FIELD
[0001] The present disclosure relates to medical devices. Specifically, the interspinous
spacer and the interspinous stabilizer used for treating neural compression caused
by degenerative spinal disease or spinal stenosis.
BACKGROUND
[0002] The human spine is composed of many vertebrae and intervertebral discs, and the aging
or degenerating of any one of the intervertebral discs would lead to spinal stenosis,
thus the nearby spinal nerves may be compressed. The compression of spinal nerves
may lead to impaired movement or pain to the patient.
[0003] Regarding the above discomforts and disorder caused by spinal stenosis, a common
surgical approach is to implant an interspinous spacer or an interspinous stabilizer
between 2 spinous processes on the dorsal side of the spine. However, commercially
available interspinous spacers or interspinous stabilizers are mostly made of rigid
materials, and they do not fit the vertebrae structure. Moreover, interspinous spacers
or interspinous stabilizers may cause tissue damages around the spinous processes.
[0004] Wallis® from Abbott Spine, Coflex® from Paradigm Spine and X-Stop®
from Medtronic are interspinous stabilizers made from metal material.
U.S. Patent No. 7,955,392 disclosed an interspinous spacer, and
U.S. Patent No. 8,968,365 disclosed a rigid interspinous stabilizer with elasticity. However, all of the above
interspinous stabilizers or interspinous spacers are made of stainless steel, titanium
alloy or polyetheretherketone (PEEK), thus they are unable to fit the structure of
the spinous processes. Therefore, they may induce concentrated stress on the spinous
processes, leading to fracture of the spinous processes; the above rigid interspinous
stabilizers may be dislocated due to the flexion, lateral flexion and rotation of
the patient's spine.
[0005] U.S. Patent No. 8,118,839 disclosed a soft interspinous spacer; DIAM® from
Medtronic and Interspine® from Cousin Biotech are soft interspinous spacers
composed mainly of silicone, therefore they are compressible and elastic interspinous
spacers. The soft interspinous spacers also prevent the fracture of interspinous processes
due to concentrated stress when using rigid interspinous stabilizers.
[0006] Each of the above soft interspinous spacers has double-wing structure, namely, wing-shaped
protrusions of identical sizes are present at both directions of the interspinous
spacer. The symmetrical double-wing structure provides a better fitting for the interspinous
spacer between 2 spinous processes. However, the above symmetrical double-wing structure
is easier to be implanted by the surgeon from the rear side of the spinous process.
It would be more difficult for the above symmetrical double-wing structure to be implanted
from the lateral side of the spinous process, and the fracture of the spinous process
may occur if the symmetrical double-wing structure are being implanted from the lateral
side of the spinous process.
[0007] Also, after being implanted between the spinous processes, DIAM®
interspinous spacer need to be fixed by 2 cables. Namely, 2 cables need to be pulled
separately by the surgeon to fix the interspinous spacer onto a precise position between
the spinous processes. Consequently, the uneven pulling of 3 cables attributes to
each of the parts of the spine being tied by the cables bearing different level of
stress, and this greatly increases the possibility of dislocation of the interspinous
spacer.
[0008] In light of the above, an interspinous stabilizer capable to solve the previous technical
problems is needed. The interspinous stabilizer needs to be implanted from the rear
side or lateral side of the spinous process, be easier to operate for the surgeon,
and have a proper cable fixation mechanism to increase the stability of the spacer
and decrease the possibility of dislocation.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0009] The present description will be better understood from the following detailed description
read in light of the accompanying drawings, where:
FIG. 1 is the appearance of an interspinous spacer in accordance with aspects of the
present disclosure.
FIG. 2 is the appearance of an interspinous stabilizer in accordance with aspects
of the present disclosure.
FIG. 3 is the appearance of an interspinous stabilizer and its' fabric sheath in accordance
with aspects of the present disclosure.
FIG. 4 is the appearance of the band in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure.
FIG. 5 is the perspective view of an interspinous spacer in accordance with aspects
of the present disclosure.
FIG. 6 is the side view of an interspinous stabilizer from the first direction in
accordance with aspects of the present disclosure.
FIG. 7 is the side view of an interspinous stabilizer and its' fabric sheath from
the first direction in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure.
FIG. 8 is the side view of an interspinous stabilizer from the second direction in
accordance with aspects of the present disclosure.
FIG. 9 is the side view of an interspinous stabilizer and its' fabric sheath from
the second direction in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure.
FIG. 10 is the side view of an interspinous spacer from the first direction in accordance
with aspects of the present disclosure.
FIG. 11 is the side view of an interspinous spacer from the second direction in accordance
with aspects of the present disclosure.
FIG. 12 is the cross-sectional view of an interspinous spacer from the first direction
in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure.
FIG. 13 is the appearance of another interspinous spacer in accordance with aspects
of the present disclosure.
FIG. 14 is the appearance of another interspinous stabilizer in accordance with aspects
of the present disclosure.
FIG. 15 is the appearance of another interspinous stabilizer and its' fabric sheath
in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure.
FIG. 16 is the perspective view of another interspinous spacer in accordance with
aspects of the present disclosure.
FIG. 17 is the side view of another interspinous spacer from the first direction in
accordance with aspects of the present disclosure.
FIG. 18 is the side view of another interspinous spacer from the second direction
in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure.
FIG. 19 is the top view of an interspinous stabilizer implanted between the spinous
processes in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure.
FIG. 20 is the top view of another interspinous stabilizer implanted between the spinous
processes in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure.
FIG. 21 is the side view of another interspinous stabilizer implanted between the
spinous processes in accordance with aspects of the present disclosure.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0010] The detailed description provided below in connection with the appended drawings
is intended as a description of the present examples and is not intended to represent
the only forms in which the present example may be constructed or utilized. The description
sets forth the functions of the example and the sequence of steps for constructing
and operating the example. However, the same or equivalent functions and sequences
may be accomplished by different examples.
[0011] An embodiment of the present disclosure provides an interspinous stabilizer. The
interspinous stabilizer comprises a soft interspinous spacer, and the interspinous
spacer having an asymmetrical double-wing structure for easier insertion between the
spinous processes. The interspinous stabilizer having only one band, and the band
is pulled when the interspinous spacer is in need of being positioned after the insertion.
The different parts of the spine thus bear similar levels of stress, and the interspinous
stabilizer is tied by a band to decrease the chance of interspinous stabilizer dislocation.
"Stress" refers to the force per unit area.
[0012] An embodiment of the present disclosure provides an interspinous spacer for use in
the interspinous stabilizer, comprising a central support having a first direction
and a second direction opposite to each other, an upper side perpendicular to the
first direction and the second direction, and a lower side perpendicular to the first
direction and the second direction. An upper side wing is on the first direction and
extending from the upper side of the central support; a lower side wing is on the
first direction and extending from the lower side of the central support. An upper
protrusion is on the second direction and extending from the upper side of the central
support, wherein a length of the upper protrusion is shorter than a length of the
upper side wing. A lower protrusion is on the second direction and extending from
the lower side of the central support, wherein a length of the lower protrusion is
shorter than a length of the lower side wing; and at least one perforation, the perforation
extending through the central support from the first direction to the second direction.
The interspinous spacer in accordance with the present disclosure has an asymmetrical
double-wing structure, as the upper side wing is longer than the upper protrusion
and the lower side wing is longer than the lower protrusion. The asymmetrical double-wing
structure makes it easier for a lateral side insertion of the interspinous spacer
between 2 vertebrae.
[0013] An embodiment of the present disclosure provides another interspinous spacer to be
used in the interspinous stabilizer, comprising a central support having a first direction
and a second direction opposite to each other, an upper side perpendicular to the
first direction and the second direction, and a lower side perpendicular to the first
direction and the second direction. An upper side wing is on the second direction
and extending from the upper side of the central support; a lower side wing is on
the second direction and extending from the lower side of the central support. An
upper protrusion is on the first direction and extending from the upper side of the
central support, wherein a length of the upper protrusion is shorter than a length
of the upper side wing. A lower protrusion is on the first direction and extending
from the lower side of the central support, wherein a length of the lower protrusion
is shorter than a length of the lower side wing; and at least one perforation, the
perforation extending through the central support from the first direction to the
second direction. The interspinous spacer in accordance with the present disclosure
has an asymmetrical double-wing structure, as the upper side wing is longer than the
upper protrusion and the lower side wing is longer than the lower protrusion. The
asymmetrical double-wing structure makes it easier for a lateral side insertion of
the interspinous spacer between 2 vertebrae.
[0014] The central support of the interspinous spacer in accordance with an embodiment of
the present disclosure further comprises an upper support and a lower support. The
upper support is on the upper side of the central support and is connected to the
upper protrusion, and the lower support is on the lower side of the central support
and is connected to the lower protrusion. The interspinous spacer in accordance with
an embodiment of the present disclosure further comprises an upper perforation and
a lower perforation. The upper perforation and the lower perforation extending through
the central support, and the upper perforation and the lower perforation is in the
upper support.
[0015] Each of the upper side wing, the lower side wing, the upper protrusion and the lower
protrusion comprise a root portion close to the central support and an end portion
away from the central support. Each of the upper side wing, the lower side wing, the
upper protrusion and the lower protrusion has a transitional edge. The transitional
edges enable the interspinous spacer to be laterally implanted, and the interspinous
spacer would be easier to be implanted between 2 vertebrae.
[0016] The central support of the interspinous spacer in accordance with an embodiment of
the present disclosure further comprises a front side and a rear side, and each of
the front side and the rear side is perpendicular to the first direction and the second
direction, and each of the front side and rear side is perpendicular to the upper
side and the lower side. A horizontal plane is formed from the front side extending
to the rear side, wherein the horizontal plane is perpendicular to the upper side
and the lower side. The central support further comprises an upper concave surface
between the upper side wing and the upper protrusion, and the upper concave surface
is on the upper side of the central support, and the upper concave surface slopes
down from the front side to the rear side and forms an upper angle; a lower concave
surface is between the lower side wing and the lower protrusion, and the lower concave
surface is on the lower side of the central support. The upper concave surface is
not parallel with the lower concave surface, thus are conformed with the structure
of human spine. The interspinous spacer is therefore tightly conformed with the two
vertebrae of the patient.
[0017] The interspinous stabilizer in accordance with the present disclosure further comprises
a band, and the band can pass through the perforation. The band can form a circular
structure on the first direction or the second direction of the central support. The
interspinous stabilizer further comprises at least one metal hook, the metal hook
is placed on at least one end of the band, wherein the metal hook can be guided to
pass through the circular structure to form a knot. The band, the metal hook, the
circular structure and the knot allows the interspinous stabilizer to be conveniently
fixed between the vertebrae. The different parts of the vertebrae being tied by the
band receive similar levels of stress because of the single band design, and the interspinous
stabilizer may not be dislocated once it was implanted.
[0018] The interspinous stabilizer in accordance with the present disclosure further comprises
a fabric sheath, and the fabric sheath may wrap all of the interspinous spacer. The
fabric sheath of the present disclosure can be a cushion between the interspinous
stabilizer and the spine, to prevent the abrasion of the interspinous spacer due to
the direct contact between the interspinous spacer and the vertebrae, and effectively
reduces the damage from the interspinous spacer to the surrounding tissues of the
spinous processes.
[0019] The present disclosure provides a method of stabilizing relative position between
the human spinous processes, comprising: (i) insert an interspinous stabilizer between
two target spinous processes of a spine; (ii) pulling a band of the interspinous stabilizer,
and hold the metal hook to pass through the interspinous ligaments of the target spinous
processes; (iii) guiding a metal hook to pass through the circular structure, and
pull the band to form a knot on the circular structure; (iv) hold the metal hook to
pass through a fixation ring, and slide the fixation ring toward the knot, and clamp
the fixation ring on the band by a surgical tool to position the knot and prevent
the knot from loosen. The interspinous stabilizer in accordance with the present disclosure
is easier to be inserted between the vertebrae due to its asymmetrical double-wing
structure. The dislocation of the interspinous stabilizer would be difficult after
implantation, and the comfort of the patient after being implanted with the interspinous
stabilizer is improved.
[0020] The present disclosure is directed to an interspinous stabilizer. The interspinous
stabilizer comprises an interspinous spacer, and the interspinous spacer comprising
a central support, and the central support having an upper side wing and an upper
protrusion extending from the central support, and a lower side wing and a lower protrusion
also extending from the central support. The upper side wing is longer than the upper
protrusion and the lower side wing is longer than the lower protrusion to form an
asymmetrical double-wing structure. The asymmetrical double-wing structure allows
the surgeon to implant the interspinous spacer between 2 vertebrae of the patient
from the lateral side during an operation. "Surgeon" refers to the person performing
an operation to implant the interspinous stabilizer. "Patient" refers to the person
suffering from spinal diseases and is in need of being surgically implanted with the
interspinous stabilizer.
[0021] FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of the present disclosure, and it is an appearance
of an interspinous spacer 1. The interspinous spacer 1 comprises a central support
100. The central support 100 having a first direction 13, a second direction 14, an
upper side 11 and a lower side 12, and the first direction 13 and the second direction
14 are opposite to each other. The upper side 11 is perpendicular to both of the first
direction 13 and the second direction 14. The lower side 12 is perpendicular to both
of the first direction 13 and the second direction 14. A length of the central support
100 from the first direction 13 to the second direction 14 is about 15 mm to 25 mm.
The central support may further comprise an upper support 100a on the upper side 11
and a lower support 100b on the lower side 12. A length of the upper support 100a
from the upper side 11 to the lower side 12 is about 8 mm to 16 mm; a width of the
upper support 100a from the first direction 13 to the second direction 14 is about
10 mm to 20 mm; a length of the lower support 100b from the upper side 11 to the lower
side 12 is about 6 mm to 12 mm; a width of the lower support 100b from the first direction
13 to the second direction 14 is about 10 mm to 20 mm. An upper side wing 110 is on
the second direction 14 and extending from the upper support 100a to the upper side
11, and a length of the upper side wing 110 is about 5.5 mm to about 15 mm. A lower
side wing 111 is on the second direction 14 and extending from the lower support 100b
to the lower side 12, and a length of the lower side wing 111 is about 5.5 mm to about
15 mm. An upper protrusion 120 is on the first direction 13 and extending from the
upper support 100a to the upper side 11, and the upper protrusion 120 has a length
of about 2 mm to 5 mm. A lower protrusion 121 is on the first direction 13 and extending
from the lower support 100b to the lower side 12, and the lower protrusion has a length
of about 2 mm to 5 mm. An upper concave surface 130, the upper concave surface 130
is between the upper side wing 110 and the upper protrusion 120 of the upper support
100a and facing toward the upper side 11, wherein the distance of the upper concave
surface 130 from the first direction 13 to the second direction 14 is about 2 mm to
about 6 mm. A lower concave surface 131, the lower concave surface 131 is between
the lower side wing 111 and the lower protrusion 121 of the lower support 100b and
facing toward the lower side 12, wherein the distance of the lower concave surface
130 from the first direction 13 to the second direction 14 is about 2 mm to about
6 mm. A set of perforations 140, comprising an upper perforation 141 and a lower perforation
142. The distance from the upper perforation 141 to a top end of the upper side 11
of the central support 100 is about 4 mm to about 6 mm. The distance from the lower
perforation 142 to the top end of the upper side 11 of the central support 100 is
about 7 mm to about 10 mm.
[0022] The upper protrusion 120 of the interspinous spacer 1 extends from the upper support
100a toward the upper side 11. The length of the upper protrusion 120 is shorter than
the upper side wing 110. The upper side wing 110 extends from upper support 100a toward
the upper side 11. The lower protrusion 121 extends from the lower support 100b toward
the lower side 12. The length of the lower protrusion is shorter than the lower side
wing 111. The lower side wing 111 extends from lower support 100b toward the lower
side 12. Thus, the upper side wing 110 has a length larger than the upper protrusion
120 and the lower side wing 111 has a length larger than the lower protrusion 121
to form an asymmetrical double-wing structure having a longer upper side 11-lower
side 12 axial extension on the second direction 14 than the first direction 13. The
asymmetrical double-wing structure allows the surgeon to insert the interspinous spacer
1 between the two vertebrae of the patient from the lateral side of the spine during
an operation. The asymmetrical double-wing structure fits the spine structure of the
patient and increases the contact area with the spinous process, allowing an even
distribution of stress to different parts of the two vertebrae. When spine rotation
occurs, the interspinous spacer 1 would still be staying in the implantation location
in the patient's spine. The durability of the interspinous spacer 1 inside the patient's
body is improved.
[0023] Referring to FIG. 2 and FIG. 4, appearances of an interspinous stabilizer 2 in accordance
with the present disclosure are illustrated. The interspinous stabilizer 2 further
comprises a band 200. The band 200 passes through one perforation of the perforation
set 140 and forms a circular structure 300 at the second direction 14 of the central
support 100. The band 200 having a flat or a round cross-section. A length of the
band 200 is about 50 mm to about 300 mm, and the area of the cross-section of the
band 200 is about 1 mm
2 to about 5 mm
2. When the interspinous spacer 1 is inserted between the vertebrae of the patient,
a first metal hook 211 and a second metal hook 212 of the interspinous stabilizer
2 are directed by the surgeon to pass through the interspinous ligaments between the
upper vertebra and the lower vertebra, and then pass through the circular structure
300. The surgeon then pulls the band 200 to reduce the size of the circular structure
300. The first metal hook 211 and the second metal hook 212 are fixed, and the interspinous
stabilizer 2 is positioned on the implantation location between the vertebrae of the
patient. The different parts of the spine contact with the band 200, therefore the
different parts of the spine bear similar levels of stress. If more than one element
is used to fix the interspinous stabilizer 2, then different parts of the spine may
bear different levels of stress, and may cause spinal injury in the long term. The
life quality of the patient can be affected by the spinal injury.
[0024] Referring to FIG. 3, an appearance of the interspinous stabilizer 2 and its' fabric
sheath 160 in accordance with the present disclosure is illustrated. The interspinous
stabilizer 2 is wrapped by a fabric sheath 160. The fabric sheath 160 could wrap the
interspinous spacer 1 completely. The fabric sheath 160 having an upper first direction
opening 161a, an upper second direction opening 161b, a lower first direction opening
162a and a lower second direction opening 162b for the trespassing of the band 200.
The upper first direction opening 161a is closer to the upper side 11 than the upper
perforation 141 in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2. The lower first direction opening 162a is closer
to lower side 12 than the lower perforation 142 in FIG. 1 and FIG.2. When the band
200 leaves from the interspinous spacer 1, it respectively folds toward the upper
side 11 and the lower side 12 in the space between the fabric sheath 160 and the interspinous
spacer 1, in order to pass through the upper first direction opening 161a and the
lower first direction 162a. The fabric sheath 160 could serve as a cushion between
the interspinous stabilizer 2 and the spine. The fabric sheath 160 prevents the interspinous
spacer 1 from make direct contact with the vertebrae, causing abrasion to the interspinous
spacer 1. The fabric sheath 160 also effectively reduces the tissue damage around
the spinous processes from the interspinous stabilizer 2.
[0025] Referring to FIG. 5, a perspective view of the interspinous spacer 1 in accordance
with the present disclosure is illustrated. One end of the band 200 is introduced
into the upper second direction perforation 141b and passes through a conduit for
the upper perforation 141c, then leaves via the upper first direction perforation
141a. The other end of the band 200 enters the lower second direction perforation
142b and passes through a conduit for the lower perforation 142c, then leaves via
the lower first direction perforation 142a. The conduit for the upper perforation
141c and the conduit for the lower perforation 142c are inside the central support
100, and the conduit for the upper perforation 141c and the conduit for the lower
perforation 142c do not cross inside the central support 100. Preferably, the conduit
for the upper perforation 141c and the conduit for the lower perforation 142c are
two parallel passages.
[0026] Referring to FIG. 6 and FIG. 8, side views of the interspinous stabilizer 2 from
the first direction 13 and the second direction 14 in accordance with the present
disclosure are illustrated. A front side 15 and a rear side 16 is defined in the present
disclosure: the front side 15 and the rear side 16 is opposite to each other, and
the front side 15 and the rear side 16 are perpendicular to both of the first direction
13 and the second direction 14, and the front side 15 and the rear side 15 are perpendicular
to both of the upper side 11 and the lower side 12. After the implantation of the
interspinous spacer 1 or the interspinous stabilizer 2 between the vertebrae of the
patient's spine, the front side 15 will face the spinal column of the patient, and
the rear side 16 will face the dorsal skin of the patient.
[0027] Referring to FIG. 7 and FIG. 9, side views of the interspinous stabilizer 2 and the
fabric sheath 160 from the first direction 13 and the second direction 14 in accordance
with the present disclosure are illustrated. It can be understood from FIG. 8 and
FIG. 9 that the band 200 leave the interspinous spacer 1 from the upper second direction
perforation 141b, and leaves the fabric sheath 160 from the second upper direction
opening 161b. On the lower side 12 and the second direction 14, the band 200 leaves
the interspinous spacer 1 from the lower second direction perforation 142b, and leaves
the fabric sheath 160 from the lower second direction opening 162b. It can be understood
from FIG. 6 and FIG. 7 that the band 200 leaves the interspinous spacer 1 from the
upper first direction perforation 141a, and folds upwardly to leave the fabric sheath
160 from the upper first direction opening 161a. When the interspinous spacer 1 is
wrapped with the fabric sheath 160, the position of the upper first direction opening
161a is not overlapped with the upper first direction perforation 141a. On the lower
side 12 and the first direction 13, the band 200 leaves the interspinous spacer 1
from the lower first direction perforation 142a, and folds downwardly to leave the
fabric sheath 160 from the lower first direction opening 162a. When the interspinous
spacer 1 is wrapped with the fabric sheath 160, the position of the lower first direction
opening 162a is not overlapped with the lower first direction perforation 142a.
[0028] Referring to FIG. 10 and FIG. 11, side views of the interspinous spacer 1 from the
first direction 13 and the second direction 14 in accordance with the present disclosure
are illustrated. Each of the upper side wing 110, the lower side wing 111, the upper
protrusion 120 and the lower protrusion 121 includes a root portion that is closer
to the central support 100 and an end portion that is further to the central support
100, denoted by a root portion of the upper side wing 110a, an end portion of the
upper side wing 110b, a root portion of the lower side wing 111a, an end portion of
the lower side wing 111b, a root portion of the upper protrusion 120a, an end portion
of the upper protrusion 120b, a root portion of the lower protrusion 121a and an end
portion of the lower protrusion 121b. "Thickness" refers to the space occupied by
one or all parts of the interspinous spacer 1 in an axis formed from the front side
15 to the rear side 16. A thickness of the upper side wing 110 is smaller than the
lower side wing 111 of the interspinous spacer 1, wherein a thickness of the upper
side wing 110 is about 6 mm to about 10 mm and a thickness of the lower side wing
is about 10.5 mm to about 15 mm. A thickness of the upper protrusion 120 is smaller
than the lower protrusion 121 of the interspinous spacer 1, wherein a thickness of
the upper protrusion 120 is about 6 mm to about 10 mm and a thickness of the lower
protrusion 121 is about 10.5 mm to about 15 mm. The thickness of the upper support
100a and the lower support 100b of the interspinous spacer 1 are about 8 mm to about
20 mm. The thickness of the upper side wing 110 is smaller than the thickness of the
upper support 100a of the interspinous spacer 1. The different thickness of above
structures of the interspinous spacer 1 has a better fitting with the human spine
structure, thus the upper concave surface 130 between the upper side wing 110 and
the upper protrusion 120 would receive the spinous process of the patient. After the
interspinous spacer 1 is implanted between the vertebrae of the spine, the different
thickness of above structures ensures that the part receiving most stress is located
beneath the vertebral plate, to have a better positioning of the interspinous spacer
1. The different thickness of above structures also allows the interspinous stabilizer
2 to have an implantation location that is closer to the rotation center of the spinal
column. Each of the root portion 110a, 111a, 120a and 121a of the above parts is connected
to the end portion 110b, 111b, 120b and 121b to form a transitional edge. On the first
direction 13, the transitional edges make the band 200 closer to the spinous processes
when the band 200 is fixing the interspinous stabilizer 200, thus provides a better
positioning. On the second direction 14, the transitional edges allow an easier implantation,
wherein the surgeon laterally inserts the interspinous spacer 1 between 2 vertebrae
of the patient.
[0029] Referring to FIG. 12, it is a cross-sectional view of the interspinous spacer 1 on
the first direction 13. A horizontal plane 150 is formed from the front side 15 stretching
to the rear side 16. The horizontal plane 150 is perpendicular to both the upper side
11 and the lower side 12. The upper concave surface 130 is inclined to the rear side
16 from the front side 15, thus forms an upper angle 130a. The upper angle 130a is
ranged from 0• to 60•, preferably, the upper angle 130a should be between 10• to 45•
The lower concave surface 131 forms a lower angle 131a with the horizontal plane 150,
wherein the lower angle 131a is ranged from 0• to 60•, preferably, the lower angle
131a should be 10• to 45• "Inclination" of "incline" describes a particular surface
of part of the interspinous spacer 1 that is not parallel to the horizontal plane
150. The particular surface or part may be tilted to the upper side 11 or the lower
side 12 along the front side 15 to the rear side 16. Because the upper angle 130a
does not equal to the lower angle 131a, therefore the upper concave surface 130 is
not parallel with the lower concave surface 131, and this structural feature provides
an improved fitting between the interspinous spacer 1 and the spinal structure of
the patient.
[0030] FIG. 13 is another embodiment of the present disclosure, and it illustrate an appearance
of an interspinous spacer 4. The interspinous spacer 4 comprises a central support
400. The central support 400 may further comprise an upper support 400a on the upper
side 11 and a lower support 400b on the lower side 12. An upper side wing 410 is on
the first direction 13 and extending from the upper support 400a to the upper side
11. A lower side wing 411 is on the first direction 13 and extending from the lower
support 400b to the lower side 12. An upper protrusion 420 is on the second direction
14 and extending from the upper support 400a to the upper side 11. A lower protrusion
421 is on the second direction 14 and extending from the lower support 400b to the
lower side 12. An upper concave surface 430, the upper concave surface 430 is between
the upper side wing 410 and the upper protrusion 420 of the upper support 400a and
facing toward the upper side 11. A lower concave surface 431, the lower concave surface
431 is between the lower side wing 411 and the lower protrusion 421 of the lower support
400b and facing toward the lower side 12. A set of perforations 440, comprising an
upper perforation 441 and a lower perforation 442.
[0031] The upper protrusion 420 of the interspinous spacer 4 extends from the upper support
400a toward the upper side 11. A length of the upper protrusion 420 is shorter than
the upper side wing 410. The lower protrusion 421 extends from the lower support 400b
toward the lower side 12. The length of the lower protrusion 421 is shorter than the
lower side wing 411. Thus, the upper side wing 410 has a length larger than the upper
protrusion 420 and the lower side wing 411 has a length larger than the lower protrusion
421 to form an asymmetrical double-wing structure having a longer extension on the
first direction 13 than the second direction 14.
[0032] Referring to FIG. 13, it illustrates an appearance of another interspinous spacer
4 in accordance with the present disclosure. A length of the central support 400 from
the first direction 13 to the second direction 14 is about 15 mm to 25 mm. The central
support may further comprise an upper support 400a on the upper side 11 and a lower
support 400b on the lower side 12. A length of the upper support 400a from the upper
side 11 to the lower side 12 is about 8 mm to 16 mm; a width of the upper support
400a from the first direction 13 to the second direction 14 is about 10 mm to 20 mm;
a length of the lower support 400b from the upper side 11 to the lower side 12 is
about 6 mm to 12 mm; a width of the lower support 400b from the first direction 13
to the second direction 14 is about 10 mm to 20 mm. An upper side wing 410 is on the
first direction 13 and extending from the upper support 400a to the upper side 11,
and a length of the upper side wing 410 is about 5.5 mm to about 15 mm. A lower side
wing 411 is on the first direction 13 and extending from the lower support 400b to
the lower side 12, and a length of the lower side wing 411 is about 5.5 mm to about
15 mm. An upper protrusion 420 is on the second direction 14 and extending from the
upper support 400a to the upper side 11, and the upper protrusion 420 has a length
of about 2 mm to 5 mm. A lower protrusion 421 is on the second direction 14 and extending
from the lower support 400b to the lower side 12, and the lower protrusion 421 has
a length of about 2 mm to 5 mm. An upper concave surface 430, the upper concave surface
430 is between the upper side wing 410 and the upper protrusion 420 of the upper support
400a and facing toward the upper side 11, wherein the distance of the upper concave
surface 430 from the first direction 13 to the second direction 14 is about 2 mm to
about 6 mm. A lower concave surface 431, the lower concave surface 431 is between
the lower side wing 411 and the lower protrusion 421 of the lower support 400b and
facing toward the lower side 12, wherein the distance of the lower concave surface
430 from the first direction 13 to the second direction 14 is about 2 mm to about
6 mm. A set of perforations 440, comprising an upper perforation 441 and a lower perforation
442. The distance from the upper perforation 441 to a top end of the upper side 11
of the central support 400 is about 4 mm to about 6 mm. The distance from the lower
perforation 442 to the top end of the upper side 11 of the central support 400 is
about 7 mm to about 10 mm.
[0033] FIG. 14 is an appearance of an interspinous stabilizer 5, FIG. 16 is a perspective
view of an interspinous spacer 4, FIG. 17 is a side view of the interspinous spacer
4 from the first direction 13 and FIG. 18 is a side view of the interspinous spacer
4 from the second direction 14, in accordance with the present disclosure. The interspinous
stabilizer 5 further comprises a band 200. The band 200 passes through one perforation
in the perforation set 440 and forms a circular structure 300 at the first direction
13 of the central support 400. The interspinous stabilizer 5 further comprises a set
of metal hooks 210, including a first metal hook 211 and a second metal hook 212.
When the interspinous spacer 4 is implanted between the vertebrae of the patient,
a first metal hook 211 of the interspinous stabilizer 5 are directed by the surgeon
to pass through the interspinous ligaments between the upper vertebra and the lower
vertebra, and then pass through the circular structure 300. The surgeon then pulls
the band 200 to reduce the size of the circular structure 300. The first metal hook
211 and the second metal hook 212 are fixed, and the interspinous stabilizer 5 is
positioned in the implantation location between the vertebrae of the patient. The
different parts of the spine contact with the band 200, therefore the different parts
of the spine bear similar levels of stress. After the implantation of the interspinous
spacer 4 or the interspinous stabilizer 5 between the vertebrae of the patient's spine,
the front side 15 will face the spinal column of the patient, and the rear side 16
will face the dorsal skin of the patient.
[0034] Each of the upper side wing 410, the lower side wing 411, the upper protrusion 420
and the lower protrusion 421 includes a root portion that is closer to the central
support 400 and an end portion that is further to the central support 400, denoted
by a root portion of the upper side wing 410a, an end portion of the upper side wing
410b, a root portion of the lower side wing 411a, an end portion of the lower side
wing 411b, a root portion of the upper protrusion 420a, an end portion of the upper
protrusion 420b, a root portion of the lower protrusion 421a and an end portion of
the lower protrusion 421b. The thickness of the upper side wing 410 is smaller than
the lower side wing 411 of the interspinous spacer 4. The thickness of the upper protrusion
420 is smaller than the lower protrusion 421 of the interspinous spacer 4. The different
thickness of above structures of the interspinous 4 allows the interspinous stabilizer
5 to have an implantation location that is closer to the rotation center of the spinal
column. Each of the root portion 410a, 411a, 420a and 421a is connected to the end
portion 410b, 411b, 420b and 421b of the above structures to form a transitional edge.
The transitional edges allow the band 200 to be closer to the spinous processes of
the patient when fixing the interspinous stabilizer 5, in order to provide a better
positioning. The transitional edges also allow an easier implantation, wherein the
surgeon laterally inserts the interspinous spacer 4 between two vertebrae of the patient.
The thickness of the upper side wing 410 is smaller than the thickness of the upper
support 400a of the interspinous spacer 4. The thickness of the upper protrusion 420
is smaller than the thickness of the upper support 400a. The different thickness of
above structures of the interspinous spacer 4 has a better fitting with the human
spine structure, thus an upper concave surface 430 between the upper side wing 410
and the upper protrusion 420 would receive the spinous process of the patient. After
the interspinous spacer 4 is implanted between the vertebrae of the spine, the different
thickness of above structures ensures that the part receiving most stress is located
beneath the vertebral plate, to have a better positioning of the interspinous spacer
4.
[0035] Referring to FIG. 15, an appearance of the interspinous stabilizer 5 and a fabric
sheath 460 in accordance with the present disclosure is illustrated. The interspinous
stabilizer 5 is wrapped by a fabric sheath 460. The fabric sheath 460 could wrap the
interspinous spacer 4 completely. The fabric sheath 460 having an upper first direction
opening 461a, an upper second direction opening 461b, a lower first direction opening
462a and a lower second direction opening 462b for the trespassing of the band 200.
The upper first direction opening 461a is closer to the upper side 11 than the upper
perforation 441 in FIG. 16 and FIG. 17. The lower first direction opening 462a is
closer to the lower side 12 than the lower perforation 442 in FIG. 16 and FIG.18.
When the band 200 leaves from the interspinous spacer 4, it respectively folds toward
the upper side 11 and the lower side 12 in the space between the fabric sheath 460
and the interspinous spacer 4, in order to pass through the upper first direction
opening 461a and the lower first direction 462a.
[0036] Referring to FIG. 19 and FIG. 20, top views of the interspinous stabilizer 2 and
the interspinous stabilizer 5 in accordance with the present disclosure are illustrated.
The present disclosure provides a method of stabilizing relative position between
the human spinous processes, comprising: (i) insert the interspinous stabilizer 2
or the interspinous stabilizer 5 between two spinous processes of the patient; (ii)
pull the band 200 of the interspinous stabilizer 2 or the interspinous stabilizer
5, and hold the metal hook 210 to pass through the interspinous ligaments of target
spinous processes; (iii) hold the metal hook 210 to pass through the circular structure
300, and pull the band 200 to form a knot on the circular structure 300; (iv) hold
the metal hook 210 to pass through a fixation ring, and slide the fixation ring toward
the knot, and clamp the fixation ring on the band 200 by a surgical tool to position
the knot and prevent the knot from loosen. The target spinous processes in the above
method can be spinous processes of any two of the lumbar vertebrae.
[0037] Referring to FIG. 21, a side view on the first direction 13 of the interspinous stabilizer
5 in accordance with the present disclosure being implanted between the vertebrae
of the patient is illustrated. The metal hook 210 is capable to pass through the spinous
processes between two lumbar vertebrae, and then pass through the circular structure
300 to fix the interspinous stabilizer 5.
[0038] The forth mentioned method for implanting the interspinous stabilizer 2 between two
spinous processes of the patient can be: inserts the interspinous stabilizer 2 from
the first direction 13 to the space between the spinous processes of the patient;
adjusts the interspinous stabilizer 2, and the lower concave surface 131 should first
be aligned with and receive a lower spinous process of the patient, then the upper
concave surface 130 should be aligned with and receive an upper spinous process of
the patient; and fixes the interspinous stabilizer 2 onto its' implantation location
by the circular structure 300 and a fixation ring. The forth mention method for implanting
the interspinous stabilizer 5 between two spinous processes of the patient can be:
inserts the interspinous stabilizer 5 from the second direction 14 to the space between
the spinous processes of the patient; adjusts the interspinous stabilizer 5, and the
lower concave surface 431 should first be aligned with and receive a lower spinous
process of the patient, then the upper concave surface 430 should be aligned with
an receive an upper spinous process of the patient; and fixes the interspinous 5 onto
its' implantation location by the circular structure 300 and a fixation ring. The
fabric sheath 160 for the interspinous stabilizer 2, the fabric sheath 460 for the
interspinous stabilizer 5 and the band 200 can be assembled before the operation.
[0039] The interspinous spacer 1 and the interspinous spacer 4 can be comprised of dimethyl
silicone or polyurethane, or the combination thereof. Preferably, dimethyl silicone
could be the core of the interspinous spacer 1 or the interspinous spacer 4, and the
core could be covered by polyurethane. The band 200 can be comprised of polyester
fiber or highly cross-linked polyethylene fiver. The metal hook 210 can be comprised
of titanium alloy, stainless steel or any other biocompatible metal materials. The
fabric sheath 160 and the fabric sheath 460 can be comprised of polyester fiber or
highly cross-linked polyethylene fiber. The fixation ring can be comprised of titanium
alloy, medical grade stainless steel or any other biocompatible metal materials.
[0040] The foregoing descriptions of specific compositions and methods of the present disclosure
have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended
to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise compositions and methods
disclosed and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of
the above teaching. The examples were chosen and described in order to best explain
the principles of the disclosure and its practical application, to thereby enable
others skilled in the art to best utilize the disclosure with various modifications
as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of
the disclosure be defined by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
1. An interspinous spacer, comprising:
a central support comprising a first direction, a second direction opposite to the
first direction, an upper side perpendicular to the first direction and the second
direction, a lower side perpendicular to the first direction and the second direction;
an upper side wing extending from the upper side of the central support and on one
of the first direction and the second direction;
a lower side wing extending from the lower side of the central support on a direction
identical to the upper side wing, wherein a thickness of the upper side wing is smaller
than a thickness of the lower side wing;
an upper protrusion extending from the upper side of the central support and on another
of the first direction and the second direction, wherein a length of the upper protrusion
is shorter than a length of the upper side wing;
a lower protrusion extending from the lower side of the central support and on a direction
identical to the upper protrusion, wherein a length of the lower protrusion is shorter
than a length of the lower side wing, and a thickness of the upper protrusion is smaller
than a thickness of the lower protrusion; and
at least one perforation traversing the central support from the first direction to
the second direction;
wherein an upper concave surface of the central support is between the upper side
wing and the upper protrusion and facing the upper side, a lower concave surface is
between the lower side wing and the lower protrusion and facing the lower side, and
the upper concave surface is not parallel with the lower concave surface.
2. The interspinous spacer of claim 1, wherein the central support further comprises
an upper support and a lower support, the upper support is on the upper side of the
central support and is connected to the upper protrusion, and the lower support is
on the lower side of the central support and is connected to the lower protrusion.
3. The interspinous spacer of claim 2, wherein the thicknesses of the upper side wing
and the upper protrusion are smaller than a thickness of the upper support, and a
thicknesses of the lower side wing and the lower protrusion are smaller than a thickness
of the lower support.
4. The interspinous spacer of claim 1, wherein the perforation comprises an upper perforation
and a lower perforation, the upper perforation and the lower perforation traverse
through the central support, and a distance between the upper perforation and a top
of the central support is shorter than a distance between the lower perforation and
the top of the central support.
5. The interspinous spacer of claim 1, wherein each of the upper side wing, the lower
side wing, the upper protrusion and the lower protrusion comprises a root portion
close to the central support and an end portion away from the central support,
thicknesses of the root portions of the upper side wing, the lower side wing, the
upper protrusion and the lower protrusion are greater than thicknesses of the end
portions of the upper side wing, the lower side wing, the upper protrusion and the
lower protrusion.
6. The interspinous spacer of claim 1, wherein the central support further comprises
a front side and a rear side, and the front side and the rear side are perpendicular
to the first direction, the second direction, the upper side, and the lower side,
and a horizontal plane extending from the front side to the rear side is perpendicular
to the upper side and the lower side.
7. The interspinous spacer of claim 1, wherein a material of the interspinous spacer
comprises dimethyl silicone, polyurethane or a combination thereof.
8. An interspinous stabilizer, comprising:
a interspinous spacer, comprising:
a central support comprising a first direction, a second direction opposite to the
first direction, an upper side perpendicular to the first direction and the second
direction, a lower side perpendicular to the first direction and the second direction;
an upper side wing extending from the upper side of the central support and on one
of the first direction and the second direction;
a lower side wing extending from the lower side of the central support on a direction
identical to the upper side wing, wherein a thickness of the upper side wing is smaller
than a thickness of the lower side wing;
an upper protrusion extending from the upper side of the central support and on another
of the first direction and the second direction, wherein a length of the upper protrusion
is shorter than a length of the upper side wing;
a lower protrusion extending from the lower side of the central support and on a direction
identical to the upper protrusion, wherein a length of the lower protrusion is shorter
than a length of the lower side wing, and a thickness of the upper protrusion is smaller
than a thickness of the lower protrusion; and
at least one perforation traversing the central support from the first direction to
the second direction;
wherein an upper concave surface of the central support is between the upper side
wing and the upper protrusion and facing the upper side, a lower concave surface is
between the lower side wing and the lower protrusion and facing the lower side, and
the upper concave surface is not parallel with the lower concave surface.
a band passing through the perforation and forming a circular structure on the first
direction of the central support; and
at least one metal hook disposed on at least one end of the band and passing through
the circular structure.
9. The interspinous stabilizer of claim 8, further comprising a fabric sheath covering
at least a portion of the interspinous spacer and at least a portion of the band.
10. The interspinous stabilizer of claim 9, wherein the fabric sheath is comprised of
polyester fabric or polyethylene fabric.
11. The interspinous stabilizer of claim 8, wherein the band is comprised of polyester
fabric or polyethylene fabric.
12. The interspinous stabilizer of claim 8, wherein the metal hook is comprised of titanium
alloy or stainless steel.
13. A method of stabilizing human spinous processes, comprising:
(i) inserting an interspinous stabilizer of claim 9 between two target spinous processes
of a spine;
(ii) pulling a band of the interspinous stabilizer and holding at least one metal
hook of the interspinous stabilizer to pass through interspinous ligaments of the
target spinous processes;
(iii) guiding the metal hook to pass through a circular structure of the interspinous
stabilizer and pulling the band to form a knot on the circular structure; and
(iv) holding the metal hook to pass through a fixation ring, sliding the fixation
ring toward the knot, and clamp the fixation ring on the band by a surgical tool to
position the knot.