TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The disclosure relates to a hot rolled steel sheet having high strength such as a
tensile strength (TS) of 780 MPa or more, excellent stretch flangeability and blanking
workability, and excellent manufacturing stability and suitable for structural-use
steel material such as material for parts of transport machinery including vehicles
and construction steel material. The disclosure also relates to a method of manufacturing
the hot rolled steel sheet.
BACKGROUND
[0002] To reduce CO
2 emissions for global environment protection, an ever-present important issue for
the automotive industry is to improve automotive fuel efficiency by lightening automotive
bodies while maintaining the strength of automotive bodies. An effective way of lightening
automotive bodies while maintaining their strength is to strengthen steel sheets as
material for automotive parts to thus reduce the thickness of steel sheets. For example,
automotive suspension parts in which thick steel sheets tend to be used are expected
to be lightened considerably by reducing the thickness of steel sheets through strengthening.
[0003] Typically, automotive suspension parts such as lower control arms are formed by burring,
and so require steel sheets to have excellent stretch flangeability. Much research
and development have been conducted for hot rolled steel sheets having both strength
and workability, and various techniques have been proposed. For example, it is known
that high tensile strength and excellent stretch flangeability can both be achieved
by making the metallic microstructure a substantially ferrite single-phase microstructure
and precipitating fine carbides in the grains of the ferrite phase.
[0004] As such a technique,
JP 2012-26034 A (PTL 1) discloses a hot rolled steel sheet whose strength is improved while maintaining
stretch flangeability, by making the steel sheet microstructure a ferrite single-phase
microstructure having excellent workability with low dislocation density and dispersing
and precipitating fine carbides in the ferrite to achieve strengthening by precipitation.
[0005] Burring is typically performed using a steel sheet blanked in a predetermined shape.
In actual mass production of parts, the part blanking clearance usually varies due
to a temperature increase or wear of the tool caused by continuous pressing. In the
case where the clearance varies, defects such as cracking or chipping may occur in
the punched end surface. This has raised demand for a steel sheet that maintains excellent
blanking workability regardless of the variations of the blanking conditions.
[0006] As such a steel sheet, for example,
JP 2014-205888 A (PTL 2) discloses a high strength hot rolled steel sheet whose mass-production blanking
workability is improved by setting the volume fraction of bainite phase to more than
92%, setting the average spacing of bainite laths to 0.60 µm or less, and setting
the number ratio of Fe-based carbides precipitated in the grains to all Fe-based carbides
to 10% or more.
CITATION LIST
Patent Literatures
SUMMARY
(Technical Problem)
[0008] The steel sheet described in PTL 1 has both high strength and excellent stretch flangeability.
However, since the steel sheet microstructure is a substantially ferrite single-phase
microstructure, there is hardly any inclusion that serves as a void origin when blanking
the steel sheet. Accordingly, in the steel sheet described in PTL 1, the punched end
surface may become rough when conditions such as clearance and a blank holder vary.
[0009] The steel sheet described in PTL 2 has excellent blanking workability, by controlling
the hot rolling conditions so that the steel sheet microstructure is mainly composed
of predetermined bainite. Such a bainite microstructure, however, tends to vary in
mechanical properties such as tensile strength due to variations in coiling temperature.
It is often not easy to keep uniform steel sheet temperature throughout the length
and width of the coil during cooling after hot rolling. The steel sheet described
in PTL 2 may thus vary greatly in mechanical properties, leading to lower manufacturing
stability.
[0010] It could be helpful to provide a hot rolled steel sheet having high strength such
as a tensile strength (TS) of 780 MPa or more, excellent stretch flangeability and
blanking workability, and excellent manufacturing stability, together with an advantageous
method of manufacturing the hot rolled steel sheet.
(Solution to Problem)
[0011] We carefully examined a method that can strengthen a steel sheet while maintaining
workability and especially stretch flangeability, provide excellent blanking workability,
and reduce variations in mechanical properties caused by variations in manufacturing
conditions.
[0012] To improve the stretch flangeability of a steel sheet, it is effective to uniformize
the strength in the metallic microstructure, as mentioned above. Available techniques
include a strengthening technique of forming a ferrite single-phase microstructure
to achieve solid solution strengthening or strengthening by precipitation and a strengthening
technique of forming a bainite single-phase microstructure to achieve microstructure
strengthening. However, in the steel sheet having the ferrite single-phase microstructure,
there is hardly any inclusion that serves as a void origin when blanking the steel
sheet, so that the punched end surface may become rough when conditions such as clearance
and a blank holder vary.
[0013] The steel sheet having the bainite single-phase microstructure has excellent stretch
flangeability. The steel sheet having the bainite single-phase microstructure also
has excellent blanking workability, because many Fe-based carbides are present in
the bainite microstructure and serve as a void origin during blanking. However, since
the bainite microstructure varies greatly in mechanical properties such as strength
depending on the transformation temperature, there is a possibility that the mechanical
properties of the steel sheet vary greatly due to variations in hot rolling conditions
such as coiling temperature.
[0014] We then considered reducing the influence of the variations of the hot rolling conditions
by tempering a microstructure mainly composed of bainite or bainite and martensite.
[0015] Tempering a bainite or martensite microstructure typically enables a significant
reduction of the variations of the mechanical properties caused by the variations
of the hot rolling conditions, but also leads to a significant decrease in steel sheet
strength. Besides, since Fe-based carbide morphology in tempered bainite or tempered
martensite phase varies depending on the annealing conditions, the steel sheet may
not be able to have excellent blanking workability depending on the annealing conditions.
[0016] In view of this, we carefully examined a technique of preventing such a decrease
in steel sheet strength and achieving excellent stretch flangeability and blanking
workability when tempering the microstructure mainly composed of bainite or bainite
and martensite.
[0017] We consequently discovered that dispersing and precipitating MC-type carbides such
as TiC inside and at the boundaries of laths inhibits the coarsening of laths during
annealing and the disappearance of laths resulting from recovery, so that high steel
sheet strength can be maintained even after annealing. We also discovered that excellent
blanking workability is achieved by ensuring that Fe-based carbides with an aspect
ratio of 5 or less make up at least a predetermined proportion in Fe-based carbides
precipitated inside and at the boundaries of laths.
[0018] Upon further examination, we discovered that the aforementioned steel sheet microstructure
can be stably obtained particularly by adding 0.03% or more Ti and appropriately adjusting
heat hysteresis in the annealing.
[0019] MC-type carbides are carbides, such as TiC, NbC, VC, and (Ti, Mo)C, with an atom
ratio between an M element (for example, Ti, Nb, V, or Mo) and C of approximately
1:1. The M element need not be of one type, and a complex carbide containing a plurality
of metal elements is applicable. A N-containing carbonitride or complex carbonitride
is applicable, too.
[0020] Upon further examination, we also discovered that, by appropriately controlling heat
hysteresis when cooling the steel sheet from the maximum heating temperature to the
room temperature in the annealing, the formation of the balance other than tempered
martensite phase and tempered bainite phase, especially the formation of martensite
phase, coarse pearlite phase, and retained austenite phase, is suppressed, as a result
of which excellent stretch flangeability can be achieved in addition to high strength
and excellent blanking workability.
[0021] The disclosure is based on these discoveries and further studies.
[0022] We thus provide:
- 1. A hot rolled steel sheet comprising: a composition containing (consisting of),
in mass%, C: 0.03% or more and 0.20% or less, Si: 0.4% or less, Mn: 0.5% or more and
2.0% or less, P: 0.03% or less, S: 0.03% or less, Al: 0.1% or less, N: 0.01% or less,
and Ti: 0.03% or more and 0.15% or less, with a balance being Fe and incidental impurities;
a microstructure in which a total area ratio of a tempered bainite phase and a tempered
martensite phase is 70% or more, a total area ratio of a coarse pearlite phase, a
martensite phase, and a retained austenite phase is 10% or less, the tempered bainite
phase and the tempered martensite phase have laths with an average width of 1.0 µm
or less as a substructure, a proportion of Fe-based carbides with an aspect ratio
of 5 or less in Fe-based carbides precipitated inside and at boundaries of the laths
is 80% or more, and MC-type carbides with an average particle size of 20 nm or less
are dispersed and precipitated inside and at the boundaries of the laths; and an average
dislocation density of 1.0 × 1014 m-2 or more and 5.0 × 1015 m-2 or less.
- 2. The hot rolled steel sheet according to 1., wherein the composition further contains,
in mass%, one or more of V: 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less, Nb: 0.01% or more and
0.1 % or less, and Mo: 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less.
- 3. The hot rolled steel sheet according to 1. or 2., wherein the composition further
contains, in mass%, B: 0.0002% or more and 0.010% or less.
- 4. The hot rolled steel sheet according to any one of 1. to 3., wherein the composition
further contains, in mass%, one or more of REM, Zr, As, Cu, Ni, Sn, Pb, Ta, W, Cr,
Sb, Mg, Ca, Co, Se, Zn, and Cs: 1.0% or less in total.
- 5. The hot rolled steel sheet according to any one of 1. to 4., comprising a coated
or plated layer on a surface thereof.
- 6. A method of manufacturing a hot rolled steel sheet, comprising: hot rolling a steel
raw material having the composition according to any one of claims 1 to 4, whereby
the steel raw material is heated to an austenite single phase region and subjected
to rough rolling and finish rolling to obtain a steel sheet, and the steel sheet is
cooled and coiled after the finish rolling; pickling the steel sheet after the hot
rolling; and then continuous annealing the steel sheet, wherein in the hot rolling,
a finisher delivery temperature is 850 °C or more and 1000 °C or less, an average
cooling rate to 500 °C after the finish rolling is 30 °C/s or more, and a coiling
temperature is 500 °C or less, and in the continuous annealing, a maximum heating
temperature of the steel sheet is 700 °C or more and (A3 point + A1 point)/2 or less, a time during which a temperature of the steel sheet is 600 °C
or more and 700 °C or less in heating the steel sheet to the maximum heating temperature
is 20 s or more and 1000 s or less, a time during which the temperature of the steel
sheet is more than 700 °C is 200 s or less, an average cooling rate to 530 °C when
cooling the steel sheet from the maximum heating temperature is 8 °C/s or more and
25 °C/s or less, and a time of holding the steel sheet in a temperature range of 470
°C or more and 530 °C or less after the cooling stops is 10 s or more.
- 7. The method of manufacturing a hot rolled steel sheet according to 6., further comprising
performing a coating or plating treatment on the steel sheet, after the continuous
annealing.
(Advantageous Effect)
[0023] It is possible to obtain a hot rolled steel sheet that has high strength such as
a tensile strength (TS) of 780 MPa or more and excellent stretch flangeability and
blanking workability and whose variations in mechanical properties caused by variations
in manufacturing conditions are reduced, which is suitable for structural-use steel
material such as material for parts of transport machinery including vehicles and
construction steel material. This widens the range of uses of hot rolled steel sheets,
and has an industrially significant advantageous effect.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0024] In the accompanying drawings:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an example of a microstructure in which
tempered bainite phase and tempered martensite phase have laths as a substructure
and Fe-based carbides precipitate and MC-type carbides disperse and precipitate inside
and at the boundaries of the laths.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0025] Detailed description is given below.
[0026] The chemical composition of a hot rolled steel sheet according to the disclosure
is described first. The unit of the content of each element in the chemical composition
is "mass%", which is simply expressed as "%" below unless otherwise noted.
C: 0.03% or more and 0.20% or less
[0027] C improves the strength of the steel, and promotes the formation of bainite and martensite
during hot rolling. The C content therefore needs to be 0.03% or more. If the C content
is more than 0.20%, equivalent carbon content is excessively high, which causes a
decrease in weldability of the steel sheet. The C content is therefore 0.03% or more
and 0.20% or less. The C content is preferably 0.04% or more. The C content is preferably
0.18% or less. The C content is more preferably more than 0.05%. The C content is
more preferably 0.15% or less.
Si: 0.4% or less
[0028] Typically, Si is actively used in a high strength steel sheet as an effective element
that improves the steel sheet strength without decreasing ductility (elongation).
If the Si content is more than 0.4%, however, Si forms oxides on the steel sheet surface
during heat treatment, and degrades coating adhesion property. The Si content is therefore
0.4% or less. The Si content is preferably 0.3% or less. The Si content is more preferably
0.2% or less. The Si content may be reduced to an impurity level, and may be 0%.
Mn: 0.5% or more and 2.0% or less
[0029] Mn is an element that dissolves and contributes to higher strength of the steel.
Mn also promotes the formation of bainite and martensite during hot rolling, by improving
quench hardenability. To achieve such effects, the Mn content needs to be 0.5% or
more. If the Mn content is more than 2.0%, austenite becomes excessively stable, causing
the microstructure of the steel sheet to excessively contain martensite and retained
austenite. This decreases stretch flangeability. The Mn content is therefore 0.5%
or more and 2.0% or less. The Mn content is preferably 0.8% or more. The Mn content
is preferably 1.8% or less. The Mn content is more preferably 1.0% or more. The Mn
content is more preferably 1.7% or less.
P: 0.03% or less
[0030] P is a harmful element that segregates to grain boundaries to decrease elongation,
induce cracking during working, and degrade anti-crash property. The P content is
therefore 0.03% or less. Excessive dephosphorization, however, leads to longer refining
time and higher cost, and so the P content is preferably 0.002% or more.
S: 0.03% or less
[0031] S exists as MnS or TiS in the steel, and facilitates the formation of voids when
blanking the hot rolled steel sheet. S also serves as a void origin during working,
and causes a decrease in stretch flangeability. The S content is therefore desirably
as low as possible, and is 0.03% or less. The S content is preferably 0.01% or less.
Excessive desulfurization, however, leads to longer refining time and higher cost,
and so the S content is preferably 0.0002% or more.
Al: 0.1% or less
[0032] Al is an element that acts as a deoxidizing material. To achieve such effects, the
Al content is desirably 0.01% or more. If the Al content is more than 0.1%, Al remains
in the steel sheet as Al oxide. Such Al oxide tends to coagulate and be coarsened,
causing a decrease in stretch flangeability. The Al content is therefore 0.1% or less.
N: 0.01% or less
[0033] N exists as coarse TiN in the steel, and facilitates the formation of coarse voids
when blanking the hot rolled steel sheet. N also serves as an origin of coarse voids
during working, and causes a decrease in stretch flangeability. The N content is therefore
desirably as low as possible, and is 0.01% or less. The N content is preferably 0.006%
or less. Excessive denitrification, however, leads to longer refining time and higher
cost, and so the N content is preferably 0.0005% or more.
Ti: 0.03% or more and 0.15% or less
[0034] Ti is a necessary element to form MC-type carbides to thus inhibit lath coarsening
in the annealing and strengthen the steel sheet. MC-type carbides also enhance the
steel sheet strength by strengthening by precipitation. If the Ti content is less
than 0.03%, such effects are insufficient, and lath coarsening and lower precipitation
amount cause a decrease in steel sheet strength, making it difficult to achieve desired
steel sheet strength (tensile strength of 780 MPa or more). If the Ti content is more
than 0.15%, central segregation is noticeable, causing a decrease in blanking workability.
The Ti content is therefore 0.03% or more and 0.15% or less. The Ti content is preferably
0.04% or more. The Ti content is preferably 0.14% or less. The Ti content is further
preferably 0.05% or more. The Ti content is further preferably 0.13% or less.
[0035] While the basic components have been described above, the hot rolled steel sheet
may optionally contain one or more of V: 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less, Nb: 0.01%
or more and 0.1% or less, and Mo: 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less, for higher strength.
V: 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less
[0036] V forms MC-type carbides and contributes to higher strength of the steel sheet by
lath coarsening inhibition in the annealing and strengthening by precipitation, as
with Ti. To achieve such effects, the V content needs to be 0.01% or more. If the
V content is more than 0.3%, central segregation is noticeable, causing a decrease
in blanking workability. Accordingly, the V content is preferably 0.01% or more. The
V content is preferably 0.3% or less. The V content is more preferably 0.01% or more.
The V content is more preferably 0.2% or less. The V content is further preferably
0.01% or more. The V content is further preferably 0.15% or less. V may form MC-type
carbides by itself, or form complex carbides with Ti, Nb, and Mo. Such carbide composition
does not affect the advantageous effects of the disclosure at all.
Nb: 0.01% or more and 0.1% or less
[0037] Nb forms MC-type carbides and contributes to higher strength of the steel sheet by
lath coarsening inhibition in the annealing and strengthening by precipitation, as
with Ti. To achieve such effects, the Nb content needs to be 0.01% or more. If Nb
is excessively added to be more than 0.1% in content, Nb does not dissolve in the
heating furnace during hot rolling. The effects thus saturate, and the alloy cost
increases. Accordingly, the Nb content is preferably 0.01% or more. The Nb content
is preferably 0.1 % or less. The Nb content is more preferably 0.01% or more. The
Nb content is more preferably 0.08% or less. The Nb content is further preferably
0.01% or more. The Nb content is further preferably 0.06% or less. Nb may form MC-type
carbides by itself, or form complex carbides with Ti, V, and Mo. Such carbide composition
does not affect the advantageous effects of the disclosure at all.
Mo: 0.01% or more and 0.3% or less
[0038] Mo, when added in combination with Ti, forms MC-type complex carbides and contributes
to higher strength of the steel sheet by lath coarsening inhibition in the annealing
and strengthening by precipitation, as with Ti. To achieve such effects, the Mo content
needs to be 0.01% or more. If the Mo content is more than 0.3%, central segregation
is noticeable, causing a decrease in blanking workability. Accordingly, the Mo content
is preferably 0.01% or more. The Mo content is preferably 0.3% or less. Mo may form
complex carbides with Nb and V. Such carbide composition does not affect the advantageous
effects of the disclosure at all.
[0039] The hot rolled steel sheet may optionally contain B: 0.0002% or more and 0.010% or
less, for improved quench hardenability during hot rolling.
B: 0.0002% or more and 0.010% or less
[0040] B is an element that segregates to austenite grain boundaries and inhibits the formation
and growth of ferrite to improve quench hardenability and promote the formation of
bainite and martensite. To achieve such effects, the B content is preferably 0.0002%
or more. If the B content is more than 0.010%, hard iron boride forms and causes a
decrease in stretch flangeability. Accordingly, in the case of adding B, the B content
is preferably 0.0002% or more and 0.010% or less. The B content is more preferably
0.0002% or more. The B content is more preferably 0.0050% or less. The B content is
further preferably 0.0004% or more. The B content is further preferably 0.0030% or
less.
[0041] In addition to the composition described above, the hot rolled steel sheet may contain
one or more of REM, Zr, As, Cu, Ni, Sn, Pb, Ta, W, Cr, Sb, Mg, Ca, Co, Se, Zn, and
Cs so that their total content is 1.0% or less.
[0042] The components other than those described above are Fe and incidental impurities.
[0043] The reasons for limiting the microstructure in the hot rolled steel sheet are given
below.
Total area ratio of tempered bainite phase and tempered martensite phase: 70% or more
[0044] The hot rolled steel sheet has a microstructure mainly composed of tempered bainite
and tempered martensite having both high strength and excellent blanking workability.
If the total area ratio of tempered bainite phase and tempered martensite phase is
less than 70%, the hot rolled steel sheet cannot have desired high strength and blanking
workability. Here, the ratio of each of tempered bainite phase and tempered martensite
is not individually defined because tempered bainite and tempered martensite after
annealing are microstructures not distinguishable from each other. This is a major
factor that can reduce variations in mechanical properties after annealing in the
case where the manufacturing conditions during hot rolling vary. The total area ratio
of tempered bainite phase and tempered martensite phase is therefore 70% or more.
The total area ratio of tempered bainite phase and tempered martensite phase is preferably
75% or more. The total area ratio of tempered bainite phase and tempered martensite
phase is more preferably 80% or more. The total area ratio of tempered bainite phase
and tempered martensite phase may be 100%.
Total area ratio of coarse pearlite phase, martensite phase, and retained austenite
phase: 10% or less
[0045] As mentioned above, the microstructure of the hot rolled steel sheet is mainly composed
of tempered bainite and tempered martensite, with the balance other than tempered
bainite and tempered martensite being, for example, Fe-based carbides, coarse pearlite,
fine pearlite, degenerate pearlite, bainite, martensite, and retained austenite. Of
these, particularly in the case where coarse pearlite, martensite, and retained austenite
are present in the metallic microstructure, stretch flangeability decreases noticeably.
The total area ratio of coarse pearlite phase, martensite phase, and retained austenite
phase is therefore 10% or less. The total area ratio of coarse pearlite phase, martensite
phase, and retained austenite phase is preferably 8% or less. The total area ratio
of coarse pearlite phase, martensite phase, and retained austenite phase is more preferably
5% or less. The total area ratio of coarse pearlite phase, martensite phase, and retained
austenite phase may be 0%.
[0046] Here, coarse pearlite has a lamellar spacing of 0.2 µm or more, fine pearlite has
a lamellar spacing of less than 0.2 µm, and degenerate pearlite is a phase in which
pearlite lamellar is not clearly observable. The lamellar spacing can be measured
by microstructure observation using a scanning electron microscope.
[0047] The balance other than tempered bainite phase, tempered martensite phase, coarse
pearlite phase, martensite phase, and retained austenite phase is, for example, ferrite
phase, degenerate pearlite phase, and fine pearlite phase. A total area ratio of such
balance of 30% or less is allowable.
Average width of laths which tempered bainite phase and tempered martensite phase
have as substructure: 1.0 µm or less
[0048] For strengthening by tempered bainite phase and tempered martensite phase, it is
important that tempered bainite phase and tempered martensite phase have fine laths
with an average width of 1.0 µm or less as their substructure. FIG. 1 is a schematic
diagram illustrating an example of a microstructure in which tempered bainite phase
and tempered martensite phase have laths as their substructure and Fe-based carbides
precipitate and MC-type carbides disperse and precipitate inside and at the boundaries
of the laths. If the laths disappears as a result of recovery or the average width
of the laths is more than 1.0 µm, predetermined high strength cannot be achieved.
The average width of laths which tempered bainite phase and tempered martensite phase
have as their substructure is therefore 1.0 µm or less. The average width of laths
is preferably 0.8 µm or less. The average width of laths is more preferably 0.6 µm
or less. No lower limit is placed on the average width of laths, yet the lower limit
is typically about 0.1 µm.
Proportion of Fe-based carbides with an aspect ratio of 5 or less in Fe-based carbides
precipitated inside and at the boundaries of laths: 80% or more
[0049] Fe-based carbides precipitated inside and at the boundaries of laths as illustrated
in FIG. 1 serve as a void origin during blanking, thus contributing to improved blanking
workability. This effect is particularly high with Fe-based carbides having an aspect
ratio of 5 or less. By setting the proportion of such Fe-based carbides to 80% or
more, excellent blanking workability can be achieved. The proportion of Fe-based carbides
with an aspect ratio of 5 or less in Fe-based carbides precipitated inside and at
the boundaries of laths is therefore 80% or more. The proportion is preferably 85%
or more. No upper limit is placed on the proportion, yet the upper limit may be 100%.
[0050] Fe-based carbides are θ carbide (cementite), ε carbide, and the like. An alloying
element may be dissolved in the carbides. The aspect ratio is the ratio of the major
axis length and minor axis length of Fe-based carbides precipitated inside and at
the boundaries of laths.
Average particle size of MC-type carbides dispersed and precipitated inside and at
the boundaries of laths: 20 nm or less
[0051] MC-type carbides finely dispersed and precipitated inside and at the boundaries of
laths as illustrated in FIG. 1 inhibit lath coarsening by a pinning effect when annealing
the steel sheet and also inhibit lath disappearance resulting from recovery, thus
contributing to higher strength. If the average particle size of MC-type carbides
is more than 20 nm, the number of particles of MC-type carbides contributing to pinning
is insufficient and so the pinning effect is insufficient, causing a decrease in steel
sheet strength. If the average particle size of MC-type carbides is 20 nm or less,
a sufficient number of particles of MC-type carbides exhibit the pinning effect, to
prevent a decrease in steel sheet strength. The average particle size of MC-type carbides
dispersed and precipitated inside and at the boundaries of laths of tempered bainite
phase and tempered martensite phase is therefore 20 nm or less. The average particle
size is preferably 15 nm or less. No lower limit is placed on the average particle
size, yet the lower limit is typically about 1 nm. The proportion of MC-type carbides
with a particle size of more than 50 nm is preferably 10% or less.
[0052] It is also important that the hot rolled steel sheet has an average dislocation density
in the following range.
Average dislocation density: 1.0 × 1014 m-2 or more and 5.0 × 1015 m-2 or less
[0053] The variations of the hot rolled steel sheet caused by the variations of the hot
rolling conditions are reduced by tempering the steel sheet having bainite and martensite
microstructure. If the average dislocation density of the steel sheet after annealing
is more than 5.0 × 10
15 m
-2, the tempering of the steel sheet is insufficient and the influence of the variations
of the hot rolling conditions cannot be reduced sufficiently. In the case where tempering
is sufficient, the average dislocation density is typically 1.0 × 10
14 m
-2 or more. The average dislocation density is therefore 1.0 × 10
14 m
-2 or more and 5.0 × 10
15 m
-2 or less. The average dislocation density is preferably 1.0 × 10
14 m
-2 or more. The average dislocation density is preferably 2.0 × 10
15 m
-2 or less.
[0054] A method of manufacturing the hot rolled steel sheet according to the disclosure
is described below.
[0055] The method of manufacturing the hot rolled steel sheet includes: hot rolling a steel
raw material having the chemical composition described above, whereby the steel raw
material is heated to an austenite single phase region, subjected to rough rolling
and finish rolling to obtain a steel sheet, and the steel sheet is cooled and coiled
after the finish rolling; pickling the steel sheet after the hot rolling; and then
continuous annealing the steel sheet, wherein in the hot rolling, a finisher delivery
temperature is 850 °C or more and 1000 °C or less, an average cooling rate to 500
°C after the finish rolling is 30 °C/s or more, and a coiling temperature is 500 °C
or less, and in the continuous annealing, a maximum heating temperature of the steel
sheet is 700 °C or more and (A
3 point + A
1 point)/2 or less, a time during which a temperature of the steel sheet is 600 °C
or more and 700 °C or less in heating the steel sheet to the maximum heating temperature
is 20 s or more and 1000 s or less, a time during which the temperature of the steel
sheet is more than 700 °C is 200 s or less, an average cooling rate to 530 °C when
cooling the steel sheet from the maximum heating temperature is 8 °C/s or more and
25 °C/s or less, and a time of holding the steel sheet in a temperature range of 470
°C or more and 530 °C or less after the cooling stops is 10 s or more. The method
may further include performing a coating or plating treatment on the steel sheet,
after the continuous annealing.
[0056] The method of obtaining the steel raw material by steelmaking is not limited, and
any known steelmaking process such as a converter steelmaking process or an electric
furnace steelmaking process may be used. After steelmaking, continuous casting is
preferably performed to yield a slab (steel raw material) in terms of productivity
and the like. The slab may be yielded by a known casting method such as ingot casting
and blooming, thin slab continuous casting, or the like.
[0057] The obtained steel raw material is subjected to hot rolling, in which the steel raw
material is subjected to rough rolling and finish rolling. Before the rough rolling,
the steel raw material is heated in the austenite single phase region. If the steel
raw material before the rough rolling is not heated in the austenite single phase
region, the remelting of Ti carbide and the like present in the steel raw material
does not progress, and fine MC-type carbides do not precipitate during the annealing
after the hot rolling. Accordingly, the steel raw material is heated to the austenite
single phase region, preferably to 1150 °C or more, before the rough rolling. No upper
limit is placed on the heating temperature, yet an excessively high heating temperature
leads to a considerable decrease in yield rate due to the oxidation of the slab surface,
and so the heating temperature is typically 1350 °C or less. In the case where the
temperature of the cast steel raw material (slab) is in the austenite single phase
region when hot rolling the steel raw material, the steel raw material may be subjected
to hot direct rolling without being heated or after being heated for a short time.
[0058] The reasons for limiting the manufacturing conditions in the hot rolling are given
below.
Finisher delivery temperature: 850 °C or more and 1000 °C or less
[0059] If the finisher delivery temperature is low, ferrite transformation is promoted during
the cooling after the rolling, causing a decrease in the bainite and martensite ratio
of the hot rolled steel sheet after the hot rolling. This makes it impossible to obtain
a predetermined tempered bainite and tempered martensite ratio after the annealing.
Accordingly, the finisher delivery temperature needs to be 850 °C or more. The finisher
delivery temperature is preferably 880 °C or more. If the finisher delivery temperature
is more than 1000 °C, the surface characteristics of the steel sheet degrade. The
finisher delivery temperature is therefore 1000 °C or less. The finisher delivery
temperature is preferably 970 °C or less. Each of the temperatures such as the finisher
delivery temperature and the coiling temperature mentioned here is the temperature
of the steel sheet surface.
Cooling rate to 500 °C after finish rolling: 30 °C/s or more
[0060] When cooling the steel sheet after the finish rolling, if the cooling rate is insufficient,
ferrite cannot be suppressed adequately, causing a decrease in the bainite and martensite
ratio of the hot rolled steel sheet after the hot rolling. This makes it impossible
to obtain a predetermined tempered bainite and tempered martensite ratio after the
annealing. Accordingly, the cooling rate to 500 °C after the finish rolling needs
to be 30 °C/s or more. The cooling rate is preferably 50 °C/s or more. No upper limit
is placed on the cooling rate, yet the upper limit is typically about 300 °C/s.
Coiling temperature: 500 °C or less
[0061] Appropriately adjusting the coiling temperature is important in controlling the steel
sheet microstructure after the hot rolling. If the coiling temperature is more than
500 °C, the lath width of bainite increases. This makes it impossible to obtain a
predetermined lath width of tempered bainite after the annealing. No lower limit is
placed on the coiling temperature, yet an excessively low coiling temperature merely
leads to higher cooling cost, and so the coiling temperature is preferably 0 °C or
more. The coiling temperature is more preferably 200 °C or more.
[0062] After the hot rolling, the hot rolled steel sheet is subjected to pickling and then
to continuous annealing. The reasons for limiting the manufacturing conditions in
the continuous annealing are given below.
Maximum heating temperature of steel sheet: 700 °C or more and (A3 point + A1 point)/2 or less
[0063] Appropriately adjusting the maximum heating temperature of the steel sheet in the
continuous annealing is important in sufficiently reducing the influence of the variations
of the manufacturing conditions in the hot rolling caused by the annealing and achieving
desired high strength. If the maximum heating temperature of the steel sheet is less
than 700 °C, the dislocation density in bainite and martensite is difficult to be
controlled within an appropriate range, and so the influence of the variations of
the manufacturing conditions in the hot rolling cannot be reduced sufficiently. Besides,
if the heating temperature of the steel sheet is less than 700 °C, the aspect ratio
of Fe-based carbides inside and between laths tends to be high, which makes it difficult
to set the proportion of Fe-based carbides with an aspect ratio of 5 or less to be
in a desired range. If the maximum heating temperature of the steel sheet is more
than (A
3 point + A
1 point)/2, MC-type carbides coarsen noticeably, as a result of which lath coarsening
in bainite and martensite cannot be inhibited adequately. Moreover, austenitizing
is promoted, causing a decrease in the bainite and martensite ratio. This makes it
impossible to obtain a desired tempered bainite and tempered martensite ratio. The
maximum heating temperature of the steel sheet in the continuous annealing is therefore
700 °C or more and (A
3 point + A
1 point)/2 or less. The maximum heating temperature is preferably 700 °C or more. The
maximum heating temperature is preferably {(A
3 point + A
1 point)/2} - 10 °C or less.
[0064] The A
1 point and the A
3 point can be calculated according to the following expressions.

where [%X] denotes the content of an X element in steel (mass%).
[0065] Time during which the steel sheet temperature is 600 °C or more and 700 °C or less
in heating the steel sheet to the maximum heating temperature: 20 s or more and 1000
s or less
[0066] In heating the steel sheet to the maximum heating temperature, it is important to
appropriately control heat hysteresis in imparting desired high strength and excellent
blanking workability to the steel sheet. The pinning effect of MC-type carbides is
used to inhibit lath coarsening, as mentioned above. To achieve the pinning effect,
MC-type carbides need to be sufficiently dispersed in bainite and martensite before
lath coarsening starts. According to our study, the precipitation of MC-type carbides
begins to occur noticeably at 600 °C or more. Meanwhile, lath coarsening and disappearance
are noticeable at more than 700 °C. Hence, lath coarsening and disappearance can be
inhibited by holding the steel sheet temperature in the temperature range of 600 °C
or more and 700 °C or less for a predetermined time so that MC-type carbides precipitate
sufficiently. For sufficient precipitation of MC-type carbides, the holding time in
this temperature range needs to be 20 s or more. If the holding time in the temperature
range is insufficient, lath coarsening starts before MC-type carbides precipitate
sufficiently, so that the pinning effect is insufficient and the laths coarsen. The
holding time is preferably 35 s or more. The holding time is more preferably 50 s
or more.
[0067] If the holding time of the steel sheet temperature in the temperature range of 600
°C or more and 700 °C or less is more than 1000 s, Fe-based carbides precipitated
inside and between laths dissolve again and move to prior austenite grain boundaries,
packet grain boundaries, block grain boundaries, and the like. Thus, Fe-based carbides
inside and between laths that effectively contribute to improved blanking workability
no longer exist. Accordingly, to obtain a steel sheet having excellent blanking workability,
the holding time of the steel sheet temperature in the temperature range of 600 °C
or more and 700 °C or less needs to be 1000 s or less. The holding time is preferably
800 s or less. The holding time is more preferably 500 s or less. The steel sheet
temperature mentioned here is the temperature of the steel sheet surface.
Time during which the steel sheet temperature is more than 700 °C: 200 s or less
[0068] When the steel sheet temperature is in the temperature range of more than 700 °C,
lath coarsening is noticeable. The pinning effect of MC-type carbides finely dispersed
and precipitated is used to prevent the movement of lath boundaries and inhibit lath
coarsening, as mentioned above. The steel sheet strength is maintained in this way.
If the holding time in this temperature range is excessively long, however, lath coarsening
cannot be inhibited. Accordingly, the holding time of the steel sheet temperature
in the temperature range of more than 700 °C is 200 s or less, in terms of preventing
lath coarsening. The holding time is preferably 180 s or less. The holding time is
more preferably 150 s or less. If the time during which the steel sheet temperature
is more than 700 °C is less than 10 s, the ductility of the steel sheet decreases
to some extent, and so the holding time is preferably 10 s or more.
Average cooling rate to 530 °C when cooling the steel sheet from the maximum heating
temperature: 8 °C/s or more and 25 °C/s or less
[0069] When cooling the steel sheet after heating it to the maximum heating temperature
in the continuous annealing, it is important to appropriately control the cooling
rate in achieving excellent stretch flangeability. Particularly in the case where
the average cooling rate to 530 °C is less than 8 °C/s, pearlite transformation cannot
be suppressed during the cooling, as a result of which coarse pearlite forms in a
predetermined amount or more. This decreases stretch flangeability. If the average
cooling rate is excessively high, holding the steel sheet in the temperature range
of 470 °C or more and 530 °C or less for a predetermined time as mentioned below is
difficult. The average cooling rate to 530 °C when cooling the steel sheet from the
maximum heating temperature is therefore 25 °C/s or less.
Holding time in the temperature range of 470 °C or more and 530 °C or less: 10 s or
more
[0070] In the continuous annealing, it is important to hold the steel sheet in the temperature
range of 470 °C or more and 530 °C or less for a predetermined time after the aforementioned
controlled cooling, in achieving excellent stretch flangeability. If the holding temperature
after the cooling stops is more than 530 °C, coarse pearlite forms, causing a decrease
in stretch flangeability. If the holding temperature after the cooling stops is less
than 470 °C, the transformation from austenite to bainite delays. As a result, C concentrates
in the non-transformed austenite region to stabilize austenite, hampering the completion
of the transformation. In the subsequent cooling, non-transformed austenite transforms
to martensite or remains in the steel sheet microstructure as retained austenite,
so that stretch flangeability decreases. In the case where the steel sheet is held
in the temperature range of 470 °C or more and 530 °C or less for 10 s or more, the
transformation of most austenite to bainite completes, with it being possible to reduce
the proportion of martensite which forms during the subsequent cooling to a predetermined
range. Accordingly, the holding time in the temperature range of 470 °C or more and
530 °C or less after the controlled cooling stops is 10 s or more. The holding time
is preferably 20 s or more. The holding time is more preferably 30 s or more. No upper
limit is placed on the holding time, yet the holding time is typically 300 s or less.
[0071] Holding the steel sheet in the temperature range of 470 °C or more and 530 °C or
less completes the control of the steel sheet microstructure. The subsequent cooling
conditions are not limited, and the steel sheet may be cooled to room temperature
by any cooling method.
[0072] Even in the case of reheating the steel sheet to 700 °C or less after holding the
steel sheet in the temperature range of 470 °C or more and 530 °C or less, desired
steel sheet microstructure can still be obtained as long as the total holding time
in the temperature range of 600 °C or more and 700 °C or less is 1000 s or less.
[0073] For example, after holding the steel sheet in the temperature range of 470 °C or
more and 530 °C or less, the steel sheet may be immersed in a zinc pot to yield a
hot-dip galvanized steel sheet. The steel sheet may then be further heated to yield
a galvannealed steel sheet. The hot dip coating is not limited to zinc, and may be
a coating of aluminum, an aluminum alloy, or the like.
[0074] After the continuous annealing, the steel sheet may be subjected to temper rolling
either continuously in the annealing line or using another line according to a conventional
method.
[0075] The hot rolled steel sheet manufactured as described above may be electrogalvanized
or hot-dip galvanized. The hot rolled steel sheet according to the disclosure is suitable
not only as a steel sheet for automotive suspension parts but also for press forming
typically performed at ordinary temperature, and has excellent heat resistance. Hence,
the hot rolled steel sheet manufactured as described above is also suitable as a blank
sheet for a warm forming process of heating a steel sheet to 400 °C to 700 °C before
pressing and then immediately press forming the steel sheet.
EXAMPLES
[0076] Molten steels having the compositions listed in Table 1 were each obtained by steelmaking
and subjected to continuous casting by a typically known technique, to yield a slab
(steel raw material) with a thickness of 300 mm. The slab was heated to the temperature
in Table 2, rough rolled, and finish rolled at the finisher delivery temperature in
Table 2. After completing the finish rolling, the steel sheet was cooled at the average
cooling rate in Table 2, and coiled at the coiling temperature in Table 2, to obtain
a hot rolled steel sheet with a sheet thickness of 3.2 mm. The hot rolled steel sheet
was then pickled by a typically known technique, and annealed in a continuous annealing
line under the conditions in Table 2. Some of the steel sheets were subjected to hot-dip
galvanizing treatment and optionally further subjected to alloying treatment in the
continuous annealing line, thus yielding hot-dip galvanized steel sheets and galvannealed
steel sheets.
Table 1
| Steel No. |
Chemical composition (mass%) |
Remarks |
| C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
Al |
N |
Ti |
V |
Nb |
Mo |
B |
Others |
| I |
0.024 |
0.06 |
0.7 |
0.025 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.0032 |
0.095 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Comparative steel |
| 2 |
0.060 |
0.03 |
0.6 |
0.027 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.0057 |
0.090 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 3 |
0.140 |
0.05 |
0.7 |
0.026 |
0.003 |
0.03 |
0.0029 |
0.056 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 4 |
0.081 |
0.31 |
0.4 |
0.014 |
0.002 |
0.05 |
0.0035 |
0.096 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Comparative steel |
| 5 |
0.128 |
0.17 |
1.2 |
0.020 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.0064 |
0.089 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 6 |
0.145 |
0.29 |
1.8 |
0.015 |
0.002 |
0.03 |
0.0037 |
0.082 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 7 |
0.177 |
0.07 |
2.5 |
0.025 |
0.002 |
0.03 |
0.0064 |
0.107 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Comparative steel |
| 8 |
0.099 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0.021 |
0.001 |
0.05 |
0.0027 |
0.024 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Comparative steel |
| 9 |
0.147 |
0.30 |
1.6 |
0.014 |
0.003 |
0.03 |
0.0060 |
0.062 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 10 |
0.161 |
0.23 |
1.4 |
0.018 |
0.001 |
0.03 |
0.0047 |
0.113 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 11 |
0.053 |
0.30 |
1.6 |
0.015 |
0.002 |
0.06 |
0.0029 |
0.195 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Comparative steel |
| 12 |
0.114 |
0.16 |
1.1 |
0.021 |
0.003 |
0.04 |
0.0056 |
0.048 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 13 |
0.163 |
0.10 |
0.9 |
0.024 |
0.003 |
0.03 |
0.0030 |
0.050 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 14 |
0.183 |
0.11 |
0.9 |
0.023 |
0.003 |
0.02 |
0.0031 |
0.045 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 15 |
0.049 |
0.19 |
1.2 |
0.019 |
0.002 |
0.06 |
0.0049 |
0.097 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 16 |
0.153 |
0.25 |
1.4 |
0.017 |
0.001 |
0.03 |
0.0051 |
0.134 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 17 |
0.163 |
0.19 |
1.2 |
0.019 |
0.003 |
0.03 |
0.0035 |
0.060 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 18 |
0.111 |
0.16 |
1.1 |
0.021 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.0037 |
0.072 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 19 |
0.056 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0.021 |
0.002 |
0.06 |
0.0032 |
0.089 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 20 |
0.112 |
0.22 |
1.3 |
0.018 |
0.001 |
0.04 |
0.0037 |
0.123 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 21 |
0.128 |
0.22 |
1.3 |
0.018 |
0.003 |
0.04 |
0.0037 |
0.057 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 22 |
0.120 |
0.17 |
1.1 |
0.020 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.0045 |
0.108 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 23 |
0.129 |
0.03 |
1.5 |
0.011 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.0037 |
0.065 |
- |
- |
- |
0,0015 |
- |
Conforming steel |
| 24 |
0.144 |
0.24 |
1.4 |
0.017 |
0.002 |
0,03 |
0.0054 |
0.109 |
0.092 |
- |
- |
- |
As: 0.003 |
Conforming steel |
| 25 |
0.173 |
0.35 |
1.8 |
0.012 |
0.001 |
0.03 |
0.0051 |
0.113 |
- |
0.043 |
- |
- |
Ca: 0.004, Sn: 0.002 |
Conforming steel |
| 26 |
0.048 |
0.34 |
1.8 |
0.012 |
0.001 |
0.06 |
0.0040 |
0.130 |
- |
- |
0.15 |
- |
Se:0.005, Cr:0.23 |
Conforming steel |
| 27 |
0.174 |
0.37 |
1.9 |
0.011 |
0.001 |
0.03 |
0.0046 |
0.125 |
- |
- |
- |
0.0019 |
Sb:0.004, Cu:0.09, Ni:0.18 |
Conforming steel |
| 28 |
0.139 |
0.32 |
1.7 |
0.014 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.0057 |
0.074 |
- |
- |
- |
0.0013 |
Co: 0.028, Cs: 0.004 |
Conforming steel |
| 29 |
0.102 |
0.09 |
0.8 |
0.024 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.0055 |
0.099 |
- |
- |
- |
0.0018 |
Mg:0.006, Ta: 0.03 |
Conforming steel |
| 30 |
0.090 |
0.26 |
1.5 |
0.017 |
0.002 |
0.05 |
0.0050 |
0.082 |
- |
- |
- |
0.0017 |
Pb: 0.004, W: 0.12 |
Conforming steel |
| 31 |
0.169 |
0.13 |
1.0 |
0.022 |
0.002 |
0.03 |
0.0044 |
0.079 |
0.046 |
- |
0.10 |
- |
Zr:0.04 |
Conforming steel |
| 32 |
0.109 |
0.33 |
1.7 |
0.013 |
0.003 |
0.04 |
0.0056 |
0.065 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Zn:0.0012 |
Conforming steel |
| 33 |
0.189 |
0.37 |
1.9 |
0.011 |
0.002 |
0.02 |
0.0030 |
0.075 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
REM:0.06 |
Conforming steel |
Table 2
| Steel sheet No. |
Steel No. |
Hot rolling conditions |
Continious annealing conditions |
Coating or plating treatement |
Alloying treatement |
Remarks |
| Sbb heating temperature (°C) |
Finisher delivery temperature (°C) |
Average cooling °1 rate (°C/s) |
Coiling temperature (°C) |
Maximum heating temperature (°C) |
A1*2 (°C) |
A3 *3 (°C) |
(A1+A1)/2 (°C) |
Holding time 1*2 (s) |
Holding time 2*3 (s) |
Average cooling rate *6 (°C/s) |
Holding time 3*7 (s) |
| 1 |
1 |
1220 |
920 |
63 |
380 |
720 |
730 |
927 |
829 |
120 |
20 |
12 |
110 |
|
|
Comparative Example |
| 2 |
2 |
1220 |
910 |
81 |
390 |
800 |
731 |
910 |
820 |
130 |
70 |
12 |
110 |
|
|
Example |
| 3 |
3 |
1220 |
860 |
86 |
460 |
710 |
732 |
867 |
800 |
190 |
20 |
15 |
110 |
Performed |
|
Example |
| 4 |
4 |
1220 |
950 |
46 |
390 |
830 |
736 |
921 |
829 |
150 |
100 |
13 |
80 |
|
|
Comparative Example |
| 5 |
5 |
1220 |
890 |
64 |
410 |
730 |
725 |
874 |
800 |
|
30 |
14 |
60 |
Performed |
Performed |
Example |
| 6 |
6 |
1220 |
950 |
78 |
360 |
790 |
721 |
860 |
790 |
170 210 |
70 |
16 |
110 |
|
|
Example |
| 7 |
7 |
1220 |
950 |
68 |
460 |
760 |
708 |
822 |
765 |
40 |
50 |
9 |
70 |
|
|
Comparative Example |
| 8 |
8 |
1220 |
850 |
47 |
340 |
710 |
730 |
881 |
805 |
110 |
20 |
12 |
90 |
|
|
Comparative Example |
| 9 |
9 |
1220 |
920 |
52 |
460 |
780 |
724 |
860 |
792 |
170 |
60 |
14 |
50 |
|
|
Example |
| 10 |
10 |
1200 |
900 |
83 |
330 |
750 |
724 |
862 |
793 |
190 |
40 |
15 |
70 |
Performed |
Performed |
Example |
| 11 |
11 |
1200 |
860 |
52 |
360 |
710 |
715 |
923 |
819 |
60 |
20 |
9 |
50 |
|
|
Comparative Example |
| 12 |
12 |
1200 |
900 |
60 |
470 |
780 |
728 |
876 |
802 |
130 |
60 |
13 |
80 |
Performed |
|
Example |
| 13 |
13 |
1200 |
830 |
60 |
470 |
710 |
731 |
854 |
792 |
190 |
20 |
15 |
100 |
|
|
Comparative Example |
| 14 |
14 |
1200 |
870 |
17 |
480 |
710 |
731 |
844 |
787 |
220 |
20 |
16 |
90 |
|
|
Comparative Example |
| 15 |
15 |
1220 |
900 |
80 |
560 |
770 |
724 |
914 |
819 |
50 |
50 |
9 |
80 |
|
|
Comparative Example |
| 16 |
16 |
1220 |
900 |
76 |
300 |
640 |
722 |
868 |
795 |
180 |
0 |
14 |
60 |
|
|
Comparative Example |
| 17 |
17 |
1220 |
890 |
59 |
450 |
850 |
728 |
854 |
791 |
190 |
80 |
15 |
80 |
|
|
Comparative Example |
| Steel sheet No. |
Steel No. |
Hot rolling conditions |
Continuous annealing conditions |
Coating or plating treatment |
Alloying treatement |
Remarks |
| Stab heating temperature (°C) |
Finisher delivery temperature (°C) |
Average cooling rate*1 tale" (°C/s) |
Coiling temperature (°C) |
Maximum heating temperature (°C) |
A1*2 (°C)O |
Aj*3 (°C) |
(A3+A1)/2 (°C) |
Holding time 1*4 (5) |
Holding time 2*5 (5) |
Average cooling rate*6 (°C/s) |
Holding time u,x 3*7 (s) |
| 18 |
18 |
1220 |
890 |
76 |
430 |
730 |
727 |
881 |
804 |
15 |
30 |
12 |
80 |
|
|
Comparative Example |
| 19 |
19 |
1220 |
880 |
70 |
390 |
720 |
725 |
910 |
817 |
1150 |
20 |
10 |
90 |
|
|
Comparative Example |
| 20 |
20 |
1220 |
890 |
49 |
320 |
730 |
722 |
887 |
804 |
130 |
230 |
12 |
70 |
|
|
Comparative Example |
| 21 |
21 |
1220 |
890 |
84 |
460 |
770 |
726 |
870 |
798 |
150 |
20 |
4 |
70 |
|
|
Comparative Example |
| 22 |
22 |
1220 |
900 |
69 |
350 |
760 |
725 |
881 |
803 |
140 |
30 |
13 |
5 |
|
|
Comparative Example |
| 23 |
23 |
1180 |
920 |
58 |
450 |
740 |
719 |
861 |
790 |
110 |
50 |
13 |
70 |
Performed |
Performed |
Example |
| 24 |
24 |
1180 |
900 |
58 |
350 |
770 |
720 |
880 |
800 |
170 |
50 |
14 |
70 |
Performed |
Performed |
Example |
| 25 |
25 |
1220 |
900 |
45 |
340 |
760 |
731 |
853 |
792 |
210 |
40 |
15 |
40 |
Performed |
Performed |
Example |
| 26 |
26 |
1220 |
890 |
49 |
310 |
750 |
721 |
922 |
821 |
50 |
50 |
9 |
40 |
Performed |
Performed |
Example |
| 27 |
27 |
1220 |
900 |
85 |
320 |
750 |
718 |
861 |
789 |
210 |
50 |
15 |
40 |
Performed |
|
Example |
| 28 |
28 |
1220 |
910 |
57 |
420 |
780 |
722 |
869 |
796 |
160 |
40 |
14 |
50 |
Performed |
|
Example |
| 29 |
29 |
1220 |
900 |
79 |
370 |
780 |
725 |
896 |
811 |
120 |
40 |
12 |
100 |
Performed |
|
Example |
| 30 |
30 |
1220 |
900 |
76 |
410 |
770 |
722 |
896 |
809 |
100 |
60 |
11 |
60 |
|
|
Example |
| 31 |
31 |
1220 |
890 |
78 |
410 |
750 |
729 |
865 |
797 |
450 |
60 |
15 |
90 |
|
|
Example |
| 32 |
32 |
1220 |
910 |
60 |
440 |
780 |
723 |
878 |
801 |
190 |
50 |
12 |
50 |
|
|
Example |
| 33 |
33 |
1220 |
870 |
75 |
420 |
710 |
722 |
841 |
782 |
540 |
40 |
16 |
40 |
|
|
Example |
*1 average cooling rate until steel sheet temperature reaches 500°C after finish rolling
*2 A1 point=751-26.6×[%C]+17.6×[%Si]-11.6×[%Mn]+22.5×[%.Mo]+233×[%Nb]-39.7×[%V]-57×[%Ti]-895×[%B]-169×[%Al]
([%X] is content of X element in steel (mass%)) *3 A3 point=937-476.5×[%C]+56×[%Si]-19.7×[%Mn]+38.1×[%Mo]+124.8×[%V]+136.3×[%Ti]-19×[%Nb]+3315×[%B]
([%X] is content of X element in steel (mass%))
*4 holding time of steel sheet temperature in temperature range of 600°C or more and
700°C or less
*5 holding time of steel sheet temperature in temperature range of more than 700°C
*6 average cooling rate from maximum heating temperature to 530°C
*7 holding time in temperature range of 470°C or more and 530°C or less after cooling
stops |
[0077] A test piece was collected from each obtained hot rolled steel sheet, and subjected
to microstructure observation, average dislocation density measurement, a tensile
test, a hole expansion test, a blanking test, and manufacturing stability evaluation.
The evaluation results are listed in Table 3. The test methods are as follows.
(i) Microstructure observation
[0078] A test piece was collected from each obtained hot rolled steel sheet, and polished
in a cross-section (L cross-section) parallel to the rolling direction of the test
piece and etched by nital. A micrograph taken with a scanning electron microscope
(1000, 3000, 5000 magnifications) was used to determine the total area ratio of tempered
bainite phase and tempered martensite phase, the area ratio of coarse pearlite phase,
the total area ratio of martensite phase and retained austenite phase (MA), and the
area ratio of phase other than these, through the use of an image analyzer. It is
difficult to distinguish martensite phase and retained austenite phase from each other
with a scanning electron micrograph. In this example, however, the total area ratio
of coarse pearlite phase, martensite phase, and retained austenite phase is important,
and accordingly the total area ratio of martensite phase and retained austenite phase
(MA) was determined without distinguishing martensite phase and retained austenite
phase from each other.
[0079] Moreover, a thin film made from each hot rolled steel sheet was observed using a
transmission electron microscope (TEM), to measure the lath width in tempered bainite
and tempered martensite and determine the proportion of Fe-based carbides with an
aspect ratio of 5 or less in Fe-based carbides precipitated inside and at the boundaries
of laths and the average particle size of MC-type carbides precipitated inside and
at the boundaries of laths.
[0080] The lath width in tempered bainite and tempered martensite was measured as follows.
In a transmission electron micrograph of 120 mm × 80 mm in size taken for 10 observation
fields at 30000 magnifications, five straight lines orthogonal to the major axes of
three or more consecutively aligned laths were drawn at intervals of 10 mm, the length
of each line segment where the corresponding straight line intersects with the lath
boundaries was measured, and the average length of the line segments was set as the
average lath width.
[0081] The proportion of Fe-based carbides with an aspect ratio of 5 or less in Fe-based
carbides precipitated inside and at the boundaries of laths was determined as follows.
In a micrograph taken at 165000 magnifications, the major axis length and the minor
axis length were measured for at least 100 particles of Fe-based carbides precipitated
inside and at the boundaries of laths for 5 observation fields in total, to calculate
the aspect ratio. The proportion of Fe-based carbides with an aspect ratio of 5 or
less was thus determined.
[0082] The average particle size of MC-type carbides was determined as follows. In a micrograph
taken at 300000 magnifications, the diameter was measured for at least 100 particles
of MC-type carbides such as TiC for 5 observation fields in total, and an arithmetic
average (average particle size d
def) was calculated. The lower limit of the measured particle size was 2 nm.
(ii) Average dislocation density measurement
[0083] A test piece was collected from each obtained hot rolled steel sheet, and the dislocation
density of a 1/4 portion in sheet thickness was measured. Assuming that the dislocation
density of a 1/4 portion in sheet thickness represents the average dislocation density
of the steel sheet, the measurement was set as average dislocation density. The collected
test piece was subjected to mechanical grinding and also polishing with oxalic acid
for 0.1 mm, to adjust the sample so that the 1/4 portion in sheet thickness was exposed
to the surface. Polishing with oxalic acid was intended to remove the layer worked
by grinding.
[0084] For the sample adjusted in this way, the strain of the steel sheet was measured by
an X-ray diffractometer. With an X-ray diffractometer, the diffraction intensity of
(110) plane, (211) plane, and (220) plane of α-iron in the 1/4 portion in sheet thickness
was measured using CoKα rays. The half-value breadth of the peak value of the reflection
intensity of each crystal plane was calculated from the obtained measurement chart,
and the local strain ε' applied to the steel sheet was determined according to the
following Expressions (1) and (2).

where β is the half-value breadth of the peak value (the value corrected according
to Expression (2) was used), θ is the diffraction angle, λ is the wavelength of CoKα
rays (0.1790 nm), D is the crystallite size (dislocation cell, crystal grain size),
and ε' is the local strain.

where β
m is the half-value breadth of the peak of the sample subjected to dislocation density
measurement, and β
0 is the half-value breadth of the peak of a strain-free sample.
[0085] Here, βcosθ/λ was plotted against sinθ/λ, and ε' and D were calculated from the slope
and the intercept. From the obtained local strain ε', the dislocation density ρ was
determined according to the following Expression (3).

where b is the Burgers vector (0.248 nm).
(iii) Tensile test
[0086] A JIS No. 5 tensile test piece (JIS Z 2001) was collected from each obtained hot
rolled steel sheet so that the direction (C direction) orthogonal to the rolling direction
was the tensile direction, and subjected to a tensile test in conformity with JIS
Z 2241 to measure yield strength (YS), tensile strength (TS), and elongation (El).
(iv) Hole expansion test
[0087] A test piece (size: 100 mm × 100 mm) was collected from each obtained hot rolled
steel sheet, and blanked with a hole of 10 mmφ in initial diameter do (clearance:
12.5% of the test piece sheet thickness). A hole expansion test was conducted using
the test piece. In detail, a conical punch with a vertex angle of 60° was inserted
into the hole of 10 mmφ in initial diameter d
0 from the punch side at the time of blanking, to expand the hole. The diameter d (mm)
of the hole when a crack ran through the steel sheet (test piece) was measured, and
the hole expansion ratio λ (%) was calculated according to the following expression.

[0088] The stretch flangeability was evaluated as favorable in the case where tensile strength
(TS) × {hole expansion ratio (λ)}
0.5 was 6200·MPa%
0,5 or more.
(v) Blanking test
[0089] A test piece (size: 30 mm × 30 mm) was collected from each obtained hot rolled steel
sheet, and blanked with a hole of 10 mmφ in diameter do (clearance: 20%, 30% of the
test piece sheet thickness). After the blanking, the fracture state of the punched
end surface was observed by a microscope (50 magnifications) on the whole circumference
of the punch hole, to observe whether or not any crack, chip, or brittle fracture
occurred. The blanking workability was evaluated as "pass" if there was no crack,
chip, or brittle fracture, and "fail" otherwise.
Table 3
| Steel sheet No. |
Steel No. |
Metallic microstructure |
Mechanical properties |
Remarks |
| Area ratio*1(%) |
Average width of laths in TB and TM (µm) |
Proportion of Fe-based carbides with aspect ratio of 5 or less*2 (%) |
Average particle size of MC-type carbides (nm) |
Average dislocation density (×1014m-2) |
Yield strengh (MPa) |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Elongation (%) |
Hole expansion ratio (%) |
TS×λ0.5 (MPa×%0.5) |
Blanking workability |
| TB+TM |
Coarse P |
MA |
Coarse P + MA |
Balance |
| 1 |
1 |
54 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
1.4 |
96 |
2 |
10 |
674 |
723 |
20 |
92 |
6935 |
Pass |
Comparative Example |
| 2 |
2 |
75 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
23 |
0.3 |
97 |
10 |
4 |
679 |
803 |
17 |
83 |
7316 |
Pass |
Example |
| 3 |
3 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.3 |
99 |
2 |
2 |
773 |
823 |
17 |
71 |
6935 |
Pass |
Example |
| 4 |
4 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
55 |
1.1 |
85 |
17 |
16 |
543 |
638 |
23 |
134 |
7385 |
Pass |
Comparative Example |
| 5 |
5 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.6 |
91 |
3 |
10 |
816 |
887 |
18 |
61 |
6928 |
Pass |
Example |
| 6 |
6 |
72 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
25 |
0.3 |
96 |
8 |
5 |
733 |
894 |
16 |
62 |
7039 |
Pass |
Example |
| 7 |
7 |
71 |
3 |
14 |
17 |
12 |
0.5 |
93 |
5 |
8 |
711 |
997 |
15 |
18 |
4230 |
Pass |
Comparative Example |
| 8 |
8 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1.8 |
86 |
Not observed |
15 |
592 |
627 |
24 |
116 |
6753 |
Pass |
Comparative Example |
| 9 |
9 |
74 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
23 |
0.6 |
87 |
3 |
14 |
707 |
846 |
19 |
78 |
7472 |
Pass |
Example |
| 10 |
10 |
87 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
0.5 |
98 |
8 |
3 |
875 |
992 |
15 |
46 |
6728 |
Pass |
Example |
| 11 |
11 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.6 |
87 |
5 |
14 |
993 |
1056 |
15 |
26 |
5385 |
Fail |
Comparative Example |
| 12 |
12 |
77 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
21 |
0.5 |
90 |
2 |
11 |
668 |
785 |
19 |
93 |
7570 |
Pass |
Example |
| 13 |
13 |
64 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
0.4 |
90 |
7 |
11 |
678 |
724 |
20 |
93 |
6982 |
Pass |
Conparative Example |
| 14 |
14 |
58 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
42 |
0.4 |
91 |
4 |
10 |
629 |
673 |
22 |
107 |
6962 |
Pass |
Comparative Example |
| 15 |
15 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
12 |
88 |
No lath observed |
97 |
2 |
4 |
577 |
730 |
20 |
102 |
7373 |
Pass |
Comparative Example |
| 16 |
16 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.6 |
55 |
7 |
56 |
916 |
1035 |
15 |
43 |
6787 |
Fail |
Comparative Example |
| 17 |
17 |
32 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
66 |
1.9 |
90 |
28 |
11 |
658 |
727 |
21 |
92 |
6973 |
Pass |
Comparative Example |
| Area ratio *1(%) |
Average width of laths in TB and TM (µm) |
Proportion of Fe-based carbides with aspect ratio of 5 or less*2 (%) |
Average particle size of MC-type carbides (nm) |
Average dislocation density (×1014m-2) |
Yield strength (MPa) |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Elongation (%) |
Hole expansion ratio λ (%) |
TS × λ0.5 (MPa × %0.5) |
Blanking workability |
|
| TB+TM |
Coarse P |
MA |
Coarse P + MA |
Balance |
|
|
|
| 18 |
18 |
97 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1.1 |
95 |
2 |
6 |
653 |
713 |
21 |
100 |
7130 |
Pass |
Comparative Example |
| 19 |
19 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.4 |
No θ inside and between laths |
6 |
8 |
742 |
796 |
18 |
81 |
7164 |
Fail |
Comparative Example |
| 20 |
20 |
95 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1.6 |
No θ inside and between laths |
22 |
15 |
681 |
745 |
20 |
83 |
6787 |
Fail |
Comparative Example |
| 21 |
21 |
80 |
10 |
2 |
12 |
8 |
0.4 |
98 |
8 |
3 |
730 |
810 |
19 |
53 |
5897 |
Pass |
Comparative Example |
| 22 |
22 |
85 |
0 |
13 |
13 |
2 |
0.3 |
93 |
3 |
8 |
714 |
928 |
16 |
32 |
5250 |
Pass |
Comparative Example |
| 23 |
23 |
89 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
0.6 |
93 |
2 |
12 |
710 |
831 |
19 |
74 |
7149 |
Pass |
Example |
| 24 |
24 |
80 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
18 |
0.4 |
89 |
3 |
12 |
823 |
960 |
16 |
53 |
6989 |
Pass |
Example |
| 25 |
25 |
84 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
0.6 |
85 |
6 |
16 |
877 |
1008 |
16 |
46 |
6837 |
Pass |
Example |
| 26 |
26 |
90 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
0.6 |
86 |
5 |
15 |
802 |
889 |
18 |
62 |
7000 |
Pass |
Example |
| 27 |
27 |
85 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
13 |
0.6 |
98 |
3 |
3 |
917 |
1039 |
16 |
41 |
6653 |
Pass |
Example |
| 28 |
28 |
75 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
22 |
0.5 |
89 |
6 |
12 |
732 |
867 |
18 |
71 |
7305 |
Pass |
Example |
| 29 |
29 |
79 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
19 |
0.2 |
96 |
5 |
5 |
751 |
879 |
16 |
68 |
7248 |
Pass |
Example |
| 30 |
30 |
82 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
16 |
0.4 |
95 |
4 |
6 |
714 |
821 |
19 |
80 |
7343 |
Pass |
Example |
| 31 |
31 |
89 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
0.3 |
96 |
4 |
5 |
817 |
917 |
16 |
58 |
6984 |
Pass |
Example |
| 32 |
32 |
76 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
22 |
0.5 |
90 |
7 |
11 |
683 |
805 |
20 |
86 |
7465 |
Pass |
Example |
| 33 |
33 |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.6 |
95 |
7 |
6 |
873 |
933 |
17 |
52 |
6728 |
Pass |
Example |
*1 TB:tempered barrite, TM tempered martensite, P pearlite, MA. martensite+retained
austersite
*2 all observed Fe-based carbides are cementite |
[0090] As can be seen from Table 3, in all Examples, a hot rolled steel sheet having high
strength such as a tensile strength (TS) of 780 MPa or more and excellent stretch
flangeability and blanking workability was obtained.
[0091] To evaluate the variations of the mechanical properties of each steel sheet, 100
JIS No. 5 tensile test pieces (JIS Z 2001) were optionally collected from the whole
length and whole width of the hot rolled steel sheets of Examples so that the orthogonal
direction (C direction) was the tensile direction. A tensile test was conducted in
conformity with JIS Z 2241 to measure the tensile strength (TS), and their standard
deviation σ was calculated. In all Examples, the standard deviation of the tensile
strength (TS) was 10 MPa or less.
[0092] Thus, in all Examples, the mechanical properties of the steel sheet such as tensile
strength (TS) had little variations, exhibiting excellent manufacturing stability.