CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
FIELD
[0002] The present disclosure generally relates to mobile computing devices and, more particularly,
to techniques for distributed optical character recognition (OCR) and distributed
machine language translation.
BACKGROUND
[0003] The background description provided herein is for the purpose of generally presenting
the context of the disclosure. Work of the presently named inventors, to the extent
it is described in this background section, as well as aspects of the description
that may not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly
nor impliedly admitted as prior art against the present disclosure.
[0004] Optical character recognition (OCR) involves the detection of a text in an image
using a computing device, e.g., a server. OCR can provide for a faster way to obtain
the text in a digital form at a user device, e.g., compared to manual input of the
text to the user device by a user. After obtaining the text in the image, the text
can be utilized in various ways. For example, the text may be processed by a computing
device, stored at a memory, and/or transmitted to another computing device. One example
of processing the text is machine language translation, which involves translating
the text from a source language to a different target language using a computing device.
SUMMARY
[0005] A computer-implemented technique is presented. The technique can include receiving,
at a mobile computing device having one or more processors, an image of an object
comprising a text in a source language. The technique can include determining, at
the mobile computing device, a degree of optical character recognition (OCR) complexity
for performing OCR on the image to obtain the text. When the degree of OCR complexity
is less than a first OCR complexity threshold the first OCR complexity threshold representing
a degree of OCR complexity that the mobile computing device is appropriate for performing,
the technique can include performing, at the mobile computing device, OCR on the image
to obtain an OCR text. When the degree of OCR complexity is greater than the first
OCR complexity threshold, the technique can include: (i) transmitting, from the mobile
computing device, at least a portion of the image to a first server, and (ii) receiving,
at the mobile computing device at least a portion of the OCR text from the first server.
The technique can include determining, at the mobile computing device, a degree of
translation complexity for translating the OCR text from the source language to a
target language. When the degree of translation complexity is less than a first translation
complexity threshold the first OCR complexity threshold representing a degree of translation
complexity that the mobile computing device is appropriate for performing, the technique
can include performing, at the mobile computing device, machine language translation
of the OCR text from the source language to a target language to obtain a translated
OCR text in the target language. When the degree of translation complexity is greater
than the first translation complexity threshold, the technique can include: (i) transmitting
at least a portion of the OCR text to a second server, and (ii) receiving at least
a portion of the translated OCR text from the second server. The technique can also
include outputting, at a display of the mobile computing device, the translated OCR
text.
[0006] In some embodiments, when the degree of OCR complexity is greater than the first
OCR complexity threshold and less than a second OCR complexity threshold, the technique
can include: transmitting, from the mobile computing device, at least the portion
of the image to the first server, and receiving, at the mobile computing device, at
least the portion of the OCR text from the first server.
[0007] In other embodiments, the second OCR complexity threshold represents a degree of
OCR complexity that the mobile computing device is not appropriate for performing
and the first server is appropriate for performing.
[0008] In some embodiments, when the degree of OCR complexity is greater than the second
OCR complexity threshold, the technique can include: transmitting, from the mobile
computing device, all of the image to the first server, and receiving, at the mobile
computing device, all of the OCR text from the first server.
[0009] In other embodiments, when the degree of translation complexity is greater than the
first translation complexity threshold and less than a second translation complexity
threshold, the technique can include: transmitting, from the mobile computing device,
at least the portion of the OCR text to the second server, and receiving, at the mobile
computing device, at least the portion of the translated OCR text from the second
server.
[0010] In some embodiments, the second translation complexity threshold represents a degree
of translation complexity that the mobile computing device is not appropriate for
performing and the second server is appropriate for performing.
[0011] In other embodiments, when the degree of OCR complexity is greater than the second
translation complexity threshold, the technique can include: transmitting, from the
mobile computing device, all of the OCR text to the second server, and receiving,
at the mobile computing device, all of the translated OCR text from the first server.
[0012] In some embodiments, the translated OCR text includes first and second portions corresponding
to machine language translation by the mobile computing device and the second server,
respectively, and outputting the translated OCR text includes outputting, at the display
of the mobile computing device, the first portion of the translated OCR text while
awaiting the second portion of the translated OCR text from the second server.
[0013] In other embodiments, the OCR text includes first and second portions corresponding
to the first and second portions of the translated OCR text, respectively, and outputting
the translated OCR text includes outputting, at the display of the mobile computing
device, the first portion of the translated OCR text and the second portion of the
OCR text while awaiting the second portion of the translated OCR text from the second
server.
[0014] In some embodiments, the technique further includes outputting, at the display of
the mobile computing device, the first and second portions of the translated OCR text
in response to receiving the second portion of the translated OCR text from the second
server.
[0015] A mobile computing device having one or more processors configured to perform operations
is presented. The operations can include receiving an image of an object comprising
a text in a source language. The operations can include determining a degree of OCR
complexity for performing OCR on the image to obtain the text. When the degree of
OCR complexity is less than a first OCR complexity threshold the first OCR complexity
threshold representing a degree of OCR complexity that the mobile computing device
is appropriate for performing, the operations can include performing OCR on the image
to obtain an OCR text. When the degree of OCR complexity is greater than the first
OCR complexity threshold, the operations can include: (i) transmitting, via a communication
device, at least a portion of the image to a first server, and (ii) receiving, via
the communication device, at least a portion of the OCR text from the first server.
The operations can include determining a degree of translation complexity for translating
the OCR text from the source language to a target language. When the degree of translation
complexity is less than a first translation complexity threshold the first OCR complexity
threshold representing a degree of translation complexity that the mobile computing
device is appropriate for performing, the operations can include performing machine
language translation of the OCR text from the source language to a target language
to obtain a translated OCR text in the target language. When the degree of translation
complexity is greater than the first translation complexity threshold, the operations
can include (i) transmitting, via the communication device, at least a portion of
the OCR text to a second server, and (ii) receiving, via the communication device,
at least a portion of the translated OCR text from the second server. The operations
can also include outputting the translated OCR text at a display of the mobile computing
device.
[0016] In some embodiments, when the degree of OCR complexity is greater than the first
OCR complexity threshold and less than a second OCR complexity threshold, the operations
can further include: transmitting, via the communication device, at least the portion
of the image to the first server, and receiving, via the communication device, at
least the portion of the OCR text from the first server.
[0017] In other embodiments, the second OCR complexity threshold represents a degree of
OCR complexity that the mobile computing device is not appropriate for performing
and the first server is appropriate for performing.
[0018] In some embodiments, when the degree of OCR complexity is greater than the second
OCR complexity threshold, the operations can further include: transmitting, via the
communication device, all of the image to the first server, and receiving, via the
communication device, all of the OCR text from the first server.
[0019] In other embodiments, when the degree of translation complexity is greater than the
first translation complexity threshold and less than a second translation complexity
threshold, the operations can further include: transmitting, via the communication
device, at least the portion of the OCR text to the second server, and receiving,
via the communication device, at least the portion of the translated OCR text from
the second server.
[0020] In some embodiments, the second translation complexity threshold represents a degree
of translation complexity that the mobile computing device is not appropriate for
performing and the second server is appropriate for performing.
[0021] In other embodiments, when the degree of OCR complexity is greater than the second
translation complexity threshold, the operations can further include: transmitting,
via the communication device, all of the OCR text to the second server, and receiving,
via the communication device, all of the translated OCR text from the first server.
[0022] In some embodiments, the translated OCR text includes first and second portions corresponding
to machine language translation by the mobile computing device and the second server,
respectively, and outputting the translated OCR text at the display of the mobile
computing device includes displaying the first portion of the translated OCR text
while awaiting the second portion of the translated OCR text from the second server.
[0023] In other embodiments, the OCR text includes first and second portions corresponding
to the first and second portions of the translated OCR text, respectively, and outputting
the translated OCR text at the display of the mobile computing device includes displaying
the first portion of the translated OCR text and the second portion of the OCR text
while awaiting the second portion of the translated OCR text from the second server.
[0024] In some embodiments, the operations further include outputting, at the display of
the mobile computing device, the first and second portions of the translated OCR text
in response to receiving the second portion of the translated OCR text from the second
server.
[0025] Another computer-implemented technique is also presented. The technique can include
receiving, at a mobile computing device having one or more processors, an image of
an object comprising a text in a source language. The technique can include determining,
at the mobile computing device, a degree of OCR complexity for performing OCR on the
image to obtain the text. The technique can include transmitting, from the mobile
computing device to a server, at least a portion of the image based on the degree
of OCR complexity. The technique can include receiving, at the mobile computing device
from the server, OCR results. The technique can include obtaining, at the mobile computing
device, an OCR text based on the OCR results. The technique can include obtaining,
at the mobile computing device, a machine language translation of the OCR text from
the source language to a target language to obtain a translated OCR text. The technique
can also include outputting, at a display of the mobile computing device, the translated
OCR text.
[0026] In some embodiments, the technique further includes: performing, at the mobile computing
device, OCR for the entire image when the degree of OCR complexity is less than a
first OCR complexity threshold, and transmitting, from the mobile computing device
to the server, at least the portion of the image when the degree of OCR complexity
is greater than the first OCR complexity threshold.
[0027] In other embodiments, the first OCR complexity threshold represents a degree of OCR
complexity that the mobile computing device is appropriate for performing itself.
[0028] In some embodiments, the technique further includes transmitting, from the mobile
computing device to the server, all of the image when the degree of OCR complexity
is greater than a second OCR complexity threshold that is greater than the first OCR
complexity threshold.
[0029] In other embodiments, the second OCR complexity threshold represents a degree of
OCR complexity that the mobile computing device is not appropriate for performing
itself.
[0030] In some embodiments, when the degree of OCR complexity is between the first and second
OCR complexity thresholds, the mobile computing device performs OCR for a first portion
of the image and the mobile computing device transmits a second portion of the image
to the server, the first and second portions of the image collectively forming the
entire image.
[0031] Another computer-implemented technique is also presented. The technique can include
receiving, at a mobile computing device having one or more processors, an image of
an object comprising a text in a source language. The technique can include obtaining,
at the mobile computing device, OCR results for the object and the text to obtain
an OCR text. The technique can include determining, at the mobile computing device,
the source language of the OCR text. The technique can include determining, at the
mobile computing device, a degree of translation complexity for performing machine
language translation of the OCR text from the source language to a target language.
The technique can include transmitting, from the mobile computing device to a server,
at least a portion of the OCR text based on the degree of translation complexity.
The technique can include receiving, at the mobile computing device from the server,
machine language translation results. The technique can include obtaining, at the
mobile computing device, a translated OCR text based on the machine language translation
results. The technique can also include outputting, at a display of the mobile computing
device, the translated OCR text.
[0032] In some embodiments, the technique further includes: performing, at the mobile computing
device, machine language translation for the entire OCR text when the degree of translation
complexity is less than a first translation complexity threshold, and transmitting,
from the mobile computing device to the server, at least the portion of the OCR text
when the degree of translation complexity is greater than the first translation complexity
threshold.
[0033] In other embodiments, the first translation complexity threshold represents a degree
of translation complexity that the mobile computing device is appropriate for performing
itself.
[0034] In some embodiments, the technique further includes: transmitting, from the mobile
computing device to the server, all of the OCR text when the degree of translation
complexity is greater than a second translation complexity threshold that is greater
than the first translation complexity threshold.
[0035] In other embodiments, the second translation complexity threshold represents a degree
of translation complexity that the mobile computing device is not appropriate for
performing itself.
[0036] In some embodiments, when the degree of translation complexity is between the first
and second translation complexity thresholds, the mobile computing device performs
machine language translation for a first portion of the OCR text and the mobile computing
device transmits a second portion of the OCR text to the server, the first and second
portions of the OCR text collectively forming the entire OCR text.
[0037] In other embodiments, machine language translation results for the first portion
of the OCR text that are obtained by the mobile computing device are output to the
display of the mobile computing device before the machine language translation results
for the second portion of the OCR text are received from the server.
[0038] Another computer-implemented technique is also presented. The technique can include
receiving, at a mobile computing device having one or more processors, an image of
an object comprising a text in a source language. The technique can include determining,
at the mobile computing device, a degree of OCR complexity for performing OCR on the
image to obtain the text. The technique can include transmitting, from the mobile
computing device to a first server, at least a portion of the image based on the degree
of OCR complexity. The technique can include receiving, at the mobile computing device
from the first server, OCR results. The technique can include obtaining, at the mobile
computing device, an OCR text based on the OCR results. The technique can include
determining, at the mobile computing device, a degree of translation complexity for
performing machine language translation of the OCR text from the source language to
a target language. The technique can include transmitting, from the mobile computing
device to a second server, at least a portion of the OCR text based on the degree
of translation complexity. The technique can include receiving, at the mobile computing
device from the second server, machine language translation results. The technique
can include obtaining, at the mobile computing device, a translated OCR text based
on the machine language translation results. The technique can also include outputting,
at a display of the mobile computing device, the translated OCR text.
[0039] In some embodiments, the technique further includes: performing, at the mobile computing
device, OCR for the entire image when the degree of OCR complexity is less than a
first OCR complexity threshold, wherein the first OCR complexity threshold represents
a degree of OCR complexity that the mobile computing device is appropriate for performing
itself, and transmitting, from the mobile computing device to the first server, at
least the portion of the image when the degree of OCR complexity is greater than the
first OCR complexity threshold.
[0040] In other embodiments, the technique further includes: transmitting, from the mobile
computing device to the first server, all of the image when the degree of OCR complexity
is greater than a second OCR complexity threshold that is greater than the first OCR
complexity threshold, wherein the second OCR complexity threshold represents a degree
of OCR complexity that the mobile computing device is not appropriate for performing
itself, and when the degree of OCR complexity is between the first and second OCR
complexity thresholds, the mobile computing device performs OCR for a first portion
of the image and the mobile computing device transmits a second portion of the image
to the first server, the first and second portions of the image collectively forming
the entire image.
[0041] In some embodiments, the technique further incudes: performing, at the mobile computing
device, machine language translation for the entire OCR text when the degree of translation
complexity is less than a first translation complexity threshold, wherein the first
translation complexity threshold represents a degree of translation complexity that
the mobile computing device is appropriate for performing itself, and transmitting,
from the mobile computing device to the second server, at least the portion of the
OCR text when the degree of translation complexity is greater than the first translation
complexity threshold.
[0042] In other embodiments, the technique further includes: transmitting, from the mobile
computing device to the second server, all of the OCR text when the degree of translation
complexity is greater than a second translation complexity threshold that is greater
than the first translation complexity threshold, wherein the second translation complexity
threshold represents a degree of translation complexity that the mobile computing
device is not appropriate for performing itself, and when the degree of translation
complexity is between the first and second translation complexity thresholds, the
mobile computing device performs machine language translation for a first portion
of the OCR text and the mobile computing device transmits a second portion of the
OCR text to the second server, the first and second portions of the OCR text collectively
forming the entire OCR text.
[0043] In some embodiments, the translated OCR text includes first and second portions corresponding
to machine language translation by the mobile computing device and the second server,
respectively, and outputting the translated OCR text at the display of the mobile
computing device includes displaying the first portion of the translated OCR text
while awaiting the second portion of the translated OCR text from the second server,
and subsequently outputting, at the display of the mobile computing device, the first
and second portions of the translated OCR text in response to receiving the second
portion of the translated OCR text from the second server.
[0044] Another computer-implemented technique is also presented. The technique can include
obtaining, at a mobile computing device having one or more processors, a text in a
source language. The technique can include determining, at the mobile computing device,
the source language of the text. The technique can include determining, at the mobile
computing device, a degree of translation complexity for performing machine language
translation of the text from the source language to a target language. The technique
can include transmitting, from the mobile computing device to a server, at least a
portion of the text based on the degree of translation complexity. The technique can
include receiving, at the mobile computing device from the server, machine language
translation results. The technique can include obtaining, at the mobile computing
device, a translated text based on the machine language translation results. The technique
can also include outputting, at a display of the mobile computing device, the translated
text.
[0045] In some embodiments, the technique further includes: performing, at the mobile computing
device, machine language translation for the entire text when the degree of translation
complexity is less than a first translation complexity threshold, and transmitting,
from the mobile computing device to the server, at least the portion of the text when
the degree of translation complexity is greater than the first translation complexity
threshold.
[0046] In other embodiments, the first translation complexity threshold represents a degree
of translation complexity that the mobile computing device is appropriate for performing
itself.
[0047] In some embodiments, the technique further includes transmitting, from the mobile
computing device to the server, all of the text when the degree of translation complexity
is greater than a second translation complexity threshold that is greater than the
first translation complexity threshold.
[0048] In other embodiments, the second translation complexity threshold represents a degree
of translation complexity that the mobile computing device is not appropriate for
performing itself.
[0049] In some embodiments, when the degree of translation complexity is between the first
and second translation complexity thresholds, the mobile computing device performs
machine language translation for a first portion of the text and the mobile computing
device transmits a second portion of the text to the server, the first and second
portions of the text collectively forming the entire text.
[0050] In other embodiments, machine language translation results for the first portion
of the text that are obtained by the mobile computing device are output to the display
of the mobile computing device before the machine language translation results for
the second portion of the text are received from the server.
[0051] Further areas of applicability of the present disclosure will become apparent from
the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed
description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and
are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0052] The present disclosure will become more fully understood from the detailed description
and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of a computing network including an example mobile
computing device according to some implementations of the present disclosure;
FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of the example mobile computing device of FIG.
1;
FIGS. 3A-3C are flow diagrams of example techniques for distributed optical character
recognition (OCR) and/or distributed machine language translation according to some
implementations of the present disclosure; and
FIGS. 4A-4D illustrate an example display of the example mobile computing device at
various stages during execution of the distributed OCR and machine language translation
techniques according to some implementations of the present disclosure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0053] Computer servers may have greater processing power than mobile computing devices
(tablet computers, mobile phones, etc.) and thus they may generate better optical
character recognition (OCR) results and machine language translation results. While
computing servers can typically generate faster and/or more accurate results, obtaining
these results at the mobile computing device can be slower due to network delays associated
with transmitting data. Moreover, in simple/non-complex cases, the mobile computing
device may be capable of generating the same results as a server. For example, an
image may have a small quantity of text and/or very large text. Similarly, for example,
a text for translation may have a small quantity of characters/words/sentences and/or
may be a linguistically simple text.
[0054] Accordingly, techniques are presented for distributed OCR and distributed language
translation. These techniques involve selectively distributing OCR and/or machine
language translation tasks between a mobile computing device and one or more servers
based on degrees of complexity for the respective tasks. The mobile computing device
can receive an image of an object comprising a text in a source language. The mobile
computing device can determine a degree of OCR complexity for obtaining the text from
the image. Based on this degree of OCR complexity, the mobile computing device and/or
a server can perform OCR to obtain an OCR text. The mobile computing device can then
determine a degree of translation complexity for translating the OCR text from the
source language to a target language. Based on this degree of translation complexity,
the mobile computing device and/or a server can perform machine language translation
of the OCR text from the source language to a target language to obtain a translated
OCR text. The mobile computing device can then output the translated OCR text. It
will be appreciated that the distributed OCR techniques and the distributed machine
language translation techniques of the present disclosure can be used individually
(separately) or together. In one example implementation, the distributed OCR techniques
of the present disclosure can be used to obtain an OCR text, and the translated text
can be obtained from the OCR text. In another example implementation, an OCR text
can be obtained from an image, and the distributed machine language translation techniques
of the present disclosure can be performed to obtain a translated text. In other example
implementations, an OCR text can be determined and stored/output using the distributed
OCR techniques of the present disclosure, and/or a translated of an input text can
be determined and stored/output using the distributed machine language translation
techniques of the present disclosure.
[0055] Referring now to FIG. 1, a computing network 100 is illustrated. The computing network
100 includes servers 104a and 104b (collectively "servers 104"). For example, server
104a may be an OCR server and server 104b may be a machine language translation server.
It should be appreciated, however, that the term "server" as used herein can refer
to both a single hardware computer server and a plurality of similar servers operating
in a parallel or distributed architecture. The computing network 100, therefore, may
include a single server 104 that performs both OCR and machine language translation,
or the computing network 100 may include three or more servers that collectively perform
OCR and machine language translation.
[0056] A mobile computing device 108 is configured to communicate with the servers 104 via
a network 112. Examples of the mobile computing device 108 include a laptop computer,
a tablet computer, a mobile phone, and wearable technology, such as a smartwatch,
eyewear, or other wearable objects that incorporate a computing device. It should
be appreciated, however, that the techniques of the present disclosure could be implemented
at any computing device having a display and a camera, e.g., a desktop computer. The
network 112 can include a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), e.g.,
the Internet, or a combination thereof. The mobile computing device 108 can be associated
with a user 116. For example, the user 116 can interact with the mobile computing
device 108 via a display 120, e.g., a touch display.
[0057] The user 116 can use the mobile computing device 108 to interact with an object 124
having a text 128 thereon. The object 124 can be any object suitable to display the
text 128, including, but not limited to, a document, a sign, an advertisement, and
a menu. For example, the user 116 may command the mobile computing device 108 to capture
an image of the object 124 and its text 128 using a camera 212 (see FIG. 2) associated
with the mobile computing device 108. OCR can be performed on the image to detect
the text 128. After obtaining the text 128, the text 128 can then be translated from
its source language to a target language, such as a language understood/spoken by
the user 116.
[0058] Referring now to FIG. 2, a functional block diagram of the example mobile computing
device 108 is illustrated. The mobile computing device 108 can include the display
120, a communication device 200, a processor 204, a memory 208, and the camera 212.
It should be appreciated that the mobile computing device 108 can also include other
suitable components, such as physical buttons, a microphone, and a speaker. The communication
device 200 can include any suitable components (such as a transceiver) that are configured
to communicate with other devices, e.g., the servers 104, via the network 112. The
memory 208 can be any suitable storage medium (flash, hard disk, etc.) configured
to store information at the mobile computing device 108.
[0059] The processor 204 can control operation of the mobile computing device 108. Example
functions performed by the processor 204 include, but are not limited to, controlling
transmission/reception of information via the communication device 200 and controlling
read/write operations at the memory 208. The processor 204 can also process information
received from the camera 212 and output information to the display 120. The camera
212 can be any suitable camera (charge-coupled device (CCD), complimentary metal-oxide-semiconductor
(CMOS), etc.) configured to capture an image of the object 124 and its text 128. In
one implementation, the display 120 is a touch display configured to receive input
from the user 116. The processor 204 can also be configured to execute at least a
portion of the techniques of the present disclosure, which are now discussed in greater
detail.
[0060] The processor 204 can receive an image of the object 124 and its text 128 from the
camera 212. The image can be captured by the camera 212 by the user 116 positioning
the camera 212 and providing an input to capture the image. When OCR on the image
is requested, the processor 204 can determine a degree of OCR complexity for the text
128. For example, the degree of OCR complexity may be determined in response to an
OCR request that is (i) generated in response to an input by the user 116 or (ii)
generated automatically in response to capturing the image with the camera 212. The
degree of OCR complexity is indicative of a degree of difficulty for the processor
204 to perform the OCR itself. Based on the degree of OCR complexity, the processor
204 can determine whether to transmit the image to the server 104a for OCR.
[0061] Example factors in determining the degree of OCR complexity include, but are not
limited to, a resolution of the image, a size of the object 124 and/or its text 128,
a style/font of the text 128, and/or an angle/view at which the image was captured.
More specifically, when the image is captured at an angle, i.e., not straight-on or
straight-forward, the text 128 in the image may be skewed. A high resolution image
may correspond to a lower degree of OCR complexity, whereas a low resolution image
may correspond to a higher degree of OCR complexity. A large, non-styled, and/or basic
font may correspond to a lower degree of OCR complexity, whereas a small, styled,
and/or complex font may correspond to a higher degree of OCR complexity. Little or
no skew may correspond to a lower degree of OCR complexity, whereas highly skewed
text may correspond to a higher degree of OCR complexity.
[0062] As mentioned above, the processor 204 can determine whether to transmit the image
to the server 104a for OCR based on the degree of OCR complexity. For example, the
processor 204 may compare the degree of OCR complexity to one or more OCR complexity
thresholds. The OCR complexity threshold(s) can be predefined or user-defined. In
some cases, the degree of OCR complexity may indicate that the server 104a is appropriate
(or more appropriate than the processor 204) for performing OCR for at least a portion
of the image. In these cases, the processor 204 may transmit at least the portion
of the image to the server 104a. In other cases, the processor 204 may transmit the
entire image to the server 104a for OCR, or may not transmit anything to the server
104a and thus may perform the OCR entirely by itself.
[0063] More specifically, when the degree of OCR complexity is less than a first OCR complexity
threshold, the processor 204 may perform the OCR entirely by itself. When the degree
of OCR complexity is greater than the first OCR complexity threshold and less than
a second OCR complexity threshold, the processor 204 may transmit at least the portion
of the image to the server 104b. When the degree of OCR complexity is greater than
the second OCR complexity threshold, the processor 204 may transmit the entire image
to the server 104b. Further, in some cases, the processor 204 may determine that a
lower resolution version of the image is sufficient for the server 104a and thus the
processor 204 may transmit at least a portion of the lower resolution version of the
image to the server 104a. When at least the portion of the image is transmitted to
the server 104a, the server 104a can return OCR results to the mobile computing device
108.
[0064] The appropriateness of the server 104a and the processor 204 to perform OCR on the
image can refer to an expected level of accuracy and/or efficiency for the server
104a and the processor 204 to perform the OCR, respectively. The processor 204 can
use any suitable OCR algorithms to perform the OCR itself. After obtaining the OCR
results locally and/or from the server 104a, the processor 204 can compile the OCR
results to obtain an OCR text. The OCR text represents OCR results for the object
124 having the text 128 thereon. Depending on the quality of the OCR results, the
OCR text may be the same as the text 128 or different than the text 128. The processor
204 can determine a source language of the OCR text.
[0065] Once the OCR text is obtained, the processor 204 can determine the source language
of the OCR text. When the processor 204 is not confident in its determination of the
source language, the processor 204 may send the OCR text to the server 104b for this
determination and, if requested, for machine language translation as well. When machine
language translation of the OCR text is requested, the OCR text can be translated
from its source language to a target language. For example, the OCR text can be translated
in response to a translation request that is (i) generated in response to an input
from the user 116 or (ii) generated automatically in response to determining that
the source language is not one or one or more languages preferred by the user 116.
In response to this translation request, the processor 204 can determine a degree
of translation complexity for translating the OCR text from the source language to
the target language. The degree of translation complexity is indicative of a degree
of difficulty for the processor 204 to perform machine language translation of the
OCR text itself.
[0066] Example factors in determining the degree of translation complexity include, but
are not limited to, complexities of the source language and/or the target language
and a number of characters, words, and/or sentences in the OCR text. Less complex
(simple), more common, and/or more utilized languages may correspond to a higher degree
of translation complexity, whereas more complex, less common, and/or less utilized
languages may correspond to a higher degree of translation complexity. Fewer characters,
words, and/or sentences may correspond to a lower degree of translation complexity,
whereas more characters, words, and/or sentences may correspond to a higher degree
of translation complexity. For example only, English may have a low degree of translation
complexity and Russian may have a high degree of translation complexity.
[0067] Based on the degree of translation complexity, the processor 204 can determine whether
to transmit the OCR text to the server 104b for machine language translation. For
example, the processor 204 may compare the degree of translation complexity to one
or more translation complexity thresholds. The translation complexity threshold(s)
can be predefined or user-defined. The mobile computing device 108 may also have local
language packs, e.g., stored at the memory 208, and these local language packs may
contain information that can be used by the processor 204 in performing machine language
translation itself. The presence and type of these local language packs, therefore,
may affect the translation complexity threshold(s). In some cases, the degree of translation
complexity may indicate that the server 104b is appropriate (or more appropriate than
the processor 204) for performing machine language translation for at least a portion
of the OCR text.
[0068] In these cases, the processor 204 may transmit at least the portion of the OCR text
to the server 104b. In other cases, the processor 204 may transmit the entire OCR
text to the server 104b for OCR, or may not transmit anything to the server 104b and
thus may perform the machine language translation entirely by itself. More specifically,
when the degree of translation complexity is less than a first translation complexity
threshold, the processor 204 may perform the machine language translation entirely
by itself. When the degree of translation complexity is greater than the first translation
complexity threshold and less than a second translation complexity threshold, the
processor 204 may transmit at least the portion of the OCR text to the server 104b.
When the degree of translation complexity is greater than the second translation complexity
threshold, the processor 204 may transmit the entire OCR text to the server 104b.
[0069] The processor 204 can use any suitable machine translation algorithms to perform
the machine language translation itself. After obtaining the machine language translation
results locally and/or from the server 104b, the processor 204 can compile the machine
language translation results to obtain a translated text. The translated text represents
machine language translation results for the OCR text. Depending on the quality of
the machine language translation results, the translated text may or may not be an
accurate translation of the OCR text from the source language to the target language.
Similarly, depending on the quality of the OCR results as discussed above, the translated
text may or may not be an accurate translation of the text 128 of the object 124 from
the source language to the target language. After obtaining the translated text, the
processor 204 can output the translated text. For example, the processor 204 can output
the translated text to the display 120.
[0070] Referring now to FIG. 3A, a flow diagram of an example technique 300 for distributed
OCR and distributed machine language translation is illustrated. At 304, the mobile
computing device 108 can receive an image of the object 124 comprising the text 128
in a source language. At 308, the mobile computing device 108 can determine the degree
of OCR complexity for performing OCR on the image to obtain the text 128. At 312,
the mobile computing device 108 can compare the degree of OCR complexity to the first
and second OCR complexity thresholds. When the degree of OCR complexity is less than
the first OCR complexity threshold, the processor 204 can perform OCR on the image
entirely by itself at 316 and then proceed to 332.
[0071] When the degree of OCR complexity is between the first and second OCR complexity
thresholds, the mobile computing device 108 can transmit a portion of the image to
the server 104a for OCR at 320 and then proceed to 328. When the degree of OCR complexity
is greater than the second OCR complexity threshold, the mobile computing device 108
can transmit the entire image to the server 104a for OCR at 324 and then proceed to
328. At 328, the mobile computing device 108 can receive OCR results from the server
104a and obtain the OCR text. At 332, the mobile computing device 108 can determine
the source language of the OCR text. In some implementations, the mobile computing
device 108 may transmit at least a portion the OCR text to the server 104b to determine
the source language.
[0072] At 336, the mobile computing device 108 can determine a degree of translation complexity
for translating the OCR text from the source language to a target language. At 340,
the mobile computing device 108 can compare the degree of translation complexity to
the first and second translation complexity thresholds. When the degree of translation
complexity is less than the first translation complexity threshold, the mobile computing
device 108 can perform machine language translation of the OCR text entirely by itself
at 344 and then proceed to 360. When the degree of translation complexity is between
the first and second translation complexity thresholds, the mobile computing device
108 can transmit a portion of the OCR text to the server 104b for machine language
translation at 348 and then proceed to 356.
[0073] When the degree of translation complexity is greater than the second translation
complexity threshold, the mobile computing device 108 can transmit the entire OCR
text to the server 104b for machine language translation at 352 and then proceed to
356. At 356, the mobile computing device 108 can receive the machine language translation
results from the server 104b and obtain the translated OCR text. At 360, the mobile
computing device 108 can output the translated OCR text at the display 120. In some
implementations, outputting the translated OCR text at the display includes outputting
a portion of the translated OCR text obtained by the mobile computing device before
outputting another portion of the OCR text obtained from the server 104b. The technique
300 can then end or return to 304 for one or more additional cycles.
[0074] Referring now to FIG. 3B, an example technique 370 for distributed OCR is presented.
At 371, the mobile computing device 104 can receive an image of the object 124 comprising
the text 128 in the source language. At 372, the mobile computing device 108 can determine
the degree of OCR complexity for performing OCR on the image to obtain the text 128.
At 373, the mobile computing device 108 can transmit at least a portion of the image
to the server 104a based on the degree of OCR complexity. At 374, the mobile computing
device 108 can receive OCR results from the server 104a. At 375, the mobile computing
device 108 can obtain an OCR text using the OCR results. At 376, the mobile computing
device 108 can obtain a machine language translation of the OCR text from the source
language to a target language to obtain a translated OCR text. At 377, the mobile
computing device 108 can output the translated OCR text. The technique 370 can then
end or return to 371 for one or more additional cycles.
[0075] Referring now to FIG. 3C, an example technique 380 for distributed machine language
translation is presented. At 381, the mobile computing device 108 can receive an image
of the object 124 comprising the text 128 in the source language. At 382, the mobile
computing device 108 can obtain an OCR text from the image. At 383, the mobile computing
device 108 can determine the source language of the OCR text. In some implementations,
the mobile computing device 108 can transmit at least a portion of the OCR text to
the server 104b to determine the source language. At 384, the mobile computing device
108 can determine a degree of translation complexity for performing machine language
translation of the OCR text from the source language to a target language. At 385,
the mobile computing device 108 can transmit at least a portion of the OCR text to
the server 104b based on the degree of translation complexity. At 386, the mobile
computing device 108 can receive machine language translation results from the server
104b. At 387, the mobile computing device 108 can obtain a translation of the OCR
text from the source language to the target language based on the machine language
translation results to obtain a translated OCR text. At 388, the mobile computing
device 108 can output the translated OCR text. The technique 380 can then end or return
to 381 for one or more additional cycles.
[0076] Referring now to FIGS. 4A-4B, the display 120 of the example mobile computing device
108 at various stages during execution of the distributed OCR and machine language
translation techniques is illustrated. FIG. 4A illustrates an image of the object
124, which for purposes of FIGS. 4A-4B is a menu in French. The menu includes header/title
text 404 ("La Menu") that is larger than other text 408. As previously discussed herein,
the degree of OCR complexity can vary depending on text size, text style (bold, italics,
etc.), and other similar factors. In this example, the mobile computing device 108
performs OCR for the header/title text 404 and the server 104a performs OCR for the
other text 408. More specifically, the mobile computing device 108 performs OCR for
a first portion 412 containing the header/title text 404 and the server 104a performs
OCR for a second portion 416 containing the other text 408.
[0077] FIG. 4B illustrates the results of the distributed OCR. The mobile computing device
108 obtained a header/title OCR text 420 from the first portion 412 and the server
104a obtained and provided another OCR text 424. These OCR texts 420, 424 collectively
represent the OCR text for the image. In some implementations, the OCR texts 420,
424 can be italicized or otherwise accented, e.g., outlined or bordered, to indicate
that OCR is complete and/or machine language translation has not yet been performed.
For example, the local OCR may be completed first and thus the header/title OCR text
420 may be accented before the other OCR text 424. In this example, the user 116 is
an English speaking user that cannot read or understand French, so he/she requests
machine language translation. This could be performed automatically, e.g., based on
their language preferences, or in response to an input from the user 116, e.g., selecting
an icon, such as the camera button, or by pushing a physical button.
[0078] FIG. 4C illustrates the results of the local machine language translation from French
to English. In this example, the mobile computing device 108 has a French-English
local language pack, e.g., stored at the memory 208, and thus the mobile computing
device 108 is capable of some French to English machine language translation. More
specifically, the mobile computing device 108 is appropriate for performing machine
language translation of a first portion 428 of the OCR text to obtain a first translated
OCR text 432. This first portion 428 of the OCR text may include easy/simple words
for French to English machine language translation. The mobile computing device 108,
however, may be incapable of, inaccurate in, or inefficient in performing machine
language translation on a second portion 436 of the OCR text. More specifically, this
second portion 436 of the OCR text includes a word 440 (Escargots) that the mobile
computing device 108 is not appropriate for performing OCR.
[0079] Because the degree of translation complexity being too high, e.g., because the word
440 is not in the local language pack, the mobile computing device 108 can determine
that the second portion 436 of the OCR text should be sent to the server 104b for
machine language translation. In some implementations, the styling/accenting of the
text can be removed once machine language translation is complete to notify the user
116. As shown in FIG. 4C, the first translated OCR text 432 has no styling or accenting.
Lastly, FIG. 4D illustrates the results of the distributed machine language translation
from French to English. The server 104b has obtained and provided a second translated
OCR text 444. The first translated OCR text 432 and the second translated OCR text
444 collectively represent the translated OCR text for the image. In response to receiving
the second translated OCR text 444 from the server 104b, the mobile computing device
108 displays the second translated OCR text 444. For example, the mobile computing
device 108 may overlay and/or fade from the word 440 to the second translated OCR
text 444.
[0080] Example embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough, and will
fully convey the scope to those who are skilled in the art. Numerous specific details
are set forth such as examples of specific components, devices, and methods, to provide
a thorough understanding of embodiments of the present disclosure. It will be apparent
to those skilled in the art that specific details need not be employed, that example
embodiments may be embodied in many different forms and that neither should be construed
to limit the scope of the disclosure. In some example embodiments, well-known procedures,
well-known device structures, and well-known technologies are not described in detail.
[0081] The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular example embodiments
only and is not intended to be limiting. As used herein, the singular forms "a," "an,"
and "the" may be intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context
clearly indicates otherwise. The term "and/or" includes any and all combinations of
one or more of the associated listed items. The terms "comprises," "comprising," "including,"
and "having," are inclusive and therefore specify the presence of stated features,
integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the
presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements,
components, and/or groups thereof. The method steps, processes, and operations described
herein are not to be construed as necessarily requiring their performance in the particular
order discussed or illustrated, unless specifically identified as an order of performance.
It is also to be understood that additional or alternative steps may be employed.
[0082] Although the terms first, second, third, etc. may be used herein to describe various
elements, components, regions, layers and/or sections, these elements, components,
regions, layers and/or sections should not be limited by these terms. These terms
may be only used to distinguish one element, component, region, layer or section from
another region, layer or section. Terms such as "first," "second," and other numerical
terms when used herein do not imply a sequence or order unless clearly indicated by
the context. Thus, a first element, component, region, layer or section discussed
below could be termed a second element, component, region, layer or section without
departing from the teachings of the example embodiments.
[0083] As used herein, the term module may refer to, be part of, or include: an Application
Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC); an electronic circuit; a combinational logic circuit;
a field programmable gate array (FPGA); a processor or a distributed network of processors
(shared, dedicated, or grouped) and storage in networked clusters or datacenters that
executes code or a process; other suitable components that provide the described functionality;
or a combination of some or all of the above, such as in a system-on-chip. The term
module may also include memory (shared, dedicated, or grouped) that stores code executed
by the one or more processors.
[0084] The term code, as used above, may include software, firmware, byte-code and/or microcode,
and may refer to programs, routines, functions, classes, and/or objects. The term
shared, as used above, means that some or all code from multiple modules may be executed
using a single (shared) processor. In addition, some or all code from multiple modules
may be stored by a single (shared) memory. The term group, as used above, means that
some or all code from a single module may be executed using a group of processors.
In addition, some or all code from a single module may be stored using a group of
memories.
[0085] The techniques described herein may be implemented by one or more computer programs
executed by one or more processors. The computer programs include processor-executable
instructions that are stored on a non-transitory tangible computer readable medium.
The computer programs may also include stored data. Non-limiting examples of the non-transitory
tangible computer readable medium are nonvolatile memory, magnetic storage, and optical
storage.
[0086] Some portions of the above description present the techniques described herein in
terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on information. These
algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in
the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to
others skilled in the art. These operations, while described functionally or logically,
are understood to be implemented by computer programs. Furthermore, it has also proven
convenient at times to refer to these arrangements of operations as modules or by
functional names, without loss of generality.
[0087] Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the above discussion, it is
appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as "processing"
or "computing" or "calculating" or "determining" or "displaying" or the like, refer
to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing
device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic)
quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information
storage, transmission or display devices.
[0088] Certain aspects of the described techniques include process steps and instructions
described herein in the form of an algorithm. It should be noted that the described
process steps and instructions could be embodied in software, firmware or hardware,
and when embodied in software, could be downloaded to reside on and be operated from
different platforms used by real time network operating systems.
[0089] The present disclosure also relates to an apparatus for performing the operations
herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or
it may comprise a general-purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by
a computer program stored on a computer readable medium that can be accessed by the
computer. Such a computer program may be stored in a tangible computer readable storage
medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical
disks, CD-ROMs, magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories
(RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, application specific integrated
circuits (ASICs), or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions,
and each coupled to a computer system bus. Furthermore, the computers referred to
in the specification may include a single processor or may be architectures employing
multiple processor designs for increased computing capability.
[0090] The algorithms and operations presented herein are not inherently related to any
particular computer or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may also be
used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient
to construct more specialized apparatuses to perform the required method steps. The
required structure for a variety of these systems will be apparent to those of skill
in the art, along with equivalent variations. In addition, the present disclosure
is not described with reference to any particular programming language. It is appreciated
that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the teachings of
the present disclosure as described herein, and any references to specific languages
are provided for disclosure of enablement and best mode of the present invention.
[0091] The present disclosure is well suited to a wide variety of computer network systems
over numerous topologies. Within this field, the configuration and management of large
networks comprise storage devices and computers that are communicatively coupled to
dissimilar computers and storage devices over a network, such as the Internet.
[0092] The foregoing description of the embodiments has been provided for purposes of illustration
and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure. Individual
elements or features of a particular embodiment are generally not limited to that
particular embodiment, but, where applicable, are interchangeable and can be used
in a selected embodiment, even if not specifically shown or described. The same may
also be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure
from the disclosure, and all such modifications are intended to be included within
the scope of the disclosure.
1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:
receiving, at a mobile computing device having one or more processors, an image of
an object comprising a text in a source language;
obtaining, at the mobile computing device, optical character recognition (OCR) results
for the object and the text to obtain an OCR text;
determining, at the mobile computing device, the source language of the OCR text;
determining, at the mobile computing device, a degree of translation complexity for
performing machine language translation of the OCR text from the source language to
a target language;
transmitting, from the mobile computing device to a server, at least a portion of
the OCR text based on the degree of translation complexity;
receiving, at the mobile computing device from the server, machine language translation
results;
obtaining, at the mobile computing device, a translated OCR text based on the machine
language translation results; and
outputting, at a display of the mobile computing device, the translated OCR text.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising:
performing, at the mobile computing device, machine language translation for the entire
OCR text when the degree of translation complexity is less than a first translation
complexity threshold; and
transmitting, from the mobile computing device to the server, at least the portion
of the OCR text when the degree of translation complexity is greater than the first
translation complexity threshold.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2, wherein the first translation complexity
threshold represents a degree of translation complexity that the mobile computing
device is appropriate for performing itself.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 or 3, further comprising transmitting,
from the mobile computing device to the server, all of the OCR text when the degree
of translation complexity is greater than a second translation complexity threshold
that is greater than the first translation complexity threshold.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4, wherein the second translation complexity
threshold represents a degree of translation complexity that the mobile computing
device is not appropriate for performing itself.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 or 5, wherein when the degree of translation
complexity is between the first and second translation complexity thresholds, the
mobile computing device performs machine language translation for a first portion
of the OCR text and the mobile computing device transmits a second portion of the
OCR text to the server, the first and second portions of the OCR text collectively
forming the entire OCR text.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 4, 5 or 6, wherein machine language translation
results for the first portion of the OCR text that are obtained by the mobile computing
device are output to the display of the mobile computing device before the machine
language translation results for the second portion of the OCR text are received from
the server.
8. A computer-implemented method, comprising:
obtaining, at a mobile computing device having one or more processors, a text in a
source language;
determining, at the mobile computing device, the source language of the text;
determining, at the mobile computing device, a degree of translation complexity for
performing machine language translation of the text from the source language to a
target language;
transmitting, from the mobile computing device to a server, at least a portion of
the text based on the degree of translation complexity;
receiving, at the mobile computing device from the server, machine language translation
results;
obtaining, at the mobile computing device, a translated text based on the machine
language translation results; and
outputting, at a display of the mobile computing device, the translated text.
9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8, further comprising:
performing, at the mobile computing device, machine language translation for the entire
text when the degree of translation complexity is less than a first translation complexity
threshold; and
transmitting, from the mobile computing device to the server, at least the portion
of the text when the degree of translation complexity is greater than the first translation
complexity threshold.
10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9, wherein the first translation complexity
threshold represents a degree of translation complexity that the mobile computing
device is appropriate for performing itself.
11. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 or 10, further comprising transmitting,
from the mobile computing device to the server, all of the text when the degree of
translation complexity is greater than a second translation complexity threshold that
is greater than the first translation complexity threshold.
12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, wherein the second translation complexity
threshold represents a degree of translation complexity that the mobile computing
device is not appropriate for performing itself.
13. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, wherein when the degree of translation
complexity is between the first and second translation complexity thresholds, the
mobile computing device performs machine language translation for a first portion
of the text and the mobile computing device transmits a second portion of the text
to the server, the first and second portions of the text collectively forming the
entire text.
14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13, wherein machine language translation
results for the first portion of the text that are obtained by the mobile computing
device are output to the display of the mobile computing device before the machine
language translation results for the second portion of the text are received from
the server.