Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a vitrified grinding stone having an open and homogeneous
structure having a low volume fraction of abrasive grains and being porous, which
is suitably applied to a field where grinding load is high and grinding burn is likely
to occur on a workpiece.
Background Art
[0002] In general, a high-porosity vitrified grinding stone is known as a grinding stone
suitably applied to the field where grinding load is high and grinding burn is likely
to occur on a workpiece, such as internal grinding and angular grinding. For example,
a high-porosity CBN vitrified grinding stone described in Patent Document 1 is such
a type. According to such a high-porosity vitrified grinding stone, pores are artificially
formed by a pore forming material to have a high porosity, and as a result, the grinding
heat is easily released in grinding under a grinding fluid, and grinding burn on the
workpiece is suitably suppressed.
[0003] Meanwhile, in the case of a grinding process in which dulling due to grinding stone
shaping and dressing is likely to occur, such as grinding of turbine blades and bearing
grooves, and in the case of a grinding process in which the thermal conductivity of
a workpiece is low and heat during the process is difficult to escape, there still
remains a problem of early burning and shape wear even in the foregoing conventional
high-porosity vitrified grinding stone.
[0004] Further, when aiming to reduce processing resistance by lowering the percentage of
abrasive grains, an open-structured vitrified grinding stone which forms large pores
is formed as a result in order to maintain a wide spacing between the abrasive grains.
The foregoing conventional art has a drawback that the structure of the grinding stone
is likely to be heterogeneous due to formation of large pores. Further, there is also
a drawback that agglomeration of the abrasive grains is likely to occur when the abrasive
grains are rearranged due to firing shrinkage if an organic pore forming material
which burns out during firing of the grinding stone is used for forming the pores.
Citation List
Patent Documents
[0005]
Patent Document 1: Publication of Japanese Patent No. 3987719
Patent Document 2: Publication of Japanese Patent No. 6013133
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0006] On the other hand, in Patent Document 2, a vitrified grinding stone having a porous
and homogeneous structure with a low percentage of abrasive grains in which the contact
ratio between abrasive grains is increased to lower the volume fraction of abrasive
grains to a certain degree is constituted by forming pores using an alumina balloon
to obtain a homogeneous grinding stone structure. As a result, the agglomeration of
the abrasive grains when the abrasive grains are rearranged due to firing shrinkage
is suppressed, and the occurrences of grinding burn and shape wear are suppressed.
[0007] However, even in the foregoing vitrified grinding stone described in Patent Document
2, there is a case in which reduction in shape retention property (grinding stone
wear amount) and grinding burn cannot be sufficiently eliminated depending on grinding
conditions, such as the case of grinding a hard-to-cut material such as Inconel (registered
trademark), Hastelloy (registered trademark) of Haynes International, Inc., stainless
steel, and titanium alloy, and a problem of grinding quality and grinding stone life
remains.
[0008] The present invention has been made in view of the foregoing circumstances, and the
object thereof is to provide a vitrified grinding stone having an open (porous) and
homogeneous structure capable of grinding even a hard-to-cut material without causing
burning while maintaining the shape retention property.
[0009] In view of the foregoing circumstances, the present inventors carried out various
studies on the volume fraction of abrasive grains and the homogeneity of the grinding
stone structure regarding the suppression in work material burn without reducing the
shape retention property of a vitrified grinding stone having a porous and open structure
whose volume fraction of abrasive grains falls below, for example, 40% by volume,
and as a result, found the unexpected fact that even if an inorganic hollow filler
is used to obtain a low volume fraction of abrasive grains, which has been conventionally
considered not to be able to obtain the shape retention property, the shape retention
property (reduction in grinding stone wear amount) is maintained and the effect of
suppressing grinding burn can be obtained even for the hard-to-cut material if the
homogeneity of the grinding stone structure is increased. The present invention has
been made based on this finding. It is presumed that when the dispersion of the inorganic
hollow filler having been filled at a ratio in a predetermined range with respect
to the volume fraction of abrasive grains is accelerated by lowering the volume fraction
of abrasive grains, a homogeneous structure in which abrasive grains and the inorganic
hollow filler are close to each other is obtained, whereby the work material burn
is suitably suppressed while the shape retention property is maintained.
Solution to Problem
[0010] According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a vitrified grinding
stone having an open and homogeneous structure in which an abrasive grain and an inorganic
hollow filler are bonded by an inorganic bonding agent, wherein the abrasive grain
is filled at a proportion by volume fraction of 23 to 35 vol%, and have homogeneity
with a standard deviation of 10 or less in a frequency distribution chart of an area
ratio of an abrasive grain, which is a distribution chart of proportions of a solid
matter including the abrasive grain per unit area at a plurality of locations in a
cross section of the vitrified grinding stone.
[0011] According to a second aspect of the invention, in the vitrified grinding stone having
the open and homogeneous structure according to the first aspect of the invention,
the inorganic hollow filler has an average particle diameter of 1.6 times or less
with respect to the abrasive grain.
[0012] According to a third aspect of the invention, in the vitrified grinding stone having
the open and homogeneous structure according to the first or second aspect of the
invention, the inorganic hollow filler is included 0.2 times to 1.7 times with respect
to the volume fraction of the abrasive grain in a volume fraction.
[0013] According to a fourth aspect of the invention, in the vitrified grinding stone having
the open and homogeneous structure according to any one of the first to third aspects
of the invention, the inorganic bonding agent is included within 10 to 15 vol% in
a volume fraction.
[0014] According to a fifth aspect of the invention, in the vitrified grinding stone having
the open and homogeneous structure according to any one of the first to fourth aspects
of the invention, homogeneity with a standard deviation of 6.5 to 8.7 in the frequency
distribution chart of the area ratio of an abrasive grain is provided.
[0015] According to a sixth aspect of the invention, in the vitrified grinding stone having
the open and homogeneous structure according to any one of the first to fifth aspects
of the invention, the inorganic hollow filler is included within 4 to 45 vol% in a
volume fraction.
[0016] According to a seventh aspect of the invention, in the vitrified grinding stone having
the open and homogeneous structure according to any one of the first to sixth aspects
of the invention, the inorganic hollow filler has an average particle diameter of
0.6 to 1.6 times with respect to the abrasive grain.
[0017] According to an eighth aspect of the invention, in the vitrified grinding stone having
the open and homogeneous structure according to any one of the first to seventh aspects
of the invention, the inorganic hollow filler has a volume fraction of 0.2 to 1.67
times with respect to the volume fraction of the abrasive grain.
[0018] According to a ninth aspect of the invention, in the vitrified grinding stone having
the open and homogeneous structure according to any one of the first to seventh aspects
of the invention, the abrasive grain is an alumina abrasive or a silicon carbide abrasive,
and the abrasive grain has a grain size of F80 to F120. Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0019] In the vitrified grinding stone according to the first aspect of the invention, the
abrasive grain is filled at a proportion of 23 to 35 vol%, and has homogeneity with
a standard deviation of 8.5 or less in a frequency distribution chart of an area ratio
of an abrasive grain, which is a distribution chart of proportions of a solid matter
including the abrasive grain per unit area at a plurality of locations in a cross
section of the vitrified grinding stone. As a result, the homogeneity of the grinding
stone structure is high and the shape retention property (reduction in the grinding
stone wear amount) is maintained even with the low volume fraction of an abrasive
grain. Thus, even for the hard-to-cut material, the occurrence of burning on the work
material can be suppressed while the shape retention property is maintained.
[0020] In the vitrified grinding stone according to the second aspect of the invention,
the inorganic hollow filler has an average particle diameter of 1.6 times or less
with respect to the abrasive grain. Therefore, a vitrified grinding stone having a
high-porosity, open, and homogeneous structure, provided with a highly homogeneous
grinding stone structure can be obtained.
[0021] In the vitrified grinding stone according to the third aspect of the invention, the
inorganic hollow filler is included 0.2 times to 1.7 times with respect to the volume
fraction of the abrasive grain in a volume fraction. Therefore, a vitrified grinding
stone having a high-porosity, open, and homogeneous structure, provided with a highly
homogeneous grinding stone structure can be obtained.
[0022] In the vitrified grinding stone according to the fourth aspect of the invention,
the inorganic bonding agent is included within 10 to 15 vol% in a volume fraction.
From this, a vitrified grinding stone having a high-porosity, open, and homogeneous
structure can be obtained.
[0023] In the vitrified grinding stone according to the fifth aspect of the invention, homogeneity
with a standard deviation of 6.5 to 8.7 in the frequency distribution chart of the
area ratio of an abrasive grain is provided. As a result, even with the low volume
fraction of abrasive grain, the homogeneity of the grinding stone structure is high
and the shape retention property (reduction in the grinding stone wear amount) is
maintained.
[0024] In the vitrified grinding stone according to the sixth aspect of the invention, the
inorganic hollow filler is included within 4 to 45 vol% in a volume fraction. Therefore,
a vitrified grinding stone having an open and homogeneous structure having a low volume
fraction of an abrasive grain and a high porosity can be obtained.
[0025] In the vitrified grinding stone according to the seventh aspect of the invention,
the inorganic hollow filler has an average particle diameter of 0.6 to 1.6 times with
respect to the abrasive grain. Therefore, a vitrified grinding stone having an open
and homogeneous structure having a low volume fraction of an abrasive grain and a
high porosity can be obtained.
[0026] In the vitrified grinding stone according to the eighth aspect of the invention,
the inorganic hollow filler has a volume fraction of 0.2 to 1.67 times with respect
to the volume fraction of the abrasive grain. Therefore, a vitrified grinding stone
having an open and homogeneous structure having a low volume fraction of an abrasive
grain and a high porosity can be obtained.
[0027] According to a ninth aspect of the invention, in the vitrified grinding stone having
the open and homogeneous structure according to any one of the first to seventh aspects
of the invention, the abrasive grain is an alumina abrasive or a silicon carbide abrasive,
and the abrasive grain has a grain size of F80 to F120. As a result, even if the work
material is a hard-to-cut material, it becomes possible to grind the hard-to-cut material
using a general abrasive grain without causing the grinding burn.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0028]
Fig. 1 is a front view showing a vitrified grinding stone having a porous and homogeneous
structure according to an embodiment of the present embodiment.
Fig. 2 is a drawing for explaining a grinding example by a grinding device using the
vitrified grinding stone of Fig. 1.
Fig. 3 is a process chart for explaining a main part of a method for manufacturing
the vitrified grinding stone of Fig. 1.
Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram for explaining an open structure of the vitrified grinding
stone of Fig. 1 in an enlarged manner.
Fig. 5 is a chart showing compositions and standard deviations indicating the homogeneity
of the grinding stone constitution of a plurality of kinds of test pieces (Example
products 1 to 4 and Comparative Example products 1 to 3) in which the composition
of the vitrified grinding stone of Fig. 1 is changed in order to confirm the relationship
between the volume fraction of abrasive grains and the homogeneity of the grinding
stone structure.
Fig. 6 is a graph showing test results of Fig. 5 in a two-dimensional coordinate system
having a horizontal axis indicating the volume fraction of abrasive grains and a vertical
axis indicating the standard deviation for indicating the homogeneity of the grinding
stone constitution.
Fig. 7 is a chart showing compositions and standard deviations indicating the homogeneity
of the grinding stone constitution of a plurality of kinds of test pieces (Example
products 2 and 5 to 10) in which the composition of the vitrified grinding stone of
Fig. 1 is changed in order to show the relationship between the particle/grain size
ratio of the inorganic hollow filler to the abrasive grains and the homogeneity of
the grinding stone constitution.
Fig. 8 is a graph showing test results of Fig. 7 in a two-dimensional coordinate system
having a horizontal axis indicating the particle/grain size ratio of the inorganic
hollow filler to the abrasive grains and a vertical axis indicating the standard deviation
for indicating the homogeneity of the grinding stone constitution.
Fig. 9 is a chart showing compositions and standard deviations indicating the homogeneity
of the grinding stone constitution of a plurality of kinds of test pieces (Example
products 1 to 3 and 11 to 21) in which the composition of the vitrified grinding stone
of Fig. 1 is changed in order to confirm the relationship between the volume ratio
of the inorganic hollow filler to the abrasive grains and the homogeneity of the grinding
stone structure.
Fig. 10 is a graph showing test results of Fig. 9 in a two-dimensional coordinate
system having a horizontal axis indicating the volume ratio of the inorganic hollow
filler to the abrasive grains and a vertical axis indicating the standard deviation
for indicating the homogeneity of the grinding stone constitution.
Fig. 11 is a chart showing volume fractions of abrasive grains and homogeneity (standard
deviations) in Comparative Example products 4 to 6 and Example product 22, which are
grinding stone test pieces prepared for evaluating the grinding stone wear amount
corresponding to the shape retention property.
Fig. 12 is a graph showing grinding stone wear amounts in comparison, which are results
of grinding stone grinding tests of Comparative Example product 4 and Example product
22 having a large difference in the volume fraction of abrasive grains in Fig. 11.
Fig. 13 is a graph showing grinding stone wear amounts in comparison, which are results
of grinding stone grinding tests of Comparative Example products 5 and 6 and Example
product 22 having a large difference in the homogeneity in Fig. 11.
Fig. 14 is a photograph showing a burned state of a work material in the grinding
test according to Comparative Example product 4 of Fig. 11.
Fig. 15 is a photograph showing a burned state of a work material in the grinding
test according to Comparative Example product 5 of Fig. 11.
Fig. 16 is a photograph showing a burned state of a work material in the grinding
test according to Comparative Example product 6 of Fig. 11.
Fig. 17 is a photograph showing a burned state of a work material in the grinding
test according to Example product 22 of Fig. 11.
Description of Embodiments
[0029] In a mode for carrying out the present invention, for example, a shirasu balloon,
an alumina balloon, a mullite balloon, a glass balloon, etc., is preferably used for
the inorganic hollow filler.
Embodiment
[0030] Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with
reference to the drawings. The drawings are simplified or conceptualized as appropriate
in the following embodiment, and the dimensional ratios and shapes of each portion
are not necessarily drawn accurately.
[0031] Fig. 1 shows an example of a vitrified grinding stone 10 which is a high-porosity
vitrified grinding stone having a porous and homogeneous structure according to one
embodiment of the present invention. The vitrified grinding stone 10 is formed in
a disc shape as a whole and is rotationally driven around an axis C in a state of
being attached to a main shaft of a grinder by using a mounting hole formed in a central
portion of the vitrified grinding stone 10. A work material 16 is ground by slidingly
contacting the work material 16 with a tapered outer circumferential grinding surface
14 of the vitrified grinding stone 10.
[0032] Fig. 2 shows a case of grinding a corner 18 of a rectangular parallelepiped work
material 16 made of a heat-resistant alloy such as Inconel (registered trademark).
While the outer circumferential grinding surface 14 is pressed against the corner
of the rectangular parallelepiped work material 16 with the vitrified grinding stone
10 rotating, the work material 16 is fed in a longitudinal direction thereof, that
is, a direction perpendicular to the sheet of Fig. 2. As a result, the corner 18 of
the work material 16 is ground.
[0033] Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram for explaining a structure of the vitrified grinding
stone 10 in an enlarged manner. In Fig. 4, abrasive grains 20 composed of general
abrasive grains such as an alumina abrasive or a silicon carbide abrasive, and an
inorganic hollow filler 22 composed of, for example, a shirasu balloon, an alumina
balloon, a mullite balloon, or a glass balloon are mutually bonded by melting of a
vitrified bond 24, which is a vitreous inorganic bonding agent. Pores 26 naturally
formed due to the absence of a binding agent (molding aid) in a manufacturing process
are formed among the abrasive grains 20, the inorganic hollow filler 22, and the vitrified
bond 24.
[0034] The abrasive grains 20 are filled at a volume fraction of abrasive grains of 23 to
35 vol%, and have homogeneity with a standard deviation of 8.5 or less in a frequency
distribution chart of an area ratio of abrasive grains, which is a proportion of a
solid matter including the abrasive grains 20 per unit area at a plurality of locations
in a cross section of the vitrified grinding stone 10. As described above, the vitrified
grinding stone 10 is a vitrified grinding stone having a porous and homogeneous structure
having an extremely low volume fraction of abrasive grains and nevertheless having
the grinding stone shape retention property maintained by the homogeneity of the grinding
stone structure.
[0035] In the vitrified grinding stone 10, the inorganic hollow filler 22 is included at
a volume fraction of filler of 0.2 to 1.7 times with respect to the volume fraction
of abrasive grains. Further, the inorganic hollow filler 22 is included at a proportion
of 4 to 45 vol%. Further, the inorganic hollow filler 22 has an average particle diameter
of 1.6 times or less with respect to the average grain diameter of the abrasive grains
20, preferably has an average particle diameter in a range of 0.6 to 1.4 times. Further,
the inorganic hollow filler 22 has a volume ratio of 0.2 to 1.67 times, and preferably
0.43 to 1.4 times with respect to the volume of the abrasive grains 20 in the vitrified
grinding stone 10.
[0036] The vitrified bond (inorganic bonding agent) 24 is included at a volume fraction
of 10 to 15 vol% in the vitrified grinding stone 10.
[0037] With such a composition, the vitrified grinding stone 10 is provided with homogeneity
having a standard deviation of 10 or less, and preferably 6.5 to 8.5 in the frequency
distribution chart of the area ratio of abrasive grains, which is the proportion of
the solid matter including the abrasive grains 20 per unit area at a plurality of
locations in the cross section of the grinding stone.
[0038] The vitrified grinding stone 10 is manufactured according to a process chart shown
in Fig. 3, for example. That is, first, in an abrasive grain bond coating process
P1, abrasive grains 20 and a powder vitrified bond 24 which is a glass powder fritted
after melting and being excellent in high impact resistance and heat resistance and
has an average particle diameter of, for example, 1/10 or less of the abrasive grains
20 are mixed together with a well-known binding agent (molding aid) such as a synthetic
adhesive paste represented by dextrin. As a result, a coating composed of the vitrified
bond (inorganic bonding agent) 24 and the binding agent is formed on an outer surface
of the abrasive grain 20 in a layered form and is dried according to need, whereby
further fluidity is given. Also, in a filling agent particle bond coating process
P2, the inorganic hollow filler 22 composed of, for example, a mullite balloon is
mixed together with the same vitrified bond 24 as described above and a well-known
binding agent such as dextrin. As a result, a coating composed of the vitrified bond
24 and the binding agent is formed on an outer circumferential surface of the inorganic
hollow filler 22 in a layered form and is dried according to need, whereby further
fluidity is given.
[0039] The vitrified bond 24 is a glass powder excellent in high impact resistance and heat
resistance, and is composed of, for example, glass frit having an oxide composition
of 50 to 80% by weight of SiO
2, 10 to 20% by weight of B
2O
3, 5 to 15% by weight of Al
2O
3, 8 to 15% by weight of a total of metal oxides selected from CaO, MgO, K
2O, and Na
2O, or glass frit having an oxide composition of 70 to 90% by weight of SiO
2, 10 to 20% by weight of B
2O
3, 1 to 5% by weight of Al
2O
3, and 1 to 5% by weight of Na
2O
3, that is, powder glass fritted after melting. The vitrified bond 24 may be such that
gairome clay, etc., is added to the above powder glass. The vitrified bond 24 is preferably
rounded-off particles obtained by wet milling, and has 55 vol% or more of single volume
fraction when a molding pressure of 300 kg/mm
2 is applied, and has 1.2 or more of apparent density (bulk specific gravity) according
to measurement based on a standard of ASTM D2840.
[0040] The abrasive grains 20 have a grain size in a range of, for example, F80 to F120,
and have a grain diameter, for example, whose average grain diameter is in a range
of about 180 µm to 106 µm, and is filled at a proportion of 23 to 35 vol%.
[0041] The inorganic hollow filler 22 is closed type hollow particles, for example, having
an apparent density of 0.5 to 1.0 g/cm
3, a bulk density of 0.25 to 0.45 g/cm
3, a compression strength of 70 N/mm
2, a melting point of 1200°C or higher, and a water absorption of almost zero.
[0042] The inorganic hollow filler 22 is prepared so as to have a volume fraction of filler
of 0.4 to 1.7 times with respect to the volume fraction of abrasive grains of the
abrasive grains 20, a volume proportion of 15 to 45 vol%, and a volume ratio of 0.43
to 1.67 times with respect to the volume of the abrasive grains 20.
[0043] Next, in a mixing process P3, the abrasive grains 20 and the inorganic hollow filler
22 to which the foregoing corresponding coatings are applied are put into a mixer
together with a well-known binding agent such as dextrin, and mixed uniformly there.
Next, in a molding process P4, the foregoing mixed material is filled into a predetermined
press die for forming a cylindrical molding space, and pressurized by a pressing machine
to be molded. In a firing process P5, a molded article having undergone the molding
process P4 is sintered under a firing condition that a temperature of, for example,
about 900°C is maintained for 0.5 hours in a predetermined firing furnace. This sintering
burns off the binding agent and melts the vitrified bond 24 to form a molten glass
body. Thus, as shown in the diagram of the structure of the vitrified grinding stone
of Fig. 4, the abrasive grains 20 and the inorganic hollow filler 22 are mutually
bonded via the melted vitrified bond 24 to form the vitrified grinding stone 10. Next,
in a finishing process P6, the vitrified grinding stone 10 is manufactured by being
ground or mechanically finished using a grinding tool so that outside dimensions such
as the outer circumferential surface and the end surface meet a predetermined product
specification. The vitrified grinding stone 10 is shipped through an inspection process
P7.
[0044] According to the vitrified grinding stone 10 provided with the grinding stone structure
as shown in Fig. 4 by being manufactured as described above, the vitrified grinding
stone structure in which the abrasive grains 20 contribute relatively greatly to grinding
performance and the inorganic hollow filler 22 constituting the grinding stone structure
together with the abrasive grains 20 are bonded by the vitrified bond 24 while being
homogeneously filled in a predetermined space is formed. The abrasive grains 20 and
the inorganic hollow filler 22 are made homogeneous by the foregoing blending, and
a relatively homogeneous distance is formed between the abrasive grains 20 via the
inorganic hollow filler 22, so that the occurrence of grinding burn is small and a
long grinding stone life can be obtained. Since the abrasive grains 20 and the inorganic
hollow filler 22 are homogeneously dispersed and bonded by the vitrified bond 24 while
being in contact with or close to each other, the shape retention property is enhanced.
[0045] The present inventors performed homogeneity evaluation test 1, homogeneity evaluation
test 2, and homogeneity evaluation test 3 shown below in order to evaluate the dispersibility
of the abrasive grains 20 with respect to changes in the volume fraction of abrasive
grains and the material quality of the pore forming material, changes in the grain
size of the abrasive grains, changes in the volume fraction of the inorganic hollow
filler in the grinding stone structure of the vitrified grinding stone 10. In these
tests, the vitrified grinding stones were prepared using different compositions and
using the same processes as those shown in Fig. 3, and their cross-sectional images
were captured with a digital microscope. In each of a plurality of divided (unit)
areas in which binarized black-and-while cross-sectional images obtained from the
cross-sectional images were divided, the area ratio of a solid matter in the white
part was calculated, and a frequency distribution chart with a horizontal axis representing
the size of the area ratio and a vertical axis of the cumulative number of the divided
areas was created. The standard deviation σ of the frequency distribution chart was
calculated as a value indicating the dispersion state, and the homogeneity evaluation
test was performed using the standard deviation σ. One side x of the divided area
is, for example, a function of an average grain diameter D of the abrasive grains
and an abrasive grain deposition rate Vg (x = (500 nD
2/4Vg)
0.5). It is indicated that the smaller the standard deviation σ, the higher the homogeneity
of the grinding stone structure of the vitrified grinding stone 10.
(Homogeneity Evaluation Test 1)
[0046] In order to evaluate the homogeneity of the vitrified grinding stone when the volume
fraction of abrasive grains and the material quality of the inorganic hollow filler
were changed, Example product 1 to Example product 4 and Comparative Example product
1 to Comparative Example product 3, which were test pieces of vitrified grinding stones
prepared by mixing abrasive grains having a grain size of F100 of Alundum (registered
trademark), which is typical alumina-based abrasive grains, with a pore forming material
at volume fractions of abrasive grains of 23%, 27%, 31%, and 35% (lowpercentages of
abrasive grains corresponding to structure numbers 20, 18, 16, and 14, that is, open
structures) and using the same processes as those of Fig. 3 were manufactured, and
standard deviations σ were measured from cross-sectional images of the test pieces
as described above. Fig. 5 shows compositions and standard deviations σ of the test
pieces, and Fig. 6 shows evaluation results thereof in the form of a graph. Amullite
balloon (inorganic hollow filler) having an average particle diameter of 125 µm was
used as the pore forming material in Example product 1 to Example product 4. On the
other hand, an organic pore forming material having an average particle diameter of
250 µm was used as the pore forming material in Comparative Example product 1 to Comparative
Example product 3. When an organic pore forming material having an average particle
diameter of 125 µm is used in Comparative Example product 1 to Comparative Example
product 3, contact points between the abrasive grains are small, so that shrinkage
during firing is large, and cracks, etc., which become an origin of grinding stone
failure are generated. Therefore, in order to avoid this, the organic pore forming
material having the average particle diameter of 250 µm was used. Although not shown
in Fig. 5, a vitrified bond at a mutually fixed ratio in a range of 10 to 15 vol%
was filled. As shown in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6, in the low volume fraction of abrasive
grains of 27 to 35 vol%, firing shrinkage was relatively large and uniform and the
standard deviations σ were 10 or more in Comparative Example product 1 to Comparative
Example product 3 in which the organic pore forming material was used, whereas firing
shrinkage was relatively small and the spacing between the abrasive grains was able
to be maintained and the standard deviations σ were sufficiently below 10 and were
7.6 to 8.4 in Example product 1 to Example product 4 in which the inorganic hollow
filler was used.
(Homogeneity Evaluation Test 2)
[0047] Vitrified grinding stone test pieces (Example product 2, Example product 5 to Example
product 10) having a structure number 16 (volume fraction of abrasive grains of 31%)
corresponding to the lower volume fraction of abrasive grains (open structure) in
the range of the grain size of F80 to F120 of Alundum (registered trademark), which
is typical alumina-based abrasive grains, used for grinding and grooving of a hard-to-cut
material were prepared using the same processes as those of Fig. 3. Standard deviations
σ were measured from cross-sectional images of the test pieces as described above
in order to evaluate the homogeneity. Fig. 7 shows compositions and standard deviations
σ of the test pieces, and Fig. 8 shows evaluation results thereof in the form of a
graph. As shown in Fig. 7 and Fig. 8, the standard deviations σ were 10 or less, specifically,
6.8 to 9.4 in the particle/grain diameter ratio of the pore forming material to the
abrasive grain (= pore forming material / particle/grain diameter) of 0.6 to 1.6 times.
In Fig. 8, a tendency is shown that the standard deviations σ are reduced as the particle/grain
diameter ratio of the inorganic hollow filler (mullite balloon) to the abrasive grain
(= pore forming material / particle/grain diameter) is smaller regardless of the grain
size of the abrasive grains.
(Homogeneity Evaluation Test 3)
[0048] Example products 1 to 3 and Example products 11 to 21 in which the volume fraction
of the inorganic hollow filler was changed as shown in Fig. 9 in structure numbers
14, 16, 18, and 19 (volume fractions of abrasive grains of 35%, 31%, 27%, and 26%)
corresponding to the low volume fraction of abrasive grains (open structure) using
a grain size of F100 of Alundum, which is typical alumina-based abrasive grains, used
for grinding and grooving of a hard-to-cut material were prepared using the processes
shown in Fig. 3. Standard deviations σ were measured from cross-sectional images of
the test pieces as described above in order to evaluate the homogeneity. Fig. 9 shows
compositions and standard deviations σ of the test pieces, and Fig. 10 shows evaluation
results thereof in the form of a graph. As shown in Fig. 9 and Fig. 10, in any of
the volume fractions of abrasive grains of 35%, 31%, 27%, and 26%, the volume ratio
of the inorganic hollow filler (mullite balloon) to the abrasive grains was in the
range of 0.43 to 1.67 and the standard deviation σ was 8.5 or less. In Fig. 10, a
hyperbolic tendency characteristic is shown that the standard deviations σ increase
as the volume ratio of the inorganic hollow filler to the abrasive grains is lowered
regardless of the volume fraction of abrasive grains in the low volume fraction of
abrasive grains (volume fractions of abrasive grains of 35%, 31%, 27%, and 26%). The
standard deviation σ of 10 or less is obtained in the linear tendency characteristic
even if the volume ratio of the inorganic hollow filler to the abrasive grains is
0.35.
[0049] Next, the present inventors manufactured, using the processes shown in Fig. 3, Comparative
Example 4 having a structure number 12 (volume fraction of abrasive grains of 39%)
and Comparative Example products 5, 6 and Example product 22 having a structure number
14 (volume fraction of abrasive grains of 35%) using a grain size of F80 of abrasive
grains which were Alundum (registered trademark), and measured σ from cross-sectional
images of the test pieces as described above in order to evaluate the homogeneity.
Comparative Example products 5, 6 and Example product 22 have different standard deviations
σ due to changes in the volume proportion of the vitrified bond. Fig. 11 shows compositions
and standard deviations σ of the test pieces. The standard deviations σ of Comparative
Example products 4, 5, and 6 were 8.8, 11.3, and 10.6, whereas the standard deviation
σ of Example product 22 was not more than 10 and was 9.8.
[0050] Next, the present inventors used the test pieces shown in Fig. 11 (Comparative Example
product 4, Comparative Example product 5, Comparative Example product 6, and Example
product 22) to perform a grinding test, for example, shown in Fig. 2, under the following
conditions.
(Grinding Test Conditions)
[0051]
Grinder: Surface grinder
Grinding method: Wet speed stroke
Work material: Inconel (registered trademark of Special Metals Corporation)
Table feed speed: Average 20 m/min
Depth of cut: 5.5 mm/min
Grinding stone size: 255 × 19 × 76.2 (mm)
Grinding fluid: Water-soluble grinding fluid
Grinding stone peripheral speed: 45 m/sec
[0052] Fig. 12 is a graph showing grinding stone wear volume ratios (%) when Comparative
Example product 4 is set to 100%, which are grinding results of Comparative Example
product 4 and Example product 22. The grinding stone wear volume represents the shape
retention property of the vitrified grinding stone. As obvious from Fig. 12, Example
product 22 is superior in the shape retention property to Comparative Example product
4 having the same homogeneity (standard deviation of not more than 10) due to the
difference in the structure of the grinding stone.
[0053] Fig. 13 is a graph showing grinding stone wear volume ratios (%) when Comparative
Example product 5 is set to 100%, which are grinding results of Comparative Example
products 5 and 6 and Example product 22. The grinding stone wear volume represents
the shape retention property of the vitrified grinding stone. As obvious from Fig.
13, Example product 22 is superior in the shape retention property to Comparative
Example product 4 having the same structure (volume fraction of abrasive grains) due
to the homogeneity of the grinding stone.
[0054] Fig. 14, Fig. 15, Fig. 16, and Fig. 17 show photographs showing burned states of
work materials after the grinding test according to Comparative Example product 4,
Comparative Example product 5, Comparative Example product 6, and Example product
22, respectively. In each photograph, a white part indicates burning. As shown in
Fig. 14, Fig. 15, Fig. 16, and Fig. 17, the grinding burn of Example product 22 is
the least, and Comparative Example product 6 and Comparative Example product 5 have
increases in burning in order. This indicates that burning is made larger as the homogeneity
of the grinding stone is reduced and the standard deviation is increased even if the
structure (volume fraction of abrasive grains) is the same. Further, the grinding
burn of Example product 22 is less than that of Comparative Example product 4. This
indicates that even with the equal homogeneity that the standard deviation is not
more than 10, burning is made less due to the difference in the structure, that is,
as the volume fraction of abrasive grains is smaller.
[0055] As described above, according to the vitrified grinding stone 10 having the open
and homogeneous structure of the present embodiment, the abrasive grain 20 is filled
at a proportion of 23 to 35 vol% and have homogeneity with a standard deviation σ
of 8.5 or less in the frequency distribution chart of the area ratio of an abrasive
grain, which is the distribution chart of proportions of the solid matter including
the abrasive grain per unit area at a plurality of locations in the cross section
of the vitrified grinding stone 10. As a result, the homogeneity of the grinding stone
structure is high and the shape retention property (reduction in the grinding stone
wear amount) is maintained even with the open structure with the low volume fraction
of an abrasive grain. Thus, even for the hard-to-cut material, the occurrence of burning
on the work material can be suppressed while the shape retention property is maintained.
[0056] Further, according to the vitrified grinding stone 10 having the open and homogeneous
structure of the present embodiment, the inorganic hollow filler 22 has an average
particle diameter of 1. 6 times or less with respect to the abrasive grain 20. Therefore,
a vitrified grinding stone 10 having a high-porosity, open, and homogeneous structure,
provided with a highly homogeneous grinding stone structure can be obtained.
[0057] According to the vitrified grinding stone 10 having the open and homogeneous structure
of the present embodiment, the inorganic hollow filler 22 is included 0.4 times to
1.7 times with respect to the volume fraction of an abrasive grain in a volume fraction.
Therefore, a vitrified grinding stone 10 having a high-porosity, open, and homogeneous
structure, provided with a highly homogeneous grinding stone structure can be obtained.
[0058] According to the vitrified grinding stone 10 having the open and homogeneous structure
of the present embodiment, the vitrified bond (inorganic bonding agent) 24 is included
within 10 to 15 vol% in a volume fraction. From this, a vitrified grinding stone 10
having a high-porosity, open, and homogeneous structure can be obtained.
[0059] According to the vitrified grinding stone 10 having the open and homogeneous structure
of the present embodiment, the homogeneity having a standard deviation of 6. 5 to
8. 5 in the foregoing frequency distribution chart of the area ratio of an abrasive
grain is provided. As a result, even with the low volume fraction of an abrasive grain,
the homogeneity of the grinding stone structure is high and the shape retention property
(reduction in the grinding stone wear amount) is maintained.
[0060] According to the vitrified grinding stone 10 having the open and homogeneous structure
of the present embodiment, the inorganic hollow filler 22 is included within 15 to
45 vol% in a volume fraction. Therefore, a vitrified grinding stone having an open
and homogeneous structure having a low volume fraction of an abrasive grain and a
high porosity can be obtained.
[0061] According to the vitrified grinding stone 10 having the open and homogeneous structure
of the present embodiment, the inorganic hollow filler 22 has an average particle
diameter of 0.6 to 1.6 times with respect to the abrasive grain 20. Therefore, a vitrified
grinding stone having an open and homogeneous structure having a low volume fraction
of an abrasive grain and a high porosity can be obtained.
[0062] According to the vitrified grinding stone 10 having the open and homogeneous structure
of the present embodiment, the inorganic hollow filler 22 has a volume fraction of
0.43 to 1.67 times with respect to the volume fraction of the abrasive grain 20. Therefore,
a vitrified grinding stone having an open and homogeneous structure having a low volume
fraction of an abrasive grain and a high porosity can be obtained.
[0063] According to the vitrified grinding stone 10 having the open and homogeneous structure
of the present embodiment, the abrasive grain 20 is the alumina abrasive or the silicon
carbide abrasive, and the grain size of the abrasive grain 20 is F80 to F120. As a
result, even if the work material is a hard-to-cut material, it becomes possible to
grind the hard-to-cut material using a general abrasive grain without causing the
grinding burn.
[0064] Although one embodiment of the present invention is described above with reference
to the drawings, the present invention can also be applied to other aspects of the
present invention.
[0065] For example, the vitrified grinding stone 10 of the foregoing embodiment has a disc
shape as shown in Fig. 1, for example, but may have another shape such as a cup shape
or a block shape.
[0066] It should be noted that what has been described above is only an embodiment, and
although other examples are not exemplified, the present invention can be practiced
in a mode in which various modifications and improvements are added based on the knowledge
of those skilled in the art without departing from the gist of the present invention.
Reference Signs List
[0067]
- 10:
- vitrified grinding stone
- 20:
- abrasive grain
- 22:
- inorganic hollow filler
- 24:
- vitrified bond (inorganic bonding agent)