Technical Field
[0001] The present disclosure relates to a drilling method, a resist layer, and a fiber-reinforced
plastic.
Background Art
[0002] A fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) is a composite material in which reinforcing fiber
(glass fiber, carbon fiber, aramid fiber, polyethylene fiber, cylon fiber, boron fiber,
and the like) is put into a resin (a polyester resin, a vinyl ester resin, an epoxy
resin, a phenol resin, and a thermoplastic resin) to improve strength. The FRP has
been used in a wide range of fields such as daily necessities, sporting goods, automobiles,
and aerospace applications.
[0003] The FRP may be subjected to drilling to improve joining and sound absorbency in some
cases. As a method of forming a hole in an FRP workpiece, drilling performed by using
a drill, and sandblasting are used. For example, Patent Literature 1 discloses a configuration
in which a resist layer having sandblast resistance is disposed on a surface of the
workpiece, and a region which is not covered with the resist layer in the workpiece
is removed by sandblasting.
Citation List
Patent Literature
[0004] Patent Literature 1: Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No.
2012-196751
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0005] In drilling performed by using a drill, in a case where the number of holes to be
processed is large, a processing time is lengthened, and thus the drilling is not
preferable from the viewpoint of productivity. In addition, in the drilling performed
by using a drill, fluffing may occur in the vicinity of a hole formed in a workpiece,
or peeling-off may occur on a surface of the workpiece.
[0006] In addition, as in a method described in Patent Literature 1, even in a case where
a hole is formed in a workpiece by sandblasting, fluffing or peeling-off may occur
in the workpiece although the degree of occurrence is lower in comparison to the drilling
performed by using a drill.
[0007] Accordingly, it is desired to form a hole in the fiber-reinforced plastic while suppressing
occurrence of fluffing and peeling-off.
Solution to Problem
[0008] According to one aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a drilling method
of forming a hole having a desired diameter in a fiber-reinforced plastic workpiece.
The method includes disposing a resist layer, in which an opening having a diameter
smaller than the desired diameter is formed, on the workpiece and ejecting blasting
abrasives to the workpiece through the resist layer to cut a portion, which is exposed
from the opening, in the workpiece while cutting a peripheral edge portion of the
opening of the resist layer.
[0009] When the blasting abrasives are continuously projected to the workpiece through the
resist layer, the blasting abrasives passing through the opening of the resist layer
enters a downward side of the resist layer, and thus peeling-off may occur on a surface
of the workpiece. When the peeling-off occurs, reinforcing fibers of the workpiece
are exposed on the surface of the workpiece as fluffing. In the method according to
the aspect, the blasting abrasives are ejected to the workpiece through the resist
layer in which the opening having the diameter smaller than the desired diameter is
formed. In this method, the blasting abrasives collide with the resist layer and cuts
a peripheral edge portion of the opening formed in the resist layer, the diameter
of the opening is gradually enlarged with the passage of a processing time. In this
manner, when the hole is formed in the workpiece while gradually enlarging the diameter
of the opening in the resist layer, even when peeling-off occurs in the workpiece,
a peeled-off portion is removed along the progress of processing of the workpiece.
As a result, it is possible to suppress occurrence of peeling-off and fluffing on
the surface of the workpiece after processing.
[0010] In one embodiment, a ratio of the diameter of the opening to the desired diameter
may be 0.84 or more and 0.94 or less. When the ratio of the diameter of the opening
to the desired diameter is set as described above, it is possible to efficiently perform
processing while maintaining accuracy in a hole diameter after processing.
[0011] In one embodiment, in the step of ejecting the blasting abrasives to the workpiece,
the blasting abrasives may be ejected toward the workpiece from a nozzle, and an angle
formed by a surface of the workpiece and a ejecting direction of the blasting abrasives
from the nozzle may be 90° ± 5°. When the blasting abrasives are ejected to the workpiece
at this angle, it is possible to suppress occurrence of peeling-off on the surface
layer of the resin. As a result, it is possible to suppress fluffing.
[0012] In one embodiment, the nozzle may be configured to suck the blasting abrasives by
introducing compressed air to the inside of the nozzle to eject the blasting abrasives
with the compressed air as a solid-gas two-phase flow. The fiber-reinforced plastic
is a difficult-to-cut material with respect to blast processing, and thus a considerable
time is necessary until processing is completed. In this embodiment, the blasting
abrasives can be continuously ejected from the nozzle, it is possible to improve processing
efficiency.
[0013] In one embodiment, the workpiece may comprise the fiber-reinforced plastic in which
a cut reinforcing fibers are dispersed in a resin. In this type of fiber-reinforced
plastic, the reinforcing fibers are dispersed without directionality. Accordingly,
in a conventional drilling method, a surface may be peeled off from the reinforcing
fibers as the origin, and the fiber-reinforce plastic may be broken. In contrast,
according to the drilling method of the one embodiment, even in the workpiece as described
above, it is possible to suppress occurrence of peeling-off or fluffing on the surface
of the workpiece.
[0014] In one embodiment, the workpiece may comprise the fiber-reinforced plastic in which
woven reinforcing fibers infiltrate into a resin. In this type of fiber-reinforced
plastic is obtained by alternately laminating reinforcing fibers that are woven in
a cloth shape and a resin. Accordingly, in the conventional drilling method, inter-layer
peeling-off may occur, and the fiber-reinforced plastic may be broken. According to
the drilling method of the one embodiment, even in the workpiece as described above,
it is possible to suppress occurrence of peeling-off or fluffing on the surface of
the workpiece.
[0015] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a resist
layer that is used in the drilling method. The resist layer is a polymer including
unsaturated polyurethane or an abrasion-resistant rubber as a main component. In a
case of using the polymer as a material of the resist layer, when drilling the workpiece,
the resist layer is suppressed from being excessively deformed, and thus it is possible
to enhance dimensional accuracy of a hole that is formed in the workpiece.
[0016] According to still another aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a
fiber-reinforced plastic having a hole formed by the drilling method. The fiber-reinforced
plastic has a plate shape having a thickness of 1.0 mm or more and 2.0 mm or less,
and an angle formed by a plane perpendicular to a central axis line of the hole and
a wall surface defining the hole is 80° or more and 90° or less. When the angle formed
by the plane perpendicular to the central axis line of the hole and the wall surface
defining the hole is an angle of 80° or more and 90° or less, it is possible to improve
uniformity of a hole diameter in a thickness direction of the fiber-reinforced plastic.
Furthermore, the plate shape stated here includes not only a flat plate shape but
also a curved plate shape.
[0017] According to still another aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a
drilling method of forming a hole in a fiber-reinforced plastic workpiece having a
front surface and a rear surface, the hole being opened on the front surface and the
rear surface and having a first opening on the surface side having a first area. The
method includes disposing a resist layer having blast resistance higher than blast
resistance of the workpiece on the workpiece, the resist layer having a second opening
which has a shape corresponding to a shape of the first opening and has a second area
smaller than the first area; and ejecting blasting abrasives to the workpiece through
the resist layer to cut a portion, which is exposed from the second opening, in the
workpiece while cutting a peripheral edge portion of the second opening of the resist
layer.
[0018] When the blasting abrasives are continuously projected to the workpiece through the
resist layer, the blasting abrasives passing through the second opening enters a downward
side of the resist layer, and thus peeling-off may occur on a surface of the workpiece.
When the peeling-off occurs, reinforcing fibers of the workpiece are exposed on the
surface of the workpiece as fluffing. In the method according to the aspect, the blasting
abrasives are ejected to the workpiece through the resist layer in which the second
opening having the second area smaller than that of the first area is formed. In this
method, the blasting abrasives, which collide with the resist layer, cut a peripheral
edge portion of the second opening, and thus the area of the second opening is gradually
enlarged with the passage of a processing time. In this manner, when the hole is formed
in the workpiece while gradually enlarging the area of the second opening, even when
peeling-off occurs in the workpiece, a peeled-off portion is removed along the progress
of processing of the workpiece. As a result, it is possible to suppress occurrence
of peeling-off and fluffing on the surface of the workpiece after processing.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0019] According to various aspects and embodiments of the present disclosure, it is possible
to form a hole in a fiber-reinforced plastic while suppressing occurrence of fluffing
and peeling-off.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0020]
FIG. 1 is a front view illustrating a sandblast machine that is used in one embodiment
in a partially cut-out manner.
FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating a drilling method of one embodiment.
FIG. 3 is a view schematically illustrating a scanning trajectory of a workpiece of
one embodiment.
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view illustrating a workpiece to which a drilling method
of one embodiment is applied.
FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view illustrating a workpiece to which a conventional
drilling method is applied.
Description of Embodiments
[0021] Hereinafter, various embodiments will be described in detail with reference to the
accompanying drawings. Furthermore, the same reference sign will be given to the same
or equivalent portion in the drawings, and redundant description for the same or equivalent
portion will be omitted. In addition, it is not necessary for dimension ratios of
the drawings to match actual dimension ratios. Furthermore, right and left directions
and upper and lower directions in description represent directions in the drawings
unless otherwise stated.
[0022] FIG. 1 is a front view illustrating a sandblast machine 01 according to one embodiment
in a partially cut-out manner. The sandblast machine 01 is a device that projects
blasting abrasives to a fiber-reinforced plastic workpiece W (workpiece) and forms
a hole in the workpiece W. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the sandblast machine 01 includes
a housing 10, a fixed-quantity supply mechanism 20, a separation mechanism 30, a suction
mechanism 40, a nozzle 50, and a control device 60.
[0023] The housing 10 constitutes a processing chamber R on an inner side thereof. A door
11 is provided in a front surface of the housing 10, and an operator can access the
processing chamber R by opening the door 11. A nozzle fixture 12, a processing table
13, and a movement mechanism 14 are provided in the processing chamber R.
[0024] The nozzle fixture 12 is a mechanism that holds the nozzle 50, and can move the nozzle
50 along a height direction. Accordingly, the nozzle fixture 12 is configured to freely
adjust a distance between the nozzle 50 and the workpiece W.
[0025] The movement mechanism 14 is provided on a frame 15 that is provided on a lower side
of the housing 10, and is disposed on a downward side of the nozzle 50. In one embodiment,
the movement mechanism 14 may be plate-shaped body in which a plurality of through-holes
are formed. When the through-holes are formed in the movement mechanism 14, it is
possible to allow blasting abrasives, which is ejected from the nozzle 50, to propagate
toward the bottom of the housing 10.
[0026] The processing table 13 is provided on the movement mechanism 14 and supports the
workpiece W that is placed on the processing table 13. For example, the movement mechanism
14 is configured to convey the processing table 13 and the workpiece W supported on
the processing table 13 in a horizontal direction by a driving force of a motor. For
example, the movement mechanism 14 is an X-Y stage that extends in the horizontal
direction and moves the workpiece W in an X direction and a Y direction which are
perpendicular to each other (refer to FIG. 3).
[0027] The fixed-quantity supply mechanism 20 is provided on an upper side of the processing
chamber R. The fixed-quantity supply mechanism 20 includes a storage hopper 21 and
a conveyance path 22, and supplies blasting abrasives in the storage hopper 21 to
the nozzle 50 in a fixed quantity through the conveyance path 22. Furthermore, a structure
of the fixed-quantity supply mechanism 20 is not limited as long as the fixed-quantity
supply mechanism 20 can supply a constant amount of blasting abrasives to the nozzle
50. For example, as the fixed-quantity supply mechanism 20, a screw feeder, a vibration
feeder, and a table feeder can be used. In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, the
screw feeder is used as the fixed-quantity supply mechanism 20.
[0028] The separation mechanism 30 is provided on an upper side of the storage hopper 21
of the fixed-quantity supply mechanism 20. The separation mechanism 30 is connected
to the storage hopper 21 of the fixed-quantity supply mechanism 20. The separation
mechanism 30 has an approximately inverted pyramid shape, collects used blasting abrasives,
and classifies the blasting abrasives into a blasting abrasives that can be reused,
and dust. One end of a first transport pipe P1 is connected to the separation mechanism
30. The other end of the first transport pipe P1 is connected to the bottom of the
housing 10. Accordingly, a space in the processing chamber R and a space in the fixed-quantity
supply mechanism 20 communicate with each other through the first transport pipe P1.
In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, a cyclone type classifier is used as the
separation mechanism 30. However, as the separation mechanism 30, arbitrary classifiers
such as a wind power type classifier, a screen type classifier can be used.
[0029] In addition, one end of a second transport pipe P2 is connected to the separation
mechanism 30. The other end of the second transport pipe P2 is connected to the suction
mechanism 40. The suction mechanism 40 is a mechanism that sets the processing chamber
R to negative pressure in order for the blasting abrasives not to be leaked to the
outside of the processing chamber R, and suctions particles including the blasting
abrasives that are ejected. The suction mechanism 40 collects light particles (a blasting
abrasives that becomes a size that is not appropriate for reuse, and chip powders
of the workpiece W and a sheet 70) which are classified in the separation mechanism
30 (cyclone type classifier) through the second transport pipe P2. In addition, the
suction mechanism 40 has a function of setting an internal space of the separation
mechanism 30 to negative pressure, and transporting the blasting abrasives, which
is used and collected at the bottom of the housing 10, to the separation mechanism
30.
[0030] The nozzle 50 is a mechanism that ejects the blasting abrasives to the workpiece
W, and includes a nozzle holder 51, an air nozzle 52, and an ejecting nozzle 53. The
nozzle holder 51 is connected to the fixed-quantity supply mechanism 20 through a
blasting abrasive hose H2. A compressor C is connected to the air nozzle 52 through
an air hose H1. In one embodiment, an electromagnetic valve VL1 and a valve VL2 may
be provided between the air nozzle 52 and the compressor C. When the compressor C
is operated, compressed air is ejected from the air nozzle 52, and the inside of the
nozzle holder 51 becomes negative pressure. According to this, the blasting abrasives
stored in the storage hopper 21 is suctioned into the nozzle holder 51 through the
conveyance path 22 and the blasting abrasive hose H2, is mixed with the compressed
air in the nozzle holder 51, and is ejected as a solid-gas two-phase flow from an
ejecting port of the ejecting nozzle 53 toward the workpiece W. The nozzle 50 having
the above-described configuration can continuously eject the blasting abrasives, and
thus it is possible to continuously process the workpiece W over a long time.
[0031] Furthermore, a so-called direct pressure type nozzle can be used as a nozzle of another
type. The direct pressure type nozzle has more excellent cutting capacity in comparison
to the nozzle 50 of this embodiment, but it is difficult to continuously perform processing
over a long time.
[0032] Examples of a blasting abrasives that is ejected from a nozzle include a metal or
nonmetal shot, grid, or cut-wire, ceramic-based particles (alumina-based particles,
silicon carbide-based particles, zircon-based particles, and the like), natural stone
particles (emery, silica stone, diamond, and the like), plant-based particles (a shell
of a walnut, a peach stone, an apricot stone, and the like), resin-based particles
(nylon, melamine, urea, and the like), and the like. The fiber-reinforce plastic is
a difficult-to-cut material. Accordingly, when selecting a relatively hard material
as the blasting abrasives, it is possible to efficiently cut the workpiece W.
[0033] The control device 60 is a computer including a processor, a storage unit, an input
device, a display device, and the like, and controls respective units of the sandblast
machine 01. In one embodiment, the control device 60 transmits a control signal to
the movement mechanism 14, the fixed-quantity supply mechanism 20, the suction mechanism
40, and the electromagnetic valve VL1, and controls positions of the movement mechanism
14 in the X direction and the Y direction, an operation of the fixed-quantity supply
mechanism 20, an operation of the suction mechanism 40, and opening and closing of
the electromagnetic valve VL1, and the like. As a control device, various operation
devices such as a personal computer, a motion controller such as a programmable logic
controller (PLC) and a digital signal processor (DSP), a high-function portable terminal,
a high-function portable telephone, and the like can be used.
[0034] Hereinafter, description will be given of a drilling method by the sandblast machine
01 of one embodiment with reference to FIG. 2. In this method, a hole H having a desired
diameter d
1 is formed in the fiber-reinforced plastic workpiece W. The workpiece W has a flat
plate shape, and includes an upper surface (front surface) 82 and a lower surface
(rear surface) 84 opposite to each other (refer to FIG. 4). The hole H to be formed
in the workpiece W is a through-hole that extends from the upper surface 82 to the
lower surface 84, and is opened to the upper surface 82 and the lower surface 84.
In the hole H, an opening (first opening) 86 on the upper surface 82 side has the
desired diameter d
1. In other words, the hole H to be formed in the workpiece W is a through-hole including
the opening 86 having an area (first area) corresponding to the desired diameter d
1 on the upper surface 82 side. Hereinafter, description will be given of an example
in which the workpiece W is constituted by a glass fiber-reinforced plastic (GFRP)
that is one kind of the fiber-reinforced plastic.
[0035] Furthermore, the desired diameter d
1 of the opening 86 represents a length of the widest portion in the diameter of the
opening 86. For example, in a case where the opening 86 has an elliptical shape, the
major axis of the ellipse becomes the desired diameter d
1. In a case where the opening 86 has a polygonal shape, a length of the longest straight
line among straight lines which connect arbitrary two corners of the polygon becomes
the desired diameter d
1. Hereinafter, description will be given of an embodiment in which the opening 86
has a circular shape. In this embodiment, the diameter of the opening 86 becomes the
desired diameter d
1.
<S1: Preparation of Resist Layer>
[0036] In a drilling method according to one embodiment, first, a step S1 is performed.
In the step S1, a sheet 70 that functions as a resist layer is prepared. The sheet
70 is constituted by a material that is softer than the blasting abrasives and is
capable of absorbing an impact force of the blasting abrasives. Accordingly, the sheet
70 has blast resistance that is higher than that of the workpiece W constituted by
the fiber-reinforced plastic.
[0037] One or a plurality of openings (second openings) 71 are formed in the sheet 70 (refer
to FIG. 4). Each of the openings 71 has a shape corresponding to a shape of the opening
86 of the hole H. For example, the opening 71 has a planar shape such as a circular
shape, an elliptical shape, and a polygonal shape in correspondence with the shape
of the opening 86. In one embodiment, the opening 71 of the sheet 70 has the same
shape as that of the opening 86 of the workpiece W. However, a diameter d
2 of the opening 71 is set to smaller than the desired diameter d
1. In other words, the opening 71 has an area (second area) that is smaller than the
area of the opening 86. A ratio (d
2/d
1) of the diameter d
2 of the opening 71 to the desired diameter d
1 may be set in a range of 0.84 to 0.94, particularly, in a range of 0.90 to 0.94.
As to be described later, when the ratio is excessively small, a collision chance
between the workpiece W and the blasting abrasives are excessively less, and thus
a drilling time is lengthened. In contrast, the ratio is excessively large, peeling-off
is likely to occur in a surface layer of the workpiece W. Here, the diameter d
2 of the opening 71 represents the largest diameter among diameters defined by the
opening 71. For example, in a case where the planar shape of the opening 71 is set
to an elliptical shape, the major axis of the opening 71 of the elliptical shape becomes
the diameter d
2. In a case where the planar shape of the opening 71 is set to a polygonal shape,
a length of the longest straight line among straight lines which connect arbitrary
two corners of the polygon becomes the diameter d
2. Hereinafter, description will be given of an embodiment in which the planar shape
of the opening 71 is a circular shape. In this embodiment, the diameter of the opening
71 becomes the diameter d
2.
[0038] As a material of the sheet 70, for example, thermoplastic resins such as various
rubbers, nylon, polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyurethane, and acrylic can
be used. For example, as the material of the sheet 70, an abrasion-resistant rubber
can be used. Abrasion resistance of a rubber can be easily adjusted by changing a
blending ratio of a filling reinforcing material such as calcium carbonate to a natural
rubber or a synthetic rubber that is a main raw material. Accordingly, when using
the abrasion-resistant rubber as the material of the sheet 70, it is possible to easily
obtain a resist material having abrasion resistance that is appropriate for drilling.
In one embodiment, an abrasion-resistance rubber in which a reinforcing filling material
is blended to a natural rubber or a synthetic rubber in a ratio of 60 wt% to 70 wt%
can be used as the material of the sheet 70.
[0039] In addition, polyurethane is comprehensively excellent in elasticity, a thermal deformation
temperature, and impact strength. Accordingly, when using polyurethane as the material
of the sheet 70, it is possible to improve accuracy of a diameter of the hole H that
is formed in the workpiece W. In addition, it is possible to easily form the opening
71 having a small diameter (for example, φ 2 mm or less) in the polyurethane sheet
70. As to be described later, in a method of one embodiment, a portion exposed from
the opening 71 in the workpiece W is cut while cutting a peripheral edge portion 72
of the opening 71 in the sheet 70 by blasting abrasives. At this time, when the peripheral
edge portion 72 of the sheet 70 is cut more than necessary, fluffing or peeling-off
may occur on a surface of the workpiece W or dimensional accuracy may deteriorate
due to the cutting. Accordingly, the material of the sheet 70 is selected in consideration
of elasticity, a thermal deformation temperature, and impact force resistance. For
example, unsaturated polyurethane is comprehensively excellent in elasticity, a thermal
deformation temperature, and Charpy impact strength, and thus the sheet 70 may be
constituted by a polymer that includes unsaturated polyurethane as a main component.
In addition, a content rate of the unsaturated polyurethane may be set to 50 wt% or
more, or 50 wt% to 70 wt%.
[0040] In one embodiment, the sheet 70 may be formed from a photosensitive resin that is
shaped in a film shape. When forming the sheet 70 from the photosensitive resin, first,
a transparent pattern mask in which an opening pattern is printed is disposed on the
sheet 70, the sheet 70 is irradiated with ultraviolet rays from an ultraviolet ray
emission source provided on an upper side of the sheet 70 through the pattern mask.
In the sheet 70, a region that does not overlap a printed pattern is cured through
irradiation of ultraviolet rays. However, a portion that overlaps the printed opening
pattern become shadow, and is not cured. Subsequently, the sheet 70 after being irradiated
with ultraviolet rays is washed out by using a development solution, and thus the
uncured region of the sheet 70 is removed. A plurality of the openings 71 can be formed
in the sheet 70 through a series of processes as described above.
[0041] In addition, in the step S1, the prepared sheet 70 is disposed on the workpiece W.
In one embodiment, the sheet 70 may have stickiness. In this case, after the sheet
70 is stuck to an upper surface of the workpiece W, pressure is reduced in a vacuum
chamber. According to this, it is possible to closely stick the sheet 70 onto the
workpiece W. In addition, when the workpiece W is subsequently heated at a temperature
of 60°C to 90°C, the workpiece W and the sheet 70 can be firmly and closely stuck
to each other.
<S2: Preparation of Sandblast Machine>
[0042] Subsequently, in a drilling method according to one embodiment, a step S2 is performed.
In the step S2, the sandblast machine 01 is prepared. In the step S2, first, the suction
mechanism 40 is operated for suctioning of the processing chamber R. Subsequently,
locking of the door 11 is released to open the door 11, and a predetermined amount
of blasting abrasives are put into the processing chamber R by an operator as an example.
Subsequently, the blasting abrasives are transported to the storage hopper 21 of the
fixed-quantity supply mechanism 20 through the first transport pipe P1 and the separation
mechanism 30 due to a suction force of the suction mechanism 40. Then, the door 11
is closed and locked. The processing chamber R becomes negative pressure due to suctioning
of the suction mechanism 40, and thus external air flows into the processing chamber
R from a suction hole (not illustrated) provided to communicate with the outside.
[0043] In the step S2, for example, the control device 60 of the sandblast machine 01 is
operated to set the electromagnetic valve VL1, which is provided in a path through
which compressed air is supplied to the nozzle 50, to "open", and to set the fixed-quantity
supply mechanism 20 to "ON". Through the setting, the blasting abrasives are supplied
to the nozzle 50, and are ejected from the nozzle 50. When the blasting abrasives
are ejected from the nozzle 50, the degree of opening of the valve VL2 that adjusts
compressed air supply pressure is adjusted, and thus a ejected velocity of the blasting
abrasives are adjusted.
[0044] Subsequently, the control device 60 of the sandblast machine 01 is operated to set
the electromagnetic valve VL1 to "close", and to set the fixed-quantity supply mechanism
20 to "OFF". Through the setting, ejecting of the blasting abrasives from the nozzle
50 are stopped. Then, the door 11 is opened, and the workpiece W is placed on the
processing table 13 and is fixed thereto. Subsequently, the nozzle fixture 12 is operated
to adjust a distance and an angle between the nozzle 50 and the workpiece W. When
the above-described processes are finished, the door 11 is closed and locked. Furthermore,
the workpiece W that is placed on the processing table 13 may be a plate-shaped body
having a thickness of 1.0 or more and 2.0 mm or less.
[0045] Subsequently, in the step S2, processing conditions such as a movement trajectory
(distances in the X direction and the Y direction in FIG. 3) and a movement velocity
of the movement mechanism 14, and the number of times of scanning are input to the
control device 60.
<S3: Drilling Process>
[0046] Subsequently, a step S3 is performed. In the step S3, as to be described later, the
blasting abrasives are ejected toward the workpiece W through the sheet 70 to cut
a portion exposed from the opening 71 in the workpiece W while cutting the peripheral
edge portion 72 of the opening 71 in the sheet 70. Hereinafter, an example of the
step S3 will be described in detail.
[0047] In the step S3, first, the control device 60 is operated to set the electromagnetic
valve VL1 to "open" and to set the fixed-quantity supply mechanism 20 to "ON". According
to this, the blasting abrasives are ejected from the nozzle 50. Subsequently, the
movement mechanism 14 is set to "ON", and the movement mechanism 14 operates so that
the workpiece W is moved in a horizontal direction. For example, as illustrated in
FIG. 3, the movement mechanism 14 repeats movement of the workpiece W in a +X direction
by a predetermined distance, and movement of the workpiece W in a -X direction after
deviating a position of the workpiece W in a +Y direction by a predetermined pitch.
According to this, the workpiece W is scanned in a comb-tooth shape with respect to
an ejecting region A of the blasting abrasives. The movement mechanism 14 moves the
workpiece W along a scanning trajectory T to allow the blasting abrasives to collide
with the entire surface of the workpiece W in an approximately uniform manner. In
one embodiment, the scanning is performed in a plurality of times to form the hole
H in the workpiece W. An ejecting port of the nozzle 50 may have rectangular planar
shape. When the ejecting port of the nozzle 50 has a rectangular planar shape and
is disposed in such a manner that a long side of the ejecting port matches the Y direction,
it is possible to enlarge a collision area of the blasting abrasives when the workpiece
W is scanned in the X direction. As a result, it is possible to improve processing
efficiency of the workpiece W.
[0048] As described above, when the workpiece W is conveyed in the X direction and the Y
direction by the movement mechanism 14, in the workpiece W, the hole H is formed in
a region that is not covered with the opening 71 of the sheet 70. Here, as illustrated
in FIG. 4, the blasting abrasives are projected from the nozzle 50 toward a region
that includes the opening 71 and the peripheral edge portion 72 of the opening 71.
Accordingly, in the step S3, as illustrated in FIG. 4, a region exposed from the opening
71 in the workpiece W is cut while the peripheral edge portion 72 of the opening 71
is cut. The sheet 70 has blast resistance higher than that of the fiber-reinforced
plastic that constitutes the workpiece W, and thus the peripheral edge portion 72
of the sheet 70 is cut slowly in comparison to the workpiece W. Accordingly, in the
step S3, the region exposed from the opening 71 in the workpiece W is cut in such
a manner that a cut area of the workpiece W does not become excessive while gradually
enlarging a diameter (area) of the opening 71 of the sheet 70. As a result, the peeling-off
of the workpiece W in a surface layer is suppressed. In the step S3, projection of
the blasting abrasives continues until the diameter of the hole H formed in the workpiece
W becomes the desired diameter d
1.
[0049] FIG. 5 illustrates a shape of the hole H that is formed in the workpiece W when the
diameter d
2 of the opening 71 and the desired diameter d
1 are set to be the same as each other. That is, FIG. 5 illustrates a conventional
method in which the hole H having the desired diameter d
1 is directly formed in the workpiece W without cutting the peripheral edge portion
72 of the sheet 70. In a case where the fiber-reinforced plastic that constitutes
the workpiece W has a structure in which a cut reinforcing fibers are dispersed in
a resin, when the blasting abrasives are projected to the workpiece W, the reinforcing
fibers dispersed without directionality becomes the origin of fracture, and thus peeling-off
occurs on a surface of the workpiece W. In addition, in a case where the fiber-reinforce
plastic that constitutes the workpiece W has a structure in which a woven reinforcing
fibers infiltrate into a resin, the reinforcing fibers having a cloth shape becomes
the origin of fracture, and thus peeling-off occurs on a surface of the workpiece
W. When cutting further continues after the peeling-off occurs, the diameter of the
hole H formed in the workpiece W finally becomes larger than the desired diameter
d
1, and a surface layer portion does not become a circle shape. In addition, fluffing
of the reinforcing fibers occur on a wall surface of the hole H (refer to a portion
surrounded by a circle in the same drawing).
[0050] In the case where an ejection flow of the blasting abrasives are captured microscopically,
when the ejection flow flows along the surface of the workpiece W, the surface layer
of the workpiece W is likely to be peeled off due to the characteristics of the fiber-reinforced
plastic. When peeling-off occurs in the surface layer of the workpiece W, the reinforcing
fibers are exposed to surface layer, and thus fluffing occurs. Furthermore, the ejection
flow flows in a direction conforming to a wall surface of the opening of the sheet
70 (that is, a direction perpendicular to the X direction and the Y direction), it
is possible to suppress peeling-off on the surface layer of the workpiece W. As a
result, it is possible to suppress fluffing of the reinforcing fibers. In a case where
the fiber-reinforced plastic that constitutes the workpiece W has a structure in which
woven reinforcing fibers infiltrate into a resin, the blasting abrasives collide with
the workpiece W in a direction in which the reinforcing fibers of the workpiece W
is cut, and thus it is possible to further suppress fluffing of the reinforcing fibers.
In addition, in a case where the ejection flow is greatly inclined to the surface
of the workpiece W, collision energy of the blasting abrasives are not sufficient.
Accordingly, the hole H may not be formed in the workpiece W, the reinforcing fibers
may not be cut, or the reinforcing fibers may be exposed on an outer peripheral surface
of the hole H as fluffing. Here, in one embodiment, the nozzle 50 may be disposed
at an angle of 85° to 95° (that is, in a range of 90° ± 5°) with respect to the surface
of the workpiece W. In other words, the nozzle 50 is disposed so that an angle made
by the surface of the workpiece W and an ejecting direction of the blasting abrasives
becomes 85° or more and 95° or less.
[0051] When processing is performed so that an angle of a wall surface of the hole H formed
in the workpiece W becomes appropriate, the processing is advantageous in performance.
For example, the hole H formed in the workpiece W is provided for joining, the higher
the perpendicularity of a wall surface defining the hole H is, the more a clearance
between a joining member such as a bolt and the wall surface of the hole H becomes
uniform in a thickness direction. As a result, it is possible to suppress backlash
after joining. In addition, in a case where the hole H formed in the workpiece W is
provided to improve sound absorbency, the higher the perpendicularity of the wall
surface defining the hole H is, the further sound reflection due to the wall surface
of the hole H is prevented. As in the examples, it is preferable that the angle of
the wall surface with respect to a plane perpendicular to a central axis line AX of
the hole H is close to 90° from the viewpoint of performance. However, as it is close
to 90°, productivity further deteriorates. Accordingly, the angle of the wall surface
that constitutes the hole H with respect to the plane perpendicular to the central
axis line AX of the hole H may be 80° to 90°, or 80° to 85° from the viewpoints of
productivity and performance.
[0052] Particles including the blasting abrasives projected to the workpiece W in the step
S3 are collected at the bottom of the housing 10, and is transported to the separation
mechanism 30 through the first transport pipe P1 due to a suction force of the suction
mechanism 40. The particles transported to the separation mechanism 30 are separated
into a blasting abrasives that can be reused and dust in the separation mechanism
30. The blasting abrasives that can be reused are accumulated in the storage hopper
21, and light dust is suctioned to the suction mechanism 40 and is collected by a
collection filter provided inside the suction mechanism 40. The blasting abrasives
that are accumulated in the storage hopper 21 and can be reused are transported to
the nozzle 50 in a constant amount, and are ejected again toward the workpiece W.
<S4: Recovery Process>
[0053] After forming the hole H in the workpiece W in the step S3, a step S4 is performed.
In the step S4, the control device 60 is operated to set the movement mechanism 14
to "OFF", to set the electromagnetic valve VL1 to "close", and to set the fixed-quantity
supply mechanism 20 to "OFF", respectively. Then, locking of the door 11 is released
to open the door 11, and the workpiece W is recovered from the processing chamber
R. Subsequently, after the sheet 70 stuck to the workpiece W is peeled off, the blasting
abrasives and dust which adhere to the workpiece W are removed by using air blow,
ultrasonic cleaning, and the like. Through the processes, a series of drilling is
terminated.
[0054] Next, description will be given of an experiment example in which drilling of the
FRP was performed by using the drilling method of one embodiment. In the experiment
example, processing of forming 100 pieces of holes (10 pieces × 10 pieces) which have
a diameter φ of 2.0 mm (on a surface to be processed side) and have an approximately
circular shape in glass fiber-reinforced glass (GFRP) workpiece W having a plate shape
(200 mm × 200 mm × t1.0 mm (thickness)) was performed.
[0055] As the resist layer, a sheet (thickness: 0.5 mm), which contains an unsaturated polyurethane
or an acrylic resin as a main component and in which an opening having a shape corresponding
to a hole to be processed, was used.
Resist A: Unsaturated polyurethane is a main component (contained in 53 wt%)
Resist B: Unsaturated polyurethane is a main component (contained in 73 wt%)
Resist C: Acrylic resin is a main component (contained in 60 wt%)
[0056] Other main processing conditions were set as illustrated in Table 1.
[Table 1]
Blasting abrasives |
Silicon carbide particles (average particle size: 150 µm) |
Ejecting pressure |
0.4 MPa |
Distance between workpiece and nozzle |
100 mm |
Angle of nozzle |
90° |
Scanning velocity of workpiece |
100 mm/sec |
Number of times of scanning of workpiece |
40 Pass |
[0057] After performing drilling with respect to the workpiece W, among 100 pieces of holes
which were formed, arbitrary 10 pieces of holes were selected, and were observed by
using an electron microscope. Then, evaluation was performed. Evaluation standards
were as follows.
<Processing Progress>
[0058]
○ ... All holes are penetrated, and an angle of a wall surface of the all holes is
80° to 90°.
Δ ... All holes are penetrated, and the angle of the wall surface of the all holes
is 60° to 80°.
× ... Hole which is not penetrated exists, or hole in which the angle of the wall
surface of the hole is 59° or less exists.
<Diameter of Hole>
[0059]
○ ... Diameter on a surface to be processed side is less than ±7% of a target dimension
(φ 2.0 mm) in all holes.
Δ ... Diameter on the surface to be processed side is ±8% to ±15% of the target dimension
(φ 2.0 mm) in the all holes.
× ... Hole in which the diameter on the surface to be processed side is ±16% of the
target dimension (φ 2.0 mm) exists.
<Presence of Absence of Peeling-Off>
[0060]
○ ... All holes have a circular shape.
Δ ... Hole in which a surface-layer peeling-off trace is observed in the vicinity
of an outer periphery exists, but the trace is less than 1 mm from an outer periphery
of a circle.
× ... Hole in which the surface-layer peeling-off trace is observed in the vicinity
of the outer periphery exists, and the magnitude of the trace is 1 mm or greater from
the outer periphery of a circle.
<Presence or Absence of Fluffing>
[0061]
○ ... Fluffing is not confirmed in all holes.
Δ ... Hole in which slight fluffing is confirmed exists, but an exposed glass fiber
is less than 0.1 mm.
× ... Hole in which fluffing is confirmed exists, and the exposed glass fiber is 0.1
mm or greater.
[0062] Hereinafter, processing conditions and evaluation results of various examples and
comparative examples are illustrated in Table 2. "Processing" in Table 2 represents
an evaluation results relating to "Processing Progress", "Peeling-Off" represents
an evaluation result relating to "Presence or Absence of Peeling-Off", and "Fluffing"
represents an evaluation result relating to "Presence or Absence of Fluffing". In
addition, "Nozzle angle" in Table 2 represents the angle of the ejection flow of the
blasting abrasives with respect to the surface of the workpiece W, and 0° is an angle
at which the ejection flow is horizontally ejected toward a scanning direction side
in the longitudinal direction of the workpiece W at initiation of scanning. That is,
a state in which the ejection flow flows in the +X direction illustrated in FIG. 3
is set as 0°.
[Table 2]
|
Resist Layer |
d2/d1 |
Nozzle angle (deg.) |
Evaluation |
Processing |
Diameter of hole |
Peeling-Off |
Fluffing |
Example 1 |
A |
0.85 |
92 |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
Example 2 |
A |
0.90 |
92 |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
Example 3 |
A |
0.94 |
92 |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
Example 4 |
A |
0.92 |
85 |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
Example 5 |
A |
0.92 |
94 |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
Example 6 |
B |
0.85 |
92 |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
Comparative Example 1 |
A |
0.78 |
92 |
× |
○ |
○ |
○ |
Comparative Example 2 |
A |
0.98 |
92 |
○ |
Δ |
Δ |
Δ |
Comparative Example 3 |
A |
1.05 |
92 |
○ |
× |
× |
× |
Comparative Example 4 |
A |
0.92 |
79 |
Δ |
○ |
○ |
Δ |
Comparative Example 5 |
A |
0.92 |
120 |
× |
○ |
○ |
Δ |
Comparative Example 6 |
C |
0.85 |
92 |
Δ |
Δ |
Δ |
Δ |
(1) Influence of d2/d1
[0063] In Examples 1 to 6, all evaluation items were "○" evaluation, and it was confirmed
that drilling was performed in a satisfactory manner. Furthermore, in a qualitative
evaluation, although the evaluation was the same "○" evaluation, but Example 2 and
Example 3 shown a tendency in which a diameter of a hole after processing was closer
to a desired dimension in comparison to Example 1.
[0064] In Comparative Example 1 in which d
2/d
1 was smaller than 0.84, "Processing Progress" was "×" evaluation. This is assumed
to be because a chance for the blasting abrasives to come into contact with the workpiece
W was excessively small. In Comparative Example 2 in which d
2/d
1 was greater than 0.94, all evaluations of "Diameter of hole", "Presence or Absence
of Peeling-OFF of Surface Layer", and "Presence or Absence of Fluffing" were "Δ" evaluation.
With regard to the "Δ" evaluation, it can be said that quality deterioration has no
problem in practical use, but the quality further deteriorates in comparison to Examples
1 to 5. In addition, in Comparative Example 3 in which d
2/d
1 was greater than 1 (that is, d
2 > d
1), evaluations of "Diameter of hole", "Presence or Absence of Peeling-OFF of Surface
Layer", and "Presence or Absence of Fluffing" were "×" evaluation. It is assumed that
when d
2/d
1 increases, an effect of suppressing of a processing area due to the opening of the
resist layer is reduced, and thus a surface layer of the workpiece W was peeled off.
(2) Influence of Nozzle Angle
[0065] In Examples 1 to 6, all were "O" evaluation, and it was confirmed that drilling was
performed in a satisfactory manner. In Comparative Example 4 and Comparative Example
5 in which the angle exceeded 90° ± 5°, it could be seen that quality deteriorates
in evaluations of "Processing Progress" and "Presence or Absence of Fluffing". With
regard to "Processing Progress", it is assumed that an inclination angle of the ejection
flow with respect to the workpiece W was great and processing capability deteriorated,
and thus quality deteriorated. With regard to the "Δ" evaluation, it can be said that
quality deterioration has no problem in practical use. However, in Comparative Example
5 in which the nozzle angle was relatively large, evaluation was "×". In addition,
with regard to "Presence or Absence of Fluffing", it is assumed that the ejection
flow flowed along the surface of the workpiece W, and thus fluffing occurred.
(3) Influence of Material of Resist Layer
[0066] In Example 1, Example 6, and Comparative Example 6, the same processing conditions
were set except for a material of the resist layer. In Example 1 and Example 6 in
which a main component of the resist layer was unsaturated polyurethane, all evaluation
items were "O" evaluation, and it was confirmed that drilling was performed in a satisfactory
manner. Furthermore, in a qualitative evaluation, although the evaluation was the
same "○" evaluation. However, there was a tendency in which the diameter of the hole
after processing was closer to a desired dimension in Example 1 in which a content
rate of unsaturated polyethylene was in a range of 50% to 70% in comparison to Example
6.
[0067] On the other hand, in Comparative Example 6 in which the main component of the resist
layer was an acrylic resin, evaluation items of "diameter of hole", "Peeling-off",
and "Fluffing" were "Δ" evaluation. With regard to the "Δ" evaluation, it can be said
that quality deterioration has no problem in practical use. However, it was confirmed
that processing accuracy was further lowered in comparison to a case of using a resist
layer in which unsaturated polyurethane is a main component.
[0068] Hereinbefore, description has been given of the embodiments, but various modifications
can be employed without limitation to the embodiments. For example, in the drilling
method according to the embodiment, in the step S1, the sheet 70 in which an opening
is formed in advance is disposed on the workpiece W. However, in one embodiment, the
opening 71 may be formed in the sheet 70 after disposing the sheet 70, in which the
opening 71 is not formed, on the workpiece W.
Industrial Applicability
[0069] In the embodiments, description has been given of drilling with respect to the workpiece
W that is constituted by glass fiber-reinforced plastic (GFRP), but the drilling method
according to the embodiments is applicable to drilling of a workpiece W that is constituted
by all kinds of fiber-reinforced plastics such as carbon fiber-reinforced plastic
(CFRP), aramid fiber-reinforced plastic (AFRP), dyneema fiber-reinforced plastic (DFRP),
xyron fiber-reinforced plastic, and boron fiber-reinforced plastic (BFRP).
Reference Signs List
[0070] 01: sandblast machine, 10: housing, 11: door, 12: nozzle fixture, 13: processing
table, 14: movement mechanism, 15: frame, 20: fixed-quantity supply mechanism, 30:
separation mechanism, 40: suction mechanism, 50: nozzle, 51: nozzle holder, 52: air
nozzle, 53: ejecting nozzle, 60: control device, 70: sheet, 71: opening, 72: peripheral
edge portion, A: ejecting region, H1: air hose, H2: blasting abrasives hose, R: processing
chamber, T: scanning trajectory, W: workpiece.