TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present disclosure relates to the field of textile industry and chemistry, namely
textile dyeing and a process for fabric bleaching, products and uses thereof.
[0002] The present disclosure describes a process for fabric bleaching using a novel enzyme
blend combined with a specifically designed chemical system, which reduces the use
of caustic soda and hydrogen peroxide in the conventional oxidative bleaching process,
replacing the manipulation of these chemicals.
BACKGROUND
[0003] The Textile Industry (TI) is one of the biggest industries in the world with a current
worth of nearly 1.5 trillion USD. Nevertheless, it is also one of the world's top
polluting industries, partaking a heavy environmental impact in terms of resource
consumption, effluents contamination and textile elimination.
[0004] It has long been known that the TI processes are characterized, not only by the large
volume of water required, but also by the high temperatures and the variety of chemicals
used. There is a long sequence of wet processing stages requiring inputs of water,
chemical and energy, generating waste at each stage.
[0005] Water is a finite resource that is quickly becoming scarce and is used at every step
of the process both to convey the chemicals used during that step and to wash them
out before beginning the next step. The water becomes full of chemical additives and
is then expelled as wastewater; which in turn pollutes the environment. The liquid
effluents of the TI have usually a high Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Biochemical
Oxygen Demand (BOD), high conductivity and colouring.
[0006] Along with the direct contamination and consumption of water, this industry's processes
are usually carried out at high temperatures, also representing a very high energy
consumption level. Most energy used in the TI is still obtained from coal and fossil
fuels, meaning this energy use is an important source of greenhouse gases emission.
[0007] The minimization of the above-mentioned issues means all processing steps need to
be optimized in such a way that their environmental impact is reduced and they become
more sustainable, resulting in reduced effluents charge and energy and water consumption.
There are different variables that can be addressed for the optimization of textile
processes, such as process temperature, water requirement and chemical system used.
It is mandatory to find alternative processes that work at a lower temperature, require
less water or where harsh chemicals can be replaced for eco-friendly and more sustainable
and safe products.
[0008] Focusing on the particular case of cotton, it remains one of the more prominent textile
fibres and it has regained importance due to the heavy environmental impact of synthetic
fibres. Among the different steps of cotton pre-treatment (before dyeing) we can have
desizing, mercerizing, alkaline scouring and bleaching, some of them requiring severe
chemical treatment and the need to perform multiple washing steps between them.
[0009] Naturally occurring fibres, such as cotton, still contain colouring materials even
after scouring processes and the cause of this colour may be the naturally occurring
pigments present in the fibre structure. This colour can come from different contaminations
occurring during the processing of natural fibres like for example, oils and greases
coming from the processing equipment.
[0010] The bleaching process aims to eliminate all coloured contaminants that are on the
fibres, as well as the remaining of other contaminants that have resisted to previous
pre-treating processes (desizing, scouring, etc.) such as bark remnants of the cotton
plant.
[0011] Nowadays, the major process used for cotton whitening is the oxidative bleaching
with hydrogen peroxide.
[0012] Considering a typical oxidative bleaching process by exhaustion, it usually consists
in the steps depicted in figure 1.
[0013] The conventional bleaching of cotton gives an article with a white level adequate
to the subsequent dyeing steps and free of additional contaminants. Nevertheless,
it is important to have in mind that this step is performed at a very high temperature,
requiring a considerable amount of time and high energy to reach. It also includes
several water baths that represent a big water consumption, with the disposed water
becoming contaminated with harsh chemicals, such as NaOH.
[0014] This chemical is used in substantial quantities in the bleaching process and it is
an important contributor to the pollution load in bleaching effluents. A high concentration
of NaOH in water will result in toxic effects for the wildlife. Likewise, highly concentrated
solutions of NaOH (which is the case of the solutions used for textile bleaching)
are also corrosive and irritating to the skin, eyes and mucous membranes, increasing
the risk of harmful accidents among textile workers.
[0015] On the perspective of textile workers safety, it is also important noting that fifty-percent-concentration
hydrogen peroxide solutions can also represent major safety hazards, such as skin
burns; eye injuries; potential for rapid pressurization within tanks, pipes, pumps,
and/ or storage vessels, etc. Therefore, being able to replace the handling of this
chemical would also be advantageous.
[0016] There are other traditional bleaching processes that can be applied, nonetheless
they are even more damaging than the oxidative bleaching with hydrogen peroxide. Chlorine
is known to be extremely toxic to the environment and to consumers, while sodium hypochlorite
is very hazardous to human health due to the etching effect that may cause skin and
lungs damage. In its compound form, sodium hypochlorite is also very toxic to aquatic
organisms and bacteria.
[0017] The TI has been exploring the potential of enzymes for several years. Enzymes are
protein catalysts produced by living cells that catalyse specific reactions. The use
of enzymes in textile processes has gained increased interest due to the fact that
enzymes are non-toxic, biodegradable and environmentally friendly.
[0018] Many processes, such as desizing, scouring, anti-pilling, can be accomplished with
the help of these products. Nevertheless, an industrially viable enzyme has still
not been developed that is capable of directly bleaching cotton fabric. Also, it has
not been possible to include enzymes in the conventional bleaching processes as they
are usually not stable to the severe pH, temperature and oxidative conditions of these
processes.
[0019] Document
WO0200823386 relates to novel compositions for biobleaching coupled with stone washing of indigo
dyed denims comprising a blend of glucose oxidase, catalases and cellulases in the
ratio of 1.0:10.0:1.0 along with sugar base, peroxide source and optional adjuvants,
wherein the process is carried out at optimized conditions of neutral pH (6.5 - 7.0)
and a temperature of 55 °C.
[0020] Document
CN103266495 discloses a method for pre-treating a cotton-polyester blended fabric with a biological
enzyme. The method comprises the steps of scouring and bleaching, washing and drying
and is characterized in that the scouring and bleaching step comprises the sub-step
of adding the cotton-polyester blended fabric to a scouring and bleaching solution
to be scoured and bleached, wherein the mass ratio of the cotton-polyester blended
fabric to the scouring and bleaching solution is (1:10)-(1:20); the temperature is
controlled to be 50-60 °C; the treatment time is 30-90 minutes; and the scouring and
bleaching solution comprises the following components by weight percent: 2.5-3.5%
of compound biological enzyme, 5-10% of hydrogen peroxide, 1-2% of tetra acetyl ethylene
diamine, 0.1-0.3% of sodium cocoamphoacetate, 0.1-0.3% of ferrous sulfate and the
balance of water. The method has the advantages of desizing and bleaching in one bath,
mild treatment conditions, small damage to the fabric and short treatment time.
[0021] These facts are disclosed in order to illustrate the technical problem addressed
by the present disclosure.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
[0022] In order to optimize and minimize the environmental impact of one of the more universal
cotton processing steps, the oxidative bleaching, we have come up with an alternative
pre-treatment process that accomplishes fabric whitening using less water, less energy
and less harsh chemicals.
[0023] The process of the present disclosure is a simplified treatment that results in a
fabric that retains the characteristics of cotton and shows a better handle and hydrophilicity
and a cleaner and smoother surface than the conventionally bleached cotton.
[0024] It was developed a bleaching process to spare some resources and increase the quality
of the treated fabric, water and energy consumption.
[0025] Additionally, the process of the present disclosure decreases the chemical load used,
namely it eliminates the use of NaOH and includes more sustainable versions of the
auxiliary chemicals used.
[0026] The chemical intervenients were as follows:
Wetting agent - It is based on ethoxylated alcohols of natural origin. It does not
contain silicone and complies with GOTS 5.0:2017 standards.
Enzyme blend - It is a specific enzyme blend, specially developed for the process
of the present invention that allows to obtain a final article with good hydrophilicity
and a soft touch. It is a blend containing, at least 3, of the following enzymes:
alpha-amylase, endoglucanase, beta-amylase, pectate lyase, cellulase, lipase.
Peroxide donor - It is a solid compound that, boosted by a combination of products,
acts as a peroxide donor. The peroxide donor may be selected from the following list:
sodium percarbonate, sodium perborate or a mixture thereof.
Bleaching activator - It is a combination of salts that works as a specific activator
for bleaching at lower temperatures.
Sequestering and dispersing agent - It is a biodegradable sequestering and dispersing
agent, based on a mixture of hydrocarboxylic acids. It is free from APEOs and GOTS
5.0 :2017 approved.
Catalase - It is a commonly used enzyme for elimination of the residual hydrogen peroxide
after bleaching.
[0027] An aspect of the present disclosure relates to process for fabric bleaching comprising
the following steps:
preparing a water bath with a wetting agent and the fabric,
wherein the bath is warmed to a first temperature up to a maximum of 70 °C,
and the pH of the bath is at a maximum of pH 8;
adding an enzyme blend to the bath, wherein the enzyme blend comprises at least 3
of the following enzymes: alpha-amylase, beta-amylase, pectate lyase, cellulase, endoglucanase,
lipase;
maintaining the first temperature of the bath during the enzymatic reaction;
adding a peroxide donor and a bleaching activator to the bath;
warming the bath to a second temperature of a minimum of 75 °C for the peroxidation
reaction.
[0028] In an embodiment for better results, the process may further comprise the following
steps:
discharging the water bath;
removing chemical residues from the fabric.
[0029] In an embodiment for better results, the process may further comprise the following
steps:
submitting the fabric to a second bath at a minimum of 60 °C to improve the residue
removal;
discharging the bath water.
[0030] In an embodiment for better results, the process may further comprise the following
steps:
preparing a further water bath with a sequestering and dispersing agents, and the
fabric,
wherein the bath is warmed to a temperature up to a maximum of 60 °C,
and the pH of the bath is at a maximum of pH 8;
maintaining the first temperature of the bath during the reaction of the component.
[0031] In an embodiment for better results, the process may further comprise the following
steps:
adding a catalase solution to the third bath maintaining the first temperature of
the bath during the catalase reaction.
[0032] In an embodiment for better results, the first temperature of the bath is from 40
- 70 °C, preferably 60 °C.
[0033] In an embodiment for better results, the pH of the first bath is from pH 5.5- 8.
[0034] In an embodiment for better results, the duration of the enzymatic reaction is at
least 30 minutes, preferably from 30 minutes to 1 hour, more preferably 45 minutes.
[0035] In an embodiment for better results, the second temperature of the first bath is
from 75-90 °C, preferably 80 °C.
[0036] In an embodiment for better results, the duration of the peroxidation reaction is
at least 5 minutes, preferably from 5-20 minutes, more preferably 10 minutes.
[0037] In an embodiment for better results, the temperature of the second bath is from 60-90
°C, preferably 70 °C.
[0038] In an embodiment for better results, the duration of the washing is at least 5 minutes,
preferably from 5-20 minutes, more preferably 10 minutes.
[0039] In an embodiment for better results, the temperature of the third bath is from 25-60
°C, preferably 40 °C.
[0040] In an embodiment for better results, the duration of the washing with sequestering
and dispersing agent is at least 5 minutes, preferably from 5-15 minutes.
[0041] In an embodiment for better results, the duration of the catalase reaction is at
least 10 minutes, preferably from 10-30 minutes.
[0042] In an embodiment for better results, the blend of enzymes is:
alpha-amylase, endoglucanase, cellulase;
alpha-amylase, endoglucanase, pectate lyase;
alpha-amylase, endoglucanase, lipase;
endoglucanase, beta-amylase, pectate lyase;
endoglucanase, beta-amylase, cellulase;
endoglucanase, beta-amylase, lipase;
beta-amylase, pectate lyase, cellulase;
beta-amylase, pectate lyase, lipase;
beta-amylase, cellulase, lipase;
pectate lyase, cellulase, lipase.
[0043] In an embodiment for better results, the blend of enzymes further comprises oxidoreductase.
[0044] In an embodiment for better results, the liquor ratio between fabric: water is from
1:5 -1:40; preferably 1:10 -1:20.
[0045] In an embodiment for better results, the wetting agent concentration is from 0,5
- 5 % (wt/wt), preferably 1 - 2 %(wt/wt).
[0046] In an embodiment for better results, the enzyme blend concentration is from 0,5 -
5 % (wt/wt), preferably 1 - 2 %(wt/wt).
[0047] In an embodiment for better results, the peroxide donor concentration is from 5 -
50 g/l, preferably 10 - 15 g/l.
[0048] In an embodiment for better results, the bleaching activator concentration is from
0.5 - 5 g/l, preferably 1 - 3 g/l.
[0049] In an embodiment for better results, the sequestering and dispersing agent concentration
is from 0.5 - 3 g/l, preferably 0.5 -1 g/l.
[0050] In an embodiment for better results, the catalase concentration is from 0.2 - 2 g/l.
[0051] In an embodiment for better results, the peroxide donor is sodium percarbonate, sodium
perborate or a mixture thereof.
[0052] In an embodiment for better results, the wetting agent is ethoxylated isotridecanol.
[0053] In an embodiment for better results, the bleaching activator is a manganese salt
[0054] In an embodiment for better results, the sequestering and dispersing agent is 3-hydroxy-3-carboxy-1,5-pentanedioic
acid.
[0055] Another aspect of the present disclosure relates to a bleached fabric obtainable
by the process described in the present disclosure wherein the weight loss is inferior
to the standard process, being less than 4.5%.
[0056] In an embodiment for better results, the fabric is a natural yarn fabric, preferably
a cotton fabric.
[0057] Another aspect of the present disclosure also relates to an article comprising the
fabric described in the present disclosure.
[0058] Among the advantages of the process of the present invention, are the significant
savings in terms of resources consumption, namely:
- In an embodiment for better results, the maximum temperature attained was 80°C, sparing
the need to heat the system an additional 20 °C.
- By accomplishing the process to be performed at the optimum temperature for each phase,
what means using different temperatures, all below 100 °C, there is no need to maintain
the system at 100 °C during the entire process.
- The process of the present invention allows to obtain a white article with three water
baths. Comparing to the example shown in figure 1, it is possible to save two water
baths, considering the middle washing and the anti-pilling treatment baths. If we
consider the bleaching of 1 ton of cotton fabric in liquor ratio of 1:10, the fact
that two baths are eliminated means a 20 000-liter saving in water consumption, i.e.
20 I water per 1 kg of cotton
- The chemical system used has been conceived to present more sustainable products and
to avoid the need for harsh chemicals like caustic soda, thus diminishing the effluent
charge in polluting species.
- The process of the present invention is also advantageous in terms of productivity
as the total time of process can be decreased.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0059] The following figures provide preferred embodiments for illustrating the invention
and should not be seen as limiting the scope of invention.
Figure 1: Schematic representation of an embodiment of a common process for oxidative bleaching
of cotton.
Figure 2: Schematic representation of an embodiment of one of the process of the present subject
matter.
Figure 3: Schematic representation of an embodiment of one of the process of the present subject
matter: Hydrophilicity: a) Spread of the drop in a fabric treated with the common
process for oxidative bleaching of cotton; b) Spread of the drop in a fabric treated
with the process of the present subject matter, the drop is wider and more regular,
meaning the fabric has higher hydrophilicity.
Figure 4: Schematic representation of an embodiment of one of the process of the present subject
matter: a) Noticeable protuberant fibres in the fabric treated with the common process
for oxidative bleaching of cotton; b) Cleaner and smoother surface of the fabric treated
with the process of the present subject matter.
Figure 5: Schematic representation of an embodiment of one of the possible processes of the
present invention: Colour yield for a Light Pink dyeing. Comparison of same dyeing
in a fabric treated with the common process for oxidative bleaching of cotton (A)
and a fabric treated with the process of the present subject matter (B); spectrophotometric
reading of both samples (C) and result for colour difference (DE).
Figure 6: Schematic representation of an embodiment of one of the possible processes of the
present invention: for a Salmon dyeing. Comparison of same dyeing in a fabric treated
with the common process for oxidative bleaching of cotton (A) and a fabric treated
with the process of the present subject matter (B); spectrophotometric reading of
both samples (C) and result for colour difference (DE).
Figure 7: Schematic representation of an embodiment of one of the possible processes of the
present invention: Brown dyeing. Comparison of same dyeing in a fabric treated with
the common process for oxidative bleaching of cotton (A) and a fabric treated with
the process of the present subject matter (B); spectrophotometric reading of both
samples (C) and result for colour difference (DE).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0060] The process of the present disclosure is an alternative pre-treatment process that
accomplishes fabric whitening using less water, less energy and less harsh chemicals.
It minimizes environmental impact of one of the more universal cotton processing steps,
the oxidative bleaching,
[0061] The process of the present disclosure is a simplified treatment that results in a
fabric that retains the characteristics of cotton and shows a better handle and hydrophilicity
and a cleaner and smoother surface than the conventionally bleached cotton.
[0062] In an embodiment, the present disclosure is used to bleach all 100% cotton articles
used as starting material for the Textile Industry.
[0063] In an embodiment the conventional process described in figure 1 consists in the following
steps:
first water bath adding a detergent, a stabilizer and sequestering agent, an anti-creasing
agent, 3 g/l of NaOH at 50% and 3 g/l of H2O2 200 vol;
temperature increase up to 100 °C, the fabric being treated for at least 30 minutes;
water discharge;
water washing with addition of a sequestering agent, at a temperature of 70°C, for
10 minutes;
water discharge;
new washing step with water at 60°C for 10 minutes;
water discharge;
new water bath at 40°C with addition of acetic acid for neutralization;
run for 5 minutes and check pH, if necessary, adjust to the interval of 6.5 - 7;
add a catalase solution (enzyme that will degrade the hydrogen peroxide to avoid its
interference in dyeing) and run for additional 15 minutes;
water discharge;
If an anti-pilling treatment is required (for a cleaner surface and to reduce the
tendency of fabric to pill) an additional water bath in necessary. It is usually run
at 50 - 60 °C, pH 5 - 8, 30 - 90 minutes, depending on the cellulase-based product
(neutral or acid cellulase) used. For inactivation of the enzyme it is then mandatory
to increase the temperature up to 80 °C for 10 minutes or add Na
2CO
3 for pH increase.
[0064] In an embodiment, the process of the present disclosure may comprise the following
steps:
Obtaining a bath with the fabric to bleach comprising water in a liquor ratio from
1:5 and 1:40, 0.5 - 5 % of a wetting agent and set the temperature to 40 - 70°C;
When temperature is close to the set point, check pH is in the interval 5.5 - 8, add
an enzyme blend 0.5 - 5% and run the process for 30- 60 min;
add 5 - 50 g/l of a peroxide donor and 0.5 - 5 g/l of a bleaching activator;
set the temperature to 75 - 90 °C and run the process for 5 -20 minutes;
discharge the water;
water wash at 60 - 90 °C for 5 - 20 minutes;
discharge the water;
new water bath at 25 - 60 °C with addition of 0.5 - 3 g/l of a sequestering and dispersing
agent;
Run for 5 -15 min and check that pH is 5 - 8;
add a catalase solution and run for 10 - 30 minutes;
discharge the water.
[0065] In an embodiment, considering an initial water temperature of 30 °C, a machine with
a heating and cooling rate of 4°C/min, a machine that takes 5 minutes to fill in and
5 minutes to drain the water and the optimized process conditions, the bleaching process
is reduced from 148 min with the conventional procedure to 135 min with the process
of the present disclosure, meaning a reduction of approximately 9% in process time.
Table 1: Comparison between 100% cotton knitted fabric bleached according to the conventional
method and to the process of the present disclosure
|
Bleaching process of figure 1 (30 min at 100°C) |
Process of the present disclosure as described in figure 2 |
HANDLE |
Slightly harsh handle |
Softer and smoother handle |
WHITE LEVEL (WI-BERG) |
74.97 |
67.73 |
WEIGHT LOSS (%) |
5.1% |
4.5% |
Table 2: Results of effluent analysis after conventional bleaching and process of the present
disclosure by exhaustion.
Effluent parameters |
Bleaching process of figure 1 (30 min at 100°C) |
Process of the present disclosure as described in figure 2 |
Total nitrogen (mg/L N) |
75 |
70 |
Biochemical oxygen demand (5 days) (g/L O2) |
1.5 |
0.79 |
Chemical Oxygen Demand (g/L O2) |
4.2 |
3.3 |
Total phosphorus (mg/L P) |
26 |
8.4 |
pH final |
11.7 |
9.9 |
Total suspended solids (g/L) |
57 |
22 |
Table 3: Results of effluent analysis after conventional bleaching and process of the present
disclosure by continuous application (pad-steam).
Effluent parameters |
Bleaching process of figure 1 (30 min at 100°C) |
Process of the present disclosure as described in figure 2 |
Total nitrogen (mg/L N) |
40 |
30 |
Biochemical oxygen demand (5 days) (g/L O2) |
15 |
1.5 |
Chemical Oxygen Demand (g/L O2) |
21 |
13 |
Total phosphorus (mg/L P) |
25 |
2.9 |
pH final |
11.7 |
10.9 |
Total suspended solids (g/L) |
0.2 |
0.4 |
[0066] In addition to the decrease of environmental impact due to resource savings, which
has already been described, the effluents generated by process of the present disclosure
show decreased values for practically all parameters of effluent analysis, namely
on BOD and COD, as shown in Tables 2 and 3.
[0067] The overall difference of colour can be calculated by spectrophotometric reading
and it is expressed by the DE value, obtained based on the comparison between samples
that went through the conventional bleaching and samples treated by process of the
present disclosure. Standard values for colour tolerance accepted amongst the industry
players are usually ≤ 0.5.
[0068] The spectrophotometric analysis of the dyed samples shows DE values between 0.52
and 0.84, which can be attributed to the slight differences in whiteness level obtained
in the samples post-bleaching. This means the colour yield of samples subjected to
the process of the present disclosure is not exactly the same but it is close enough
to the conventionally bleached samples and, therefore, it is expected to be easy to
adjust the dyeing recipes. In some cases, this colour difference will possibly mean
the need to use less dyestuff.
[0069] In conclusion, in terms of final article characteristics, the process of the present
disclosure is a perfectly viable option to replace the conventional bleaching process
as the final article is softer, smoother, with cleaner surface, better hydrophilicity
and lower weigh loss. Even though there seems to be some variation in the colour yield,
dyeing recipes are expected to be easily adjusted. When assessing the variation of
colour yield against all the benefits and advantages of the process of the present
disclosure, it can be deemed a manageable adaptation.
[0070] Moreover, on an environmental perspective, the process of the present disclosure
allows meaningful savings in terms of water, energy and time consumption and originates
less polluted effluents.
[0071] The term "comprising" whenever used in this document is intended to indicate the
presence of stated features, integers, steps, components, but not to preclude the
presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, components or
groups thereof.
[0072] It will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that unless otherwise
indicated herein, the particular sequence of steps described is illustrative only
and can be varied without departing from the disclosure. Thus, unless otherwise stated
the steps described are so unordered meaning that, when possible, the steps can be
performed in any convenient or desirable order.
[0073] Furthermore, it is to be understood that the disclosure encompasses all variations,
combinations, and permutations in which one or more limitations, elements, clauses,
descriptive terms, etc., from one or more of the claims or from relevant portions
of the description is introduced into another claim. For example, any claim that is
dependent on another claim can be modified to include one or more limitations found
in any other claim that is dependent on the same base claim.
[0074] Furthermore, where the claims recite a composition, it is to be understood that methods
of using the composition for any of the purposes disclosed herein are included, and
methods of making the composition according to any of the methods of making disclosed
herein or other methods known in the art are included, unless otherwise indicated
or unless it would be evident to one of ordinary skill in the art that a contradiction
or inconsistency would arise.
[0075] Where ranges are given, endpoints are included. Furthermore, it is to be understood
that unless otherwise indicated or otherwise evident from the context and/or the understanding
of one of ordinary skill in the art, values that are expressed as ranges can assume
any specific value within the stated ranges in different embodiments of the invention,
to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit of the range, unless the context clearly
dictates otherwise. It is also to be understood that unless otherwise indicated or
otherwise evident from the context and/or the understanding of one of ordinary skill
in the art, values expressed as ranges can assume any subrange within the given range,
wherein the endpoints of the subrange are expressed to the same degree of accuracy
as the tenth of the unit of the lower limit of the range.
[0076] The disclosure should not be seen in any way restricted to the embodiments described
and a person with ordinary skill in the art will foresee many possibilities to modifications
thereof.
[0077] The above described embodiments are combinable.
[0078] The following claims further set out particular embodiments of the disclosure.
1. A process for fabric bleaching comprising the following steps:
preparing a water bath with a wetting agent and the fabric; wherein the bath is warmed
to a first temperature up to a maximum of 70 °C and the pH of the bath is at a maximum
of pH 8;
adding an enzyme blend to the bath, wherein the enzyme blend comprises at least 3
of the following enzymes: alpha-amylase, beta-amylase, pectate lyase, cellulase, endoglucanase,
lipase;
maintaining the first temperature of the bath during the enzymatic reaction;
adding a peroxide donor and a bleaching activator to the bath;
warming the bath to a second temperature of a minimum of 75 °C for the peroxidation
reaction.
2. The process according to the previous claim further comprising the following steps:
discharging the first water bath;
removing chemical residues from the fabric;
optionally submitting the fabric to a second water bath of a minimum of 60 °C to improve
the residue removal;
optionally discharging the bath water;
optionally preparing a further water bath, with a sequestering and dispersing agent,
and the fabric, wherein the bath is warmed to a temperature up to a maximum of 60
°C, preferably 40 °C - 50 °C, and the pH of the bath is at a maximum of pH 8, maintaining
the first temperature of the bath during the reaction time;
optionally adding a catalase solution to the third bath, maintaining the first temperature
of the bath during the catalase reaction.
3. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the first temperature
of the first bath is from 40 to 70 °C, preferably 60 °C and the pH of the first bath
is from pH 5.5 to 8, preferably 6.0 - 6.5; and wherein the second temperature of the
first bath is from 75 to 90 °C, preferably 80 °C and wherein the temperature of the
second bath is from 60 to 90 °C, preferably 70 °C and wherein the temperature of the
third bath is from 25 to 60 °C, preferably 40 °C.
4. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the duration of the enzymatic
reaction is of at least 30 minutes, preferably from 30 minutes to 1 hour, more preferably
45 minutes.
5. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the duration of the peroxidation
reaction is at least 5 minutes, preferably from 5 to 20 minutes, more preferably 10
minutes.
6. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the duration of the washing
is at least 5 minutes, preferably from 5 to 20 minutes, more preferably 10 minutes.
7. Theprocess according to any of the previous claims wherein the duration of the washing
with the sequestering and dispersing is at least 5 minutes, preferably from 5 to 15
minutes.
8. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the duration of the catalase
reaction is at least 10 minutes, preferably from 10 to 30 minutes.
9. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the blend of enzymes is:
alpha-amylase, endoglucanase, cellulase;
alpha-amylase, endoglucanase, pectate lyase;
alpha-amylase, endoglucanase, lipase;
endoglucanase, beta-amylase, pectate lyase;
endoglucanase, beta-amylase, cellulase;
endoglucanase, beta-amylase, lipase;
beta-amylase, pectate lyase, cellulase;
beta-amylase, pectate lyase, lipase;
beta-amylase, cellulase, lipase;
pectate lyase, cellulase, lipase.
optionally comprising oxidoreductase.
10. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the liquor ratio between
fabric: water is from 1:5 to 1:40; preferably from 1:10 to 1:20.
11. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the wetting agent concentration
is from 0.5 to 5 % (wt/wt), preferably from 1 to 2 % (wt/wt), the peroxide donor concentration
is from 5 to 50 g/l, preferably from 10 to 15 g/l, the bleaching activator concentration
is from 0.5 to 5 g/l, preferably from 1 to 3 g/l and/or the sequestering and dispersing
agent concentrations are from 0.5 to 3 g/l, preferably from 0.5 to 1 g/l.
12. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the enzyme blend concentration
is from 0.5 to 5 % (wt/wt), preferably from 1 to 2 % (wt/wt) and/or the catalase concentration
is from 0.2 to 2 g/l, preferably from 0.5 to 1.
13. The process according to any of the previous claims wherein the peroxide donor is
sodium percarbonate, sodium perborate or a mixture thereof, the wetting agent is ethoxylated
isotridecanol, the bleaching activator is a manganese salt, the sequestering and the
dispersing agent is 3-hydroxy-3-carboxy-1,5-pentanedioic acid.
14. A bleached fabric obtainable by the process described in any of the previous claims
wherein the weight loss is less than 4.5%.
15. An article comprising the fabric described in any one of the preceding claims, wherein
the fabric is a natural yarn fabric, preferably a cotton fabric, most preferably a
100% cotton fabric.