Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a coated cutting tool.
Background Art
[0002] It has been conventionally well known to employ, for the cutting of steel, cast iron,
etc., a coated cutting tool which is obtained by depositing, via chemical vapor deposition,
a coating layer with a total thickness of from 3 µm or more to 20 µm or less on a
surface of a substrate consisting of a cemented carbide. A known example of the above
coating layer is a coating layer consisting of a single layer of one kind selected
from the group consisting of a Ti carbide, a Ti nitride, a Ti carbonitride, a Ti carboxide,
a Ti carboxynitride, and aluminum oxide, or consisting of multiple layers of two or
more kinds selected therefrom.
[0003] For example, Patent Document 1 proposes a coated tool comprising a substrate consisting
of a cemented carbide and a coating layer located on a surface of the substrate, wherein:
the coating layer is in contact with the substrate and includes a first layer containing
Ti(C
xN
1-x) (0≤x≤1); and, as to the WC particles in a region of the substrate which ranges from
the surface thereof to a depth of 5 µm, the KAM average value measured by an electron
backscatter diffraction (EBSD) method with a scanning electron microscope equipped
with an electron backscatter diffraction pattern system is 1° or less.
Citation List
Patent Documents
Summary
Technical Problem
[0005] An increase in speed, feed and depth of cut has become more conspicuous in cutting
in recent times, and the chipping resistance and fracture resistance of a tool are
required to be further improved compared to those involved in the prior art. In particular,
a tool is required which has stable performance not involving the occurrence of sporadic
fracturing even in the case of such tool being mass produced.
[0006] When depositing a coating layer on a surface of a cemented carbide via chemical vapor
deposition, strain remains in a part of the cemented carbide which is near the surface
thereof due to a large difference in the thermal expansion coefficient between the
coating layer and the cemented carbide.
[0007] Further, the coated tool of Patent Document 1 only takes into consideration the KAM
average value of a region of the substrate which ranges from the surface thereof to
a depth of 5 µm. It is therefore considered that a large difference exists in the
absolute value of the KAM value between a part of the substrate which is close to
the surface and a part thereof which is distant from the surface. This can be inferred
from the fact that the coating layer is formed by chemical vapor deposition.
[0008] The present invention has been made in light of the above circumstances, and an object
of the present invention is to provide a coated cutting tool which has excellent chipping
resistance and fracture resistance and which accordingly allows for an extended tool
life.
Solution to Problem
[0009] The present inventor has conducted intensive studies in order to achieve the above
object and has then found that, in a coated cutting tool, strain control performed
on a part of a cemented carbide which is close to a surface thereof and an inner part
of the cemented carbide allows the coated cutting tool to have excellent chipping
resistance and fracture resistance, and this has led to the completion of the present
invention.
[0010] Namely, the present invention is as set forth below:
- [1] A coated cutting tool comprising a cemented carbide and a coating layer formed
on a surface of the cemented carbide, wherein:
an average thickness of the coating layer is from 5.0 µm or more to 30.0 µm or less;
and
in the cemented carbide, when regarding a region thereof which ranges from the surface
of the cemented carbide to a depth of 20.0 µm in a direction opposite to the coating
layer as a surface region, and also regarding a region thereof on a side opposite
to the coating layer across the surface region as an inner region, an average value
of KAM values in the surface region and an average value of KAM values in the inner
region satisfy a condition represented by formula (1) below.

(In formula (1), KAMs denotes an average value of KAM values in the surface region, and KAMi denotes an average value of KAM values in the inner region.)
- [2] The coated cutting tool of [1], wherein the KAMs is from 0.35° or more to 0.55° or less.
- [3] The coated cutting tool of [1] or [2], wherein the KAMi is from 0.35° or more to 0.55° or less.
- [4] The coated cutting tool of any of [1] to [3], wherein the cemented carbide comprises
5.0 mass% or more to 12.0 mass% or less of a binder phase.
- [5] The coated cutting tool of any of [1] to [4], wherein:
the cemented carbide comprises a compound phase containing one or more kinds of a
compound or compounds, each compound consisting of: an element of at least one kind
selected from the group consisting of Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb, Ta, Cr and Mo; and an element
of at least one kind selected from the group consisting of C, N, O and B; and
the cemented carbide comprises 3.0 mass% or more to 6.0 mass% or less of the compound
phase.
- [6] The coated cutting tool of any of [1] to [5], wherein:
the coating layer comprises a lower layer and an upper layer formed on a surface of
the lower layer in order from the cemented carbide side;
the lower layer has an average thickness of from 1.5 µm or more to 15.0 µm or less;
the lower layer is a Ti compound layer comprised of a layer of one kind selected from
the group consisting of a Ti carbide layer, a Ti nitride layer, a Ti carbonitride
layer, a Ti carboxide layer and a Ti carboxynitride layer, or comprised of layers
of two or more kinds selected therefrom;
the upper layer has an average thickness of from 1.5 µm or more to 15.0 µm or less;
and
the upper layer is an α-type aluminum oxide layer comprised of α-type aluminum oxide.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0011] The present invention can provide a coated cutting tool which has excellent chipping
resistance and fracture resistance and which accordingly allows for an extended tool
life.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0012] Fig. 1 is a schematic view showing an example of a coated cutting tool according
to the present invention.
Description of Embodiments
[0013] An embodiment for carrying out the present invention (hereinafter simply referred
to as the "present embodiment") will hereinafter be described in detail, with reference
to the attached drawings as appropriate. However, the present invention is not limited
to the present embodiment below. Various modifications may be made to the present
invention without departing from the gist of the invention. It should be noted that,
in the drawings, the same elements are denoted by the same symbols and will not be
further explained. Unless otherwise specified, positional relationships, such as vertical
and horizontal relationships, are based on the positional relationships shown in the
drawings. Further, the dimensional ratios of the drawings are not limited to those
shown therein.
[0014] A coated cutting tool according to the present embodiment is a coated cutting tool
comprising a cemented carbide and a coating layer formed on a surface of the cemented
carbide, wherein: an average thickness of the coating layer is from 5.0 µm or more
to 30.0 µm or less; and, in the cemented carbide, when regarding a region thereof
which ranges from the surface of the cemented carbide to a depth of 20.0 µm in a direction
opposite to the coating layer as a surface region, and also regarding a region thereof
on a side opposite to the coating layer across the surface region as an inner region,
an average value of KAM values in the surface region and an average value of KAM values
in the inner region satisfy a condition represented by formula (1) below.

(In formula (1), KAM
s denotes an average value of KAM values in the surface region, and KAM
i denotes an average value of KAM values in the inner region.)
[0015] Fig. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional view showing an example of a coated cutting
tool according to the present embodiment. A coated cutting tool 6 comprises a substrate
1 (cemented carbide) and a coating layer 5 formed on a surface of the substrate 1,
and the substrate 1 consists of a surface region 1a and an inner region 1b. The coating
layer 5 comprises: a lower layer 2 formed on the surface of the substrate 1; an upper
layer 3 formed on a surface of the lower layer 2 which is located on a side opposite
to the substrate 1; and an outermost layer 4 formed on a surface of the upper layer
3 which is located on a side opposite to the lower layer 2.
[0016] The coated cutting tool of the present embodiment has the configuration described
above and thereby provides the following operational advantages. The operations can
be considered to be as set forth below; however, they are not limited thereto.
[0017] With regard to the coated cutting tool of the present embodiment, in the cemented
carbide serving as the substrate, if the absolute value of the difference between
an average value of KAM values in the surface region and an average value of KAM values
in the inner region is 0.10° or less, this leads to a reduced number of locations
serving as starting points for the breakage of the coated cutting tool, which allows
the load in a cutting process to be prone to be dispersed, thereby resulting in excellent
fracture resistance.
[0018] A KAM value is a numerical value, in a crystal orientation analysis based on an electron
backscatter diffraction (hereinafter referred to as "EBSD") method with the use of
a scanning electron microscope, which indicates a local misorientation, being a crystal
orientation difference between adjacent measurement points, and such KAM value is
a parameter for evaluating plastic deformation in a quantitative manner. A greater
KAM value refers to a greater crystal orientation difference between adjacent measurement
points and, in turn, means greater plastic deformation. In the cemented carbide, if
the absolute value of the difference between the average value of KAM values in the
surface region and the average value of KAM values in the inner region is 0.10° or
less, this leads to a small difference in the plastic deformation (strain) between
the surface region and the inner region, and this can suppress, in the surface region,
the generation of cracking due to the plastic deformation, and can also suppress,
even if cracking is generated, the progress of such cracking. In other words, the
toughness in the surface region of the cemented carbide is increased. Further, if
the average thickness of the coating layer is 5.0 µm or more, this leads to an improvement
of wear resistance because the function of the coating layer can be exerted in an
effective and reliable manner. If the average thickness of the coating layer is 30.0
µm or less, this leads to an improvement in the adhesion of the coating layer with
the cemented carbide as well as an improvement of fracture resistance. As a result,
the coated cutting tool of the present embodiment has both excellent chipping resistance
and fracture resistance, and in particular has excellent fracture resistance. The
coated cutting tool of the present embodiment also has stable performance not involving
the occurrence of sporadic fracturing even in the case of such tool being mass produced.
However, the factors for the excellent chipping resistance and fracture resistance
of the coated cutting tool of the present embodiment are not limited thereto.
(Substrate)
[0019] The coated cutting tool of the present embodiment comprises a cemented carbide, serving
as a substrate, and a coating layer formed on a surface of the cemented carbide. Specific
examples of types of such coated cutting tool include an indexable cutting insert
for milling or turning, a drill and an end mill.
[0020] The substrate used for the coated cutting tool of the present embodiment is a cemented
carbide. Since the substrate of the coated cutting tool of the present embodiment
is a cemented carbide, such coated cutting tool has further excellent wear resistance
and fracture resistance.
[0021] The cemented carbide satisfies a condition represented by formula (1) below.

(In formula (1), KAM
s denotes an average value of KAM values in the surface region, and KAM
i denotes an average value of KAM values in the inner region.)
[0022] With regard to the coated cutting tool of the present embodiment, in the cemented
carbide, if the absolute value of the difference between an average value of KAM values
in the surface region and an average value of KAM values in the inner region is 0.10°
or less, this allows the load in a cutting process to be prone to be dispersed, thereby
resulting in excellent fracture resistance.
[0023] From the perspective of providing the above-described operational advantages in a
more effective and reliable manner, in the cemented carbide, the absolute value of
the difference between the average value of KAM values in the surface region and the
average value of KAM values in the inner region is preferably 0.08° or less, is more
preferably 0.06° or less, and is further preferably 0.04° or less. In the cemented
carbide, if the absolute value of the difference between the average value of KAM
values in the surface region and the average value of KAM values in the inner region
falls under the range described above, this allows the load in a cutting process to
be prone to be further dispersed, thereby resulting in further excellent fracture
resistance.
[0024] Even when forming the coating layer by chemical vapor deposition, the absolute value
of the difference between the average value of KAM values in the surface region and
the average value of KAM values in the inner region in the cemented carbide can be
adjusted by, for example, controlling the dry shot blasting conditions set forth below.
More specifically, for example, in dry shot blasting, the above absolute value can
be controlled so as to be from 0.00° or more to 0.10° or less by setting a shot angle
at 90° and by adjusting a shot pressure so as to be from 1.7 bar or higher to 1.9
bar or lower, as well as adjusting the average particle size of a shot material so
as to be from 120 µm or more to 150 µm or less (where the shot material is steel,
from 380 µm or more to 420 µm or less).
[0025] KAM values and the average value thereof are measured as set forth below. A sample
of a coated cutting tool is polished in a direction orthogonal to the surface of such
sample so that a cross-sectional surface is exposed. With regard to a part of such
cross-sectional surface which consists of the cemented carbide, a region of the cemented
carbide which ranges from the surface thereof to a depth of 20.0 µm in a direction
opposite to the coating layer is regarded as a surface region, and further, a region
thereof which is located further inward than the surface region is regarded as an
inner region. Using an EBSD (manufactured by TexSEM Laboratories, Inc.), each measurement
region in each of the surface region and the inner region is divided into regular
hexagonal regions (pixels). As to each of the divided regions, the orientation of
the pixel is measured by obtaining Kikuchi patterns from reflected electrons from
an electron beam which has been incident on the polished surface of the sample. The
obtained orientation data is analyzed using analysis software for the EBSD, thereby
calculating various parameters. The measurement conditions are as set forth below:
the acceleration voltage is 15 kV; the dimensions of the measurement region employ
a width of 50 µm and, as to the surface region, a thickness of 20 µm from the surface
of the cemented carbide or, as to the inner region, a thickness of 20 µm below the
surface region toward an inner part of the cemented carbide; and the distance (step
size) between adjacent pixels is 0.1 µm. From among the pixels adjacent to a pixel
serving as a measurement center, pixels which each have a misorientation of 5° or
more with respect to such pixel are excluded from the calculation of KAM values as
such excluded pixels are each regarded as straddling the grain boundary of the monocrystal
where the pixel serving as a measurement center is located. That is, a KAM value is
obtained as an average value of the misorientation of a pixel located in a crystal
grain and the misorientations of the pixels which are adjacent to such pixel and which
do not straddle the grain boundary of such crystal grain. Then, an average is taken
of the KAM values in all the pixels which configure the entire measurement region.
It should be noted that the average value of the KAM values is defined as a numerical
value obtained by, as to any three measurement regions, taking an average of the KAM
values in the above-described manner for each of such measurement regions and then
averaging the resultant average values.
[0026] In the cemented carbide, the average value of KAM values in the surface region (KAM
s) is preferably from 0.35° or more to 0.55° or less. If the KAM
s is 0.55° or less, this leads to a reduced amount of strain so that the starting point
for breakage can be suppressed in the surface of the cemented carbide, whereby the
generation of cracking and the progress of such cracking can be further suppressed,
thereby resulting in a coated cutting tool which is further excellent in terms of
fracture resistance and chipping resistance, particularly in terms of fracture resistance.
Moreover, from the perspective of ease of manufacturing, KAM
s is preferably 0.35° or more. From the same perspective, KAM
s is more preferably from 0.35° or more to 0.50° or less, and is further preferably
from 0.35° or more to 0.45° or less.
[0027] In the cemented carbide, the average value of KAM values in the surface region (KAM
s) can be controlled by, for example, adjusting the shot material, the average particle
size thereof, the shot pressure and the nozzle pitch interval.
[0028] In the cemented carbide, the average value of KAM values in the inner region (KAM
i) is preferably from 0.35° or more to 0.55° or less. If the KAM
i is 0.55° or less, this leads to a reduced amount of strain so that the starting point
for breakage can be suppressed in an inner part of the cemented carbide, whereby the
generation of cracking and the progress of such cracking can be further suppressed,
thereby resulting in a coated cutting tool which is further excellent in terms of
fracture resistance and chipping resistance, particularly in terms of fracture resistance.
Moreover, from the perspective of ease of manufacturing, KAM
i is preferably 0.35° or more. From the same perspective, KAM
i is more preferably from 0.35° or more to 0.50° or less, and is further preferably
from 0.35° or more to 0.45° or less.
[0029] In the cemented carbide, the average value of KAM values in the inner region (KAM
i) can be controlled by, for example, adjusting the shot material, the average particle
size thereof, the shot pressure and the nozzle pitch interval.
[0030] In the coated cutting tool of the present embodiment, the cemented carbide preferably
comprises a binder phase and a hard phase. In the present embodiment, the binder phase
refers to a phase which binds the particles of the hard phase together, and the hard
phase refers to a phase of a high hardness deposit or additive which is introduced
with the aim of increasing the deformation resistance of the cemented carbide and
improving the elastic modulus, strength, wear resistance and creep characteristics
thereof at high temperatures.
[0031] In the cemented carbide, the content of the binder phase is preferably from 5.0 mass%
or more to 12.0 mass% or less, is more preferably from 5.0 mass% or more to 11.0 mass%
or less, and is further preferably from 6.0 mass% or more to 10.0 mass% or less, based
on a total amount of the cemented carbide. Further, in the cemented carbide, the content
of the hard phase is preferably from 88.0 mass% or more to 95.0 mass% or less, is
more preferably from 89.0 mass% or more to 95.0 mass% or less, and is further preferably
from 90.0 mass% or more to 94.0 mass% or less, based on a total amount of the cemented
carbide. If the coated cutting tool of the present embodiment comprises the cemented
carbide having the above-described configuration, such coated cutting tool is further
excellent in terms of wear resistance, fracture resistance and chipping resistance.
[0032] In the cemented carbide used in the present embodiment, the hard phase is preferably
constituted by, for example, a phase of tungsten carbide and a compound phase of other
compounds.
[0033] In the coated cutting tool of the present embodiment, the cemented carbide preferably
comprises a compound phase containing one or more kinds of compounds, each compound
consisting of: an element of at least one kind selected from the group consisting
of Ti (titanium), Zr (zirconium), Hf (hafnium), V (vanadium), Nb (niobium), Ta (tantalum),
Cr (chromium) and Mo (molybdenum); and an element of at least one kind selected from
the group consisting of C (carbon), N (nitrogen), O (oxygen) and B (boron). Further,
in the cemented carbide, the content of the compound phase is preferably from 3.0
mass% or more to 6.0 mass% or less, is more preferably from 3.0 mass% or more to 5.0
mass% or less, and is further preferably from 4.0 mass% or more to 5.0 mass% or less.
If the coated cutting tool of the present embodiment comprises the cemented carbide
having the above-described configuration, such coated cutting tool is further excellent
in terms of fracture resistance and chipping resistance.
[0034] It should be noted that the surface of the substrate may be modified. For instance,
a β-free layer may be formed on the surface of a cemented carbide. The operational
advantages of the present invention are still provided, even if the substrate surface
has been modified in this way.
(Coating layer)
[0035] The average thickness of the coating layer used in the coated cutting tool of the
present embodiment is from 5.0 µm or more to 30.0 µm or less. If the average thickness
of the coating layer is 5.0 µm or more, this leads to an improvement of wear resistance,
and if such average thickness is 30.0 µm or less, this leads to an improvement in
the adhesion of the coating layer with the substrate and an improvement of fracture
resistance. From the same perspective, the average thickness of the coating layer
is preferably from 7.0 µm or more to 29.0 µm or less, is more preferably from 8.0
µm or more to 18.0 µm or less, and is further preferably from 10.0 µm or more to 18.0
µm or less.
(Lower layer)
[0036] The coating layer used in the coated cutting tool of the present embodiment preferably
comprises a lower layer and an upper layer formed on a surface of the lower layer,
in order from the cemented carbide side.
[0037] The lower layer is preferably a Ti compound layer of a layer comprised of a layer
of one kind selected from the group consisting of a Ti carbide layer (hereinafter
also simply referred to as a "TiC layer"), a Ti nitride layer (hereinafter also simply
referred to as a "TiN layer"), a Ti carbonitride layer (hereinafter also simply referred
to as a "TiCN layer"), a Ti carboxide layer (hereinafter also simply referred to as
a "TiCO layer") and a Ti carboxynitride layer (hereinafter also simply referred to
as a "TiCNO layer"), or comprised of layers of two or more kinds selected therefrom.
The coating layer preferably comprises such lower layer because this leads to a further
improvement in the adhesion between the substrate and the coating layer. The lower
layer may be constituted by a single layer or multiple layers (for example, two or
three layers). However, the lower layer is preferably constituted by multiple layers,
is more preferably constituted by two or three layers, and is further preferably constituted
by three layers. Further, the lower layer may include a layer of one kind from among
the above various layers or may include multiple layers of one kind therefrom. The
lower layer, from the perspective of further improving chipping resistance and fracture
resistance, preferably includes a layer of at least one kind selected from the group
consisting of a TiN layer, a TiCN layer and a TiCNO layer. From the same perspective,
the lower layer further preferably includes: a TiN layer or a TiC layer as the layer
closest to the substrate (lowermost layer); a TiCNO layer or a TiCO layer as the layer
closest to the upper layer; and a TiCN layer therebetween, and the lower layer particularly
preferably includes: a TiN layer as the layer closest to the substrate (lowermost
layer); a TiCNO layer as the layer closest to the upper layer; and a TiCN layer therebetween.
[0038] In the present embodiment, from the perspective of further increasing the adhesion
of the coating layer with the layer (for example, the substrate) located below the
coating layer, the average thickness of the lower layer is preferably from 1.5 µm
or more to 15.0 µm or less. From the same perspective, the average thickness of the
lower layer is more preferably from 3.0 µm or more to 14.0 µm or less, is further
preferably from 4.0 µm or more to 12.0 µm or less, and is particularly preferably
from 5.0 µm or more to 10.0 µm or less. When the lower layer is constituted by multiple
layers, the average thickness of the layer closest to the substrate from among such
multiple layers, particularly from the perspective of further improving the adhesion
with the layer (for example, the substrate) located below such layer closest to the
substrate, is preferably from 0.05 µm or more to 1.0 µm or less. When the lower layer
is constituted by multiple layers, the average thickness of the layer closest to the
upper layer from among such multiple layers, particularly from the perspective of
further increasing the adhesion with the layer (for example, the upper layer) located
on such layer closest to the upper layer, is preferably from 0.1 µm or more to 1.5
µm or less.
(Upper layer)
[0039] The upper layer is preferably an α-type aluminum oxide layer (hereinafter also simply
referred to as an "α-Al
2O
3 layer") comprised of α-type aluminum oxide. If the coating layer comprises such upper
layer, this leads to an increase in the wear resistance of the coating layer and of
the coated cutting tool. The upper layer may be constituted by a single layer or multiple
layers (for example, two or three layers involving different manufacturing steps).
[0040] In the present embodiment, from the perspective of sufficiently increasing the wear
resistance of the coated cutting tool and achieving excellent fracture resistance
and chipping resistance, the average thickness of the upper layer is preferably from
1.5 µm or more to 15.0 µm or less. From the same perspective, the average thickness
of the upper layer is more preferably from 3.0 µm or more to 14.0 µm or less, is further
preferably from 3.5 µm or more to 12.0 µm or less, and is particularly preferably
from 5.0 µm or more to 10.0 µm or less
[0041] It is preferable for the coating layer to further include a layer comprised of a
Ti nitride (TiN layer) on a surface of the upper surface which is opposite to the
lower layer. This leads to a further increase in the wear resistance of the coating
layer and of the coated cutting tool, and also leads to further excellent visibility
between an unused cutting edge and a used cutting edge. If the TiN layer serves as
the outermost layer (also referred to as the "uppermost layer") of the coating layer,
this leads to further excellent wear resistance of the coating layer and of the coated
cutting tool. The average thickness of such layer, from the perspective of providing
the effect of excellent wear resistance in a more effective and reliable manner, is
preferably from 0.1 µm or more to 2.5 µm or less, is more preferably from 0.1 µm or
more to 2.0 µm or less, and is further preferably from 0.1 µm or more to 1.5 µm or
less. The average thickness of 2.5 µm or less leads to the tendency of the fracture
resistance of the coated cutting tool to be further increased.
[0042] The coated cutting tool of the present embodiment is not particularly limited and
can be obtained by the method set forth below, by way of example.
[0043] Firstly, a layer of one kind selected from the group consisting of a TiC layer, a
TiN layer, a TiCN layer, a TiCO layer and a TiCNO layer, or layers of two or more
kinds selected therefrom is/are formed, as a lower layer, on a surface of a cemented
carbide (substrate). Next, the surface of the lower layer (when the lower layer is
comprised of multiple layers, the layer which is the most distant from the substrate
from among such multiple layers) is oxidized. Thereafter, an upper layer, being an
α-Al
2O
3 layer, is formed on the oxidized surface of the lower layer. Further, as needed,
an outermost layer, being a TiN layer, may be formed on the surface of the upper layer.
[0044] More specifically, a TiN layer, which serves as the lower layer, can be formed by
chemical vapor deposition with a raw material gas composition of TiCl
4 from 5.0 mol% or more to 10.0 mol% or less, N
2: from 20 mol% or more to 60 mol% or less, and H
2: the balance, a temperature of from 850°C or higher to 920°C or lower, and a pressure
of from 100 hPa or higher to 400 hPa or lower.
[0045] A TiC layer can be formed by chemical vapor deposition with a raw material gas composition
of TiCl
4: from 1.0 mol% or more to 3.0 mol% or less, CH
4: from 4.0 mol% or more to 6.0 mol% or less, and H
2: the balance, a temperature of from 990°C or higher to 1,030°C or lower, and a pressure
of from 50 hPa or higher to 100 hPa or lower.
[0046] A TiCN layer can be formed by chemical vapor deposition with a raw material gas composition
of TiCl
4 from 5.0 mol% or more to 7.0 mol% or less, CH
3CN: from 0.5 mol% or more to 1.5 mol% or less, and H
2: the balance, a temperature of from 840°C or higher to 890°C or lower, and a pressure
of from 60 hPa or higher to 80 hPa or lower.
[0047] A TiCO layer can be formed by chemical vapor deposition with a raw material gas composition
of TiCl
4: from 0.5 mol% or more to 1.5 mol% or less, CO: from 2.0 mol% or more to 4.0 mol%
or less, and H
2: the balance, a temperature of from 975°C or higher to 1,025°C or lower, and a pressure
of from 60 hPa or higher to 100 hPa or lower.
[0048] A TiCNO layer can be formed by chemical vapor deposition with a raw material gas
composition of TiCl
4: from 3.0 mol% or more to 5.0 mol% or less, CO: from 0.4 mol% or more to 1.0 mol%
or less, N
2: from 30 mol% or more to 40 mol% or less, and H
2: the balance, a temperature of from 975°C or higher to 1,025°C or lower, and a pressure
of from 90 hPa or higher to 110 hPa or lower.
[0049] The oxidation of the surface of the lower layer is performed under the conditions
of a gas composition of CO: from 0.1 mol% or more to 1.0 mol% or less, and H
2: the balance, a temperature of from 970°C or higher to 1,020°C or lower, and a pressure
of from 50 hPa or higher to 70 hPa or lower. Here, the oxidation time is preferably
from 0.5 minutes or more to 2 minutes or less.
[0050] An α-Al
2O
3 layer, which serves as the upper layer, can be formed by chemical vapor deposition
with a raw material gas composition of AlCl
3: from 2.0 mol% or more to 5.0 mol% or less, CO
2: from 2.5 mol% or more to 4.0 mol% or less, HCl: from 2.0 mol% or more to 3.0 mol%
or less, H
2S: from 0.25 mol% or more to 0.45 mol% or less, and H
2: the balance, a temperature of from 950°C or higher to 1,130°C or lower, and a pressure
of from 60 hPa or higher to 80 hPa or lower.
[0051] In the present embodiment, in order to obtain a desired coated cutting tool, dry
shot blasting is preferably performed on the coating layer after the formation of
the upper layer. It is preferable for the conditions for dry shot blasting to be:
a shot pressure of from 1.7 bar or higher to 1.9 bar or lower; and a shot angle of
90°. In a blasting apparatus used in dry shot blasting, when a shot material is ejected
while a nozzle is travelling in a predetermined direction, a pitch interval of the
nozzle is preferably from 3 mm or more to 5 mm or less in a direction orthogonal to
the travel direction of the nozzle. Further, the speed (travel speed) of the nozzle
is preferably from 6,000 mm/minute or more to 7,000 mm/minute or less. The shot material
(medium) in dry shot blasting preferably has an average particle size of from 120
µm or more to 400 µm or less (when the shot material is steel, from 380 µm or more
to 420 µm or less), more preferably has an average particle size of from 120 µm or
more to 150 µm or less, and further preferably has an average particle size of from
120 µm or more to 140 µm or less, and such shot material is preferably a material
of one or more kinds selected from the group consisting of SiC, steel, Al
2O
3 and ZrO
2. It should be noted that, when dry shot blasting is not performed, this causes great
plastic deformation in the surface region of the cemented carbide after the formation
of the coating layer, so that the difference in the average value of KAM values between
the surface region and the inner region is less likely to satisfy the condition represented
by formula (1) above.
[0052] A TiN layer, which serves as the outermost layer, can be formed by chemical vapor
deposition with a raw material gas composition of TiCl
4: from 5.0 mol% or more to 10.0 mol% or less, N
2: from 20 mol% or more to 60 mol% or less, and H
2: the balance, a temperature of from 950°C or higher to 1,000°C or lower, and a pressure
of from 300 hPa or higher to 400 hPa or lower.
[0053] The thickness of each layer in the coating layer used in the coated cutting tool
of the present embodiment can be measured by observing a cross-sectional structure
of the coated cutting tool, using an optical microscope, a scanning electron microscope
(SEM), an FE-SEM, or the like. It should be noted that, as to the average thickness
of each layer used in the coated cutting tool of the present embodiment, such average
thickness can be obtained by: measuring the thickness of each layer at three or more
locations near the position 50 µm from the edge, toward the center of the rake surface
of the coated cutting tool; and calculating the arithmetic mean of the resulting measurements.
Further, the composition of each layer can be measured from a cross-sectional structure
of the coated cutting tool of the present embodiment, using an energy-dispersive X-ray
spectroscope (EDS), a wavelength-dispersive X-ray spectroscope (WDS), or the like.
Examples
[0054] Although the present invention will be described in further detail below, with examples,
the present invention is not limited to such examples.
[0055] A cutting insert of a P15-equivalent cemented carbide (invention samples 1 to 15
and comparative samples 1 to 7) or a P25-equivalent cemented carbide (invention samples
16 and 17 and comparative samples 8 and 9) with a shape of IOS standard CNMG120412
and the composition shown in Table 2 was prepared, as a substrate, from a raw material
having the formulation composition shown in Table 1. The edge of such substrate was
subjected to round honing by means of an SiC brush, and a surface of the substrate
was then washed.
[Table 1]
| Sample No. |
Cemented carbide |
| Formulation composition (mass%) |
| Invention sample 1 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Invention sample 2 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Invention sample 3 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Invention sample 4 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Invention sample 5 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Invention sample 6 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Invention sample 7 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Invention sample 8 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Invention sample 9 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Invention sample 10 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Invention sample 11 |
89.8%WC, 1.4%TiN, 0.3%TiC, 1.4%NbC, 0.1%ZrCN, 0.1%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Invention sample 12 |
90.0%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 5.3%Co |
| Invention sample 13 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Invention sample 14 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Invention sample 15 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Invention sample 16 |
86.3%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 9.0%Co |
| Invention sample 17 |
85.5%WC, 2.2%TiN, 0.6%TiC, 2.2%NbC, 0.3%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 9.0%Co |
| Comparative sample 1 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Comparative sample 2 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Comparative sample 3 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Comparative sample 4 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Comparative sample 5 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Comparative sample 6 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Comparative sample 7 |
88.4%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 6.9%Co |
| Comparative sample 8 |
86.3%WC, 1.9%TiN, 0.5%TiC, 1.9%NbC, 0.2%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 9.0%Co |
| Comparative sample 9 |
85.5%WC, 2.2%TiN, 0.6%TiC, 2.2%NbC, 0.3%ZrCN, 0.2%Cr3C2, 9.0%Co |
[Table 2]
| |
Cemented carbide |
| Hard phase |
Binder phase |
| Sample No. |
Tungsten carbide |
Compound phase |
Entire hard phase (mass% |
Composition |
(mass%) |
| Composition |
(mass%) |
Composition |
(mass%) |
| Invention sample 1 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Invention sample 2 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Invention sample 3 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Invention sample 4 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Invention sample 5 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Invention sample 6 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Invention sample 7 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Invention sample 8 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Invention sample 9 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Invention sample 10 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Invention sample 11 |
WC |
89.8 |
TiN, TaC, ZrCN, VC, Cr3C2 |
3.3 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Invention sample 12 |
WC |
90.0 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
94.7 |
Co |
5.3 |
| Invention sample 13 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Invention sample 14 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Invention sample 15 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| invention sample 16 |
WC |
86.3 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
91.0 |
Co |
9.0 |
| Invention sample 17 |
WC |
85.5 |
TiN, TaC, ZrCN, VC, Cr3C2 |
5.5 |
91.0 |
Co |
9.0 |
| Comparative sample 1 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Comparative sample 2 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Comparative sample 3 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Comparative sample 4 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Comparative sample 5 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Comparative sample 6 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Comparative sample 7 |
WC |
88.4 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
93.1 |
Co |
6.9 |
| Comparative sample 8 |
WC |
86.3 |
TiN, TiC, NbC, ZrCN, Cr3C2 |
4.7 |
91.0 |
Co |
9.0 |
| Comparative sample 9 |
WC |
85.5 |
TiN, TaC, ZrCN, VC, Cr3C2 |
5.5 |
91.0 |
Co |
9.0 |
[0056] After the substrate was washed, a coating layer was formed by chemical vapor deposition.
As to invention samples 1 to 17, firstly, the substrate was inserted into an external
heating chemical vapor deposition apparatus, and a lower layer, whose composition
is shown in Table 4, was formed on the substrate surface, in the order of a first
layer, a second layer and a third layer, so as to have the respective average thicknesses
shown in Table 4 under the raw material gas composition, temperature and pressure
conditions shown in Table 3. Then, the surface of the lower layer was oxidized for
1 minute under the conditions of: a gas composition of CO: 0.5 mol% and H
2: 99.5 mol%, a temperature of 1,000°C, and a pressure of 70 hPa. Next, an upper layer,
being comprised of α-type aluminum oxide, was formed on the oxidized surface of the
lower layer so as to have the average thickness shown in Table 4 under the raw material
gas composition, temperature and pressure conditions shown in Table 3. Thereafter,
dry shot blasting was performed on the upper layer under the shot conditions shown
in Table 5, using the shot material shown in Table 5. Lastly, an uppermost layer,
whose composition is shown in Table 4, was formed on the surface of the upper layer
so as to have the average thickness shown in Table 4 under the raw material gas composition,
temperature and pressure conditions shown in Table 3. As a result, the coated cutting
tools of invention samples 1 to 17 were obtained.
[0057] Meanwhile, as to comparative samples 1 to 9, firstly, the substrate was inserted
into an external heating chemical vapor deposition apparatus, and a lower layer, whose
composition is shown in Table 4, was formed on the substrate surface, in the order
of a first layer, a second layer and a third layer, so as to have the respective average
thicknesses shown in Table 4 under the raw material gas composition, temperature and
pressure conditions shown in Table 3. Then, the surface of the lower layer was oxidized
for 1 minute under the conditions of: a gas composition of CO: 0.5 mol% and H
2: 99.5 mol%, a temperature of 1,000°C, and a pressure of 70 hPa. Next, an upper layer,
whose composition is shown in Table 4, was formed on the oxidized surface of the lower
layer so as to have the average thickness shown in Table 4 under the raw material
gas composition, temperature and pressure conditions shown in Table 3. Thereafter,
dry shot blasting was performed on the upper layer under the shot conditions shown
in Table 5, using the shot material shown in Table 5. Lastly, an uppermost layer,
whose composition is shown in Table 4, was formed on the surface of the upper layer
so as to have the average thickness shown in Table 4 under the raw material gas composition,
temperature and pressure conditions shown in Table 3. As a result, the coated cutting
tools of comparative samples 1 to 9 were obtained.
[Table 3]
| Each layer composition |
Temperature (°C) |
Pressure (hPa) |
Raw material gas composition (mol%) |
| TiN (lowermost layer) |
900 |
350 |
TiCl4:7.5%, N2:40.0%, H2:52.5% |
| TiC |
1,000 |
75 |
TiCl4:2.4%, CH4:4.6%, H2:93.0% |
| TiCN |
850 |
70 |
TiCl4:6.0%, CH3CN:1.0%, H2:93.0% |
| TiCNO |
1,000 |
100 |
TiCl4:3.5%, CO:0.7%, N2:35.5%, H2:60.3% |
| TiCO |
1,000 |
80 |
TiCl4:1.5%, CO:2.5%, H2:96.0% |
| α-type Al2O3 |
1,000 |
70 |
AlCl3:2.5%, CO2:3.0%, HCl:2.3%, H2S:0.35%, H2:91.85% |
| TiN (uppermost layer) |
1,000 |
350 |
TiCl4:7.5%, N2:40.0%, H2:52.5% |
| TiCN (uppermost layer) |
1,000 |
350 |
TiCl4:6.0%, CH3CN:1.0%, H2:93.0% |
[Table 4]
| |
Coating layer |
| Lower layer |
Upper layer |
Uppermost layer |
Thickness of entire coating layer (µm) |
| Sample No. |
First layer |
Second layer |
Third layer |
Thickness of entire lower layer (µm) |
| Composition |
Average thickness (µm) |
Composition |
Average thickness (µm) |
Composition |
Average thickness (µm) |
Composition |
Crystal system |
Average thickness (µm) |
Composition |
Average thickness (µm) |
| Invention sample 1 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
| Invention sample 2 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
| Invention sample 3 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
| Invention sample 4 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
| Invention sample 5 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
3.0 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
3.7 |
Al2O3 |
α |
13.0 |
TiN |
0.5 |
17.2 |
| Invention sample 6 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
13.0 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
13.7 |
Al2O3 |
α |
3.0 |
TiN |
0.5 |
17.2 |
| Invention sample 7 |
TiC |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
| Invention sample 8 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
| Invention sample 9 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
3.0 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
3.7 |
Al2O3 |
α |
3.0 |
TiN |
2.0 |
8.7 |
| Invention sample 10 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
13.0 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
13.7 |
Al2O3 |
α |
13.0 |
TiN |
2.0 |
28.7 |
| Invention sample 11 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
| Invention sample 12 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
| Invention sample 13 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
| Invention sample 14 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
| Invention sample 15 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
| Invention sample 16 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
| Invention sample 17 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
| Comparati ve sample 1 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
| Comparative sample 2 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
4.0 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
4.7 |
Al2O3 |
z |
11.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.7 |
| Comparative sample 3 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
11.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
12.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
4.0 |
TiCN |
0.5 |
16.7 |
| Comparative sample 4 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
16.0 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
16.7 |
Al2O3 |
α |
16.0 |
TiCN |
0.5 |
33.2 |
| Comparative sample 5 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
2.0 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
2.7 |
Al2O3 |
α |
1.5 |
TiCN |
0.3 |
4.5 |
| Comparative sample 6 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
16.0 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
16.7 |
Al2O3 |
α |
16.0 |
TiCN |
0.5 |
33.2 |
| Comparative sample 7 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
4.0 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
4.7 |
Al2O3 |
α |
11.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.7 |
| Comparative sample 8 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
| Comparative sample 9 |
TiN |
0.4 |
TiCN |
5.5 |
TiCNO |
0.3 |
6.2 |
Al2O3 |
α |
9.5 |
TiN |
0.5 |
16.2 |
[Table 5]
| |
Dry shot blasting conditions |
| Sample No. |
Shot material |
Shot conditions |
| Material |
Average thickness (µm) |
Shot angle (°) |
Shot pressure (bar) |
Nozzle speed (mm/min) |
Nozzle pitch interval (mm) |
| Invention sample 1 |
Al2O3 |
130 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,500 |
5 |
| Invention sample 2 |
SiC |
130 |
90 |
1.8 |
7,000 |
5 |
| Invention sample 3 |
Al2O3 |
120 |
90 |
1.8 |
7,000 |
5 |
| Invention sample 4 |
Al2O3 |
130 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,500 |
5 |
| Invention sample 5 |
Al2O3 |
130 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,500 |
5 |
| Invention sample 6 |
Al2O3 |
130 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,500 |
5 |
| Invention sample 7 |
Al2O3 |
130 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,500 |
5 |
| Invention sample 8 |
Al2O3 |
130 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,500 |
5 |
| Invention sample 9 |
Al2O3 |
130 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,500 |
5 |
| Invention sample 10 |
Al2O3 |
130 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,500 |
5 |
| Invention sample 11 |
SiC |
140 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,000 |
5 |
| Invention sample 12 |
SiC |
140 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,000 |
5 |
| Invention sample 13 |
Steel |
400 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,500 |
5 |
| Invention sample 14 |
Al2O3 |
120 |
90 |
1.7 |
7,000 |
5 |
| Invention sample 15 |
Al2O3 |
130 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,500 |
3 |
| Invention sample 16 |
SiC |
140 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,000 |
5 |
| Invention sample 17 |
SiC |
140 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,000 |
5 |
| Comparative sample 1 |
Al2O3 |
130 |
90 |
2.5 |
6,500 |
9 |
| Comparative sample 2 |
Al2O3 |
50 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,500 |
9 |
| Comparative sample 3 |
SiC |
50 |
90 |
1.8 |
7,000 |
9 |
| Comparative sample 4 |
Al2O3 |
130 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,500 |
5 |
| Comparative sample 5 |
Al2O3 |
130 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,500 |
5 |
| Comparative sample 6 |
Al2O3 |
130 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,500 |
3 |
| Comparative sample 7 |
Al2O3 |
50 |
90 |
1.8 |
6,500 |
5 |
| Comparative sample 8 |
Al2O3 |
130 |
90 |
2.5 |
6,500 |
5 |
| Comparative sample 9 |
Al2O3 |
130 |
90 |
2.5 |
6,500 |
9 |
[0058] The thickness of each layer of each of the samples was obtained as set forth below.
That is, using an FE-SEM, the average thickness was obtained by: measuring the thickness
of each layer, from each of the cross-sectional surfaces at three locations near the
position 50 µm from the edge of the coated cutting tool, toward the center of the
rake surface thereof; and calculating the arithmetic mean of the resulting measurements.
Using an EDS, the composition of each layer of the obtained sample was measured from
the cross-sectional surface near the position 50 µm from the edge of the coated cutting
tool, toward the center of the rake surface thereof.
[0059] KAM values and the average value thereof in each of the surface region and the inner
region in the cemented carbide were measured as set forth below. A sample of a coated
cutting tool was polished in a direction orthogonal to the surface of such sample
so that a cross-sectional surface was exposed. With regard to a part of such cross-sectional
surface which consisted of the cemented carbide, a region of the cemented carbide
which ranged from the surface thereof to a depth of 20.0 µm in a direction opposite
to the coating layer was regarded as a surface region, and further, a region thereof
which was located further inward than the surface region was regarded as an inner
region. Using an EBSD (manufactured by TexSEM Laboratories, Inc.), each measurement
region in each of the surface region and the inner region was divided into regular
hexagonal regions (pixels). As to each of the divided regions, the orientation of
the pixel was measured by obtaining Kikuchi patterns from reflected electrons from
an electron beam which had been incident on the polished surface of the sample. The
obtained orientation data was analyzed using analysis software for the EBSD, thereby
calculating various parameters. The measurement conditions were as set forth below:
the acceleration voltage was 15 kV; the dimensions of the measurement region employed
a width of 50 µm and, as to the surface region, a thickness of 20.0 µm from the surface
of the cemented carbide or, as to the inner region, a thickness corresponding to the
remainder of the cemented carbide; and the distance (step size) between adjacent pixels
was 0.1 µm. From among the pixels adjacent to a pixel serving as a measurement center,
pixels which each had a misorientation of 5° or more with respect to such pixel were
excluded from the calculation of KAM values as such excluded pixels were each regarded
as straddling the grain boundary of the monocrystal where the pixel serving as a measurement
center was located. That is, a KAM value was obtained as an average value of the misorientation
of a pixel located in a crystal grain and the misorientations of the pixels which
were adjacent to such pixel and which did not straddle the grain boundary of such
crystal grain. Then, an average was taken of the KAM values in all the pixels which
configured the entire measurement region. It should be noted that the average value
of the KAM values was defined as a numerical value obtained by, as to any three measurement
regions, taking an average of the KAM values in the above-described manner for each
of such measurement regions and then averaging the resultant average values. Based
on the above results, the relationship between the average value of KAM values in
the surface region (KAM
s) and the average value of KAM values in the inner region (KAM
i) was obtained. The results are shown in Table 6.
[Table 6]
| |
Cemented carbide |
| Sample No. |
Average value of KAM values |
| Surface region (°) KAMs |
Inner region (°) KAMi |
Difference (°) between the surface region and the inner region | KAMs - KAMi| |
| Invention sample 1 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
0.00 |
| Invention sample 2 |
0.54 |
0.44 |
0.10 |
| Invention sample 3 |
0.54 |
0.53 |
0.01 |
| Invention sample 4 |
0.44 |
0.42 |
0.02 |
| Invention sample 5 |
0.45 |
0.44 |
0.01 |
| Invention sample 6 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
0.00 |
| Invention sample 7 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
0.00 |
| Invention sample 8 |
0.44 |
0.43 |
0.01 |
| Invention sample 9 |
0.44 |
0.43 |
0.01 |
| Invention sample 10 |
0.45 |
0.44 |
0.01 |
| Invention sample 11 |
0.50 |
0,46 |
0.04 |
| Invention sample 12 |
0.49 |
0.46 |
0.03 |
| Invention sample 13 |
0.42 |
0.36 |
0.06 |
| Invention sample 14 |
0.57 |
0.55 |
0.02 |
| Invention sample 15 |
0.45 |
0.47 |
0.02 |
| Invention sample 16 |
0.50 |
0.46 |
0.04 |
| Invention sample 17 |
0.50 |
0.45 |
0.05 |
| Comparative sample 1 |
0.66 |
0.45 |
0.21 |
| Comparative sample 2 |
0.68 |
0.49 |
0.19 |
| Comparative sample 3 |
0.67 |
0.49 |
0.18 |
| Comparative sample 4 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
0.00 |
| Comparative sample 5 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
0.00 |
| Comparative sample 6 |
0.45 |
0.47 |
0.02 |
| Comparative sample 7 |
0.61 |
0.45 |
0.16 |
| Comparative sample 8 |
0.66 |
0.50 |
0.16 |
| Comparative sample 9 |
0.66 |
0.45 |
0.21 |
[0060] Cutting tests 1 and 2 for evaluating fracture resistance and chipping resistance
were conducted using the obtained samples under the following conditions. The results
of the respective cutting tests are shown in Table 7.
[Cutting test 1]
[0061] Substrate: P15-equivalent cemented carbide (invention samples 1 to 15 and comparative
samples 1 to 7)
Workpiece material: SCM415 round bar with two grooves
Cutting speed: 150 m/min
Feed: 0.25 mm/rev
Depth of cut: 1.0 mm
Coolant: used
Evaluation items: A time when a sample was fractured or had a maximum flank wear width
of 0.3 mm was defined as the end of the tool life, and the machining time to reach
the end of the tool life was measured. The damage state after a machining time of
5 minutes was checked.
[Cutting test 2]
[0062] Substrate: P25-equivalent cemented carbide (invention samples 16 and 17 and comparative
samples 8 and 9)
Workpiece material: SCM415 round bar with two grooves
Cutting speed: 150 m/min
Feed: 0.30 mm/rev
Depth of cut: 2.0 mm
Coolant: used
Evaluation items: A time when a sample was fractured or had a maximum flank wear width
of 0.3 mm was defined as the end of the tool life, and the machining time to reach
the end of the tool life was measured. The damage state after a machining time of
5 minutes was checked.
[0063] As to the machining time to reach the end of the tool life in the cutting tests,
evaluations were made with grade "A" for 13 minutes or more, grade "B" for 8 minutes
or more and less than 13 minutes, and grade "C" for less than 8 minutes. The evaluation
results are shown in Table 7.
[Table 7]
| Sample No. |
Cutting test |
|
| Damage state after a machining time of 5 min. |
Machining time (min) |
Grade |
| Invention sample 1 |
Normal wear |
15 |
A |
| Invention sample 2 |
Normal wear |
10 |
B |
| Invention sample 3 |
Normal wear |
12 |
B |
| Invention sample 4 |
Normal wear |
15 |
A |
| Invention sample 5 |
Normal wear |
16 |
A |
| Invention sample 6 |
Normal wear |
17 |
A |
| Invention sample 7 |
Normal wear |
14 |
A |
| Invention sample 8 |
Normal wear |
14 |
A |
| Invention sample 9 |
Normal wear |
8 |
B |
| Invention sample 10 |
Normal wear |
19 |
A |
| Invention sample 11 |
Normal wear |
12 |
B |
| Invention sample 12 |
Normal wear |
13 |
A |
| Invention sample 13 |
Normal wear |
16 |
A |
| Invention sample 14 |
Normal wear |
9 |
B |
| Invention sample 15 |
Normal wear |
16 |
A |
| Invention sample 16 |
Normal wear |
16 |
A |
| Invention sample 17 |
Normal wear |
18 |
A |
| Comparative sample 1 |
Fracturing |
3 |
C |
| Comparative sample 2 |
Fracturing |
4 |
C |
| Comparative sample 3 |
Fracturing |
5 |
C |
| Comparative sample 4 |
Fracturing |
4 |
C |
| Comparative sample 5 |
Normal wear |
5 |
C |
| Comparative sample 6 |
Fracturing |
5 |
C |
| Comparative sample 7 |
Fracturing |
5 |
C |
| Comparative sample 8 |
Chipping |
7 |
C |
| Comparative sample 9 |
Fracturing |
5 |
C |
[0064] The results of Fig. 7 show that each invention sample had grade "B" or higher in
the cutting test. Meanwhile, each comparative sample had grade "C" in the cutting
test. Further, with regard to the damage state after 5 minutes from the start of machining,
each invention sample indicated normal wear, whereas chipping was found in comparative
sample 8, and fracturing occurred in comparative samples 1 to 4, 6, 7 and 9 before
the elapse of 5 minutes, which did not allow the machining to be performed anymore.
[0065] It is apparent from the above results that each invention sample has excellent fracture
resistance and chipping resistance, thereby resulting in a longer tool life.
Industrial Applicability
[0066] The coated cutting tool according to the present invention has excellent chipping
resistance and fracture resistance, whereby the tool life can be extended more than
that involved in the prior art, and, from such perspective, the coated cutting tool
has industrial applicability.
Reference Signs List
[0067] 1: Substrate, 1a: Surface region, 1b: Inner region, 2: Lower layer, 3: Upper layer,
4: Uppermost layer, 5: Coating layer, 6: Coated cutting tool.