TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] This disclosure relates to a high-strength steel sheet with excellent formability
which is mainly suitable for automobile structural members and a method for manufacturing
the same, and in particular, to provision of a high-strength steel sheet with high
productivity that has a tensile strength (TS) of 780 MPa or more and that is excellent
in ductility as well as in stretch flangeability and fatigue properties.
BACKGROUND
[0002] In order to secure passenger safety upon collision and to improve fuel efficiency
by reducing the weight of automotive bodies, high-strength steel sheets reduced in
thickness and having a tensile strength (TS) of 780 MPa or more have been increasingly
applied to automobile structural members. Further, in recent years, examination has
been made of applications of ultra-high-strength steel sheets with 980 MPa and 1180
MPa grade TS.
[0003] In general, however, strengthening of steel sheets leads to deterioration in formability.
It is thus difficult to achieve both increased strength and excellent formability.
Therefore, it is desirable to develop steel sheets with increased strength and excellent
formability.
It is also desirable for steel sheets to have excellent fatigue properties since the
travelable distance (total running distance) of automobiles depends on the fatigue
strength of steel sheets applied to the automobile structural members.
[0004] To meet these demands, for example,
JP2004218025A (PTL 1) describes "a high-strength steel sheet with excellent workability and shape
fixability comprising: a chemical composition containing, in mass%, C: 0.06 % to 0.6
%, Si + Al: 0.5 % to 3 %, Mn: 0.5 % to 3 %, P: 0.15 % or less (exclusive of 0 %),
and S: 0.02 % or less (inclusive of 0 %); and a structure that contains tempered martensite:
15 % or more by area to the entire structure, ferrite: 5 % to 60 % by area to the
entire structure, and retained austenite: 5 % or more by volume to the entire structure,
and that may contain bainite and/or martensite, wherein a ratio of the retained austenite
transforming to martensite upon application of a 2 % strain is 20 % to 50 %.
[0005] JP2011195956A (PTL 2) describes "a high-strength thin steel sheet with excellent elongation and
hole expansion formability, comprising: a chemical composition containing, in mass%,
C : 0.05 % or more and 0.35 % or less, Si: 0.05 % or more and 2.0 % or less, Mn: 0.8
% or more and 3.0 % or less, P : 0.0010 % or more and 0.1 % or less, S : 0.0005 %
or more and 0.05 % or less, N : 0.0010 % or more and 0.010 % or less, and Al: 0.01
% or more and 2.0 % or less, and the balance consisting of iron and incidental impurities;
and a metallographic structure that includes a dominant phase of ferrite, bainite,
or tempered martensite, and a retained austenite phase in an amount of 3 % or more
and 30 % or less, wherein at a phase interface at which the austenite phase comes
in contact with the ferrite phase, bainite phase, and martensite phase, a mean carbon
concentration in the austenite phase is 0.6 % or more and 1.2 % or less, and austenite
grains that satisfy Cgb/Cgc > 1.3 are present in the austenite phase in an amount
of 50 % or more, where Cgc is a central carbon concentration and Cgb is a carbon concentration
at grain boundaries of austenite grains.
[0006] JP201090475A (PTL 3) describes "a high-strength steel sheet comprising a chemical composition
containing, in mass%, C : 0.17 % or more and 0.73 % or less, Si: 3.0 % or less, Mn:
0.5 % or more and 3.0 % or less, P: 0.1 % or less, S: 0.07 % or less, Al: 3.0 % or
less, and N: 0.010 % or less, where Si + Al is 0.7 % or more, and the balance consisting
of Fe and incidental impurities; and a structure that contains martensite: 10 % or
more and 90 % or less by area to the entire steel sheet structure, retained austenite
content: 5 % or more and 50 % or less, and bainitic ferrite in upper bainite: 5 %
or more by area to the entire steel sheet structure, wherein the steel sheet satisfies
conditions that 25 % or more of the martensite is tempered martensite, a total of
the area ratio of the martensite to the entire steel sheet structure, the retained
austenite content, and the area ratio of the bainitic ferrite in upper bainite to
the entire steel sheet structure is 65 % or more, and an area ratio of polygonal ferrite
to the entire steel sheet structure is 10 % or less (inclusive of 0 %), and wherein
the steel sheet has a mean carbon concentration of 0.70 % or more in the retained
austenite and has a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more.
[0007] JP2008174802A (PTL 4) describes "a high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet with a high yield ratio
and having a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more, the steel sheet comprising, on average,
a chemical composition that contains, by mass%, C : more than 0.06 % and 0.24 % or
less, Si ≤ 0.3 %, Mn: 0.5 % to 2.0 %, P ≤ 0.06 %, S ≤ 0.005 %, Al ≤ 0.06 %, N ≤ 0.006
%, Mo: 0.05 % to 0.5 %, Ti: 0.03 % to 0.2 %, and V: more than 0.15 % and 1.2 % or
less, and the balance consisting of Fe and incidental impurities, wherein the contents
of C, Ti, Mo, and V satisfy 0.8 ≤ (C/12)/{(Ti/48) + (Mo/96) + (V/51)} ≤ 1.5, and wherein
an area ratio of ferrite phase is 95 % or more, and carbides containing Ti, Mo, and
V with a mean grain size of less than 10 nm are diffused and precipitated, where Ti,
Mo, and V contents represented by atomic percentage satisfy V/(Ti + Mo + V) ≥ 0.3.
[0008] JP2010275627A (PTL 5) describes "a high-strength steel sheet with excellent workability comprising
a chemical composition containing C : 0.05 mass% to 0.3 mass%, Si: 0.01 mass% to 2.5
mass%, Mn: 0.5 mass% to 3.5 mass%, P: 0.003 mass% to 0.100 mass%, S: 0.02 mass% or
less, and Al: 0.010 mass% to 1.5 mass%, where a total of the Si and Al contents is
0.5 mass% to 3.0 mass%, and the balance consisting of Fe and incidental impurities;
and a metallic structure that contains, by area, ferrite: 20 % or more, tempered martensite:
10 % to 60 %, and martensite: 0 % to 10 %, and that contains, by volume, retained
austenite: 3 % to 10 %, where a ratio (m)/(f) of a Vickers hardness (m) of the tempered
martensite to a Vickers hardness (f) of the ferrite is 3.0 or less.
[0009] JP4268079B (PTL 6) describes "an ultra-high-strength steel sheet exhibiting an excellent elongation
in an ultra-high-strength range with a tensile strength of 1180 MPa or more, and having
excellent hydrogen embrittlement resistance, the steel sheet comprising a chemical
composition containing, in mass%, C : 0.06 % to 0.6 %, Si + Al: 0.5 % to 3 %, Mn:
0.5 % to 3 %, P : 0.15 % or less (exclusive of 0 %), S: 0.02 % or less (inclusive
of 0 %), and the balance: Fe and incidental impurities; and a structure that contains
tempered martensite: 15 % to 60 % by area to the entire structure, ferrite: 5 % to
50 % by area to the entire structure, retained austenite: 5 % or more by area to the
entire structure, and massive martensite with an aspect ratio of 3 or less: 15 % to
45 %, where an area ratio of fine martensite having a mean grain size of 5 µm or less
in the massive martensite is 30 % or more.
[0010] PTL 6 also describes a method for manufacturing the ultra-high-strength steel sheet
comprising: heating and retaining a steel satisfying the aforementioned composition
at a temperature from A
3 to 1100 °C for 10 s or more, and then cooling the steel at a mean cooling rate of
30 °C/s or higher to a temperature at or below Ms, and repeating this cycle at least
twice; and heating and retaining the steel at a temperature from (A
3 - 25 °C) to A
3 for 120 s to 600 s, and then cooling the steel at a mean cooling rate of 3 °C/s or
higher to a temperature at or above Ms and at or below Bs, at which the steel is retained
for at least one second.
CITATION LIST
Patent Literature
SUMMARY
(Technical Problem)
[0012] In fact, PTL 1 teaches the high-strength steel sheet has excellent workability and
shape fixability, PTL 2 teaches the high-strength thin steel sheet has excellent elongation
and hole expansion formability, PTL 3 teaches the high-strength steel sheet has excellent
workability, in particular, excellent ductility and stretch flangeability. None of
them however takes into account fatigue properties.
[0013] The high-strength cold-rolled steel sheet with a high yield ratio described in PTL
4 uses expensive elements, Mo and V, which results in increased costs and a low elongation
(EL), which is as low as approximately 19 %.
[0014] The high-strength steel sheet described in PTL 5 exhibits, for example, TS of 980
MPa or more and TS x EL of approximately 24000 MPa·%, which remain, although may be
relatively high when compared to general-use material, insufficient to meet the ongoing
requirements for steel sheets.
[0015] The ultra-high tensile-strength steel sheet described in PTL 6 requires performing
annealing treatment at least three times during its manufacture, resulting in low
productivity in actual facilities.
[0016] It could thus be helpful to provide a method that can manufacture a high-strength
steel sheet with high productivity that has a tensile strength (TS) of 780 MPa or
more and that is excellent not only in ductility but also in stretch flangeability
and fatigue properties, by performing a single annealing treatment at a ferrite-austenite
dual phase region to form a fine structure that contains appropriate amounts of ferrite,
bainitic ferrite, and retained austenite, and performing reheating following the annealing
treatment so that an appropriate amount of tempered martensite is present in the structure.
It could also be helpful to provide a high-strength steel sheet manufactured by the
method.
As used herein, the term "high-strength steel sheet" is intended to include high-strength
galvanized steel sheets having a galvanized surface.
[0017] A steel sheet obtained according to the disclosure has the following target properties:
- Tensile strength (TS)
780 MPa or more
- Ductility
TS 780 MPa grade: EL ≥ 34 %
TS 980 MPa grade: EL ≥ 27 %
TS 1180 MPa grade: EL ≥ 23 %
- Balance between strength and ductility
TS x EL ≥ 27000 MPa·%
- Stretch flangeability
TS 780 MPa grade: λ ≥ 40 %
TS 980 MPa grade: λ ≥ 30 %
TS 1180 MPa grade: λ ≥ 20 %

where Df is the hole diameter (mm) upon cracking and D0 is the initial hole diameter (mm).
- Fatigue property
fatigue limit strength ≥ 400 MPa, and fatigue ratio ≥ 0.40
As used herein, the term "fatigue ratio" means a ratio of fatigue limit strength to
tensile strength.
(Solution to Problem)
[0018] Upon carefully examining how to manufacture a steel sheet having TS of 780 MPa or
more and excellent in ductility, stretch flangeability, and fatigue properties with
high productivity, we discovered the following.
[0019]
- (1) To obtain a steel sheet having a tensile strength (TS) of 780 MPa or more and
excellent in ductility, stretch flangeability, and fatigue properties, it is important
to prepare an appropriate chemical composition and to form a structure that contains
appropriate amounts of ferrite, bainitic ferrite, and retained austenite, and in which
fine retained austenite and fine bainitic ferrite are distributed.
- (2) In addition, to form such a structure, it is important to provide the steel sheet
with a structure prior to annealing treatment in which a single phase structure of
martensite, a single phase structure of bainite, or a martensite-bainite mixed structure
is dominantly present, while controlling annealing treatment conditions properly.
In this respect, in order for the steel sheet to have such a pre-annealing structure
without subjection to separate annealing treatment, it is important to perform appropriate
slab reheating and optimize hot rolling conditions, in particular, to keep the mean
coiling temperature (CT) following hot rolling low.
- (3) Moreover, when cold rolling is performed after hot rolling, it is important to
set a low rolling reduction such that the resulting structure of the hot-rolled steel
sheet in which a single phase structure of martensite, a single phase structure of
bainite, or a martensite-bainite mixed phase structure is dominantly present will
remain intact as much as possible.
- (4) Additionally, to improve stretch flangeability, it is important for the structure
to contain an appropriate amount of tempered martensite and, to this end, it is of
importance to keep the cooling stop temperature after annealing low and perform subsequent
reheating treatment under proper conditions.
The disclosure is based on the aforementioned discoveries and further studies.
[0020] Specifically, the primary features of this disclosure are as described below.
- 1. A method for manufacturing a high-strength steel sheet, the method comprising:
preparing a steel slab containing (consisting of), in mass%, C: 0.10 % or more and
0.35 % or less, Si: 0.50 % or more and 2.50 % or less, Mn: 2.00 % or more and less
than 3.50 %, P: 0.001 % or more and 0.100 % or less, S: 0.0001 % or more and 0.0200
% or less, and N: 0.0005 % or more and 0.0100 % or less, and the balance consisting
of Fe and incidental impurities; subjecting the steel slab to hot rolling by heating
the steel slab to a temperature of 1100 °C or higher and 1300 °C or lower, hot rolling
the steel slab with a finisher delivery temperature of 800 °C or higher and 1000 °C
or lower to form a hot-rolled steel sheet, and coiling the hot-rolled steel sheet
at a mean coiling temperature of 200 °C or higher and 500 °C or lower; subjecting
the hot-rolled steel sheet to pickling treatment; subjecting the hot-rolled steel
sheet to annealing by retaining the hot-rolled steel sheet at a temperature of 740
°C or higher and 840 °C or lower for 10 s or more and 900 s or less, and then cooling
the hot-rolled steel sheet at a mean cooling rate of 5 °C/s or higher and 30 °C/s
or lower to a cooling stop temperature of 150 °C or higher and 350 °C or lower; and
subjecting the hot-rolled steel sheet to reheating treatment by reheating the hot-rolled
steel sheet to a reheating temperature of higher than 350 °C and 550 °C or lower,
and retaining the hot-rolled steel sheet at the reheating temperature for 10 s or
more.
- 2. The method for manufacturing a high-strength steel sheet according to 1., the method
further comprising prior to the annealing, cold rolling the hot-rolled steel sheet
at a rolling reduction of less than 30 % to form a cold-rolled steel sheet, wherein
in the annealing, the cold-rolled steel sheet is retained at a temperature of 740
°C or higher and 840 °C or lower for 10 s or more and 900 s or less, and cooled at
a mean cooling rate of 5 °C/s or higher and 30 °C/s or lower to a cooling stop temperature
of 150 °C or higher and 350 °C or lower, and in the reheating treatment, the cold-rolled
steel sheet is reheated to a reheating temperature of higher than 350 °C and 550 °C
or lower and retained at the reheating temperature for 10 s or more.
- 3. The method for manufacturing a high-strength steel sheet according to 1. or 2.,
the method further comprising after the reheating treatment, subjecting the hot-rolled
steel sheet or the cold-rolled steel sheet to galvanizing treatment.
- 4. The method for manufacturing a high-strength steel sheet according to any of 1.
to 3., wherein the steel slab further contains, in mass%, at least one element selected
from the group consisting of Ti: 0.005 % or more and 0.100 % or less and B: 0.0001
% or more and 0.0050 % or less.
- 5. The method for manufacturing a high-strength steel sheet according to any of 1.
to 4., wherein the steel slab further contains, in mass%, at least one element selected
from the group consisting of Al: 0.01 % or more and 1.00 % or less, Nb: 0.005 % or
more and 0.100 % or less, Cr: 0.05 % or more and 1.00 % or less, Cu: 0.05 % or more
and 1.00 % or less, Sb: 0.002 % or more and 0.200 % or less, Sn: 0.002 % or more and
0.200 % or less, Ta: 0.001 % or more and 0.100 % or less, Ca: 0.0005 % or more and
0.0050 % or less, Mg: 0.0005 % or more and 0.0050 % or less, and REM: 0.0005 % or
more and 0.0050 % or less.
- 6. A high-strength steel sheet comprising: a steel chemical composition containing
(consisting of), in mass%, C: 0.10 % or more and 0.35 % or less, Si: 0.50 % or more
and 2.50 % or less, Mn: 2.00 % or more and less than 3.50 %, P: 0.001 % or more and
0.100 % or less, S: 0.0001 % or more and 0.0200 % or less, and N: 0.0005 % or more
and 0.0100 % or less, and the balance consisting of Fe and incidental impurities;
and a steel structure that contains a total of 30 % or more and 75 % or less by area
of ferrite and bainitic ferrite, 5 % or more and 15 % or less by area of tempered
martensite, and 8 % or more by volume of retained austenite, wherein the retained
austenite has a mean grain size of 2 µm or less and the bainitic ferrite has a mean
free path of 3 µm or less.
- 7. The high-strength steel sheet according to 6., wherein the steel chemical composition
further contains, in mass%, at least one element selected from the group consisting
of Ti: 0.005 % or more and 0.100 % or less and B: 0.0001 % or more and 0.0050 % or
less.
- 8. The high-strength steel sheet according to 6. or 7., wherein the steel chemical
composition further contains, in mass%, at least one element selected from the group
consisting of Al: 0.01 % or more and 1.00 % or less, Nb: 0.005 % or more and 0.100
% or less, Cr: 0.05 % or more and 1.00 % or less, Cu: 0.05 % or more and 1.00 % or
less, Sb: 0.002 % or more and 0.200 % or less, Sn: 0.002 % or more and 0.200 % or
less, Ta: 0.001 % or more and 0.100 % or less, Ca: 0.0005 % or more and 0.0050 % or
less, Mg: 0.0005 % or more and 0.0050 % or less, and REM: 0.0005 % or more and 0.0050
% or less.
(Advantageous Effect)
[0021] According to the disclosure, it becomes possible to manufacture a high-strength steel
sheet having a tensile strength (TS) of 780 MPa or more and excellent in ductility,
stretch flangeability, and fatigue properties with high productivity.
Also, a high-strength steel sheet manufactured by the method according to the disclosure
is highly beneficial in industrial terms, because it can improve fuel efficiency when
applied to, e.g., automobile structural members by a reduction in the weight of automotive
bodies.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0022] The present invention will be specifically described below. According to the method
disclosed herein, a steel slab with a predetermined chemical composition is heated
and hot rolled. At this point, it is important to keep the mean coiling temperature
(CT) during hot rolling low so that the hot-rolled steel sheet is provided with a
structure in which a single phase structure of martensite, a single phase structure
of bainite, or a martensite-bainite mixed structure is dominantly present.
It is also important when cold rolling is performed after hot rolling to set as low
a rolling reduction as possible so that the resulting structure of the hot-rolled
steel sheet will remain intact as much as possible.
[0023] In this way, a single phase structure of martensite, a single phase structure of
bainite, or a martensite-bainite mixed structure is dominantly present in the structure
of the steel sheet before subjection to annealing treatment. Consequently, even when
annealing treatment is performed just once at a ferrite-austenite dual phase region,
it becomes possible to form a structure that contains appropriate amounts of ferrite,
bainitic ferrite, and retained austenite, and in which fine retained austenite and
fine bainitic ferrite are distributed.
In addition, by causing the cooling stop temperature after annealing to drop to 350
°C or lower and performing reheating treatment under proper conditions, the structure
may contain an appropriate amount of tempered martensite.
As a result, it becomes possible to manufacture a high-strength steel sheet having
a tensile strength (TS) of 780 MPa or more and excellent in ductility, stretch flangeability,
and fatigue properties with high productivity.
[0024] Firstly, the reasons for the limitations on the chemical composition of the steel
manufactured according to our methods are described.
When components are expressed in "%," this refers to "mass%" unless otherwise specified.
C: 0.10 % or more and 0.35 % or less
[0025] C is an element that is important for increasing the strength of steel, has a high
solid solution strengthening ability, and is essential for guaranteeing the presence
of a desired amount of retained austenite to improve ductility.
[0026] If the C content is below 0.10 %, it becomes difficult to obtain the required amount
of retained austenite. If the C content exceeds 0.35 %, however, the steel sheet is
made brittle or susceptible to delayed fracture.
[0027] Therefore, the C content is 0.10 % or more and 0.35 % or less, preferably 0.15 %
or more and 0.30 % or less, and more preferably 0.18 % or more and 0.26 % or less.
Si: 0.50 % or more and 2.50 % or less
[0028] Si is an element that is effective in suppressing decomposition of retained austenite
to carbides. Si also exhibits a high solid solution strengthening ability in ferrite,
and has the property of purifying ferrite by facilitating solute C diffusion from
ferrite to austenite to improve ductility. Moreover, Si dissolved in ferrite improves
strain hardenability and increases the ductility of ferrite itself. To obtain this
effect, the Si content needs to be 0.50 % or more. If the Si content exceeds 2.50
%, however, an abnormal structure grows, causing ductility to deteriorate.
[0029] Therefore, the Si content is 0.50 % or more and 2.50 % or less, preferably 0.80 %
or more and 2.00 % or less, and more preferably 1.20 % or more and 1.80 % or less.
Mn: 2.00 % or more and less than 3.50 %
[0030] Mn is effective in guaranteeing strength. Mn also improves hardenability to facilitate
formation of a multi-phase structure. Moreover, Mn acts to suppress formation of ferrite
and pearlite during a cooling process after hot rolling, and thus is an effective
element in causing the hot-rolled sheet to have a structure in which a low temperature
transformation phase (bainite or martensite) is dominantly present. To obtain this
effect, the Mn content needs to be 2.00 % or more. If the Mn content is 3.50 % or
more, however, Mn segregation becomes significant in the sheet thickness direction,
leading to deterioration of fatigue properties.
[0031] Therefore, the Mn content is 2.00 % or more and less than 3.50 %, preferably 2.00
% or more and 3.00 % or less, and more preferably 2.00 % or more and 2.80 % or less.
P: 0.001 % or more and 0.100 % or less
[0032] P is an element that has a solid solution strengthening effect and can be added depending
on a desired strength. P also facilitates transformation to ferrite, and thus is an
effective element in forming a multi-phase structure. To obtain this effect, the P
content needs to be 0.001 % or more. If the P content exceeds 0.100 %, however, weldability
degrades and, when a galvanized layer is subjected to alloying treatment, the alloying
rate decreases, impairing galvanizing quality.
[0033] Therefore, the P content is 0.001 % or more and 0.100 % or less, and preferably 0.005
% or more and 0.050 % or less.
S: 0.0001 % or more and 0.0200 % or less
[0034] S segregates to grain boundaries, makes the steel brittle during hot working, and
forms sulfides to reduce local deformability. Therefore, the S content needs to be
0.0200 % or less. Under manufacturing constraints, however, the S content is necessarily
0.0001 % or more.
[0035] Therefore, the S content is 0.0001 % or more and 0.0200% or less, and preferably
0.0001 % or more and 0.0050 % or less.
N: 0.0005 % or more and 0.0100 % or less
[0036] N is an element that deteriorates the anti-aging property of steel. Deterioration
of the anti-aging property becomes more pronounced, particularly when the N content
exceeds 0.0100 %. Under manufacturing constraints, the N content is necessarily 0.0005
% or more, although smaller N contents are more preferable.
[0037] Therefore, the N content is 0.0005 % or more and 0.0100 % or less, and preferably
0.0005 % or more and 0.0070 % or less.
[0038] In addition to the above basic components, at least one element selected from the
group consisting of Ti and B may also be included. In particular, when the steel contains
both Ti and B in appropriate amounts, the resulting hot-rolled sheet may be provided
more advantageously with a structure in which a single phase structure of martensite,
a single phase structure of bainite, or a martensite-bainite mixed structure is dominantly
present.
Ti: 0.005 % or more and 0.100 % or less
[0039] Ti forms fine precipitates during hot rolling or annealing to increase strength.
In addition, Ti precipitates as TiN with N, and may thus suppress precipitation of
BN when B is added to the steel, thereby effectively bringing out the effect of B
as described below. To obtain this effect, the Ti content needs to be 0.005 % or more.
If the Ti content exceeds 0.100 %, however, strengthening by precipitation works excessively,
leading to deterioration of ductility. Therefore, the Ti content is preferably 0.005
% or more and 0.100 % or less, and more preferably 0.010 % or more and 0.080 % or
less.
B: 0.0001 % or more and 0.0050 % or less
[0040] B has the effect of suppressing ferrite-pearlite transformation during a cooling
process after hot rolling so that the hot-rolled sheet has a structure in which a
low temperature transformation phase (bainite or martensite), in particular martensite
is dominantly present. B is also effective in increasing the strength of steel. To
obtain this effect, the B content needs to be 0.0001 % or more. However, excessively
adding B beyond 0.0050 % forms excessive martensite, raising a concern that ductility
might decrease due to a rise in strength.
[0041] Therefore, the B content is preferably 0.0001 % or more and 0.0050 % or less, and
more preferably 0.0005 % or more and 0.0030 % or less.
Mn content/B content: 2100 or less
[0042] In particular for a low-Mn chemical composition, ferrite-pearlite transformation
develops during a cooling process after hot rolling, which tends to cause ferrite
and/or pearlite to be present in the structure of the hot-rolled sheet. As such, to
bring out the above-described addition effect of B sufficiently, it is preferred that
the Mn content divided by the B content (Mn content/B content) equals 2100 or less,
and more preferably 2000 or less. No lower limit is particularly placed on the Mn
content/B content, yet a preferred lower limit is approximately 300.
[0043] In addition to the above components, at least one element selected from the group
consisting of the following may also be included:
Al: 0.01 % or more and 1.00 % or less, Nb: 0.005 % or more and 0.100 % or less, Cr:
0.05 % or more and 1.00 % or less, Cu: 0.05 % or more and 1.00 % or less, Sb: 0.002
% or more and 0.200 % or less, Sn: 0.002 % or more and 0.200 % or less, Ta: 0.001
% or more and 0.100 % or less, Ca: 0.0005 % or more and 0.0050 % or less, Mg: 0.0005
% or more and 0.0050 % or less, and REM: 0.0005 % or more and 0.0050 % or less.
A1: 0.01 % or more and 1.00 % or less
[0044] Al is an element that is effective in forming ferrite and improving the balance between
strength and ductility. To obtain this effect, the Al content needs to be 0.01 % or
more. On the other hand, an A1 content exceeding 1.00 % leads to deterioration of
surface characteristics.
[0045] Therefore, when Al is added to steel, the Al content is 0.01 % or more and 1.00 %
or less, and preferably 0.03 % or more and 0.50 % or less.
Nb: 0.005 % or more and 0.100 % or less
[0046] Nb forms fine precipitates during hot rolling or annealing to increase strength.
To obtain this effect, the Nb content needs to be 0.005 % or more. If the Nb content
exceeds 0.100 %, however, formability deteriorates.
[0047] Therefore, when Nb is added to steel, the Nb content is 0.005 % or more and 0.100
% or less.
Cr: 0.05 % or more and 1.00 % or less, Cu: 0.05 % or more and 1.00 % or less
[0048] Cr and Cu not only serve as solid-solution-strengthening elements, but also act to
stabilize austenite in a cooling process during annealing, facilitating formation
of a multi-phase structure. To obtain this effect, the Cr and Cu contents each need
to be 0.05 % or more. If the Cr and Cu contents both exceed 1.00 %, formability deteriorates.
[0049] Therefore, when Cr and Cu are added to steel, respective contents are 0.05 % or more
and 1.00 % or less.
Sb: 0.002 % or more and 0.200 % or less, Sn: 0.002 % or more and 0.200 % or less
[0050] Sb and Sn may be added as necessary for suppressing decarbonization of a region extending
from the surface layer of the steel sheet to a depth of about several tens of micrometers,
which is caused by nitriding and/or oxidation of the steel sheet surface. Suppressing
such nitriding or oxidation is effective in preventing a reduction in the amount of
martensite formed in the steel sheet surface and guaranteeing strength. To obtain
this effect, the Sb and Sn contents each need to be 0.002 % or more. However, excessively
adding any of these elements beyond 0.200 % leads to deterioration of toughness. Therefore,
when Sb and Sn are added to steel, respective contents are 0.002 % or more and 0.200
% or less.
Ta: 0.001 % or more and 0.100 % or less
[0051] As is the case with Ti and Nb, Ta forms alloy carbides or alloy carbonitrides, and
contributes to increasing the strength of steel. It is also believed that Ta has the
effect of significantly suppressing coarsening of precipitates when partially dissolved
in Nb carbides or Nb carbonitrides to form complex precipitates, such as (Nb, Ta)
(C, N), and providing a stable contribution to increasing strength through strengthening
by precipitation. This precipitate-stabilizing effect can be obtained when the Ta
content is 0.001 % or more. However, excessively adding Ta beyond 0.100 % fails to
further increase the precipitate-stabilizing effect, but instead increases alloy costs.
Therefore, when Ta is added to steel, the Ta content is 0.001 % or more and 0.100
% or less.
Ca: 0.0005 % or more and 0.0050 % or less, Mg: 0.0005 % or more and 0.0050 % or less,
REM: 0.0005 % or more and 0.0050 % or less
[0052] Ca, Mg, and REM are elements that are used for deoxidation, and are effective in
causing spheroidization of sulfides and mitigating the adverse effect of sulfides
on local ductility and stretch flangeability. To obtain this effect, Ca, Mg, and REM
each need to be added to steel in an amount of 0.0005 % or more. However, excessively
adding Ca, Mg, and REM beyond 0.0050 % leads to increased inclusions and the like,
causing defects on the steel sheet surface and internal defects.
[0053] Therefore, when Ca, Mg, and REM are added to steel, respective contents are 0.0005
% or more and 0.0050 % or less.
[0054] The balance other than the above components consists of Fe and incidental impurities.
[0055] The following provides a description of manufacturing conditions in the method according
to the disclosure.
The method for manufacturing a high-strength steel sheet according to the disclosure
comprises: preparing a steel slab with the aforementioned chemical composition; subjecting
the steel slab to hot rolling by heating the steel slab to a temperature of 1100 °C
or higher and 1300 °C or lower, hot rolling the steel slab with a finisher delivery
temperature of 800 °C or higher and 1000 °C or lower to form a hot-rolled steel sheet,
and coiling the hot-rolled steel sheet at a mean coiling temperature of 200 °C or
higher and 500 °C or lower; subjecting the hot-rolled steel sheet to pickling treatment;
optionally cold rolling the hot-rolled steel sheet at a rolling reduction below 30
% to form a cold-rolled steel sheet; subjecting the hot-rolled or cold-rolled steel
sheet to annealing by retaining the steel sheet at a temperature of 740 °C or higher
and 840 °C or lower for 10 s or more and 900 s or less, and then cooling the steel
sheet at a mean cooling rate of 5 °C/s or higher and 30 °C/s or lower to a cooling
stop temperature of 150 °C or higher and 350 °C or lower; and subsequently subjecting
the hot-rolled or cold-rolled steel sheet to reheating treatment by reheating the
steel sheet to a reheating temperature of higher than 350 °C and 550 °C or lower,
and retaining the steel sheet at the reheating temperature for 10 s or more.
In the above steps, the temperatures, such as the finisher delivery temperature, the
mean coiling temperature, and the like, all represent temperatures measured at the
steel sheet surface. The mean cooling rate is also calculated from temperatures measured
at the steel sheet surface.
The following explains the reasons for the limitations placed on the manufacturing
conditions.
Steel slab heating temperature: 1100 °C or higher and 1300 °C or lower
[0056] Precipitates that are present at the time of heating of a steel slab will remain
as coarse precipitates in the resulting steel sheet, making no contribution to strength.
Thus, remelting of any Ti- and Nb-based precipitates precipitated during casting is
required.
[0057] In this respect, if a steel slab is heated at a temperature below 1100 °C, it is
difficult to cause sufficient melting of carbides, leading to problems such as an
increased risk of trouble during hot rolling resulting from increased rolling load.
In addition, for obtaining a smooth steel sheet surface, it is necessary to scale-off
defects on the surface layer of the slab, such as blow hole generation, segregation,
and the like, and to reduce cracks and irregularities on the steel sheet surface.
Therefore, the steel slab heating temperature needs to be 1100 °C or higher.
[0058] If the steel slab heating temperature exceeds 1300 °C, however, scale loss increases
as oxidation progresses. Therefore, the steel slab heating temperature needs to be
1300 °C or lower.
[0059] For this reason, the steel slab heating temperature is 1100 °C or higher and 1300
°C or lower, and preferably 1150 °C or higher and 1250 °C or lower.
[0060] A steel slab is preferably made with continuous casting to prevent macro segregation,
yet may be produced with other methods such as ingot casting or thin slab casting.
The steel slab thus produced may be cooled to room temperature and then heated again
according to the conventional method. Alternatively, there can be employed without
problems what is called "energy-saving" processes, such as hot direct rolling or direct
rolling in which either a warm steel slab without being fully cooled to room temperature
is charged into a heating furnace, or a steel slab undergoes heat retaining for a
short period and immediately hot rolled. Further, a steel slab is subjected to rough
rolling under normal conditions and formed into a sheet bar. When the heating temperature
is low, the sheet bar is preferably heated using a bar heater or the like prior to
finish rolling from the viewpoint of preventing troubles during hot rolling.
Finisher delivery temperature in hot rolling: 800 °C or higher and 1000 °C or lower
[0061] The heated steel slab is hot rolled through rough rolling and finish rolling to form
a hot-rolled steel sheet. At this point, when the finisher delivery temperature exceeds
1000 °C, the amount of oxides (scales) generated suddenly increases and the interface
between the steel substrate and oxides becomes rough, which tends to impair the surface
quality after pickling and cold rolling. In addition, any hot-rolling scales remaining
after pickling adversely affect ductility. Further, grain size increases excessively
and fatigue properties deteriorate.
[0062] On the other hand, if the finisher delivery temperature is below 800 °C, rolling
load and burden increase, rolling is performed more often in a state in which recrystallization
of austenite does not occur, and an abnormal texture develops. As a result, the final
product has a significant planar anisotropy, and not only does the material properties
become less uniform, but also the ductility itself deteriorate.
[0063] Therefore, the finisher delivery temperature in hot rolling needs to be 800 °C or
higher and 1000 °C or lower, and preferably 820 °C or higher and 950 °C or lower.
Mean coiling temperature after hot rolling: 200 °C or higher and 500 °C or lower
[0064] Setting of mean coiling temperature after the hot rolling is very important for the
method according to the disclosure.
[0065] Specifically, when the mean coiling temperature after the hot rolling is above 500
°C, ferrite and pearlite form during cooling and retaining processes after the hot
rolling. Consequently, it becomes difficult to provide the hot-rolled sheet with a
structure in which a single phase structure of martensite, a single phase structure
of bainite, or a martensite-bainite mixed structure is dominantly present, making
it difficult to impart a desired ductility to the steel sheet obtained after annealing
or to balance its strength and ductility. If the mean coiling temperature after the
hot rolling is below 200 °C, the hot-rolled steel sheet is degraded in terms of shape,
deteriorating productivity. Therefore, the mean coiling temperature after the hot
rolling needs to be 200 °C or higher and 500 °C or lower, preferably 300 °C or higher
and 450 °C or lower, and more preferably 350 °C or higher and 450 °C or lower.
[0066] Finish rolling may be performed continuously by joining rough-rolled sheets during
the hot rolling. Rough-rolled sheets may be coiled on a temporary basis. At least
part of finish rolling may be conducted as lubrication rolling to reduce rolling load
in hot rolling. Conducting lubrication rolling in such a manner is effective from
the perspective of making the shape and material properties of a steel sheet uniform.
In lubrication rolling, the coefficient of friction is preferably 0.10 or more and
0.25 or less.
[0067] The hot-rolled steel sheet thus produced is subjected to pickling. Pickling enables
removal of oxides from the steel sheet surface, and is thus important to ensure that
the high-strength steel sheet as the final product has good chemical convertibility
and a sufficient quality of coating. Pickling may be performed in one or more batches.
Rolling reduction in cold rolling: less than 30 %
[0068] Additionally, the hot-rolled steel sheet may be subjected to cold rolling to form
a cold-rolled steel sheet. When cold rolling is performed, rolling reduction in cold
rolling is of great importance.
[0069] Specifically, if the rolling reduction is 30 % or more, a low temperature transformation
phase is broken in the structure of the hot-rolled sheet. Consequently, it becomes
difficult to provide the steel sheet obtained after the annealing with a structure
that contains appropriate amounts of ferrite, bainitic ferrite, and retained austenite,
and in which fine retained austenite and fine bainitic ferrite are distributed, making
it difficult to ensure ductility, balance strength and ductility, or guarantee good
fatigue properties. Therefore, the rolling reduction in cold rolling is less than
30 %, preferably 25 % or less, and more preferably 20 % or less. No lower limit is
particularly placed on the rolling reduction in cold rolling. It may be greater than
0 %. The number of rolling passes and the rolling reduction per pass are not particularly
limited, and the effect of the disclosure may be obtained with any number of rolling
passes and any rolling reduction per pass.
Annealing temperature: 740 °C or higher and 840 °C or lower
[0070] An annealing temperature below 740 °C cannot ensure formation of a sufficient amount
of austenite during the annealing. Consequently, a desired amount of retained austenite
cannot be obtained in the end, making it difficult to yield good ductility and to
balance strength and ductility. On the other hand, an annealing temperature above
840 °C is within a temperature range of austenite single phase, and a desired amount
of fine retained austenite cannot be produced in the end, which makes it difficult
again to ensure good ductility and to balance strength and ductility.
[0071] Therefore, the annealing temperature is 740 °C or higher and 840 °C or lower, and
preferably 750 °C or higher and 830 °C or lower.
Annealing treatment holding time: 10 s or more and 900 s or less
[0072] A annealing treatment holding time shorter than 10 s cannot ensure formation of a
sufficient amount of austenite during the annealing. Consequently, a desired amount
of retained austenite cannot be obtained in the end, making it difficult to yield
good ductility and to balance strength and ductility. On the other hand, an annealing
treatment holding time longer than 900 s causes grain coarsening, a desired amount
of fine retained austenite cannot be produced in the end, making it difficult to ensure
good ductility and to balance strength and ductility. This also inhibits productivity.
[0073] Therefore, the annealing treatment holding time is 10 s or more and 900 s or less,
preferably 30 s or more and 750 s or less, and more preferably 60 s or more and 600
s or less.
Mean cooling rate to a cooling stop temperature of 150 °C or higher and 350 °C or
lower: 5 °C/s or higher and 30 °C/s or lower
[0074] If the mean cooling rate to a cooling stop temperature of 150 °C or higher and 350
°C or lower is below 5 °C/s, a large amount of ferrite is produced during cooling,
making it difficult to guarantee a desired strength. On the other hand, if the mean
cooling rate is above 30 °C/s, a low temperature transformation phase forms excessively,
degrading ductility.
[0075] Therefore, the mean cooling rate to a cooling stop temperature of 150 °C or higher
and 350 °C or lower is 5 °C/s or higher and 30 °C/s or lower, and preferably 10 °C/s
or higher and 30 °C/s or lower.
[0076] The cooling in the annealing is preferably performed by gas cooling; however, furnace
cooling, mist cooling, roll cooling, water cooling, and the like can also be employed
in combination.
[0077] In addition, if the cooling stop temperature is above 350 °C, it is higher than the
martensite transformation starting temperature (Ms), with the result that tempered
martensite is not produced when reheating treatment is performed subsequently, hard
and fresh martensite (martensite not tempered) remains in the resulting structure,
and hole expansion formability (stretch flangeability) ends up deteriorating. On the
other hand, if the cooling stop temperature is below 150 °C, austenite transforms
to martensite in a large amount, and a desired amount of retained austenite cannot
be obtained in the end, making it difficult to obtain good ductility and to balance
strength and ductility.
Therefore, the cooling stop temperature is 150 °C or higher and 350 °C or lower, and
preferably 180 °C or higher and 320 °C or lower.
Reheating temperature: higher than 350 °C and 550 °C or lower
[0078] If the reheating temperature is above 550 °C, decomposition of retained austenite
occurs, and a desired amount of retained austenite cannot be obtained in the end,
making it difficult to yield good ductility and balance strength and ductility. On
the other hand, if the heating temperature is 350 °C or lower, a desired amount of
tempered martensite cannot be obtained, making it difficult to ensure hole expansion
formability (stretch flangeability).
[0079] Therefore, the reheating temperature is higher than 350 °C and 550 °C or lower, and
preferably 370 °C or higher and 530 °C or lower.
Holding time at reheating temperature: 10 s or more
[0080] If the holding time at the reheating temperature is shorter than 10 s, there is insufficient
time for the concentration of C (carbon) into austenite to progress, making it difficult
to ensure a desired amount of retained austenite in the end. Therefore, the holding
time at the reheating temperature is 10 s or more. However, a holding time longer
than 600 s does not increase the amount of retained austenite and ductility does not
significantly improve, where the effect reaches a plateau. Therefore, the holding
time at the reheating temperature is preferably 600 s or less, more preferably 30
s or more and 500 s or less, and still more preferably 60 s or more and 400 s or less.
[0081] Cooling after the holding is not particularly limited, and any method may be used
to implement cooling to a desired temperature.
[0082] The steel sheet thus obtained may be subjected to galvanizing treatment such as hot-dip
galvanizing.
[0083] For example, when hot-dip galvanizing is performed, the above-described steel sheet
subjected to the annealing treatment is immersed in a galvanizing bath at 440 °C or
higher and 500 °C or lower for hot-dip galvanizing, after which coating weight adjustment
is performed using gas wiping or the like. For hot-dip galvanizing, a galvanizing
bath with an Al content of 0.10 % or more and 0.22 % or less is preferably used. When
a galvanized layer is subjected to alloying treatment, the alloying treatment is performed
in a temperature range of 470 °C to 600 °C after hot-dip galvanizing. If alloying
treatment is performed at a temperature above 600 °C, untransformed austenite transforms
to pearlite, where the presence of a desired volume fraction of retained austenite
cannot be ensured and ductility may degrade. Therefore, when a galvanized layer is
subjected to alloying treatment, the alloying treatment is preferably performed in
a temperature range of 470 °C to 600 °C. Electrogalvanized plating may also be performed.
[0084] Moreover, when skin pass rolling is performed after the heat treatment, the skin
pass rolling is preferably performed with a rolling reduction of 0.1 % or more and
1.0 % or less. A rolling reduction below 0.1 % provides only a small effect and complicates
control, and hence 0.1 % is the lower limit of the favorable range. On the other hand,
a rolling reduction above 1.0 % significantly degrades productivity, and thus 1.0
% is the upper limit of the favorable range.
[0085] The skin pass rolling may be performed on-line or off-line. Skin pass may be performed
in one or more batches with a target rolling reduction. No particular limitations
are placed on other manufacturing conditions, yet from the perspective of productivity,
the aforementioned series of processes such as annealing, hot-dip galvanizing, and
alloying treatment on a galvanized layer are preferably carried out on a CGL (Continuous
Galvanizing Line) as the hot-dip galvanizing line. After the hot-dip galvanizing,
wiping may be performed for adjusting the coating amounts.
[0086] The following describes the microstructure of a steel sheet manufactured by the method
according to the disclosure.
Total area ratio of ferrite and bainitic ferrite: 30 % or more and 75 % or less
[0087] A high-strength steel sheet manufactured by the method according to the disclosure
comprises a multi-phase structure in which retained austenite having an influence
mainly on ductility and, more preferably, a small amount of martensite affecting strength
are diffused in a structure in which soft ferrite with high ductility is dominantly
present. In addition, bainitic ferrite forms adjacent to ferrite and retained austenite/martensite,
and reduces the difference in hardness between ferrite and retained austenite and
between ferrite and martensite to suppress the occurrence of cracking during hole
expansion test and of fatigue cracking during fatigue test.
[0088] To ensure sufficient ductility, the total area ratio of ferrite and bainitic ferrite
needs to be 30 % or more. On the other hand, to secure strength, the total area ratio
of ferrite and bainitic ferrite needs to be 75 % or less. For better ductility, the
total area ratio of ferrite and bainitic ferrite is preferably 35 % or more and 70
% or less.
[0089] Bainitic ferrite is effective in ensuring better hole expansion formability and better
fatigue properties since, as described above, it forms adjacent to ferrite and retained
austenite/martensite and has the effect of reducing the difference in hardness between
ferrite and retained austenite and between ferrite and martensite to suppress the
occurrence of cracking during hole expansion test and of fatigue cracking during fatigue
test. Therefore, the area ratio of bainitic ferrite is preferably 5 % or more. On
the other hand, to secure stable strength, the area ratio of bainitic ferrite is preferably
25 % or less.
[0090] As used herein, the term "bainitic ferrite" means such ferrite that is produced during
the process of annealing at a temperature of 740 °C or higher and 840 °C or lower,
followed by cooling to and holding at a temperature of 600 °C or lower, and that has
a high dislocation density as compared to normal ferrite.
While the main example of ferrite is acicular ferrite, ferrite may include polygonal
ferrite and non-recrystallized ferrite. To ensure good ductility, however, it is preferred
that the area ratio of polygonal ferrite is 20 % or less and the area ratio of non-recrystallized
ferrite is 5 % or less. The area ratios of polygonal ferrite and of non-recrystallized
ferrite may be 0 %.
[0091] The area ratios of ferrite and bainitic ferrite can be determined by polishing a
cross section of a steel sheet taken in the sheet thickness direction to be parallel
to the rolling direction (L-cross section), etching the cross section with 3 vol.%
nital, and averaging the results from observing ten locations at 2000 times magnification
under an SEM (scanning electron microscope) at a position of sheet thickness x 1/4
(a position at a depth of one-fourth of the sheet thickness from the steel sheet surface)
and calculating the area ratios of ferrite and bainitic ferrite for the ten locations
with Image-Pro, available from Media Cybernetics, Inc., using the structure micrographs
imaged with the SEM.
In the structure micrographs, ferrite and bainitic ferrite appear as a gray structure
(base steel structure), while retained austenite and martensite as a white structure.
[0092] Identification of ferrite and bainitic ferrite is made by EBSD (Electron Back Scatter
Diffraction) measurement. Specifically, a crystal grain (phase) that includes a sub-boundary
with a grain boundary angle of smaller than 15° is identified as bainitic ferrite,
for which the area ratio is calculated and used as the area ratio of bainitic ferrite.
The area ratio of ferrite can be calculated by subtracting the area ratio of bainitic
ferrite from the area ratio of the above-described gray structure.
Area ratio of tempered martensite: 5 % or more and 15 % or less
[0093] To ensure good hole expansion formability (stretch flangeability), the area ratio
of tempered martensite needs to be 5 % or more. For better hole expansion formability
(stretch flangeability), it is preferred that the area ratio of tempered martensite
is 8 % or more. If the area ratio of tempered martensite exceeds 15 %, however, it
becomes difficult to obtain a sufficient amount of retained austenite. This results
in a difficulty in obtaining good ductility and balancing strength and ductility.
Therefore, the area ratio of tempered martensite needs to be 15 % or less.
[0094] Here, tempered martensite can be identified by determining whether cementite or retained
austenite is included in martensite (tempered martensite is martensite containing
cementite or retained austenite). The area ratio of tempered martensite can be determined
by polishing an L-cross section of a steel sheet, etching the cross section with 3
vol.% nital, and averaging the results from observing ten locations at 2000 times
magnification under an SEM (scanning electron microscope) at a position of sheet thickness
x 1/4 and calculating the area ratios of ferrite and bainitic ferrite for the ten
locations with Image-Pro, available from Media Cybernetics, Inc., using the structure
micrographs imaged with the SEM.
Volume fraction of retained austenite: 8 % or more
[0095] To ensure good ductility and balance strength and ductility, the volume fraction
of retained austenite needs to be 8 % or more. For obtaining better ductility and
achieving a better balance between strength and ductility, it is preferred that the
volume fraction of retained austenite is 10 % or more. No upper limit is particularly
placed on the volume fraction of retained austenite, yet it is around 35 %.
[0096] The volume fraction of retained austenite is calculated by determining the x-ray
diffraction intensity of a plane of sheet thickness x 1/4, which is exposed by polishing
the steel sheet surface to a depth of one-fourth of the sheet thickness. Using an
incident x-ray beam of MoKα, the intensity ratio of the peak integrated intensity
of the {111}, {200}, {220}, and {311} planes of retained austenite to the peak integrated
intensity of the {110}, {200}, and {211} planes of ferrite is calculated for all of
the twelve combinations, the results are averaged, and the average is used as the
volume fraction of retained austenite.
Mean grain size of retained austenite: 2 µm or less
[0097] Refinement of retained austenite grains contributes to improving the ductility and
fatigue properties of the steel sheet. Accordingly, to ensure good ductility and fatigue
properties, retained austenite needs to have a mean grain size of 2 µm or less. For
better ductility and fatigue properties, it is preferred that retained austenite has
a mean grain size of 1.5 µm or less. No lower limit is particularly placed on the
mean grain size, yet it is around 0.1 µm.
[0098] The mean grain size of retained austenite can be determined by averaging the results
from observing twenty locations at 15000 times magnification under a TEM (transmission
electron microscope) and averaging the equivalent circular diameters calculated from
the areas of retained austenite grains identified with Image-Pro, as mentioned above,
using the structure micrographs imaged with the TEM.
Mean free path of bainitic ferrite: 3 µm or less
[0099] The mean free path of bainitic ferrite is very important. Specifically, bainitic
ferrite forms in the process of cooling to and holding at a temperature of 600 °C
or lower following the annealing in a temperature range of 740 °C to 840 °C. In this
respect, bainitic ferrite forms adjacent to ferrite and retained austenite, and has
the effect of reducing the difference in hardness between ferrite and retained austenite
to suppress the occurrence of fatigue cracking and propagation of cracking. It is
thus more advantageous if bainitic ferrite is densely distributed, in other words,
if bainitic ferrite has a small mean free path.
[0100] To ensure good fatigue properties, bainitic ferrite needs to have a mean free path
of 3 µm or less. For better fatigue properties, it is preferred that bainitic ferrite
has a mean free path of 2.5 µm or less. No lower limit is particularly placed on the
mean free path, yet it is around 0.5 µm.
[0101] The mean free path (L
BF) of bainitic ferrite can be calculated by:
LBF: mean free path of bainitic ferrite (µm)
dBF: mean grain size of bainitic ferrite (µm)
f: area ratio of bainitic ferrite (%) ÷ 100
[0102] The mean grain size of bainitic ferrite can be determined by averaging the areas
of grains by dividing the area of bainitic ferrite in the measured region calculated
by EBSD (Electron Back Scatter Diffraction) measurement by the number of bainitic
ferrite grains in the measured region to identify an equivalent circle diameter.
[0103] In addition to ferrite and bainitic ferrite, tempered martensite, and retained austenite,
the microstructures according to the disclosure may include carbides such as martensite,
pearlite, cementite, and the like, as well as other microstructures well known as
steel sheet microstructures. Any microstructure that has an area ratio of 15 % or
less may be used without detracting from the effect of the disclosure.
EXAMPLES
[0104] Steels having the chemical compositions presented in Table 1, each with the balance
consisting of Fe and incidental impurities, were prepared by steelmaking in a converter
and formed into slabs by continuous casting. The steel slabs thus obtained were heated
under the conditions presented in Table 2, and subjected to hot rolling, followed
by pickling treatment. For Steel Nos. 1, 3-6, 8, 9, 12, 14, 16-19, 21, 24, 26, 29,
31, 33, 35, 37, 38, 40, 42, 43, 47, 50, 51, 53, 56, and 60 presented in Table 2, cold
rolling was not performed, and annealing treatment was conducted under the conditions
presented in Table 2 to produce high-strength hot-rolled steel sheets (HR). For Steel
Nos. 2, 7, 10, 11, 13, 15, 20, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36, 39, 41, 44-46,
48, 49, 52, 54, 55, 57-59, and 61 presented in Table 2, cold rolling was performed,
and annealing treatment was conducted under the conditions presented in Table 2 to
produce high-strength cold-rolled steel sheets (CR). Moreover, some were subjected
to galvanizing treatment to obtain hot-dip galvanized steel sheets (GI), galvannealed
steel sheets (GA), and electrogalvanized steel sheets (EG).
Used as hot-dip galvanizing baths were a zinc bath containing 0.19 mass% of A1 for
GI and a zinc bath containing 0.14 mass% of A1 for GA, in each case the bath temperature
was 465 °C. The coating weight per side was 45 g/m
2 (in the case of both-sided coating), and the Fe concentration in the coated layer
of each hot-dip galvannealed steel sheet (GA) was 9 mass% or more and 12 mass% or
less.
[0105] The Ac
1 transformation temperature (°C) presented in Table 1 was calculated by:

[0106] Where (%X) represents content (in mass%) of an element X in steel.

[0107] Table 2
Table 2
No. |
Steel ID |
Slab heating temp. |
Hot-rolling, conditions |
Cold-rolling conditions |
Annealing treatment conditions |
Reheating treatment conditions |
Type* |
Remarks |
Finisher delivery temp. |
Mean coiling temp. |
Rolling reduction |
Annealing temp. |
Annealing holding time |
Mean cooling rate |
Cooling stop temp. |
Reheating temp. |
Reheating holding time |
(°C) |
(°C) |
(°C) |
(%) |
(°C) |
(s) |
(°C/s) |
(°C) |
(°C) |
(s) |
1 |
A |
1250 |
910 |
400 |
cold rolling not performed |
770 |
120 |
17 |
220 |
400 |
190 |
HR |
Example |
2 |
B |
1260 |
890 |
440 |
13.0 |
790 |
150 |
20 |
190 |
500 |
340 |
GI |
Example |
3 |
C |
1230 |
870 |
410 |
cold rolling not performed |
780 |
140 |
22 |
200 |
420 |
210 |
HR |
Example |
4 |
C |
890 |
900 |
400 |
cold rolling not performed |
810 |
200 |
15 |
230 |
430 |
150 |
HR |
Comparative example |
5 |
C |
1420 |
910 |
420 |
cold rolling not performed |
800 |
240 |
16 |
200 |
450 |
130 |
HR |
Comparative example |
6 |
C |
1220 |
640 |
380 |
cold rolling not performed |
810 |
280 |
17 |
190 |
390 |
210 |
HR |
Comparative example |
7 |
C |
1230 |
1120 |
490 |
6.0 |
800 |
180 |
17 |
220 |
400 |
290 |
CR |
Comparative example |
8 |
C |
1240 |
910 |
120 |
cold rolling not performed |
790 |
300 |
18 |
240 |
400 |
210 |
GI |
Comparative example |
9 |
C |
1260 |
890 |
630 |
cold rolling not performed |
790 |
250 |
22 |
250 |
420 |
230 |
HR |
Comparative example |
10 |
C |
1230 |
900 |
420 |
46.2 |
820 |
200 |
17 |
280 |
500 |
240 |
CR |
Comparative example |
11 |
C |
1230 |
920 |
450 |
13.0 |
660 |
280 |
15 |
240 |
480 |
180 |
EG |
Comparative example |
12 |
C |
1220 |
860 |
470 |
cold rolling not performed |
900 |
100 |
16 |
200 |
490 |
210 |
HR |
Comparative example |
13 |
C |
1240 |
870 |
460 |
5.3 |
780 |
5 |
17 |
170 |
460 |
290 |
CR |
Comparative example |
14 |
C |
1250 |
900 |
480 |
cold rolling not performed |
790 |
1200 |
17 |
300 |
440 |
260 |
HR |
Comparative example |
15 |
C |
1260 |
910 |
500 |
8.7 |
800 |
180 |
72 |
260 |
420 |
190 |
EG |
Comparative example |
16 |
C |
1250 |
900 |
480 |
cold rolling not performed |
810 |
220 |
17 |
70 |
400 |
160 |
GI |
Comparative example |
17 |
C |
1230 |
860 |
460 |
cold rolling not performed |
800 |
240 |
15 |
550 |
450 |
170 |
HR |
Comparative example |
18 |
C |
1240 |
900 |
450 |
cold rolling not performed |
810 |
180 |
14 |
220 |
270 |
150 |
HR |
Comparative example |
19 |
C |
1200 |
870 |
420 |
cold rolling not performed |
820 |
150 |
12 |
200 |
620 |
200 |
HR |
Comparative example |
20 |
C |
1230 |
890 |
400 |
8.0 |
810 |
300 |
18 |
230 |
420 |
5 |
GA |
Comparative example |
No. |
Steel ID |
Slab heating temp. |
Hot-rolling conditions |
Cold-rolling conditions |
Annealing treatment conditions |
Reheating treatment conditions |
Type* |
Remarks |
Finisher delivery temp. |
Mean coiling temp. |
Rolling reduction |
Annealing temp. |
Annealing holding time |
Mean cooling rate |
Cooling stop temp. |
Reheating temp. |
Reheating holding time |
(°C) |
(°C) |
(°C) |
(%) |
(°C) |
(s) |
(°C/s) |
(°C) |
(°C) |
(s) |
21 |
C |
1240 |
880 |
450 |
cold rolling not performed |
790 |
180 |
20 |
220 |
500 |
950 |
GI |
Example |
22 |
D |
1220 |
890 |
460 |
11.1 |
770 |
180 |
24 |
200 |
480 |
480 |
CR |
Example |
23 |
E |
1230 |
900 |
420 |
11.1 |
790 |
200 |
24 |
240 |
380 |
260 |
CR |
Example |
24 |
F |
1240 |
910 |
480 |
cold rolling not performed |
760 |
240 |
22 |
220 |
400 |
270 |
GA |
Example |
25 |
G |
1230 |
880 |
500 |
6.3 |
790 |
190 |
20 |
190 |
460 |
190 |
CR |
Example |
26 |
H |
1220 |
860 |
470 |
cold rolling not performed |
760 |
150 |
22 |
200 |
450 |
170 |
EG |
Example |
27 |
I |
1210 |
880 |
490 |
8.7 |
820 |
100 |
19 |
220 |
480 |
150 |
CR |
Example |
28 |
J |
1200 |
860 |
500 |
8.0 |
760 |
180 |
22 |
240 |
430 |
190 |
CR |
Comparative example |
29 |
K |
1230 |
890 |
470 |
cold rolling not performed |
820 |
150 |
17 |
230 |
400 |
510 |
EG |
Comparative example |
30 |
L |
1230 |
890 |
460 |
4.3 |
800 |
170 |
16 |
210 |
420 |
200 |
CR |
Comparative example |
31 |
M |
1250 |
900 |
420 |
cold rolling not performed |
820 |
200 |
18 |
200 |
480 |
450 |
GI |
Example |
32 |
N |
1240 |
890 |
450 |
5.3 |
750 |
90 |
16 |
210 |
500 |
510 |
CR |
Example |
33 |
O |
1240 |
880 |
460 |
cold rolling not performed |
780 |
120 |
27 |
220 |
450 |
180 |
HR |
Example |
34 |
P |
1250 |
860 |
400 |
5.6 |
790 |
180 |
26 |
240 |
410 |
520 |
CR |
Example |
35 |
Q |
1230 |
890 |
440 |
cold rolling not performed |
800 |
80 |
17 |
190 |
400 |
400 |
EG |
Example |
36 |
R |
1220 |
860 |
400 |
5.3 |
800 |
160 |
28 |
200 |
460 |
180 |
GA |
Example |
37 |
S |
1230 |
910 |
380 |
cold rolling not performed |
790 |
200 |
17 |
230 |
420 |
190 |
GI |
Example |
38 |
T |
1220 |
880 |
410 |
cold rolling not performed |
810 |
240 |
17 |
240 |
410 |
380 |
EG |
Example |
39 |
U |
1230 |
880 |
400 |
5.3 |
790 |
160 |
16 |
200 |
400 |
540 |
GI |
Example |
40 |
V |
1240 |
890 |
420 |
cold rolling not performed |
800 |
280 |
15 |
190 |
450 |
250 |
HR |
Example |
41 |
W |
1220 |
880 |
400 |
8.0 |
780 |
200 |
16 |
180 |
420 |
180 |
EG |
Example |
42 |
X |
1230 |
910 |
350 |
cold rolling not performed |
810 |
90 |
22 |
260 |
400 |
200 |
HR |
Example |
43 |
Y |
1230 |
870 |
380 |
cold rolling not performed |
770 |
150 |
20 |
240 |
460 |
180 |
GI |
Example |
44 |
Z |
1210 |
860 |
400 |
5.3 |
800 |
200 |
20 |
200 |
450 |
190 |
CR |
Example |
45 |
AA |
1250 |
900 |
450 |
11.1 |
790 |
200 |
15 |
200 |
410 |
200 |
CR |
Example |
46 |
AB |
1220 |
910 |
480 |
9.1 |
800 |
180 |
14 |
210 |
430 |
180 |
GA |
Example |
47 |
AC |
1240 |
870 |
490 |
cold rolling not performed |
780 |
250 |
13 |
180 |
410 |
200 |
HR |
Example |
48 |
AD |
1230 |
880 |
480 |
10.0 |
810 |
200 |
16 |
230 |
400 |
150 |
GI |
Example |
49 |
AE |
1250 |
900 |
400 |
11.1 |
820 |
250 |
14 |
200 |
410 |
220 |
CR |
Example |
50 |
AF |
1240 |
880 |
440 |
cold rolling not performed |
790 |
180 |
22 |
240 |
380 |
180 |
HR |
Example |
51 |
AG |
1210 |
890 |
400 |
cold rolling not performed |
800 |
200 |
18 |
220 |
400 |
150 |
HR |
Example |
52 |
AH |
1200 |
900 |
380 |
12.5 |
820 |
200 |
22 |
210 |
460 |
200 |
GA |
Example |
53 |
AI |
1230 |
910 |
410 |
cold rolling not performed |
790 |
250 |
19 |
200 |
450 |
150 |
HR |
Example |
54 |
AJ |
1230 |
880 |
400 |
13.3 |
830 |
230 |
21 |
200 |
450 |
190 |
EG |
Example |
55 |
AK |
1240 |
880 |
420 |
6.3 |
790 |
160 |
17 |
220 |
390 |
510 |
CR |
Example |
56 |
AL |
1220 |
890 |
400 |
cold rolling not performed |
760 |
300 |
16 |
210 |
400 |
200 |
HR |
Example |
57 |
AM |
1230 |
880 |
350 |
7.7 |
780 |
170 |
17 |
190 |
400 |
450 |
CR |
Example |
58 |
AN |
1230 |
910 |
420 |
6.7 |
800 |
250 |
16 |
270 |
420 |
510 |
CR |
Example |
59 |
AO |
1210 |
860 |
380 |
6.7 |
820 |
90 |
26 |
190 |
500 |
190 |
CR |
Example |
60 |
AP |
1230 |
880 |
400 |
cold rolling not performed |
810 |
100 |
17 |
220 |
480 |
410 |
HR |
Example |
61 |
AQ |
1250 |
900 |
420 |
6.7 |
810 |
200 |
18 |
210 |
400 |
350 |
GI |
Example |
Underlined if outside of the appropriate range.
* HR: Hot-rolled steel sheets (uncoated), CR: Cold-rolled steel sheets (uncoated),
GI: hot-dip galvanized steel sheets (alloying treatment not performed on galvanized
layers), GA: galvannealed steel sheets, EG: electrogalvanized steel sheets |
[0108] The high-strength hot-rolled steel sheets (HR), high-strength cold-rolled steel sheets
(CR), hot-dip galvanizing steel sheets (GI), galvannealed steel sheets (GA), and electrogalvanized
steel sheets (EG) thus obtained were subjected to structure observation, tensile test,
hole expansion test, and fatigue test.
In this case, tensile test was performed in accordance with
JIS Z 2241 (2011) to measure TS (tensile strength) and EL (total elongation), using JIS No. 5 test
pieces that were sampled such that the longitudinal direction of each test piece coincides
with a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction of the steel sheet (the C
direction).
In this case, TS and EL were determined to be good when EL ≥ 34 % for TS 780 MPa grade,
EL ≥ 27 % for TS 980 MPa grade, and EL ≥ 23 % for TS 1180 MPa grade, and TS x EL ≥
27000 MPa·%.
[0109] Further, hole expansion test was performed in accordance with
JIS Z 2256 (2010). Each of the steel sheets thus obtained was cut to a sample size of 100 mm x 100
mm, and a hole with a diameter of 10 mm was drilled through each sample with clearance
12 % ± 1 %. Subsequently, each steel sheet was clamped into a die having an inner
diameter of 75 mm with a blank holding force of 8 tons (7.845 kN). In this state,
a conical punch of 60° was pushed into the hole, and the hole diameter at the time
of occurrence of cracking (hole diameter at crack initiation limit) was measured.
Based on the hole diameter thus measured, the maximum hole expansion ratio λ (%) was
calculated by the following equation to evaluate hole expansion formability:

[0110] Where D
f is a hole diameter at the time of occurrence of cracking (mm) and Do is an initial
hole diameter (mm).
[0111] In this case, TS and EL were determined to be good when λ ≥ 40 % for TS 780 MPa grade,
λ ≥ 30 % for TS 980 MPa grade, and λ ≥ 20 % TS 1180 MPa grade.
[0112] Moreover, in fatigue test, sampling was performed such that the longitudinal direction
of each fatigue test piece coincides with a direction perpendicular to the rolling
direction of the steel sheet, and plane bending fatigue test was conducted under the
completely reversed (stress ratio: -1) condition and at the frequency of 20 Hz in
accordance with
JIS Z 2275 (1978). In the completely reversed plane bending fatigue test, the stress at which no fracture
was observed after 10
7 cycles was measured and used as fatigue limit strength.
Fatigue limit strength was divided by tensile strength TS to calculate a fatigue ratio.
In this case, the fatigue property was determined to be good when fatigue limit strength
≥ 400 MPa and fatigue ratio ≥ 0.40.
[0113] Additionally, during the manufacture of steel sheets, measurements were made of productivity,
sheet passage ability during hot rolling and cold rolling, and surface characteristics
of each steel sheet obtained after final annealing (hereinafter also referred to as
a "final-annealed sheet").
In this case, productivity was evaluated according to the lead time costs, including:
- (1) malformation of a hot-rolled steel sheet occurred;
- (2) a hot-rolled steel sheet requires straightening before proceeding to the subsequent
steps;
- (3) a prolonged annealing treatment holding time; and
- (4) a prolonged austemper holding time (a prolonged holding time in a reheating temperature
range in annealing treatment).
The productivity was determined to be "high" when none of (1) to (4) applied, "middle"
when only (4) applied, and "low" when any of (1) to (3) applied.
[0114] The sheet passage ability during hot rolling was determined to be low when the risk
of trouble during rolling increased with increasing rolling load. Similarly, the sheet
passage ability during cold rolling was determined to be low when the risk of trouble
during rolling increased with increasing rolling load.
[0115] Furthermore, the surface characteristics of each final-annealed sheet were determined
to be poor when defects such as blow hole generation and segregation on the surface
layer of the slab could not be scaled-off, cracks and irregularities on the steel
sheet surface increased, and a smooth steel sheet surface could not be obtained. The
surface characteristics were also determined to be poor when the amount of oxides
(scales) generated suddenly increased, the interface between the steel substrate and
oxides was roughened, and the surface quality after pickling and cold rolling degraded,
or when some hot-rolling scales remained after pickling.
Structure observation was performed following the above-described procedure.
The evaluation results are shown in Tables 3 and 4.
[0116] Table 3
Table 3
No. |
Steel ID |
|
Steel structure |
Remarks |
Sheet thickness |
Area ratio of F+BF |
Area ratio of TM |
Volume fraction of RA |
Mean grain size of RA |
Mean free path of BF |
Balance structure |
|
(mm) |
(%) |
(%) |
(%) |
(µM) |
(µm) |
|
1 |
A |
2.3 |
69.1 |
9.2 |
11.9 |
0.6 |
1.8 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
2 |
B |
2.0 |
68.4 |
9.8 |
10.2 |
0.7 |
1.7 |
M-P+θ |
Example |
3 |
C |
2.3 |
67.8 |
11.1 |
12.2 |
0.7 |
2.0 |
M-P+θ |
Example |
4 |
C |
2.9 |
63.6 |
10.4 |
17.1 |
1.4 |
2.1 |
M+P+θ |
Comparative example |
5 |
C |
2.5 |
62.2 |
11.1 |
16.8 |
1.3 |
2.4 |
M+P+θ |
Comparative example |
6 |
C |
2.5 |
59.2 |
9.7 |
6.8 |
0.6 |
5.6 |
M+P+θ |
Comparative example |
7 |
C |
2.3 |
65.7 |
10.6 |
12.5 |
2.9 |
2.2 |
M+P+θ |
Comparative example |
8 |
C |
1.9 |
64.9 |
12.2 |
15.4 |
1.4 |
2.4 |
M+P+θ |
Comparative example |
9 |
C |
1.4 |
70.6 |
8.9 |
3.8 |
0.5 |
2.5 |
M-P+θ |
Comparative example |
10 |
C |
1.4 |
66.9 |
8.6 |
9.1 |
3.8 |
5.2 |
M+P+θ |
Comparative example |
11 |
C |
2.0 |
64.2 |
1.2 |
5.7 |
3.0 |
2.6 |
M+P+θ |
Comparative example |
12 |
C |
2.1 |
66.4 |
23.4 |
9.1 |
3.1 |
2.7 |
M+P+θ |
Comparative example |
13 |
C |
1.8 |
67.6 |
5.6 |
6.7 |
3.4 |
2.4 |
M+P+θ |
Comparative example |
14 |
C |
1.7 |
85.6 |
7.9 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
2.1 |
M+P+θ |
Comparative example |
15 |
C |
2.1 |
54.8 |
26.0 |
11.0 |
1.7 |
2.2 |
M+P+θ |
Comparative example |
16 |
C |
1.7 |
63.1 |
31.4 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
2.2 |
M+P+θ |
Comparative example |
17 |
C |
2.3 |
64.6 |
0.6 |
2.9 |
0.5 |
2.3 |
M-P+θ |
Comparative example |
18 |
C |
1.8 |
46.9 |
37.8 |
2.4 |
0.6 |
1.8 |
M-P+θ |
Comparative example |
19 |
C |
2.1 |
48.2 |
10.6 |
4.2 |
0.7 |
2.2 |
M-P+θ |
Comparative example |
20 |
C |
2.3 |
63.7 |
3.1 |
3.5 |
0.6 |
2.4 |
M-P+θ |
Comparative example |
21 |
C |
1.9 |
66.6 |
9.6 |
14.4 |
0.8 |
2.5 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
22 |
D |
1.6 |
59.9 |
12.1 |
14.5 |
1.1 |
1.9 |
M-P+θ |
Example |
23 |
E |
1.6 |
66.6 |
11.6 |
11.4 |
1.2 |
1.8 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
24 |
F |
1.9 |
67.4 |
10.8 |
10.9 |
0.9 |
1.7 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
25 |
G |
1.5 |
68.4 |
9.2 |
11.4 |
0.7 |
1.9 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
26 |
H |
1.8 |
66.5 |
8.4 |
12.8 |
0.9 |
1.5 |
M-P+θ |
Example |
27 |
I |
2.1 |
58.2 |
12.8 |
15.6 |
0.8 |
2.0 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
28 |
J |
2.3 |
83.3 |
5.5 |
2.1 |
0.3 |
2.3 |
M+P+θ |
Comparative example |
29 |
K |
2.5 |
48.4 |
26.2 |
3.5 |
0.6 |
2.1 |
M+P+θ |
Comparative example |
30 |
L |
2.2 |
81.7 |
0.5 |
4.6 |
0.7 |
2.4 |
M+P+θ |
Comparative example |
31 |
M |
2.5 |
65.4 |
11.4 |
11.1 |
0.7 |
1.7 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
32 |
N |
1.8 |
66.5 |
10.9 |
11.9 |
0.9 |
1.5 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
33 |
O |
1.7 |
64.4 |
9.7 |
12.8 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
34 |
P |
1.7 |
67.7 |
9.9 |
11.4 |
0.9 |
1.6 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
35 |
Q |
2.4 |
64.5 |
10.6 |
11.4 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
36 |
R |
1.8 |
68.2 |
11.2 |
9.1 |
0.7 |
1.8 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
37 |
S |
2.7 |
71.7 |
8.9 |
9.6 |
0.6 |
2.0 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
38 |
T |
2.5 |
69.7 |
9.7 |
10.1 |
0.5 |
1.2 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
39 |
U |
1.8 |
67.6 |
10.4 |
11.4 |
0.7 |
1.5 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
40 |
V |
2.5 |
65.4 |
10.1 |
12.5 |
0.5 |
1.8 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
41 |
W |
2.3 |
63.0 |
11.8 |
13.6 |
0.6 |
1.1 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
42 |
X |
1.9 |
68.4 |
9.4 |
11.6 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
43 |
Y |
2.5 |
66.1 |
10.6 |
12.8 |
0.9 |
1.5 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
44 |
Z |
1.8 |
67.4 |
9.7 |
12.5 |
0.9 |
1.6 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
45 |
AA |
1.6 |
68.3 |
11.2 |
11.1 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
46 |
AB |
2.0 |
66.9 |
12.4 |
13.2 |
0.9 |
1.7 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
47 |
AC |
2.2 |
65.1 |
12.9 |
14.8 |
1.1 |
2.1 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
48 |
AD |
1.8 |
66.2 |
10.8 |
12.1 |
0.7 |
1.9 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
49 |
AE |
1.6 |
68.9 |
9.2 |
10.9 |
0.6 |
1.6 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
50 |
AF |
2.0 |
69.2 |
12.1 |
12.5 |
1.3 |
2.2 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
51 |
AG |
1.8 |
68.9 |
11.6 |
11.4 |
1.4 |
2.3 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
52 |
AH |
1.4 |
69.1 |
10.8 |
10.9 |
1.0 |
1.8 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
53 |
AI |
1.8 |
67.5 |
12.2 |
11.4 |
0.9 |
2.2 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
54 |
AJ |
1.3 |
66.6 |
11.4 |
13.8 |
0.7 |
2.4 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
55 |
AK |
1.5 |
62.9 |
12.8 |
15.6 |
0.7 |
2.5 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
56 |
AL |
2.0 |
61.9 |
11.9 |
22.5 |
0.9 |
1.9 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
57 |
AM |
1.2 |
56.7 |
10.8 |
23.5 |
0.9 |
1.8 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
58 |
AN |
1.4 |
64.1 |
9.2 |
18.3 |
0.7 |
1.7 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
59 |
AO |
1.4 |
61.3 |
11.6 |
21.3 |
0.8 |
1.9 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
60 |
AP |
1.8 |
59.9 |
10.7 |
22.1 |
1.0 |
1.9 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
61 |
AQ |
1.4 |
57.7 |
10.4 |
24.9 |
1.1 |
1.8 |
M+P+θ |
Example |
Underlined if outside of the appropriate range.
F: ferrite, BF: bainitic ferrite, RA: retained austenite, M: martensite,
TM: tempered martensite, P: pearlite, θ: cementite |
[0117] Table 4
Table 4
No. |
Tensile test results |
Hole expansion test results |
Fatigue test results |
Productivity |
Sheet passage ability during hot rolling |
Sheet passage ability during cold rolling |
Surface characteristics of final-annealed sheet |
Remarks |
TS |
EL |
TS x EL |
λ |
Fatigue limit strength |
Fatigue ratio |
(MPa) |
(%) |
(MPa·%) |
(%) |
(MPa) |
1 |
794 |
40.1 |
31839 |
68 |
450 |
0.57 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
2 |
910 |
37.1 |
33761 |
52 |
460 |
0.51 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
3 |
1008 |
33.5 |
33768 |
42 |
470 |
0.47 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
4 |
1028 |
27.8 |
28578 |
35 |
410 |
0.40 |
Low |
Low |
- |
Fairly poor |
Comparative example |
5 |
1034 |
27.2 |
28125 |
33 |
410 |
0.40 |
Low |
Low |
- |
Fairly poor |
Comparative example |
6 |
1235 |
12.4 |
15314 |
26 |
500 |
0.40 |
Low |
Low |
- |
Fairly poor |
Comparative example |
7 |
1012 |
18.9 |
19127 |
34 |
410 |
0.41 |
Low |
High |
Low |
Poor |
Comparative example |
8 |
942 |
28.1 |
26470 |
42 |
400 |
0.42 |
Low |
High |
- |
Good |
Comparative example |
9 |
679 |
34.1 |
23154 |
50 |
280 |
0.41 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Comparative example |
10 |
1044 |
15.8 |
16495 |
26 |
290 |
0.28 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Comparative example |
11 |
1189 |
16.2 |
19262 |
16 |
480 |
0.40 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Comparative example |
12 |
1022 |
18.4 |
18805 |
38 |
410 |
0.40 |
Low |
High |
- |
Good |
Comparative example |
13 |
1279 |
14.8 |
18929 |
24 |
520 |
0.41 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Comparative example |
14 |
682 |
26.9 |
18346 |
45 |
290 |
0.43 |
Low |
High |
- |
Good |
Comparative example |
15 |
1289 |
8.9 |
11472 |
24 |
510 |
0.40 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Comparative example |
16 |
802 |
20.5 |
16441 |
52 |
340 |
0.42 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Comparative example |
17 |
1030 |
27.6 |
28428 |
24 |
480 |
0.47 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Comparative example |
18 |
716 |
24.5 |
17542 |
53 |
300 |
0.42 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Comparative example |
19 |
1199 |
14.7 |
17625 |
21 |
480 |
0.40 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Comparative example |
20 |
1088 |
14.2 |
15450 |
14 |
490 |
0.45 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Comparative example |
21 |
1011 |
28.9 |
29218 |
35 |
430 |
0.43 |
Middle |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
22 |
1122 |
30.1 |
33772 |
36 |
470 |
0.42 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
23 |
1000 |
33.4 |
33400 |
38 |
430 |
0.43 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
24 |
1041 |
30.8 |
32063 |
35 |
440 |
0.42 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
25 |
984 |
34.5 |
33948 |
41 |
420 |
0.43 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
26 |
1008 |
33.1 |
33365 |
37 |
440 |
0.44 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
27 |
1211 |
27.8 |
33666 |
27 |
510 |
0.42 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
28 |
678 |
25.8 |
17492 |
68 |
310 |
0.46 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Comparative example |
29 |
1245 |
10.9 |
13571 |
14 |
520 |
0.42 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Comparative example |
30 |
679 |
26.9 |
18265 |
40 |
320 |
0.47 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Comparative example |
31 |
1056 |
30.1 |
31786 |
45 |
450 |
0.43 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
32 |
1047 |
29.8 |
31201 |
40 |
440 |
0.42 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
33 |
1070 |
28.4 |
30388 |
36 |
470 |
0.44 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
34 |
1004 |
32.9 |
33032 |
39 |
480 |
0.48 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
35 |
1007 |
32.4 |
32627 |
46 |
450 |
0.45 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
36 |
1004 |
33.9 |
34036 |
41 |
430 |
0.43 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
37 |
827 |
39.1 |
32336 |
51 |
410 |
0.50 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
38 |
908 |
35.5 |
32234 |
53 |
420 |
0.46 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
39 |
1001 |
33.6 |
33634 |
42 |
430 |
0.43 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
40 |
1033 |
32.0 |
33056 |
39 |
460 |
0.45 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
41 |
1107 |
28.9 |
31992 |
40 |
450 |
0.41 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
42 |
1002 |
33.7 |
33767 |
39 |
480 |
0.48 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
43 |
1039 |
32.6 |
33871 |
38 |
440 |
0.42 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
44 |
1026 |
32.8 |
33653 |
40 |
500 |
0.49 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
45 |
989 |
32.2 |
31846 |
56 |
450 |
0.46 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
46 |
1036 |
30.8 |
31909 |
62 |
460 |
0.44 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
47 |
1198 |
29.2 |
34982 |
48 |
510 |
0.43 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
48 |
996 |
32.1 |
31972 |
54 |
450 |
0.45 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
49 |
810 |
37.8 |
30618 |
61 |
440 |
0.54 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
50 |
822 |
34.1 |
28030 |
48 |
430 |
0.52 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
51 |
1014 |
27.9 |
28291 |
39 |
490 |
0.48 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
52 |
797 |
34.9 |
27815 |
45 |
400 |
0.50 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
53 |
1002 |
28.8 |
28858 |
38 |
470 |
0.47 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
54 |
1189 |
24.4 |
29012 |
31 |
520 |
0.44 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
55 |
1092 |
30.7 |
33524 |
37 |
490 |
0.45 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
56 |
1111 |
29.9 |
33219 |
33 |
520 |
0.47 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
57 |
1239 |
28.2 |
34940 |
28 |
560 |
0.45 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
58 |
985 |
30.6 |
30141 |
41 |
480 |
0.49 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
59 |
1134 |
28.7 |
32546 |
37 |
500 |
0.44 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
60 |
1122 |
28.2 |
31640 |
39 |
520 |
0.46 |
High |
High |
- |
Good |
Example |
61 |
1086 |
31.9 |
34643 |
45 |
500 |
0.46 |
High |
High |
High |
Good |
Example |
[0118] It can be seen that each of our examples has TS of 780 MPa or more, and the present
disclosure enables manufacture of high-strength steel sheets with high productivity
that are excellent not only in ductility but also in hole expansion formability (stretch
flangeability) and fatigue properties. It can also be appreciated that each of our
examples exhibits excellent sheet passage ability during hot rolling and cold rolling,
as well as excellent surface characteristics of the final-annealed sheet.
In contrast, comparative examples are inferior in terms of one or more of tensile
strength, ductility, balance between strength and ductility, hole expansion formability
(stretch flangeability), fatigue properties, and productivity.