[0001] The invention relates to a suction anchor with a device for reducing the strain on
a wellhead casing from a bending moment generated by a horizontal load component from
a well element arranged over a wellhead.
[0002] As a rule, installing elements on a wellhead, in particular a blowout preventer (BOP),
at the top of a wellhead casing which extends down through unconsolidated masses in
the sea floor, usually with an upper wellhead-casing portion surrounded by and fixed
to a conductor casing, involves a risk of fatiguing the wellhead casing, by the wellhead
being subjected to lateral forces so that the wellhead casing is being bent. The lateral
load may arise in consequence of drift of a riser extending through the water masses
from the wellhead upwards to a surface installation. When a blowout preventer weighs
250-500 tonnes and has a vertical extent of up to 14-16 metres and a horizontal extent
of 5-6 metres, such a bending strain will increase in that the load that is resting
on the wellhead casing will have its centre of gravity displaced away from the original,
vertical centre axis of the wellhead. The problem is described among other things
by
Dahl Lien: "Methods to Improve Subsea Wellhead Fatigue Life", a project assignment
at the Faculty for engineering science and technology, the Institute for petroleum
technology and applied geophysics, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway, 2009. The situation may lead to deformation of the wellhead casing and, at worst, fatigue
and rupturing. The problems intensify as the safety requirements are being increased,
for example illustrated by the fact that while pressure barriers were earlier dimensioned
to withstand 5000 psi, the requirements have gradually increased to 15000 psi, and
associated valves have gone from 4 to 6 levels. The use of deep-water rigs with heavy
subsurface safety equipment at moderate water depths has further intensified the problems.
It has been recorded that the wellhead has been subjected to strains of up to 90 %
of the critical limit of the wellhead as regards fatigue.
[0003] From the prior art describing solutions to the problem of fatiguing the wellhead
casing which forms the foundation for wellhead elements, the inventor's own suction
foundation (Conductor Anchor Node = CAN) may be mentioned, disclosed in
NO patent No. 313340, included in its entirety herein by reference, in principle providing a larger contact
surface between the upper part of the conductor casing and the surrounding seabed
mass, the diameter of the suction foundation typically being approximately 6 metres,
whereas the diameter of the conductor casing is in the range of 0.75-0.90 m (30-36
inches). CAN therefore provides significant lateral support to the conductor and thereby
to the wellhead/wellhead casing therein.
[0004] It is also known (Dahl Lien 2009, see above) to use mooring lines extending at outward
and downward angles from an upper portion of a wellhead installation to the seabed
where the moorings are secured to anchors.
[0005] From
NO 305179, a suction anchor enclosing an upper portion of a conductor casing and parts of a
wellhead is known. To the wellhead, a frame is connected, arranged to carry a swivel
device for the horizontal connection of a riser
et cetera, the frame resting on separate suction anchors placed at a distance from the former
suction anchor.
[0006] From the applicant's own
NO patent 331978 (and the corresponding
WO publication 2011162616 A1), a stabilizing device for a wellhead with the upper portion of a wellhead casing
projecting up above a seabed is known, in which a wellhead valve which projects up
from the upper portion of the wellhead casing is completely or partially supported
on the suction foundation by several supporting elements being arranged between the
wellhead valve and the suction foundation.
[0007] US2006162933A1 discloses a system and a method of establishing a subsea exploration and production
system, in which a well casing, projecting up from a seabed where a well is to be
stablished, is provided with a buoyancy body arranged at a distance above the seabed.
The buoyancy body is stabilized by means of adjustable stabilizing elements, which
are anchored to the seabed at a distance from the well casing.
[0008] US2010/0212916 A1 is disclosing a stabilizer for a wellhead, comprising: a ground engaging support
structure having lateral dimensions suitable for laterally stabilizing the wellhead;
wellhead stabilizer elements disposed within the ground engaging support structure,
the wellhead stabilizer elements having wellhead abutting faces spaced to laterally
cage the wellhead to restrict lateral movement of the wellhead while permitting the
wellhead to move in a vertical direction. The wellhead may include various wellhead
components, including for example casing bowls, spools, blowout preventers, and other
suitable components. The portion of wellhead that is laterally caged need not be circular
in cross-section, but may be a suitable geometry.
[0009] To try to meet the constantly increasing challenges when it comes to avoiding fatigue
fracturing of the wellhead, the dimension of the wellhead casing has gradually been
increased, the diameter having increased from 30 inches to 36 inches and further to
42 inches, with a wall thickness that has increased from 1 inch all the way up to
2 inches.
[0010] In the further description, the term "wellhead valve" covers both a blowout preventer
(BOP) alone and also a combination of a blowout preventer and other valve types (for
example production valves), and other valve types or combinations of valve types alone,
said wellhead valve being arranged on a wellhead on an end portion of a wellhead casing
projecting above a seabed.
[0011] As mentioned above, suction anchors have been known to provide significant lateral
support to conductors such as disclosed in the above-mentioned
NO 313340, which corresponds to
US 6692194. The applicant's own
WO 2016/085348 on the other hand, discloses a supporting frame provided on a suction anchor, where
the supporting frame also transfers a significant portion of bending moment exerted
on the wellhead, directly or indirectly, from the wellhead to the suction anchor.
A disadvantage of the supporting frame disclosed in
WO 2016/085348 is that the frame itself needs to have a certain height, typically around 1 meter,
in order to create a force pair that may handle the high loads in question. This leads
to a higher stick-up requiring a correspondingly large trawl protection.
[0012] The invention has for its object to remedy or reduce at least one of the drawbacks
of the prior art or at least provide a useful alternative to the prior art.
[0013] The object is achieved through the features, which are specified in the description
below and in the claims that follow.
[0014] The applicant has realised that the above-mentioned drawback of the high stick-up
may be avoided by partially or fully embedding the supporting frame into a top portion
of the suction anchor.
[0015] The invention provides a suction anchor including a device for reducing the risk
of fatigue in a wellhead without increasing the pipe dimension, that is to say the
pipe-wall thickness, the pipe diameter or the material quality, of the wellhead casing
projecting up above the seabed and forming the wellhead, and without intervening in
valves and so on mounted on the wellhead and while avoiding a large stickup from the
suction anchor The invention relates to a suction anchor having a supporting frame
integrated into a top portion of the suction anchor that rests on a seabed, the supporting
frame being rigidly connected, directly or indirectly, to the wellhead casing to absorb
a substantial portion of a bending moment applied to the wellhead casing by a horizontal
load component. Calculations show that the bending stresses on the wellhead casing
can be reduced considerably by the supporting frame absorbing a substantial part of
the load caused by horizontal load components affecting the wellhead. Such horizontal
load components may, for example, be caused by a connected riser being bent out sideways,
for example because of sea currents. Studies have shown that bending stresses on the
wellhead casing can be reduced to a range of 5-25 % of the total torque by the supporting
frame relieving the wellhead casing. The material stresses in the wellhead casing
will thereby be reduced correspondingly and, with a view to fatigue, the lifetime
of the wellhead casing will increase. With a conservatively estimated effect by which
the load on the wellhead casing is reduced to 10 %, the supporting frame taking 90
% of the load, the stresses in the wellhead casing will be reduced to 10 %, which
results in an increase in the estimated lifetime of the wellhead casing by 1000 times
seen in relation to fatigue.
[0016] The invention is defined by the independent claim. The dependent claims define advantageous
embodiments of the invention.
[0017] The invention relates, more specifically, to a suction anchor with a device for reducing
the strain on a wellhead casing from a bending moment generated by a horizontal load
component from a well element arranged over a wellhead, wherein the device includes
a supporting frame being integrated with the top portion of the suction anchor and
connected, directly or indirectly, to an upper portion of the wellhead casing and
projecting outwards from the centre axis of the wellhead casing and being provided
with abutments resting in a supporting manner against the top portion of the suction
anchor at a radial distance from the wellhead casing, the supporting frame being arranged
to absorb a portion of said bending moment.
[0018] The supporting frame may include a well-casing extension adapted for connection to
the wellhead casing. The advantage of this is that the wellhead casing can thereby
be protected from bending stresses from drilling operations during the establishing
of the well, as, in this phase, the bending moment from a blowout valve and other
elements temporarily installed over the wellhead subject only the supporting frame
and the well-casing extension to strain, and this is removed after the drilling operations
have been carried out, and the well casing is possibly provided with a new supporting
frame connected directly to the wellhead casing.
[0019] The ratio of the bending moment absorbed by the supporting frame to the bending moment
applied to the wellhead casing may be at least 1:2, alternatively at least 3:4, alternatively
at least 9:10.
[0020] The connection between the supporting frame and the wellhead casing, possibly between
the supporting frame and the well-casing extension may preferable be formed as a zero-clearance
connection. An advantage of this is that any bending moment applied will, in the main,
be absorbed immediately by the supporting frame.
[0021] The supporting frame may include a coupling formed as a sleeve enclosing a portion
of the wellhead casing or the well-casing extension, by a press fit. The sleeve may
have been shrunk around a portion of the wellhead casing or the well-casing extension.
An advantage of this is that the connection can be machined with moderate requirements
of tolerance, and the shrinking may be provided by heat development during the welding-together
of the sleeve and the projecting elements of the supporting frame.
[0022] In a preferred embodiment, the so-called low-pressure housing may be integrated with
the supporting frame of the suction anchor for optimal load transfer. The high-pressure
housing/wellhead may be connected inside the low-pressure housing, The low pressure
housing may be a standard 30" or 36" housing and the high-pressure housing may be
a standard 18 3/4" housing. The bending moment exerted on the wellhead will be transferred
into a vertical force pair that is directly transmitted into the suction anchor and
further into ground. The well equipment below the supporting frame will not be exposed
to significant loads and enables the use of small diameter dimensions. Basis for this
transfer of forces is the stiffness relation between the supporting frame and the
equipment below the supporting frame in the well. If the stiffness would be equal,
the load sharing would be 50/50. Beneficial for this case is that the piping (e.g.
conductor) below the supporting frame is intended to be of small diameter and therefore
has a low stiffness. This way, most of, and in principle almost all, the bending moment
may be transferred through the supporting frame. This is also beneficial for fatigue
lifetime as stresses in the material will be very small. The connection between the
supporting frame and the wellhead, via the low-pressure housing, is preferably zero
clearance.
[0023] In what follows, an example of preferred embodiments is described, which is visualized
in the accompanying drawings, in which:
- Figure 1
- shows a principle drawing of a suction anchor and wellhead according to the prior
art provided with a supporting frame directly connected to an upper portion of a wellhead
casing;
- Figure 2
- shows, in a highly simplified manner, the elements that absorb load when a wellhead
is subjected to a bending moment from a horizontal load component;
- Figure 3
- shows another principle drawing of a suction anchor and wellhead according to the
prior art provided with a supporting frame connected to an upper portion of a well-head
casing via a well-casing extension integrated in the supporting frame; and
- Figure 4
- shows a suction anchor and wellhead according to the present invention with supporting
frame integrated into the top portion of the suction anchor.
[0024] The drawings discussed in the following are drawn in a simplified and highly schematic
manner, and various features shown therein are not necessarily drawn to scale. Like
reference numerals refer to identical or similar features in the drawings.
[0025] Reference is first made to figure 1 showing a suction anchor 14 according to the
prior art as disclosed in the above-referenced
WO2016/085348. The suction anchor is formed with a closed upper portion (13) and an open lower
portion (15). A subsea well 1 extends downwards in an underground 4 under a water
mass 5. A wellhead 11 is arranged immediately above a seabed 41, an upper portion
12a of a wellhead casing 12 projecting up from the seabed and forming the wellhead
11 in which one or more wellhead elements 2 are arranged, such as a Christmas tree
or blowout preventer (also referred to as a BOP), a wellhead connector 21 connecting
the wellhead elements 2 to the wellhead casing 12. From the wellhead element 2, at
least a marine riser 3 extends up through the water mass 5 to a surface installation
(not shown). The riser 3 is shown as being deflected in order to indicate a situation
in which the wellhead 11 is subjected to a horizontal load component L
h which subjects the wellhead casing 12 to a bending moment M
w. The deflection of the riser 3 may be due to currents in the water mass 5 or the
position of the surface installation not shown. Currents in the water mass 5 may also
subject the wellhead element 2 to a horizontal load component L
h, and skewed distribution of the mass of the wellhead element 2 will also subject
the wellhead 11 to a horizontal load component L
h.
[0026] The wellhead casing 12 is shown here as a casing 122 extending up through a so-called
conductor casing 121 which bounds the well 1 in a manner known
per se towards the unconsolidated masses in the upper part of the base 4. An upper portion
12a of the wellhead casing 12 is rising from an upper portion 121a of the conductor
casing 121. The upper portion 12a of the wellhead casing is often also referred to
as the wellhead or the high-pressure housing. Similarly, the upper portion 121a of
the conductor casing 121 is often referred to as the low-pressure housing. It should
also be noted that in the industry, the combined low-pressure and high-pressure housings
have also been known to be referred to as the wellhead.
[0027] Connected to the upper portion 12a of the wellhead casing 12, there is a supporting
frame 6 which projects radially outwards from the wellhead casing 12 and is provided
with several abutments 61 resting in a supporting manner against the top portion 13
of the suction anchor 14, the suction anchor 14 shown schematically here as an element
which is embedded into the seabed 41. The wellhead casing 12 and the supporting frame
6 are connected to each other in a way that makes it possible for the supporting frame
6 to absorb a bending moment M
f as a reaction to the horizontal load component L
h from the wellhead element 2 subjecting the wellhead casing 12 to said bending moment
M
w. In one embodiment a coupling 62 may be arranged in such a way that the wellhead
casing 12 is allowed a certain deflection before hitting the supporting frame 6 and
the further load being substantially absorbed by the supporting frame 6. The design
of the coupling 62 and the dimensioning of the supporting frame 6 can thereby be used
to control how great a load the wellhead casing 12 may be subjected to. However, in
preferred embodiments there is zero radial clearance between the wellhead and the
supporting frame 6. Calculations carried out by the applicant and other instances
have shown that the supporting frame 6 may absorb 75 to 95 % of the strain caused
by said horizontal load component L
h.
[0028] To ensure a greatest possible relief of the wellhead casing 12, the coupling 62 may
be formed as a sleeve 621 surrounding a portion of the wellhead casing 12 without
radial clearance. This may be achieved by shrinking the sleeve 621.
[0029] The supporting frame 6 according to figure 1 is suitable for permanent installation
on the wellhead 11.
[0030] Reference is now made to figure 3, in which the supporting frame 6 is provided with
a well-casing extension 63 which is adapted for insertion between the wellhead casing
12 and the wellhead element 2. Thereby the supporting frame 6 can be installed without
any intervention into the wellhead casing 12. This embodiment is well suited for temporary
installation, for example while drilling is in progress, indicated here by a drill
string 7 extending from a surface installation not shown and through the wellhead
11. The well-casing extension 63 also works as a protection of the wellhead 11 during
the temporary installation of wellhead elements 2 or the insertion or withdrawal of
drilling equipment.
[0031] Figure 2 shows the statics of the supporting frame 6 in principle, the statics being
representative for the supporting frames 6 shown in each of the figures 1, 3 and 4.
Solid, oblique connecting lines between horizontal and vertical lines indicate that
the connection is rigid. Fig. 4 shows a suction anchor 14 with a device according
to the present invention. In the shown embodiment, the supporting frame 6 is fully
embedded into the top portion 13 of the suction anchor 14, significantly reducing
the stick-up and thereby the need for a large trawl protection structure. The principle
for transfer of bending moment is the same as for the suction anchors shown in figures
1 and 3. For simplicity, the connection between the upper portion of the conductor
121a and the supporting frame 6 is shown without any coupling 62. However, a coupling
may well be present between the supporting frame 6 and the upper portion of the conductor
121a in order to ensure a zero clearance radial gap connection. The closed upper portion
13 of suction anchor 14 may be located at the upper end, lower end or anywhere in
between of the upper and lower ends of the support structure 6.
[0032] When the supporting frame 6 is mounted on the wellhead 11 and the wellhead 11 is
subjected to a bending moment M
w generated by a horizontal load component L
n from above-lying elements 2, 3, the supporting frame 6 is subjected to a vertical
load L
v which is transmitted to the seabed 41 at a distance from the centre axis of the wellhead
casing 12 through the abutment of the supporting frame 6 against the base. Depending
on the amount of play the coupling 62 between the supporting frame 6 and the wellhead
casing 12 allows and how great a bending stiffness the wellhead casing 12 and the
supporting frame 6 exhibit, the portion of the applied bending moment M
w absorbed by the supporting frame, that is to say M
f/M
w, M
f being the bending moment absorbed by the supporting frame 6, will vary. Calculations
show that it is quite possible to dimension the supporting frame 6 to enable absorption
of at least 9/10 of the bending moment M
w applied.
[0033] It should be noted that all the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate the invention,
but do not limit it, and persons skilled in the art may construct many alternative
embodiments without departing from the scope of the dependent claims. In the claims,
reference numbers in brackets should not be regarded as restrictive. The use of the
verb "to comprise" and its different forms does not exclude the presence of elements
or steps that are not mentioned in the claims. The indefinite article "a" or "an"
before an element does not exclude the presence of several such elements.
[0034] The fact that some features are stated in mutually different dependent claims does
not indicate that a combination of these features cannot be used with advantage.
1. A suction anchor (14) with a device for reducing the load on a wellhead casing (12)
from a bending moment (Mw) generated by a horizontal load component (Lh) from a well element (2, 3) arranged over a wellhead (11), the suction anchor having
a closed top portion and an open lower portion, the device including a supporting
frame (6), integrated into the closed top portion of the suction anchor, connected
to an upper portion (12a) of the wellhead casing (12) and projecting outwards from
the centre axis of the wellhead casing (12) and being provided with abutments (61)
which rest supportingly against the top portion of the suction anchor, at a radial
distance from the wellhead casing (12), the supporting frame (6) being arranged to
absorb a portion of said bending moment (Mw).
2. The suction anchor according to claim 1, wherein the supporting frame (6) comprises
a well-casing extension (63) adapted for connection to the wellhead casing (12).
3. The suction anchor according to claim 1, wherein the ratio of the bending moment (Mf)
absorbed in the supporting frame (6) to the bending moment (Mw) applied to the wellhead casing (12) is at least 1:2.
4. The suction anchor according to claim 3, wherein the ratio of the bending moment (Mf)
absorbed by the supporting frame (6) to the bending moment (Mw) applied to the wellhead casing (12) is at least 3:4.
5. The suction anchor according to claim 4, wherein the ratio of the bending moment (Mf)
absorbed in the supporting frame (6) to the bending moment (Mw) applied to the wellhead casing (12) is at least 9:10.
6. The suction anchor according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the connection between the supporting
frame (6) and the wellhead casing (12), possibly between the supporting frame (6)
and the well-casing extension (63) is formed as a zero-clearance connection.
7. The suction anchor according to claim 6, wherein the supporting frame (6) comprises
a coupling (62) formed as a sleeve (621) which encloses a portion of the wellhead
casing (12) with a press fit.
8. The suction anchor according to claim 6, wherein the supporting frame (6) comprises
a coupling (62) formed as a sleeve (621) which encloses a portion of the well-casing
extension (63) with a press fit.
9. The suction anchor according to claim 6, wherein the supporting frame (6) comprises
a coupling (62) formed as a sleeve (621) which has been shrunk around a portion of
the wellhead casing (12).
10. The suction anchor according to claim 6, wherein the supporting frame (6) comprises
a coupling (62) formed as a sleeve (621) which has been shrunk around a portion of
the well-casing extension (63).
11. The suction anchor according to any of the preceding claims, wherein a low-pressure
housing is integrated into said supporting frame (6).