[Technical Field]
[0001] The present disclosure relates to an austenitic steel material, used for steels in
the fields of mining, transportation, storage, and the like, in the oil and gas industries,
as steels for industrial machinery, structural materials and slurry pipes, and as
sour-resistant steel and the like, and a method of manufacturing the same, and more
particularly, to an austenitic steel material having excellent internal quality and
wear resistance, and a method of manufacturing the same.
[Background Art]
[0002] Austenitic steels are used for a variety of applications due to their excellent work
hardenability, low-temperature toughness, and non-magnetic properties. In detail,
as carbon steel composed of ferrite or martensite as a main structure, which has been
mainly used, has limitations in its properties, the austenitic steel application has
recently been increasing as a substitute for overcoming the disadvantages.
[0003] In particular, according to the growth of the mining industry, oil and gas industries,
wear of steel used in mining, transportation, refining and storage processes has emerged
as a major problem. Furthermore, as the development of oil sands as fossil fuels to
replace petroleum has recently started, wear of steel by slurry containing oil, rock,
gravel, sand, and the like, is pointed out as an important cause of increasing production
costs. Accordingly, demand for the development and application of steel materials
having excellent wear resistance is greatly increasing.
[0004] In the existing parts industry for the mining and machinery industry, Hadfield steel
having excellent wear resistance have been mainly used. To increase the wear resistance
of steel materials, efforts to generate the austenite structure by including a high
content of carbon and a large amount of manganese to increase wear resistance have
been made steadily. However, in the case of Hadfield steel, a high carbon content
sharply degrades the properties of steel, especially ductility, by forming network-type
carbide at high temperature along the austenite grain boundary.
[0005] To suppress the precipitation of carbides in the form of a network, a method of manufacturing
a high-manganese steel has been proposed by performing a solution heat treatment at
a high temperature or quenching to room temperature after hot working. However, it
may be difficult to suppress the precipitation of carbides in the form of this network
when the change in manufacturing conditions is not easy, such as when the thickness
of the steel material is thick or when welding is essential, and thus, it causes a
problem that the mechanical properties of the steel material deteriorate rapidly.
[0006] In addition, ingots or steel slabs of high-manganese steel inevitably cause segregation
by impurity elements such as P, S and the like in addition to alloying elements such
as manganese and carbon during solidification. Eventually, coarse carbide is formed
along the deep segregation zone in the final product, which eventually causes non-uniformity
of the microstructure and deterioration of properties.
[0007] In addition, it may result in generating a central portion crack due to heat or stress
generated during processing.
[0008] To improve wear resistance, it is essential to increase the carbon content, and increasing
the manganese content to prevent deterioration of mechanical properties due to carbide
precipitation may be a general method, but this leads to an increase in the alloy
amount and manufacturing cost.
[0009] To solve this, studies on the addition of elements effective for suppressing carbide
formation, compared to manganese, are also required. In addition, research on brittleness
problems due to segregation, which is common in high-alloy products, is continuously
required.
(Prior Art Document)
[0010] (Patent Document 1) Korean Patent Application Publication No.
2016-0077558
[Disclosure]
[Technical Problem]
[0011] An aspect of the present disclosure is to provide a steel material having excellent
internal quality and wear resistance as well as excellent strength, elongation and
impact toughness.
[0012] Another aspect of the present disclosure is to provide a method of manufacturing
a steel material having excellent internal quality and wear resistance as well as
excellent strength, elongation and impact toughness.
[Technical Solution]
[0013] According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a steel material having excellent
wear resistance, includes, in weight percent, 0.55 to 1.4% of carbon (C), 12 to 23%
of manganese (Mn), 5% or less (excluding 0%) of chromium (Cr), 5% or less (excluding
0%) of copper (Cu), 0.5% or less (excluding 0%) of Al, 1.0% or less (excluding 0%)
of Si, 0.02% or less (including 0%) of S, 0.04% or less (including 0%) of phosphorus
(P), and a balance of Fe and unavoidable impurities, wherein the steel material includes,
in area%, 10% or less (including 0%) of carbide and balance austenite, as a microstructure.
[0014] The steel material may have a component segregation index (S) of 3.0 or less, represented
by relational expression 1.

where a component in the central portion indicates a component in a range of 50 µm
or less in upper and lower portions of a part in which a highest component is measured
in microstructure analysis at a position equal to half of a thickness of the rolled
material.
[0015] The steel material may have a yield strength of 350 MPa or more, a uniform elongation
of 20% or more, and an impact toughness of 40 J or more.
[0016] According to another aspect of the present disclosure, a method of manufacturing
a steel material having excellent wear resistance, includes:
preparing a molten steel containing, in weight percent, 0.55 to 1.4% of carbon (C),
12 to 23% of manganese (Mn), 5% or less (excluding 0%) of chromium (Cr), 5% or less
(excluding 0%) of copper (Cu), 0.5% or less (excluding 0%) of Al, 1.0% or less (excluding
0%) of Si, 0.02% or less (including 0%) of S, 0.04% or less (including 0%) of phosphorus
(P), and a balance of Fe and unavoidable impurities;
continuous casting operating of obtaining a slab by continuously casting the molten
steel under conditions of a molten steel temperature (Tc) satisfying the following relational expression 2 and a casting speed (V) satisfying
the following relational expression 3,

where in relational expression 2, a K value represents a value determined by the
following relational expression 4,

where in relational expression 3, a K value represents a value determined by the
following relational expression 4,

where [C], [Mn] and [P] each indicate a content (weight%) of an element;
reheating the slab at a reheating temperature (TR) or lower obtained by the following relational expression 5,

where TR indicates a reheating temperature (°C), and [C] and [Mn] each indicate a content
(weight%) of an element;
hot rolling the slab reheated in the reheating to a finish rolling temperature of
850 to 1050°C to obtain a hot rolled steel; and
cooling the hot rolled steel to 600°C or less at 5°C/sec or more.
[Advantageous Effects]
[0017] According to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, a steel material
may have excellent wear resistance, and may thus be applied to fields requiring wear
resistance, across the mining, transportation, storage or industrial machinery fields
in the oil and gas industries in which a relatively large amount of wear occurs. In
detail, since internal defects that may occur during the production process, may be
significantly reduced, the steel material may be expandably applied to fields requiring
relatively high internal quality.
[Description of Drawings]
[0018] FIG. 1 is an image illustrating a defect in a central portion of a steel sheet thickness
of comparative steel 4.
[Best Mode for Invention]
[0019] The present inventors have studied steels having superior strength and wear resistance,
as compared to existing steels used in technical fields in which wear resistance is
required, and have recognized that, in the case of high manganese steels, excellent
strength and elongation, unique to austenitic steels, may be secured, and furthermore,
excellent wear resistance may be secured as the hardness of the material may be increased
due to work hardening of the material itself in an abrasive environment when improving
a work hardening rate, thereby completing the present disclosure.
[0020] An exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure provides an austenitic steel material
having excellent strength as well as superior strength and elongation characteristics
unique to austenite-based steel materials, as the hardness of the material was increased
due to work hardening of the material itself in an abrasive environment.
[0021] Furthermore, in an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, casting conditions
and reheating conditions may be relatively optimized to provide an improved austenitic
wear-resistant steel material having improved internal quality (central portion quality)
and a method of manufacturing the same, by controlling the embrittlement of the core
due to impurities such as P or the like, and large amounts of carbon and manganese,
which are problems with existing austenitic wear-resistant steels.
[0022] Hereinafter, a steel material having excellent wear resistance according to an exemplary
embodiment of the present disclosure will be described.
[0023] A steel material having excellent wear resistance according to an exemplary embodiment
of the present disclosure includes, in weight percent, 0.55 to 1.4% of carbon (C),
12 to 23% of manganese (Mn), 5% or less (excluding 0%) of chromium (Cr), 5% or less
(excluding 0%) of copper (Cu), 0.5% or less (excluding 0%) of Al, 1.0% or less (excluding
0%) of Si, 0.02% or less (including 0%) of S, 0.04% or less (including 0%) of phosphorus
(P), and a balance of Fe and unavoidable impurities. The steel material includes 10
area% or less (including 0%) of carbide and balance austenite, as a microstructure.
[0024] Hereinafter, components and component ranges will be described.
C: 0.55 to 1.4% by weight (hereinafter, also referred to as "%")
[0025] Carbon (C) is an austenite stabilizing element, which not only serves to improve
the uniform elongation, but also is a significantly advantageous element for improving
strength and increasing a work hardening rate. If the carbon content is less than
0.55%, it may be difficult to form stable austenite at room temperature, and there
is a problem that it may be difficult to secure sufficient strength and work hardening
rate. On the other hand, if the content exceeds 1.4%, a large amount of carbide is
precipitated to reduce the uniform elongation, and thus, it may be difficult to secure
excellent elongation, causing wear resistance deterioration and premature fracture.
[0026] Therefore, the content of C may be preferably limited to 0.55 to 1.4%, and in detail,
limited to 0.8 to 1.3%.
Mn: 12 to 23%
[0027] Manganese (Mn) is a significantly important element that plays a role in stabilizing
austenite and improves uniform elongation. To obtain austenite as a main structure
in an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, it may be preferable that Mn
is included in 12% or more.
[0028] If the Mn content is lower than 12%, the austenite stability may decrease, and thus,
a martensite structure may be formed. Therefore, if the austenite structure is not
sufficiently secured, it may be difficult to secure a sufficient uniform elongation.
On the other hand, if the Mn content exceeds 23%, not only does the manufacturing
cost increase, but also there are problems such as corrosion resistance deterioration
due to manganese addition, difficulty in a manufacturing process, and the like.
[0029] Therefore, the Mn content may be preferably limited to 12 to 23%, and in detail,
15 to 21%.
Cr: 5% or less (excluding 0%)
[0030] Chromium (Cr) stabilizes austenite up to a range of an appropriate addition amount,
thereby improving impact toughness at low temperatures, and is solidified in austenite
to increase the strength of steel. In addition, chromium is also an element that improves
the corrosion resistance of steel materials. However, if the content of Cr exceeds
5%, it may not be preferable because excessively formed carbides at the austenite
grain boundary may significantly reduce toughness of steel. Also, in some cases, the
content may be limited to 3.5% or less.
Cu: 5% or less (excluding 0%)
[0031] Copper (Cu) has a significantly low solid solubility in carbide and has slow diffusion
in austenite, to be concentrated at an austenite and nucleated carbide interface,
thereby hindering diffusion of carbon, such that the growth of carbide effectively
slows. Therefore, eventually, there is an effect of suppressing generation of carbide.
However, if the content of Cu exceeds 5%, there is a problem of deteriorating hot
workability of the steel, and thus, it may be preferable to limit the upper limit
of the content to 5%.
Al: 0.5% or less (excluding 0%), Si: 1.0% or less (excluding 0%)
[0032] Aluminum (Al) and silicon (Si) are components added as a deoxidizer during the steelmaking
process, and the upper limit of the aluminum (Al) content is limited to 0.5%, and
the upper limit of the silicon (Si) content may be preferably limited to 1.0%..
S: 0.02% or less (including 0%)
[0033] S is an impurity and may be preferably suppressed as much as possible, and the upper
limit thereof may be preferably managed to be 0.02%.
P: 0.04% or less (including 0%)
[0034] In general, P is well known as an element that causes hot brittleness by segregation
at the grain boundary. In detail, high alloy steels containing a large amount of C
and Mn, such as in the steel according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure,
may cause serious brittleness for slabs and products in a case in which P segregation
is added. Moreover, if P exceeds a certain content, the segregation degree rises rapidly,
and thus, it may be preferable to limit the content to 0.04% or less.
[0035] In addition, the balance of Fe and unavoidable impurities are included. However,
in the normal manufacturing process, impurities not intended, from the raw material
or the surrounding environment, may be inevitably mixed, and therefore may not be
excluded. These impurities are known to anyone skilled in the art and thus, are not
specifically mentioned in this specification. In addition, addition of effective ingredients,
in addition to the above composition, is not excluded.
[0036] A steel material having excellent wear resistance according to an exemplary embodiment
of the present disclosure includes, in area%, 10% or less (including 0%) of carbide
and residual austenite, as a microstructure.
[0037] If the fraction of the carbide exceeds 10% by area, rapid impact toughness deterioration
may be caused. The austenite improves ductility and toughness.
[0038] The steel material may preferably have a component segregation index (S) of 3.0 or
less.

(where a component in the central portion indicates a component in a range of 50
µm or less in upper and lower portions of a part in which a highest component is measured
in microstructure analysis at a position equal to half of a thickness of the rolled
material).
[0039] If the component segregation index (S) represented by relational expression 1 exceeds
3.0, the probability of occurrence of cracks along the segregation zone at a position
of 1/2t (t: a steel thickness) during processing, for example, during cutting, may
increase rapidly.
[0040] The steel material may have a yield strength of 350 MPa or more, a uniform elongation
of 20% or more, and an impact toughness of 40 J or more.
[0041] Hereinafter, a method of manufacturing a steel material having excellent wear resistance
according to another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure will be described
in detail.
[0042] A method of manufacturing a steel material having excellent wear resistance according
to another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, includes:
preparing a molten steel containing, in weight percent, 0.55 to 1.4% of carbon (C),
12 to 23% of manganese (Mn), 5% or less (excluding 0%) of chromium (Cr), 5% or less
(excluding 0%) of copper (Cu), 0.5% or less (excluding 0%) of Al, 1.0% or less (excluding
0%) of Si, 0.02% or less (including 0%) of S, 0.04% or less (including 0%) of phosphorus
(P), and a balance of Fe and unavoidable impurities;
continuous casting operating of obtaining a slab by continuously casting the molten
steel under conditions of a molten steel temperature (Tc) satisfying the following relational expression 2 and a casting speed (V) satisfying
the following relational expression 3,

where in relational expression 2, a K value represents a value determined by the
following relational expression 4,

where in relational expression 3, a K value represents a value determined by the
following relational expression 4,

where [C], [Mn] and [P] each indicate a content (weight%) of an element;
reheating the slab at a reheating temperature (TR) or lower obtained by the following relational expression 5,

where TR indicates a reheating temperature (°C), and [C] and [Mn] each indicate a content
(weight%) of an element;
hot rolling the slab reheated in the reheating to a finish rolling temperature of
850 to 1050°C to obtain a hot rolled steel; and
cooling the hot rolled steel to 600°C or less at 5°C/sec or more.
Continuous casting
[0043] A steel slab is obtained by continuously casting the molten steel formed as described
above under the conditions of a molten steel temperature (T
c) satisfying the following relational expression 2 and of a casting speed (V) satisfying
the following relational expression 3.

[0044] (In relational expression 2, a K value represents a value determined by the following
relational expression 4.)

[0045] (In relational expression 3, a K value represents a value determined by the following
relational expression 4.)

(where [C], [Mn] and [P] each indicate a content (weight%) of an element.)
[0046] In an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, to suppress excessive segregation
in the slab structure, which may easily occur in high-carbon high-manganese wear-resistant
steel, the casting conditions depending on the component changes, as in relational
expressions 2 to 4, are derived. Therefore, internal quality (core quality) defects
frequently occurring in the final steel may be suppressed.
[0047] If the slab is not manufactured under the above casting conditions, an excessive
segregation zone may be formed in the slab, resulting in slab brittleness, and the
excessive segregation zone may remain even after reheating and rolling, leading to
quality defects.
Slab Reheating
[0048] The slab obtained by continuous casting as above is reheated.
[0049] It may be preferable that the slab reheating is performed at the reheating temperature
(T
R) or lower obtained by the following relational expression 5.

[0050] [T
R indicates a reheating temperature (°C), and [C] and [Mn] each indicate the content
(weight%) of the corresponding element]
[0051] In an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, to suppress the embrittlement
of the central portion due to partial melting of a segregation zone during reheating,
which may easily occur in high-carbon high-manganese wear-resistant steel, the conditions
for limiting the reheating temperature depending on the component change as in relational
expression 5 above is derived. Therefore, internal quality (core quality) defects
frequently occurring in the final steel may be suppressed.
[0052] If the slab reheating temperature exceeds the T
R temperature, partial melting may occur in the segregation zone in the slab, and the
resulting embrittlement of the core affects a product, causing a component segregation
index of the rolled material to exceed 3.0 to cause defects in the core.
obtaining a hot rolled steel
[0053] Hot rolled steel is obtained by hot rolling the reheated slab as described above
to a finish rolling temperature of 850 to 1050°C.
[0054] If the finish rolling temperature is less than 850°C, carbides may precipitate so
that uniform elongation may decrease, and microstructures may become pancakes, resulting
in uneven elongation due to anisotropy of the structure. If the finish rolling temperature
exceeds 1050°C, grain growth may be active, which may easily cause coarsening of the
grain, resulting in a decrease in strength.
Cooling hot rolled steel
[0055] The hot-rolled steel is cooled to 600°C or less at 5°C/sec or more.
[0056] If the cooling rate is less than 5°C/sec, or if the cooling stop temperature exceeds
600°C, carbides may be precipitated, resulting in a problem that the elongation decreases
. The rapid cooling process helps ensure high solid-solubility of C and N elements
in the matrix. Therefore, the cooling may be preferably carried out to 600°C or less
at 5°C/sec or more. The cooling rate may be, in detail, 10°C/sec or more, and in more
detail, 15°C/sec or more.
[0057] The upper limit of the cooling rate is not particularly limited, and may be limited
in consideration of the cooling capability of the equipment. The hot rolled steel
may also be cooled to room temperature.
[0058] In a method of manufacturing a steel material having excellent wear resistance according
to another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, for example, a steel material
having a yield strength of 350 MPa or more, a uniform elongation of 20% or more, and
an impact toughness of 40 J or more may be manufactured.
[Mode for Invention]
[0059] Hereinafter, an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure will be described
in more detail through examples. However, it should be noted that the embodiments
described below are only intended to exemplify the present disclosure and are not
intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure. This is because the scope of
the present disclosure is determined by the items described in the claims and items
able to be reasonably inferred therefrom.
(Example)
[0060] Slabs were prepared by continuously casting molten steel satisfying the components
and component ranges illustrated in Table 1 under the conditions in Table 2, and then,
hot-rolled steels were prepared by reheating, hot rolling and cooling the slabs under
the conditions in Table 3.
[0061] The microstructure, component segregation index, cut-crack incidence rate (%), wear
resistance (g), yield strength (MPa), and uniform elongation (%) of the hot-rolled
steel prepared as described above were measured, and the results are illustrated in
Table 4 below. In this case, the wear resistance is evaluated by measuring the reduced
weight after contacting the specimen to a rotating roll while spraying a predetermined
amount of sand with a sand abrasion test according to the ASTM 65 test method.
[0062] In addition, the -29°C impact toughness (impact energy (J)) for the hot-rolled steel
was measured, and the results are illustrated in Table 4 below.
[0063] On the other hand, for comparative steel 4, to observe the occurrence of defects
in a central portion of a thickness of the steel sheet, an image was observed, and
the result is illustrated in FIG. 1.
[Table 1]
| Steel Grade |
Steel Composition (weight%) |
| c |
Mn |
P |
Cr |
Cu |
Al |
Si |
S |
| Inventive Steel 1 |
0.58 |
22.1 |
0.031 |
4.3 |
2.1 |
0.035 |
0.43 |
0.006 |
| Inventive Steel 2 |
0.65 |
16.6 |
0.022 |
3.4 |
3.9 |
0.078 |
0.017 |
0.011 |
| Inventive Steel 3 |
0.83 |
14.9 |
0.019 |
1.2 |
0.33 |
0.044 |
0.21 |
0.007 |
| Inventive Steel 4 |
1.11 |
18.4 |
0.015 |
2.1 |
0.06 |
0.121 |
0.015 |
0.005 |
| Inventive Steel 5 |
1.32 |
12.6 |
0.011 |
0.08 |
1.2 |
0.264 |
0.085 |
0.012 |
| Comparative Steel 1 |
0.36 |
16.1 |
0.018 |
3.1 |
0.02 |
0.055 |
0.07 |
0.01 |
| Comparative Steel 2 |
1.44 |
17.2 |
0.012 |
2.3 |
0.3 |
0.049 |
0.12 |
0.007 |
| Comparative Steel3 |
0.59 |
11.6 |
0.015 |
0.8 |
1.2 |
0.078 |
0.15 |
0.005 |
| Comparative Steel4 |
1.17 |
17.1 |
0.045 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.043 |
0.11 |
0.008 |
| Comparative Steel5 |
1.21 |
18.9 |
0.016 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.039 |
0.21 |
0.007 |
| Comparative Steel6 |
0.98 |
15.8 |
0.015 |
3.3 |
2.3 |
0.046 |
0.098 |
0.004 |
| Comparative Steel7 |
0.89 |
18.3 |
0.015 |
2.1 |
1.3 |
0.039 |
0.046 |
0.006 |
| Comparative Steel8 |
1.09 |
21.3 |
0.022 |
0.01 |
1.2 |
0.063 |
0.15 |
0.011 |
| Comparative Steel9 |
0.99 |
17.8 |
0.018 |
0.05 |
0.044 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
0.009 |
[Table 2]
| Steel Grade |
Continuous Casting Condition |
| Temperature of molten steel in Relational Expression 2 (Tc) (°C ) |
Casting speed in Relational Expression 3 (V) (m/min) |
Actual Molten Steel Temperature (°C ) |
Actual Casting Speed (m/min) |
| Inventive Steel 1 |
1425 |
0.2 |
1434 |
0.5 |
| Inventive Steel 2 |
1447 |
0.3 |
1459 |
0.4 |
| Inventive Steel3 |
1445 |
0.6 |
1467 |
1 |
| Inventive Steel4 |
1415 |
0.5 |
1433 |
1 |
| Inventive Steel8 |
1430 |
0.8 |
1462 |
0.9 |
| Comparative Steel 1 |
1465 |
0.5 |
1486 |
0.7 |
| Comparative Steel 2 |
1403 |
0.8 |
1435 |
1 |
| Comparative Steel 3 |
1473 |
1.1 |
1517 |
1.2 |
| Comparative Steel 4 |
1416 |
0.2 |
1425 |
0.5 |
| Comparative Steel 5 |
1407 |
1.0 |
1446 |
1.2 |
| Comparative Steel 6 |
1433 |
1.4 |
1489 |
1.5 |
| Comparative Steel 7 |
1427 |
0.8 |
1460 |
1 |
| Comparative Steel 8 |
1402 |
0.7 |
1431 |
1 |
| Comparative Steel 9 |
1424 |
0.7 |
1453 |
0.2 |
In Table 2, the casting speed V is V (m/min) = 0.025 [T
c-K].
[Table 3]
| Steel Grade |
Reheating, hot rolling and cooling conditions |
| Reheating temperature in Relational Expression 5 (TR)(°C) |
Reheating Temperature (°C) |
Finish Rolling Temperature (°C) |
Cooling Rate (°C/sec) |
Cooling Stop Temperature (°C) |
| Inventive Steel 1 |
1245 |
1212 |
870 |
11 |
510 |
| Inventive Steel 2 |
1262 |
1205 |
875 |
25 |
390 |
| Inventive Steel 3 |
1241 |
1185 |
903 |
19 |
320 |
| Inventive Steel 4 |
1181 |
1170 |
980 |
61 |
250 |
| Inventive Steel 5 |
1174 |
1162 |
990 |
41 |
270 |
| Comparative Steel 1 |
1314 |
1220 |
1020 |
21 |
560 |
| Comparative Steel 2 |
1133 |
1130 |
905 |
19 |
440 |
| Comparative Steel 3 |
1297 |
1196 |
898 |
28 |
280 |
| Comparative Steel 4 |
1164 |
1152 |
885 |
30 |
370 |
| Comparative Steel 5 |
1162 |
1187 |
913 |
29 |
380 |
| Comparative Steel 6 |
1214 |
1195 |
829 |
25 |
385 |
| Comparative Steel 7 |
1218 |
1207 |
908 |
3 |
420 |
| Comparative Steel 8 |
1168 |
1179 |
950 |
16 |
690 |
| Comparative Steel 9 |
1202 |
1156 |
945 |
22 |
420 |
[Table 4]
| Classification |
Microstructure |
Component Segregation Index 1) |
Cutting crack incidence rate (%)2) |
Wear Resistance (g) |
Yield Strength (MPa) |
Uniform Elongation (%) |
Impact Toughness (-29°C)(J) |
| Inventive Steel1 |
γ + Carbide 10% or less |
2.85 |
0 |
1.88 |
363 |
51 |
193 |
| Inventive Steel2 |
γ +Carbide 10% or less |
2.58 |
0 |
1.74 |
451 |
53 |
233 |
| Inventive Steel3 |
γ +Carbide 10% or less |
2.51 |
0 |
1.54 |
412 |
60 |
265 |
| Inventive Steel1 |
γ + Carbide 10% or less |
2.45 |
0 |
1.43 |
499 |
53 |
217 |
| Inventive Steel8 |
γ + Carbide 10% or less |
2.27 |
0 |
1.41 |
522 |
49 |
122 |
| Comparative Steel1 |
γ + Carbide 10% or less |
2.45 |
0 |
2.69 |
270 |
49 |
99 |
| Comparative Steel 2 |
γ + Carbide 15.8% |
2.31 |
0 |
1.56 |
581 |
18 |
33 |
| Comparative Steel3 |
γ+a |
- |
12 |
2.98 |
378 |
36 |
20 |
| Comparative Steel4 |
γ + Carbide 10% or less |
3.56 |
83 |
- |
505 |
22 |
60 |
| Comparative Steel8 |
γ + Carbide 10% or less |
3.59 |
68 |
- |
514 |
27 |
69 |
| Comparative Steel6 |
γ + Carbide 12.1% |
2.39 |
0 |
2.11 |
418 |
28 |
33 |
| Comparative Steel7 |
γ +Carbide 13.2% |
2.31 |
0 |
2.17 |
432 |
25 |
29 |
| Comparative Steels |
γ +Carbide 14.2% |
2.55 |
0 |
2.31 |
519 |
33 |
35 |
| Comparative Steel9 |
γ + Carbide 10% or less |
3.9 |
85 |
- |
508 |
29 |
55 |

[0064] * Component in the central portion: refers to a component in a range of 50 µm or
less in upper and lower portions of a part in which a highest component is measured
in microstructure analysis at a position equal to half of a thickness of the rolled
material.

[0065] As illustrated in Tables 1 to 4, in the case of inventive steels 1 to 5 that satisfy
all of the steel composition and manufacturing conditions of the present disclosure,
it can be seen that not only excellent wear resistance, yield strength, impact toughness
and uniform elongation, but also the low cutting crack rate may be exhibited.
[0066] On the other hand, in the case of the comparative steels 1 to 9 that do not satisfy
the condition of at least one of the steel composition and manufacturing conditions
of the present disclosure, it can be seen that at least one property of wear resistance,
yield strength, impact toughness and uniform elongation is insufficient or the cutting
crack rate is high.
[0067] In the case of the comparative steel 4 having a central-portion component segregation
index of more than 3.0, it was found that the cracking incidence rate was high, and
as illustrated in FIG. 1, a defect in the central portion of the steel thickness was
generated. It can be seen that the crack occurred in the central portion most vulnerable
to thermal stress generated during the cutting process, and the crack propagated along
the central portion.