CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] The presently disclosed subject matter relates generally to methods, systems, and
computer readable media for evaluating risks associated with vascular pathologies.
In particular, the presently disclosed subject matter relates to employing a measure
referred to as Reserve Strength Ratio for evaluating such risks.
BACKGROUND
[0003] Aortic aneurysms (abdo mina and thoracic) are generally asymptomatic and indolent.
If left untreated, an aneurysm will gradually expand urltil rupture, art event that
carries a mortality rate of 90%. The conmionly used maximum diameter criterion is
based on a statistically-derived cut-off value and when used alone to provide indication
for surgery is prone to false positives and false negatives. Surgery treatments, both
open and minimally invasive endovascular approaches, present immediate as well as
long term risks to the patient and should be reserved to the cases where the risk
of complications outweighs surgical risks. Thus, methods to improve risk assessment
for life-threatening events such as aortic rupture and dissection would be desirable,
particularly where a treatment itself carl have its own complications and is reserved
for those aneurysms at highest risk of rupture.
[0004] WO 2006/062958 A2 describes a method and a computer system, for providing an assessment for disease
status of a disease, such as a cardiovascular disease, employ construction of image-based
3D computational model of an organ representative of the disease status, computationally
obtaining a certain mechanical distribution using the 3D-organ model, and computational,
quantitative analysis of the mechanical distribution to provide an assessment for
disease status of a disease.
SUMMARY
[0005] This Summary lists several embodiments of the presently disclosed subject matter
arld in many cases lists variations and permutations of these embodiments.
[0006] This Summary is merely exemplary of the numerous and varied embodiments. Mention
of one or more representative features of a given embodiment is likewise exemplary.
Such an embodiment can typically exist with or without the feature(s) mentioned, likewise,
those features can be applied to other embodiments of the presently disclosed subject
matter, whether listed in this Summary or not. To avoid excessive repetition, this
Summary does not list or suggest all possible combinations of such features.
[0007] In some embodiments, the presently disclosed subject matter provides methods for
estimating a Reserve Strength Ratio (RSR) and a Maximum Pressure Strength (MPS) in
a segment of a blood vessel or a lymphatic vessel. In some embodiments, the methods
comprise providing a multiphase Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM)
stack of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) images of a blood vessel
or a lymphatic vessel to software, wherein the stack of DICOM images is organized
by phase; providing the output from the software to a Model Segmentation procedure
in which the first phase of the DICOM stack (1st phase) is segmented to create the
Geometric Model and finite element mesh of the 1st phase and a map of Local Thickness
Measure; uploading a mesh created for the first phase onto the DICOM image volume;
mapping each voxel position of the mesh for the first phase to all the subsequent
meshes using an optical flow (OF) algorithm; creating deformed meshes at all phases
from the maps of displaced nodes; estimating local curvature at each node location
for all the phases using a finite difference method; evaluating the local deformation
at each phase from the meshes corresponding to all the phases using an element approach;
calculating the maximum principal strain at each nodal location; calculating local
thickness at each node for all the phases using the deformation calculation at each
phase and the thickness measured at the first phase and using the assumption of incompressibility
for the aortic wall; and calculating the local principal stresses for each element
from an extension of Laplace's equation applied to the local principal directions
of curvatures, wherein the Reserve Strength Ratio in a segment of a blood vessel or
a lymphatic vessel is calculated. In some embodiments, the local strength estimated
is used to calculate the Maximum Pressure Strength by calculating the pressure equivalent
that would raise the stress in each segment of the vessel above the estimated strength.
In some embodiments, the stack of DICOM images is organized by phase with the number
of phases being based at least in part on whether the images are CT images or MR images.
In some embodiments, the segmentation from the first phase of the DICOM phase also
provides a measure for the thickness of the wall at each of the nodes of the mesh.
[0008] The presently disclosed subject matter also provides in some embodiments methods
for predicting an increased risk of rupture of a blood vessel or a lymphatic vessel.
In some embodiments, the methods comprise calculating a Reserve Strength Ratio in
a blood vessel or a lymphatic vessel in a subject; and identifying at least one region
of the blood vessel or the lymphatic vessel for which the Reserve Strength Ratio is
less than a pre-selected percentage, whereby an increased risk of rupture of the blood
vessel or the lymphatic vessel is predicted. In some embodiments, the pre-selected
percentage is selected from the group consisting of 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%,
60%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, and 100%. In some embodiments, the methods comprise
calculating a Maximum Pressure Strength in a blood vessel or a lymphatic vessel in
a subject; and identifying at least one region of the blood vessel or the lymphatic
vessel for which the Maximum Pressure Strength is less than a pre-selected value chosen
by the user based on the vessel of interest. In some embodiments, the pre-selected
value is selected from the group consisting of 130 mm Hg, 120 mm Hg, 110 mm Hg, 100
mm Hg, 90 mm Hg, 80 mm Hg, 70 mm Hg, 60 mm Hg, and 50 mm Hg. In some embodiments,
the vessel is the abdominal aorta and the pre-selected value is 100 mm Hg.
[0009] The presently disclosed subject matter also provides in some embodiments methods
for identifying subjects as being at risk for rupture of a blood vessel or a lymphatic
vessel. In some embodiments, the methods comprise calculating a Reserve Strength Ratio
in a blood vessel or a lymphatic vessel in a subject, wherein presence of at least
one region of the blood vessel or the lymphatic vessel for which the Reserve Strength
Ratio is less than a pre-selected percentage identifies the subject as being at risk
for rupture of the blood vessel or the lymphatic vessel. In some embodiments, the
pre-selected percentage is selected from the group consisting of 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%,
35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, and 100%.
[0010] The presently disclosed subject matter also provides in some embodiments methods
for identifying subjects as being at risk for rupture of a blood vessel or a lymphatic
vessel. In some embodiments, the methods comprise calculating a Reserve Strength Ratio
(RSR), a Maximum Pressure Strength (MPS), or both in a blood vessel or a lymphatic
vessel in a subject, wherein presence of at least one region of the blood vessel or
the lymphatic vessel for which the RSR and/or the MPS is less than a pre-selected
value identifies the subject as being at risk for rupture of the blood vessel or the
lymphatic vessel. In some embodiments, the pre-selected value for RSR is selected
from the group consisting of 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 70%,
75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, and 100%, and/or the pre-selected value for MPS is selected
from the group consisting of 130 mm Hg, 120 mm Hg, 110 mm Hg, 100 mm Hg, 90 mm Hg,
80 mm Hg, 70 mm Hg, 60 mm Hg, and 50 mm Hg.
[0011] The presently disclosed subject matter also provides in some embodiments computer
program products comprising computer executable instructions embodied in computer
readable medium. In some embodiments, the computer program products perform steps
comprising accepting data related to a multiphase Digital Imaging and Communications
in Medicine (DICOM) stack of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) images
of a blood vessel or a lymphatic vessel to software, wherein the stack of DICOM images
is organized by phase and further wherein the first phase of the DICOM stack (1st
phase) is segmented to create the Geometric Model and finite element mesh of the 1st
phase and a map of Local Thickness Measure; mapping each voxel position of the mesh
for the first phase to all the subsequent meshes using an optical flow (OF) algorithm;
creating deformed meshes at all phases from the maps of displaced nodes; estimating
local curvature at each node location for all the phases using a finite difference
method; evaluating the local deformation at each phase from the meshes corresponding
to all the phases using an element approach; calculating local thickness at each node
for all the phases using the deformation calculation at each phase and the thickness
measured at the first phase and using the assumption of incompressibility for the
aortic wall; and calculating the local principal stresses for each element from an
extension of Laplace's equation applied to the local principal directions of curvatures.
[0012] It is thus an object of the presently disclosed subject matter to provide methods,
systems, and computer readable media for evaluating risks associated with vascular
pathologies.
[0013] An object of the presently disclosed subject matter having been stated hereinabove,
and which is achieved in whole or in part by the presently disclosed subject matter,
other objects will become evident as the description proceeds when taken in connection
with the accompanying Figures and non-limiting examples as best described herein below.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0014] Exemplary embodiments of the subject matter described herein will now be explained
with reference to the accompanying Figures, wherein like numerals represent like parts,
of which:
Figure 1 shows a flow chart of an exemplary embodiment of the presently disclosed
subject matter.
Figure 2 is a depiction of Reserve Strength Ratios and how they can differ along a
segment of an exemplary abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) case.
Figure 3 is a depiction of Maximum Pressure Strength and how it can differ along a
segment of an exemplary abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) case. Black/Dark grey represents
segments at elevated risk of rupture (Maximum Pressure Strength < 100 mmHg).
Figure 4 is a plot of ultimate tensile strength (UTS - MPa) versus material stiffness
(MPa) obtained from mechanical tests on specimens obtained from surgery.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
I. Definitions
[0015] All technical and scientific terms used herein, unless otherwise defined below, are
intended to have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill
in the art. References to techniques employed herein are intended to refer to the
techniques as commonly understood in the art, including variations on those techniques
or substitutions of equivalent techniques that would be apparent to one of skill in
the art. While the following terms are believed to be well understood by one of ordinary
skill in the art, the following definitions are set forth to facilitate explanation
of the presently disclosed subject matter.
[0016] All references listed herein, including but not limited to patents, patent application
publications, journal articles, and database entries (
e.
g., GENBANK
® database entries, including all annotations and references cited therein) are incorporated
herein by reference to the extent that they supplement, explain, provide a background
for, or teach methodology, techniques, and/or compositions employed herein.
[0017] Following long-standing patent law convention, the terms "a", "an", and "the" mean
"one or more" when used in this application, including the claims. Thus, the phrase
"a flow channel" refers to one or more flow channels, unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise.
[0018] As used herein, the term "and/or" when used in the context of a list of entities,
refers to the entities being present singly or in combination. Thus, for example,
the phrase "A, B, C, and/or D" includes A, B, C, and D individually, but also includes
any and all combinations and subcombinations of A, B, C, and D.
[0019] The term "comprising", which is synonymous with "including", "containing", and "characterized
by", is inclusive or open-ended and does not exclude additional, unrecited elements
and/or method steps. "Comprising" is a term of art that means that the named elements
and/or steps are present, but that other elements and/or steps can be added and still
fall within the scope of the relevant subject matter.
[0020] As used herein, the phrase "consisting of" excludes any element, step, and/or ingredient
not specifically recited. For example, when the phrase "consists of" appears in a
clause of the body of a claim, rather than immediately following the preamble, it
limits only the element set forth in that clause; other elements are not excluded
from the claim as a whole.
[0021] As used herein, the phrase "consisting essentially of" limits the scope of the related
disclosure or claim to the specified materials and/or steps, plus those that do not
materially affect the basic and novel characteristic(s) of the disclosed and/or claimed
subject matter.
[0022] With respect to the terms "comprising", "consisting essentially of", and "consisting
of", where one of these three terms is used herein, the presently disclosed and claimed
subject matter can include the use of either of the other two terms.
[0023] The term "about", as used herein when referring to a measurable value such as an
amount of weight, time, dimension, etc., is meant to encompass variations of in some
embodiments ±20%, in some embodiments ±10%, in some embodiments ±5%, in some embodiments
±1%, and in some embodiments ±0.1% from the specified amount, as such variations are
appropriate to perform the disclosed methods and/or to employ the presently disclosed
flow chambers.
II. Methods to Determine Structural Strengths of Vessels
[0024] The presently disclosed subject matter relates in some embodiments to approaches,
including algorithm-based approaches, for determining the actual structural strength
of a vessel (
e.g., an aorta)
in vivo and expresses the same using measures referred to herein as "Reserve Strength Ratio"
and "Maximum Pressure Strength" for an individual patient so that clinical decisions
can be made with respect to the and on a patient-by-patient basis while taking into
account the local heterogeneity of the vessel. In some embodiments, the input comprises
a series of dynamic CT scans and/or dynamic MRI images gated over the cardiac cycle.
From these inputs, the presently disclosed subject matter is characterized by an output
that comprises a complete time-varying strain field in the vessel (
e.g., the aorta)
in vivo directly from clinical images, without recurring to simulations techniques that have
several limiting assumptions. No Finite Element Methods techniques were used for these
calculations. The presently disclosed approaches thus allows for the computation of
local wall strains in a completely non-invasive manner starting from routine CT or
MR scans and implicitly includes the combined effect of the pulsatile blood pressure,
of the local material properties, and of the surrounding structures. In other words,
in some embodiments a fully patient-specific analysis is provided by the presently
disclosed subject matter to enable a highly individualized diagnosis (
i.e., inter-patient variability) while at the same time taking into account the regional
heterogeneity within the aneurysm (
i.e., intra- patient variability).
[0025] In some embodiments, the presently disclosed subject matter also provides an estimate
of the time varying stress acting on the vessel wall, based on curvature changes and
intra-luminal pressure.
[0026] In some embodiments, the presently disclosed subject matter also provides an estimate
of the strength of the vessel locally. The estimate is based on the observation that
strength is directly correlated with the material stiffness of the tissue and inversely
correlated with the tissue thickness (Figure 4) due to inflammation in the tissue
that reduces stiffness and increases thickness.
[0027] In some embodiments the presently disclosed subject matter also provides a calculation
referred to herein as the Reserve Strength Ratio. At each point on the vessel wall,
the presently disclosed subject matter allows for a calculation of a % index of strength
that indicates how vulnerable to rupture and/or dissection the vessel wall is in real
time.
[0028] In some embodiments the presently disclosed subject matter also provides a calculation
referred to herein as the Maximum Pressure Strength. At each point on the vessel wall,
the presently disclosed subject matter allows for a calculation of an equivalent blood
pressure value that identifies a low-limit blood pressure value that could rupture
the vessel at any given location given the calculated strength and the local diameter
of the vessel.
[0029] By way of example and not limitation, a normal aorta in a healthy subject has a Reserve
Strength Ratio of more than 100%. It has been determined that in an aneurysm, values
of Reserve Strength Ratio as low as 25-30% can be observed. What this translates to
is that for a normal aorta, a pressure of more than 800 mmHg would be required for
the aorta to rupture and/or dissect (which in practical terms is impossible), while
at 25-30% Reserve Strength Ratio a small increase in pressure or further decrease
in mechanical properties would be enough to rupture and/or dissect the aorta. The
Maximum Pressure Strength is intended as a demonstrative index to help relate the
Reserve Strength Ratio in terms of low-limit pressure equivalent that can cause vessel
failure for a specific Reserve Strength Ratio at a specific point.
[0030] Localized non-invasive material stiffness estimations could benefit decision making
for other pathologies as well. For example, the presently disclosed subject matter
could be used to identify fibrotic areas to better target atrial fibrillation. It
could also be used for the evaluation of annulus integrity for the selection of candidate
patients for catheter-based aortic valve replacement. Finally, it could be used (coupled
with force-plate and fluoroscope measurements) to identify local material properties
changes in cartilage that precede symptomatic arthritis.
[0031] Figure 1 shows a flow chart of an exemplary embodiment of the presently disclosed
subject matter, particularly with respect to exemplary method for calculating Reserve
Strength Ratio
100. With respect to dynamic imaging scans acquisition, CT or MR can be used. In some
embodiments, a CT protocol can comprise pre-operative retrospectively gated MDCT (64-row
multi-slice CT scanner) with variable dose radiation to capture the R-R interval.
In some embodiments, an MR protocol can comprise steady state T2 weighted fast field
echo (TE = 2.6 ms, TR = 5.2 ms, flip angle 110 degree, fat suppression (SPIR), echo
time 50ms, maximum heart phases 2, matrix 256 x 256, acquisition voxel MPS 1.56/1.56/3.00
mm and reconstruction voxel MPS 0.78/0.78/1.5), or similar cine acquisition of the
portion of aorta under study, axial slices.
[0032] With particular reference to Figure 1, the first step of the algorithm relates to
multiphase Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) stack
110. Stack of DICOM images
110 (organized by phase - 10 for CT and 30 for MR) is loaded into Matlab software (The
MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States of America). The output from
the Matlab software is then provided to Model Segmentation procedure
120 in which the first phase of DICOM stack
110 (corresponding to the time in the cardiac cycle chosen as phase 0) is segmented to
create Geometric Model
130 of phase 0 and map of Local Thickness Measure
125. Geometric Model
130 created is smoothed and a mesh (in some embodiments, discretized geometry in small
triangular elements) is created with a resolution at least as big as the pixel size
(Smoothing and mesh processing step
140). The mesh created for the first phase is uploaded onto the DICOM image volume (Mesh
mapping to the DICOM volume). Each voxel position of the mesh for the first phase
is mapped to all the subsequent meshes using an optical flow (OF) algorithm (Motion
tracking
150 of the DICOM voxels with OF (every phase)).
[0033] The position of all the voxel at the different phases is mapped back to the mesh
for the 1st phase (Mapping back from the displaced DICOM voxels to the mesh
160). In essence, each node position of the geometry at the first phase is associated
with node positions corresponding to all the subsequent phases. For example, for CT
images, the nodes corresponding to the first phase will have corresponding node positions
for all the subsequent nine (9) phases. (
see Satriano et al. (2015) In vivo strain assessment of the abdominal aortic aneurysm.
J Biomech 48(2):354-360).
[0035] From the maps of displaced nodes, deformed meshes at all phases are created (Deformed
Geometric Model Mesh (all phases)
170).
[0038] Using the deformation calculation at each phase, the thickness measured at the first
phase and using the assumption of incompressibility for the aortic wall (as is widely
accepted), local thickness is calculated at each node for all the phases (Local thickness
assessment
135 (every phase)).
[0039] Thanks to the tubular symmetry of the TAA structure, the local principal stresses
are calculated for each element from an extension of Laplace's equation applied to
the local principal directions of curvatures (Stress Estimate
195). This algorithm uses the local deformation, the local principal curvatures, the
pressure measured from the patient, and the local thickness (as computed above).
[0040] In some embodiments, the outputs of the complete algorithm are:
- Local Stress along the principal directions of curvature (at every phase);
- Local Strain along the principal directions of curvature (at every phase); and
- Local Maximum Principal Strain along the principal strain direction (at every phase)
[0041] Nonlinear statistical fitting procedure
200 provides local Material Stiffness estimate
210, Reserve Strength Ratio estimate
220 and Maximum Pressure Strength estimate
230. In some embodiments, the local mechanical properties of the aorta are estimated through
non-linear statistical fitting (equivalent stiffness, neo-Hookean material parameter,
non-linear anisotropic constitutive model material parameters) and the Reserve Strength
Ratio is estimated from the local material properties using the statistical fitting
procedure. Local strain calculation
190 comes directly from deformed mesh
170. Continuum mechanics methods are employed to obtain a deformation gradient tensor
at each phase from deformed mesh
170 and then from the deformation gradient tensor the different strain measures are computed:
maximum principal strain and strain projected along circumferential and axial directions.
III. Methods for Computing a Reserve Strength Ratio (RSR) of a Vessel
[0042] In some embodiments, the presently disclosed subject matter relates to methods for
computing a Reserve Strength Ratio (RSR) of a vessel. As used herein, the phrase "Reserve
Strength Ratio" refers to a local measure that computes a propensity for rupture of
a vessel wall tissue including, but not limited to an aortic wall tissue. In some
embodiments, RSR can be used as an added diagnostic measure (
i.e., in addition to standard diagnostic measures currently employed including, but not
limited to diameter, growth rate, subject age, and subject gender) to personalize
an evaluation of risk of rupture of aortic aneurysms).
[0043] By way of example and not limitation, an exemplary clinical workflow that can be
employed with the methods of the presently disclosed subject matter is as follows.
Once an aneurysm has been diagnosed (e.g., obtained with an ultrasound scan), a subject
undergoes either a) multi-detector CT scan imaging; or b) cine MR imaging. Pressure
data are also collected at the time of imaging. The DICOM images and the pressure
information are fed to a semi-automated software that computes the local strain and
local stress on the individual aortic aneurysm. These local strain and stress measures
are in some embodiments outputted as color-coded maps to visualize and identify areas
of a vessel wall that are at higher strain (e.g., where the aneurysm wall could be
weaker) and areas at elevated stress. Based on the local deformation and local thickness
measures, an algorithm of the presently disclosed subject matter computes a local
maximum principal strain measure, an anisotropy measure and a thickness measure that
are fed into a non-linear regression algorithm that provides a value for the tissue
strength at each local point along the aneurysm. The experimental local strength measure
(measured from uniaxial tensile tests to failure) was predicted for 44 specimens obtained
from surgical resection of aortic aneurysm specimens from five (5) patients using
an algorithm of the presently disclosed subject manner with a power > 0. 8 and
p-value < 0.05.
[0044] The local strength measure is thereafter used along with the local stress measure
to compute a
Reserve Strength Ratio (RSR) at each point of the aneurysm. The RSR represents a ratio between the applied stress
to the aneurysm locally and the actual local strength of the tissue at that location.
As a reference, a normal aorta has a Reserve Strength Ratio of > 100%. In some embodiments,
any areas with a Reserve Strength Ratio of less than 50% are considered weak spots
and can be considered by a surgeon and/or a radiologist as possible at risk sites.
[0045] In some embodiments, the Reserve Strength Ratio can be visualized as a color-coded
map with different colors indicating weaker areas (
see e.g., Figure 2 for a black and white depiction of an example of a color-coded RSR map).
IV. Methods for Computing a Maximum Pressure Strength from the Strength Estimate
[0046] Additionally, in some embodiments the presently disclosed subject matter relates
to visualization of local wall vulnerability of a vessel as a "Maximum Pressure Strength"
measure. Thus, in some embodiments the local strength can be used locally to compute
the blood pressure (in mm Hg) that would disrupt the tissue at that location, referred
to herein as a "Maximum Pressure Strength".
[0047] In some embodiments, the "normal" pressure in a blood vessel or lymphatic vessel
is 80-120 mm Hg. Thus, and by way of example and not limitation, the pre-selected
value for Maximum Pressure Strength is in some embodiments 130 mm Hg, in some embodiments
120 mm Hg, in some embodiments 110 mm Hg, in some embodiments 100 mm Hg, in some embodiments
90 mm Hg, in some embodiments 80 mm Hg, in some embodiments 70 mm Hg, in some embodiments
60 mm Hg, and in some embodiments 50 mm Hg. In some embodiments, the vessel is the
abdominal aorta and the pre-selected value for Maximum Pressure Strength is 100 mm
[0048] In some embodiments, a pressure equivalent measure can provide surgeons, radiologists,
and other medical professionals with an immediate readout of the risk of rupture of
a particular segment of a vessel including, but not limited to the aorta.
EXAMPLES
[0049] The following EXAMPLES provide illustrative embodiments of the presently disclosed
subject matter. In light of the present disclosure and the general level of skill
in the art, those of skill will appreciate that the following EXAMPLES are intended
to be exemplary only and that numerous changes, modifications, and alterations can
be employed without departing from the scope of the presently disclosed subject matter.
EXAMPLE 1
Analysis of a Representative Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA)
[0050] An analysis of a patient undergoing surgery for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)
was performed with respect to the presently disclosed subject matter. The results
are provided in Figure 2. As shown in Figure 2, the aorta presented with areas where
the Reserve Strength Ratio was 30% (red areas - dark grey in the b/w figure) and areas
where the Reserve Strength Ratio was in excess of 80% (blue areas - black in the b/w
figure). For comparison, a normal aorta typically has a Reserve Strength Ratio of
more than 100%. In the instant case, the patient had a relatively small aorta (4.5
cm maximum diameter) that was below the guidelines for surgery for an abdominal aortic
aneurysm. However, the presently disclosed subject matter (confirmed by subsequent
material testing) identified some areas of weak aorta that was at risk for rupture.
EXAMPLE 2
Calculation of RSR
[0051] Dynamic diagnostic images are obtained of an entire aneurysm, with sagittal slices
of at least 1.5 mm diameter for CT and/or 6 mm for MR. Spatial resolution is at least
1.4 mm in plane for MR and 0.5 mm in plane for CT. Temporal resolution is 10 phases/cardiac
cycle for CT images and 30 phases/cardiac cycle for MR, which have been validated
in porcine and human cases. Pressure is also measured at the time of the imaging scans.
The DICOM images are uploaded into software of the presently disclosed subject matter.
The user inputs the subject's pressure and selects the location of the aneurysm and
type(s) of images (CT and/or MR).
[0052] Thereafter, the user selects the first phase (phase 0) and is prompted to select
parameters to build a mesh (including, but not limited to discretization of the 3D
geometry in smaller triangular elements). The user also selects parameters for the
optical flow algorithm to perform the strain calculation, including number of iteration
= 5, and spatial coherence = 200. The software then computes a strain map and a stress
map.
[0053] The user thereafter selects desired visualization options for the strain and stress
maps as well as other options to calculate the maximum/minimum strain/stress values
and visualize the relative locations. The RSR calculation can then be initiated, with
the user selecting options to visualize RSR as a map and/or to visualize the location
of the lower RSR value or a map of areas within a user-selected limit. If desired,
the user can also select a "equivalent-diameter" calculation to visualize the location
and value of the maximum "equivalent-diameter.
EXAMPLE 3
Validation of RSR Calculation
[0054] The principle underlying the RSR calculation was validated on a large sample of intra-operatory
specimens (n = 116). The results are presented in Figure 4. Tensile Strength (MPa)
and Material Stiffness (MPa) were measured using a uniaxial Tensile testing device
(Model 3200; TA Instruments, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, United States of America) while
being continuously wetted with PBS solution. After 10 cycles preconditioning at 10%
deformation, the samples were tested to failure while recording the Cauchy Stress
and stretch as the deformed length normalized by the original length of each specimen.
The material stiffness was calculated as the maximum tangential stiffness of the stress/stretch
curve.
[0055] The strength of the tissue correlated with the material stiffness (calculated as
set forth herein); Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.85, (p < 0.01). The strength
of the tissue also correlated with the thickness of the tissue; Pearson's correlation
coefficient = -0.27 (p < 0.01). The RSR (and maximum pressure strength) calculations
were based on an algorithm based on this experimental correlation.
[0056] In order to validate the in-vivo estimation of the strength of the tissue, aneurysm
aortic patients (n = 5) underwent dynamic CT imaging following an approved ethics
protocol prior to surgery. During surgery, intra-operatory specimens were collected
(n = 44) and tensile tests to failure were conducted. Material stiffness was estimated
via the maximum principal strain measure (with higher strain meaning lower material
stiffness) and wall thickness was categorized as 0 (when thickness < 1.9 mm and 1
(when thickness ≥ 1.9 mm). The tensile strength correlated with the local maximum
principal strain computed from our algorithm (Pearson's coefficient = -0.5, p < 0.01).
The tensile strength correlated with the Wall thickness (Spearman Rank Order Correlation
coefficient = -0.476, p < 0.01).
[0057] It will be understood that various details of the presently disclosed subject matter
can be changed without departing from the scope of the presently disclosed subject
matter. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration
only, and not for the purpose of limitation.