again, it is assumed that the frequency dependence of
the uplink and downlink channels is suppressed. Similarly, it should be understood
that training and corresponding signal processing occurs within each frequency interval
(i.e., subband) over which the propagation channels are considered to be substantially
constant.
[0055] First, the M base station antennas transmit on the downlink channel orthogonal pilot
sequences of sample duration
τd, represented by a
τd ×
M unitary matrix
Ψd. The k-th terminal,
k ∈ {1,...,K}, receives a 1×τ
d signal, i.e.

where
gdk denotes the Mx
1 downlink propagation vector for the k-th terminal, and
vdk denotes additive receiver noise. Now, instead of immediate re-transmission of the
received pilot signals in the uplink, each terminal
k first applies a correlation filter that introduces a terminal-specific autocorrelation
onto the received pilot sequence
xdk. Throughout this specification, this operation is referred to as correlative coding,
and a pilot signal being subjected to correlative coding is referred to as a correlatively
coded pilot signal. As will be discussed in more detail below, providing the pilot
signal with a terminal-specific autocorrelation signature, i.e. forming a correlatively
coded pilot signal, enables the base station to estimate the uplink channels. The
correlative coding by a terminal
k may be described by a multiplication of the received pilot sequence
xdk with a so-called Toeplitz matrix
Ck, i.e.

where the Toeplitz matrix
Ck is to be a lower triangular matrix so that the resulting filter is a causal filter,
which realizes a linear convolution. Alternatively,
Ck can also be chosen as a circulant matrix in order to realize a circular convolution.
A possible choice of suitable Toeplitz matrices
Ck, for all
k ∈ {1,...,K} will be described below. Note that in order to enable estimation of the
downlink channels at the MIMO base station the filter matrices employed by corresponding
terminals have to be known by the base station.
[0056] Preferably, the components of the downlink channel vectors
gdk, for all
k, are all independent and identically distributed (complex) Gaussian random variables,
which is the case for Rayleigh fading channels. In such case, the received sequences
xdk, for all
k, are mutually uncorrelated with independent and identically (complex) Gaussian elements.
Such sequences are spectrally white and indistinguishable from a statistical domain
point of view. By judiciously coloring the sequences
xdk, i.e. assigning distinct spectral patterns by means of correlative coding at the
terminals, the MIMO base station is able to identify the uplink channels and to separate
the terminal's signals, e.g. by means of the SOBI algorithm.
[0057] All K terminals may then re-transmit their correlatively coded pilot signals
yuk as defined by equation (7) simultaneously in the uplink, optionally using an appropriate
scaling factor
αk to conform to power constraints. The antenna array of the base station then receives
a
M ×
τd signal, i.e.

[0058] The base station may now calculate estimates
ĝuk for all uplink channels and the signals
yuk, both up to a complex scaling factor and up to a permutation of terminal indices.
As mentioned previously, such calculation may for example apply a SOBI algorithm.
Based on the separated uplink signals
yuk the base station is able to estimate the k-th downlink channel (up to a complex scaling
factor) as follows:

[0059] The total number of resource samples required to estimate all of the uplink and downlink
channels thus equals 2
M.
[0060] As mentioned previously, a relatively easy way to achieve sufficient spectral diversity
for correlative coding at the terminals is to filter each received signal
xdk by an autoregressive model of order 1, for example by using a judiciously chosen
coefficient

where
ρk is typically chosen to have the same value for all
k, with
k∈{1,...,K}, so that the coefficients
ak for all
k lie on a circle in the complex plane with a radius equal to e.g.,
r = 0.95; that is;,
ρk = 0.95 for all
k. Furthermore, in case of such uniform distribution of
ak on the complex circle, the parameters
θk for all
k may be calculated as follows:

[0061] The corresponding filter matrix,
Ck is a lower-triangular Toeplitz matrix constructed from the vector

For a case with
M=4, this results in:

[0062] The radius of the circle in the complex plane (i.e.; the parameter
ρk) may be modified in order to trade-of the spectral overlap of the signals
yuk, for all k, versus the so-called condition number of the matrix

which dictates noise amplification within the downlink channel estimation step given
in equation (9).
[0063] In case of fully analog terminals one has to resort to a (causal) linear convolution
as realized by a filter matrix with Toeplitz structure. Additionally, the use of a
linear convolution is particularly useful if the pilot signals being used are sufficiently
narrow, i.e. if their signal bandwidth is smaller than the coherence bandwidth of
the channel over which they are transferred. In contrast, a circular convolution (i.e.,
a circular filter matrix) requires digital processing, but improves the performance
of the blind separation algorithm employed by the MIMO base station for channel estimation
purposes, in particular for small pilot lengths and/or small number of MIMO base station
antennas.
[0064] After performing the estimation of the uplink channels and obtaining the estimates
for the downlink channels as described in general with reference to FIG. 3, and illustrated
with the quantitative example above, the uplink and downlink channel vectors are sufficiently
known up to an unknown permutation of the terminal indices (or if terminals have more
than one antenna with respect to the antenna indices). This ambiguity is no problem
in scenarios such as the broadcast transmission in the downlink with conjugate beam
forming for individual terminals. However, it may cause issues in some other scenarios.
[0065] To overcome abovementioned ambiguity the channel estimation method described with
reference to FIG. 3 may further include the transmission of data signals in the uplink
to the plurality of antennas of the MIMO base station, each data signal comprising
information related to an identity of the transmission source from which the data
signal originates (action
111). The transmission source may be identified as the terminal itself, in which the
transmission source identity information includes terminal-specific information. Alternatively,
if terminals are provided with more than one antenna, the specific antenna transmitting
the data signal may be identified as the transmission source. In such case, the transmission
source identity information thus includes antenna-specific information. In any case,
the identity information may take the form of coded signals with identity-specific
scrambling and/or cyclic redundancy check (CRC) checksums.
[0066] The decoding module of the MIMO base station may then use the transmission source
identity information to link uplink and downlink channels to corresponding terminals
(action
113). It will be understood that the expression "corresponding terminals" relates to
the terminals itself if the terminals are provided with a single antenna, but may
also relate to specific antennas of a terminal if the respective terminal is provided
with more than one antenna. In particular, the MIMO base station may apply the estimated
uplink channel vectors in order to separate the superimposed uplink signals of all
terminals by means of e.g. a minimum mean square error (MMSE) of zero-forcing equalizer.
By merely trying the different identities obtained by means of the identity information,
the MIMO base station is able to resolve abovementioned index ambiguity without a
need for any further channel uses.
[0067] The description and drawings merely illustrate the principles of the invention. It
will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise various
arrangements that, although not explicitly described or shown herein, embody the principles
of the invention. Furthermore, all examples recited herein are principally intended
expressly to be only for pedagogical purposes to aid the reader in understanding the
principles of the invention and the concepts contributed by the inventor(s) to furthering
the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically
recited examples and conditions. Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles,
aspects, and embodiments of the invention, as well as specific examples thereof, are
intended to encompass equivalents thereof.
1. Method for channel estimation in a wireless communication system comprising a communication
unit and one or more terminals, wherein the communication unit comprises a plurality
of antennas, the method comprising:
- transmitting pilot signals from each antenna of the plurality of antennas towards
the one or more terminals;
- performing correlative coding with respect to the transmitted pilot signals at the
one or more terminals to form correlatively coded pilot signals, the correlatively
coded pilot signals being provided with a terminal-specific correlation signature
or an antenna-specific correlation signature if the one or more terminals comprise
more than one antenna;
- retransmitting the correlatively coded pilot signals from the one or more terminals
to the plurality of antennas;
- estimating uplink channels between the one or more terminals and the plurality of
antennas based on the correlatively coded pilot signals; and
- obtaining estimates of the downlink channels between the plurality of antennas and
the one or more terminals based on the estimated uplink channels.
2. Method according to claim 1, further comprising:
- transmitting data signals from the one or more terminals to the plurality of antennas,
each data signal comprising information related to an identity of the transmission
source from which the data signal originates; and
- linking uplink and downlink channels to corresponding terminals using the transmission
source identity information.
3. Method according to claim 2, wherein the transmission source identity information
is terminal-specific information if the one or more terminals are provided with a
single antenna or antenna-specific information if the one or more terminals are provided
with more than one antenna.
4. Method according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein correlative coding comprises filtering
received pilot signals by an auto-regressive model, preferably an auto-regressive
model of order 1.
5. Method according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein correlative coding comprises executing
a circular convolution operation onto the pilot signals.
6. Method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein estimating uplink channels
between the one or more user terminals and the plurality of antennas utilizes a second-order
blind identification algorithm.
7. Communication unit (10;50) for communication with one or more terminals (UE1-UE4;SC1-SC2)
in a communication system, the communication unit comprising:
- a plurality of antennas (30-1,...,30-m;70-1,...,70-m); and
- at least one channel estimation module (20;60);
wherein the communication unit is configured to:
- transmit pilot signals from each antenna of the plurality of antennas towards the
one or more terminals in the communication system;
- receive correlatively coded pilot signals from the one or more terminals at the
plurality of antennas, the correlatively coded pilot signals being provided with a
terminal-specific correlation signature or an antenna-specific correlation signature
if the one or more terminals comprise more than one antenna;
- estimate uplink channels between the one or more terminals and the plurality of
antennas by the at least one channel estimation module based on the coded pilot signals;
and
- obtain estimates of the downlink channels between the plurality of antennas and
the one or more user terminals by the at least one channel estimation module based
on the estimated uplink channels.
8. Communication unit according to claim 7, wherein the communication unit further comprises
at least one decoding module (25;65), and wherein the communication unit is further
configured to:
- receive data signals from the one or more terminals via the plurality of antennas,
the data signals comprising information related to an identity of the transmission
source from which the data signal originates; and
- linking uplink and downlink channels to corresponding terminals by the at least
one channel decoding module (25;65) using the transmission source identity information
as received.
9. Communication unit according to claim 7 or 8, wherein the at least one channel estimation
module is configured to estimate the uplink channels by utilizing a second-order blind
identification algorithm.
10. Terminal (UE1-UE4;SC1-SC4) for communication with a communication unit (10;50) provided
with a plurality of antennas (30-1,...,30m;70-1,...,70-m) in a communication system,
the terminal comprising:
- a transceiver for respectively receiving signals from and transmitting signals to
the plurality of antennas of the communication unit; and
- a coding unit (40;90);
wherein the terminal is configured to:
- receive pilot signals transmitted from each antenna of the plurality of antennas;
- perform correlative coding with respect to the received pilot signals using the
coding unit to form correlatively coded pilot signals, the correlatively coded pilot
signals being provided with a terminal-specific correlation signature or an antenna-specific
correlation signature if the one or more terminals comprise more than one antenna;
and
- retransmit the coded pilot signals to the plurality of antennas thereby enabling
the communication unit to estimate uplink channels based on the coded pilot signals
and to obtain estimate of downlink channels based on the estimated uplink channels.
11. Terminal according to claim 10, further configured to transmit a data signal to the
plurality of antennas, the data signal including information related to an identity
of the transmission source from which the data signal originates.
12. Terminal according to claim 10 or 11, wherein correlative coding as performed by the
coding unit comprises filtering received pilot signals by an autoregressive model.
13. Terminal according to any one of claims 10-12, wherein the terminal is a user terminal
(UE1-UE4).
14. Terminal according to any one of claims 10-12, wherein the terminal is a relay station
(SC1-SC4).
15. Communication system comprising a communication unit according to any one of claims
7-9 and one or more terminals according to any one of claims 10-14.
1. Verfahren zur Kanalschätzung in einem Drahtloskommunikationssystem, umfassend eine
Kommunikationseinheit und ein oder mehr Endgeräte, wobei die Kommunikationseinheit
eine Vielzahl von Antennen umfasst, und das Verfahren Folgendes umfasst:
- Übertragen von Pilotsignalen von jeder Antenne der Vielzahl von Antennen an das
eine oder die mehreren Endgeräte;
- Durchführen korrelativer Codierung in Bezug auf die übertragenen Pilotsignale an
dem einen oder den mehreren Endgeräten, um korrelativ codierte Pilotsignale zu bilden,
wobei die korrelativ codierten Pilotsignale mit einer endgerätspezifischen Korrelationssignatur
oder einer antennenspezifischen Korrelationssignatur versehen werden, wenn das eine
oder die mehreren Endgeräte mehr als eine Antenne umfassen,
- erneutes Übertragen der korrelativ codierten Pilotsignale von dem einen oder den
mehreren Endgeräten an die Vielzahl von Antennen;
- Schätzen von Uplink-Kanälen zwischen dem einen oder den mehreren Endgeräten und
der Vielzahl von Antennen basierend auf den korrelativ codierten Pilotsignalen; und
- Erlangen von Schätzungen der Downlink-Kanäle zwischen der Vielzahl von Antennen
und dem einen oder den mehreren Endgeräten basierend auf den geschätzten Uplink-Kanälen.
2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, ferner umfassend:
- Übertragen von Datensignalen von dem einen oder den mehreren Endgeräten an die Vielzahl
von Antennen, wobei jedes Datensignal Informationen in Bezug auf eine Identität der
Übertragungsquelle umfasst, von der das Datensignal stammt; und
- Verknüpfen von Uplink- und Downlink-Kanälen mit entsprechenden Endgeräten unter
Verwendung der Übertragungsquellenidentitätsinformationen.
3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2, wobei die Übertragungsquellenidentitätsinformationen endgerätspezifische
Informationen sind, wenn das eine oder die mehreren Endgeräte mit einer einzelnen
Antenne versehen sind, oder antennenspezifische Informationen sind, wenn das eine
oder die mehreren Endgeräte mit mehr als einer Antenne versehen sind.
4. Verfahren nach einem beliebigen der Ansprüche 1 bis 3, wobei das korrelative Codieren
Filtern empfangener Pilotsignale durch ein autoregressives Modell, vorzugsweise ein
autoregressives Modell erster Ordnung umfasst.
5. Verfahren nach einem beliebigen der Ansprüche 1 bis 3, wobei das korrelative Codieren
Ausführen einer zirkulären Faltung an den Pilotsignalen umfasst.
6. Verfahren nach einem beliebigen der vorstehenden Ansprüche, wobei das Schätzen von
Uplink-Kanälen zwischen dem einen oder den mehreren Endgeräten und der Vielzahl von
Antennen einen blinden Identifikationsalgorithmus zweiter Ordnung benutzt.
7. Kommunikationseinheit (10; 50) zum Kommunizieren mit einem oder mehreren Endgeräten
(UE1-UE4; SC1-SC2) in einem Kommunikationssystem, wobei die Kommunikationseinheit
Folgendes umfasst:
- eine Vielzahl von Antennen (30-1, ..., 30-m; 70-1, ..., 70-m); und
- wenigstens ein Kanalschätzungsmodul (20; 60);
wobei die Kommunikationseinheit konfiguriert ist zum:
- Übertragen von Pilotsignalen von jeder Antenne der Vielzahl von Antennen an das
eine oder die mehreren Endgeräte im Kommunikationssystem;
- Empfangen korrelativ codierter Signale von dem einen oder den mehreren Endgeräten
an der Vielzahl von Antennen, wobei die korrelativ codierten Pilotsignale mit einer
endgerätspezifischen Korrelationssignatur oder einer antennenspezifischen Korrelationssignatur
versehen sind, wenn das eine oder die mehreren Endgeräte mehr als eine Antenne umfassen;
- Schätzen von Uplink-Kanälen zwischen dem einen oder den mehreren Endgeräten und
der Vielzahl von Antennen durch das wenigstens eine Kanalschätzungsmodul basierend
auf den codierten Pilotsignalen; und
- Erlangen von Schätzungen der Downlink-Kanäle zwischen der Vielzahl von Antennen
und dem einen oder den mehreren Endgeräten durch das wenigstens eine Kanalschätzungsmodul
basierend auf den geschätzten Uplink-Kanälen.
8. Kommunikationseinheit nach Anspruch 7, wobei die Kommunikationseinheit ferner wenigstens
ein Decodierungsmodul (25; 65) umfasst und wobei die Kommunikationseinheit ferner
konfiguriert ist zum:
- Empfangen von Datensignalen von dem einen oder den mehreren Endgeräten über die
Vielzahl von Antennen, wobei die Datensignale Informationen in Bezug auf eine Identität
der Übertragungsquelle umfassen, von der das Datensignal stammt; und
- Verknüpfen von Uplink- und Downlink-Kanälen mit entsprechenden Endgeräten durch
das wenigstens eine Decodierungsmodul (25; 65) unter Verwendung der Übertragungsquellenidentitätsinformationen.
9. Kommunikationseinheit nach Anspruch 7 oder 8, wobei das wenigstens eine Kanalschätzungsmodul
zum Schätzen der Uplink-Kanäle durch Benutzen eines blinden Identifikationsalgorithmus
zweiter Ordnung konfiguriert ist.
10. Endgerät (UE1-UE4; SC1-SC2) zum Kommunizieren mit einer Kommunikationseinheit (10;
50), die mit einer Vielzahl von Antennen (30-1, ..., 30-m; 70-1, ..., 70-m) versehen
ist, in einem Kommunikationssystem, wobei das Endgerät Folgendes umfasst:
- eine Sende-Empfangseinrichtung zum jeweiligen Empfangen von Signalen von und Übertragen
von Signalen an die Vielzahl von Antennen der Kommunikationseinheit; und
- eine Codiereinheit (40; 90);
wobei das Endgerät konfiguriert ist zum:
- Empfangen von Pilotsignalen, die von den einzelnen Antennen der Vielzahl von Antennen
übertragen werden;
- Durchführen korrelativer Codierung in Bezug auf die empfangenen Pilotsignale unter
Verwendung der Codiereinheit, um korrelativ codierte Pilotsignale zu bilden, wobei
die korrelativ codierten Pilotsignale mit einer endgerätspezifischen Korrelationssignatur
oder einer antennenspezifischen Korrelationssignatur versehen werden, wenn das eine
oder die mehreren Endgeräte mehr als eine Antenne umfassen; und
- erneuten Übertragen der codierten Pilotsignale an die Vielzahl von Antennen, wodurch
es der Kommunikationseinheit ermöglicht wird, Uplink-Kanäle basierend auf den codierten
Pilotsignalen zu schätzen und eine Schätzung von Downlink-Kanälen basierend auf den
geschätzten Uplink-Kanälen zu erlangen.
11. Endgerät nach Anspruch 10, das ferner zum Übertragen eines Datensignals an die Vielzahl
von Antennen konfiguriert ist, wobei das Datensignal Informationen in Bezug auf eine
Identität der Übertragungsquelle umfasst, von der das Datensignal stammt.
12. Endgerät nach Anspruch 10 oder 11, wobei korrelatives Codieren, das von der Codiereinheit
durchgeführt wird, Filtern empfangener Pilotsignale durch ein autoregressives Modell
umfasst.
13. Endgerät nach einem beliebigen der Ansprüche 10 bis 12, wobei das Endgerät ein Benutzerendgerät
(UE1-UE4) ist.
14. Endgerät nach einem beliebigen der Ansprüche 10 bis 12, wobei das Endgerät eine Relaisstation
(SC1-SC4) ist.
15. Kommunikationssystem, umfassend eine Kommunikationseinheit nach einem der Ansprüche
7 bis 9 und ein oder mehrere Endgeräte nach einem der Ansprüche 10 bis 14.
1. Procédé d'estimation de canal dans un système de communication sans fil comprenant
un module de communication et un ou plusieurs terminaux, dans lequel le module de
communication comprend une pluralité d'antennes, le procédé comprenant les étapes
suivantes :
- transmettre des signaux pilotes de chaque antenne de la pluralité d'antennes vers
le ou les terminaux ;
- effectuer un codage corrélatif par rapport aux signaux pilotes transmis au niveau
du ou des terminaux pour former des signaux pilotes codés de façon corrélative, les
signaux pilotes codés de façon corrélative étant délivrés avec une signature de corrélation
spécifique à un terminal ou une signature de corrélation spécifique à une antenne
si le ou les terminaux comprennent plusieurs antennes ;
- retransmettre les signaux pilotes codés de façon corrélative du ou des terminaux
à la pluralité d'antennes ;
- estimer les canaux montants entre le ou les terminaux et la pluralité d'antennes
en fonction des signaux pilotes codés de façon corrélative ; et
- obtenir des estimations des canaux descendants entre la pluralité d'antennes et
le ou les terminaux en fonction des canaux montants estimés.
2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, comprenant en outre les étapes suivantes :
- transmettre des signaux de données du ou des terminaux à la pluralité d'antennes,
chaque signal de données contenant des informations relatives à une identité de la
source de transmission d'où provient le signal de données ; et
- relier les canaux montants et descendants aux terminaux correspondants en utilisant
les informations d'identité de la source de transmission.
3. Procédé selon la revendication 2, dans lequel les informations d'identité de la source
de transmission sont des informations spécifiques à un terminal si le ou les terminaux
sont munis d'une seule antenne ou des informations spécifiques à une antenne si le
ou les terminaux sont munis de plusieurs antennes.
4. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3, dans lequel le codage corrélatif
comprend un filtrage des signaux pilotes reçus au moyen d'un modèle autorégressif,
de préférence un modèle autorégressif d'ordre 1.
5. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3, dans lequel le codage corrélatif
comprend l'exécution d'une opération de convolution circulaire sur les signaux pilotes.
6. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel l'estimation
des canaux montants entre le ou les terminaux d'utilisateur et la pluralité d'antennes
utilise un algorithme d'identification en aveugle du deuxième ordre.
7. Module de communication (10 ; 50) destiné à communiquer avec un ou plusieurs terminaux
(UE1-UE4; SC1-SC2) dans un système de communication, le module de communication comprenant
:
- une pluralité d'antennes (30-1...30-m ; 70-1...70-m) ; et
- au moins un module d'estimation de canal (20 ; 60) ;
le module de communication étant configuré pour :
- transmettre des signaux pilotes de chaque antenne de la pluralité d'antennes vers
le ou les terminaux dans le système de communication ;
- recevoir des signaux pilotes codés de façon corrélative du ou des terminaux au niveau
de la pluralité d'antennes, les signaux pilotes codés de façon corrélative étant délivrés
avec une signature de corrélation spécifique à un terminal ou une signature de corrélation
spécifique à une antenne si le ou les terminaux comprennent plusieurs antennes ;
- estimer les canaux montants entre le ou les terminaux et la pluralité d'antennes
au moyen du ou des modules d'estimation de canal en fonction des signaux pilotes codés
; et
- obtenir des estimations des canaux descendants entre la pluralité d'antennes et
le ou les terminaux d'utilisateur au moyen du ou des modules d'estimation de canal
en fonction des canaux montants estimés.
8. Module de communication selon la revendication 7, le module de communication comprenant
en outre au moins un module de décodage (25 ; 65), et le module de communication étant
en outre configuré pour :
- recevoir des signaux de données du ou des terminaux via la pluralité d'antennes,
les signaux de données comprenant des informations relatives à une identité de la
source de transmission d'où provient le signal de données ; et
- relier les canaux montants et descendants aux terminaux correspondants au moyen
du ou des modules de décodage de canal (25 ; 65) en utilisant les informations d'identité
de la source de transmission telles qu'elles sont reçues.
9. Module de communication selon la revendication 7 ou 8, dans lequel le ou les modules
d'estimation de canal sont configurés pour estimer les canaux montants en utilisant
un algorithme d'identification en aveugle du deuxième ordre.
10. Terminal (UE1-UE4; SC1-SC4) destiné à communiquer avec un module de communication
(10 ; 50) muni d'une pluralité d'antennes (30-1...30-m ; 70-1...70-m) dans un système
de communication, le terminal comprenant :
- un émetteur-récepteur pour respectivement recevoir des signaux de et transmettre
des signaux à la pluralité d'antennes du module de communication ; et
- un module de codage (40 ; 90) ;
le terminal étant configuré pour :
- recevoir des signaux pilotes transmis depuis chaque antenne de la pluralité d'antennes
;
- effectuer un codage corrélatif par rapport aux signaux pilotes reçus en utilisant
le module de codage pour former des signaux pilotes codés de façon corrélative, les
signaux pilotes codés de façon corrélative étant délivrés avec une signature de corrélation
spécifique à un terminal ou une signature de corrélation spécifique à une antenne
si le ou les terminaux comprennent plusieurs antennes ; et
- retransmettre les signaux pilotes codés à la pluralité d'antennes, ce qui permet
au module de communication d'estimer les canaux montants en fonction des signaux pilotes
codés et d'obtenir une estimation des canaux descendants en fonction des canaux montants
estimés.
11. Terminal selon la revendication 10, configuré en outre pour transmettre un signal
de données à la pluralité d'antennes, le signal de données contenant des informations
relatives à une identité de la source de transmission d'où provient le signal de données.
12. Terminal selon la revendication 10 ou 11, dans lequel le codage corrélatif tel qu'effectué
par le module de codage comprend un filtrage des signaux pilotes reçus au moyen d'un
modèle autorégressif.
13. Terminal selon l'une quelconque des revendications 10 à 12, le terminal étant un terminal
d'utilisateur (UE1-UE4).
14. Terminal selon l'une quelconque des revendications 10 à 12, le terminal étant une
station relais (SC1-SC4).
15. Système de communication comprenant un module de communication selon l'une quelconque
des revendication 7 à 9 et un ou plusieurs terminaux selon l'une quelconque des revendications
10 à 14.