Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy
and a sintered body prepared by using the same, and more particularly to a mixed powder
for iron-based powder metallurgy containing calcium sulfate anhydrite II at a specific
ratio and a sintered body prepared by using the same.
Background Art
[0002] Powder metallurgy is widely used as a method for industrial production of various
kinds of mechanical parts. A procedure for the iron-based powder metallurgy is such
that, first, a mixed powder is prepared by mixing an iron-based powder with a powder
for alloy such as a copper (Cu) powder or a nickel (Ni) powder, a graphite powder,
and a lubricant. Next, this mixed powder is put into a mold to perform press-molding,
and the resultant is sintered to prepare a sintered body. Finally, this sintered body
is subjected to cutting such as drilling process or turning on a lathe, so as to be
prepared into a mechanical part having a desired shape.
[0003] An ideal for powder metallurgy is such that the sintered body is processed to be
made usable as a mechanical part without performing cutting on the sintered body.
However, the aforesaid sintering may generate non-uniform contraction of the raw material
powder. In recent years, the dimension precision required in the mechanical parts
is increasing, and the shapes of the parts are becoming more complex. For this reason,
it is becoming essential to perform cutting on the sintered body. From such a technical
background, machinability is imparted to the sintered body so that the sintered body
can be smoothly processed.
[0004] There is a technique of adding a manganese sulfide (MnS) powder to the mixed powder
as means for imparting the machinability. Addition of the manganese sulfide powder
is effective for cutting at a comparatively low speed, such as drilling. However,
addition of a manganese sulfide powder is not necessarily effective for cutting at
a high speed that is performed in recent years, and raises problems such as generation
of contamination on the sintered body and decrease in the mechanical strength.
[0005] Patent Literature 1 (Japanese Examined Patent Application Publication No.
S52-16684) discloses a method of imparting machinability other than the aforesaid addition
of manganese sulfide. Patent Literature 1 discloses a sintered steel in which 0.1
to 1.0% of calcium sulfide (CaS), 0.1 to 2% of carbon (C), and 0.5 to 5.0% of copper
(Cu) are incorporated into an iron-based raw material powder obtained by allowing
a needed amount of carbon and copper to be contained in an iron powder.
[0006] Incorporation of calcium sulfide into an iron-based raw material powder disclosed
in Patent Literature 1 raises problems such as considerable decrease in the strength
of the mechanical parts and unstable product quality caused by change with lapse of
time of the mixed powder. Further, when the sintered steel disclosed in Patent Literature
1 is processed with use of a cutting tool, the chips are hardly fragmented finely.
From this, the sintered steel disclosed in Patent Literature 1 can hardly be said
to be excellent to a degree such as to satisfy the current demand for the chip controllability.
[0007] The present invention has been made in view of the aforementioned problems, and an
object thereof is to provide a mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy capable
of preparing a sintered body having a stable product quality and performance.
Citation List
Patent Literature
[0008] Patent Literature 1: Japanese Examined Patent Application Publication No.
S52-16684
Summary of Invention
[0009] A mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy of the present invention comprises
a powder containing calcium sulfate anhydrite II such that a weight ratio of CaS after
sintering is 0.01 wt% or more to 0.1 wt% or less.
[0010] A method for producing a mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy of the present
invention comprises:
preparing a powder containing calcium sulfate anhydrite II by heating a powder containing
dihydrate gypsum or hemihydrate gypsum at a temperature of 350°C or higher to 900°C
or lower; and
mixing the powder containing calcium sulfate anhydrite II with an iron-based powder.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0011]
FIG. 1 is an image showing one example of an outer appearance of chips having a good
chip controllability.
FIG. 2 is an image showing one example of an outer appearance of chips without having
a good chip controllability.
FIG. 3 is an observation image of a worn part of a tool rake face after a sintered
body prepared in Example 26 was turned on a lathe with a cermet tip.
FIG. 4 is an observation image of a worn part of a tool rake face after a sintered
body prepared in Example 30 was turned on a lathe with a cermet tip.
FIG. 5 is an observation image of a worn part of a tool rake face after a sintered
body prepared in Example 32 was turned on a lathe with a cermet tip.
FIG. 6 is an observation image of a worn part of a tool rake face after a sintered
body prepared in Example 33 was turned on a lathe with a cermet tip.
FIG. 7 is an observation image of a worn part of a tool rake face after a sintered
body prepared in Example 34 was turned on a lathe with a cermet tip.
FIG. 8 is an observation image of a worn part of a tool rake face after a sintered
body prepared in Reference Example 1 was turned on a lathe with a cermet tip.
Description of Embodiments
[0012] In order to achieve the aforementioned object, the present inventor has made investigations
on why the sintered body disclosed in Patent Literature 1 undergoes decrease in the
product quality and performance with lapse of time. Then, the present inventors have
found out that, when the sintered body contains calcium sulfide and hemihydrate gypsum
(hereafter, these two components will be referred to as "CaS components"), the product
quality and performance of the sintered body decreases. In other words, the present
inventors have found out that, when the CaS components absorb moisture in ambient
air, the CaS components are changed into calcium sulfate dihydrate (CaSO
4·2H
2O), or the CaS components are aggregated by a hardening reaction to form coarse grains
of 63 µm or greater. It has been made clear that this lets the CaS components be non-uniformly
dispersed in the mixed powder or in the sintered body to decrease the machinability
of the sintered body, or lets the moisture adsorbed onto the CaS components be dilated
during the sintering to decrease the strength of the sintered body.
[0013] The present inventor has completed the present invention shown below by further making
eager studies on the crystal structure of calcium sulfate having a low moisture absorptivity
based on the above findings.
[0014] According to the present invention, there can be provided a mixed powder for iron-based
powder metallurgy capable of preparing a sintered body having a stable product quality
and performance.
[0015] Hereafter, a mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy according to the present
invention and a method for producing the same will be specifically described.
<Mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy>
[0016] A mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy of the present invention is a mixed
powder obtained by mixing an iron-based powder with a powder containing calcium sulfate
anhydrite II (which may hereafter be referred to also as "II type CaSO
4 powder"). Various kinds of additives such as ternary oxides, binary oxides, powders
for alloy, graphite powders, lubricants, and binders may be appropriately added into
this mixed powder. In addition to these, the mixed powder may contain a slight amount
of inevitable impurities during the process of producing the mixed powder for iron-based
powder metallurgy. The mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy of the present
invention may be put into a mold or the like to be molded and thereafter sintered
to give a sintered body. The sintered body thus prepared may be subjected to cutting
process, so as to be made usable in various kinds of mechanical parts. The use and
the production method of this sintered body will be described later.
<Iron-based powder>
[0017] The iron-based powder is a main constituent component constituting the mixed powder
for iron-based powder metallurgy, and is preferably contained at a weight ratio of
60 wt% or more relative to the total amount of the mixed powder for iron-based powder
metallurgy. Here, wt% of the iron-based powder as used herein refers to the occupied
ratio relative to the total weight of the constituent components of the mixed powder
for iron-based powder metallurgy other than the lubricants. Hereafter, it is assumed
that, when wt% of each component is defined, the definition refers to the occupied
weight ratio relative to the total weight of the constituent components of the mixed
powder for iron-based powder metallurgy other than the lubricants.
[0018] The above iron-based powder usable in the present invention may be, for example,
a pure iron powder such as an atomized iron powder or a reduced iron powder, a partially
diffused alloyed steel powder, a completely alloyed steel powder, a hybrid steel powder
obtained by partially diffusing alloy components into a completely alloyed steel powder,
or the like. A volume-average particle size of the iron-based powder is preferably
50 µm or more, more preferably 70 µm or more. When the volume-average particle size
of the iron-based powder is 50 µm or more, the handling property is excellent. Further,
the volume-average particle size of the iron-based powder is preferably 200 µm or
less, more preferably 100 µm or less. When the volume-average particle size of the
iron-based powder is 200 µm or less, a precision shape can be readily molded, and
also a sufficient strength can be obtained.
<II-type CaSO4 powder>
[0019] The mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy of the present invention is characterized
by comprising a powder containing calcium sulfate anhydrite II (II type CaSO
4 powder). The present invention overturns a conventional technical common sense (for
example, of Patent Literature 1) that mere addition of a component that becomes calcium
sulfide (CaS) after sintering can enhance the machinability of the sintered body.
In other words, dihydrate gypsum (CaSO
4·2H
2O), calcium sulfate anhydrite III (III type CaSO
4) hemihydrate gypsum (CaS0
4·1/2H
2O), and the like may in some cases absorb moisture with lapse of time, thereby decreasing
the machinability of the sintered body. In contrast, calcium sulfate anhydrite II
has low moisture absorptivity and does not absorb moisture in ambient air, so that
the mass of calcium sulfate anhydrite II does not increase even when the calcium sulfate
anhydrite II is stored for a certain period of time in a state of being contained
in the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy. Moreover, calcium sulfate anhydrite
II can enhance the machinability of the sintered body by being changed into CaS after
sintering. For this reason, a mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy containing
II type CaSO
4 powder can enhance various performances of the sintered body stably as compared with
dihydrate gypsum (CaSO
4·2H
2O), calcium sulfate anhydrite III (III type CaSO
4) and hemihydrate gypsum (CaSO
4·1/2H
2O).
[0020] The II type CaSO
4 powder contains calcium sulfate anhydrite II as a major component; however, the II
type CaSO
4 powder may contain dihydrate gypsum (CaSO
4-2H
2O), calcium sulfate anhydrite III (III type CaSO
4) hemihydrate gypsum (CaSO
4·1/2H
2O), and the like. The more the ratio occupied by calcium sulfate anhydrite II in the
II type CaSO
4 powder is, the more preferable it is. The weight ratio of calcium sulfate anhydrite
II is preferably 70 wt% or more, more preferably 80 wt% or more, and it is particularly
preferable that the II type CaSO
4 powder is made of calcium sulfate anhydrite II alone. Further, the surface of the
II type CaSO
4 powder may be covered with a lubricant or a binder described later.
[0021] It is preferable that the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy contains
a II type CaSO
4 powder such that a weight ratio of CaS after sintering is 0.01 wt% or more to 0.1
wt% or less. The II type CaSO
4 powder is more preferably such that a weight ratio of CaS after sintering is 0.02
wt% or more, still more preferably such that a weight ratio of CaS after sintering
is 0.03 wt% or more. A sintered body containing CaS at such a weight ratio is excellent
particularly in machinability. The II type CaSO
4 powder is contained more preferably so that a weight ratio of CaS after sintering
is 0.09 wt% or less, still more preferably so that a weight ratio of CaS after sintering
is 0.08 wt% or less. Incorporation of CaS at such a weight ratio can enhance the strength
of the sintered body.
[0022] The term "weight ratio of CaS after sintering" refers to the weight ratio occupied
by CaS in the sintered body obtained by sintering the mixed powder for iron-based
powder metallurgy. The weight ratio of CaS contained in the sintered body after sintering
can be adjusted by the weight ratio of II type CaSO
4 powder contained before the sintering.
[0023] The weight ratio of CaS contained in the sintered body is calculated by collecting
a sample piece through processing the sintered body with a drill or the like and converting
the weight of Ca, which is obtained by performing quantitative analysis of the weight
of Ca contained in the sample piece, into the weight of CaS. Such conversion is carried
out by dividing with the atomic weight of Ca (40.078) and multiplying with the molecular
weight of CaS (72.143). Little amount of Ca disappears by reacting during the sintering,
so that the weight of Ca does not change between before and after the sintering, and
Ca and S are bonded at a ratio of 1 : 1.
[0024] The volume-average particle size of the II type CaSO
4 powder is preferably 0.1 µm or more, more preferably 0.5 µm or more, and still more
preferably 1 µm or more. Further, the volume-average particle size of the II type
CaSO
4 powder is preferably 60 µm or less, more preferably 30 µm or less, and still more
preferably 20 µm or less. A II type CaSO
4 powder having such a volume-average particle size can be obtained, for example, by
heating hemihydrate gypsum to 350°C or higher and 900°C or lower, holding the heated
hemihydrate gypsum for 1 hour or more to 10 hours or less, and crushing and classifying
the resultant. According as the volume-average particle size of the II type CaSO
4 powder is smaller, machinability of the sintered body can be improved even if the
amount of addition of the II type CaSO
4 powder is reduced to be smaller. The above volume-average particle size is a value
of the particle size D
50 at an accumulated value of 50% in the particle size distribution obtained by using
a laser diffraction particle size distribution measurement device (Microtrac "MODEL9320-X100"
manufactured by Nikkiso Co., Ltd.).
[0025] When the volume-average particle size of the II type CaSO
4 powder is R (µm) and the weight ratio of CaS contained in the sintered body after
the sintering is W (wt%), it is preferable that a lower limit of R
1/3(W is 15 or more, more preferably 20 or more, and still more preferably 25 or more.
Further, an upper limit of R
1/3(W is preferably 400 or less, more preferably 340 or less, and still more preferably
270 or less. Such a definition is based on an experience of the present inventors
that the relationship between the volume-average particle size, which is proportional
to the cubic root of the volume ratio, and the weight ratio is correlated to various
properties of the sintered body. When such a numerical value range is satisfied, a
sintered body that is good in all of radial crushing strength, machinability, and
chip controllability can be obtained.
<Ternary oxides>
[0026] Ternary oxides may be added in order to improve the machinability when the sintered
body is used for a long period of time in a cutting process. Addition of the ternary
oxides in combination with addition of the II type CaSO
4 powder can considerably enhance the machinability of the sintered body. The ternary
oxide means a composite oxide of three types of elements. Specifically, the ternary
oxide is preferably a composite oxide of three types of elements selected from the
group consisting of Ca, Mg, Al, Si, Co, Ni, Ti, Mn, Fe, and Zn, and is more preferably
a Ca-Al-Si oxide, a Ca-Mg-Si oxide, or the like. The Ca-Al-Si oxide may be, for example,
2CaO·Al
2O
3·SiO
2 or the like. The Ca-Mg-Si oxide may be, for example, 2CaO·MgO·2SiO
2 or the like. Among these, it is preferable to add 2CaO·Al
2O
3·SiO
2. The aforementioned 2CaO·Al
2O
3·SiO
2 reacts with TiO
2 contained in the cutting tool or in the coating formed on the cutting tool to form
a protection coating film on the surface of the cutting tool, whereby the wear resistance
of the cutting tool can be considerably increased.
[0027] A shape of the ternary oxide is not particularly limited; however, the ternary oxide
preferably has a spherical shape or a crushed spherical shape, that is, a shape that
is round as a whole.
[0028] A lower limit of the volume-average particle size of the ternary oxide is preferably
0.1 µm or more, more preferably 0.5 µm or more, and still more preferably 1 µm or
more. There is a tendency such that, according as the volume-average particle size
is smaller, the machinability of the sintered body can be improved by a smaller amount
of addition. Further, an upper limit of the volume-average particle size of the ternary
oxide is preferably 15 µm or less, more preferably 10 µm or less, and still more preferably
9 µm or less. When the volume-average particle size is too large, it is difficult
to improve the machinability of the sintered body. The volume-average particle size
of the ternary oxide is a value obtained by a measurement method similar to the above-described
method for measuring the volume-average particle size of the II type CaSO
4 powder.
[0029] A lower limit of the content of the ternary oxide is preferably 0.01 wt% or more,
more preferably 0.03 wt% or more, and still more preferably 0.05 wt% or more. Further,
an upper limit of the content of the ternary oxide is preferably 0.25 wt% or less,
more preferably 0.2 wt% or less, and still more preferably 0.15 wt% or less. When
the ternary oxide is contained at such a weight ratio, a sintered body can be obtained
that has an excellent machinability even in a cutting process of a long period of
time while suppressing the costs. Use of the ternary oxides in combination with II
type CaSO
4 powder can improve the machinability in a cutting process of a long period of time
even when the amount of addition of the ternary oxide is small.
[0030] The weight ratio of the ternary oxides and CaS after the sintering is preferably
1 : 9 to 9 : 1, more preferably 3 : 7 to 9 : 1, and still more preferably 4 : 6 to
7 : 3. When the two components are contained at such a weight ratio, the machinability
of the sintered body can be considerably improved.
<Binary oxides>
[0031] Binary oxides may be added in order to improve the machinability at an initial stage
of cutting when the sintered body is used in a cutting process. The binary oxide means
a composite oxide of two types of elements. Specifically, the binary oxide is preferably
a composite oxide of two types of elements selected from the group consisting of Ca,
Mg, Al, Si, Co, Ni, Ti, Mn, Fe, and Zn, and is more preferably a Ca-Al oxide, a Ca-Si
oxide, or the like. The Ca-Al oxide may be, for example, CaO·Al
2O
3, 12CaO·7Al
2O
3, or the like. The Ca-Si oxide may be, for example, 2CaO·SiO
2 or the like.
[0032] The shape and the volume-average particle size of the binary oxide as well as the
method of measurement and the weight ratio thereof are preferably similar to those
of the ternary oxide described above.
<Binary oxides and ternary oxides>
[0033] The mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy of the present invention preferably
contains both of binary oxides and ternary oxides in a sum weight of 0.02 wt% or more
to 0.3 wt% or less. The sum weight of the binary oxides and ternary oxides is preferably
0.05 wt% or more, more preferably 0.1 wt% or more. In view of costs, the weight ratio
of the binary oxides and ternary oxides is preferably as small as possible. Further,
the sum weight of the binary oxides and ternary oxides is preferably 0.25 wt% or less,
more preferably 0.2 wt% or less. When the sum weight of the oxides is 0.25 wt% or
less, the radial crushing strength of the sintered body can be sufficiently ensured.
[0034] The weight ratio of the binary oxides and CaS after the sintering is preferably 1
: 9 to 9 : 1, more preferably 3 : 6 to 9 : 1, and still more preferably 4 : 6 to 7
: 3. When the two components are contained at such a weight ratio, a sintered body
having an excellent machinability at an initial stage of cutting can be prepared.
<Powder for alloy>
[0035] A powder for alloy is added for the purpose of promoting bonding between the iron-based
powders and enhancing the strength of the sintered body after the sintering. Such
a powder for alloy is contained preferably at a ratio of 0.1 wt% or more to 10 wt%
or less relative to the whole of the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy.
When the ratio is 0.1 wt% or more, the strength of the sintered body can be enhanced.
Further, when the ratio is 10 wt% or less, the dimension precision of the sintered
body at the time of sintering can be ensured.
[0036] The powder for alloy may be, for example, a non-ferrous metal power such as copper
(Cu) powder, nickel (Ni) powder, Mo powder, Cr powder, V powder, Si powder, or Mn
powder, a copper suboxide powder, or the like. These may be used either alone as one
kind or in combination of two or more kinds.
<Lubricant>
[0037] A lubricant is added into the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy so that
the molded body obtained by compressing the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy
in a mold can be readily taken out from the mold. In other words, when a lubricant
is added into the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy, the withdrawing pressure
at the time of taking the molded body out from the mold can be reduced, so that cracking
of the molded body and damage of the mold can be prevented. The lubricant may be added
into the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy or may be applied on the surface
of the mold. When the lubricant is added into the mixed powder for iron-based powder
metallurgy, the lubricant is contained preferably at a ratio of 0.01 mass% or more
to 1.5 mass% or less, more preferably at a ratio of 0.1 mass% or more to 1.2 mass%
or less, and still more preferably at a ratio of 0.2 mass% or more to 1.0 mass% or
less, relative to the weight of the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy.
When the content of the lubricant is 0.01 mass% or more, the effect of reducing the
withdrawing pressure of the mold can be readily obtained. When the content of the
lubricant is 1.5 mass% or less, a sintered body having a high density can be readily
obtained, and a sintered body having a high strength can be obtained.
[0038] The lubricant that can be put to use may be one or more selected from the group consisting
of metal soap (lithium stearate, calcium stearate, zinc stearate, or the like), stearamide,
fatty acid amide, amide wax, hydrocarbon-based wax, and cross-linked alkyl (meth)acrylate
resin. Among these, it is preferable to use an amide-based lubricant from the viewpoint
of having a good performance of allowing the powder for alloy, graphite powder, or
the like to adhere onto the iron-based powder surface and being capable of readily
reducing the segregation of the iron-based mixed powder.
<Binder>
[0039] A binder is added for the purpose of allowing the powder for alloy, graphite powder,
or the like to adhere onto the iron-based powder surface. The binder that is put to
use may be a butene-based polymer, a methacrylate-based polymer, or the like. As the
butene-based polymer, it is preferable to use a 1-butene homopolymer made of butene
alone or a copolymer of butene and alkene. The alkene is preferably a lower alkene,
and is preferably ethylene or propylene. As the methacrylate-based polymer, it is
possible to use one or more selected from the group consisting of methyl methacrylate,
ethyl methacrylate, butyl methacrylate, cyclohexyl methacrylate, ethylhexyl methacrylate,
lauryl methacrylate, methyl acrylate, and ethyl acrylate.
[0040] The binder is contained preferably at a ratio of 0.01 mass% or more to 0.5 mass%
or less, more preferably at a ratio of 0.05 mass% or more to 0.4 mass% or less, and
still more preferably at a ratio of 0.1 mass% or more to 0.3 mass% or less, relative
to the weight of the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy.
<Method for producing mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy>
[0041] In preparing the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy of the present invention,
a II type CaSO
4 powder contained in the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy is prepared
first. The II type CaSO
4 powder is preferably obtained by heating a hemihydrate gypsum or dihydrate gypsum
having a volume-average particle size of 0.1 µm or more to 60 µm or less, to a temperature
of 300°C or higher to 900°C or lower. The volume-average particle size of the hemihydrate
gypsum or dihydrate gypsum that is put to use is preferably equivalent to or slightly
smaller than the volume-average particle size of the II type CaSO
4 powder in consideration of aggregation at the time of heating. A lower limit of the
heating temperature is preferably 350°C or higher, more preferably 400°C or higher.
Further, an upper limit of the heating temperature is preferably 800°C or lower, more
preferably 700°C or lower, and still more preferably 500°C or lower. When the heating
temperature is 900°C or lower, it is possible to obtain a II type CaSO
4 powder having a particle size of 100 µm or less, which is general as a powder to
be mixed into the iron-based powder. In particular, when the heating temperature is
700°C or lower, aggregation of the hemihydrate gypsum or dihydrate gypsum is less
likely to occur, so that the II type CaSO
4 powder can be obtained while maintaining the volume-average particle size of the
hemihydrate gypsum or dihydrate gypsum. When the heating temperature is high, a strong
and firm aggregation occurs, so that it is preferable to perform a grinding step.
When the heating temperature is 300°C or higher, moisture of the hemihydrate gypsum
or dihydrate gypsum can be dehydrated to form the II type CaSO
4 powder. When the heating temperature is low, it is not preferable because calcium
sulfate anhydrite III may be formed instead of calcium sulfate anhydrite II.
[0042] The heating time is preferably such that the time for dehydrating the hemihydrate
gypsum or dihydrate gypsum into the II type calcium sulfate can be ensured, and is
preferably one hour or more to eight hours or less. The higher the heating temperature
is, the shorter the heating time can be made. When the heating time is short, part
of the hemihydrate gypsum may remain as it is without being changed to II type calcium
sulfate, or may change into calcium sulfate anhydrite III. For this reason, the heating
time is preferably two hours or more, more preferably three hours or more.
[0043] The mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy of the present invention can be
prepared by mixing the iron-based powder with the II type CaSO
4 powder prepared in the above with use of, for example, a mechanical agitation mixer.
In addition to these powders, various kinds of additives such as a ternary oxide,
a powder for alloy, a graphite powder, a lubricant, a binary oxide, and a binder may
be suitably added. The mechanical agitation mixer may be, for example, a high-speed
mixer, a Nauta Mixer, a V-type mixer, a double-cone blender, or the like. The order
of mixing these powders is not particularly limited. The mixing temperature is not
particularly limited; however, the mixing temperature is preferably 150°C or lower
in view of suppressing oxidation of the iron-based powder in the mixing step.
<Method for producing sintered body>
[0044] After the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy prepared in the above is
put into a mold, a pressure of 300 MPa or higher to 1200 MPa or lower is applied to
produce a pressed-powder molded body. The molding temperature during this time is
preferably 25°C or higher to 150°C or lower.
[0045] The pressed-powder molded body prepared in the above is sintered by an ordinary sintering
method to obtain a sintered body. The sintering conditions may be a non-oxidizing
atmosphere or a reducing atmosphere. The above pressed-powder molded body is preferably
sintered at a temperature of 1000°C or higher to 1300°C or lower for 5 minutes or
more to 60 minutes or less in an atmosphere such as a nitrogen atmosphere, a mixed
atmosphere of nitrogen and hydrogen, or a hydrocarbon atmosphere.
<Sintered body>
[0046] The sintered body thus prepared can be used as a mechanical part of an automobile,
an agricultural instrument, a power tool, a home electrical appliance, or the like
by being processed with various kinds of tools such as a cutting tool in accordance
with the needs. The cutting tool for processing the sintered body may be, for example,
a drill, an end mill, a cutting tool for milling, a cutting tool for turning on a
lathe, a reamer, a tap, or the like.
[0047] According to the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy of the above-described
embodiment, a sintered body having a stable product quality and performance can be
prepared. The calcium sulfate anhydrite II contained in the mixed powder for iron-based
powder metallurgy of the above embodiment has low moisture absorptivity and does not
absorb moisture in ambient air, so that the mass of a powder containing calcium sulfate
anhydrite II does not increase even when the powder is stored for a certain period
of time in ambient air. For this reason, various performances of the sintered body
can be stably enhanced by using a powder containing calcium sulfate anhydrite II (II
type CaSO
4 powder) instead of using calcium sulfide and hemihydrate gypsum, as a component that
is turned into CaS by sintering.
[0048] In the above embodiment, since the II type CaSO
4 powder has a volume-average particle size of 0.1 µm or more to 60 µm or less, the
machinability of the sintered body can be enhanced.
[0049] When the volume-average particle size of the II type CaSO
4 powder is R µm and the weight ratio of CaS contained in the sintered body after the
sintering is W wt%, it is satisfied that R
1/3(W is 15 or more to 400 or less, so that a sintered body that is good in all of radial
crushing strength, machinability, and chip controllability can be obtained.
[0050] The mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy of the above-described embodiment
further contains one or more ternary oxides selected from the group consisting of
Ca-Al-Si oxides and Ca-Mg-Si oxides, so that the machinability in a cutting process
for a long period of time can be improved.
[0051] In the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy of the above-described embodiment,
the weight ratio of the ternary oxides and CaS after the sintering is 3 : 7 to 9 :
1, so that the machinability in a cutting process for a long period of time can be
improved.
Examples
[0052] Hereafter, the present invention will be described in further detail by way of Examples;
however, the present invention is not limited to these.
(Example 1)
[0053] First, a commercially available powder of hemihydrate gypsum was classified with
a sieve into -63/+45 µm (volume-average particle size of 54 µm). The classified hemihydrate
gypsum was heated at 350°C for five hours in an ambient air heating furnace to obtain
an calcium sulfate anhydrite II powder (II type CaSO
4 powder). This II type CaSO
4 powder was classified with a sieve into -63/+45 µm (volume-average particle size
of 54 µm). The yield of the obtained II type CaSO
4 powder was 100%. This yield is a value of percentage relative to the weight of the
II type CaSO
4 powder after the heating and represents the weight obtained by subtracting the weight
of the II type CaSO
4 powder that was removed by the classification, from the weight of the II type CaSO
4 powder after the heating.
[0054] Next, a pure iron powder (trade name: ATOMEL 300M (manufactured by Kobe Steel, Ltd.))
was mixed with 2 wt% of copper powder (trade name: CuATW-250 (manufactured by Fukuda
Metal Foil & Powder Co., Ltd.)), 0.8 wt% of graphite powder (trade name: CPB (manufactured
by Nippon Graphite Industries Co., Ltd.)), 0.75 wt% of an amide-based lubricant (ACRAWAX
C (manufactured by Lonza Ltd.)), and the II type CaSO
4 powder prepared in the above, so as to prepare a mixed powder for iron-based powder
metallurgy. The graphite powder was added at an amount such that the amount of carbon
after the sintering would be 0.75 wt%. The II type CaSO
4 powder was added at an amount such that the weight of CaS after the sintering would
be 0.5 wt%.
[0055] With use of the above mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy, two types of
sintered bodies were prepared. One was a sintered body prepared by using the mixed
powder for iron-based powder metallurgy which was in a state immediately after the
preparation (which will be hereafter referred to as "sintered body immediately after"),
and the other one was a sintered body prepared by using the mixed powder for iron-based
powder metallurgy that had been stored in ambient air for ten days after the preparation
(which will be hereafter referred to as "sintered body after 10 days").
[0056] A procedure of producing the sintered body immediately after is as follows. First,
the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy which was in a state of immediately
after the preparation was put into a mold, and a test piece was molded so as to have
a ring shape with an outer diameter of 64 mm, an inner diameter of 24 mm, and a thickness
of 20 mm and to have a molding density of 7.00 g/cm
3. Next, this test piece having a ring shape was sintered at 1130°C for 30 minutes
in a 10 vol% H
2-N
2 atmosphere, so as to prepare a sintered body. On the other hand, the sintered body
after 10 days was prepared in the same manner as the sintered body immediately after
except that the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy was left to stand in
ambient air for ten days after the preparation, and thereafter put into a mold.
(Examples 2 to 8)
[0057] In each of Examples 2 to 8, a sintered body was prepared in the same manner as in
Example 1 except that the temperature of heating the hemihydrate gypsum powder was
changed as shown in the section of "heating treatment temperature" in Table 1.
(Comparative Examples 1 to 3)
[0058] In each of Comparative Examples 2 to 3, a sintered body was prepared in the same
manner as in Example 1 except that the calcium sulfate anhydrite II was changed to
a material shown in the section of "CaS component" in Table 1. In Comparative Example
1, a sintered body was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the
calcium sulfate anhydrite II was not added.
[Table 1]
| Experiment number |
Example 1 |
Example 2 |
Example 3 |
Example 4 |
Example 5 |
Example 6 |
Example 7 |
Example 8 |
Comparative Example 1 |
Comparative Example 2 |
Comparative Example 3 |
| Heating temperature (°C) |
350 |
400 |
500 |
600 |
700 |
800 |
900 |
300 |
- |
- |
- |
| CaS component |
II type CaSO4 |
II, III type CaSO4 |
None |
CaS |
Hemihydrate gypsum |
| Molded body density (g/cm3) |
7.00/7.00 |
7.00/7.00 |
7.00/7.00 |
7.00/7.00 |
7.00/7.00 |
7.00/7.00 |
7.00/7.00 |
7.00/7.00 |
7.00/7.00 |
7.00/7.00 |
7.00/7.00 |
| Sintered body density (g/cm3) |
6.82/6.80 |
6.81/6.81 |
6.82/6.82 |
6.82/6.81 |
6.82/6.82 |
6.82/6.82 |
6.82/6.81 |
6.81/6.77 |
6.94/6.94 |
6.83/6.78 |
6.80/6.76 |
| Radial crushing strength (MPa) |
779/783 |
776/778 |
785/779 |
787/788 |
790/792 |
789/791 |
792/788 |
780/730 |
915/920 |
781/714 |
775/708 |
| Tool wear amount (µm) |
45/46 |
47/41 |
51/53 |
52/54 |
67/61 |
71/69 |
76/72 |
46/64 |
253/248 |
57/144 |
44/160 |
| Yield (%) |
100 |
99 |
99 |
97 |
85 |
73 |
65 |
100 |
- |
- |
- |
<Evaluation>
[0059] In Table 1, the evaluation results of molded body density, sintered body density,
radial crushing strength, and tool wear amount were given in a form of "sintered body
immediately after / sintered body after 10 days". Such notation means that the value
on the left side of the slash mark is the evaluation result of the sintered body immediately
after, whereas the value on the right side of the slash mark is the evaluation result
of the sintered body after 10 days.
[0060] The molded body density and the sintered body density of the sintered body immediately
after and the sintered body after 10 days of each Example and each Comparative Example
were values as determined by making measurements in accordance with Japan Powder Metallurgy
Association Standard (JPMA M 01). Further, the radial crushing strength was a value
as determined by making measurements on each sintered body of each Example and each
Comparative Example in accordance with JIS Z 2507-2000. The higher the radial crushing
strength is, the less likely the sintered body is broken, so that the sintered body
has a higher strength.
[0061] The sintered body prepared in each Example and each Comparative Example was turned
on a lathe for 1150 m by using a cermet tip (ISO type number: SNGN120408 non-breaker)
under conditions with a circumferential speed of 160 m/min, a cutting rate of 0.5
mm/pass, and a feed rate of 0.1 mm/rev, and with a dry type. The tool wear amount
(µm) of the cutting tool after the sintered body was turned on the lathe was measured
with a tool microscope. The results thereof are shown in the section of "tool wear
amount" in Table 1. The smaller the value of the tool wear amount is, the more excellent
the machinability of the sintered body is.
[0062] From the results of each Example and each Comparative Example shown in Table 1, it
has been found out that various properties (sintered body density, radial crushing
strength, and tool wear amount) of the sintered body immediately after and the sintered
body after 10 days are almost equivalent when the II type CaSO
4 powder is contained as the CaS component as in each Example. On the other hand, in
Comparative Examples 2 and 3, CaS single or hemihydrate gypsum was contained as the
CaS component, so that various properties of the sintered body after 10 days were
considerably deteriorated as compared with those of the sintered body immediately
after.
[0063] The reason why the product quality and performance of the sintered body after 10
days were considerably deteriorated in Comparative Examples 2 and 3 seems to be that
the CaS or hemihydrate gypsum in the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy
absorbed moisture during the period of time in which the mixed powder for iron-based
powder metallurgy was left to stand for ten days. In other words, this seems to be
due to the fact that, in Comparative Examples 2 and 3, the CaS single or hemihydrate
gypsum in the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy absorbed moisture during
the storage in ambient air for 10 days, so that the density of the sintered body decreased,
or the radial crushing strength decreased. In Comparative Example 1, the CaS component
was not contained, so that the tool wear amount was considerably high both in the
sintered body immediately after and in the sintered body after 10 days, and the machinability
of the sintered body was considerably low.
[0064] Also, the degree of deterioration in various performances of the sintered body after
10 days of Example 8 from the sintered body immediately after of Example 8 is greater
than that of the Examples 1 to 7. This seems to be due to the fact that, because the
temperature of heating the hemihydrate gypsum of Example 8 was lower than that of
Examples 1 to 7, part of the hemihydrate gypsum was changed into III type calcium
sulfate or remained, as it was, as the hemihydrate gypsum instead of being changed
into II type calcium sulfate, these components exhibited the moisture absorptivity.
However, the stability of various performances of the sintered body obtained in Example
8 is outstandingly excellent as compared with those of Comparative Examples 1 to 3.
For this reason, it has been made clear that the effect of enhancing the stability
of the sintered body can be obtained even if the whole of the hemihydrate gypsum is
not turned into II type calcium sulfate, as shown in Example 8.
[0065] When attention is paid to the "yield" of the Examples 1 to 7 of Table 1, there is
a tendency such that, the higher the temperature of heating the hemihydrate gypsum
is, the lower the yield is. This seems to be because, according as the heating temperature
is raised, the II type calcium sulfate is aggregated to form a large granular substance,
and this large granular substance is removed by classification. Accordingly, it has
been made clear that, in order to obtain a power made of II type calcium sulfate at
a high yield, the temperature of heating the hemihydrate gypsum is preferably set
to be 350°C or higher to 600°C or lower.
[0066] From the results shown in Table 1, it has been made clear that, when a II type CaSO
4 powder is contained as the CaS component, various properties (sintered body density,
radial crushing strength, and tool wear amount) of the sintered body immediately after
and the sintered body after 10 days are almost equivalent, and the product quality
and performance of the sintered body is stable, thereby showing the effect of the
present invention.
(Examples 9 to 29)
[0067] A sintered body was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the volume-average
particle size of the II type CaSO
4 powder and the weight ratio of CaS after the sintering were changed as shown in the
sections of "volume-average particle size" and "CaS weight ratio" in Table 2, and
each evaluation item was evaluated by a method similar to that of Example 1. The results
are shown in Table 2. Adjustment of the volume-average particle size of the II type
CaSO
4 powder used in each Example was made by performing various grinding and classifying
treatments on the heated II type CaSO
4 powder.
[0068] Here, in Examples 9 to 29 as well, two types of sintered bodies, that is, a sintered
body immediately after and a sintered body after 10 days, were prepared in the same
manner as in Example 1, and the properties of each of the two types were evaluated;
however, the two measurement values were the same as each other or of a slight difference
such that the difference could be ignored in all of the evaluation items, so that
only one measurement value is shown in Table 2. From the results shown in Table 2,
it has been made clear that the sintered body prepared by using the mixed powder for
iron-based powder metallurgy of Examples 9 to 29 has a stable product quality and
performance, thereby showing the effect of the present invention.

[0069] The "chip controllability" in Table 2 is a result obtained by evaluating the outer
appearance of the chips, which are generated by turning the sintered body on the lathe
with use of the cermet tip, in accordance with the following evaluation criterion.
(Evaluation criterion of chip controllability)
[0070]
very good: The number of spring-like windings (number of curls) is one or less (for
example, FIG. 1).
good: The number of curls is within a range from one to three.
poor: The number of curls exceeds three (for example, FIG. 2).
[0071] As shown in FIG. 1, when the chips are finely fragmented, the frequency of cleaning
the chip hopper of the cutting machine can be suppressed to be low. On the other hand,
when the chips are extended long in a coil form as shown in FIG. 2, the chips are
entangled with each other in a complex manner within the chip hopper, so that the
labor of cleaning may become cumbersome, or the frequency of cleaning the chip hopper
may increase, thereby leading to lower production efficiency. When this occurs, automatic
operation for a long period of time can not be carried out even if the tool wear amount
can be reduced. This does not lead to power saving or increase in efficiency.
[0072] From the results shown in Table 2, it has been made clear that a sintered body being
excellent in all of radial crushing strength, tool wear amount, and chip controllability
can be prepared when R
1/3/W is 20 or more to 340 or less. On the other hand, it has been confirmed that, when
R
1/3/W is less than 20, the chip controllability tends to decrease, whereas when R
1/3/W exceeds 340, the radial crushing strength tends to be high, and the tool wear amount
tends to increase considerably.
(Examples 30 to 34 and Reference Examples 1 to 2)
[0073] In Examples 30 to 34, a sintered body was prepared in the same manner as in Example
26 except that a part of the II type CaSO
4 powder was changed to 2CaO·Al
2O
3·SiO
2 or 2CaO·MgO·2SiO
2, as shown in Table 3. In Reference Examples 1 to 2, a sintered body was prepared
in the same manner as in Example 26 except that the whole amount of the II type CaSO
4 powder was changed to 2CaO·Al
2O
3·SiO
2 or 2CaO·MgO·2SiO
2. With respect to the 2CaO·Al
2O
3·SiO
2 or 2CaOM·gO·2SiO
2, those having a volume-average particle size of 2 µm were used. Furthermore, with
respect to the II type CaSO
4 powder, one having a volume-average particle size of 18.4 µm was used.
[0074] Each evaluation item was evaluated by a method similar to that of Example 26 on the
sintered body of each Example and each Comparative Example prepared in this manner.
The results are shown in Table 3. In Examples 30 to 34 as well, two types of sintered
bodies, that is, a sintered body immediately after and a sintered body after 10 days,
were prepared, and the properties of each of the two types were evaluated; however,
the two measurement values were the same as each other or of a slight difference such
that the difference could be ignored in all of the evaluation items, so that only
one measurement value is shown in Table 3. Therefore, it has been made clear that
the sintered body prepared by using the mixed powder for iron-based powder metallurgy
of Examples 30 to 34 has a stable product quality and performance, thereby showing
the effect of the present invention.
[Table 3]
| Experiment number |
Examples |
Reference Examples |
| 26 |
30 |
31 |
32 |
33 |
34 |
1 |
2 |
| CaS weight ratio (II type CaSO4) |
0.1 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
0.07 |
- |
- |
| 2CaO·Al2O3·SiO2 |
- |
0.05 |
- |
0.09 |
0.07 |
0.03 |
0.1 |
|
| 2CaO·MgO·2SiO2 |
- |
- |
0.05 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.1 |
| Radial crushing strength (MPa) |
801 |
846 |
835 |
871 |
866 |
844 |
907 |
889 |
| Tool wear amount (µm) |
51 |
38 |
48 |
47 |
43.2 |
46.4 |
58.5 |
69.6 |
| Chip controllability |
very good |
very good |
very good |
very good |
very good |
very good |
very good |
very good |
[0075] From the results shown in Table 3, it has been made clear that the tool wear amount
can be further reduced by replacing a part of the II type CaSO
4 powder with ternary oxides. In particular, as shown by the results of Examples 32
to 34, it has been made clear that the tool wear amount can be considerably reduced
when the weight ratio of the ternary oxides and CaS after the sintering is 3 : 7 to
9 : 1.
[0076] The reason why the tool wear amount can be reduced in such a manner seems to be that,
by combined use of the II type CaSO
4 powder and the ternary oxides, interaction of the two occurs.
[0077] The reason why it is considered so is that the mode of wear of the tool rake face
and the component of the worn part were different between the case in which the II
type CaSO
4 powder and the ternary oxides were used in combination and the case in which the
ternary oxides were used alone. FIGS. 3 to 8 show observation images of a worn part
of a tool rake face after the sintered bodies prepared in Examples 26, 30, 32 to 34,
and Reference Example 1, respectively, were turned on a lathe with a cermet tip. The
observation images were obtained with an optical microscope. Referring to FIGS. 4
to 7, in the case in which the II type CaSO
4 powder and the ternary oxides were used in combination (Examples 30, and 32 to 34),
the adhesion of iron was reduced, and no groove-like wear was observed. In contrast,
in the case in which only the ternary oxides were added without addition of the II
type CaSO
4 powder (Reference Example 1), a groove-like wear was formed, and adhesion of iron
was observed, as shown in FIG. 8. Further, in the worn part of Examples 30, and 32
to 34, the ternary oxide components were detected over the whole worn surface. In
contrast, in the worn part of Reference Example 1, the ternary oxides were detected
only in a part of the half-moon-shaped worn part. Here, in the case in which only
the II type CaSO
4 powder was added without addition of the ternary oxides (Example 26), the area of
the half-moon-shaped worn part of the tool rake face was smaller (i.e., received with
a smaller area of the tool) than that of Examples 30, and 32 to 34, and partial adhesion
of iron (Fe) was large. When such an iron adherent substance adheres to and drops
off from the tool repeatedly, the wear of the cutting tool is liable to proceed, or
the surface of the workpiece material may become non-smooth.
[0078] From the above results, it has been made clear that the machinability of the sintered
body is furthermore excellent when the II type CaSO
4 powder and the ternary oxides are used in combination as in Examples 30 to 34.