FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] This invention relates generally to the field of male fertility and more specifically
provides methods of identifying a reproductive approach for achieving mammalian fertilization.
BACKGROUND
[0002] The diagnosis of male infertility is based predominantly on the results of standard
semen analysis for concentration, total motility, progressive motility, volume, pH,
viscosity and/or morphology. However, measurements of sperm morphology, motility and
concentration do not assess fertilizing potential, including the complex changes that
sperm undergo during residence within the female reproductive tract. In addition to
the challenges associated with assessing fertilizing potential, cryopreservation is
often used to preserve sperm cells and preserve male fertility for extended periods
of time. Unfortunately, freezing and thawing can negatively affect sperm viability
and function. Cryopreservation is reported to alter capacitation and shift/limit the
fertilization window.
[0003] Newly developed fertility tests should determine the ability of sperm to fertilize,
as well as initiate and maintain pregnancy (
Oehninger et al., "Sperm functional tests," Fertil Steril. 102: 1528-33 (2014);
Wang et al., "Limitations of semen analysis as a test of male fertility and anticipated
needs from newer tests," Fertil Steril. 102: 1502-07 (2014)). While freshly ejaculated spermatozoa appear morphologically mature and motile,
they are fertilization incompetent. They must first undergo a maturational process
known as "capacitation," which renders them capable of fertilization (
Austin, "The capacitation of the mammalian sperm," Nature, 170: 326 (1952);
Chang, "Fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa deposited into the fallopian tubes," Nature,
168: 697-8 (1951)). In most species, capacitation is dependent upon the removal of sterols from the
sperm plasma membrane (sterol efflux) and the influx of bicarbonate and calcium ions
(
Baldi et al., "Intracellular calcium accumulation and responsiveness to progesterone
in capacitating human spermatozoa," J Androl. 12: 323-30 (1991);
Bedu-Addo et al., "Bicarbonate and bovine serum albumin reversibly 'switch' capacitation-induced
events in human spermatozoa," Mol Hum Reprod., 11: 683-91 (2005);
Cohen et al., "Lipid modulation of calcium flux through Cav2.3 regulates acrosome
exocytosis and fertilization," Dev Cell. 28: 310-21 (2014);
Gadella et al., "Bicarbonate and its role in mammalian sperm function," Anim. Reprod.
Sci. 82: 307-19 (2004)). The efflux of sterols that occurs during sperm capacitation changes membrane fluidity
patterns and allows for the redistribution of specific membrane components (Cohen
et al. 2014;
Cross, "Role of cholesterol in sperm capacitation," Biol Reprod. 59: 7-11 (1998);
Selvaraj et al., "Mechanisms underlying the micron-scale segregation of sterols and
GM1 in live mammalian sperm," J Cell Physiol. 218: 522-36 (2007);
Selvaraj et al, "GM1 dynamics as a marker for membrane changes associated with the
process of capacitation in murine and bovine spermatozoa," J Androl. 28: 588-99 (2009))
[0004] Currently, there are few if any sensitive and simple capacitation biomarkers suitable
for clinical application. For example, the phosphorylation of tyrosine residues has
been well detailed in association with capacitation (
Battistone et al., "Functional human sperm capacitation requires both bicarbonate-dependent
PKA activation and down-regulation of Ser/Thr phosphatases by Src family kinases,"
Mol, Human Reprod. 19: 570-80 (2013);
Osheroff et al., "Regulation of human sperm capacitation by a cholesterol efflux-stimulated
signal transduction pathway leading to protein kinase A-mediated up-regulation of
protein tyrosine phosphorylation," Mol, Human Reprod. 5: 1017-26 (1999);
Visconti et al.. "Capacitation of mouse spermatozoa. I. Correlation between the capacitation
state and protein tyrosine phosphorylation," Development, 121: 1129-37 (1995)). However, evaluating these events can take multiple days and provide only a semi-quantitative
assessment, making it inappropriate for the clinical evaluation of male fertility.
[0005] It has been known for some time that sperm must undergo sterol efflux to become fertilization
competent (Osheroff et al. 1999;
Travis et al., "The role of cholesterol efflux in regulating the fertilization potential
of mammalian spermatozoa," The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 110: 731-36 (2002)). In addition, cholesterol and other lipids, such as the ganglioside G
M1, are organized into microdomains within the sperm's plasma membrane (
Asano et al., "Biochemical characterization of membrane fractions in murine sperm:
Identification of three distinct sub-types of membrane rafts," J Cell Physiol., 218:
537-48 (2009);
Asano et al., "Characterization of the proteomes associating with three distinct membrane
raft sub-types in murine sperm," Proteomics, 10: 3494-505 (2010);
Travis et al., "Expression and localization of caveolin-1, and the presence of membrane
rafts, in mouse and Guinea pig spermatozoa," Dev Biol., 240: 599-610 (2001); Selvaraj et al. 2009). These membrane rafts consolidate signaling pathways, making
them sensible candidates for mediating sperm function. Interestingly, predictable
changes in G
M1 localization patterns have been measured both in mouse and bull sperm that have been
stimulated for capacitation (Selvaraj et al. 2007). What's more, G
M1 regulates the activity of an R-type calcium channel, triggering a transient calcium
flux that is essential for acrosome exocytosis and thus successful fertilization (Cohen
et al. 2014).
Paniza et al., "A bioassay to measure fertilization competence of human spermatozoa,"
Poster, 2014, noted that sperm capacitation was reflected in the pattern of GM1 localization.
These findings substantiate the use of G
M1 localization patterns to assess sperm function and accordingly male fertility.
[0006] Various G
M1 localization patterns have been identified and associated with capacitation or non-capacitation.
In particular, apical acrosome (AA) G
M1 localization patterns and acrosomal plasma membrane (APM) G
M1 localization patterns have been associated with capacitation in bovine and human
sperm. Sperm capacitation can be quantitatively expressed as a Cap-Score
™ value, generated via the Cap-Score
™ Sperm Function Test ("Cap-Score
™ Test" or "Cap-Score"), is defined as ([number of apical acrosome (AA) G
M1 localization patterns + number of acrosomal plasma membrane (APM) G
M1 localization patterns]/total number of G
M1 labeled localization patterns) where the number of each localization pattern is measured
and then ultimately converted to a percentage score. In addition to APM G
M1 localization patterns and AA G
M1 localization patterns, the other labeled localization patterns included Lined-Cell
G
M1 localization patterns, intermediate (INTER) G
M1 localization patterns, post acrosomal plasma membrane (PAPM) G
M1 localization patterns, apical acrosome/post acrosome (AA/PA) G
M1 localization patterns, equatorial segment (ES) G
M1 localization patterns, and diffuse (DIFF) G
M1 localization patterns. (
Travis et al., "Impacts of common semen handling methods on sperm function," The Journal
of Urology, 195 (4), e909 (2016)).
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
[0007] The invention provides a method for identifying an approach for achieving mammalian
fertilization comprising the steps of: obtaining by imaging one or more t
0-fluorescence images from a first sample of
in vitro capacitated sperm cells treated with a fluorescence label, wherein the sperm cells
are displaying one or more G
M1 localization patterns, wherein said t
0-fluorescence images are obtained at post
in vitro capacitation times selected from: 0.1 hour to 5 hours; 0.1 hour to 8 hours; 0.1 to
12 hours; or 0.1 hour to 18 hours; measuring a number of apical acrosome (AA) G
M1 localization patterns, a number of acrosomal plasma membrane (APM) G
M1 localization patterns and a total number of G
M1 localization patterns displayed in one or more t
0-fluorescence images to determine a percentage of t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns]; comparing the percentage of measured t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] to a reference percentage of [AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] to determine a fertility status; and identifying a reproductive
approach for achieving mammalian fertilization based on the determined fertility status,
wherein a reference percentage of [AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] corresponding to: greater than 35 % indicates a high fertility
status; one standard deviation below 35 % indicates a medium fertility status; and
two or more standard deviations below 35 % indicates a low fertility status.
[0008] In an embodiment of the method of the invention, if the male has at least normal
sperm concentration, then the reproductive approach for high fertility status is selected
from the group consisting of: intercourse, intracervical insemination (ICI), pre-capacitating
sperm prior to intracervical insemination, intrauterine insemination (IUI), or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to intrauterine insemination,; the reproductive approach for medium fertility
status is selected from the group consisting of: intracervical insemination (ICI),
pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination; intrauterine insemination
(IUI); pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; or
in vitro fertilization (IVF) or pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization; or the reproductive approach for low fertility status is selected
from group consisting of:
in vitro fertilization (IVF), pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), pre-capacitating sperm prior
to intracytoplasmic sperm injection, gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT), pre-capacitating
sperm prior to gamete intrafallopian transfer, subzonal insemination (SUZI), or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to subzonal insemination.
[0009] In a further embodiment of the method of the invention, if the male has a less than
normal sperm concentration, then the reproductive approach for high fertility status
is selected from group consisting of: intracervical insemination (ICI), pre-capacitating
sperm prior to intracervical insemination, intrauterine insemination (IUI) or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; the reproductive approach for medium fertility
status is selected from group consisting of: intracervical insemination (ICI), pre-capacitating
sperm prior to intracervical insemination, intrauterine insemination (IUI) or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; in vitro fertilization (IVF), pre-capacitating
sperm prior to in vitro fertilization; or the reproductive approach for low fertility
status is selected from group consisting of: in vitro fertilization (IVF), pre-capacitating
sperm prior to in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), pre-capacitating
sperm prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection, gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT),
pre-capacitating sperm prior to gamete intrafallopian transfer, subzonal insemination
(SUZI) or pre-capacitating sperm prior to subzonal insemination.
[0010] In a further embodiment, if the reproductive approach corresponds to pre-capacitating
sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), gamete intrafallopian transfer
(GIFT), or subzonal insemination (SUZI), then the time period for pre-capacitation
prior to insemination corresponds to incubating sperm in media containing one or more
stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24 hours before insemination; 18 hours before
insemination; 12 hours before insemination; 6 hours before insemination; 4 hours before
insemination; 3 hours before insemination; or 1 hour before insemination.
[0011] In an instance of each of the foregoing embodiments, the method may further comprise
the steps of: obtaining by imaging one or more t
1-fluorescence images from a second sample of
in vitro capacitated sperm cells obtained from the same male as the first sample and treated
with a fluorescence label displaying one or more G
M1 localization patterns, wherein said t
1-fluorescence images are obtained at post capacitation time t
1, wherein t
1 is greater than to or greater than 18 hours; measuring a number of apical acrosome
(AA) G
M1 localization patterns, a number of acrosomal plasma membrane (APM) G
M1 localization patterns and a total number of G
M1 localization patterns displayed in one or more t
1-fluorescence images to determine a percentage of t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns]; comparing the percentage of t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] to the percentage of t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] to determine an
in vivo capacitation time, wherein a difference in the percentage of t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] and the percentage of t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] of greater than one standard deviation from a standard of
35 % indicates an
in vivo capacitation time greater than 12 hours; and a difference of less than one standard
deviation from the standard of 35 % indicates an
in vivo capacitation time of less than 12 hours; further if the
in vivo capacitation time is determined to be greater than 12 hours, then a t
1-fertility status is determined based on a comparison of the percentage of measured
t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] to the reference percentage of [AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns]; or, if the
in vivo capacitation time is determined to be less than 12 hours, then a t
1-fertility status is determined based on a comparison of the reference percentage
of [AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] to the percentage of measured t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] or the percentage of measured t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns]; and based on the male's t
1-fertility status and
in vivo capacitation time, identifying a time period for insemination and a reproductive
approach to use in order to achieve fertilization.
[0012] In an embodiment of the methods of the invention, the identifying step may also be
based on one or more of the following: patient demographics, reproductive status of
female partner, sperm concentration, total motility, progressive motility, semen volume,
semen pH, semen viscosity and/or sperm morphology and combinations thereof.
[0013] In an embodiment of the methods of the invention, the more than one G
M1 localization patterns may include AA G
M1 localization pattern, APM G
M1 localization pattern, Lined-Cell G
M1 localization pattern, INTER G
M1 localization pattern, PAPM G
M1 localization pattern, AA/PA G
M1 localization pattern, ES G
M1 localization pattern, and DIFF G
M1 localization pattern.
[0014] In an embodiment of the methods of the invention, the sperm cells may have been treated
in vitro with capacitation conditions for a capacitation time period of: at least one hour;
at least 3 hours; at least 12 hours; at least 18 hours; at least 24 hours; for a capacitation
time period ranging between 0.5 hours to 3 hours; 3 hours to 12 hours; 6 hours to
12 hours; 3 hours to 24 hours; 12 hours to 24 hours; or 18 hours to 24 hours.
[0015] In an embodiment of the methods of the invention, the
in vitro capacitated sperm cells may have been treated with a fixative for a fixative time
period of: at least 0.5 hour; at least 3 hours; at least 12 hours; at least 18 hours;
at least 24 hours; at least 30 hours; at least 36 hours; or at least 48 hours, for
a fixation time period ranging between 0.5 hours to 3 hours; 3 hours to 12 hours;
6 hours to 12 hours; 3 hours to 18 hours; 6-18 hours; 6-24 hours; 12 hours to 24 hours;
18 hours to 24 hours; 18-30 hours; 18-36 hours; 24-30 hours; 24-26 hours; 18-48 hours;
24-48 hours; or 36-48 hours.
[0016] In an embodiment of the methods of the invention, the sperm cells may have been treated
with cryopreservation procedures and stored prior to being treated
in vitro with capacitation conditions.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0017] The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of the invention,
will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings.
FIG. 1A illustrates a plot of the average Cap-Score is shown on the x-axis and the
corresponding Standard Deviation is shown on the y-axis. The average SD for all images
was found to be three (3) and is shown by the solid horizontal line. The dotted lines
show the linear dependence of the SD (y = 0.06x + 0.02; r= 0.69; p=0.00).
FIG. 1B illustrates a plot of the average Cap-Score shown on the x-axis and Coefficient
of Variation is shown on the y-axes. The CoV for all images was found to be thirteen
(13) and is shown by the solid horizontal line. The dotted lines show the linear dependence
of the CoV (y = -0.32x + 0.22; r=-0.84; p=0.00) to the Cap-Score average.
FIG. 2A illustrates the reproducibility of mean Cap-Scores between operators. Ten
stitched images, containing up to 5,000 sperm each, were obtained for "less than normal"
(more than one (1) SD below the mean Cap-Score result for a population of normal men.
Two different readers determined Cap-Scores by randomly resampling each image 20 times
and counting 150 cells each time (reader 1 open bars, reader 2 grey bars).
FIG. 2B illustrates the reproducibility of mean Cap-Scores between operators. Ten
stitched images, containing up to 5,000 sperm each, were obtained for "presumed normal"
classified as above one (1) SD below the mean Cap-Score result for a population of
normal men. Two different readers determined Cap-Scores by randomly resampling each
image 20 times and counting 150 cells each time (reader 1 open bars, reader 2 grey
bars).
FIG. 3A illustrates the repeatability of Cap-Score variances between operators. Ten
stitched images, containing up to 5,000 sperm each, were obtained for "less than normal"
(more than one (1) SD below the mean Cap-Score result for a population of normal men.
Two different readers determined Cap-Scores by randomly resampling each image 20 times
and counting 150 cells each time (reader 1 open bars, reader 2 grey bars).
FIG. 3B illustrates the repeatability of Cap-Score variances between operators. Ten
stitched images, containing up to 5,000 sperm each, were obtained for "presumed normal"
classified as above one (1) SD below the mean Cap-Score result for a population of
normal men. Two different readers determined Cap-Scores by randomly resampling each
image 20 times and counting 150 cells each time (reader 1 open bars, reader 2 grey
bars).
FIG. 4 illustrates various localization patterns of GM1 in normal human sperm and sperm from infertile males which form under in vitro capacitating
conditions.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0018] As described herein, the time period for sperm capacitation among and within different
males varies. It has been discovered that determining the time period for a male's
sperm capacitation can be used to identify a time period for insemination and a reproductive
approach to use during the insemination time period in order to achieve fertilization.
[0019] G
M1 refers to monosialotetrahexosylganglioside and is a member of the ganglio series
of gangliosides.
[0020] For human sperm, eight different G
M1 localization patterns have been reported when the sperm was under in vitro capacitating
conditions as illustrated in FIG. 4. To visualize the location patterns, the capacitated
sperm were treated with labeling molecule for G
M1, such as cholera toxin b, which has a florescence detectable label on it.
[0021] INTER is characterized by a sperm cell where the vast majority of the fluorescence
signal is in a band around the equatorial segment, with some signal in the plasma
membrane overlying the acrosome. There is usually a gradient of the fluorescence signal,
with the most at the equatorial segment and then progressively less toward the tip.
There is often an increase in fluorescence signal intensity on the edges of the sperm
head in the band across the equatorial segment.
[0022] Apical Acrosome "AA" is characterized by a sperm cell where the fluorescence signal
is concentrated toward the apical tip, increased in brightness and reduced in area
with signal.
[0023] Acrosomal Plasma Membrane "APM" is characterized by a sperm cell exhibiting a distributed
fluorescence signal in the plasma membrane overlying the acrosome. APM signal is seen
either from the bright equatorial INTER band moving apically toward the tip, or it
can start further up toward the tip and be found in a smaller region, as it is a continuum
with the AA.
[0024] Post-Acrosomal Plasma Membrane "PAPM' is characterized by a sperm cell where the
fluorescence signal is exclusively in the post-acrosomal plasma membrane.
[0025] Apical Acrosome Post-Acrosome "AA/PA" is characterized by a sperm cell where the
fluorescence signal is located both in the plasma membrane overlying the acrosome
and post-acrosomal plasma membrane. The equatorial segment does not exhibit a fluorescence
signal.
[0026] Equatorial Segment "ES" is characterized by a sperm cell having a bright fluorescence
signal located solely in the equatorial segment. It may be accompanied by thickening
of the sperm head across the equatorial region.
[0027] Diffuse "DIFF" is characterized by a sperm cell having a diffuse fluorescence signal
located over the whole sperm head.
[0028] Lined-Cell is characterized by a sperm cell having a diffuse fluorescence signal
ontop of the post-acrosomal region and at the plasma membrane overlying the acrosome
as well as the bottom of the equatorial segment (i.e., the post acrosome/equatorial
band). A fluorescence signal is missing around the equatorial segment.
[0029] The various G
M1 localization patterns are identified by treating sperm cells with labeling molecule
for G
M1, such as cholera toxin b, which has a florescence detectable label on it. The labeled
sperm cells are then visualized using a fluorescence microscope as known to those
of skill in the art.
[0031] For the purposes of this application "t
0" corresponds to the number of hours after treating sperm cells with
in vitro capacitation conditions and is selected from 0.1 hour to 5 hours; 0.1 hour to 8 hours;
0.1 to 12 hours; or 0.1 hour 18 hours.
[0032] For the purposes of this application "t
1" corresponds to the number of hours after treating sperm cells with
in vitro capacitation conditions and is greater than 18 hours or greater than t
0.
[0033] For the purposes of this application images is understood to mean (i) digital images;
(ii) G
M1 patterns directly viewed by an operator through an eye piece; or (iii) G
M1 patterns discerned by flow cytometry.
[0034] For the purposes of this application "insemination" is understood to have a meaning
dependent upon the reproductive approach. For example, for "intercourse," insemination
is understood to mean introduction of sperm into a female's reproductive tract. For
example, for "intracervical insemination (ICI)," insemination is understood to mean
introduction of sperm into a female's cervix. For "intrauterine insemination (IUI),"
insemination is understood to mean when sperm is introduced into a female's uterus.
For
"in vitro fertilization (IVF)," insemination is understood to mean when sperm are introduced
into a droplet of medium containing egg cells (oocytes) to allow co-incubation of
sperm and egg cell(s). For "pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization," insemination is understood to mean when sperm are introduced into
a droplet of medium containing egg cells (oocytes) to allow co-incubation of sperm
and egg cell(s). For "intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)," insemination is understood
to mean injection of sperm or pre-capacitated sperm into an egg cell. For "gamete
intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT)," insemination is understood to mean injection of
sperm or pre-capacitated sperm and egg cell(s) into the female's Fallopian tubes.
For "subzonal insemination (SUZI)," insemination is understood to mean injection of
a single sperm cell or a single pre-capacitated sperm cell just beneath the zona pellucida.
For purposes of this application, the term "cryopreservation" refers to the entire
process of freezing, storing, and thawing the cells for use
[0035] As used herein below, the male is a mammal. In an embodiment, the male is a human.
In another embodiment, the male is a non-human mammal. In one such embodiment, the
male is a companion animal. In another embodiment, the male is an agricultural animal.
In one such embodiment, the male is a canine, feline, equine, bovine, sheep, goat,
pig, camellid, or buffalo.
[0036] In an embodiment, the disclosure provides for a method to identify an approach for
achieving mammalian fertilization. A first sample, of
in vitro capacitated sperm cells, is treated with a fluorescence label. One or more to-fluorescence
images are obtained by imaging where the images display one or more G
M1 localization patterns associated with t
0-fluorescence labeled
in vitro capacitated sperm cells. The t
0-fluorescence images are obtained at post
in vitro capacitation times selected from: 0.1 hour to 5 hours; 0.1 hour to 8 hours; 0.1 to
12 hours; or 0.1 hour 18 hours (t
0). A number of apical acrosome (AA) G
M1 localization patterns, a number of acrosomal plasma membrane (APM) G
M1 localization patterns and a total number of G
M1 localization patterns are measured for the t
0-fluorescence labeled
in vitro capacitated sperm cells displayed in one or more t
0-fluorescence images to determine a percentage of t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns]. A fertility status associated with a percentage of measured
t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] is determined wherein a reference percentage of [AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] corresponding to: greater than 35 % indicates a high fertility
status; one standard deviation below 35 % indicates a medium fertility status; and
two or more standard deviations below 35 % indicates a low fertility status. The percentage
of measured t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns and APM G
M1 localization patterns] is compared to the reference percentage of [AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns]. A reproductive approach is identified based on fertility
status in order to achieve fertilization.
[0037] In an instance of the foregoing embodiment, wherein the male has at least normal
sperm concentration: (i) the reproductive approach for high fertility status is selected
from the group consisting of: intercourse, intracervical insemination (ICI), pre-capacitating
sperm prior to intracervical insemination, intrauterine insemination (IUI), or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; (ii) the reproductive approach for medium
fertility status is selected from the group consisting of: intracervical insemination
(ICI), pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination; intrauterine insemination
(IUI); pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; or
in vitro fertilization (IVF) or pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization; or (iii) the reproductive approach for low fertility status is selected
from group consisting of:
in vitro fertilization (IVF), pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), pre-capacitating sperm prior
to intracytoplasmic sperm injection, gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT), pre-capacitating
sperm prior to gamete intrafallopian transfer, subzonal insemination (SUZI), or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to subzonal insemination.
[0038] In another instance of the foregoing embodiment, wherein the male has a less than
normal sperm concentration: (i) the reproductive approach for high fertility status
is selected from group consisting of: intracervical insemination (ICI), pre-capacitating
sperm prior to intracervical insemination, intrauterine insemination (IUI) or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; (ii) the reproductive approach for medium
fertility status is selected from group consisting of: intracervical insemination
(ICI), pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination, intrauterine insemination
(IUI) or pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination;
in vitro fertilization (IVF), pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, or (iii) the reproductive approach for low fertility status is selected
from group consisting of:
in vitro fertilization (IVF), pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), pre-capacitating sperm prior
to intracytoplasmic sperm injection, gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT), pre-capacitating
sperm prior to gamete intrafallopian transfer, subzonal insemination (SUZI) or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to subzonal insemination.
[0039] For the foregoing embodiments, where the sperm is pre-capacitated and the reproductive
approach corresponds to pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, the time period for pre-capacitation corresponds to incubating sperm
in media containing one or more stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24 hours
before insemination; 18 hours before insemination; 12 hours before insemination; 6
hours before insemination; 4 hours before insemination; 3 hours before insemination;
or 1 hour before insemination.
[0040] For embodiments where the sperm is pre-capacitated and the reproductive approach
corresponds to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), the time period for pre-capacitation
prior to insemination corresponds to incubating sperm in media containing one or more
stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24 hours before insemination; 18 hours before
insemination; 12 hours before insemination; 6 hours before insemination; 4 hours before
insemination; 3 hours before insemination; or 1 hour before insemination.
[0041] For embodiments where the sperm is pre-capacitated and the reproductive approach
corresponds to gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT), the time period for pre-capacitation
prior to insemination corresponds to incubating sperm in media containing one or more
stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24 hours before insemination; 18 hours before
insemination; 12 hours before insemination; 6 hours before insemination; 4 hours before
insemination; 3 hours before insemination; or 1 hour before insemination.
[0042] For embodiments where the sperm is pre-capacitated and the reproductive approach
corresponds to subzonal insemination (SUZI), the time period for pre-capacitation
prior to insemination corresponds to incubating sperm in media containing one or more
stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24 hours before insemination; 18 hours before
insemination; 12 hours before insemination; 6 hours before insemination; 4 hours before
insemination; 3 hours before insemination; or 1 hour before insemination.
[0043] In an instance of each of the foregoing embodiments, a second sample of
in vitro capacitated sperm cells is treated with a fluorescence label, wherein the second
sample of
in vitro capacitated sperm cells and first sample of
in vitro capacitated sperm cells are associated with the same male. One or more t
1-fluorescence images displaying one or more G
M1 localization patterns associated with t
1-fluorescence labeled
in vitro capacitated sperm cells are obtained by imaging, wherein t
1-fluorescence images are obtained at post capacitation time t
1, wherein t
1 is selected from greater than to or greater than 18 hours. A number of apical acrosome
(AA) G
M1 localization patterns, a number of acrosomal plasma membrane (APM) G
M1 localization patterns and a total number of G
M1 localization patterns for the t
1-fluorescence labeled
in vitro capacitated sperm cells displayed in one or more t
1-fluorescence images are measured to determine a percentage of t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns]. The percentage of t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] to the percentage of t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] is compared to determine an
in vivo capacitation time selected from a late
in vivo capacitation time greater than 12 hours or a standard
in vivo capacitation time of less than 12 hours. A difference in percentage of t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] and the percentage of t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] corresponding to: greater than one standard deviation from
a standard of 35 % indicates a late
in vivo capacitation time greater than 12 hours; or less than one standard deviation from
the standard of 35 % indicates a standard
in vivo capacitation time less than 12 hours. Further when a difference in percentage of
t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] and the percentage of t
1[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] corresponding to: greater than one standard deviation from
a standard of 35 % then a t
1-fertility status is determined based on a comparison of the percentage of measured
t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] to the reference percentage of [AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns]; or less than one standard deviation from a standard of 35
% then a t
1-fertility status is determined based on a comparison of the reference percentage
of [AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] to the percentage of measured t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] or the percentage of measured t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns]. Based on the male's t
1-fertility status and
in vivo capacitation time, a time period for insemination and a reproductive approach to
use are identified in order to achieve fertilization.
[0044] In an instance of the foregoing embodiment, wherein the male has at least normal
sperm concentration and late
in vivo capacitation time: (i) the reproductive approach for high t
1-fertility status is selected from the group consisting of: modifying the timing of
intercourse to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of intracervical insemination (ICI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of intrauterine insemination (IUI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination, or
pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; (ii) the reproductive approach
for medium t
1-fertility status is selected from group consisting of: modifying the timing of intracervical
insemination (ICI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of intrauterine insemination (IUI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of
in vitro fertilization (IVF) to late
in vivo capacitation time; pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination; intrauterine
insemination (IUI); pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; or
pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, or (iii) the reproductive approach for low t
1-fertility status is selected from group consisting of: modifying the timing of
in vitro fertilization (IVF) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)
to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT)
to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of subzonal insemination (SUZI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection,
pre-capacitating sperm prior to gamete intra-fallopian transfer, or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to subzonal insemination.
[0045] In an instance of the foregoing embodiment, wherein the male has a less than normal
sperm concentration and late
in vivo capacitation time: (i) the reproductive approach for t
1-high fertility status is selected from the group consisting of: modifying the timing
of intercourse to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of intracervical insemination (ICI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of intrauterine insemination (IUI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination, or
pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; (ii) the reproductive approach
for t
1-medium fertility status is selected from group consisting of: modifying the timing
of intracervical insemination (ICI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of intrauterine insemination (IUI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of
in vitro fertilization (IVF) to late
in vivo capacitation time; pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination, pre-capacitating
sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; or pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization; or (iii) the reproductive approach for t
1-low fertility status is selected from group consisting of: modifying the timing of
in vitro fertilization (IVF) to late
in vivo capacitation time; intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), modifying the timing
of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT)
to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of subzonal insemination (SUZI) to late
in vivo capacitation time, pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection,
pre-capacitating sperm prior to gamete intra-fallopian transfer, or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to subzonal insemination.
[0046] In another instance of the foregoing embodiment, wherein the male has at least normal
sperm concentration and standard
in vivo capacitation time: (i) the reproductive approach for high t
1-fertility status is selected from the group consisting of: intercourse, intracervical
insemination (ICI), pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination, intrauterine
insemination (IUI), or pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination;
(ii) the reproductive approach for medium t
1-fertility status is selected from the group consisting of: intracervical insemination
(ICI), pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination; intrauterine insemination
(IUI); pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; or
in vitro fertilization (IVF) or pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization; or (iii) the reproductive approach for low t
1-fertility status is selected from group consisting of:
in vitro fertilization (IVF), pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), pre-capacitating sperm prior
to intracytoplasmic sperm injection, gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT), pre-capacitating
sperm prior to gamete intra-fallopian transfer, subzonal insemination (SUZI), or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to subzonal insemination.
[0047] In another instance of the foregoing embodiment, wherein the male has a less than
normal sperm concentration and standard
in vivo capacitation time: (i) the reproductive approach for high t
1-fertility status is selected from group consisting of: intracervical insemination
(ICI), pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination, intrauterine insemination
(IUI) or pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; (ii) the reproductive
approach for medium t
1-fertility status is selected from group consisting of: intracervical insemination
(ICI), pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination, intrauterine insemination
(IUI) or pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination;
in vitro fertilization (IVF), pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, or (iii) the reproductive approach for low ti-fertility status is
selected from group consisting of:
in vitro fertilization (IVF), pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), pre-capacitating sperm prior
to intracytoplasmic sperm injection, gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT), pre-capacitating
sperm prior to gamete intra-fallopian transfer, subzonal insemination (SUZI) or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to subzonal insemination.
[0048] For the foregoing embodiments, where the sperm is pre-capacitated and the reproductive
approach corresponds to pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, the time period for pre-capacitation corresponds to incubating sperm
in media containing one or more stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24 hours
before insemination; 18 hours before insemination; 12 hours before insemination; 6
hours before insemination; 4 hours before insemination; 3 hours before insemination;
or 1 hour before insemination.
[0049] For embodiments where the sperm is pre-capacitated and the reproductive approach
corresponds to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), the time period for pre-capacitation
prior to insemination corresponds to incubating sperm in media containing one or more
stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24 hours before insemination; 18 hours before
insemination; 12 hours before insemination; 6 hours before insemination; 4 hours before
insemination; 3 hours before insemination; or 1 hour before insemination.
[0050] For embodiments where the sperm is pre-capacitated and the reproductive approach
corresponds to gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT), the time period for pre-capacitation
prior to insemination corresponds to incubating sperm in media containing one or more
stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24 hours before insemination; 18 hours before
insemination; 12 hours before insemination; 6 hours before insemination; 4 hours before
insemination; 3 hours before insemination; or 1 hour before insemination.
[0051] For embodiments where the sperm is pre-capacitated and the reproductive approach
corresponds to subzonal insemination (SUZI), the time period for pre-capacitation
prior to insemination corresponds to incubating sperm in media containing one or more
stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24 hours before insemination; 18 hours before
insemination; 12 hours before insemination; 6 hours before insemination; 4 hours before
insemination; 3 hours before insemination; or 1 hour before insemination.
[0052] In an instance of each of the foregoing embodiments, the identifying step is also
based on one or more of the following: patient demographics, reproductive status of
female partner, sperm concentration, total motility, progressive motility, semen volume,
semen pH, semen viscosity and/or sperm morphology and combinations thereof.
[0053] In an instance of each of the foregoing embodiments, the more than one G
M1 localization patterns include AA G
M1 localization pattern, APM G
M1 localization pattern, Lined-Cell G
M1 localization pattern, INTER G
M1 localization pattern, PAPM G
M1 localization pattern, AA/PA G
M1 localization pattern, ES G
M1 localization pattern, and DIFF G
M1 localization pattern.
[0054] In an instance of each of the foregoing embodiments, sperm cells are treated
in vitro with capacitation conditions for a capacitation time period of: at least one hour;
at least 3 hours; at least 12 hours; at least 18 hours; at least 24 hours; for a capacitation
time period ranging between 0.5 hours to 3 hours; 3 hours to 12 hours; 6 hours to
12 hours; 3 hours to 24 hours; 12 hours to 24 hours; or 18 hours to 24 hours.
[0055] In an instance of each of the foregoing embodiments, the
in vitro capacitated sperm cells are treated with a fixative for a fixative time period of:
at least 0.5 hour; at least 3 hours; at least 12 hours; at least 18 hours; at least
24 hours; at least 30 hours; at least 36 hours; or at least 48 hours, for a fixation
time period ranging between 0.5 hours to 3 hours; 3 hours to 12 hours; 6 hours to
12 hours; 3 hours to 18 hours; 6-18 hours; 6-24 hours; 12 hours to 24 hours; 18 hours
to 24 hours; 18-30 hours; 18-36 hours; 24-30 hours; 24-26 hours; 18-48 hours; 24-48
hours; or 36-48 hours.
[0056] In an instance of each of the foregoing embodiments, the sperm cells were treated
to cryopreservation procedures and stored prior to being treated
in vitro with capacitation conditions.
[0057] The disclosure describes a further method to identify an approach for achieving mammalian
fertilization. A sample of
t0-in vitro capacitated sperm cells is treated with a fluorescence label and a sample of
t1-in vitro capacitated sperm cells is treated with a fluorescence label. One or more t
0-fluorescence images is obtained by imaging, the to-fluorescence images displaying
one or more G
M1 localization patterns associated with t
0-fluorescence labeled
in vitro capacitated sperm cells. And one or more t
1-fluorescence images is obtained, the t
1-fluorescence displaying one or more G
M1 localization patterns associated with t
1-fluorescence labeled
in vitro capacitated sperm cells. The t
0-fluorescence images are obtained at post
in vitro capacitation times selected from: 0.1 hour to 5 hours; 0.1 hour to 8 hours; 0.1 to
12 hours; or 0.1 hour 18 hours (t
0); and the t
1-fluorescence images being obtained at post capacitation time t
1 wherein t
1 is greater than t
0. A number of apical acrosome (AA) G
M1 localization patterns, a number of acrosomal plasma membrane (APM) G
M1 localization patterns and a total number of G
M1 localization patterns are measured for the t
0-fluorescence labeled
in vitro capacitated sperm cells displayed in the t
0-fluorescence images to determine a percentage of t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns]. And a number of apical acrosome (AA) G
M1 localization patterns, a number of acrosomal plasma membrane (APM) G
M1 localization patterns and a total number of G
M1 localization patterns are measured for the t
1-fluorescence labeled
in vitro capacitated sperm cells displayed in the t
1-fluorescence images to determine a percentage of t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns]. The percentage of t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] is compared to the percentage of t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] to determine an
in vivo capacitation time selected from a late
in vivo capacitation time greater than 12 hours or a standard
in vivo capacitation time of 12 hours or less. A difference in percentage of t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] and the percentage of t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] corresponding to: greater than one standard deviation from
a standard of 35 % indicates a late
in vivo capacitation time greater than 12 hours; or less than one standard deviation from
a standard of 35 % indicates a standard
in vivo capacitation time less than 12 hours. A reference percentage of [AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] corresponding to: greater than 35 % indicates a high fertility
status; one standard deviation below 35 % indicates a medium fertility status; and
two or more standard deviations below 35 % indicates a low fertility status. Further
when a difference in percentage of t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] and the percentage of t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] corresponding to: greater than one standard deviation from
a standard of 35 %, then a t
1-fertility status is determined based on a comparison of the percentage of measured
t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] to the reference percentage of [AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns]; or less than one standard deviation from a standard of 35
% then a t
1-fertility status is determined based on a comparison of the reference percentage
of [AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] to the percentage of measured t
1-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns] or the percentage of measured t
0-[AA G
M1 localization patterns plus APM G
M1 localization patterns]. Based on the male's t
1-fertility status and
in vivo capacitation time, a time period for insemination and a reproductive approach are
identified to use in order to achieve fertilization.
[0058] In the preceding aspect of the disclosure the male has at least normal sperm concentration
and late
in vivo capacitation time: (i) the reproductive approach for high t
1-fertility status is selected from the group consisting of: modifying the timing of
intercourse to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of intracervical insemination (ICI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of intrauterine insemination (IUI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination, or
pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; (ii) the reproductive approach
for medium t
1-fertility status is selected from group consisting of: modifying the timing of intracervical
insemination (ICI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of intrauterine insemination (IUI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of
in vitro fertilization (IVF) to late
in vivo capacitation time; pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination; intrauterine
insemination (IUI); pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; or
pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, or (iii) the reproductive approach for low t
1-fertility status is selected from group consisting of: modifying the timing of
in vitro fertilization (IVF) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)
to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT)
to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of subzonal insemination (SUZI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection,
pre-capacitating sperm prior to gamete intra-fallopian transfer, or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to subzonal insemination.
[0059] In the preceding aspect of the disclosure the male has a less than normal sperm concentration
and late
in vivo capacitation time: (i) the reproductive approach for t
1-high fertility status is selected from the group consisting of: modifying the timing
of intercourse to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of intracervical insemination (ICI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of intrauterine insemination (IUI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination (ICI),
or pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination (IUI); (ii) the reproductive
approach for t
1-medium fertility status is selected from group consisting of: modifying the timing
of intracervical insemination (ICI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of intrauterine insemination (IUI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of
in vitro fertilization (IVF) to late
in vivo capacitation time; pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination, pre-capacitating
sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; or pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization; or (iii) the reproductive approach for t
1-low fertility status is selected from group consisting of: modifying the timing of
in vitro fertilization (IVF) to late
in vivo capacitation time; intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), modifying the timing
of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT)
to late
in vivo capacitation time; modifying the timing of subzonal insemination (SUZI) to late
in vivo capacitation time, pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection,
pre-capacitating sperm prior to gamete intra-fallopian transfer, or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to subzonal insemination.
[0060] In the preceding aspect of the disclosure the male has at least normal sperm concentration
and standard
in vivo capacitation time: (i) the reproductive approach for high t
1-fertility status is selected from the group consisting of: intercourse, intracervical
insemination (ICI), pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination, intrauterine
insemination (IUI), or pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination;
(ii) the reproductive approach for medium t
1-fertility status is selected from the group consisting of: intracervical insemination
(ICI), pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination; intrauterine insemination
(IUI); pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; or
in vitro fertilization (IVF) or pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization; or (iii) the reproductive approach for low t
1-fertility status is selected from group consisting of:
in vitro fertilization (IVF), pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), pre-capacitating sperm prior
to intracytoplasmic sperm injection, gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT), pre-capacitating
sperm prior to gamete intra-fallopian transfer, subzonal insemination (SUZI), or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to subzonal insemination.
[0061] In the preceding aspect of the disclosure the male has a less than normal sperm concentration
and standard
in vivo capacitation time: (i) the reproductive approach for high t
1-fertility status is selected from group consisting of: intracervical insemination
(ICI), pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination, intrauterine insemination
(IUI) or pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination; (ii) the reproductive
approach for medium t
1-fertility status is selected from group consisting of: intracervical insemination
(ICI), pre-capacitating sperm prior to intracervical insemination, intrauterine insemination
(IUI) or pre-capacitating sperm prior to intrauterine insemination;
in vitro fertilization (IVF), pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, or (iii) the reproductive approach for low t
1-fertility status is selected from group consisting of:
in vitro fertilization (IVF), pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), pre-capacitating sperm prior
to intracytoplasmic sperm injection, gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT), pre-capacitating
sperm prior to gamete intra-fallopian transfer, subzonal insemination (SUZI) or pre-capacitating
sperm prior to subzonal insemination.
[0062] In each of the foregoing disclosure, the identifying step is also based on one or
more of the following: patient demographics, reproductive status of female partner,
sperm concentration, total motility, progressive motility, semen volume, semen pH,
semen viscosity and/or sperm morphology and combinations thereof.
[0063] In each of the foregoing disclosure, the more than one G
M1 localization patterns include AA G
M1 localization pattern, APM G
M1 localization pattern, Lined-Cell G
M1 localization pattern, INTER G
M1 localization pattern, PAPM G
M1 localization pattern, AA/PA G
M1 localization pattern, ES G
M1 localization pattern, and DIFF G
M1 localization pattern.
[0064] In each of the foregoing disclosure, the sperm cells are treated
in vitro with capacitation conditions for a capacitation time period of: at least one hour;
at least 3 hours; at least 12 hours; at least 18 hours; at least 24 hours; for a capacitation
time period ranging between 0.5 hours to 3 hours; 3 hours to 12 hours; 6 hours to
12 hours; 3 hours to 24 hours; 12 hours to 24 hours; or 18 hours to 24 hours.
[0065] In each of the foregoing disclosure , the
in vitro capacitated sperm cells are treated with a fixative for a fixative time period of:
at least 0.5 hour; at least 3 hours; at least 12 hours; at least 18 hours; at least
24 hours; at least 30 hours; at least 36 hours; or at least 48 hours, for a fixation
time period ranging between 0.5 hours to 3 hours; 3 hours to 12 hours; 6 hours to
12 hours; 3 hours to 18 hours; 6-18 hours; 6-24 hours; 12 hours to 24 hours; 18 hours
to 24 hours; 18-30 hours; 18-36 hours; 24-30 hours; 24-26 hours; 18-48 hours; 24-48
hours; or 36-48 hours.
[0066] In each of the foregoing disclosure, the sperm cells were treated to cryopreservation
procedures and stored prior to being treated
in vitro with capacitation conditions.
[0067] The present disclosure provides for a method identifying an approach for achieving
mammalian fertilization.
In vitro capacitated sperm cells are treated with a fluorescence label. Data are generated
that illustrate one or more G
M1 localization patterns of the fluorescence label treated
in vitro capacitated sperm cells said data obtained at post
in vitro capacitation times selected from: 0.1 hour to 5 hours; 0.1 hour to 8 hours; 0.1 to
12 hours; or 0.1 hour 18 hours (t
0); and times greater than t
0 (t
1). A male's fertility status data are then characterized using the data of one or
more G
M1 localization patterns at those times. Based on the male's fertility status data,
a time period for insemination and a reproductive approach are identified to use in
order to achieve fertilization. The sperm cells may be cryopreserved and stored prior
to being treated in vitro with capacitation conditions.
[0068] The sperm cells may be treated
in vitro with capacitation conditions for a capacitation time period of: at least one hour;
at least 3 hours; at least 12 hours; at least 18 hours; at least 24 hours; for a capacitation
time period ranging between 0.5 hours to 3 hours; 3 hours to 12 hours; 6 hours to
12 hours; 3 hours to 24 hours; 12 hours to 24 hours; or 18 hours to 24 hours. Capacitation
conditions include
in vitro exposure to 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin. Non-capacitation conditions include lack
of
in vitro exposure to any of bicarbonate ions, calcium ions and a mediator of sterol efflux
such as 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin for varying periods of time.
[0069] In one such other instance, the
in vitro capacitated sperm cells are treated with a fixative for a fixation time period of:
at least 0.5 hour; at least 3 hours; at least 12 hours; at least 18 hours; at least
24 hours; for a capacitation time period ranging between 0.5 hours to 3 hours; 3 hours
to 12 hours; 6 hours to 12 hours; 3 hours to 24 hours; 12 hours to 24 hours; or 18
hours to 24 hours. The fixative may be paraformaldehyde or glutaraldehyde.
[0070] The male's fertility status data may be characterized by comparing data illustrating
the G
M1 localization patterns of
in vitro capacitated sperm cells to reference data illustrating G
M1 localization patterns of
in vitro capacitated sperm cells for males having a known fertility status. The number of
each G
M1 labeled localization patterns is determined for a predetermined number of the in
vitro capacitated sperm cells. A ratio is then calculated for a sum of the number
of apical acrosome (AA) G
M1 localization patterns and the number of acrosomal plasma membrane (APM) G
M1 localization patterns over a sum of the total number of G
M1 labeled localization patterns. The ratio of G
M1 localization patterns is then compared to reference ratios of G
M1 localization patterns for males having a known fertility status. The more than one
G
M1 localization patterns correspond to apical acrosome (AA) G
M1 localization pattern, acrosomal plasma membrane (APM) G
M1 localization pattern, Lined-Cell G
M1 localization pattern, intermediate (INTER) G
M1 localization pattern, post acrosomal plasma membrane (PAPM) G
M1 localization pattern, apical acrosome/post acrosome (AA/PA) G
M1 localization pattern, equatorial segment (ES) G
M1 localization pattern, and diffuse (DIFF) G
M1 localization pattern.
[0071] In another instance of the foregoing disclosure, the male's fertility status data
are compared to data of known male fertility status which is associated with a known
time period for insemination and associated with a known reproductive approach. The
known fertility status includes: fertile with sperm capacitation within 3 hours; fertile
with sperm capacitation within 12 hours, fertile with capacitation between 12 and
24 hours; and non-fertile.
[0072] In the foregoing disclosure, the reproductive approach may correspond to natural
insemination approaches and artificial insemination approaches as known in the art.
The reproductive approach may include: intercourse; intracervical insemination (ICI),
intrauterine insemination (IUI),
in vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), pre-capacitating sperm
prior to
in vitro fertilization, gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT), and subzonal insemination
(SUZI).
[0073] Where the reproductive approach corresponds to intercourse, the time period for intercourse
is determined relative to the female's timing of ovulation, as visualized with ultrasonography,
and/or predicted based on timing of the menstrual cycle, use of ovulation timing kits,
changes in body temperature, or timing relative to one or more injections with one
or more hormones designed to induce follicular growth and ovulation. For example,
the insemination time period may correspond to: 96 hours before the time of ovulation;
72 hours before the time of ovulation; 48 hours before the time of ovulation; 24 hours
before the time of ovulation; 12 hours before the time of ovulation; 6 hours before
the time of ovulation; or at the time of ovulation.
[0074] Where the reproductive approach corresponds to ICI or IUI, the time period for insemination
is determined relative to the female's timing of ovulation, as visualized with ultrasonography,
and/or predicted based on timing of the menstrual cycle, use of ovulation timing kits,
changes in body temperature, or timing relative to one or more injections with one
or more hormones designed to induce follicular growth and ovulation. For example,
the insemination time period may correspond to: 96 hours before the time of ovulation;
72 hours before the time of ovulation; 48 hours before the time of ovulation; 24 hours
before the time of ovulation; 12 hours before the time of ovulation; 6 hours before
the time of ovulation; or at the time of ovulation.
[0075] Where the reproductive approach corresponds to IVF, the time period for insemination
corresponds to 3 hours before determination of pronuclear formation; 4 hours before
determination of pronuclear formation; 6 hours before determination of pronuclear
formation; 12 hours before determination of pronuclear formation; 18 hours before
determination of pronuclear formation; 24 hours before determination of pronuclear
formation; or 30 hours before determination of pronuclear formation.
[0076] Where the reproductive approach corresponds to pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, the time period for pre-capacitation corresponds to incubating sperm
in media containing one or more stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24 hours
before insemination; 18 hours before insemination; 12 hours before insemination; 6
hours before insemination; 4 hours before insemination; 3 hours before insemination;
or 1 hour before insemination.
[0077] Where the reproductive approach corresponds to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI),
the time period for pre-capacitation prior to insemination corresponds to incubating
sperm in media containing one or more stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24
hours before insemination; 18 hours before insemination; 12 hours before insemination;
6 hours before insemination; 4 hours before insemination; 3 hours before insemination;
or 1 hour before insemination.
[0078] Where the reproductive approach corresponds to gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT),
the time period for pre-capacitation prior to insemination corresponds to incubating
sperm in media containing one or more stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24
hours before insemination; 18 hours before insemination; 12 hours before insemination;
6 hours before insemination; 4 hours before insemination; 3 hours before insemination;
or 1 hour before insemination.
[0079] Where the reproductive approach corresponds to subzonal insemination (SUZI), the
time period for pre-capacitation prior to insemination corresponds to incubating sperm
in media containing one or more stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24 hours
before insemination; 18 hours before insemination; 12 hours before insemination; 6
hours before insemination; 4 hours before insemination; 3 hours before insemination;
or 1 hour before insemination.
[0080] In some instances of the foregoing disclosure, other parameters may be used to identify
a time period for insemination and a reproductive approach. The other parameters may
include one or more of the following: patient demographics, reproductive status of
female partner, sperm concentration, total motility, progressive motility, semen volume,
semen pH, semen viscosity and/or sperm morphology and combinations thereof.
[0081] The present disclosure also provides a further method of identifying an approach
for achieving mammalian fertilization.
In vitro capacitated sperm cells are treated with a fluorescence label. One or more fluorescence
images of fluorescence labeled in vitro capacitated sperm cells are obtained. A Cap-Score
value is measured for fluorescence labeled
in vitro capacitated sperm sample after the sperm cells are treated
in vitro with capacitation conditions for varying periods of time. The Cap-Score value is
compared to reference Cap-Score values associated with males of known fertility status
at those times. Based on the Cap-Score value, a time period for insemination and a
reproductive approach are identified for use in order to achieve fertilization.
[0082] The sperm cells are treated
in vitro with capacitation conditions for a capacitation time period of: at least one hour;
at least 3 hours; at least 12 hours; at least 18 hours; at least 24 hours; for a capacitation
time period ranging between 0.5 hours to 3 hours; 3 hours to 12 hours; 6 hours to
12 hours; 3 hours to 24 hours; 12 hours to 24 hours; or 18 hours to 24 hours. Non-capacitation
conditions include lack of
in vitro exposure to any of bicarbonate ions, calcium ions and a mediator of sterol efflux
such as 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin for varying periods of time.
[0083] The
in vitro capacitated sperm cells are treated with a fixative for a time period of: at least
0.5 hour; at least 3 hours; at least 12 hours; at least 18 hours; at least 24 hours;
at least 30 hours; at least 36 hours; or at least 48 hours, for a fixation time period
ranging between 0.5 hours to 3 hours; 3 hours to 12 hours; 6 hours to 12 hours; 3
hours to 18 hours; 6-18 hours; 6-24 hours; 12 hours to 24 hours; 18 hours to 24 hours;
18-30 hours; 18-36 hours; 24-30 hours; 24-26 hours; 18-48 hours; 24-48 hours; or 36-48
hours. The fixative includes paraformaldehyde or glutaraldehyde.
[0084] In an instance of the foregoing disclosure, the Cap-Score value is compared to reference
Cap-Score values for known male fertility status which is associated with known time
period for insemination and associated with known reproductive approach. In such instances,
the known fertility status includes: fertile with sperm capacitation within 3 hours;
fertile with sperm capacitation within 12 hours, fertile with capacitation between
12 and 24 hours; and non-fertile.
[0085] In instances of the forgoing disclosure, Cap-Score corresponds to a ratio for a sum
of a number of AA G
M1 localization patterns and a number of APM G
M1 localization patterns over a sum of a total number of G
M1 labeled localization patterns, each determined for the
in vitro capacitated sperm sample. The one or more G
M1 labeled localization patterns comprises AA G
M1 localization pattern, APM G
M1 localization pattern, Lined-Cell G
M1 localization pattern, INTER G
M1 localization pattern, PAPM G
M1 localization pattern, AA/PA G
M1 localization pattern, ES G
M1 localization pattern, and DIFF G
M1 localization pattern.
[0086] The reproductive approach may correspond to natural insemination approaches and artificial
insemination approaches as known in the art. The reproductive approach includes: intercourse;
intracervical insemination (ICI), intrauterine insemination (IUI),
in vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), pre-capacitating sperm
prior to
in vitro fertilization, gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT), and subzonal insemination
(SUZI).
[0087] Where the reproductive approach corresponds to intercourse, the time period for intercourse
is determined relative to the female's timing of ovulation, as visualized with ultrasonography,
and/or predicted based on timing of the menstrual cycle, use of ovulation timing kits,
changes in body temperature, or timing relative to one or more injections with one
or more hormones designed to induce follicular growth and ovulation. For example,
the insemination time period may correspond to: 96 hours before the time of ovulation;
72 hours before the time of ovulation; 48 hours before the time of ovulation; 24 hours
before the time of ovulation; 12 hours before the time of ovulation; 6 hours before
the time of ovulation; or at the time of ovulation.
[0088] Where the reproductive approach corresponds to ICI or IUI, the time period for insemination
is determined relative to the female's timing of ovulation, as visualized with ultrasonography,
and/or predicted based on timing of the menstrual cycle, use of ovulation timing kits,
changes in body temperature, or timing relative to one or more injections with one
or more hormones designed to induce follicular growth and ovulation. For example,
the insemination time period may correspond to: 96 hours before the time of ovulation;
72 hours before the time of ovulation; 48 hours before the time of ovulation; 24 hours
before the time of ovulation; 12 hours before the time of ovulation; 6 hours before
the time of ovulation; or at the time of ovulation.
[0089] Where the reproductive approach corresponds to IVF, the time period for insemination
corresponds to 3 hours before determination of pronuclear formation; 4 hours before
determination of pronuclear formation; 6 hours before determination of pronuclear
formation; 12 hours before determination of pronuclear formation; 18 hours before
determination of pronuclear formation; 24 hours before determination of pronuclear
formation; or 30 hours before determination of pronuclear formation.
[0090] Where the reproductive approach corresponds to pre-capacitating sperm prior to
in vitro fertilization, the time period for pre-capacitation corresponds to incubating sperm
in media containing one or more stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24 hours
before insemination; 18 hours before insemination; 12 hours before insemination; 6
hours before insemination; 4 hours before insemination; 3 hours before insemination;
or 1 hour before insemination.
[0091] Where the reproductive approach corresponds to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI),
the time period for pre-capacitation prior to insemination corresponds to incubating
sperm in media containing one or more stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24
hours before insemination; 18 hours before insemination; 12 hours before insemination;
6 hours before insemination; 4 hours before insemination; 3 hours before insemination;
or 1 hour before insemination.
[0092] Where the reproductive approach corresponds to gamete intra-fallopian transfer ("GIFT"),
the time period for pre-capacitation prior to insemination corresponds to incubating
sperm in media containing one or more stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24
hours before insemination; 18 hours before insemination; 12 hours before insemination;
6 hours before insemination; 4 hours before insemination; 3 hours before insemination;
or 1 hour before insemination.
[0093] Where the reproductive approach corresponds to subzonal insemination (SUZI), the
time period for pre-capacitation prior to insemination corresponds to incubating sperm
in media containing one or more stimuli for capacitation, for periods of 24 hours
before insemination; 18 hours before insemination; 12 hours before insemination; 6
hours before insemination; 4 hours before insemination; 3 hours before insemination;
or 1 hour before insemination.
[0094] The present disclosure also provides for a method of identifying an appropriate mechanism
for achieving successful mammalian pregnancy.
In vitro capacitated sperm cells are treated with a fluorescence label. One or more fluorescence
images of fluorescence labeled in vitro capacitated sperm cells are obtained. A Cap-Score
value is measured for fluorescence labeled
in vitro capacitated sperm sample after the sperm cells are treated
in vitro with capacitation conditions for varying periods of time. The Cap-Score value is
compared to a reference Cap-Score value associated with fertile males. An appropriate
mechanism to achieve a successful pregnancy is determined based on the Cap-Score value.
The determination is also based on one or more of the following: patient demographics,
reproductive status of female partner sperm concentration, total motility, progressive
motility, semen volume, semen pH, semen viscosity and/or sperm morphology.
[0095] In an embodiment, a semen sample is processed using a wide orifice pipette having
an orifice of sufficient size in diameter to prevent shearing of a sperm membrane
and the semen sample is processed without use of a reagent that can damage sperm membranes.
In one such embodiment, the processed semen sample is exposed to capacitating media,
fixative, and reagents for determining G
M1 localization patterns.
[0096] In an embodiment, a reagent that can damage sperm membranes is selected from the
group consisting of: (i) a protease; (ii) a nuclease (iii) a mucolytic agent; (iv)
a lipase; (v) an esterase and (vi) Glycoside hydrolases. Examples of compounds which
may similarly interfere with the ability of sperm to respond to capacitation stimuli
include: (i) a protease, including but not limited to, chymotrypsin, trypsin, collagenase,
bromelain; (ii) a nucleases, including but not limited to, Dornase, HindIII, EcoRI;
(iii) a mucolytic agent, including but not limited to, Erdostein, Acetylcysteine,
Guiafenesin; (iv) a lipase, including but not limited to, Phospholipase Al, Phospholipase
C, Lipoprotein lipase; (v) an esterase, including but not limited to, Cholinesterase,
Thioesterase, Alkaline phosphatase; and (vi) Glycoside hydrolases, including but not
limited to, Alpha-amylase, beta-galactosidase, hyaluronidase, neuorminodases, and
lysozyme.
[0097] In instances of the foregoing disclosure, the population size for one or more G
M1 labeled localization patterns is determined, such that the percent change about Cap-Score
is minimized within an individual. The one or more G
M1 labeled localization patterns comprises AA G
M1 localization pattern, APM G
M1 localization pattern, Lined-Cell G
M1 localization pattern, intermediate (INTER) G
M1 localization pattern, post acrosomal plasma membrane (PAPM) G
M1 localization pattern, apical acrosome/post acrosome (AA/PA) G
M1 localization pattern, equatorial segment (ES) G
M1 localization pattern, and diffuse (DIFF) G
M1 localization pattern.
EXAMPLES
[0098] The following examples further describe and demonstrate illustrative embodiments
of the present invention and instances of the disclosure.
Example 1
Sperm Handling Methods
[0099] Three common methods to reduce viscosity were evaluated. Ejaculates were: 1) Incubated
for 0.25, 1.25 or 2 hours, 2) diluted 1:1 with Modified Human Tubal Fluid (Irvine
Scientific; Santa Anna, CA) and then passed through a wide orifice transfer pipette
("WOTP") or a Pasteur pipette ("PP"), 3) Enzymatically digested with chymotrypsin
("chymo"). Pilot studies revealed that passage through a hypodermic needle negatively
affected motility and membrane integrity and was not studied further. After liquefaction,
samples were washed and incubated under capacitating (CAP) and non-capacitating (NC)
conditions. Cap-Score values were obtained via fluorescence microscopy according to
the calculation described above.
Reliability and Reproducibility of Cap-Score™
[0100] Following liquefaction of semen samples from consenting men, sperm were washed, incubated,
fixed and then evaluated via fluorescence microscopy for G
M1 localization patterns. Precision of scoring within one sample, and variation between
readers scoring the same samples were both assessed. Student's t-Test employing unequal
variance was done using Microsoft Excel (2013).
Cap-Score Correlation with Traditional Semen Analysis Parameters
[0101] Semen samples from consenting patients were liquefied, washed and incubated under
both non-capacitating and capacitating conditions. Semen analysis was performed according
to WHO guidelines. Cap-Score values were obtained via fluorescence microscopy. Statistical
analyses were done using Microsoft Excel (2013) and XLSTAT (2015).
Assessment of Capacitation using Cap-Score™ For Males of Demonstrated Fertility Compared to Males Being Assessed for Fertility
[0102] The Cap-Score values were determined on consenting men from two cohorts: 1) known
fertility (pregnant partner or fathering a child less than 3 years old), and 2) patients
seeking their first semen analysis. Following liquefaction, sperm were washed and
3 million incubated for 3 hour under non-capacitating (NC) and capacitating (CAP)
conditions. Sperm were fixed overnight and G
M1 localization patterns assessed via fluorescence microscopy.
RESULTS
[0103] Liquefaction time, dilution and pipetting did not alter Cap-Score values. Control
(incubation only), WOTP and PP treated samples had Cap-Score values of 41±4, 40±5,
and 41±6 (n=5; CAP). A decrease in response to capacitating stimuli was observed when
samples were liquefied using chymo (P=0.03). Control samples had Cap-Score values
of 40±6 (n=5; CAP) whereas samples enzymatically liquefied had Cap-Score values of
31±4 (n=5; CAP). Because chymo is a protease that can cut membrane proteins, it was
examined to determine if the reduced Cap-Score value resulted from an alteration in
labeling. Samples not exposed to capacitation stimuli were compared and no difference
was observed. Control and enzymatically liquefied samples had Cap-Score values of
22±4 and 21±5 (n=5; NC). These data support the view that treating semen with chymo,
although widely used in clinical practice, can inhibit the ability of sperm to respond
to capacitation stimuli.
[0104] Classes of compounds which may similarly interfere with the ability of sperm to respond
to capacitation stimuli include: (i) a protease, including but not limited to, chymotrypsin,
trypsin, collagenase, bromelain; (ii) a nucleases, including but not limited to, Dornase,
HindIII, EcoRI; (iii) a mucolytic agent, including but not limited to, Erdostein,
Acetylcysteine, Guiafenesin; (iv) a lipase, including but not limited to, Phospholipase
Al, Phospholipase C, Lipoprotein lipase; (v) an esterase, including but not limited
to, Cholinesterase, Thioesterase, Alkaline phosphatase; and (vi) Glycoside hydrolases,
including but not limited to, Alpha-amylase, beta-galactosidase, hyaluronidase, neuorminodases,
and lysozyme.
[0105] Liquefaction times of up to 2 hours and mechanical liquefaction using WOTP and/or
PP did not influence capacitation. In contrast, the use of enzymes such as chymo reduced
the ability of sperm to capacitate, as measured by Cap-Score
™ Test. These results demonstrate the importance of knowing how semen processing methods
impact sperm function.
[0106] Precision was evaluated by comparing the percent change about Cap-Score values (%Δ=(y
2-y
1)/y
2) when 50, 100, 150 and 200 sperm were evaluated. Changes in values of 11, 6 and 5%
were observed for each addition of 50 sperm (n≥23). To be conservative, Cap-Score
value was determined by counting the G
M1 localization patterns of at least 150 cells. To assess variation within and between
readers, 8 large image files containing up to 5,000 sperm were generated by combining
images taken from multiple visual fields. Two different readers were trained and they
determined Cap-Score values by randomly resampling each image 20 times, counting 150
cells each time. When scoring the same sample, individual readers reported an average
SD of three (3) Cap-Score units. The difference between readers when scoring the same
sample ranged from 0.00 to 1.52, with an average difference of one (1) between the
readers for any given sample. Applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons,
no difference between readers was observed for any image file (p-values ranged from
0.02 to 0.99).
[0107] Cap-Score was not affected by liquefaction time or mechanical liquefaction with WOTP
or PP (n=5), though after washing and incubation, samples that had undergone two (2)
hours liquefaction or passage through a PP showed a greater decline in motility (p=0.02,
3E-3). Use of a needle damaged sperm and was not investigated further. Liquefaction
with chymo reduced Cap-Scores in CAP (p=0.03), but not NC samples (p=0.74). Samples
incubated with chymo (n=5; 3mg/ml) could not be scored due to membrane damage, yet
showed an increase in motility under NC conditions (p=9E-4).
Example 2
[0108] This example was conducted using a cohort comparison between fertile (cohort 1, pregnant
or recent father) and potential subfertile/infertile men (cohort 2, men questioning
fertility). Relationships between Cap-Score and traditional semen measures were also
explored.
[0109] All studies approved by WIRB (20152233). Semen samples were liquefied, washed, and
incubated under non-capacitating and capacitating conditions. Sperm were fixed overnight
and Cap-Score determined via fluorescence microscopy. Semen quality measures were
evaluated according to WHO. T-Test, ANOVA and correlation analyses were done using
Microsoft Excel (2013) and XLSTAT.
[0110] The mean Cap-Score for cohort 1 was 35.3 (SD= 7.7%; n=76 donors; 187 collections).
Cap-Scores were lower for cohort 2 (p=1.0E-03), with 33.6% (41/122) having Cap-Scores
below one (1) SD below the mean for cohort 1, versus an expected 16%. For cohort 2,
no relationship was observed between Cap-Score and morphology (p=0.28), motility (p=0.14)
or concentration (p=0.67). 93.4% (114/122) of men in cohort 2 exhibited normal motility,
yet 30.7% (35/114) of them had Cap-Scores below one (1) SD below the mean. Similarly,
101 of 122 men (82.7%) exhibited normal concentration with 32.6% (33/101) having Cap-Scores
below one (1) SD below the mean. These results show that capacitation defects are
common in men having difficulty conceiving and the Cap-Score provides functional data
that complement semen analysis.
[0111] The ability of sperm to capacitate differs between fertile men and those having trouble
conceiving. Because capacitation is required for fertilization, the Cap-Score can
provide an important functional complement to standard semen analysis and may help
in choosing the most appropriate fertility treatment.
[0112] Common measures of semen quality are subjective and can vary within and among readers,
making the assessment of male fertility challenging. The Cap-Score
™ Test evaluates the ability of sperm to capacitate, a necessity for male fertility.
The data presented here show that the Cap-Score
™ Test is highly reproducible and reliable within and between readers, which are key
considerations when attempting to diagnose male infertility.
[0113] The Cap-Score mean (µ=39) and SD (σ=7) from 41 fertile men were used to estimate
the number of known fertile men needed for establishing a robust fertile capacitation
profile. For a power analysis, an acceptable range about the mean was set at 3% and
a two-tailed t-test at the p<0.01 level, with a probability of detecting a difference
this large of 90% were applied. Results suggested that a valid standard can be established
with ≥85 individuals. A preliminary normal fertile standard was created using 125
observations from 41 unique donors. The Cap-Score values were averaged by donor and
then converted to z-scores ((X-µ)/σ; X=observation, µ=39; σ=7). This transformed the
µ to 0 and the σ to 1, with converted values representing the distance from the µ
(mean) in units of σ (S.D.). The normal fertile standard was tested against Cap-Score
values from 93 men seeking fertility exams. This cohort scored significantly below
the fertile population (p=1.6E-5), with 27 and 38% having z-scores ≤-2 and between
-1 and -2. Only 35% scored near or above the mean. These data suggest that, in comparison
to fertile men, many men seeking fertility exams have defects in capacitation.
Example 3
[0114] The procedures used in Examples 1 and 2 were used in Example 3.
[0115] Classic semen analyses provide little information on the ability of samples to fertilize
and egg. Capacitation is required for fertilization and can be assessed using G
M1 localization. A comparison of the Cap-Score values from two cohorts of men revealed
significant differences in their ability to capacitate. A robust capacitation profile
can be defined and employed for identifying abnormalities. Remarkably, 33% of men
questioning their fertility had z-scores ≤-1, versus an expected result of 16%. Combining
the Cap-Score
™ Test with traditional analyses should prove valuable in diagnosing male infertility.
[0116] Samples from 122 men referred to an infertility specialist were analyzed and had
Cap-Scores ranging from 13 to 52%. An analysis of variance was done to compare Cap-Score
values and sperm morphology. Samples were classified as having 0, 1, 2, 3, or ≥ 4%
normal forms (scores ≥ 4% are considered normal, WHO) and mean Cap-Scores were compared
among the groups. No relationship between Cap-Score value and morphology was observed
(P=0.67). Next, sperm concentration (range 3x10
6 to 210x10
6/mL) was compared to Cap-Score value using the Pearson product-moment correlation
coefficient and no connection was found (r=0.01, P=0.90). Lastly, Cap-Score value
was compared to total % motility (range 15 to 80%) and the two measures were determined
to be independent (r=0.14 P=0.21). Multiple donors who were classified as normal by
WHO criteria had Cap-Score values more than two (2) SD below the normal mean, supporting
the view that even normal appearing sperm can have functional abnormalities.
[0117] Traditional semen analysis identifies only 50% of male infertility cases. This study
shows that there is little relationship between Cap-Score value and standard semen
analysis parameters. Since capacitation is necessary for fertilization, the addition
of the Cap-Score test to traditional semen evaluations could both identify cases of
idiopathic infertility and help clinicians counsel couples towards the most appropriate
treatment
[0118] The data presented herein demonstrate that a male's Cap-Score value may provide guidance
on an appropriate mechanism for achieving successful mammalian pregnancies, including
recommended assisted reproductive technology such as
in vitro fertilization (IVF), or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The male may be
a human or a non-human mammal. The Cap-Score value in combination with other components
of a semen analysis, including concentration, total motility, progressive motility,
volume, pH, viscosity and/or morphology may be considered. For example, the recommended
assisted reproductive technology for two males with the same Cap-Score may differ
if their sperm counts or sperm motility differ. In addition, the fertility status
or reproductive health of the female partner would also be considered by the clinician.
Example 4
[0119] Semen samples from consenting men were liquefied, washed and aliquots incubated under
non-capacitating (NC) or capacitating (CAP) conditions. The consenting men included
men who were classified as fertile based on a pregnant partner or the male being a
recent biological father. The consenting men also included men seeking fertility exams.
Capacitation conditions include
in vitro exposure to 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin. Non-capacitation conditions include lack
of
in vitro exposure to any of bicarbonate ions, calcium ions and a mediator of sterol efflux
such as 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin for varying periods of time. The
in vitro capacitated sperm and the
in vitro non-capacitated sperm were then fixed in a fixative such as paraformaldehyde or glutaraldehyde.
The fixed
in vitro capacitated sperm and the
in vitro non-capacitated sperm were then labeled with a fluorescent labeled cholera toxin
b subunit.
[0120] For one dataset, the sperm samples were incubated in capacitation or non-capacitation
conditions for three (3) hours, fixed, labeled and then analyzed ("day0"). For a second
dataset, the sperm samples were incubated in capacitation or non-capacitation conditions
for three (3) hours, fixed overnight, labeled and then analyzed ("day1"). For a third
dataset, the sperm samples were incubated in capacitation or non-capacitation conditions
for three (3) hours, fixed, labeled and then analyzed. For a third dataset, the sperm
samples were incubated in capacitation or non-capacitation conditions for 24 hours,
fixed, labeled and then analyzed ("24hrCap"). Sperm capacitation was assessed using
localization of G
M1 (Cap-Score
™).
[0121] 102 sperm samples from 36 fertile men were evaluated at day0 and day1. Between day0
and day1, an increase in Cap-Score was observed in 81% (83/102) of sperm samples,
with 44% of the sperm samples (45/102) having an increase in in Cap-Score of more
than one (1) standard deviation (7%).
[0122] Sperm samples from 17 men seeking fertility treatment were evaluated at day0 and
day1. Between day0 and day1, an increase in Cap-Score was observed in 29% (5/17) where
the Cap-Scores increased more than one (1) standard deviation (7%).
[0123] To determine whether this change in Cap-Score was physiological or an artifact of
being in fixative overnight, semen samples from nine (9) fertile men were analyzed
at day0, day1 and after 24 hours of
in vitro incubation in capacitation or non-capacitation medium and then fixed. All
in vitro non-capacitated samples were equivalent (Cap-Scores of 19±2, 23±2 and 20±1%) and
were different from the
in vitro capacitated samples (Cap-Scores of 28±1, 34±2 and 31±2%, respectively). The Cap-Scores
on day1 were significantly greater than the Cap-Scores for day0 (p=0.03). However,
the Cap-Scores for
in vitro capacitated samples incubated overnight in the fixative (day1) or in capacitating
medium (24hrCap) were the same (p=0.33).
[0124] Consistent with prior literature, these data show that sperm membrane changes involved
in capacitation still occur over time in certain fixatives. These data suggest that
sperm achieve capacitation at different times in different ejaculates. To see if this
was reproducible for an individual, 91 samples from 25 fertile men were classified
as either early or late capacitators (day1-day0>7). The average concordance of change
within donors was 76%, showing that capacitation timing was highly consistent within
men.
Example 5
[0125] Semen samples from 8 fertile men (pregnant partner or recent father) were used to
examine the effect of cryopreservation on capacitation timing. Liquefied ejaculates
were split; half processed immediately (fresh) and the other cryopreserved in test
yolk buffer with glycerol (Irvine Scientific). Cryopreserved samples were subsequently
thawed and processed (CryoT). Fresh and CryoT aliquots were washed and then incubated
under non-capacitating (NC) and capacitating (CAP) conditions for 3 hours. Capacitation
timing differs among men and can be evaluated by comparing Cap-Score differences from
day 1 (after overnight incubation under conditions that promote/allow capacitation)
to day 0 (analyzed after 3 hours incubation).
[0126] Cap-Score increased in NC CryoT treatments for both day 0 and day 1 when compared
to fresh. For day 0 there was a 155% increase ((fresh - CryoT)/fresh; 11±1.6% vs 28±2.4%;
n=7; p=0.00) and a 79% increase for day 1 (19±2.6% vs 34±2.7%; n=8; p=0.00). Conversely,
Cap-Score for CAP treatments remained the same for both day 0 (26±3.1% vs 30±2.5%;
n=7; p=0.31,) and day 1 (34±2.9% vs 34±1.7%; n=8; p=0.86,). Average post-thaw and
post wash motilities of 27±3.5% and 31±8.6% for CryoT samples suggest reasonable post-thaw
viability. When samples for day 0 and day 1 were compared, no difference in capacitation
timing (day 1 - day 0; n=7) was observed between fresh and CryoT samples for NC (10±2.2%
vs 8±2.7%) or CAP treatments (8±3.8% vs 5±2.3%).
Example 6
[0127] All procedures, for specimen collection, were approved by WIRB (Protocol #20152233).
Semen samples were collected from consenting men by manual masturbation after a minimum
of 2 and a maximum of 5 days of sexual abstinence. Those samples having fewer than
10x10
6 motile sperm cells were discarded from this study.
[0128] Ejaculates were liquefied at 37°C for at least 15 minutes and for no more than two
(2) hours. Subsequent to liquefaction, the sperm were removed from the seminal plasma
by centrifugation through Enhance S-Plus Cell Isolation Media (Vitrolife, reference:
15232 ESP-100-90%) at 300xg for 10 minutes. The cells were collected, resuspended
in ∼4ml of Modified Human Tubal Fluid medium (mHTF; Irvine Scientific; reference 90126)
and pelleted at 600xg for 10 minutes. The sperm were resuspended in mHTF with and
without capacitation stimuli and incubated for three (3) hours. Following incubation,
the samples were fixed as described (
Selvaraj V, et al., "Segregation of micron-scale membrane sub-domains in live murine
sperm," J Cell Physiol. 206: 636-46 (2006)) with paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences; Hatfield, PA) for at least
30 minutes prior to labeling.
[0129] Samples were labeled with 2 µg/mL of Cholera Toxin B, conjugated with Alexa Fluor
488 (CTB; Thermo Fisher: C34775). After ten minutes, 5 µl of the labeled sperm were
placed on a microscope slide, overlaid with a cover slip and moved to an imaging station.
[0130] Imaging stations consisted of Nikon Eclipse NI-E microscopes equipped with: CFI60
Plan Apochromat Lambda 40x Objectives, C-FL AT GFP/FITC Long Pass Filter Sets, Hamamatsu
ORCA-Flash 4.0 cameras, H101F - ProScan III Open Frame Upright Motorized H101F Flat
Top Microscope Stages, and 64bit imaging workstations running NIS Elements software
(Nikon; Melville, NY). These systems were programmed to automatically capture sets
of 15x15 stitched images containing up to 5,000 sperm.
[0131] The Cap-Score SFT detects and analyzes localization patterns of the ganglioside G
M1. Two independent readers were trained to identify G
M1 localization patterns that have been associated with capacitation of human sperm.
The proportion of sperm within a sample having undergone capacitation was determined
and reported as the Cap-Score.
RESULTS
[0133] The first step in determining Cap-Score precision was to define the number of cells
to count per sample. In general, as the number of cells counted increases, there is
an increase in precision. However, at some point counting additional cells becomes
redundant, as the Cap-Score will not change with additional observations. To identify
the point when counting additional cells is unnecessary, the percent change about
Cap-Score when 50, 100, 150 and 200 sperm was evaluated (Table 1).
Table 1: Percent change in Cap-Score with increasing number of counted sperm.
| No. of counted sperm |
Mean %Δ |
STDEV |
No. of Obs. |
SEM |
95% CI |
| |
|
|
|
|
LL |
UL |
| from 50 to 100 |
11% |
9% |
23 |
2% |
7% |
14% |
| from 100 to 150 |
6% |
5% |
26 |
1% |
4% |
8% |
| from 150 to 200 |
5% |
3% |
26 |
1% |
4% |
6% |
The percent change in Cap-Score when counting 50 or 100 sperm was large when compared
to the percent change when counting 100 or 150 and 150 or 200 sperm. These observations
supported the view that Cap-Score precision was only modestly improved by counting
more than 100 sperm. However, the 95% confidence intervals for the percent change
when counting 50 or 100 and 150 or 200 did not overlap, suggesting a significant reduction
in percent change when at least 150 cells were counted. To be conservative, Cap-Score
was determined by counting the G
M1 localization patterns of at least 150 cells.
[0134] To further explore Cap-Score reliability and assess its potential as an objective
measure of semen quality, its measurement was investigated to determine its accuracy
within individual readers. Accuracy is defined as the proximity of measurements to
the true value. The true value of an unknown population can be estimated by its central
tendency, or the mean. One can judge whether a data set has a strong or a weak central
tendency based on its dispersion, or the inverse of precision (JCGM/WG2 2008). That
is to say that as dispersion increases, there is a decrease in precision. The standard
deviation (SD) and Coefficient of Variation (CoV) measure the amount of dispersion
within a sample. A standard deviation close to zero (0) indicates that the data points
tend to be clustered tightly about the mean, while a high standard deviation indicates
that the data points are spread out. Similarly, the CoV represents the amount of dispersion
relative to the mean (CoV=SD/mean) and is useful for comparing the degree of variation
from one data series to another, even if the means are drastically different from
each other.
[0135] Prior to evaluating Cap-Score accuracy within readers, the number of images for each
reader to sample was estimated. To this end, two semen donor groups were defined based
on a cut-off of one (1) SD below the mean Cap-Score for a population of men with presumed
fertility (pregnant wife or child less than 3 years old). The mean Cap-Score for the
group with "lower Cap-Scores" was 27 and the "presumed fertile" group was 40. The
standard deviations for each group were 5.2 and 4.9 respectively. A power analysis
using a two-tailed test was done at the p<0.05 and p<0.01 level, with a probability
of detecting a difference this large, if it exists, of 90% (1-beta=0.90). The results
of these analyses indicated that sample 10 and 14 images respectively (5 and 7 per
group) should be sampled. To be conservative, 10 images, each in the "lower Cap-Score"
and "presumed fertile" groups, were generated. Sampling this number of images per
group ensured that each was sufficiently interrogated to identify any differences
in reproducibility that might occur because of either low- or high-value Cap-Scores.
[0136] To evaluate the accuracy of the Cap-Score SFT, two different readers determined Cap-Score
by randomly resampling 10 images, that contained up to 5,000 sperm each, from the
"lower Cap-Score" and "presumed fertile" groups and resampled 20 times by each reader.
The SD and CoV were calculated on a per image basis for each reader. The average SD
across images and readers was 3 (Fig 1A) and the average CoV was 13% (Fig 1B). Both
the SD and CoV showed a linear relationship to Cap-Score. Thus, while there was greater
dispersion associated with reading higher Cap-Scores, this appeared to result from
a greater Cap-Score magnitude. These data were consistent with a high degree of accuracy,
because when the same population of sperm was randomly resampled by the same or different
reader, Cap-Score values were clustered tightly about the true value. Since these
measure of variance and (or) dispersion are small and stable, they reveal a high degree
of Cap-Score reproducibility within readers.
[0137] In general, a distribution can be described using its mean and variance. The mean
indicates the location of the distribution, while the variance describes how dispersed
the data are. One can envisage two distributions where the means are the same, yet
the variances are different. For example, one distribution might resemble a normal
bell shape, while the other is flatter having more extreme values. To demonstrate
similar Cap-Score distributions between readers, 10 stitched images were obtained
each for the "lower Cap-Score" and "presumed fertile" groups. Two different readers
determined Cap-Scores by randomly resampling each image 20 times. Since each image
file contained several magnitudes more sperm than were being sampled, each random
resampling represented a distinct subsample of cells from within an individual ejaculate.
[0138] An average difference of one (1) in mean Cap-Score was observed between the readers
for the 20 different images (Fig. 3). When the Bonferroni correction was applied,
no discernable differences were observed. Similarly, Cap-Score variances were not
different between readers (Fig. 3). These data support the view that Cap-Score was
reproducible between readers, as independent readers obtained similar Cap-Score distributions
when resampling the same population of sperm. Collectively, these data provide strong
evidence that the Cap-Score SFT is highly reproducible and reliable within and between
readers, which are key considerations when attempting to evaluate male reproductive
fitness.
[0139] The data presented in the current study demonstrate that the Cap-Score SFT is highly
reproducible and reliable within and between readers. The data and image files acquired
should serve as a foundation for the continued quality control (QC) and quality assurance
(QA) within and among laboratories in the evaluation of Cap-Score. For example, two
of the 20 image files, one each from the "lower Cap-Scores" and "presumed fertile"
groups could be selected at random and scored each day to demonstrate a reader's daily
ability to read Cap-Scores. If values are obtained that are outside of acceptable
ranges from the established mean (
Westgard et al., "A multi-rule Shewhart chart for quality control in clinical chemistry,"
Clin Chem. 27: 493-50 (1981), the laboratory director can be consulted for remediation. These data can also be
used to track individual readers over time and to identify potential changes in Cap-Score
determination. Similarly, as new personal and (or) laboratories are trained and incorporated
into the reading rotation, their reading ability can be evaluated by scoring multiple
image files and comparing their Cap-Scores to established values. Such an approach
would ensure comparable data both within and among laboratories. Only through continued
internal and external QA and QC can high standards of sperm function evaluations be
maintained.
[0140] Male fertility diagnosis has historically been plagued by the inability to assess
sperm function; namely, the ability to fertilize (
Oehninger et al., "Sperm functional tests," Fertil Steril. 102: 1528-33 (2014);
Wang et al., "Limitations of semen analysis as a test of male fertility and anticipated
needs from newer tests," Fertil Steril. 102: 1502-07 (2014)). Such a diagnostic capability would provide a functional complement to the descriptive
assessments of traditional semen evaluations. Identifying sperm with deficiencies
in fertilizing ability may allow for a more specific diagnosis of what is now categorized
as idiopathic infertility. Of much greater practical importance, this information
could enable a clinician to help counsel a couple toward the most appropriate form
of ART to achieve pregnancy. To achieve the previously specified goal, many assays
of sperm function have been suggested (e.g., hamster zona penetration assays (
Barros et al., "Human Sperm Penetration into Zona-Free Hamster Oocytes as a Test to
Evaluate the Sperm Fertilizing Ability," Andrologia. 11: 197-210 (1979);
Rogers et al., "Analysis of human spermatozoal fertilizing ability using zona-free
ova," Fertil Steril. 32: 664-70)1979), sperm-ZP binding tests (
Liu et al., "Clinical application of sperm-oocyte interaction tests in in vitro fertilization-embryo
transfer and intracytoplasmic sperm injection programs," Fertil Steril. 82: 1251-63
(2004), and cervical mucus penetration assays (
Alexander, "Evaluation of male infertility with an in vitro cervical mucus penetration
test," Fertil Steril. 36: 201-8 (1981);
Menge et al., "Interrelationships among semen characteristics, antisperm antibodies,
and cervical mucus penetration assays in infertile human couples." Fertil Steril.
51: 486-92 (1989);
Eggert-Kruse et al., "Prognostic value of in vitro sperm penetration into hormonally
standardized human cervical mucus," Fertil Steril. 51: 317-23 (1989). However, their use has been limited by the great difficulty in obtaining needed
materials in a logistically practical fashion. To fill the current void, a diagnostic
tool has been developed to evaluate the ability of sperm to undergo the physiological
changes required to fertilize an oocyte.