BACKGROUND
[0001] A variety of amino acid derivatives are known in the art for a variety of uses. For
example,
U.S. Pat. No. 5,874,068,
WO2003/013454, and
US2010/0330136 disclose the use of Lauryl arginine ethyl ester ("LAE"), and certain related compounds,
for use in oral compositions. In addition, LAE is currently used in hydroalcoholic
mouth rinses to prevent bacterial attachment. However, applicants have recognized
that LAE tends to lack sufficient stability to be useful in low-alcohol or alcohol-free
mouth rinses.
[0002] In addition, other documents such as
WO2008/137758A2 and
WO2000/011022 disclose broad classes of compounds, which may include certain amino acid derivatives,
for uses such as for drug delivery or anti-tumor end benefits, respectively.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0003]
Figure 1 is an HPLC chromatograph and a mass spectrometry graph of [amino({[4-dodecanamido-4-(ethylcarbamoyl)butyl]amino})methylidene]azanium.
Figure 2 is a drawing of the chemical structure and mass spectrometry graph of [amino({[4-dodecanamido-4-(ethylcarbamoyl)butyl]amino})methylidene]azanium.
Figure 3: is a 1H-NMR graph of [amino({[4-dodecanamido-4-(ethylcarbamoyl)butyl]amino})methylidene]azanium.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0004] The present invention relates to new amino acid derivatives developed by applicants
that are described by the Formula I:

wherein:
R1 is a C7-C17 alkyl group;
R2 is -NH2; said salt versions having an anion X- preferably selected from the group consisting of acetate, benzoate, besylate, bromide,
chloride, chlortheophyllinate, citrate, ethandisulfonate, fumarate, gluconate, hippurate,
iodide, fluoride, lactate, laurylsulfate, malate, laeate, mesylate, methysulfate,
napsylate, nitrate, octadecanoate, oxalate, pamoate, phosphate, polygalacturonate,
succinate, sulfate, tartrate, and tosylate;
n is from 1 to 3; and
R3 is a linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated aliphatic group having from 1 to
6 carbon atoms.
R1 is linear or branched alkyl group having a carbon chain of from 7 to 17 carbons atoms,
including for example, heptyl, octyl, nonyl, decyl, undecyl, dodecyl, tridecyl, tetradecyl,
pentadecyl, hexadecyl and heptadecyl. In still other embodiments, R1 is linear or branched alkyl group having a carbon chain of from 9 to 14 carbons atoms,
including for example, decyl, undecyl, dodecyl up to tetradecyl. In certain embodiments,
R1 is an undecyl group. In certain embodiments, R1 is a heptyl group. In certain embodiments, R1 is a heptadecyl group.
[0005] The compositions of Formula I comprise an R
2 group that is an amine group in its free base form (-NH
2) or a salt thereof as described in the claims. Examples of suitable amine salts include
salts of such groups having an anion (X-) selected from the group consisting of acetate,
benzoate, besylate, bromide, chloride, chlortheophyllinate, citrate, ethandisulfonate,
fumarate, gluconate, hippurate, iodide, fluoride, lactate, laurylsulfate, malate,
laeate, mesylate, methysulfate, napsylate, nitrate, octadecanoate, oxalate, pamoate,
phosphate, polygalacturonate, succinate, sulfate, tartrate, and tosylate. In certain
other embodiments, the R
2 amine salt has an anion selected from the group consisting of acetate, benzoate,
bromide, chloride, citrate, fumarate, gluconate, iodide, fluoride, lactate, malate,
nitrate, oxalate, phosphate, sulfate, and in certain other embodiments an anion selected
from the group consisting of bromide, chloride, iodide, fluoride, oxalate, and phosphate.
[0006] The compositions of Formula I may have any suitable linear or branched, saturated
or unsaturated aliphatic group having from 1 to 6 carbons for R
3. Examples of suitable linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated aliphatic groups
having from 1 to 6 carbons include, C
1 to C
6 linear or branched alkyl groups, such as, methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, butyl,
isobutyl, sec-butyl, tert-butyl, pentyl, tert-pentyl, neopentyl, isopentyl, hexyl,
isohexyl, neohexyl; as well as, C
2 to C
6 linear or branched alkenyl groups such as vinyl, allyl, propenyl, butenyl, pentenyl,
hexenyl, and the like. In certain embodiments, R
3 is linear or branched alkyl group having a carbon chain of from 1 to 4 carbons atoms,
including for example, methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, butyl, sec-butyl, isobutyl,
and tert-butyl. In certain other embodiments, R
3 is linear or branched alkyl group having a carbon chain of from 1 to 3 carbons atoms,
including for example, methyl, ethyl, propyl and isopropyl. In certain embodiments,
R
3 is an ethyl group.
[0007] In certain embodiments, R
3 is linear or branched alkenyl group having a carbon chain of from 2 to 6 carbons
atoms, including for example, vinyl, allyl, propenyl, butenyl, pentenyl, hexenyl,
and the like as well as mixture thereof. In certain other embodiments, R
3 is linear or branched alkylene group having a carbon chain of from 2 to 4 carbons
atoms, including for example, vinyl, allyl, propenyl, and butenyl.
[0008] In the compounds of Formula I, n is from 1 to 3. In certain other embodiments n is
1, in other embodiments n is 2 in other embodiments n is 3.
[0009] In certain other embodiments, the compounds of Formula I are compounds wherein R
2 is an amine group in its free base form (-NH
2) or a salt thereof; and n is 1 or 3. Examples of such compounds include those wherein
n is 3; R
1 is a C
7-C
17 alkyl group, including for example an alkyl group, having 7 carbon atoms; and R
3 is a linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated aliphatic group, including for
example an alkyl group, having a carbon chain length of 1 to 11 carbons atoms, including
from 2 to 10 carbon atoms, 2 to 9 carbon atoms, 2 to 8 carbon atoms, 3 to 11 carbon
atoms, 3 to 10 carbon atoms, 3 to 9 carbon atoms, 3 to 8 carbon atoms, and 8, and/or
11 carbon atoms. Other Examples include compounds wherein n is 3; R
1 is a C
7-C
17 alkyl group, including for example an alkyl group, having 11 carbon atoms; and R
3 is a linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated aliphatic group, including for
example an alkyl group, having a carbon chain length of 1 to 11 carbons atoms, including
from 1 to 10 carbon atoms, 1 to 9 carbon atoms, 1 to 8 carbon atoms, 1 to 7 carbon
atoms, 1 to 6 carbon atoms, 2 to 11 carbon atoms, 2 to 10 carbon atoms, 2 to 9 carbon
atoms, 2 to 8 carbon atoms, 2 to 7 carbon atoms, 2 to 6 carbon atoms, and 2 and/or
6 carbon atoms.
[0010] Disclosed herein is the reference compound [amino({[4-dodecanamido-4-(ethylcarbamoyl)butyl]amino})methylidene]azanium
(compound 9) as shown below.

[0011] Other compounds disclosed herein are:
Reference Compound 5

[amino({[4-(methylcarbamoyl)-4-octanamidobutyl]amino})methylidene]azanium
Reference Compound 8

[amino({[4-(ethylcarbamoyl)-4-octanamidobutyl]amino})methylidene]azanium
Reference Compound 11

[amino({[4-(hexylcarbamoyl)-4-oclanamidobutyl]aminol)methylidene]azanium
Reference Compound 6

[amino({[4-dodecanamido-4-(methylcarbamoyl)butyl]amino})methylidene]azanium
Reference Compound 12

[amino({[4-dodecanamido-4-(hexylcarbamoyl)butyl]amino})methylidene]azanium
Reference Compound 7

[amino({[4-(methylcarbamoyl)-4-octadecanamidobutyl]amino})methylidene]azanium
Reference Compound 10

[amino({[4-(ethylcarbamoyl)-4-octadecanamidobutyl]amino})methylidene]azanium
Reference Compound 13

[amino({[4-(hexylcarbamoyl)-4-octadecanamidobutyl]amino})methylidene]azanium
Reference Compound 4

[amino({[5-dodecanamido-5-(ethylcarbamoyl)pentyl]amino})methylidene]azanium
Reference Compound 3

N-[5-amino-1-(ethylcarbamoyl)pentyl]dodecanamide
Compound 1 is a compound of Formula I of the present invention

N-[4-amino-1-(ethylcarbamoyl)butyl]dodecanamide
Compound 2 is a compound of Formula I of the present invention

N-[2-amino-1-(ethylcarbamoyl)ethyl]dodecanamide
Reference Compound 14

3-dodecanamido-4-(ethylamino)-4-oxobutanoic acid
Reference Compound 15

N-(1-(ethylamino)-3-hydroxy-1-oxopropan-2-yl)dodecanamide
Reference Compound 16

2-dodecanamido-3-(ethylamino)-3-oxopropyl dihydrogen phosphate
Compound 17 is a compound of Formula I of the present invention

N-(5-amino-1-(hexylamino)-1-oxopentan-2-yl)dodecanamide
Compound 18 is a compound of Formula I of the present invention

N-(5-amino-1-oxo-1-(undecylamino)pentan-2-yl)octanamide
Compound 19 is a compound of Formula I of the present invention

N-(5-amino-1-(octylamino)-1-oxopentan-2-yl)octanamide
Reference Compound 20

N-(1-(ethylamino)-5-guanidino-1-oxopentan-2-yl)tetradecanamide
Reference Compound 21

N-(5-guanidino-1-(octylamino)-1-oxopentan-2-yl)octanamide
Reference Compound 22

N-(5-guanidino-1-(octylamino)-1-oxopentan-2-yl)dodecanamide
Reference Compound 23

N-(1-(decylamino)-5-guanidino-1-oxopentan-2-yl)dodecanamide
Reference Compound 24

N-(1-(ethylamino)-5-guanidino-1-oxopentan-2-yl)decanamide
Reference Compound 25

N-(5-guanidino-1-oxo-1-(undecylamino)pentan-2-yl)dodecanamide
Reference Compound 26

N-(5-guanidino-1-oxo-1 -(undecylamino)pentan-2-yl)octanamide
[0012] Any of a variety of suitable methods for synthesizing the compounds of the present
invention may be used. One particular method for synthesizing [amino({[4-dodecanamido-4-(ethylcarbamoyl)butyl]amino})methylidene]azanium
is described in Example 1. As will be recognized by those of skill in the art, other
similar compounds of Formula I may be synthesized in a similar manner using the appropriate
starting materials to achieve the appropriate R
1, R
2, R
3 and n substitution on the molecule without undue experimentation.
[0013] Applicants have recognized that the compounds of the present invention provide a
wide variety of benefits, including, for example, in compositions for use in healthcare
applications. Accordingly, in certain embodiments, the present invention is directed
to healthcare compositions comprising at least one compound of Formula I. Such healthcare
compositions may be in any suitable form for use as, in, or on personal care, cosmetic,
pharmaceutical, and medical device products, and the like. In certain preferred embodiments,
the compositions of the present invention are compositions for oral care, including,
for example, oral care compositions in the form of a solution, mouthwash, mouth rinse,
mouth spray, toothpaste, tooth gel, sub-gingival gel, mousse, foam, denture care product,
dentifrice, lozenge, chewable tablet, dissolvable tablet, dry powder and the like.
The oral care composition may also be incorporated into or onto floss, dissolvable
strips or films or integrated into or onto a device or applicator for oral use.
[0014] In certain embodiments, the compositions of the invention comprise at least one composition
of Formula I and a vehicle. Any suitable vehicle may be used in the compositions of
the present invention. Preferably, the vehicle is selected from the group consisting
of cosmetically-acceptable and pharmaceutically-acceptable vehicles. As used herein,
"cosmetically-acceptable" and "pharmaceutically-acceptable" vehicles are liquid, solid,
or other ingredients suitable for use as vehicles in products for mammals, including
humans without undue toxicity, incompatibility, instability, irritation, allergic
response, and the like.
[0015] For liquid compositions, the vehicle may be any suitable aqueous or non-aqueous liquid
vehicle. In certain embodiments, the liquid vehicle comprises water. For example,
in many compositions, as will be understood by those of skill in the art, water is
added to q.s. (Quantum Sufficit, Latin for "as much as needed") the composition. In
certain embodiments, the composition comprises from 60% to 99.99% water, including
from 70% to 95% water, from 80% to 95% water, from 60% to 90% water, from 60% to 80%
water, or from 60% to 75% water.
[0016] In certain embodiments, alcohol may be added to the composition. Any of a variety
of alcohols represented by the formula R
4-OH, wherein R
4 is an alkyl group having from 2 to 6 carbons, may be used in the present invention.
Examples of suitable alcohols of formula R
4-OH include ethanol; n-propanol, iso-propanol; butanols; pentanols; hexanols, and
combinations of two or more thereof, and the like. In certain embodiments, the alcohol
is, or comprises, ethanol.
[0017] In some embodiments, the alcohol may be present in the composition in an amount of
at least 10.0% v/v of the total composition, or from 10% to 35% v/v of the total composition,
or from 15% to 30% v/v of the total composition and may be from 20% to 25% v/v of
the total composition.
[0018] Applicants have discovered that the compounds of the present invention exhibit increased
stability in low-alcohol or alcohol free formulations, while maintaining other oral
care benefits, as compared to previously known amino acid derivative compounds. Accordingly,
in some embodiments, the composition may comprise a reduced level of alcohol. The
phrase "reduced level" of alcohol means an amount of a R
4-OH alcohol of 10% v/v or less, optionally of 5% v/v or less, optionally of 1% v/v
or less, optionally of 0.1% v/v or less by volume of the total composition. In certain
embodiments, the compositions of the present invention are free of R
4-OH alcohols.
[0019] Alternatively, the compositions of the present invention may be formulated in a dissolvable
tablet, dry powder, chewing gum, film, semi-solid, solid or liquid concentrate form.
In such embodiments, for example, water is added to q. s. as necessary in the case
of liquid dissolvable tablet, concentrates or powdered formulations, or water may
be removed using standard evaporation procedures known in the art to produce a composition
in dry powder form. Evaporated, or freeze dried forms are advantageous for storage
and shipping.
[0020] Any suitable amounts of one or more compounds of Formula I may be used in the compositions
of the present invention. In certain embodiments, the compositions comprise a total
amount of compounds of Formula I (whether the composition comprises only one compound
of Formula I or a combination of two or more thereof) of 0.0001 % to 50% w/w of active/solid
amount of total compounds of Formula I based on the total weight of the composition.
In certain embodiments, the percent of total compound(s) of Formula I is from 0.001%
to 10 %, or from 0.01% to 1%, or from 0.05% to 0.5% w/w of active/solid amount of
total compounds of Formula I based on the total weight of the composition.
[0021] In certain embodiments, as will be recognized by those of skill in the art, compounds
made in accord with the present invention may be purified and/or may comprise a mixture
of two or more compounds of Formula I. In certain embodiments, the compositions of
the present invention comprise a combination of at least two compounds of Formula
I. In certain embodiments, the compositions of the present invention comprise a combination
of at least three compounds of Formula I.
[0022] The compositions of the present invention may further comprise any of a variety of
optional ingredients therein, including, but not limited to oily components, active
ingredients, additional surfactants, humectants, solvents, flavors, sweeteners, colorants,
preservatives, pH adjusters, pH buffers, and the like.
[0023] Any of a variety of oily components may be used in the present compositions. The
oily component may comprise any one or more oils, or other materials that are water
insoluble, or substantially water-insoluble, meaning that its solubility is less than
1% by weight in water at 25°C or, optionally, less than 0.1%. In certain embodiments,
the oily component of the present invention comprises, consists essentially of, or
consists of, at least one essential oil, i.e. a natural or synthetic (or combination
thereof) concentrated hydrophobic material of vegetable origin, generally containing
volatile compounds, at least one flavor oil, or a combination of two or more thereof.
Examples of suitable essential oils, flavor oils, and their amounts are described
below. In certain embodiments, the composition comprises a total amount of oily component
of 0.05% w/w or more, 0.1% w/w or more, or 0.2% w/w or more of oily component.
[0024] In certain embodiments, compositions of the present invention comprise essential
oils. Essential oils are volatile aromatic oils which may be synthetic or may be derived
from plants by distillation, expression or extraction, and which usually carry the
odor or flavor of the plant from which they are obtained. Useful essential oils may
provide antiseptic activity. Some of these essential oils also act as flavoring agents.
Useful essential oils include but are not limited to citra, thymol, menthol, methyl
salicylate (wintergreen oil), eucalyptol, carvacrol, camphor, anethole, carvone, eugenol,
isoeugenol, limonene, osimen, n-decyl alcohol, citronel, a-salpineol, methyl acetate,
citronellyl acetate, methyl eugenol, cineol, linalool, ethyl linalaol, safrola vanillin,
spearmint oil, peppermint oil, lemon oil, orange oil, sage oil, rosemary oil, cinnamon
oil, pimento oil, laurel oil, cedar leaf oil, gerianol, verbenone, anise oil, bay
oil, benzaldehyde, bergamot oil, bitter almond, chlorothymol, cinnamic aldehyde, citronella
oil, clove oil, coal tar, eucalyptus oil, guaiacol, tropolone derivatives such as
hinokitiol, avender oil, mustard oil, phenol, phenyl salicylate, pine oil, pine needle
oil, sassafras oil, spike lavender oil, storax, thyme oil, tolu balsam, terpentine
oil, clove oil, and combinations thereof.
[0025] In certain embodiments, the essential oils are selected from the group consisting
of thymol ((CH
3)
2CHC
6H
3(CH
3)OH, also known as isopropyl-m-cresol), eucalyptol (C
10H
18O, also known as cineol), menthol (CH
3C
6H
9(C
3H
7)OH), also known as hexahydrothymol), methyl salicylate (C
6H
4OHCOOCH
3, also known as wintergreen oil), isomers of each of these compounds, and combinations
of two or more thereof. In some embodiments, the compositions of the present invention
contain thymol. In some embodiments, the compositions of the present invention contain
menthol. In some embodiments, the composition contains all four of these essential
oils.
[0026] In certain embodiments, thymol is employed in amounts of from 0.0001% to 0.6% w/v,
or from 0.005% to 0.07% w/v of the composition. In certain embodiments, eucalyptol
may be employed in amounts of from 0.0001% to 0.51 w/v, or from 0.0085% to 0.10% w/v
of the composition. In certain embodiments, menthol is employed in amounts of from
0.0001% to 0.25% w/v, or from 0.0035% to 0.05% w/v of the composition. In certain
embodiments, methyl salicylate is employed in amounts of from 0.0001% to 0.28% w/v,
or from 0.004% to 0.07% w/v of the composition. In certain embodiments, the total
amount of all of such essential oils present in the disclosed compositions can be
from 0.0004% to 1.64% w/v, or from 0.0165% to 0.49% w/v of the composition.
[0027] In certain embodiments, fluoride providing compounds may be present in the mouth
rinse compositions of this invention. These compounds may be slightly water soluble
or may be fully water soluble and are characterized by their ability to release fluoride
ions or fluoride containing ions in water. Typical fluoride providing compounds are
inorganic fluoride salts such as soluble alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, and heavy
metal salts, for example, sodium fluoride, potassium fluoride, ammonium fluoride,
cupric fluoride, zinc fluoride, stannic fluoride, stannous fluoride, barium fluoride,
sodium hexafluorosilicate, ammonium hexafluorosilicate, sodium fluorozirconate, sodium
monofluorophosphate, aluminum mono-and difluorophosphate and fluorinated sodium calcium
pyrophosphate. Amine fluorides, such as N'-octadecyltrimethylendiamine-N,N,N'- tris(2-ethanol)-dihydrofluoride
and 9-octadecenylamine-hydrofluoride), may also be used. In certain embodiments, the
fluoride providing compound is generally present in an amount sufficient to release
up to 5%, or from 0.001% to 2%, or from 0.005% to 1.5% fluoride by weight of the composition.
[0028] In certain embodiments, sensitivity reducing agents, such as potassium salts of nitrate
and oxalate in an amount from 0.1% to 5.0% w/v of the composition may be incorporated
into the present invention. Other potassium releasing compounds are feasible (
e.g. KCl). High concentrations of calcium phosphates may also provide some added sensitivity
relief. These agents are believed to work by either forming an occlusive surface mineral
deposit on the tooth surface or through providing potassium to the nerves within the
teeth to depolarize the nerves. A more detailed discussion of suitable sensitivity
reducing agents can be found in
US 2006/0013778 to Hodosh and
U.S. Pat. No. 6,416,745 to Markowitz et al.
[0029] In certain embodiments, compounds with anti-calculus benefits (
e.g. various carboxylates, polyaspartic acid, etc.) may be incorporated into the present
invention. Also useful as an anticalculus agent are the anionic polymeric polycarboxylates.
Such materials are well known in the art, being employed in the form of their free
acids or partially or preferably fully neutralized water soluble alkali metal (
e.g. potassium and preferably sodium) or ammonium salts. Preferred are 1:4 to 4:1 by
weight copolymers of maleic anhydride or acid with another polymerizable ethylenically
unsaturated monomer, preferably methyl vinyl ether (methoxyethylene) having a molecular
weight (M.W.) of 30,000 to 1,000,000. These copolymers are available, for example,
as Gantrez 25 AN 139 (M.W. 500,000), AN 119 (M.W. 250,000) and preferably S-97 Pharmaceutical
Grade (M.W. 70,000), of GAF Chemicals Corporation.
[0030] Additional anti-calculus agents may be selected from the group consisting of polyphosphates
(including pyrophosphates) and salts thereof polyamino propane sulfonic acid (AMPS)
and salts thereof; polyolefin sulfonates and salts thereof; polyvinyl phosphates and
salts thereof; polyolefin phosphates and salts thereof; diphosphonates and salts thereof;
phosphonoalkane carboxylic acid and salts thereof; polyphosphonates and salts thereof;
polyvinyl phosphonates and salts thereof; polyolefin phosphonates and salts thereof;
polypeptides; and mixtures thereof; carboxy-substituted polymers; and mixtures thereof.
In one embodiment, the salts are alkali metal or ammonium salts. Polyphosphates are
generally employed as their wholly or partially neutralized water-soluble alkali metal
salts such as potassium, sodium, ammonium salts, and mixtures thereof. The inorganic
polyphosphate salts include alkali metal (e.g. sodium) tripolyphosphate, tetrapolyphosphate,
dialkyl metal (e.g. disodium) diacid, trialkyl metal (e.g. trisodium) monoacid, potassium
hydrogen phosphate, sodium hydrogen phosphate, and alkali metal (e.g. sodium) hexametaphosphate,
and mixtures thereof. Polyphosphates larger than tetrapolyphosphate usually occur
as amorphous glassy materials. In one embodiment the polyphosphates are those manufactured
by FMC Corporation, which are commercially known as Sodaphos (n≈6), Hexaphos (n≈13),
and Glass H (n≈21, sodium hexametaphosphate), and mixtures thereof. The pyrophosphate
salts useful in the present invention include, alkali metal pyrophosphates, di-, tri-,
and mono-potassium or sodium pyrophosphates, dialkali metal pyrophosphate salts, tetraalkali
metal pyrophosphate salts, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment the pyrophosphate
salt is selected from the group consisting of trisodium pyrophosphate, disodium dihydrogen
pyrophosphate (Na
2H
2P
2O
7), dipotassium pyrophosphate, tetrasodium pyrophosphate (Na
4P
2O
7), tetrapotassium pyrophosphate (K
4P
2O
7), and mixtures thereof. Polyolefin sulfonates include those wherein the olefin group
contains 2 or more carbon atoms, and salts thereof. Polyolefin phosphonates include
those wherein the olefin group contains 2 or more carbon atoms. Polyvinylphosphonates
include polyvinylphosphonic acid. Diphosphonates and salts thereof include azocycloalkane-2,2-diphosphonic
acids and salts thereof, ions of azocycloalkane-2,2-diphosphonic acids and salts thereof,
azacyclohexane-2,2-diphosphonic acid, azacyclopentane-2,2-diphosphonic acid, N-methyl-azacyclopentane-2,3-diphosphonic
acid, EHDP (ethane-1-hydroxy-1,1,-diphosphonic acid), AHP (azacycloheptane-2,2-diphosphonic
acid), ethane-1-amino-1,1-diphosphonate, dichloromethane-diphosphonate, etc. Phosphonoalkane
carboxylic acid or their alkali metal salts include PPTA (phosphonopropane tricarboxylic
acid), PBTA (phosphonobutane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid), each as acid or alkali metal
salts. Polyolefin phosphates include those wherein the olefin group contains 2 or
more carbon atoms. Polypeptides include polyaspartic and polyglutamic acids.
[0031] In certain embodiments, zinc salts such as zinc chloride, zinc acetate or zinc citrate
may be added as an astringent for an "antiseptic cleaning" feeling, as a breath protection
enhancer or as anti-calculus agent in an amount of from 0.0025% w/v to 0.75% w/v of
the composition.
[0032] Any of a variety of additional surfactants may be used in the present invention.
Suitable surfactants may include anionic, non-ionic, cationic, amphoteric, zwitterionic
surfactants, and combinations of two or more thereof. Examples of suitable surfactants
are disclosed, for example, in
U.S. Pat. No. 7,417,020 to Fevola, et al.
[0033] In certain embodiments, the compositions of the present invention comprise a non-ionic
surfactant. Those of skill in the art will recognize that any of a variety of one
or more non-ionic surfactants include, but are not limited to, compounds produced
by the condensation of alkylene oxide groups (hydrophilic in nature) with an organic
hydrophobic compound which may be aliphatic or alkyl-aromatic in nature. Examples
of suitable nonionic surfactants include, but are not limited to, alkyl polyglucosides;
alkyl glucose amines, block copolymers such as ethylene oxide and propylene oxide
copolymers e.g. Poloxamers; ethoxylated hydrogenated castor oils available commercially
for example under the trade name CRODURET (Croda Inc., Edison, NJ); alkyl polyethylene
oxide e.g. Polysorbates, and/or; fatty alcohol ethoxylates; polyethylene oxide condensates
of alkyl phenols; products derived from the condensation of ethylene oxide with the
reaction product of propylene oxide and ethylene diamine; ethylene oxide condensates
of aliphatic alcohols; long chain tertiary amine oxides; long chain tertiary phosphine
oxides; long chain dialkyl sulfoxides; and mixtures thereof.
[0034] Exemplary non-ionic surfactants are selected from the group known as poly(oxyethylene)-poly(oxypropylene)
block copolymers. Such copolymers are known commercially as poloxamers and are produced
in a wide range of structures and molecular weights with varying contents of ethylene
oxide. These non-ionic poloxamers are non-toxic and acceptable as direct food additives.
They are stable and readily dispersible in aqueous systems and are compatible with
a wide variety of formulations and other ingredients for oral preparations. These
surfactants should have an HLB (Hydrophilic-Lipophilic Balance) of between 10 and
30 and preferably between about 10 and about 25. By way of example, non-ionic surfactants
useful in this invention include the poloxamers identified as poloxamers 105, 108,
124, 184, 185, 188, 215, 217, 234, 235, 237, 238, 284, 288, 333, 334, 335, 338, 407,
and combinations of two or more thereof. In certain preferred embodiments, the composition
comprises poloxamer 407.
[0035] In certain embodiments, the compositions of the claimed invention comprise less than
9% of non-ionic surfactant, less than 5%, or less than 1.5%, or less than 1%, or less
than 0.8, less than 0.5%, less than 0.4%, or less than .3% of non-ionic surfactants.
In certain embodiments, the composition of the present invention is free of non-ionic
surfactants.
[0036] In certain embodiments, the compositions of the present invention also contain at
least one alkyl sulfate surfactant. In certain embodiments, suitable alkyl sulfate
surfactants include, but are not limited to sulfated C
8 to C
18, optionally sulfated C
10 to C
16 even numbered carbon chain length alcohols neutralized with a suitable basic salt
such as sodium carbonate or sodium hydroxide and mixtures thereof such that the alkyl
sulfate surfactant has an even numbered C
8 to C
18, optionally C
10 to C
16, chain length. In certain embodiments, the alkyl sulfate is selected from the group
consisting of sodium lauryl sulfate, hexadecyl sulfate and mixtures thereof. In certain
embodiments, commercially available mixtures of alkyl sulfates are used. A typical
percentage breakdown of alkyl sulfates by alkyl chain length in commercially available
sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is as follows:
Alkyl Chain Length |
Component Percentage in SLS |
C12 |
>60% |
C14 |
20%-35% |
C16 |
<10% |
C10 |
<1% |
C18 |
<1% |
[0037] In certain embodiments, the alkyl sulfate surfactant is present in the composition
from 0.001% to 6.0% w/v, or optionally from 0.1% to 0.5% w/v of the composition.
[0038] Another suitable surfactant is one selected from the group consisting of sarcosinate
surfactants, isethionate surfactants and taurate surfactants. Preferred for use herein
are alkali metal or ammonium salts of these surfactants, such as the sodium and potassium
salts of the following: lauroyl sarcosinate, myristoyl sarcosinate, palmitoyl sarcosinate,
stearoyl sarcosinate and oleoyl sarcosinate. The sarcosinate surfactant may be present
in the compositions of the present invention from 0.1% to 2.5%, or from 0.5% to 2%
by weight of the total composition.
[0039] Zwitterionic synthetic surfactants useful in the present invention include derivatives
of aliphatic quaternary ammonium, phosphonium, and sulfonium compounds, in which the
aliphatic radicals can be straight chain or branched, and wherein one of the aliphatic
substituents contains from 8 to 18 carbon atoms and one contains an anionic water-solubilizing
group, e.g., carboxy, sulfonate, sulfate, phosphate or phosphonate.
[0040] The amphoteric surfactants useful in the present invention include, but are not limited
to, derivatives of aliphatic secondary and tertiary amines in which the aliphatic
radical can be a straight chain or branched and wherein one of the aliphatic substituents
contains from 8 to 18 carbon atoms and one contains an anionic water-solubilizing
group, e.g., carboxylate, sulfonate, sulfate, phosphate, or phosphonate. Examples
of suitable amphoteric surfactants include, but are not limited alkylimino-diproprionates,
alky lamphoglycinates (mono or di), alkylamphoproprionates (mono or di), alkylamphoacetates
(mono or di), N-alkyl [3-aminoproprionic acids, alkylpolyamino carboxylates, phosphorylated
imidazolines, alkyl betaines, alkylamido betaines, alkylamidopropyl betaines, alkyl
sultaines, alkylamido sultaines, and mixtures thereof. In certain embodiments, the
amphoteric surfactant is selected from the group consisting of alkylamidopropyl betaines,
amphoacetates such as sodium auroamphoacetate and mixtures thereof. Mixtures of any
of the above mentioned surfactants can also be employed. A more detailed discussion
of anionic, nonionic and amphoteric surfactants can be found in
US. Pat. No. 7,087,650 to Lennon;
U.S. Pat. No. 7,084,104 to Martin et al.;
U.S. Pat. No. 5,190,747 to Sekiguchi et al.; and
U.S. Pat. No. 4,051,234, Gieske, et al.
[0041] In certain embodiments, the compositions of the claimed invention comprise less than
9% of amphoteric surfactant, less than 5%, or less than 1.5%, or less than 1%, or
less than 0.8, less than 0.5%, less than 0.4%, or less than 0.3% of amphoteric surfactants.
In certain embodiments, the composition of the present invention is free of amphoteric
surfactants.
[0042] Additional surfactants may be added with the alkyl sulfate surfactant to aid in solubilization
of the essential oils provided such surfactants do not affect the bioavailability
of the essential oils. Suitable examples include additional anionic surfactants, nonionic
surfactants, amphoteric surfactants and mixtures thereof. However, in certain embodiments,
the total surfactant concentration (including the alkyl sulfate surfactant alone or
in combination with other surfactants) for mouth rinses of the present invention should
not exceed or should about 9% or less, optionally, the total surfactant concentration
should be 5% or less, optionally about 1% or less, optionally 0.5% or less w/w% of
active surfactant by weight of the composition.
[0043] In certain embodiments, a sugar alcohol (humectant) is also added to the oral compositions
of the present invention. The sugar alcohol solvent(s) may be selected from those
multi-hydroxy-functional compounds that are conventionally used in oral and ingestible
products. In certain embodiments, the sugar alcohol (s) should be nonmetabolized and
non-fermentable sugar alcohol (s). In specific embodiments, the sugar alcohols include,
but are not limited to sorbitol, glycerol, xylitol, mannitol, maltitol, inositol,
allitol, altritol, dulcitol, galactitol, glucitol, hexitol, iditol, pentitol, ribitol,
erythritol and mixtures thereof. Optionally, the sugar alcohol is selected from the
group consisting of sorbitol and xylitol or mixtures thereof. In some embodiments,
the sugar alcohol is sorbitol. In certain embodiments, the total amount of sugar alcohol
(s), which are added to effectively aid in the dispersion or dissolution of the mouth
rinse or other ingredients, should not exceed 50% w/ of the total composition. Or,
total amount of sugar alcohol should not exceed 30% w/v of the total composition.
Or, total amount of sugar alcohol should not exceed 25% w/v of the total composition.
The sugar alcohol can be in an amount of from 1.0% to 24% w/v, or from 1.5% to 22%
w/v, or from 2.5% to 20% w/v of the total composition.
[0044] In certain embodiments, a polyol solvent is added to the composition. The polyol
solvent comprises a polyol or polyhydric alcohol selected from the group consisting
of polyhydric alkanes (such as propylene glycol, glycerin, butylene glycol, hexylene
glycol, 1,3-propanediol); polyhydric alkane esters (dipropylene glycol, ethoxydiglycol);
polyalkene glycols (such as polyethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol) and mixtures
thereof. In certain embodiments, the polyol solvent can be present in an amount of
from 0% to 40% w/v, or from 0.5% to 20% w/v, or from 1.0% to 10% w/v of the composition.
[0045] In certain embodiments, the compositions of the present invention have a pH of 11
or less. In some embodiments, the compositions have a pH of from to 7, or from 3.5
to 6.5, or from 3.5 to 5.0.
[0046] As will be recognized by those of skill in the art, the pH of the composition may
be adjusted or maintained using a buffer in an amount effective to provide the composition
with a pH at or below 11. The composition can optionally comprise at least one pH
modifying agents among those useful herein include acidifying agents to lower pH,
basifying agents to raise pH, and buffering agents to maintain pH within a desired
range. For example, one or more compounds selected from acidifying, basifying and
buffering agents can be included to provide a pH of 2 to 7, or in various embodiments
from 3 to 6, or from 4 to 5. Any orally acceptable pH modifying agent can be used
including without limitation hydrochloric, carboxylic and sulfonic acids, acid salts
(e.g., monosodium citrate, disodium citrate, monosodium malate, etc.), alkali metal
hydroxides such as sodium hydroxide, borates, silicates, imidazole and mixtures thereof.
One or more pH modifying agents are optionally present in a total amount effective
to maintain the composition in an orally acceptable pH range. In certain embodiments,
inorganic acids may be used as the buffer added to the composition.
[0047] In certain embodiments, organic acids may be used as the buffer added to the composition.
Organic acids suitable for use in the compositions of the present invention include,
but are not limited to, ascorbic acid, sorbic acid, citric acid, glycolic acid, lactic
acid and acetic acid, benzoic acid, salicylic acid, phthalic acid, phenolsulphonic
acid, and mixtures thereof, optionally, the organic acid is selected from the group
consisting of benzoic acid, sorbic acid, citric acid and mixtures thereof, or optionally,
the organic acid is benzoic acid.
[0048] Generally the amount of buffering compound is from 0.001% to 20.0% of the composition.
In certain embodiment, the organic acid buffer is present in amounts of from 0.001%
to 10% w/v of the composition, or from 0.01% to 1% of the composition.
[0049] In certain embodiments, additional conventional components may be added as in mouthwashes
and mouth rinses of the prior art. Whereas some alcohol containing mouth rinses have
a pH of about 7.0, reduction of the alcohol level may require the addition of acidic
preservatives, such as sorbic acid or benzoic acid, which reduce pH levels. Buffer
systems are then necessary to control the pH of the composition at optimal levels.
This is generally accomplished through the addition of a weak acid and its salt or
a weak base and its salt. In some embodiments, useful systems have been found to be
sodium benzoate and benzoic acid in amounts of from 0.01% to 1.0% w/v of the composition,
and sodium citrate and citric acid in amounts of from 0.001% to 1.0% w/v of the composition,
phosphoric acid and sodium/potassium phosphate of amounts from 0.01% to 1.0% by weight
of the composition. In certain embodiments, the buffers are incorporated in amounts
that maintain the pH at levels of from 3.0 to 8.0, optionally from 3.5 to 6.5, optionally
from 3.5 to 5.0.
[0050] Additional buffering agents include alkali metal hydroxides, ammonium hydroxide,
organic ammonium compounds, carbonates, sesquicarbonates, borates, silicates, phosphates,
imidazole, and mixtures thereof. Specific buffering agents include monosodium phosphate,
trisodium phosphate, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, alkali metal carbonate
salts, sodium carbonate, imidazole, pyrophosphate salts, sodium gluconate, sodium
lactate, citric acid, and sodium citrate.
[0051] Sweeteners such as aspartame, sodium saccharin (saccharin), sucralose, stevia, acesulfame
K and the like may be added for better taste in amounts of from 0.0001% w/v to 1.0%
w/v. In certain preferred embodiments, the sweetener comprises sucralose.
[0052] In certain embodiments, the composition further comprises flavors or flavorants to
modify or magnify the taste of the composition, or reduce or mask the sharp "bite"
or "burn" of ingredients such as thymol. Suitable flavors include, but are not limited
to, flavor oils such as oil of anise, anethole, benzyl alcohol, spearmint oil, citrus
oils, vanillin and the like may be incorporated. Other flavors such as citrus oils,
vanillin and the like may be incorporated to provide further taste variations. In
these embodiments, the amount of flavor oil added to the composition can be from 0.001%
to 5% w/v, or from 0.01% to 0.3% w/v of the total composition. The particular flavors
or flavorants, and other taste improving ingredients, employed will vary depending
upon the particular taste and feel desired. Those skilled in the art can select and
customize these types of ingredients to provide the desired results.
[0053] In certain embodiments, acceptably approved food dyes may be used to provide a pleasing
color to the compositions of the invention. These may be selected from, but not limited
to, the long list of acceptable food dyes. Suitable dyes for this purpose include
FD&C yellow #5, FD&C yellow #10, FD&C blue #1 and FD&C green #3. These are added in
conventional amounts, typically in individual amounts of from 0.00001% w/v to 0.0008%
w/v, or from 0.000035% w/v to 0.0005% w/v of the composition.
[0054] Other conventional ingredients may be used in the liquid or mouth rinse compositions
of this invention, including those known and used in the art. Examples of such ingredients
include thickeners, suspending agents and softeners. Thickeners and suspending agents
useful in the compositions of the present invention can be found in
US Pat. 5,328,682 to Pullen et al. In certain embodiments, these are incorporated in amounts of from 0.1% w/v to 0.6%
w/v, or about 0.5% w/v of the composition.
[0055] In some embodiments, antimicrobial preservatives may be added to the composition.
Some antimicrobial preservatives which may be used include , but are not limited to
cationic antibacterials, such as sodium benzoate, polyquaternium polycationic polymers
(i.e polyquaternium-42: Poly[oxyethylene(dimethylimino)ethylene (dimethylimino)ethylene
dichloride]), quaternary ammonium salts or quaternary ammonium compounds, parabens
(i.e. parahydroxybenzoates or esters of parahydroxybenzoic acid), hydroxyacetophenone,
1,2-Hexanediol, Caprylyl Glycol, chlorhexidine, alexidine, hexetidine, benzalkonium
chloride, domiphen bromide, cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), tetradecylpyridinium chloride
(TPC), N-tetradecyl-4-ethylpyridinium chloride (TDEPC), octenidine, bisbiguanides,
zinc or stannous ion agents, grapefruit extract, and mixtures thereof. Other antibacterial
and antimicrobial agents include, but are not limited to: 5-chloro-2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-phenol,
commonly referred to as triclosan; 8-hydroxyquinoline and its salts, copper II compounds,
including, but not limited to, copper(II) chloride, copper(II) sulfate, copper(II)
acetate, copper(II) fluoride and copper(II) hydroxide; phthalic acid and its salts
including, but not limited to those disclosed in
U.S. Pat. No. 4,994,262, including magnesium monopotassium phthalate; sanguinarine; salicylanilide; iodine;
sulfonamides; phenolics; delmopinol, octapinol, and other piperidino derivatives;
niacin preparations; nystatin; apple extract; thyme oil; thymol; antibiotics such
as augmentin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, doxycycline, minocycline, metronidazole,
neomycin, kanamycin, cetylpyridinium chloride, and clindamycin; analogs and salts
of the above; methyl salicylate; hydrogen peroxide; metal salts of chlorite; pyrrolidone
ethyl cocoyl arginate; lauroyl ethyl arginate monochlorohydrate; and mixtures of all
of the above. In another embodiment, the composition comprises phenolic antimicrobial
compounds and mixtures thereof. Antimicrobial components may be present from 0.001%
to 20% by weight of the oral care composition. In another embodiment the antimicrobial
agents generally comprise from 0.1% to 5% by weight of the oral care compositions
of the present invention.
[0056] Other antibacterial agents may be basic amino acids and salts. Other embodiments
may comprise arginine.
[0058] The compositions of the present invention may be made according to any of a variety
of methods disclosed herein and known in the art. In particular, applicants have discovered
for certain oral care compositions, that the present compounds may be incorporated
into oral care compositions to produce compositions that tend to be relatively more
stable than prior compositions, including, for example, similar compositions comprising
LAE.
[0059] According to certain embodiments, the compositions of the present invention may be
made according to the following method(s).
[0060] The compounds and compositions of the present invention may be used in a variety
of methods of treating a mammalian body. Such methods generally comprise introducing
a compound or composition of the present invention into or onto the mammalian body
to be treated. For example, certain methods comprise treating a condition or disease
of the skin, mucosal membrane, hair, eye, or other part of the mammalian body by applying
to the skin, mucosal membrane, hair, eye, or other part of the body, respectively,
or injecting into the mammalian body, a compound or composition of the claimed invention.
Certain methods comprise treating a condition or disease of the oral cavity, including
the teeth, mucosal membranes/gums, and the like, by applying to the oral cavity, or
injecting into the oral cavity or otherwise into the mammalian body, a compound or
composition of the claimed invention.
[0061] The compounds and compositions of the present invention may be used in a variety
of methods of treating a mammalian body, in particular for disrupting a biofilm on
a surface of the oral cavity. For example disrupting biofilm on a surface by contacting
the surface comprising biofilm with a composition of the present invention. Also disclosed
is a method of removing biofilm from a surface by contacting the surface comprising
biofilm with a composition of the present invention. Also disclosed is a method of
reducing bacterial attachment to a surface by contacting the surface with a composition
of the present invention. Also disclosed are methods comprising inhibiting plaque
by contacting a surface of the oral cavity with a compound or composition of the present
invention.
[0062] Any suitable surface of the oral cavity may be contacting including one or more surfaces
selected from the group consisting of surfaces of one or more teeth, surfaces of the
gums, combinations of two or more thereof, and the like.
[0063] In each of the above methods, the composition may be introduced to the surface to
be contacted via any of a variety of methods. The composition may be introduced into
the oral cavity and applied to the surface by a user as a mouthwash or mouth rinse.
The composition may be introduced to the oral cavity and applied to the surface as
a toothpaste on an article for cleaning the teeth, e.g. a toothbrush. The compositions
may be further introduced via the mouth and applied to the surface as a gum, lozenge,
dissolvable strip, or the like.
[0064] Furthermore, the contacting step of the methods described may comprise contacting
the surface with the composition for any suitable amount of time. The contacting step
may comprise contacting the surface for less than thirty seconds. The contacting step
may comprise contacting the surface with the composition for thirty seconds or more,
for example, for about thirty seconds, for about 40 seconds, for about one minute,
or for greater than one minute.
EXAMPLES
Example 1: Synthesis of reference compound [amino({[4-dodecanamido-4-(ethylcarbamoyl)butyl]amino})methylidene]azanium
(reference compound 9)
[0065]

[0066] [amino({[4-dodecanamido-4-(ethylcarbamoyl)butyl]amino})methylidene]azanium was synthesized
in accord with the following procedure:
Condensation of Protected Arginine with Ethylamine: A mass of 19.72 g of N-α-(9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl)-N-ω',N-ω"-bis-tert-butyloxycarbonyl-L-argine
(Fmoc-Arg(Boc)2-OH; 0.033050; 1.0 equivalents) and 12.80 g of 1-[Bis(dimethylamino)methylene]-1H-1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-b]pyridinium 3-oxid hexafluorophosphate (HATU; 0.033663 moles; 1.0 equivalents) was
dissolved in in 120 mL of dichloromethane (DCM). To this, 19.0 mL (0.038000 moles;
1.1 equivalents) of 2.0 M ethylamine in tetrahydrofuran (THF) was added to the reaction
mixture. To promote the condensation reaction, 18.0 mL of diisopropylethylamine (DIEA;
0.10334 moles; 3.0 equivalents) was added to the reaction mixture and allowed to stir
for 24 hours at room temperature under argon gas (Ar(g)). The reaction was followed
by thin-layer chromatography by monitoring the consumption of reactants and production
of product 1. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was concentrated under vacuum
and product 1 was purified over silica employing a methanol (MeOH) gradient with DCM.
The purified mass of product 1 was 16.5 g, a yield of 80%.
Fmoc-deprotection of Product 1: A mass of 16.5 g of product 1 (0.026453 moles; 1.0 equivalents) was dissolved in
80 mL of DCM. After which 20 mL of piperidine (0.23488 moles; 8.9 equivalents) was
added to the reaction mixture and allowed to stir at room temperature under Ar(g).
The reaction was monitored by TLC until completion. Product 2 was concentrated under
vacuum and purification was attempted over silica. The impure mass of product 2 was
10.83 g.
Condensation of Product 2 with Lauric Acid: A mass of 10.83 g of product 2 (0.026973 moles; 1.0 equivalents) and 11.29 g of HATU
(0.029692 moles; 1.1 equivalents) was dissolved in 120 mL of DCM. To this a mass of
5.95 g of lauric acid (0.029702 moles; 1.1 equivalents) was added to the reaction
mixture. To promote the condensation reaction, 14.0 mL of DIEA (0.080377 moles; 3.0
equivalents) was added to the reaction mixture and allowed to stir for 24 hours at
room temperature under Ar(g). The reaction was followed by thin-layer chromatography
by monitoring the consumption of reactants and production of product 3. Upon completion,
the reaction mixture was concentrated under vacuum and product 3 was purified over
silica employing a ethyl acetate (EtOAc) gradient with heptane. The purified mass
of product 3 was 7.0 g, a yield of 44%.
Boc-group Deprotection of Product 3: A mass of 7.0 g of product 3 (0.011990 moles; 1.0 equivalents) was dissolved in dioxane.
To this, 50 mL of 12.1 M concentration hydrochloridic acid (HCl; 0.60500 moles; 50.1
equivalents) was added to the reaction mixture. The reaction was stirred for 2 hours
at room temperature under Ar(g). Upon completion of the reaction a significant amount
of product3 remained with respect to product 4. Therefore, the reaction mixture was
concentrated and the reaction was repeated for 30 minutes to ensure complete conversion
of product3 to product4. After near complete conversion was observed, the reaction
was concentrated under vacuum and purified over silica employing a MeOH gradient with
DCM. The final purified mass of product 4, the desired product, was 2.77 g, a yield
of 60%. Complete 1H-NMR, LC/MS and flow injection positive mode ESI-MS was performed to confirm the
identity of the product.
[0067] In general the reaction scheme that can be employed is shown below. Here, the Fmoc-protect
amino acid can be couple to any primary (or secondary amine) with any one of the various
coupling agents to amidate the carboxylic acid. Following deprotection of the Fmoc-group
with piperidine, the amine on the amino acid can be acetylated with any carboxylic
acid employing any one of the plethora of coupling agents. Finally, deprotection of
any side chain protection groups can be performed by utilizing a strong acid.

[0068] As further illustrated in Figs. 1-3, the resulting purified product was measured
using HPLC monitoring absorbance at 220nm wavelength, mass spectrometry, and proton
NMR in D
2O using a 400 MHz Bruker instrument with 16 scans and identified as [amino({[4-dodecanamido-4-(ethylcarbamoyl)butyl]amino})methylidene]azanium.
Shown in Fig. 1 is the LC/MS of purified compound 9. (A) HPLC chromatogram monitoring
absorbance at 220 nm wavelength. (B) The corresponding positive mode electrospary
ionization mass spectrometery of the primary peak highlighted in the red dotted line
box. The calculated m/z for the [M+H]
+ of compound 9 is calculated to be 384.58727. Shown in Fig. 2 is: (A) The chemical
structure and corresponding [M+H]
+ m/z for compound 9. (B) Positive mode ESI-MS of compound 9 final product. Shown in
Fig. 3 is:
1H-NMR of compound 9 in D
2O on 400 MHz Bruker instrument with 16 scans.
Reference Example 2: Dose response of reference compound 9 prevention of bacterial
attachment
[0069] Compositions A-F comprising different concentrations of reference compound 9 in water
are shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Formulation compositions used in Example 2
Composition |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
Reference Compound 9 (w/w %) |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.15 |
0.1 |
0.05 |
0.01 |
Purified Water (w/w %) |
99.6 |
99.7 |
99.85 |
99.9 |
99.95 |
99.99 |
[0070] Initial studies evaluated the concentration effect of reference compound 9 in a simple
water solution (Table 1 compositions) on prevention of bacterial attachment to pellicle
coated HA pegs. Reference Compound 9 in water demonstrated a dose dependent response
and the most effective concentration was identified to be 0.3 wt% (Table 2). However,
0.15 wt% reference compound 9 also demonstrated efficacy at preventing bacterial attachment
and was evaluated at that concentration further to match the concentration of LAE
in the current commercial product, Listerine Advanced Defense Gum Health (positive
control).
Table 2: Prevention assay efficacy results for compositions in Table 1
Composition |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
Positive Control |
Negative Control |
Average Log RLU |
3.44 |
3.25 |
4.86 |
5.59 |
5.52 |
5.95 |
4.09 |
6.20 |
Std Error |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
0.14 |
0.15 |
Example 3: Reference Compound 9 prevents bacterial attachment equivalent to LAE
[0071] The optimal concentration of reference compound 9 (0.15 wt %) was compared to the
same concentration of LAE for prevention of bacterial attachment when formulated into
a simple water or alcohol solution (Table 3).
Table 3: Formulation compositions used in Example 3
Compositions |
G |
H |
I |
J |
Reference Compound 9 (w/w %) |
0.00 |
0.15 |
0.00 |
0.15 |
LAE (w/w%) |
0.15 |
0.00 |
0.15 |
0.00 |
Alcohol, 190 proof (w/w %) |
18.2 |
18.2 |
0 |
0 |
Purified Water (w/w%) |
81.65 |
81.65 |
99.85 |
99.85 |
[0072] Table 4 suggests that reference compound 9 (0.15 wt%) is equally as efficacious as
LAE (0.15 wt%) at preventing bacterial attachment in both a 21.6% alcohol and water
based solution. LAE concentration in Listerine Advanced Defense Gum Treatment (LAGDT)
is 0.15 wt% which was the positive control with water as the negative control.
Table 4. Comparison between LAE and reference
compound 9 in the prevention of bacterial attachment
Compositions |
G |
H |
I |
J |
21.6% Alcohol Control |
(Positive Control) |
(Negative Control) |
Average Log RLU |
4.35 |
4.75 |
4.85 |
4.59 |
5.96 |
4.09 |
6.20 |
Std Error |
- |
- |
0.26 |
0.47 |
- |
0.14 |
0.15 |
[0073] Example 4: Reference
Compound 9 prevents bacterial attachment in full formula Following confirmation that LAE prevents bacterial attachment to the same degree
as LAE by the same mechanism of action, full formulas with reference compound 9 were
optimized. Reference Compound 9 compositions K-R include 0.15 wt% reference compound
9 in alcohol free base (Table 5).
Table 5: Formulation compositions used in example 3.
Composition |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
Reference Compound 9 (w/w%) |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
L-Menthol, USP (w/w%) |
0.0039 |
0.0000 |
0.0039 |
0.0000 |
0.0039 |
0.0000 |
0.0039 |
0.0000 |
Thymol NF(w/w%) |
0.0062 |
0.0000 |
0.0062 |
0.0000 |
0.0062 |
0.0000 |
0.0062 |
0.0000 |
Methyl Salicylate NF (w/w%) |
0.0064 |
0.0000 |
0.0064 |
0.0000 |
0.0064 |
0.0000 |
0.0064 |
0.0000 |
Eucalyptol USP (w/w%) |
0.0090 |
0.0000 |
0.0090 |
0.0000 |
0.0090 |
0.0000 |
0.0090 |
0.0000 |
Pluracare F-127 NF Prill (w/w%), Poly ethylene oxide co-propylene oxide |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Mackam (w/w%) (31% LAURAMIDOPROPYL BETAINE, 62.7% water, 5.4% sodium chloride) |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.65 |
0.65 |
0.65 |
0.65 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Benzoic Acid (w/w%) |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
Sodium Benzoate, NF/FCC Dense Form (w/w%) |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
Sucralose(w/w%), 1,6-Dichloro-1,6-di deoxy-β-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-α-D-galactopyranoside |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
Sorbitol 70%, USP (w/w%), (2S,3R,4R,5R)-Hexane-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexol |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
10.00 |
Propylene Glycol, USP (w/w%) |
7.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
7.00 |
Intensate Sweet Mint II, SF MOD (w/w%) |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.00 |
Purified Water (w/w%) |
82.43 |
82.48 |
81.79 |
81.83 |
81.99 |
82.03 |
82.63 |
82.68 |
Final pH |
4.20 |
4.20 |
4.20 |
4.20 |
4.20 |
4.20 |
4.20 |
4.20 |
[0074] The results in Table 6 suggest that the presence of essential oils (EOs) has no effect
on reference compound 9 (0.15 wt%) prevention of bacterial attachment. However, surfactant
has a major effect with 0.645 wt% Mackam and no surfactant enabling the best prevention
of attachment. LAE concentration in Listerine Advanced Defense Gum Treatment (LAGDT)
is 0.15 wt% which is the positive control with water as the negative control.
Table 6: Prevention efficacy of formulations in Table 5.
Compositions |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
Positive Control |
Negative Control |
Average Log RLU |
4.70 |
4.88 |
4.33 |
4.39 |
4.08 |
4.17 |
3.82 |
3.65 |
4.09 |
6.20 |
Std Error |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.14 |
0.15 |
Example 5: Reference Compound 9 maintains stability in an alcohol-free formulation while LAE does not
[0075] Select formulations (Table 7) were further evaluated for stability following incubation
at 50°C for 4 weeks by HPLC.
Table 7: Formulation compositions for Example 5.
Composition |
S |
L |
I |
J |
L-Menthol, USP (w/w%) |
0.0039 |
0.0039 |
0 |
0 |
Thymol NF (w/w%) |
0.0062 |
0.0062 |
0 |
0 |
Methyl Salicylate NF (w/w%) |
0.0064 |
0.0064 |
0 |
0 |
Eucalyptol USP (w/w%) |
0.0090 |
0.0090 |
0 |
0 |
Pluracare F-127 NF Prill (w/w%), Poly ethylene oxide co-propylene oxide |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0 |
0 |
Benzoic Acid (w/w%) |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0 |
0 |
Sodium Benzoate, NF/FCC Dense Form (w/w%) |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0 |
0 |
Sucralose(w/w%), 1,6-Dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-β-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-α-D-galactopyranoside |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0 |
0 |
Sorbitol 70%, USP (w/w%), (2S,3R,4R,5R)-Hexane-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexol |
10.00 |
10.00 |
0 |
0 |
Propylene Glycol, USP (w/w%) |
7.00 |
7.00 |
0 |
0 |
Intensate Sweet Mint II, SF MOD (w/w%) |
0.017 |
0.017 |
0 |
0 |
LAE (w/w%) |
0.15 |
0 |
0.15 |
0 |
Reference Compound 9 (w/w%) |
0 |
0.15 |
0 |
0.15 |
Purified Water (w/w%) |
82.43 |
82.43 |
99.85 |
99.85 |
Final pH |
4.37 |
4.37 |
- |
- |
[0076] Table 8 shows that reference compound 9 containing formulations are able maintain
at least 90% reference compound 9 out to 8 weeks when stored at 50°C as opposed to
LAE which shows only 46 and 73% stability of the molecule after that length of storage
(determined by HPLC).
Table 9. Reference Compound 9 is stable in alcohol free formulation compositions.
|
% of Compound Remaining Following Storage at 50°C |
Week 0 |
Week 2 |
Week 4 |
Week 8 |
Composition S |
99 |
85 |
69 |
46 |
Composition L |
104 |
95 |
93 |
92 |
Composition I |
99 |
73 |
72 |
73 |
Composition J |
100 |
90 |
98 |
106 |
Example 6: Compounds 1, 2, 17, 18, 19 and reference compounds 3, 4, 6, 9, 11, 12,
16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 prevent bacterial attachment.
[0077] A broader set of compounds (compounds 1-26) were evaluated for their ability to prevent
bacterial attachment on a pellicle coated hydroxyapatite pegs. The results in Table
10 suggest that compounds 1, 2, 17, 18 and 19 and reference compounds 3, 4, 6, 9,
11, 12, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 have the ability to prevent bacterial attachment
with compounds 1, 2, 17, 18 and 19 and reference compounds 3, 6, 9, 12, 21, 22, and
26 preventing bacterial attachment the best. All tests were done in simple solution
solvent base formulas (Table 11). Listerine Advanced Defense Gum Treatment (LAGDT)
is the positive control with water as the negative control.

Example 7: Compounds 1 and reference compounds 3-13 are stable in simple solution
formulations (Table 13) and compounds 1 and 2 and reference compounds 3, 4, 6, 7,
9, 11 and 12 do not result in more than a one log reduction in S. mutans
[0078] Compounds 1 and 2 and reference compounds 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11 and 12 were evaluated
in an
in-vitro single species
S.
mutans biofilm model (Table 12 row 2). All compounds tested do not result in more than a
one log reduction in
S.
mutans. Listerine Cool Mint was the positive control with water as the negative control.
Compounds 1 and 2 and reference compounds 3-13 were evaluated for structural stability
via HPLC after storage at 50 °C for 4 and 8 weeks (Table 12 rows 3 and 4). All compounds
tested maintained stability with only compound 2 showing a significant decrease in
peak area. All tests were done in simple solution solvent base formulas (Table 13).

Example 8: Compounds 1 and 2 and reference compounds 3, 6, 9, 11 and 12 prevent bacterial
attachment when tested in alcohol free full formulations (Table 15).
[0079] Some of the lead candidates at preventing bacterial attachment were further optimized
in alcohol-free full formulations with water as the only solvent (Table 15) for their
ability to prevent bacterial attachment with and without essential oils (EOs) (Table
14: J2-Q2 without EOs and Q2-W2 with EOs). All formulations tested prevent bacterial
attachment better when formulated with EOs. Listerine Advanced Defense Gum Treatment
(LAGDT) is the positive control with water as the negative control.
Table 15: Formulation compositions used in Example 8.
Composition (w/w%) |
J2 |
K2 |
L2* |
M2* |
N2* |
O2* |
P2* |
|
Compound 1 |
Compound 2 |
Compound 3* |
Compound 6* |
Compound 9* |
Compound 11* |
Compound 12* |
Compound |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
Pluracare F-68 NF Prill (w/w%), Poly ethylene oxide co-propylene oxide |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
Propylene glycol, USP |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Sucralose(w/w%), 1,6-Dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-β-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-α-D-galactopyranoside |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
Benzoic Acid |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.000 |
Sodium Benzoate, NF/FCC Dense Form |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.000 |
L-Menthol, USP |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
Thymol NF |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
Methyl Salicylate NF |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
Eucalyptol USP |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
Garbanzo 8 EC MOD, UT264932/00 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
Purified water |
97.13 |
97.13 |
97.13 |
97.13 |
97.13 |
97.13 |
97.29 |
Table 15 Continued: Formulation compositions used in example 8.
Composition (w/w%) |
Q2 |
R2 |
S2* |
T2* |
U2* |
V2* |
W2* |
|
Compound 1 |
Compound 2 |
Compound 3* |
Compound 6* |
Compound 9* |
Compound 11* |
Compound 12* |
Compound |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
Pluracare F-68 NF Prill (w/w%), Poly ethylene oxide co-propylene oxide |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
Propylene glycol, USP |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Sucralose(w/w%), 1,6-Dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-β-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-α-D-galactopyranoside |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
Benzoic Acid |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.000 |
Sodium Benzoate, NF/FCC Dense Form |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.000 |
L-Menthol, USP |
0.020 |
0.020 |
0.020 |
0.020 |
0.020 |
0.020 |
0.020 |
Thymol NF |
0.018 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
Methyl Salicylate NF |
0.070 |
0.070 |
0.070 |
0.070 |
0.070 |
0.070 |
0.070 |
Eucalyptol USP |
0.017 |
0.017 |
0.017 |
0.017 |
0.017 |
0.017 |
0.017 |
Garbanzo 8 EC MOD, UT264932/00 |
0.088 |
0.088 |
0.088 |
0.088 |
0.088 |
0.088 |
0.088 |
Purified water |
96.92 |
96.92 |
96.92 |
96.92 |
96.92 |
96.92 |
97.08 |
Example 9: Compounds 1 and 2 and reference compounds 3, 6, 9, 11 and 12 prevent bacterial
attachment when tested in alcohol-free full formulations (Table 17)
[0080] The lead candidates at preventing bacterial attachment were further optimized in
alcohol-free full formulations with water and propylene glycol as the solvents (Table
17) for their ability to prevent bacterial attachment with and without essential oils
(EOs) (Table 16: X2-D3 without EOs and E3-K3 with EOs). All formulations tested prevent
bacterial attachment better when formulated with EOs. Listerine Advanced Defense Gum
Treatment (LAGDT) is the positive control with water as the negative control.
Table 17: Formulation compositions used in Example 9.
Composition (w/w%) |
X2 |
Y2 |
Z2* |
A3* |
B3* |
C3* |
D3* |
|
Compound 1 |
Compound 2 |
Compound 3* |
Compound 6* |
Compound 9* |
Compound 11* |
Compound 12* |
Compound |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
Pluracare F-68 NF Prill (P188), Poly ethylene oxide co-propylene oxide |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Propylene glycol, USP |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
Sucralose(w/w%), 1,6-Dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-β-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-α-D-galactopyranoside |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
Benzoic Acid |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.011 |
Sodium Benzoate, NF/FCC Dense Form |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.010 |
L-Menthol, USP |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
Thymol NF |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
Methyl Salicylate NF |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
Eucalyptol USP |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
Garbanzo 8 EC MOD, UT264932/00 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
Purified water |
83.63 |
83.63 |
83.63 |
83.63 |
83.63 |
83.63 |
83.77 |
Table 17 Continued: Formulation compositions used in Example 9.
Composition (w/w%) |
E3 |
F3 |
G3* |
H3* |
I3* |
J3* |
K3* |
|
Compound 1 |
Compound 2 |
Compound 3* |
Compound 6* |
Compound 9* |
Compound 11* |
Compound 12* |
Compound |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
Pluracare F-68 NF Prill (P188), Poly ethylene oxide co-propylene oxide |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Propylene glycol, USP |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
15.00 |
Sucralose(w/w%), 1,6-Dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-β-D-fructofuranosyl-4-chloro-4-deoxy-α-D-galactopyranoside |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
0.059 |
Benzoic Acid |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.086 |
0.011 |
Sodium Benzoate, NF/FCC Dense Form |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0.010 |
L-Menthol, USP |
0.020 |
0.020 |
0.020 |
0.020 |
0.020 |
0.020 |
0.020 |
Thymol NF |
0.018 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
Methyl Salicylate NF |
0.070 |
0.070 |
0.070 |
0.070 |
0.070 |
0.070 |
0.070 |
Eucalyptol USP |
0.017 |
0.017 |
0.017 |
0.017 |
0.017 |
0.017 |
0.017 |
Garbanzo 8 EC MOD, UT264932/00 |
0.088 |
0.088 |
0.088 |
0.088 |
0.088 |
0.088 |
0.088 |
Purified water |
83.57 |
83.57 |
83.57 |
83.57 |
83.57 |
83.57 |
83.71 |
METHODS
Formulation Preparation
[0081] The formulations in Examples 2-9 were prepared using conventional mixing technology.
Briefly, benzoic acid and sodium benzoate were dissolved in propylene glycol or water.
Flavor and essential oils were dissolved in propylene glycol or in surfactant and
water (in some compositions no EOs or flavor were added). Sucralose was dissolved
in water. Surfactant was dissolved/mixed into water. The sodium benzoate and benzoic
acid containing solution was added to the mixing vessel followed by the essential
oil and flavor solutions and then the surfactant solution and sorbitol. This was followed
by addition of the solid compound. Sonication or increase in temperature may or may
not be used to expedite the dissolution of the compounds. The pH of the formulations
was adjusted to about pH 4.2 with sodium hydroxide or hydrochloric acid and then water
added to q.s. the composition.
Prevention Assay Method
[0082] The formulations in Examples 2-4, 6, 8 and 9 were prepared and test for prevention
of bacterial attachment using the prevention assay. In this assay hydroxyapatite-coated
polystyrene peg plate (96 pegs, N=8 per group) was exposed to saliva for one minute
to form a pellicle at a temperature of 35C. Then, for each formulation, eight pegs
(N=8) were pre-treated for ten minutes with the formulation using an orbital shaker
set to 500RPM at room temperature. As a negative control, eight pegs (N=8) were pre-treated
for ten minutes with sterile water. Next, a 16-hour salivary biofilm was grown on
these polystyrene peg plates at a temperature of 35C.
[0083] After all treatments were complete, the biofilm from each peg was neutralized and
rinsed. The biofilm was harvested via sonication using a Q-Sonica Q700 Ultrasonic
Liquid Processor with 431MP4-00 microplate horn Damper and 0.5:1 reverse gain booster
(Q-Sonica, Newtown, CT). Using a Celsis Rapid Detection RapiScreen kit (Celsis International
PLC, Chicago, IL), the bacteria were lysed with Celsis Luminex and then the adenosine
triphosphate (ATP) from the lysed bacteria was measured using the bioluminescence
marker Celcis Luminate and a Centro LB 960 Microplate Luminometer supplied by Berthold
Technologies (Wildbad, Germany). Data were reported in log RLU (relative light units)
where decreasing log RLUs indicated fewer viable bacteria remained on the biofilm
substrate. The log RLUs for the prevention assay are shown on Tables 2, 4, 6, 10,
14, and 16.
S. Mutans Single Species Kill Assay
[0084] The formulations listed in Example 7 were prepared and tested using an
in-vitro single species
S.
mutans biofilm model. A 24-hour
S.
mutans biofilm is grown on a polystyrene peg plate (96 pegs, N=6 per test group). The pegs
were subsequently treated for thirty seconds with each of formulations H and I, as
well as positive and negative controls. The treatment is applied as a single thirty
(30) second treatment. The positive control is a commercially available essential
oil mouth rinse. The negative control is sterile water. After treatment the biofilm
is neutralized and rinsed. The biofilm is harvested via sonication using a Misonix
Ultrasonic Liquid Processor (Farmingdale, NY). Using a Celsis Rapid Detection RapiScreen
kit (Celsis International PLC, Chicago), the bacteria are lysed with Celsis Luminex
and then the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) from the lysed bacteria is measured using
the bioluminescence marker LB960 Microplate Luminometer supplied by Berthold (Wildbad,
Germany). Data are reported in log RLU (relative light units) where decreasing log
RLUs indicates fewer viable bacteria remaining on the biofilm substrate.
HPLC Quantification of Compounds
[0085] Briefly, formulations containing either LAE or any of the 26 compounds and standards
are diluted into a solution of 50% acetonitrile and 50% water. They are evaluated
on an Agilent HPLC using a Zorbax ion exchange column. In the method, 10uL of the
sample is withdrawn and ran through the HPLC with a 40% potassium phosphate (molarity
at pH 3.0) 60% acetonitrile mobile phase. Sample retention time varies between 4 and
12 minutes, depending upon the molecule. The molecule peak is auto-integrated using
the Online Agilent HPLC software. Comparisons are made to the standard to identify
the % of compound remaining following storage.
METHODS
Formulation Preparation
[0086] The formulations in Examples 2-9 were prepared using conventional mixing technology.
Briefly, benzoic acid and sodium benzoate were dissolved in propylene glycol or water.
Flavor and essential oils were dissolved in propylene glycol or in surfactant and
water (in some compositions no EOs or flavor were added). Sucralose was dissolved
in water. Surfactant was dissolved/mixed into water. The sodium benzoate and benzoic
acid containing solution was added to the mixing vessel followed by the essential
oil and flavor solutions and then the surfactant solution and sorbitol. This was followed
by addition of the solid compound. Sonication or increase in temperature may or may
not be used to expedite the dissolution of the compounds. The pH of the formulations
was adjusted to about pH 4.2 with sodium hydroxide or hydrochloric acid and then water
added to q.s. the composition.
Prevention Assay Method
[0087] The formulations in Examples 2-4, 6, 8 and 9 were prepared and test for prevention
of bacterial attachment using the prevention assay. In this assay hydroxyapatite-coated
polystyrene peg plate (96 pegs, N=8 per group) was exposed to saliva for one minute
to form a pellicle at a temperature of 35C. Then, for each formulation, eight pegs
(N=8) were pre-treated for ten minutes with the formulation using an orbital shaker
set to 500RPM at room temperature. As a negative control, eight pegs (N=8) were pre-treated
for ten minutes with sterile water. Next, a 16-hour salivary biofilm was grown on
these polystyrene peg plates at a temperature of 35C.
[0088] After all treatments were complete, the biofilm from each peg was neutralized and
rinsed. The biofilm was harvested via sonication using a Q-Sonica Q700 Ultrasonic
Liquid Processor with 431MP4-00 microplate horn Damper and 0.5:1 reverse gain booster
(Q-Sonica, Newtown, CT). Using a Celsis Rapid Detection RapiScreen kit (Celsis International
PLC, Chicago, IL), the bacteria were lysed with Celsis Luminex and then the adenosine
triphosphate (ATP) from the lysed bacteria was measured using the bioluminescence
marker Celcis Luminate and a Centro LB 960 Microplate Luminometer supplied by Berthold
Technologies (Wildbad, Germany). Data were reported in log RLU (relative light units)
where decreasing log RLUs indicated fewer viable bacteria remained on the biofilm
substrate. The log RLUs for the prevention assay are shown on Tables 2, 4, 6, 10,
14, and 16.
S. Mutans Single Species Kill Assay
[0089] The formulations listed in Example 7 were prepared and tested using an
in-vitro single species
S.
mutans biofilm model. A 24-hour
S. mutans biofilm is grown on a polystyrene peg plate (96 pegs, N=6 per test group). The pegs
were subsequently treated for thirty seconds with each of formulations H and I, as
well as positive and negative controls. The treatment is applied as a single thirty
(30) second treatment. The positive control is a commercially available essential
oil mouth rinse. The negative control is sterile water. After treatment the biofilm
is neutralized and rinsed. The biofilm is harvested via sonication using a Misonix
Ultrasonic Liquid Processor (Farmingdale, NY). Using a Celsis Rapid Detection RapiScreen
kit (Celsis International PLC, Chicago), the bacteria are lysed with Celsis Luminex
and then the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) from the lysed bacteria is measured using
the bioluminescence marker LB960 Microplate Luminometer supplied by Berthold (Wildbad,
Germany). Data are reported in log RLU (relative light units) where decreasing log
RLUs indicates fewer viable bacteria remaining on the biofilm substrate.
HPLC Quantification of Compounds
[0090] Briefly, formulations containing either LAE or any of the 26 compounds and standards
are diluted into a solution of 50% acetonitrile and 50% water. They are evaluated
on an Agilent HPLC using a Zorbax ion exchange column. In the method, 10uL of the
sample is withdrawn and ran through the HPLC with a 40% potassium phosphate (molarity
at pH 3.0) 60% acetonitrile mobile phase. Sample retention time varies between 4 and
12 minutes, depending upon the molecule. The molecule peak is auto-integrated using
the Online Agilent HPLC software. Comparisons are made to the standard to identify
the % of compound remaining following storage.