2. FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present disclosure generally relates to maltose dependent degrons, maltose-responsive
promoters, and stabilization constructs. The present disclosure also relates to their
use in controlling gene expression, protein stability, and production of non-catabolic
compounds by genetically modified host cells.
3. BACKGROUND
[0002] The advent of synthetic biology has brought about the promise of fermentative microbial
production of biofuels, chemicals and biomaterials from renewable sources at industrial
scale and quality. For example, functional non-native biological pathways have been
successfully constructed in microbial hosts for the production of precursors to the
antimalarial drug artemisinin (
see,
e.g.,
Martin et al., Nat Biotechnol 21:796-802 (2003)); fatty acid derived fuels and chemicals
(e.g., fatty esters, fatty alcohols and waxes;
see,
e.g.,
Steen et al., Nature 463:559-562 (2010)); polyketide synthases that make cholesterol lowering drugs
(see, e.g., Ma et al., Science 326:589-592 (2009)); and polyketides
(see, e.g., Kodumal, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15573-15578 (2004)). However, the commercial success of synthetic biology will depend largely on whether
the production cost of renewable products can be made to compete with, or out-compete,
the production costs of their respective non-renewable counterparts.
[0003] Strain stability can be a major driver of the cost of industrial fermentations, as
it affects the length of time that a continuous fermentation can be run productively.
Strain stability generally refers to the ability of a microbe to maintain favorable
production characteristics (
e.
g., high yield (grams of compound per gram of substrate) and productivity (grams per
liter of fermentation broth per hour) of a non-catabolic fermentation product over
extended cultivation times. In particular, genetic stability, which is the propensity
of the producing microbial population to have little to no alteration of the intended
allelic frequency of genes relevant to the production of product over time, plays
a major role in the sustained output of product.
[0004] For non-catabolic fermentation of products other than biomass (which products, by
definition, consume metabolic energy and carbon that could otherwise be used in the
production of more cells), the basis of instability is two-fold: evolutionary mutation
and selection. First, loss-of-production mutations arise spontaneously and randomly.
Second, a growth rate or "fitness" advantage of cells with reduced product yields
leads to an eventual population sweep by low producers, and thereby decreases the
overall culture performance. This phenomenon can be referred to as "strain degeneration."
[0005] Brazilian fuel ethanol fermentations achieve extremely high yields of ethanol from
sugar for long periods of time,
i.e., about 90% of maximum theoretical yield. This is in part because the production
of ethanol is catabolic: it generates 2 ATP per molecule of sugar produced and is
redox balanced without the involvement of oxygen. A cell that mutates to not produce
ethanol is less fit under the low oxygen conditions of the fermentor and will not
sweep the population. This allows industrial ethanol fermentations to recycle the
majority of yeast biomass throughout the season, thereby minimizing conversion of
sugar into yeast cell biomass and directing nearly all of the sugar to ethanol production.
This extended propagation and reuse of biomass increases the efficiencies of ethanol
production: operational expenditures are reduced because less sugar goes to biomass
during each cycle
(i.e., the yield increases); and capital expenditures are reduced because fewer and smaller
fermentors are needed to build biomass for inoculations.
[0006] By contrast, the production of acetyl-CoA derived hydrocarbons (
e.
g., isoprenoids, fatty acids, and polyketides) are generally non-catabolic in nature;
they usually require a net input of ATP, NADPH, and carbon, often with large amounts
of oxygen supplied to help balance the redox of the system. Such an environment makes
evolution towards lower product, higher biomass yielding genotypes more favorable,
and leads to a higher rate of strain degeneration.
[0007] One way to decrease the negative selective pressure of producing non-catabolic products
is to switch off the formation of product during periods when the product is not desired,
such as during phases of fermentation where biomass must be generated in order to
maximize fermentor productivity. Thus, there is a need in the art for switches that
can control the timing of production of non-catabolic compounds during fermentation.
There is also a need in the art for methods and compositions that reduce the rate
of strain degeneration and stabilize the production of non-catabolic compounds during
fermentation. The compositions and methods provided herein meet these needs, and they
can be used for other applications beyond a fermentation environment.
4. SUMMARY
[0009] The invention is as defined in the claims. Maltose dependent degrons are obtained
by modifying a protein known to bind maltose (
e.
g., MBP or maltose binding protein), to become unstable when it is not bound to maltose.
Therefore, maltose dependent degrons provided herein are dependent on their binding
to its ligand (
e.
g., maltose) for stability. In some embodiments, the maltose dependent degron can be
utilized in combination with a maltose-responsive promoter to simultaneously control
the timing of expression and stability of proteins. For example, the expression of
enzymes of a biosynthetic pathway for producing a non-catabolic compound can be controlled,
directly or indirectly, using the maltose dependent degron and a maltose-responsive
promoter by manipulating maltose content in a culture medium. Thus, in some embodiment,
the same molecule effector (
e.
g., maltose) can be utilized to provide both transcriptional and post-translational
control for gene expression. Also provided herein are methods that utilize a stabilization
construct that provides a growth advantage to high-product-yielding original strains,
and a growth disadvantage to spontaneously mutated yeast cells that have become low
producers or non-producers. As a result, the high-product-yielding original strains
outgrow mutated yeast cells, and the production of desired products (
e.
g., non-catabolic compounds) is stabilized during fermentation. A maltose dependent
degron, a maltose-responsive promoter, and a stabilization construct can be used,
either alone, in combination or in subcombination, in the methods provided herein.
[0010] In certain embodiments, one or more mutations are introduced into a maltose binding
protein (MBP) to convert it into a maltose dependent degron (also referred to as a
maltose binding degron), which is more stable when it is bound to maltose than when
it is not. In the absence of maltose, a maltose dependent degron and any protein fused
thereto are unstable or inactive, resulting in a faster degradation of the fusion
protein. Thus, the stability of any protein of interest fused to a maltose dependent
degron can be controlled by manipulating the maltose content.
[0011] In some embodiments, the fusion protein's stability in yeast host cells can have
downstream effects on target molecules, such as enzymes of a biosynthetic pathway
for producing a non-catabolic compounds during fermentation. For example, if a fusion
protein comprises a transcriptional regulator fused in frame to a maltose dependent
degron, its stability can be controlled by adding or removing maltose from a culture
medium. In such embodiments, the maltose dependent degrons and maltose content in
the culture medium can be used as a switch to control production of non-catabolic
compounds. While maltose dependent degrons are useful during a fermentation process,
they can be used in any environment where it is desired to modulate stability of proteins
of interest and/or the production of target molecules.
[0012] In another aspect of the invention, a maltose-responsive promoter is used in combination
with a maltose dependent degron in methods provided herein. More specifically, a maltose-responsive
promoter may be operably linked to nucleic acids encoding a fusion protein comprising
a protein of interest fused in frame to a maltose dependent degron. By combining maltose-dependent
transcriptional control and post-translational control, compositions and methods provided
herein can impose a very robust and tight control of expression and stability of any
gene product.
[0013] Thus, provided herein is a method according to claim 1.
[0014] In certain embodiments, the method for providing dual transcription and post-translation
control can be performed with any maltose dependent degrons described herein. In certain
embodiments, the method for providing dual transcription and translation can be performed
with a maltose-responsive promoter comprising a sequence selected from the group consisting
of pMAL1 (SEQ ID NO: 29), pMAL2 (SEQ ID NO: 30), pMAL11 (SEQ ID NO: 31), pMAL12 (SEQ
ID NO: 32), pMAL31 (SEQ ID NO: 33), pMAL32 (SEQ ID NO: 34), pMAL32_v1 (SEQ ID NO:
78), pGMAL_v5 (SEQ ID NO: 35), pGMAL _v6 (SEQ ID NO: 36), pGMAL _v7 (SEQ ID NO: 37),
pGMAL _v9 (SEQ ID NO: 38), pGMAL v10 (SEQ ID NO: 39), pGMAL_v11 (SEQ ID NO: 40), pGMAL_v12
(SEQ ID NO: 41), pGMAL_v!3 (SEQ ID NO: 42), pGMAL_v14 (SEQ ID NO: 43), pGMAL_v!5 (SEQ
ID NO: 44), pGMAL_v16 (SEQ ID NO: 45), pGMAL_v17 (SEQ ID NO: 46), pGMAL_v!8 (SEQ ID
NO: 47), pG2MAL_v1 (SEQ ID NO: 48), pG2MAL_v2 (SEQ ID NO: 49), pG2MAL _v3 (SEQ ID
NO: 50), pG2MAL v5 (SEQ ID NO: 51), pG2MAL_v6 (SEQ ID NO: 52), pG2MAL_v7 (SEQ ID NO:
53), pG2MAL _v8 (SEQ ID NO: 54), pG2MAL_v9 (SEQ ID NO: 55), pG2MAL_v10 (SEQ ID NO:
56), pG7MAL_v2 (SEQ ID NO: 57), pG7MAL_v4 (SEQ ID NO: 58), pG7MAL _v6 (SEQ ID NO:
59), pG7MAL_v8 (SEQ ID NO: 60), pG7MAL_v9 (SEQ ID NO: 61), pG172_MAL_v13 (SEQ ID NO:
62), pG271_MAL_v12 (SEQ ID NO: 63), pG721_MAL_v11 (SEQ ID NO: 64), pG712_MAL_v14 (SEQ
ID NO: 65), a portion thereof which retains promoter function, or a sequence that
has at least about 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% sequence identity
to thereof. In certain embodiments, other synthetic maltose-responsive promoters described
herein can be used in the method for providing dual transcription and post-translation
control.
[0015] A fermentation process for producing a heterologous non-catabolic compound from a
genetically modified host cell can comprise two phases: a build stage during which
non-catabolic compound production is substantially reduced (the "off' stage) while
cell biomass is accumulated; and a production stage, during which non-catabolic compound
production is turned on (the "on" stage). Thus, the negative selective pressure associated
with non-catabolic compound production is alleviated during a stage of fermentation
(
i.e., a build stage) in which production is not needed. The reduction or elimination of
the non-catabolic compound production during the build stage results in (i) an improved
growth rate of the cells during the build stage; and (ii) improved production stability
of the strain during the production stage. This results in longer sustained non-catabolic
compound production, thereby increasing the overall yield and/or productivity of the
strain. Advantageously, the "off' and "on" states of non-catabolic compound production
in the fermentation methods provided herein are controlled through easily obtained,
affordable, and industrially relevant conditions.
[0016] The term "off' stage as used herein does not necessarily indicate that the non-catabolic
compound production in a genetically modified host cell is zero or near zero during
this stage. Rather, the term "off' stage is relative to the "on" stage in that non-catabolic
compound production during the "off' stage is substantially reduced compared to the
"on" stage (
e.
g., more than about 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, or 100% less).
[0017] The "off' and "on" states of non-catabolic compound production in the fermentation
culture may be controlled by the amount of sugar maltose in the culture medium, in
conjunction with the use of maltose-responsive promoters which regulate gene expression
of pathway enzymes that effect heterologous non-catabolic compound production. Advantageously,
by coupling pathway gene expression to maltose-sensitive promoters, heterologous non-catabolic
compound production can be turned on or off by controlling the amount of maltose in
the feedstock. For example, a maltose-responsive promoter can be wired as an "on"
switch to induce production of the heterologous non-catabolic compound in the presence
of maltose. Alternatively, a maltose-responsive promoter can be wired as an "off'
switch to induce expression of a negative regulator of the biosynthetic pathway for
compound production in the presence of maltose.
[0018] The "off" and "on" states of non-catabolic compound production in the fermentation
culture may be controlled by the amount of sugar maltose in the culture medium, in
conjunction with the use of a maltose dependent degron which regulates the stability
of expression of pathway enzymes that effect heterologous non-catabolic compound production.
Advantageously, by coupling pathway gene expression to maltose dependent stability
of maltose dependent degrons, heterologous non-catabolic compound production can be
turned on or off by controlling the amount of maltose in the feedstock. For example,
a maltose dependent degron fused to a suitable fusion partner (
e.
g., a transcriptional regulator) can be wired as an "on" switch to induce production
of the heterologous non-catabolic compound in the presence of maltose. Alternatively,
a maltose dependent degron fused to a suitable fusion partner can be wired as an "off'
switch to induce expression of a negative regulator of the biosynthetic pathway for
compound production in the presence of maltose.
[0019] The "off" and "on" states of non-catabolic compound production in the fermentation
culture may be controlled by the amount of sugar maltose in the culture medium, in
conjunction with the use of a maltose-responsive promoter and a maltose-dependent
degron, which can regulate gene expression of pathway enzymes that effect heterologous
non-catabolic compound production. By simultaneously combining transcriptional and
post-translational control by the same small molecule effector maltose, the timing
and the expression levels of pathway enzymes can be tightly regulated. By imposing
two layers of control on genes that are tightly regulated during a long fermentation
run, the probability of potential strain degeneration can also be reduced.
[0020] In certain embodiments, the non-catabolic compound provided by the method is selected
from the group consisting of an amino acid, a fatty acid, an isoprenoid, and a polyketide.
[0021] In certain embodiments, the genetically modified yeast host cells provided in the
present cells provided in the present methods are capable of producing a heterologous
isoprenoid and comprises at least one heterologous nucleic acid encoding an isoprenoid
pathway enzyme selected from the group consisting of: (a) an enzyme that condenses
two molecules of acetyl-coenzyme A to form acetoacetyl-CoA; (b) an enzyme that condenses
acetoacetyl-CoA with another molecule of acetyl-CoA to form 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA
(HMG-CoA); (c) an enzyme that converts HMG-CoA into mevalonate; (d) an enzyme that
converts mevalonate into mevalonate 5-phosphate; (e) an enzyme that converts mevalonate
5-phosphate into mevalonate 5-pyrophosphate; (f) an enzyme that converts mevalonate
5-pyrophosphate into IPP; (g) an enzyme that converts IPP into DMAPP; (h) a polyprenyl
synthase that can condense IPP and/or DMAPP molecules to form polyprenyl compounds
containing more than five carbons; (i) an enzyme that condenses IPP with DMAPP to
form GPP; (j) an enzyme that condenses two molecules of IPP with one molecule of DMAPP;
(k) an enzyme that condenses IPP with GPP to form FPP; (1) an enzyme that condenses
IPP and DMAPP to form GGPP; and (m) an enzyme that condenses IPP and FPP to form GGPP.
[0022] In certain embodiments, the yeast host cells further comprise a heterologous nucleic
acid encoding an enzyme that modifies a polyprenyl, selected from the group consisting
of a geraniol synthase, a linalool synthase, a limonene synthase, a myrcene synthase,
an ocimene synthase, an α-pinene synthase, β-pinene synthase, a sabinene synthase,
a γ-terpinene synthase, a terpinolene synthase, an amorphadiene synthase, an α-famesene
synthase, a β-famesene synthase, a farnesol synthase, a nerolidol synthase, a patchouliol
synthase, a nootkatone synthase, and an abietadiene synthase.
[0023] In certain embodiments, the yeast host cells comprise a plurality of heterologous
nucleic acids encoding all the enzymes of a mevalonate pathway. In some embodiments,
the isoprenoid is selected from the group consisting of a hemiterpene, monoterpene,
diterpene, triterpene, tetraterpene, and polyterpene. In some embodiments, the isoprenoid
is a C
5-C
20 isoprenoid. In some embodiments, the isoprenoid is a sesquiterpene. In some embodiments,
the isoprenoid is selected from the group consisting of abietadiene, amorphadiene,
carene, α-farnesene, β-famesene, farnesol, geraniol, geranylgeraniol, isoprene, linalool,
limonene, myrcene, nerolidol, ocimene, patchoulol, β-pinene, sabinene, γ-terpinene,
terpinolene and valencene.
[0024] In certain embodiments, the yeast host cells are capable of producing a polyketide
and comprises at least one heterologous nucleic acid encoding a polyketide synthesis
enzyme, wherein the polyketide synthesis enzyme is selected from the group consisting
of: (a) an enzyme that condenses at least one of acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA with an
acyl carrier protein; (b) an enzyme that condenses a first reactant selected from
the group consisting of acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA with a second reactant selected
from the group consisting of malonyl-CoA or methylmalonyl-CoA to form a polyketide
product; (c) an enzyme that reduces a β-keto chemical group on a polyketide compound
to a β-hydroxy group; (d) an enzyme that dehydrates an alkane chemical group in a
polyketide compound to produce an α-β-unsaturated alkene; (e) an enzyme that reduces
an α-β-double-bond in a polyketide compound to a saturated alkane; and (f) an enzyme
that hydrolyzes a polyketide compound from an acyl carrier protein.
[0025] In certain embodiments, the polyketide is a lipid having at least one of antibiotic,
antifungal, and antitumor activity. In some embodiments, the polyketide is selected
from the group consisting of a macrolid, an antibiotic, an antifungal, a cytostatic
compound, an anticholesterolemic compound, an antiparasitic compound, a coccidiostatic
compound, an animal growth promoter and an insecticide.
[0026] In certain embodiments, the yeast host cells are capable of producing a fatty acid
and comprises at least one heterologous nucleic acid encoding a fatty acid synthesis
enzyme, wherein the fatty acid synthesis enzyme is selected from the group consisting
of: (a) an enzyme that covalently links at least one of acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA
to an acyl carrier protein (ACP); (b) an enzyme that condenses acetyl-ACP and malonyl-ACP
to form acetoacetyl-ACP; (c) reduce the double bond in acetoacetyl-ACP with NADPH
to form a hydroxyl group in D-3-hydroxybutyryl hydroxylase-ACP; (d) an enzyme that
dehydrates D-3-Hydroxybutyryl hydroxylase-ACP to create a double bond between the
beta- and gamma-carbons forming crotonyl-ACP; (e) an enzyme that reduces crotonyl
ACP with NADPH to form butyryl-ACP; and (f) an enzyme that hydrolyzes a C16 acyl compound
from an acyl carrier protein to form palmitate. In some embodiments, the fatty acid
is selected from the group consisting of palmitate, palmitoyl CoA, palmitoleic acid,
sapienic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, α-linolenic acid, arachidonic acid, eicosapentaenoic
acid, erucic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid.
[0027] In all embodiments, the host cells are a yeast cell.
[0028] In certain embodiments, a synthetic maltose-responsive promoter comprises a sequence
selected from the group consisting of pGMAL _v5 (SEQ ID NO: 35), pGMAL _v6 (SEQ ID
NO: 36), pGMAL _v7 (SEQ ID NO: 37), pGMAL _v9 (SEQ ID NO: 38), pGMAL_v10 (SEQ ID NO:
39), pGMAL_v11 (SEQ ID NO: 40), pGMAL_v12 (SEQ ID NO: 41), pGMAL_v!3 (SEQ ID NO: 42),
pGMAL_v14 (SEQ ID NO: 43), pGMAL_v!5 (SEQ ID NO: 44), pGMAL_v16 (SEQ ID NO: 45), pGMAL_v17
(SEQ ID NO: 46), pGMAL_v18 (SEQ ID NO: 47), pG2MAL_v1 (SEQ ID NO: 48), pG2MAL_v2 (SEQ
ID NO: 49), pG2MAL _v3 (SEQ ID NO: 50), pG2MAL _v5 (SEQ ID NO: 51), pG2MAL_v6 (SEQ
ID NO: 52), pG2MAL_v7 (SEQ ID NO: 53), pG2MAL _v8 (SEQ ID NO: 54), pG2MAL _v9 (SEQ
ID NO: 55), pG2MAL_v10 (SEQ ID NO: 56), pG7MAL_v2 (SEQ ID NO: 57), pG7MAL _v4 (SEQ
ID NO: 58), pG7MAL_v6 (SEQ ID NO: 59), pG7MAL_v8 (SEQ ID NO: 60), pG7MAL_v9 (SEQ ID
NO: 61), pG172_MAL_v!3 (SEQ ID NO: 62), pG271_MAL_v12 (SEQ ID NO: 63), pG721_MAL_v11
(SEQ ID NO: 64), pG712_MAL_v14 (SEQ ID NO: 65), a portion thereof which retains promoter
function, or a sequence that has at least about 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%,
97%, 98%, or 99% sequence identity to thereof. In certain embodiments, other synthetic
maltose-responsive promoters provided herein comprise: (a) a core promoter comprising
a transcription initiation site; and (b) one or more MAL transcriptional activator
binding sites, wherein the promoter activity of the synthetic maltose-responsive promoter
during an un-induced condition in the absence of maltose is less than the promoter
activity of a native maltose-responsive promoter from which the one or more MAL transcriptional
activator binding sites are derived.
[0029] In certain embodiments, the method of producing a heterologous non-catabolic compound
comprises culturing, in a culture medium, a genetically modified yeast host cell which
comprises: (a) a heterologous nucleic acid encoding an enzyme of a biosynthetic pathway
for producing a heterologous non-catabolic compound, wherein the heterologous nucleic
acid is operably linked to a first promoter; (b) a nucleic acid encoding a cell-growth-affecting
protein, wherein the nucleic acid is operably linked to a second promoter; and (c)
a nucleic acid encoding a transcriptional regulator. In these embodiments, the first
promoter and the second promoter are both regulated by the same transcriptional regulator.
Therefore, a functional disruption of the transcriptional regulator (
e.
g., caused by a spontaneous mutation) negatively impacts expression of both of the
heterologous nucleic acid encoding the enzyme of the biosynthetic pathway and the
nucleic acid encoding the cell-growth-affecting protein. Reduced expression of the
nucleic acid encoding the cell-growth-affecting protein would provide a growth disadvantage
and prevent such cells from dominating the population of cells during a long fermentation
run.
[0030] In the method described above, the transcriptional regulator(s) that regulate the
first promoter and the second promoter are regulatory proteins of the GAL regulon.
For example, genetically modified yeast host cells can comprise a heterologous nucleic
acid encoding transcriptional activator Gal4p and/or transcriptional repressor Gal80p.
In some embodiments, the first promoter and the second promoter are naturally derived
pGAL promoters or pGAL synthetic promoters as defined in the claims. In certain embodiments,
the heterologous nucleic acid encoding a cell-growth-affecting protein and the heterologous
nucleic acid encoding an enzyme of a biosynthetic pathway for producing a non-catabolic
compound are chromosomally integrated into a genome of the genetically modified yeast
host cell.
[0031] In all embodiments, a heterologous nucleic acid encoding a cell-growth-affecting
protein is a conditional essential gene which is necessary for cell growth when yeast
host cells are grown in a culture medium lacking an essential compound. These include,
for example, one or more biosynthetic genes that encode one or more enzymes in biosynthetic
pathways for producing amino acids, nucleotides, or fatty acids. In certain embodiments,
a conditional essential gene encodes an enzyme in a biosynthetic pathway for producing
lysine. In other embodiments, a conditional essential gene encodes an enzyme in a
biosynthetic pathway for producing methionine.
[0032] In certain embodiments, the method of culturing comprises two stages: (a) a cellular
biomass build stage where a population of genetically modified yeast host cell is
cultured in a culture medium that limits production of heterologous non-catabolic
compounds, followed by a production stage where the population or a subpopulation
thereof is cultured under culture conditions that promote production of the heterologous
non-catabolic compound. During the cellular biomass build stage, expression of the
regulon (
e.
g., nucleic acids encoding enzymes of a biosynthetic pathway for producing non-catabolic
compounds and a nucleic acid encoding a conditional essential gene product) in genetically
modified yeast host cells is limited and the culture medium is supplemented with an
essential compound so that the yeast cells can grow. During the production stage,
genetically modified yeast host cells are cultured in a culture medium lacking or
containing a sufficiently low amount of essential compound such that only the cells
that can synthesize the essential compound can grow. This provides a positive selective
pressure for yeast cells that maintain expression of transcriptional regulators, and
therefore, expression of the regulon, during the production stage.
[0033] In another aspect, provided herein are methods for producing a heterologous non-catabolic
compound, which utilize a combination of a fusion protein comprising a transcriptional
regulator fused in frame to a maltose dependent degron and a stabilization construct.
When the fusion protein is used in combination with a stabilization construct described
herein, the production of heterologous non-catabolic compounds is further stabilized
since both constructs can counteract any negative effect of spontaneous mutations.
A stabilization construct, which couples cell growth of genetically modified yeast
host cells to the production of non-catabolic compounds, mitigates any negative effects
of spontaneous mutations at the transcriptional level. A fusion protein comprising
a transcriptional regulator fused in frame to a maltose dependent degron mitigates
any negative effects of spontaneous mutations at the post-translational level.
[0034] Provided herein is a method according to claim 1.
[0035] In an embodiment, the fusion protein comprises a Gal80p fused in frame to a maltose
dependent degron, and Gal4p-responsive promoters are operably linked to the heterologous
nucleic acids encoding one or more enzymes of the biosynthetic pathway and to the
nucleic acid encoding the cell-growth-affecting protein.
[0036] These and other embodiments of the invention along with many of its features are
described in more detail in conjunction with the text below and attached figures.
5. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0037]
FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate schematic diagrams showing the use of maltose dependent
stability of a fusion protein comprising Gal80p fused in frame to a maltose dependent
degron to negatively regulate expression of biosynthetic pathway genes.
FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate schematic diagrams showing the use of maltose dependent
stability of a fusion protein comprising Gal4p fused in frame to a maltose dependent
degron to positively regulate expression of biosynthetic pathway genes.
FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate schematic diagrams showing combining a maltose-responsive
promoter and a maltose dependent degron to control transcription of a fusion DNA construct
and post-translational stability of the fusion protein by manipulating maltose content
in a culture medium.
FIG. 4 illustrates a schematic representation illustrating a selection screen for
nucleic acids encoding a maltose-dependent Gal80p fused in frame to a MBP mutant.
FIG. 5 illustrates a graph representing the farnesene production by strains expressing
fusion proteins comprising Gal80p fused in frame to various MBP mutants obtained from
the first tier mutagenesis. The X-axis represents the amount of farnesene production
from strains cultured in a culture medium comprising maltose, and the Y-axis represents
the amount of farnesene production from strains cultured in a culture medium with
no maltose. Each MBP mutant strain obtained through the first tier mutagenesis is
indicated by a square marker.
FIG. 6 illustrates a schematic representation of a second tier optimization process
showing competition enrichment performed on the first tier MBP mutant strains to improve
their maltose dependent switchability.
FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate results of the growth competition selection for combination
of MBP mutations from the first tier mutagenesis after one round of selection/counter-selection
cycle and after three rounds of selection/counter-selection cycles. After three rounds
of selection/counter-selection cycles of the second tier optimization process, strains
with improved "off' states were obtained.
FIG. 8A illustrates a schematic diagram illustrating a cell sorting strategy to screen
for MBP mutants with improved instability in the absence of maltose.
FIG. 8B illustrates relative GFP (green fluorescent protein) intensities from host
cells expressing GFP fused to various MBP mutants when the host cells are cultured
in a culture medium with maltose or without maltose.
FIG. 8C illustrates GFP fluorescent intensity (in raw units) from host cells expressing
GFP fused to various MBP mutants and to wild-type MBP when the host cells are cultured
in a culture medium with maltose (top graph) and without maltose (bottom graph). A
table at the bottom of FIG. 8C illustrates a ratio of GFP fluorescent intensities
from genetically modified host cells cultured in the presence of maltose versus in
the absence of maltose.
FIGS. 9A to 9C illustrate the maltose dependent farnesene production levels of host
cells expressing a fusion protein comprising a Gal80p fused in frame to different
MBP mutants.
FIG. 9D illustrates a schematic diagram showing how to visualize and interpret data
shown as box plots in FIGS. 9A to 9C, 10, and 19. The box plots for these figures
were generated using TIBCO® Spotfire® data visualization and analytics software. When measurements for different runs are
very precise and close to one another, a box represented by the upper quartile and
lower quartile collapses into a line or lines (see, e.g., GAL80 _MBP _H9 and GAL80_MBP _M1 data in FIG. 9A).
FIG. 10 illustrates switchability of different switch constructs containing MBP. Strains
B, C, and D are isogenic strains, and strains B and C comprise specific switch constructs.
B = pMAL32_v1>GAL80_MBPL8_v4d (a weaker promoter driving GAL80 fused to the MBP mutant with the best maltose-dependent differential for protein
stability); C = pMAL32>GAL80_ MBPL8_v4d (same as B except that the promoter is stronger); D = parent strain (constitutive
promoter driving expression of mevalonate pathway genes without maltose switch or
maltose dependent degron).
FIG. 11A illustrates degradation of various MBP mutants fused to GFP in BSM sucrose
medium. GFP expression was driven by the maltose inducible promoter pMAL32. GFP protein
was expressed alone or fused to the N terminus of a wild-type or mutant MBP (no MBP
- x; GFP_MBP - o; GFP_5A2 - □; GFP _5F3 - ▼; GFP _H8 - ◊; GFP_L8_v4d - ▲).
FIG. 11B illustrates half-lives of GFP control and GFP fused to various MBP mutants
in host cells cultured in BSM sucrose medium.
FIGS. 12A and 12B provide results demonstrating that host cells capable of producing
the isoprenoid farnesene, and comprising the MEV pathway under negative regulation
by a maltose-responsive promoter and a maltose dependent degron, display improved
stability of production of farnesene in a long fermentation run when the build stage
of the fermentation is performed in the presence of maltose (thereby effecting an
"off' state), compared to production from a constitutively producing strain that produced
farnesene throughout the build stage.
FIG. 13A illustrates a schematic diagram illustrating construction of pGMAL promoters.
FIG. 13B illustrates sequence alignments of MAL transcriptional activator binding
sites from pMAL12 and pMAL32. The sequences of the binding sites were aligned using
Clone Manager software with scoring matrix: linear (Mismatch 2, OpenGap 4, ExtGap
1).
FIGS. 14A and 14B provide results that pGMAL promoters are maltose inducible and are
not affected by growth rate in the absence of maltose.
FIG. 15 provides a schematic representation of the mevalonate ("MEV") pathway for
the production of isopentenyl diphosphate ("IPP")
FIG. 16 provides a schematic representation of the conversion of IPP and dimethylallyl
pyrophosphate ("DMAPP") to geranyl pyrophosphate ("GPP"), farnesyl pyrophosphate ("FPP"),
and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate ("GGPP").
FIG. 17 illustrates a schematic diagram showing the use of a stabilization construct
comprising LYS9 operably linked to pGAL10v3 promoter to couple expression of a conditional
essential gene, LYS9, with expression of biosynthetic pathway genes for producing
a non-catabolic compound. The embodiment shown in FIG. 17 illustrates that a maltose,
when present in a culture medium, binds to Malx3 protein, which activates a maltose-responsive
promoter, resulting in expression of transcriptional repressor GAL80. Gal80p encoded
from GAL80 gene, in turn, represses transcriptional activator Gal4p. Since LYS9 gene
and biosynthetic pathway genes for producing a non-catabolic compound are co-regulated
as a GAL regulon, the expression of these genes is coupled via transcriptional regulators
of the GAL regulon.
FIG. 18 illustrates a schematic representation showing a selection screen for a combination
of an amino acid biosynthetic pathway gene and a pGAL promoter operably linked thereto,
which renders genetically modified host cells dependent on its expression for cell
growth.
FIG. 19 illustrates two stabilization constructs, each comprising a lysine biosynthetic
gene operably linked to a pGAL promoter, which renders genetically modified host cells
dependent on its expression for cell growth.
FIG. 20 illustrates results demonstrating that maltose switchable yeast strains comprising
a stabilization construct (strain F comprising pGAL10 _v3>LYS9; and Strain G comprising
pGAL2_v3>LYS 1) displays improved stability of production of the isoprenoid farnesene
in a long fermentation run, compared to their parent strain which does not comprise
a stabilization construct (Strain E).
6. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
6.1 Definitions
[0038] As used herein, the term "maltose-binding protein" or MBP refers a protein that includes
a portion that can specifically bind to and interact with maltose. A MBP includes
a protein which is a part of the maltose/maltodextrin system of
Escherichia coli and other bacteria, which is responsible for the uptake and efficient catabolism
of maltodextrins. MBP exhibits the binding affinity to maltose and maltodextrins.
Macromolecular alpha (1-4) linked glucans are also bound with high affinities.
Ferenci & Klotz, FEBSLetters, vol. 94(2): 213-217 (1978).
[0039] As used herein, the term "wild-type" MBP includes a MBP which can be isolated from
organisms. The term "wild-type" MBP may include a MBP isolated from bacteria, such
as a MPB isolated from
E. coli comprising an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 2. SEQ ID NO: 2 is a mature MBP (370
residues) upon cleavage of the N-terminal extension from a precursor polypeptide encoded
by the
malE gene from
E.
coli. The "wild-type" MPB may comprise a protein encoded by a nucleic acid sequence of
SEQ ID NO: 1. A "wild-type" MBP may refer to a reference sequence which is used as
a background sequence to introduce mutations to generate MBP mutants. For example,
a "wild-type" MBP can further include a reference sequence which comprises SEQ ID
NO: 2 and additional sequences, such as a linker sequence. For example, a "wild-type"
MBP comprises a MBP comprising an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 28, which includes
a linker sequence at the C terminal end of SEQ ID NO: 2. A "wild-type" MBP nucleic
acid sequence also comprises a nucleic acid sequence comprising a nucleotide sequence
of SEQ ID NO: 27, which includes a linker sequence at the C terminal end of SEQ ID
NO: 1.
[0040] As used herein, the term "MBP mutant" refers to any variant of wild-type MBP. The
MBP mutant can include, for example, a wild-type MBP with one or more amino acids
added and/or substituted and/or deleted and/or inserted.
[0041] The term "degradation domain" or "degron" refers to a protein element that confers
instability to another protein to which it is fused.
[0042] As used herein, the term "maltose dependent degron," or "maltose binding degron,"
or "maltose binding protein degron" is a maltose binding protein mutant which has
become dependent on binding to maltose for its stability. A maltose dependent degron
is more stable when it is in contact with or bound to maltose than when it is not
in contact with or bound to maltose. A maltose dependent degron also confers stability
to another protein to which it is fused when the maltose dependent degron is in contact
or bound to maltose compared to when the maltose dependent degron is not in contact
or bound to maltose.
[0043] The term "maltose based inducer" includes a maltose or any analogs and derivatives
of maltose. The maltose based inducer can bind to MBP, MBP mutants or maltose dependent
degrons. When a maltose based inducer is bound to a maltose dependent degron, it can
stabilize the maltose dependent degron. A maltose based inducer can also induce activation
of a maltose-responsive promoter. While the term "maltose" is used throughout the
specification for simplicity, any maltose based inducer can be used instead of maltose
in compositions and methods provided herein, and the term "maltose" can be substituted
with a "maltose based inducer" throughout the disclosure.
[0044] As used herein, the term "sequence identity" or "percent identity," in the context
or two or more nucleic acid or protein sequences, refers to two or more sequences
or subsequences that are the same or have a specified percentage of amino acid residues
or nucleotides that are the same. For example, the sequence can have a percent identity
of at least about 70%, at least about 75%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%,
at least about 90%, at least about 91% at least about 92%, at least about 93%, at
least about 94%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least
about 98%, at least about 99%, or higher identity over a specified region to a reference
sequence when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence over a comparison window,
or designated region as measured using a sequence comparison algorithm or by manual
alignment and visual inspection. For example, percent of identity is determined by
calculating the ratio of the number of identical nucleotides (or amino acid residues)
in the sequence divided by the length of the total nucleotides (or amino acid residues)
minus the lengths of any gaps.
[0045] For convenience, the extent of identity between two sequences can be ascertained
using computer program and mathematical algorithms known in the art. Such algorithms
that calculate percent sequence identity generally account for sequence gaps and mismatches
over the comparison region. Programs that compare and align sequences, like Clustal
W (
Thompson et al., (1994) Nucleic Acids Res., 22: 4673-4680), ALIGN (
Myers et al., (1988) CABIOS, 4: 11-17), FASTA (
Pearson et al., (1988) PAAS, 85:2444-2448;
Pearson (1990), Methods Enzymol., 183: 63-98) and gapped BLAST (
Altschul et al., (1997) Nucleic Acids Res., 25: 3389-3402) are useful for this purpose. The BLAST or BLAST 2.0 (
Altschul et al., J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-10, 1990) is available from several sources, including the National Center for Biological
Information (NCBI) and on the Internet, for use in connection with the sequence analysis
programs BLASTP, BLASTN, BLASTX, TBLASTN, and TBLASTX. Additional information can
be found at the NCBI web site.
[0046] The sequence alignments and percent identity calculations can be determined using
the BLAST program using its standard, default parameters. For nucleotide sequence
alignment and sequence identity calculations, the BLASTN program is used with its
default parameters (Gap opening penalty=5, Gap extension penalty=2, Nucleic match=1,
Nucleic mismatch=-3, Expectation value = 10.0, Word size = 11). For polypeptide sequence
alignment and sequence identity calculations, BLASTP program is used with its default
parameters (Gap opening=11, Gap extension penalty=2; Nucleic match=1; Nucleic mismatch=-3,
Expectation value = 10.0; Word size= 11; matrix Blosum 62). Alternatively, the following
program and parameters are used: Align Plus software of Clone Manager Suite, version
5 (Sci-Ed Software); DNA comparison: Global comparison, Standard Linear Scoring matrix,
Mismatch penalty=2, Open gap penalty=4, Extend gap penalty=1. Amino acid comparison:
Global comparison, BLOSUM 62 Scoring matrix.
[0047] As used herein, the term "homology" refers to the identity between two or more nucleic
acid sequences, or two or more amino acid sequences. Sequence identity can be measured
in terms of percentage identity (or similarity or homology); the higher the percentage,
the more near to identical the sequences are to each other. Homologs or orthologs
of nucleic acid or amino acid sequences possess a relatively high degree of sequence
identity when aligned using standard methods. For example, a "homolog" of a reference
protein or nucleic acid includes a protein or nucleic acid which has at least about
50%, at least about 55%, at least about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%,
at least about 75%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at
least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least
about 99% sequence identity to the reference protein or nucleic acid, respectively.
As discussed above, various programs for sequence alignment and analysis are well
known, and can be used to determine whether two sequences are homologs of each other.
[0048] The phrase "stringent hybridization conditions" refers to conditions under which
a probe will hybridize to its target subsequence, typically in a complex mixture of
nucleic acids, but to no other sequences. Stringent conditions are sequence-dependent
and will be different in different circumstances. Longer sequences hybridize specifically
at higher temperatures. An extensive guide to the hybridization of nucleic acids is
found in
Tijssen, Techniques in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Hybridization with Nucleic
Probes, "Overview of principles of hybridization and the strategy of nucleic acid
assays" (1993). Generally, stringent conditions are selected to be about 5-10 °C lower than the
thermal melting point (T
m) for the specific sequence at a defined ionic strength pH. The T
m is the temperature (under defined ionic strength, pH, and nucleic concentration)
at which 50% of the probes complementary to the target hybridize to the target sequence
at equilibrium (as the target sequences are present in excess, at T
m, 50% of the probes are occupied at equilibrium). Stringent conditions may also be
achieved with the addition of destabilizing agents such as formamide. For selective
or specific hybridization, a positive signal is at least two times background, preferably
10 times background hybridization. Exemplary stringent hybridization conditions can
be as following: 50% formamide, 5×SSC, and 1% SDS, incubating at 42 °C, or, 5×SSC,
1% SDS, incubating at 65 °C, with wash in 0.2×SSC, and 0.1% SDS at 65 °C.
[0049] Nucleic acids that do not hybridize to each other under stringent conditions are
still substantially identical if the polypeptides which they encode are substantially
identical. This occurs, for example, when a copy of a nucleic acid is created using
the maximum codon degeneracy permitted by the genetic code. In such cases, the nucleic
acids typically hybridize under moderately stringent hybridization conditions. Exemplary
"moderately stringent hybridization conditions" include a hybridization in a buffer
of 40% formamide, 1 M NaCl, 1% SDS at 37 °C, and a wash in 1×SSC at 45 °C. A positive
hybridization is at least twice background. Those of ordinary skill will readily recognize
that alternative hybridization and wash conditions can be utilized to provide conditions
of similar stringency. Additional guidelines for determining hybridization parameters
are provided in numerous reference,
e.g.,
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, ed. Ausubel et al.
[0050] A "conservative amino acid substitution" is one in which an amino acid residue is
substituted by another amino acid residue having a side chain (R group) with similar
chemical properties (
e.
g., charge or hydrophobicity). In general, a conservative amino acid substitution will
not substantially change the functional properties of a protein. In cases where two
or more amino acid sequences differ from each other by conservative substitutions,
the percent sequence identity or degree of homology may be adjusted upwards to correct
for the conservative nature of the substitution. Means for making this adjustment
are well known to those of skill in the art (
See, e.g.,
Pearson W. R., 1994, Methods in Mol. Biol 25: 365-89).
[0051] The following six groups each contain amino acids that are conservative substitutions
for one another: 1) Serine (S), Threonine (T); 2) Aspartic Acid (D), Glutamic Acid
(E); 3) Asparagine (N), Glutamine (Q); 4) Arginine (R), Lysine (K); 5) Isoleucine
(I), Leucine (L), Alanine (A), Valine (V); and 6) Phenylalanine (F), Tyrosine (Y),
Tryptophan (W).
[0052] As used herein, the term "variant amino acid residue" refers to an amino acid change
or an amino acid substitution in a variant form of a reference protein. For example,
a variant amino acid residue "I10T" refers that position 10 of a reference protein,
which normally has isoleucine (I), is substituted with amino acid residue threonine
(T) in the variant protein. In another example, a variant amino acid residue "A216V"
refers that position 216 of a reference protein, which normally has amino acid residue
alanine (A), is substituted with amino acid residue valine (V) in the variant protein.
[0054] As used herein, the term "protein of interest" refers to any protein or polypeptide,
the production of which is desirable. The term "protein of interest" may refers to
a protein whose expression is desired within the fusion protein.
[0055] As used herein, the term "fusion protein" refers to a protein created through the
joining of two or more proteins through a peptide bond formed between the amino terminus
of one protein and the carboxyl terminus of another protein. Translation of the "fusion
gene" results in a single fusion protein with functional properties derived from each
of the original proteins.
[0056] The term "protein stability" as used herein is used in a structural context,
i.e., relating to the structural integrity of a protein. The protein stability refers
to the net balance of forces, which determine whether a protein will be in its native
folded conformation that is protected from degradation or in a denatured state which
is subject to degradation. The protein stability can be measured in a functional context,
i.
e., relating to the protein's or its fusion protein's state to confer its function
and/or activity over time.
[0057] The term "stable" in reference to a protein can be used as a relative term to refer
to the protein's relative state of being protected from protein degradation. For example,
a maltose dependent degron is referred to as being more stable under a condition when
it is in contact with or bound to maltose, as compared to a condition when it is not
in contact with or bound to maltose. The maltose dependent degron's stability, in
the presence or absence of maltose, can be measured by comparing activities of a reporter
gene (
e.
g., green fluorescent protein) fused thereto.
[0058] The term "half-life" of a protein typically refers to the time required for the concentration
of proteins in host cells or in cell extracts to be reduced by one-half.
[0059] As used herein, the maltose dependent degron or fusion protein being "in contact
with maltose" or "binding with maltose" refers to either the maltose dependent degron
being in physical attachment or close association with maltose. The binding can result
from hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic forces, van der Waals forces, covalent, or ionic
bonding, for example.
[0060] As used herein, the term "biomolecule" refers to any endogenous or heterologous molecules
that can exist in cells. The term "biomolecule" can refer to, for example, nucleic
acids, proteins, peptides, amino acids, lipids, carbohydrates, metabolites, and metabolic
products.
[0061] As used herein, the term "target molecule" refers to a molecule of interest, the
amount or expression level of which is directly or indirectly influenced by the activity
of a fusion protein comprising a protein of interest fused in frame to a maltose dependent
degron. The term "target molecule" can refer to, for example, enzymes, other proteins,
peptides, amino acids, nucleic acids, lipids, carbohydrates, metabolites, metabolic
products, and non-catabolic compounds.
[0062] GAL80 gene refers to a gene encoding a transcriptional regulator Gal80p involved in the
repression of GAL regulon gene expression. Transcriptional regulation in the galactose
regulon of yeast is determined by an interplay between a positive regulatory protein,
Gal4p, and a negative regulatory protein, Gal80p. As used herein, Gal80p may refer
to a wild-type Ga180p, any variants or modified versions thereof. For example, as
used herein,
GAL80 gene may encode a wild-type Gal80p or a Gal80p modified with a constitutive degron
fused to its N terminus to increase its protein turnover.
[0063] As used herein, the phrase to "functionally disrupt" or a "functional disruption"
e.g., of a selected gene means that the selected gene is altered in such a way as to
decrease in the host cell the activity of the protein encoded by the selected gene.
Similarly, to "functionally disrupt" or a "functional disruption"
e.
g., of a selected protein means that the protein is altered in such a way as to decrease
in the host cell the activity of the protein.
[0064] The activity of the selected protein encoded by the selected gene may be eliminated
in the host cell. Alternatively, the activity of the selected protein encoded by the
selected gene may be decreased in the host cell. Functional disruption of the selected
gene may be achieved by deleting all or a part of the gene so that gene expression
is eliminated or reduced, or so that the activity of the gene product is eliminated
or reduced. Functional disruption of the selected gene may also be achieved by mutating
a regulatory element of the gene,
e.g., the promoter of the gene so that expression is eliminated or reduced, or by mutating
the coding sequence of the gene so that the activity of the gene product is eliminated
or reduced. Functional disruption of the selected gene may result in the removal of
the complete open reading frame of the selected gene.
[0065] As used herein, the term "native" or "endogenous" refers to a substance or process
that can occur naturally in a host cell.
[0066] As used herein, the term "genetically modified" denotes a host cell that comprises
a heterologous nucleotide sequence.
[0067] As used herein, the term "heterologous" refers to what is not normally found in nature.
For example, the term "heterologous" when used with respect to a nucleic acid (DNA
or RNA) or protein refers to a nucleic acid or protein that does not occur naturally
as part of the organism, cell, genome, or DNA or RNA sequence in which it is present,
or that is found in a cell or location or locations in the genome or DNA or RNA sequence
that differ from that in which it is found in nature. The term "heterologous" when
used with respect to a nucleic acid (DNA) can also refer to a nucleic acid which is
operably linked to a promoter other than an endogenous promoter. The term "heterologous
compound" refers to the production of a compound by a cell that does not normally
produce the compound, or to the production of a compound at a level at which it is
not normally produced by the cell.
[0068] As used herein, the phrase "heterologous enzyme" refers to an enzyme that is not
normally found in a given cell in nature. The term encompasses an enzyme that is:
- (a) exogenous to a given cell (i.e., encoded by a nucleotide sequence that is not naturally present in the host cell or
not naturally present in a given context in the host cell); and
- (b) naturally found in the host cell (e.g., the enzyme is encoded by a nucleotide sequence that is endogenous to the cell)
but that is produced in an unnatural amount (e.g., greater or lesser than that naturally found) in the host cell.
[0069] As used herein, the term "naturally occurring" refers to what is found in nature.
For example, a maltose binding protein that is present in an organism can be isolated
from a source in nature and that has not been intentionally modified by a human in
the laboratory is a naturally occurring maltose binding protein (
e.
g., maltose binding protein sequences in GenBank). Conversely, as used herein, the
term "naturally not occurring" refers to what is not found in nature but created by
human intervention.
[0070] The terms "amino acid sequence," "peptide," "oligopeptide," "polypeptide" and "protein"
are used here interchangeably, and refer to a polymeric form of amino acids of any
length which may or may not be chemically or biochemically modified.
[0071] The terms "polynucleotide" and "nucleic acid" are used here interchangeably, referring
to polymeric forms of any length, both ribonucleotides and deoxyribonucleotide.
[0072] The term "isolated nucleic acid," when applied to DNA, refers to a DNA molecule that
is separated from sequences with which it is immediately contiguous in the naturally
occurring genome of the organism in which it originated. An "isolated nucleic acid"
also includes non-genomic nucleic acids such as cDNA or other non-naturally occurring
nucleic acid molecules.
[0073] The term "cDNA" is defined herein as a DNA molecule which can be prepared by reverse
transcription from a mature, spliced, mRNA molecule obtained from a cell. cDNA lacks
intron sequences that are usually present in the corresponding genomic DNA.
[0074] As used herein, the phrase "operably linked" refers to a functional linkage between
nucleic acid sequences such that the linked promoter and/or regulatory region functionally
control expression of the coding sequence.
[0075] As used herein, the term "production" generally refers to an amount of non-catabolic
compound produced by a genetically modified yeast host cell provided herein. Production
may be expressed as a yield of the non-catabolic compound by the yeast host cell.
Production may be expressed as a productivity of the yeast host cell in producing
the non-catabolic compound.
[0076] The term "yield" refers to production of a non-catabolic compound by a host cell,
expressed as the amount of non-catabolic compound produced per amount of carbon source
consumed by the host cell, by weight. The term "yield" may refer to the amount of
non-catabolic compound produced per amount of total reducing sugar added to a fermentor
vessel or a flask (
i.e., grams of non-catabolic produced divided by grams of total reducing sugar added, expressed
as percentage). The total reducing sugar is a unit of measurement of sugar in grams.
A reducing sugar is any sugar that is capable of acting as a reducing agent because
it has a free aldehyde group or a free ketone group. All monosaccharides, such as
galactose, glucose, and fructose, are reducing sugars. For example, if 10 grams of
non-catabolic compound is produced by feeding host cells 100 grams of glucose
(i.e., 100 grams of reducing sugar), then the yield of product per reducing sugar is 10%.
[0077] As used herein, the term "productivity" refers to production of a non-catabolic compound
by a host cell, expressed as the amount of non-catabolic compound produced (by weight)
per amount of fermentation broth in which the host cell is cultured (by volume) over
time (per hour).
[0078] The term "fermentation" is used to refer to culturing host cells that utilize carbon
sources, such as sugar, as an energy source to produce a desired product.
[0079] The term "culture medium" refers to a medium which allows growth of cellular biomass
and production of metabolites from host cells. It contains a source of carbon and
may further contain a source of nitrogen, a source of phosphorus, a source of vitamins,
a source of minerals, and the like.
[0080] As used herein, the term "fermentation medium" may be used synonymously with "culture
medium." Generally, the term "fermentation medium" may be used to refer to a medium
which is suitable for culturing host cells for a prolonged time period to produce
a desired compound.
[0081] The term "medium" refers to a culture medium and/or fermentation medium. The "medium"
can be liquid or semi-solid. A given medium may be both a culture medium and a fermentation
medium.
[0082] The term "whole cell broth" refers to the entire contents of a vessel (
e.
g., a flask, plate, fermentor and the like), including cells, aqueous phase, compounds
produced in hydrocarbon phase and/or emulsion. Thus, the whole cell broth includes
the mixture of a culture medium comprising water, carbon source (
e.
g., sugar), minerals, vitamins, other dissolved or suspended materials, microorganisms,
metabolites and compounds produced by host cells, and all other constituents of the
material held in the vessel in which a non-catabolic compound is being made by the
host cells.
[0083] The term "fermentation composition" is used interchangeably with "whole cell broth."
The fermentation composition can also include an overlay if it is added to the vessel
during fermentation.
[0084] The term "biosynthetic pathway" refers to a pathway with a set of anabolic or catabolic
biochemical reactions for transmuting one chemical species into another, leading to
the biosynthesis of a molecule. Gene products belong to the same "biosynthetic pathway"
if they, in parallel or in series, act on the same substrate, produce the same product,
or act on or produce a metabolic intermediate (
e.
g., metabolite) between the same substrate and metabolite end product.
[0085] As used herein, the term "promoter" refers to a synthetic or naturally-derived nucleic
acid that is capable of conferring, activating or enhancing expression of a DNA coding
sequence. A promoter may comprise one or more specific transcriptional regulatory
sequences to further enhance expression and/or to alter the spatial expression and/or
temporal expression of the coding sequence. A promoter may be positioned 5' (upstream)
of the coding sequence under its control. The distance between the promoter and a
coding sequence to be expressed may be approximately the same as the distance between
that promoter and the native nucleic acid sequence it controls. As is known in the
art, variation in this distance may be accommodated without loss of promoter function.
In certain embodiments, the regulated promoter used herein generally allows transcription
of the nucleic acid sequence encoding a transcriptional regulator (
e.
g., an activator such as Gal4p, or a repressor such as Gal80p) while in a permissive
environment (
e.
g., the presence of maltose), but ceases transcription of the nucleic acid sequence
encoding a transcriptional regulator while in a non-permissive environment (
e.
g., in the absence of maltose).
[0086] The term "maltose-responsive promoter" or "pMAL" promoter refers to a promoter sequence
that is bound by and regulated by a transcriptional activator regulated by maltose.
For example, the maltose-inducible promoter is regulated by a MAL operon activator
(
e.
g., a MAL transcriptional activator) or functional homologs thereof.
[0087] The term "MAL operon activator" or "MAL transcriptional activator" refers to a DNA-binding,
maltose-dependent transcriptional activator of the maltose operon or a maltose-responsive
promoter.
[0088] The term "galactose-inducible promoter" or "pGAL" promoter refers to a promoter sequence
that is bound by and regulated by a transcriptional activator regulated by galactose.
For example, the galactose-inducible promoter is regulated by Gal4p or functional
homologs thereof.
[0089] The term "pGMAL" promoter refers to a synthetic promoter which has pGAL promoter
sequences with its GAL transcriptional activator (
e.
g., GAL4p) binding sites replaced with one or more binding sites for a MAL transcriptional
activator. Thus, pGMAL promoters are activated by a MAL transcriptional activator
instead of a GAL transcriptional activator.
[0090] The term "synthetic promoter" refers to a nucleotide sequence having promoter activity
and that is not known to be found in nature. A synthetic promoter may be assembled
from multiple elements that are heterologous to one another.
[0091] The phrase "strain stability" generally refers to the stability of heterologous compound
production over extended periods of fermentation by a genetically modified host cell
described herein. In particular, stability refers the ability of a microbe to maintain
favorable production characteristics (
i.e., high yield (grams of compound per gram of substrate) and/or productivity (grams
per liter of fermentation broth per hour)) of a non-catabolic fermentation product
over extended cultivation times,
e.
g., about 3 to 20 days. Genetic stability, which is the propensity of the producing
microbial population to have little to no alteration of the intended allelic frequency
of genes relevant to the production of product over time, plays a major role in the
sustained output of product.
[0092] Unless indicated otherwise, the concentration unit of maltose or other components
in a culture medium or solution is weight/volume percent. It is defined as concentration
solute

[0093] The term "transcriptional regulator" refers to a protein that control gene expression.
[0094] The term "transcriptional activator" refers to a transcriptional regulator that activates
or positively regulates expression of a gene.
[0095] The term "transcriptional repressor" refers to a transcriptional regulator that represses
or negatively regulates expression of a gene.
[0096] The term "cell-growth-affecting gene" or "nucleic acid encoding a cell-growth-affecting
protein" refers to a nucleic acid that encodes a protein which affects cell growth
(
e.
g., growth rate or cellular biomass) of a cell.
[0097] The term "essential gene" refers to a gene which is absolutely required to maintain
life under optimum conditions where all nutrients are available.
[0098] The term "conditional essential gene" refers to a gene that is essential only under
certain circumstances or growth conditions.
[0099] The term "regulon" refers to a group of genes or nucleic acids that are regulated
by the same regulatory proteins (
e.
g., transcriptional regulators). The genes of a regulon have regulatory binding sites
or promoters that are regulated by common transcriptional regulators. The group of
genes or nucleic acids comprising a regulon can be located contiguously or non-contiguously
in a genome of a host cell.
[0100] The term "inducible promoter" refers to a promoter that is activated by an inducer
to induce the transcription of the gene(s) it controls.
[0101] The phrase "constitutive promoter" refers to a promoter that does not require the
presence of an inducer to induce the transcription of the gene(s) it controls.
[0102] The term "expression," unless otherwise indicated, refers to the production of mRNA
by transcription of the relevant gene and/or, to production of protein via gene transcription
and then mRNA translation.
[0103] The term "catabolic" as used herein refers to the process of molecule breakdown or
degradation of large molecules into smaller molecules.
[0104] The term "non-catabolic" refers to the process of constructing molecules from smaller
units, and these reactions typically require energy. The term "non-catabolic compound"
refers to a compound produced by a non-catabolic process.
[0105] The term "a," "an," and "the" means "at least one" unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise.
6.2 Maltose Dependent Degrons
6.2.1. Assays to Determine Maltose Dependent Stability of Maltose Dependent Degrons
and MBP Mutants
[0106] Useful maltose dependent degrons in the present invention depend on binding on maltose
for their stability and for their fusion proteins. In the methods provided herein,
the maltose dependent stability of maltose dependent degrons and their fusion proteins
is conditional in a sense that they are stable when the maltose dependent degrons
are in contact with maltose, and they are unstable when maltose is removed from contact
with maltose dependent degrons. For instance, when yeast host cells expressing maltose
dependent degrons and/or their fusion proteins are cultured in a culture medium comprising
maltose, they are more stable compared to when they are cultured in a medium with
no maltose. In certain embodiments, when maltose is removed from the culture medium,
the half-life of the fusion protein is reduced compared to a control (
e.
g., a fusion protein comprising a protein of interest fused to a wild-type maltose
binding protein or the protein of interest alone).
[0107] Any suitable amount of maltose can be contacted with maltose dependent degrons and/or
their fusion proteins to maintain their stability. For example yeast host cells genetically
modified to express maltose dependent degrons and/or their fusion proteins may be
cultured in a culture medium comprising maltose at a concentration (w/v) of at least
about 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75%, 1.0%, 1.25%, 1.5%, 1.75%, 2.0%, 2.25%, 2.5%, 2.75%, 3.0%,
3.25%, 3.75%, 4.0%, 4.25%, 4.5%, 4.75%, 5.0%, or more. When it is desired to destabilize
or degrade maltose dependent degrons and/or their fusion proteins at a faster rate
in yeast host cells, the yeast host cells can be cultured in a new culture medium
with no or sufficiently low amounts of maltose (e.g., less than about 0.25 %, less
than about 0.1%, 0%, or the like). Suitable amounts of maltose to maintain stability
of maltose dependent degrons and/or their fusion proteins are described in further
detail in Section 6.4 below.
[0108] Maltose dependent degrons may be derived from a maltose binding protein (MBP) by
introducing destabilizing mutation(s) to a natural protein that already binds maltose.
Without wishing to be bound by any theory, the mutation(s) in the MBP cause the mutant
protein to depend on the binding energy from maltose to fold properly, and without
maltose, the mutant protein may not be able to fold properly and is degraded at a
faster rate. When it is fused to another protein, the entire fusion protein becomes
targeted for degradation when maltose is absent.
[0109] MBP mutants may be obtained by mutagenizing nucleic acids encoding a wild-type MBP
(
e.g., a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 27 which
includes a linker sequence in addition to the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1).
Nucleic acids encoding a wild-type MBP may be randomly mutagenized. Alternatively,
nucleic acids encoding a wild-type MBP may be rationally mutagenized based on its
known structure and/or function. Additionally, mutations in MBP mutants obtained from
random or rational mutagenesis may be combined to generate additional MBP mutants.
By introducing one or more mutations that perturb protein conformation in the absence
of bound ligand, MBP mutants useful as maltose dependent degrons have been identified
and described in Section 6.2.2, and the Examples sections below.
[0110] MBP mutants useful as maltose dependent degrons display one or more of the following
features. One of the features of useful maltose dependent degrons includes increased
stability of their fusion proteins in the presence of maltose compared to in the absence
or in sufficiently low amounts of maltose. Without wishing to be bound by any theory,
if binding of maltose to a maltose dependent degron renders its fusion protein conformation
more stable, then the fusion protein may be degraded by yeast host cells' degradation
machinery at a slower rate. Another feature of useful maltose dependent degrons includes
their conditional stability to modulate the expression levels or amounts of downstream
target molecules by manipulating the maltose content in a culture medium. These and
other features of maltose dependent stability of maltose binding proteins and/or their
fusion proteins may be determined using any suitable assays described below.
[0111] A suitable assay for screening MBP mutants (and determining maltose dependent features
of maltose dependent degrons) may include determining maltose dependent stability
of a fusion protein comprising a reporter protein. For example, a reporter protein
fused in frame to a MBP mutant may be used to measure the reporter activity in the
presence or in the absence of maltose. As described in Example 7.8 in the Examples
section, a reporter, such as a fluorescent marker protein (
e.
g., GFP), may be used as a fusion partner. Here, a population of genetically modified
host cells comprising reporter fusion proteins may be pre-cultured to express the
fusion proteins in a culture medium comprising maltose. Then, the population or a
subpopulation of the genetically modified host cells is divided into two groups and
cultured in parallel, where one group of cells is cultured in a culture medium comprising
maltose and the other group of cells is cultured in a culture medium comprising no
maltose. After a suitable time period (
e.
g., after 48 hours of culturing or when expression of control GFP reporter in host
cells is at its maximum), the fluorescence levels from the host cells cultured in
the presence of maltose and in the absence of maltose may be compared. A MBP mutant
is considered as a maltose dependent degron if the relative GFP intensity of the GFP
fusion protein is higher in the presence of maltose than in the absence of maltose
(or in low amounts of maltose).
[0112] For these comparative experiments, genetically modified host cells are typically
cultured in a culture medium comprising the same amount (
e.
g., molar or weight amount) of carbon source. For example, the culture medium comprising
maltose may contain about 2.3% (w/v) sucrose and about 1.7% (w/v) maltose, and the
culture medium comprising no maltose may contain about 4% sucrose.
[0113] A MBP mutant may be considered useful as a maltose dependent degron if the relative
GFP intensity of the fusion protein is higher in the presence of maltose than in the
absence of maltose by at least about 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%,
100%, 110%, 120%, 130%, 140%, 150%, 160%, 170%, 180%, 190%, 200%, 210%, 220%, 230%,
240%, 250%, 260%, 270%, 280%, 290%, 300%, or more. For example, host cells expressing
MBP mutant L8_v4d shown in FIG. 8B exhibit a relative GFP intensity of about 95% in
the presence of maltose and a relative GFP intensity of about 30% in the absence of
maltose compared to a control
(i.e., GPF intensity of GFP alone in the presence of maltose). Since the reporter activity
(
i.e., fluorescent intensity) of MBP mutant L8_v4d fusion protein is about 316% higher
in the presence of maltose than in the absence of maltose, MBP mutant L8_v4d is useful
and is considered as a maltose dependent degron.
[0114] In FIG. 8B, the relative GFP intensities of fusion proteins are normalized against
the GFP intensity of unfused GFP being 100%. The relative GFP intensities of fusion
proteins may be normalized against the GFP intensity of GFP fused to a wild-type MBP
expressed in the presence of maltose or in the absence of maltose. For example, the
GFP intensity of GFP fused to the wild-type MBP in the presence of maltose may be
scaled as having the intensity of 100%, and the GFP intensities of other fusion proteins
may be scaled relative the wild-type MBP fusion protein. In another example, as shown
in FIG. 8C, the ratios of GFP fluorescence in the presence of maltose and in the absence
of maltose can be calculated for the control (e.g., a GFP fused to a wild-type MBP)
and for each GFP fused to various MBP mutants. The calculated ratio for each MBP mutant
can be compared to the calculated ratio for the control. If the calculated GFP fluorescence
ratio of a MBP mutant is greater than that for the control by at least about 10%,
20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 110%, 120%, 130%, 140%, 150%, 160%,
170%, 180%, 190%, 200%, 210%, 220%, 230%, 240%, 250%, 260%, 270%, 280%, 290%, 300%,
or more, then a MBP mutant is considered useful as a maltose dependent degron.
[0115] While the use of GFP as a reporter is described above, the determination of fusion
protein stability is not limited to the use of GFP or relative GFP intensity measurements.
Other suitable reporters or assay methods deemed suitable by those skilled in the
art may be used to compare the fusion protein stability in the presence of maltose
or in the absence (or in sufficiently low amounts) of maltose to determine MBP mutants'
maltose dependence for their stability.
[0116] A suitable assay for screening MBP mutants (or determining maltose dependent features
of maltose dependent degrons) may include determining the expression levels or amounts
of target molecules, which are directly or indirectly influenced by the stability
of a fusion protein comprising a MBP mutant. Such a screening assay using target molecules
can be illustrated as shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B. As shown in the figures, a fusion
protein comprises Gal80p fused in frame to a maltose dependent degron (or a MBP mutant).
Gal80p is a repressive transcriptional regulator, which binds to Gal4p, a master transcriptional
activator of Gal promoters. In FIGS. 1A and 1B, one or more pGal promoters are operably
linked to biosynthetic pathway genes. If Gal80p fusion protein in host cells is stable
with maltose bound to the maltose dependent degron (or MBP mutant) portion, then it
will repress Gal4p transcriptional activator, resulting in little or no expression
of pathway enzymes. This will, in turn, eliminate or reduce the amount of any heterologous
compounds produced by the pathway enzymes. If Gal80p fusion protein is unstable because
the maltose dependent degron (or a MBP mutant) is not in contact with maltose as shown
in FIG. 1B, then the fusion protein is also unstable or inactive, relieving Gal4p
from being repressed by Gal80p. This will result in higher expression levels of pathway
enzymes and increased production of heterologous compounds produced by the pathway
enzymes. The maltose dependent production amount of heterologous compounds can be
used as downstream target molecules to screen whether MBP mutants fused to Gal80p
are suitable as maltose dependent degrons.
[0117] The isoprenoid farnesene may be used as a downstream target molecule. Here, the pathway
enzyme genes shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B may include genes encoding the mevalonate pathway
enzymes and farnesene synthase, and host cells will produce isoprenoid farnesene as
one of the downstream target molecules. The genetically modified host cells will produce
no or a small amount of farnesene in a culture medium comprising maltose when stable
Gal80p represses the biosynthetic pathway gene expression (
see FIG. 1A). When these host cells are cultured in the absence of maltose as shown in
FIG. 1B, the host cells will produce farnesene (when unstable or inactive Gal80p no
longer represses the biosynthetic pathway gene expression). Thus, the amount of farnesene
produced from the host cells in the absence or presence of maltose may be used to
screen whether a MBP mutant fused to a Gal80p behaves as a maltose dependent degron,
which depends on binding to maltose for its stability.
[0118] In FIGS. 1A and 1B where the fusion protein acts as a negative regulator of target
molecules, MBP mutants may be considered as useful maltose dependent degrons if their
maltose dependent stability results in host cells producing an increased amount of
target molecule (
e.
g., farnesene) in the absence of maltose than in the presence of maltose. The amount
of target molecules (
e.
g., farnesene) produced in host cells may be measured using any known techniques in
the art. For example, the farnesene titer measurement methods described in Example
7.2, 7.3, or 7.4 in the Examples section may be used. In FIGS. 1A and 1B, a MBP mutant
is considered as a useful maltose dependent degron if the amount of target molecules
(
e.
g., farnesene) produced from host cells cultured without maltose is higher than the
amount of target molecules produced by host cells cultured with maltose by at least
about 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 110%, 120%, 130%, 140%, 150%,
160%, 170%, 180%, 190%, 200%, 210%, 220%, 230%, 240%, 250%, 260%, 270%, 280%, 290%,
300%, or more.
[0119] The percentage of relative increase of the target molecule production discussed above
can be calculated by dividing the raw measured value of target molecule production
(
e.
g., UV farnesene titer assay described in Example 7.2) in the absence of maltose by
the raw measured value of target molecule production in the presence of maltose. The
amount of target molecule produced by the host cell can be normalized against a control
prior to dividing the two values. For example, the control may include the amount
of target molecule produced by host cells which constitutively produce target molecules
in the presence of maltose. The control amount may be scaled as 100, and all other
target molecule production values obtained from host cells comprising MBP mutants
may be normalized against this value.
[0120] A suitable assay for screening MBP mutants includes using auxotroph strains and suitable
positive and negative selection schemes to screen for MBP mutants that display maltose
dependent stability. For example, a genetic strategy can be devised to screen for
MBP mutants, which, when fused to constitutively-transcribed Gal80p, would cause Gal80p
to switch from a functional (
e.
g., stable) state in the presence of maltose to a non-functional (
e.
g., unstable) state in the absence of maltose.
[0121] An exemplary genetic strategy useful as a screening assay is illustrated in FIG.
4 and described in Example 7.6 in the Examples section. As shown in FIG. 4, the GAL80
gene is fused in frame to nucleic acids encoding a MBP mutant. Here, a yeast strain,
a lysine auxotroph comprising a
LYS2 gene operably linked to pGAL10, may be used as a reporter strain to screen for MBP
mutants which behave as a maltose dependent degron. If a MBP mutant fused to Gal80p
depends on binding of maltose for its stability, then it would impart maltose dependent
stability to Gal80p fusion protein. Thus, in the reporter strain, the Gal80p function
and its maltose dependent stability can be reported by the phenotypes ascribed to
expression or repression of the
LYS2 gene from a Gal80-regulated promoter (
e.
g., pGAL10).
[0122] In this exemplary screening assay, the
LYS2 gene is operably linked to pGAL10 promoter as shown in FIG. 4. The
LYS2 gene encodes an aminoadipate reductase, an enzyme that is required for biosynthesis
of lysine. When a MBP mutant has properties of a maltose dependent degron, then Gal80p
fused to the MBP mutant will be unstable in the absence of maltose, and it will not
repress expression of
LYS2 operably linked to pGAL10. As a result, the aminoadipate reductase will be expressed
from the
LYS2 gene, allowing the reporter yeast to grow on media lacking lysine. To exclude generally
destabilizing MBP mutants that exhibit maltose dependent stability, a negative or
counter-selection screen may then be performed. In a counter-selection screen, the
reporter strain is cultured on media containing α-aminoadipate as the sole nitrogen
source. Reporter strains expressing
LYS2 will not grow on this media. If a MBP mutant is dependent on maltose for its stability,
then Gal80p fused thereto would be stable and functional in the presence of maltose,
resulting in repression of pGAL10 and no expression of
LYS2. Therefore, during the counter-selection screen, the reporter strains comprising a
MBP mutant, which depends on binding to maltose for its stability, can be selected.
The positive and negative selection schemes illustrated in FIG. 4 to screen for MBP
mutants are merely exemplary. Other suitable auxotroph reporter strains (
e.g.,
URA3 or
TRP1 auxotroph) that have positive and counter-selection schemes may be used to screen
MBP mutants.
[0123] The assays for determining the maltose dependent stability of MBP mutants, maltose
dependent degrons, and their fusion proteins described herein are merely exemplary.
Those skilled in the art can readily determine other maltose dependent stability assays
to screen for MBP mutants which can be utilized as maltose dependent degrons in the
methods provided herein. For example, rounds of competitive selective/counter-selective
growth scheme described in Example 7.7 may also be used.
6.2.2. Maltose Dependent Degron Sequences
6.2.2.1 Maltose Dependent Degron Amino Acid Sequences
[0124] Provided herein are amino acid sequences of maltose dependent degrons that exhibit
maltose dependent stability. Maltose dependent degrons are mutants that are derived
from any suitable wild-type maltose binding proteins that can bind to maltose. In
certain embodiments, the maltose dependent degrons comprise one or more destabilizing
mutations (
e.g., one or more amino acid additions, substitutions, deletions or insertions), compared
to their wild-type counterparts. The maltose dependent degrons are less stable when
not bound to maltose, compared to when bound to maltose.
[0125] In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
that has at least about at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%,
at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, or at least about 99%
sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 2. In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron
comprises an amino acid sequence that has at least about 85%, at least about 90%,
at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, or
at least about 99% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 2, and comprises at least one variant
amino acid residue compared to SEQ ID NO: 2.
[0126] In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
that has at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about
96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, or at least about 99% sequence identity
to SEQ ID NO: 28. In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an
amino acid sequence that has at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about
95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, or at least about
99% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 2, and comprises at least one variant amino acid
residue compared to SEQ ID NO: 28.
[0127] In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
that comprises at least one or more variant amino acid residues that are located at
one or more positions selected from 7, 10, 11, 21, 24, 28, 42, 43, 64, 68, 83, 88,
92, 95, 98, 101,110, 117, 134, 135, 136, 149, 168, 177, 186, 187, 193, 198, 210, 216,
217, 229, 236, 237, 242, 263, 291, 304, 321, 322, 339, 351, 357, 367, 370, and 374,
wherein the positions of these variant amino acid residues correspond to amino acid
positions of SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 28.
[0128] In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
that comprises one or more variant amino acid residues, wherein the one or more variant
amino acid residues are selected from the group consisting of K7R, I10T, W11G, L21S,
V24A, F28Y, D42V, K43E, A64T, F68S, D83G, D88N, P92T, W95R, V98I, N101I, A110T, I117V,
P134S, A135T, L136M, M149I, Y168C, Y168N, Y177H, N186S, A187P, L193S, D198V, D210E,
A216V, A217D, G229C, I236N, D237N, N242D, L263M, L291V, A304S, T321N, M322L, A339T,
A351T, T357S, T367S, S370P, and N374S. The positions of these variant amino acid residues
correspond to amino acid positions of SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 28.
[0129] In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron may comprise an amino acid sequence
which is truncated in comparison to the wild-type MBP having SEQ ID NO: 2. For example,
a maltose dependent degron may comprise an amino acid sequence which is truncated
after amino acid position 365 of SEQ ID NO: 2. Thus, in certain embodiments, a maltose
dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence from position 1 to position 365
of SEQ ID NO: 2 and comprises one or more variant amino acid residues at positions
selected from the group consisting of 7, 10, 11, 21, 24, 28, 42, 43, 64, 68, 83, 88,
92, 95, 98, 101,110, 117, 134, 135, 136, 149, 168, 177, 186, 187, 193, 198, 210, 216,
217, 229, 236, 237, 242, 263, 291, 304, 321, 322, 339, 351, and 357, wherein the positions
of these variant amino acid residues correspond to SEQ ID NO: 2.
[0130] In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
from position 1 to position 365 of SEQ ID NO: 2, and comprises one or more of the
following variant amino acid residues: K7R, I10T, W11G, L21S, V24A, F28Y, D42V, K43E,
A64T, F68S, D83G, D88N, P92T, W95R, V98I, N101I, A110T, I117V, P134S, A135T, L136M,
M149I, Y168C, Y168N, Y177H, N186S, A187P, L193S, D198V, D210E, A216V, A217D, G229C,
I236N, D237N, N242D, L263M, L291V, A304S, T321N, M322L, A339T, A351T, and T357S, wherein
the positions of these variant amino acid residues correspond to amino acid positions
of SEQ ID NO: 2. In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron may comprise an
amino acid sequence shorter than 365 amino acid residues and comprises one or more
of variant amino acid residues disclosed herein.
[0131] In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
that has four variant amino acid residues compared to SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 28.
In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
that has five variant amino acid residues compared to SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 28.
In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
that has six variant amino acid residues compared to SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 28.
In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
that has seven variant amino acid residues compared to SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO:
28. In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
that has eight variant amino acid residues compared to SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO:
28. In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
that has nine variant amino acid residues compared to SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 28.
In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
that has ten variant amino acid residues compared to SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 28.
In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
that has eleven variant amino acid residues compared to SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO:
28. In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
that has less than four variant amino acid residues (
e.
g., 1, 2, or 3) compared to SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 28. In certain embodiments,
a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence that has more than eleven
variant amino acid residues (
e.
g., 12, 13, 14, 15, or more) compared to SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 28.
[0132] In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
that comprises at least five variant amino acid residues that are located at positions
10, 24, 42, 149, and 216, wherein the positions of these variant amino acid residues
correspond to positions of SEQ ID NO: 2. In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent
degron comprises at least five variant amino acid residues that comprise I10T, V24A,
D42V, M149I, and A216V, wherein the positions of these variant amino acid residues
correspond to positions of SEQ ID NO: 2. In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent
degron comprising an amino acid sequence of these variant amino acid residues is truncated
at amino acid position 365 or less.
[0133] In certain embodiments, the maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
comprising at least one set of variant amino acid residues from the following group
of variant amino acid residue sets, wherein the positions of the variant amino acid
residues correspond to amino acid positions of SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 28:
- (a) HOT, V24A, D42V, K43E, D83G, P92T, M149I, Y168N, N186S, A216V, and T357S;
- (b) HOT, V24A, D42V, K43E, D83G, M149I, Y168N, N186S, A216V, and D237N;
- (c) HOT, V24A, D42V, K43E, D83G, M149I, Y168N, N186S, A216V, and A339T;
- (d) HOT, V24A, D42V, K43E, D83G, M149I, Y168N, N186S, A216V, and N242D;
- (e) HOT, V24A, D42V, A110T, M149I, and A216V;
- (f) HOT, V24A, D42V, K43E, D83G, M149I, Y168N, N186S, and A216V;
- (g) L21S, A64T, L136M, Y177H, A187P, A304S, T321N, and A351T;
- (h) K7R, D83G, V98I, L193S, I236N, and N374S;
- (i) W11G, D88N, P134S, A135T, D210E, and M322L;
- (j) I117V, Y168N, G229C, L263M, T367S, and S370P;
- (k) F68S, W95R, N186S, and D198V; and
- (l) F28Y, K43E, N101I, Y168C, A217D, and L291V.
[0134] In certain embodiments, the maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
of SEQ ID NO: 4 (MBP mutant 3A6). In certain embodiments, the maltose dependent degron
comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6 (MBP mutant 4D3). In certain embodiments,
the maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 8 (MBP
mutant 5A2). In certain embodiments, the maltose dependent degron comprises an amino
acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 10 (MBP mutant SF3). In certain embodiments, the maltose
dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 12 (MBP mutant L8).
In certain embodiments, the maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
of SEQ ID NO: 14 (MBP mutant L8_v4d). In certain embodiments, the maltose dependent
degron comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 16 (MBP mutant H8). In certain
embodiments, the maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ
ID NO: 18 (MBP mutant H9). In certain embodiments, the maltose dependent degron comprises
an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 20 (MBP mutant H10). In certain embodiments,
the maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 22 (MBP
mutant M1). In certain embodiments, the maltose dependent degron comprises an amino
acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 24 (MBP mutant M5). In certain embodiments, the maltose
dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 26 (MBP mutant M13).
[0135] A number of MBP mutants mentioned above (e.g., 5A2, 5F3, L8, etc.) are truncated
at 365 amino acids in length and are functional as maltose dependent degrons. Thus,
in some embodiments, some of longer MBP mutants can be used in the truncated form
as maltose dependent degrons. For example, in certain embodiments, a useful maltose
dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence from position 1 to 365 of SEQ ID
NO: 16 (MBP mutant H8). In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises
an amino acid sequence from position 1 to 365 of SEQ ID NO: 18 (MBP mutant H9). In
certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence from
position 1 to 365 of SEQ ID NO: 20 (MBP mutant H10). In certain embodiments, a maltose
dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence from position 1 to 365 of SEQ ID
NO: 22 (MBP mutant M1). In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises
an amino acid sequence from position 1 to 365 of SEQ ID NO: 24 (MBP mutant M5). In
certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence from
position 1 to 365 of SEQ ID NO: 26 (MBP mutant M13).
[0136] Some of the MBP mutants include additional linker sequences at the C terminus compared
to the wild-type MBP having SEQ ID NO: 2. As the linker sequence is not necessarily
required for the function of a maltose dependent degron, useful maltose dependent
degrons comprise an amino acid sequence which has the same length as the wild-type
MBP. For example, in certain embodiments, a useful maltose dependent degron comprises
an amino acid sequence from position 1 to 370 of SEQ ID NO: 16 (MBP mutant H8). In
certain embodiments, the maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence
from position 1 to 370 of SEQ ID NO: 18 (MBP mutant H9). In certain embodiments, the
maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence from position 1 to 370 of
SEQ ID NO: 20 (MBP mutant H10). In certain embodiments, the maltose dependent degron
comprises an amino acid sequence from position 1 to 370 of SEQ ID NO: 22 (MBP mutant
M1). In certain embodiments, the maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid
sequence from position 1 to 370 of SEQ ID NO: 24 (MBP mutant M5). In certain embodiments,
the maltose dependent degron comprises an amino acid sequence from position 1 to 370
of SEQ ID NO: 26 (MBP mutant M13).
[0137] In certain embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises any suitable amino acid
sequence described herein with substitutions, deletions, or insertions. Typically,
amino acid changes may be minor such that a maltose dependent degron retains its maltose
dependent conditional stability. For instance, the substitutions, deletions, or insertions
may include one to about 30 amino acid acids, and may include, for example, a small
peptide linker of about 30 amino acid residues or less at the carboxyl terminal end
or at the amino terminal end.
[0138] In some embodiments, a maltose dependent degron comprises any suitable amino acid
described herein with conservative amino acid substitutions. The following six groups
each contain amino acids that are conservative substitutions for one another: 1) Serine
(S), Threonine (T); 2) Aspartic Acid (D), Glutamic Acid (E); 3) Asparagine (N), Glutamine
(Q); 4) Arginine (R), Lysine (K); 5) Isoleucine (I), Leucine (L), Alanine (A), Valine
(V), and 6) Phenylalanine (F), Tyrosine (Y), Tryptophan (W). Amino acid substitutions
that do not generally alter specific activity are known in the art and are described,
for example, by
H. Neurath and R.L. Hill, 1979, In, The Proteins, Academic Press, New York. The most commonly occurring exchanges are Ala/Ser, Val/Ile, Asp/Glu, Thr/Ser, Ala/Gly,
AlalThr, Ser/Asn, Ala/Val, Ser/Gly, Tyr/Phe, Ala/Pro, Lys/Arg, Asp/Asn, Leu/Ile, Leu/Val,
AlalGlu, and Asp/Gly.
[0139] In addition to the 20 standard amino acids, non-standard amino acids (such as 4-hydroxyproline,
6-N-methyl lysine, 2-aminoisobutyric acid, isovaline, and alpha-methyl serine) may
be substituted for amino acid residues of a maltose dependent degron described herein.
A limited number of non-conservative amino acids, amino acids that are not encoded
by the genetic code, and unnatural amino acids may be substituted for amino acid residues.
Unnatural amino acids can be modified after protein synthesis, and/or have a chemical
structure in their side chain(s) different from that of the standard amino acids.
[0140] While specific amino acid sequences and specific variant amino acid residues for
maltose dependent degrons are described herein, the maltose dependent degron amino
acid sequences suitable for use with methods of the invention are not limited to these
specific amino acid sequences or variants. For example, FIG. 8B illustrates a number
of other maltose dependent degrons (e.g., 1-B9, 4-E12, 4-G10, 4-F11, 4-F4, 2-F10,
2-E8, 2-G8, 1-F7, 4-H4, and 2-A4), which exhibit maltose dependent stability.
[0141] Furthermore, the destabilizing mutations described herein can be introduced to any
homologs of MBP comprising SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 28. For example, the corresponding
positions of destabilizing mutations can be readily determined for other homologs
by sequence alignment algorithms known in the art. The amino acid substitutions described
herein with reference to SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 28 may be applied to their homologs
from different species or organisms. For example, the amino acid substitutions described
with reference to positions of SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 28 may be derived from homologs
of
E. coli MBP (
e.g., MBP from
Yersinia pestis,
Vibrio cholerae,
Thermotoga maritima,
Thermococcus litoralis,
Pyrococcus furiosus, and the like). In some embodiments, some of these homologs may share at least about
90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 2 or SEQ ID NO: 28.
In other embodiments, maltose dependent degrons can be derived from MBPs which are
not homologs of
E. coli MBP, but depend on binding to maltose for their stability. Thus, other maltose dependent
degrons (
e.g., MBP mutants screened using assays described herein) are within the scope of the
present invention and may be used in the methods provided herein.
6.2.2.2 Maltose Dependent Degron Nucleic Acid Sequences
[0142] The term "nucleic acid molecule" refers to DNA, RNA, or both in combination or any
modification thereof that is known in the state of art. Such nucleic acid molecule(s)
are single- or double-stranded, linear or circular and without any size limitation.
The nucleic acid molecules of the invention can be obtained by recombinant techniques,
such as PCR or may be produced synthetically.
[0143] MBP mutants may be obtained by mutagenizing nucleic acids encoding a wild-type MBP
(
e.g., a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1 or a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 27 which
includes a linker sequence in addition to the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1).
The maltose dependent degron nucleic acid molecule may comprises a nucleotide sequence
of SEQ ID NO: 3 (MBP mutant 3A6). The maltose dependent degron nucleic acid molecule
may comprise a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 5 (MBP mutant 4D3). The maltose dependent
degron nucleic acid molecule may comprise a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 7 (MBP
mutant 5A2). The maltose dependent degron nucleic acid molecule may comprise a nucleotide
sequence of SEQ ID NO: 9 (MBP mutant 5F3). The maltose dependent degron nucleic acid
molecule may comprise a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 11 (MBP mutant L8). The
maltose dependent degron nucleic acid molecule may comprise a nucleotide sequence
of SEQ ID NO: 13 (L8_v4d). The maltose dependent degron nucleic acid molecule may
comprises a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 15 (MBP mutant H8). The maltose dependent
degron nucleic acid molecule may comprise a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 17 (MBP
mutant H9). The maltose dependent degron nucleic acid molecule may comprise a sequence
of SEQ ID NO: 19 (MBP mutant H10). The maltose dependent degron nucleic acid molecule
may comprises a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 21 (MBP mutant M1). The maltose
dependent degron nucleic acid molecule may comprise a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID
NO: 23 (MBP mutant M5). The maltose dependent degron nucleic acid molecule comprises
a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 25 (MBP mutant M13).
[0144] A number of MBP mutant nucleic acids mentioned above (
e.
g., 5A2, 5F3, L8, etc.) are truncated at 1098 nucleotides in length, and, when translated
into proteins, are functional as maltose dependent degrons. Thus, maltose dependent
degrons with sequences longer than 1098 nucleotides can be used in the truncated form.
For example, the maltose dependent degron nucleic acid molecule may comprise a nucleotide
sequence from position 1 to position 1098 of SEQ ID NO: 11. The maltose dependent
degron nucleic acid molecule may comprise a nucleotide sequence from position 1 to
position 1098 of SEQ ID NO: 15. The maltose dependent degron nucleic acid molecule
may comprise a nucleotide sequence from position 1 to position 1098 of SEQ ID NO:
17. The maltose dependent degron nucleic acid molecule may comprise a sequence from
position 1 to position 1098 of SEQ ID NO: 19. The maltose dependent degron nucleic
acid molecule may comprises position 1 to position 1098 of a nucleotide sequence of
SEQ ID NO: 21. The maltose dependent degron nucleic acid molecule may comprise a nucleotide
sequence from position 1 to position 1098 of SEQ ID NO: 23. The maltose dependent
degron nucleic acid molecule may comprise a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 25.
[0145] Some of the MBP mutant nucleic acids include additional linker sequences at their
C terminus compared to the wild-type MBP nucleic acid having SEQ ID NO: 1. Thus, these
MBP mutant nucleic acids can be used without the additional linker sequences at their
C terminal end. For example, the maltose dependent degron nucleic acid moleculeAcomprises
a nucleotide sequence from position 1 to position 1113 of SEQ ID NO: 11. The maltose
dependent degron nucleic acid molecule may comprise a nucleotide sequence from position
1 to position 1113 of SEQ ID NO: 15. The maltose dependent degron nucleic acid molecule
may comprises a nucleotide sequence from position 1 to position 1113 of SEQ ID NO:
17. The maltose dependent degron nucleic acid molecule may comprise a sequence from
position 1 to position 1113 of SEQ ID NO: 19. The maltose dependent degron nucleic
acid molecule may comprise position 1 to position 1113 of a nucleotide sequence of
SEQ ID NO: 21. The maltose dependent degron nucleic acid moleculecomprise-s a nucleotide
sequence from position 1 to position 1113 of SEQ ID NO: 23. The maltose dependent
degron nucleic acid molecule may comprise a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 25.
[0146] Mutations can be introduced to any of the sequences disclosed herein (
e.
g., wild-type MBP having SEQ ID NO: 1) by usual methods such as polymerase chain reaction
(PCR,
see Sambrook J et al., Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, Cold Spring Harbor Press,
New York (2001),
Ausubel F M et al., Current protocols in molecular biology, John Wiley and sons, New
York (1999),
Adams A et al., Methods in yeast genetics, Cold Spring Harbor Press, New York (1997)), or by random mutagenesis techniques, such as use of mutagenic agents (UltraViolet
rays or chemical agents like nitrosoguanidine (NTG) or ethylmethanesulfonate (EMS))
or use of PCR techniques (DNA shuffling or error-prone PCR). Any of the nucleic acid
sequences encoding the maltose dependent degrons may be optimized by genetic/protein
engineering techniques, such as directed evolution or rational mutagenesis, which
are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. The mutants generated using these
methods can be screened for their maltose binding stability using any assays described
herein or other assays deemed suitable by those skilled in the art. Thus, the scope
of the maltose dependent degron nucleic acids is not limited to specific sequences
disclosed herein, but further includes any MBP mutant nucleic acids, which, when encoded
into proteins, display maltose dependent stability.
[0147] Due to the inherent degeneracy of the genetic code, other polynucleotides which encode
substantially the same or functionally equivalent polypeptides described in Section
6.2.2.1 can also be used in the methods provided herein.
[0148] As will be understood by those of skill in the art, it can be advantageous to modify
a coding sequence to enhance its expression in a particular host. The genetic code
is redundant with 64 possible codons, but most organisms typically use a subset of
these codons. The codons that are utilized most often in a species are called optimal
codons, and those not utilized very often are classified as rare or low-usage codons.
Codons can be substituted to reflect the preferred codon usage of the host, in a process
sometimes called "codon optimization" or "controlling for species codon bias."
[0149] Optimized coding sequences containing codons preferred by a particular prokaryotic
or eukaryotic host (
Murray et al., 1989, Nucl Acids Res. 17: 477-508) can be prepared, for example, to increase the rate of translation or to produce
recombinant RNA transcripts having desirable properties. Translation stop codons can
also be modified to reflect host preference. For example, typical stop codons for
S.
cerevisiae and mammals are UAA and UGA, respectively. The typical stop codon for monocotyledonous
plants is UGA, whereas insects and
E. coli commonly use UAA as the stop codon (
Dalphin et al., 1996, Nucl Acids Res. 24: 216-8).
[0150] While degeneracy of the genetic code and optimizing coding sequences are discussed
in the context of maltose dependent degrons, the principle can be applied to any coding
sequences described in the present disclosure.
6.2.3. Fusion Proteins
[0151] Maltose dependent degrons may be fused to any protein of interest to control its
stability by manipulating maltose content in a culture medium. For example, proteins
of interest may include transcriptional regulators, enzymes, signaling proteins, transport
proteins, and the like. In some embodiments, a protein of interest is selected such
that the maltose dependent stability of the protein of interest can be utilized to
temporally change the level of desired target molecules by manipulating the maltose
content.
[0152] In certain embodiments, a transcriptional regulator may be selected as a protein
of interest to be fused with a maltose dependent degron. A transcriptional regulator
fused in frame to a maltose dependent degron can globally affect expression of a number
of different downstream target molecules. Transcriptional regulators that can be fused
with a maltose dependent degron include Gal80p or Gal4p. The maltose dependent stability
of a transcriptional regulator fused in frame to a maltose dependent degron can, in
turn, modulate the expression level or amount of target molecules downstream from
the transcriptional regulator. For example, the target molecules can include enzymes
encoded by biosynthetic genes in a biosynthetic pathway, metabolites, or heterologous
compounds produced by enzyme catalytic reactions.
[0153] Methods for generating fusion proteins and fusion DNA constructs are well known in
the art. Briefly, the methods include linking DNA encoding a gene of interest, or
portion thereof, to DNA encoding a maltose dependent degron in the same translational
reading frame. The encoded protein of interest may be linked in-frame to the amino-
or carboxyl-terminus of the maltose dependent degron. The coding sequence of a maltose
dependent degron may be linked directly to the coding sequence of a protein of interest.
Alternatively, a fusion protein may comprise a linker (
e.
g., a peptide linker) to connect a maltose dependent degron to a protein of interest.
6.2.4. Nucleic Acid Constructs and Expression Vectors
[0154] Nucleic acid constructs may comprise nucleic acids encoding a fusion protein comprising
a maltose dependent degron fused in frame to a protein of interest.
[0155] A promoter sequence operably linked to the fusion nucleic acid may be a maltose-responsive
promoter. By combining a maltose-responsive promoter together with a nucleic acid
construct encoding a fusion protein comprising a maltose dependent degron, the methods
can control both transcription of the fusion nucleic acid construct and post-translational
stability of the fusion protein encoded therefrom using a single ligand (e.g., maltose).
Examples of suitable maltose-responsive promoters are further described in detail
in Section 6.3 below.
[0156] Expression vectors or chromosomal integration constructs may comprise nucleic acids
encoding fusion proteins comprising proteins of interest and maltose dependent degrons.
The recombinant expression vector may be any vector (e.g., a plasmid, viral vector,
cosmid) that is suitable for expressing the fusion protein. The choice of vector will
depend on the compatibility of the vector with the yeast host cell into which the
vector is to be introduced and the end application of the host cells. The vector may
further include element(s) that permit integration of the vector into the yeast host
cell's genome. The vectors may be an autonomously replicating vector which exists
extrachromosomally in yeast host cells.
6.2.5. Use of a Maltose Dependent Degron in Methods for Modulating Protein Stability
and for Production of Non-Catabolic Compounds
[0157] In certain embodiments yeast host cells are genetically modified to comprise a maltose-responsive
promoter operably linked to nucleic acids encoding a fusion protein. These embodiments
are described further in detail in Sections 6.2.6 and 6.8. In these embodiments, the
saturating or optimal amount of maltose includes an amount that is capable of activating
the maltose-responsive promoter to drive the expression of the fusion gene at the
maximum level as well as to maintain the maximum post-translational stability of the
fusion protein encoded therefrom. Generally, to increase the activity of a maltose-responsive
promoter and stability of a fusion protein, maltose is present in a culture medium
in the amount of at least about 5 grams/liter, typically at least about 10 grams/liter,
more typically at least about 20 grams/liter in the culture medium. Generally, maltose
is present in a culture medium less than about 100 grams/liter, typically less than
about 60 grams/liter, more typically less than about 50 grams/liter.
[0158] In certain embodiments, a fusion protein according to an embodiment of the invention
is at least about 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 110%, 120%, 130%,
140%, 150%, 160%, 170%, 180%, 190%, 200%, 210%, 220%, 230%, 240%, 250%, 260%, 270%,
280%, 290%, 300%, or more stable when the maltose dependent degron within the fusion
protein is in contact with maltose compared to when it is not in contact with maltose.
The maltose dependent stability of fusion proteins can be determined using any assays
described herein or other assays deemed suitable by those skilled in the art.
[0159] For a given fusion protein, its maltose dependent stability can be modulated in a
number of different ways. In one embodiment, the concentration of maltose can be adjusted
in a culture medium. For example, if the maximum stability is desired for the fusion
protein, then the optimal amount of maltose determined from the titration curve may
be added to the culture medium. In some embodiments, maltose may be used at a concentration
higher than the optimal amount determined from the maltose titration curve to ensure
the maximum stability of the fusion protein can be achieved. In another example, if
a moderate level of stability is desired for the fusion protein, then a sub-optimal
amount of maltose (
e.
g., a half of the optimal amount) may be added to the culture medium.
[0160] The maltose dependent stability for a fusion protein may be modulated by selecting
a suitable maltose dependent degron as a fusion partner to a protein of interest.
At a given concentration of maltose or in the absence of maltose, different maltose
dependent degrons, when fused to a protein of interest, can confer different levels
of stability (e.g., measured in terms of fusion protein activity). For example, as
shown in FIG. 8B, the stability level of a fusion protein comprising GFP fused to
maltose dependent degron 4-H10 (e.g., H10) is lower than the stability level of a
fusion protein comprising GFP and maltose dependent degron L8_v4d, both in the presence
of maltose or in the absence of maltose. Where a higher stability level of a fusion
protein is desired, then a maltose dependent degron, such as L8_v4d, may be used as
a fusion partner. Where a lower stability level is desired for the fusion protein,
then maltose dependent degron 4-H10 may be used as a fusion partner. It may be desirable
to match the stability level of the fusion protein (when in contact with maltose)
to the endogenous stability level of protein of interest in yeast host cells. Here,
a suitable maltose dependent degron that imparts an appropriate level of maltose dependent
stability may be selected as a fusion partner for the protein of interest.
[0161] A maltose dependent degron may be selected as a fusion partner based on its degradation
rate profile. As shown in FIGS. 11A and 11B, some of maltose dependent degrons have
a faster degradation rate in cells in the absence of maltose compared to other maltose
dependent degrons. For example, maltose dependent degron 5F3, when fused to GFP, degrades
the fusion protein at a faster rate in comparison to maltose dependent degron H8.
If a slower degradation rate is desired for the protein of interest after removing
maltose from the culture medium, then a maltose dependent degron with a slower degradation
rate, such as H8, may be used as a fusion partner. On the other hand, if a faster
degradation rate is desired for the protein of interest after removing maltose, then
a maltose dependent degron with a faster degradation rate, such as 5F3, may be used
as a fusion partner for the protein of interest.
[0162] In certain embodiments, the protein of interest selected as a fusion partner to a
maltose dependent degron may be endogenously expressed in yeast host cells. Since
expression of the endogenous protein of interest may obscure the maltose dependent
stability of fusion proteins, in some embodiments, the endogenous gene encoding the
protein of interest (
e.g., Ga180p) may be functionally disrupted. For example, the endogenous gene may be deleted
from the host genome. In another example, a nucleic acid construct which comprises
nucleic acids encoding the fusion protein may be integrated at the site of the endogenous
gene encoding the protein of interest in the host genome. Any suitable methods known
in the art can be used to integrate the nucleic acids encoding the fusion protein
at a desired target site within the host genome. For example, the heterologous nucleic
acids encoding the fusion protein may be integrated into the selected gene following
cleavage by the nuclease, such as a zinc finger nuclease, a TAL-effector domain nuclease,
and/or a CRISPR/Cas nuclease system. These techniques are known and described in,
for example,
U.S. Patent No. 8,685,737; and
Horwitz et al. (2015), Cell Systems 1, 1-9.
[0163] A protein of interest is selected as a fusion partner to a maltose dependent degron
such that the maltose dependent stability of the protein of interest can be utilized
to cascade its effects onto one or more downstream target molecules by manipulating
the maltose content. Here, a fusion protein comprising a maltose dependent degron
may interact with one or more biomolecules (
e.g., other proteins or nucleic acids) in the yeast host cell to indirectly modulate
the expression level or amount of one or more target molecules. For example, indirect
regulation of the one or more enzymes of a biosynthetic pathway can be achieved by
fusing a maltose dependent degron to a single heterologous transcriptional regulator,
the expression of which, in turn, regulates expression of the one or more enzymes
(
e.g., all the members) of the biosynthetic pathway. Examples of indirect regulation are
illustrated by schematic diagrams shown in FIGS. 1A through 2B, which illustrates
regulation of a plurality of biosynthetic pathway genes as a GAL regulon.
[0164] The GAL regulon in yeast provides an exemplary regulatory network of activators,
repressors and promoters that can be utilized in combination with a maltose dependent
degron described herein. Yeast can utilize galactose as a carbon source via expression
of the GAL genes to import galactose and metabolize it inside the cell. The GAL genes
include structural genes GAL1, GAL2, GAL7 and GAL10 genes, which respectively encode
galactokinase, galactose permease, α-D-galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase, and
uridine diphosphogalactose-4-epimerase, and regulator genes GAL4, GAL80, and GAL3.
The GAL4 gene product is a positive regulator (
i.e., activator) and the GAL80 gene product is a negative regulator (
i.e., repressor) of the expression of the GAL1, GAL2, GAL7, and GAL10 genes. Gal4p activates
transcription by binding upstream activating sequences (UAS), such as those of the
GAL structural genes,
i.e., within the pGAL1, pGAL7 and pGAL10 promoters. In the absence of galactose, very little
expression of the structural proteins (Gal1p, Gal2p, Gal7p, and Ga110p) is typically
detected, due to Gal80p interacting with Gal4p and preventing Gal4p transcriptional
activity. In the presence of galactose, however, Gal3p interacts with Gal80p, relieving
Gal4p repression by Gal80p. This allows expression of genes downstream of Gal4p binding
sequences, such as the GAL1, GAL2, GAL7, and GAL10 gene products.
[0165] FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate an example where a fusion protein, interacting with one
or more biomolecules indirectly and negatively, modulates expression levels or amount
of one or more target molecules using the GAL regulon. In FIGS. 1A and 1B, transcriptional
regulator Gal80p is the protein of interest fused in frame to a maltose dependent
degron. Gal80p is a repressive co-factor (
i.e., transcriptional repressor) of transcriptional activator Gal4p (
e.g., a biomolecule), which binds to the pGal promoters, such as pGal1, pGal2, pGal7, or
pGAL10 (e.g., a biomolecule). As shown in FIG. 1A, a pGal promoter is operably linked
to one or more genes encoding enzymes in a biosynthetic pathway (
e.g., target molecules). In the presence of maltose in the culture medium as shown in
FIG. 1A, maltose binds to the maltose dependent degron and the fusion protein is stabilized
and expressed at a relatively high level. The Gal80p portion of the fusion protein
binds to and represses transcriptional activator Gal4p from activating the pGal promoter.
This, in turn, represses transcription of the biosynthetic pathway genes from the
pGal promoter, lowering the expression level of enzymes and other downstream target
molecules resulting from catalytic reactions of the enzymes (e.g., non-catabolic compounds).
Thus, in FIG. 1A, the fusion protein, when maltose is in contact with the maltose
dependent degron, negatively modulates the expression level or amount of target molecules
(e.g., enzymes, non-catabolic compounds, and the like).
[0166] In FIG. 1B, when maltose is removed from the culture medium, the fusion protein comprising
Gal80p in host cells is unstable and degraded at a faster rate, resulting in a lower
level of Gal80p expression in host cells compared to the stage shown in FIG. 1A. This
relieves repression of transcriptional activator Gal4p, which, in turn, can bind to
the pGal promoter and drive the expression of biosynthetic pathway genes. Therefore,
the levels of target molecules, such as enzymes, metabolites, heterologous compounds
catalyzed from enzyme reactions are increased in comparison to the stage shown in
FIG. 1A when maltose is present in the culture medium.
[0167] FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate a fusion protein interacting with one or more biomolecules
to indirectly and positively modulate the expression level or amount of one or more
target molecules. As shown in FIG. 2A, a host cell comprises transcriptional activator
Gal4p as the protein of interest which is fused to a maltose dependent degron. When
maltose is added to the culture medium as shown in FIG. 2A, the fusion protein is
stabilized with maltose in contact with the maltose dependent degron. This increases
the overall stability of the fusion protein comprising Gal4p, which, in turn, binds
to the pGal promoter (e.g., biomolecule) to drive the expression of biosynthetic pathway
genes (e.g., target molecules). The expression of biosynthetic pathway genes, in turn,
increases production of downstream target molecules, such as heterologous compounds
which are products of catalytic reactions of these enzymes. When it is desired to
reduce or eliminate the expression level or amount of one or more target molecules
produced in the host cells, the maltose content can be lowered or removed as shown
in FIG. 2B. In this example, expression of the endogenous
GAL80 gene may be functionally disrupted such that endogenous Gal80p, which is a repressor
of Gal4p, is not present to negatively regulate Gal4p activity.
6.2.6. Dual Transcriptional Control and Post-Translational Control with a Maltose-Responsive
Promoter and a Maltose Dependent Degron
[0168] In another aspect, provided herein are methods for providing both transcriptional
control of gene expression and post-translational stability control of gene product(s)
by manipulating maltose content. By combining a genetic element that can confer maltose
dependent post-translational stability to any gene it is fused in frame to with a
promoter that is induced by maltose, the methods provided herein can impart a very
robust and tight control over timing of expression and stability of proteins of interest
(and any downstream target molecules).
[0169] Thus, provided herein are methods of controlling timing of expression and stability
of a protein of interest in genetically modified yeast host cell using both maltose
dependent degrons and maltose-responsive promoters. In certain embodiments, a yeast
host cell comprises a maltose-responsive promoter operably linked to a heterologous
nucleic acid encoding a fusion protein comprising a protein of interest as defined
in the claims, fused in frame to a maltose dependent degron. In the presence of a
sufficient amount of maltose, the transcription of the heterologous nucleic acid is
activated (or increased) and the fusion protein encoded therefrom is stabilized. At
a suitable time point, the yeast host cells can be cultured in a culture medium in
which maltose is absent or in sufficiently low amounts such that the maltose-responsive
promoter activity and the fusion protein stability are reduced as compared to when
a culture medium comprises a sufficient amount of maltose. As a result, the heterologous
nucleic acid expression can be down-regulated in the absence (or in sufficiently low
amounts) of maltose. Therefore, in these embodiments, the same effector molecule (e.g.,
maltose) can be utilized to provide a simultaneous transcriptional control of a gene
of interest and post-translational control of the gene product. In the methods provided
herein, any suitable maltose-responsive promoters (either a natural or synthetic)
described in Section 6.3 or others known in the art can be used.
[0170] FIGS. 3A and 3B represent a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary dual transcriptional
control of gene expression and post-translational control of gene product(s) with
maltose and a maltose dependent degron. As shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B, nucleic acids
encoding a fusion protein comprising Gal80p and a maltose dependent degron are operably
linked to a maltose-responsive promoter (e.g., native promoter pMAL or synthetic maltose-responsive
promoter such as a pGMAL promoter). In the presence of maltose, as shown in FIG. 3A,
the pMAL or pGMAL promoter is activated (or its activity increased), and the fusion
DNA construct is transcribed to encode a fusion protein comprising Gal80p fused in
frame to a maltose dependent degron. In the presence of maltose, the fusion protein
is stable with maltose bound to the maltose dependent degron, thereby providing a
high level of fusion protein expression and stability. When maltose is removed from
the culture medium as shown in FIG. 3B, the maltose-responsive promoter is either
inactive or less active and any fusion protein encoded from the fusion DNA construct
becomes unstable and degraded at a faster rate.
[0171] The embodiment shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B is merely exemplary. The dual transcriptional
control and post-translational control using a maltose-responsive promoter and a maltose
dependent degron can be applied to any situation where a tight control of timing of
expression and stability of fusion proteins and/or downstream target molecules is
desired.
6.2.6.1 Use of a Maltose-Responsive Promoter in Combination with a Maltose Dependent
Degron and Maltose Content Manipulation as a Switch for Production of Non-Catabolic
Compounds
[0172] In particular embodiments, the methods provided herein utilize a maltose-responsive
promoter and a maltose dependent degron, in combination with manipulation of maltose
content in a fermentation medium to regulate, either directly or indirectly, the expression
and/or stability of heterologous enzymes capable of effecting non-catabolic compound
production in a genetically modified yeast host cell. In these embodiments, the nucleic
acids encoding one or more target molecules shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B may include heterologous
nucleic acids encoding biosynthetic pathway genes encoding enzymes (
e.
g., mevalonate pathway enzymes) capable of effecting production of non-catabolic compound
(e.g., isoprenoid compounds).
[0173] Maltose (or its analogs or derivatives) is inexpensive, non-toxic and stable. It
is an attractive molecule to use to control timing of gene expression and protein
stability, in particular, for large-scale manufacturing processes. In certain situations,
naturally occurring maltose-responsive promoters, when operably linked to a gene of
interest, do not always provide a tight transcriptional control required for extended
manufacturing processes. Thus, a maltose dependent degron can be utilized in combination
with a maltose-responsive promoter to concurrently control the timing of gene expression
and/or stability of proteins, for example, enzymes of a biosynthetic pathway for producing
non-catabolic compounds in genetically modified yeast host cells during fermentation.
A synthetic maltose-responsive promoters can also be used in combination with a maltose
dependent degron to concurrently control the timing of gene expression and/or stability
of proteins in the production of non-catabolic compounds.
[0174] In one embodiment, when fermentation of a yeast host cell is carried out in the presence
of maltose (e.g., at least about 0.1% maltose), non-catabolic compound production
is substantially reduced or turned off. When the amount of maltose in a fermentation
culture medium is reduced or eliminated, non-catabolic compound production is turned
on or increased. Thus, in some embodiments, the genetically modified yeast cells described
herein comprise heterologous biosynthetic pathway genes that are regulated by a maltose-responsive
promoter and a fusion protein comprising a protein of interest fused in frame to a
maltose dependent degron. Such a system enables the use of maltose content in a fermentation
medium as a switch for the production of non-catabolic compounds. Controlling the
timing of non-catabolic compound production to occur only when production is desired
redirects the carbon flux during the non-production phase into cell maintenance and
biomass. This more efficient use of carbon greatly reduces the metabolic burden on
the host cells, improves cell growth, increases the stability of the heterologous
genes, reduces strain degeneration, and contributes to better overall health and viability
of the cells.
[0175] In some embodiments, the fermentation method comprises a two-step process that utilizes
maltose as a switch to effect the "off' and "on" stages. In the first step (
i.e., the "build" stage, step (a)) wherein production of the compound is not desired, the
genetically modified yeast host cells are grown in a growth or "build" medium comprising
maltose in an amount sufficient to induce the expression of genes under the control
of a maltose-responsive promoter, and the induced gene products act to negatively
regulate production of the non-catabolic compound. After transcription of the fusion
DNA construct under the control of a maltose-responsive promoter, the stability of
the fusion proteins is post-translationally controlled. In the second step (
i.e., the "production" stage, step (b)), the fermentation is carried out in a culture
medium comprising a carbon source wherein maltose is absent or in sufficiently low
amounts such that the activity of a maltose-responsive promoter is reduced or inactive
and the fusion proteins are destabilized. As a result, the production of the heterologous
non-catabolic compound by the yeast host cells is turned on or increased.
6.3 Maltose-Responsive Promoters
[0176] Maltose-responsive promoters useful in the methods provided herein promote transcription
of an operably linked DNA coding sequence in the presence of maltose. In some embodiments,
unmodified maltose-responsive promoters derived from the regulatory network for the
maltose fermentation system of various organisms (e.g., pMAL promoters) can be utilized
to control transcription of the operably linked DNA coding sequence. In other embodiments,
synthetic maltose-responsive promoters can be utilized to control transcription of
the operably linked DNA coding sequence. As described in detail below, the synthetic
maltose-responsive promoters provided herein provide certain advantages in that they
can reduce the "leakiness" of gene expression under un-induced conditions (e.g., in
the absence of maltose), compared to unmodified maltose-responsive promoters.
6.3.1. pMAL Promoters
[0177] In certain embodiments, maltose-responsive promoters useful in the methods provided
herein promote transcription of an operably linked DNA coding sequence in the presence
of maltose. In certain embodiments, any maltose-responsive promoters known in the
art may be used to regulate expression of enzymes capable of effecting non-catabolic
compounds. In some embodiments, the maltose-responsive promoter is selected from the
group consisting of pMAL1 (SEQ ID NO: 12), pMAL2 (SEQ ID NO: 13), pMAL11 (SEQ ID NO:
14), pMAL12 (SEQ ID NO: 15), pMAL31 (SEQ ID NO: 16) and pMAL32 (SEQ ID NO: 17). In
certain embodiments, pMAL promoters include modified versions of these promoters that
have increased or decreased promoter activity compared to unmodified pMAL promoters.
An exemplary modified pMAL promoter includes pMAL32_v1 (SEQ ID NO: 78).
[0178] Other useful maltose-responsive promoters useful in the methods provided herein can
be derived from the regulatory network for the maltose fermentation system of
S. cerevisiae. Maltose fermentation in
Saccharomyces species requires the presence of at least one of five unlinked MAL loci: MAL1, MAL2,
MAL3, MAL4, and MAL6. Each of these loci consists of a complex of genes involved in
maltose metabolism; the complex includes a maltose permease (
MALx1, where x stands for one of the five loci), the maltase
(MALx2) responsible for intracellular hydrolysis of the sugar, and a positive regulatory
protein (
MALx3) that induces the transcription of the two previous genes in the presence of maltose.
See, e.g., Cheng & Michels, J. Bacteriol. 173: 1817-1820 (1991);
Dubin et al., J. Bacteriol. 164:605-610 (1985);
Chang et al., Curr. Genet. 14:201-209 (1988);
Higgins et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 680-685 (1999). At the MAL6 locus, the activator is encoded by the MAL63 gene. Mal63p is a DNA-binding
transcriptional activator required for the maltose-dependent induction of the MAL
structural genes encoding maltose permease and maltase.
[0179] A MAL activator intermediate complex is stable in the absence of inducer maltose,
but addition of maltose causes the release of inducible MAL activator from the complex
in an active form capable of DNA binding and transcription activation.
See, e.g., Ran, F. and Michels., C.A., J. Biol. Chem. 285(18):13850-13862 (2010). Binding sites of the MAL63 protein in the divergently transcribed MAL61-62 promoter
have been characterized as an upstream activating sequence for the MAL genes.
See, e.g., Ni, B. and Needleman, R., "Identification of the Upstream Activating Sequence of MAL
and the Binding Sites for the MAL63 Activator of Saccharomyces cerevisiae," Molecular
and Cellular Biology 10(7):3797-3800 (1990).
[0180] At the MAL1 locus, MAL2 locus, MAL3 locus, and MAL4 locus, the activators are encoded
by the MAL13 gene, MAL23 gene, MAL33 gene, and MAL43 gene, respectively.
Vidgren et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71(12): 7864-7857 (2005). Mal13p, Mal23p, Mal33p, and Mal43p are DNA binding transcriptional activators encoded
by those genes required for the maltose-dependent induction of the MAL structural
genes.
[0181] Other maltose-responsive promoters useful in the methods provided herein can be derived
from the regulatory network for the maltose/maltodextrin metabolism system of
E. coli. The malT nucleic acid encodes MalT, a positive regulator of four maltose-responsive
promoters (P
PQ, P
EFG, P
KBM, and P
S). The combination of malT and a mal promoter creates a tightly regulated expression
system that has been shown to work as a strong promoter induced by the addition of
maltose.
See, e.g., Schleif, "Two Positively Regulated Systems, ara and mal," pp. 1300-1309 in Escherichia
coli and Salmonella Cellular and Molecular Biology, Second Edition, Neidhardt et al.,
eds., ASM Press, Washington, D.C., 1996; and
Boos, W. and Shuman, H., "Maltose/Maltodextrin System of Escherichia coli: Transport,
Metabolism and Regulation," Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 62(1):204-229
(1998)).
6.3.2. Synthetic Maltose-Responsive Promoters
[0183] In certain embodiments, useful maltose-responsive promoters comprise synthetic maltose-responsive
promoters. In certain situations, a gene operably linked to a native, unmodified maltose-responsive
promoter (
e.g., pMAL32) may express the gene product at a low level even in the absence of maltose.
In addition, expression of a gene operably linked to a native maltose-responsive promoter
can be up-regulated when yeast cells are cultured under a condition that promotes
a low cell growth rate in the absence of maltose. See Example 7.14 and FIGS. 14A and
14B.
[0184] Thus, provided herein are synthetic maltose-responsive promoters which can reduce
the leaky expression of a gene product in the absence or in sufficiently low amounts
of maltose in comparison to the native, un-modified maltose-responsive promoters.
In certain embodiments, the synthetic maltose-responsive promoters are constructed
using galactose-inducible pGAL promoters by removing at least one or all of Gal4p
binding sites and inserting one or more binding sites for the Mal operon activator
(
i.e., Mal transcriptional activator). For example, all 4 Gal4p binding sites may be removed
from pGAL1 promoter, and various copy numbers of binding sites for the Mal operon
activator (e.g., binding sites for Malx3p as shown in FIG. 13, which includes, for
example, Mal13p, Mal23p, Mal33p, Mal43p, and Mal63p) may be inserted into the modified
pGAL1 promoter. In certain embodiments, a single binding site for the Mal transcriptional
activator may be inserted into the modified pGAL promoters. In certain embodiments,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more binding sites for the Mal transcriptional activator
may be inserted into the modified pGAL promoters. These modified pGAL promoters with
Gal4p binding sites removed and binding sites for the Mal transcriptional activator
inserted are herein referred to as pGMAL promoters.
[0185] In certain embodiments, pGAL1_GAL10 promoter (SEQ ID NO: 82) may be used as a background
promoter to produce pGMAL promoters. In some embodiments, pGAL1 promoter is derived
from the divergent GAL1_GAL10 promoter (
Johnston & Davis, Mol. Cell Biol. 4(8): 1440-1448 (1984)). The pGAL1_GAL10 promoter includes four Gal4p binding sites (at position 216 to
232, at position 235 to 251, at position 253 to 269, and at position 317 and 333 of
SEQ ID NO: 82). All of these Gal4p binding sites can be removed from the pGAL1_GAL10
promoter, and one or more Mal transcriptional activator binding sites can be added
to generate additional synthetic maltose-responsive promoters. These synthetic promoters
originating from the pGAL1_GAL10 promoter include, for example, pGMAL_v5 (SEQ ID NO:
35), pGMAL_v6 (SEQ ID NO: 36), pGMAL_v7 (SEQ ID NO: 37), pGMAL_v9 (SEQ ID NO: 38),
pGMAL_v10 (SEQ ID NO: 39), pGMAL_v11 (SEQ ID NO: 40), pGMAL_v12 (SEQ ID NO: 41), pGMAL_v13
(SEQ ID NO: 42), pGMAL_v14 (SEQ ID NO: 43), pGMAL_v15 (SEQ ID NO: 44), pGMAL_v16 (SEQ
ID NO: 45), pGMAL_v17 (SEQ ID NO: 46), and pGMAL_v18 (SEQ ID NO: 47).
[0186] In certain embodiments, pGAL2 promoter (SEQ ID NO: 83) may be used as a background
promoter to produce pGMAL promoters. pGAL2 promoter includes four Gal4p binding sites
and two overlapping Gal4p binding sites (at position 230 to 246, at position 344 to
360, at position 363 to 379, at position 427 to 443, and position 432 to 448 of SEQ
ID NO: 83). At least one or all of these Gal4p binding sites may be removed from the
pGAL2 promoter, and one or more Mal transcriptional activator binding sites may be
added to generate additional synthetic maltose-responsive promoters. These synthetic
promoters originating from the pGAL2 promoter include, for example, pG2MAL_v1 (SEQ
ID NO: 48), pG2MAL_v2 (SEQ ID NO: 49), pG2MAL_v3 (SEQ ID NO: 50), pG2MAL_v5 (SEQ ID
NO: 51), pG2MAL_v6 (SEQ ID NO: 52), pG2MAL_v7 (SEQ ID NO: 53), pG2MAL_v8 (SEQ ID NO:
54), pG2MAL_v9 (SEQ ID NO: 55), and pG2MAL_v10 (SEQ ID NO: 56).
[0187] In certain embodiments, pGAL7 promoter (SEQ ID NO: 79) may be used as a background
promoter to produce pGMAL promoters. The pGAL7 promoter includes two Gal4p binding
sites (at position 471 to 487 and at position 558 to 574 of SEQ ID NO: 79). At least
one or all of these Gal4p binding sites may be removed from pGAL7 promoter, and one
or more Mal transcriptional activator binding sites may be added to generate additional
synthetic maltose-responsive promoters. These synthetic promoters originating from
the pGAL7 promoter include, for example, pG7MAL_v2 (SEQ ID NO: 57), pG7MAL_v4 (SEQ
ID NO: 58), pG7MAL_v6 (SEQ ID NO: 59), pG7MAL_v8 (SEQ ID NO: 60), and pG7MAL_v9 (SEQ
ID NO: 61).
[0188] In certain embodiments, a hybrid promoter can be constructed by combining sequences
from two or more of pGAL1, pGAL2, and pGAL7. From the hybrid promoters, at least one
or all of Gal4p binding sites may be removed, and one or more MAL transcriptional
activator binding sites may be added to generate additional synthetic maltose-responsive
promoters. These synthetic promoters originating from the hybrid promoters include,
for example, pG172_MAL_v13 (SEQ ID NO: 62), pG271_MAL_v12 (SEQ ID NO: 63), pG721_MAL_v11
(SEQ ID NO: 64), and pG712_MAL_v14 (SEQ ID NO: 65).
[0189] In certain embodiments, pGCY1, pGAL80, or other pGAL promoters may be used as background
promoters to produce pGMAL promoters. These promoter sequences and the Gal4p binding
sites are well-known.
See, e.g., Saccharomyces genome database (http://www.yeastgenome.org/). The nucleotide sequences
for the Gal4p binding sites are also well-known, and can be removed and substituted
with MAL transcriptional activator binding sites.
[0190] In certain embodiments, a synthetic promoter may comprise a portion of pGMAL promoter
sequences disclosed herein, which portion retains the promoter function, instead of
the entire sequences associated with SEQ ID numbers. In some embodiments, some of
the nucleotide bases in the middle or at the end of the disclosed promoter sequences
may not be necessary for their promoter function. Thus, in certain embodiments, synthetic
maltose-responsive promoters may generally include at least about 200, 250, 300, 350,
400, 450, 475, 500, 525, 550, 575, 600, 625, 650 nucleotides or more of specific sequences
disclosed herein which retain the promoter function. For example, the portions of
these sequences may include transcriptional activator and other transcriptional regulator
binding sites to retain the promoter function. In certain embodiments, the synthetic
maltose-responsive promoter sequences disclosed herein may be further modified by,
for example, adding or removing the number of binding sites for the MAL transcriptional
activator. In other embodiments, the synthetic maltose-responsive promoter sequences
disclosed herein may further comprise additional sequences, such as a linker sequence
at the N' terminal and/or C' terminal of a promoter sequence. For example, a linker
sequence of 24 or 36 nucleotides may be added to the pGMAL sequences provided herein
to provide an adequate space between the promoter sequence and the coding sequence.
[0191] In certain embodiments, synthetic promoters or naturally derived promoters do not
need to have the exact sequences disclosed herein to retain their promoter function
in genetically modified yeast host cells. While many promoter sequences are highly
conserved, there are variations in sequences among strains or species even for the
same promoter. Thus, in certain embodiments, provided herein are synthetic or naturally
derived promoter which have at least about 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%,
98%, or 99% sequence identity to promoter sequences disclosed herein.
[0192] Furthermore, as shown in FIGS. 14A and 14B, each of these pGMAL promoters has different
promoter strengths and characteristics. For example, pGMAL_v15, when induced with
maltose, is comparable in strength as native promoter pMAL32. In another example,
pGMAL_v12 is a stronger promoter than pGMAL_v15 and is comparable in strength to promoter
pTDH3. Depending on the promoter strength desired for gene expression, any suitable
pGMAL promoter may be selected for the compositions and methods provided herein.
[0193] In certain embodiments, promoters other than pGAL promoters may be used as background
promoters to generate synthetic maltose-responsive promoters. The selection of a background
promoter may depend on the selection of a host cell, an expression level desired,
and the like. Thus, in some embodiment, for any selected background promoter, its
endogenous transcriptional activator binding sites may be removed, and the binding
sites for the MAL transcriptional activator can be inserted. For example, the MAL
transcriptional activator binding site sequences from bidirectional promoter pMAL12
can be incorporated into a background promoter (with native transcriptional activator
binding sites removed) to generate synthetic maltose-responsive promoters. Exemplary
sequences of the four MAL transcriptional activator binding sites from pMAL12 include
the following 11 or 12 base pair nucleotide sequences and their reverse complements:
pMAL12_1: GATAATATTTC (SEQ ID NO: 97);
pMAL12_2: GAAAATTTCGC (SEQ ID NO: 98);
pMAL12_3: GTTAAAGTTTAC (SEQ ID NO: 99);
pMAL12_4: GAAATTTTCGC (SEQ ID NO: 100);
pMAL12_1r: GAAATATTATC (SEQ ID NO: 101);
pMAL12_2r: GCGAAATTTTC (SEQ ID NO: 102);
pMAL12_3r: GTAAACTTTAAC (SEQ ID NO: 103); and
pMAL12_4r: GCGAAAATTTC (SEQ ID NO: 104).
[0194] In certain embodiments, the MAL transcriptional activator binding site sequences
from bidirectional promoter pMAL32 can be incorporated into a background promoter
(with native transcriptional activator binding sites removed) to generate synthetic
maltose-responsive promoters. Exemplary sequences of the MAL transcriptional activator
binding sites from pMAL32 include the following 11 or 12 base pair nucleotide sequences
and their reverse complements:
pMAL32_1: TATAATATTTC (SEQ ID NO: 105);
pMAL32_2: GAAAATTTCGC (same as pMAL12 _2; SEQ ID NO: 98);
pMAL32_3: GTTTAAGTTTAC (SEQ ID NO: 106);
pMAL32_4: GAAGTTTTCGC (SEQ ID NO: 107);
pMAL32_1r: GAAATATTATA (SEQ ID NO: 108);
pMAL32_2r: GCGAAATTTTC (same as 2nd in pMAL12_2r; SEQ ID NO: 102);
pMAL32_3r: GTAAACTTAAAC (SEQ ID NO: 109); and
pMAL32_4r: GCGAAAACTTC (SEQ ID NO: 110).
[0195] These short 11 or 12 base pair fragments, representing MAL transcriptional activator
binding sites, share at least about 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, or
90% sequence identity to one another. Furthermore, as shown in FIG. 13B, these short
11 or 12 base pair fragments, representing MAL transcriptional activator binding sites,
comprise one of the following sequence motifs:
DAADDTTTH, DWADDTTTH, DAADDTTWH, or DWADDTTWH.
[0196] The symbols of the sequence motifs have the following meanings:
A = nucleotide adenine;
T = nucleotide thymine;
W = nucleotide A (adenine) or T (thymine);
D = nucleotide G (guanine) or A (adenine) or T (thymine); and
H = nucleotide A (adenine) or C (cytosine) or T (thymine).
[0197] Thus, in some embodiments, a synthetic maltose-responsive promoter comprises a sequence
motif selected from the group consisting of DAADDTTTH, DWADDTTTH, DAADDTTWH, DWADDTTWH,
and a combination thereof. In some embodiments, any one or combination of these sequence
motifs are incorporated into a background promoter with its native transcriptional
activator binding sites removed.
[0198] In some embodiments, a synthetic maltose-responsive promoter comprises a core promoter,
and one or more MAL transcriptional activator binding sites. As used herein, the core
promoter refers to the minimal portion of the promoter required to properly initiate
transcription of a selected DNA sequence to which it is operably linked. The term
"core promoter" refers to a promoter element providing basal transcription. Optionally
it comprises a TATA box or a TATA-like box and complexes with an RNA polymerase. In
some embodiments, the synthetic maltose-responsive promoter comprises one or more
copies of MAL transcriptional activator binding sites described herein. In some embodiments,
the MAL transcriptional activator binding sites comprise a sequence motif selected
from the group consisting of DAADDTTTH, DWADDTTTH, DAADDTTWH, DWADDTTWH, and a combination
thereof.
[0199] In some embodiments, the promoter activity of a synthetic maltose-responsive promoter
during an un-induced condition (
e.g., a yeast host cell being cultured in a culture medium without maltose) is less than
the promoter activity of a native maltose-responsive promoter from which the one or
more MAL transcriptional activator binding sites are derived (e.g., pMAL31, pMAL11,
pMAL12, and the like). For example, when a host cell comprising a reporter gene (e.g.,
GFP) operably linked to a synthetic maltose-responsive promoter is cultured in a culture
medium lacking maltose, the reporter gene expression under the synthetic maltose-responsive
promoter under the un-induced state is at least about 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%,
70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 150%, 200%, 250%, 300% or more, less as compared to a reporter
gene operably linked to a native maltose-responsive promoter from which the one or
more MAL transcriptional activator binding sites are derived.
[0200] The MAL transcriptional activator binding site sequences described herein are merely
exemplary, and the MAL transcriptional activator binding sites from other maltose-responsive
promoters may be inserted into synthetic maltose-responsive promoters. In some embodiments,
synthetic promoters may comprise one or any combination of the MAL transcriptional
activator binding sites inserted therein. In some embodiments, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9, 10, or more binding sites for the MAL transcriptional activator may be inserted
into the synthetic promoters. In general, the higher copy number of MAL transcriptional
activator binding sites in synthetic promoters increases the promoter strengths.
6.3.3. Use of Maltose-Responsive Promoters in Expression of Heterologous Nucleic Acids
and in Production of Non-Catabolic Compounds
[0201] While maltose-responsive promoters described herein can be used together with maltose
dependent degrons as described in Section 6.2.6 above, in some embodiments, maltose-responsive
promoters can be used without maltose dependent degrons to promote transcription of
any operably linked gene in the presence of maltose. Depending on the level of gene
products desired, a suitable maltose-responsive promoter with an appropriate promoter
strength may be selected in the compositions and methods provided herein.
[0202] Thus, provided herein are heterologous nucleic acids encoding a gene of interest
operably linked to a maltose-responsive promoter or a portion thereof that retains
the promoter function. In certain embodiments, a maltose-responsive promoter is a
synthetic maltose-responsive promoter, which is generated from a background promoter
(which is not responsive to maltose) with its native transcriptional activator binding
sites replaced with MAL transcriptional activator binding sites. In certain embodiments,
a synthetic maltose-responsive promoter is a pGMAL promoter. In all embodiments, the
gene of interest operably linked to a synthetic maltose-responsive promoter includes
transcriptional regulators. Per The transcriptional regulators may include Gal80p
or Gal4p. The application of synthetic maltose-responsive promoters provided herein
is not limited to a fermentation environment, and may be used as an inducible promoter
to regulate any gene expression.
[0203] In all embodiments, expression of the one or more enzymes of an enzymatic pathway
is indirectly regulated by the maltose-responsive promoter. For example, indirect
regulation of the one or more enzymes of the pathway can be achieved by operably linking
a maltose-responsive promoter to a single heterologous transcriptional regulator,
the expression of which, in turn, directly regulates expression of the one or more
enzymes (e.g., all the members) of the pathway. The GAL regulon in yeast, described
in detail above, provides an exemplary regulatory network of activators, repressors
and promoters that can be utilized in combination with a maltose-responsive promoter
described herein.
[0204] In some embodiments, one or more GAL4-activated promoters,
e.g., pGAL1, pGAL7, pGAL10, pGCY1 and/or pGAL80 are operably linked to, and are used
to drive expression of, the one or more enzymes of an enzymatic pathway for making
the heterologous non-catabolic compound. In some embodiments, the yeast host cell
further comprises a nucleic acid encoding GAL4. In some embodiments, the GAL4 gene
product is constitutively expressed,
i.e. is under the control of a constitutive promoter. In some embodiments, the yeast host
cell further comprises a nucleic acid encoding GAL80 under the control of a maltose-responsive
promoter described herein, and expression of the GAL80 gene product is induced in
the presence of maltose. Gal80p, in turn, interacts with Gal4p and prevents Gal4p
transcriptional activity. When maltose is removed or sufficiently depleted so that
GAL80 expression is no longer induced, Gal4p is relieved of repression by Gal80p,
and is free to activate expression of the one or more enzymes of an enzymatic pathway
for making the heterologous non-catabolic compound.
[0205] In the embodiment described above, if desired, one or more growth-promoting genes
can also be placed under the control of a maltose-responsive promoter to further take
advantage of a maltose switch to separate cell growth phase from production phase
of the heterologous non-catabolic compound. In certain embodiments, one or more genes,
which promote production of the heterologous non-catabolic compound, can be operably
linked to GAL4-activated promoters such that they will be expressed together with
one or more enzymes of an enzymatic pathway for making the heterologous non-catabolic
compound.
[0206] In other embodiments, the native pGAL4 promoter is replaced by a heterologous nucleic
acid comprising a maltose-responsive promoter. In some embodiments, the yeast host
cell comprises a heterologous nucleic acid comprising a nucleic acid that encodes
Gal4p, operably linked to a heterologous nucleic acid comprising maltose-responsive
promoter. In one embodiment, a maltose-responsive promoter is operably linked to a
coding sequence for Gal4p, and the coding sequences of the one or more enzymes (
e.g., all the members) of the enzymatic pathway for making the heterologous non-catabolic
compound are operably linked to GAL4-responsive promoters, such that expression of
the one or more enzymes are induced in the presence of maltose. In some embodiments,
the GAL4-responsive promoter is pGAL1. In some embodiments, the GAL4-responsive promoter
is pGAL7. In some embodiments, the GAL4-responsive promoter is pGAL10. In some embodiments,
the GAL4-responsive promoter is pGCY1. In some embodiments, the GAL4-responsive promoter
is pGAL80.
[0208] In the methods described herein, any suitable maltose-responsive promoter, either
synthetic or native promoters, can be used to express any gene of interest and/or
for the production of non-catabolic compounds.
6.4 Repressing and Non-repressing Amounts of Maltose
[0209] Maltose is a disaccharide sugar formed from 2 glucose molecules, as shown below.
It has the chemical formula, C
12H
22O
11, and a molecular weight of 343 g/mol.

[0210] In addition or alternative to maltose (shown above and isomers thereof), other substrates
which function similarly to maltose in the present methods may be used to stabilize
maltose dependent degrons and/or to induce a maltose-responsive promoter. For example,
substrates that specifically bind to MBP, MBP mutants, and maltose dependent degrons
and that are suitable as their ligands can be selected from the group consisting of
maltose, maltodextrins, macromolecular alpha (1 ->4) linked glucans (
e.g., maltotriose), or a combination thereof. Suitable analogs or derivatives of these
substrates (
i.e., maltose, maltodextrins, and macromolecular alpha (1-74) linked glucans) may also
be used to stabilize maltose dependent degrons (or to induce maltose-responsive promoter).
In the present invention, the terms "analog" or "derivative" are used interchangeably
to mean a chemical substance that is related structurally and functionally to another
substance, in this instance, maintaining the ability to specifically bind to maltose
binding proteins and maltose dependent degrons, to stabilize maltose dependent degrons,
and/or to induce a maltose-responsive promoter. Examples of maltose analogs and derivatives
include maltose derivatives, such as methyl-α-maltoside and 5-thiomaltose. Additional
examples of maltose analogs and derivatives include maltoheptaose (β-cyclodextrin),
maltitol, maltohexaose, maltotetraitol, maltohexaitol, maltohexanoic acid, maltotetraose,
and the like. These and other substrates that specifically bind to MBP, MBP mutants,
and maltose dependent degrons, that stabilize maltose dependent degrons, and/or that
induce a maltose-responsive promoter are collectively referred to as a "maltose based
inducer."
[0211] While maltose is described as a ligand for MBP mutants and maltose dependent degrons
and as an inducer for maltose-responsive promoters throughout the present disclosure,
any suitable maltose based inducer (
e.g., analogs or derivatives of maltose, maltodextrins, and macromolecular alpha (1→4)
linked glucans) may be used instead of maltose in certain embodiments. Thus, any disclosure
related to maltose described herein also apply to other maltose based inducers. Similarly,
any discussions related to repressing and non-repressing amounts of maltose apply
to other maltose based inducers.
[0212] In some embodiments, an "inducing" amount of maltose is an amount of maltose sufficient
to induce a desired high expression level of a coding sequence operably linked to
a maltose-responsive promoter and/or retain stability of a maltose dependent degron
and/or fusion protein. In certain embodiments, an "inducing" amount of maltose is
a sufficient amount of maltose that allows a maltose dependent degron to be "in contact"
with maltose or that a maltose dependent degron (or a fusion protein thereof) is stabilized.
In certain embodiments, an "inducing" amount of maltose is an amount of maltose which
activates a maltose-responsive promoter or increases the activity of a maltose-responsive
promoter compared to the promoter activity in the absence of maltose. In some embodiments,
a "non-inducing" amount of maltose is an amount below which expression of a coding
sequence operably linked to a maltose-responsive promoter is not induced or reduced
compared to when an "inducing" amount of maltose is present in a culture medium. In
certain embodiments, a "non-inducing" amount of maltose is an amount of maltose which
reduces the activity of a maltose-responsive promoter and/or reduces stability of
a maltose dependent degron (and a fusion protein thereof) in comparison to when an
"inducing" amount of maltose is present in a culture medium.
[0213] The "inducing" amount and "non-inducing" amount of maltose for use in the methods
provided herein can be determined for any genetically modified yeast host cell capable
of producing a heterologous non-catabolic compound as described above. A non-inducing
amount of maltose can be determined by performing a gene expression curve in the presence
of increasing amounts of maltose in the culture medium to be used in the fermentation
process,
i.e., a maltose titration. For example, a population of genetically modified yeast host
cells may be divided into a plurality of subpopulations and cultured in parallel,
wherein each subpopulation is grown in culture media comprising a different,
e.g., increasing amount of maltose (including no maltose), and reporter gene expression
or non-catabolic compound production is assayed after a defined period of time.
[0214] In some embodiments, where the maltose-responsive promoter (and/or a maltose dependent
degron) is wired to effect an "off' state of non-catabolic compound production in
the presence of maltose, the maltose titration comprises at least two concentrations
of maltose whereby non-catabolic compound production of the yeast host cells is plateaued
at a minimum, that is, where no further decrease in production of the compound is
observed with an increase in maltose concentration. In some embodiments, the "repressing"
amount of maltose is at least the minimum amount of maltose at which non-catabolic
compound production of the yeast host cells is plateaued at its minimum (e.g., at
about zero). This amount can also be referred to as a "saturating" or "optimal" amount
of maltose for repression of non-catabolic compound production for the particular
yeast host cell. In some such embodiments, the "repressing" amount of maltose can
include any concentration of maltose at which non-catabolic compound production has
been decreased relative to an "on" state, even where there is a low level of compound
production. In some embodiments, the "non-repressing" amount of maltose, in this configuration
of the switch, is any amount of maltose below the "repressing" amount of maltose.
In some embodiments, the non-repressing amount of maltose is at least about 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100 or greater than about 100
times less than the repressing amount of maltose. In a particular embodiment, the
non-repressing amount of maltose is less than about 0.8% (w/v) of the culture medium.
In another particular embodiment, the non-repressing amount of maltose is about 0%
(w/v) of the culture medium.
[0215] In a specific embodiment, the repressing amount of maltose is the optimal or saturating
amount for a given yeast host cell, as described above, and the non-repressing amount
is no maltose. In another specific embodiment, the repressing amount of maltose is
at least about 0.25%, and the non-repressing amount is no maltose. In another specific
embodiment, the repressing amount of maltose is an amount of maltose from about 0.25%
to 3%, and the non-repressing amount is no maltose. In another specific embodiment,
the repressing amount of maltose is in an amount of maltose from about 0.5% to 1%,
and the non-repressing amount is no maltose. In another specific embodiment, the repressing
amount of maltose is at least about 3%, and the limiting amount is no maltose.
[0216] In some embodiments where the maltose-responsive promoter (and/or a maltose dependent
degron) is wired to effect an "off' state of non-catabolic compound production in
the presence of maltose, the repressing amount of maltose in the culture medium is
at least about 0.1% (weight maltose per volume of culture medium). In some embodiments,
the repressing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least about 0.25%. In
some embodiments, the repressing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least
about 0.5%. In some embodiments, the repressing amount of maltose in the culture medium
is at least about 0.75%. In some embodiments, the repressing amount of maltose in
the culture medium is at least about 1.0%. In some embodiments, the repressing amount
of maltose in the culture medium is at least about 1.25%. In some embodiments, the
repressing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least about 1.5%. In some
embodiments, the repressing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least about
1.75%. In some embodiments, the repressing amount of maltose in the culture medium
is at least about 2.0%. In some embodiments, the repressing amount of maltose in the
culture medium is at least about 2.25%. In some embodiments, the repressing amount
of maltose in the culture medium is at least about 2.5%. In some embodiments, the
repressing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least about 2.75%. In some
embodiments, the repressing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least about
3.0%. In some embodiments, the repressing amount of maltose in the culture medium
is at least about 3.25%. In some embodiments, the repressing amount of maltose in
the culture medium is at least about 3.5%. In some embodiments, the repressing amount
of maltose in the culture medium is at least about 3.75%. In some embodiments, the
repressing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least about 4.0%. In some
embodiments, the repressing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least about
4.25%. In some embodiments, the repressing amount of maltose in the culture medium
is at least about 4.5%. In some embodiments, the repressing amount of maltose in the
culture medium is at least about 4.75%. In some embodiments, the repressing amount
of maltose in the culture medium is at least about 5.0%. In some embodiments, the
repressing amount of maltose in the culture medium is between about 5% and 50%. In
some embodiments, the repressing amount of maltose in the culture medium is about
5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40% 45% or about 50%.
[0217] In some embodiments, the non-repressing amount of maltose is an amount that is at
least about 2-fold, 10-fold, 100-fold, 1000-fold, 10,000-fold or about 100,000-fold
less than a repressing amount of maltose as determined according to the methods described
above. In some embodiments, the non-repressing amount of maltose is an amount that
is at least about 2-fold, 10-fold, 100-fold, 1000-fold, 10,000-fold or 100,000-fold
less than the saturating amount of maltose as determined according to the methods
described above. In some embodiments, the non-repressing amount of maltose is an amount
that is less than about 50%, less than about 20%, less than about 10%, less than about
1%, less than about 0.5%, less than about 0.2%, less than about 0.1%, less than about
0.01%, or less than about 0.001% of a repressing amount of maltose as determined according
to the methods described above. In some embodiments, the non-repressing amount of
maltose is an amount that is less than about 50%, less than about 20%, less than about
10%, less than about 1%, less than about 0. 1%, less than about 0.01%, or less than
about 0.001% of the saturating amount of maltose as determined according to the methods
described above. In a specific embodiment, the non-repressing amount of maltose is
about 0 mg/L (0%),
i.e., no maltose. Thus, in this specific embodiment, the yeast host cells are grown during
the production stage in a cell culture medium that comprises no external source of
maltose.
[0218] In some embodiments, where the maltose-responsive promoter (and/or a maltose dependent
degron) is wired to effect an "on" state of non-catabolic compound production in the
presence of maltose, the maltose titration comprises at least two concentrations of
maltose whereby non-catabolic compound production of the yeast host cells is plateaued
at a maximum, that is, where no further increase in production of the compound is
observed with an increase in maltose concentration. In some embodiments, the "non-repressing"
amount of maltose is at least the minimum amount of maltose at which non-catabolic
compound production of the yeast host cells is plateaued at its maximum. This amount
can also be referred to as a "saturating" or "optimal" amount of maltose for induction
of non-catabolic compound production for the particular host cell, in this configuration
of the switch. In some such embodiments, the "inducing" amount or "non-repressing"
amount of maltose can include any concentration of maltose at which non-catabolic
compound production has been increased relative to an "off' state, even where compound
production is suboptimal. In some embodiments, the "non-inducing" or "repressing"
amount of maltose, in this configuration of the switch, is any amount of maltose below
the "inducing" or "non-repressing" amount of maltose. In some embodiments, the non-inducing
amount or repressing of maltose is at least about 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20,
30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100 or greater than 100 times less than the inducing amount
or the non-repressing amount of maltose. In a particular embodiment, the non-inducing
amount of maltose is less than about 0.8% (w/v) of the culture medium. In another
particular embodiment, the non-inducing amount of maltose is about 0% (w/v) of the
culture medium.
[0219] In a specific embodiment, the inducing amount of maltose is the optimal or saturating
amount for a given yeast host cell, as described above, and the non-inducing amount
is no maltose. In another specific embodiment, the inducing amount of maltose is at
least about 0.25%, and the non-inducing amount is no maltose. In another specific
embodiment, the inducing amount of maltose is an amount of maltose from about 0.25%
to 3%, and the non-inducing amount is no maltose. In another specific embodiment,
the inducing amount of maltose is an amount of maltose from about 0.5% to 1%, and
the non-inducing amount is no maltose. In another specific embodiment, the inducing
amount of maltose is at least about 3%, and the limiting amount is no maltose.
[0220] In some embodiments where the maltose-responsive promoter (and/or a maltose dependent
degron) is wired to effect an "on" state of non-catabolic compound production in the
presence of maltose, the inducing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least
about 0.1% (weight maltose per volume of culture medium). In some embodiments, the
inducing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least about 0.25%. In some
embodiments, the inducing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least about
0.5%. In some embodiments, the inducing amount of maltose in the culture medium is
at least about 0.75%. In some embodiments, the inducing amount of maltose in the culture
medium is at least about 1.0%. In some embodiments, the inducing amount of maltose
in the culture medium is at least about 1.25%. In some embodiments, the inducing amount
of maltose in the culture medium is at least about 1.5%. In some embodiments, the
inducing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least about 1.75%. In some
embodiments, the inducing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least about
2.0%. In some embodiments, the inducing amount of maltose in the culture medium is
at least about 2.25%. In some embodiments, the inducing amount of maltose in the culture
medium is at least about 2.5%. In some embodiments, the inducing amount of maltose
in the culture medium is at least about 2.75%. In some embodiments, the inducing amount
of maltose in the culture medium is at least about 3.0%. In some embodiments, the
inducing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least about 3.25%. In some
embodiments, the inducing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least about
3.5%. In some embodiments, the inducing amount of maltose in the culture medium is
at least about 3.75%. In some embodiments, the inducing amount of maltose in the culture
medium is at least about 4.0%. In some embodiments, the inducing amount of maltose
in the culture medium is at least about 4.25%. In some embodiments, the inducing amount
of maltose in the culture medium is at least about 4.5%. In some embodiments, the
inducing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least about 4.75%. In some
embodiments, the inducing amount of maltose in the culture medium is at least about
5.0%. In some embodiments, the inducing amount of maltose in the culture medium is
between about 5% and 50%. In some embodiments, the inducing amount of maltose in the
culture medium is about 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40% 45% or about 50%.
[0221] In some embodiments where the maltose-responsive promoter (and/or a maltose dependent
degron) is wired to effect an "on" state of non-catabolic compound production in the
presence of maltose, the repressing amount of maltose is an amount that is at least
about 2-fold, 10-fold, 100-fold, 1000-fold, 10,000-fold or 100,000-fold less than
a non-repressing amount of maltose as determined according to the methods described
above. In some embodiments, the repressing amount of maltose is an amount that is
at least about 2-fold, 10-fold, 100-fold, 1000-fold, 10,000-fold or about 100,000-fold
less than the saturating amount of maltose as determined according to the methods
described above. In some embodiments, the repressing amount of maltose is an amount
that is less than about 50%, less than about 20%, less than about 10%, less than about
1%, less than about 0.5%, less than about 0.2%, less than about 0. 1%, less than about
0.01%, or less than about 0.001% of a non-repressing amount of maltose as determined
according to the methods described above. In some embodiments, the repressing amount
of maltose is an amount that is less than about 50%, less than about 20%, less than
about 10%, less than about 1%, less than about 0.1%, less than about 0.01%, or less
than about 0.001% of the saturating amount of maltose as determined according to the
methods described above. In a specific embodiment, the repressing amount of maltose
is about 0 mg/L (0%),
i.e., no maltose. Thus, in this specific embodiment, the yeast host cells are grown during
the build stage in a cell culture medium that comprises no external source of maltose.
[0222] While "inducing" amount, "non-inducing" amount, "repressing" amount, and "non-repressing"
amount of maltose are mainly discussed in the context of methods of producing non-catabolic
compounds, these terms and their meanings are applicable to any compositions and methods
provided herein. For example, an "inducing" amount of maltose includes a sufficient
amount of maltose to induce stability of a fusion protein comprising a protein of
interest fused in frame to a maltose dependent degron. In another example, a "non-inducing"
amount of maltose includes sufficiently low amounts of maltose or no maltose that
destabilizes the fusion protein.
6.5 Production of Non-Catabolic Compounds using Maltose Dependent Degrons and/or Maltose-Responsive
Promoters
[0223] In some embodiments of the fermentation methods provided herein, utilizing a maltose-responsive
promoter and/or a maltose dependent degron in combination with manipulation of maltose
conditions, the production of the non-catabolic compound during the build stage (step
(a) of the methods described above) is less than about 50, 40, 30, 20 or 10% of the
maximum non-catabolic compound production of the genetically modified yeast host cell,
e.g., the amount of non-catabolic compound production when the yeast host cell is cultured
during the production stage (step (b) of the methods described above).
[0224] The periods of time for during which the build stage and production stage of the
fermentation process are carried out can vary, and will depend on factors such as
the growth rates of the yeast host cell, the intrinsic rate of growth of the yeast
host cell; and other culture conditions such as the pH, temperature, depending on
the specific requirements of the yeast host cell, the fermentation, and the process.
However, any duration of the build stage is expected to result in some benefit to
the final productivity of the fermentation, since some amount of the negative selective
pressure associated with non-catabolic compound production is relieved in the "off'
state.
[0225] In some embodiments, the build stage is carried out for a period of time sufficient
to produce an amount of cellular biomass that can support production of the non-catabolic
compound during the production stage. In some embodiments, the build stage is carried
out for a period of time sufficient for the population present at the time of inoculation
to undergo a plurality of doublings until a desired cell density is reached. In some
embodiments, the build stage is carried out for a period of time sufficient for the
yeast host cell population to reach a cell density (OD
600) of between about 0.01 and 400 in the fermentation vessel or container in which the
build stage is being carried out. In some embodiments, the build stage is carried
out until an OD
600 of at least 0.01 is reached. In some embodiments, the build stage is carried out
until an OD
600 of at least about 0.1 is reached. In some embodiments, the build stage is carried
out until an OD
600 of at least about 1.0 is reached. In some embodiments, the build stage is carried
out until an OD
600 of at least about 10 is reached. In some embodiments, the build stage is carried
out until an OD
600 of at least about 100 is reached. In some embodiments, the build stage is carried
out until an OD
600 of between about 0.01 and 100 is reached. In some embodiments, the build stage is
carried out until an OD
600 of between about 0.1 and 10 is reached. In some embodiments, the build stage is carried
out until an OD
600 of between about 1 and 100 is reached. In other embodiments, the build stage is carried
for a period of at least about 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 or more than about 96
hours.
[0226] In some embodiments, the production stage is carried out for a period of time sufficient
to produce a desired amount of the non-catabolic compound. In some embodiments, the
production stage is carried out for a period of at least about 12, 24, 36, 48, 60,
72, 84, 96 or more than about 96 hours.
[0227] In some embodiments, the production stage is carried out for a period of between
about 3 and 20 days. In some embodiments, the production stage is carried for a period
of about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 or
more than about 20 days.
[0228] In some embodiment, the method of producing a non-catabolic compound comprises culturing
the yeast host cells in separate build and production culture media. For example,
the method can comprise culturing the genetically modified yeast host cell in a build
stage wherein the cell is cultured under non-producing conditions to produce an inoculum,
then transferring the inoculum into a second fermentation medium under conditions
suitable to induce compound production, and maintaining steady state conditions in
the second fermentation stage to produce a cell culture containing a non-catabolic
product. In certain embodiments, maltose is present in a build culture media, and
maltose is absent in the fermentation medium to produce a cell culture containing
a non-catabolic product. Any residual amount of maltose transferred together with
the cells in the build culture media will be metabolized by the cells during the fermentation
stage.
[0229] In some embodiments, the method provided herein is sufficient for producing one or
more non-catabolic compounds in an amount greater than about 10 grams per liter of
fermentation medium. In some such embodiments, the non-catabolic derived compound
is produced in an amount from about 10 to about 50 grams, more than about 15 grams,
more than about 20 grams, more than about 25 grams, or more than about 30 grams per
liter of cell culture.
[0230] In some embodiments, the method provided herein is sufficient for producing one or
more non-catabolic compounds in an amount greater than about 50 milligrams per gram
of dry cell weight. In some embodiments, the recombinantly produced non-catabolic
compound is produced in an amount from about 50 to about 1500 milligrams, more than
about 100 milligrams, more than about 150 milligrams, more than about 200 milligrams,
more than about 250 milligrams, more than about 500 milligrams, more than about 750
milligrams, or more than about 1000 milligrams per gram of dry cell weight.
[0231] In some embodiments, the practice of the method provided herein results in increased
production of the non-catabolic compound by the population of genetically modified
yeast host cells, compared to production resulting from a method not comprising a
production stage during which the yeast host cells are cultured under non-producing
conditions. In some embodiments, the practice of the method results in the production
of one or more non-catabolic compounds in an amount that is at least about 10%, at
least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least
about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about
60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 2-fold,
at least about 2.5-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about 10-fold, at least about
20-fold, at least about 30-fold, at least about 40-fold, at least about 50-fold, at
least about 75-fold, at least about 100-fold, at least about 200-fold, at least about
300-fold, at least about 400-fold, at least about 500-fold, or at least about 1,000-fold,
or more, higher than the amount of non-catabolic compound produced by a method not
comprising a production stage during which the yeast host cells are cultured under
non-producing conditions, on a per unit volume of cell culture basis.
[0232] In some embodiments, the practice of the method results in the production of one
or more non-catabolic compounds in an amount that is at least about 10%, at least
about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about
35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%,
at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 2-fold,
at least about 2.5-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about 10-fold, at least about
20-fold, at least about 30-fold, at least about 40-fold, at least about 50-fold, at
least about 75-fold, at least about 100-fold, at least about 200-fold, at least about
300-fold, at least about 400-fold, at least about 500-fold, or at least about 1,000-fold,
or more, higher than the amount of non-catabolic compound produced by a method not
comprising a production stage during which the yeast host cells are cultured under
non-producing conditions, on a per unit dry cell weight basis.
[0233] In some embodiments, the practice of the method results in the production of one
or more non-catabolic compounds in an amount that is at least about 10%, at least
about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about
35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%,
at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 2-fold,
at least about 2.5-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about 10-fold, at least about
20-fold, at least about 30-fold, at least about 40-fold, at least about 50-fold, at
least about 75-fold, at least about 100-fold, at least about 200-fold, at least about
300-fold, at least about 400-fold, at least about 500-fold, or at least about 1,000-fold,
or more, higher than the amount of non-catabolic compound produced by a method not
comprising a production stage during which the yeast host cells are cultured under
non-producing conditions, on a per unit volume of cell culture per unit time basis.
[0234] In some embodiments, the practice of the method results in the production of one
or more non-catabolic compounds in an amount that is at least about 10%, at least
about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about
35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%,
at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 2-fold,
at least about 2.5-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about 10-fold, at least about
20-fold, at least about 30-fold, at least about 40-fold, at least about 50-fold, at
least about 75-fold, at least about 100-fold, at least about 200-fold, at least about
300-fold, at least about 400-fold, at least about 500-fold, or at least about 1,000-fold,
or more, higher than the amount of non-catabolic compound produced by a method not
comprising a build stage during which the yeast host cells are cultured under non-producing
conditions, on a per unit dry cell weight per unit time basis.
6.6 Stabilization Constructs and Their Use in Coupling Cell Growth with Production
of Non-Catabolic Compounds
[0235] In another aspect, provided herein are methods which can counteract potential negative
effects of spontaneous mutations on the production of heterologous non-catabolic compounds
by genetically modified yeast host cells. As described above, the production of non-catabolic
compounds heterologous to genetically modified host cells typically requires a net
input of ATP, NADPH, and carbon, often with large amounts of oxygen supplied to help
balance the redox of the system. Such an environment makes evolution towards lower
product, higher biomass yielding genotypes more favorable, and mutations arise spontaneously
in host cells including loss of production mutations. Thus, mutated host cells with
reduced product yields have a "fitness advantage" compared to original, high-product-yielding
parental cells, because more of the mutated host cells' metabolic resources go towards
building biomass. This results in the mutant, low-product-yielding or no-product-yielding
cells (referred to as "broken strains") with a higher growth rate outgrowing the original,
high-product-yielding parental cells with a slower growth rate. The differential growth
rates of these cells, in turn, cause the mutant, low-product-yielding or no-product-yielding
mutant cells eventually taking over the population of cells in a fermentation tank
(a process called "strain degeneration"), and a substantially reduced product yield
over time.
[0236] To stabilize production of heterologous non-catabolic compounds, expression of a
nucleic acid encoding a cell-growth-affecting protein is coupled to the production
of heterologous non-catabolic compounds. For example, a nucleic acid encoding a cell-growth-affecting
protein and one or more nucleic acids encoding enzymes of a biosynthetic pathway for
producing a non-catabolic compound are operably linked to their respective promoters,
which are co-regulated by same transcriptional regulator(s). In other words, these
nucleic acids, which are not normally regulated by the same transcriptional regulator(s),
are co-regulated as a regulon. As a result, any spontaneous mutation that negatively
impacts expression or stability of the transcriptional regulator(s) will negatively
impact expression of all nucleic acids in the regulon. When expression of the cell-growth-affecting
gene in the regulon is reduced due to a spontaneous mutation, it will result in a
growth disadvantage for these mutated cells compared to high-product-yielding parental
cells. Thus, expression of the regulon, co-regulated by the same transcriptional regulator(s),
is more stable to mutations which might otherwise reduce production of heterologous
non-catabolic compounds.
[0237] Because of its stabilizing effect on the production of non-catabolic compounds, the
phrase "stabilization construct" is used herein to refer to a nucleic acid encoding
a cell-growth-affecting protein, which is operably linked to a promoter regulated
by a common transcriptional regulator of the regulon of interest
(i.e., a group of genes of interest that are regulated as a unit). In addition, the term
"heterologous nucleic acid encoding a cell-growth-affecting protein" is used in certain
embodiments to refer that a nucleic acid encoding a cell-growth-affecting protein
is operably linked to a heterologous promoter instead of its endogenous promoter.
Similarly, in certain embodiments, the term "heterologous nucleic acid encoding an
enzyme of a biosynthetic pathway" is used to refer that a nucleic acid encoding the
enzyme is operably linked to a heterologous promoter instead of its endogenous promoter.
[0238] In certain embodiments, a promoter responsive to a common transcriptional regulator
of the regulon of interest is used to drive expression of a conditional essential
gene of a metabolic pathway whose end product is consumable by the genetically modified
yeast host cell. For example, a conditional essential gene may be the
LYS9 gene in the biosynthetic pathway for producing lysine as an end product. In this
embodiment, the conditional essential gene of a metabolic pathway is a cell-growth-affecting
gene, since a functional disruption of the conditional essential gene will affect
the cell growth or viability. The cell population containing such a genetic design
requires a high expression of the regulon of interest (when cultured in the absence
of externally added lysine), and therefore, expression of the regulon is more stable
to mutations which might otherwise reduce expression of the regulon. This approach
to regulon stability is compatible with host cells comprising genetic designs with
a genetic switch which conditionally reduces the regulon expression when desired,
for example, during the biomass build stage (
e.g., the GAL regulon shown in FIG. 17). During the build stage, the resulting auxotrophy
caused by reduction of the conditional essential gene expression can be compensated
by providing the metabolite of interest (e.g., lysine) to the growth medium. Such
an exemplary embodiment is illustrated in FIG. 17, and further described in detail
below.
[0239] While the exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 17 relates to the production of heterologous
non-catabolic compounds via enzymes of a biosynthetic pathway, the methods provided
herein have broader applications. For example, they can be applied to the production
of any heterologous non-catabolic compounds such as proteins of interest, which are
encoded by heterologous nucleic acids in host cells. Examples of heterologous proteins
of interest include antibodies, vaccines, antibiotics, hormones (e.g., insulin or
human growth factors), and the like. Similar to non-catabolic compounds produced via
enzymes of a biosynthetic pathway, a heterologous protein of interest, when produced
in high quantity, exerts stress on the host cell's metabolic resources. Such an environment
can favor evolution towards mutated cells with lower product, higher biomass yielding
genotypes, resulting in de-stabilized production of heterologous proteins of interest.
Thus, expression of a stabilization construct provided herein can be coupled with
expression of a nucleic acid encoding any heterologous protein of interest to stabilize
its production during fermentation. Any discussions related to the production of non-catabolic
compounds via enzymes of a biosynthetic pathway described herein also apply to the
production of any heterologous proteins of interest, which are also non-catabolic
compounds.
6.6.1. Common Transcriptional Regulators to Couple Cell Growth and Production of Non-Catabolic
Compounds
[0240] Transcriptional regulators of the GAL regulon are used to couple the expression of
one or more heterologous nucleic acids encoding one or more enzymes of the biosynthetic
pathway and a heterologous nucleic acid encoding the cell-growth-affecting protein.
Transcriptional activator Gal4p can be used as a common transcriptional regulator
to regulate expression of all of the heterologous nucleic acids in the regulon. Transcriptional
repressor Gal80p can be used as a common transcriptional repressor to repress expression
of all of the heterologous nucleic acids in the regulon. In some embodiments, Gal4p
and Gal80p are both used as common transcriptional regulators to co-regulate expression
of all of the heterologous nucleic acids in the regulon.
6.6.2. Nucleic Acids Encoding a Cell-Growth-Affecting Protein Operably Linked to a
Co-regulated Promoter as a Stabilization Construct
[0241] Any suitable nucleic acid encoding a cell-growth-affecting protein can be used in
a stabilization construct so that its expression is coupled, via a common transcriptional
regulator, to expression of one or more enzymes of a biosynthetic pathway for producing
non-catabolic compounds (or any protein of interest). As used herein, the term "nucleic
acid encoding a cell-growth-affecting protein" or "cell-growth-affecting gene" refers
to a nucleic acid that encodes a protein which affects cell growth (
e.g., growth rate, cellular biomass, or cell viability) of genetically modified yeast
host cells. Any spontaneous mutation that negatively impacts the common transcriptional
regulator will also negatively impact expression of the nucleic acid encoding the
cell-growth-affecting protein, and therefore cell growth. Thus, a genetically modified
yeast host cell comprising such a stabilization construct will be more stable to mutations
which might otherwise reduce the production of non-catabolic compounds.
[0242] In certain embodiments, a heterologous promoter is operably linked to a nucleic acid
encoding a cell-growth-affecting protein by replacing or superceding its endogenous
promoter in the genome of a yeast host cell. In other embodiments, a heterologous
promoter operably linked to a nucleic acid encoding a cell-growth-affecting protein
can be chromosomally integrated at a different location, while its endogenous counterpart
is functionally disrupted. These methods are merely exemplary, and other suitable
methods can be used to incorporate a stabilization construct into a genetically modified
the yeast host cell.
6.6.2.2 Use of Conditional Essential Genes in a Stabilization Construct
[0243] In all embodiments, the nucleic acids encoding cell-growth-affecting proteins include
conditional essential genes which are essential only under certain circumstances or
growth conditions. Being essential for yeast cell growth or affecting yeast cell growth
can be highly dependent on a given culture medium or condition. Examples of conditional
essential genes include auxotrophic genes, which are conditional essential. For example,
in the absence of uracil in culture media, the orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase
gene, URA3, which catalyzes the sixth enzymatic step in the
de novo biosynthesis of pyrimidines, becomes essential for a yeast host cell. In another
example, in the absence of tryptophan in culture media, the TRP1 gene encoding a phosphoribosylanthranilate
isomerase that catalyzes the third step in tryptophan biosynthesis, becomes essential
for a yeast host cell. In another example, in the absence of lysine in culture media,
the LYS2 gene, which encodes an aminoadipate reductase, can become essential. Any
of these conditional essential genes may be operably linked to a promoter regulated
by a common transcriptional regulator which also regulates expression of one or more
enzymes of a biosynthetic pathway for producing non-catabolic compounds (or any heterologous
proteins of interest).
[0244] There are a number of other conditional essential genes which encode enzymes for
synthesis of essential compounds, which are necessary for cell growth when yeast host
cells are grown in culture media lacking these essential compounds. Additional examples
of such conditional essential genes include those that encode enzymes in biosynthetic
pathways for producing essential amino acids, fatty acids, nucleotides and the like.
Genetically modified yeast host cells containing such a conditional essential gene
will require high expression of the regulon so that an adequate amount of essential
compounds will be produced. Thus, such a regulon will be more stable to mutations
which might otherwise reduce production of non-catabolic compounds.
[0245] There are a number of databases which provide various biosynthetic pathways including
those for synthesizing essential compounds. These include, for example, KEGG pathway
database (
see, e.g., Kanehisha et al., (2002) Nucleic Acids Res., 30: 42-46); and MetaCyc pathway database (
see, e.g., Altman et al. (2013) BNC Bioinformatics 14:112). Other useful databases include BRENDA database (
see, e.g., Schomburg et al. (2002) Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 47-49); SWISS-PROT database (
Bairoch and Apweiler (2000) Nucleic Acids Res. 28: 45-48); EcoCyc (
Karp et al. (2002) Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 56-8); and EMP/MPW (
Selkov et al. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26: 43-45). Many of these pathway databases provide nucleotide sequences of genes encoding
enzymes of biosynthetic pathways for producing essential compounds. Any suitable nucleic
acids encoding enzymes involved in synthesis of essential compounds can be used in
a stabilization construct.
[0246] In certain embodiments, amino acid biosynthetic genes encoding essential amino acids
can be used as conditional essential genes in a stabilization construct. These include
one or more of lysine biosynthetic genes, methionine biosynthetic genes, leucine biosynthetic
genes, histidine biosynthetic genes, leucine biosynthetic genes, tryptophan biosynthetic
genes, and the like. The biosynthetic pathways for synthesizing these amino acids
are well-known. Nucleic acid sequences for many of these amino acid biosynthetic genes
are also known and publicly available for many organisms.
See, e.g., GenBank sequence database (maintained by National Center for Biotechnology Information).
[0247] In some embodiments, a nucleic acid encoding an enzyme in a lysine biosynthetic pathway
may be used in a stabilization construct. In yeast, the lysine biosynthetic pathway
includes a number of different enzymes to synthesize lysine. These include an enzyme
that converts 2-oxoglutarate and acetyl-CoA into homocitrate (
e.g., homocitrate synthase; LYS21 or LYS20), an enzyme that converts homocitrate into
homoaconitate and homoaconitate into homo-isocitrate (
e.g., homoaconitase; LYS4), an enzyme that converts homo-isocitrate into α-ketoadipate
(
e.g., homo-isocitrate dehydrogenase; LYS12), an enzyme that converts α-ketoadipate into
L-2-aminoadipate (
e.g., enzyme 2.6.1.39; 2-aminonadipate amino transferase), an enzyme that converts L-2-aminoadipate
into L-2-aminoadipate 6-semialdehyde (
e.g., alpha aminoadipate reductase; LYS2), an enzyme that converts L-2-aminoadipate 6-semialdehyde
into sacchropine (e.g., sacchropine dehydrogenase (NADP+ L-glutamate-forming); LYS9);
and an enzyme that converts sacchropine into L-lysine (e.g., sacchropine dehydrogenase
(NAD+, L-lysine-forming); LYS1).
[0248] Other organisms may use slightly different pathways and enzymes for biosynthesis
of lysine. Biosynthetic pathways in other organisms, biosynthetic enzymes, and their
corresponding nucleic acid sequences can be found in, for example, the KEGG database
and MetaCyc database. For example, a nucleic acid encoding an enzyme that converts
2-oxoglutarate into homocitrate (
e.g., homocitrate synthase) from a number of different organisms can be used as a conditional
essential gene in a stabilization construct to couple cell growth of genetically modified
yeast host cells with the production of heterologous non-catabolic compounds. Illustrative
examples of suitable nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited to: (L YS20/YDL
182W;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae), (LYS21/YDL131W, which is a paralog of LYS20;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae), (AGOS_ADR107W;
Eremothecium gossypii), (Ecym_8045;
Eremothecium cymbalariae), (KLLA0E23695g;
Kluveromyces lactis), (KLLA0F05489g;
Kluveromyces lactis), (KLTH0E12848g;
Lachancea thermotolerans), (KLTH0H02486g;
Lachancea thermotolerans), (Kpol_2000p11;
Vanderwaltozyma polysopora), (ZYRO0A13222g;
Zygosaccharomyces rouxii), and the like.
[0249] In some embodiments, a nucleic acid encoding an enzyme that converts homocitrate
into homo-isocitrate (e.g., homoaconitase) can be used as a conditional essential
gene in a stabilization construct to couple cell growth of genetically modified host
cells with the production of heterologous non-catabolic compounds. Illustrative examples
of suitable nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited to: (LYS4/YDR234W;
Sacchromyces cerevisiae), (AGOS_ABL106C;
Eremothecium gossypii), (Ecym_5123;
Eremothecium cymbalariae), (KLLA0C15125g;
Kluyveromyces lactis), (KLTH0E10582p;
Lachancea thermotolerans); (Kpol_1031p57;
Venderwaltozyma polyspora), (K1705;
Zygosaccharomyces rouxii), and the like.
[0250] In some embodiments, a nucleic acid encoding an enzyme that converts homo-isocitrate
to α-ketoadipate (e.g., homo-isocitrate dehydrogenase) can be used as a conditional
essential gene in a stabilization construct to couple cell growth of genetically modified
yeast host cells with the production of heterologous non-catabolic compounds. Illustrative
examples of a suitable nucleotide sequence include, but are not limited to: (LYS12/YIL094C;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae)
, and the like.
[0251] In some embodiments, a nucleic acid encoding an enzyme that converts α-ketoadipate
into L-2-aminoadipate (e.g., enzyme 2.6.1.39; aminoadipate aminotransferase) can be
used as a conditional essential gene in a stabilization construct to couple cell growth
of genetically modified yeast host cells with the production of heterologous non-catabolic
compounds. Illustrative examples of a suitable nucleotide sequence, but are not limited
to: (AADAT, KAT2, KATII;
Homo sapiens), (AADAT;
Pan troglodytes), (AADAT;
Pan paniscus), (AADAT;
Pongo abelii), (AADAT;
Momascus leucogenys), and the like.
[0252] In some embodiments, a nucleic acid encoding an enzyme that converts L-2-amino adipate
into L-2-aminoadipate 6-semialdehyde (e.g., alpha aminoadipate reductase) can be used
as a conditional essential gene in a stabilization construct to couple cell growth
of genetically modified yeast host cells with the production of heterologous non-catabolic
compounds. Illustrative examples of a suitable nucleotide sequence include, but are
not limited to: (LYS2/YBR115C;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae), (AGOS_ADL346W;
Eremothecium gossypii), (Ecym_3457;
Eremothecium cymbalariae), (KILLAOB09218g;
Kluyvermonyces lactis), (KLTH0F10384g;
Lachancea thermotolerans), (Kpol_1006p6;
Vanderwaltozyma polyspora), (ZYRO0C16566g;
Zygosaccharomyces rouxii), and the like.
[0253] In some embodiments, a nucleic acid encoding an enzyme that converts L-2-aminoadipate
6-semialdhyde into sacchropine (e.g., sacchropine dehydrogenase, NADP+ L-glutamate-forming)
can be used as a conditional essential gene in a stabilization construct to couple
cell growth of genetically modified yeast host cells with the production of heterologous
non-catabolic compounds. Illustrative examples of a suitable nucleotide sequence include,
but are not limited to: (LYS9/YNR050C;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae), (SORBI_03g030510;
Sorghum bicolor), (AGOS_ABR116c;
Eremothecium gossypii), (Ecym_7008;
Eremothecium cymbalariae), (KLAA0C18744g;
Kluyvermyces lactis), (KLTH0A07590g;
Lachancea thermotolerans), (Kpol_1028p12;
Vanderwaltozyma polyspora), (ZYRO0D17578g;
Zygosaccharomyces rouxii), and the like.
[0254] In some embodiments, a nucleic acid encoding an enzyme that converts sacchropine
into L-lysine (
e.g., sacchropine dehydrogenase, NAD+, L-lysine-forming) can be used as a conditional
essential gene in a stabilization construct to couple cell growth of genetically modified
yeast host cells with the production of heterologous non-catabolic compounds. Illustrative
examples of a suitable nucleotide sequence include, but are not limited to: (LYS1;
YIR034c;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae), (AGOS_ACR167c;
Eremothecium gossypii), (Ecym_5636;
Eremothecium cymbalariae), (KLLA0E07987g;
Kluyvermyces lactis), (KLTH0C00594g;
Lachancea thermotolerans), (Kpol_1057p13;
Vanderwaltozyma polyspora), (ZYRO0D00594g;
Zygosaccharomyces rouxii), and the like.
[0255] The use of nucleic acids encoding enzymes in a lysine biosynthetic pathway as conditional
essential genes is merely exemplary, and nucleic acids encoding enzymes in other amino
acid biosynthetic pathways can be used as conditional essential genes in a stabilization
construct. These include, for example, nucleic acids encoding enzymes of a methionine
biosynthetic pathway: folypolyglutamate synthetase (e.g., MET7), N5-methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate-homocysteine
methyltransferase (MET6), L-aspartate 4-P-transferase (HOM3); aspartic beta semi-aldehyde
dehydrogenase (e.g., HOM2), homoserine dehydrogenase (e.g., HOM6), homoserine O-trans-acetylase
(e.g., MET2), O-acetylhomoserine (thio)-lyase (e.g., MET17), and the like.
[0256] Other examples include nucleic acids encoding enzymes of a leucine biosynthetic pathway:
alpha-isopropylmalate synthase minor isozyme (LEU9), alpha-isopropylmalate synthase
(LEU4); isopropylmalate isomerase (LEU1), beta-IPM dehydrogenase (LEU2); branched-chain
amino acid transaminase (e.g., BAT2), branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase (BAT1),
and the like.
[0257] Other examples include nucleic acids encoding enzymes of a tryptophan biosynthetic
pathway: anthranilate synthase (TRP3 and TRP2), anthranilate phosphoribosyl transferase
(TRP4), N-(5'-phosphoribosyl)-anthranilate isomerase (TRP), indole-3-glycerol phosphate
synthase (TRP3), tryptophan synthetase (TRP5), and the like.
[0258] Other examples include nucleic acids encoding enzymes of a histidine biosynthetic
pathway: ATP phosphoribosyltransferase (HIS), phosphoribosyl-ATP pyrophosphatase (HIS4),
phosphoribosyl-AMP cyclohydrolase (HIS4), phosphoribosyl-5-amino-1-phosphoribosyl-4-imidazolecarboxiamide
(HIS6), imidazoleglycerol phosphate synthase (HIS7), imidazole glycerol-phosphate
dehydratase (HIS3), histidinol-phosphate aminotransferase (HISS), histidinolphosphatase
(HIS2), histidinol dehydrogenase (HIS4), and the like.
[0259] Other examples include nucleic acids encoding enzymes of a phenylalanine biosynthetic
pathway: chlorismate mutase (ARO7), prephenate dehydratatse (PHA2), aromatic amino
acid aminotransferase (ARO8 and ARO9), and the like.
[0260] Other examples include nucleic acids encoding enzymes of a threonine biosynthetic
pathway: homoserine kinase (THR1), threonine synthase (THR4), and the like.
[0261] Other examples include nucleic acids encoding enzymes of an isoleucine biosynthetic
pathway: threonine deaminase (ILV1), acetolactate bynthase (ILV6, ILV2), aceohydroxyacid
reductoisomerase (ILV5), dihydroxy-acid dehyrfatase (ILV3), branched-chain amino acid
transaminase (BAT2), branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase (BAT1), and the like.
[0262] Other examples include nucleic acids encoding enzymes of a valine biosynthetic pathway:
acetolactate synthase (ILV6, ILV2), acetohydroxyacid reductoisomerase (ILV5), dihydroxy-acid
dehydratase (ILV3), branched-chain amino acid transaminase (BAT2), branched-chain
amino acid aminotransferase (BAT1), and the like.
[0263] In certain embodiments, nucleic acids encoding enzymes in nucleotide biosynthetic
pathways can be used as conditional essential genes in present methods. These include,
for example, nucleic acids encoding enzymes of biosynthetic pathways for producing
adenine, thymine, uracil, guanine or cytosine. In other embodiments, nucleic acids
encoding enzymes in fatty acid biosynthetic pathways can be used as conditional essential
genes in present methods.
[0264] The nucleic acid sequences encoding these enzymes in yeast can be obtained from the
Saccharomyces genome database, and can be found at www.yeastgenome.org. The functional homologs
from other organisms can also be obtained using the BLAST search. Any other suitable
conditional essential genes may be used to generate genetically modified yeast host
cells that are conditionally auxotrophic, which can be alleviated by expression of
the conditional essential genes.
6.6.2.3 Screening Additional Cell-Growth-Affecting Gene Candidates
[0265] Certain nucleic acids, which may not have been identified in the DEG database as
essential genes or conditional essential genes, may nonetheless be important for cell
growth for particular culture media or conditions selected for fermentation. The cell-growth-affecting
genes may include those that affect cell growth such that their insufficient or lack
of expression will cause cells to grow at a substantially slower growth rate, compared
to when they are fully expressed under a particular culture medium or condition.
[0266] Cell-growth-affecting gene candidates potentially suitable for use in a stabilization
construct can be screened using a number of different methods. An inducible promoter
can be operably linked to a cell-growth-affecting gene candidate, and its inducer
is used to turn on or off the expression of the cell-growth-affecting gene candidate.
After a suitable time period (e.g., about 24, 48 or 72 hours) of culture, the cell
growth phenotypes of cells under inducing and non-inducing conditions can be compared.
Under non-inducing conditions, the inducible promoter is inactivated, and the cell-growth-affecting
gene candidate is no longer transcribed. As the cells divide, the amount of proteins
encoded from the cell-growth-affecting gene candidate gradually declines, eventually
reaching a state of depletion that mimics a complete loss-of-function mutation. The
difference in cell growth phenotype of cells cultured under inducing or non-inducing
conditions will indicate whether the cell-growth-affecting gene candidate is important
for cell growth.
[0267] The cell-growth-affecting gene candidates may be selected as a cell-growth-affecting
gene in a stabilization construct if inactivation of their expression (
e.g., under non-inducing conditions) results in a reduction in cellular biomass (
e.g., cell count or density) compared to when their expression is activated (
e.g., under inducing conditions) by at least about 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%,
85%, 90%, 95% or more after a suitable time period (
e.g., about 24 hours, 48, hour, or 72 hours). Cell densities or counts of cultures under
non-inducing and inducing conditions can be compared. For example, an optical density
(OD
600) of induced and non-induced cell cultures can be compared. Alternatively, cell forming
units (CFR) can be counted if the cells are grown on agar plates. Maximum specific
growth rates can also be compared. Other suitable methods which represent cell growth
may be used to compare the effects of cell-growth-affecting gene candidate expression
under inducing and non-inducing conditions.
[0268] A cell-growth-affecting gene candidate can be screened in combination with a promoter
which is regulated by a common transcriptional regulator of the regulon. For example,
if a nucleic acid encoding an enzyme of a biosynthetic pathway for producing non-catabolic
compounds is operably linked to a pGAL promoter, then a cell-growth-affecting gene
candidate is also operably linked to a pGAL promoter to screen its suitability as
a stabilization construct. In this example, a screening host cell may be further modified
to functionally disrupt expression of repressor GAL80 so that transcriptional activator
Gal4p can activate expression of the regulon.
[0269] A number of different promoters of varying promoter strengths may be tested in expressing
these cell-growth-affecting gene candidates. In situations where a low expression
level of a cell-growth-affecting gene candidate is required for cell growth, the cell-growth-affecting
gene candidate may be operably linked to a relatively weak promoter. In other situations
where a high expression level of a cell-growth-affecting gene candidate is required,
the cell-growth-affecting gene candidate may be operably linked to a strong promoter.
Any naturally derived or synthetic promoters for the regulon may be utilized to drive
expression of the cell-growth-affecting gene candidates. For example, if transcriptional
regulators of the GAL regulon are used, any promoters of the GAL regulon, pGAL1, pGAL2,
pGAL7, pGAL10, pGCY1, pGAL80, or any synthetic promoters generated therefrom, may
be utilized during screening of cell-growth-affecting gene candidates.
6.6.3. Fermentation Compositions and Production of Non-Catabolic Compounds using a
Stabilization Construct
[0270] In certain embodiments, a method of producing heterologous non-catabolic compounds
comprises culturing in a culture medium a genetically modified yeast host cell which
comprises: (a) a heterologous nucleic acid encoding an enzyme of a biosynthetic pathway
for producing the heterologous non-catabolic compound, wherein the heterologous nucleic
acid is operably linked to a first promoter; (b) a nucleic acid encoding a cell-growth-affecting
protein, wherein the nucleic acid is operably linked to a second promoter; and (c)
a nucleic acid encoding a transcriptional regulator, wherein the first promoter and
the second promoter are both regulated by the transcriptional regulator. Generally,
genetically modified yeast host cells are cultured in a culture medium comprising
a carbon source under suitable conditions for a period of time sufficient to produce
a desired biomass of yeast host cells and/or a desired amount of non-catabolic compounds.
[0271] In the methods provided herein, the first promoter and the second promoter are both
regulated by one or more common transcriptional regulators. Since the common transcriptional
regulator(s) regulate expression of both heterologous nucleic acids encoding an enzyme
of the biosynthetic pathway and a cell-growth-affecting protein, any spontaneous mutation
that negatively affects the transcriptional regulator (e.g., its expression or stability)
will negatively impact the expression of both heterologous nucleic acids. These mutated
yeast cells will not be viable or will grow at a much slower rate compared to high
product-yielding yeast cells, and therefore, high product-yielding yeast cells (
e.g., parent cells with the original high-product-yielding genotype) will dominate the
cell population during the course of fermentation. Thus, coupling of expression of
heterologous nucleic acids encoding an enzyme of a biosynthetic pathway for producing
non-catabolic compounds with expression of a cell-growth-affecting protein will stabilize
the high-product-yielding genotype of yeast host cells, resulting in stabilized production
of non-catabolic compounds over a long fermentation run. Similarly, coupling of expression
of a heterologous nucleic acid encoding a protein of interest with expression of a
cell-growth-affecting protein will stabilize the production of the protein of interest.
[0272] The selection of promoter sequences depends on the expression level desired for heterologous
nucleic acids encoding a cell-growth-affecting protein or an enzyme of a biosynthetic
pathway for producing non-catabolic compounds. In some embodiments, the first promoter
sequence and the second promoter sequence are identical. In other embodiments, the
first promoter sequence and the second promoter sequence are different. In certain
embodiments, the first promoter and the second promoter have different promoter strengths.
For example, naturally derived pGal promoters, such as pGAL1, pGAL2, pGAL7 and pGAL10,
are generally stronger promoters than synthetic promoters derived from these pGAL
promoters (e.g., pGAL2_v3 (SEQ ID NO: 84), pGAL7_v1 (SEQ ID NO: 85), pGAL2_v4 (SEQ
ID NO: 86), pGAL1 _v3 (SEQ ID NO: 87), pGAL10_v3 (SEQ ID NO: 88), pGAL2_v2 (SEQ ID
NO: 89), pGAL7_v2 (SEQ ID NO: 90)). If it is desired to have a higher expression of
biosynthetic pathway enzymes compared to cell-growth-affecting proteins, then nucleic
acids encoding these enzymes can be operably linked to naturally derived pGAL promoters,
whereas nucleic acids encoding a cell-growth-affecting protein can be operably linked
to a weaker synthetic promoter of naturally derived pGAL promoters. Generally, promoters
are selected so that their promoter strengths are balanced to match the needed expression
of a cell-growth-affecting gene in host cells, and the needed expression of a biosynthetic
pathway gene for producing non-catabolic compounds.
[0273] Additional details related to building of cellular biomass and producing non-catabolic
compounds described in Section 6.5 and other sections are also applicable to the compositions
and methods comprising a stabilization construct provided herein.
6.6.5. Use of a Stabilization Construct with a Switch to Produce Non-Catabolic Compounds
[0274] A stabilization construct described herein can be utilized in combination with a
switch which separates a growth phase (
i.e., a build stage of cellular biomass) and a production phase (
i.e., a production stage of heterologous compounds) of fermentation. The production of
non-catabolic compounds during a build stage can be undesirable. It can lead to slow
growth of cells, and cells cannot reach an optimal cell density for the production
stage. On the other hand, biomass production during a production stage of fermentation
is undesirable as it diverts metabolic resources away from the production of heterologous
non-catabolic compounds.
[0275] In an embodiment, the build stage is carried out for a period of time sufficient
to produce an amount of cellular biomass that can support production of heterologous
compounds during the production stage. The build stage is carried out for a period
of time sufficient for the population present at the time of inoculation to undergo
a plurality of doublings until a desired yeast cell density is reached. In some embodiments,
the build stage is carried out for a period of time sufficient for the yeast host
cell population to reach a cell density (OD
600) of between about 0.01 and 400 in the fermentation vessel or container in which the
build stage is being carried out. In some embodiments, the build stage is carried
out until an OD
600 of at least about 0.01 is reached. In some embodiments, the build stage is carried
out until an OD
600 of at least about 0.1 is reached. In some embodiments, the build stage is carried
out until an OD
600 of at least about 1.0 is reached. In some embodiments, the build stage is carried
out until an OD
600 of at least about 10 is reached. In some embodiments, the build stage is carried
out until an OD
600 of at least about 100 is reached. In some embodiments, the build stage is carried
out until an OD
600 of between about 0.01 and 100 is reached. In some embodiments, the build stage is
carried out until an OD
600 of between about 0.1 and 10 is reached. In some embodiments, the build stage is carried
out until an OD
600 of between about 1 and 100 is reached. In other embodiments, the build stage is carried
for a period of at least about 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96 or more than about 96
hours.
[0276] In some embodiments, the production stage is carried out for a period of time sufficient
to produce a desired amount of heterologous compounds. In some embodiments, the production
stage is carried out for a period of at least about 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96
or more than about 96 hours. In some embodiments, the production stage is carried
out for a period of between about 3 and 20 days. In some embodiments, the production
stage is carried for a period of about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,
14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 or more than about 20 days.
[0277] In an embodiment where a switch is used to separate two stages of fermentation, a
conditional essential gene can be used as a cell-growth-affecting gene in a stabilization
construct. For example, a conditional essential gene can encode an enzyme of a metabolic
pathway whose end product is an essential compound essential for cell growth, which
is consumable by the yeast host cell. Genetically modified yeast host cells containing
such a conditional essential gene in a stabilization construct will require high expression
of the regulon so that an adequate amount of essential compounds can be produced.
An "off' stage of fermentation (
i.e., build stage), where the switch turns off expression of both conditional essential
gene and biosynthetic pathway genes, will result in conditional auxotrophy for these
genetically modified yeast host cells. The conditional auxotrophy can be compensated
by adding essential compounds to the culture medium. During an "on" stage of fermentation
(i.e., the production stage) wherein the switch turns on expression of both conditional
essential gene and biosynthetic pathway genes for producing non-catabolic compounds,
an essential compound is not supplemented in a culture medium. Thus, only yeast cells
that can express the conditional essential gene and produce a sufficient amount of
essential compound can grow. This strategy is compatible with genetically modified
yeast host cells with a genetic switch which conditionally reduces the regulon expression
when desired, since the resulting auxotrophy caused by the reduction of the regulon
expression can be compensated by providing auxotrophically required essential compounds
to culture media.
[0278] Thus, provided herein is a method for producing a heterologous non-catabolic compound,
wherein the method comprises: (a) a build stage where a population of genetically
modified yeast host cells is cultured in a culture medium that limits the production
of heterologous non-catabolic compounds, wherein the culture medium comprises an essential
compound, followed by (b) a production stage where the population or a subpopulation
of genetically modified yeast host cells is cultured under culture conditions that
promote production of heterologous non-catabolic compounds without supplementing the
culture medium with the essential compound (or supplementing with a sufficiently low
amount of the essential compound). In this embodiment, genetically modified host cells
can comprise: (i) a heterologous nucleic acid encoding a protein of interest (
e.g., an enzyme of a biosynthetic pathway for producing a heterologous non-catabolic
compound), wherein the heterologous nucleic acid is operably linked to a first promoter;
(ii) a nucleic acid encoding a conditional essential gene product of a biosynthetic
pathway for producing an essential compound, wherein the heterologous nucleic acid
is operably linked to a second promoter; and (iii) a nucleic acid encoding a transcriptional
regulator, wherein the first promoter and the second promoter are both regulated by
the same transcriptional regulator. During the production stage, only the genetically
modified yeast host cells that can express the conditional essential gene can grow
since the essential compound is not added to the culture medium (or added in a sufficiently
low amount). This adds a selective pressure for functional expression of the transcriptional
regulator, which, in turn, improves stability of production of non-catabolic compounds.
[0279] Any suitable amount of an essential compound can be added to a culture medium during
a build stage. It is generally undesirable for growth to become limited by the concentration
of the auxotrophically required essential compound in the medium during a build stage.
An essential compound can be added in an amount such that genetically modified auxotrophic
yeast host cells comprising a conditional essential gene (expression of which is repressed
during the build stage) can grow to a desired concentration of biomass as described
in above. A suitable amount of an essential compound in a build stage culture medium
can be determined by performing a titration curve in the presence of increasing amounts
of an essential compound in a build stage culture medium. For example, a population
of genetically modified yeast host cells may be divided into a plurality of subpopulations
and cultured in parallel, wherein each subpopulation is grown in a culture medium
comprising a different,
e.g., increasing amount of an essential compound (including no essential compound), and
a cellular biomass (
e.g., OD
600 reading) can be determined after a defined period time.
[0280] A suitable amount of an essential compound in a build stage culture medium can be
determined by measuring a cell growth rate,
e.g., a maximum specific growth rate of genetically modified auxotrophic yeast host cells
at different concentrations of an essential compound. The term "specific growth rate"
refers to the increase of biomass or cell number per time. The term "maximum specific
growth rate" refers to "specific growth rate" during the exponential growth phase
of a culture. Usually during the exponential growth phase, the specific growth rate
is approximately constant as the substrates (or products) are still not exerting a
significant inhibition on growth.
[0281] The essential compound titration may comprise at least one concentration of essential
compound whereby yeast host cell biomass (
e.g., as measured by OD
600) or the maximum specific growth rate is plateaued at a maximum, that is, where no
further increase in yeast host cell biomass or maximum specific growth rate is observed
with an increasing amount of essential compound. In some embodiment, the amount of
essential compound added to a build stage culture medium is at least the minimum amount
of an essential compound at which the yeast host cell's biomass or maximum specific
growth rate is at its maximum. This amount can also be referred to as a "saturating"
amount of essential compound.
[0282] In certain embodiments, a saturating amount of an essential compound can be added
to a build stage culture medium. In some embodiments, an essential compound can be
added to a build stage medium in an amount greater than the saturating amount to ensure
that genetically modified yeast host cells reach a desired cellular biomass or maximum
specific growth rate. For example, an essential compound added to a build stage culture
medium is at least about 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90,
100, or more than about 100 times greater than the saturating amount determined from
an essential compound titration curve. In certain embodiments, if it is desired to
grow genetically modified auxotrophic yeast host cells to a lower biomass concentration
or maximum specific growth rate, an essential compound can be added to a build stage
culture medium in an amount less than the saturating amount. For example, an essential
compound added to a build stage culture medium can be at least about 0.1, 0.2, 0.3,
0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 100, or more than about
100 times less than the saturating amount determined from an essential compound titration
curve.
[0283] In addition, for a given concentration of carbon source (
e.g., 20 grams of glucose per a liter of medium) suitable concentrations of essential compounds,
such as essential amino acids, for auxotrophic strains are generally known in the
art. In some embodiments, the concentration of an essential compound in a build stage
culture medium is at least about 0.0001% (weight of essential compound per volume
of culture medium). In some embodiments, the concentration of an essential compound
in a build stage culture medium is at least about 0.0005% (w/v). In some embodiments,
the concentration of an essential compound in a build stage culture medium is at least
about 0.001% (w/v). In some embodiments, the concentration of an essential compound
in a build stage culture medium is at least about 0.005% (w/v). In some embodiments,
the concentration of an essential compound in a build stage culture medium is at least
about 0.01% (w/v). In some embodiments, the concentration of an essential compound
in a build stage culture medium is at least about 0.05% (w/v). In some embodiments,
the concentration of an essential compound in a build stage culture medium is at least
about 0.1% (w/v). In some embodiments, the concentration of an essential compound
in a build stage culture medium is at least about 0.5% (w/v). In some embodiments,
the concentration of an essential compound in a build stage culture medium is at least
about 1% (w/v). In some embodiments, the concentration of an essential compound in
a build stage culture medium is at least about 5% or 10% (w/v). Designing a culture
medium for cultivation of auxotrophic strains are well-known in the art, and described
in, for example, Guide to
Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology, 194 (Guthrie et al., Academic Press 1990); Introduction to Yeast Media (Sigma-Aldrich).
[0284] After the build stage, a production stage culture medium used to culture genetically
modified yeast host cells comprises no externally added essential compound or in sufficiently
low amounts. This way, a selective pressure is placed on the yeast host cell to maintain
expression of a conditional essential gene so that the cell is capable of producing
an auxotrophically required essential compound for cell growth. In certain embodiments,
a production stage culture medium comprises no externally added essential compound.
In some embodiments, however, an essential compound can be added to a production stage
culture medium in a sufficiently low amount. For example, a production stage culture
medium can comprise an essential compound in an amount which is at least about 10-fold,
100-fold, 1000-fold, 10,000-fold or about 100,000-fold less than the saturating amount
of an essential compound. In some embodiments, a production stage culture medium comprises
an essential compound in an amount which is at least about 10-fold, 100-fold, 1000-fold,
10,000-fold or about 100,000-fold less than the amount of essential compound in a
build stage culture medium.
[0285] In some embodiments, an essential compound is an amino acid, and a conditional essential
gene in a stabilization construct encodes an enzyme in an amino acid biosynthetic
pathway. For example, an essential compound which is used to supplement a culture
medium during the build stage is lysine and any one or combinations of lysine biosynthetic
genes,
LYS1, LYS2, LY4, LYS9, LYS12, LYS14, LYS20 or LYS21, can be used in a stabilization construct. In another example, an essential compound
which is used to supplement a culture medium during the build stage is methionine.
Other amino acid biosynthetic genes described in Section 6.6.2 can also be used in
a stabilization construct.
[0286] In other embodiments, an essential compound that is used to supplement a culture
medium during the build stage can be uracil, thymine, guanine or cytosine, and any
one or combination of genes that encode enzymes in biosynthetic pathways for these
nucleotides can be used in a stabilization construct. In yet other embodiments, an
essential compound is a fatty acid, and a conditional essential gene in a stabilization
construct encodes an enzyme in a fatty acid biosynthetic pathway.
[0287] In all embodiments, an inducible promoter and its inducer can be used as a switch
to turn off the production of heterologous non-catabolic compounds during the build
stage and to turn on the production during the production stage. For example, an inducible
promoter is operably linked to a nucleic acid encoding a transcriptional activator
which can activate expression of both heterologous nucleic acids encoding enzymes
of a biosynthetic pathway to produce non-catabolic compounds and conditional essential
gene product during the production stage of fermentation. Examples of suitable inducible
promoters include maltose-responsive promoters which are inducible by ligands such
as maltose based inducers. Additional details of maltose-responsive promoters and
maltose based inducers are described in Sections 6.3 and 6.4 above.
[0288] In other embodiments, an inducible promoter is operably linked to a nucleic acid
encoding a transcriptional repressor which represses expression of both heterologous
nucleic acids encoding enzymes of a biosynthetic pathway for producing non-catabolic
compounds and conditional essential gene products during the build stage of fermentation.
Any suitable inducible promoters including those described above or known in the art
can be used in these embodiments to activate transcriptional repressors.
[0289] An exemplary embodiment of using an inducible promoter as a switch to turn off or
repress expression of heterologous nucleic acids encoding enzymes of a biosynthetic
pathway for producing non-catabolic compounds and conditional essential gene products
are shown in FIG. 17. As shown in FIG. 17, a nucleic acid encoding a transcriptional
repressor of the GAL regulon, Gal80p, is operably linked to a maltose-responsive promoter
pMAL32. When an inducing amount of maltose is added to culture medium, Gal80p is expressed,
which, in turn, represses activation of transcriptional activator Gal4p and expression
of one or more biosynthetic enzymes for producing the heterologous compounds. Gal80p
concurrently represses expression of LYS9, a conditional essential gene that encodes
an enzyme in the lysine biosynthetic pathway. During the build stage when Gal80p represses
the expression of the regulon (including the conditional essential gene expression),
lysine is supplemented in a culture medium so that cells can grow.
[0290] During the production stage of the exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 17, the genetically
modified host cells are cultured in a culture medium with no maltose or lysine (or
in sufficiently low amount thereof). Since GAL80 is no longer expressed, transcriptional
activator Gal4p is no longer repressed and therefore activates expression of the biosynthetic
pathway genes to produce non-catabolic compounds. Concurrently, Gal4p also activates
expression of LYS9, which, in turn, allows the lysine biosynthetic pathway to produce
essential compound lysine. Since the genetically modified cells are capable of producing
lysine, the cells can be cultured without lysine in a culture medium during the production
stage. Absence of lysine in the culture medium adds a selective pressure for Gal4p
expression during the production stage. Therefore, any cells that gain spontaneous
mutations that negatively affect the GAL regulon will not be able to survive, allowing
high product-yielding host cells to dominate the population of cells during a long
fermentation run.
6.7 Production of Non-Catabolic Compounds using a Maltose Dependent Degron and a Stabilization
Construct
[0291] In another aspect, provided herein are methods for producing heterologous non-catabolic
compounds using a maltose dependent degron and a stabilization construct. A maltose
dependent degron fused in frame to a transcriptional regulator can force the transcriptional
regulator to become dependent on binding of maltose for its stability. For example,
a fusion protein comprising Gal80p fused to a maltose dependent degron in the absence
of maltose in a culture medium will become unstable during the production stage. Thus,
even if a spontaneous mutation reactivates expression of the fusion protein comprising
Gal80p, the fusion protein will become destabilized in the absence of maltose in the
culture medium and will not be able to repress the GAL regulon expression during the
production stage. When a maltose dependent degron is used in combination with a stabilization
construct described herein, the production of heterologous non-catabolic compounds
is further stabilized since both constructs can counteract any negative effects of
spontaneous mutations.
[0292] In an embodiment, methods comprise culturing a genetically modified yeast host cell
in a culture medium, wherein the genetically modified yeast host cell comprises:
(a) a heterologous nucleic acid encoding a fusion protein comprising a transcriptional
regulator fused in frame to a maltose dependent degron; (b) one or more heterologous
nucleic acids encoding one or more enzymes of a biosynthetic pathway for producing
heterologous non-catabolic compounds, each operably linked to a promoter regulated
by the fusion protein; and (c) a stabilization construct which comprises a heterologous
nucleic acid encoding a cell-growth-affecting protein, wherein the heterologous nucleic
acid is operably linked to a promoter regulated by the fusion protein. The stabilization
construct in genetically modified yeast host cell provides a growth advantage to high
product-yielding cells and a growth disadvantage to spontaneously mutated cells that
are low producers or non-producers, and therefore stabilizes the production of heterologous
non-catabolic compounds during fermentation. In addition, a maltose dependent degron
provides a post-translational control for the fusion protein comprising a transcriptional
regulator fused in frame to a maltose dependent degron. By manipulating the content
of maltose in a culture medium, the stability of maltose dependent degron, and therefore,
the post-translational stability and activity level of the transcriptional regulator
can be controlled. This, in turn, provides an additional layer of stabilization in
producing heterologous non-catabolic compounds.
[0293] A fusion protein may comprise a transcriptional activator fused in frame to a maltose
dependent degron. Transcriptional activator Gal4p is selected as a transcriptional
regulator in the fusion protein. For this embodiment, genetically modified yeast host
cells comprising heterologous nucleic acids described herein can be cultured in a
culture medium comprising maltose during the production stage. The stable fusion protein
bound to maltose, in turn, can activate expression of heterologous nucleic acids operably
linked to Gal4p-responsive promoters to express enzymes of a biosynthetic pathway
for producing non-catabolic compounds and cell-growth-affecting protein. When a maltose
dependent degron is fused in frame to a transcriptional activator, any endogenous
transcriptional repressor of the regulon (
e.g., Gal80p) may be functionally disrupted so that it does not interfere with the activity
of the fusion protein.
[0294] In other embodiments, a fusion protein comprises a transcriptional repressor fused
in frame to a maltose dependent degron. For example, transcriptional repressor Gal80p
is selected as a transcriptional regulator in the fusion protein. For this embodiment,
genetically modified yeast host cells comprising heterologous nucleic acids described
herein can be cultured in a culture medium comprising maltose and an essential compound
during a cellular biomass build stage of fermentation. This way, the transcriptional
repressor in the fusion protein, bound to maltose, is stable, and therefore, represses
the activity of Gal4p. This, in turn, represses expression of heterologous nucleic
acids encoding one or more enzymes of a biosynthetic pathway for producing non-catabolic
compounds and cell-growth-affecting protein during the cellular biomass build stage
of fermentation.
[0295] In certain embodiments, any maltose dependent degrons, fusion proteins, maltose based
inducers, maltose-responsive promoters, culture conditions and other features related
to production of non-catabolic compounds described herein can be used in combination
with a stabilization construct to further improve stability and production of non-catabolic
compounds from genetically modified yeast host cells. Furthermore, additional details
related to the production of non-catabolic compounds and building of cellular biomass
described in Section 6.5 and other sections are applicable to the compositions and
methods comprising a maltose dependent degron and a stabilization construct provided
herein.
6.8 Genetically Modified Host Cells
[0296] Provided herein are genetically modified yeast host cells that comprise heterologous
nucleic acids encoding a fusion protein described herein.
[0297] In certain embodiments, the heterologous nucleic acid encoding a fusion protein is
operably linked to a maltose-responsive promoter in yeast host cells. For such host
cells, the maltose content in culture media can be adjusted at a suitable time point
to activate (or to increase) transcription of the DNA coding sequence of the fusion
protein and to increase post-translational stability of the fusion protein encoded
therefrom.
[0298] The genetically modified yeast host cells according to all embodiments may be further
modified to produce heterologous non-catabolic compounds (
e.g., acetyl Co-A derived compound). For example, the genetically modified yeast host
cells further comprise heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding one or more enzymes
of a biosynthetic pathway for producing non-catabolic compounds. In these embodiments,
the genetically modified yeast host cells may produce greater amounts of one or more
compounds biosynthesized from acetyl-CoA compared to a parent host cell lacking the
genetic modifications described herein.
[0299] In all embodiments, the genetically modified yeast host cells provided herein comprise
one or more heterologous nucleic acids encoding one or more enzymes of a biosynthetic
pathway for producing a heterologous non-catabolic compound, and one or more heterologous
nucleic acids encoding one or more cell-growth-affecting proteins, wherein each of
the heterologous nucleic acids is operably linked to a commonly regulated promoter.
[0300] In certain embodiments, various combinations and subcombinations of nucleic acids
and constructs described herein may be introduced into genetically modified yeast
host cells to stabilize expression of heterologous nucleic acids encoding biosynthetic
enzymes for production of non-catabolic compounds. For example, heterologous non-catabolic
compound producing yeast host cells can be further modified to comprise a stabilization
construct and a fusion protein described herein.
[0301] The heterologous nucleic acids described herein may be introduced into yeast host
cells using any suitable vectors described herein or those known in the art. Methods
for genetically modifying host cells using expression vectors or chromosomal integration
constructs,
e.g., to effect increased production of one or more non-catabolic compounds in a host
cell, are well known in the art. S
ee, for example,
Sherman, F., et al., Methods Yeast Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, N.Y. (1978);
Guthrie, C., et al. (Eds.) Guide To Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology Vol. 194,
Academic Press, San Diego (1991);
Sambrook et al., 2001, Molecular Cloning -- A Laboratory Manual, 3rd edition, Cold
Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY; and
Ausubel et al., eds., Current Edition, Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Greene
Publishing Associates and Wiley Interscience, NY. . In addition, inhibition of gene expression, e.g., which results in increased production
of one or more non-catabolic compounds in the cell, may be accomplished by deletion,
mutation, and/or gene rearrangement. It can also be carried out with the use of antisense
RNA, siRNA, miRNA, ribozymes, triple stranded DNA, and transcription and/or translation
inhibitors. In addition, transposons can be employed to disrupt gene expression, for
example, by inserting it between the promoter and the coding region, or between two
adjacent genes to inactivate one or both genes.
[0302] Generally, expression vectors are recombinant polynucleotide molecules comprising
replication signals and expression control sequences, e.g., promoters and terminators,
operably linked to a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide. Expression vectors
useful for expressing polypeptide-encoding nucleotide sequences include viral vectors
(e.g., retroviruses, adenoviruses and adeno-associated viruses), plasmid vectors,
and cosmids. Illustrative examples of expression vectors suitable for use in yeast
cells include, but are not limited to CEN/ARS and 2µ plasmids. Illustrative examples
of promoters suitable for use in yeast cells include, but are not limited to the promoter
of the TEF1 gene of
K. lactis, the promoter of the PGK1 gene of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the promoter of the TDH3 gene of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, repressible promoters,
e.g., the promoter of the CTR3 gene of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and inducible promoters,
e.g., galactose inducible promoters of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (e.g., promoters of the GAL1, GAL7, and GAL10 genes).
[0303] Expression vectors and chromosomal integration constructs can be introduced into
host cells by any method known to one of skill in the art without limitation.
See, for example,
Hinnen et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75:1292-3 (1978);
Cregg et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 5:3376-3385 (1985);
U.S. Patent No. 5,272,065;
Goeddel etal., eds, 1990, Methods in Enzymology, vol. 185, Academic Press, Inc., CA;
Krieger, 1990, Gene Transfer and Expression --A Laboratory Manual, Stockton Press,
NY;
Sambrook et al., 1989, Molecular Cloning -- A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory, NY; and
Ausubel et al., eds., Current Edition, Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Greene
Publishing Associates and Wiley Interscience, NY. Exemplary techniques include, but are not limited to, spheroplasting, electroporation,
PEG 1000 mediated transformation, and lithium acetate or lithium chloride mediated
transformation.
6.8.1. Host Cells
[0304] Cells useful in the methods provided herein include any yeast cell capable of producing
fusion proteins. In all embodiments, the cell is a yeast cell. In some embodiments,
the cell is a Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell.
[0305] Yeasts useful in the methods provided herein include yeasts that have been deposited
with microorganism depositories
(e.g. IFO, ATCC,
etc.) and belong to the genera
Aciculoconidium, Ambrosiozyma, Arthroascus, Arxiozyma, Ashbya, Babjevia, Bensingtonia,
Botryoascus, Botryozyma, Brettanomyces, Bullera, Bulleromyces, Candida, Citeromyces,
Clavispora, Cryptococcus, Cystofilobasidium, Debaryomyces, Dekkara, Dipodascopsis,
Dipodascus, Eeniella, Endomycopsella, Eremascus, Eremothecium, Erythrobasidium, Fellomyces,
Filobasidium, Galactomyces, Geotrichum, Guilliermondella, Hanseniaspora, Hansenula,
Hasegawaea, Holtermannia, Hormoascus, Hyphopichia, Issatchenkia, Kloeckera, Kloeckeraspora,
Kluyveromyces, Kondoa, Kuraishia, Kurtzmanomyces, Leucosporidium, Lipomyces, Lodderomyces,
Malassezia, Metschnikowia, Mrakia, Myxozyma, Nadsonia, Nakazawaea, Nematospora, Ogataea,
Oosporidium, Pachysolen, Phachytichospora, Phaffia, Pichia, Rhodosporidium, Rhodotorula,
Saccharomyces, Saccharomycodes, Saccharomycopsis, Saitoella, Sakaguchia, Saturnospora,
Schizoblastosporion, SchizoSaccharomyces, Schwanniomyces, Sporidiobolus, Sporobolomyces,
Sporopachydermia, Stephanoascus, Sterigmatomyces, Sterigmatosporidium, Symbiotaphrina,
Sympodiomyces, Sympodiomycopsis, Torulaspora, Trichosporiella, Trichosporon, Trigonopsis,
Tsuchiyaea, Udeniomyces, Waltomyces, Wickerhamia, Wickerhamiella, Williopsis, Yamadazyma,
Yarrowia, Zygoascus, ZygoSaccharomyces, Zygowilliopsis, and
Zygozyma, among others.
[0306] In particular embodiments, useful yeasts in the methods provided herein include
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia pastoris, SchizoSaccharomyces pombe, Dekkera bruxellensis,
Kluyveromyces lactis (previously called
Saccharomyces lactis), Kluveromyces marxianus, Arxula adeninivorans, or
Hansenula polymorpha (now known as
Pichia angusta). In some embodiments, the microbe is a strain of the genus
Candida, such as
Candida lipolytica, Candida guilliermondii, Candida krusei, Candida pseudotropicalis, or
Candida utilis.
[0307] In a particular embodiment, the cell is a
Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell. In some embodiments, the strain of the
Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell is selected from the group consisting of Baker's yeast, CBS 7959, CBS 7960,
CBS 7961, CBS 7962, CBS 7963, CBS 7964, IZ-1904, TA, BG-1, CR-1, SA-1, M-26, Y-904,
PE-2, PE-5, VR-1, BR-1, BR-2, ME-2, VR-2, MA-3, MA-4, CAT-1, CB-1, NR-1, BT-1, and
AL-1. In some embodiments, the strain of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is selected from the group consisting of PE-2, CAT-1, VR-1, BG-1, CR-1, and SA-1.
In a particular embodiment, the strain of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is PE-2. In another particular embodiment, the strain of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is CAT-1. In another particular embodiment, the strain of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is BG-1.
[0308] Exemplary non-catabolic compound producing cells,
e.g., cells recombinantly producing isoprenoids, polyketides, and fatty acids, and methods
for generating such cells, are provided below.
6.9 Culture Media and Conditions
[0309] Materials and methods for the maintenance and growth of cultures are well known to
those skilled in the art of microbiology or fermentation science
(see, for example,
Bailey et al., Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals, second edition, McGraw Hill,
New York, 1986). Consideration must be given to appropriate culture medium, pH, temperature, and
requirements for aerobic, microaerobic, or anaerobic conditions, depending on the
specific requirements of the host cell, the fermentation, and the process.
[0310] The methods of producing non-catabolic compounds provided herein may be performed
in a suitable culture medium in a suitable container, including but not limited to
a cell culture plate, a flask, or a fermentor. Further, the methods can be performed
at any scale of fermentation known in the art to support industrial production of
microbial products. Any suitable fermentor may be used including a stirred tank fermentor,
an airlift fermentor, a bubble fermentor, or any combination thereof. In particular
embodiments utilizing
Saccharomyces cerevisiae as the host cell, strains can be grown in a fermentor as described in detail by
Kosaric, et al, in Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Sixth Edition,
Volume 12, pages 398-473, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KDaA, Weinheim, Germany. Further, the methods can be performed at any volume of fermentation, e.g., from
lab scale (
e.g., about 10 ml to 20L) to pilot scale
(e.g., about 20L to 500L) to industrial scale
(e.g., about 500L to ≥500,000L) fermentations.
[0311] The culture medium for use in the methods of producing non-catabolic compounds as
provided herein includes any culture medium in which a genetically modified microorganism
capable of producing a non-catabolic compound can subsist,
i.e., support and maintain growth and viability.
[0312] The culture medium may be an aqueous medium comprising assimilable carbon, nitrogen
and phosphate sources. Such a medium can also include appropriate salts, minerals,
metals and other nutrients. The carbon source and each of the essential cell nutrients
may be added incrementally or continuously to the fermentation media, and each required
nutrient is maintained at essentially the minimum level needed for efficient assimilation
by growing cells, for example, in accordance with a predetermined cell growth curve
based on the metabolic or respiratory function of the cells which convert the carbon
source to a biomass.
[0313] Suitable conditions and suitable media for culturing microorganisms are well known
in the art. The suitable medium may be supplemented be with one or more additional
agents, such as, for example, an inducer (e.g., when one or more nucleotide sequences
encoding a gene product are under the control of an inducible promoter), a repressor
(
e.
g., when one or more nucleotide sequences encoding a gene product are under the control
of a repressible promoter), or a selection agent
(e.g., an antibiotic to select for microorganisms comprising the genetic modifications).
[0314] The carbon source may be a monosaccharide (simple sugar), a disaccharide, a polysaccharide,
a non-fermentable carbon source, or one or more combinations thereof. Non-limiting
examples of suitable monosaccharides include glucose, galactose, mannose, fructose,
ribose, and combinations thereof. Non-limiting examples of suitable disaccharides
include sucrose, lactose, maltose, trehalose, cellobiose, and combinations thereof.
Non-limiting examples of suitable polysaccharides include starch, glycogen, cellulose,
chitin, and combinations thereof. Non-limiting examples of suitable non-fermentable
carbon sources include acetate and glycerol. Sugar cane syrup which includes different
combinations of carbon source may be used.
[0315] The concentration of a carbon source, such as glucose, in the culture medium should
promote cell growth, but not be so high as to repress growth of the microorganism
used. Typically, cultures are run with a carbon source, such as glucose, being added
at levels to achieve the desired level of growth and biomass, but at undetectable
levels (with detection limits being about <0.1g/l). The concentration of a carbon
source, such as glucose, in the culture medium may be greater than about 1 g/L, typically
greater than about 2 g/L, and typically greater than about 5 g/L. In addition, the
concentration of a carbon source, such as glucose, in the culture medium is generally
less than about 100 g/L, typically less than about 50 g/L, and more typically less
than about 20 g/L. Sometimes the concentration of carbon source can be greater than
100g/L during a brief period, for example, when cells are initially added to the fermentor.
It should be noted that references to culture component concentrations can refer to
both initial and/or ongoing component concentrations. In some cases, it may be desirable
to allow the culture medium to become depleted of a carbon source during culture.
[0316] Sources of assimilable nitrogen that can be used in a suitable culture medium include,
but are not limited to, simple nitrogen sources, organic nitrogen sources and complex
nitrogen sources. Such nitrogen sources include anhydrous ammonia, ammonium salts
and substances of animal, vegetable and/or microbial origin. Suitable nitrogen sources
include, but are not limited to, protein hydrolysates, microbial biomass hydrolysates,
peptone, yeast extract, ammonium sulfate, urea, and amino acids. Any suitable amount
of nitrogen sources may be added to the culture medium. Further, in some instances
it may be desirable to allow the culture medium to become depleted of the nitrogen
sources during culture.
[0317] The effective culture medium can contain other compounds such as inorganic salts,
vitamins, trace metals or growth promoters. Such other compounds can also be present
in carbon, nitrogen or mineral sources in the effective medium or can be added specifically
to the medium.
[0318] The culture medium can also contain a suitable phosphate source. Such phosphate sources
include both inorganic and organic phosphate sources. Preferred phosphate sources
include, but are not limited to, phosphate salts such as mono or dibasic sodium and
potassium phosphates, ammonium phosphate and mixtures thereof. Any suitable amount
of phosphate source may be added to the culture medium.
[0319] A suitable culture medium can also include a source of magnesium, preferably in the
form of a physiologically acceptable salt, such as magnesium sulfate heptahydrate,
although other magnesium sources in concentrations that contribute similar amounts
of magnesium can be used. Any suitable amount of magnesium source may be added to
the culture medium. Further, in some instances it may be desirable to allow the culture
medium to become depleted of a magnesium source during culture.
[0320] The culture medium can also include a biologically acceptable chelating agent, such
as the dihydrate of trisodium citrate. Any suitable amount of chelating agent may
be added to the culture medium.
[0321] The culture medium can also initially include a biologically acceptable acid or base
to maintain the desired pH of the culture medium. Biologically acceptable acids include,
but are not limited to, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric
acid and mixtures thereof. Biologically acceptable bases include, but are not limited
to, ammonium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide and mixtures thereof.
[0322] The culture medium can also include a biologically acceptable calcium source, including,
but not limited to, calcium chloride. The culture medium can also include sodium chloride.
The culture medium can also include trace metals. Such trace metals can be added to
the culture medium as a stock solution that, for convenience, can be prepared separately
from the rest of the culture medium. Any suitable amount of calcium source, sodium
chloride, and trace metals may be added to the culture medium.
[0323] The culture media can include other vitamins, such as biotin, calcium, pantothenate,
inositol, pyridoxine-HCl, and thiamine-HCl. Such vitamins can be added to the culture
medium as a stock solution that, for convenience, can be prepared separately from
the rest of the culture medium. Beyond certain concentrations, however, the addition
of vitamins to the culture medium is not advantageous for the growth of the microorganisms.
[0324] The fermentation methods described herein can be performed in conventional culture
modes, which include, but are not limited to, batch, fed-batch, cell recycle, continuous
and semi-continuous. The fermentation may be carried out in fed-batch mode. In such
a case, some of the components of the medium are depleted during culture during the
production stage of the fermentation. The culture may be supplemented with relatively
high concentrations of such components at the outset, for example, of the production
stage, so that growth and/or non-catabolic compound production is supported for a
period of time before additions are required. The preferred ranges of these components
are maintained throughout the culture by making additions as levels are depleted by
culture. Levels of components in the culture medium can be monitored by, for example,
sampling the culture medium periodically and assaying for concentrations. Alternatively,
once a standard culture procedure is developed, additions can be made at timed intervals
corresponding to known levels at particular times throughout the culture. As will
be recognized by those in the art, the rate of consumption of nutrient increases during
culture as the cell density of the medium increases. Moreover, to avoid introduction
of foreign microorganisms into the culture medium, addition is performed using aseptic
addition methods, as are known in the art. In addition, a small amount of anti-foaming
agent may be added during the culture.
[0325] The temperature of the culture medium can be any temperature suitable for growth
of the genetically modified yeast cells and/or production of non-catabolic compounds.
For example, prior to inoculation of the culture medium with an inoculum, the culture
medium can be brought to and maintained at a temperature in the range of from about
20°C to about 45°C, typically to a temperature in the range of from about 25°C to
about 40°C, and more typically in the range of from about 28°C to about 34°C.
[0326] The pH of the culture medium can be controlled by the addition of acid or base to
the culture medium. In such cases when ammonia is used to control pH, it also conveniently
serves as a nitrogen source in the culture medium. Preferably, the pH is maintained
from about 3.0 to about 8.0, typically from about 3.5 to about 7.0, and more typically
from about 4.0 to about 6.5.
[0327] The carbon source concentration, such as the maltose or glucose concentration, of
the culture medium may be monitored during culture. Glucose concentration of the culture
medium can be monitored using known techniques, such as, for example, use of the glucose
oxidase enzyme test or high pressure liquid chromatography, which can be used to monitor
glucose concentration in the supernatant, e.g., a cell-free component of the culture
medium, and maltose levels may be similarly monitored. As stated previously, the carbon
source concentration should be kept below the level at which cell growth inhibition
occurs. Although such concentration may vary from organism to organism, for glucose
as a carbon source, cell growth inhibition may occur at glucose concentrations greater
than at about 60 g/L, and can be determined readily by trial. Accordingly, when glucose
is used as a carbon source the glucose is preferably fed to the fermentor and maintained
below detection limits. Alternatively, the glucose concentration in the culture medium
is maintained in the range of from about 1 g/L to about 100 g/L, typically in the
range of from about 2 g/L to about 50 g/L, and sometimes in the range of from about
5 g/L to about 20 g/L. Although the carbon source concentration can be maintained
within desired levels by addition of, for example, a substantially pure glucose solution,
it is acceptable to maintain the carbon source concentration of the culture medium
by addition of aliquots of the original culture medium. The use of aliquots of the
original culture medium may be desirable because the concentrations of other nutrients
in the medium (e.g. the nitrogen and phosphate sources) can be maintained simultaneously.
Likewise, the trace metals concentrations can be maintained in the culture medium
by addition of aliquots of the trace metals solution.
6.10 Recovery of Non-Catabolic Compounds
[0328] Once the non-catabolic is produced by the yeast host cell, it may be recovered or
isolated for subsequent use using any suitable separation and purification methods
known in the art.
6.11 Production of Isoprenoids
[0329] In some embodiments, the non-catabolic compound is an isoprenoid. Isoprenoids are
derived from isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP), which can be biosynthesized by enzymes
of the mevalonate-dependent ("MEV") pathway or the 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-diphosphate
("DXP") pathway.
6.11.1. MEV Pathway
[0330] In some embodiments of the methods provided herein, the genetically modified yeast
host cell comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding one or
more enzymes of the MEV pathway, which effects increased production of one or more
isoprenoid compounds as compared to a genetically unmodified parent cell.
[0331] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can condense two molecules of acetyl-coenzyme A to
form acetoacetyl-CoA, e.g., an acetyl-CoA thiolase. Illustrative examples of nucleotide
sequences encoding such an enzyme include, but are not limited to: (NC_000913 REGION:
2324131.2325315;
Escherichia coli), (D49362;
Paracoccus denitrificans), and (L20428;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae).
[0332] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can condense acetoacetyl-CoA with another molecule
of acetyl-CoA to form 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA), e.g., a HMG-CoA synthase.
Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences encoding such an enzyme include, but
are not limited to: (NC_001145. complement 19061.20536;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae), (X96617;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae), (X83882;
Arabidopsis thaliana), (AB037907;
Kitasatospora griseola), (BT007302;
Homo sapiens), and (NC_002758, Locus tag SAV2546, GeneID 1122571;
Staphylococcus aureus).
[0333] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can convert HMG-CoA into mevalonate, e.g., a HMG-CoA
reductase. Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences encoding such an enzyme include,
but are not limited to: (NM_206548;
Drosophila melanogaster), (NC_002758, Locus tag SAV2545, GeneID 1122570;
Staphylococcus aureus), (NM_204485;
Gallus gallus), (AB015627;
Streptomyces sp. KO 3988), (AF542543;
Nicotiana attenuata), (AB037907;
Kitasatospora griseola), (AX128213, providing the sequence encoding a truncated HMGR;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae), and (NC_001145: complement (115734.118898;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae).
[0334] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can convert mevalonate into mevalonate 5-phosphate,
e.g., a mevalonate kinase. Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences encoding
such an enzyme include, but are not limited to: (L77688;
Arabidopsis thaliana), and (X55875;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae).
[0335] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can convert mevalonate 5-phosphate into mevalonate
5-pyrophosphate, e.g., a phosphomevalonate kinase. Illustrative examples of nucleotide
sequences encoding such an enzyme include, but are not limited to: (AF429385;
Hevea brasiliensis), (NM_006556;
Homo sapiens), and (NC_001145. complement 712315.713670;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae).
[0336] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can convert mevalonate 5-pyrophosphate into IPP,
e.g., a mevalonate pyrophosphate decarboxylase. Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences
encoding such an enzyme include, but are not limited to: (X97557;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae), (AF290095;
Enterococcus faecium), and (U49260;
Homo sapiens).
[0337] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises one or more heterologous
nucleotide sequences encoding more than one enzyme of the MEV pathway. In some embodiments,
the isoprenoid producing cell comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences
encoding two enzymes of the MEV pathway. In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing
cell comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an enzyme that
can convert HMG-CoA into mevalonate and an enzyme that can convert mevalonate into
mevalonate 5-phosphate. In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises
one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding three enzymes of the MEV pathway.
In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises one or more heterologous
nucleotide sequences encoding four enzymes of the MEV pathway. In some embodiments,
the isoprenoid producing cell comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences
encoding five enzymes of the MEV pathway. In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing
cell comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding six enzymes
of the MEV pathway.
[0338] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell further comprises a heterologous
nucleotide sequence encoding an enzyme that can convert IPP generated via the MEV
pathway into its isomer, dimethylallyl pyrophosphate ("DMAPP"). DMAPP can be condensed
and modified through the action of various additional enzymes to form simple and more
complex isoprenoids (Figure 2).
6.11.2. DXP Pathway
[0339] In some embodiments of the methods provided herein, the isoprenoid producing cell
comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding one or more enzymes
of the DXP pathway, which effects increased production of one or more isoprenoid compounds
as compared to a genetically unmodified parent cell.
[0340] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can condense two molecules of acetyl-coenzyme A to
form acetoacetyl-CoA, e.g., an acetyl-CoA thiolase. Illustrative examples of nucleotide
sequences encoding such an enzyme include, but are not limited to: (NC_000913 REGION:
2324131.2325315;
Escherichia coli), (D49362;
Paracoccus denitrificans), and (L20428;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae).
[0341] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme, e.g., 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase, which
can condense pyruvate with D-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate to make 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate.
Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences encoding such an enzyme include but
are not limited to: (AF035440;
Escherichia coli), (NC_002947, locus tag PP0527;
Pseudomonas putida KT2440), (CP000026, locus tag SPA2301;
Salmonella enterica Paratyphi, see ATCC 9150), (NC_007493, locus tag RSP_0254;
Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1), (NC_005296, locus tag RPA0952;
Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009), (NC_004556, locus tag PD1293;
Xylella fastidiosa Temecula1), and (NC_003076, locus tag ATSG11380;
Arabidopsis thaliana).
[0342] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme,
e.
g., 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase, which can convert 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate
to 2C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate. Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences
include but are not limited to: (AB013300;
Escherichia coli), (AF148852;
Arabidopsis thaliana), (NC_002947, locus tag PP1597;
Pseudomonas putida KT2440), (AL939124, locus tag SCO5694;
Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2)), (NC_007493, locus tag RSP _2709;
Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1), and (NC_007492, locus tag Pfl_1107;
Pseudomonas fluorescens PfO-1).
[0343] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme, e.g., 4-diphosphocytidyl-2C-methyl-D-erythritol synthase,
which can convert 2C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate to 4-diphosphocytidyl-2C-methyl-D-erythritol.
Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences include but are not limited to: (AF230736;
Escherichia coli), (NC_007493, locus tag RSP _2835;
Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1), (NC_003071, locus tag AT2G02500;
Arabidopsis thaliana), and (NC_002947, locus tag PP1614;
Pseudomonas putida KT2440).
[0344] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme, e.g., 4-diphosphocytidyl-2C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase,
which can convert 4-diphosphocytidyl-2C-methyl-D-erythritol to 4-diphosphocytidyl-2C-methyl-D-erythritol-2-phosphate.
Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences include but are not limited to: (AF216300;
Escherichia coli) and (NC_007493, locus tag RSP_1779; Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1).
[0345] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme, 2C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate synthase,
which can convert 4-diphosphocytidyl-2C-methyl-D-erythritol-2-phosphate to 2C-methyl-D-erythritol
2,4-cyclodiphosphate. Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences include but are
not limited to: (AF230738;
Escherichia coli), (NC_007493, locus tag RSP_6071;
Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1), and (NC_002947, locus tag PP1618;
Pseudomonas putida KT2440).
[0346] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme, e.g., 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate
synthase, which can convert 2C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate to 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate.
Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences include but are not limited to: (AY033515;
Escherichia coli), (NC_002947, locus tag PP0853;
Pseudomonas putida KT2440), and (NC_007493, locus tag RSP _2982;
Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1).
[0347] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme, e.g., isopentyl/dimethylallyl diphosphate synthase, which
can convert 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl-4-diphosphate into either IPP or its
isomer, DMAPP. Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences include but are not limited
to: (AY062212;
Escherichia coli) and (NC_002947, locus tag PP0606;
Pseudomonas putida KT2440).
[0348] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises one or more heterologous
nucleotide sequences encoding more than one enzyme of the DXP pathway. In some embodiments,
the isoprenoid producing cell comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences
encoding two enzymes of the DXP pathway. In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing
cell comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding three enzymes
of the DXP pathway. In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises one
or more heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding four enzymes of the DXP pathway.
In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises one or more heterologous
nucleotide sequences encoding five enzymes of the DXP pathway. In some embodiments,
the isoprenoid producing cell comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences
encoding six enzymes of the DXP pathway. In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing
cell comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding five enzymes
of the DXP pathway. In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises one
or more heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding seven enzymes of the DXP pathway.
[0349] "Cross-talk" (or interference) between the host cell's own metabolic processes and
those processes involved with the production of IPP may be minimized or eliminated
entirely. For example, cross talk is minimized or eliminated entirely when the host
microorganism relies exclusively on the DXP pathway for synthesizing IPP, and a MEV
pathway is introduced to provide additional IPP. Such a host organism would not be
equipped to alter the expression of the MEV pathway enzymes or process the intermediates
associated with the MEV pathway. Organisms that rely exclusively or predominately
on the DXP pathway include, for example,
Escherichia coli.
[0350] In some embodiments, the yeast host cell produces IPP via the MEV pathway, either
exclusively or in combination with the DXP pathway. In other embodiments, a host's
DXP pathway is functionally disabled so that the host cell produces IPP exclusively
through a heterologously introduced MEV pathway. The DXP pathway can be functionally
disabled by disabling gene expression or inactivating the function of one or more
of the DXP pathway enzymes.
[0351] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid produced by the cell is a C
5 isoprenoid. These compounds are derived from one isoprene unit and are also called
hemiterpenes. An illustrative example of a hemiterpene is isoprene. In other embodiments,
the isoprenoid is a C
10 isoprenoid. These compounds are derived from two isoprene units and are also called
monoterpenes. Illustrative examples of monoterpenes are limonene, citranellol, geraniol,
menthol, perillyl alcohol, linalool, thujone, and myrcene. In other embodiments, the
isoprenoid is a C
15 isoprenoid. These compounds are derived from three isoprene units and are also called
sesquiterpenes. Illustrative examples of sesquiterpenes are periplanone B, gingkolide
B, amorphadiene, artemisinin, artemisinic acid, valencene, nootkatone, epi-cedrol,
epi-aristolochene, farnesol, gossypol, sanonin, periplanone, forskolin, and patchoulol
(which is also known as patchouli alcohol). In other embodiments, the isoprenoid is
a C
20 isoprenoid. These compounds are derived from four isoprene units and also called
diterpenes. Illustrative examples of diterpenes are casbene, eleutherobin, paclitaxel,
prostratin, pseudopterosin, and taxadiene. In yet other examples, the isoprenoid is
a C
20+ isoprenoid. These compounds are derived from more than four isoprene units and include:
triterpenes (C
30 isoprenoid compounds derived from 6 isoprene units) such as arbrusideE, bruceantin,
testosterone, progesterone, cortisone, digitoxin, and squalene; tetraterpenes (C
40 isoprenoid compounds derived from 8 isoprenoids) such as β-carotene; and polyterpenes
(C
40+ isoprenoid compounds derived from more than 8 isoprene units) such as polyisoprene.
In some embodiments, the isoprenoid is selected from the group consisting of abietadiene,
amorphadiene, carene, α-farnesene, β-farnesene, farnesol, geraniol, geranylgeraniol,
isoprene, linalool, limonene, myrcene, nerolidol, ocimene, patchoulol, β-pinene, sabinene,
γ-terpinene, terpinolene and valencene. Isoprenoid compounds also include, but are
not limited to, carotenoids (such as lycopene, α- and β-carotene, α- and β-cryptoxanthin,
bixin, zeaxanthin, astaxanthin, and lutein), steroid compounds, and compounds that
are composed of isoprenoids modified by other chemical groups, such as mixed terpene-alkaloids,
and coenzyme Q-10.
[0352] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell further comprises a heterologous
nucleotide sequence encoding an enzyme that can convert IPP generated via the MEV
pathway into DMAPP, e.g., an IPP isomerase. Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences
encoding such an enzyme include, but are not limited to: (NC_000913, 3031087.3031635;
Escherichia coli), and (AF082326;
Haematococcus pluvialis).
[0353] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell further comprises a heterologous
nucleotide sequence encoding a polyprenyl synthase that can condense IPP and/or DMAPP
molecules to form polyprenyl compounds containing more than five carbons.
[0354] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can condense one molecule of IPP with one molecule
of DMAPP to form one molecule of geranyl pyrophosphate ("GPP"),
e.g., a GPP synthase. Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences encoding such an enzyme
include, but are not limited to: (AF513111;
Abies grandis), (AF513112;
Abies grandis), (AF513113;
Abies grandis), (AY534686;
Antirrhinum majus), (AY534687;
Antirrhinum majus), (Y17376;
Arabidopsis thaliana), (AE016877, Locus AP11092;
Bacillus cereus; ATCC 14579), (AJ243739;
Citrus sinensis), (AY534745;
Clarkia breweri), (AY953508;
Ips pini), (DQ286930;
Lycopersicon esculentum), (AF182828;
Mentha xpiperita), (AF182827;
Mentha x piperita), (MPI249453; Mentha x piperita), (PZE431697, Locus CAD24425;
Paracoccus zeaxanthinifaciens), (AY866498;
Picrorhiza kurrooa), (AY351862;
Vitis vinifera), and (AF203881, Locus AAF12843;
Zymomonas mobilis).
[0355] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can condense two molecules of IPP with one molecule
of DMAPP, or add a molecule of IPP to a molecule of GPP, to form a molecule of farnesyl
pyrophosphate ("FPP"),
e.g., a FPP synthase. Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences that encode such an
enzyme include, but are not limited to: (ATU80605;
Arabidopsis thaliana), (ATHFPS2R;
Arabidopsis thaliana), (AAU36376;
Artemisia annua), (AF461050;
Bos taurus), (D00694;
Escherichia coli K-12), (AE009951, Locus AAL95523;
Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum ATCC 25586), (GFFPPSGEN;
Gibberella fujikuroi), (CP000009, Locus AAW60034;
Gluconobacter oxydans 621H), (AF019892;
Helianthus annuus), (HUMFAPS;
Homo sapiens), (KLPFPSQCR;
Kluyveromyces lactis), (LAU15777;
Lupinus albus), (LAU20771;
Lupinus albus), (AF309508;
Mus musculus), (NCFPPSGEN;
Neurospora crassa), (PAFPS1;
Parthenium argentatum), (PAFPS2;
Parthenium argentatum), (RATFAPS;
Rattus norvegicus), (YSCFPP;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae), (D89104;
SchizoSaccharomyces pombe), (CP000003, Locus AAT87386;
Streptococcus pyogenes), (CP000017, Locus AAZ51849;
Streptococcus pyogenes), (NC_008022, Locus YP_598856;
Streptococcus pyogenes MGAS10270), (NC_008023, Locus YP_600845;
Streptococcus pyogenes MGAS2096), (NC_008024, Locus YP_602832;
Streptococcus pyogenes MGAS10750), (MZEFPS;
Zea mays), (AE000657, Locus AAC06913;
Aquifex aeolicus VF5), (NM _202836;
Arabidopsis thaliana), (D84432, Locus BAA12575;
Bacillus subtilis), (U12678, Locus AAC28894;
Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110), (BACFDPS;
Geobacillus stearothermophilus), (NC_002940, Locus NP_873754;
Haemophilus ducreyi 35000HP), (L42023, Locus AAC23087;
Haemophilus influenzae Rd KW20), (J05262;
Homo sapiens), (YP_395294;
Lactobacillus sakei subsp. sakei 23K), (NC_005823, Locus YP_000273;
Leptospira interrogans serovar Copenhageni str. Fiocruz L1-130), (AB003187;
Micrococcus luteus), (NC_002946, Locus YP_208768;
Neisseria gonorrhoeae FA 1090), (U00090, Locus AAB91752;
Rhizobium sp. NGR234), (J05091;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae), (CP000031, Locus AAV93568;
Silicibacter pomeroyi DSS-3), (AE008481, Locus AAK99890;
Streptococcus pneumoniae R6), and (NC_004556, Locus NP 779706;
Xylellafastidiosa Temecula1).
[0356] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell further comprises a heterologous
nucleotide sequence encoding an enzyme that can combine IPP and DMAPP or IPP and FPP
to form geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate ("GGPP"). Illustrative examples of nucleotide
sequences that encode such an enzyme include, but are not limited to: (ATHGERPYRS;
Arabidopsis thaliana), (BT005328;
Arabidopsis thaliana), (NM_119845;
Arabidopsis thaliana), (NZ_AAJM01000380, Locus ZP_00743052;
Bacillus thuringiensis serovar israelensis, ATCC 35646 sq1563), (CRGGPPS;
Catharanthus roseus), (NZ_AABF02000074, Locus ZP_00144509;
Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. vincentii, ATCC 49256), (GFGGPPSGN;
Gibberella fujikuroi), (AY371321;
Ginkgo biloba), (AB055496;
Hevea brasiliensis), (AB017971;
Homo sapiens), (MCI276129;
Mucor circinelloides f. lusitanicus), (AB016044;
Mus musculus), (AABX01000298, Locus NCU01427;
Neurospora crassa), (NCU20940;
Neurospora crassa), (NZ_AAKL01000008, Locus ZP_00943566;
Ralstonia solanacearum UW551), (AB118238;
Rattus norvegicus), (SCU31632;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae), (AB016095; Synechococcus elongates), (SAGGPS;
Sinapis alba), (SSOGDS;
Sulfolobus acidocaldarius), (NC_007759, Locus YP_461832;
Syntrophus aciditrophicus SB), (NC_006840, Locus YP_204095;
Vibrio fischeri ES114), (NM_112315;
Arabidopsis thaliana), (ERWCRTE;
Pantoea agglomerans), (D90087, Locus BAA14124;
Pantoea ananatis), (X52291, Locus CAA36538;
Rhodobacter capsulatus), (AF195122, Locus AAF24294;
Rhodobacter sphaeroides), and (NC_004350, Locus NP_721015;
Streptococcus mutans UA159).
[0357] In some embodiments, the isoprenoid producing cell further comprises a heterologous
nucleotide sequence encoding an enzyme that can modify a polyprenyl to form a hemiterpene,
a monoterpene, a sesquiterpene, a diterpene, a triterpene, a tetraterpene, a polyterpene,
a steroid compound, a carotenoid, or a modified isoprenoid compound.
[0358] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes a carene synthase. Illustrative
examples of suitable nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited to: (AF461460,
REGION 43.1926;
Picea abies) and (AF527416, REGION: 78.1871;
Salvia stenophylla).
[0359] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes a geraniol synthase. Illustrative
examples of suitable nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited to: (AJ457070;
Cinnamomum tenuipilum), (AY362553;
Ocimum basilicum), (DQ234300;
Perilla frutescens strain 1864), (DQ234299;
Perilla citriodora strain 1861), (DQ234298;
Perilla citriodora strain 4935), and (DQ088667;
Perilla citriodora).
[0360] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes a linalool synthase. Illustrative
examples of a suitable nucleotide sequence include, but are not limited to: (AF497485;
Arabidopsis thaliana), (AC002294, Locus AAB71482;
Arabidopsis thaliana), (AY059757;
Arabidopsis thaliana), (NM_104793;
Arabidopsis thaliana), (AF154124;
Artemisia annua), (AF067603;
Clarkia breweri), (AF067602;
Clarkia concinna), (AF067601;
Clarkia breweri), (U58314;
Clarkia breweri), (AY840091;
Lycopersicon esculentum), (DQ263741;
Lavandula angustifolia), (AY083653;
Mentha citrate), (AY693647;
Ocimum basilicum), (XM_463918;
Oryza sativa), (AP004078, Locus BAD07605;
Oryza sativa), (XM _463918, Locus XP_463918;
Oryza sativa), (AY917193;
Perilla citriodora), (AF271259;
Perilla frutescens), (AY473623;
Picea abies), (DQ195274;
Picea sitchensis), and (AF444798;
Perilla frutescens var. crispa cultivar No. 79).
[0361] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes a limonene synthase. Illustrative
examples of suitable nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited to: (+)-limonene
synthases (AF514287, REGION: 47.1867;
Citrus limon) and (AY055214, REGION: 48.1889;
Agastache rugosa) and (-)-limonene synthases (DQ195275, REGION: 1.1905;
Picea sitchensis), (AF006193, REGION: 73.1986;
Abies grandis), and (MHC4SLSP, REGION: 29.1828;
Mentha spicata).
[0362] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes a myrcene synthase. Illustrative
examples of suitable nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited to: (U87908;
Abies grandis), (AY195609;
Antirrhinum majus), (AY195608;
Antirrhinum majus), (NM_127982;
Arabidopsis thaliana TPS10), (NM_113485;
Arabidopsis thaliana ATTPS-CIN), (NM_113483;
Arabidopsis thaliana ATTPS-CIN), (AF271259;
Perilla frutescens), (AY473626;
Picea abies), (AF369919;
Picea abies), and (AJ304839;
Quercus ilex).
[0363] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes an ocimene synthase. Illustrative
examples of suitable nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited to: (AY195607;
Antirrhinum majus), (AY195609;
Antirrhinum majus), (AY195608;
Antirrhinum majus), (AK221024;
Arabidopsis thaliana), (NM_113485;
Arabidopsis thaliana ATTPS-CIN), (NM_113483;
Arabidopsis thaliana ATTPS-CIN), (NM_117775;
Arabidopsis thaliana ATTPS03), (NM_001036574;
Arabidopsis thaliana ATTPS03), (NM_127982;
Arabidopsis thaliana TPS10), (AB110642;
Citrus unshiu CitMTSL4), and (AY575970;
Lotus corniculatus var. japonicus).
[0364] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes an α-pinene synthase. Illustrative
examples of suitable nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited to: (+) α-pinene
synthase (AF543530, REGION: 1.1887;
Pinus taeda), (-)α-pinene synthase (AF543527, REGION: 32.1921;
Pinus taeda), and (+)/(-)α-pinene synthase (AGU87909, REGION: 6111892;
Abies grandis)
.
[0365] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes a β-pinene synthase. Illustrative
examples of suitable nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited to: (-) β-pinene
synthases (AF276072, REGION: 1.1749;
Artemisia annua) and (AF514288, REGION: 26.1834;
Citrus limon).
[0366] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes a sabinene synthase. An
illustrative example of a suitable nucleotide sequence includes but is not limited
to AF051901, REGION: 26.1798 from
Salvia officinalis.
[0367] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes a γ-terpinene synthase.
Illustrative examples of suitable nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited
to: (AF514286, REGION: 30.1832 from
Citrus limon) and (AB110640, REGION 1.1803 from
Citrus unshiu).
[0368] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes a terpinolene synthase.
Illustrative examples of a suitable nucleotide sequence include but are not limited
to: (AY693650 from
Ocimum basilicum) and (AY906866, REGION: 10.1887 from
Pseudotsuga menziesii).
[0369] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes an amorphadiene synthase.
An illustrative example of a suitable nucleotide sequence is SEQ ID NO. 37 of
U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0005678.
[0370] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes a α-farnesene synthase.
Illustrative examples of suitable nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited
to DQ309034 from
Pyrus communis cultivar d'Anjou (pear; gene name AFS1) and AY182241 from
Malus domestica (apple; gene AFS1).
Pechouus et al., Planta 219(1):84-94 (2004).
[0371] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes a β-farnesene synthase.
Illustrative examples of suitable nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited
to GenBank accession number AF024615
from Mentha x piperita (peppermint; gene Tspa11), and AY835398
from Artemisia annua. Picaud et al., Phytochemistry 66(9): 961-967 (2005).
[0372] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes a farnesol synthase. Illustrative
examples of suitable nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited to GenBank
accession number AF529266 from
Zea mays and YDR481C from
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (gene Pho8).
Song, L., Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 128:149-158 (2006).
[0373] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes a nerolidol synthase. An
illustrative example of a suitable nucleotide sequence includes, but is not limited
to AF529266 from
Zea mays (maize; gene tps1).
[0374] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes a patchouliol synthase.
Illustrative examples of suitable nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited
to AY508730 REGION: 1.1659 from
Pogos lemon cablin.
[0375] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes a nootkatone synthase. Illustrative
examples of a suitable nucleotide sequence include, but are not limited to AF441124
REGION: 1.1647 from
Citrus sinensis and AY917195 REGION: 1.1653 from
Perilla frutescens.
[0376] In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleotide encodes an abietadiene synthase.
Illustrative examples of suitable nucleotide sequences include, but are not limited
to: (U50768;
Abies grandis) and (AY473621;
Picea abies).
6.12 Production of Polyketides
[0377] In some embodiments, the non-catabolic compound is a polyketide. Polyketides are
synthesized by sequential reactions catalysed by a collection of enzyme activities
called polyketide synthases (PKSs), which are large multi-enzyme protein complexes
that contain a coordinated group of active sites. Polyketide biosynthesis proceeds
stepwise starting from simple 2-, 3-, 4-carbon building blocks such as acetyl-CoA,
propionyl CoA, butyryl-CoA and their activated derivatives, malonyl-, methylmalonyl-
and ethylmalonyl-CoA, primarily through decarboxylative condensation of malonyl-CoA-derived
units via Claisen condensation reactions. The PKS genes are usually organized in one
operon in bacteria and in gene clusters in eukaryotes. Three types of polyketide synthases
have been characterized: Type I polyketide synthases are large, highly modular proteins
subdivided into two classes: 1) iterative PKSs, which reuse domains in a cyclic fashion
and 2) modular PKSs, which contain a sequence of separate modules and do not repeat
domains. Type II polyketide synthases are aggregates of monofunctional proteins, and
Type III polyketide synthases do not use acyl carrier protein domains.
[0378] Unlike fatty acid biosynthesis, in which each successive chain elongation step is
followed by a fixed sequence of ketoreduction, dehydration and enoyl, reduction as
described below, the individual chain elongation intermediates of polyketide biosynthesis
undergo all, some, or no functional group modifications, resulting in a large number
of chemically diverse products. Additional degrees of complexity arise from the use
of different starter units and chain elongation units as well as the generation of
new stereo-isomers.
[0379] The order of complete polyketide-synthesis as directed by a polyketide synthase follows
(in the order N-terminus to C-terminus): starting or loading the initial carbon building
blocks onto an acyl carrier protein, elongation modules which catalyze the extension
of the growing macrolide chain and termination modules that catalyze the release of
the synthesized macrolide. Component domains or separate enzyme functionalities active
in this biosynthesis include acyl-transferases for the loading of starter, extender
and intermediate acyl units; acyl carrier proteins which hold the growing macrolide
as a thiol ester; β-keto-acyl synthases which catalyze chain extension; β-keto reductases
responsible for the first reduction to an alcohol functionality; dehydratases which
eliminate water to give an unsaturated thiolester; enoyl reductases which catalyse
the final reduction to full saturation; and thiolesterases which catalyze macrolide
release and cyclization.
[0380] In some embodiments, the genetically modified yeast host cell useful for the methods
disclosed herein comprises a heterologous nucleotide sequence encoding an enzyme that
can condense at least one of acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA with an acyl carrier protein,
e.g. an acyl-transferase.
[0381] In some embodiments, the genetically modified yeast host cell disclosed herein comprises
a heterologous nucleotide sequence encoding an enzyme that can condense a first reactant
selected from the group consisting of acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA with a second reactant
selected from the group consisting of malonyl-CoA or methylmalonyl-CoA to form a polyketide
product, e.g. a β-keto-acyl synthase.
[0382] In some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can reduce a β-keto chemical group on a polyketide
compound to a β-hydroxy group, e.g. a β-keto reductase.
[0383] In some embodiments, the genetically modified yeast host cell disclosed herein comprises
a heterologous nucleotide sequence encoding an enzyme that can dehydrate an alkane
chemical group in a polyketide compound to produce an α-β-unsaturated alkene,
e.g. a dehydratase.
[0384] In some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can reduce an α-β-double-bond in a polyketide compound
to a saturated alkane,
e.g. an enoyl-reductase.
[0385] In some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can hydrolyze a polyketide compound from an acyl
carrier protein, e.g. a thioesterase.
[0386] In some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell comprises one or more heterologous
nucleotide sequences encoding an enzyme comprising a KS catalytic region. In some
embodiments, the polyketide producing cell comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide
sequences encoding an enzyme comprising an AT catalytic region. In some embodiments,
the polyketide producing cell comprises more than one heterologous nucleotide sequence
encoding an enzyme comprising an AT catalytic region. In some embodiments, the polyketide
producing cell comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an
enzyme comprising a CLF catalytic region. In some embodiments, the polyketide producing
cell comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an enzyme comprising
an ACP activity. In some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell comprises more
than one heterologous nucleotide sequence encoding an enzyme comprising an ACP activity.
[0387] In a particular embodiment, the polyketide producing cell comprises a minimal aromatic
PKS system, e.g., heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an enzyme comprising
a KS catalytic region, an enzyme comprising an AT catalytic region, an enzyme comprising
a CLF catalytic region, and an enzyme comprising an ACP activity, respectively. In
a particular embodiment, the polyketide producing cell comprises a minimal modular
PKS system, e.g., heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an enzyme comprising
a KS catalytic region, an enzyme comprising an AT catalytic region, and an enzyme
comprising an ACP activity, respectively. In yet another particular embodiment, the
polyketide producing cell comprises a modular aromatic PKS system for
de novo polyketide synthesis,
e.g., heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an enzyme comprising a KS catalytic region,
one or more enzymes comprising an AT catalytic region, and one or more enzymes comprising
an ACP activity, respectively.
[0388] In some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell comprises a minimal PKS system,
e.g., a minimal aromatic PKS system or minimal modular PKS system, further comprises
additional catalytic activities which can contribute to production of the end-product
polyketide. In some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell comprises one or more
heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an enzyme comprising a cyclase (CYC) catalytic
region, which facilitates the cyclization of the nascent polyketide backbone. In some
embodiments, the polyketide producing cell comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide
sequences encoding an enzyme comprising a ketoreductase (KR) catalytic region. In
some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell comprises one or more heterologous
nucleotide sequences encoding an enzyme comprising an aromatase (ARO) catalytic region.
In some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell comprises one or more heterologous
nucleotide sequences encoding an enzyme comprising an enoylreductase (ER) catalytic
region. In some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell comprises one or more heterologous
nucleotide sequences encoding an enzyme comprising a thioesterase (TE) catalytic region.
In some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell further comprises one or more heterologous
nucleotide sequences encoding an enzyme comprising a holo ACP synthase activity, which
effects pantetheinylation of the ACP.
[0389] In some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell further comprises one or more
heterologous nucleotide sequences conferring a postsynthesis polyketide modifying
activity. In some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell further comprises one
or more heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an enzyme comprising a glycosylase
activity, which effects postsynthesis modifications of polyketides, for example, where
polyketides having antibiotic activity are desired. In some embodiments, the polyketide
producing cell further comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding
an enzyme comprising a hydroxylase activity. In some embodiments, the polyketide producing
cell further comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an enzyme
comprising an epoxidase activity. In some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell
further comprises one or more heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an enzyme
comprising a methylase activity.
[0390] In some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell further comprises one or more
heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding a biosynthetic enzyme including, but not
limited to, at least one polyketide synthesis pathway enzyme, and enzymes that can
modify an acetyl-CoA compound to form a polyketide product such as a macrolide, an
antibiotic, an antifungal, a cytostatic compound, an anticholesterolemic compound,
an antiparasitic compound, a coccidiostatic compound, an animal growth promoter or
an insecticide. In some embodiments, the non-catabolic compound is a polyene. In some
embodiments, the non-catabolic compound is a cyclic lactone. In some embodiments,
the non-catabolic compound comprises a 14, 15, or 16-membered lactone ring. In some
embodiments, the non-catabolic compound is a polyketide selected from the group consisting
of a polyketide macrolide, antibiotic, antifungal, cytostatic, anticholesterolemic,
antiparasitic, a coccidiostatic, animal growth promoter and insecticide.
[0391] In some embodiments, the polyketide producing cell comprises heterologous nucleotide
sequences, for example sequences encoding PKS enzymes and polyketide modification
enzymes, capable of producing a polyketide selected from, but not limited to, the
following polyketides: Avermectin
(see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,252,474;
U.S. Pat. No. 4,703,009;
EP Pub. No. 118,367;
MacNeil et al., 1993, "Industrial Microorganisms: Basic and Applied Molecular Genetics";
Baltz, Hegeman, & Skatrud, eds. (ASM), pp. 245-256, "A Comparison of the Genes Encoding
the Polyketide Synthases for Avermectin, Erythromycin, and Nemadectin";
MacNeil et al., 1992, Gene 115: 119-125; and
Ikeda and Omura, 1997, Chem. Res. 97: 2599-2609); Candicidin (FR008)
(see, e.g., Hu et al., 1994, Mol. Microbiol. 14: 163-172); Carbomycin, Curamycin
(see, e.g., Bergh et al., Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 1992 Feb;15(1):80-9); Daunorubicin
(see, e.g., JBacteriol. 1994 Oct;176(20):6270-80); Epothilone
(see, e.g., PCT Pub. No. 99/66028; and
PCT Pub. No. 00/031247); Erythromycin
(see, e.g., PCT Pub. No. 93/13663;
U.S. Pat. No. 6,004,787;
U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,513;
Donadio et al., 1991, Science 252:675-9; and
Cortes et al., Nov. 8, 1990, Nature 348:176-8); FK-506
(see, e.g., Motamedi etal., 1998; Eur. J Biochem. 256: 528-534; and
Motamedi etal., 1997, Eur. J Biochem. 244: 74-80); FK-520
(see, e.g., PCT Pub. No. 00/020601; and
Nielsen et al., 1991, Biochem. 30:5789-96); Griseusin
(see, e.g., Yu et al., JBacteriol. 1994 May;176(9):2627-34); Lovastatin
(see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,744,350); Frenolycin
(see, e.g., Khosla et al., Bacteriol. 1993 Apr;175(8):2197-204;
and Bibb et al., Gene 1994 May 3;142(1):31-9); Granaticin
(see, e.g., Sherman et al., EMBO J. 1989 Sep;8(9):2717-25; and
Bechtold et al., Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Sep 20;248(5):610-20); Medermycin
(see, e.g., Ichinose et al., Microbiology 2003 Jul;149(Pt 7):1633-45); Monensin
(see, e.g., Arrowsmith et al., Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Aug;234(2):254-64); Nonactin
(see, e.g., FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000 Feb 1;183(1):171-5); Nanaomycin
(see, e.g., Kitao et al., J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1980 Jul;33(7):711-6); Nemadectin
(see, e.g., MacNeil
et al., 1993, supra); Niddamycin
(see, e.g., PCT Pub. No. 98/51695; and
Kakavas et al., 1997, J. Bacteriol. 179: 7515-7522); Oleandomycin
(see e.g., Swan et al., 1994, Mol. Gen. Genet. 242: 358-362;
PCT Pub. No. 00/026349;
Olano et al., 1998, Mol. Gen. Genet. 259(3): 299-308; and
PCT Pat. App. Pub. No. WO 99/05283); Oxytetracycline
(see, e.g., Kim et al., Gene. 1994 Apr 8;141(1):141-2); Picromycin
(see, e.g., PCT Pub. No. 99/61599;
PCT Pub. No. 00/00620;
Xue et al., 1998, Chemistry & Biology 5(11): 661-667;
Xue et al., October 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 12111 12116); Platenolide
(see, e.g., EP Pub. No. 791,656; and
U.S. Pat. No. 5,945,320); Rapamycin
(see, e.g., Schwecke et al., August 1995, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:7839-7843; and
Aparicio et al., 1996, Gene 169: 9-16); Rifamycin
(see, e.g., PCT Pub. No. WO 98/07868; and
August et al., Feb. 13, 1998, Chemistry & Biology, 5(2): 69-79); Sorangium
(see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,090,601); Soraphen
(see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,716,849;
Schupp et al., 1995, J. Bacteriology 177: 3673-3679); Spinocyn
(see, e.g., PCT Pub. No. 99/46387); Spiramycin
(see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,098,837); Tetracenomycin
(see, e.g., Summers et al., J Bacteriol. 1992 Mar;174(6):1810-20; and
Shen et al., JBacteriol. 1992 Jun;174(11):3818-21); Tetracycline
(see, e.g., JAm Chem Soc. 2009 Dec 9;131(48):17677-89); Tylosin
(see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,876,991;
U.S. Pat. No. 5,672,497;
U.S. Pat. No. 5,149,638;
EP Pub. No. 791,655;
EP Pub. No. 238,323;
Kuhstoss etal., 1996, Gene 183:231-6; and
Merson-Davies and Cundliffe, 1994, Mol. Microbiol. 13: 349-355); and 6-methylsalicyclic acid
(see, e.g., Richardson et al., Metab Eng. 1999 Apr;1(2):180-7; and
Shao et al., Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006 Jun 23;345(1):133-9).
6.13 Production of Fatty Acids
[0392] In some embodiments, the non-catabolic compound is a fatty acid. Fatty acids are
synthesized by a series of decarboxylative Claisen condensation reactions from acetyl-CoA
and malonyl-CoA catalyzed by fatty acid synthases. Similar to polyketide synthases,
fatty acid synthases are not a single enzyme but an enzymatic system composed of 272
kDa multifunctional polypeptide in which substrates are handed from one functional
domain to the next. Two principal classes of fatty acid synthases have been characterized:
Type I fatty acid synthases are single, multifunctional polypeptides common to mammals
and fungi (although the structural arrangement of fungal and mammalian synthases differ)
and the CMN group of bacteria (corynebacteria, mycobacteria, and nocardia). Type II
synthases, found in archaeabacteria and eubacteria, are a series of discrete, monofunctional
enzymes that participate in the synthesis of fatty acids. The mechanisms fatty acid
elongation and reduction is the same in the two classes of synthases, as the enzyme
domains responsible for these catalytic events are largely homologous amongst the
two classes.
[0393] Following each round of elongation of the fatty acid chain in the decarboxylative
Claisen condensation reactions, the β-keto group is reduced to a fully saturated carbon
chain by the sequential action of a ketoreductase, a dehydratase, and an enol reductase.
The growing fatty acid chain moves between these active sites attached to an acyl
carrier protein and is ultimately released by the action of a thioesterase upon reaching
a carbon chain length of 16 (palmitidic acid).
[0394] In some embodiments, the genetically modified yeast host cell useful for the methods
disclosed herein comprises a heterologous nucleotide sequence encoding a biosynthetic
enzyme including, but not limited to, at least one fatty acid synthesis pathway enzyme,
and enzymes that can modify an acetyl-CoA compound to form a fatty acid product such
as a palmitate, palmitoyl CoA, palmitoleic acid, sapienic acid, oleic acid, linoleic
acid, α-linolenic acid, arachidonic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, erucic acid, and
docosahexaenoic acid. In some embodiments, the non-catabolic compound is a fatty acid
selected from the group consisting of palmitate, palmitoyl CoA, palmitoleic acid,
sapienic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, α-linolenic acid, arachidonic acid, eicosapentaenoic
acid, erucic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid.
[0395] In some embodiments, the fatty acid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can covalently link at least one of acetyl-CoA and
malonyl-CoA with an acyl carrier protein, e.g. an acyl-transferase.
[0396] In some embodiments, the genetically modified yeast host cell disclosed herein comprises
a heterologous nucleotide sequence encoding an enzyme that can condense acetyl chemical
moiety and a malonyl chemical moiety, each bound to an acyl carrier protein (ACP),
to form acetoacetyl-ACP, e.g. a β-Ketoacyl-ACP synthase.
[0397] In some embodiments, the fatty acid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can reduce the double bond in acetoacetyl-ACP with
NADPH to form a hydroxyl group in D-3-hydroxybutyryl hydroxylase-ACP, e.g. a β-Ketoacyl-ACP
reductase.
[0398] In some embodiments, the fatty acid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can dehydrate D-3-Hydroxybutyryl hydroxylase-ACP
to create a double bond between the beta- and gamma-carbons forming crotonyl-ACP,
e.g. a β-hydroxyacyl-ACP dehydrase.
[0399] In some embodiments, the fatty acid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can reduce crotonyl ACP with NADPH to form butyryl-ACP,
e.g. an enoyl ACP reductase.
[0400] In some embodiments, the fatty acid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can hydrolyze a C16 acyl compound from an acyl carrier
protein to form palmitate, e.g. a thioesterase.
[0401] In some embodiments, the fatty acid producing cell comprises one or more heterologous
nucleotide sequences encoding acetyl-CoA synthase and/or malonyl-CoA synthase, to
effect increased production of one or more fatty acids as compared to a genetically
unmodified parent cell.
[0402] For example, to increase acetyl-CoA production, one or more of the following genes
can be expressed in the cell:
pdh, panK, aceEF (encoding the EIp dehydrogenase component and the E2p dihydrolipoamide acyltransferase
component of the pyruvate and 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complexes),
fabH, fabD,fabG, acpP, and
fabF. Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences encoding such enzymes include, but
are not limited to:
pdh (BAB34380, AAC73227, AAC73226),
panK (also known as coaA, AAC76952),
aceEF (AAC73227, AAC73226),
fabH (AAC74175), fabD (AAC74176),
fabG (AAC74177),
acpP (AAC74178),
fαbF (AAC74179).
[0403] In some embodiments, increased fatty acid levels can be effected in the cell by attenuating
or knocking out genes encoding proteins involved in fatty acid degradation. For example,
the expression levels of
fadE, gpsA, idhA, pflb, adhE, pta, poxB, ackA, and/or
ackB can be attenuated or knocked-out in an engineered yeast host cell using techniques
known in the art. Illustrative examples of nucleotide sequences encoding such proteins
include, but are not limited
to: fade (AAC73325),
gspA (AAC76632),
IdhA (AAC74462),
pflb (AAC73989),
adhE (AAC74323),
pta (AAC75357),
poxB (AAC73958),
ackA (AAC75356), and
ackB (BAB81430). The resulting yeast host cells will have increased acetyl-CoA production
levels when grown in an appropriate environment.
[0404] In some embodiments, the fatty acid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding an enzyme that can convert acetyl-CoA into malonyl-CoA, e.g., the
multisubunit AccABCD protein. An illustrative example of a suitable nucleotide sequence
encoding AccABCD includes but is not limited to accession number AAC73296, EC 6.4.1.2.
[0405] In some embodiments, the fatty acid producing cell comprises a heterologous nucleotide
sequence encoding a lipase. Illustrative examples of suitable nucleotide sequences
encoding a lipase include, but are not limited to accession numbers CAA89087 and CAA98876.
[0406] In some embodiments, increased fatty acid levels can be effected in the cell by inhibiting
PlsB, which can lead to an increase in the levels of long chain acyl-ACP, which will
inhibit early steps in the fatty acid biosynthesis pathway
(e.g., accABCD, fabH, and fabl). The expression level of PlsB can be attenuated or knocked-out in an engineered yeast
host cell using techniques known in the art. An illustrative example of a suitable
nucleotide sequence encoding PlsB includes but is not limited to accession number
AAC77011. In particular embodiments, the
plsB D31 IE mutation can be used to increase the amount of available acyl-CoA in the cell.
[0407] In some embodiments, increased production of monounsaturated fatty acids can be effected
in the cell by overexpressing an
sfa gene, which would result in suppression of
fabA. An illustrative example of a suitable nucleotide sequence encoding
sfa includes but is not limited to accession number AAN79592.
[0408] In some embodiments, increased fatty acid levels can be effected in the cell by modulating
the expression of an enzyme which controls the chain length of a fatty acid substrate,
e.g., a thioesterase. In some embodiments, the fatty acid producing cell has been
modified to overexpress a
tes or
fat gene. Illustrative examples of suitable
tes nucleotide sequences include but are not limited to accession numbers:
(tesA: AAC73596, from
E.
Coli, capable of producing C
18:1 fatty acids) and
(tesB: AAC73555 from E.
Coli). Illustrative examples of suitable
fat nucleotide sequences include but are not limited to:
(jatB: Q41635 and AAA34215, from
Umbellularia california, capable of producing C
12:0 fatty acids),
(fatB2: Q39513 and AAC49269, from
Cuphea hookeriana, capable of producing C
8:0 - C
10:0 fatty acids),
(fatB3: AAC49269 and AAC72881, from
Cuphea hookeriana, capable of producing C
14:0 - C
16:0 fatty acids),
(fatB: Q39473 and AAC49151, from
Cinnamonum camphorum, capable of producing C
14:0 fatty acids ),
(fatB [M141T]: CAA85388, from m
Arabidopsis thaliana, capable of producing C
16:1 fatty acids ),
(fatA: NP 189147 and NP 193041, from
Arabidopsis thaliana, capable of producing C
18:1 fatty acids ),
(fatA: CAC39106, from
Bradvrhiizobium japonicum, capable of preferentially producing C
18:1 fatty acids ),
(fatA: AAC72883, from
Cuphea hookeriana, capable of producing C
18:1 fatty acids ), and
(fatAl, AAL79361 from
Helianthus annus).
[0409] In some embodiments, increased levels of C
10 fatty acids can be effected in the cell by attenuating the expression or activity
of thioesterase C
18 using techniques known in the art. Illustrative examples of suitable nucleotide sequences
encoding thioesterase C
18 include, but are not limited to accession numbers AAC73596 and P0ADA1. In other embodiments,
increased levels of C
10 fatty acids can be effected in the cell by increasing the expression or activity
of thioesterase C
10 using techniques known in the art. An illustrative example of a suitable nucleotide
sequence encoding thioesterase C
10 includes, but is not limited to accession number Q39513.
[0410] In some embodiments, increased levels of C
14 fatty acids can be effected in the cell by attenuating the expression or activity
of endogenous thioesterases that produce non-C
14 fatty acids, using techniques known in the art. In other embodiments, increased levels
of C
14 fatty acids can be effected in the cell by increasing the expression or activity
of thioesterases that use the substrate C
14-ACP, using techniques known in the art. An illustrative example of a suitable nucleotide
sequence encoding such a thioesterase includes, but is not limited to accession number
Q39473.
[0411] In some embodiments, increased levels of C
12 fatty acids can be effected in the cell by attenuating the expression or activity
of endogenous thioesterases that produce non- C
12 fatty acids, using techniques known in the art. In other embodiments, increased levels
of C
12 fatty acids can be effected in the cell by increasing the expression or activity
of thioesterases that use the substrate C
12-ACP, using techniques known in the art. An illustrative example of a suitable nucleotide
sequence encoding such a thioesterase includes, but is not limited to accession number
Q41635.
7. EXAMPLES
7.1 Example: Cell Density Measurements
[0412] This example describes an exemplary method for determining the cell density (OD
600) of a yeast cell culture.
[0413] An 8 µL sample of a cell culture was combined with 92 µL of Triton OD Diluent (20
g/L Triton X-114, 200 mL/L PEG 200, 200 mL/L 100% ethanol, rest water) in a clear
96-well plate, the solution was agitated at 1,000 RPM for 6 minutes, and the OD
600 was determined by measuring absorbance at 600 nm on an M5 spectrophotometer (Molecular
Devices, Sunnyvale, CA).
7.2 Example: UV Methods for Measuring Farnesene Titer
[0414] This example describes an exemplary method for determining the amount of farnesene
production using an UV assay method. In this UV assay method, farnesene titers are
measured using the whole broth followed by direct UV absorbance or gas chromatography.
[0415] For preculture conditions, the strains were cultured were gown in sterile 96-well
plates (1.1 ml working volume; Axygen) containing 360 µl of Bird Seed Media (BSM,
originally described by van Hoek
et al. (2000). For the preculture conditions, the carbon source was typically a mixture
of 1.4% sucrose and 0.7% maltose, unless indicated otherwise. Single colonies were
picked into each well and incubated for approximately 72 hours at 33.5°C, 80% humidity
and 1000 rpm (Infers Multitron; ATR Biotec).
[0416] For farnesene production experiments, the aforementioned saturated cultures were
diluted 1/25 into sterile 1.1 ml plates containing 145 µl of BSM and 5 µl of mineral
oil. Typically, the carbon source was either 4% sucrose, or a mixture of 2.3% sucrose
and 1.7% maltose, unless indicated otherwise. After 72 hours of culture, farnesene
extraction was performed by adding 600 µl of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) to each well.
After 30-minute incubation, 8 µl was transferred to a clear bottom assay plate containing
192 µl IPA. Farnesene concentration was measured by UV absorbance at 222 nm on a SpectraMax
plate reader.
7.3 Example: Nile Red Based Method for Measuring the Farnesene Titer
[0417] This example describes an exemplary Nile Red based method useful for determining
the farnesene titer of yeast cell cultures.
[0418] A 98 µL sample of a cell culture was transferred into a 96-well black polystyrene
flat bottom assay plate, and 2 µL of Nile Red (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) dissolved
at 100 µg/mL in DMSO was added to each well. Fluorescence levels were immediately
measured on an M5 spectrophotometer with excitation at 500 nm and emission at 550
nm.
7.4 Example: Gas Chromatography Based Method for Measuring the Farnesene Titer
[0419] This example describes an exemplary gas chromaogrpahy (GC) based method useful for
determining the farnesene titer of yeast cell cultures.
[0420] Sample was extracted with methanol-heptane (1:1 v/v), and the mixture was centrifuged
to remove cellular material. An aliquot of the methanol-heptane extract was diluted
into n-heptane with 0.001% t-caryohyllene (which served as a retention time marker
to monitor successful injection and elution during the specified GC oven profile)
and then injected onto a methyl silicone stationary phase using a pulsed split injection.
Farnesene was separated by boiling point using GC with flame ionization detection
(FID).
7.5 Example: Background Strain Engineering
[0421] A "non-switchable" farnesene production strains (e.g., Y9213 and Y9709) were derived
from a wild-type
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain (CEN.PK2) and also comprises the following chromosomally integrated mevalonate
pathway genes (shown in FIG. 15) from S.
cerevisiae under the control of GAL promoters: acetyl-CoA thiolase, HMG-CoA synthase, HMG-CoA
reductase, mevalonate kinase, phosphomevalonate kinase, and mevalonate pyrophosphate
decarboxylase; and six copies of farnesene synthase mutants
from Artemisinin annua. This non-switchable strain has
GAL80 gene deleted and an additional copy of
GAL4 under GAL4oc promoter, wherein the coding sequence of the
GAL4 gene of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is under regulatory control of an "operative constitutive" version of its native
promoter (PGAL4oc;
see, e.g., Griggs & Johnston (1991) PNAS 88(19):8597-8601).
[0422] Farnesene production in the "non-switchable" strain was then made "switchable," that
is, repressible in the presence of maltose. The maltose switchable strain (e.g., Strain
H) was built on top of the constitutive strain by chromosomally integrating a copy
of GAL80 (SEQ ID NO: 71) under the control of maltose-responsive promoter pMAL32 (SEQ
ID NO: 34).
[0423] Strain E is also a maltose switchable strain that was built on top of the constitutive
parent by chromosomally integrating a copy of GAL80 (SEQ ID NO: 71) under the control
of maltose-responsive promoter pMAL32 (SEQ ID NO: 34). This strain has a URA3 marker.
7.6 Example: Tier I Mutagenesis and Screening Maltose Binding Protein ("MBP") Mutants
[0424] This example describes the initial tier I mutagenesis of nucleic acids encoding wild-type
MBP. MBP mutants generated from the mutagenesis were screened to obtain those, which,
when fused to a protein of interest, would cause the protein of interest to become
maltose dependent in terms of their expression and stability in genetically modified
host cells. For example, MBP mutants that act as maltose dependent degrons would switch
from a functional (e.g., stable) state in the presence of maltose to a non-functional
(e.g., unstable) state in the absence of maltose. In this example, Gal80p was used
as a fusion partner for MBP mutants to test whether a MBP mutant fused to Gal80p results
in maltose dependent stability to Gal80p.
7.6.1. Materials and Methods
[0425] The GeneMorph II Random Mutagenesis Kit from Agilent technologies was used to mutagenize
a nucleic acid sequence encoding wild-type MBP (SEQ ID NO: 27 which includes a linker
sequence at the C terminus end of the wild-type MBP having SEQ ID NO: 1) by error-prone
PCR, using conditions for high, medium or low mutagenesis rates. The following primers
PC542 and PC543 were used for to mutagenize the wild-type MBP nucleic acids from the
DNA construct (SEQ ID NO: 68), which comprises a
GAL80 gene fused in frame to the wild-type MBP gene, flanked by homologous sequences consisting
of the upstream nucleotide sequences of the S.
cerevisiae GAS2 locus, and a portion of nucleotide sequences encoding the
URA3 marker gene:
PC542: CGTTAGCAATATCTCGCATTATAG (SEQ ID NO: 66; a forward primer to mutagenize the
wild-type MBP nucleic acids from the DNA construct (SEQ ID NO: 68)); and
PC543: CCAAGCACAGGGCAAGATGC (SEQ ID NO: 67; a reverse primer to mutagenize the wild-type
MBP nucleic acids from the DNA construct (SEQ ID NO: 68)).
[0426] The mutagenized PCR MBP fragment was assembled into the transformation vector using
the Gibson Assembly
® Cloning Kit from New England Biolabs. The following primers (PC540 and PC541) were
designed to amplify part of the DNA construct (SEQ ID NO: 68) lacking the bulk of
the MBP sequence but overlapping sequences of the mutagenized fragment, and the mutagenized
MBP fragment was assembled into the amplified vector:
PC540: TGACTAACTTACCTTCTTCG (SEQ ID NO: 69; a reverse primer for vector backbone for
the DNA construct (SEQ ID NO: 68) for Gibson assembly); and
PC541: CAACAACTTGGGTATCGAAGG (SEQ ID NO: 70; a forward primer for vector backbone
the DNA construct (SEQ ID NO: 68) for Gibson assembly).
[0427] Ten random clones from each mutagenesis reaction were sequenced to confirm that the
library contained an appropriate diversity and frequency of mutations. The validated
libraries were amplified, cut with Pme1, and transformed into the Y9213-based reporter
strain. The Y-9213-based reporter strain PCY757 was constructed by transforming DNA
construct MS71316 (SEQ ID NO: 72) into strain Y9709 and subsequently selecting for
FOA-resistant colonies that had lost the
URA3 marker. The reporter strain PCY757 comprised
a LYS2 gene operably linked to the pGAL10 promoter as shown in FIG. 4. The transformants
were plated onto CSM - ura - lysine + 2% glucose agar plates to select for transformants
that failed to express functional Gal80p. Colonies that grew were transferred to the
standard solid α-aminoadipate plates with 1% maltose. For example, the α-aminoadipate
plates contained 0.167% Bactoyeast nitrogen base without acids and without ammonium
sulfate, 2% dextrose, 1% maltose, 0.2% D, L-α-aminoadipic acid, 30 m/L lysine, 2%
Bacto-agar, and other standard supplements if they were required by the auxotrophic
strain. The general methods for preparing α-aminoadipate plates are described in
Keeney & Reed, J. Microbiology & Biology Education, vol. 1 (2000) and
Chattoo & Sherman, Genetics 93: 51-65 (1979).
[0428] Positive colonies from the counter-selection were streaked out on a plate to single
colonies, and the farnesene titer measurements in the production media were measured
for the cells cultured in the presence of maltose, followed by in the absence of maltose.
In addition to the carbon source, lysine was added to the production media since the
host cells comprising MBP mutants were selected for
LYS2- phenotype conferred by functional
GAL80. Thus, for this example, the production medium for the "off' state contained 2.3%
sucrose, 1.7% maltose, and 0.1% lysine. The production medium for the "on" state contained
4% sucrose and 0.1% lysine. The farnesene titer was measured using the UV assay method
as described in Example 7.2.
7.6.2. Results and Discussion
[0429] A genetic strategy was devised to screen for MBP mutants, which, when fused to constitutively-transcribed
GAL80, would cause Gal80p to switch from a functional (e.g., stable) state in the presence
of maltose to a non-functional (e.g., unstable) state in the absence of maltose. Gal80p
function was reported by the phenotypes ascribed to expression or repression of
LYS2 from a Gal80p-regulated promoter
(pGAL10) as shown in FIG. 4. When Gal80p is unstable and non-functional,
LYS2 is expressed and this confers host cells the ability to grow on media lacking lysine.
Media lacking lysine would also exclude cells not expressing
LYS2. When Gal80p is stable and functional,
LYS2 is not expressed and this confers host cells the ability to grow on media containing
α-aminoadipate as the sole nitrogen source. The α-aminoadipate media also prevent
LYS2-expressing cells from growing. The expected phenotypes were validated by introducing
pGAL80>GAL80 (encoding always-stable Gal80p) and
pGAL80>D_GAL80 (e.g., SEQ ID NO: 71 encoding constitutively unstable Gal80p due to its fusion to the constitutive
degron at its N terminus to increase protein turnover) into the reporter strain and
growing the strains on the two types of media. FIG. 4 illustrates the genetic strategy
as well as the validated controls for growth on the two types of selection media.
[0430] A library containing PCR-mutagenized MBP fused to
GAL80 expressed from the native
pGAL80 promoter was integrated into the
GAS2 locus of the Y9213 background reporter strain containing
pGAL10>LYS2. The transformants were first plated on media lacking lysine and maltose to select
for MBP mutations that had inactivated
GAL80. Cells that grew could contain MBP mutations that generally destabilized Gal80p regardless
of the absence of maltose. To exclude generally destabilizing mutations, colonies
that grew on the first plated on media lacking lysine and maltose were counter-selected
on media containing maltose and α-aminoadipate as the sole nitrogen source. Only cells
containing Gal80p that could become stable in the presence of maltose should be able
to grow on the counter-selective media.
[0431] Sixty-six putative MBP mutants were obtained from the selection/counter-selection
process described above. They were analyzed to assess their switchability for farnesene
production in the presence or in the absence of maltose. The reporter strain (Y9213
background) produces farnesene with pathway genes under the control of GAL regulon
promoters. Any real mutations that conferred conditional Gal80p stability in a maltose-dependent
manner should also cause farnesene production to switch in a maltose-dependent manner.
[0432] The results are shown in Figure 5. Each MBP mutant is indicated by a square marker,
and the value of the ratio of farnesene titer in the absence of maltose to that in
the presence of maltose is indicated by the size of the marker. The controls for the
constitutive producer and non-producer are indicated on the graph, as is the theoretical
position of a perfectly switching strain. As shown in FIG. 5, although none of the
MBP mutants performed as a perfect switch
(i.e., no production of farnesene in the presence of maltose and a high production of farnesene
in the absence of maltose), the screen identified numerous MBP mutants that were able
to produce more farnesene in the absence of maltose than in the presence of maltose.
Among these mutants, MBP domains from MBP mutants L8, H8, H9, H10, M1, M5, and M13
were cloned and sequenced.
7.7 Example: Tier II Optimization: Construction of Combinatory Library
7.7.1. Materials and Methods
[0433] Primers were designed to contain degenerate bases at locations where SNPs had been
identified (to encode both wild-type sequence and mutated sequence/sequences) from
the MBP mutants obtained from tier I mutagenesis. The combinatorial library was constructed
by using the Quickchange multi-site mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies) to incorporate
the primer sequences randomly into a DNA construct having SEQ ID NO: 73 (containing
MBP L8 mutant) or a DNA construct having SEQ ID NO: 74 (containing MBP M5 mutant).
DNA construct S69250 comprises a pGAL80 promoter operably linked to fusion nucleic
acids comprising a GAL80 gene fused to MBP mutant L8 nucleic acids, flanked by upstream
sequences of the
S. cerevisiae GAS2 locus and a portion of
URA3 marker gene. The DNA construct comprise a pGAL80 promoter operably linked to a fusion
nucleic acids comprising a GAL80 gene fused to MBP mutant M5 nucleic acids, flanked
by upstream sequences of the S.
cerevisiae GAS2 locus and a portion of
URA3 marker gene. The Quickchange multi-site mutagenesis kit has been reported to be able
to randomly combine up to 49 different SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphism) in one
single reaction. Sequencing of random clones from the library confirmed a good rate
of incorporation of mutant SNPs.
[0434] The library was transformed into the reporter strain. The transformation mix representing
approximately 20,000 transformants was directly inoculated into liquid non-maltose-containing
media lacking lysine and uracil
(i.e., the same media as described in Example 7.6 except without agar). Transformants bearing
constructs that confer better "on" states would grow faster in the absence of lysine
and become enriched. The resulting culture was then re-inoculated into maltose media
containing α-aminoadipate
(i.e., the same media as described in Example 7.6 except without agar), which selects for
cells that can impose a tight "off' state in the presence of maltose. The rounds of
competitive selective/counter-selective growth scheme are illustrated in FIG. 6. After
a few passages in alternating non-maltose minimal media followed by maltose-containing
alpha-aminoadipate media, the positive colonies from the last round of counter-selection
were streaked out on a plate to single colonies. Single colonies were cultured under
pre-culture conditions, and the farnesene production from the cells in the presence
or in the absence of maltose in the production media were measured as described above
in Example 7.2. The farnesene production media used in this example were same as those
described in Example 7.6.
7.7.2. Results and Discussion
[0435] Sixteen best MBP mutants from Example 7.6 were sequenced. These MPB mutants were
best in terms of their "on" state for farnesene production and/or "off' state for
shutting down farnesene production. Sixty-eight unique mutations were identified from
these sixteen MBP mutants. A few of these mutations occurred multiple times and were
derived from independent mutagenic PCR reactions, suggesting that they were significant
causal mutations. In one case, the same codon was mutated to encode two different
amino acids in two different MBP mutants. The identified mutations were mapped to
the crystal structure of MBP. These mutations were analyzed using a stability prediction
algorithm (e.g., http://mordred.bioc.cam.ac.uk/~sdm/sdm.php). A large number of the
identified mutations were predicted to destabilize the MBP structure, in accordance
with the original theory that destabilizing mutations could make the protein dependent
on binding to its ligand for stability. In this example, it was tested whether combining
destabilizing mutations identified from separate MBP mutants could increase the dependence
of stability on binding to maltose even more, thereby increasing the differential
between the stable and unstable states of the MBP mutants.
[0436] To obtain additional MBP mutants with a potentially increased differential between
the stable and unstable states, a combinatorial library of identified mutations was
generated. In order to identify cells with the combination of mutations that resulted
in the best switching (between "on" and "off' states), the library of transformants
were subjected to a growth competition regime as shown in FIG. 6 where they were alternatively
grown in the liquid medium that favored growth when Gal80p was unstable in the absence
of maltose followed by growth in the liquid medium that favored growth when Gal80p
was stable in the presence of maltose. After rounds of selection and counter-selection,
cells were plated out for growth into single colonies. These colonies represent additional
MBP mutants obtained by the Tier II optimization process.
[0437] The additional MBP mutants obtained by the Tier II optimization process were cultured
in the culture medium including or excluding maltose, respectively, to assess farnesene
production under fermentation conditions intended to serve as "off' and "on" state.
FIGS. 7A and 7B show the results when additional mutations were combined with an original
MBP mutant L8, and the combinatorial library was subjected to the growth competition
regime after 1 round of selection/counter-selection (FIG. 7A) or after 3 rounds of
selection/counter-selection (FIG. 7B). The original MBP mutant L8 had a relatively
good "on" state
(i.e., a high level of farnesene production in the absence of maltose) but less than ideal
"off' state. After 3 rounds of selection/counter-selection, strains derived from the
original MBP mutant L8 with improved "off' states were obtained. As shown in FIG.
7B, a number of new MBP mutants (represented by squares on the graph) shifted to the
left of the original L8 MBP mutant, indicating that their farnesene production during
"off' state is less than the original L8 MBP mutant and close to that of the non-farnesene
producing control strain. One of the best MBP mutants obtained during this Tier II
optimization was L8_v4d
(see, e.g., Figure 10B). Another original MBP mutant M5, with a good "off' state but less than
ideal "on" state, was combined with the identified mutations. After 3 rounds of selection/counter-selection
process shown in FIG. 6, strains with improved "on" states were identified (data not
shown). These results indicate that the growth competition assay can be used as a
powerful strategy to select for desired mutations that can be coupled to growth phenotypes.
7.8 Example: Tier III Optimization to Engineer an Unstable MBP in the Absence of Maltose
7.8.1. Materials and Methods
[0438] A different host strain was constructed by transforming DNA construct MS85927 (SEQ
ID NO: 75) into Y9709 (resulting in PCY816). DNA construct MS85927 includes a gene
encoding GFP operably linked to pTHD3 promoter and a
URA3 marker flanked between
GAS2 upstream and downstream sequences for integration into the host genome at the
GAS2 locus. A fragment containing MBP L8_v4d from DNA construct S73873 (SEQ ID NO: 76)
was mutagenized using the GeneMorph II Random Mutagenesis Kit from Agilent technologies.
Mutagenized DNA was transformed directly into PCY816 together with pAM2947 plasmid
(SEQ ID NO: 77; F-CphI gene operably linked to pTDH3 promoter, kanmx4-marked, Cen-ARS)
encoding the Cph1 nuclease.
See FIG. 8A for the genetic strategy. The transformation mix was directly inoculated
into liquid media containing 5-FOA (5-fluoro-orotic acid) lacking maltose and allowed
to grow into a culture. Cells from the resulting culture were sorted for dimly fluorescing
cells on the GFP channel (530/11 band) using the FACSAria (BD Sciences).
[0439] Sorted cells were inoculated into BSM media containing uracil and maltose, and the
sorted cells were grown in the BSM media. Cells from this culture were then sorted
for brightly fluorescing cells using the FACSAria. The brightly fluorescing cells
were plated out on plates, and single colonies were picked and cultured in 96-well
plates to form pre-cultures. The pre-cultures were then inoculated into uracil-supplemented
production media plates containing no maltose or with maltose. After 24 hours of growth
in the production media
(see Example 7.2 for the description of production media), the GFP intensity was measured
using the Guava flow cytometer for each of the production conditions.
7.8.2. Results and Discussions
[0440] Measurements of fluorescent intensity of GFP fused to various MBP mutants from the
combinatorial library growth competition selection from the Tier II optimization process
identified L8_v4d as the MBP mutant with the best maltose-dependent stability differential
(see, e.g., FIG. 8B). However, in the absence of maltose, the residual GFP expression could still
be detected for L8_v4d. Direct mutagenesis of MBP mutant L8_v4d was performed to obtain
additional MBP mutants which could potentially reduce the residual GFP expression
in the absence of maltose. MBP mutants with reduced residual GFP expression in the
absence of maltose would be particularly useful in controlling expression of genes
with native promoters or of genes that were already expressed at very low levels.
[0441] A MBP mutant screening was performing using cell sorting as described above in the
materials and methods section. Using this strategy, additional maltose dependent MBP
mutants were obtained. These include MBP mutants 3A6, 4D3, 5A2, and 5F3. MBP mutants
4-H10, 1-B9, 4-G10, 4-F11, 2-F10, 2-E8, 2-G8, 1-F7, 4-H4, and 2-A4 were also identified
from Tier III mutagenesis. As shown in FIG. 8B, these MBP mutants also depend on maltose
content in the culture medium for their stability.
[0442] FIG. 8C also illustrates the fluorescent intensity of GFP fused to wild-type MBP.
The GFP fused to wild-type MPB was not destabilized in the absence of maltose compared
to in the presence of maltose. This result is in contrast to GFP fused to various
MBP mutants, which were destabilized and expressed at reduced levels in the absence
of maltose compared to in the presence of maltose.
7.9 Example: Using Maltose Dependent Degrons to Control the Stability of Constitutively-Expressed
Gal80 Protein and their Effects on Farnesene Production
[0443] This example illustrates that MBP mutants obtained from Tier I through Tier III mutagenesis
can be used as maltose dependent degrons to control the stability of constitutively
expressed Gal80 protein (e.g., using native pGAL80 promoter). Each MBP domain from
the mutant strains was cloned, sequenced, and re-fused to a vector containing a
GAL80 gene operably linked to its native promoter pGAL80. The MBP mutant strains were tested
to confirm their maltose dependent famesene production.
7.9.1. Materials and Methods
[0444] The strains comprising MBP mutants were cultured for 72 hours under preculture conditions
as described in Example 7.2. For famesene production experiments, the aforementioned
cultures were diluted and cultured in production media described in Example 7.2. In
the production media, the carbon source was either 4% sucrose ("on" state) or a mixture
of 2.3% sucrose and 1.7% maltose ("off' state). After 72 hours of culture, famesene
extraction was performed, and famesene concentration was measured by UV absorbance
at 222 nm on a SpectraMax plate reader as described in Example 7.2.
7.9.2. Results and Discussions
[0445] The results are shown in FIGS. 9A through 9C. The plots on the top panel represent
famesene production without any maltose in the production medium for strains that
express various fusion proteins comprising Gal80p fused to wild-type MBP or MBP mutants
operably linked to a pGal80 promoter. The plots on the bottom panel represent famesene
production with maltose in the production medium for the same set of strains shown
on the top panel.
[0446] As shown in FIG. 9A, for the strains which express wild-type MBP fused in frame to
Gal80p (second from the right), there was virtually no production of famesene (only
background measurements) either in the presence or in the absence of maltose. By contrast,
for strains comprising MBP mutants H8, H9, H10, M1, M5, and M13, famesene production
in the absence of maltose ("on" state) was at least about 10% greater, typically at
least about 50% greater than in the presence of maltose ("off' state). In this group,
MBP mutant M5 has the best "on" state response. However, the "on" state response of
host cells comprising MBP mutant M5 was reduced compared to the constitutively famesene
producing control Y9213 by about 46%.
[0447] Similarly, FIG. 9B illustrates famesene production from strains which express Gal80p
fused in frame to various MBP mutants. As shown in FIG. 9B, for strains comprising
MBP mutants 3A6, 4D3, 5A2, and 5F3, famesene production from the strains in the absence
of maltose ("on" state) was at least about 50% greater than in the presence of maltose
("off' state).
[0448] FIG. 9C illustrates famesene production from the strain which expresses Gal80p fused
in frame to MBP mutant L8. As shown in FIG. 9C, famesene production from the strain
in the absence of maltose ("on" state) was at least about 280% greater than in the
absence of maltose ("off " state). The famesene production from this mutant strain
during the "on" state was comparable (about 90%) to that of non-switchable famesene
producing control strain Y9213. The famesene production from
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strainY17025 (CEN.PK) which does not comprise the heterologous mevalonate pathway
enzyme and which contains
pGAL80>GAL80 gene without MBP mutants produced virtually no famesene (only background measurements).
[0449] These results indicate that these MBP mutants, in the presence of maltose, are stable
and therefore fusion proteins comprising Gal80p fused in frame to MBP mutants repress
Gal4p, reducing expression of biosynthetic pathway genes necessary to produce farnesene.
In the absence of maltose, however, Gal80p fused in frame to MBP mutants is de-stabilized,
relieving Gal4p from being repressed by the fusion protein, therefore, resulting in
higher expression of biosynthetic pathway genes necessary to produce farnesene.
7.10 Example: Combining MBP Mutants that are Maltose dependent degrons with the Maltose-Responsive
Promoter
[0450] This example illustrates that MBP mutants behaving as maltose dependent degrons can
be combined with maltose-responsive promoters to control famesene production at both
transcription and post-translational levels.
7.10.1. Materials and Methods
[0451] As shown in FIG. 10, two isogenic strains were generated by varying the specific
switch constructs. The parent strain D is similar to strains Y9213 and Y9709 and comprises
heterologous nucleic acids that encode mevalonate pathway enzymes and famesene synthase
with
GAL80 gene deleted as described in Example 7.5. Strains B and C are isogenic strains as
strain D, except that these strains comprise nucleic acids encoding Gal80p fused to
a MBP mutant operably linked to a maltose-responsive promoter. For example, strain
B is a transformant generated after introducing a DNA construct MS85487 which includes
promoter pMal_32_v1 (SEQ ID NO: 78) operably linked to nucleic acids encoding Gal80p
fused in frame to MBP mutant L8v4d; Strain C is a transformant generated after introducing
DNA construct MS85488 which comprises promoter pMAL32 (SEQ ID NO: 34) operably linked
to nucleic acids encoding Gal80p fused in frame to MBP mutant L8_v4d. Promoter pMAL32
used in strain C is stronger than promoter pMAL_32_v1 (SEQ ID NO: 78).
[0452] The strains were cultured for 72 hours under preculture conditions as described in
Example 7.2. For famesene production experiments, the aforementioned cultures were
diluted and cultured in production media as described in Example 7.2. In the production
media, the carbon source was either 4% sucrose ("on" state) or a mixture of 2.3% sucrose
and 1.7% maltose ("off' state). After 72 hours of culture, famesene extraction was
performed and famesene concentration was measured by UV absorbance at 222 nm on a
SpectraMax plate reader as described in Example 7.2.
7.10.2. Results and Discussions
[0453] In Example 7.9, MBP mutants were used by themselves to control the stability of constitutively-expressed
GAL80 transcribed from its native promoter in host cells. In this example, the maltose
control of
GAL80 transcription with maltose control of
GAL80 stability were combined by integrating and operably linking various MBP mutants fused
to Gal80p a maltose-inducible promoter. The results shown in FIG. 10 illustrate that
various combinations of maltose-responsive promoters and MBP mutants resulted in good
switchability for these new strains B and C. In addition, famesene productions from
both strains B and C during "on" state in the absence of maltose were comparable to
non-switchable famesene producing control.
7.11 Example: Half-Lives of Fusion Proteins Comprising MBP Degrons
[0454] This example illustrates that MBP mutants obtained from Tier I through Tier III mutagenesis
can be used as maltose dependent degrons to increase the degradation rate for their
fusion partner, GFP.
7.11.1. Materials and Methods
[0455] All the GFP DNA constructs (e.g., a GFP gene fused to a MBP mutant gene operably
linked to a pTDH3 promoter) were transformed into Y9709 and integrated at
GAS2 locus using
URA3 as selection marker. Strains were inoculated and grown in BSM 1.4% sucrose and 0.7%
maltose medium at 30 degrees for 2 days to induce GFP expression. Two days later,
cultures were diluted by 25 fold in BSM 2% sucrose. GFP fluorescence was measured
by Guava flow cytometer during log growth phase (e.g., immediately before, 1.75, 3,
4.25, 6, 7.25, and 8.5 hours after dilution). The reduction in GFP fluorescence was
reported in log scale after background subtraction, which is shown in FIG. 11A. Since
GFP fluorescence decrease shown in FIG. 11A reflects the effects of both GFP protein
degradation and GFP dilution by cell division during log phase. In order to obtain
the true GFP degradation rate, the growth rate was subtracted from GFP fluorescence
decrease rate. Growth rate of Y9213 in sucrose (µ = 0.15 hr
-1) was subtracted to correct the half-lives. The true GFP degradation rates were then
converted to GFP half-lives as shown in FIG. 11B. Half-lives of GFP are shown in FIG.
11B without taking into account the GFP transcription change in sucrose medium.
7.11.2. Results and Discussions
[0456] Half of GFP protein decayed in 8.7 hours when it was not fused to MBP. Half of GFP
protein fused in frame to wild-type MBP decayed in 11.6 hours. When GFP was fused
to MBP mutants, the degradation speed was dramatically increased and the half-lives
of the fusion proteins were shortened to 1.4 - 5.0 hours
(See Figure 11B). Among these, two MBP mutants (5A2, 5F3) had the shortest half-lives
as measured by GFP intensity in the absence of maltose
(see FIG. 11A). These results indicate that MBP mutants facilitate protein degradation
in the absence of maltose.
7.12 Example: MBP-based Maltose Switch Prevents Breakage due to GAL80 Reactivation
[0457] This example provides results demonstrating that host cells capable of producing
the isoprenoid famesene, and comprising the MEV pathway under negative regulation
by a maltose switch and a maltose dependent degron, display improved stability of
production of famesene in a long fermentation run when the build stage of the fermentation
is performed in the presence of maltose (thereby effecting an "off" state), compared
to production from a constitutively producing strain that produced famesene throughout
the build stage.
7.12.1. Material and Methods
[0458] The non-switchable famesene producing control strain and the maltose switchable strain
(pMAL32>GAL80 fused toMBP_L8) were initially struck out on a solid agar medium containing 2% dextrose,
1% maltose and grown at 30°C until colonies were visible. Seed vials were prepared
by inoculating a single colony into a 15ml tube containing 3 ml of BSM 2% sucrose,
1% maltose. After approximately 48 hours, all 3 ml was transferred into 500 mL disposable
shake flask containing 125 mL of 2% sucrose, and 1% maltose BSM (seed vial medium).
Cells were grown at 30°C in a shaker at 200 rpm until an OD
600 between 4 and 7 was reached. Once the desired OD has been reached, 36ml of a sterile
50% glycerol stock was added to 84 ml of culture, the suspension was aliquoted into
seed vials, and the seed vials were slowly frozen to -80°C at a rate of approximately
1°C/min. Biomass build prior to the fermentation was accomplished by thawing one or
more seed vials into a 250 mL shake flask containing 50 mL of 1.6% sucrose, 0.4% glucose,
and 1% maltose BSM (biomass build medium), and by growing the culture for 24 hours
at 34°C and 200 RPM. A portion of this culture was then transferred a 500 ml flask
containing 100 ml of the same medium to reach a starting OD
600 of 0.1, and grown for an additional 24 hours. 25 ml of this culture was then used
to inoculate a 0.5 L fermentor containing 225 ml of BSM media lacking any sugar. Cane
syrup (without any maltose) was fed on demand and the fermentation was run for 13
days at 34 °C following a feeding protocol that maximized famesene yield.
[0459] The total amount of famesene produced and the total sugar consumed by the cells were
monitored daily, and the cumulative famesene yield was measured and plotted against
time as shown in FIG. 12A. The cumulative famesene yield shown in FIG. 12A was normalized
against the cumulative famesene yield value of the maltose switchable strain measured
at 168 hours.
[0460] The total amount of famesene produced and the total sugar consumed by the cells were
updated daily, and the ratio of these two values was determined for each 24 hour interval,
normalized by the highest yield observed in any interval, and plotted as normalized
fermentor interval yield, as shown in FIG. 12B. The normalized famesene interval yield
shown in FIG. 12B was normalized against the interval famesene yield value of the
maltose switchable strain measured at 168 hours.
7.12.2. Results and Discussion
[0461] As shown in FIG. 12A, the normalized cumulative yield of the non-switchable parent
strain declined continuously from its peak at about 120 hours to below about 20% of
the peak yield of the switchable child strain at 168 hours. By contrast, the maltose
switchable strain maintained the normalized cumulative yield into about 216 hours.
Similarly, as shown in FIG. 12B, the normalized interval famesene yield of the non-switchable
parent strain declined continuously from its peak at about 100 hours to well below
40% of the peak yield of the maltose switchable strain at 168 hours. By contrast,
the maltose switchable strain maintained a normalized yield that was about 80% of
its peak into 216 hours. Thus, these results demonstrate that a maltose switchable
strain
(pMAL32>GAL80 fused to MBP_L8) that turns off famesene production in the presence of maltose during
the build stage of a two-stage fermentation process results in improved production
stability of famesene production during the production stage.
7.13 Example: Construction of pGMAL Promoters
[0462] This example illustrates construction of synthetic pGMAL promoters. In this example,
exemplary pGMAL promoters were constructed using pGAL1, pGAL2, and/or pGAL7 promoters
as background promoters with their Gal4p binding sites removed and different copy
numbers of MAL activator binding sequences (e.g., Malx3p) added at different locations
within the background promoters.
7.13.1. Materials and Methods
[0463] There are four Gal4p binding sites in
pGAL1 and
pGAL2, and two Gal4p binding sites
inpGAL7. All Gal4p binding sites were removed from these promoters. The resulting "empty"
promoters were called
pGAL1_0, pGAL2_0, and
pGAL7_0. One to eight copies of the following MAL activator binding sequences were inserted
in these empty
GAL promoters: AGAAATATTATCTAAAAGCGAGAGTTTAAGCGAGTTGCAAGA (SEQ ID NO: 80); and GTCCGCGAAAATTTCCGGATAAATCG
(SEQ ID NO: 81). Thirty-four new synthetic promoters were created, and they were named
as
pGMAL, pG2MAL, and
pG7MAL (see FIGS. 14A and 14B) Four hybrid promoters were also constructed by joining partial
sequences of
pGAL1_
0, pGAL2_0, and
pGAL7_ 0 with a few MAL binding sites. These promoters were named as
pG721_MAL_v11, pG271_MAL_v12, pG172_MAL _v13, and
pG712_MAL_v14. Some of these and other new synthetic promoters were used to drive GFP expression
at
GAS2 locus in the famesene production strain Y9213.
7.13.2. Results and Discussions
[0464] For a genetic switch system, it is desirable to have an inducible promoter which
does not express any genes operably linked thereto without an inducing agent. It is
also desirable to have inducible promoters with a varying degree of strength to control
gene expression so that production of gene products can be adjusted to an appropriate
level.
[0465] Synthetic pGMAL promoters were generated because host cells comprising a natural
pMAL promoter operably linked to a gene of interest tend to express the gene product
at a low level in the culture medium without any maltose. In addition, it was found
that the activity of natural pMAL promoters was up-regulated in a culture medium without
maltose when host cells were growing at a low growth rate. As illustrated in FIGS.
14A and 14B, synthetic pGMAL promoters were found to be maltose inducible and were
not affected by the cell growth rate when host cells were grown in a culture medium
which does not include maltose. The results shown in FIGS. 14A and 14B are described
in further detail in Example 7.14.
7.14 Example: pGMAL Promoters Are Maltose Inducible
[0466] This example illustrates that synthetic pGMAL promoters obtained from Example 7.13
are maltose inducible. The promoters are also not affected by the growth rate of host
cells in the absence of maltose.
7.14.1. Materials and Methods
[0467] Synthetic pGMAL promoters produced from Example 7.13 were used to drive GFP expression
at
GAS2 locus in Y9213 using
URA3 as selection marker. Strains were inoculated and grown in BSM 1.45 sucrose and 0.7%
maltose media at 30 degrees for 2 days and then were diluted by 25 fold in the same
medium. After 48 hours, GFP fluorescence was measured using Guava flow cytometer.
pGAL1, pTDH3, pMAL11, pMAL12, pMAL31, and
pMAL32 were used as controls in this experiment. GFP fluorescence data were normalized to
the background signal generated by Y9213 without GFP expression. A ladder of maltose
inducible promoters was created with promoter strength ranging from slightly above
the background
(pG7MAL_v2, 108%) to twice of
pTDH3 (pGMAL_v16, 9000% of background). Strains with the empty promoters
pGAL1_0, pGAL2_0, and
pGAL7_0 driving GFP were also measured, and they did not exhibited any GFP fluorescence
(data not shown). Leakiness of these promoters at high growth rate (0.15 h
-1) in BSM 2% sucrose and low growth rate (0.03 hr
-1) in BSM 2% raffinose plus 0.1% of glucose were also examined.
7.14.2. Results and Discussions
[0468] The GFP fluorescence data from various synthetic pGMAL promoters are illustrated
in FIGS. 14A and 14B. As shown in FIGS. 14A and 14B, a ladder of synthetic pGMAL promoters
with different promoter strength induced by maltose was obtained. In addition, the
promoter strength of synthetic pGMAL promoters were relatively unaffected by the cell
growth rate. By contrast, pMAL promoters exhibited a relatively large difference in
the promoter strength when the cells were cultured in 2% sucrose (providing high cell
growth rate) versus in 2% raffinose (providing low cell growth rate). As shown in
FIGS. 14A and 14B, some of the promoters (e.g. pGMAL_v5 and pG2MAL_v8) exhibited extremely
low leakiness at both high and low growth rates under un-induced condition.
7.15 Example: First Round of Screening of Essential Amino Acid Biosynthesis Genes
to Test its Suitability in a Stabilization Construct
[0469] This example describes screening various combinations of essential amino acid biosynthesis
genes operably linked to four native GAL regulon promoters
(i.e., pGAL3, pGAL2, pGAL7 and pGAL10) to determine their suitability as stabilization constructs
in genetically modified host cells.
Table 1. List of GAL regulon promoters and amino acid biosynthesis genes screened
during the first round of screen
pGAL promoters tested |
Lysine biosynthesis genes tested |
Methionine biosynthesis genes tested |
pGAL3 |
LYS1 |
HOM2 |
pGAL2 |
LYS2 |
HOM3 |
pGAL7 |
LYS4 |
HOM6 |
pGAL10 |
LYS9 |
MET2 |
|
LYS12 |
MET17 |
|
LYS14 |
|
|
LYS20 |
|
[0470] Forty eight combinations of GAL regulon promoters and amino acid biosynthetic genes
were transformed into yeast host cells using URA3 as a selective marker. For each
combination, a pGal promoter was inserted immediately upstream of the initiation codon
of a selected amino acid biosynthetic gene at its endogenous locus by homologous recombination.
Two different strains were used for transformation: Y9213 and Y9213 containing native
GAL80, which represses expression of enzymes in the biosynthetic pathway for producing
famesene, and therefore, turns off the production of famesene. A construct useful
as a stabilization construct would exhibit differential cell growth in the two strains
when essential amino acid (methionine or lysine) is not added to culture medium. If
a construct behaves as a suitable stabilization construct, strain Y9213 transformed
with such a construct would grow without added essential amino acid (methionine or
lysine) in culture media since constitutively expressed transcriptional activator
Gal4p in Y9213 would activate expression of the amino acid biosynthesis gene operably
linked to a pGal promoter. On the other hand, strain Y9213 containing native GAL80
transformed with the same construct would not grow as well since Y9213 containing
native GAL80 will repress the GAL regulon.
[0471] The transformants comprising a lysine biosynthetic gene operably linked to a pGAL
promoter were plated onto CSM + 2% glucose agar plates with 0.2% lysine or onto the
plates without lysine. The transformants comprising a methionine biosynthetic gene
operably linked to a pGAL promoter were plated onto CSM + 2% glucose agar plates with
20 mg/L methionine or onto the agar plates without methionine. The plates were cultured
for 4 to 5 days at 30 °C. The colonies that grew on the plates were visually compared.
[0472] The transformants comprising a lysine biosynthetic gene operably linked to a pGAL
promoter were cultured in a 96-well plate in BSM liquid medium comprising 2% sucrose
with 0.1% lysine or the BSM liquid medium without lysine. The transformants comprising
a methionine biosynthetic gene operably linked to a pGAL promoter were cultured in
a 96-well plate in BSM liquid media comprising 2% sucrose with 20 mg/L methionine
or the BSM liquid medium without methionine. The plates were cultured for about 1
to 2 days at 30 °C. The cell densities of the transformants grown with and without
their respective essential amino acids were also compared visually.
[0473] Based on the visual comparison, it was found that several combinations of amino acid
biosynthesis genes, when coupled to the GAL regulon, were able to prevent cell growth
in strain Y9213 containing native GAL80 strain but not in strain Y9213. For example,
MET2, LYS2, LYS1 and LYS4 genes coupled to all 4 pGAL promoters prevented cell growth
in Y9213 containing native GAL80 strain but not in Y9213 strain when cultured in culture
media lacking lysine (or methionine for MET2 construct). LYS9, when coupled to pGAL2
or pGAL3, was able to prevent cell growth in strain Y9213 containing native GAL80
but not in strain Y9213. These results indicated that various combinations of amino
acid biosynthetic genes operably linked to pGAL promoters are suitable in generating
GAL regulon based conditional auxotrophy in yeast cells.
7.16 Example: Second Round of Screening of Essential Amino Acid Biosynthesis Genes
[0474] This example describes a second round of screening of essential amino acid biosynthesis
genes from Example 7.15, operably linked to additional pGAL promoters to determine
their suitability as a stabilization construct in genetically modified host cells.
[0475] As shown in Table 2 below, a more comprehensive promoter swap library was generated
for the eight amino acid synthesis genes selected. pGALx_v# promoters are engineered
pGAL promoters that have increased or reduced promoter strength by altering the number
and location of Gal4p-binding sites; these are derived from native pGAL promoters
(denoted by x in the name), and the engineered versions of the promoters have a version
number in their names following the name of the original native promoter from which
they were derived. Each of lysine or methionine biosynthesis gene for Saccharomyces
cerevisiae is publicly available and can be obtained from, e.g., the yeast genome
database (www.yeastgenome.org) or from GENBANK. The nucleotide sequences of lysine
and methionine biosynthesis genes used in the examples section are also provided in
the Sequence Listing.
Table 2. List of promoters and genes screened in the second round
pGAL promoters tested |
Lysine or methionine biosynthesis genes tested |
pGAL3 |
LYS1 |
pGAL2 |
LYS2 |
pGAL7 |
LY59 |
pGAL10 |
LYS20 |
pGCY1 |
LYS4 |
pGAL80 |
LYS12 |
pGAL2_v3 |
LYS14 |
pGAL7_v1 |
MET2 |
pGAL2_v4 |
|
pGAL1_v3 |
|
pGAL10_v3 |
|
pGAL2_v2 |
|
pGAL7_v2 |
|
[0476] During the second round of screening, promoter swap libraries containing various
combinations of 13 pGAL promoters (6 native promoters and 7 engineered synthetic promoters)
and seven different biosynthesis genes shown in Table 2 were transformed into maltose
switch strain H. Strain H contains same nucleic acid elements described above for
non-switchable strain Y9213, and was made into a "switchable" strain, that is, repressible
in the presence of maltose by chromosomally integrating a copy of GAL80 under the
control of maltose-responsive promoter pMAL 32 (SEQ ID NO: 34). For each combination,
a pGAL promoter was inserted immediately upstream of the initiation codon of a selected
amino acid biosynthetic gene at its endogenous locus by homologous recombination.
[0477] The second round of screening for transformants comprising a lysine biosynthetic
gene operably linked to a pGAL promoter was performed under four different conditions
on CSM + 2% glucose agar plates: 1) CSM agar plates containing 2% glucose and 1% maltose
but no lysine; 2) CSM agar plates containing 2% glucose, 1% maltose and 0.1% lysine;
3) CSM agar plates containing 2% glucose but no lysine; and 4) CSM agar plates containing
2% glucose and 0.1% lysine. For transformants comprising a methionine biosynthetic
gene operably linked to a pGAL promoter, the CSM agar plates contained 20 mg/L methionine
instead of lysine in conditions 2) and 4). The plates were cultured for 4 to 5 days
at about 30 °C. The size and/or densities of colonies grew on plates were visually
compared for transformants cultured under four different conditions.
[0478] Similar sets of experiments were performed in BSM liquid medium containing 2% sucrose.
The transformants comprising a lysine biosynthetic gene operably linked to a pGAL
promoter were cultured under the following four conditions: 1) BSM culture medium
containing 2% sucrose and 1% maltose but no lysine; 2) BSM culture medium containing
2% sucrose, 1% maltose and 0.1% lysine; 3) BSM culture medium containing 2% sucrose
but no lysine; and 4) BSM culture medium containing 2% sucrose and 0.1% lysine. The
transformants were cultured for 1 to 2 days at about 30 °C. The cell densities of
the transformants grown under four different conditions were visually compared.
[0479] An optimal combination of promoter and gene would allow transformed cells to grow
during the "on" state (production stage) without lysine (or methionine), but would
prevent cell growth during the "off' state (build stage) in the absence of lysine
(or methionine). The "off' state without lysine (or methionine) condition mimics the
reactivation of GAL80, which may occur due to spontaneous mutations in genetically
modified yeast during a long fermentation run. Cells containing an optimal combination
of promoter and gene should not be able to grow when GAL80 is expressed.
[0480] FIG. 18 illustrates the screening strategy and growth phenotypes of Strain H transformed
with pGAL10_v3 operably linked to LYS2 (pGAL_v3>LYS2). As shown on the top left quadrant
of FIG. 18, transformed cells cultured in a culture medium containing maltose but
lacking lysine (GAL80 expressed) did not grow on agar plates or in a liquid medium.
As shown on the bottom left quadrant of FIG. 18, transformed cells cultured in a culture
medium containing dextrose but lacking lysine (no GAL80 expression) grew on agar plates
and in a liquid medium. As shown on the top right quadrant of FIG. 18, transformed
cells cultured in a culture medium containing maltose and lysine (GAL80 expressed)
grew. As shown on the bottom right quadrant of FIG. 18, transformed cells cultured
in a culture medium containing dextrose and lysine (no GAL 80 expressed) grew.
[0481] Using the screening strategy shown in FIG. 18, transformants comprising various combinations
of an amino acid biosynthetic gene operably linked to a pGAL promoters were tested.
Among the combinations, the following constructs exhibited a discernable growth phenotype
differential:
pGAL10_v3>LYS9, pGAL2_v2>LYS1, pGAL2 v3>LYS], pGAL7_v2>LYS1, pGAL80>LYS1, pGCY1>LYS1. Overall, it was found that synthetic pGAL promoters with low promoter strengths performed
best in terms of providing differential cell growth during the "on" versus "off' state
of the GAL regulon.
7.17 Example: Additional Testing of Differential Growth Phenotypes Exhibited by Two Stabilization constructs
[0482] This example describes additional testing of differential growth phenotypes exhibited
by two stabilization constructs in Y9213 strain background.
[0483] During the second round of screening, there were a few constructs that showed very
low growth, when cultured in a culture medium containing maltose but no added lysine,
while retaining good growth when cultured in a culture medium containing sucrose but
no added maltose.
pGAL2_v3>LYS1 was chosen as a representative construct from this group for further testing. The
constructs chosen for further testing in fermentation tanks were
pGAL10_v3>LYS9 and
pGAL2_v3>LYS1.
[0484] Each stabilization construct was transformed into strains were transformed into strain
Y9213. For preculture conditions, the strains were cultured were gown in sterile 96-well
plates (1.1 ml working volume; Axygen) containing 360 µl of Bird Seed Media (BSM,
originally described by van Hoek
et al. (2000). For the preculture conditions, the carbon source was typically a mixture
of 1.4% sucrose and 0.7% maltose, and 0.1% lysine was added to the culture medium.
Single colonies were picked into each well and incubated for approximately 72 hours
at 33.5°C, 80% humidity and 1000 rpm (Infors Multitron; ATR Biotec).
[0485] For the production stage experiments, the aforementioned saturated cultures were
diluted 1/25 into sterile 1.1 ml plates containing 145 µl of BSM and 5 µl of mineral
oil. The carbon source was a mixture of 2.3% sucrose and 1.7% maltose. The presence
of maltose in the culture medium activates GAL80 expression and therefore is expected
to repress expression of LYS1 or LYS9 operably linked to a GAL promoter. During the
production stage, the strains were cultured in the presence of 0.1 % lysine or in
the absence of lysine in a culture medium to determine whether added lysine can alleviate
conditional auxotrophy in these strains. After 72 hours of culture, cell densities
in the production stage cultures were measured according to techniques described in
Example 7.1.
[0486] As shown in FIG. 19, both strains containing stabilization constructs showed very
low growth in the culture medium without added lysine, whereas they showed good growth
in the culture medium with added lysine. The results shown in FIG. 19 indicates that
both constructs pGAL10_
v3>LYS9 and
pGAL2_v3>LYS1 are good candidates as stabilization constructs for stabilizing production of heterologous
non-catabolic compounds in genetically modified host cells.
7.18 Example: Stabilization Constructs in Farnesene Producing Strains Stabilize Production of Farnesene
in a Long Fermentation Run
[0487] This example provides results demonstrating that the host cells capable of producing
the isoprenoid famesene, and comprising the MEV pathway under negative regulation
by a maltose switch, display improved stability of production of famesene in a long
fermentation run when the host cells were transformed with a stabilization construct
(e.g., conditional essential LYS1 or LYS9 gene operably linked to a pGAL promoter).
[0488] Both control maltose switchable strain E and these strains transformed with stabilization
constructs (pGAL10_v3>LYS9 and pGAL2_v3>LYS1) were initially struck out on a solid
agar medium containing 2% dextrose, 1% maltose and 2g/L of lysine and grown at 30°C
until colonies were visible. Seed vials were prepared by inoculating a single colony
into a 15ml tube containing 3 ml of BSM 2% sucrose, 1% maltose, and 1g/L of lysine.
After approximately 48 hours, all 3 ml was transferred into 500 mL disposable shake
flask containing 125 mL of 2% sucrose, 1% maltose, and 1g/L of lysine BSM (seed vial
medium). Cells were grown at 30°C in a shaker at 200 rpm until an OD
600 between 4 and 7 was reached. Once the desired OD has been reached, 36ml of a sterile
50% glycerol stock was added to 84 ml of culture, the suspension was aliquoted into
seed vials, and the seed vials were slowly frozen to -80°C at a rate of approximately
1°C/min. Biomass build prior to the fermentation was accomplished by thawing one or
more seed vials into a 250 mL shake flask containing 50 mL of 1.6% sucrose, 0.4% glucose,
1% maltose, 1g/L of lysine BSM (biomass build medium), and by growing the culture
for 24 hours at 34°C and 200 RPM. A portion of this culture was then transferred a
500 ml flask containing 100 ml of the same medium to reach a starting OD
600 of 0.1, and grown for an additional 24 hours. 25 ml of this culture was then used
to inoculate a 0.5 L fermentor containing 225 ml of BSM media lacking any sugar. Cane
syrup (without any maltose or lysine) was fed on demand and the fermentation was run
for 13 days at 34 °C following a feeding protocol that maximized famesene yield.
[0489] The total amount of famesene produced and the total sugar consumed by the cells were
updated daily, and the ratio of these two values was determined for each 24 hour interval,
normalized by the highest yield observed in any interval, and plotted as normalized
as farnesene fermentor interval yield, as shown in FIG. 20. The normalized famesene
interval yield shown in FIG. 20 was normalized against the interval famesene yield
value of strain F measured at 96 hours of the production stage.
[0490] As shown in FIG. 20, the normalized interval famesene yield of the parent maltose
switchable strain E peaked at about 120 hours, and the normalized interval famesene
yield declined from its peak to well below about 40% of the peak yield of the switchable
child strain with a stabilization construct at 200 hours. By contrast, the child strains
comprising a stabilization construct (Strain F comprising pGAL10_v3>LYS9; Strain G
comprising pGAL2_v3>LYS1) maintained the normalized interval yield that was at least
about 70% of its peak from 120 to about 300 hours. Thus, these results demonstrate
that a stabilization construct in genetically modified host cells have a stabilization
effect on the production of heterologous compound famesene during a long fermentation
run.