Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a carbon fiber suitable for use in aircraft members,
automobile members, and ship members as well as the applications of sport gears such
as golf shaft and fishing rod and other general industrial applications.
Background Art
[0002] Carbon fibers have a low specific weight simultaneously with a high specific strength
and a high specific modulus, and accordingly, they have been widely used in the sports
and aerospace applications as a reinforcement fiber for composite materials. Carbon
fibers have recently extended their use to automobile applications, civil engineering
and building applications, pressure vessels, windmill blades, and the like, and there
is a demand for further improvement in their performance.
[0003] Performance of the carbon fiber is known to greatly depend on the performance of
the precursor fiber for carbon fiber. In particular, surface irregularities in the
surface layer of the precursor fiber for carbon fiber are conceived to induce loss
of carbon fiber strength, and a dry-wet spinning method which is more likely to form
a smooth surface has been proposed. However, a technology capable of further improving
the strength is widely investigated.
[0004] For example, Patent Document 1 proposes a technology wherein intrusion of an oil
agent is suppressed by controlling the conditions of the dry-wet spinning step and
stretching-in-the bath step by the use of a water-base coagulation bath for densification
of the surface layer part.
[0005] Patent Document 2 proposes a technology wherein the size of the voids in the coagulated
yarn is reduced by conducing the dry-wet spinning in a coagulation bath comprising
a paraffin hydrocarbon.
[0006] Patent Document 3 proposes a technology having characteristic feature in the coagulation
step. More specifically, the technology proposed in the Patent Document 3 is the one
wherein a polymer solution of low concentration is gelated in a low temperature coagulation
bath of an alcohol and speed in the stretching step is increased by high draw ratio
to improve the productivity.
Prior Art Documents
Patent Documents
[0007]
Patent Document 1: WO2010/143680
Patent Document 2: Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication (Kokai) No. HEI 2-74607
Patent Document 3: Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication (Kokai) No. 2010-100970
Summary of the Invention
Problems to Be Solved by the Invention
[0008] While the effect of improving the carbon fiber strength is realized by the use of
the coagulated yarn produced by densifying the surface layer described in Patent Document
1 and the coagulated yarn having reduced voids described in Patent Document 2, the
effect has been insufficient.
[0009] Patent Document 1 discloses that the stretching of the coagulated yarn having the
degree of swelling of up to 160% under particular conditions is preferable, and the
case of stretching the yarn having a degree of swelling of 100 to 155% is disclosed
in the Examples. However, in the investigation of the inventors of the present invention,
it has been found that increase in the strength is insufficient when the degree of
swelling is 100% or higher. Patent Document 2 discloses the technology where the degree
of swelling had been reduced. However, in the investigation of the inventors of the
present invention, it has been found that, when the proportion of the paraffin hydrocarbon
is increased for reducing the degree of swelling, the carbon fiber had low evenness
and the surface layer had an increased pore size, and the effect of improving the
strength had been limited despite the decrease in the degree of swelling conceivably
because of the slow coagulation rate. With regard to the technology of the Patent
Document 3, this technology certainly had the effect of improving the productivity
while it did not necessarily have the effect of improving the strength probably because
of the difficulty of achieving the densification necessary to realize the high strength
in the coagulation step due to the low polymer concentration of the polymer solution.
[0010] An object of the present invention is to provide a coagulated yarn for producing
a carbon fiber having a high strength, a precursor fiber for carbon fiber, and a carbon
fiber prepared by using these.
Means for Solving the Problems
[0011] In order to solve the problems as described above, the coagulated yarn of the present
invention has a pore size of the surface layer of 30 nm or less and a degree of swelling
of less than 100%, or a pore size of the surface layer of 30 nm or less and a pore
size of the inner layer of 30 nm or less.
Advantageous Effects of the Invention
[0012] The coagulated yarn of the present invention has a pore size of the surface layer
of 30 nm or less and a degree of swelling of less than 100%, or a pore size of the
surface layer of 30 nm or less and a pore size of the inner layer of 30 nm or less,
and such constitution enables production of a precursor fiber for carbon fiber which
is capable of producing a carbon fiber having a high strength and a carbon fiber having
a high strength.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0013]
FIG. 1 is an image of the surface layer of the coagulated yarn of Example 1 taken
by TEM.
FIG. 2 is an image of the inner layer of the coagulated yarn of Example 1 taken by
TEM.
FIG. 3 is an image of the surface layer of the coagulated yarn of Comparative Example
1 taken by TEM.
FIG. 4 is an image of the inner layer of the coagulated yarn of Comparative Example
1 taken by TEM. Description of Preferred Embodiments
[0014] In the present invention, a carbon fiber having a high strength is produced by controlling
pore size of the surface layer of a coagulated yarn to a small size and also controlling
the degree of swelling to an extremely low level. In another embodiment, a carbon
fiber having a high strength is produced by controlling the pore size of the surface
layer of a coagulated yarn to a small size and also controlling pore size of the inner
layer to a small size.
[0015] The precursor fiber for carbon fiber as used in the present invention is a precursor
fiber that can be produced into carbon fiber. An exemplary such precursor fiber for
carbon fiber is the one produced by stretching the coagulated yarn.
[Coagulated yarn]
(Pore size of the surface layer of the coagulated yarn)
[0016] The size of the surface layer pores in the coagulated yarn of the present invention
is 30 nm or less. The strength of the yarn will be higher when this size is smaller,
and the pore size of the surface layer is preferably up to 20 nm and more preferably
up to 10 nm. When the pore size of the surface layer is up to 1 nm, desolvation in
the washing with water will take time, and therefore, the lower limit is approximately
1 nm. In view of the balance between the carbon fiber strength and processability,
the pore size of the surface layer is preferably 1 nm to 10 nm.
[0017] The surface layer as used in the present invention corresponds to the area in the
periphery (in the range of up to 500 nm from the exterior periphery to the interior)
of the cross section in the direction of the fiber diameter. The pore size is the
size of the pore formed by the fibrillar structure of the coagulated yarn and voids
in the fibrillar structure.
(Degree of swelling of the coagulated yarn)
[0018] In an aspect of the present invention, the degree of swelling of the coagulated yarn
is less than 100%. When the pore size of the surface layer is within the range as
described above, the strength will increase with the decrease in the degree of swelling,
and therefore, the degree of swelling is preferably less than 90%, and more preferably
less than 85%. When the degree of swelling is up to 3%, desolvation by washing with
water will be retarded, and therefore, the lower limit is approximately 3%. The degree
of swelling is more preferably 3% to 85% in view of the balance between the carbon
fiber strength and processability.
(Pore size of the inner layer of the coagulated yarn)
[0019] In another aspect of the present invention, the pore size of the inner layer of the
coagulated yarn is 30 nm or less. When the pore size of the surface layer is within
such range, the strength will increase with the decrease in the pore size of the inner
layer, and accordingly, the pore size of the inner layer is preferably up to 20 nm,
and more preferably up to 10 nm. When the pore size of the inner layer is up to 1
nm, desolvation in the washing with water will take time, and therefore, the lower
limit is approximately 1 nm. In view of the balance between the carbon fiber strength
and processability, the pore size of the inner layer is preferably 1 nm to 10 nm.
[0020] The inner layer as used in the present invention corresponds to the circular area
(with the diameter of up to 500 nm) concentric with the cross section of the fiber
in the direction of the fiber diameter. The pore size is the size of the pore formed
by the fibrillar structure of the coagulated yarn and voids in the fibrillar structure.
[Production method of the coagulated yarn]
[0021] The coagulated yarn of the present invention can be produced, for example, by the
process comprising the step of polymer coagulation using a coagulation bath prepared
by mixing a non-solvent having a solubility parameter of -11 to + 20 in relation to
the solubility parameter of polymer for forming the coagulated yarn and solvent of
the polymer solution for forming the coagulated yarn at a non-solvent to solvent ratio
of 1:9 to 9:1.
[0022] In the present invention, preferably, the polymer solution is ejected from the spinneret
in the spinning step, introduced in the coagulation bath in the coagulation step for
precipitation of the polymer to form the coagulated yarn, washed with water, stretched
in the bath, applied with an oil agent in the oil agent-application step, and dried
in the drying step to thereby produce the precursor fiber for carbon fiber. The coagulated
yarn of the present invention may also be produced by wet spinning or dry-wet spinning
of the polymer solution. In such process, the pore size and the degree of swelling
may be controlled by the conditions used in the coagulation of the polymer solution
in the coagulation bath, namely, the conditions used for precipitating the polymer
in the polymer solution from the solvent.
(Spinning step)
[0023] The spinning method used may be either wet spinning or dry-wet spinning. In the present
invention, however, the temperature of the coagulation bath is preferably set at a
low temperature as will be described below. In the meanwhile, in consideration of
the spinnability, the polymer solution should also be at a temperature capable of
realizing certain flowability. Accordingly, a difference in the temperature is often
set between the temperature of the coagulation bath and the temperature of the polymer
solution. Therefore, use of the dry-wet spinning is preferable in view of the ease
of setting temperature difference between the coagulation bath and the polymer (temperature
of the polymer ejection spinneret).
[0024] The polymer used in the present invention is not particularly limited as long as
it can be made into a carbon fiber. Examples include polyacrylonitrile, a copolymer
containing polyacrylonitrile as its main component, and a mixture containing polyacrylonitrile
as its main component. Unless otherwise noted, a copolymer containing polyacrylonitrile
as its main component is called "polymer" in the present invention.
[0025] The solvent for the polymer is not particularly limited as long as the polymer is
soluble in the solvent, and examples include dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethylformamide,
and dimethyl acetamide.
[0026] Although concentration of the polymer in the polymer solution is not particularly
limited, the concentration is preferably at least 10% by weight since the degree of
swelling is likely to be reduced with the increase in the polymer concentration. The
upper limit is not particularly limited as long as the polymer is soluble in the solvent,
and the upper limit is generally up to 30% by weight. Often, a higher polymer concentration
is also preferable in view of reducing the pore size.
[0027] The polymer solution is more likely to be flowable when the temperature of the polymer
solution ejected from the spinneret is higher. On the other hand, the precipitation
in the coagulation bath is easier when the polymer solution is at a lower temperature.
When the polymer precipitation in the coagulation bath is facilitated, the pore size
will be smaller since the pore size will not be developed in the liquid-liquid phase
separation process. Accordingly, the polymer solution preferably has a temperature
of 15 to 95°C.
(Coagulation step)
[0028] The coagulated yarn of the present invention can be produced, for example, by the
process comprising the step of polymer coagulation using a coagulation bath prepared
by mixing a non-solvent having a solubility parameter of -11 to + 20 in relation to
the solubility parameter of polymer for forming the coagulated yarn and a solvent
of the polymer solution for forming the coagulated yarn at a non-solvent to solvent
ratio of 1:9 to 9:1. The solubility parameter as used in the present invention is
Hansen solubility parameter (MPa
0.5).
[0029] The polymer is less soluble when difference between the solubility parameter of the
non-solvent and the solubility parameter of the polymer is large. In the present invention,
it has been discovered that the degree of swelling and the pore size of inner layer
can be reduced by choosing a non-solvent having a solubility parameter near that of
the polymer. The solubility parameter of the non-solvent is preferably -9 to + 15,
and more preferably - 7 to + 10 in relation to the solubility parameter of the polymer.
When polyacrylonitrile is used for the polymer, the solubility parameter of the polyacrylonitrile
is 27.4 and the preferable solubility parameter of the non-solvent is 16.4 to 47.4.
Examples of such non-solvent include methanol, ethanol, propanol, butanol, glycerin,
ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, butanediol, acetic acid, ethyl acetate, acetone,
benzene, toluene, xylene, cyclohexane, methyl ethyl ketone, and chloroform. The non-solvent
as used herein is those wherein the polymer is precipitated upon addition of the polymer
solution under the environment of normal pressure and normal temperature. The solubility
parameter used is the value described in or calculated by the method described in
a handbook (see, for example,
Hansen Solubility Parameters A User's Handbook Second Edition, CRC Press (2007)). When the polymer is a mixture, difference between the solubility parameter (δ)
of the non-solvent and the solubility parameter of each polymer are compared, and
a non-solvent having a solubility parameter which is -11 to + 20 in relation to the
solubility parameter of at least one polymer is used. When the non-solvent is a mixture,
3 parameters, namely, dispersion forces (δ
d), dipolar intermolecular force (δ
p), and hydrogen bond (δ
h) are calculated by the addition corresponding to the volume fraction of the mixture,
and the square root of the total sum of the square of each of the resulting 3 parameters
is used for the solubility parameter of the non-solvent.
[0030] For example, when the non-solvent is a two-component mixture comprising non-solvents
A and B, δ
d, δ
p, and δ
h of the mixed non-solvent are

wherein ϕ
A and ϕ
B are volume fraction of the mixture, and ϕ
A+ϕ
B = 1. The solubility parameter (δ) of the mixed non-solvent can be calculated from
the calculated δ
d, δ
p, and δ
h of the mixed non-solvent by:

[0031] The inventors of the present invention have also discovered that the pore size of
the surface layer and the inner layer can be controlled by mixing a solvent for the
polymer in the coagulation bath. In addition, the inventors of the present invention
have discovered that while circularity tended to decrease when the non-solvent in
the range as described above was used, increase of the polymer solvent had the effect
of increasing the circularity while retaining the low degree of swelling. On the other
hand, it has also been found that the pore size of the surface layer and the inner
layer can be reduced by reducing the amount of the polymer solvent. In one aspect
of the present invention, the ratio of the non-solvent to solvent is more preferably
2:8 to 8:2, still more preferably 3:7 to 7:3, and most preferably 4:6 to 6:4. In addition,
other substances may be present to the extent not adversely affecting the merits of
the present invention. It is to be noted that, the ratio as used herein is the ratio
in weight.
[0032] The diffusion coefficient D of the non-solvent in the coagulation bath of the present
invention is preferably up to 3.4 x 10
-10 m
2·S
-1. When the diffusion coefficient D is low, the resulting coagulated yarn will exhibit
a lower degree of swelling and the surface and inner layers will have a smaller pore
size. The diffusion coefficient D of the non-solvent is the coefficient obtained by
pulsed magnetic field gradient nuclear magnetic resonance (PFG-NMR method). In the
PFG-NMR, diffusion movement distance of the substance, namely, information on the
position of the nuclear spin can be collected by applying a pulsed magnetic field
gradient (PFG) in the direction of the static magnetic field in the ordinary NMR analysis.
[0033] More specifically, this method is a method wherein attenuation of the observed peak
strength based on the change of the PFG strength is tracked, and the diffusion coefficient
is determined from the gradient obtained by exponential function analysis of the attenuation
change. In the actual measurement of the non-solvent diffusion coefficient D using
the PFG-NMR, an NMR system equipped with Diff60 probe (AVANCE III HD 400 manufactured
by Bruker Biospin) is used, and the evaluation was conducted by Stejskal-Tanner equation:

wherein G is intensity of magnetic field gradient, α is pulse width of magnetic field
gradient, Δ is interval of the magnetic field gradient pulse (diffusion time), and
γ is nuclear gyromagnetic ratio of the observing nucleus. ln(I/I
0) which is the signal strength I standardized with the signal strength I
0 when G is minimum is plotted in relation to the G
2γ
2α
2(Δ-α/3), and the diffusion coefficient D of the non-solvent is determined from the
gradient non-solvent. When two or more types of non-solvents are included, the D of
the non-solvent having the highest diffusion coefficient D (the non-solvent with the
highest diffusion speed) was defined as the D of the coagulating liquid.
[0034] The coagulation bath in the present invention preferably has a viscosity of 2 to
1000 mPa·s. When the coagulation bath has a high viscosity, the degree of swelling
is likely to be low, while low viscosity of the coagulation bath facilitates precipitation
of the polymer and decrease of the pore size. The viscosity of the coagulation bath
is more preferably 5 to 500 mPa·s, and still more preferably 10 to 200 mPa.
[0035] In the coagulation bath of the present invention, temperature of the coagulation
bath is preferably 10 to 100°C lower than the temperature of the polymer ejected from
the spinneret. When the temperature of the coagulation bath is low, polymer precipitation
is promoted, and the pore size can be controlled to a smaller size. On the other hand,
when the coagulation bath has a high temperature, spinnability will be improved, and
production of fibers with reduced fluffs and fiber-fiber adhesion will be enabled.
The temperature of the coagulation bath is preferably 20 to 80°C, more preferably
30 to 60°C lower than the temperature of the polymer solution.
[Production method of the precursor fiber for carbon fiber]
[0036] Next, the method for producing the precursor fiber for carbon fiber of the present
invention is described.
[0037] In the present invention, the production method of the precursor fiber for carbon
fiber preferably comprises forming the coagulated yarn by the method as described
above and conducting the stretching step. More preferably, the precursor fiber for
carbon fiber is produced by washing the coagulated yarn with water, stretching the
washed yarn in the bath, applying an oil agent, and drying the yarn. In another preferable
embodiment, the method may further comprise a dry heat stretching step or a steam
stretching step. The fiber after the coagulation may be directly subjected to the
stretching in the bath without conducting the step of washing with water, or the fiber
may be subjected to the stretching in the bath after removing the solvent by the washing
with water.
[0038] After the stretching step in the bath, a silicone oil agent is preferably applied
to the stretched fibers in order to prevent adhesion between the filaments.
[0039] After applying the oil agent, the fibers are preferably dried. In addition, after
the drying step, the fibers are preferably stretched in a heated medium for the purpose
of improving the productivity or orientation parameter of crystallites. Examples of
the preferable heated medium include steam under pressure and superheated steam in
view of the stable operation and the cost.
[0040] When the draw ratio is high, arrangement of the molecules in the fiber axis direction
is promoted, and the tensile strength after production into the carbon fiber is more
likely to be improved. On the other hand, when the draw ratio is reduced, improvement
in the evenness in the fiber longitudinal direction is more likely to be becomes easier.
Accordingly, the total draw ratio is preferably at least 1 and less than 20.
[Production method of the carbon fiber]
[0041] Next, the method for producing the carbon fiber of the present invention is described.
[0042] In the present invention, the production method of the carbon fiber preferably comprises
the steps of producing the precursor fiber for carbon fiber and subjecting the precursor
fiber for carbon fiber to a heat treatment. The heat treatment step is not particularly
limited as long as the precursor fiber for carbon fiber is heated in the production
of the carbon fiber from the precursor fiber for carbon fiber. Examples of such step
include the stabilization (oxidation) or fireproofing step, pre-carbonization step,
carbonization step, and graphitization step as described below.
[0043] In the present invention, preferably, the precursor fiber for carbon fiber produced
as described above is sequentially subjected to a stabilization step wherein the fibers
are made fireproof in the air at a temperature of 200 to 300°C, a pre-carbonization
step wherein the fibers produced by the stabilization step is preliminarily carbonized
in an inert atmosphere at a temperature of 300 to 800°C, and a carbonization step
wherein the fibers produced by the pre-carbonization step are carbonized in an inert
atmosphere at a temperature of 1,000 to 3,000°C to produce the carbon fiber.
[0044] When a carbon fiber having a higher modulus is desired, graphitization may be conducted
subsequent to the carbonization step. The temperature of the graphitization step is
preferably 2,000 to 2,800°C, and the maximum temperature may be adequately selected
depending on the properties required for the intended carbon fiber. The draw ratio
in the graphitization step may be adequately selected depending on the properties
required for the intended carbon fiber so that the quality loss such as fluff generation
will not be caused.
(Surface modification step)
[0045] The resulting carbon fiber may be subjected to electrolytic treatment for the surface
modification so that the fiber reinforced composite material obtained by the electrolytic
treatment will exhibit adequate adhesion between the carbon fiber and the carbon fiber
matrix. This will solve the problems such as brittle fracture of the composite material
by the excessively high adhesion, loss of tensile strength in the fiber direction,
and failure to develop the strength properties in the non-fiber direction due to high
tensile strength in the fiber direction but with poor adhesion with the resin. As
a consequence, the resulting fiber reinforced composite material will exhibit well-balanced
strength properties in both fiber direction and non-fiber direction.
[0046] After the electrolytic treatment, sizing process may be conducted to provide convergency
with the carbon fiber. The sizing agent may be an adequately selected sizing agent
having good compatibility with the matrix resin depending on the type of the resin
used.
Examples
[0047] The data in the Examples and the Comparative Examples were measured by the procedures
as described below.
1. Pore size of the coagulated yarn
(1) Sample preparation
[0048] The liquid in the coagulated yarn was replaced with water, and after freeze drying,
this yarn was embedded in a resin. Sections of 100 nm were prepared with an ultramicrotome.
(2) Observation
[0049] After removing the resin in the prepared section, the section was observed by using
a transmission electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 100 kV. The cross-section
in the fiber diameter direction was observed at a magnification of 10,000.
(3) Measurement of the pore size
[0050]
- A. Noise was removed by Image Processing Software J Trim ver.1.53c (J Trim) at the
applied intensity of 50.
- B. Normalization of the histogram for the image obtained in A was conducted with the
J Trim.
- C. Black and white conversion was conducted by using 145 for the border threshold
for the image obtained in B by the J Trim.
- D. In the image obtained in C, necessary areas were selected with an area selection
tool of Image Processing Software Image J 1.50i (Image J) (the area with the width
of 500 nm from the outer periphery was selected for the surface layer, and the circular
area having a diameter of 500 nm wherein the center was the center of gravity of the
cross-section was used for the inner layer).
- E. For the image obtained in D, the area of the part corresponding to the pore was
measured by particle analyzing command of the Image Processing Software Image J 1.50i
(Image J), and the thus obtained area was converted to a circle to determine the particle
size.
- F. Of the particle size obtained in the image obtained in E, average of the second
largest to the 31st largest was used for the particle size. When 31 particles were
not detected, the values in the detected range were used.
2. Degree of swelling of the coagulated yarn
[0051] First, about 10 g of the coagulated yarn was sampled, and washed with water for at
least 12 hours. Next, the yarn was dehydrated by using a centrifugal dehyhdrator (for
example, H-110A manufactured by Kokusan) at 3000 rpm for 3 minutes and fiber weight
after the dehydration was determined. Subsequently, the dehydrated sample was dried
in a dryer adjusted to 105°C for 2.5 hours, and the fiber weight after the drying
was determined. The degree of swelling of the fiber was calculated by the following
equation.

3. Tensile strength and modulus of the carbon fiber bundle
[0052] The value was determined on the bases of JIS R7608 (2007) "Carbon fiber: Determination
of tensile properties of resin-impregnated yarn". The resin-impregnated strand of
the carbon fiber to be measured was prepared by impregnating carbon fiber or graphitized
fiber with 3,4-epoxycyclohexylmethyl-3,4-epoxy-cyclohexyl-carboxylate (100 parts by
weight) / boron trifluoride monoethylamine (3 parts by weight) / acetone (4 parts
by weight) and curing at a temperature of 130°C for 30 minutes. The number of carbon
fiber strand measured was 6, and the average of the measurements was used for the
tensile strength. In the Example, "Bakelite" (Registered Trademark) ERL4221 manufactured
by Union Carbide was used for the 3,4-epoxycyclohexylmethyl-3,4-epoxy-cyclohexyl-carboxylate.
4. Measurement of the diffusion coefficient (D) of the non-solvent
[0053] The diffusion coefficient (D) of the non-solvent in each coagulation bath was measured
by PFG-NMR method using NMR system (AVANCE III HD400 manufactured by Bruker Biospin)
equipped with Diff60 probe. The measurement was conducted at a temperature of 5°C.
(Example 1)
[0054] A copolymer comprising acrylonitrile and itaconic acid was polymerized by solution
polymerization using dimethyl sulfoxide for the solvent and using a polymerization
initiator. The resulting polyacrylonitrile copolymer was used for the spinning dope
solution.
[0055] The spinning dope solution was controlled to 50°C, and after ejecting into air, it
was introduced in a coagulation bath prepared by mixing at 48% by weight of dimethyl
sulfoxide (polymer solvent) and 52% by weight of ethylene glycol (non-solvent) controlled
to 5°C, and the coagulated fiber was produced by dry-wet spinning by taking up at
a speed corresponding to a spinning draft of 2.5. The coagulated fiber was washed
with water and stretched in water bath. Subsequently, an amino-modified silicone-based
silicone oil agent was applied to the fiber bundle that had been stretched in water
bath, and the drying densification process was conducted by using a heater roller,
and stretched in a steam at elevated pressure to a total draw ratio of the process
of 10 to produce a polyacrylonitrile precursor fiber for carbon fiber having a filament
fineness of 0.8 dtex. Next, the resulting polyacrylonitrile precursor fiber for carbon
fiber was subjected to stabilization process in the air having a temperature gradient
of 220 to 270°C to produce a stabilized bundle of fibers. The resulting stabilized
bundle of fibers was subjected to preliminary carbonization treatment in nitrogen
atmosphere at a temperature of 300 to 800°C to produce a bundle of preliminarily carbonized
fibers. The resulting bundle of preliminarily carbonized fibers was subjected to carbonization
treatment in nitrogen atmosphere at the maximum temperature of 1400°C. Subsequently,
the fiber was subjected to electrolytic surface treatment by using aqueous solution
of sulfuric acid for the electrolyte, washed with water, and dried, and carbon fiber
was obtained after applying a sizing agent.
(Example 2)
[0056] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that methanol was used for the non-solvent
in the coagulation bath to obtain the carbon fiber.
(Example 3)
[0057] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that temperature of the coagulation
bath was controlled to 45°C.
(Example 4)
[0058] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that n-butanol was used for the non-solvent
in the coagulation bath and ratio of the non-solvent to the polymer solvent was changed
to obtain the carbon fiber.
(Example 5)
[0059] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that glycerin and ethanol were used
for the non-solvent in the coagulation bath to obtain the carbon fiber.
(Example 6)
[0060] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that dimethylformamide was used for
the polymer solvent to obtain the carbon fiber.
(Example 7)
[0061] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that ethylene glycol and ethanol were
used for the non-solvent in the coagulation bath and ratio of the non-solvent to the
polymer solvent was changed to obtain the carbon fiber.
(Example 8)
[0062] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that propylene glycol and ethanol
were used for the non-solvent in the coagulation bath and ratio of the non-solvent
to the polymer solvent was changed to obtain the carbon fiber.
(Example 9)
[0063] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that water and glycerin were used
for the non-solvent in the coagulation bath and ratio of the non-solvent to the polymer
solvent was changed to obtain the carbon fiber. The D evaluated by the PFG-NMR was
2.7 x 10
-10 m
2·S
-1.
(Example 10)
[0064] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that water and ethylene glycol were
used for the non-solvent in the coagulation bath and ratio of the non-solvent to the
polymer solvent was changed to obtain the carbon fiber. The D evaluated by the PFG-NMR
was 2.7 x 10
-10 m
2·S
-1.
(Example 11)
[0065] The procedure of Example 10 was repeated except that temperature of the coagulation
bath was controlled to 25°C.
(Example 12)
[0066] The procedure of Example 10 was repeated except that temperature of the coagulation
bath was controlled to - 15°C.
(Example 13)
[0067] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that water and propylene glycol were
used for the non-solvent in the coagulation bath and ratio of the non-solvent to the
polymer solvent was changed to obtain the carbon fiber. The D evaluated by the PFG-NMR
was 3.3 x 10
-10 m
2·S
-1.
(Example 14)
[0068] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that water and methanol were used
for the non-solvent in the coagulation bath and ratio of the non-solvent to the polymer
solvent was changed to obtain the carbon fiber. The D evaluated by the PFG-NMR was
4.4 x 10
-10 m
2·S
-1.
(Example 15)
[0069] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that water and ethanol were used for
the non-solvent in the coagulation bath and ratio of the non-solvent to the polymer
solvent was changed to obtain the carbon fiber. The D evaluated by the PFG-NMR was
3.4 x 10
-10 m
2·S
-1.
(Example 16)
[0070] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that water and 1-propanol were used
for the non-solvent in the coagulation bath and ratio of the non-solvent to the polymer
solvent was changed to obtain the carbon fiber. The D evaluated by the PFG-NMR was
5.3 x 10
-10 m
2·S
-1.
(Comparative Example 1)
[0071] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that water was used for the non-solvent
in the coagulation bath and ratio of the non-solvent to the polymer solvent was changed
to obtain the carbon fiber. The D evaluated by the PFG-NMR was 3.5 x 10
-10 m
2·S
-1.
(Comparative Example 2)
[0072] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that no polymer solvent was used in
the coagulation bath to obtain the carbon fiber.
(Comparative Example 3)
[0073] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that liquid paraffin and decanol were
used for the non-solvent and no polymer solvent was used in the coagulation bath to
obtain the carbon fiber. The type and the combination of the non-solvent used were
the same as the examples described in Patent Document 2. The resulting coagulated
yarn had a pore size of the surface layer of 42 nm which was outside the scope of
claims 1 to 3.
(Comparative Example 4)
[0074] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that water was used for the non-solvent
and dimethylformamide was used for the polymer solvent in the coagulation bath, and
ratio of the non-solvent to the polymer solvent was changed to obtain the carbon fiber.
The type of the non-solvent, the type of the solvent, and the mixing ratio used were
the same as the examples described in Patent Document 1. The resulting coagulated
yarn had a pore size of the surface layer of 35nm and a degree of swelling of 108%,
which were outside the range of claims 1 to 3. The D evaluated by the PFG-NMR was
5.5 x 10
-10 m
2·S
-1.
(Comparative Example 5)
[0075] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that water was used for the non-solvent
in the coagulation bath and ratio of the non-solvent to the polymer solvent was changed
to obtain the carbon fiber. The D evaluated by the PFG-NMR was 5.8 x 10
-10 m
2·S
-1.
[Table 1-1]
[0076]
[Table 1-1]
| |
Production conditions |
Physical properties |
|
| Non-solvent (1) |
Non-solvent (2) |
Non-solvent (total) |
Solvent |
Mixing ratio (Weight fraction) |
Viscosity of the coagulation bath |
Temperature difference between the polymer solution and the coagulation bath |
Coagulated yarn |
Carbon fiber |
| - |
Solubility parameter |
- |
Solubility parameter |
Solubility parameter |
- |
Non-solvent (1)/non-solvent (2)/solvent |
Pore size of the surface layer |
Pore size of the inner layer |
Degree of swelling |
Strength |
| - |
(MPa)0.5 |
- |
(MPa)0.5 |
(MPa)0.5 |
- |
- |
mPa·s |
°C |
nm |
nm |
% |
GPa |
| Example 1 |
Ethylene glycol |
33 |
|
|
33 |
DMSO |
52/0/48 |
17 |
45 |
3 |
3 |
82 |
8.9 |
| Example 2 |
Methanol |
29.6 |
|
|
29.6 |
DMSO |
52/0/48 |
10 |
45 |
12 |
15 |
85 |
8.5 |
| Example 3 |
Ethylene glycol |
33 |
|
|
33 |
DMSO |
52/0/48 |
17 |
5 |
15 |
3 |
84 |
8.5 |
| Example 4 |
n-butanol |
23.2 |
|
|
23.2 |
DMSO |
40/0/60 |
15 |
45 |
7 |
10 |
83 |
8.7 |
| Example 5 |
Glycerine |
36.2 |
Ethanol |
26.5 |
30.2 |
DMSO |
26/26/48 |
50 |
45 |
4 |
18 |
82 |
8.7 |
| Example 6 |
Ethylene glycol |
33 |
|
|
33 |
DMF |
52/0/48 |
15 |
45 |
5 |
5 |
80 |
8.7 |
| Example 7 |
Ethylene glycol |
33 |
Ethanol |
26.5 |
27.7 |
DMSO |
20/60/20 |
16 |
45 |
9 |
7 |
85 |
8.7 |
| Example 8 |
Propylene glycol |
30.2 |
Ethanol |
26.5 |
27.3 |
DMSO |
20/60/20 |
14 |
45 |
12 |
7 |
87 |
8.5 |
| Example 9 |
Water |
47.8 |
Glycerine |
36.2 |
39.5 |
DMSO |
20/60/20 |
20 |
45 |
8 |
5 |
85 |
8.7 |
| Example 10 |
Water |
47.8 |
Ethylene glycol |
33 |
36.8 |
DMSO |
20/60/20 |
18 |
45 |
19 |
10 |
88 |
8.5 |
[Table 1-2]
[0077]
[Table 1-2]
| |
Production conditions |
Physical properties |
|
| Non-solvent (1) |
Non-solvent (2) |
Non-solvent (total) |
Solvent |
Mixing ratio (Weight fraction) |
Viscosity of the coagulation bath |
Temperature difference between the polymer solution and the coagulation bath |
Coagulated yarn |
Carbon fiber |
| - |
Solubility parameter |
- |
Solubility parameter |
Solubility parameter |
- |
Non-solvent (1) /non-solvent (2) /solvent |
Pore size of the surface layer |
Pore size of the inner layer |
Degree of swelling |
Strength |
| - |
(MPa)0.5 |
- |
(MPa)0.5 |
(MPa)0.5 |
- |
- |
mPa·s |
°C |
nm |
nm |
% |
GPa |
| Example 11 |
Water |
47.8 |
Ethylene glycol |
33 |
36.8 |
DMSO |
20/60/20 |
18 |
25 |
21 |
12 |
90 |
8.3 |
| Example 12 |
Water |
47.8 |
Ethylene glycol |
33 |
36.8 |
DMSO |
20/60/20 |
18 |
65 |
17 |
8 |
84 |
8.3 |
| Example 13 |
Water |
47.8 |
Propylene glycol |
30.2 |
33.9 |
DMSO |
20/60/20 |
14 |
45 |
19 |
12 |
90 |
8.4 |
| Example 14 |
Water |
47.8 |
Methanol |
29.6 |
33.2 |
DMSO |
20/60/20 |
7 |
45 |
28 |
19 |
96 |
8.2 |
| Example 15 |
Water |
47.8 |
Ethanol |
26.5 |
30.6 |
DMSO |
20/60/20 |
9 |
45 |
26 |
21 |
92 |
8.3 |
| Example 16 |
Water |
47.8 |
1-Propanol |
24.6 |
29.0 |
DMSO |
20/60/20 |
7 |
45 |
22 |
20 |
98 |
8.1 |
| Comparative Example 1 |
Water |
47.8 |
|
|
47.8 |
DMSO |
20/0/80 |
8 |
45 |
32 |
50 |
102 |
8 |
| Comparative Example 2 |
Ethylene glycol |
33 |
|
|
33 |
(DMSO) |
100/0/0 |
16 |
45 |
40 |
3 |
85 |
7.5 |
| Comparative Example 3 |
Liquid paraffin |
16.2 |
1-decanol |
19.4 |
16.4 |
(DMSO) |
90/10/0 |
70 |
45 |
42 |
3 |
80 |
7.7 |
| Comparative Example 4 |
Water |
47.8 |
|
|
47.8 |
DMF |
20/0/80 |
7 |
45 |
35 |
42 |
108 |
7.7 |
| Comparative Example 5 |
Water |
47.8 |
|
|
47.8 |
DMSO |
50/0/50 |
7 |
45 |
48 |
62 |
131 |
7.1 |