[Technical Field]
[0001] The present disclosure relates to a high-strength steel material having excellent
brittle crack arrestability and welding zone brittle crack initiation resistance,
and to a method of manufacturing the same.
[Background Art]
[0002] Recently, there has been demand for the development of ultra-thick steel sheets having
high strength properties in consideration of the design requirements of structures
to be used in the shipping, maritime, architectural, and civil engineering fields,
domestically and internationally.
[0003] In a case in which high-strength steel is included in the design of a structure,
economic benefits may be obtained due to reductions in the weight of structures while
processing and welding operations may be easily undertaken using a steel sheet having
a relatively reduced thickness.
[0004] In general, in the case of high-strength steel, due to a reduction in a reduction
ratio when thick steel plates are manufactured, sufficient deformation is not performed,
as compared with a thin steel sheet. Thus, microstructures of thick steel plates may
be coarse, so that low temperature properties on which grain sizes have the most significant
effect may be degraded.
[0005] In detail, in a case in which brittle crack arrestability representing stability
of a structure is applied to a main structure, such as a ship's hull, the number of
cases of demanding assurances has been increased. However, in a case in which microstructures
become coarse, a phenomenon in which brittle crack arrestability is significantly
degraded may occur. Thus, it is difficult to improve brittle crack arrestability of
an ultra-thick high-strength steel material.
[0006] In the meantime, in the case of high-strength steel having yield strength of 460
MPa or greater, various technologies, such as adjustment of grain size, by applying
surface cooling during finishing milling and applying bending stress during rolling
to refine the grain size of a surface portion, in order to improve brittle crack arrestability,
have been introduced.
[0007] However, such technologies may contribute to refining a structure of a surface portion,
but may not solve a problem in which impact toughness is degraded due to coarsening
of structures other than the surface portion. Thus, such technologies may not be fundamental
countermeasures to brittle crack arrestability.
[0008] In addition, recently, the design concept to improve safety of a ship by controlling
brittle crack initiation of a steel material applied to large container ships has
been introduced. Thus, in general, the number of cases of guaranteeing brittle crack
initiation of a heat affected zone (HAZ), the most vulnerable portion in terms of
brittle crack initiation, has been increased.
[0009] In general, since, in the case of high-strength steel, the microstructure in a HAZ
includes low temperature transformation ferrite having high strength, such as bainite,
there is a limitation in which HAZ properties, in detail, toughness, is significantly
reduced.
[0010] In detail, in the case of brittle crack initiation resistance generally evaluated
through a crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) test to evaluate the stability of
the structure, martensite-austenite generated from untransformed austenite, when low
temperature transformation ferrite is generated, becomes an active nucleation site
of brittle crack occurrence. Thus, it is difficult to improve brittle crack initiation
resistance of a high-strength steel material.
[0011] In the case of high-strength steel of the related art having a yield strength of
460 MPa or greater, in order to improve welding zone brittle crack initiation resistance,
an effort to refine a microstructure in a HAZ using TiN or to form ferrite in a HAZ
using oxide metallurgy has been made. However, the effort partially contributes to
forming impact toughness through refining a structure, but does not have a great effect
on reducing a fraction of martensite-austenite having a significant influence on reducing
brittle crack initiation resistance.
[0012] In addition, in the case of brittle crack initiation resistance of a base material,
martensite-austenite may be transformed to have a different phase through tempering,
or the like, to secure physical properties. However, in the case of the HAZ in which
an effect of tempering disappears due to thermal history, it is impossible to apply
brittle crack initiation resistance.
[0013] In the meantime, in order to minimize the formation of martensite-austenite, the
amount of elements, such as carbon (C) and niobium (Nb), should be reduced. However,
in this case, it may be difficult to secure a specific level of strength. To this
end, a relatively large amount of high-priced elements, such as molybdenum (Mo) and
nickel (Ni), should be added. Thus, there is a limitation in which economic efficiency
is deteriorated.
[Disclosure]
[Technical Problem]
[0014] An aspect of the present disclosure may provide a high-strength steel material having
excellent brittle crack arrestability and welding zone brittle crack initiation resistance.
[0015] Another aspect of the present disclosure may provide a method of manufacturing a
high-strength steel material having excellent brittle crack arrestability and welding
zone brittle crack initiation resistance.
[Technical Solution]
[0016] According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a high-strength steel material
having excellent brittle crack arrestability and welding zone brittle crack initiation
resistance comprises, by wt%, carbon (C): 0.05% to 0.09%, manganese (Mn): 1.5% to
2.2%, nickel (Ni): 0.3% to 1.2%, niobium (Nb): 0.005% to 0.04%, titanium (Ti): 0.005%
to 0.04%, copper (Cu): 0.1% to 0.8%, silicon (Si): 0.05% to 0.3%, aluminum (Al): 0.005%
to 0.05%, phosphorus (P): 100 ppm or less, sulfur (S): 40 ppm or less, iron (Fe) as
a residual component thereof, and inevitable impurities, wherein a microstructure
of a central portion includes, by area%, a mixed phase of acicular ferrite and granular
bainite in an amount of 70% or greater, upper bainite in an amount of 20% or less,
and one or more selected from a group consisting of ferrite, pearlite, and martensite-austenite
(MA), as residual components; a circle-equivalent diameter of an effective grain of
the upper bainite having a high angle grain boundary of 15° or greater measured using
an electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) method being 15 µm or less; a surface portion
microstructure in a region at a depth of 2 mm or less, directly below a surface, includes,
by area%, ferrite in an amount of 20% or greater and one or more of bainite and martensite
as residual components; and a heat affected zone (HAZ) formed during welding includes,
by area%, martensite-austenite (MA) in an amount of 5% or less.
[0017] Contents of Cu and Ni may be set such that a weight ratio of Cu to Ni may be 0.8
or less, and in more detail, 0.6 or less.
[0018] The high-strength steel material may have yield strength of 460 MPa or greater.
[0019] The high-strength steel material may have a Charpy fracture transition temperature
of -40°C or lower in a 1/2t position in a steel material thickness direction, where
t is a steel sheet thickness.
[0020] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a method of manufacturing
a high-strength steel material having excellent brittle crack arrestability and welding
zone brittle crack initiation resistance comprises rough rolling a slab at a temperature
of 900°C to 1100°C after reheating the slab at 1000°C to 1100°C, including, by wt%,
C: 0.05% to 0.09%, Mn: 1.5% to 2.2%, Ni: 0.3% to 1.2%, Nb: 0.005% to 0.04%, titanium
(Ti) : 0.005% to 0.04%, copper (Cu): 0.1% to 0.8%, silicon (Si): 0.05% to 0.3%, aluminum
(Al): 0.005% to 0.05%, phosphorus (P): 100 ppm or less, sulfur (S): 40 ppm or less,
iron (Fe) as a residual component thereof, and inevitable impurities; obtaining a
steel sheet by finish rolling a bar obtained from the rough rolling a slab, at a temperature
in a range of Ar
3 + 60°C to Ar
3 °C, based on a temperature of a central portion; and cooling the steel sheet to 500°C
or lower.
[0021] A reduction ratio per pass of three final passes during the rough rolling a slab
may be 5% or greater, and a total cumulative reduction ratio may be 40% or greater.
[0022] A strain rate of three final passes during the rough rolling a slab may be 2/sec
or lower.
[0023] A grain size of a central portion in a bar thickness direction before finish rolling
after the rough rolling a slab may be 150 µm or less, in detail, 100 µm or less, and
more specifically, 80 µm or less.
[0024] A reduction ratio during the finish rolling may be set such that a ratio of a slab
thickness (mm) to a steel sheet thickness (mm) after the finish rolling may be 3.5
or greater, and in more detail, 4 or greater.
[0025] A cumulative reduction ratio during the finish rolling may be maintained to be 40%
or greater, while the reduction ratio per pass, not including skin pass rolling, may
be maintained to be 4% or greater. Skin pass rolling refers to a process of rolling
a sheet at a relatively low reduction ratio in order to secure flatness of the sheet.
[0026] The cooling the steel sheet may be performed at a cooling rate of the central portion
of 2°C/s or higher.
[0027] The cooling the steel sheet may be performed at an average cooling rate of 3°C/s
to 300°C/s.
[0028] In addition, the present inventive concept may be exemplified in many different forms
and should not be construed as being limited to the specific embodiments set forth
herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough
and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the disclosure to those skilled in
the art.
[Advantageous Effects]
[0029] According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a high-strength steel material
having a relatively high level of yield strength, as well as excellent brittle crack
arrestability and welding zone brittle crack initiation resistance.
[Best Mode for Invention]
[0030] The inventors of the present disclosure conducted research and experiments to improve
yield strength, brittle crack arrestability, and welding zone brittle crack initiation
resistance of a thick steel material and proposed the present disclosure based on
results thereof.
[0031] In an exemplary embodiment, a steel composition, a structure, and manufacturing conditions
of a steel material may be controlled, thereby improving yield strength, brittle crack
arrestability, and welding zone brittle crack initiation resistance of the thick steel
material.
[0032] A main concept of an exemplary embodiment is as follows.
- 1) The steel composition is appropriately controlled to improve strength through solid
solution strengthening. In detail, contents of manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), copper
(Cu), and silicon (Si) are optimized for solid solution strengthening.
- 2) The steel composition is appropriately controlled to improve strength by increasing
hardenability. In detail, the contents of Mn, Ni, and Cu, as well as a carbon (C)
content are optimized to increase hardenability.
A fine structure is secured in a central portion of the thick steel material even
at a relatively slow cooling rate.
- 3) A composition is appropriately controlled to control a fraction of martensite-austenite.
In detail, contents of C, Si, and niobium (Nb), affecting generation of martensite-austenite,
are optimized.
As such, the steel composition may be optimized, thereby securing excellent brittle
crack initiation resistance even in a heat affected zone (HAZ).
- 4) More specifically, a structure of the steel material may be controlled to improve
strength and brittle crack arrestability. In detail, a structure of the central portion
and a surface layer region is controlled in a direction of a steel material thickness.
As such, a microstructure may be controlled, thereby securing strength required in
the steel material, while the microstructure facilitating generation of a crack may
be excluded, thereby improving brittle crack arrestability.
- 5) In detail, rough rolling conditions may be controlled to refine the structure of
the steel material.
In detail, the fine structure is secured in the central portion by controlling a rolling
condition during rough rolling. Using a process described above, the generation of
acicular ferrite and granular bainite is facilitated.
- 6) A finish rolling condition is controlled to further refine the structure of the
steel material. In detail, a finish rolling temperature and rolling conditions may
be controlled to generate a relatively large amount of strain bands in austenite during
finish rolling and secure a large number of ferrite nucleation sites, thereby securing
a fine structure in the central portion of the steel material. As such, generation
of acicular ferrite and granular bainite is facilitated.
[0033] Hereinafter, the high-strength steel material having excellent brittle crack arrestability
and welding zone brittle crack initiation resistance according to an aspect of the
present disclosure will be described in detail.
[0034] According to an aspect of the present disclosure, the high-strength steel material
having excellent brittle crack arrestability and welding zone brittle crack initiation
resistance comprises, by wt%, carbon (C): 0.05% to 0.09%, manganese (Mn): 1.5% to
2.2%, nickel (Ni): 0.3% to 1.2%, niobium (Nb): 0.005% to 0.04%, titanium (Ti): 0.005%
to 0.04%, copper (Cu): 0.1% to 0.8%, silicon (Si): 0.05% to 0.3%, aluminum (Al) :
0.005% to 0.05%, phosphorus (P): 100 ppm or less, sulfur (S) : 40 ppm or less, iron
(Fe) as a residual component thereof, and inevitable impurities, wherein a microstructure
of a central portion includes, by area%, a mixed phase of acicular ferrite and granular
bainite in an amount of 70% or greater, upper bainite in an amount of 20% or less,
and one or more selected from a group consisting of ferrite, pearlite, and martensite-austenite
(MA), as residual components; a circle-equivalent diameter of an effective grain of
the upper bainite having a high angle grain boundary of 15° or greater measured using
an electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) method being 15 µm or less; a surface portion
microstructure in a region at a depth of 2 mm or less, directly below a surface, includes,
by area%, ferrite in an amount of 20% or greater and one or more of bainite and martensite
as residual components; and a heat affected zone (HAZ) formed during welding includes,
by area%, martensite-austenite (MA) in an amount of 5% or less.
[0035] Hereinafter, a steel component and a component range of an exemplary embodiment will
be described.
Carbon (C): 0.05 wt% to 0.09 wt% (hereinafter, referred to as "%")
[0036] Since C is the most significant element used in securing basic strength, C is required
to be contained in steel within an appropriate range. In order to obtain an effect
of addition, C may be added in an amount of 0.05% or greater.
[0037] However, in a case in which a C content exceeds 0.09%, a large amount of martensite-austenite
is generated in the HAZ to degrade brittle crack initiation resistance. Low temperature
toughness is degraded due to a relatively high level of strength of ferrite of a base
material and generation of a relatively large amount of low temperature transformation
ferrite. Thus, the C content may be limited to 0.05% to 0.09%.
[0038] In detail, the C content may be limited to 0.055% to 0.08%, and more specifically,
to 0.06% to 0.075%.
Manganese (Mn): 1.5% to 2.2%
[0039] Mn is a useful element improving strength through solid solution strengthening and
increasing hardenability to generate low temperature transformation ferrite. In addition,
since Mn may generate low temperature transformation ferrite even at a relatively
low cooling rate due to improved hardenability, Mn is a main element to secure strength
of a central portion of a thick steel plate.
[0040] Therefore, in order to obtain an effect described above, Mn may be added in an amount
of 1.5% or greater.
[0041] However, in a case in which a Mn content exceeds 2.2%, generation of upper bainite
and martensite may be facilitated due to an increase in excessive hardenability, thereby
degrading impact toughness and brittle crack arrestability and toughness of the HAZ.
[0042] Therefore, the Mn content may be limited to 1.5% to 2.2%.
[0043] In detail, the Mn content may be limited to 1.6% to 2.0%, and more specifically,
to 1.65% to 1.95%.
Nickel (Ni): 0.3% to 1.2%
[0044] Ni is a significant element used in improving impact toughness by facilitating a
dislocation cross slip at a relatively low temperature and increasing strength by
improving hardenability. In order to obtain an effect described above, Ni may be added
in an amount of 0.3% or greater. However, in a case in which Ni is added in an amount
of 1.2% or greater, hardenability is excessively increased to generate low temperature
transformation ferrite, thereby degrading toughness, and a manufacturing cost may
be increased due to a relatively high cost of Ni, as compared with other hardenability
elements. Thus, an upper limit value of the Ni content may be limited to 1.2%.
[0045] In detail, the Ni content may be limited to 0.4% to 1.0%, and more specifically,
to 0.45% to 0.9%.
Niobium (Nb): 0.005% to 0.04%
[0046] Nb is educed to have a form of NbC or NbCN to improve strength of a base material.
[0047] In addition, Nb solidified when being reheated at a relatively high temperature is
significantly finely educed to have the form of NbC during rolling to suppress recrystallization
of austenite, thereby having an effect of refining a structure.
[0048] Therefore, Nb may be added in an amount of 0.005% or greater. However, in a case
in which Nb is added excessively, generation of martensite-austenite in the HAZ may
be facilitated to degrade brittle crack initiation resistance and cause a brittle
crack in an edge of the steel material. Thus, an upper limit value of an Nb content
may be limited to 0.04%.
[0049] In detail, the Nb content may be limited to 0.01% to 0.035%, and more specifically,
to 0.015% to 0.03%.
Titanium (Ti): 0.005% to 0.04%
[0050] Ti is a component educed to be TiN when being reheated and inhibiting growth of the
base material and a grain in the HAZ to greatly improve low temperature toughness.
In order to obtain an effect of addition, Ti may be added in an amount of 0.005% or
greater.
[0051] However, in a case in which Ti is added excessively, low temperature toughness may
be degraded due to clogging of a continuous casting nozzle or crystallization of the
central portion. Thus, a Ti content may be limited to 0.005% to 0.04%.
[0052] In detail, the Ti content may be limited to 0.008% to 0.03%, and more specifically,
to 0.01% to 0.02%.
Silicon (Si): 0.05% to 0.3%
[0053] Si is a substitutional element improving strength of the steel material through solid
solution strengthening and having a strong deoxidation effect, so that Si may be an
element essential in manufacturing clean steel. Thus, Si may be added in an amount
of 0.05% or greater. However, when a relatively large amount of Si is added, a coarse
martensite-austenite phase may be formed to degrade brittle crack arrestability and
welding zone brittle crack initiation resistance. Thus, an upper limit value of an
Si content may be limited to 0.3%.
[0054] In detail, the Si content may be limited to 0.1% to 0.25%, and more specifically,
to 0.1% to 0.2%.
Copper (Cu): 0.1% to 0.8%
[0055] Cu is a main element used in improving hardenability and causing solid solution strengthening
to enhance strength of the steel material. In addition, Cu is a main element used
in increasing yield strength through the generation of an epsilon Cu precipitate when
tempering is applied. Thus, Cu may be added in an amount of 0.1% or greater. However,
when a relatively large amount of Cu is added, a slab crack may be generated by hot
shortness in a steelmaking process. Thus, an upper limit value of a Cu content may
be limited to 0.8%.
[0056] In detail, the Cu content may be limited to 0.2% to 0.6%, and more specifically,
to 0.25% to 0.5%.
[0057] Contents of Cu and Ni may be set such that the weight ratio of Cu to Ni may be 0.8
or less, and in more detail, 0.6 or less. More specifically, the weight ratio of Cu
to Ni may be limited to 0.5 or less.
[0058] In a case in which the weight ratio of Cu to Ni is set as described above, surface
quality may be improved.
Aluminum (Al): 0.005% to 0.05%
[0059] Al is a component functioning as a deoxidizer. In a case in which an excessive amount
of Al is added, an inclusion may be formed to degrade toughness. Thus, an Al content
may be limited to 0.005% to 0.05%.
Phosphorus (P): 100 ppm or less, Sulfur (S): 40 ppm or less
[0060] P and S are elements causing brittleness in a grain boundary or forming a coarse
inclusion to cause brittleness. In order to improve brittle crack arrestability, a
P content may be limited to 100 ppm or less, while an S content may be limited to
40 ppm or less.
[0061] A residual component of an exemplary embodiment is iron (Fe) .
[0062] However, since, in a manufacturing process of the related art, unintended impurities
may be inevitably mixed from a raw material or an external source, which may not be
excluded.
[0063] Since the impurities are apparent to those skilled in the art, all the contents thereof
are not specifically described in the present disclosure.
[0064] In the case of a steel material of an exemplary embodiment, a microstructure of a
central portion includes, by area%, a mixed phase of acicular ferrite and granular
bainite in an amount of 70% or greater, upper bainite in an amount of 20% or less,
and one or more selected from a group consisting of ferrite, pearlite, and martensite-austenite
(MA), as residual components; a circle-equivalent diameter of an effective grain of
the upper bainite having a high angle grain boundary of 15° or greater measured using
an electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) method being 15 µm or less; a microstructure
in a region at a depth of 2 mm or less, directly below a surface, includes, by area%,
ferrite in an amount of 20% or greater and one or more of bainite and martensite as
residual components; and a heat affected zone (HAZ) formed during welding includes,
by area%, martensite-austenite (MA) in an amount of 5% or less.
[0065] In a case in which a fraction of the mixed phase of acicular ferrite and granular
bainite of the microstructure of the central portion is less than 70%, sufficient
yield strength may be difficult to secure. For example, yield strength of 460 MPa
or greater may be difficult to secure.
[0066] In detail, the fraction of the mixed phase of acicular ferrite and granular bainite
may be 75% or greater, and more specifically, may be limited to 80% or greater.
[0067] A fraction of acicular ferrite may be 20% to 70%.
[0068] In a case in which the fraction of acicular ferrite exceeds 70%, sufficient yield
strength may be difficult to secure due to a reduction in strength. For example, a
yield strength of 460 MPa or greater may be difficult to secure. In a case in which
yield strength is less than 20%, impact toughness may be degraded due to a relatively
high level of strength.
[0069] In detail, the fraction of acicular ferrite may be limited to 30% to 50%, and more
specifically, to 30% to 40%.
[0070] A fraction of granular bainite may be 10% to 60%.
[0071] In a case in which the fraction of granular bainite exceeds 60%, impact toughness
may be degraded due to a relatively high level of strength. In a case in which the
fraction of granular bainite is less than 10%, sufficient yield strength may be difficult
to secure due to a reduction in strength. For example, yield strength of 460 MPa or
greater may be difficult to secure.
[0072] In detail, the fraction of granular bainite may be limited to 20% to 50%, and more
specifically, to 30% to 50%.
[0073] In a case in which a fraction of upper bainite in the central portion exceeds 20%,
a microcrack may be generated in a front end of a crack during brittle crack propagation,
thereby degrading brittle crack arrestability. Thus, the fraction of upper bainite
in the central portion may be 20% or less.
[0074] In detail, the fraction of upper bainite may be limited to 15% or less, and more
specifically, to 10% or less.
[0075] In a case in which the circle-equivalent diameter of the effective grain of upper
bainite in the central portion having a high angle grain boundary of 15° or greater
measured using an EBSD method exceeds 15 µm, there is a problem in which a crack may
be easily generated despite a relatively low fraction of upper bainite. Thus, the
circle-equivalent diameter of the effective grain of upper bainite in the central
portion may be 15 µm or less.
[0076] In a case in which the surface portion microstructure in the region at a depth of
2 mm or less, directly below the surface, includes ferrite in an amount of 20% or
greater, crack propagation may be effectively prevented on the surface during brittle
crack propagation, thereby improving brittle crack arrestability.
[0077] In detail, the fraction of ferrite may be limited to 30% or greater, and more specifically,
to 40% or greater.
[0078] Ferrite in the microstructure in the central portion and the surface portion refers
to polygonal ferrite or elongated polygonal ferrite.
[0079] In a case in which a fraction of martensite-austenite in the HAZ of the steel material
exceeds 5%, martensite-austenite functions as a starting point of a crack, thereby
degrading brittle crack initiation resistance. Thus, the fraction of martensite-austenite
in the HAZ may be 5% or less.
[0080] Welding heat input during welding may be 0.5 kJ/mm to 10 kJ/mm.
[0081] A welding method during welding is not specifically limited and may include, for
example, flux cored arc welding (FCAW), submerged arc welding (SAW), and the like.
[0082] The steel material may have yield strength of 460 MPa or greater.
[0083] The steel material may have a Charpy fracture transition temperature of -40°C or
lower in a 1/2t position in a steel material thickness direction, where t is a steel
sheet thickness.
[0084] The steel material have a thickness of 50 mm or greater, and in detail, a thickness
of 50 mm to 100 mm.
[0085] Hereinafter, a method of manufacturing a high-strength steel material having excellent
brittle crack arrestability according to another aspect of the present disclosure
will be described in detail.
[0086] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, the method of manufacturing
a high-strength steel material having excellent brittle crack arrestability and welding
zone brittle crack initiation resistance comprises rough rolling a slab at a temperature
of 900°C to 1100°C after reheating the slab at 1000°C to 1100°C, including, by wt%,
C: 0.05% to 0.09%, Mn: 1.5% to 2.2%, Ni: 0.3% to 1.2%, Nb: 0.005% to 0.04%, Ti: 0.005%
to 0.04%, Cu: 0.1% to 0.8%, Si: 0.05% to 0.3%, Al: 0.005% to 0.05%, P: 100 ppm or
less, S: 40 ppm or less, Fe as a residual component thereof, and inevitable impurities;
obtaining a steel sheet by finish rolling a bar obtained from the rough rolling a
slab, at a temperature in a range of Ar
3 + 60°C to Ar
3°C, based on a temperature of a central portion; and cooling the steel sheet to 500°C
or lower.
Reheating a slab
[0087] A slab is reheated before rough rolling.
[0088] A reheating temperature of the slab may be 1000°C or higher so that a carbonitride
of Ti and/or Nb, formed during casting, may be solidified.
[0089] However, in a case in which the slab is reheated at a significantly high temperature,
austenite may become coarse. Thus, an upper limit value of the reheating temperature
may be 1100°C.
Rough rolling
[0090] A reheated slab is rough rolled.
[0091] A rough rolling temperature may be a temperature Tnr at which recrystallization of
austenite is halted, or higher. Due to rolling, a cast structure, such as a dendrite
formed during casting, may be destroyed, and an effect of reducing a size of austenite
may also be obtained. In order to obtain the effect, the rough rolling temperature
may be limited to 900°C to 1100°C.
[0092] In more detail, the rough rolling temperature may be 950°C to 1050°C.
[0093] In an exemplary embodiment, in order to refine a structure of the central portion
during rough rolling, a reduction ratio per pass of three final passes during rough
rolling may be 5% or greater, and a total cumulative reduction ratio may be 40% or
greater.
[0094] In detail, the reduction ratio per pass may be 7% to 20%.
[0095] In detail, the total cumulative reduction ratio may be 45% or greater.
[0096] In the case of a structure recrystallized by initial rolling during rough rolling,
grain growth occurs due to a relatively high temperature. However, when three final
passes are performed, a bar is air cooled while waiting for a rolling process, so
that grain growth speed may be decreased. Thus, during rough rolling, a reduction
ratio of the three final passes has the greatest impact on a grain size of a final
microstructure.
[0097] In addition, in a case in which the reduction ratio per pass of rough rolling is
reduced, sufficient deformation is not transmitted to the central portion, so that
toughness may be degraded due to coarsening of the central portion. Therefore, the
reduction ratio per pass of the three final passes may be limited to 5% or greater.
[0098] In the meantime, in order to refine a structure of the central portion, the total
cumulative reduction ratio during rough rolling may be set to be 40% or greater.
[0099] A strain rate of the three final passes during rough rolling may be 2/sec or lower.
[0100] In general, rolling is difficult at a relatively high reduction ratio due to a relatively
great thickness of the bar during rough rolling. Thus, there is a limitation in which
it is difficult to transmit a rolling reduction to the central portion of a thick
steel plate, thereby allowing an austenite grain size in the central portion to be
coarsened. However, as the strain rate is reduced, deformation is transmitted to the
central portion even at a relatively low rolling reduction. Thus, the grain size may
be refined.
[0101] Therefore, in terms of the three final passes having the greatest impact on the final
grain size during rough rolling, the strain rate may be limited to 2/sec or lower,
thereby refining the grain size of the central portion. Thus, generation of acicular
ferrite and granular bainite may be facilitated.
Finish rolling
[0102] A rough rolled bar may be finish rolled at a temperature of Ar
3 (a ferrite transformation initiation temperature) + 60°C to Ar
3°C to obtain a steel sheet so that a further refined microstructure may be obtained.
[0103] In a case in which rolling is performed at a temperature higher than Ar
3, a relatively large amount of strain bands may be generated in austenite to secure
a relatively large number of ferrite nucleation sites, thereby obtaining an effect
of securing a fine structure in the central portion of a steel material.
[0104] In addition, in order to effectively generate a relatively large amount of strain
bands in austenite, a cumulative reduction ratio during finish rolling may be maintained
to be 40% or greater. The reduction ratio per pass, not including skin pass rolling,
may be maintained to be 4% or greater.
[0105] In detail, the cumulative reduction ratio may be 40% to 80%.
[0106] In detail, the reduction ratio per pass may be 4.5% or greater.
[0107] In a case in which a finish rolling temperature is reduced to Ar
3 or lower, coarse ferrite is generated before rolling and is elongated during rolling,
thereby reducing impact toughness. In a case in which finish rolling is performed
at a temperature of Ar
3 + 60°C or higher, the grain size is not effectively refined, so that the finish rolling
temperature during finish rolling may be set to be a temperature of Ar
3 + 60 °C to Ar
3°C.
[0108] In an exemplary embodiment, a reduction ratio in an unrecrystallized region may be
limited to 40% to 80% during finish rolling.
[0109] As described above, since the reduction ratio in the unrecrystallized region is controlled,
thereby increasing a number of nucleation sites of acicular ferrite and granular bainite,
generation of structures described above may be facilitated.
[0110] In a case in which the reduction ratio in the unrecrystallized region is significantly
low, acicular ferrite and granular bainite may not be sufficiently secured. In a case
in which the reduction ratio in the unrecrystallized region is significantly high,
strength may be reduced due to generation of pro-eutectoid ferrite caused by a relatively
high reduction ratio.
[0111] The grain size of the central portion of the bar in a thickness direction after rough
rolling before finish rolling may be 150 µm or less, in detail, 100 µm or less, and
more specifically, 80 µm or less.
[0112] The grain size of the central portion of the bar in a thickness direction after rough
rolling before finish rolling may be controlled depending on a rough rolling condition,
or the like.
[0113] As described above, in a case in which the grain size of the bar after rough rolling
before finish rolling may be controlled, a final microstructure is refined due to
refinement of an austenite grain. Thus, an advantage of improving low temperature
impact toughness may be added.
[0114] The reduction ratio during finish rolling may be set such that a ratio of a slab
thickness (mm) to a steel sheet thickness (mm) after finish rolling may be 3.5 or
greater, and in detail, 4 or greater.
[0115] As described above, in a case in which the reduction ratio is controlled, as the
rolling reduction is increased during rough rolling and finish rolling, an advantage
of improving toughness of the central portion may be added by increasing yield strength/tensile
strength, improving low temperature toughness, and decreasing the grain size of the
central portion in the thickness direction through refinement of the final microstructure.
[0116] After finish rolling, the steel sheet may have a thickness of 50 mm or greater, and
in detail, 50 mm to 100 mm.
Cooling
[0117] The steel sheet is cooled to a temperature of 500°C, or lower, after finish rolling.
[0118] In a case in which a cooling end temperature exceeds 500°C, a microstructure may
not be properly formed, so that sufficient yield strength may be difficult to secure.
For example, yield strength of 460 MPa or greater may be difficult to secure.
[0119] In a case in which the cooling end temperature exceeds 400°C, a generation amount
of acicular ferrite and granular bainite may be reduced, and strength thereof may
be reduced due to an auto-tempering effect.
[0120] The cooling end temperature may be 400°C or lower.
[0121] The steel sheet may be cooled at a cooling rate of the central portion of 2°C/s or
higher. In a case in which the cooling rate of the central portion of the steel sheet
is lower than 2°C/s, the microstructure may not be properly formed, so that it may
be difficult to secure sufficient yield strength. For example, yield strength of 460
MPa or greater may be difficult.
[0122] In addition, the steel sheet may be cooled at an average cooling rate of 3°C/s to
300°C/s.
[Industrial Applicability]
[0123] Hereinafter, the present disclosure will be described in more detail through exemplary
embodiments. However, an exemplary embodiment below is intended to describe the present
disclosure in more detail through illustration thereof, but not to limit right scope
of the present disclosure, because the right scope thereof is determined by the contents
written in the appended claims and reasonably inferred therefrom.
(Exemplary Embodiment)
[0124] A steel slab having a composition illustrated in Table 1 below, which is 400 mm in
thickness, was reheated to a temperature of 1045°C, and then rough rolling was started
at a temperature of 1020°C, thereby manufacturing a bar. A cumulative reduction ratio
of 52% during rough rolling was equally applied to an entirety of steel grades.
[0125] A thickness of a bar having been rough rolled was 192 mm, while a grain size of a
central portion after rough rolling before finish rolling, as illustrated in Table
2, was 66 µm to 82 µm. A reduction ratio of three final passes during rough rolling
was within a range of 7.9% to 14.1%. A strain rate during rolling was within a range
of 1.22/s to 1.68/s.
[0126] After rough rolling, finish rolling was performed at the reduction ratio per pass
of 4.2% to 5.6% and at the cumulative reduction ratio of 50% at a temperature equal
to a difference between a finish rolling temperature and an Ar
3 temperature, illustrated in Table 2 below to obtain a steel sheet having a thickness
illustrated in Table 3 below, and then the steel sheet was cooled to a temperature
of 241°C to 378°C at a cooling rate of the central portion of 3.8°C/sec to 5.0°C/sec.
[0127] In terms of the steel sheet manufactured as illustrated above, a microstructure,
yield strength, a Kca value (a brittle crack arrestability coefficient), and a crack
tip opening displacement (CTOD) value (a brittle crack initiation resistance) were
examined, and results thereof were illustrated in Tables 3 and 4 below.
[0128] Surface properties illustrated in Table 3 below were measured to determine whether
a star crack in a surface portion is generated by hot shortness occurring depending
on a Cu to N addition ratio.
[0129] In addition, the Kca value in Table 4 below is a value evaluated by performing an
ESSO test on the steel sheet. The CTOD value was a result in which a FCAW (1.0 kJ/mm)
welding process is performed to carry out structure analysis and a CTOD test on the
HAZ.
[Table 1]
| Steel Grade |
Steel Composition (wt%) |
| C |
Si |
Mn |
Ni |
Cu |
Ti |
Nb |
Al |
P(pp m) |
S(pp m) |
Cu/Ni wt% |
| Inventive Steel 1 |
0.07 8 |
0.21 |
1.82 |
0.73 |
0.32 |
0.023 |
0.03 2 |
0.03 0 |
63 |
18 |
0.44 |
| Inventive Steel 2 |
0.06 9 |
0.19 |
1.72 |
0.66 |
0.39 |
0.012 |
0.02 2 |
0.03 1 |
72 |
15 |
0.59 |
| Inventive Steel 3 |
0.05 7 |
0.22 |
2.05 |
0.57 |
0.26 |
0.017 |
0.02 7 |
0.02 5 |
56 |
16 |
0.46 |
| Inventive Steel 4 |
0.07 2 |
0.21 |
1.83 |
0.62 |
0.33 |
0.022 |
0.01 9 |
0.03 5 |
49 |
13 |
0.53 |
| Inventive Steel 5 |
0.08 4 |
0.17 |
1.58 |
1.06 |
0.49 |
0.016 |
0.03 3 |
0.04 0 |
66 |
12 |
0.46 |
| Inventive Steel 6 |
0.07 1 |
0.23 |
1.93 |
0.36 |
0.19 |
0.018 |
0.02 8 |
0.02 5 |
43 |
23 |
0.53 |
| Inventive Steel 7 |
0.06 6 |
0.18 |
1.82 |
0.79 |
0.36 |
0.019 |
0.01 2 |
0.02 0 |
39 |
31 |
0.46 |
| Comparative Steel 1 |
0.13 |
0.19 |
1.88 |
0.63 |
0.29 |
0.021 |
0.02 9 |
0.02 1 |
79 |
13 |
0.46 |
| Comparative Steel 2 |
0.06 7 |
0.45 |
1.96 |
0.59 |
0.22 |
0.011 |
0.03 8 |
0.03 2 |
88 |
9 |
0.37 |
| Comparative Steel 3 |
0.07 1 |
0.19 |
2.44 |
0.88 |
0.32 |
0.013 |
0.02 1 |
0.02 9 |
65 |
23 |
0.36 |
| Comparative Steel 4 |
0.082 |
0.18 |
2.02 |
1.62 |
0.52 |
0.022 |
0.026 |
0.034 |
55 |
19 |
0.32 |
| Comparative Steel 5 |
0.07 2 |
0.27 |
1.89 |
0.62 |
0.44 |
0.043 |
0.04 9 |
0.03 0 |
48 |
22 |
0.71 |
| Inventive Steel 8 |
0.06 2 |
0.18 |
1.93 |
0.59 |
0.63 |
0.015 |
0.02 9 |
0.03 1 |
65 |
16 |
1.07 |
| Comparative Steel 6 |
0.04 2 |
0.22 |
1.36 |
0.55 |
0.21 |
0.019 |
0.03 3 |
0.02 7 |
43 |
18 |
0.38 |
[Table 2]
| Exemp lary Embod iment No. |
Steel Gra de |
Grain Size of Central Portion after Rough Rolling before Finish Rolling (µm) |
Average Reducti on Ratio of Three final passes during Rough Rolling (%) |
Average Strain Rate of Three final passes during Rough Rolling (/s) |
Avera ge Reduc tion Ratio per Pass durin g Finis h Rolli ng (%) |
Finish Rollin g Temper ature -Ar3 Temper ature (°C) |
Cool ing Rate of Cent ral Port ion (°C/ sec) |
Cooli ng End Tempe ratur e (°C) |
| Inventive Example 1 |
Inventive Steel 1 |
78 |
11.3 |
1.61 |
4.2 |
35 |
4.1 |
324 |
| Inventive Example 2 |
Inventive Steel 2 |
66 |
9.6 |
1.35 |
4.5 |
43 |
4.4 |
285 |
| Inventive Example 3 |
Inventive Steel 3 |
79 |
10.3 |
1.44 |
5.1 |
29 |
4.3 |
296 |
| Inven tive Examp le 4 |
Inven tive Steel 4 |
75 |
8.9 |
1.46 |
5.3 |
41 |
3.8 |
335 |
| Inven tive Examp le 5 |
Inven tive Steel 5 |
69 |
13.2 |
1.67 |
4.8 |
23 |
3.9 |
342 |
| Inventive Example 6 |
Inventive Steel 6 |
73 |
14.1 |
1.32 |
4.2 |
15 |
4.3 |
312 |
| Comparative Example 1 |
Inventive Steel 7 |
79 |
12.2 |
1.22 |
4.7 |
93 |
4.8 |
256 |
| Comparative Example 2 |
Comparative Steel 1 |
76 |
10.3 |
1.68 |
5.6 |
28 |
4.4 |
330 |
| Comparative Example 3 |
Comparative Steel 2 |
68 |
13.1 |
1.55 |
5.2 |
26 |
4.2 |
351 |
| Comparative Example 4 |
Comparative Steel 3 |
77 |
7.9 |
1.54 |
5.3 |
39 |
4.1 |
241 |
| Compa rative Example 5 |
Comparative Steel 4 |
81 |
10.1 |
1.39 |
4.5 |
18 |
4.6 |
378 |
| Comparative Example 6 |
Comparative Steel 5 |
82 |
10.9 |
1.41 |
4.9 |
13 |
4.7 |
312 |
| Inventive Examp |
Inventive Steel 8 |
73 |
11.3 |
1.43 |
5.1 |
46 |
4.1 |
333 |
| Comparative Example 7 |
Comparative Steel 6 |
72 |
9.8 |
1.52 |
5.3 |
53 |
5.0 |
316 |
[Table 3]
| Exemplary Embod iment No. |
Steel Grade |
Surface Prope rties |
Steel Sheet Thic knes s (mm) |
Microstructure Phase Fraction of Central Portion (area%) |
Phase Fraction of Ferrit e of Surface Portion (%) |
| Acicular Ferrite (AF) |
Granular Bainite (GB) |
Upper Bainite (Average Grain Size, µm) |
Residual Phase Fraction (Ferrite/Pearlite/One or more of MA |
| Inventive Example 1 |
Inventive Steel 1 |
None |
85 |
37.9 |
45.4 |
13.9(12. 2) |
2.8 |
45 |
| Inventive Example 2 |
Inventive Steel 2 |
None |
80 |
49.3 |
41.9 |
7.2(9.5) |
1.6 |
39 |
| Inventive Example 3 |
Inventive Steel 3 |
None |
75 |
36.5 |
45.1 |
16.8(9.6 ) |
1.6 |
53 |
| Inventive Example 4 |
Inventive Steel 4 |
None |
95 |
39.8 |
53.2 |
5.1(8.6) |
1.9 |
26 |
| Inventive Example 5 |
Inventive Steel 5 |
None |
90 |
42.6 |
45.6 |
9.2(11.3 ) |
2.6 |
51 |
| Inventive Example 6 |
Inventive Steel 6 |
None |
100 |
29.7 |
48.8 |
15.6(11. 6) |
5.9 |
66 |
| Comparative Example 1 |
Inventive Steel 7 |
None |
90 |
32.6 |
46.6 |
12.4(12. 2) |
8.4 |
0 |
| Comparative Example 2 |
Comparative Steel 1 |
None |
90 |
20.5 |
39.3 |
32(18.3) |
8.2 |
59 |
| Comparative Example 3 |
Comparative Steel 2 |
None |
85 |
51.2 |
31 |
11.3(9.7 ) |
6.5 |
52 |
| Compa rativ e Examp le 4 |
Comparative Steel 3 |
None |
80 |
16.8 |
32.1 |
43.8(17. 1) |
7.3 |
36 |
| Comparative Example 5 |
Comparative Steel 4 |
None |
90 |
13.2 |
30.6 |
49.8(19. 0) |
6.4 |
61 |
| Comparative Example 6 |
Comparative Steel 5 |
None |
75 |
37.5 |
41.6 |
13.7(13. 3) |
7.2 |
59 |
| Inventive Example 7 |
Inventive Steel 8 |
Occur |
90 |
53.9 |
38.7 |
6.1(9.6) |
1.3 |
31 |
| Comparative Example 7 |
Comparative Steel 6 |
None |
90 |
13.2 |
20.3 |
6.2(13.2 ) |
60.3 |
33 |
[Table 4]
| Exempl ary Embodi ment No. |
Steel Grade |
Yield Strengt h (Mpa) |
Kca (N/mm1.5, @-10°C) |
MA Fraction in HAZ (%) |
CTOD Value in HAZ (mm) |
| Inventive Example 1 |
Inventive Steel 1 |
512 |
7120 |
1.8 |
0.56 |
| Inventive Example 2 |
Inventive Steel 2 |
489 |
6988 |
1.9 |
0.49 |
| Inventive Example 3 |
Inventive Steel 3 |
504 |
7286 |
2.6 |
0.55 |
| Inventive Example 4 |
Inventive Steel 4 |
518 |
7057 |
2.3 |
0.43 |
| Inventive Example 5 |
Inventive Steel 5 |
485 |
7516 |
2.1 |
0.68 |
| Inventive Example 6 |
Inventive Steel 6 |
523 |
7030 |
3.2 |
0.56 |
| Comparative Example 1 |
Inventive Steel 7 |
501 |
5549 |
3.9 |
0.47 |
| Comparative Example 2 |
Comparative Steel 1 |
579 |
4256 |
6.8 |
0.12 |
| Comparative Example 3 |
Comparative Steel 2 |
496 |
6775 |
7.8 |
0.16 |
| Comparative Example 4 |
Comparative Steel 3 |
577 |
4356 |
3.1 |
0.22 |
| Comparative Example 5 |
Comparative Steel 4 |
562 |
4150 |
2.1 |
0.59 |
| Comparative Example 6 |
Comparative Steel 5 |
532 |
6554 |
7.2 |
0.12 |
| Inventive Example 7 |
Inventive Steel 8 |
516 |
7211 |
1.3 |
0.54 |
| Comparative Example 7 |
Comparative Steel 6 |
435 |
5026 |
2.1 |
0.62 |
[0130] As illustrated in Tables 1 to 4, in the case of Comparative Example 1, the difference
between the finish rolling temperature during finish rolling and the Ar
3 temperature, proposed in an exemplary embodiment, was controlled to be 60°C or higher.
Rolling was performed at a relatively high temperature, so that sufficient reduction
was not applied to the central portion. In addition, cooling was started at a relatively
high temperature, so that ferrite of 20% or greater was not generated in a surface
portion. Thus, it can be confirmed that the Kca value measured at a temperature of
-10°C may not exceed 6000 required in a steel material for shipbuilding of the related
art.
[0131] In the case of Comparative Example 2, a C content had a value higher than an upper
limit value of a C content of an exemplary embodiment. It can be confirmed that a
relatively large amount of coarse upper bainite was generated in the central portion
during rough rolling, so the Kca value measured at a temperature of -10° C was 6000
or less. It can be confirmed that a relatively large amount of martensite-austenite
(MA) was also generated in the HAZ, so the CTOD value was 0.25 mm or less .
[0132] In the case of Comparative Example 3, a Si content had a value higher than an upper
limit value of a Si content of an exemplary embodiment. It can be confirmed that a
relatively large amount of Si was added to generate a relatively large amount of an
MA structure in the HAZ, so the CTOD value is 0.25 mm or less.
[0133] In the case of Comparative Example 4, a Mn content has a value higher than an upper
limit value of a Mn content of an exemplary embodiment. It can be confirmed that due
to having a relatively high level of hardenability, a relatively large amount of upper
bainite is formed in the central portion, thereby allowing the Kca value to be 6000
or less at a temperature of -10°C. In addition, it can be confirmed that due to a
relatively high carbon equivalent (Ceq) value, a relatively small amount of MA phase
was present in the HAZ, but the CTOD value is 0.25 or less.
[0134] In the case of Comparative Example 5, an Ni content had a value higher than an upper
limit value of an Ni content of an exemplary embodiment. It can be confirmed that
due to a relatively high level of hardenability, a relatively large amount of upper
bainite was generated in the central portion, thereby allowing the Kca value to be
6000 or less at a temperature of -10°C. However, it can be confirmed that due to a
relatively high Ni content, the CTOD value was relatively high.
[0135] In the case of Comparative Example 6, an Nb and Ti content has a value higher than
an upper limit value of an Nb and Ti content of an exemplary embodiment. It can be
confirmed that an entirety of other conditions satisfies a condition suggested in
an exemplary embodiment, but due to a relatively high Nb and Ti content, a relatively
large amount of the MA structure is generated in the HAZ, thereby allowing the CTOD
value to be 0.25 mm or less.
[0136] Inventive Example 7 includes a component exceeding a ratio of Cu to Ni suggested
in an aspect of the present disclosure. It can be confirmed that despite having other,
significantly excellent physical properties, a star crack was generated on a surface,
thereby causing a default in surface quality.
[0137] In the case of Comparative Example 7, a C and Mn content has a value lower than a
lower limit value of a C and Mn content of an exemplary embodiment. It can be confirmed
that due to a relatively low level of hardenability, a fraction of AF+GB in the central
portion is significantly low, and a relatively large amount of polygonal ferrite and
a pearlite structure of 10% or greater are present, thereby allowing the Kca value
to be 6000 or less at a temperature of -10°C.
[0138] On the other hand, in the case of Inventive Examples 1 to 6, satisfying a composition
range and a manufacturing range of an exemplary embodiment, AF + GB of a microstructure
in the central portion was 70% or greater, a fraction of upper bainite in the central
portion was 20% or less, a circle-equivalent diameter of an effective grain of upper
bainite of the central portion having a high angle grain boundary of 15° or greater
was 15 µm or less, and a fraction of the MA phase in the HAZ was less than 5%.
[0139] It can be confirmed that, in Inventive Examples 1 to 6, yield strength satisfies
460 MPa or greater, the Kca value satisfies a value of 6000 or greater at a temperature
of -10°C, and the CTOD value also represents a relatively high value of 0.25 mm or
greater.
[0140] While exemplary embodiments have been shown and described above, it will be apparent
to those skilled in the art that modifications and variations could be made without
departing from the scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
1. A high-strength steel material having excellent brittle crack arrestability and welding
zone brittle crack initiation resistance, comprising:
by wt%, carbon (C): 0.05% to 0.09%, manganese (Mn): 1.5% to 2.2%, nickel (Ni): 0.3%
to 1.2%, niobium (Nb): 0.005% to 0.04%, titanium (Ti): 0.005% to 0.04%, copper (Cu):
0.1% to 0.8%, silicon (Si): 0.05% to 0.3%, aluminum (Al): 0.005% to 0.05%, phosphorus
(P): 100 ppm or less, sulfur (S): 40 ppm or less, iron (Fe) as a residual component,
and inevitable impurities,
wherein a microstructure of a central portion includes, by area%, a mixed phase of
acicular ferrite and granular bainite in an amount of 70% or greater, upper bainite
in an amount of 20% or less, and one or more selected from a group consisting of ferrite,
pearlite, and martensite-austenite (MA), as residual components; a circle-equivalent
diameter of an effective grain of the upper bainite having a high angle grain boundary
of 15° or greater measured using an electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) method
being 15 µm or less; a surface portion microstructure in a region at a depth of 2
mm or less, directly below a surface, includes, by area%, ferrite in an amount of
20% or greater and one or more of bainite and martensite as residual components; and
a heat affected zone (HAZ) formed during welding includes, by area%, martensite-austenite
(MA) in an amount of 5% or less.
2. The high-strength steel material having excellent brittle crack arrestability and
welding zone brittle crack initiation resistance of claim 1, comprising a thickness
of 50 mm or greater.
3. The high-strength steel material having excellent brittle crack arrestability and
welding zone brittle crack initiation resistance of claim 1, wherein, in terms of
a Cu and Ni content, a weight ratio of Cu to Ni is 0.8 or less.
4. The high-strength steel material having excellent brittle crack arrestability and
welding zone brittle crack initiation resistance of claim 1, wherein welding heat
input during welding is 0.5 kJ/mm to 10 kJ/mm.
5. The high-strength steel material having excellent brittle crack arrestability and
welding zone brittle crack initiation resistance of claim 4, wherein a welding method
during welding includes flux cored arc welding (FCAW) or submerged arc welding (SAW).
6. The high-strength steel material having excellent brittle crack arrestability and
welding zone brittle crack initiation resistance of claim 1, comprising yield strength
of 460 MPa or greater.
7. The high-strength steel material having excellent brittle crack arrestability and
welding zone brittle crack initiation resistance of any of claims 1 to 6, comprising
a Kca value measured at a temperature of -10°C of 6000 or greater.
8. The high-strength steel material having excellent brittle crack arrestability and
welding zone brittle crack initiation resistance of claim 1, comprising a Charpy fracture
transition temperature of -40°C or lower in a 1/2t position in a steel material thickness
direction, where t is a steel sheet thickness.
9. A method of manufacturing a high-strength steel material having excellent brittle
crack arrestability and welding zone brittle crack initiation resistance, comprising:
rough rolling a slab at a temperature of 900°C to 1100°C after reheating the slab
at 1000°C to 1100°C, including, by wt%, C: 0.05% to 0.09%, Mn: 1.5% to 2.2%, Ni: 0.3%
to 1.2%, Nb: 0.005% to 0.04%, titanium (Ti): 0.005% to 0.04%, copper (Cu): 0.1% to
0.8%, silicon (Si): 0.05% to 0.3%, aluminum (Al): 0.005% to 0.05%, phosphorus (P):
100 ppm or less, sulfur (S): 40 ppm or less, iron (Fe) as a residual component, and
inevitable impurities;
obtaining a steel sheet by finish rolling a bar obtained from the rough rolling a
slab, at a temperature in a range of Ar3 + 60°C to Ar3°C, based on a temperature of a central portion; and
cooling the steel sheet to 500°C or lower.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein a thickness of the steel sheet having been finish rolled
is 50 mm or greater.
11. The method of claim 9, wherein a reduction ratio per pass of three final passes during
the rough rolling a slab is 5% or greater, and a total cumulative reduction ratio
is 40% or greater.
12. The method of claim 9, wherein a strain rate of three final passes during the rough
rolling a slab is 2/sec or lower.
13. The method of claim 9, wherein a grain size of a central portion of a bar thickness
before finish rolling after the rough rolling a slab is 150 µm or less.
14. The method of claim 9, wherein a reduction ratio during the finish rolling is set
such that a ratio of a slab thickness (mm) to a steel sheet thickness (mm) after the
finish rolling is 3.5 or greater.
15. The method of claim 9, wherein a cumulative reduction ratio during the finish rolling
is maintained to be 40% or greater, and a reduction ratio per pass, not including
skin pass rolling, is maintained to be 4% or greater.
16. The method of claim 9, wherein the cooling the steel sheet is performed at a cooling
rate of the central portion of 2°C/s or higher.
17. The method of claim 9, wherein the cooling the steel sheet is performed at an average
cooling rate of 3°C/s to 300°C/s.