CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
BACKGROUND
[0002] The present disclosure relates to the use of ultrasonically generated acoustic standing
waves to achieve trapping, concentration, and separation of suspended-phase components
and thereby remove such contaminants from a fluid medium such as water. The acoustic
standing waves may be created by exciting the piezoelectric crystal of an ultrasonic
transducer.
[0003] Piezoelectric crystals may be composed of any material that is able to generate a
piezoelectric effect, i.e. vibrate when subjected to an external voltage. A conventional
material that is used to make piezoelectric crystals is lead zirconate titanate (PZT).
Piezoelectric ceramics are traditionally a mass of perovskite ceramic crystals composed
of a small, tetravalent metal ion (e.g., titanium, zirconium) in a lattice of larger,
divalent metal ions (e.g., lead, barium) and oxygen ions.
[0004] A piezoelectric PZT crystal can be made by mixing fine powders of the component metal
oxides in specific proportions. This mixture is then heated to form a uniform powder.
An organic binder is mixed with the metal oxides and formed into desired shapes (e.g.,
plates, rods, discs). The formed materials are heated at high temperatures that sinter
the mixture and form a dense crystalline structure. The sintered parts are then cooled
and subsequently shaped or trimmed to desired specifications. Electrodes are applied
to the appropriate surfaces of the PZT crystal using processes such as electroless
nickel plating or a silver/glass bead mixture coating that is heated and fused on
the surface of the crystal.
[0005] Exposing the piezoelectric crystal to an electric charge (i.e. voltage) either in
air or a liquid fluid generates pressure waves. A function generator may be used to
apply a specific frequency or group of frequencies to the piezoelectric crystal such
that the pressure waves have a specific frequency. An amplifier may be used to apply
higher voltages to the piezoelectric crystal at the frequencies generated by the function
generator. Conventionally, the face of the piezoelectric crystal is flat and thus
the waves generated from the piezoelectric crystal are uniform across the face of
the crystal.
[0006] A flat-faced piezoelectric crystal can be perturbed in a multi-mode fashion so as
to generate multi-dimensional acoustic standing waves. These higher order modes of
the piezoelectric crystal allow for multiple trapping lines to be formed in the acoustic
standing wave, thus forming a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave. The document
US 2014/0377834 A1 describes a method of using an acoustic standing wave to separate components from
a multi-component fluid, such as animal cells from fluid-cell mixture, in a fluid
flow scheme with an acoustophoresis device. For example, the flow scheme and device
allows for trapping of falling cells as the cells coalesce, agglomerate, and the weight
of the agglomerated mass overcomes the drag and ultrasonic standing wave forces in
the device. It is generally mentioned that a reflector of the acoustophoresis device
may have a non-planar surface.
[0007] It would be desirable to provide a piezoelectric crystal that can be perturbed by
a single excitation, yet still generate a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave(s)
and improved tuning.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
[0008] This object is attained by the combination of features of claim 1 or by the combination
of features of claim 4. The present disclosure relates, in various embodiments, to
acoustophoretic devices and methods of separating a second fluid or a particulate
from a host fluid. Briefly, a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave(s) emanating
from a non-planar face of a piezoelectric material is used to continuously trap the
second fluid or particulate, which then agglomerates, aggregates, clumps, or coalesces
together, and subsequently rises or settles out of the host fluid due to buoyancy
or gravity forces, and exits the acoustic chamber. The non-planar piezoelectric material
only needs to be exposed to a single frequency, rather than a group of frequencies,
to generate a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave.
[0009] Disclosed in various embodiments herein are acoustophoretic devices, comprising:
an acoustic chamber having at least one inlet and at least one outlet; at least one
ultrasonic transducer located on a wall of the acoustic chamber; and a reflector located
on a wall on the opposite side of the acoustic chamber from the at least one ultrasonic
transducer. The at least one ultrasonic transducer includes a piezoelectric material
driven by a voltage signal to create a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave in
the acoustic chamber emanating from the piezoelectric material. The piezoelectric
material and/or the reflector includes a non-planar surface, wherein the non-planar
surface is a faceted surface.
[0010] In certain embodiments, the faceted surface of the piezoelectric material is poled
in a direction substantially perpendicular to a second face of the piezoelectric material.
The faceted surface of the piezoelectric material can be defined by a step function.
[0011] In certain embodiments, the reflector also has a faceted surface which can be defined
by a step function.
[0012] In certain embodiments, the piezoelectric material may be planar and the reflector
includes the faceted surface.
[0013] The at least one ultrasonic transducer can have a non-symmetrical shape, such as
a trapezoidal shape. The reflector can also have a non-symmetrical shape, such as
a trapezoidal shape.
[0014] Also disclosed herein are methods for separating a second fluid or a particulate
from a host fluid. The methods comprise flowing a mixture of the host fluid and the
second fluid or particulate through an acoustophoretic device. The acoustophoretic
device comprises an acoustic chamber having at least one inlet and at least one outlet;
at least one ultrasonic transducer located on a wall of the acoustic chamber; and
a reflector located on a wall on the opposite side of the acoustic chamber from the
at least one ultrasonic transducer. The at least one ultrasonic transducer includes
a piezoelectric material driven by a voltage signal to create a multi-dimensional
acoustic standing wave in the acoustic chamber emanating from the piezoelectric material.
The methods further comprise sending a voltage signal to drive the at least one ultrasonic
transducer to create the multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave in the acoustic
chamber such that the second fluid or particulate is continuously trapped in the standing
wave, and then agglomerates, aggregates, clumps, or coalesces together, and continuously
rises or settles out of the host fluid due to enhanced buoyancy or gravity forces,
and exits the acoustic chamber. The piezoelectric material and/or the reflector includes
a non-planar surface, wherein the non-planar surface is a faceted surface.
[0015] The voltage signal can be a sinusoidal, triangular, pulsed or similar waveform. The
voltage signal can have a frequency of from about 100 kHz to about 20 MHz.
[0016] In certain embodiments, the mixture of the host fluid and the second fluid or particulate
is continuously flowed through the acoustic chamber. The second fluid or particulate
can include at least one cell selected from the group consisting of CHO cells, T-cells,
and yeast cells. Flow rates through the acoustic chamber can be from about 1 mL per
minute to about 50 liters per hour. The methods and devices of the present disclosure
may be capable of separation efficiencies of 90% and more for cell concentrations
from as low as 50,000 cells per milliliter of fluid to 80,000,000 cells per milliliter
of fluid.
[0017] Separation of materials may also include particulates separated from a primary fluid.
This would include microspheres, microbubbles, microcarriers and the like. These materials
may be solid or hollow and have a positive or negative contrast factor.
[0018] In one embodiment, the faceted surface of the reflector can include a plurality of
facet clusters or a plurality of wells.
[0019] In particular embodiments, the multi-dimensional standing wave results in an acoustic
radiation force having an axial force component and a lateral force component that
are the same order of magnitude. In an example not forming part of the invention,
the acoustic standing wave may be a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave (e.g.,
a three-dimensional acoustic standing wave). Examples of such multi-dimensional acoustic
standing waves can be found in commonly owned
U.S. Patent No. 9,228,183. In other examples not forming part of the invention, the acoustic standing wave
can be a planar acoustic standing wave. Further yet, in examples not forming part
of the invention, the acoustic standing wave may be a combination of a planar acoustic
standing wave and a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave, such as where the planar
acoustic standing wave and multidimensional acoustic standing wave are super-positioned
on each other.
[0020] These and other non-limiting characteristics are more particularly described below.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0021] The following is a brief description of the drawings, which are presented for the
purposes of illustrating the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein and not for the
purposes of limiting the same.
FIG. 1 is a graph showing the relationship of the acoustic radiation force, gravity / buoyancy
force, and Stokes' drag force to particle size. The horizontal axis is in microns
(µm) and the vertical axis is in Newtons (N).
FIG. 2A illustrates a first embodiment of a piezoelectric material according to the present
disclosure. The piezoelectric material is a perovskite crystal at a temperature above
the Curie point.
FIG. 2B illustrates a second embodiment of a piezoelectric material according to the present
disclosure. The piezoelectric material is a perovskite crystal at a temperature below
the Curie point.
FIG. 3 illustrates a first example not forming part of the invention of a non-planar face
of a piezoelectric material. The non-planar face of the piezoelectric material is
defined by a smooth function.
FIG. 4 illustrates a second embodiment of a non-planar face of a piezoelectric material
according to the present disclosure. The non-planar face of the piezoelectric material
is defined by a stepped function formed by facets.
FIG. 5 illustrates a third embodiment of a non-planar face of a piezoelectric material according
to the present disclosure. The non-planar face of the piezoelectric material is defined
by a stepped function formed by facets.
FIG. 6 illustrates a cross-sectional view of an acoustic chamber of an acoustophoretic device
according to the present disclosure. The device includes a piezoelectric material
having a planar first face and a reflector having a faceted surface.
FIG. 7A illustrates a first exemplary configuration of the faceted surface of the reflector
of FIG. 6.
FIG. 7B illustrates a second exemplary configuration of the faceted surface of the reflector
of FIG. 6.
FIG. 7C illustrates a third exemplary configuration of the faceted surface of the reflector
of FIG. 6.
FIG. 8 illustrates a magnified view of a facet cluster of the faceted surface of FIG. 7C, showing the height differential between a central facet and four surrounding outer
facets.
FIG. 9 illustrates a fourth exemplary configuration of the faceted surface of the reflector
of FIG. 6.
FIG. 10 illustrates a magnified view of the faceted surfaces depicted in FIG. 9.FIG. 11 is a graph illustrating the separation efficiency of a faceted reflector versus a
flat, planar reflector at varied impedance levels. The left-hand y-axis is impedance
in thousands of kg * S-1 * m-2 (Rayls). The two lines marked as "flat reflector" and "faceted reflector" are read
against the left-hand y-axis. The right-hand y-axis is efficiency. The points labeled
"1 mission" and "1e6 flat" (triangular and X-shaped points) are read against the right-hand
y-axis. The x-axis is in units of ten thousand Hertz.
FIG. 12 is a graph illustrating the separation efficiency of a faceted reflector versus a
flat, planar reflector over time at a frequency of 2.185 MHz and two different powers
(5W and 10W).
FIG. 13 illustrates a third embodiment of a piezoelectric material according to the present
disclosure. The piezoelectric material has a non-symmetrical, trapezoidal shape.
FIG. 14 illustrates the non-planar face of the trapezoidal piezoelectric material of FIG. 13 upon which asymmetric excitation patterns are generated at four different frequencies.
In FIG. 14, the top left picture is at a frequency of 2.217 MHz. The right-hand scale is in
units of 10-9, and ranges from 0.55 to 1 in intervals of 0.05. The maximum value is 2.25x10-9, and the minimum value is 2.18x10-11.
In FIG. 14, the top right picture is at a frequency of 2.302 MHz. The right-hand scale is in
units of 10-1, and ranges from 3 to 6 in intervals of 0.5. The maximum value is 1.38x10-9, and the minimum value is 1.64x10-11.
In FIG. 14, the bottom left picture is at a frequency of 2.32 MHz. The right-hand scale is in
units of 10-1, and ranges from 2.5 to 6 in intervals of 0.5. The maximum value is 1.11x10-9, and the minimum value is 1.4x10-11.
In FIG. 14, the bottom right picture is at a frequency of 2.34 MHz. The right-hand scale is
in units of 10-1, and ranges from 3 to 5 in intervals of 0.5. The maximum value is 9.23x10-10, and the minimum value is 8.98x10-12.
FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an acoustophoretic separation method according to the present
disclosure for a second fluid or particle less dense than a host fluid.
FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating an acoustophoretic separation method according to the present
disclosure for a second fluid or particle denser than a host fluid.
FIG. 17 is a cross-sectional diagram of a conventional ultrasonic transducer.
FIG. 18 is a cross-sectional diagram of an ultrasonic transducer according to the present
disclosure. An air gap is present within the transducer, and no backing layer or wear
plate is present.
FIG. 19 is a cross-sectional diagram of an ultrasonic transducer according to the present
disclosure. An air gap is present within the transducer, and a backing layer and wear
plate are present.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0022] The present disclosure may be understood more readily by reference to the following
detailed description of desired embodiments and the examples included therein. In
the following specification and the claims which follow, reference will be made to
a number of terms which shall be defined to have the following meanings.
[0023] Although specific terms are used in the following description for the sake of clarity,
these terms are intended to refer only to the particular structure of the embodiments
selected for illustration in the drawings, and are not intended to define or limit
the scope of the disclosure. In the drawings and the following description below,
it is to be understood that like numeric designations refer to components of like
function.
[0024] The singular forms "a," "an," and "the" include plural referents unless the context
clearly dictates otherwise.
[0025] The term "comprising" is used herein as requiring the presence of the named component
and allowing the presence of other components. The term "comprising" should be construed
to include the term "consisting of", which allows the presence of only the named component,
along with any impurities that might result from the manufacture of the named component.
[0026] Numerical values should be understood to include numerical values which are the same
when reduced to the same number of significant figures and numerical values which
differ from the stated value by less than the experimental error of conventional measurement
technique of the type described in the present application to determine the value.
[0027] All ranges disclosed herein are inclusive of the recited endpoint and independently
combinable (for example, the range of "from 2 grams to 10 grams" is inclusive of the
endpoints, 2 grams and 10 grams, and all the intermediate values). The endpoints of
the ranges and any values disclosed herein are not limited to the precise range or
value; they are sufficiently imprecise to include values approximating these ranges
and/or values.
[0028] The modifier "about" used in connection with a quantity is inclusive of the stated
value and has the meaning dictated by the context. When used in the context of a range,
the modifier "about" should also be considered as disclosing the range defined by
the absolute values of the two endpoints. For example, the range of "from about 2
to about 10" also discloses the range "from 2 to 10." The term "about" may refer to
plus or minus 10% of the indicated number. For example, "about 10%" may indicate a
range of 9% to 11%, and "about 1" may mean from 0.9-1.1.
[0029] It should be noted that many of the terms used herein are relative terms. For example,
the terms "upper" and "lower" are relative to each other in location, i.e. an upper
component is located at a higher elevation than a lower component in a given orientation,
but these terms can change if the device is flipped. The terms "inlet" and "outlet"
are relative to a fluid flowing through them with respect to a given structure, e.g.
a fluid flows through the inlet into the structure and flows through the outlet out
of the structure. The terms "upstream" and "downstream" are relative to the direction
in which a fluid flows through various components, i.e. the flow fluids through an
upstream component prior to flowing through the downstream component. It should be
noted that in a loop, a first component can be described as being both upstream of
and downstream of a second component.
[0030] The terms "horizontal" and "vertical" are used to indicate direction relative to
an absolute reference, i.e. ground level. However, these terms should not be construed
to require structures to be absolutely parallel or absolutely perpendicular to each
other. For example, a first vertical structure and a second vertical structure are
not necessarily parallel to each other. The terms "top" and "bottom" or "base" are
used to refer to surfaces where the top is always higher than the bottom/base relative
to an absolute reference, i.e. the surface of the earth. The terms "upwards" and "downwards"
are also relative to an absolute reference; upwards is always against the gravity
of the earth.
[0031] The term "parallel" should be construed in its lay sense of two surfaces that maintain
a generally constant distance between them, and not in the strict mathematical sense
that such surfaces will never intersect when extended to infinity.
[0032] The present application refers to "the same order of magnitude." Two numbers are
of the same order of magnitude if the quotient of the larger number divided by the
smaller number is a value of at least 1 and less than 10.
[0033] Acoustophoresis is the separation of particles and secondary fluids from a primary
or host fluid using high-intensity acoustic standing waves, and without the use of
membranes or physical size exclusion filters. It has been known that high intensity
standing waves of sound can exert forces on particles in a fluid when there is a differential
in both density and/or compressibility, otherwise known as the acoustic contrast factor.
The pressure profile in a standing wave contains areas of local minimum pressure amplitudes
at its nodes and local maxima at its anti-nodes. Depending on the density and compressibility
of the particles, they will be trapped at the nodes or anti-nodes of the standing
wave. Generally, the higher the frequency of the standing wave, the smaller the particles
that can be trapped due the pressure of the standing wave.
[0034] When acoustic standing waves propagate in liquids, the fast oscillations may generate
a non-oscillating force on particles suspended in the liquid or on an interface between
liquids. This force is known as the acoustic radiation force. The force originates
from the non-linearity of the propagating wave. As a result of the non-linearity,
the wave is distorted as it propagates and the time-averages are nonzero. By serial
expansion (according to perturbation theory), the first non-zero term will be the
second-order term, which accounts for the acoustic radiation force. The acoustic radiation
force on a particle, or a cell, in a fluid suspension is a function of the difference
in radiation pressure on either side of the particle or cell. The physical description
of the radiation force is a superposition of the incident wave and a scattered wave,
in addition to the effect of the non-rigid particle oscillating with a different speed
compared to the surrounding medium thereby radiating a wave. The following equation
presents an analytical expression for the acoustic radiation force on a particle,
or cell, in a fluid suspension in a planar standing wave.

where β
m is the compressibility of the fluid medium, ρ is density, ϕ is acoustic contrast
factor, V
p is particle volume, λ is wavelength, k is 2π/λ, P
0 is acoustic pressure amplitude, x is the axial distance along the standing wave (i.e.,
perpendicular to the wave front), and

where ρ
p is the particle density, ρ
m is the fluid medium density, β
p is the compressibility of the particle, and β
m is the compressibility of the fluid medium.
[0035] In a typical experiment, the system is operated at a voltage such that the particles
are trapped in the ultrasonic standing wave, i.e., remain in a stationary position.
The axial component of the acoustic radiation force drives the particles, with a positive
contrast factor, to the pressure nodal planes, whereas particles with a negative contrast
factor are driven to the pressure anti-nodal planes. The radial or lateral component
of the acoustic radiation force is the force that traps the particle. It therefore
must be larger than the combined effect of fluid drag force and gravitational force.
For small particles or emulsions, the drag force F
D can be expressed as:

where U
f and U
p are the fluid and particle velocity, R
p is the particle radius, µ
f and µ
p are the dynamic viscosity of the fluid and particle, and
µ̂ = µp /
µf is the ratio of dynamic viscosities. The buoyancy force F
B is expressed as:

where
Rp is the particle radius, ρ
f is the fluid density, ρ
p is the particle density, and g is the universal gravitational constant.
[0036] For a particle to be trapped in the ultrasonic standing wave, the force balance on
the particle must be zero, and therefore an expression for lateral acoustic radiation
force F
LRF can be found, which is given by:

[0037] For a particle of known size and material property, and for a given flow rate, this
equation can be used to estimate the magnitude of the lateral acoustic radiation force.
[0038] The theoretical model that is used to calculate the acoustic radiation force is the
formulation developed by Gor'kov, where the primary acoustic radiation force F
R is defined as a function of a field potential U,
FR = -∇ (
U), where the field potential U is defined as

and fi and
f2 are the monopole and dipole contributions defined by

where

where
p is the acoustic pressure, u is the fluid particle velocity, Λ is the ratio of cell
density ρ
p to fluid density ρ
f, σ is the ratio of cell sound speed
Cp to fluid sound speed
Cf, V
o =
πRp3 is the volume of the cell, and < > indicates time averaging over the period of the
wave.
[0039] For a one dimensional standing wave, where the acoustic pressure is expressed as

where A is the acoustic pressure amplitude, k is the wavenumber, and ω is the angular
frequency. In this case, there is only the axial component of the acoustic radiation
force F
ARF, which is found to be

where X is the contrast factor given by

[0040] Particles with a positive contrast factor will be driven to the pressure nodal planes,
and particles with a negative contrast factor will be driven to the pressure anti-nodal
planes. In this way, the generation of a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave
in an acoustic chamber results in the creation of tightly packed clusters of particles
in the acoustic chamber, typically corresponding to the location of the pressure nodes
or anti-nodes in the standing wave depending on acoustic contrast factor.
[0041] Gork'ov's model is for a single particle in a standing wave and is limited to particle
sizes that are small with respect to the wavelength of the sound fields in the fluid
and the particle. It also does not take into account the effect of viscosity of the
fluid and the particle on the radiation force. As a result, this model cannot be used
for macro-scale ultrasonic separators since particle clusters can grow quite large.
[0042] FIG. 1 is a log-log graph (logarithmic y-axis, logarithmic x-axis) that shows the scaling
of the acoustic radiation force, fluid drag force, and buoyancy force with particle
radius. Calculations are done for a typical mammalian cell used in experiments. In
the experiment, the mammalian cell had a density (ρ
p) of 1,050 kg/m
3 and a cell sound speed (
Cp) of 1,550 m/s. The fluid in which the particle was flowed was water having a density
(ρ
w) of 1000 kg/m
3, a fluid sound speed (
Cf) of 1500 m/s, and a flow rate (
Vf) of 4 cm/min. The experiment used 33 PZT-8 ultrasonic transducers driven at a frequency
(f) of 2.2 MHz at a pressure (p) of 1 MPa. As explained above, the gravity / buoyancy
force is a particle volume dependent force, and is therefore negligible for particle
sizes on the order of micron, but grows, and becomes significant for particle sizes
on the order of hundreds of microns. The fluid drag force scales linearly with fluid
velocity, and therefore typically exceeds the buoyancy force for micron sized particles,
but is negligible for larger sized particles on the order of hundreds of microns.
The acoustic radiation force scaling is different. When the particle size is small,
Gor'kov's equation is accurate and the acoustic trapping force scales with the volume
of the particle. Eventually, when the particle size grows, the acoustic radiation
force no longer increases with the cube of the particle radius, and will rapidly vanish
at a certain critical particle size. For further increases of particle size, the radiation
force increases again in magnitude but with opposite phase (not shown in the graph).
This pattern repeats for increasing particle sizes.
[0043] Initially, when a suspension is flowing through the system with primarily small micron
sized particles, it is necessary for the acoustic radiation force to balance the combined
effect of fluid drag force and buoyancy force for a particle to be trapped in the
standing wave. In
FIG. 1, this happens for a particle size of about 3.5 micron, labeled as R
c1. The graph then indicates that all larger particles will be trapped as well. Therefore,
when small particles are trapped in the standing wave, particles coalescence / clumping
/ aggregation / agglomeration takes place, resulting in continuous growth of effective
particle size. As the particle size grows, the acoustic radiation force reflects off
the particle, such that large particles will cause the acoustic radiation force to
decrease. Particle size growth continues until the buoyancy force becomes dominant,
which is indicated by a second critical particle size, R
c2, at which size the particles will rise or sink, depending on their relative density
with respect to the host fluid. Thus,
FIG. 1 explains how small particles can be trapped continuously in a standing wave, grow
into larger particles or clumps, and then continuously will rise or settle out because
of enhanced buoyancy or gravity forces.
[0044] The models that were implemented in the present disclosure are based on the theoretical
work of Yurii Ilinskii and Evgenia Zabolotskaya as described in
AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1474-1, pp. 255-258 (2012). These models also include the effect of fluid and particle viscosity, and therefore
are a more accurate calculation of the acoustic radiation force.
[0045] The acoustophoretic separation technology of the present disclosure employs multi-dimensional
ultrasonic acoustic standing waves, planar acoustic standing waves or combinations
of planar and multidimensional acoustic standing waves (collectively referred to herein
simple as acoustic standing waves) to trap particles or a secondary fluid in a volume
of fluid containing said particles / secondary fluid.
[0046] Turning now to
FIG. 2A, a first embodiment of a piezoelectric material
200 is shown. In the embodiment depicted in
FIG. 2A, the piezoelectric material
200 is a perovskite crystal at a temperature above the Curie point. The piezoelectric
material
200 is in the shape of a cubic lattice with a symmetrical arrangement of positive and
negative charges.
FIG. 2B shows a second embodiment of a piezoelectric material
250. In the embodiment depicted in
FIG. 2B, the piezoelectric material
250 is a perovskite crystal at a temperature below the Curie point. The piezoelectric
material
250 is in the shape of a tetragonal (orthorhombic) lattice with an electric dipole. Both
of the piezoelectric materials
200,
250 depicted in
FIG. 2A and
FIG. 2B are comprised of divalent metal ion(s) (e.g., lead, barium), oxygen ion(s), and tetravalent
metal ion(s) (e.g., titanium, zirconium). The dipole expansion and contraction of
the piezoelectric materials
200,
250 depicted in
FIG. 2A and
FIG. 2B allow for the piezoelectric effect to occur, resulting in the generation of pressure
waves.
[0047] The Curie point is a critical temperature at which each perovskite crystal in a piezoelectric
material exhibits a simple cubic symmetry with no dipole moment. However, at temperatures
below the Curie point, such as is depicted in
FIG. 2B, each crystal has tetragonal or rhombohedral symmetry and a dipole moment. Adjoining
dipoles form regions of local alignment are called domains. The alignment of the crystals
gives a net dipole moment to the domain in the crystal and, as a result, generates
a net polarization. The polarization, however, is still random and thus there is no
overall direction that the piezoelectric crystal will change in shape when an electrical
impulse is applied.
[0048] In operation, a strong, direct current electric field, usually at a temperature slightly
below the Curie point, is applied to the crystal. Through this poling (polarization)
treatment, the domains of the piezoelectric crystal most nearly aligned with the electric
field expand at the expense of domains that are not aligned with the field, and the
piezoelectric crystal expands in the direction of the strong electrical field. When
the electric field is removed, most of the dipoles are locked into a configuration
of near alignment. The piezoelectric crystal now has a permanent polarization (i.e.,
the crystal can be considered "poled"). Thus, upon supplying an electrical charge
to the crystal, the crystal will expand and contract in the direction that it is now
poled.
[0049] In a conventional flat / planar piezoelectric surface, a single frequency can be
used to excite a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave. In accordance with the
present disclosure, it has been found that a piezoelectric material having a non-planar
(i.e., non-flat) face can be electrically excited by a single frequency to further
enhance the expansion and contraction in the poled direction of the crystal, such
that differential vibrations (as opposed to uniform vibrations) emanate from the surface
of the non-planar face of the piezoelectric material to generate a multi-dimensional
acoustic standing wave. Through proper shaping of the non-planar surface, a multi-dimensional
acoustic standing wave can be generated as desired (e.g., with a desired strength,
shape, intensity).
[0050] FIG. 3 shows an example not forming part of the invention of such a piezoelectric material
300 in which a non-planar first face
310 of the piezoelectric material
300 is defined by a smooth function. In this way, the non-planar face
310 of the piezoelectric material
300 is poled in a direction
320 substantially perpendicular to a second face
330 of the piezoelectric material
300. In the piezoelectric material
300 depicted in
FIG. 3, the non-planar face
310 and the second face
330 are located on opposite sides of the crystal. The second face is planar, and provides
the reference against which the non-planarity of the first face
310 is determined. As seen here, the first face
310 is formed from a series of peaks
312 and valleys
314. The transition between the peaks and valleys is smooth. A smooth function is a function
having a derivative that is continuous.
[0051] A single electrode can be used on each side of the piezoelectric material. The electrode
may be coated by several means, such as plating with electroless nickel or spray coating
with a conductive coating, such as a silver-containing coating. The electrodes must
be separated so that there is a positive terminal and a negative terminal to energize
the piezoelectric material.
[0052] In contrast to
FIG. 3,
FIG. 4 shows a second embodiment of a piezoelectric material
400 in which a non-planar first face
410 of the piezoelectric material
400 is defined by a stepped function. Again, the non-planar face
410 of the piezoelectric material
400 is poled in a direction
420 substantially perpendicular to a second face
430 of the piezoelectric material
400. A stepped function is a piecewise constant function. As seen here, the overall shape
of the first face
410 is made up of a series of smaller flat surfaces
412, also referred to herein as facets.
[0053] FIG. 5 shows a third embodiment of a piezoelectric material
500 in which a non-planar face
510 of the piezoelectric material
500 is defined by a stepped function. Yet again, the non-planar first face
510 of the piezoelectric material
500 is poled in a direction
520 substantially perpendicular to a second face
530 of the piezoelectric material
500. The main difference between
FIG. 4 and
FIG. 5 is that the adjacent smaller flat surfaces
512 (i.e. facets) vary much more in their difference in height (relative to the second
face
530).
[0054] It is also contemplated that the reflector located on an opposite side of the acoustic
chamber from the transducer / piezoelectric material can also have a non-planar surface,
which can be likewise defined by a smooth or stepped function. The non-planar face
of the transducer / piezoelectric material and the non-planar surface of the reflector
may be described as being faceted, such as is depicted in
FIG. 6. In
FIG. 6, the piezoelectric material
600 has a flat, planar first face
610, and the reflector
650 has a faceted surface
660. The faceted surface
660 of the reflector
650 is defined by flat surfaces or facets
662, similar to the facets
512 of the piezoelectric material
500 of
FIG. 5 and the facets
412 of the piezoelectric material
400 of
FIG. 4. That is, as depicted in
FIG. 6, the facets
662 in the faceted surface
660 of the reflector
650 can be stepped, such that adjacent facets are located different distances from a
first face
610 of the piezoelectric material
600. For example, facet
670 is located distance
L1 from the first face
610 of the piezoelectric material
600, while facet
680 is located distance
L2 from the first face
610 of the piezoelectric material
600, with
L1 being greater than
L2. It is to be understood that the facets
662 may be dimensioned as desired. For example, facet
670 typically has a width
672 selected to maximize the reflected energy. Similarly, the distance between adjacent
facets, such as distance
L3 between facet
670 and facet
680, is typically selected to minimize the distance between the director of a natural
vibration mode of the piezoelectric material and adjacent facets. The distance between
a facet and the first face
610 of the piezoelectric material
600 (e.g., distance
L1 for facet
670 and distance
L2 for facet
680) typically corresponds to a half wavelength to accommodate for all possible resonance
conditions in the acoustic chamber.
[0055] As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the facets
662 can be arranged as desired to create an acoustic standing wave having a desired mode
pattern.
FIGS. 7A-7C depict various exemplary configurations of the faceted surface
660 of the reflector
650. For example,
FIG. 7A shows a design in which the faceted surface
660 of the reflector
650 includes flat surfaces or facets
662 that extend along the length of the reflector
650. The height of a given facet generally differs from the height of an adjacent facet
by a fraction of the generated acoustic standing wave. The design in
FIG. 7A implements a degenerated one-dimensional pattern of intermittent steps.
[0056] FIG. 7B shows a design in which the faceted surface
660 of the reflector
650 includes wells
664 having flat bottoms
666. In the exemplary embodiment of
FIG. 7B, the wells
664 are all of equal depth. The distribution of the wells
664 on the faceted surface
660 of the reflector
650 corresponds to the distribution of the 3x3 mode pattern emitted by the reflector
650. The wells are distributed in a regular pattern along the faceted surface.
[0057] Finally,
FIG. 7C and
FIG. 8 show a design in which the faceted surface
660 of the reflector
650 includes multiple facet clusters
668. In this exemplary embodiment, each facet cluster
668 is comprised of a pyramid-shaped group of five facets, with four outer facets
673,
674,
675,
676 differing from a central facet
670 by a multiple of 0.1 wavelengths. That is, if the central facet
670 corresponds to the 0 position, the four outer facets
673,
674,
675,
676 are deeper by 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 wavelengths, respectively. For example, central
facet
670 in
FIG. 8 corresponds to position 0, outer facet
673 is located 70 µm below the surface of the central facet
670, outer facet
674 is located 140 µm below the surface of the central facet
670, outer facet
675 is located 210 µm below the surface of the central facet
670, and outer facet
676 is located 240 µm below the surface of the central facet
670. The distribution of the facet clusters
668 corresponds to the distribution of the 9x9 mode pattern reflected by the reflector,
though it is to be understood that such a design could also be used with a 3x3 mode
pattern. It is further contemplated that the pattern of the facets in the faceted
surface
660 of the reflector
650 may influence the mode selection for various frequencies. The number of facets or
facet levels within a single facet cluster is typically selected to ensure smooth
adjustment to the changing resonance conditions within the acoustic chamber (i.e.,
more facets or facet levels for more gradual transitions), with the facets or facet
levels differing from one another by a fraction of the acoustic wavelength, as previously
explained. The number of facets or facet levels should, however, generally be limited
to minimize the total number of facets, thereby increasing the reflecting area per
facet. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the piezoelectric material
may likewise have a faceted front face, similar to the faceted surface of the reflector
depicted in
FIG. 6 and
FIGS. 7A-7C. In such embodiments, the first face of the piezoelectric material is faceted, while
the surface of the reflector is generally kept planar or flat.
[0058] FIG. 9 and
FIG. 10 depict another exemplary embodiment of a faceted surface
660 of the reflector
650.
FIG. 9 shows the entire reflector, while
FIG. 10 provides a magnified view of a portion of the faceted surface
660 of the reflector
650. As best seen in
FIG. 10, the surface is divided into multiple facets that provide four different heights.
A dotted line is used to indicate the facet cluster
690. The central facet
691 is surrounded by a second facet
692, a third facet
693, and a fourth facet
694. The second facet
692 has approximately twice the surface area of the third facet or the fourth facet.
The third facet
693 is the lowest of these facets, followed by the second facet
692, then the fourth facet
694, with the central facet
691 being the highest of these facets.
[0059] It is noted that in
FIGS. 4-10, the facets are generally illustrated as being surfaces with a square-shaped perimeter.
This is not a requirement, and the facets may be of any suitable shape, e.g. rectangular,
circular, etc.
[0060] As will be explained in greater detail herein, the operation of the acoustophoretic
devices of the present disclosure includes generation of acoustic standing waves in
an acoustic chamber. The acoustic standing waves can be at a fixed frequency throughout
the period of operation, and the frequency may be selected to match the mode distribution
of the piezoelectric material to the facet distribution of the reflector. The maximal
amplitude of the acoustic standing wave is achieved under the resonance conditions
that occur when the wave frequency f satisfies the condition

where c is the speed of sound in the medium,
n is a positive integer, and
L is the distance between the transducer and the reflector. Optimal cell separation
is achieved under the resonance conditions at the maximal amplitude of the acoustic
pressure for a fixed emitter power. The maximal acoustic pressure in turn leads to
the maximal acoustic radiation force, which is the result of the acoustic field gradients,
and to the most efficient cell trapping. When particles (e.g., cells) accumulate within
the acoustophoretic device (or more generally due to inhomogeneous conditions), the
speed of sound c changes and the resonance conditions are destroyed. The speed of
sound may also change due to the change of temperature of the suspension. The temperature
change may be a result of the acoustic operation or due to the change of the feed
solution temperature. The resonance conditions can be changed also for different suspension
compositions. These are most typical, but not all the possible, mechanisms of the
resonance destruction.
[0061] FIG. 11 graphically illustrates some of the advantages of using a reflector having a faceted
surface over a flat, planar reflector. In
FIG. 11, the lowest two lines (i.e., the lines having square and diamond-shaped points) represent
the impedance of a faceted reflector and flat reflector in thousands of kg * s
-1 * m
-2 (Rayls) along the left y-axis, and the upper two lines (i.e., the lines having triangular
and X-shaped points) represent the efficiency of a faceted reflector and a flat reflector
in values of percentage along the right y-axis. The x-axis of
FIG. 11 represents various operating frequencies in ten thousands of Hertz.
FIG. 11 shows that for a yeast concentration of 1 x 10
6 cells/mL, the efficiency of a faceted reflector was noticeably greater than the efficiency
of a flat, planar reflector. A similar result is noticed in
FIG. 12, which graphically illustrates the efficiency of a faceted reflector versus the efficiency
of a flat, planar reflector at a frequency of 2.185 MHz across a period of 80 minutes.
[0062] Referring back to
FIG. 6, when the resonance is destroyed for facet
670 separated by distance
L1 from the piezoelectric material
600, the standing wave "hops" to nearby facet
680, which corresponding
L2 distance from the piezoelectric material
600 satisfies the resonance conditions at the new speed of sound. Therefore, the device
is a self-tuning system capable of readjusting to maintain a strong multi-dimensional
(e.g., three-dimensional) acoustic field regardless of the changing properties of
the processed suspension, and capable of working at the same operation frequency.
Put another way, the use of a reflector having a faceted surface improves the acoustophoretic
device by shortening or completely eliminating the undesirable time periods during
which the frequency of the device must be scanned and, therefore, out of tune.
[0063] The use of a reflector having a faceted surface also optimizes the performance at
uneven cell mass distribution. As the cell density and concentration can be different
along the paths between the piezoelectric material / transducer and the reflector
at different positions across the resonator cross section, the resonance conditions
can be different along these paths. With a reflector having a faceted surface, different
facets are available to re-tune the resonator along these paths in accordance to these
local conditions. This level of optimization does not exist in a flat transducer-flat
reflector system, even with agile frequency tuning.
[0064] Moreover, the use of a reflector having a faceted surface suppresses the standing
wave corresponding to the "piston" mode of the flat piezoelectric material / transducer
regardless of the frequency. Therefore, the range of operation frequencies available
with the reflector having a faceted surface is wider than with a flat transducer-flat
reflector system.
[0065] The differential vibrations of the non-planar face of the piezoelectric material
allow for differential pressure waves to be generated from the non-planar face of
the piezoelectric material using a single voltage input from the function generator
and the amplifier into the piezoelectric material. This, in turn, allows for the creation
of a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave and further allows for local wave fronts
with varying amplitudes to come from the non-planar face of the piezoelectric material
with a single frequency input to then generate the multi-dimensional standing wave
in the fluid.
[0066] In certain embodiments, the piezoelectric material and/or reflector may be non-symmetrical
or asymmetric in shape. This refers to the shape of the piezoelectric material as
defined by its perimeter. Put another way, the perimeter of the piezoelectric material
forms an irregular polygon, or the piezoelectric material does not have any axis of
symmetry. The piezoelectric crystal of
FIG. 3, for example, is a square, which is symmetrical. However, piezoelectric material
1300 depicted in
FIG. 13 has a trapezoidal shape with four different angles. Designing the piezoelectric material
to have a non-symmetrical shape allows for an acoustic standing wave created by the
piezoelectric material to generate trapping lines that are asymmetric.
[0067] FIG. 14 shows four asymmetric excitation patterns generated on the face of a trapezoidal
piezoelectric material at four different frequencies. The asymmetry of the piezoelectric
material leads to generation of asymmetric trapping lines of particles inside the
fluid, at different frequencies of excitation. This asymmetric field of trapping lines
allows for less interference between adjacent trapping lines when continuous gravity
separation of a secondary fluid or particulate from a host fluid is in operation.
Put another way, when a non-symmetrical piezoelectric material is placed in an acoustic
chamber across from a reflector having a non-symmetrical or another shape, the trapping
lines of the standing wave will be staggered in such a manner that the collected secondary
fluid or particles in each trapping line interfere less with one another as they are
gravitationally separated from the host fluid, compared to those generated by a symmetric
piezoelectric material.
[0068] In accordance with the present disclosure, the particles or secondary fluid collect
at the nodes or anti-nodes of the acoustic standing wave, depending on the particles'
or secondary fluid's acoustic contrast factor relative to the host fluid, forming
clusters / clumps / agglomerates / coalesced droplets that continuously fall out of
the acoustic standing wave when the clusters have grown to a size large enough to
overcome the holding force of the acoustic standing wave (e.g. by coalescence or agglomeration)
and the particle / secondary fluid density is higher than the host fluid, or to rise
out of the acoustic standing wave when the particle / secondary fluid density is less
than the host fluid. The acoustic radiation force is proportional to the particle
volume (e.g. the cube of the radius) when the particle is small relative to the wavelength.
It is proportional to frequency and the acoustic contrast factor. It also scales with
acoustic energy (e.g. the square of the acoustic pressure amplitude). For harmonic
excitation, the sinusoidal spatial variation of the force is what drives the particles
to the stable axial positions within the standing waves. When the acoustic radiation
force exerted on the particles is stronger than the combined effect of fluid drag
force and buoyancy and gravitational force, the particle is trapped within the acoustic
standing wave field. This results in concentration, agglomeration and/or coalescence
of the trapped particles. The strong lateral forces create rapid clustering of particles.
Micron-sized particles, e.g., bacteria, mammalian cells, micro-algae, metal particles,
yeast, fungi, lipids, oil droplets, red blood cells, white blood cells, platelets,
etc., can thus be separated from the host fluid through enhanced gravitational separation.
For the case of a suspension with several different particle sizes, it is possible
by tuning of the system parameters to settle out the group of particles that are larger
in size whereas the group of particles smaller in size can be kept in suspension.
These two layers can then be harvested separately. A repeated process can then be
used to fractionate groups of different sized particles according to size. In this
regard, the multi-dimensional acoustic standing waves generated by each transducer
can be of different frequencies.
[0069] One specific application for the acoustophoresis device is in the processing of bioreactor
materials. It is important to be able to separate relatively larger cells and cell
debris from the expressed materials that are in the host fluid. The expressed materials
are composed of biomolecules such as recombinant proteins or monoclonal antibodies,
and are the desired product to be recovered. Through the use of acoustophoresis, the
separation of the cells and cell debris is very efficient and leads to very little
loss of the expressed materials. This is an improvement over current filtration processes
(depth filtration, tangential flow filtration, and the like), which show limited efficiencies
at high cell densities, so that the loss of the expressed materials in the filter
beds themselves can be up to 5% of the materials produced by the bioreactor. The use
of mammalian cell cultures including Chinese hamster ovary (CHO), NS0 hybridoma cells,
baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells, insect cells, and human cells (e.g. T-cells, B-cells,
stem cells, red blood cells), and living/biological cells in general has proven to
be a very efficacious way of producing/expressing the recombinant proteins and monoclonal
antibodies required of today's pharmaceuticals. The filtration of the mammalian cells
and the mammalian cell debris through acoustophoresis aids in greatly increasing the
yield of the bioreactor. As desired, the acoustophoresis process may also be coupled
with a standard filtration process upstream or downstream, such as depth filtration,
tangential flow filtration (TFF), or other physical filtration processes.
[0070] Efficient separation has been demonstrated for CHO cells, T-cells, and yeast cells
with separation efficiencies in excess of 90% and more for cell concentrations from
as little as 50,000 cells per ml of fluid to 80 million cells per ml of fluid. The
flow rates of the acoustic separation devices according to the current embodiments
vary from 1 ml/min for smaller scale devices to in excess of 50 liter/hour for larger
scale devices.
[0071] In this regard, the acoustic contrast factor is a function of the ratio of particle
to fluid compressibility and particle to fluid density. Most cell types present a
higher density and lower compressibility than the medium in which they are suspended,
so that the acoustic contrast factor between the cells and the medium has a positive
value. As a result, the axial acoustic radiation force (ARF) drives the cells, with
a positive contrast factor, to the pressure nodal planes, whereas cells or other particles
with a negative contrast factor are driven to the pressure anti-nodal planes. The
radial or lateral component of the ARF is larger than the combined effect of fluid
drag force and gravitational force. The radial or lateral component drives the cells/particles
to specific locations (points) within these planes where they cluster, clump, agglomerate,
or coalesce into larger groups, which will then continuously gravity separate from
the fluid.
[0072] Desirably, the ultrasonic transducer(s) generate a three-dimensional or multi-dimensional
acoustic standing wave in the fluid that exerts a lateral force on the suspended particles
to accompany the axial force so as to increase the particle trapping and clumping
capabilities of the standing wave. Typical results published in literature state that
the lateral force is two orders of magnitude smaller than the axial force. In contrast,
the technology disclosed in this application provides for a lateral force to be of
the same order of magnitude as the axial force (i.e. a multi-dimensional acoustic
standing wave). However, in certain embodiments described further herein, combinations
of transducers that produce both multi-dimensional acoustic standing waves and planar
standing waves are contemplated. For purposes of this disclosure, a standing wave
where the lateral force is of the same order of magnitude as the axial force is considered
a "multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave."
[0073] A diagrammatic representation of an acoustic chamber for removing oil or other lighter-than-water
material is shown in
FIG. 15. Excitation frequencies typically in the range from hundreds of kHz to 10s of MHz
are applied by transducer
10. One or more standing waves are created between the transducer
10 and the reflector
11. Incoming host fluid containing a secondary phase enters at inlet
12. Microdroplets are trapped in standing waves at the pressure anti-nodes
14 where they agglomerate, aggregate, clump, or coalesce, and, in the case of buoyant
material, float to the surface and are discharged via an effluent outlet 16 located
above the flow path. Clarified fluid (e.g. water) is discharged at outlet 18. The
acoustophoretic separation technology can accomplish multi-component particle separation
without any fouling at a much reduced cost.
[0074] A diagrammatic representation of an acoustic chamber for removing contaminants or
other heavier-than-water material is shown in
FIG. 16. Excitation frequencies typically in the range from hundreds of kHz to 10s of MHz
are applied by transducer
10. Incoming contaminated fluid enters through inlet
13. Contaminants are trapped in standing waves at the pressure nodes
15 where they agglomerate, aggregate, clump, or coalesce, and, in the case of heavier
material, sink to the bottom collector and are discharged via an effluent outlet
17 located below the flow path. Clarified fluid is discharged at outlet
18.
[0075] As previously explained, the ultrasonic transducer and reflector are located on opposite
sides of the acoustic chamber. In this way, one or more acoustic standing waves are
created between the ultrasonic transducer and reflector.
[0076] Prior to discussing further optimization of the systems, it is helpful to provide
an explanation now of how multi-dimensional acoustic standing waves are generated.
The multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave needed for particle collection is obtained
by driving an ultrasonic transducer at a frequency that both generates the acoustic
standing wave and excites a fundamental 3D vibration mode of the transducer piezoelectric
element. The multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave may be generated by distinct
modes of the piezoelectric element such as a 3x3 mode that would generate multidimensional
acoustic standing waves. A multitude of multidimensional acoustic standing waves may
also be generated by allowing the piezoelectric element to vibrate through many different
mode shapes. Thus, the element would excite multiple modes such as a 0x0 mode (i.e.
a piston mode) to a 1x1 (the fundamental mode), to 2x2, 1x3, 3x1, 3x3, and other higher
order modes and then cycle back through the lower modes of the element (not necessarily
in straight order). This switching or dithering of the piezoelectric element between
modes allows for various multi-dimensional wave shapes, along with a single piston
mode shape, to be generated over a designated time.
[0077] It is also possible to excite or choose a frequency of excitation that excites multiple
modes at the same time, each mode with a varying degree of displacement amplitude.
Through this combination of multiple modes excited at the same time with varying displacement
amplitude, it is possible to generate a superposition of multi-dimensional standing
waves desirable for trapping, clustering, and separation of a secondary fluid or particle
from a host fluid.
[0078] The scattering of the acoustic field off the particles results in a three dimensional
acoustic radiation force, which acts as a three-dimensional trapping field. The acoustic
radiation force is proportional to the particle volume (e.g. the cube of the radius)
when the particle is small relative to the wavelength. It is proportional to frequency
and the acoustic contrast factor. It also scales with acoustic energy (e.g. the square
of the acoustic pressure amplitude). When the acoustic radiation force exerted on
the particles is stronger than the combined effect of fluid drag force and buoyancy
and gravitational force, the particles are trapped within the acoustic standing wave
field. This results in concentration, agglomeration and/or coalescence of the trapped
particles. Relatively large solids of one material can thus be separated from smaller
particles of a different material, the same material, and/or the host fluid through
enhanced gravitational separation.
[0079] The multi-dimensional standing wave generates acoustic radiation forces in both the
axial direction (i.e., in the direction of the standing wave, between the transducer
and the reflector, perpendicular to the flow direction) and the lateral direction
(i.e., in the flow direction). As the mixture flows through the acoustic chamber,
particles in suspension experience a strong axial force component in the direction
of the standing wave. Since this acoustic force is perpendicular to the flow direction
and the drag force, it quickly moves the particles to pressure nodal planes or anti-nodal
planes, depending on the contrast factor of the particle. The lateral acoustic radiation
force then acts to move the concentrated particles towards the center of each planar
node, resulting in agglomeration or clumping. The lateral acoustic radiation force
component has to overcome fluid drag for such clumps of particles to continually grow
and then drop out of the mixture due to gravity. Therefore, both the drop in drag
per particle as the particle cluster increases in size, as well as the drop in acoustic
radiation force per particle as the particle cluster grows in size, must be considered
for the acoustic separator device to work effectively. In the present disclosure,
the lateral force component and the axial force component of the multi-dimensional
acoustic standing wave are of the same order of magnitude. In this regard, it is noted
that in a multi-dimensional acoustic standing wave, the axial force is stronger than
the lateral force, but the lateral force of a multi-dimensional acoustic standing
wave is much higher than the lateral force of a planar standing wave, usually by two
orders of magnitude or more.
[0080] Some further explanation of the ultrasonic transducers used in the devices, systems,
and methods of the present disclosure may be helpful as well. In this regard, the
transducers use a piezoelectric element, usually made of PZT-8 (lead zirconate titanate).
Such elements may have a 2,54 cm by 2,54 cm (1 inch by 1 inch) square shape with a
thickness of 1 mm (nominal 2 MHz resonance frequency), and may also be of a larger
size, such as a 2,54 cm by 7,62 cm (1 inch by 3 inch) shape with a 1 mm thickness,
or smaller such as 1,27 cm by 1,27 cm (0.5 inch by 0.5 inch). The thickness controls
the resonance frequency, as the resonance frequency is inversely proportional to thickness.
Each ultrasonic transducer module can have only one piezoelectric element, or can
have multiple elements that each act as a separate ultrasonic transducer and are either
controlled by one or multiple amplifiers. The piezoelectric element(s) can be crystalline,
semi-crystalline, or non-crystalline. The transducer(s) is/are used to create a pressure
field that generates forces of the same order of magnitude both orthogonal to the
standing wave direction (lateral) and in the standing wave direction (axial).
[0081] FIG. 17 is a cross-sectional diagram of a conventional ultrasonic transducer. This transducer
has a wear plate
50 at a bottom end, epoxy layer
52, piezoelectric element
54 (e.g. a ceramic crystal made of, e.g. PZT), an epoxy layer
56, and a backing layer
58. On either side of the piezoelectric element, there is an electrode: a positive electrode
61 and a negative electrode
63. The epoxy layer
56 attaches backing layer
58 to the piezoelectric element
54. The entire assembly is contained in a housing
60 which may be made out of, for example, aluminum. An electrical adapter
62 provides connection for wires to pass through the housing and connect to leads (not
shown) which attach to the piezoelectric element
54. Typically, backing layers are designed to add damping and to create a broadband
transducer with uniform displacement across a wide range of frequency and are designed
to suppress excitation at particular vibrational eigen-modes. Wear plates are usually
designed as impedance transformers to better match the characteristic impedance of
the medium into which the transducer radiates.
[0082] FIG. 18 is a cross-sectional view of an ultrasonic transducer
81 of the present disclosure. Transducer
81 is shaped as a disc or a plate, and has an aluminum housing
82. The piezoelectric element can be, e.g., a mass of perovskite ceramic crystals, each
consisting of a small, tetravalent metal ion, usually titanium or zirconium, in a
lattice of larger, divalent metal ions, usually lead or barium, and O2-ions. As an
example, in the embodiment shown in
FIG. 18, a PZT (lead zirconate titanate) crystal
86 defines the bottom end of the transducer, and is exposed from the exterior of the
housing. The crystal is supported on its perimeter by a small elastic layer
98, e.g. silicone or similar material, located between the crystal and the housing.
Put another way, no wear layer is present. In particular embodiments, the crystal
is an irregular polygon, and in further embodiments is an asymmetrical irregular polygon.
[0083] Screws
88 attach an aluminum top plate
82a of the housing to the body
82b of the housing via threads. The top plate includes a connector
84 for powering the transducer. The top surface of the PZT crystal
86 is connected to a positive electrode
90 and a negative electrode
92, which are separated by an insulating material
94. The electrodes can be made from any conductive material, such as silver or nickel.
Electrical power is provided to the PZT crystal
86 through the electrodes on the crystal. Note that the crystal
86 has no backing layer or epoxy layer. Put another way, there is an air gap
87 in the transducer between aluminum top plate
82a and the crystal
86 (i.e. the air gap is completely empty). A minimal backing
58 and/or wear plate
50 may be provided in some embodiments, as seen in
FIG. 19.
[0084] The transducer design can affect performance of the system. A typical transducer
is a layered structure with the piezoelectric element bonded to a backing layer and
a wear plate. Because the transducer is loaded with the high mechanical impedance
presented by the standing wave, the traditional design guidelines for wear plates,
e.g., half wavelength thickness for standing wave applications or quarter wavelength
thickness for radiation applications, and manufacturing methods may not be appropriate.
Rather, in one embodiment of the present disclosure the transducers, there is no wear
plate or backing, allowing the piezoelectric element to vibrate in one of its eigenmodes
(i.e. near eigenfrequency) with a high Q-factor. The vibrating piezoelectric element,
such as, e.g., a ceramic crystal/disk, is directly exposed to the fluid flowing through
the acoustic chamber.
[0085] Removing the backing (e.g. making the piezoelectric element air backed) also permits
the element to vibrate at higher order modes of vibration with little damping (e.g.
higher order modal displacement). In a transducer having a piezoelectric element with
a backing, the element vibrates with a more uniform displacement, like a piston. Removing
the backing allows the element to vibrate in a non-uniform displacement mode. The
higher order the mode shape of the piezoelectric element, the more nodal lines the
element has. The higher order modal displacement of the element creates more trapping
lines, although the correlation of trapping line to node is not necessarily one to
one, and driving the element at a higher frequency will not necessarily produce more
trapping lines.
[0086] In some embodiments, the piezoelectric element may have a backing that minimally
affects the Q-factor of the crystal (e.g. less than 5%). The backing may be made of
a substantially acoustically transparent material such as balsa wood, foam, or cork
which allows the element to vibrate in a higher order mode shape and maintains a high
Q-factor while still providing some mechanical support for the element. The backing
layer may be a solid, or may be a lattice having holes through the layer, such that
the lattice follows the nodes of the vibrating element in a particular higher order
vibration mode, providing support at node locations while allowing the rest of the
element to vibrate freely. The goal of the lattice work or acoustically transparent
material is to provide support without lowering the Q-factor of the piezoelectric
element or interfering with the excitation of a particular mode shape.
[0087] Placing the piezoelectric element in direct contact with the fluid also contributes
to the high Q-factor by avoiding the dampening and energy absorption effects of the
epoxy layer and the wear plate. Other embodiments may have wear plates or a wear surface
to prevent the PZT, which contains lead, contacting the host fluid. This may be desirable
in, for example, biological applications such as separating blood. Such applications
might use a wear layer such as chrome, electrolytic nickel, or electroless nickel.
Chemical vapor deposition could also be used to apply a layer of poly(p-xylylene)
(e.g. Parylene) or other polymers or polymer films. Organic and biocompatible coatings
such as silicone or polyurethane are also usable as a wear surface.
[0088] The lateral force of the total acoustic radiation force (ARF) generated by the ultrasonic
transducers of the present disclosure is significant and is sufficient to overcome
the fluid drag force at high linear velocities up to 1 cm/s and beyond. For example,
linear velocities through the devices of the present disclosure can be a minimum of
4 cm/min for separation of cells/particles, and can be as high as 1 cm/sec for separation
of oil/water phases.
[0089] The lateral force of the acoustic radiation force generated by the transducer can
be increased by driving the transducer in higher order mode shapes, as opposed to
a form of vibration where the piezoelectric element effectively moves as a piston
having a uniform displacement. The acoustic pressure is proportional to the driving
voltage of the transducer. The electrical power is proportional to the square of the
voltage. The voltage signal can have a sinusoidal, triangular, pulsed, or similar
waveform and can have a frequency of from about 100 kHz to about 20 MHz. The transducer
is typically a thin piezoelectric plate, with electric field in the z-axis and primary
displacement in the z-axis. The transducer is typically coupled on one side by air
(i.e., the air gap within the transducer) and on the other side by the fluid mixture
of the cell culture media. The types of waves generated in the plate are known as
composite waves. A subset of composite waves in the piezoelectric plate is similar
to leaky symmetric (also referred to as compressional or extensional) Lamb waves.
The piezoelectric nature of the plate typically results in the excitation of symmetric
Lamb waves. The waves are leaky because they radiate into the water layer, which result
in the generation of the acoustic standing waves in the water layer. Lamb waves exist
in thin plates of infinite extent with stress free conditions on its surfaces. Because
the transducers of this embodiment are finite in nature, the actual modal displacements
are more complicated.
[0090] Generally, the transducers of the present disclosure are used to create a pressure
field that generates acoustic radiation forces of the same order of magnitude both
orthogonal to the standing wave direction and in the standing wave direction. When
the forces are roughly the same order of magnitude, particles of size 0.1 microns
to 300 microns will be moved more effectively towards "trapping lines," so that the
particles will not pass through the pressure field. Instead, the particles will remain
within the acoustic chamber, from which they can advantageously be collected via specified
outlets of the acoustophoretic device or otherwise recycled back to an associated
bioreactor.
[0091] The acoustophoretic devices and methods described herein are useful for separating
a second fluid or particulate from a host fluid. In this regard, the devices and methods
of the present disclosure utilize higher order modal displacement of a piezoelectric
material having a non-planar face, such that the piezoelectric material may be perturbed
by a single excitation, yet still generate multi-dimensional acoustic standing waves.
[0092] The present disclosure has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments.
Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon reading and understanding
the preceding detailed description. It is intended that there can be modifications
and alterations made of the present disclosure without departing from the scope of
the invention as set forth in the appended claims.