[0001] A gas hob typically comprises a top sheet made of metal or glass and a number of
gas burners. A respective gas burner is associated with a gas valve for providing
fuel gas. The gas valve is typically provided below the top sheet. The fuel gas is
mixed with primary air to obtain a flammable gas/air mixture. Specifically, the fuel
gas may be injected into a mixing element, such as a venturi pipe, which is arranged
below the top sheet.
[0002] To achieve a clean and balanced flame, the flammable gas/air mixture preferably includes
a high amount of primary air and has a high degree of homogeneity. However, space
below the top sheet is limited. A shortened venturi pipe may have adverse effects
on the mixing performance, and may result in an unbalanced flame, soot and stability
issues.
[0003] It is one object of the present invention to provide an improved gas burner for a
gas hob.
[0004] Accordingly, a gas burner for a gas hob comprises a mixing element for mixing a fuel
gas with primary air and an injector nozzle adapted to inject a stream of the fuel
gas into the mixing element such that a stream of the primary air is entrained in
the stream of the fuel gas. The injector nozzle comprises a gas outlet having a first
inner diameter, a gas inlet having a second inner diameter larger than the first inner
diameter, and a circumferential wall extending along a longitudinal axis of the injector
nozzle from the gas inlet to the gas outlet and circumferentially around the longitudinal
axis. Herein, in a radial cross section of the circumferential wall, an inner diameter
of the circumferential wall varies along the longitudinal axis in accordance with
a polynomial function of a distance between the gas inlet and the radial cross section,
the distance being measured along the longitudinal axis.
[0005] The polynomial-shaped inner surface of the circumferential wall of the injector nozzle
may advantageously improve a degree of homogeneity of the injected fuel gas stream,
thereby increasing an amount of entrained primary air and improving the burner performance.
[0006] The polynomial function may be a polynomial function of a higher order. The order
of the polynomial function may be at least three, and may, more preferably, be six.
Coefficients of the polynomial function may be determined by solving a linear equation
system with boundary conditions. The boundary conditions may be determined by a desired
geometry, by the type of gas and pressure mixture, and the like. In particular, a
first and a second boundary condition may be determined by a desired length of the
circumferential wall in a longitudinal direction along the longitudinal axis and by
desired first and second inner diameters of the circumferential wall, respectively.
[0007] The mixing element may be a venturi pipe. The injector nozzle and the venturi pipe
may form an injector-venturi assembly of the gas burner.
[0008] The gas inlet and the gas outlet may be defined by respective circumferential edges
of the circumferential wall of the injector nozzle.
[0009] Particularly, the longitudinal axis extends along a direction in which the fuel gas
flows from the gas inlet to the gas outlet.
[0010] In the radial cross section, the circumferential wall may have symmetry, and the
longitudinal axis may be a symmetry axis of the circumferential wall. In particular,
in the radial cross section, the circumferential wall may have an elliptical or circular
shape centered on the longitudinal axis.
[0011] The injector nozzle may be manufactured and shaped using a stamping process.
[0012] According to an embodiment, the polynomial function is a sixth-order polynomial function.
[0013] The sixth-order polynomial shaped inner surface of the circumferential wall of the
injector nozzle may advantageously achieve a virtually flat velocity profile of the
fuel gas stream. That is, across a radial cross section at the gas outlet, the fuel
gas velocities may be uniform. At the same time, a tear-off of the gas stream from
the circumferential wall of the injector nozzle may be prevented. That is, the injected
fuel gas stream may be highly homogenous. In other words, a velocity near a circumferential
border of the injected fuel gas stream may be the same or similar to the velocity
in the center of the injected fuel gas stream. Consequently, the entrainment of the
primary air may be improved.
[0014] According to a further embodiment, the polynomial function is defined such that a
first derivative of the polynomial function at the gas inlet and a first derivative
of the polynomial function at the gas outlet are zero.
[0015] Thus, at the gas inlet and at the gas outlet, the circumferential wall may be parallel
to the longitudinal axis. This may ensure a smooth and homogenous inflow and outflow
of the fuel gas stream into and out of the injector nozzle without tear-off at the
inlet and outlet.
[0016] Here and in the flowing, the expression "the polynomial function is defined such
that" a certain condition is achieved may be construed to mean that, when solving
a linear equation system to determine the coefficients of the polynomial function,
one or more boundary conditions may be formulated based on the certain condition.
[0017] In particular, according to the present embodiment, a third and a fourth boundary
condition may be formulated based on the first derivative of the polynomial function
being zero at the gas inlet and at the gas outlet, respectively.
[0018] According to a further embodiment, the polynomial function is defined to have exactly
one inflexion point between the gas inlet and the gas outlet.
[0019] That is, a fifth boundary condition may be formulated based on the coordinates of
the inflexion point, such as a coordinate along the longitudinal axis and a radial
coordinate, and a sixth boundary condition may be formulated based on a second derivative
of the polynomial function being zero at the inflexion point. In particular, if the
polynomial function is the sixth-order polynomial function, it may be fully defined
by the first to sixth boundary condition as outlined above.
[0020] The present configuration, in which the shape of the circumferential wall is defined
by a polynomial function with exactly one inflexion point, may advantageously ensure
a smooth and homogenous flow of the fuel gas stream throughout the injector nozzle
without tear-off at the circumferential wall.
According to a further embodiment, the inflexion point is located at a distance between
0.5 and 0.8 of a distance between the gas inlet and the gas outlet measured along
the longitudinal axis.
[0021] The distance between the gas inlet and the gas outlet may be identified as the length
of the injector nozzle.
[0022] Preferably, the inflexion point may be located at a distance of 0.6 of the distance
between the gas inlet and the gas outlet.
[0023] According to a further embodiment, in the radial cross section of the circumferential
wall, an outer diameter of the circumferential wall varies along the longitudinal
axis in accordance with a further polynomial function of a distance between the gas
inlet and the radial cross section measured along the longitudinal axis.
[0024] That is, not only the inner surface of the circumferential wall, but also the outer
surface of the circumferential wall may be shaped in accordance with a respective
polynomial function.
[0025] A stream of primary air may flow on the outside of the circumferential wall of the
injector nozzle to become entrained in the stream of fuel gas at the gas outlet. According
to the present embodiment, also a velocity profile of the stream of the primary air
may be made more homogenous without tear-off off the outer surface of the circumferential
wall. Thereby, a mixing performance of the primary air and the fuel gas may be improved
further.
[0026] According to a further embodiment, the further polynomial function is a sixth-order
polynomial function.
[0027] The embodiments and advantages described with reference to the polynomial function
defining the variation of the inner diameter of the circumferential wall apply, mutatis
mutandis, to the further polynomial function defining the variation of the outer diameter
of the circumferential wall.
[0028] According to a further embodiment, the further polynomial function is defined such
that a thickness of the circumferential wall is constant along the longitudinal axis
between the gas inlet and the gas outlet.
[0029] That is, the inner surface of the circumferential wall and the outer surface of the
circumferential wall may be parallel to each other.
[0030] Thereby, the injector nozzle may be easily manufactured, for example by stamping
a metal sheet of constant thickness.
[0031] According to a further embodiment, the mixing element comprises a venturi pipe, the
injector nozzle is adapted to inject the stream of the fuel gas into an inlet port
of the venturi pipe, and a gap for entry of the primary air is formed between the
gas outlet of the injector nozzle and the inlet port of the venturi pipe.
[0032] The venturi pipe may be a pipe that comprises the inlet port, an outlet port and
a middle section having an inner diameter that is smaller than an inner diameter of
the inlet port and an inner diameter of the outlet port.
[0033] By virtue of the venturi effect, when the fuel gas stream flows through the venturi
pipe, a suction may be generated that causes the primary air to be pulled in through
the gap between the inlet port and the gas outlet and to become entrained in the fuel
gas stream.
[0034] That is, the proposed injector nozzle may be advantageously used in an injector-venturi
assembly of a gas burner.
[0035] According to a further embodiment, the injector nozzle is introduced, at least in
part, into the inlet port of the venturi pipe such that a portion of the venturi pipe
including the inlet port and a portion of the injector nozzle including the gas outlet
overlap.
[0036] Thereby, a total length, along the longitudinal direction, of the injector-venturi
assembly may be reduced, to accommodate for space constraints below the top sheet
of the gas hob. Still, the polynomial shape of the injector nozzle may advantageously
provide a fuel gas/primary air mixing performance that is equal to or superior to
a mixing performance of a comparative injector-venturi assembly in which a non-polynomial
injector nozzle of the same dimensions is not introduced into the venturi pipe.
[0037] According to a further embodiment, at the gas outlet, the circumferential wall of
the injector nozzle protrudes in a radial direction so as to form a circumferential
flange portion for fixation of the injector nozzle.
[0038] For example, the circumferential flange portion may be welded onto an outer face
of a gas supply pipe.
[0039] According to a further embodiment, a threaded nut is placed over the injector nozzle
and screwed onto an outer thread of a gas supply pipe to fix the circumferential flange
portion against the gas supply pipe.
[0040] In particular, the flange of the injector nozzle may be sandwiched between the gas
supply pipe and the threaded nut, thereby fixing the injector nozzle to the gas supply
pipe.
[0041] The present configuration enables easy assembly of the injector nozzle in the gas
burner and furthermore enables easy manufacturing of the injector nozzle through suitably
stamping a metal sheet.
[0042] The gas supply pipe may be a pipe configured to supply the fuel gas to the gas burner.
[0043] According to a further aspect, a gas hob comprising at least one above-described
gas burner is provided. The gas hob may be configured as a domestic cooking appliance.
[0044] Preferably, the number of gas burners in the gas hob is between three and five.
[0045] Further possible implementations or alternative solutions of the invention also encompass
combinations - that are not explicitly mentioned herein - of features described above
or below with regard to the embodiments. The person skilled in the art may also add
individual or isolated aspects and features to the most basic form of the invention.
[0046] Further embodiments, features and advantages of the present invention will become
apparent from the subsequent description and dependent claims, taken in conjunction
with the accompanying drawings, in which:
- Fig. 1
- schematically shows a top view of a gas hob according to an embodiment;
- Fig. 2
- shows a sectional view of a known gas burner;
- Fig. 3
- shows a sectional view of a known injector-venturi assembly;
- Fig. 4
- conceptually shows the fuel gas stream and the primary air stream for various injector
nozzle geometries;
- Fig. 5
- shows sectional views of an injector nozzle geometry of a comparative example and
five injector nozzles according to an embodiment.
- Fig. 6
- shows a graph of polynomial functions according to an embodiment;
- Fig. 7
- shows a sectional view of an injector-ventury assembly according to an embodiment;
- Fig. 8
- shows a sectional view of an injector nozzle, a threaded nut and a gas supply pipe
according to an embodiment; and
- Fig. 9
- shows a perspective view of an injector nozzle and a threaded nut according to an
embodiment.
[0047] In the Figures, like reference numerals designate like or functionally equivalent
elements, unless otherwise indicated.
[0048] Fig. 1 schematically shows a top view of a gas hob 1 according to an embodiment.
The gas hob 1 comprises a top sheet 2 and four gas burners 3. A pan support structure
4, which may be a metal grid, metal arms or the like, is placed on the top sheet 2.
The gas hob 1 may be configured as a domestic cooking appliance and may be, for example,
part of a gas stove.
[0049] Fig. 2 shows a schematic sectional view of a known gas burner 3. The known gas burner
3 comprises an injector-venturi assembly 5 including an injector nozzle 6 and a venturi
pipe 7. The gas burner 3 further comprises a spreader 8 and a cap 9, for example.
[0050] In operation, fuel gas 31 is supplied to the known gas burner 3 via a gas supply
pipe (not shown in Fig. 2). When an operator operates a knob or the like (not shown),
a gas valve (not shown) is opened, and fuel gas 31 is supplied to the injector nozzle
6. The injector nozzle 6 ejects the fuel gas 31 into the venturi pipe 7. By virtue
of the venturi-effect, a suction is generated and primary air 11 is pulled in through
a gap 10 between the injector nozzle 6 and the venturi pipe 7. That is, the primary
air 11 stream is entrained in the ejected fuel gas 31 stream. Inside the venturi pipe
7, which is an example of a mixing element, the primary air 11 stream is mixed with
the fuel gas 31 stream to obtain a stream of a flammable gas/air mixture. The flammable
gas/air mixture leaves the venturi pipe 7 and travels, through a channel 12 formed
between the spreader 8 and the cap 9, to a plurality of gas ports 13 arranged circumferentially
around the cap 9. At the gas ports 13, the flammable gas/air mixture is ignited to
create a flame 14 for heating a pan, pot, wok or the like (not shown) placed on the
pan support structure (4 in Fig. 1).
[0051] Fig. 3 shows a section of a known injector-venturi assembly 5 in greater detail.
The injector nozzle 6 comprises a gas inlet 15, a gas outlet 16 and a circumferential
wall 17. The circumferential wall 17 extends longitudinally from the gas inlet 15
to the gas outlet 16 and circumferentially around a longitudinal axis A of the injector
nozzle 6. It is noted that the horizontal direction in Fig. 3 will be referred to
as the longitudinal direction, whereas the vertical direction in the section shown
in Fig. 3 will be referred to as the radial direction. The circumferential wall 17
and, likewise, the injector nozzle 6, each have a length H (longitudinal dimension
between the gas inlet 15 and the gas outlet 16). The inner diameter of the gas outlet
16 is smaller than the inner diameter of the gas inlet 15.
[0052] The venturi pipe 7 comprises an inlet port 18, an outlet port 19 and a circumferential
wall 20. It is noted that an inner diameter of a middle portion of the circumferential
wall 20 located longitudinally between the inlet port 18 and the outlet port 19 is
smaller than an inner diameter of the inlet port 18 and is also smaller than an inner
diameter of the outlet port 19. The circumferential wall 20 and, likewise, the venturi
pipe 7, each have a length L (longitudinal dimension between the inlet port 18 and
the outlet port 19).
[0053] The known injector nozzle 6 is arranged such that the gas outlet 16 thereof is longitudinally
adjacent to the inlet port 18 of the venturi pipe 7. An inner diameter of the inlet
port 18 of the venturi pipe 7 is larger than an outer diameter of the gas outlet 16
of the injector nozzle 6. Thus, a radial gap 10 is formed between the gas outlet 16
of the injector nozzle 6 and the inlet port 18 of then venturi pipe 7. The radial
gap 10 allows primary air 11 to be pulled in therethrough by a suction created by
virtue of the venturi effect of the venturi pipe 7.
[0054] It is noted that features and configurations described for the known injector nozzle
6 and the known injector-venturi assembly 5 also apply to the injector nozzle 6 and
the injector-venturi assembly 5 according to the various embodiments described hereinbelow,
unless noted otherwise.
[0055] Fig. 4 shows a fuel gas stream 21 and a primary air stream 22 for various injector
nozzle 6 geometries. In particular, Fig. 4 a) shows a known injector nozzle 6, while
Fig. 4 b) and c) show injector nozzles 6 according to respective embodiments. It is
noted that in Fig. 4 a) to c), the vertical direction is the longitudinal direction
and the horizontal direction is the radial direction.
[0056] In the known injector nozzle 6 shown in Fig. 4 a), neither the inner surface 23 nor
the outer surface 24 of the circumferential wall 17 have a polynomial shape. Accordingly,
a velocity profile of the fuel gas stream 21 ejected from the outlet port 16 of the
known injector nozzle 6 of Fig. 4 a) is a parabolic profile. In particular, at a circumferential
border of the fuel gas stream 21, which is a portion of the fuel gas stream 21 that
is adjacent to the primary air stream 22 to be entrained, a velocity of the fuel gas
is low.
[0057] The injector nozzle 6 according to an embodiment shown in Fig. 4 b) differs from
the known injector nozzle 6 shown in Fig. 4 a) in that the inner surface 23 of the
circumferential wall 17 of the injector nozzle 6 of Fig. 4 b) has a polynomial shape.
That is, an inner diameter d in a radial direction of the circumferential wall 17
varies along the longitudinal axis A in accordance with a polynomial function of a
distance x from the gas inlet 15. It is noted that Fig. 4 b) shows the half diameter
d/2.
[0058] This configuration has the effect shown in Fig. 4 b), i.e., a velocity profile of
the fuel gas stream 21 ejected from the gas outlet 16 is a so-called "flat top profile",
wherein the fuel gas velocity is substantially uniform across the entire gas outlet
16. More particularly, at a circumferential border of the fuel gas stream 21, which
is a portion of the fuel gas stream 21 that is adjacent to the primary air stream
22 to be entrained, a velocity is larger than in the comparative example shown in
Fig. 4a).
[0059] The injector nozzle 6 according to a further embodiment shown in Fig. 4 c) differs
from the injector nozzle 6 of Fig. 4 b) in that, in the injector nozzle 6 of Fig.
4c), also an outer surface 24 of the circumferential wall 17 has a polynomial shape.
That is, also an outer diameter D in a radial direction of the circumferential wall
17 varies along the longitudinal axis A in accordance with a polynomial function of
a distance x from the gas inlet 15. The circumferential wall 17 may thus have a constant
thickness along the longitudinal axis A. This configuration can further improve the
mixing performance, as will be shown below.
[0060] In order to confirm the effects of the polynomial-shaped surfaces of the circumferential
wall 17, computer simulations have been carried out on a known injector-venturi system
5 (Fig. 3) configured according to a comparative example and on five injector-venturi
systems 5 (Fig. 7) configured according to respective five working examples.
[0061] Fig. 5 shows sectional views of a geometry of an injector nozzle 6 of the comparative
example and five geometries of respective injector nozzles 6 according to the five
working examples.
[0062] Each of the injector nozzles 6 shown in Fig. 5 a) to f) have a first inner diameter
at the gas outlet 16 of d1 = 1.71 mm, and a second inner diameter at the gas inlet
15 of d2 = 4.5 mm.
[0063] The injector nozzle 6 of the comparative example shown in Fig. 5 a) has a height
H = 12,26 mm.
[0064] The injector nozzle 6 of the first working example shown in Fig. 5 b) has the same
height H as the comparative injector nozzle 6 shown in Fig. 5 a). It differs from
the latter in that the inner surface 23 of the circumferential wall 17 has a polynomial
shape.
[0065] The injector nozzle 6 of the second working example shown in Fig. 5 c) differs from
the injector nozzle 6 of the first working example shown in Fig. 5 b) in that also
its outer surface 24 has a polynomial shape.
[0066] The injector nozzle 6 of the third working example shown in Fig. 5 d) differs from
the injector nozzle 6 of the second working example shown in Fig. 5 c) in that it
has a reduced height h = 2/3 H = 8.17 mm.
[0067] The injector nozzle 6 of the fourth working example shown in Fig. 5 e) differs from
the injector nozzle 6 of the second working example shown in Fig. 5 c) in that it
has a reduced height h = 1/3 H = 4.09 mm.
[0068] The injector nozzle 6 of the fifth working example shown in Fig. 5 f) differs from
the injector nozzle 6 of the second working example shown in Fig. 5 c) in that it
has a greater height h = 4/3 H = 16.35 mm.
[0069] Fig. 6 shows a graph of polynomial functions 25 describing the respective inner surface
23 of the injector nozzles 6 of the various working examples. More specifically, a
distance x measured in mm along the longitudinal axis A is plotted horizontally, and
a distance y measured in mm along the radial axis is plotted vertically.
[0070] In the following, reference is made to Fig. 5 and Fig. 6. The polynomial function
251 describes the variation of the inner half diameter d/2 of the injector nozzle
6 of the first and second working examples shown in Fig. 5 b) and Fig. 5 c) along
the longitudinal axis A. Polynomial function 252 describes the variation of the inner
half diameter d/2 of the injector nozzle 6 of the third working example shown in Fig.
5 d). Polynomial function 253 describes the variation of the inner half diameter d/2
of the injector nozzle 6 of the fourth working example shown in Fig. 5 e). Polynomial
function 254 describes the variation of the inner half diameter d/2 of the injector
nozzle 6 of the fifth working example shown in Fig. 5f).
[0071] Each of the polynomial functions 25 is a sixth-order polynomial function and can
be expressed by formula (I):

[0072] Herein, x is a distance between the gas inlet 15 and a radial cross section through
the injection nozzle 6, the distance x being measured along the longitudinal axis
A. Further, "0,5 d(x)" is the inner half diameter d/2 of the circumferential wall
17 measured in the radial cross section taken at the distance, or longitudinal position,
x.
[0073] In order to determine the coefficients A, B, C, D, E, F, G for each of the working
examples, the following boundary conditions were set:
- 1. d(x=0) shall be the inlet diameter of d2 = 4.5 mm.
- 2. d(x=h) shall be the outlet diameter of d1 = 1.71 mm, wherein h is the respective
height (h = H, 2/3 H, 1/3 H or 4/3 H, with H = 12.26 mm, as outlined above for the
various working examples).
- 3. The first derivative of d(x) for x shall be zero at x=0.
- 4. The first derivative of d(x) for x shall be zero at x=h.
- 5. The second derivative of d(x) for x shall be zero (there shall be an inflection
point) at x = 0.6 h.
- 6. The half diameter at the inflection point shall be the average between the inlet
diameter d2 and the outlet diameter d1, that is d(x = 0.6 h) = 0.5 (d1 + d2).
[0074] By inserting each of the above six boundary conditions into formula (I) shown above,
a linear equation system was obtained and solved for the coefficients A to G. The
solutions obtained are shown in the following table (I).
Table (I) - Polynomial Coefficients
|
1st and 2nd examples Fig. 5 b), c), polynomial function 251 |
3d working example Fig. 5 d) polynomial function 252 |
4th example Fig. 5 e) function 253 |
5th example Fig. 5 f) function 254 |
A |
-9.3436E-06 |
-1.0643E-04 |
-6.8115E-03 |
-1.6630E-02 |
B |
2.6910E-04 |
2.0435E-03 |
6.5391E-02 |
6.3858E-05 |
C |
-2.0182E-03 |
-1.0217E-02 |
-1.6348E-01 |
-6.3858E-04 |
D |
-3.3610E-17 |
6.7220E-17 |
1.2100E-15 |
8.4026E-18 |
E |
0.0000E+00 |
0.0000E+00 |
0.0000E+00 |
0.0000E+00 |
F |
0.0000E+00 |
0.0000E+00 |
0.0000E+00 |
0.0000E+00 |
G |
4.5000E+00 |
4.5000E+00 |
4.5000E+00 |
4.5000E+00 |
[0075] It is noted that to facilitate illustration, in Fig. 6 the half diameter d(x)/2 is
plotted for each of the polynomial functions 251, 252, 253, 254. Therefore, the graphs
of Fig. 6 may also be understood as a schematic representation of a cross-sectional
shape of a respective inner surface 23 (Figs. 5).
[0076] A total of five injector-venturi assemblies 5 (similar to the known injector-venturi
assembly 5 (Fig. 3) were obtained for simulation. For each of the simulated injector-venturi
assemblies 5, the length of the venturi pipe 7 (Fig. 3) was set at L = 81.74 mm, and
the height H of the known comparative reference injector nozzle 6 (Fig. 5 a)) was
set at H = 12.26 mm.
[0077] A first injector-venturi assembly (not shown) was created by replacing, in the injector-venturi
assembly 5 (Fig. 3), the known injector nozzle 6 (Fig. 3, 5a)) with the injector nozzle
6 (Fig. 5 b)) of the first working example.
[0078] A second injector-venturi assembly (not shown) was created by replacing, in the injector-venturi
assembly 5 (Fig. 3), the known injector nozzle 6 (Fig. 3, 5a)) with the injector nozzle
6 (Fig. 5 c)) of the second working example.
[0079] A third injector-venturi assembly (not shown) was created by replacing, in the injector-venturi
assembly 5 (Fig. 3), the known injector nozzle 6 (Fig. 3, 5a)) with the injector nozzle
6 (Fig. 5 d)) of the third working example. It is noted that the injector nozzle 6
of Fig. 5 d) is shorter than the known injector nozzle 6 of Fig. 5 a). Therefore,
in the injector-venturi assembly 5 of Fig. 3, the injector nozzle 6 of Fig. 5 d) was
arranged such that its gas inlet 15 is at the same position as the gas inlet 15 of
the injector nozzle 6 of Figs 3, 5a) that it replaces. That is, in addition to the
radial gap 10 shown in Fig. 3, in the present working example, there is also a longitudinal
gap of 1/3 H in the longitudinal direction between the venturi pipe 7 of Fig. 3 and
the injector nozzle 6 of Fig. 5 d).
[0080] A fourth injector-venturi assembly (not shown) was created by replacing, in the third
injector-venturi assembly, the injector nozzle 6 (Fig. 5 d)) of the third working
example with the injector nozzle 6 (Fig. 5 e)) of the fourth working example. The
injector nozzle 6 of Fig. 5 e) is even shorter than the injector nozzle 6 of Fig.
5 d). Thus, the longitudinal gap between the venturi pipe 7 (Fig. 3) and the injector
nozzle of Fig. 5 d) is even larger in the fourth injector-venturi assembly and amounts
to 2/3 H.
[0081] Finally, a fifth injector-venturi assembly 5 was created by replacing, in the injector-venturi
assembly 5 (Fig. 3), the known injector nozzle 6 (Fig. 3, 5a)) with the injector nozzle
6 (Fig. 5 f)) of the fifth working example. A sectional view of the fifth injector-venturi
assembly is shown in Fig. 7. It is noted that the injector nozzle 6 of Fig. 5 f),
7 is longer than the known injector nozzle 6 of Fig. 5 a). Still, as shown in Fig.
7, the injector nozzle 6 in Fig. 7 is arranged such that its gas inlet 15 is at the
same position as the gas inlet 15 of the injector nozzle 6 of Fig. 3, 5a) that it
replaces. That is, the injector nozzle 6 of the sixth working example is introduced
into an inlet port 17 of the venturi pipe 7 such that a portion of the venturi pipe
7 including the inlet port 17 and a portion of the injector nozzle 6 including the
gas outlet 16 overlap. Thus, an overall length L+H of the fifth injector-venturi assembly
5 (Fig. 7) is unchanged and is the same as the overall length L+H of the known injector-venturi
assembly 5 (Fig. 3).
[0082] For each of the injector/venturi assemblies 5, a simulation was carried out based
on the assumption that fuel gas 31 is provided to the gas inlet 15 of the injector
nozzle 6 at a pressure of 20 mbar. The simulation results are shown in the following
table (II):
Table (II) - Simulation Results
|
mair/mfuel |
increase |
Em / L |
Comparative example |
9.31 |
reference case |
1.00 |
Fig. 3, Fig. 5 a) |
|
|
1st working example, |
9.49 |
2.00 % |
1.00 |
polynomial inner surface, Fig. 5 b) |
|
|
|
2nd working example, |
9.94 |
6.78 % |
1.00 |
polynomial inner+outer surfaces, Fig. 5 c) |
|
|
|
3rd working example |
9.86 |
5.89 % |
1.05 |
shortened length h=2/3 H, Fig. 5 d) |
|
|
(Em = L + 1/3 H) |
4th working example |
9.54 |
2.53 % |
1.10 |
shortened length h=1/3 H, Fig. 5 e) |
|
|
(Em = L + 2/3 H) |
5th working example, |
10.05 |
8.00 % |
0.95 |
large length h=4/3 H, overlap with venturi, Fig. 7, 5f) |
|
|
(Em = L - 1/3 H) |
[0083] Table II shows, for each of the working examples:
- i. The entrainment ratio mair/mfuel, wherein mair is the mass flow rate of the primary air stream and mfuel is the mass flow rate of the fuel gas stream.
- ii. The increase in the entrainment ratio versus the reference case of the comparative
example.
- iii. The ratio of effective mixing distance Em to the total length L of the venturi pipe 7. The effective mixing distance Em (Fig. 7) is the distance between the gas outlet 16 of the injector nozzle 6 and the
outlet port 19 of the venturi pipe 7, i.e., a distance within which mixing of fuel
gas and primary air is possible.
[0084] As can be seen in table (II), for each of the first to fifth working examples, the
entrainment ratio is improved over the entrainment ratio of the comparative example.
That is, an increased amount of primary air 11 (Fig. 2) may be entrained in the fuel
gas stream 21 (Fig. 4), combustion may be improved and emissions of pollutant and
greenhouse gases may be reduced.
[0085] What is particular noteworthy is that, in working example 5, the injector nozzle
6 (Fig. 5 f), 7) is longer than the injector nozzle 6 (Fig. 3, 5a)) of the comparative
example and is partly inserted into the venturi pipe 7. This causes the effective
mixing distance E
m to be shorter than the total length L of the venturi pipe 7 (Fig. 7). Yet still,
working example 5 achieves the best overall improvement of the entrainment ratio.
[0086] In other words, according to embodiments of the proposed solution, through use of
a polynomial shaped injector nozzle 6, a primary air/fuel gas entrainment rate may
be improved. Further improvements of the entrainment rate may be achieved by either
shortening the polynomial shaped injector nozzle 6 and leaving a longitudinal gap
between the injector nozzle 6 and the venturi pipe 7. Conversely, further improvements
may also be achieved by using a longer polynomial shaped injector nozzle 6 that is
partly introduced into the venturi pipe 7. In each of these embodiments, the entrainment
rate may be improved while keeping an overall length L+H of the injector-venturi assembly
5 (Fig. 3, 7) constant. That is, a space requirement under a top sheet (2 in Fig.
1) of a gas hob 1 is kept constant.
[0087] It is likewise contemplated that the injector nozzle 6 of Fig. 5 f) may be inserted
yet further into the venturi pipe 7, or that one of the shortened injector nozzle
6 of Fig. 5d) or Fig 5e) may be arranged such that a smaller longitudinal gap or no
longitudinal gap is present between the venturi pipe 7 (Fig. 3, 7) and the injector
nozzle 6. In each of these contemplated embodiments, an overall length L+H of the
injector-venturi assembly 5 (Fig. 7) may be reduced, thereby reducing a space requirement
under the top sheet (2 in Fig. 1) of the domestic cooking appliance, while still an
entrainment rate that is higher or at least the same as the entrainment rate achieved
in the comparative example.
[0088] Fig. 8 shows a sectional view, and Fig. 9 shows a perspective view, of a further
injector nozzle 6 of a further embodiment. The injector nozzle 6 of the present embodiment
has a polynomial shaped outer surface 24 and a polynomial shaped inner surface 23,
similar to the second to fifth working examples discussed above.
[0089] In the injector nozzle 6 of Fig. 8, at or near the gas inlet 15, the circumferential
wall 17 of the injector nozzle 6 protrudes in a radial direction so as to form a circumferential
flange portion 26. The flange portion 26 is adapted to be flush with an outer face
30 of a gas supply pipe 27. The gas supply pipe 27 has an outer thread 28. A threaded
nut 29 having an inner thread (not shown) is placed over the injector nozzle 6 and
is screwed onto the outer thread 28 of the gas supply pipe 27 so as to fix the injector
nozzle 6 to the gas supply pipe 27.
[0090] By having the flange portion 26, the injector nozzle 6 of the present embodiment
may be easily fixed to a gas supply pipe 27 below a top sheet 2 (Fig. 1) of a domestic
cooking appliance by means of screwing the threaded nut 29 over the injector nozzle
6 and onto the outer thread 28 of the gas supply pipe 27.
[0091] Although the present invention has been described in accordance with preferred embodiments,
it is obvious for the person skilled in the art that modifications are possible in
all embodiments.
[0092] The numbers and dimensions discussed in connection with the working examples are
mere examples and the present invention is not limited to these precise dimensions.
For example, the inflection point does not need to be located precisely at a height
of 0.6 H, but may also be located at a different suitable longitudinal location, preferably
within a range of 0.5 H to 0.8 H.
[0093] The injector nozzles 6 and injector-venturi assemblies 5 shown and described above
may be suitably implemented as forming part of a gas burner 3 (Fig. 2) of a gas hob
1 (Fig. 1). A domestic cooking appliance may be, for example, a gas hob 1, and may
comprise a number of gas burners 3 each comprising an injector-venturi assembly 5
or an injector nozzle 6 according to one of the embodiments as discussed in connection
with Figures 5 to 9.
Reference Numerals:
[0094]
- 1
- gas hob
- 2
- top sheet
- 3
- gas burner
- 4
- pan support structure
- 5
- injector-venturi assembly
- 6
- injector nozzle
- 7
- venturi pipe
- 8
- spreader
- 9
- cap
- 10
- gap
- 11
- primary air
- 12
- channel
- 13
- gas port
- 14
- flame
- 15
- gas inlet
- 16
- gas outlet
- 17
- circumferential wall
- 18
- inlet port
- 19
- outlet port
- 20
- circumferential wall
- 21
- fuel gas stream
- 22
- primary air stream
- 23
- inner surface
- 24
- outer surface
- 25
- polynomial function
- 26
- flange portion
- 27
- gas pipe
- 28
- outer thread
- 29
- threaded nut
- 30
- outer face
- 31
- fuel gas
- 251-255
- respective polynomial function of the first to fifth working example
- A
- longitudinal axis
- d/2
- inner half diameter
- D/2
- outer half diameter
- Em
- effective mixing distance
- H
- height of known injector nozzle of comparative example
- L
- length of venturi pipe
1. A gas burner (3) for a gas hob (1), the gas burner (3) comprising a mixing element
(7) for mixing a fuel gas (31) with primary air (11) and an injector nozzle (6) adapted
to inject a stream (21) of the fuel gas (31) into the mixing element (7) such that
a stream (22) of the primary air (11) is entrained in the stream (21) of the fuel
gas (31), the injector nozzle (6) comprising a gas outlet (16) having a first inner
diameter, a gas inlet (15) having a second inner diameter larger than the first inner
diameter, and a circumferential wall (17) extending along a longitudinal axis (A)
of the injector nozzle (6) from the gas inlet (15) to the gas outlet (16) and circumferentially
around the longitudinal axis (A), wherein, in a radial cross section of the circumferential
wall (17), an inner diameter (d) of the circumferential wall (17) varies along the
longitudinal axis (A) in accordance with a polynomial function (25) of a distance
(x) between the gas inlet (15) and the radial cross section measured along the longitudinal
axis (A).
2. The gas burner of claim 1, wherein the polynomial function (25) is a sixth-order polynomial
function.
3. The gas burner of one of claim 1 or 2, wherein the polynomial function (25) is defined
such that a first derivative of the polynomial function (25) at the gas inlet (15)
and a first derivative of the polynomial function (25) at the gas outlet (16) are
zero.
4. The gas burner of one of claims 1 - 3, wherein the polynomial function (25) is defined
to have exactly one inflexion point between the gas inlet (15) and the gas outlet
(16).
5. The gas burner of one of claims 1 - 4, wherein the inflexion point is located at a
distance (x) between 0.5 and 0.8 of a distance (h) between the gas inlet (15) and
the gas outlet (16) measured along the longitudinal axis (A).
6. The gas burner of one of claims 1 - 5, wherein, in the radial cross section of the
circumferential wall (17), an outer diameter (D) of the circumferential wall (17)
varies along the longitudinal axis (A) in accordance with a further polynomial function
of a distance (x) between the gas inlet (15) and the radial cross section measured
along the longitudinal axis (A).
7. The gas burner of claim 6, wherein the further polynomial function is a sixth-order
polynomial function.
8. The gas burner of claim 6 or 7, wherein the further polynomial function is defined
such that a thickness of the circumferential wall (17) is constant along the longitudinal
axis (A) between the gas inlet (15) and the gas outlet (16).
9. The gas burner of one of claims 1 - 8, wherein the mixing element comprises a venturi
pipe (7), the injector nozzle (5) is adapted to inject the stream (21) of the fuel
gas (31) into an inlet port (18) of the venturi pipe (7), and a gap (10) for entry
of the primary air (11) is formed between the gas outlet (16) of the injector nozzle
(6) and the inlet port (18) of the venturi pipe (7).
10. The gas burner of claim 9, wherein the injector nozzle (6) is introduced, at least
in part, into the inlet port (18) of the venturi pipe (7) such that a portion of the
venturi pipe (7) including the inlet port (18) and a portion of the injector nozzle
(6) including the gas outlet (16) overlap.
11. The gas burner of one of claims 1 - 10, wherein, at the gas inlet (15), the circumferential
wall (17) of the injector nozzle (6) protrudes in a radial direction so as to form
a circumferential flange portion (26) for fixation of the injector nozzle (6).
12. The gas burner of claim 11, wherein a threaded nut (29) is placed over the injector
nozzle (6) and screwed onto an outer thread (28) of a gas supply pipe (27) so as to
fix the circumferential flange portion (26) against the gas supply pipe (27).
13. A gas hob (1) comprising at least one gas burner (3) according to any of claims 1
to 12.