TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to a stainless steel pipe exhibiting excellent corrosion
resistance and a method of manufacturing the same.
BACKGROUND ART
[0002] Stainless steel is widely used in building material applications such as roofing
materials, wall materials, and building components since it exhibits excellent weather
resistance, processability, weldability, and the like. In addition, a stainless steel
pipe is used in applications such as handrails, fences, and pipe shutters after being
subjected to surface polishing since it exhibits excellent designing property as well.
[0003] In the general industrial polishing of this stainless steel pipe, scratch-removing
polishing is first conducted in order to remove scratches and the like on the original
pipe before being polished and then finish polishing, glossy polishing, and the like
are conducted. Dry polishing using a flap wheel, a polishing belt, or the like is
conducted in the rough polishing and finish polishing in this polishing operation.
Furthermore, there is a case in which wet polishing by buffing is conducted after
the above process in order to obtain a desired surface.
[0004] Conventionally, stainless steel exhibits excellent weather resistance as a material,
but there is a case in which the inherent weather resistance of the material is not
exerted and remarkable rusting occurs depending on the state of polishing finish,
and this is one of the factors to eliminate the stability (reliability) of the weather
resistance of stainless steel. For example, there is a case in which rusting occurs
in a short period of about one month after stainless steel is constructed into outdoor
handrails and the like.
[0005] It is considered that the oxide film and polishing marks remaining on the surface
of the stainless steel pipe after being polished are the starting points of rusting.
The remaining oxide film is a film formed due to heat generation at the time of polishing
and a Cr-depleted layer is formed right under the oxide film. Hence, rusting proceeds
from the oxide film and the Cr-depleted layer right under the oxide film and corrosion
resistance is likely to deteriorate when the oxide film remains. In addition, with
regard to the polishing marks which are scratches engraved on the surface of the stainless
steel pipe by polishing as well, the possibility that it is difficult to remove the
oxide film formed by polishing using a flap wheel or the like by buffing and the oxide
film remains is higher as the concave portion of the polishing marks is deeper, and
rusting proceeds and corrosion resistance is likely to deteriorate since the concave
portion of the polishing marks becomes a starting point of rusting.
[0006] Patent Document 1 proposes a stainless steel pipe capable of maintaining glossiness
and weather resistance for a long period by polishing the surface to be in a state
in which rusting does not occur in a short period even in an outdoor environment.
[0007] Patent Document 1: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, Publication No.
2003-56755
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
Problems to be Solved by the Invention
[0008] The invention described in Patent Document 1 is a stainless steel pipe having a surface
roughness after the final polishing of Ry 0.6 µm or less and an area ratio of the
remaining oxide film of 7.0% or less. In other words, it is intended to decrease the
oxide films remaining in the concave portions of the polishing marks by setting the
surface roughness after final polishing to Ry 0.6 µm or less. In addition, it is intended
to suppress progress of rusting starting from the oxide film and the Cr-depleted layer
right under the oxide film and deterioration in corrosion resistance by setting the
area ratio of the remaining oxide film to 7.0% or less.
[0009] Here, referring to Examples of Patent Document 1, the area ratio of the remaining
oxide film is from 3.1 to 6.8% and the oxide film thus remains in a weather resistance-passed
product. Hence, there is still a problem that rusting may proceed from the remaining
oxide film and the Cr-depleted layer right under the oxide film and the corrosion
resistance may deteriorate.
[0010] Furthermore, the demand for construction has increased in association with the redevelopment
of urban areas and the demand for construction in the waterfront environment has increased
in recent years. In the waterfront environment, there is a problem that building components
are likely to be affected by sea salt particles which are a kind of aerosol particles
contained in the atmosphere and are fine particles composed of salts derived from
seawater. Hence, needs for highly corrosion resistant building components have increased.
[0011] In Patent Document 1, SUS304 is mentioned as one steel type of stainless steel pipes
exhibiting excellent weather resistance. However, SUS304 has a problem that it rusts
at an early stage and requires maintenance in a waterfront environment affected by
sea salt particles.
[0012] The present invention has been made to solve the problem described above and an object
thereof is to provide a stainless steel pipe which exhibits excellent corrosion resistance
so as not to rust at an early stage even in a waterfront environment affected by sea
salt particles and a method of manufacturing the same.
Means for Solving the Problems
[0013] The present inventors have carried out investigations on the stainless steel pipe
described in Patent Document 1. In Examples of Patent Document 1, dry polishing using
a flap wheel is conducted. The oxide film on the surface of the stainless steel pipe
of Examples of Patent Document 1 using this polishing method remains at an area ratio
of 3.1% or more. As a result of investigations on the factors of this, it has been
found out that the temperature of the surface of the stainless steel pipe increases
high and an oxide film is formed at the time of polishing using a flap wheel, which
is a dry polishing and surface defects are caused together with polishing marks which
are scratches engraved by high polishing resistance by dry polishing. The term "surface
defect" as referred to herein is a defect having a form in which the metal on the
surface partly peels off and covers the base portion as the polishing material and
polishing paper are continuously brought into contact with the surface of the steel
pipe and polished when polishing the surface of the steel pipe, and it is referred
to as "burr" or "covering". A surface defect includes portions at which the metal
is turned up as a strip shape or a bamboo leaf shape, and it is a defect having a
maximum length from one end portion of the portion bonded to the base to the other
end portion at the peeling tip of 5 µm or more. The surface defect forms a microgap
with the surface base portion of the stainless steel pipe, and thus crevice corrosion
is likely to occur and a decrease in corrosion resistance of the steel pipe is caused.
[0014] The present inventors have found out a stainless steel pipe exhibiting excellent
corrosion resistance and a method of manufacturing the same based on the analysis
results.
[0015] In other words, the present invention provides a stainless steel pipe exhibiting
excellent corrosion resistance and a method of manufacturing the same of the following
(1) to (3) .
- (1) A stainless steel pipe exhibiting excellent corrosion resistance, in which the
stainless steel pipe has a polishing mark on a surface, an oxide film exhibiting color
is not present on the surface, and an average number of surface defects including
covering by a metal base of 5 µm or more on the surface is suppressed to 5 or fewer
per 0.01 mm2.
The stainless steel pipe of the present invention exhibits excellent design property
and antiglare property since it has polishing marks on the surface thereof. In addition,
rusting starting from the oxide film and the Cr-depleted layer right under the oxide
film hardly proceeds and the corrosion resistance hardly deteriorates since the oxide
film exhibiting color is not present on the surface of the stainless steel pipe. Furthermore,
crevice corrosion is suppressed and a stainless steel pipe exhibiting excellent corrosion
resistance is obtained since the average number of surface defects including covering
by the metal base of 5 µm or more on the surface of the stainless steel pipe is suppressed
to 5 or fewer per 0.01 mm2.
- (2) A method of manufacturing the stainless steel pipe of (1), the method including
a polishing step of polishing a surface of a stainless steel pipe with a solid polishing
agent.
- (3) The manufacturing method of (2), in which the surface of the stainless steel pipe
is polished by attaching the solid polishing agent to a polishing flap wheel in the
polishing step.
Effects of the Invention
[0016] According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a stainless steel pipe
which exhibits excellent corrosion resistance so as not to rust at an early stage
even in a waterfront environment affected by sea salt particles and a method of manufacturing
the same.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0017]
Fig. 1 is a photograph of the surface enlarged using an optical microscope of a stainless
steel pipe, Fig. 1(a) is a surface on which the generation of surface defects is suppressed,
and Fig. 1(b) is a surface having surface defects.
Fig. 2 is a view illustrating the relationship between surface defects and a change
in current density, Fig. 2(a) is an enlarged photograph illustrating surface defects
of a stainless steel pipe, and Fig. 2(b) is a graph illustrating a change in current
density in pitting potential measurement.
Fig. 3 is a view illustrating the relationship between surface defects and a change
in current density, Fig. 3(a) is an enlarged photograph illustrating the surface of
a stainless steel pipe on which the generation of surface defects is suppressed, and
Fig. 3(b) is a graph illustrating a change in current density in pitting potential
measurement.
Fig. 4 is a photograph of the surface enlarged using an optical microscope of the
stainless steel pipe of Comparative Example 2.
Fig. 5 is a photograph of the surface enlarged using an optical microscope of the
stainless steel pipe of Reference Example 1.
Fig. 6 is a photograph of the surface of a stainless steel pipe after a CCT test,
Fig. 6(a) illustrates the surface of Example 1, and Fig. 6(b) illustrates the surface
of Comparative Example 1.
PREFERRED MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0018] Hereinafter, embodiments for carrying out the present invention will be described.
It should be noted that the present invention is not to be interpreted restrictively
by the embodiments.
(Stainless Steel Pipe)
[0019] The stainless steel pipe of the present invention is a stainless steel pipe exhibiting
excellent corrosion resistance since it has a polishing mark on the surface, an oxide
film exhibiting color is not present on the surface, and an average number of surface
defects including covering by the metal base of 5 µm or more on the surface is suppressed
to 5 or fewer per 0.01 mm
2.
[0020] In the present invention, the surface of the stainless steel pipe is subjected to
polishing finish so as to impart unevenness and gloss to the surface. By this, the
stainless steel pipe becomes a stainless steel pipe which have polishing marks and
exhibits excellent design property and antiglare property. The polishing marks are
scratches engraved on the surface of the stainless steel pipe by polishing.
[0021] With regard to the polishing marks on the surface after polishing, the possibility
that the oxide film formed by polishing using a flap wheel or the like remains is
higher as the concave portion of the polishing marks is deeper, and rusting proceeds
and corrosion resistance is likely to deteriorate since the concave portion of the
polishing marks becomes a starting point of rusting. Accordingly, the surface roughness
Ra of the surface of the stainless steel pipe in the present invention after polishing
is preferably from 0.1 to 1.0 µm and more preferably from 0.2 to 0.5 µm. The surface
roughness after polishing is measured in conformity to JIS B0601, and it can be measured
using a contact type surface roughness tester, for example.
[0022] As polishing finish, dry polishing using a flap wheel or the like has been conventionally
conducted, but the temperature of the surface of the stainless steel pipe increases
high and an oxide film is formed when dry polishing is conducted. Meanwhile, the stainless
steel pipe of the present invention is characterized in that an oxide film exhibiting
color is not present on the surface. The present inventors believe that the reason
for this is because the oxide film on the surface is removed as the stainless steel
pipe of the present invention is polished with a solid polishing agent. In addition,
the formation of oxide film is further suppressed as the solid polishing agent is
attached to the polishing flap wheel.
[0023] In the present invention, the fact that an oxide film exhibiting color is present
refers to a case in which an oxide film which is a spot-like substance exhibiting
color is present at an area ratio of 5% or more in 50 µm square when arbitrary 10
points on the surface of the stainless steel pipe are observed at a magnification
of 400-fold using an optical microscope. Here, the color is not limited to a specific
one, and it may be a color which can be visually distinguished from the metal base
or metallic luster of the stainless steel pipe. A typical color as the color is dark
reddish-brown.
[0024] In addition, when dry polishing using a flap wheel or the like is conducted as polishing
finish, the polishing material and the polishing paper are continuously brought into
contact with the surface of the stainless steel pipe and a surface defect which is
burr or covering that the metal constituting the surface partly peels off and covers
the base portion is caused. The surface defect is a factor of crevice corrosion since
it forms a microgap with the surface base portion of the stainless steel pipe.
[0025] Fig. 1 is a photograph of the surface enlarged using an optical microscope of the
stainless steel pipe, Fig. 1(a) is a surface on which the generation of surface defects
is suppressed, and Fig. 1(b) is a surface having surface defects. Fig. 1(a) is the
surface of the stainless steel pipe of the present invention, which has polishing
marks but on which the generation of surface defects is suppressed. Meanwhile, Fig.
1(b) is a dry polished surface of a stainless steel pipe, and surrounded portions
1 to 9 represent surface defects that the metal constituting the surface partly peels
off and covers the base portion. The present inventors have analyzed the reason why
the generation of surface defects is suppressed on the surface of the stainless steel
pipe of the present invention after polishing as illustrated in Fig. 1(a) is because
a solid polishing agent is used at the time of polishing. In addition, the generation
of surface defects is further suppressed by attaching the solid polishing agent to
the polishing flap wheel. Incidentally, the white horizontal line in Fig. 1 represents
a convex portion formed during polishing, and the concave portion between the white
horizontal line which is a convex portion and the white horizontal line adjacent thereto
is a polishing mark.
[0026] In the present invention, the surface defects refer to those having covering by the
metal base in which the maximum length portion of the defect has a size of 5 µm or
more. In addition, the surface is defined to be in a state in which the generation
of surface defects is suppressed in the present invention in a case in which the average
number of measured surface defects is 5 or fewer when a range of 100 µm × 100 µm (0.01
mm
2) at arbitrary 10 points on the polished surface of a stainless steel pipe is enlarged
by 200-fold and observed using an optical microscope. The number of surface defects
on the polished surface of the stainless steel pipe is more preferably 3 or fewer
and still more preferably 2 or fewer per unit area of 100 µm × 100 µm (0.01 mm
2). Incidentally, there is no upper limit to the maximum length portion of surface
defects, but the upper limit may be set to 50 µm as a reference value in the measurement.
[0027] Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 are views illustrating the relationship between surface defects
and a change in current density, Fig. 2(a) is an enlarged photograph illustrating
surface defects of a stainless steel pipe, Fig. 3(a) is an enlarged photograph illustrating
the surface of a stainless steel pipe on which the generation of surface defects is
suppressed, and Fig. 2(b) and Fig. 3(b) are graphs illustrating a change in current
density in pitting potential measurement of the stainless steel pipes of Fig. 2(a)
and Fig. 3(a), respectively.
[0028] The pitting potential measurement method of stainless steel conforms to JIS G0577,
and the method B is used. The method B is a pitting potential measurement method by
a potentiodynamic method in a 3.5mass% sodium chloride aqueous solution. The pH of
the sodium chloride aqueous solution is set to 7 and the temperature is set to 30°C.
In addition, the potential sweep rate is set to 20 mV/min.
[0029] As illustrated in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b), in the case of a stainless steel pipe having
a surface on which the generation of surface defects is suppressed, a change in the
value of the current density at a potential lower than the pitting potential is small
and the portion at which the rate of change (maximum current density / minimum current
density) in the current density in a range of from the natural potential to the pitting
potential, namely, a potential range of from 0.1 to 0.5 (part B in Fig. 3(b)) is 10
or more is not recognized in the change in current density in the pitting potential
measurement.
[0030] Meanwhile, as illustrated in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), in the case of a stainless steel
pipe having surface defects, the change in the value of the current density at a potential
lower than the pitting potential is great and the portion at which the rate of change
in the current density in a range of from the natural potential to the pitting potential,
namely, a potential range of from 0.1 to 0.3 V (part A in Fig. 2(b)) exceeds 10 is
at ten or more potential positions in the change in current density in the pitting
potential measurement. This great change in current density is caused by occurrence
of corrosion. Therefore, the present inventors presume that a great change in current
density indicates the occurrence of crevice corrosion caused by the presence of surface
defects. Accordingly, in the present invention, the portion at which the rate of change
(maximum current density / minimum current density) in the current density in a range
of from the natural potential to the pitting potential is 10 or more is preferably
at fewer than ten potential positions and more preferably at five or fewer places
in the change in current density in pitting potential measurement.
[0031] As a composition in the case of using ferritic stainless steel as the material for
the stainless steel pipe of the present invention, for example, C is contained preferably
at 0.02% by mass or less since it tends to decrease corrosion resistance when being
contained in a great amount although it is an element useful for obtaining the strength
of steel. Si is contained preferably at 1.00% by mass or less since it tends to harden
the steel when being contained in a great amount although it is an element useful
as a deoxidizer and a heat source in the steelmaking process. Mn is contained preferably
at 2.00% by mass or less, and more preferably at 1.00% by mass or less since it tends
to form an austenite phase when being contained in a great amount although it is an
element useful as deoxidation in the steelmaking process. Cr is contained preferably
at from 17.00% to 30.00% by mass and more preferably at from 20.00% to 24.00% by mass
since it tends to not only increase the cost but also decrease the processability
when being contained in a great amount although it is an element useful for securing
corrosion resistance. Mo is contained preferably at from 1.00% to 2.50% by mass and
more preferably at from 1.00% to 1.50% by mass since it tends to not only increase
the cost but also decrease the processability when being contained in a great amount
although it is an element useful for improving the corrosion resistance of stainless
steel in the presence of Cr. It is more preferable as P is contained in a smaller
amount since it decreases corrosion resistance, and P is contained preferably at 0.040%
by mass or less. It is more preferable as S is contained in a smaller amount since
it decreases corrosion resistance, and S is contained preferably at 0.030% by mass
or less. Ni is contained preferably at 0.6% by mass or less since it causes the formation
of an austenite phase and high cost when being contained too much although it is preferred
from the viewpoint of an effect of suppressing the progress of corrosion and of being
effective in improvement of toughness of ferritic stainless steel pipes. With regard
to Ti and Nb, it is preferable to contain one kind or two kinds of these. Ti is contained
preferably at from 0.05% to 0.5% by mass since a large amount of Ti content tends
to decrease the surface quality of steel although it is preferred from the viewpoint
of having a strong affinity for C and N and suppressing intergranular corrosion of
ferritic stainless steel pipes. Nb is contained preferably at from 0.1% to 0.6% by
mass since a large amount of Nb content tends to hinder toughness although it is preferred
from the viewpoint of having a strong affinity for C and N and suppressing intergranular
corrosion of ferritic stainless steel pipes. N is contained preferably at 0.025% by
mass or less since it, like C, tends to decrease corrosion resistance when being contained
in a great amount. Al is contained preferably at from 0.01% to 0.50% by mass since
it decreases the weldability and low temperature toughness of steel as well as deteriorates
the surface quality when being excessively added although it is an element effective
in refining and casting as a deoxidizer. The balance is preferably Fe and inevitable
impurities. In addition, for example, it is also possible to use one containing C
at 0.02% by mass or less, Si at 0.40% by mass or less, Mn at 0.40% by mass or less,
Cr at from 21.00% to 23.00% by mass, Mo at from 1.00% to 1.50% by mass, P at 0.040%
by mass or less, S at 0.030% by mass or less, Ni at 0.60% by mass or less, Ti at from
0.05% to 0.5% by mass, Nb at from 0.10% to 0.6% by mass, N at 0.025% by mass or less,
Al at 0.15% by mass or less, and Fe as the balance as the stainless steel pipe of
the present invention.
[0032] As the material for the stainless steel pipe of the present invention, a material
having a pitting (corrosion) index (PI) of 20 or more is preferable. PI is determined
by the following Equation (1). PI = Cr + 3Mo ---Equation (1)
[0033] The stainless steel pipe of the present invention having a pitting index (PI) of
20 or more exhibits excellent corrosion resistance. Hence, rusting of the stainless
steel pipe of the present invention can be suppressed whereas SUS304 having a low
pitting index of 19 rusts at an early stage in a waterfront environment affected by
sea salt particles. The pitting index (PI) is more preferably 24 or more and still
more preferably 30 or more from the viewpoint of corrosion resistance.
(Manufacturing Method)
[0034] The method of manufacturing a stainless steel pipe of the present invention is a
manufacturing method including a polishing step of polishing the surface of a stainless
steel pipe with a solid polishing agent.
[0035] The solid polishing agent is not particularly limited and can be used as long as
it contains a fatty acid and mineral fat and oil.
[0036] It is preferable that the solid polishing agent contains oxides such as SiO
2, Al
2O
3, and CrO
2. The content of oxides such as SiO
2, Al
2O
3, and CrO
2 is preferably from 50% to 80% by mass, more preferably from 55% to 75% by mass, and
particularly preferably from 60% to 70% by mass.
[0037] As the fatty acid, it is preferable to use stearic acid, myristic acid, and the like.
As the mineral fat and oil, it is preferable to use palmitic acid and the like.
[0038] In the present method of manufacturing a stainless steel pipe, it is preferable to
polish the surface of the stainless steel pipe using a polishing flap wheel to which
the solid polishing agent is attached in the polishing step.
[0039] As described above, when dry polishing using a flap wheel or the like is conducted
as polishing finish, the polishing material and the polishing paper are continuously
brought into contact with the surface of the stainless steel pipe and a surface defect
which is burr or covering that the metal constituting the surface partly peels off
and covers the base portion is caused. Meanwhile, it is preferable to conduct wet
polishing by attaching the solid polishing agent to the polishing flap wheel in the
method of manufacturing a stainless steel pipe of the present invention. This makes
it possible to decrease the polishing resistance even in a case in which the polishing
material and the polishing paper are continuously brought into contact with the surface
of the stainless steel pipe, and the generation of a surface defect which is burr
or covering that the metal constituting the surface partly peels off and covers the
base portion is likely to be further suppressed.
[0040] Incidentally, the present invention is not limited by the above embodiment. For example,
buffing using a solid polishing agent may be conducted after wet polishing is conducted
by attaching a solid polishing agent to a polishing flap wheel. In addition, it is
possible to manufacture a stainless steel pipe which has random polishing marks on
the surface of the stainless steel pipe and on which generation of an oxide film exhibiting
color and surface defects is suppressed by manually conducting polishing by the movement
formed by combining an eccentric motion and a rotational motion using a polishing
apparatus (air sander) to which a nonwoven fabric is attached after a solid polishing
agent is applied and wet polishing is conducted as well.
EXAMPLES
[0041] Piping and shape modification of a stainless steel pipe were conducted, and polishing
finish for decoration was conducted. The following two types of stainless steel pipes
were used. The composition (mass%) and dimensions are as follows.
Steel Type 1 (SUS445J1) Cr: 22%, Mo: 1.05%, Ti: 0.2%, Nb: 0.2%, Al: 0.09%, and Fe:
balance
Steel Type 2 (SUS304) Cr: 18%, Ni: 8%, Si: 0.6%, Mn: 0.8%, and Fe: balance
[0042] Dimensions: 34 mm in diameter × 1.5 mm in thickness × 4000 mm in length.
[0043] Polishing was conducted in Lines 1 to 4 as follows. In addition, the polishing conditions
are as follows.
[0044] Line 1 is a line in which five flap wheels (#240, #240, #240, #400, and #600) are
arranged so as to polish the surface of steel pipe in the circumferential direction
(to impart polishing marks in the circumferential direction). Line 2 is a line in
which four flap wheels (#240, #240, #240, and #400) are arranged so as to polish the
surface of steel pipe in the longitudinal direction (to impart polishing marks in
the longitudinal direction). Line 3 is a line in which four flap wheels (#150, #150,
#150, and #320) are arranged so as to polish the surface of steel pipe in the longitudinal
direction (to impart polishing marks in the longitudinal direction). Line 4 is a line
composed of three flap wheels (#320, #400, and #600) arranged so as to polish the
surface of steel pipe in the longitudinal direction (to impart polishing marks in
the longitudinal direction) and two cotton buffs (#400 and #400) arranged so as to
polish the surface of steel pipe in the circumferential direction (to impart polishing
marks in the circumferential direction). Here, a solid polishing agent was applied
to the flap wheel in Line 1 and Line 4. Meanwhile, a solid polishing agent was not
applied in Line 2 and Line 3. Incidentally, "#240" and the like represent the mesh
grading.
(Polishing Conditions)
[0045]
Line speed: 1.8 m/min
Number of rotations of pipe: 380 rpm
Number of rotations of wheel: 1500 rpm
Wheel diameter: 400 mm
(Solid Polishing Agent)
[0046] The solid polishing agent had a SiO
2 content of 75% by mass, a content of stearic acid which was a fatty acid of 16% by
mass, and a content of palmitic acid which was a mineral fat and oil of 3.8% by mass.
(Example 1)
[0047] Polishing of Steel Type 1 was conducted in Line 1 (applied with a solid polishing
agent).
(Example 2)
[0048] Polishing of Steel Type 1 was conducted in Line 3 (not applied with a solid polishing
agent) and then in Line 4 (applied with a solid polishing agent). Thereafter, polishing
to uniformly adjust the random polishing marks was manually conducted by the movement
formed by combining an eccentric motion and a rotational motion using a polishing
apparatus (air sander) to which a nonwoven fabric (#80) was attached without applying
a solid polishing agent.
(Comparative Example 1)
[0049] Polishing of Steel Type 1 was conducted in Line 2 (not applied with a solid polishing
agent).
(Comparative Example 2)
[0050] Polishing of Steel Type 2 was conducted in Line 2 (not applied with a solid polishing
agent).
(Reference Example 1)
[0051] Polishing of Steel Type 2 was conducted in Line 1 (applied with a solid polishing
agent).
(Surface Defects)
[0052] The polished surface of a stainless steel pipe was enlarged by 200-fold and observed
in a range of 100 µm × 100 µm (0.01 mm
2) using an optical microscope. The surface was evaluated as "○" to be in a state in
which the generation of surface defects was suppressed in a case in which the number
of surface defects having covering by the metal base of 5 µm or more was 5 or fewer,
and the surface was evaluated as "×" to be in a state in which the generation of surface
defects was suppressed in a case in which the number of surface defects was more than
5 (see Table 1).
[0053] As presented in Table 1, the surface of the stainless steel pipe of Example 1 did
not have surface defects as illustrated in Fig. 1(a). Meanwhile, the surface of the
stainless steel pipe of Comparative Example 1 had at least nine surface defects as
illustrated in Fig. 1(b), and thus it was not in a state in which the generation of
surface defects was suppressed. In addition, the surface of the stainless steel pipe
of Comparative Example 2 had at least 6 surface defects as illustrated in Fig. 4,
and thus it was not in a state in which the generation of surface defects was suppressed.
Incidentally, in Reference Example 1, there was no surface defect as illustrated in
Fig. 5.
(Oxide Film)
[0054] The surface of the stainless steel pipe was observed at a magnification of 400-fold
using an optical microscope, and to what extent an oxide film which was a spot-like
substance exhibiting dark reddish-brown was present in 50 µm square as an area ratio
was calculated. The surface was evaluated as "O(Good)" not to have an oxide film exhibiting
color in a case in which the area ratio of the remaining oxide film was 3% or more
and less than 5%, the surface was evaluated as "⊙ (Excellent)" in the case of a more
preferred state in which the area ratio of the remaining oxide film was less than
3%, and the surface was evaluated as "× (Failure)" to have an oxide film exhibiting
color in a case in which the area ratio was 5% or more (see Table 1).
[0055] As presented in Table 1, the area ratio of the oxide film was 1% or less in Example
1, the area ratio of the oxide film was 3% in Example 2, and an oxide film exhibiting
color was not thus present on the surface of the stainless steel pipes. Meanwhile,
the area ratio of the oxide film was 15% and 20% in Comparative Examples 1 and 2,
respectively and an oxide film exhibiting color was thus present on the surface of
the stainless steel pipes. Incidentally, the area ratio of the oxide film was 2% and
an oxide film exhibiting color was not thus present on the surface of the stainless
steel pipe in Reference Example 1.
(Corrosion Resistance Test)
[0056] The stainless steel pipes of Examples 1 and 2, Comparative Examples 1 and 2, and
Reference Example 1 were subjected to a corrosion resistance test (salt-dry-wet combined
cyclic corrosion test (CCT test)) under the following conditions. Conditions: (1)
Salt water spray (35°C, 5%NaCl, 15 minutes)
(2) Drying (60°C, 30%RH, 60 minutes)
(3) Wetting (50°C, 95%RH, 3 hours)
[0057] The above conditions (1) to (3) constituted one cycle, and the cycle was repeatedly
conducted by 30 cycles. Evaluation: the stainless steel pipe was evaluated as "○(Good)"
to exhibit good corrosion resistance when the rusting area after the test was within
5% of the entire surface of the steel pipe, as "Δ (Passing)" when the rusting area
was more than 5% and 15% or less, and as "×(Failure)" to exhibit poor corrosion resistance
when the rusting area was more than 15% (see Table 1).
[0058] The surface photographs after the CCT test of Example 1 and Comparative Example 1
are illustrated in Fig. 6. In Example 1, it has been indicated that rusting has not
occurred on the surface even after the CCT test as illustrated in Fig. 6(a) and the
corrosion resistance is excellent. Meanwhile, in Comparative Example 1, rusting has
occurred on the surface after the CCT test as illustrated in Fig. 6(b) and the corrosion
resistance is inferior. Incidentally, in Reference Example 1, the corrosion resistance
is Δ since the corrosion resistant level of the base material itself is low. The corrosion
resistant level of the base material in a waterfront environment affected by sea salt
particles is preferably 24 or more as a pitting index (PI).
[Table 1]
|
Surface defects |
Oxide film |
Corrosion resistance |
Example1 |
○ |
⊙ |
○ |
Example2 |
○ |
○ |
○ |
Comparative Example1 |
× |
× |
× |
Comparative Example2 |
× |
× |
× |
Reference Example1 |
○ |
⊙ |
Δ |
EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NUMERALS
[0059]
- 1 to 9
- ... Surface defect
- A and B
- ... Region having change in current density