TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The disclosure relates to a cold-rolled steel sheet with a sheet thickness of 0.4
mm or more and 3.0 mm or less suitable for use in vehicles, electric appliances, etc.,
and particularly relates to a cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent spot weldability
with a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more and a manufacturing method therefor.
BACKGROUND
[0002] In recent years, improved fuel efficiency of vehicles has become increasingly important
for global environment protection, which has encouraged reductions in weight of automotive
bodies. The most effective means for this is to strengthen the steel sheets used and
reduce their sheet thickness. It is also important to improve the safety of vehicle
occupants. Effective means for this is equally to strengthen the steel sheets used.
For such steel sheet strengthening, conventionally the conditions of hot rolling and
subsequent continuous annealing have been strictly managed while adding various alloying
elements such as C and Mn in steel sheets.
[0003] When using cold-rolled steel sheets as an automotive member, typically the steel
sheets that have been formed are joined by welding and made into a desired finished
shape. To ensure excellent safety as an automotive body structure, not only the base
material of the cold-rolled steel sheets but also the area including the weld metal
and the heat-affected zone is required to have excellent mechanical property. A conventional
measure to ensure excellent weld property as cold-rolled steel sheets for vehicles
typically limits the addition amounts of alloying elements for enhancing quench hardenability
such as C and Mn and the addition amounts of impurity elements for facilitating the
microsegregation of welds such as P and S.
[0004] However, it is extremely difficult to achieve both tensile strength as high as 980
MPa or more and high spot weldability, as there is a trade-off between increasing
strength and increasing spot weldability by the addition of alloying components such
as C and Mn.
[0005] For example, in resistance spot welding used as a typical method of joining steel
sheets for vehicles, the steel sheets are heated to the melting point and then quenched.
As a result, the weld metal becomes a solidified martensite single-phase structure
in coarse columnar form. The heat-affected zone heated to a temperature range of Ac
3 point or more (hereafter also referred to as "heat-affected zone of Ac
3 point or more") also becomes a relatively coarse martensite structure. The weld metal
and the heat-affected zone of Ac
3 point or more are therefore higher in hardness than the base material, and susceptible
to embrittlement. Besides, the heat-affected zone heated only to a temperature range
less than Ac
3 point (hereafter also referred to as "heat-affected zone less than Ac
3 point") is likely to decrease in strength due to tempering effect, and tends to have
a higher softening degree with respect to the base material when the base material
has higher strength. The weld typically has a discontinuous shape unlike the base
material, so that stress tends to concentrate and residual stress due to welding heat
hysteresis is unavoidable. Especially in a high strength steel sheet, the discontinuity
of strength in the area from the weld metal through the heat-affected zone to the
base material is significant, and the fracture strength of the spot weld is likely
to be lower than that of the base material.
CITATION LIST
Patent Literatures
SUMMARY
(Technical Problem)
[0007] High strength steel sheets proposed in
JP 2012-167338 A (PTL 1),
JP 4530606 B2 (PTL 2),
JP 4883216 B2 (PTL 3),
JP 5142068 B2 (PTL 4),
JP 5323552 B2 (PTL 5), and the like fail to achieve both high strength of 980 MPa or more in tensile
strength and sufficiently improved spot weldability while ensuring sufficient economic
efficiency and productivity.
[0008] It could therefore be helpful to provide a cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent
spot weldability with a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more and an advantageous manufacturing
method therefor, without increasing manufacturing cost or decreasing productivity.
[0009] In the disclosure, "excellent spot weldability" means that the cross tensile strength
is 10 kN/spot or more and the failure mode is plug failure in a cross tensile test
according to JIS Z 3137 (1999), and the difference ΔHV between the maximum and minimum
values of Vickers hardness in the area from the weld metal portion to the base material
portion is less than 120 in a spot weld section test according to JIS Z 3139 (2009).
(Solution to Problem)
[0010] As a result of conducting extensive study on the chemical components of a steel sheet,
a manufacturing method, and various factors determining microstructure, we discovered
the following:
- (1) To achieve a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more, it is important to strictly
adjust the chemical composition of the steel sheet and appropriately control the mass%
ratio ofTi and N (Ti/N).
By appropriately controlling Ti/N, strengthening by crystal grain refinement and strengthening
by precipitation are realized through the generation of TiN. Moreover, the generation
of Nb nitride is suppressed to secure solute Nb in the annealing process, which produces
an effect of delaying the progress of recrystallization during heating and contributes
to higher strength of the steel sheet.
- (2) To achieve excellent spot weldability, it is important to suppress the embrittlement
of the weld metal and heat-affected zone of Ac3 point or more and also suppress the softening of the heat-affected zone less than
Ac3 point.
To suppress the embrittlement of the weld metal and heat-affected zone of Ac3 point or more, it is necessary to minimize solute N, refine crystal grains, and suppress
excessive hardening in the weld metal and heat-affected zone.
Moreover, when an appropriate amount of solute Nb exists in the steel, NbC is formed
in the low-temperature range in the cooling process during welding, thus suppressing
softening in the heat-affected zone less than Ac3 point.
- (3) To effectively produce the aforementioned effects, the existence states of Ti
and Nb in the cold-rolled steel sheet after annealing need to be appropriately controlled.
[0011] To attain the desired existence states of Ti and Nb, it is important to strictly
adjust the chemical composition of the steel sheet and Ti/N and appropriately control
the manufacturing conditions, in particular the hot rolling conditions and the annealing
conditions.
[0012] The disclosure is based on the aforementioned discoveries and further studies.
[0013] We provide the following:
- 1. A cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent spot weldability, the cold-rolled steel
sheet having a steel composition containing (consisting of), in mass%: C: 0.05% to
0.13%; Si: 0.05% to 2.0%; Mn: 1.5% to 4.0%; P: 0.05% or less; S: 0.005% or less, Al:
0.01% to 0.10%; Cr: 0.05% to 1.0%; Nb: 0.010% to 0.070%; Ti: 0.005% to 0.040%; and
N: 0.0005% to 0.0065%, with a mass ratio Ti/N of Ti and N being 2.5 or more and 7.5
or less, and a balance being Fe and incidental impurities, wherein 70 mass% or more
of Ti in steel exists as a precipitate, and 15 mass% or more of Nb in the steel exists
as solute Nb, and a tensile strength is 980 MPa or more.
- 2. The cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent spot weldability according to the
foregoing 1, wherein the steel composition further contains one or more selected from,
in mass%: Mo: 0.01% to 1.0%, Cu: 1.0% or less; Ni: 1.0% or less; and V: 0.1% or less.
- 3. A manufacturing method for a cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent spot weldability,
the manufacturing method including: heating a steel material having the steel composition
according to the foregoing 1 or 2 to a temperature range of (Ts - 50) °C or more and
(Ts + 200) °C or less where Ts is a temperature defined by the following Formula (1),
hot rolling the steel material with a finisher delivery temperature of 850 °C or more
to obtain a hot-rolled steel sheet, and then coiling the hot-rolled steel sheet at
a temperature of 650 °C or less; cold rolling the hot-rolled steel sheet into a cold-rolled
steel sheet; and continuously annealing the cold-rolled steel sheet by: heating the
cold-rolled steel sheet to a temperature range of 700 °C or more and 900 °C or less;
and, in a subsequent cooling process, cooling the cold-rolled steel sheet to a temperature
range of 200 °C or more and 450 °C or less with an average cooling rate of 12 °C/s
or more and 100 °C/s or less, and holding the cold-rolled steel sheet in the temperature
range of 200 °C or more and 450 °C or less for a time of 30 s or more and 600 s or
less,

where [%Nb], [%C], and [%N] respectively denote Nb, C, and N contents in steel in
mass%.
(Advantageous Effect)
[0014] It is thus possible to obtain a cold-rolled steel sheet having excellent spot weldability
with a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more, without increasing manufacturing cost
or decreasing productivity.
[0015] The use of the cold-rolled steel sheet according to the disclosure improves manufacturing
efficiency when producing steel structures such as vehicles and safety for vehicle
occupants, and also improves fuel efficiency and thus significantly contributes to
lower environmental burden.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0016] Detailed description is given below.
[0017] The reasons for limiting the chemical composition of the steel material to the aforementioned
range are described first. While the unit of the content of each element in the chemical
composition of the steel material is "mass%", the content is simply expressed in "%"
unless otherwise stated.
C: 0.05% to 0.13%
[0018] C is the most important element in strengthening the steel, and has high solid solution
strengthening ability. To achieve such effect, the C content needs to be 0.05% or
more. If the C content is more than 0.13%, martensite phase in the base material increases
and significantly hardens the material, causing degradation in hole expansion formability.
The C content is therefore limited to the range of 0.05% to 0.13%. The C content is
preferably in the range of 0.06% to 0.12%.
Si: 0.05% to 2.0%
[0019] Si is an element necessary in steelmaking, acting as a deoxidizing material. Si also
has an effect of dissolving in the steel to strengthen the steel sheet by solid solution
strengthening. To achieve such effects, the Si content needs to be 0.05% or more.
If the Si content is more than 2.0%, the toughness of the weld metal and heat-affected
zone degrades significantly, causing lower fracture strength of the weld. The Si content
is therefore limited to the range of 0.05% to 2.0%. The Si content is preferably in
the range of 0.10% to 1.60%.
Mn: 1.5% to 4.0%
[0020] Mn has an effect of increasing the quench hardenability of the steel at relatively
low cost. To ensure a base material strength of 980 MPa or more in tensile strength,
the Mn content needs to be 1.5% or more. If the Mn content is more than 4.0%, the
fracture strength of the weld decreases, and the microsegregation of the base material
increases, promoting a delayed fracture originating from the base material segregation
area. The Mn content is therefore limited to the range of 1.5% to 4.0%. The Mn content
is preferably in the range of 1.7% to 3.8%.
P: 0.05% or less
[0021] P is an element having high solid solution strengthening ability, but promotes microsegregation
as with Mn. Accordingly, if the P content is more than 0.05%, not only the base material
embrittles but also the grain boundary segregation area tends to become a delayed
fracture origin. Hence, the P content is desirably minimized with the upper limit
being 0.05%. Excessively reducing P, however, involves high refining cost and is economically
disadvantageous. Therefore, the lower limit of the P content is desirably about 0.005%.
S: 0.005% or less
[0022] S segregates in the grain boundary and decreases ductility in hot rolling. Hence,
the S content is desirably minimized with the upper limit being 0.005%.
Al: 0.01% to 0.10%
[0023] Al acts as a deoxidizer, and is the most generally used element in the molten steel
deoxidizing process for steel sheets. Al also has an effect of fixing solute N in
the steel to form AlN, thus suppressing embrittlement caused by solute N. To achieve
such effects, the Al content needs to be 0.01% or more. If the Al content is more
than 0.10%, surface cracking during slab manufacture is promoted. The Al content is
therefore limited to the range of 0.01% to 0.10%. The Al content is preferably in
the range of 0.02% to 0.07%.
Cr: 0.05% to 1.0%
[0024] Cr has an effect of increasing the quench hardenability of the steel at relatively
low cost, and is an element that delays the bainite transformation of intermediate
hardness phase in the annealing process and generates martensite of high hardness
phase to contribute to improved strength of the steel. To achieve such effects, the
Cr content needs to be 0.05% or more. If the Cr content is more than 1.0%, not only
an excessive strength increase promotes embrittlement, but also an economic disadvantage
is entailed. The Cr content is therefore limited to the range of 0.05% to 1.0%. The
Cr content is preferably in the range of 0.07% to 0.8%.
Nb: 0.010% to 0.070%
[0025] Nb is an important element that, in annealing heating after cold rolling, exists
as solute Nb to produce a solute drag effect and delay the recrystallization of the
deformed microstructure generated in cold rolling, thus strengthening the steel sheet
after annealing. Moreover, NbC generated in the hot rolling process and annealing
process refines the microstructure in the base material and heat-affected zone, and
improves toughness. To achieve such effects, the Nb content needs to be 0.010% or
more. If the Nb content is more than 0.070%, coarse carbonitride precipitates, which
promotes surface cracking during slag manufacture and may also become a fracture origin.
The Nb content is therefore limited to the range of 0.010% to 0.070%. The Nb content
is preferably in the range of 0.015% to 0.060%.
Ti: 0.005% to 0.040%
[0026] Ti is an important alloying element in the disclosure. By fixing solute N to form
TiN, Ti has an effect of suppressing the coarsening of crystal grains in the weld
metal and heat-affected zone and an effect of suppressing embrittlement by reducing
solute N. Moreover, by forming TiN, Ti suppresses the generation of Nb nitride to
secure a predetermined amount of solute Nb in the hot rolling and annealing steps,
thus effectively contributing to higher strength of the steel sheet after annealing.
To achieve such effects, the Ti content needs to be 0.005% or more. If the Ti content
is more than 0.040%, very hard and brittle TiC precipitates, which promotes embrittlement.
The Ti content is therefore limited to the range of 0.005% to 0.040%. The Ti content
is preferably in the range of 0.010% to 0.035%.
N: 0.0005% to 0.0065%
[0027] N is contained in the steel as incidental impurity. However, when an appropriate
amount of Ti is added, N forms TiN, and thus has an effect of suppressing the coarsening
of crystal grains in the weld metal and heat-affected zone during welding. To achieve
such effect, the N content needs to be 0.0005% or more. If the N content is more than
0.0065%, an increase of solute N causes a significant decrease in anti-aging property.
The N content is therefore limited to the range of 0.0005% to 0.0065%. The N content
is preferably in the range of 0.0010% to 0.0060%.
[0028] In the disclosure, it is important to appropriately control the mass% ratio of Ti
and N, i.e. Ti/N, in addition to limiting the chemical composition as described above.
Ti/N: 2.5 or more and 7.5 or less
[0029] By controlling Ti/N in the aforementioned range, strengthening by crystal grain refinement
and strengthening by precipitation are achieved through the generation of TiN. Moreover,
an appropriate amount of solute Nb can be secured in the annealing process by suppressing
the generation of Nb nitride, and the resulting effect of delaying the progress of
recrystallization during heating contributes to higher strength of the steel sheet.
The controlled ratio also contributes to reduced solute N and refined crystal grains
in the weld metal and heat-affected zone, thus preventing the embrittlement of the
weld metal and heat-affected zone.
[0030] If Ti/N is less than 2.5, solute N in the steel sheet increases, which promotes embrittlement.
If Ti/N is more than 7.5, very hard and brittle TiC is generated in the steel sheet,
causing lower ductility and significant embrittlement. Ti/N is therefore limited to
the range of 2.5 to 7.5. Ti/N is preferably in the range of 3.0 to 7.0.
[0031] While the basic components have been described above, one or more selected from Mo,
Cu, Ni, and V may also be contained according to need.
Mo: 0.01% to 1.0%
[0032] Mo is an element that contributes to improved strength of the steel. To achieve such
effect, the Mo content needs to be 0.01% or more. If the Mo content is more than 1.0%,
not only an excessive strength increase promotes embrittlement, but also an economic
disadvantage is entailed. Accordingly, in the case of adding Mo, the Mo content is
in the range of 0.01% to 1.0%. The Mo content is preferably in the range of 0.03%
to 0.8%.
Cu: 1.0% or less
[0033] Cu is an element that contributes to improved strength of the steel. If the Cu content
is more than 1.0%, however, hot shortness occurs and the surface characteristics of
the steel sheet degrade. Accordingly, in the case of adding Cu, the Cu content is
1.0% or less.
Ni: 1.0% or less
[0034] Ni is an element that contributes to improved strength of the steel. If the Ni content
is more than 1.0%, however, the effect saturates, which is economically disadvantageous.
Accordingly, in the case of adding Ni, the Ni content is 1.0% or less.
V: 0.1% or less
[0035] V is an element that contributes to improved strength of the steel. If the V content
is more than 0.1%, however, the ductility of the base material degrades. Accordingly,
in the case of adding V, the V content is 0.1% or less.
[0036] In the chemical composition of the steel sheet according to the disclosure, the balance
other than the aforementioned components is Fe and incidental impurities.
[0037] The chemical composition of the steel sheet according to the disclosure has been
described above. In the disclosure, it is very important to appropriately control
the existence forms of Ti and Nb in the steel.
Proportion of Ti existing as precipitate in steel: 70 mass% or more
[0038] In the annealing process, Ti precipitate refines the structure, thus improving the
hole expansion formability of the eventually obtained cold-rolled steel sheet. In
addition, when Ti exists as a precipitate in the cold-rolled steel sheet after annealing,
the coarsening of crystal grains in the heat-affected zone due to welding heat hysteresis
during welding is suppressed, so that the fracture strength of the weld is improved.
To achieve such effects, 70 mass% or more of Ti in the steel need to exist as a precipitate.
The proportion of Ti existing as a precipitate in the steel is preferably 75 mass%
or more. The upper limit of the proportion of Ti existing as a precipitate in the
steel is not particularly limited. If the proportion is 100 mass%, however, toughness
degrades significantly due to remaining solute N. Accordingly, the proportion of Ti
existing as a precipitate in the steel is preferably less than 100 mass%, and more
preferably less than 98 mass%.
[0039] The form of the precipitate is mainly a single precipitate of TiN or a composite
precipitate of TiN and another precipitate. Even when Ti oxide or Ti carbide is mixed,
its effect is negligible as long as Ti oxide or Ti carbide is less than 10% of the
total number of Ti-based precipitates. The existence form of Ti in the steel other
than a precipitate is solute Ti.
Proportion of Nb existing as solute Nb in steel: 15 mass% or more
[0040] Nb existing as a solute has an effect of suppressing recrystallization during heating
in the annealing process to effectively contribute to higher strength of the steel
and also has an effect of suppressing the softening of the heat-affected zone less
than Ac
3 point.
[0041] To achieve such effects, 15 mass% or more of Nb in the steel need to exist as solute
Nb. The proportion ofNb existing as solute Nb in the steel is preferably 20 mass%
or more.
[0042] The upper limit of the proportion of Nb existing as solute Nb in the steel is not
particularly limited. If the amount of solute Nb in the steel is excessively high,
however, the aforementioned effects saturate, and the manufacturing cost increases.
Accordingly, the proportion of Nb existing as solute Nb in the steel is preferably
70 mass% or less.
[0043] The existence form of Nb in the steel other than solute Nb is Nb precipitate. Examples
of the Nb precipitate include Nb carbide and Nb carbonitride such as NbC.
[0044] The following describes a manufacturing method according to the disclosure. Note
that the temperature of the steel sheet in the manufacturing conditions is the surface
temperature of the steel sheet.
[0045] Molten steel having the aforementioned chemical composition is obtained by steelmaking
using a known method such as a converter or an electric heating furnace, and made
into a steel material such as a slab having predetermined dimensions using a known
method such as continuous casting or ingot casting and blooming. The molten steel
may also be subjected to treatment such as refining with a ladle or vacuum degassing.
[0046] The obtained steel material is immediately or temporarily cooled, heated to a temperature
range of (Ts - 50) °C or more and (Ts + 200) °C or less, and hot rolled with a finisher
delivery temperature of 850 °C or more. The steel material is then coiled at 650 °C
or less, to form a hot-rolled steel sheet.
[0047] Here, Ts is defined by the following Formula (1):

where [%Nb], [%C], and [%N] respectively denote the Nb, C, and N contents (mass%)
in the steel.
Heating temperature: (Ts - 50) °C or more and (Ts + 200) °C or less
[0048] Carbonitride containing coarse Nb which has crystallized during the steelmaking of
the steel material does not contribute to higher strength of the steel sheet. It is
therefore important to temporarily dissolve such coarse Nb-based crystallized product
in the steel in the heating stage before hot rolling, and precipitate it again as
fine Nb carbide or carbonitride in the subsequent processes such as rolling, cooling,
and annealing.
[0049] If the heating temperature is less than (Ts - 50) °C, heating is insufficient and
the Nb-based crystallized product does not sufficiently dissolve in the steel, leading
to insufficient strength after annealing. If the heating temperature is more than
(Ts + 200) °C, the aforementioned effects saturate. Besides, the Ti crystallized product
dissolves completely, making it difficult to cause an appropriate amount of Ti to
exist as a precipitate after annealing. Further, the fuel cost for heating increases
and also the yield rate drops due to increased scale-off, which is economically disadvantageous.
The heating temperature is therefore (Ts - 50) °C or more and (Ts + 200) °C or less.
The heating temperature is preferably (Ts - 20) °C or more and (Ts + 170) °C or less.
Finisher delivery temperature: 850 °C or more
[0050] If the finisher delivery temperature is less than 850 °C, not only rolling efficiency
drops, but also the rolling load increases, causing a greater load on the mill. The
finisher delivery temperature is therefore 850 °C or more.
Coiling temperature: 650 °C or less
[0051] If the coiling temperature for the hot-rolled steel sheet is more than 650 °C, NbC
which precipitates during coiling coarsens excessively, which facilitates embrittlement
and is likely to provide a fracture origin. The coiling temperature for the hot-rolled
steel sheet therefore needs to be 650 °C or less. The coiling temperature for the
hot-rolled steel sheet is preferably 620 °C or less. The lower limit of the coiling
temperature for the hot-rolled steel sheet need not be particularly limited. Given
that an excessive temperature decrease causes lower manufacturing efficiency, however,
the lower limit is preferably about 400 °C.
[0052] The obtained hot-rolled steel sheet is then cold rolled into a cold-rolled steel
sheet. The cold rolling conditions need not be particularly limited. To ensure desired
strength after annealing, however, the total rolling reduction is preferably 30% or
more. Moreover, to avoid an excessive load on the mill, the total rolling reduction
is preferably 80% or less.
[0053] The cold-rolled steel sheet obtained in this way is then continuously annealed under
the following conditions.
Heating temperature in continuous annealing: 700 °C or more and 900 °C or less
[0054] If the heating temperature in continuous annealing is less than 700 °C, the reverse
transformation of austenite is insufficient, and the amount of hard martensite or
bainite generated in the subsequent cooling is insufficient, making it impossible
to obtain desired strength. If the heating temperature in continuous annealing is
more than 900 °C, austenite grains coarsen considerably, causing degradation in hole
expansion formability of the base material and toughness of the heat-affected zone.
The heating temperature in continuous annealing is therefore 700 °C or more and 900
°C or less. The heating temperature in continuous annealing is preferably 720 °C or
more and 880 °C or less.
[0055] The holding time after heating need not be particularly limited. To ensure a uniform
temperature distribution and a stable microstructure, however, the holding time is
preferably 15 s or more. Meanwhile, a long holding time causes not only lower manufacturing
efficiency but also coarser austenite grains, and so the holding time is preferably
600 s or less.
Average cooling rate: 12 °C/s or more and 100 °C/s or less
[0056] If the average cooling rate in the cooling process after heating in continuous annealing
is less than 12 °C/s, soft ferrite phase is generated excessively during cooling,
making it difficult to ensure desired strength. Besides, Nb reprecipitates excessively
in the middle of cooling, making it difficult to secure a desired amount of solute
Nb. Further, coarse ferrite phase or pearlite phase is generated in the middle of
cooling, leading to a decrease in strength. If the average cooling rate after annealing
is more than 100 °C/s, it is difficult to secure the shape of the steel sheet. The
average cooling rate after annealing treatment is therefore 12 °C/s or more and 100
°C/s or less. The average cooling rate is preferably 14 °C/s or more and 70 °C/s or
less.
Cooling stop temperature: 200 °C or more and 450 °C or less
[0057] If the cooling stop temperature is less than 200 °C, the conveyance speed for the
steel sheet is to be lowered extremely, which is not preferable in terms of manufacturing
efficiency. If the cooling stop temperature is more than 450 °C, relatively soft bainite
phase is generated excessively after the cooling stop, making it difficult to ensure
desired strength. Besides, Nb reprecipitates excessively after the cooling stop, making
it difficult to secure a desired amount of solute Nb. Further, a soft structure such
as ferrite is generated excessively, leading to insufficient strength. The cooling
stop temperature is therefore 200 °C or more and 450 °C or less. The cooling stop
temperature is preferably 230 °C or more and 420 °C or less.
Holding time in cooling stop temperature range: 30 s or more and 600 s or less
[0058] If the holding time in the cooling stop temperature range is less than 30 s, the
uniformity of the temperature and material in the steel sheet decreases. If the holding
time in the cooling stop temperature range is more than 600 s, manufacturing efficiency
decreases. The holding time in the cooling stop temperature range is therefore 30
s or more and 600 s or less.
EXAMPLES
[0059] Steel having the chemical composition shown in Table 1 was obtained by steelmaking
using a converter, refined with a ladle, and continuously cast into a steel slab.
The steel slab was then hot rolled under the conditions shown in Table 2, into a hot-rolled
steel sheet. The hot-rolled steel sheet was cold rolled and continuously annealed
under the conditions shown in Table 2, thus obtaining a cold-rolled steel sheet as
a product sheet.
[Table 1]
Table I
| Steel No. |
Chemical composition (mass%) |
Ti/N |
Ts |
Ts-50 |
Ts+200 |
Remarks |
| C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
Al |
Cr |
Nb |
Ti |
N |
Mo |
Cu |
Ni |
V |
(°C) |
(°C) |
(°C) |
| 1 |
0.074 |
0.52 |
2.86 |
0.013 |
0.0011 |
0.029 |
0.16 |
0.029 |
0.018 |
0.0044 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4.1 |
1107 |
1057 |
1307 |
Confirming steel |
| 2 |
0.114 |
1.46 |
1.84 |
0.005 |
0.0010 |
0.033 |
0.65 |
0.037 |
0.015 |
0.0036 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4.2 |
1191 |
1141 |
1391 |
Conforming steel |
| 3 |
0.083 |
0.22 |
3.10 |
0.019 |
0.0024 |
0.035 |
0.21 |
0.051 |
0.011 |
0.0029 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3.8 |
1192 |
1142 |
1392 |
Conforming steel |
| 4 |
0.098 |
0.13 |
1.96 |
0.025 |
0.0031 |
0.051 |
0.39 |
0.038 |
0.028 |
0.0052 |
0.36 |
- |
- |
- |
5.4 |
1177 |
1127 |
1377 |
Conforming steel |
| 5 |
0.106 |
0.83 |
3.28 |
0.010 |
0.0019 |
0.065 |
0.08 |
0.041 |
0.010 |
0.0016 |
- |
0.12 |
0.19 |
- |
6.3 |
1194 |
1144 |
1394 |
Conforming steel |
| 6 |
0.119 |
0.26 |
2.76 |
0.008 |
0.0012 |
0.036 |
0.42 |
0.029 |
0.032 |
0.0060 |
- |
- |
- |
0.05 |
5.3 |
1166 |
1116 |
1366 |
Confirming steel |
| 7 |
0.067 |
1.12 |
3.74 |
0.036 |
0.0029 |
0.066 |
0.14 |
0.057 |
0.023 |
0.0046 |
0.06 |
- |
- |
- |
5.0 |
1182 |
1132 |
1382 |
Conforming steel |
| 8 |
0.124 |
0.28 |
2.41 |
0.012 |
0.0018 |
0.023 |
0.23 |
0.019 |
0.021 |
0.0056 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3.8 |
1117 |
1067 |
1317 |
Conforming steel |
| 9 |
0.039 |
0.58 |
2.71 |
0.024 |
0.0028 |
0.031 |
0.13 |
0.028 |
0.025 |
0.0046 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5.4 |
1034 |
984 |
1234 |
Comparative steel |
| 10 |
0.165 |
0.49 |
3.32 |
0.012 |
0.0024 |
0.030 |
0.20 |
0.045 |
0.015 |
0.0029 |
- |
- |
- |
0.05 |
5.2 |
1272 |
1222 |
1472 |
Comparative steel |
| 11 |
0.076 |
0.44 |
1.01 |
0.008 |
0.0014 |
0.022 |
0.24 |
0.030 |
0.012 |
0.0036 |
- |
0.18 |
- |
- |
3.3 |
1113 |
1063 |
1313 |
Comparative steel |
| 12 |
0,095 |
0.32 |
4.38 |
0.021 |
0.0031 |
0.041 |
0.32 |
0.029 |
0.028 |
0.0046 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6.1 |
1137 |
1087 |
1337 |
Comparative steel |
| 13 |
0.072 |
0.21 |
2.41 |
0.012 |
0.0028 |
0.048 |
0.01 |
0.021 |
0.015 |
0.0047 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3.2 |
1066 |
1016 |
1266 |
Comparative steel |
| 14 |
0.075 |
0.32 |
2.59 |
0.016 |
0.0015 |
0.025 |
0.17 |
0.008 |
0.013 |
0.0038 |
- |
- |
- |
0.04 |
3.4 |
966 |
916 |
1166 |
Comparative steel |
| 15 |
0.118 |
0.99 |
3.51 |
0.031 |
0.0033 |
0.050 |
0.20 |
0.042 |
0.004 |
0.0012 |
0.28 |
- |
- |
- |
3.3 |
1211 |
1161 |
1411 |
Comparative steel |
| 16 |
0.068 |
0.25 |
3.44 |
0.016 |
0.0029 |
0.032 |
0.26 |
0.021 |
0.041 |
0.0060 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6.8 |
1061 |
1011 |
1261 |
Comparative steel |
| 17 |
0.120 |
0.16 |
3.20 |
0.021 |
0.0025 |
0.030 |
0.09 |
0.049 |
0.033 |
0.0076 |
0.10 |
- |
- |
- |
4.3 |
1242 |
1192 |
1442 |
Comparative steel |
| 18 |
0.093 |
0.38 |
3.02 |
0.015 |
0.0012 |
0.046 |
0.35 |
0.024 |
0.014 |
0.0058 |
- |
- |
0.20 |
- |
2.4 |
1112 |
1062 |
1312 |
Comparative steel |
| 19 |
0.111 |
0.30 |
3.39 |
0.031 |
0.0030 |
0.026 |
0.15 |
0.041 |
0.032 |
0.0022 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
14.5 |
1200 |
1150 |
1400 |
Comparative steel |
| Underlines indicate outside the appropriate range |
[Table 2] Table 2
Table 2
| No. |
Steel No |
Material thickness (mm) |
Hot rolling conditions |
Cold rolling conditions |
Annealing conditions |
Remarks |
| Heating temperature |
Finisher delivery temperature |
Coiling temperature |
Sheet thickness |
Total rolling reduction |
Sheet thickness |
Heating temperature |
Heating holding time |
Cooling rate |
Cooling Stop temperature |
Holding time |
| (°C) |
(°C) |
(°C) |
(mm) |
(%) |
(mm) |
(°C) |
(s) |
(°C/s) |
(°C) |
(s) |
| 1-1 |
1 |
200 |
1200 |
900 |
590 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
790 |
100 |
15 |
320 |
200 |
Example |
| 1-2 |
200 |
1200 |
860 |
590 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
790 |
100 |
15 |
280 |
500 |
Example |
| 1-3 |
200 |
1030 |
860 |
590 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
790 |
100 |
15 |
300 |
200 |
Comparative Example |
| 1-4 |
200 |
1330 |
930 |
590 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
790 |
100 |
15 |
300 |
200 |
Comparative Example |
| 1-5 |
200 |
1200 |
900 |
700 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
790 |
100 |
15 |
300 |
200 |
Comparative Example |
| 1-6 |
200 |
1200 |
900 |
590 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
920 |
100 |
15 |
300 |
200 |
Comparative Example |
| 1-7 |
200 |
1200 |
900 |
590 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
680 |
100 |
15 |
300 |
200 |
Comparative Example |
| 2 |
2 |
210 |
1200 |
890 |
600 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
820 |
60 |
15 |
270 |
120 |
Example |
| 3-1 |
3 |
200 |
1230 |
900 |
600 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
780 |
80 |
25 |
310 |
150 |
Example |
| 3-2 |
200 |
1230 |
900 |
600 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
780 |
80 |
3 |
310 |
150 |
Comparative Example |
| 3-3 |
200 |
1230 |
900 |
600 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
780 |
80 |
20 |
480 |
150 |
Comparative Example |
| 4 |
4 |
200 |
1200 |
870 |
520 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
820 |
70 |
70 |
230 |
150 |
Example |
| 5 |
5 |
200 |
1250 |
880 |
600 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
760 |
150 |
13 |
310 |
400 |
Example |
| 6 |
6 |
200 |
1280 |
900 |
620 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
880 |
90 |
20 |
330 |
200 |
Example |
| No |
Steel No |
Material thickness |
Hot rolling conditions |
Cold rolling conditions |
Annealing conditions |
Remarks |
| heating temperature |
Finisher delivery temperature |
Coiling temperature |
Sheet thickness |
Total rolling reduction |
Sheet thickness |
Heating temperature |
Heating holding time |
Cooling rate |
Cooling slop temperature |
Holding time |
| (mm) |
(°C) |
(°C) |
(°C) |
(mm) |
(%) |
(mm) |
(°C) |
(s) |
(°C/s) |
(°C) |
(s) |
| 7 |
7 |
200 |
1150 |
920 |
600 |
28 |
50 |
1.4 |
750 |
90 |
20 |
290 |
200 |
Example |
| 8 |
8 |
200 |
1100 |
860 |
450 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
770 |
90 |
25 |
300 |
120 |
Example |
| 9 |
9 |
200 |
1200 |
880 |
580 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
780 |
90 |
15 |
300 |
200 |
Comparative Example |
| 10 |
10 |
230 |
1280 |
920 |
550 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
810 |
60 |
40 |
250 |
120 |
Comparative Example |
| 11 |
11 |
200 |
1220 |
880 |
560 |
28 |
50 |
1.4 |
830 |
90 |
30 |
300 |
180 |
Comparative Example |
| 12 |
12 |
200 |
1250 |
900 |
600 |
28 |
50 |
1.4 |
780 |
60 |
20 |
300 |
120 |
Comparative Example |
| 13 |
13 |
220 |
1200 |
860 |
550 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
840 |
100 |
20 |
310 |
230 |
Comparative Example |
| 14 |
14 |
200 |
1150 |
850 |
500 |
2 8 |
50 |
1.4 |
810 |
100 |
25 |
280 |
200 |
Comparative Example |
| 15 |
15 |
200 |
1250 |
930 |
600 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
810 |
90 |
20 |
300 |
180 |
Comparative Example |
| 16 |
16 |
200 |
1250 |
900 |
560 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
800 |
120 |
15 |
280 |
300 |
Comparative Example |
| 17 |
17 |
200 |
1250 |
900 |
600 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
790 |
100 |
20 |
300 |
250 |
Comparative Example |
| 18 |
18 |
200 |
1200 |
900 |
550 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
780 |
60 |
25 |
320 |
100 |
Comparative Example |
| 19 |
19 |
200 |
1250 |
900 |
600 |
2.8 |
50 |
1.4 |
800 |
90 |
20 |
290 |
150 |
Comparative Example |
| Underlines indicate outside the appropriate range. |
[0060] Each cold-rolled steel sheet obtained as a result was subjected to (I) analysis of
extracted residue of precipitate, (2) tensile test, and (3) spot weld test as follows.
(1) Analysis of extracted residue of precipitate
[0061] An electroextraction test piece was collected from each cold-rolled steel sheet obtained
as mentioned above, and subjected to electrolytic treatment using a AA electrolytic
solution (ethanol solution of acetylacetone tetramethylammonium chloride), to extract
a residue by filtration.
[0062] The extracted residue was set to a constant volume of 100 ml using pure water, and
the amount of Ti was measured by high-frequency inductively coupled plasma (ICP) emission
spectrometry as the amount of Ti existing as a precipitate. Likewise, the amount of
Nb in the extracted residue was measured, and the measured amount of Nb was subtracted
from the total amount of Nb in the test piece to calculate the amount of solute Nb.
[0063] The calculated amount of Ti existing as a precipitate and amount of solute Nb were
respectively divided by the total amount of Ti and total amount of Nb in the test
piece, to find the proportion of Ti existing as a precipitate in the steel and the
proportion of Nb existing as solute Nb in the steel. The evaluation results are shown
in Table 3.
(2) Tensile test
[0064] A JIS No. 5 tensile test piece was collected in the direction orthogonal to the rolling
direction, and tensile strength (TS) and total elongation (El) were measured according
to JIS Z 2241 (2011). The evaluation results are shown in Table 3. Each sample with
TS ≥ 980 MPa and El ≥ 13% was determined as favorable.
(3) Spot weld test
- Cross tensile test
[0065] Each cold-rolled steel sheet obtained as mentioned above was used to form a cross
tensile test piece according to JIS Z 3137 (1999). Spot welding in the formation of
the cross tensile test piece was performed under the welding conditions of a nugget
diameter of 6.0 mm according to the Japan Welding Engineering Society Standard: WES7301.
[0066] The formed cross tensile test piece was then subjected to a cross tensile test according
to JIS Z 3137 (1999). Each sample with a cross tensile strength of 10 kN/spot or more
and a failure mode of plug failure was determined as excellent in spot weldability.
- Section test
[0067] A section test was conducted according to JIS Z 3139 (2009).
[0068] Two cold-rolled steel sheets of the same steel sample ID were spot welded under the
same conditions as the aforementioned cross tensile test piece forming conditions.
After polishing a weld section cut perpendicularly to the steel sheet surface, nital
etching was applied to obtain a hardness measurement test piece. According to JIS
Z 2244 (2009), a Vickers hardness test was conducted from the weld metal portion to
the base material portion with a pitch of 0.5 mm from the center position of the nugget
in two directions parallel to the steel sheet surface at the positions of 0.5 mm above
and 0.5 mm below the center position in the sheet thickness direction, with a test
force of 0.9807 N. The difference (ΔHV) between the maximum and minimum values of
the measured Vickers hardness was then calculated. Each sample with ΔHV of less than
120 was determined as excellent in spot weldability.
[0069] The evaluation results are shown in Table 3.
[Table 3] Table 3
Table 3
| No. |
(1) Analysis result of extracted residue of precipitate |
(2) Tensile test result |
(3) Spot weld test result |
Remarks |
| Proportion of precipitate Ti |
Proportion of solute Nb |
TS |
El |
Cross tensile strength |
Failure mode |
(Joint hardness distribution) Difference between maximum and minimum values of Vickers
hardness |
| (mass%) |
(mass%) |
(MPa) |
(%) |
(kN/spot) |
|
ΔHV |
| 1-1 |
85.1 |
26.9 |
1039 |
16.4 |
12.0 |
Plug failure |
77 |
Example |
| 1-2 |
89.4 |
23.6 |
1082 |
15.2 |
11.6 |
Plug failure |
80 |
Example |
| 1-3 |
86.2 |
12.5 |
906 |
20.1 |
9.1 |
Plug failure |
126 |
Comparative Example |
| 1-4 |
51.4 |
48.6 |
1036 |
12.7 |
11.6 |
Plug failure |
82 |
Comparative Example |
| 1-5 |
95.2 |
10.4 |
948 |
18.1 |
9.8 |
Plug failure |
125 |
Comparative Example |
| 1-6 |
82.1 |
33.6 |
954 |
12.0 |
11.6 |
Plug failure |
80 |
Comparative Example |
| 1-7 |
69.4 |
10.8 |
789 |
20.3 |
8.7 |
Plug failure |
139 |
Comparative Example |
| 2 |
85.4 |
24.9 |
990 |
17.6 |
11.5 |
Plug failure |
10.1 |
Example |
| 3-1 |
90.1 |
24.3 |
1032 |
16.2 |
11.4 |
Plug failure |
88 |
Example |
| 3-2 |
93.2 |
10.7 |
852 |
18.8 |
9.6 |
Plug failure |
135 |
Comparative Example |
| 3-3 |
89.2 |
12.6 |
931 |
18.0 |
9.7 |
Plug failure |
128 |
Comparative Example |
| 4 |
80.6 |
60.8 |
991 |
16.0 |
11.7 |
Plug failure |
94 |
Example |
| 5 |
88.4 |
33.4 |
1098 |
13.6 |
10.5 |
Plug failure |
72 |
Example |
| 6 |
91.7 |
16.8 |
1028 |
16.7 |
11.4 |
Plug failure |
110 |
Example |
| Proportion of precipitate Ti |
Proportion of solute Nb |
TS |
EI |
Cross tensile strength |
Failure mode |
(Joint hardness distribution) Difference between maximum and minimum values of Vickers
hardness |
|
|
| (mass%) |
(mass%) |
(MPa) |
(%) |
(kN/spot) |
|
ΔHV |
|
|
| 7 |
72.7 |
21.3 |
987 |
14.3 |
10.6 |
Plug failure |
101 |
Example |
| 8 |
87.4 |
24.1 |
992 |
16.2 |
11.1 |
Plug failure |
90 |
Example |
| 9 |
76.4 |
55.2 |
812 |
19.6 |
8.7 |
Plug failure |
57 |
Comparative Example |
| 10 |
78.4 |
12.7 |
1157 |
10.9 |
9.1 |
Interface failure |
151 |
Comparative Example |
| 11 |
77.5 |
19.3 |
882 |
17.4 |
9.2 |
Plug failure |
135 |
Comparative Example |
| 12 |
80.4 |
35.5 |
1162 |
11.8 |
9.1 |
Interface failure |
125 |
Comparative Example |
| 13 |
82.5 |
33.3 |
942 |
17.2 |
10.4 |
Plug failure |
59 |
Comparative Example |
| 14 |
82.1 |
69.4 |
862 |
17.1 |
8.9 |
Plug failure |
121 |
Comparative Example |
| 15 |
66.9 |
8.2 |
830 |
16.7 |
8.2 |
Plug failure |
130 |
Comparative Example |
| 16 |
89.2 |
36.1 |
1096 |
10.2 |
8.2 |
Interface failure |
111 |
Comparative Example |
| 17 |
92.3 |
11.9 |
973 |
18.4 |
9.5 |
Interface failure |
127 |
Comparative Example |
| 18 |
98.6 |
12.3 |
955 |
17.9 |
9.9 |
Plug failure |
106 |
Comparative Example |
| 19 |
52.4 |
38.6 |
1102 |
11.8 |
9.7 |
Plug failure |
101 |
Comparative Example |
| Underlines indicate outside the appropriate range. |
[0070] As shown in Table 3, all Examples had a tensile strength of 980 MPa or more, and
had excellent spot weldability as the cross tensile strength was 10 kN/spot or more,
the failure mode was plug failure, and the difference ΔHV between the maximum and
minimum values of Vickers hardness was less than 120. All Examples also had a total
elongation of 13% or more.
[0071] On the other hand, Comparative Examples had insufficient performance in at least
one of the tensile strength and total elongation of the base material and the cross
tensile strength, the failure mode, and the difference (ΔHV) between the maximum and
minimum values of Vickers hardness in the spot weld test.