Field
[0001] The present disclosure relates to a fiber guide. Background
[0002] To guide a fiber, fiber guides having various shapes, which are called a roller guide,
an oiling nozzle, a rod guide, a traverse guide, or a friction disk, are attached
to a fiber machine while in use. As for a surface (hereinafter referred to as a fiber
contact surface) of a fiber guide that is brought into contact with a fiber, there
is a demand to prevent the occurrence of damage, such as scratch or looseness, to
a fiber. There is also a demand for low manufacturing costs of fiber guides.
[0003] For these reasons, aluminum oxide ceramics, which are superior in abrasion resistance
regardless of low costs, are often used as the material of a fiber guide.
[0004] For example, Patent Literature 1 discloses a guide that includes aluminum oxide and
has a Vickers hardness HV of 1900 or more.
Citation List
Patent Literature
[0005] Patent Literature 1: Japanese Laid-open Patent Publication No.
2003-213522
Summary
Technical Problem
Solution to Problem
Brief Description of Drawings
[0006]
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a roller guide to illustrate an example of a fiber
guide according to the present disclosure.
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an oiling nozzle to illustrate an example of the fiber
guide according to the present disclosure.
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a rod guide to illustrate an example of the fiber
guide according to the present disclosure.
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a traverse guide to illustrate an example of the fiber
guide according to the present disclosure.
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a friction disk to illustrate an example of the fiber
guide according to the present disclosure.
FIG. 6 is a top view of the oiling nozzle illustrated in FIG. 2.
FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram that illustrates an example of a surface of the fiber
guide according to the present disclosure.
FIG. 8 is a schematic view of a sliding testing device.
Description of Embodiments
[0007] In recent years, there has been an extreme increase in the delivering speed of fibers
up to 1000 to 10000 m/minute to improve the productive efficiency of fibers. Therefore,
there is a demand for a fiber guide having a fiber contact surface with a low friction
coefficient, which is unlikely to give damage to fibers regardless of an increase
in the delivering speed of fibers.
[0008] With the fiber guide according to the present disclosure, a fiber contact surface
with a low friction coefficient may reduce the occurrence of damage to fibers while
the fibers are guided. The fiber guide according to the present disclosure is described
below in detail with reference to drawings.
[0009] First, the typical types of fiber guides are described with reference to FIGS. 1
to 5. First of all, a roller guide 10a illustrated in FIG. 1 guides a fiber 1 at a
U-shaped groove portion while rotating. Then, an oiling nozzle 10b illustrated in
FIG. 2 is used to apply oil to the fiber 1. Then, a rod guide 10c illustrated in FIG.
3 is used to bundle or separate the fibers 1. Then, a traverse guide 10d illustrated
in FIG. 4 is used as a guide to wind the fiber 1 around the outer circumference of
a cylindrical package. A friction disk 10e illustrated in FIG. 5 is used to twist
the fiber 1.
[0010] FIG. 6 is a top view (the view in the direction of the arrow that is white with the
black outline in FIG. 2) of the oiling nozzle 10b illustrated in FIG. 2. In the following
description, the fiber guide is denoted by the reference numeral "10", except for
the case where the specific fiber guide is described.
[0011] As illustrated in FIG. 6, the fiber guide 10 according to the present disclosure
includes a base 11 and a fiber contact surface 2 that is brought into contact with
the fiber 1 in at least part of the base 11. The fiber contact surface 2 is a surface
of the fiber guide 10 that is brought into contact with the fiber 1 and, to discriminate
it from the base 11, the fiber contact surface 2 is in the depth up to 0.2 mm from
the surface that is brought into contact with the fiber 1. In FIG. 6, the fiber contact
surface 2 is illustrated in color so as to be distinguished. The inlet side and the
outlet side for the fiber 1 need to be clearly distinguished on the fiber contact
surface 2, and the fiber contact surface 2 includes an inlet portion 3, an intermediate
portion 4, and an outlet portion 5. The fiber guide including the fiber contact surface
2 including the inlet portion 3, the intermediate portion 4, and the outlet portion
5 is, for example, the oiling nozzle 10b illustrated in FIG. 2. The fiber contact
surface 2 of the above-described oiling nozzle 10b includes a pair of a first end
6 and a second end 7 in a delivering direction of the fiber 1. The first end 6 is
the portion of the fiber contact surface 2 with which the fiber 1 is first brought
into contact at the inlet side of the fiber 1, and the second end 7 is the portion
of the fiber contact surface 2 with which the fiber 1 is in contact up to the end
at the outlet side of the fiber 1. The inlet portion 3 refers to, when the entire
length of the fiber contact surface 2 is from the first end 6 to the second end 7,
the portion of 1/5 of the entire length from the first end 6. Conversely, the outlet
portion 5 refers to the portion of 1/5 of the entire length from the second end 7.
The portion of the fiber contact surface 2 between the inlet portion 3 and the outlet
portion 5 is the intermediate portion 4.
[0012] The fiber contact surface 2 of the fiber guide 10 according to the present disclosure
includes an aluminum oxide ceramic and, as illustrated in FIG. 7, includes a zirconium
silicate phase 8 between aluminum oxide crystals 9.
[0013] In the aluminum oxide ceramic, out of 100 mass-% of all the components included in
the aluminum oxide ceramic, aluminum oxide occupies 80 or more mass-%.
[0014] The material of the fiber contact surface 2 may be confirmed in the following method.
First of all, measurement is conducted on the fiber contact surface 2 by using an
X-ray diffraction device (XRD), and identification is executed by using the JCPDS
card based on the obtained value of 2θ (2θ is a diffraction angle). Subsequently,
quantitative analysis is conducted on components contained in the fiber contact surface
2 by using a fluorescence X-ray analysis device (XRF). Subsequently, an aluminum oxide
ceramic is determined when the presence of aluminum oxide is confirmed during the
identification by the above-described XRD and the content of aluminum oxide (Al
2O
3), converted from the content of aluminum (Al) measured by the above-described XRF,
is 80 or more mass-%.
[0015] The zirconium silicate phase 8 has a low friction coefficient as compared with the
aluminum oxide crystal 9. In the fiber guide 10 according to the present disclosure,
as the zirconium silicate phase 8 is provided between the aluminum oxide crystals
9, the fiber contact surface 2 has a low friction coefficient.
[0016] The presence or absence of the zirconium silicate phase 8 in the fiber contact surface
2 may be determined in the following method.
[0017] First of all, by using an Electron Probe Micro Analyzer (EPMA), elemental mapping
is executed on the area that is recognized as a phase present between the aluminum
oxide crystals 9. If zirconium, silicon, and oxygen are simultaneously detected during
the elemental mapping, it is determined that the fiber guide 10 according to the present
disclosure includes the zirconium silicate phase 8. As the aluminum oxide layer 9
is present under the zirconium silicate phase 8, aluminum may be detected even when
no aluminum oxide is included between the aluminum oxide crystals 9.
[0018] FIG. 7 schematically illustrates a state of the fiber contact surface 2 observed
by a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), or the like. The color relation in FIG. 7
is based on an SEM image (picture); the zirconium silicate phase 8 exhibits a white-based
color, and the aluminum oxide crystal 9 exhibits a black-based color, whereby the
zirconium silicate phase 8 and the aluminum oxide crystal 9 may be visually discriminated.
[0019] In the fiber guide 10 according to the present disclosure, the base 11 and the fiber
contact surface 2 include an integrated aluminum oxide ceramic, and the percentage
of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase 8 in the fiber contact surface
2 may be higher than the percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate
phase 8 inside the base 11. The inside of the base 11 refers to a portion in the depth
of 0.2 or more mm from the surface of the base 11. The material of the base 11 may
be confirmed in the same method as the above-described method for confirming the material
of the fiber contact surface 2.
[0020] The heat conductivity of the zirconium silicate phase 8 is approximately 3 to 8 W/m·K.
Conversely, the heat conductivity of the aluminum oxide crystal 9 is approximately
15 to 40 W/m·K. Therefore, when the above-described configuration is satisfied, the
fiber contact surface 2 having a higher percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium
silicate phase 8 as compared with the base 11 has a lower heat conductivity than that
of the inside of the base 11; thus, the friction heat generated in the fiber contact
surface 2 during the delivery of the fiber 1 is diffused into the inside of the base
11 having a higher heat conductivity so that an increase in the temperature of the
fiber contact surface 2 may be suppressed. Thus, in the fiber guide 10 according to
the present disclosure, damage such as scratch or looseness are unlikely to occur
in the fiber 1 even though the fiber 1 is guided for a long period of time. In other
words, the friction coefficient of the fiber contact surface 2 may be maintained.
[0021] In the fiber guide 10 according to the present disclosure, the percentage of the
area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase 8 in the fiber contact surface 2 may
be higher than the percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase
8 inside the base 11 by 0.2 or more area-%. When this configuration is satisfied,
the friction coefficient of the fiber contact surface 2 may be further maintained
in the fiber guide 10 according to the present disclosure even though the fiber 1
is guided for a long time of period.
[0022] The percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase 8 in the fiber
contact surface 2 may be, for example, 0.2 or more area-% and 1.8 or less area-%.
The percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase 8 inside the base
11 is, for example, 0.1 or less area-% and may be 0 area-%, in which the zirconium
silicate phase 8 is not present.
[0023] The percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase 8 in the fiber
contact surface 2 and inside the base 11 may be calculated in the following method.
First of all, backscattered electron image (BEI) pictures (hereafter simply referred
to as pictures) of the fiber contact surface 2 and the inside of the base 11 are taken
by using the SEM. As the zirconium silicate phase 8 exhibits a white-based color as
described above, image analysis is performed on the picture by applying a particle
analysis technique of the image analysis software "A-zo Kun" (registered trademark,
manufactured by Asahi Kasei Engineering Corporation; when the image analysis software
"A-zo Kun" is described below, it indicates the image analysis software manufactured
by Asahi Kasei Engineering Corporation) so that the percentage of the area occupied
by the zirconium silicate phase 8 may be obtained.
[0024] The percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase 8 in the fiber
contact surface 2 is the average value of the image analysis on six or more pictures
at different areas of the fiber contact surface 2 captured at 1000 to 3000 magnification.
As the contact surface 2 includes the inlet portion 3, the intermediate portion 4,
and the outlet portion 5, the image analysis is conducted on two pictures at each
of the different areas in the inlet portion 3, the intermediate portion 4, and the
outlet portion 5, and the average value may be the percentage of the area occupied
by the zirconium silicate phase 8 in the fiber contact surface 2.
[0025] The percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase 8 inside the
base 11 is the average value of the image analysis on six or more pictures at different
areas inside the base 11 captured at 1000 to 3000 magnification.
[0026] Examples of the analysis conditions of "A-zo Kun" include, but are not limited to,
"bright" for the brightness of a crystal particle, "manual" for the method for binarization,
"present" for shading, etc., and a threshold may be set so as to clearly distinguish
between the zirconium silicate phase 8 and the aluminum oxide crystal 9.
[0027] On the fiber contact surface 2 of the fiber guide 10 according to the present disclosure,
the percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase 8 in the inlet
portion 3 may be higher than the percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium
silicate phase 8 in the intermediate portion 4. When this configuration is satisfied,
the inlet portion 3, which is a portion where the fiber 1 is most likely to be damaged,
may have low frictional resistance. In the fiber guide 10 according to the present
disclosure, the percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase 8
in the inlet portion 3 included in the fiber contact surface 2 may be 0.3 or more
area-% and 2.5 or less area-%.
[0028] The percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase 8 in the inlet
portion 3 and the intermediate portion 4 may be calculated by the particle analysis
of the image analysis software "A-zo Kun" in the same manner as the above-described
method for calculating the percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate
phase in the fiber contact surface 2 and inside the base 11. Specifically, the percentage
of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase 8 in the inlet portion 3 is the
average value of the image analysis on two or more pictures at different areas of
the inlet portion 3 captured at 1000 to 3000 magnification. The percentage of the
area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase 8 in the intermediate portion 4 is the
average value of the image analysis on two or more pictures at different areas of
the intermediate portion 4 captured at 1000 to 3000 magnification.
[0029] In the fiber guide 10 according to the present disclosure, the average value of the
equivalent circle diameter of the zirconium silicate phase 8 in the fiber contact
surface 2 may be 0.6 or more µm and 3.2 or less µm. The equivalent circle diameter
refers to the diameter of the circle when the zirconium silicate phase 8 is converted
into the circle having the same size. When this configuration is satisfied, the zirconium
silicate phase 8 is unlikely to be removed from the fiber contact surface 2 so that
the friction coefficient of the fiber contact surface 2 may be further maintained.
[0030] The average value of the equivalent circle diameter of the aluminum oxide crystal
9 is, for example, 10 or more µm and 25 or less µm.
[0031] The average value of the equivalent circle diameter of each of the zirconium silicate
phase 8 and the aluminum oxide crystal 9 may be calculated in the same method as the
above-described method for calculating the percentage of the area occupied by the
zirconium silicate phase in the fiber contact surface 2.
[0032] Then, the method for measuring the friction coefficient of the fiber contact surface
2 is described with reference to FIG. 8. A sliding testing device illustrated in FIG.
8 is a device that includes a roller R1, a roller R2, the fiber guide 10, a roller
R3, and a roller R4 so as to guide the fiber 1 in this order. The roller R2 and the
roller R3 are coupled to tension detectors (not illustrated).
[0033] Calculation is performed according to Amonton's Law equation (µ={lnT2-T1)}/θ) by
using the measured value of tension T1 detected by the tension detector of the roller
R2 and the measured value of tension T2 detected by the tension detector of the roller
R3 while the fiber 1 is guided by using the sliding testing device so as to obtain
a friction coefficient (µ).
[0034] The friction coefficient changes in accordance with a testing condition, such as
the type of the fiber 1, the form of the fiber 1, the delivering speed of the fiber
1, the tensional force of the fiber 1, or θ. For this reason, the comparison between
friction coefficients needs to be performed under the same testing condition.
[0035] Then, an example of the method for producing the fiber guide 10 according to the
present disclosure is described. Among the fiber guides 10, the oiling nozzle 10b
is described as an example. In an example of the case described, the base 11 and the
fiber contact surface 2 include an integrated aluminum oxide ceramic.
[0036] First of all, aluminum oxide (Al
2O
3) powders, a sintering agent, and a solvent are put into a mill together with a ball
and is smashed to have predetermined granularity so as to produce a slurry. To obtain
the fiber guide 10 having the zirconium silicate phase 8 inside the base 11, zirconium
silicate (ZrSiO
4) powders may be doped when a slurry is produced.
[0037] Subsequently, after the obtained slurry is doped with a binder, spray drying is conducted
by using a spray drier to produce granular powders.
[0038] Subsequently, the granular powders, thermoplastic resin, wax, and the like, are put
into a kneader and mixed while heated to obtain a paste. The obtained paste is put
into a pelletizer to obtain pellets that are the material for injection molding (injection
molding). Subsequently, the obtained pellets are put into an injection molding machine
(injection molding machine) for injection molding so as to obtain a compact shaped
like an oiling nozzle. To obtain a compact shaped like an oiling nozzle, a mold for
obtaining an oiling nozzle shape may be manufactured according to a typical injection
molding technique and may be placed in the injection molding machine for injection
molding.
[0039] Subsequently, the obtained compact is sintered in the air atmosphere at the highest
temperature of 1500 or more °C and 1600 or less °C and in the retention time of two
or more hours and five or less hours at the highest temperature to obtain a sinter.
As the sintering condition, such as the highest temperature or the retention time,
changes in accordance with the shape and the size of a product, they may be adjusted
as appropriate.
[0040] Subsequently, the sinter, abrasive media, and water are put into a wet barrel finishing
machine, and barrel finishing is performed. At this point, zirconium silicate powders
have been mixed with water; therefore, when the media collides with the sinter during
barrel finishing, the zirconium silicate powders enter the gap between the aluminum
oxide crystals 9 so as to adhere to the surface of the sinter as the zirconium silicate
phase 8.
[0041] After the barrel finishing, the sinter is cleaned and dried to obtain the oiling
nozzle 10b according to the present disclosure.
[0042] The percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase 8 in the fiber
contact surface 2 and inside the base 11 may be controlled to have any value by adjusting
the amount of zirconium silicate powders doped to produce a slurry, the amount of
zirconium silicate powders mixed with water during barrel finishing, and the time
period of the barrel finishing.
[0043] The percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase 8 in the inlet
portion 3 and the intermediate portion 4 of the fiber contact surface 2 may be controlled
to have any value by adjusting the amount of zirconium silicate powders mixed with
water during barrel finishing and the time period of the barrel finishing and by executing
barrel finishing while masking parts of the inlet portion 3 and the intermediate portion
4 of the fiber contact surface 2.
[0044] The average particle diameter of the zirconium silicate powder used may be adjusted
so that the average value of the equivalent circle diameter of the zirconium silicate
phase 8 in the fiber contact surface 2 becomes 0.6 or more µm and 3.2 or less µm.
[First Embodiment]
[0045] Oiling nozzles were manufactured, which were different depending on the presence
or absence of a zirconium silicate phase in a fiber contact surface. A sliding test
was conducted on the oiling nozzles to compare the friction coefficients of fiber
contact surfaces.
[0046] First of all, aluminum oxide powders, titanium oxide (TiO
2) powders and magnesium carbonate (MgCO
3) powders as sintering agents were prepared. The powders were weighted and mixed such
that the aluminum oxide powders were 98.4 mass-%, the titanium oxide powders were
1 mass-%, and the magnesium carbonate powders were 0.6 mass-% in terms of magnesium
oxide (MgO). Subsequently, they were put into a mill together with water, which was
a solvent, and a ball to be ground so as to produce a slurry.
[0047] Subsequently, after the slurry was doped with a binder, spray drying was performed
using a spray drier to produce granular powders.
[0048] Subsequently, the granular powders, thermoplastic resin, and wax were additionally
put into a kneader and mixed while heated to obtain a paste. The obtained paste was
put into a pelletizer to obtain pellets that were the material for injection molding.
Subsequently, the obtained pellets were put into an injection molding machine for
injection molding so as to obtain a compact shaped like an oiling nozzle.
[0049] Subsequently, the compact was sintered in the air atmosphere at the highest temperature
of 1550 °C and in the retention time of three hours at the highest temperature to
obtain a sinter.
[0050] Subsequently, the sinter, abrasive media, and water were put into a wet barrel finishing
machine and were subjected to barrel finishing for two hours. At this point, during
the barrel finishing, zirconium silicate powders having an average particle diameter
of 3.5 µm were mixed with water such that the amount to be doped was 0.015 mass-%
with respect to 100 mass-% of the total amount of water and zirconium silicate powders.
[0051] Subsequently, the sinter was cleaned and dried to obtain a sample No. 1.
[0052] In the above-described production method, barrel finishing was conducted by using
water that was not mixed with zirconium silicate powders to obtain a sample No. 2.
[0053] Subsequently, each sample was set in the sliding testing device illustrated in FIG.
8 and was subjected to a sliding test to obtain the friction coefficient of each sample.
The measurement conditions were as follows:
Type of fiber: nylon (75 denier)
Delivering speed of fiber: 1500 m/minute
θ: 90°
Tensional force of fiber: 50 gf
Measurement frequency: 10 times (every one minute)
Friction coefficient: a friction coefficient was determined from each detected tension
and the average value in ten times was obtained as a friction coefficient.
[0054] Table 1 illustrates the results.
Table 1
SAMPLE NO. |
PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ZIRCONIUM SILICATE PHASE |
FRICTION COEFFICIENT µ |
1 |
PRESENT |
0.36 |
2 |
ABSENT |
0.45 |
[0055] According to the results illustrated in Table 1, the sample No. 1 had a low friction
coefficient of 0.36 as compared with the sample No. 2. This indicates that, when the
fiber contact surface includes the zirconium silicate phase, the fiber contact surface
has a low friction coefficient.
[Second Embodiment]
[0056] Then, oiling nozzles having different percentages of the area occupied by the zirconium
silicate phase in the fiber contact surface and inside the base were produced. A sliding
test was conducted on the oiling nozzles to compare the friction coefficients of the
fiber contact surfaces.
[0057] The production method was the same as the method for producing the sample No. 1 according
to the first embodiment except that the amount of zirconium silicate powders illustrated
in Table 2 was doped to produce a slurry and the amount of zirconium silicate powders
illustrated in Table 2 was doped and mixed with water during barrel finishing, and
a sample No. 5 was the same as the sample No. 1 according to the first embodiment.
When the slurry was doped with zirconium silicate powders, the amount of aluminum
oxide powders to be doped was reduced by the amount of zirconium silicate powders
doped.
[0058] Subsequently, the percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase
in the fiber contact surface and inside the base of each sample was calculated in
the following method. First of all, backscattered electron image pictures of the fiber
contact surface and the inside of the base were taken by using the SEM. As the zirconium
silicate phase exhibits a white-based color, the image analysis was performed on the
picture by applying a particle analysis technique of the image analysis software "A-zo
Kun" so that the percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase was
obtained. Specifically, the percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate
phase in the fiber contact surface was the average value of the image analysis on
two pictures at different areas in the inlet portion, the intermediate portion, and
the outlet portion of the fiber contact surface captured at 2000 magnification. Conversely,
the percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase inside the base
was the average value of the image analysis on six pictures at different areas of
the inside captured at 2000 magnification.
[0059] The sliding test was performed in the same manner as in the first embodiment except
that the start time of the measurement of a friction coefficient was 20 minutes after
the start of the sliding test, and the friction coefficient of the fiber contact surface
of each sample was obtained. Table 2 illustrates the results.
Table 2
SAMPLE NO. |
ZIRCONIUM SILICATE POWDERS (MASS-%) |
PERCENTAGE OF AREA OCCUPIED BY ZIRCONIUM SILICATE PHASE |
FRICTION COEFFICIENT µ |
SLURRY |
BARREL FINISHING |
FIBER CONTACT SURFACE |
INSIDE |
DIFFERENCE (FIBER CONTACT SURFACE-IN SIDE) |
3 |
0.2 |
0 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0 |
0.4 |
4 |
0 |
0.01 |
0.13 |
0 |
0.13 |
0.38 |
5 |
0 |
0.015 |
0.2 |
0 |
0.2 |
0.36 |
6 |
0 |
0.04 |
0.6 |
0 |
0.6 |
0.35 |
7 |
0 |
0.13 |
1.8 |
0 |
1.8 |
0.34 |
8 |
0.2 |
0.13 |
2.0 |
0.2 |
1.8 |
0.34 |
[0060] According to the results illustrated in Table 2, samples No. 4 to 8 had a low friction
coefficient of 0.38 or less in the fiber contact surface, as compared with the sample
No. 3. This indicates that, when the percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium
silicate phase in the fiber contact surface is higher than the percentage of the area
occupied by the zirconium silicate phase inside the base, the friction coefficient
of the fiber contact surface may be maintained.
[0061] Among the samples No. 4 to 8, the samples No. 5 to 8 had a low friction coefficient
of 0.36 or less in the fiber contact surface. This indicates that, when the percentage
of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase in the fiber contact surface
is higher than the percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase
inside the base by 0.2 or more area-%, the friction coefficient of the fiber contact
surface may be further maintained.
[Third Embodiment]
[0062] Then, oiling nozzles having different percentages of the area occupied by the zirconium
silicate phase in the inlet portion and the intermediate portion of the fiber contact
surface were produced. A sliding test was performed on the oiling nozzles to compare
the friction coefficients of the fiber contact surfaces.
[0063] The production method was the same as the method for producing the sample No. 1 according
to the first embodiment except that the amount of zirconium silicate powders doped
and mixed with water during barrel finishing was adjusted and parts of the inlet portion
and the intermediate portion in the fiber contact surface were masked so that the
percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase became the value illustrated
in Table 3, and a sample No. 9 was the same sample as the sample No. 1 according to
the first embodiment.
[0064] Subsequently, a sliding test was performed in the same manner as in the first embodiment
to obtain the friction coefficient of the fiber contact surface of each sample. Table
3 illustrates the results.
Table 3
SAMPLE NO. |
PERCENTAGE OF AREA OCCUPIED BY ZIRCONIUM SILICATE PHASE (AREA-%) |
FRICTION COEFFICIENT µ |
INLET PORTION |
INTERMEDIATE PORTION |
9 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.36 |
10 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.37 |
11 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.32 |
12 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.29 |
13 |
1 |
0.1 |
0.28 |
14 |
2.5 |
0.1 |
0.29 |
15 |
3 |
0.1 |
0.32 |
[0065] According to the results illustrated in Table 3, the samples No. 11 to 15 have a
low friction coefficient of 0.32 or less in the fiber contact surface, as compared
with the samples No. 9, 10. This indicates that, when the percentage of the area occupied
by the zirconium silicate phase in the inlet portion is higher than the percentage
of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase in the intermediate portion,
the friction coefficient of the fiber contact surface may be lower.
[0066] Among the samples No.11 to 15, the samples No. 12 to 14 have a low friction coefficient
of 0.29 or less in the fiber contact surface. This indicates that, when the percentage
of the area occupied by the zirconium silicate phase in the inlet portion is 0.3 or
more area-% and 2.5 or less area-%, the friction coefficient of the fiber contact
surface may be lower.
[Fourth Embodiment]
[0067] Then, oiling nozzles having different average values of the equivalent circle diameter
of the zirconium silicate phase in the fiber contact surface were produced. A sliding
test was performed on the oiling nozzles to compare the friction coefficients of the
fiber contact surfaces.
[0068] The production method was the same as the method for producing the sample No. 6 according
to the second embodiment except that the zirconium silicate powder having the average
particle diameter illustrated in Table 4 was used during barrel finishing and the
barrel time period illustrated in Table 4 was applied, and a sample No. 20 was the
same sample as the sample No. 6 according to the second embodiment. The barrel time
period for each sample was changed so that the percentage of the area occupied by
the zirconium silicate phase in the fiber contact surface of each sample became 0.6
area-%.
[0069] Subsequently, the average value of the equivalent circle diameter of the zirconium
silicate phase in the fiber contact surface of each sample was calculated in the same
method as the method for calculating the percentage of the area occupied by the zirconium
silicate phase in the fiber contact surface according to the second embodiment.
[0070] A sliding test was performed in the same manner as in the second embodiment to obtain
the friction coefficient of the fiber contact surface of each sample. Table 4 illustrates
the results.
Table 4
SAMPLE NO. |
AVERAGE PARTICLE DIAMETER (µm) OF ZIRCONIUM SILICATE POWDER |
BARREL TIME PERIOD (HOUR) |
AVERAGE VALUE (µm) OF EQUIVALENT CIRCLE DIAMETER OF ZIRCONIUM SILICATE PHASE |
FRICTION COEFFICIENT µ |
16 |
0.4 |
6 |
0.4 |
0.35 |
17 |
0.4 |
5 |
0.6 |
0.29 |
18 |
1.8 |
4 |
1.8 |
0.27 |
19 |
3.2 |
3 |
3.2 |
0.29 |
20 |
3.5 |
2 |
3.5 |
0.35 |
[0071] According to the results illustrated in Table 4, samples No. 17 to 19 have a low
friction coefficient of 0.29 or less in the fiber contact surface, as compared with
the samples No. 16, 20. This indicates that, when the average value of the equivalent
circle diameter of the zirconium silicate phase in the fiber contact surface is 0.6
or more µm and 3.2 or less µm, the friction coefficient of the fiber contact surface
may be further maintained.
Reference Signs List
[0072]
- 1:
- FIBER
- 2:
- FIBER CONTACT SURFACE
- 3:
- INLET PORTION
- 4:
- INTERMEDIATE PORTION
- 5:
- OUTLET PORTION
- 6:
- FIRST END
- 7:
- SECOND END
- 8:
- ZIRCONIUM SILICATE PHASE
- 9:
- ALUMINUM OXIDE CRYSTAL
- 10A:
- ROLLER GUIDE
- 10B:
- OILING NOZZLE
- 10C:
- ROD GUIDE
- 10D:
- TRAVERSE GUIDE
- 10E:
- FRICTION DISK
- 10:
- FIBER GUIDE
- 11:
- BASE
- R1 TO R4:
- ROLLER