Technical Field
[0001] The present disclosure relates to a mechanical structure steel for cold-working and
a manufacturing method therefor. In particular, the present disclosure relates to
a mechanical structure steel having a low deformation resistance after spheroidizing
annealing and excellent cold workability, and a method useful for manufacturing the
mechanical structure steel. The mechanical structure steel for cold-working in the
present disclosure is suitable for use in various components, such as automobile components
and construction machine components, manufactured by cold-working, such as cold forging,
cold heading, and cold rolling. The form of the steel is not limited particularly,
and the steel is intended to be used, for example, as a rolled wire rod or the like.
Examples of various components above specifically include machine components and electric
components, such as bolts, screws, nuts, sockets, ball joints, inner tubes, torsion
bars, clutch cases, cages, housings, hubs, covers, cases, cradles, tappets, saddles,
bulks, inner cases, clutches, sleeves, outer races, sprockets, cores, stators, anvils,
spiders, rocker arms, bodies, flanges, drums, joints, connectors, pulleys, metal fittings,
yokes, mouthpieces, valve lifters, spark plugs, pinion gears, steering shafts, and
common rails. Note that the term a wire rod as used in the present specification means
a rolled wire rod, specifically, indicating a line-shaped steel material produced
by cooling a hot-rolled steel to room temperature. Further, the term a steel wire
as used herein indicates a line-shaped steel material having its properties adjusted
by drawing and/or annealing the rolled wire rod.
Background Art
[0002] When producing various components, such as automobile components and construction
machine components, a spheroidizing annealing treatment is usually applied to hot-rolled
wire rods made of carbon steel, alloy steel or the like to impart adequate cold workability
to the wire rod. Then, the steel wire obtained after the spheroidizing annealing is
subjected to cold-working and then machining, such as cutting, to be formed into a
predetermined shape, followed by a quenching-tempering treatment to thereby finally
adjust its strength.
[0003] In recent years, the conditions for spheroidizing annealing have been revised in
terms of energy saving, and especially, shortening of the spheroidizing annealing
time has been required. For example, if the spheroidizing annealing time is reduced
by 20 to 30 percent, the reduction in energy consumption and CO
2 emission can be expected.
[0004] However, it is known that if the spheroidizing annealing time is shortened, a spheroidization
degree as an index of spheroidization of carbides becomes larger (that is, the spheroidized
microstructure becomes deteriorated), and thereby the cold workability is deteriorated.
Because of this, shortening of the spheroidizing annealing time is not easy to implement.
[0005] Some techniques have been hitherto proposed to achieve the shortening of the spheroidizing
annealing time. For example, Patent Document 1 discloses a mechanical structure steel
for cold-working that can be softened even after spheroidizing annealing for a relatively
short time by controlling the metal microstructure before the spheroidizing annealing,
and also discloses a manufacturing method for such a mechanical structure steel. Specifically,
in the disclosed mechanical structure steel for cold-working, a total area ratio of
pearlite and ferrite to the entire microstructure is set at 95% by area or more, and
an area ratio of ferrite is set at a predetermined level or more, and a grain size
of a bcc-Fe crystal is controlled within an appropriate range. In the disclosed manufacturing
method for the mechanical structure steel for cold-working, finish processing is performed
on the steel at a temperature in a range of 750 to 950°C, and then cooled down to
a temperature in a range of 600 to 660°C at an average cooling rate of 5°C/sec. or
more, followed by cooling at an average cooling rate of 1°C/sec. or less for 20 seconds
or more.
[0006] Patent Document 2 discloses a steel wire rod that includes a proeutectoid ferrite
microstructure, a pearlite microstructure and a bainite microstructure in a metal
microstructure, as well as a manufacturing method for the same. The disclosed steel
wire rod can shorten the softening annealing time and can also achieve excellent cold
forgeability after the softening annealing. In the disclosed manufacturing method
for the steel wire rod, the steel is hot-rolled, wound and immersed into a molten
salt bath at a temperature of 500°C or higher and 600°C or lower for 10 seconds or
more, and is then maintained isothermally in a molten salt bath of 530°C or higher
and 600°C or lower for 20 seconds or more and 150 seconds or less, followed by cooling.
[0007] Patent Document 3 discloses a hot-rolled wire rod for cold forging and a manufacturing
method therefor in which a ferrite grain size number is 9 or more, a ferrite fraction
is 30% by area or more with the balance being pearlite, bainite, martensite, or a
microstructure of a combination thereof, while a bainite-martensite fraction is 50%
by area or more of the balance. In the disclosed manufacturing method for the hot-rolled
wire rod for cold forging, finish rolling is performed on the steel in a temperature
range from Ar
3 point to Ar
3 point + 150°C, and the steel is then cooled down in a temperature range of Ar
1 point to 300°C at a cooling rate of 5 to 40°C/sec.
Prior Art Document
Patent Document
Disclosure of the Invention
Problems to be Solved by the Invention
[0009] However, according to the way disclosed in the Patent Document 2, an area ratio of
the proeutectoid ferrite is too low that the hardness of a steel wire obtained after
the spheroidizing annealing might become high. According to the way disclosed in the
Patent Document 3, an area ratio of the ferrite is too low, and the steel further
includes bainite or martensite. Because of this, the hardness of a steel wire obtained
after the spheroidizing annealing is expected to become high.
[0010] In this way, the techniques proposed so far are effective in shortening the spheroidizing
annealing time. However, the development of the techniques has been required to soften
the steel while obtaining a better spheroidized microstructure than that in the related
art.
[0011] Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention have been made under such circumstances
and have an object to provide a mechanical structure steel for cold-working that enables
the achievement of the spheroidization equal to or better than that in a prior steel
and can also be more softened than the prior steel, even when the time for the spheroidizing
annealing is shorter than a usual spheroidizing annealing time, and to provide a method
for manufacturing the steel.
Means for Solving the Problems
[0012] A mechanical structure steel for cold-working according to one embodiment of the
present invention that can solve the above-mentioned problems comprises, in percent
by mass, C: 0.07% or more and less than 0.3%, Si: 0.05 to 0.5%, Mn: 0.2 to 1.7%, P:
more than 0% and 0.03% or less, S: 0.001 to 0.05%, Al: 0.01 to 0.1%, and N: 0 to 0.015%,
with the balance being iron and inevitable impurities, wherein the steel has a metal
microstructure comprising proeutectoid ferrite and pearlite, a total area ratio of
the proeutectoid ferrite and the pearlite with respect to the entire microstructure
is 90% or more, while an area ratio Af of the proeutectoid ferrite with respect to
the entire microstructure satisfies a relationship of Af ≥ A where an A value is represented
by formula (1) below, an average circle equivalent diameter of a bcc-Fe crystal grain
is in a range of 15 to 30 µm, and a pearlite lamellar spacing is 0.20 µm or less on
average:

where [C(%)] in the formula (1) indicates the C content in percent by mass.
[0013] In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the above-mentioned mechanical
structure steel for cold-working further comprises, in percent by mass, one or more
elements selected from the group consisting of Cr: more than 0% and 0.5% or less,
Cu: more than 0% and 0.25% or less, Ni: more than 0% and 0.25% or less, Mo: more than
0% and 0.25% or less, and B: more than 0% and 0.01% or less, the mechanical structure
steel satisfying formula (X) below:

where [Cr%], [Cu%], [Ni%], and [Mo%] indicate the contents of Cr, Cu, Ni, and Mo
in percent by mass, respectively.
[0014] In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, the above-mentioned mechanical
structure steel for cold-working further comprises, in percent by mass, Ti: more than
0% and 0.1% or less.
[0015] A method for manufacturing the above-mentioned mechanical structure steel for cold-working
according to the above-mentioned embodiments of the present invention comprises: performing
finish rolling at a temperature of 950°C or higher and 1, 150°C or lower; and then
performing, in the following order, first cooling to a first-cooling end temperature
of 700 to 750°C at an average cooling rate of 3°C/sec. or less and second cooling
in a temperature range from the first-cooling end temperature to at least 600°C at
an average cooling rate of 5 to 30°C/sec.
Effects of the Invention
[0016] In the mechanical structure steel for cold-working of the present disclosure, each
of the total area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite and the pearlite and the area
ratio of the pro-eutectoid ferrite with respect to the entire microstructure is set
at a predetermined value or more, while the chemical component composition is appropriately
adjusted, and further the average circle equivalent diameter of the body-centered
cubic (bcc)-Fe crystal grain (hereinafter simply referred to as a "bcc-Fe average
grain size" in some cases) and the pearlite lamellar spacing are respectively set
within appropriate ranges. Consequently, the steel can have the spheroidized microstructure
equal to or better than that in a prior steel and can be more softened than the prior
steel, even when the time for the spheroidizing annealing is shorter than the usual
spheroidizing annealing time. Accordingly, when the mechanical structure steel for
cold-working in the present disclosure is processed into the above-mentioned various
components at room temperature or in the working heat generation region after the
spheroidizing annealing, the mechanical structure steel can exhibit a low deformation
resistance and suppress cracking in a working die and steel (rawmaterial). As a result,
the mechanical structure steel for cold-working in the present disclosure can exert
excellent cold workability.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0017] Fig. 1 is an explanatory diagram showing a measurement method of a lamellar spacing
of pearlite.
Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
[0018] The inventors have studied from various point of views to achieve a mechanical structure
steel for cold-working that can be more softened than previously possible, while obtaining
the spheroidized microstructure equal to or better than that in a prior steel, even
when a spheroidizing annealing time is shorter than the usual spheroidizing annealing
time (hereinafter referred to as a "short-time spheroidizing annealing"). As a result,
it has been found that in the metal microstructure (spheroidized microstructure) of
the steel obtained after the spheroidizing annealing, the ferrite grain size is coarsened
to enlarge a mean interparticle distance between carbide particles, thereby making
it possible to achieve the softening of the steel. It leads to an idea that in order
to obtain such a spheroidized microstructure, it is important to control the metal
microstructure provided before the spheroidizing annealing (hereinafter referred to
as a pre-microstructure). In order to obtain the metal microstructure (spheroidized
microstructure) of the above-mentioned steel, on the precondition that the pre-microstructure
is a microstructure that includes proeutectoid ferrite and pearlite as a main phase,
it has been found to be necessary to control the pre-microstructure so as to set the
area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite as high as possible and so as to make the bcc-Fe
crystal grain coarser than that in the prior steel, and to set a pearlite lamellar
spacing at a predetermined value or less. Further, it has also been found that the
steel with such a pre-microstructure can be more softened than the prior steel, while
obtaining a spheroidized microstructure equal to or better than that in the prior
steel, as the spheroidized microstructure after the short-time spheroidizing annealing.
In these ways, the embodiments of the present invention have been completed.
[0019] Respective requirements defined in the present disclosure will be described below.
[0020] The metal microstructure of a steel according to an embodiment of the present invention
includes proeutectoid ferrite and pearlite. These microstructures form a metal microstructure
that reduces the deformation resistance of the steel obtained after the spheroidizing
annealing and contributes to improving the cold workability. However, only by causing
the metal microstructure to simply include proeutectoid ferrite and pearlite, the
desired softening cannot be achieved. For this reason, the area ratio of these microstructures
and an average grain size of a bcc-Fe crystal grain need to be controlled appropriately
as mentioned below.
Total area ratio of proeutectoid ferrite and pearlite: 90% or more
[0021] When the pre-microstructure of the steel includes a large amount of fine microstructures,
including bainite and martensite, even after general spheroidizing annealing, the
microstructure of the steel subjected to the spheroidizing annealing is locally refined
due to the influence of bainite and/or martensite. Consequently, the softening of
the steel becomes insufficient. From this perspective, to sufficiently soften the
steel, the total area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite and the pearlite to the entire
microstructure needs to be 90% or more. The total area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite
and the pearlite is preferably 95% or more, more preferably 97% or more, and most
preferably 100%. Examples of the metal microstructure other than the proeutectoid
ferrite and the pearlite include martensite, bainite, and austenite. As mentioned
above, as the area ratio of these microstructures including martensite is increased,
the strength of the steel becomes higher. Thus, these microstructures may not be included
at all. The steel may include a carbide, a nitride, an oxide, and/or a sulfide, other
than cementite, as other microstructure factors.
Average circle equivalent diameter of bcc-Fe crystal grain: 15 to 30 µm
[0022] When the average circle equivalent diameter of the bcc-Fe crystal grain in the pre-microstructure
of the steel, i.e., the bcc-Fe average grain size is set at 30 µm or less, a good
spheroidized microstructure is obtained even after the short-time spheroidizing (that
is, a spheroidized microstructure with a small spheroidization degree) . If the bcc-Fe
average grain size exceeds 30 µm, the spheroidized microstructure is deteriorated
during the short-time spheroidizing annealing (that is, the spheroidization degree
becomes larger), and consequently the desired spheroidized microstructure cannot be
obtained. The bcc-Fe average grain size is preferably 29 µm or less, and more preferably
28 µm or less. However, if the bcc-Fe average grain size of the pre-microstructure
is extremely small, the steel is strengthened by refinement of ferrite crystal grains
after the spheroidizing annealing, thereby making it difficult to soften the steel.
For this reason, the bcc-Fe average grain size is set at 15 µm or more. The bcc-Fe
average grain size is preferably 16 µm or more, and more preferably 17 µm or more.
Note that the term circle equivalent diameter of a crystal grain means a diameter
of a circle that has the same area as each crystal grain.
[0023] The microstructure in which the above-mentioned bcc-Fe average grain size is to be
controlled corresponds to bcc-Fe crystal grains surrounded by high angle grain boundaries
where a misorientation between two adjacent crystal grains is more than 15°. The microstructure
also includes low angle grain boundaries where a misorientation is 15° or less. However,
these low angle grain boundaries barely influence the spheroidized microstructure
obtained after spheroidizing annealing. To obtain the desired spheroidized microstructure
after the spheroidizing annealing, it is necessary to control the high angle grain
boundaries of the pre-microstructure before spheroidizing annealing. The bcc-Fe average
grain size of the grains surrounded by the high angle grain boundaries is set within
a predetermined range, thereby making it possible to achieve good spheroidized microstructure
(that is, spheroidized microstructure with a small spheroidization degree) even after
the short-time spheroidizing annealing. Note that the above-mentioned "misorientation"
is also called a "deviation angle" or an "oblique angle". As the measurement of the
misorientation, an electron back scattering pattern (EBSP) method may be adopted.
The bcc-Fe implies not only proeutectoid ferrite, but also ferrite included in the
pearlite microstructure.
Pearlite lamellar spacing: 0.20 µm or less
[0024] The metal microstructure of the steel according to the embodiment of the present
invention includes proeutectoid ferrite and pearlite as mentioned above. By narrowing
the pearlite lamellar spacing (i.e., by refining a pearlite lamellar), spheroidizing
of carbides (mainly cementite in the pearlite) is promoted by the spheroidizing annealing
even for a short time, thereby producing a good spheroidized microstructure. From
this perspective, the pearlite lamellar spacing in the pre-microstructure needs to
be 0.20 µm or less on average (hereinafter simply referred to as an "average lamellar
spacing") . The average lamellar spacing is preferably 0.18 µm or less, and more preferably
0.16 µm or less. The lower limit of the average lamellar spacing is not limited particularly,
but usually approximately 0.05 µm.
[0025] Note that the term "pearlite lamellar spacing" as used in the present specification
means a distance between the adjacent lamellar cementite layers. More specifically,
the pearlite lamellar spacing is the shortest distance from a center position of a
thickness of a certain lamellar cementite layer to a center position of a thickness
of another lamellar cementite layer adjacent to the certain lamellar cementite layer.
Area ratio of proeutectoid ferrite Af ≥ A
[0026] As the area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite increases in the pre-microstructure,
the amount of carbide precipitation sites during the spheroidizing annealing is decreased,
so that the number density of carbide particles is decreased, thus promoting the coarsening
of the carbide. Consequently, the interparticle distance between carbide particles
is widened, thereby making it possible to further soften the metal microstructure.
Meanwhile, the area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite changes by the influence of
a carbon content. As the carbon content increases, the area ratio of the proeutectoid
ferrite decreases. Likewise, the area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite suitable for
obtaining the good spheroidized material also changes depending on the carbon content.
As the carbon content increases, the area ratio of the suitable proeutectoid ferrite
decreases. As a result of analysis of a number of experimental results from this perspective,
it is found that the area ratio Af of the proeutectoid ferrite in the pre-microstructure
to the entire microstructure satisfies the relationship of Af ≥ A where an A value
is represented by formula (1) below, thereby making it possible to further soften
the metal microstructure:

where [C(%)] in the formula (1) indicates a content of carbon (C) in percent by mass.
[0027] Af is preferably (103 - 128 × [C(%)]) × 0.85 or more, and more preferably (103 -
128 × [C(%)]) × 0.90 or more. From the above point of view, the upper limit of Af
is not limited particularly. However, as the Af is increased, the manufacturing cost
will increase. When considering the productivity, Af is preferably (103 - 128 × [C(%)])
× 0.97 or less.
[0028] The embodiment of the present invention relates to the mechanical structure steel
for cold-working, and its steel type can be any type as long as it includes a general
chemical component composition as the mechanical structure steel for cold-working.
However, the contents of C, Si, Mn, P, S, Al and N are adjusted within respective
appropriate ranges mentioned below. The term % as used for the chemical component
composition in the present specification means "% by mass".
C: 0.07% or more and less than 0.3%
[0029] C is an element effective in ensuring the strength of steel, that is, the strength
of a final product. To efficiently exert this effect, the C content needs to be 0.07%
or more. The C content is preferably 0.09% or more, and more preferably 0.11% or more.
However, any excessive C content enhances the strength of steel, thereby degrading
the cold workability. Because of this, the C content needs to be less than 0.3%. The
C content is preferably 0.28% or less, and more preferably 0.26% or less.
Si: 0.05 to 0.5%
[0030] Si is effective as a deoxidizing element and as a strength improving element of the
final product by solid-solution hardening. To effectively exert these effects, the
Si content is set at 0.05% or more. The Si content is preferably 0.07% or more, and
more preferably 0.10% or more. Meanwhile, an excessive Si content extremely raises
the hardness of the steel, thereby deteriorating the cold workability. Thus, the Si
content is set at 0.5% or less. The Si content is preferably 0.45% or less, and more
preferably 0.40% or less.
Mn: 0.2 to 1.7%
[0031] Mn is an effective element in increasing the strength of the final product through
the improvement of hardenability of the steel. To effectively exert these effects,
the Mn content is set at 0.2% or more. The Mn content is preferably 0.3% or more,
and more preferably 0.4% or more. Meanwhile, an excessive Mn content raises the hardness
of the steel, thereby deteriorating the cold workability. Thus, the Mn content is
set at 1.7% or less. The Mn content is preferably 1.5% or less, and more preferably
1.3% or less.
P: more than 0% and 0.03% or less
[0032] P is an element inevitably contained in steel and causes grain boundary segregation
in the steel, thereby deteriorating ductility of the steel. Thus, the P content is
set at 0.03% or less. The P content is preferably 0.02% or less, more preferably 0.017%
or less, and still more preferably 0.01% or less. The smaller the P content is, the
better the quality of the steel becomes. The P content is most preferably 0%. However,
in practice, approximately 0.001% of P occasionally remains due to manufacturing process
constraints.
S: 0.001 to 0.05%
[0033] S is an element inevitably contained in steel, specifically, a harmful element for
the cold workability because S is present in the form of MnS in the steel to degrade
the ductility of the steel. Thus, the S content is set at 0.05% or less. The S content
is preferably 0.04% or less, and more preferably 0.03% or less. Note that the S content
of 0.001% or more is effective because S has the function of improving machinability
of the steel. Thus, the S content is preferably 0.002% or more, and more preferably
0.003% or more.
Al: 0.01 to 0.1%
[0034] Al is effective as a deoxidizing element and also effective in fixing solid-solution
N existing in the steel, in the form of AlN. To efficiently exert these effects, the
Al content is set at 0.01% or more. Thus, the Al content is preferably 0.013% or more,
and more preferably 0.015% or more. However, any excessive Al content forms Al
2O
3 excessively, thereby deteriorating the cold workability. Thus, the Al content is
set at 0.1% or less. The Al content is preferably 0.090% or less, and more preferably
0.080% or less.
N: 0 to 0.015%
[0035] N is an element inevitably contained in steel. If the solid-solution N is contained
in the steel, the hardness of the steel is raised and the ductility thereof is degraded
due to strain aging, thus deteriorating the cold workability. Thus, the N content
is set at 0.015% or less. The N content is preferably 0.013% or less, and more preferably
0.010% or less. The smaller N content is preferred. The N content is most preferably
0%. However, in practice, approximately 0.001% of N occasionally remains due to manufacturing
process constraints.
[0036] The basic components of the mechanical structure steel according to the embodiment
of the present invention have been mentioned above, with the balance substantially
being iron as one embodiment. The expression "substantially iron "as used herein means
that for example, a small content of components other than iron, such as Sb and Zn,
can exist in the steel as long as the properties of the present disclosure are not
inhibited, and inevitable impurities other than P, S, and N, such as O and H, can
be contained in the steel. Furthermore, the embodiment of the present invention may
selectively contain the following arbitrary elements as appropriate. The properties
of copper can be further improved depending on the kind of selected arbitrary element
(selective component).
[0037] As mentioned above, P, S, and N are elements inevitably contained (inevitable impurities),
and their composition ranges are specified separately as mentioned above. Because
of this, the term "inevitable impurities" contained as the balance, as used in the
present specification, means elements inevitably contained, except for elements with
their composition ranges separately specified.
[0038] One or more elements selected from the group consisting of Cr: more than 0% and 0.5%
or less, Cu: more than 0% and 0.25% or less, Ni: more than 0% and 0.25% or less, Mo:
more than 0% and 0.25% or less, and B: more than 0% and 0.01% or less
[0039] All Cr, Cu, Ni, Mo and B are elements effective in increasing the strength of the
final product by improving the hardenability of the steel material. These elements
may be contained alone or in combination as needed. Such effects are enhanced as the
contents of these elements are increased. To efficiently exert the above-mentioned
effect, the Cr content is preferably 0.015% or more, and more preferably 0.020% or
more. Each of the Cu content, the Ni content and the Mo content is preferably 0.02%
or more, and more preferably 0.05% or more. The B content is preferably 0.0003% or
more, and more preferably 0.0005% or more.
[0040] However, if the contents of Cr, Cu, Ni and Mo are excessive, the strength of the
steel becomes extremely high, whereby the cold workability might be deteriorated.
Thus, the Cr content is preferably set at 0.5% or less, and each of the Cu content,
the Ni content and the Mo content is preferably 0.25% or less. The Cr content is more
preferably 0.45% or less, and still more preferably 0.40% or less. Each of the Cu
content, the Ni content and the Mo content is more preferably 0.22% or less, and still
more preferably 0.20% or less.
[0041] If the B content is excessive, the toughness of the steel might be deteriorated.
Thus, the B content is preferably set at 0.01% or less. The B content is more preferably
0.007% or less, and still more preferably 0.005% or less.

[0042] When the steel according to the embodiment of the present invention contains one
or more elements of Cr, Cu, Ni and Mo within the above-mentioned respective ranges,
the steel preferably satisfy the following formula (X).

where [Cr%], [Cu%], [Ni%], and [Mo%] indicate the contents of Cr, Cu, Ni and Mo in
percent by mass, respectively.
[0043] The contents of Cr, Cu, Ni and Mo satisfy the formula (X) mentioned above, thereby
preventing the strength of the steel from becoming extremely high, which can improve
the cold workability.
Ti: more than 0% and 0.1% or less
[0044] Ti forms a compound with N to reduce the amount of solid-solution N, and thereby
exerts the softening effect of steel. For this reason, Ti may be contained as needed.
To effectively exert these effects, the Ti content is preferably set at 0.01 or more,
and more preferably 0.02 or more. However, any excessive Ti content causes an increase
in the hardness of the formed compound. Thus, the Ti content is preferably 0.08% or
less, and more preferably 0.05 or less.
[0045] Preferably, in order to manufacture the mechanical structure steel for cold-working
according to the embodiment of the present invention, for the steel satisfying the
above-mentioned component composition, a finish rolling temperature is adjusted during
hot-rolling, and thereafter the cooling rate and the cooling temperature range are
adjusted appropriately by setting the cooling rate in two stages. Specifically, following
steps are performed in this order: finish rolling at a temperature of 950°C or higher
and 1,150°C or lower; first cooling from a temperature of 950°C or higher and 1,150°C
or lower to a first-cooling end temperature of 700 to 750°C at an average cooling
rate of 3°C/sec. or less; and second cooling in a temperature range from the first-cooling
end temperature to at least 600°C at an average cooling rate of 5 to 30°C/sec.
[0046] The finish rolling temperature, the first cooling, and the second cooling will be
respectively described in detail below.
(a) Finish rolling temperature: 950°C or higher and 1,150°C or lower
[0047] To set a bcc-Fe average grain size at 15 to 30 µm, the finish rolling temperature
needs to be controlled appropriately. If the finish rolling temperature exceeds 1,150°C,
it becomes difficult to set the bcc-Fe average grain size at 30 µm or less. Thus,
the finish rolling temperature is preferably 1,150°C or lower. If the finish rolling
temperature is lower than 950°C, it becomes difficult to set the bcc-Fe average grain
size at 15 µm or more. Thus, the finish rolling temperature is preferably 950°C or
higher. The finish rolling temperature is preferably 970°C or higher, and more preferably
990°C or higher. The finish rolling temperature is preferably 1,130°C or lower, and
more preferably 1,110°C or lower.
(b) First cooling
Average cooling rate of the first cooling: 3°C/sec. or less
[0048] The first cooling is started at the finish rolling temperature of 950°C or higher
and 1,150°C or lower and ended at the first-cooling end temperature of 700 to 750°C.
As the cooling rate is increased in the first cooling, the proeutectoid ferrite area
ratio Af becomes smaller, whereby the steel could not satisfy the relationship of
Af ≥ A. Here, the average cooling rate of the first cooling is 3°C/sec. or less. The
average cooling rate of the first cooling is preferably 2.5°C/sec. or less, and more
preferably 2°C/sec. or less. The lower limit of the average cooling rate in the first
cooling is not limited particularly. However, the lower limit is preferably set at
0.01°C/sec. or more as a practical range. It is noted that in the first cooling, the
cooling rate may be changed as long as the average cooling rate is 3°C/sec. or less.
(c) Second cooling
Average cooling rate of the second cooling: 5 to 30°C/sec.
[0049] The second cooling is started at a temperature in a range of 700 to 750°C and ended
at a temperature of at least 600°C. If the average cooling rate in the second cooling
is less than 5°C/sec., it becomes difficult to set an average lamellar spacing of
the pearlite at 0.20 µm or less. The average cooling rate in the second cooling is
preferably 7°C/sec. or more, and more preferably 10°C/sec. or more. If the average
cooling rate in the second cooling is more than 30°C/sec., microstructures such as
bainite and/or martensite, are generated, which makes it difficult to set the total
area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite and the pearlite at 90% or more. The average
cooling rate in the second cooling is preferably 28°C/sec. or less, and more preferably
25°C/sec. or less. It is noted that in the second cooling, the cooling rate may be
changed as long as the average cooling rate is in a range of 5 to 30°C/sec.
[0050] The term "at least 600°C" as used herein means that the highest end temperature of
the second cooling performed at the above-mentioned average cooling rate is 600°C.
The reason for setting the highest end temperature to "600°C" is that the forms of
the metal microstructure specified by the present disclosure, such as an average lamellar
spacing of the pearlite and the total area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite and the
pearlite, are almost determined by the cooling step to 600°C and hardly influenced
by the cooling rate of lower than 600°C. Therefore, the end temperature of the second
cooling is not limited to 600°C, but may be room temperature, like Examples to be
mentioned later. Alternatively, for example, the second cooling may be performed by
setting the end temperature of the second cooling at 400°C, and then the usual cooling
down to room temperature, such as allowing the steel to cool, may be performed. In
general, the average cooling rate for allowing the steel to cool often becomes lower
than the average cooling rate of the second cooling mentioned above.
[0051] By using the mechanical structure steel for cold-working according to the embodiment
of the present invention, the spheroidizing annealing is performed for a short time,
for example, for approximately 1 to 3 hours, in a temperature range of Ac
1 to approximately Ac
1 + 30°C. Consequently, the spheroidization degree can be at a target spheroidization
degree or less as mentioned later, and further the hardness of the steel can be at
a target hardness or lower as mentioned later. Ac
1 is a value calculated from the following formula:

where (% element name) in the formula means a content of each element in percent
by mass.
Examples
[0052] The embodiments of the present invention will be more specifically described by
way of Examples. The embodiments of the present invention are not limited by the following
Examples, and it is possible to implement the embodiments with modifications within
the range that can meet the gist of the present disclosure as described above and
below, all of these modifications being within the technical scope of the present
disclosure.
[0053] Steels having the chemical component composition shown in Table 1 below were used
and rolled to produce a wire rod with φ17.0 mm. Further, the wire rod was then subjected
to machining to produce a test specimen for working Formastor that had a size of φ8.0
mm × 12.0 mm. The obtained test specimen for the working Formastor was used to perform
a working heat treatment test by a working Formastor tester on the conditions mentioned
in Table 2. The working conditions mentioned in Table 2 simulate rolling conditions
imposed on the actual device. Note that in Table 2, the working temperature corresponds
to the finish rolling temperature.
[Table 1]
Steel type |
Chemical composition (% by mass) *Balance being iron and inevitable impurities |
Cr+Cu+Ni+Mc (Formula (X)) |
C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
Al |
N |
Others |
A |
0.25 |
0.22 |
0.40 |
0.013 |
0.024 |
0.022 |
0.005 |
- |
0 |
B |
0.07 |
0.19 |
0.44 |
0.009 |
0.035 |
0.042 |
0.002 |
Cr: 0.15 |
0.15 |
C |
0.09 |
0.22 |
0.51 |
0.016 |
0.019 |
0.050 |
0.002 |
- |
0 |
D |
0.10 |
0.09 |
0.33 |
0.018 |
0.011 |
0.018 |
0.003 |
- |
0 |
E |
0.10 |
0.18 |
0.72 |
0.012 |
0.022 |
0.027 |
0.010 |
Cu: 0.22 |
0.35 |
Ni:0.13 |
F |
0.12 |
0.41 |
1.12 |
0.012 |
0.025 |
0.073 |
0.005 |
- |
0 |
G |
0.14 |
0.36 |
0.68 |
0.020 |
0.029 |
0.026 |
0.004 |
B: 0.0032 |
0 |
H |
0.15 |
0.47 |
0.23 |
0.008 |
0.016 |
0.082 |
0.012 |
- |
0 |
I |
0.18 |
0.32 |
1.66 |
0.015 |
0.024 |
0.054 |
0.013 |
- |
0 |
J |
0.19 |
0.25 |
1.44 |
0.026 |
0.012 |
0.025 |
0.006 |
Ni: 0.15 |
0.15 |
K |
0.22 |
0.24 |
0.92 |
0.014 |
0.036 |
0.017 |
0.007 |
Mo: 0.21 |
0.21 |
L |
0.25 |
0.06 |
0.85 |
0.017 |
0.043 |
0.038 |
0.010 |
Cr: 0.36 |
0.36 |
M |
0.27 |
0.12 |
1.10 |
0.010 |
0.024 |
0.023 |
0.005 |
- |
0 |
N |
0.29 |
0.18 |
1.57 |
0.023 |
0.018 |
0.019 |
0.007 |
- |
0 |
O |
0.15 |
0.33 |
2.08 |
0.025 |
0.031 |
0.085 |
0.004 |
- |
0 |
P |
0.21 |
0.34 |
0.78 |
0.009 |
0.042 |
0.042 |
0.008 |
Cr: 1.07 |
1.07 |
Q |
0.26 |
0.20 |
0.43 |
0.012 |
0.022 |
0.025 |
0.004 |
- |
0 |
R |
0.16 |
0.18 |
0.44 |
0.016 |
0.023 |
0.026 |
0.003 |
- |
0 |
S |
0.17 |
0.22 |
0.70 |
0.015 |
0.020 |
0.031 |
0.007 |
Cr: 0.13 |
0.13 |
B: 0.0019 |
Ti: 0.033 |
T |
0.23 |
0.20 |
0.82 |
0.011 |
0.017 |
0.029 |
0.005 |
Cr: 0.16 |
0.16 |
B: 0.0012 |
Ti: 0.022 |
U |
0.24 |
0.29 |
0.88 |
0.008 |
0.016 |
0.040 |
0.009 |
Ti: 0.061 |
0 |
[0054] The test specimens obtained after performing the working heat treatment test on the
conditions mentioned in Table 2 were evaluated for their microstructures in the ways
(1) to (3) below. Further, after the working heat treatment test, the test specimens
subjected to the spheroidizing annealing were measured for the spheroidization degree
and the hardness in the ways (4) and (5) below, respectively. In either measurement,
the test specimen provided after the working heat treatment or the spheroidizing annealing
was cut at a plane (axial central section) passing through the central axis of the
test specimen and oriented in parallel to the central axis thereof. The cut test specimen
is sometimes called a "longitudinal section sample". The longitudinal section sample
was embedded in resin so that the section of the center axis of the test specimen
can be observed. Regarding the test specimens respectively obtained after the working
heat treatment and after the spheroidizing annealing, the position of D/4 ("D/4 position")
from the side surface toward the center of the test specimen was subjected to the
measurement of the properties below, where D is a diameter of the cylindrical test
specimen.
(1) Measurement of Microstructure Area Ratio
[0055] The axial central section of the longitudinal section sample was polished to a mirror
finish, and then etched with nital to expose its microstructure. Then, in the microstructure
at the D/4 position, a region of 220 µm × 165 µm was photographed for each of five
fields of view with an optical microscope at a magnification of 400X. Then, on each
of the obtained images, ten lines were drawn in each of the longitudinal and lateral
directions at equal intervals in a grid pattern to form 100 intersection points. Among
the 100 intersection points, the number of points where proeutectoid ferrite or pearlite
exists was measured on each image. The total area ratios (%) of such microstructures
in the respective five fields of view were determined to calculate an average of them
over the five fields of view.
(2) Measurement of bcc-Fe Average Grain Size
[0056] A bcc-Fe average grain size was measured using an Electron Back Scattering Pattern
(EBSP) analyzer and a Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FE-SEM). The "crystal
grain" was defined by specifying boundaries where a misorientation (oblique angle)
exceeded 15°, i.e., high angle grain boundaries as grain boundaries, and then the
bcc-Fe average grain size was determined. At this time, the measuring was performed
with the measurement region set at 200 µm × 400 µm and the measurement step set at
intervals of 1.0 µm. Any measured point where a confidence index indicative of the
reliability of a measurement orientation was 0.1 or less was excluded from an analysis
target. A sample where a martensite microstructure was precipitated in the metal microstructure
did not obtain an appropriate bcc-Fe average grain size and thus was not measured.
(3) Measurement of Pearlite Lamellar Spacing
[0057] Fig. 1(a) shows a schematic diagram of a pearlite lamellar microstructure 1, and
Fig. 1(b) shows an enlarged view of the pearlite lamellar microstructure 1. As shown
in Fig. 1(b), the pearlite lamellar microstructure 1 is a microstructure in which
a lamellar ferrite 3 and a lamellar cementite 2 are alternately arranged side by side
in a layer shape (in a lamellar shape) . The lamellar spacing specified by the present
disclosure is a distance between the adjacent lamellar cementites 2.
[0058] The axial central section of the longitudinal section sample was polished to a mirror
finish, and then etched with picral to expose its microstructure. Thereafter, the
microstructure was observed at the D/4 position using the FE-SEM to photograph a region
of 42 µm × 28 µm at a magnification of 3000X or a region of 25 µm × 17 µm at a magnification
of 5000 X for each of the five fields of view in total. At this time, the photographing
was performed to cause an image of each field of view to include at least one pearlite
. A pearlite having the finest lamellar spacing (i.e., the narrowest lamellar spacing)
in each field of view of the photographed image was selected and set as a measurement
target. One line segment 4 was drawn in the pearlite as the measurement target so
as to be perpendicular to the layered microstructure (i.e., perpendicular to the direction
in which each layer extends) . Each of a starting point and an ending point of the
line segment 4 was positioned at the center of the thickness of the lamellar cementite.
A length L of the line segment 4 and the number n of lamellar cementites 2 included
in the line segment 4 (in other words, the number of layers n of the lamellar cementites
2 intersecting the line segment 4) were measured. Note that the number n also includes
the lamellar cementites where the starting point and the ending point of the line
segment are positioned. By using formula (2), the lamellar spacing λ was calculated
from the length L and the number n. The lamellar spacings λ in the respective fields
of view were determined to calculate an average of them over the five fields of view.
Fig. 1(b) indicates an example of n = 5, but the embodiment is not limited thereto.
In the present specification, the line segment 4 was drawn such that the number n
of the lamellar cementites 2 intersecting the line segment 4 was 5 or more when calculating
the lamellar spacing λ.

[0059] The measurement was not performed on the sample in which a martensite microstructure
was precipitated in the metal microstructure, and the total area ratio of the proeutectoid
ferrite and the pearlite was less than 90%, because the lamellar spacing in such a
sample was difficult to calculate.
(4) Measurement of Spheroidization Degree After Spheroidizing Annealing
[0060] Regarding the longitudinal section sample of each test specimen obtained after the
spheroidizing annealing, the axial central section thereof was polished to a mirror
finish and then etched with picral to expose its microstructure. Then, the microstructure
at the D/4 position of each sample was observed for each of five fields of view with
an optical microscope at a magnification of 400X. The spheroidization degree of each
field of view was evaluated as any of No. 1 to No. 4 based on the accompanied drawings
or JIS G3539:1991, and an average of the spheroidization degrees over the five fields
of view was calculated. This means that the smaller the spheroidization degree is,
the better the spheroidized microstructure becomes.
(5) Measurement of Hardness After Spheroidizing Annealing
[0061] Regarding the longitudinal section sample of each test specimen obtained after the
spheroidizing annealing, the axial central section thereof was polished to a mirror
finish. Then, the hardness of the D/4 position of the longitudinal section sample
was measured. The hardness was measured under a load of 1 kgf by using a Vickers hardness
tester. The measurement was performed at five different points located at D/4 position
to thereby calculate its average (HV).
Examples
[0062] The steels of the types A to U shown in Table 1 were used and subjected to the working
Formastor test by changing the working temperature (corresponding to a finish rolling
temperature) and the cooling rate as shown in Table 2 below. In this way, working
Formastor test specimens having different pre-microstructures were produced. In the
steel type O, the Mn content exceeded 1.7%, and hence the steel type O did not fall
within the scope of the present invention in the present application. In the steel
type P, the Ti content exceeded 0.1%, and hence the steel type P did not fall within
the scope of the present invention in the present application. In the steel types
A to O and Q to U, [Cr%] + [Cu%] + [Ni%] + [Mo%] was 0.75% by mass or less, which
satisfy the above-mentioned formula (X). In the steel type P, [Cr%] + [Cu%] + [Ni%]
+ [Mo%] exceeded 0.75% by mass, and therefore does not satisfy the formula (X).
[0063] In the working conditions shown in Table 2, in test specimens except for Test Nos.
10, 20, 43, and 44, the "first cooling" was started from the working temperature and
ended at the first-cooling end temperature in a temperature of 700 to 750°C, while
the "second cooling" was started at the first-cooling end temperature of the "first
cooling" and ended at room temperature. In Test Nos. 10, 20, and 44, since cooling
was performed at a certain average cooling rate from the working temperature at the
start of the first cooling to the end temperature of the second cooling, the "first
cooling" and the "second cooling" were not distinguished. Note that in Test No. 44,
the cooling was performed at an average cooling rate of 40.0°C/sec. from 850°C to
300°C, and then the test specimen was allowed to cool to room temperature. In Test
No. 43, the cooling was performed by setting the end temperature of the "first cooling"
at 650°C, and setting the end temperature of the "second cooling" at 550°C, and then
the test specimen was allowed to cool to room temperature.
[Table 2]
Test No. |
Steel type |
Working conditions |
Heating |
First cooling |
Second cooling |
Working temperature (°C) |
Average cooling rate (°C/sec.) |
End temperature (°C) |
Average cooling rate (°C/sec.) |
End temperature (°C) |
1 |
A |
950 |
2.5 |
710 |
10.0 |
Room temperature |
2 |
A |
1,000 |
1.0 |
740 |
7.0 |
Room temperature |
3 |
A |
1,000 |
1.5 |
730 |
20.0 |
Room temperature |
4 |
A |
1,050 |
2.5 |
700 |
15.0 |
Room temperature |
5 |
A |
1,050 |
3.0 |
720 |
5.0 |
Room temperature |
6 |
A |
1,100 |
0.1 |
740 |
10.0 |
Room temperature |
7 |
A |
1,150 |
1.0 |
730 |
25.0 |
Room temperature |
8 |
A |
1,150 |
2.0 |
730 |
7.0 |
Room temperature |
9 |
A |
900 |
2.5 |
700 |
15.0 |
Room temperature |
10 |
A |
1,000 |
2.0 |
|
2.0 |
Room temperature |
11 |
A |
1,050 |
10.0 |
700 |
10.0 |
Room temperature |
12 |
A |
1200 |
0.1 |
740 |
10.0 |
Room temperature |
13 |
B |
1,050 |
1.0 |
720 |
5.0 |
Room temperature |
14 |
B |
1,100 |
0.5 |
750 |
3.0 |
Room temperature |
15 |
C |
1,000 |
0.1 |
740 |
10.0 |
Room temperature |
16 |
C |
1,100 |
2.0 |
730 |
5.0 |
Room temperature |
17 |
D |
1,150 |
0.1 |
730 |
25.0 |
Room temperature |
18 |
D |
1,250 |
2.5 |
740 |
7.0 |
Room temperature |
19 |
E |
950 |
1.5 |
740 |
20.0 |
Room temperature |
20 |
E |
1,100 |
5.0 |
- |
5.0 |
Room temperature |
21 |
F |
1,000 |
3.0 |
720 |
10.0 |
Room temperature |
22 |
F |
1,000 |
2.0 |
720 |
50.0 |
Room temperature |
23 |
G |
1,050 |
0.1 |
710 |
30.0 |
Room temperature |
24 |
G |
1,150 |
2.0 |
700 |
15.0 |
Room temperature |
25 |
H |
900 |
2.0 |
710 |
20.0 |
Room temperature |
26 |
H |
1,100 |
1.5 |
720 |
15.0 |
Room temperature |
27 |
I |
950 |
3.0 |
740 |
5.0 |
Room temperature |
28 |
I |
1,050 |
10.0 |
730 |
15.0 |
Room temperature |
29 |
J |
950 |
1.5 |
740 |
10.0 |
Room temperature |
30 |
J |
1,150 |
2.5 |
730 |
10.0 |
Room temperature |
31 |
K |
950 |
3.0 |
700 |
20.0 |
Room temperature |
32 |
K |
1,000 |
0.1 |
750 |
7.0 |
Room temperature |
33 |
L |
1,050 |
20.0 |
720 |
7.0 |
Room temperature |
34 |
L |
1,100 |
1.5 |
740 |
50.0 |
Room temperature |
35 |
M |
1,050 |
1.0 |
700 |
30.0 |
Room temperature |
36 |
M |
1,150 |
1.0 |
740 |
7.0 |
Room temperature |
37 |
N |
1,000 |
3.0 |
710 |
25.0 |
Room temperature |
38 |
N |
1,150 |
2.5 |
720 |
10.0 |
Room temperature |
39 |
O |
950 |
2.5 |
720 |
30.0 |
Room temperature |
40 |
O |
1,150 |
0.1 |
740 |
5.0 |
Room temperature |
41 |
P |
1,000 |
0.5 |
740 |
10.0 |
Room temperature |
42 |
P |
1,050 |
2.0 |
700 |
25.0 |
Room temperature |
43 |
Q |
850 |
15.0 |
650 |
0.5 |
550 |
44 |
R |
850 |
40.0 |
- |
40.0 |
300 |
45 |
S |
1,000 |
2.5 |
720 |
10.0 |
Room temperature |
46 |
S |
1,100 |
2.0 |
710 |
15.0 |
Room temperature |
47 |
T |
1,050 |
2.0 |
730 |
15.0 |
Room temperature |
48 |
T |
1,100 |
1.0 |
720 |
7.0 |
Room temperature |
49 |
U |
950 |
1.0 |
740 |
10.0 |
Room temperature |
50 |
U |
1,100 |
3.0 |
700 |
7.0 |
Room temperature |
[0064] Each of the above working Formastor test specimens was cut into four equal pieces
at the section perpendicular to its central axis. One of these pieces was used as
a sample for examination of the microstructure, and another of these pieces was used
as a sample for spheroidizing annealing. The spheroidizing annealing was performed
by sealing each test specimen in a vacuum and applying heat treatment in an atmospheric
furnace. In the spheroidizing annealing, the test specimen was subjected to soaking
by holding its temperature at 730°C for 2 hours, then cooled to 710°C at an average
cooling rate of 30°C/hr, and subsequently cooled to 680°C at an average cooling rate
of 10°C/hr, followed by allowed the test specimen to cool to the room temperature.
[0065] Table 3 shows the microstructure of each test specimen before the spheroidizing annealing
and the spheroidization degree and hardness thereof after the spheroidizing annealing,
which were evaluated in the above ways (1) to (5). The required spheroidization degree
for the test specimen differs depending on its C content. The spheroidization degree
to be targeted (mentioned as "target spheroidization degree" in Table 3) was a value
determined by formula (3) below. The required spheroidization degree differs depending
on the contents of C, Si and Mn in each test specimen. Further, the hardness to be
targeted (mentioned as "target hardness" in Table 3) was a value determined by formula
(4) below.

in which Ceq = [C%] + 0.2 × [Si%] + 0.2 × [Mn%], where [C%], [Si%] and [Mn%] indicate
contents of C, Si and Mn in percent by mass, respectively.
[Table 3]
Test No. |
Microstructure before annealing |
Microstructure after annealing |
Area ratio of proeutectoid ferrite and pearlite (%) |
bcc-Fe average grain size (µm) |
Area ratio Af of proeutectoid ferrite (%) |
Value (A) on the right side of formula (1) |
Average pearlite lamellar spacing (µm) |
Spheroidization degree |
Target spheroidization degree |
Hardness (HV) |
Target hardness (HV) |
1 |
100 |
16.7 |
83 |
57 |
0.15 |
2.20 |
2.75 |
116 |
119 |
2 |
100 |
18.2 |
74 |
57 |
0.18 |
2.40 |
2.75 |
117 |
119 |
3 |
100 |
19.6 |
80 |
57 |
0.13 |
2.20 |
2.75 |
116 |
119 |
4 |
100 |
21.2 |
77 |
57 |
0.13 |
2.40 |
2.75 |
114 |
119 |
5 |
100 |
22.5 |
72 |
57 |
0.20 |
2.60 |
2.75 |
118 |
119 |
6 |
100 |
25.0 |
83 |
57 |
0.16 |
2.60 |
2.75 |
116 |
119 |
7 |
100 |
28.2 |
72 |
57 |
0.11 |
2.40 |
2.75 |
115 |
119 |
8 |
100 |
29.3 |
65 |
57 |
0.19 |
2.60 |
2.75 |
118 |
119 |
9 |
100 |
12.4 |
80 |
57 |
0.13 |
1.80 |
2.75 |
121 |
119 |
10 |
100 |
17.9 |
84 |
57 |
0.23 |
3.20 |
2.75 |
119 |
119 |
11 |
100 |
23.0 |
53 |
57 |
0.15 |
2.40 |
2.75 |
122 |
119 |
12 |
100 |
33.6 |
72 |
57 |
0.14 |
3.40 |
2.75 |
117 |
119 |
13 |
100 |
21.6 |
95 |
75 |
0.19 |
1.60 |
1.85 |
100 |
103 |
14 |
100 |
25.2 |
92 |
75 |
0.22 |
2.80 |
1.85 |
101 |
103 |
15 |
100 |
20.5 |
93 |
73 |
0.16 |
1.40 |
1.95 |
104 |
107 |
16 |
100 |
25.8 |
92 |
73 |
0.18 |
1.60 |
1.95 |
103 |
107 |
17 |
100 |
29.6 |
92 |
72 |
0.10 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
99 |
102 |
18 |
100 |
36.6 |
85 |
72 |
0.17 |
3.00 |
2.00 |
101 |
102 |
19 |
100 |
15.3 |
83 |
72 |
0.20 |
1.60 |
2.00 |
110 |
111 |
20 |
100 |
26.1 |
65 |
72 |
0.11 |
1.80 |
2.00 |
114 |
111 |
21 |
100 |
17.4 |
88 |
70 |
0.15 |
1.60 |
2.10 |
122 |
124 |
22 |
54 |
- |
40 |
70 |
- |
1.40 |
2.10 |
136 |
124 |
23 |
92 |
23.9 |
90 |
68 |
0.10 |
1.80 |
2.20 |
116 |
117 |
24 |
100 |
28.7 |
77 |
68 |
0.14 |
2.00 |
2.20 |
114 |
117 |
25 |
100 |
11.2 |
86 |
67 |
0.12 |
1.40 |
2.25 |
115 |
112 |
26 |
100 |
27.4 |
83 |
67 |
0.14 |
2.20 |
2.25 |
108 |
112 |
27 |
100 |
16.6 |
74 |
64 |
0.19 |
2.20 |
2.40 |
133 |
137 |
28 |
100 |
22.7 |
55 |
64 |
0.13 |
2.40 |
2.40 |
141 |
137 |
29 |
100 |
17.3 |
86 |
63 |
0.16 |
2.20 |
2.45 |
129 |
133 |
30 |
100 |
27.9 |
66 |
63 |
0.15 |
2.40 |
2.45 |
130 |
133 |
31 |
100 |
15.9 |
82 |
60 |
0.14 |
2.00 |
2.60 |
124 |
126 |
32 |
100 |
18.2 |
69 |
60 |
0.17 |
2.40 |
2.60 |
126 |
126 |
33 |
100 |
23.1 |
49 |
57 |
0.17 |
2.20 |
2.75 |
128 |
124 |
34 |
0 |
- |
0 |
57 |
- |
1.40 |
2.75 |
142 |
124 |
35 |
95 |
20.3 |
84 |
55 |
0.11 |
2.40 |
2.85 |
127 |
131 |
36 |
100 |
29.0 |
61 |
55 |
0.16 |
2.80 |
2.85 |
128 |
131 |
37 |
100 |
20.3 |
71 |
53 |
0.12 |
2.60 |
2.95 |
139 |
143 |
38 |
100 |
19.1 |
63 |
53 |
0.15 |
2.60 |
2.95 |
143 |
143 |
39 |
100 |
16.3 |
78 |
67 |
0.10 |
1.60 |
2.25 |
147 |
142 |
40 |
100 |
29.5 |
69 |
67 |
0.18 |
2.20 |
2.25 |
145 |
142 |
41 |
100 |
19.1 |
79 |
61 |
0.16 |
2.20 |
2.55 |
127 |
124 |
42 |
100 |
22.2 |
83 |
61 |
0.12 |
2.20 |
2.55 |
126 |
124 |
43 |
100 |
11.4 |
54 |
56 |
0.14 |
1.80 |
2.80 |
125 |
120 |
44 |
47 |
- |
38 |
66 |
- |
1.40 |
2.30 |
123 |
111 |
45 |
100 |
17.1 |
75 |
65 |
0.17 |
1.80 |
2.35 |
113 |
117 |
46 |
100 |
23.5 |
69 |
65 |
0.17 |
2.00 |
2.35 |
114 |
117 |
47 |
100 |
20.8 |
67 |
59 |
0.16 |
2.20 |
2.65 |
122 |
124 |
48 |
100 |
24.0 |
63 |
59 |
0.19 |
2.60 |
2.65 |
120 |
124 |
49 |
100 |
16.2 |
70 |
58 |
0.15 |
2.20 |
2.70 |
123 |
128 |
50 |
100 |
21.6 |
61 |
58 |
0.18 |
2.40 |
2.70 |
126 |
128 |
[0066] From the results shown in Table 3, the following consideration can be made. Test
Nos. 1 to 8, 13, 15 to 17, 19, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29 to 32, 35 to 38, and 45 to 50
shown in Table 3 are examples that satisfied all the requirements specified by the
embodiment of the present invention. After the spheroidizing annealing, these tests
achieved the target spheroidization degree as well as and further could achieve the
target hardness even if the spheroidizing annealing is the short-time spheroidizing
annealing.
[0067] Meanwhile, Test Nos. 9 to 12, 14, 18, 20, 22, 25, 28, 33, 34, and 39 to 44 shown
in Table 3 are examples that did not satisfy any one of the requirements specified
by the embodiment of the present invention. After the spheroidizing annealing, these
tests did not achieve at least one of the target spheroidization degree and the target
hardness.
[0068] Test No. 9 used steel type A shown in Table 1 that satisfied the composition of the
embodiment of the present invention.
[0069] However, in this test, the working temperature, corresponding to the finish rolling
temperature, was low. Thus, the bcc-Fe average grain size became small, and the hardness
of the steel after the spheroidizing annealing still remained hard.
[0070] Test No. 10 used steel type A shown in Table 1 that satisfied the composition of
the embodiment of the present invention. However, in this test, the cooling rate of
the second cooling was low. Thus, an average pearlite lamellar spacing became large,
and the spheroidization degree after the spheroidizing annealing was unsatisfactory.
[0071] Test No. 11 used steel type A shown in Table 1 that satisfied the composition of
the embodiment of the present invention. However, in this test, the cooling rate of
the first cooling was high. Thus, the area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite in the
steel became small, and the hardness of the steel after the spheroidizing annealing
still remained hard.
[0072] Test No. 12 used steel type A shown in Table 1 that satisfied the composition of
the embodiment of the present invention. However, in this test, the working temperature
was high. Thus, the bcc-Fe average grain size of the steel became large, and the spheroidization
degree after the spheroidizing annealing became large (that is, the spheroidized microstructure
was unsatisfactory).
[0073] Test No. 14 used steel type B shown in Table 1 that satisfied the composition of
the embodiment of the present invention. However, in this test, the cooling rate of
the second cooling was low. Thus, the average pearlite lamellar spacing became large,
and the spheroidization degree after the spheroidizing annealing became large (that
is, the spheroidized microstructure was unsatisfactory).
[0074] Test No. 18 used steel type D shown in Table 1 that satisfied the composition of
the embodiment of the present invention. However, in this test, the working temperature
was high. Thus, the bcc-Fe average grain size became large, and the spheroidization
degree of the steel after the spheroidizing annealing became large (that is, the spheroidized
microstructure was unsatisfactory).
[0075] Test No. 20 used steel type E shown in Table 1 that satisfied the composition of
the embodiment of the present invention. However, in this test, the cooling rate of
the first cooling was high. Thus, the area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite in the
steel became small, and the hardness of the steel after the spheroidizing annealing
still remained hard.
[0076] Test No. 22 used steel type F shown in Table 1 that satisfied the composition of
the embodiment of the present invention. However, in this test, the cooling rate of
the second cooling was high. Thus, the martensite microstructure was precipitated,
whereby the total area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite and the pearlite and the
area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite became small. As a result, the hardness of
the steel after the spheroidizing annealing still remained hard.
[0077] Test No. 25 used steel type H shown in Table 1 that satisfied the composition of
the embodiment of the present invention. However, in this test, the working temperature
was low. Thus, the bcc-Fe average grain size of the steel became small, and the hardness
of the steel after the spheroidizing annealing still remained hard.
[0078] Test No. 28 used steel type I shown in Table 1 that satisfied the composition of
the embodiment of the present invention. However, in this test, the cooling rate of
the first cooling was high. Thus, the area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite in the
steel became small, and the hardness of the steel after the spheroidizing annealing
still remained hard.
[0079] Test No. 33 used steel type L shown in Table 1 that satisfied the composition of
the embodiment of the present invention. However, in this test, the cooling rate of
the first cooling was high. Thus, the area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite in the
steel became small, and the hardness of the steel after the spheroidizing annealing
still remained hard.
[0080] Test No. 34 used steel type L shown in Table 1 that satisfied the composition of
the embodiment of the present invention. However, in this test, the cooling rate of
the second cooling was high. Thus, the martensite microstructure was precipitated,
whereby the total area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite and the pearlite and the
area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite became small. As a result, the hardness of
the steel after the spheroidizing annealing still remained hard.
[0081] Test Nos. 39 and 40 used steel type O shown in Table 1 in which the Mn content was
large. Thus, the hardness of the steel after the spheroidizing annealing still remained
hard.
[0082] Test Nos. 41 and 42 used steel type P shown in Table 1 in which the Cr content was
large and which did not satisfy the formula (X). Thus, the hardness of the steel after
the spheroidizing annealing still remained hard.
[0083] Test No. 43 used steel type Q shown in Table 1 that satisfied the composition of
the embodiment of the present invention. However, in this test, the working temperature
was low and the cooling rate of the first cooling was high. Thus, the bcc-Fe average
grain size became small, and the martensite microstructure was precipitated, so that
the area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite was reduced. As a result, the hardness
of the steel after the spheroidizing annealing still remained hard.
[0084] Test No. 44 used steel type R shown in Table 1 that satisfied the composition of
the embodiment of the present invention. However, in this test, the working temperature
was low, the cooling rate of the first cooling was high, and the cooling rate of the
second cooling was high. Thus, the bcc-Fe average grain size of the steel became small,
the area ratio of the proeutectoid ferrite was reduced, and further the martensite
microstructure was precipitated, so that the total area ratio of the proeutectoid
ferrite and the pearlite was reduced. As a result, the hardness of the steel after
the spheroidizing annealing still remained hard.
[0085] Note that in Test Nos. 1 to 8, 13, 15 to 17, 19, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29 to 32, 35
to 38, and 45 to 50 (that satisfied all requirements specified by the embodiment of
the present invention), the second cooling was performed until room temperature. However,
the second cooling may be performed until 600°C, and then the steel may be allowed
to cool. In this case, the substantially same results can be expected to be obtained.
Description of Reference Numerals
[0087]
- 1 Pearlite lamellar microstructure
- 2 Lamellar cementite
- 3 Lamellar ferrite
- 4 Line segment (which is perpendicular to the layered microstructure and has its starting
point and ending point positioned at the center of the thickness of the lamellar cementite)